Nature of Hulme 2018 - Project Summary
Nature of Hulme 2018 - Project Summary
Nature of Hulme 2018 - Project Summary
This evidence-led approach has also built on the significant work already being done by the
MCC Policy and Neighbourhood Team to deliver environmental improvements in the Central
Area Ward. It has also taken advantage of the comprehensive and detailed pre-existing Green
Infrastructure data created by MCC and their partners, integrating it with additional local
information collected through stakeholder dialogue with citizens, local civil society groups,
businesses and members of the wider community.
This combined evidence has now been used to create this Nature of Hulme Evidence Review,
which will now be used to develop short-, medium- and long-term actions that improve
the experiences of nature and the environment in Hulme for people from across the local
community.
This report has been created through a partnership formed between Manchester City Council,
the Westcountry Rivers Trust and the Community of Hulme. The project has also been a pilot
application of the Defra-funded Local Action Project in Manchester: a local collaborative
natural capital approach designed to work with local communities to enhance the value of
nature in their local landscape, build community resilience, improve people’s quality of life
and increase local economic prosperity.
Nature of Hulme:
A ‘NATURAL HISTORY’
In order to build a shared vision for the future or nature in Hulme, it was vital that we first sought to
understand the relationship that the community currently has with the natural environment surrounding
them. And in order for us to understand that, it was clear that we first had to look back over the unique
and chequered history of this extraordinary Manchester suburb and explore how the natural world in it
has been shaped and moulded by the huge changes that the landscape has undergone.
What we have discovered is that the social, cultural and environmental histories of Hulme are
inextricably intertwined - there has been so much change and yet so many things (good and bad)
have remained the same...
1900
The rapid industrialisation of the landscape saw rapid
Image: Manchester Library population growth in Hulme and by 1900 the population
of "the poorest and most neglected district of the city"
was ~80,000. During the 19th Century, new housing had
to be built rapidly and space was limited, which resulted
in low-quality housing interspersed with the myriad
smoking chimneys of the mills and the railway. The
combination of a lack of sanitation, the rampant spread
of disease and extremely high levels of pollution resulted
in an extremely low quality-of-life for residents (and for
nature as well).
1950
Living conditions in Hume continued to deteriorate
up to, during and after WWII. Much of the old housing
stock was comprised of dilapidated and over-crowded
'back-to-back' terraces which "lacked many of the basics
essential for healthy living". Open space, especially green
1955 space, was in very short supply and the neighbourhood
remained polluted and dangerous. Having said that, the
communities were strong and resilient.
1960
Image: MMU Special Collections At the end of WWII, Britain had a very high need for
more and better quality housing and, by the 1960s, many
towns and cities had begun to clear their 19th Century
'slums'. Nearly all of the slum areas of Hulme were then
1965 demolished and for nearly a decade nature was allowed
to reclaim the wastelands that were all that remained
where the community of Hulme had once been. Several
iconic landmarks did survive (e.g. The Junction Pub and
St Mary's Church) and then the redevelopment began
with the construction of Birley High School (left).
Image: MMU Special Collections 1970 Hulme was redeveloped according to the modernist and
brutalist architectural styles of the late 60's and early
70's when the need for rapid and low cost construction
dictated high-rise 'modular' tower blocks consisting of
deck-access flats and terraces. This high density housing
was balanced with the inclusion of large green spaces
1975
and trees around and within the redevelopment.
1985
Despite the huge social problems in the 80's and 90's,
it was during this period that Hulme became one of
the most culturally vibrant and unique communities
anywhere in the country. The area acquired a 'Bohemian'
reputation for its many punks, artists and musicians and,
in addition, many of the open green spaces surrounding
Image: Natural England 1990 the crescents became much loved by the community.
2000
community. One was designated as a public park in 1999,
when Hulme Park was officially opened, while another
Image: Homes for Change by Academy of Urbanism (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)
was converted into the Hulme Community Garden
Centre. Others, such as Birley Field by the Stretford Road,
remained unprotected, but grew increasingly valuable.
Hulme has areas of parks, institutional grounds, outdoor sports facilities and other publicly accessible
green spaces that are fairly typical of the densely populated wards that lie close to the city centre in
Manchester. However, the ward does have a relatively low area of private gardens and natural habitats
(such as woodlands, wetlands and heath, which is also typical of a city centre location) and, overall, this
means that green and blue spaces cover just 35% of the land area of Hulme - among the lowest in the city.
