Sterling Student Manik
Sterling Student Manik
Sterling Student Manik
Shareholders' equity
Contributed capital $466 $474 $478
Retained earnings $2,552 $2,687 $2,816
Treasury stock -$2,788 -$2,954 -$3,085
Stockholders' equity $230 $207 $209
Interest expenses $0 $0 $0
Income before income taxes $327 $367 $350
Long-term debt $1 $1 $0
Other long-term liabilities $27 $40 $46
Total liabilities $207 $267 $307
Shareholders' Equity
Contributed capital $347 $424 $446
Retained earnings $249 $515 $772
Treasury stock -$85 -$85 -$85
Shareholders' equity $511 $854 $1,133
Income Statement
($ in thousands) 2010 2011 2012
Balance sheet
($ in thousands) 2010 2011 2012
Operating assets:
Accounts receivable $16,533 $17,217 $17,675
Inventory $21,059 $22,772 $23,802 $27,019
Property, plant & equipment, at cost $43,840 $46,172 $48,454
- Accumulated depreciation $16,366 $18,695 $21,133
Property, plant & equipment, net $27,474 $27,477 $27,321
Total operating assets $65,066 $67,466 $68,798
Operating liabilities:
Accounts payable $10,573 $11,143 $11,689
Exhibit 6 Pro Forma Financial Information for Montagne Medical Instruments Company's germicidal, sanitation
and antiseptic products unit
Income Statement
($ in thousands) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Balance sheet
($ in thousands) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Operating assets:
Accounts receivable $18,522 $18,966 $19,422 $19,888 $20,365
Inventory $24,945 $25,543 $26,156 $26,784 $27,427
Property, plant & equipment, at cost $50,192 $51,692 $53,192 $54,692 $56,192
- Accumulated depreciation $23,658 $26,258 $28,933 $31,683 $34,508
Property, plant & equipment, net $26,534 $25,434 $24,259 $23,009 $21,684
Total operating assets $70,000 $69,944 $69,837 $69,681 $69,476
Operating liabilities:
Accounts payable $12,248 $12,542 $12,843 $13,151 $13,467
Exhibit 7 Financial information for selected companies in S.I.C. 3841 (surgical and medical instruments & apparatus) with
significant shares of the germicidal, sanitation, and antiseptic products market
Teleological Labyrinth Stratus
2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012
Sales revenue ($ in millions) $683 $682 $728 $455 $488 $520 $224 $306 $338
Net income ($ in millions) $144 $96 $154 $34 $44 $19 $23 $42 $58
Earnings per share $7.63 $5.04 $7.98 $1.74 $2.17 $0.95 $0.50 $0.92 $1.21
Dividends per share $1.36 $1.36 $1.36 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Year-end price/earnings ratio 6.97 10.77 7.56 19.28 18.78 46.52 53.12 33.70 24.93
Year-end common stock price $53.15 $54.30 $60.36 $33.55 $40.75 $44.19 $26.56 $31.00 $30.16
Market value of equity ($ in millions) $1,003.1 $1,034.3 $1,164.8 $655.6 $826.3 $883.8 $1,221.8 $1,415.2 $1,445.7
Balance sheet capitalization $1,320 $1,271 $1,398 $503 $530 $683 $526 $608 $467
% debt 43% 33% 32% 41% 37% 52% 20% 18% 0%
% common stock 57% 67% 68% 59% 63% 48% 80% 82% 100%
Equity beta coefficient --- --- 1.02 --- --- 1.04 --- --- 0.86
Interest coverage 2.8 2.9 3.3 4.2 5.4 2.0 4.1 8.2 24.5
Year-end price/earnings ratio 13.83 36.70 13.23 n/a 126.70 34.48 22.67 21.18 21.19
Year-end common stock price $30.14 $31.56 $30.83 $16.24 $25.34 $25.17 $17.91 $16.94 $24.79
Market value of equity ($ in millions) $276.5 $293.6 $291.1 $487.2 $760.2 $827.5 $249.4 $232.9 $360.2
Balance sheet capitalization $153 $158 $164 $136 $232 $275 $122 $143 $201
% debt 22% 21% 20% 0% 25% 22% 5% 9% 25%
% common stock 78% 79% 80% 100% 75% 78% 95% 91% 75%
Equity beta coefficient --- --- 0.85 --- --- 0.53 --- --- 0.90
Interest coverage 15.5 7.1 18.4 n/a 4.5 3.6 27.9 32.6 14.0
Answer to question 1
Ans 1)
Business risk is the possibility a company will have lower than anticipated profits
or experience a loss rather than taking a profit. Business risk is influenced by
numerous factors, including sales volume, per-unit price, input costs, competition,
the overall economic climate and government regulations.
