Exp 5 Gas Absorption
Exp 5 Gas Absorption
TECHNOLOGY
LABORATORY: SEPARATION
REVISION NO:
ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY
(KEP)
JABATAN TEKNOLOGI KEJURUTERAAN KIMIA
Saya dengan ini mengaku bahawa saya telah menyediakan laporan ini dengan daya usaha
saya sendiri. Saya juga mengaku tidak menerima atau memberi sebarang bantuan dalam
menyediakan laporan ini dan membuat ikrar ini dengan kepercayaan bahawa apa-apa yang
Ketua Nama:
Ahli 1 Nama:
Ahli 2 Nama:
Ahli 3 Nama:
Ahli 4 Nama:
Ahli 5 Nama:
1.0 OBJECTIVES
Gas absorption is a unit operation in which soluble components of a gas mixture are dissolved in a liquid phase. The inverse
operation, called stripping or desorption, is employed when it is desired to transfer volatile components from a liquid mixture
into a gas phase. Both absorption and desorption processes, common to distillation, make use of special equipment for
bringing gas and liquid phases into intimate contact.
Consider a system in which a gaseous component A is in equilibrium with both air and water at a given temperature. The
equilibrium relationship between the partial pressure, pA in the gas phase and the composition, xA in the liquid phase can often
be expressed by a straight line Henry’s Law equation at low concentrations.
pA = H xA [1]
where H is the Henry’s Law constant for the given system expressed in atm/mole fraction. If both sides of the equation is
divided by the total pressure, P in atm, the composition, yA in the gas phase can be related below:
yA = H’ xA [2]
where H’ is equal to H/P. However, H is more often used because it is independent of the total system pressure. Equilibrium
data for most systems follow Henry’s Law up to a concentration of about 1 mol% in the liquid phase.
pA
equilibrium
data
Henry’s Law
xA
Figure 1: Equilibrium data and Henry’s Law
FACULTY: ENGINEERING EDITION:
TECHNOLOGY
LABORATORY: SEPARATION
REVISION NO:
ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY
Before evaluating the design calculations of an absorption column, it is important to understand the principles of a single stage
equilibrium process. It is defined as one in which two different phases are brought into intimate contact with each other and
then are separated. Various components transfer between the two phases and are essentially at equilibrium with each other
after considerable mixing. The process can be represented in Figure 2 below.
V1, V2,
yA1 yA2
L0, L1,
xA0 xA1
Figure 2: Single stage equilibrium process
The following material balances can be carried out around the single-stage equilibrium process:
For a gas-liquid system, the solute A is usually in the gas phase V with inert gas and in the liquid phase L with inert liquid.
Assuming that the gas is insoluble in the liquid phase and that the liquid does not vaporize to the gas phase, both L and V
phases contain only binary components. Therefore, the component balance on A from equation [3b] can be rewritten as:
x y x y
L' A0 V ' A2 L' A1 V ' A1 [4]
1 x A0 1 y A2 1 x A1 1 y A1
where L’ is the amount of inert liquid and V’ is the amount of inert gas, both of which are usually known in a process.
To solve the above equation, Henry’s Law can be used for dilute solutions, or else the actual equilibrium data must be
available.
In a packed absorption column, variations in composition are continuous from one end to the other. Material balances for the
portion of the column above an arbitary section, as shown by the dashed box in Figure 3, are similar to the single stage
equilibrium process. However, the subscript for component A is dropped since it is the only component being transferred
between phases.
By rearranging the component A material balance in equation [5b], the relationship between x and y at any point in the column
can be obtained. This relationship is called the operating line equation.