Area of Natural (Green & Blue) space per ward in Manchester (32 wards)
Gartside
Gardens
Trinity Sports
Centre
St George’s
(Barrack) Park
Hullard Aquarius
Park Allotments
Seymore
Park Bold Street Whitworth
Sports Ground Park
Alexandra
Park
Nature of Hulme:
Memories & favourite natural spaces in Hulme captured during the first Nature of Hulme Workshop in 2017
BIRLEY CAMPUS (MMU)
In 2014, Manchester Metropolitan University
(MMU) completed their £60 million redevelopment
of the Birley Fields site adjacent to the Stretford
Road in Hulme to create the award-winning and
environmentally spectacular Birley Campus.
The site was formerly the site of Birley High School,
which was demolished in 1999, and which had
become an unofficial greenspace called Birley Fields
(which contained the much loved Birley Meadow and
the ‘Birley Tree’).
While high land prices and pressure from different competing objectives often makes the creation of a
new park in an area unlikely (although not impossible), this makes it all the more important for us to
assess the diversity of benefits provided by our existing parks, determine who receives these benefits
and to manage them in a way that maximises the multiple benefits they provide.
Parks have, in recent years, recorded increasing visitor numbers, showing that there is a demand for
their use. Over 10% of people visit or pass through their local parks daily, and over 50% at least once per
month. Parks and open space have been suggested to be the third most frequently used public service
after GP surgeries and hospitals. However, budgets are being cut and staff numbers reduced, leading to
54,082 m2 of
public parks
St George’s
(Barrack) Park
Parks, depending on their size and design, often constitute a combination of different types of green
infrastructure elements and their value to society and the environment depends on the number, diversity
and condition of these different parts.
In modern cities, it is often not possible to create new public parks or greenspaces and, more commonly,
the priority actions required to enhance the benefits they provide are: 1) to protect these public
open spaces (especially if they are informal community-used spaces on brownfield sites that receive
no statutory protection); 2) improve the quality or condition of the assets already in the landscape
(increased amenity value and resilience), or 3) ‘unlock’ the flow of benefits (more, different or to more
people), by targeting ‘performance regulating factors’ that control the conversion of ecosystem function
into benefits (e.g. connectivity or accessibility).
The level of greenspace use in urban landscapes (and therefore the ability of these assets to provide
benefits) is determined by three main factors: 1) the level of access that people have to the space; 2)
the ‘resistance’ or ‘permeability’ of the surrounding landscape that encourages and facilitates people
getting to the space in order to use it and obtain benefits, and 3) the amenity value of the space - i.e.
the condition of the space as determined by the ecological value, aesthetic quality (smell, appearance,
cleanliness, etc), safety, accessibility and opportunities for social or cultural activities.
Parks are not evenly distributed across Hulme. By considering access points to parks, pelican crossings
of main roads, and a reasonable distance to walk to a park (600m – which is approximately a 10 minute
walk), the number of people with access to parks can be estimated. The map below shows this analysis,
which suggests that approximately 4,800 homes in Hulme, just over half, are within walking distance of
a park.
This analysis includes woodland and grassland areas which are labelled on online
maps as parks (but may not be official council-managed parks), and parks which lie
outside of Hulme but are within walking distance for some of the residents of Hulme.
Walking distance
to accessible
greenspaces
However, what makes these types of urban green spaces so unique is the social and cultural aspect
of food production and land ownership in an otherwise urban environment. They also provide the
opportunity to work with other local people in clubs and organisations, to grow food in urban spaces
where this opportunity may otherwise be scarce, and to learn about plant species both native to the UK
and more exotic.
In addition to social and cultural benefits they provide, these greenspaces can provide a range of other
ecosystem services, but this depends on how the different natural elements of the space are used and
guidance for allotment owners and users should therefore be considered within the management of
However, as they cover a significant amount of land, they do have the potential to contribute locally,
not only by infiltrating runoff and providing amenity benefits, but also provide the opportunity to
incorporate or ‘retrofit’ other interventions (e.g. ponds, swales, natural habitats, etc) within them,
maximising the multiple benefits they provide.
