Medicaid Fraud in South Carolina - A Review For SC Health Care Fraud Lawyers, Attorneys and Law Firms
Medicaid Fraud in South Carolina - A Review For SC Health Care Fraud Lawyers, Attorneys and Law Firms
Medicaid Fraud in South Carolina - A Review For SC Health Care Fraud Lawyers, Attorneys and Law Firms
The State of South Carolina has enacted several criminal statutes in order to
combat health care fraud at the state, as opposed to the federal, level. Health care
fraud in the State of South Carolina is exploding, and the state is aggressively
prosecuting health care fraud crimes. Health care providers, including hospitals,
outpatient surgery centers, ambulatory surgery centers, doctors, nurses nursing
home facilities, hospices, and health care administrators, as well as their lawyers,
attorneys and law firms, need to be aware of South Carolina’s criminal statutes
which are used to fight those who would seek to commit fraud with respect to
health care services. SC criminal defense health care fraud attorneys, lawyers and
law firms need to be aware of these statutes in order to assess potential criminal
activity and properly advise client’s about their conduct.
The South Carolina “Presenting False Claims for Payment” statute, found at S.C.
Code Ann. § 38-55-170, provides that a person who knowingly causes, assists with,
solicits, or conspires in the presentation of a false claim to an insurer, health
maintenance organization, or to any person (including the State of South Carolina)
providing benefits for health care in South Carolina is, depending upon the amount
of the claim, guilty of anywhere from a misdemeanor for which the person can be
fined and imprisoned to a felony whereby the person is subject to imprisonment for
ten years and/or a fine of five thousand dollars.
The South Carolina Medicaid False Claims Statute, set forth at S.C. Code Ann. § 43-
7-60, provides criminal, civil, and administrative penalties and sanctions related to
health care providers who knowingly and willfully make a false statement in an
application or request for a benefit, reimbursement or in a report or certificate
submitted to the Medicaid program. The Medicaid False Claims Statute also
provides that it is unlawful for a provider to knowingly and willfully conceal or fail to
disclose any material fact which affects the provider’s initial or continued
entitlement to reimbursement or the amount of payment under the Medicaid
program. Each false claim or concealed fact constitutes a separate offense.
A person who violates the Medicaid False Claims Statute is guilty of a misdemeanor
and subject to imprisonment for up to three years and a fine of not more than one
thousand dollars per offense. In addition, the Attorney General may bring a civil
action to recover treble damages and seek penalties of two thousand dollars per
false claim. The state agency administering the Medicaid program may impose
additional administrative sanctions on providers convicted under the Statute.
A person who violates the provisions of this statute is guilty of medical assistance
recipient fraud, a misdemeanor, and upon conviction must be imprisoned not more
than three years or fined not more than one thousand dollars, or both.
The South Carolina Insurance Fraud and Reporting Immunity Act, set forth at S.C.
Code Ann. § 38-55-510, et seq., provides for criminal and civil penalties related to
insurance fraud and established an Insurance Fraud Division in the office of the
Attorney General to prosecute health care insurance and health care fraud
violations.
The term “false statement and misrepresentation” is defined as one made with
knowledge and the intent of obtaining an undeserved economic benefit or deny
another a benefit in connection with an insurance transaction. Any person or insurer
who makes a “false statement or misrepresentation” is, depending upon the
amount received and number of offenses, guilty of anywhere from a misdemeanor,
thirty days imprisonment or fine to a felony, ten years imprisonment, and a fifty
thousand dollar fine. In all cases the person must make full restitution to the victim
of the health care fraud.
In addition to criminal liability, a person who violates the statute faces potential civil
fines up to fifteen thousand dollars and may be ordered to pay court costs and
attorneys’ fees to the director of the Insurance Fraud Division which retains the
fines for use in enforcing and administering the Act.
Any person, insurer, or agency (1) having reason to believe that another has made
a false statement or misrepresentation, or (2) has knowledge of a suspected false
statement or representation shall notify the Insurance Fraud Division. If the
reporter acts without malice or in good faith, the reporter is immune from any
liability arising out of the report.
The South Carolina Computer Crime Act, S.C. Code Ann. § 16-16-10, et seq.,
provides criminal penalties related to causing direct or indirect access to a
computer for, among other things, the purpose of devising or executing a fraud
scheme or obtaining money, property or services by means of false or fraudulent
pretenses, representations or promises. This statute may be used to prosecute
criminal activity in which computers are used to fraudulently obtain health care
payments or benefits.
