0% found this document useful (0 votes)
73 views6 pages

PROJECT#2 Stimsum Final

This document describes a project on well stimulation modeling. It provides input data for calculating well stimulation parameters such as average proppant width, injection time, fluid efficiency, and proppant concentration using formulas from both the presenter's program and Economides. The results from the two methods are then compared for several examples, showing some differences between the calculated values.

Uploaded by

Nurrahmisr
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
73 views6 pages

PROJECT#2 Stimsum Final

This document describes a project on well stimulation modeling. It provides input data for calculating well stimulation parameters such as average proppant width, injection time, fluid efficiency, and proppant concentration using formulas from both the presenter's program and Economides. The results from the two methods are then compared for several examples, showing some differences between the calculated values.

Uploaded by

Nurrahmisr
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

TM4107

STIMULASI SUMUR
Project #2

NAMA : Naura Tsabita Fadjar (12215051)


Nur Rahmi SR (12215092)
Nevi Cahya Winofa (12215093)

DOSEN : Ardhi Hakim Lumban Gaol S.T.,M.T.,M.Si.

Prof. Dr. Ir. Sudjati Rachmat, DEA

TANGGAL PENYERAHAN : 20 September 2018


ASISTEN : Wilson Wiranda (12214008)

PROGRAM STUDI TEKNIK PERMINYAKAN


FAKULTAS TEKNIK PERTAMBANGAN DAN PERMINYAKAN
INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG
2018

1
Problem 1
A. Input Data

B. Calculation Process
This calculation process is based on Mas Ardi’s slide and it is done in macro excel.

Function we_avg(n As Double, K As Double, qi As Double, E As Double, hf As Double,


xf As Double) As Double
Dim z As Double
Dim ww0 As Double

z = 1 / ((2 * n) + 2)
ww0 = (9.15 ^ z) * (3.98 ^ (n * z)) * (((1 + 2.14 * n) / n) ^ n ^ z) * (qi ^ n * K * xf * hf
^ (1 - n) / E) ^ z
we_avg = 0.628 * ww0
End Function

Function t_pump(CL As Double, Sp As Double, qi As Double, we_avg As Double, hp As


Double, hf As Double, xf As Double) As Double
Dim A As Double
Dim B As Double
Dim C As Double
Dim D As Double
Dim t1 As Double
Dim t2 As Double

2
Dim Af As Double

Af = xf * hf
A = (qi * 5.615) / (Af)
B = -2 * 1.5 * CL
C = -((we_avg / 12 + (2 * Sp / 12)))
D = (B ^ 2) - (4 * A * C)

t1 = (-B + D ^ 0.5) / 2 / A
t2 = (-B - D ^ 0.5) / 2 / A

If (t1 < 0) Then


t_pump = (t2 ^ 2)
Else
t_pump = (t1 ^ 2)
End If
End Function
Function fluid_eff(qi As Double, t_pump As Double, we_avg As Double, hf As Double,
xf As Double) As Double

fluid_eff = (2 * xf * hf * we_avg / 12) / (qi * t_pump * 5.615)


End Function
Function Vi(qi As Double, t_pump As Double) As Double
Vi = qi * t_pump * 5.615 * 7.48052
End Function
Function eps(fluid_eff As Double) As Double
eps = (1 - fluid_eff) / (1 + fluid_eff)
End Function
Function t_pad(t_pump As Double, eps As Double) As Double
t_pad = eps * t_pump
End Function
Function V_pad(Vi As Double, eps As Double) As Double
V_pad = Vi * eps

3
End Function
Function c_t(cmax As Double, t_pump As Double, t_pad As Double, eps As Double, t As
Double) As Double
c_t = cmax * ((t - t_pad) / (t_pump - t_pad)) ^ eps
End Function
Function mprop(cmax As Double, Vi As Double, fluid_eff As Double) As Double
mprop = cmax * fluid_eff * Vi
End Function

C. Result

Problem 2

4
The formula from economidies and Mas Ardi’s slide a little bit different. So the calculation
result from both method is different. So, here is the calculation result from our program that
use economidies formula

Example 16-10
Input
Parameter Value Unit
Fracture Height (Hf) 100 ft
Fracture Half-Length (Xf) 1000 ft
Injection rate 1 wing (Qi) 40 bpm
Perforation Height (Hp) 70 ft
COMPARISON
Our Program Economidies
Number 1
Value Value
Average Prop Width 0.11571 0.1859
Injection Time 32.96 36.343
Injection Volume 55378.0636 61061.0986
Fluid Efficiency 0.26051 0.37
Vpad 32487.8308 27457.6411
Example 16-11
Input
Parameter Value Unit

5
Injection Time 245 min
Fluid Efficiency 0.4
Pad Injection Time 105 min
time (t) 150 min
Max Concentration Proppant 3 ppg
COMPARISON
Our Program Economidies
Number 1
Value Value
eps 0.428571429 0.428571429
Concentration Proppant at t 1.84 1.84
Example 16-12
Input
Parameter Value Unit
Fracture Height (Hf) 100 ft
Fracture Half-Length (Xf) 1000 ft
Injection rate 1 wing (Qi) 40 bpm
Perforation Height (Hp) 70 ft
COMPARISON
Our Program Economidies
Number 1
Value Value
Average Prop Width 0.11571 0.1859
Injection Time 32.96 36.343
Injection Volume 55378.0636 61061.0986
Fluid Efficiency 0.26051 0.37
Vpad 32487.8308 27457.6411
Example 16-12
Input
Parameter Value Unit
Porosity Proppant 0.42
Density Proppant 230
Xf 1000 ft
hf 150 ft
eps 0.43
Max Concentration Proppant 3 ppg
COMPARISON
Our Program Economidies
Number 1
Value Value
Average Slurry Concentration 2.1 2.1
Mass of Proppant 68740.6345 490000
Proppant Concentration in
Fracture 0.687406345 1.63
Proppant Width 0.00343531 0.15

You might also like