As allotments are not typically accessible to the public, certain benefits, such as access, social cohesion,
education, etc, can only be provided on a fairly limited scale that is dependent on the local group
who administer the site. However, the benefits that these resources do provide, particularly to older
people and children are significant and the National Society of Allotment and Leisure Gardeners (NSALG)
recommend that councils provide ~20 plots per 1,000 people (1 plot = 300 sq. yards or 250 m2).
[1] www.geofutures.com/food/allotments/
[2] www.allotmoreallotments.org.uk/legislation.htm
[3] www.nsalg.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/ttwk_nsalg_survey_2013.pdf
HULME COMMUNITY GARDEN
CENTRE (HCGC)
Founded in 1998 on a piece of waste ground, the
“garden centre with a difference that makes a
difference” has the mission to bring together the
local community through gardening. Up to 100
volunteers contribute each week, from a wide range
of backgrounds and age groups.
PRIVATE GARDENS
In 2002, an estimated 27 million people in the UK owned gardens. Domestic gardens contribute about a
quarter of the total urban area in typical cities in the UK and contribute up to 86% of the total number
of trees in a city.
Small gardens are especially important, as they contribute the greatest proportion to the total area
of gardens and the accumulated number of structures they contain, such as ponds, nesting sites or
compost heaps is significant at the city-scale. This indicates the importance of gardens on a wider scale,
not only for humans but also nature.
Private gardens are mainly used for relaxation and recreation, with over a third of garden owners
surveyed in 2011 naming these as main activities in the garden, with gardening, eating, drying laundry
and socialising being other common activities. Over 80% of gardens are used for more than one of
these activities. It is important to note that, while the social benefits from increased permeability and
4,026 private
gardens in Hulme
As private gardens are not publicly accessible and often not even visible, they have been ranked lower
than their benefits for the individual as they cannot provide the same benefits to a larger number of
people. However, their contribution to the wellbeing of the individual should not be underestimated...!
During our evidence review and community engagement activities it became clear that, as private home
ownership increases in Hulme, the number of private gardens in the neighbourhood are also increasing.
However, while some residents clearly take great pride in their gardens, many are not very well looked
after at all and there is a widely help belief that more could be done to encourage members of the
community to take greater advantage of the opportunity having a garden represents.
Trees also encourage the use of community spaces, leading to a stronger sense of community and lower
crime rates. It is suggested that trees can transform a ‘no man’s land’ in a city into welcoming and
well-used spaces. The impacts are not limited to those experiencing the trees while walking – tree-lined
streets are more popular with cyclists, and drivers seeing natural roadsides have lower levels of stress
than those in wholly built-up settings.
Trees can also provide a number of other ecosystem services depending on their size, species, and
Birley Community
Woodland
Street trees
& woodland
Trees in St
George’s Park
Manchester University
Tree Trail (see over)
Trees in
Hulme Park
They also intercept rainfall and so slow the rate with which water reaches the ground, increasing
infiltration where permeable surfaces are available and additionally reducing runoff through evaporation
and root uptake. Studies have shown that trees can reduce runoff by 62% compared to the same area
of naked asphalt, and a 5% increase in tree cover in an area can reduce total runoff by 2%. Water that is
not intercepted by trees can infiltrate into the 'tree pit' and from there fed into storage structures for
further treatment.
To provide a comprehensive treatment and management of surface water, trees should be seen within
the wider landscape. While they are able to intercept rainfall before it becomes runoff, it is important
to understand that their ability to take up existing runoff and infiltrate it is limited and they should be
complemented with additional interventions.
Air pollution, water pollution, noise, drought, flooding from rivers surface water drains, extreme urban
temperatures, social problems (such as poor health, anti-social, behaviour, poverty, unemployment,
crime or drug addiction) and many other factors, can all reduce the benefits that we get from nature.
They can also block our ability to access the benefits or overwhelm the benefits to such an extent that
they do not have a noticeable positive effect on us.
Having said this, many, but not all, of these pressures and problems can be reduced or even overcome.
By changing people’s day-to-day behaviour, so that the negative impact they have on the environment is
reduced, or through the restoration or creation of natural features in the local landscape we can tip the
balance back in the favour of the environment (and help it deliver more benefits for us).
Environmental pressures and problems in Hulme captured during the first Nature of Hulme Workshop in 2017
Pressure Hotspots
During the workshops, local people had the opportunity to note down pressures they felt were having a negative impact in Hulme,
and to place them on a map. This hotspot analysis indicates that there are some locations, typically around major roads and traffic
junctions, where people feel the environment is being negatively impacted.