Any person convicted or computer crime is, depending upon the amount of the
victim’s loss and number of offenses, guilty of anywhere from a misdemeanor, thirty
days imprisonment or fine of not more than two hundred dollars to a felony, five
years imprisonment, and/or a fifty thousand dollar fine.
Pursuant to the South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (“DHHS”)
Regulations, “Administrative Sanctions Against Medicaid Providers,” found at S.C.
Code of Regulations R. 126-400, et seq., the Administrator of Medicaid may invoke
administrative sanctions against a Medicaid provider who has been determined to
have abused the Medicaid Program. “Abuse” is defined as provider practices that
are inconsistent with sound fiscal, business, or medical practices and result in
unnecessary cost to the Medicaid Program, reimbursement for medically
unnecessary services, or services that fail to meet professionally recognized
standards for health care.
Grounds for sanctioning providers under the DHHS regulations include presenting a
false claim for services, submitting false information to obtain greater compensation
than that to which the provider is entitled, overutilization, conviction for a criminal
offense related to Medicaid or Medicare, failure to meet standards required by State
or Federal law for participation in Medicaid, and other acts. Sanctions may include
educational intervention, peer review, recoupment of overpayments, suspension,
termination, post-payment or prepayment review of claims, and referral to licensing
and certifying boards or agencies.
The factors considered in determining sanctions include, but are not limited to: the
seriousness of the offense; the extent of violation; history of prior violation(s); prior
imposition of sanction; and, the providers failure to obey program rules and policies
as specified in the appropriate Provider Manual or other official notices.
South Carolina’s Medicaid Fraud Control Units are responsible for facilitating and
coordinating state efforts to identify and prosecute Medicaid fraud and abuse.
Federal legislation, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1396a(a)(61), required each state to establish a
Medicaid Fraud Control Unit by 1995 to fight Medicaid fraud by health care
providers and health care beneficiaries.
The primary duties and responsibilities of Medicaid Fraud Control Units are:
• To conduct a statewide program for investigating and prosecuting violations
of all applicable State laws pertaining to fraud in (a) the administration of the
Medicaid program; (b) the provision of medical assistance; or, (c) the
activities of providers of medical assistance under the State Medicaid plan.
See 42 U.S.C.A. § 1396b(q); 42 C.F.R. § 1007.11(a).
The following are the actual provisions of some of the foregoing South Carolina
criminal statutes:
This article is known and may be cited as the "Omnibus Insurance Fraud and
Reporting Immunity Act".
(B) "Insurer" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 38-1-20(25) and includes
any authorized insurer, self-insurer, reinsurer, broker, producer, or any agent
thereof.
(E) "Immune" means that neither a civil action nor a criminal prosecution may arise
from any action taken pursuant to this article unless actual malice on the part of the
reporting person or gross negligence or reckless disregard for the rights of the
reported person is present.
(A) A person who knowingly makes a false statement or misrepresentation, and any
other person knowingly, with an intent to injure, defraud, or deceive, or who assists,
abets, solicits, or conspires with a person to make a false statement or
misrepresentation, is guilty of a:
(1) misdemeanor, for a first offense violation, if the amount of the economic
advantage or benefit received is less than one thousand dollars. Upon conviction,
the person must be fined not less than one hundred nor more than five hundred
dollars or imprisoned not more than thirty days;
(2) misdemeanor, for a first offense violation, if the amount of the economic
advantage or benefit received is one thousand dollars or more but less than ten
thousand dollars. Upon conviction, the person must be fined not less than two
thousand nor more than ten thousand dollars or imprisoned not more than three
years, or both;
(3) felony, for a first offense violation, if the amount of the economic advantage or
benefit received is ten thousand dollars or more but less than fifty thousand dollars.
Upon conviction, the person must be fined not less than ten thousand nor more
than fifty thousand dollars or imprisoned not more than five years, or both;
(4) felony, for a first offense violation, if the amount of the economic advantage or
benefit received is fifty thousand dollars or more. Upon conviction, the person must
be fined not less than twenty thousand nor more than one hundred thousand dollars
or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both;
(5) felony, for a second or subsequent violation, regardless of the amount of the
economic advantage or benefit received. Upon conviction, the person must be fined
not less than twenty thousand nor more than one hundred thousand dollars or
imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
(B) In addition to the criminal penalties set forth in subsection (A), a person
convicted pursuant to the provisions of this section must be ordered by the court to
make full restitution to a victim for any economic advantage or benefit which has
been obtained by the person as a result of that violation, and to pay the difference
between any taxes owed and any taxes the person paid, if applicable.
