Lesson Plan Analysis
Lesson Plan Analysis
Assignment 2
Contents
Academic Justification………………………………………………………13
References…………………………………………………………………...16
1
Original lesson plan
Lesson Plan
2
Time Teaching and learning actions
5 Introduction
As this is the first HPE lesson for the students the teacher is entering the class with three
initial objectives:
1. To introduce them-self to the students and address what we hope to achieve over the
coming year. This will involve a demonstration of the scope and sequence for year 7 (see
appendix A) which includes the layout of each unit and assessment task students will
complete for each term.
2. To identify the background knowledge and understandings which students have
previously attained. This second objective is specific to each unit of work as new skills
are introduced and developed; hence in this unit background knowledge circulates around
student relationships and helping build connections between new peers.
3. Every class/classroom activity needs to ensure all students are given equal opportunity to
be included, for students to feel safe, and to have an element of fun within the lesson. This
can be achieved through various pedagogical approaches which address a variety of
students learning needs. Examples are group work, audio-visual learning, comprehension
and integration of ICT learning mediums (as seen in appendix B).
After explaining (in summary) these three points to students, the teacher will then state that:
“While this unit will be enjoyable, there will be some topics that we cover that may make you
uncomfortable, embarrassed, or may spark a question that you don’t wish to share with the
class.”
“Because this can happen, we have created a “Question Box” which can be used by placing
an anonymous (or named) question, suggestion or any other kind of feedback on a piece of
paper. This is to help ensure that you feel like this is a safe environment where all of your
question’s – no matter how long or short, simple or difficult they are - can be heard as long as
they are appropriate to the conversation. Alternatively, you may stick your hand up if you
have a question at any point during the class. The question box will be located next to the
door and is available every lesson in our classroom or between class times too at the HPE
staff room. It is also worth noting that the door is our primary fire exit in the event of an
emergency so cannot be blocked at any time. Remember, chances are if you are thinking of
asking the question, then someone else is too.”
Ice breakers:
2 truths, 1 lie
3
- They are to write down three facts about themselves – however two must be true and
one must be a lie.
- The teacher should provide an example about themselves which students are to guess:
e.g. I teach HPE at this school (truth)
I enjoy participating in sport (truth)
I have competed at the Olympics (lie)
- Students are to write their three “facts” down and partner up with another student
nearby.
- Students take turns to read out their three “facts” and guess which of the three their lie
is. They may also stand up, move around, and repeat this process with other
students too.
This game has been adapted from the idea “human bingo” as described in McDonald (2010).
- Students receive a bingo card (see resource 1 below) with a 4x4 grid of information which
students could have in common with each other.
- The aim of the game is to walk around and meet other students, asking them if they share
one of the same boxes in common (as found on the bingo card). (Remind students to
tuck in their chair’s)
- If students have the same thing in common as listed on the card, then they place each-
others names down for ONE of those categories only and continue to search for other
students with things in common.
- This game has two challenges – first is to list up to four names in a row (up, down or
diagonal) then second is to finish the sheet with a different students name in each box.
45 Introduce a partner
Students find a partner (group of three is fine if there are uneven numbers) with something in
common from the previous game and take a seat together. Let students know:
“You will get a few minutes to find out a bit more about your partners before introducing
them to the class.”
Students are then given three minutes to have a brief chat about each-other.
After having met their classmates and completing introductions, the teacher is to direct
student’s attention towards the board.
4
The teacher is to write up on the board “Classroom Rules and standards” and direct
students towards this statement.
Teacher states:
“Okay, so I hope you’ve all enjoyed todays class. We will now be going through a set of
rules and standards that can be used for our class for the year. If you have a point, then please
share it and I’ll scribe it up on the board. Alternatively, there is also the “Question Box”
available if you would like to drop an anonymous piece of feedback or suggestion also.”
Accordingly, students are given a chance to set the rules for the class. Students are
encouraged to take notes related to this. Teacher to facilitate discussion and ensure fair and
equal input occurs.
An important part of this process is allowing the students the freedom to assist with setting
the rules as it encourages positive social interactions to occur (Board of Studies, 2003b).
As this is the case, the teacher will have a prepared list of rules for reference (see resource 2
below), though will avoid referring to them to allow this task to be student directed.
“Thank you very much for your input. I will ensure these rules are checked over and
available for the next lesson, along with any additional rules or standards we may have
missed. Before the next lesson I would like you to think through what we discussed and any
notes you’ve taken about the rules and standards for next weeks’ discussion. Don’t forget to
bring a workbook (exercise book) if you haven’t already.”
60 Remember my name
Students stand up, spread out around the room and pass the ball to each other.
At the start, when students catch the ball they state their name.