In order to determine what actions could be delivered most effectively and where they are most needed
to improve the health and wellbeing of people living and working in Hulme, we have done two things.
First, we have undertaken a comprehensive review of all the data and evidence relating to these pressures
and problems in Hulme. Second, we have surveyed, interviewed and discussed these issues with as many
people from Hulme as we could, listened to their point of view and tried to determine what improvements
they would like to see made to the environment of Hulme in the future.
By undertaking this collaborative process we have begun to work together with the community of Hulme
to build a shared vision for the future of their neighbourhood. We have begun to develop an inclusive
plan that identifies those actions that the people of Hulme need to have done, which includes the changes
that they would like to see happen and which empowers them to change their behaviour and take action
together in a way that increases the strength and resilience of their community both now and into the
future.
PRIORITY PRIORITY
3 1
PRIORITY
2
Nature of Hulme:
Particulate matter (PM) is a pollutant of key concern with respect to public health, as the particles can
be breathed in and can lead to a wide array of health problems and increase mortality rates. Particulate
matter of <10µM (known as PM10) is commonly measured and is correlated with negative health impacts,
but it is particulate matter of <2.5µM (microns) in size (known as PM2.5) that is now known to be especially
harmful.
The UK National Air Quality Objectives and European Directive limits and target values for the protection
of human health for Nitrogen Dioxide are: for no monitoring location to have: 1) an hourly average that
exceeds 200µg/m3 more than 18 times a year, 2) an hourly average that exceeds 200µg/m3 for more than
18 hours, and 3) to have an annual average level that exceeds 40µg/m3.
AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL
NO2 Air Quality Standard (Oxford Rd) 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
According to air quality
Annual Mean not >40µg/m3 Y (68) Y (66) Y (66) Y (65) Y (55) standards, the NO2 annual
Hourly average not >200µg/m3 >18h N N N N N average should not exceed
Hourly average not >200µg/m3 >18x a year 14x 60x 90x 6x 0x above 40µg/m3
In the past, Hulme has had a reputation for having very high levels of crime and anti-social behaviour.
However, while the problem remains to some degree (perhaps at a level more typical of any urban
community in the UK), it has reduced significantly in recent years. It has been speculated that the
lower-than-expected use of some public open spaces in Hulme could be the result of this perceived risk,
but, while this clearly remains an issue, it actually seems more likely to be the result other factors.
The major roads that surround and bisect the Hulme landscape are a major source of disturbance.
By polluting the air and being dangerous for pedestrians to cross, they create a physical barrier to
movement, but due to their busyness and noise pollution they also create a create a psychological barrier
to people wishing to move around the neighbourhood and may also impinge on their enjoyment of the
greenspaces they are using.
Data source: Defra (Open Government Licence) - Data indicating the level of noise according to the
strategic noise mapping of rail sources within areas with a population of at least 100,000 people
(agglomerations) and along Network Rail and HS1 traffic routes. Data indicates a 24 hour annual average
noise level with separate weightings for the evening and night periods.
Nature of Hulme:
Data source: Risk of Flooding from Rivers and Sea is obtained from
the Environment Agency under an Open Government Licence - ©
Environment Agency copyright and/or database right 2017. All The Environment Agency Risk of Flooding
rights reserved. Some features of this map are based on digital from Rivers and Sea dataset uses local
spatial data from the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, © NERC water level and flood defence data to
(CEH) © Crown copyright and database rights 2017 Ordnance model flood risk, for different flood
Survey 100024198
likelihoods.
The indicator used to indicate flood risk
from rivers and sea is typically the number
of properties located in >1 in 100 year
flood risk areas (from rivers and sea).
FLOOD RISK (SURFACE WATER - PLUVIAL)
Surface water (SW - pluvial) flooding happens when rainwater does not drain via the normal drainage
systems or soak into the ground, but lies on or flows over the ground instead. SW flooding can cause
serious problems, particularly as it can often be contaminated with untreated waste water, and both
living at risk of flooding and being flooded can also have a profound effect on the psychological health
and emotional wellbeing of the people affected.