SECTION 38-55-550. Civil penalties for violations of article; costs; payment; use of
revenues; Attorney General to assist Insurance Fraud Division; consent agreements.
(A) In addition to any criminal liability, any person who is found by a court of
competent jurisdiction to have violated any provision of this article, including
Section 38-55-170, is subject to a civil penalty for each violation as follows:
(1) for a first offense, a fine not to exceed five thousand dollars;
(2) for a second offense, a fine of not less than five thousand dollars but not to
exceed ten thousand dollars;
(3) for a third and subsequent offense, a fine of not less than ten thousand dollars
but not to exceed fifteen thousand dollars.
(B) The civil penalty must be paid to the director of the Insurance Fraud Division to
be used in accordance with subsection (D) of this section. The court may also award
court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees to the director. When requested by the
director, the Attorney General may assign one or more deputies attorneys general
to assist the bureau in any civil court proceedings against the person.
(C) Nothing in subsections (A) and (B) shall be construed to prohibit the director of
the Insurance Fraud Division and the person alleged to be guilty of a violation of this
article from entering into a written agreement in which the person does not admit
or deny the charges but consents to payment of the civil penalty. A consent
agreement may not be used in a subsequent civil or criminal proceeding relating to
any violation of this article.
(D) All revenues from the civil penalties imposed pursuant to this section must be
used to provide funds for the costs of enforcing and administering the provisions of
this article.
(A) There is established in the office of the Attorney General a division to be known
as the Insurance Fraud Division, which must prosecute violations of Sections 38-55-
170 and 38-55-540 and related criminal insurance activity. Upon receipt of any
claims or allegations of violations of Section 38-55-170 and 38-55-540 and related
criminal insurance activity, the Attorney General shall forward the information to
the State Law Enforcement Division for investigation.
(B) The Attorney General, upon receipt of any claims or allegations of violations of
Sections 38-55-170 and 38-55-540 and related criminal insurance activity, is
empowered to:
(1) refer the matter for investigation to the State Law Enforcement Division;
(3) collect fines and restitution ordered by the court. Where considered appropriate,
the Attorney General may use the Setoff Debt Collection Act to collect fines and
restitution ordered as a result of actions brought pursuant to Sections 38-55-170
and 38-55-540.
(C) The State Law Enforcement Division shall investigate thoroughly all claims or
allegations of violations of Sections 38-55-170 and 38-55-540 and related criminal
insurance activity received from the Attorney General pursuant to this section.
(D) The Insurance Fraud Division of the Office of Attorney General and the
investigative services of the State law Enforcement Division as provided by this
section must be funded by an appropriation of not less than two hundred thousand
dollars annually from the general revenues of the State derived from the insurance
premium taxes collected by the Department of Insurance and/or from fines
assessed under Sections 38-55-170 and 38-55-540 which must be deposited in the
general revenue fund to the credit of the Office of the Attorney General and the
State Law Enforcement Division to offset the costs of this program; provided, that
the funds generated from these fines, to be utilized by either the Office of the
Attorney General or the State Law Enforcement Division shall not total more than
five hundred thousand dollars. These monies must be shared equally on a fifty-fifty
basis by the Office of the Attorney General and the State Law Enforcement Division,
and the balance must go to the general fund of the State.
(E) The Office of the Attorney General is authorized to hire, employ, and reasonably
equip one forensic accountant, and this forensic accountant must be assigned to
the Insurance Fraud Division of the Office of the Attorney General. A person is not
qualified to be hired and the Insurance Fraud Division may not hire a forensic
accountant unless he possesses and maintains a current license to engage in the
practice of accounting pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 2, Title 40.
(A) Any person, insurer, or authorized agency having reason to believe that another
has made a false statement or misrepresentation or has knowledge of a suspected
false statement or misrepresentation shall, for purposes of reporting and
investigation, notify the Insurance Fraud Division of the Office of the Attorney
General of the knowledge or belief and provide any additional information within his
possession relative thereto.
(B) Upon request by the Insurance Fraud Division, any person, insurer, or authorized
agency shall release to the Insurance Fraud Division any or all information relating
to any suspected false statement or misrepresentation including, but not limited to:
(2) policy premium payment records, audits, or other documents which are
available;
(3) history of previous claims, payments, fees, commission, service bills, or other
documents which are available; and
(4) other information relating to the investigation of the suspected false statement
or misrepresentation.