L V y LT xT
y x T T [6]
V V
FACULTY: ENGINEERING EDITION:
TECHNOLOGY
LABORATORY: SEPARATION
REVISION NO:
ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY
VT, yT
LT, xT
V, y L, x
LB, xB
VB, yB
The operating line can be drawn on a graph along with the equilibrium curve, as shown in Figure 4. It must lie above the
equilibrium line in order for absorption to take place, since this gives a positive driving force for transfer of solute from the gas
phase into the liquid phase. The absorption process (solute transfer) will thus make the total gas rate V decrease as the gas
passes through the column, and the flow of liquid L increases. These changes cause the operating line to be slightly curved.
B
yB
equilibrium
operating line line
T
yT
x
xT xB
Figure 4: Operating line for absorption process
For the case of A being absorbed between inert gas and liquid phases, the material balance on component A around the
dashed box can take the form of:
x y x y
L' T V ' L' V ' T [7]
1 xT 1 y 1 x 1 yT
FACULTY: ENGINEERING EDITION:
TECHNOLOGY
LABORATORY: SEPARATION
REVISION NO:
ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY
However, for dilute mixtures containing less than 10% soluble gas, the effect of changes in total flow is usually neglected and
the design is based on the average flow rates. In this case, the terms (1–x) and (1–y) will be close to 1 and equation [7] will
become:
The operating line in equation [8] has a constant slope of L’/V’ and is essentially straight for dilute mixtures.
When the solute is being transferred from the liquid phase into the gas phase, the process is called desorption or stripping.
The operating line equation for the desorption process is similar to the above, but the location of the operating line is below
the equilibrium line, as shown in Figure 5. This will give a positive driving force for transfer of solute from the liquid phase into
the gas phase.
y
equilibrium
curve
T
yT
operating line
yB B
x
xB xT
In an absorption process, two immiscible phases (gas and liquid) are present in which the solute will diffuse from one phase to
the other through an interface between the two phases. For a solute A to diffuse from the gas phase V into the liquid phase L,
it must first pass through phase V, the interface, and then into phase L in series. A concentration gradient has to exist to allow
the mass transfer to take place through resistances in each phase, as illustrated in Figure 6.
The concentration in the bulk gas phase, yL decreases to yi at the interface, while the liquid concentration starts at xi at the
interface and drops to the bulk liquid phase concentration xL. There is usually negligible resistance to mass transfer across
the interface, thus xi and yi are in equilibrium with each other and are related in an equilibrium relationship.
FACULTY: ENGINEERING EDITION:
TECHNOLOGY
LABORATORY: SEPARATION
REVISION NO:
ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY
interface
liquid phase, L yV
xi yi
gas phase, V
xL
For a gas absorption process, it is common that only one solute component diffuses through stagnant gas and liquid phases.
The mass transfer calculations for one-way diffusion are more complicated than equimolar counterdiffusion since it involves
unequal molar flux across the interface. Derivation of the mass transfer equations will not be discussed in detail and can be
consulted in any transport processes book.
Generally, the rates of mass transfer in a packed absorption column can be quantified by four different equations:
N A k y a y y i
Gas film: [9a]
Liquid film: N A k x ax i x [9b]
N A K y a y y *
Overall gas: [9c]
Overall liquid: N A K x ax * x [9d]
in which:
NA = rate of absorption
kx,y = individual film mass transfer coefficient
Kx,y = overall mass transfer coefficient
a = interfacial area per unit packing volume
x = concentration in liquid phase
y = concentration in gas phase
xi = concentration at the liquid interface
yi = concentration at the gas interface
x* = liquid phase concentration in equilibrium with gas phase
y* = gas phase concentration in equilibrium with liquid phase
The coefficients kya, kxa, Kya and Kxa are based on unit volume. It is not necessary to calculate or predict the value of a
since it is incorporated into the volumetric coefficients.