As students become more familiar with the game and each-others names, the rules can be
changed so that students are calling the name of the person they are passing to.
How am I measuring the outcomes of this lesson?
Relating to others The group activities throughout this lesson are able to reveal: a. how students
interact one-to-one with their peers and b. how students respond to the teacher
during class discussion. Observations about attitudes, values and ability of
students to relate to others can be made during both formal and teacher and
5
student directed discussion/activity times.
Communication skills As this will be the first time the teacher and students meet in a classroom setting,
communication is vital to this lesson. The majority of activities in this lesson are
student centred which grants more room for teacher observation.
6
Lesson plan analysis
Evaluate the lesson plan according to the following NSW Quality Teaching model elements.
Evaluation score – refer to NSW QTM Classroom Practice Guide for each element
1 Intellectual quality
1.1 Deep knowledge
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments:
5 The teacher is expected to provide some sort of knowledge for the students, and is expected
to provide more sophisticated learning, rather than focusing only on games/activities.
1.5 Metalanguage
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments:
5 The teacher is expected to use PDHPE vocabulary when interacting with the students. It is
expected that the teacher explores language within resources through terms and definitions.
7
2.2 Engagement
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments:
5 The teacher has produced the lesson and assessment activities which allow most students to
be engaged. However, engagement is not necessarily observable in written tasks.
2.3 High expectations
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments:
5 The teacher communicates high expectations, rules and standards for all students. The
teacher produces tasks and sets the tone from the very first lesson.
2.4 Social support
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments:
5 The teacher provides a positive supporting learning environment, based on respect and
interactions. Ice-breakers create new friendships and the drop box supports shy students.
2.5 Students’ self-regulation
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments:
5 The teacher allows students to demonstrate initiative and autonomy through the activities.
The lesson is more student focused, allowing the teacher to sit back.
2.6 Student direction
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments:
5 The teacher does not allow students to direct their own learning. It is expected the teacher
would allow the selection of activities and manner of how activities will be done by students.
3 Significance
3.1 Background knowledge
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments:
5 The teacher is expected to build lessons regularly form the background knowledge of the
students’. The teacher is expected to allow students to link old and new knowledge.
3.2 Cultural knowledge
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments:
5 The teacher integrates cultural knowledge and awareness into the lessons through all the
activities. The teacher enables students to communicate and discover about each other.
3.3 Knowledge integration
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments:
5 The teacher provides a link between the first lesson and the next, and within key learning
areas. It is expected the teacher would allow each lesson to flow amongst different topics.
3.4 Inclusivity
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments:
5 The teacher has designed the lesson allowing all students to be included. The teacher values
diversity, and allows students’ to understand differences in social and cultural backgrounds.
3.5 Connectedness
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments:
5 The teacher produces an environment where students’ gain trust of one another, learning
each other’s names and cultural backgrounds, connecting with the outside world.
3.6 Narrative
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – Comments:
5 It is expected that the teacher would discuss personal stories or other narrative techniques,
which they have not done.
Identify the four NSW QT model elements you are targeting for improvement.
QT model
1) Higher order thinking 2) Metalanguage
3) Student direction 4) Narrative
8
Modified lesson plan
Lesson Plan
XXYYZZ Classroom
9
Assessment task - the qualities of
“group effective
presentation end communication
of the term about
adolescent LS.2-the nature and
development purpose of physical
changes during
puberty
10
5 min Teacher directs students to kahoot. Questions will ask:
1. What is puberty?
2. Define adolescence?
3. What age group is an adolescent?
4. Changes in adolescence are caused by?
Teacher defines puberty and discusses sexual organs and physical and emotional
changes.
Teacher discusses with the students their feelings about puberty and teacher
13min shares personal experiences during school, being a late maturing boy.
Respect each student's comfort level.
2min
YouTu Explain that they will work as a class to find out the following information about
be clip puberty:
Students will watch a short 2 minute YouTube clip that discusses puberty.
20min
Students will be split into small groups of approximately 5.
Each group will choose a topic within adolescent development which underpins
puberty, for example: cognitive development or emotional development etc.
Students will research the changes Involved in the development using their smart
devices, readings and prior knowledge.
Students will answer questions, and come up with interventions to manage the
changes, ex; mindfulness can enhance social and emotional development for
adolescents.
11
Students develop an engaging way to present their results to the class.
Conclu The teacher will tell the students to pack up and will recap the main ideas learnt
sion this lesson, acknowledging those students who behaved and participated.
Discusses what students will be learning next lesson.
5min
The teacher may ask:
Reflection
12
Academic justification
Although the original lesson plan was detailed, it is primarily an hour’s worth of ice-breakers,
and the activities are based on students getting to know one another. It neglects other areas
within the Australian Professional standards for Teachers and elements within the quality
student direction and narrative, which would have strengthened the lesson plan (AITSL,
2016).