The approach assesses 12 indicators, visualised in a wheel graphic, which can be used to establish a
baseline of the net-benefits experienced by people living in a specific or across a number of communities
(facilitating a strategic assessment of the ‘need for enhancement’ or the deficiency of provision).
The wheel of environmental benefits for Hulme is shown below - the scores for each indicator show how
Hulme compares for each in relation to the other 31 wards in the City of Manchester.
Higher Blackley
Charlestown
Moston
18
4
6
7 Clayton & Openshaw
10
9 11
8
15
Hulme 13
12
14
Chorlton
17
15
16 Burnage
18
19
20
21
Chorlton Park 23
24
22 25
26
Old Moat
27
29
28
Burnage
Rusholme
Brooklands
30 Fallowfield
31
Didsbury East
Withington 19
32
Didsbury West
Northenden
Brooklands
ACTION PLAN
Having spent a year working to determine the environmental 'wants' and 'needs' of people living, working
and learning in Hulme, the final key element of the project has been to begin collating and working-up
an ‘action plan’ of practical project ideas, actions and resources that will all contribute in one way or
another the realisation of that vision. In order to be targeted and cost effective, this action planning has
had to be based on a detailed assessment of the 'opportunities' and 'feasibility' for delivery in Hulme.
We have always been very clear that this process must deliver demonstrable social and environmental
outcomes in Hulme if it is to be considered a success. We hope that the Nature of Hulme Project has
initiated the creation of some social benefits, but we still need to demonstrate that the work has inspired,
facilitated or enabled the implementation of actions or behaviour changes in the community that truly
protect or increase the natural/environmental assets in Hulme.
Nature of Hulme:
ACTION PLAN
TOOLBOX
Distance:
100m (<2Ha) &
300m (>2Ha)
combined
PROJECT IDEA
Reconnecting Birley Field
Manchester Metropolitan University is extremely proud of
the redevelopment of Birley Field and want it to become an
exemplar for how a University and its local communities can
benefit from being in such close proximity.
While the public are still able access the open spaces at Birley,
which include a community orchard, wetland area, woodland
area and sustainability trail, it is clear that some sections of the
local community remain reluctant to use this new space and
it has not been universally embraced by the people of Hulme.
ACTION PLAN
TOOLBOX
For many people, but especially for Visible lack of maintenance can have a Lack of information about existence or
groups like elderly or disabled, negative impact on the use of green facilities available in a greenspace can
physical access and the state of the space. Be aware of: be a barrier to its use.
environment can inhibit use of a
• Litter removal and repair of • Make information about facilities
greenspace. Improve access with:
damage/vandalism and services and how they can be
• Signs and maps close to and used easily accessible (e.g. online)
• Overgrown vegetation and dog
throughout the park mess (Potential trade-off: • Within the area, maps and signs
• Maintenance of footpaths overgrown, wild areas may be help find important services and
perceived as untidy but be areas
• Public transport connections
important factors for wildlife. Make
• Introduce staff (e.g. rangers,
sure to designate specific wildlife gardeners, volunteers) into the area
areas and provide explanatory to provide a first point of contact
signs.) and community interaction
• Information on how and where
damage should be reported and
rapid response
Perceived safety risks are a key barrier While a greenspace consisting of only Local communities often want to be
to the use of green spaces. Improve vegetation and pathways may provide involved of the management of ‘their’
access with: a nice corridor to walk through, space. This can work in multiple ways
ensuring certain needs can be met and be coordinated via existing groups
• Sufficient lighting. Street lighting
locally can increase time spent in a (e.g. schools) or ones that are
has been shown to reduce levels of
space and its attractiveness to new specifically set up for a particular
crime and increase levels of
groups. space:
perceived safeness.
• Especially in bigger areas, having • Involving ‘problem groups’ can
• Avoid dense wooded or shrubby
well maintained facilities addressing avoid single group dominance in
areas, and maintain lines of sight
different target groups like cafes public spaces and help increase use
and visibility of exits throughout
and public toilets can increase use and make the space safer.
the area, and take advantage of
existing infrastructure and by existing user groups and attract
• Community lead green space
buildings for natural surveillance new groups. management can address local
(e.g. visibility form cafes, offices…). • Providing specific areas for dogs needs differently and possibly allow
(increase use by dog owners and better maintenance without
• Wide main paths to give
make other user groups feel more increased budget
pedestrians enough space to pass
by. comfortable).