FACULTY: ENGINEERING EDITION:
TECHNOLOGY
LABORATORY: SEPARATION
REVISION NO:
ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY
By combining equations [9a] and [9b], the interface composition (xi, yi) can be obtained as follows:
y y i k x a
x i x k y a [10]
A line drawn with the slope of (–kxa / kya) from the operating line will intersect the equilibrium line at the interface composition
(xi, yi). This is shown in Figure 7.
y
m
operating line
equilibrium
y line
yi
y* slope = (–kxa /
kya)
x
x xi x
* compositions
Figure 7: Interface and equilibrium
The overall driving forces for absorption are represented by the vertical or horizontal line distances on the x-y diagram. The
overall coefficients Kya and Kxa can be related to the gas or liquid film coefficients kya and kxa by the local slope of the
equilibrium curve, m as follows:
1 1 m
Kya kya kxa
[11a]
1 1 1
K x a k x a mk y a
[11b]
The resistances to mass transfer in the gas film and liquid film are characterized by the terms 1/(kya) and 1/(kxa) in equations
[11a & b] respectively. When these two coefficients are of roughly the same magnitude, and m is very much larger than 1.0,
the mass transfer is said to be liquid film controlling. This means that any change in the liquid film coefficient kxa will effect a
nearly proportional change on both Kya and Kxa, while change in the gas film coefficient kya will have little effect.
For example, Henry’s Law coefficient for CO2 in water at 20°C and 1 atm is 1430 (which equals the value of m). This shows
that the absorption of CO2 in water is a liquid film controlling process. Therefore, the CO2 absorption rate can be increased by
increasing the value of kxa (i.e. increase liquid velocity) but not by increasing the value of kya (i.e. increase gas velocity).
Inversely, when the solubility of a gas is very high in liquid (such as HCl and NH3 in water), the value of m is very small and
the mass transfer is said to be gas film controlling. This means that a change in kya will have a much larger effect on the
overall values of Kya and Kxa, thus absorption rate, than a change in kxa. However, gases with intermediate solubility are
somewhat equally controlled by both gas and liquid film resistances.
FACULTY: ENGINEERING EDITION:
TECHNOLOGY
LABORATORY: SEPARATION
REVISION NO:
ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY
However, for dilute mixtures containing less than 10% soluble gas, the effect of changes in total flow is usually neglected and
the design is based on the average flow rates. In this case, the terms (1–x) and (1–y) will be close to 1 and equation [7] will
become:
The operating line in equation [8] has a constant slope of L’/V’ and is essentially straight for dilute mixtures.
When the solute is being transferred from the liquid phase into the gas phase, the process is called desorption or stripping.
The operating line equation for the desorption process is similar to the above, but the location of the operating line is below
the equilibrium line, as shown in Figure 5. This will give a positive driving force for transfer of solute from the liquid phase into
the gas phase.
y
equilibrium
curve
T
yT
operating line
yB B
x
xB xT
In an absorption process, two immiscible phases (gas and liquid) are present in which the solute will diffuse from one phase to
the other through an interface between the two phases. For a solute A to diffuse from the gas phase V into the liquid phase L,
it must first pass through phase V, the interface, and then into phase L in series. A concentration gradient has to exist to allow
the mass transfer to take place through resistances in each phase, as illustrated in Figure 6.
The concentration in the bulk gas phase, yL decreases to yi at the interface, while the liquid concentration starts at xi at the
interface and drops to the bulk liquid phase concentration xL. There is usually negligible resistance to mass transfer across
the interface, thus xi and yi are in equilibrium with each other and are related in an equilibrium relationship.
FACULTY: ENGINEERING EDITION:
TECHNOLOGY
LABORATORY: SEPARATION
REVISION NO:
ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY
interface
liquid phase, L yV
xi yi
gas phase, V
xL
For a gas absorption process, it is common that only one solute component diffuses through stagnant gas and liquid phases.
The mass transfer calculations for one-way diffusion are more complicated than equimolar counterdiffusion since it involves
unequal molar flux across the interface. Derivation of the mass transfer equations will not be discussed in detail and can be
consulted in any transport processes book.