(D) Except as otherwise provided by law, any information furnished pursuant to this
section is privileged and shall not be part of any public record. Any information or
evidence furnished to an authorized agency pursuant to this section is not subject
to subpoena or subpoena duces tecum in any civil or criminal proceeding unless,
after reasonable notice to any person, insurer, or authorized agency which has an
interest in the information and after a subsequent hearing, a court of competent
jurisdiction determines that the public interest and any ongoing investigation will
not be jeopardized by obedience of the subpoena or subpoena duces tecum. The
Department of Insurance may receive and must maintain as confidential any
documents or information furnished to it by the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners or insurance departments of other states which is classified as
confidential by that association or state. The Department of Insurance may share
documents or information, including confidential documents or information, with the
National Association of Insurance Commissioners or insurance departments of other
states, if the association or other state agrees to maintain the same level of
confidentiality as is provided under South Carolina law. If the documents or
information received by the Department of Insurance from the National Association
of Insurance Commissioners or the insurance departments of other states involve
allegations of insurance fraud, the documents or information must be forwarded by
the Department of Insurance to the Insurance Fraud Division of the Office of the
Attorney General.
(A) A person, insurer, or authorized agency, when acting without malice or in good
faith, is immune from any liability arising out of filing reports, cooperating with
investigations by any authorized agency, or furnishing other information, whether
written or oral, and whether in response to a request by an authorized agency or
upon their own initiative, concerning any suspected, anticipated, or completed false
statement or misrepresentation when such reports or information are provided to or
received by any authorized agency.
(B) Nothing herein abrogates or modifies in any way common law or statutory
privilege or immunity heretofore enjoyed by any person, insurer, or authorized
agency.
(C) Nothing herein limits the liability of any person or insurer who, with malice or in
bad faith, makes a report of suspected fraud under the provisions of this article.
(1) for any information related to suspected fraudulent insurance acts provided to
an insurer; or
(2) for information related to suspected fraudulent insurance acts provided to the
National Insurance Crime Bureau or the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners.
Provided, however, that the qualified immunity against civil liability conferred on
any insurer or its designated employees shall be forfeited with respect to the
exchange or publication of any defamatory information with third persons not
expressly authorized by subsection (D) to share in such information.
The director of the Insurance Fraud Division in the Office of the Attorney General
shall annually report to the General Assembly regarding:
(A) the status of matters reported to the division, if not privileged information by
law;
(C) the number of matters referred to the State Law Enforcement Division for
investigation;
(D) the outcome of all investigations and prosecutions under this article, if not
privileged by law;
(E) the total amount of fines levied by the court and paid to or deposited by the
division; and
(1) "provider" includes a person who provides goods, services, or assistance and
who is entitled or claims to be entitled to receive reimbursement, payment, or
benefits under the state's Medicaid program. "Provider" also includes a person
acting as an employee, representative, or agent of the provider.
For purposes of this subsection, each fact, event, or transaction concealed or not
disclosed constitutes a separate offense.
(D) A person who violates the provisions of this section is guilty of medical
assistance provider fraud, a Class A misdemeanor and, upon conviction, must be
imprisoned not more than three years and fined not more than one thousand dollars
for each offense.
(E) In addition to all other remedies provided by law, the Attorney General may
bring an action to recover damages equal to three times the amount of an
overstatement or overpayment and the court may impose a civil penalty of two
thousand dollars for each false claim, representation, or overstatement made to a
state or federal agency which administers funds under the state's Medicaid
program. Upon a finding that the provider has violated a provision of this section,
the state agency which administers the Medicaid program may impose other
administrative sanctions against the provider authorized by law. A civil or criminal
action brought under this section may be filed or brought in either the county where
the false claim, statement, or representation originated or in the county in which
the false claim, statement, or representation was received by the Health and
Human Services Finance Commission or other agency of the State responsible for
administering the state's Medicaid Program.
(2) It is unlawful for any applicant, recipient, or other person acting on behalf of the
applicant or recipient knowingly and wilfully to conceal or fail to disclose any
material fact affecting the applicant's or recipient's initial or continued entitlement
to receive assistance, goods, or services under the state's Medicaid program.