• Working with other communities or
• Creation of tranquil, sheltered or groups with similar remits and aims
natural spaces can provide mental opens opportunities for
restorative value. collaboration and knowledge
transfer
A nature trail around Hulme could link up the green spaces and
give local people and newcomers to the area the confidence to
visit and make the most of them. Signposts, notice boards or
maps (online or offline) could be used to provide information
about local nature projects, inspire local people to engage with
the natural environment around them and, if successful, could
reconnect people with nature in the ward.
ACTION PLAN
TOOLBOX
During the Nature of Hulme Project, the issue of litter and fly-tipping were frequently raised and was
the highest ranked issue in the online survey (see page 22) and this is reflected in the data shown below.
ACTION PLAN
URBAN 'TOOLBOX' OF NATURAL SOLUTIONS
There are lots of ways to create and improve green spaces and to combat some of the pressures which
have been investigated across Hulme. Some of these can be used in individual gardens, and others will
need to be promoted and supported by wider communities. This page summarises some of the tools, and
the following pages investigates where they could work best across Hulme.
Natural Beauty
These interventions help improve the aesthetics of an urban location. Increasing the amount of green compared
to grey across Hulme was an important issue for many Hulme community members at the workshops.
Photos on this page (left to right): Arlington County (CC BY-SA 2.0), coconinoco (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0), Center for Neighborhood Technology (CC BY-SA 2.0), John Lord
(CC BY 2.0), Melbourne Water (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0), Malcom (CC BY-NC 2.0), Mikey (CC BY 2.0), Elizabeth Phung (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)
Nature of Hulme:
ACTION PLAN
TOOLBOX
Street tree
opportunity map
Costs of implementation
Instalment costs: £15-400
per tree (including planting).
Relative costs decrease with
increasing number of trees.
Costs of maintenance Dependent on: Species and age
Maintenance costs: 0.10 £/m2 for managed woodland of the tree, location of planting.
in managed greenspace. Higher for singular trees.
Main costs: Pruning Maintenance will be lower the
better the tree is suited to the conditions – e.g. soil
type, water supply, size of tree pit.
UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER
TREE TRAIL
The campuses of the University of Manchester are
home to over 1,500 trees of more than 50 different
species. The University’s main campus is located to
the eastern side of Hulme.
ACTION PLAN
TOOLBOX
PRIVATE GARDENS
The vegetated, permeable area provided by private domestic gardens is being significantly reduced each
year due to development pressures, individual choices regarding the design of their garden and their
conversion/maintenance to provide space for private vehicles. In London, for example, an area of 2.5
Hyde Parks of vegetated garden land is lost each year, and in a case study area in Leeds, paved area in
gardens increased by 13% over the course of 10 years. The recent My Back Yard Project (see right) found
a similar trend could be observed in Manchester. These changes in the way we use and manage our
gardens can have significant implications for their ability to provide us with benefits; at a local- as well
as a city-wide scale. One way to reverse this trend is to provide protection for gardens in the planning
process, but other local groups are targeting poorly managed or non-natural gardens for restoration
through community education and the retrofitting of more natural characteristics.
% Area of non-natural
JOINED-UP APPROACH gardens
We need to manage gardens at a larger scale. Reduce
pesticide, irrigation and fertilizer use. Improve soil
structure and include ponds. Make gardens visible to the
neighbourhood. Increase awareness of value for exercise,
education and play. Enhance gardens for wildlife.
Front gardens
in Hulme
“People should take
better care of their
front gardens”
ACTION PLAN
SUSTAINABLE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS (SuDS)
We currently rely on traditional sewerage and drainage systems to take up rainwater in urban areas
and transport it away from the surface - they take over the function that vegetation and soil perform
in natural situations. Unfortunately, however, our drainage systems are being overwhelmed by the high
volumes of water they have to cope with during increasingly common extreme rainfall events and the
resulting ‘surface water flooding’ is occurring more and more frequently.
Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) are one way of mimicking nature to provide solutions to these
problems. They either capture water at the source and allow it to infiltrate or evaporate before it becomes
a problem, or they convey water to natural storage areas where it can provide benefits to humans and
wildlife rather than ave such profound negative impacts.
