Structural Deformation Monitoring Surveys of New Administrative Building of Federal School of Surveying, Oyo - Nigeria
Structural Deformation Monitoring Surveys of New Administrative Building of Federal School of Surveying, Oyo - Nigeria
Structural Deformation Monitoring Surveys of New Administrative Building of Federal School of Surveying, Oyo - Nigeria
net/publication/296923859
CITATIONS READS
0 545
2 authors:
All content following this page was uploaded by Nura Yelwa on 06 March 2016.
http://www.ejournalofsciences.org
ABSTRACT
Structural monitoring is carried out to reduce cases of building collapse thereby enhancing safety conditions for the
inhabitants. During this survey, the use of measuring techniques which are geodetic are determined considering the type of
the structure of which deformations will be monitored, its environmental conditions and expected accuracy from the
measurements. Different structural monitoring requires certain kind of techniques. According to the profession,
deformation monitoring techniques and instrumentation of geodetic surveys include conventional measures such as precise
levelling measurements, angle and distance measurements, photogrammetric: terrestrial, aerial and digital
photogrammetry, satellite: such as Global Positioning System-GPS, and some special techniques were employed.
The control network points were positioned using GPS measuring technique for both new and existing pillars and height
differences were supported with precise leveling measurements; and Total Station equipment for angular observations
which employed intersection method. Afterward, deformation analysis using the height differences according to provided
data from the GPS and the precise levelling were carried out separately. The result of the analyses shows that the building
is stable both horizontally and vertically, and there were no noticeable displacement on the structure; as such it is safe to
dwell in it.
http://www.ejournalofsciences.org
methods was practically measured using Total Station, monitoring systems, the accuracy, availability, reliability
Global Positioning System, Geodetic Level, Lasers, and integrity of the positioning solutions is heavily
Tiltmeters, Strainmeters, Extensometers, Joint-meters, dependent on the number and geometric distribution of
Plumb lines, Micrometers and any other high precision satellites being tracked. However, in some situations,
equipment for geometric data acquisition. such as in urban canyons, dam monitoring in valleys and
in deep open-cut mines, the number of visible satellites
The major motivation of this study is geodetic may not be sufficient to reliably determine precise
techniques in monitoring deformations of engineering coordinates. Furthermore, it is impossible to use GPS for
structures and analyzing. In determining deformations indoor applications.
according to geodetic techniques constitutes terrestrial
measurement techniques or space based positioning Global Positioning System offers advantages over
techniques and/or combination of both techniques. conventional terrestrial methods. Intervisibility between
stations is not strictly necessary, allowing greater
1.1 Study Area flexibility in the selection of station locations than for
terrestrial geodetic surveys. Measurements can be
The site of the project is located within Longitude 070 carried out during night or day, under varying weather
50’ 32” and latitude 030 57’ 08”; New Administrative conditions, which makes GPS measurements
building of Federal School of Surveying, part of Oyo economical, especially when multiple receivers can be
East Local Government of Old Oyo Town, Oyo State. deployed on the structure during the survey. With the
Located towards the school staff quarters, bounded on recent developed rapid static positioning techniques, the
the sides and behind by staff quarters and farmlands. time for the measurements at each station is reduced to a
few minutes [6].
Oyo State Nigeria GPS survey techniques can often be used to establish or
densify project controls more efficiently than
conventional control surveying techniques. Quality
control statistics and redundant measurements in GPS
networks help to ensure reliable results. Field operations
to perform a GPS survey are relatively easy and can
generally be performed by one person per receiver, with
two or more receivers required to transfer control. GPS
does not require inter-visibility between adjacent
stations. However, GPS must have visibility of at least
four satellites (for position determination) during
surveying. This requirement may make GPS
inappropriate in areas of dense vegetation [6].
http://www.ejournalofsciences.org
The geodetic techniques employed for deformation instruments, method of data acquisition, to
studies of the New Building complexes, are first order forecast/prepare for circumstances that may spring up in
intersection and precise leveling. The techniques give the course of executing any survey project. It requires
both absolute and relative value. The computations visitation of the site, checking for existing control points,
involved are: intersection computation and adjustment, and collection of coordinates which the work to be tied.