When valuing a target for acquisition the cost of capital and the discounting rates which are used are for the tar
hence here when we have to evaluate the target we should be using the targets cost of equity and cost of capita
or undervalued or overvalued
Montagne
All 6 firms average equity beta 0.87
2 firms more similar 0.88
We get very similar betas though it would be more appropriate to use the beta for similar firms because montangne has 100%
Wacc 7.48% This can be used for valuing the target to see if the value is actually 265 million which means to k
These Cost of Equity and Wacc are for valuating the firm to know if it is actually worth
But if we were to check the NPV for this project we would use the cost of capital of the sterling
i.e for investment cash flows we should be using wacc for sterling and the capital structure that would be right for assessing th
after aquiring the firm with the new capital structure which is 70% equity and 30% debt
Equity beta for sterling = .40 Beta sterli 0.4 asset beta =' 0.32
ke = 5.100% Beta Monta 0.87 is also equal to asset beta for company since debt
if we take the average beta 0.447 considering 90% equity of ste
new ke of the firm with 30 % debt now equity beta for combined firm 0.638571
6.293%
A sensitivity analysis could help us estimate the amount of business risk associated with the acquisition
which are used are for the target not the aquirer
ost of equity and cost of capital to see if it is rightly valued
MRP 5%
Rf 3.10%
y 265 million which means to know if the right price was paid
before combining
t beta for company since debt was 0
considering 90% equity of sterling and 10% of target
considering beta debt to be 0
e there could
may actually be hurt even harded if the expected cash flows are not realized
Ans 2) Lets look at the cash flows from 2013 to 2022
We already have a prepared forecasts for the next 5 years ie 2013 to 2017
To estimate the cash flows for next 5 years assuming a growth of 5% in the sales a
of these 5 years to predict for next 5 years
Find Below the projected values for operated income for the next 10 years
Income Statement
($ in thousands) 2013 2014 2015 2016
Balance sheet
($ in thousands) 2013 2014 2015 2016
Operating assets:
Accounts receivable $18,522 $18,966 $19,422 $19,888
Inventory $24,945 $25,543 $26,156 $26,784
Property, plant & equipment, at cost $50,192 $51,692 $53,192 $54,692
- Accumulated depreciation $23,658 $26,258 $28,933 $31,683
Property, plant & equipment, net $26,534 $25,434 $24,259 $23,009
Total operating assets $70,000 $69,944 $69,837 $69,681
Capex for the year $1,738 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500
Operating liabilities:
Accounts payable $12,248 $12,542 $12,843 $13,151
1 2 3 4
Now free cash flows = Operating income + Depreciation - WC - Capex
2013 2014 2015 2016
FCF $15,044 $19,539 $20,048 $20,569
Taxes as 35%
Terminal value 9 times the cash flow of 2022
$205,361.32
PV of TV $121,374.94
Operating assets:
Accounts receivable $18,521.80 $22,759.59 $25,247.97 $27,842.68
Inventory $24,944.68 $30,652.02 $34,003.31 $37,497.81
Property, plant & equipment, at cost $50,192 $111,692 $113,192 $114,692
- Accumulated depreciation $23,658 29258 28933 31683
Property, plant & equipment, net $26,534.00 82434 84259 83009
Total operating assets $70,000.48 $135,845.61 $143,510.28 $148,349.49
Capex for the year $1,738 $61,500 $1,500 $1,500
Operating liabilities:
Accounts payable $12,248.29 $15,050.69 $16,696.24 $18,412.10
1 2 3 4
FCFF $5,913.38 -$33,557.11 $33,780.63 $38,181.31
PV 5610.437536219 -30206.93422 28850.335226425 30938.1961
Terminal value $456,668.00
PV of TV 269905.01349628
NPV 219756.72260197
s ie 2013 to 2017
5 6 7 8 9 10
NPV $135,416.51
5 6 7 8 9 10
$42,524.84 $37,221.77 $43,228.90 $45,605.78 $48,107.69 $50,740.89
32692.48111 27149.58696 29915.8536492 29943.886265 29968.4205 29989.4459440315
2012
Growth rate = 5%
Net sales $142,528 Operating income 19%
$149,654.40
Terminal value
same % as before
same % as before
Answer Q4)
There are several trends pointing toward in favor of the acquisition, because the health care industry has been growing and
in particular there are no market leaders in the germinicidal line of business.
The financial performance for the business is strong with yoy growth rates close to 5% and the operatinmg profits as huge as 1
As far as the financial is concerned the target has zero debt so we do not take over any liabilities and this increases our debt ca
It is useful because the borrowing rates are low in the market + the tax rates are high so a higher value of tax shields
Another point in favor would be the closely related product lines with the target would ensure we do not have to spend a lot o
The goal of the company has been yoy growth now because of its recent bad growth rates of as low as 2% this acquisition help
The company is not run properly and we may change the management etc to get a better control over the company
One of the issues could be the market being segmented despite our acquisition we cannot be sure if we will gain the forecaste
competition may step up and we may not get the required synergies
Secondly we are taking debt for this acquisition which increases our financial leverage so we may actually be hurt even harded
tive NPV project
may actually be hurt even harded if the expected cash flows are not realized