Hulme
Ward
SuDS Feasibility
Once sources and sinks have been
identified in SuDS Studio, they are
compared against the constraint and
SuDS Opportunities - large-scale solutions opportunity layers to assess feasible
SuDS Studio outputs have been used to identify options on each site.
opportunities for the creation/retrofitting of large-scale
SuDS solutions, such as: large raingardens, wetlands,
detention ponds, attenuation ponds and swales.
Data source: SuDS Studio Outputs were obtained under licence from United Utilities. ©
United Utilities copyright and/or database rights 2018. All rights reserved
Nature of Hulme:
ACTION PLAN
GREEN ROOFS
Green roofs fall into two main categories: intensive and extensive. Extensive green roofs usually have
a thin layer of soil medium and plants like succulents, grasses or other low maintenance, low growing
vegetation. They require little to no maintenance and are usually not accessible. Intensive green roofs
typically have a deeper substrate and shrubby vegetation or even trees. They are usually accessible and
can often take the shape of a garden, which also means they require more maintenance than extensive
roofs.
By intercepting precipitation and allowing infiltration into the soil media (as well as evaporation and
transpiration from plants), green roofs reduce the impermeable surface of an area. They are most
effective in small to medium rainfall events with low intensities and longer durations. Green roofs can
also improve health and wellbeing by reducing air temperature and improving air quality in urban areas,
and they can provide valuable habitat for wildlife.
ACTION PLAN
TOOLBOX
Image: J C Decaux UK
Nature of Hulme:
ACTION PLAN
NATURAL FEATURES FOR WILDLIFE & PEOPLE
Significant increases in the benefits provided by both formal and informal greenspaces in an urban
landscape can be achieved through the retrofitting of natural habitats into them - i.e. through the addition
of natural features such as wildflower meadows, trees, fruit trees, pollinator friendly flower beds, hedges
and ponds (or other wetland features).
These enhancements are carefully designed to ensure that they do not compromise the usability of the
greenspaces for their principle function (e.g. sport, dog-walking, exercising, etc), but rather serve to
improve the ecological and aesthetic quality of the greenspace and therefore increase both its amenity
value and its ability to provide social (health and wellbeing), cultural, environmental and local economic
benefits to people and wildlife. The addition of wildlife-rich habitats to an urban landscape can inspire
a greater sense of pride among the local community and can inspire people to take better care of their
green spaces.
Wildlife Opportunities
This map (right) shows the all of the
current greenspaces and ‘natural
surfaces’ in the ward of Hulme. Any of
these spaces, such as amenity grassland,
parks, sports pitches, green roadsides,
or small informal greenspaces represent
an opportunity for the creation of
wildlife conservation features. This could
wildflowers meadows, trees, fruit trees,
pollinator friendly flower beds, hedges
and ponds (or other wetland features)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the numerous professionals and community
representatives from Hulme who have given their time and enthusiasm to discuss, debate and explore
the Nature of Hulme with us over year. Particular thanks go to our project coordinator Patrick Hanfling
for his boundless energy and passion for improving the environment in Hulme, but also to many of
his colleagues and collaborators from across the community: Cllr. Annette Wright, Cllr. Lee-Ann Igbon,
Cllr. Nigel Murphy, Ruth Billingham, Dave Barlow, Sally Casey, Bernard Sudlow, Pauline Campbell,
Christian Berger, Mark Frith, Helen Green, Lynne Skipworth, Mark Hammond, Kim Foale, Steph Lynch,
Liz Prestbury, Stuart Fraser, Robert Docherty, Rachel & Janine from Hulme Garden Centre, Polly Moseley,
Caroline Riley, and so many others (including the 123 people who completed the Nature of Hulme Online
Questionnaire..!).
We would also like to extend our gratitude to One Manchester, Ambition for Ageing, Loreto College,
Hulme Garden Centre, Z-Arts, Ascension Church, Hulme Ward Co-ordination, Manchester a Certain
Future and also to the following organisations for sharing their data and evidence with us for use in this
project -
Manchester City Council & Red Rose Forest (now City of Trees)
Dataset: Tree audit 2012
Acknowledgements: MCC & Red Rose Forest –
www.wildaboutmanchester.info/www/index.php/tree-audit
United Utilities
Dataset: SuDS Studio outputs from the SE014 Surface Water Removal project
Acknowledgements: United Utilities, MCC & Atkins
NATURE OF HULME
Community-led action to improve access to
nature and green spaces in Hulme