leveling computation and adjustment, GPS data
processing and transformation, variation of coordinates. These are collection of coordinates to be used (X,Y,Z),
The best technique that can be adopted for adjusting the base map if there is any, description of control stations
final product is the least squares adjustment. The X, Y, Z and bench mark points to be used and relevant
coordinates of all points would be generated from the information which could be instrumental towards the
acquired data. Necessary reductions and computations success of the project execution as shown in table 1.
would be performed after which least squares adjustment
would be used to adjust all the appropriate parameters. This is done in order to get acquainted with the project
site, to locate existing pillars, fix positions for
The measurement of relative movement is generally establishing new controls and structural pillars, fix best
much easier since movements are related to the structure positions for survey lines to ensure intervisibility.
itself or to some arbitrary points nearby. These may
move during a survey but this does not affect the result Table 1: Coordinates of GPS control used
obtained. While, absolute measurements on the other
hand are related to datum points that are assumed not to
move during a survey. The accuracy required for a Source: Archive, F.S.S. OYO.
deformation survey depends on many factors including
the type and the size of the building or structure, what is 3.2 Monumentation
causing the movement (environment factors or loading)
and whether an understanding of the movement is PILLAR EASTING( NORTHING( HEIGHT REMARK
m) m) (m)
needed. XSN 07 170112.050 424788.294 309.972 Horizontal &
Vertical Control
3. METHODOLOGY FSS1/9 170212.282 425117.072 304.661 Horizontal &
Vertical Control
FSS1/40/ 167954.629 425493.585 298.365 Horizontal &
Survey methods, principles and procedures adopted in 49 Vertical Control
the course of carrying out the surveyinvolves the SBM 300.923 Vertical Control
preliminary planning in the office, choice of instrument OYO
selection, field operations and data collection. As shown
in the work flow figure 2 below. This is the construction or fixing of control points
monuments around the structural building to be surveyed
for both the structural and control network points.
Monitoring Plan The lawn pillars were buried all around the structure
with a distance of not more than 30m. The pillars were
Maximum made of concrete mixed in the ratio of 3:2:1 proportion
Accuracy Pre-analysis &
Expected
Displacement
Requirement Survey Design of sharp sands, crushed stone/gravel to a part of cement
in accordance with survey rules and regulations [8][9].
The dimension of the pillar is 75cm long, 18cm in
section with 5cm above the ground and 70cm below the
Network Data Data ground surface with identifier as shown in figure 3. The
Adjustment Reduction Collection
identification numbers are BMSC 400, BMSC 401,
BMSC 402, BMSC 403, BMSC 404, BMSC 405, BMSC
406, and BMSC 407.
Deformation Data
Modeling Presentation
http://www.ejournalofsciences.org
18cm 18cm
BMSC 400
70cm
3.3 Instrumentation
Figure 5: Two peg Test Diagram (from the software)
The instruments used in the execution of the project
include; Hardware and Software these are: Leica GPS 3.4 CONTROL CHECK
1200 receivers and its accessories; Leica TCA 1201+
and its accessories; Leica Geodetic Digital Level (DNA Vertical control check
03) and its accessories; Geodetic leveling staffs; Tripods;
Target; Plumb bob; Steel tape; Nails; Cutlass; and Field Suitability of the control points XSN07 and FSS1/9 for
book. While for the software are: Leica Geo-office vertical positioning was also checked. SBM OYO bench
combined; DATUM software for coordinate mark was used for the checking. Geodetic digital level
transformation; least square adjustment software; and was used for this operation. The leveling was run from
Microsoft office suite. the SBM OYO to the control XSN 07 and FSS1/9. The
point identifier and the corresponding observed height
The entire instruments used were tested to ascertain their are tabulated in table 2 below.
accuracy and suitability for data acquisition. The
instruments tested were Leica GPS 1200 receiver, Leica
Digital geodetic level (DNA 03) and Leica Total Station
TCA 1201+.