(3) It is unlawful for a person eligible to receive benefits, services, or goods under
the Medicaid program to sell, lease, lend, or otherwise exchange rights, privileges,
or benefits to another person.
(B) A person who violates the provisions of this section is guilty of medical
assistance recipient fraud, a Class A misdemeanor and, upon conviction, must be
imprisoned not more than three years or fined not more than one thousand dollars,
or both.
(a) "Computer" means a device that performs logical, arithmetic, and memory
functions by manipulating impulses including, but not limited to, all input, output,
processing, storage, computer software, and communication facilities that are
connected or related to a computer in a computer system or computer network. For
the purposes of this section, "computer" includes, but is not limited to, mainframes,
servers, workstations, desktops, and notebooks; industrial controls such as
programmable logic controllers and supervisory control and data acquisition
systems; portable hand-held computing devices such as personal digital assistants
and digital cellular telephones; data communications network devices such as
routers and switches; and all other devices that are computer-based or
communicate with or are under the control of a computer such as appropriate
telephone switches, medical devices, and cable and satellite television interface
systems. "Computer" does not include automated typewriters or typesetters.
(b) "Computer network" means the interconnection of two or more computers, and
those devices and facilities through which an interconnection occurs.
(f) "Property" includes, but is not limited to, financial instruments, data, documents
associated with computer systems, and computer software, or copies thereof,
whether tangible or intangible, including both human and computer system
readable data, and data while in transit.
(g) "Services" include, but are not limited to, the use of the computer system,
computer network, computer programs, or data prepared for computer use, or data
obtained within a computer system, or data contained within a computer network.
(i) "Access" means to gain entry to, attempt to gain entry to, instruct, communicate
with, attempt to communicate with, store or alter data in, retrieve or remove data
from, or otherwise make use of or attempt to make use of the logical, arithmetic,
control, memory, storage, output, or communication functions of a computer,
computer system, or computer network.
(3) misusing computer or network services including, but not limited to, mail
transfer programs, file transfer programs, proxy servers, and web servers by
performing functions not authorized by the appropriate principal of the computer,
computer system, or computer network. Misuse of computer and network services
includes, but is not limited to, the unauthorized use of:
(i) mail transfer programs to send mail to persons other than the authorized users of
that computer or computer network;
(ii) file transfer program proxy services or proxy servers to access other computers,
computer systems, or computer networks; and
(iii) web servers to redirect users to other web pages or web servers;
(iv) the presence or versions of computer software including, but not limited to,
operating systems, computer services, or computer contaminants;
(v) the presence of a known computer software deficiency that can be used to gain
unauthorized access to a computer, computer system, or computer network; or
This group of computer programs does not include standard computer software
used for the normal operation, administration, management, and test of a
computer, computer system, or computer network including, but not limited to,
operating system services such as domain name services and mail transfer
services, network monitoring and management computer software such as the
computer programs commonly called "ping", "tcpdump", and " traceroute", and
systems administration computer software such as the computer programs
commonly known as "nslookup" and "whois". It is unlawful to intentionally and
knowingly use such computer software to access any computer, computer system,
or computer network to adversely affect computer or network access or
performance; and
Computer hacking does not include the introduction of a computer contaminant into
a computer, computer system, computer program, or computer network.
(1) a group of computer programs commonly known as "viruses" and "worms" that
are self-replicating or self-propagating, and that are designed to contaminate other
computer programs, compromise computer security, consume computer resources,
modify, destroy, record, or transmit data, or disrupt the normal operation of the
computer, computer system, or computer network;
(3) a group of computer programs commonly known as "zombies" that are designed
to use a computer without the knowledge and consent of the appropriate principal,
and that are designed to send large quantities of data to a targeted computer
network for the purpose of degrading the targeted computer's or network's
performance, or denying access through the network to the targeted computer or
network, resulting in what is commonly known as "Denial of Service" or "Distributed
Denial of Service" attacks; or
(4) a group of computer programs commonly known as "trap doors", "back doors",
or "root kits" that are designed to bypass standard authentication software, and
that are designed to allow access to or use of a computer without the knowledge or
consent of the appropriate principal.
(ii) the use of computer software not explicitly or implicitly authorized by the
appropriate principal or licensee of the computer software; or
(2) A person is guilty of computer crime in the first degree if the amount of gain
directly or indirectly derived from the offense made unlawful by subsection (1) or
the loss directly or indirectly suffered by the victim exceeds ten thousand dollars.