Generally, the rates of mass transfer in a packed absorption column can be quantified by four different equations:
N A k y a y y i
Gas film: [9a]
Liquid film: N A k x ax i x [9b]
N A K y a y y *
Overall gas: [9c]
Overall liquid: N A K x ax * x [9d]
in which:
NA = rate of absorption
kx,y = individual film mass transfer coefficient
Kx,y = overall mass transfer coefficient
a = interfacial area per unit packing volume
x = concentration in liquid phase
y = concentration in gas phase
xi = concentration at the liquid interface
yi = concentration at the gas interface
x* = liquid phase concentration in equilibrium with gas phase
y* = gas phase concentration in equilibrium with liquid phase
The coefficients kya, kxa, Kya and Kxa are based on unit volume. It is not necessary to calculate or predict the value of a
since it is incorporated into the volumetric coefficients.
FACULTY: ENGINEERING EDITION:
TECHNOLOGY
LABORATORY: SEPARATION
REVISION NO:
ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY
In an absorption process, the inlet gas flow, VB and its composition, yB are generally known. The outlet gas concentration, yT is
also fixed as a requirement for the absorption column, and the inlet liquid concentration, xT is also set by the process
requirements. This leaves the amount of entering liquid flow, LT to choice.
Referring to Figure 9, if the liquid flow is decreased, the upper end of the operating line will shift to the direction of the
equilibrium line, and the concentration of the outlet liquid, xB will obviously increase. The maximum possible outlet liquid
concentration and minimum possible liquid flow rate are obtained when the operating line just touches the equilibrium line at
point B1. In some cases if the equilibrium line is concaved downwards, the minimum liquid flow rate is reached when the
operating line becomes tangent to the equilibrium line.
y equilibrium
line
B B1
yB
operating line
yB*
operating line with
T minimum L/V
yT
x
xT xB xB*
At this limiting condition, an infinitely high packed absorption column is necessary, since the driving forces for mass transfer
become zero at point B1 at the bottom of the column. In an actual column, the liquid flow rate must be greater than this
minimum to achieve the required change in the outlet gas composition.
The choice of optimum liquid to gas ratio, L/V must obviously be more than the minimum ratio. Since the driving force for
mass transfer (y – y*) is proportional to the vertical distance between the operating line and the equilibrium line, increasing the
L/V ratio will increase the driving force along the column, thus reducing the height of the column. However, the higher liquid
flow rate will give a more dilute product, which makes it more difficult to recover the solute by desorption. This in turn
increases the energy cost for desorption.
As a general rule, the optimum liquid flow rate should be between 1.1 and 1.5 times the minimum value, unless the liquid is
meant to be discarded and not regenerated.
FACULTY: ENGINEERING EDITION:
TECHNOLOGY
LABORATORY: SEPARATION
REVISION NO:
ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY
5.0 PROCEDURES
Samples can be taken from the liquid in the sump tank B1 for analysis. The sampling valve is located at V5 for outlet liquid
from absorption column K1.
Water for absorption experiment should be deionised because presence of dissolved salts could affect the analysis method
as described below.
CHEMICALS NEEDED:
PROCEDURES:
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Variables Range
Air flow rate 3 M3/Hr
CO2 gas flow rate 4-8 L/min
Inlet gas composition 9-16 vol%
Liquid flow rate 4.0 L/min
FACULTY: ENGINEERING EDITION:
TECHNOLOGY
LABORATORY: SEPARATION
REVISION NO:
ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY
Experimental condition:
Concentration of NaOH for Titration: 0.05 M
1. Plot the CO2 concentration in the inlet water flow as a function of time.
Thus,
y mol
L 0.05
1000 L
Concentration of CO2 in Feed Tank = 0.1L
By using the calculated concentration of CO2 in Feed Tank, plot the graph of Concentration of CO2 in Feed Tank versus Time.
[conct x conct 0 ]
Rate of absorption of CO2 into water = VT
sec
x min 60
min