Ground Level
Ground Level
A B Figure 6: Geodetic level control checking from SBM/OYO
to XSN 07
Figure 3: Total Station setup
Volume 6 No.1, January 2016 ISSN 2224-3577
International Journal of Science and Technology
http://www.ejournalofsciences.org
Table 2: Vertical Control Check Readings Thereafter, the position of the reference was shifted to
(FSS1/9 &XSN 07) XSN 07 and rover to FSS1 40/96 and then to FSS1/9.
The operation was repeated for the third time by placing
Station Known Observation Difference the reference on FSS1/9 and the rover to FSS1/40/96 and
Station Elevation (m) XSN07 respectively. The acquired and transformed
XSN07 309.972 309.9748 -0.0028 coordinates are tabulated in tables 3, 4 and 5 below.
FSS1/9 304.661 304.6585 -0.0025
For
Where
http://www.ejournalofsciences.org
http://www.ejournalofsciences.org
L1=Sinαij/(LijSin1”), L2=Sinαik/(Lijsin1”)
FSS/SP/06 FSS/SP/09 405
BMSC
FSS/SP/10
BMSC
406
Normalization, Solution
FSS/SP/05 FSS/SP/11
FSS/SP/12
FSS/SP/03
FSS/SP/04
FSS/SP/13 ‘δ’ = (ATPA)-1 AT PL. Where P = W (weight), W = 1/δ2.
Centenary Administrative Complex BMSC Variance was also computed.
407
BMSC
401
Table 7: Co-efficient of correction
Not Drawn to scale
BMSC
400
Ei Ni Ej Nj Ek O-C
Figure 14: Intersection Observation to Structural Beacons
of New Administrative Complex (For all the Epochs) K1- L1- 0 Angle O-
K2 L2 L1 K2 C
http://www.ejournalofsciences.org
http://www.ejournalofsciences.org
Table 11: Shows the acquired data and their differences of New Administrative building
EPOCH 1 EPOCH 2 EPOCH 3 DIFF. & MEAN DIFF. & MEAN MEANS
POINT ∆X1 ∆Y1 ∆Z1 ∆X2 ∆Y2 ∆Z2 ∆X3 ∆Y3 X1- ∆X1- ∆X Y1- Y1- ∆Y ∆Z
ID X2 ∆X3 Y2 Y3
FSS/SP 0 0 - 0.001 -0.0042
01 308.7887 308.793 170404.318 424755.097 0.001
FSS/SP 0.003 0.003 - 0.001 0.0015
02 308.441 308.44 170432.034 424768.038 0.001
FSS/SP 0 0.0007 0.0004 0 0.023 0.0115 0.0001
03 170435.47 424762.086 308.91 170435.47 424762.1 308.91 170435.477 424762.063
FSS/SP - 0.0001 0 0 0.0002
04 308.9885 308.988 170434.966 424760.78 0.0001
FSS/SP 0.024 0.024 - 0.005 -0.0007
05 309.0817 309.082 170430.264 424757.631 0.005
FSS/SP 0.016 0.016 0.004 0.004 -0.001
06 309.5339 309.535 170438.135 424741.666
FSS/SP 0.021 0.021 - 0.006 -0.0017
07 309.7324 309.734 170437.596 424740.647 0.006
FSS/SP -0.023 0.023 0.008 0 -0.0017
08 310.0404 310.042 170421.491 424733.086
FSS/SP 170420.534 424733.766 424733.8 - 0.01 0.009 - - 0.004 -0.0003
09 310.1147 170420.541 310.118 170420.544 424733.771 0.007 0.003 0.005
FSS/SP -0.0005
10 309.6088 309.609
FSS/SP 170421.16 424746.129 170421.166 424746.1 - 0.004 0.005 -0.01 - 0.013 -0.0019
11 309.387 309.389 170421.170 424746.144 0.006 0.015
FSS/SP 170410.556 424749.382 170410.556 0 0 0 0.006 0.012 0.009 -0.0014
12 309.4152 424749.4 309.417 170410.556 424749.37
FSS/SP 170405.374 424751.138 170405.369 0.005 0.008 0.007 0.034 0.054 0.044 -0.0021