Computer crime in the first degree is a felony and, upon conviction, a person must
be fined not more than fifty thousand dollars or imprisoned not more than five
years, or both.
(3)(a) A person is guilty of computer crime in the second degree if the amount of
gain directly or indirectly derived from the offense made unlawful by subsection (1)
or the loss directly or indirectly suffered by the victim is greater than one thousand
dollars but not more than ten thousand dollars.
(b) A person is also guilty of computer crime in the second degree where:
(ii) he deprives the owner of possession of, or takes, transfers, conceals, or retains
possession of any computer, data, computer property, or computer-related
property, including all parts of a computer, computer system, computer network,
computer software, computer services, or information associated with a computer,
whether in a tangible or intangible form; or
(iii) the gain derived from the offense made unlawful by subsection (1) or loss
suffered by the victim cannot reasonably be ascertained.
(c) Computer crime in the second degree is a misdemeanor and, upon conviction for
a first offense, a person must be fined not more than ten thousand dollars or
imprisoned not more than one year, or both. Upon conviction for a second or
subsequent offense, a person is guilty of a misdemeanor and must be fined not
more than twenty thousand dollars or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
(4) A person is guilty of computer crime in the third degree if the amount of gain
directly or indirectly derived from the offense made unlawful by subsection (1) or
the loss directly or indirectly suffered by the victim is not more than one thousand
dollars. A person is also guilty of computer crime in the third degree if he wilfully,
knowingly, and without authorization or for an unauthorized purpose engages in
computer hacking. Computer crime in the third degree is a misdemeanor and, upon
conviction for a first offense, a person must be fined not more than two hundred
dollars or imprisoned not more than thirty days. Upon conviction for a second or
subsequent offense, a person must be fined not more than two thousand dollars or
imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
(5) Each computer, computer system, or computer network affected by the violation
of this chapter constitutes a separate violation.
(2) costs of repairing or, if necessary, replacing the affected computer, computer
system, computer network, computer software, computer program, or data;
(3) lost profits for the period that the computer, computer system, computer
network, computer software, computer program, or data was unusable; and
(4) costs of replacing or restoring the data lost or damaged as a result of a violation
of this chapter.
For the purpose of venue under this chapter, a violation of this chapter is
considered to have been committed in the county in which the violation took place;
however, upon proper motion and the proper showing before a judge, venue may
be transferred if justice would be better served by the transfer, to one of the
following:
(2) the county of the principal place of business in this State of the owner or lessee
of a computer, computer system, computer network, or any part of it, which has
been subject to the violation; or
The provisions of this chapter must not be construed to preclude the applicability of
any other provision of the criminal law of this State, which presently applies or may
in the future apply, to any transaction which violates this chapter.
CONCLUSION
Clearly, the number of civil and criminal health care fraud prosecutions involving
Medicaid has increased in recent years. Many of these civil prosecutions have been
a result of whistleblowers bringing qui tam False Claims Act (FCA) lawsuits against
hospitals, outpatient surgery centers, ambulatory surgery centers, nursing home
facilities, hospices, doctors, nurses, health care administrators, pharmacists,
pharmaceutical companies and pharmacies for false and fraudulent claims against
Medicare, Medicaid and other federal health care programs. So too, as a result of
increased funding for federal prosecutors and health care fraud investigators,
criminal prosecutions against health care providers who commit fraud against
federal health care programs have also increased. South Carolina’s MFCU has
stepped up its prosecution of Medicaid fraud cases. Health care fraud lawyers,
attorneys and law firms need to be aware of recent prosecution trends involving
health care providers accused of making false and fraudulent claims against
Medicare, Medicaid and Tricare. Whether representing the relator or whistleblower
in a qui tam suit alleging fraud against a hospital, outpatient surgery center,
ambulatory surgery center, nursing home facility, hospice, doctor, nurse, health
care administrator, pharmacy, pharmaceutical company or pharmacist, or the
defendant in a civil and/or criminal proceeding against a health care provider or
beneficiary, the practitioner needs to keep abreast of the case law developments in
this area and the expanding efforts by the federal government to take civil and
criminal actions against those involved in making fraudulent health care claims
against the federal government.
South Carolina Attorney Joe Griffith is a former SC federal prosecutor who handles
health care fraud white collar criminal cases, qui tam whistleblower cases, Medicaid
fraud cases, Medicare fraud cases, pharmaceutical fraud cases and government
contractor fraud cases in South Carolina and the United States.