Even though the original lesson plan acknowledges the influence of Information and
Communication Technologies (ICT) on learning, it does not implement ICT in any activities
in the first lesson. Learning through technologies and activities gives rise to differentiation,
as Handa (2013) identifies that differentiated learning allows teachers to be flexible to work
with the student’s interests, learning needs and abilities. ICT may further promote effective
instructions, meeting the learning needs of all students, and enhancing learning for gifted and
The modified lesson plan allows for group based learning, increasing perceived support
amongst students (French, Walker, & Shore, 2011). The benefit of group work for students is
extensive on both a social and academic level (Beccaria, Kek, Huijser, Rose, & Kimmins,
2014). Group work allows students to develop a greater awareness of group dynamics and
processes, they develop leadership skills, critical thinking, communication, social skills,
problem-solving skills, and develop personal growth and peer support networks (Beccaria,
Kek, Huijser, Rose, & Kimmins, 2014). It also allows students to develop responsibility and
self-autonomy, which are key concepts for the development of learning (Burdett & Hastie,
2009).
13
The modifications in the lesson plan allow students to develop metalanguage in PDHPE
language and health literacy, which the original lesson plan lacks. Daffern (2010) identifies
teachers who use metalanguage in their teaching lessons develop student’s autonomy and
confidence in spelling, and content knowledge. Metalanguage shows how symbols and
language may be used to construct power, knowledge and texts (Ludwig & Gore, 2003).
The integration of ICT is implemented through an educational YouTube clip and kahoot quiz
understanding and learning (Burton, 2012). ICT integration enables students to develop their
thinking, as well as increasing the ability of students to collaborate and communicate (Yuen,
Law, & Wong, 2003). This is further beneficial, considering the original lesson plan lacks
higher order thinking. Critical thinking and problem-solving leads towards higher order
thinking, which is easily implemented when ICT is incorporated into the lessons (Yuen, Law,
& Wong, 2003), and when students are asked to evaluate or manipulate ideas when asked a
question (Ludwig & Gore, 2003). Kim, Seitz, & Shams (2008) found that learning was more
Another modification to the lesson was implementing student direction into the lesson.
Compared with the original lesson plan, students now have more control into the method they
want to present to the class, whether through posters, speech or role-play, as well as given a
choice about the topic of adolescent development they want to discuss. Ludwig & Gore
(2003) claim that low student direction results when students do not have control over the
giving students a choice, leading towards enhanced levels of motivation for learning. When
compared to teaching that does not incorporate autonomy, declines in motivation to learn
14
occur, particularly when it comes to PDHPE participation, due to students not having a
choice, the teacher becomes controlling, causing boredom and reducing creativity
Narrative was an element that was lacking significantly throughout the lesson plan. The
modified lesson plan gives rise to narrative in the body of the lesson, as the teacher mentions
discussing personal puberty experiences with the rest of the class. The use of narrative
provides students with information that may be used positively to enhance self-
understanding, and the understanding of certain situations and of others, helping students gain
a perspective on their own life, and focusing on education through a lens of sharing lived
experiences (Bunkers, 2005). This enhances the significance of the lesson (Ludwig & Gore,
2003), as Patiño-Santos (2015) claims that narratives gives identity through postmodern
understanding and validation of research, enabling students to develop a resource that allows
them to draw upon as they construct their identities, and gives a voice to the marginalized
students.
1650 words
15
References
http://www.aitsl.edu.au/australian-professional-standards-forteachers/standards/list
Beccaria, L., Kek, M., Huijser, H., Rose, J., & Kimmins, L. (2014). The interrelationships
Berman, K., Schultz, R., & Weber, C. (2012). A Lack of Awareness and Emphasis in
Burdett, J., & Hastie, B. (2009). Predicting satisfaction with group work assignments.
Middle School Science Teachers Using Interactive Lessons, ProQuest Dissertations and
Theses.
French, L., Walker, C., & Shore, B. (2011). Do Gifted Students Really Prefer to Work
Kim, R., Seitz, A., & Shams, L. (2008). Benefits of Stimulus Congruency for Multisensory
16
Leptokaridou, E., Vlachopoulos, S., & Papaioannou, A. (2016). Experimental longitudinal
Ludwig, J., & Gore, J. (2003). Quality Teaching in NSW Public Schools A classroom practice
Quality_Teaching_Guide.pdf
Yuen, A., Law, N., & Wong, K. (2003). ICT implementation and school leadership. Journal
17
Learning Portfolio Web Link
https://rabiehsabouh.weebly.com
18