13 308.9857 424751.2 308.988 170405.366 424751.192
Volume 6 No.1, January 2016 ISSN 2224-3577
International Journal of Science and Technology
http://www.ejournalofsciences.org
Table 12: Shows Comparison between first, second and third epoch of New Administrative building
http://www.ejournalofsciences.org
Table 13: Shows comparison between 2011 and 2012 results data and their differences of the New Administrative building
POINT ID ∆X1 ∆Y1 ∆Z1 ∆X2 ∆Y2 ∆Z2 X1-X2 Y1-Y2 ∆Z1-Z2
FSS/SP 01 170404.389 424755.136 308.8005 170404.318 424755.1 308.7929 0.0711 0.0387 0.0076
FSS/SP 02 170432.128 424768.086 308.4499 170432.034 424768.04 308.4395 0.0935 0.0484 0.0104
FSS/SP 03 170435.523 424762.127 308.9208 170435.477 424762.06 308.9099 0.0462 0.0638 0.0109
FSS/SP 04 170435.042 424760.826 308.9978 170434.966 424760.78 308.9883 0.076 0.0464 0.0095
FSS/SP 05 170430.356 424757.677 309.092 170430.264 424757.63 309.0824 0.0916 0.0464 0.0096
FSS/SP 06 170438.206 424741.718 309.5435 170438.135 424741.67 309.5349 0.0714 0.0522 0.0086
FSS/SP 07 170437.669 424740.7 309.7424 170437.596 424740.65 309.7341 0.0734 0.0534 0.0083
FSS/SP 08 170421.621 424733.166 310.0503 170421.491 424733.09 310.0421 0.1304 0.0795 0.0082
FSS/SP 09 170420.615 424733.825 310.1256 170420.544 424733.77 310.1177 0.071 0.0542 0.0079
FSS/SP 10 170418.161 424739.834 309.6181 170418.06 424739.75 309.6093 0.1011 0.0879 0.0088
FSS/SP 11 170421.253 424746.208 309.3975 170421.17 424746.14 309.3889 0.0826 0.0642 0.0086
FSS/SP 12 170410.633 424749.646 309.4258 170410.556 424749.37 309.4166 0.0768 0.2761 0.0092
FSS/SP 13 170405.437 424751.567 308.9955 170405.366 424751.19 308.9878 0.0714 0.3751 0.0077
Volume 6 No.1, January 2016 ISSN 2224-3577
International Journal of Science and Technology
http://www.ejournalofsciences.org
Table 14: Magnitude and comments of the comparison between 2011 and 2012 (Magnitude of horizontal and vertical displacement)
http://www.ejournalofsciences.org
424730
[1]. Erol, S., Erol, B. &Ayan, T. (2005): A General
170400 170420 170440
Review of the Deformation
MonitoringTechniques and a case study:
Figure 15: Comparison of Structural Horizontal Analysing Deformations using GPS/Levelling,
Movement ITU, Civil Engineering Faculty, Geodesy
Division, 34469 Maslak Istanbul, Turkey. 6P
http://www.ejournalofsciences.org
of the Army, Washington DC. No. 1110-2-1009, [8]. SURCON, (2003): Specification for Geodetic
Pp 2-5 to 2-6. Surveys in Nigeria, Surveyors’ Council of
Nigeria. Printed by Wale AjayiEnt. Lagos 66P.
[7]. GIS PARK (2011): “Design and Application of
Deformation Monitoring Information [9]. SURCON, (2010): Specification for Large Scale
Management and Construction Safety”: Cadastral and Engineering Surveys in Nigeria,
Predicting and Alarm System, Pg 18-20. (Latest edition). Surveyors’ Council of Nigeria,
Printed by Wale AjayiEnt. Lagos. 11P.