Soi Stages Feb 2016
Soi Stages Feb 2016
Soi Stages Feb 2016
Note:
It
is
impossible
to
conduct
a
thorough
scanning
without
involving
learners
–
and
listening
closely
to
what
they
have
to
say.
Three
powerful
ways
to
engage
in
the
scanning
process:
1.
Use
the
four
key
questions
from
Spirals
of
Inquiry
to
determine
the
extent
to
which
learners
are
connected
to
their
school
community
(social-‐emotional
learning)
and
are
developing
meta-‐
cognitiion
and
self-‐regulation
(cognitive
sciences).
1. Can
you
name
two
adults
in
this
setting
who
believe
you
will
be
a
success
in
life?
2. Where
are
you
going
with
your
learning?
(What
are
you
learning
and
why
is
this
important?)
3. How’s
it
going?
4. Where
to
next?
2.
Use
the
seven
learning
principles
from
the
conclusion
to
The
Nature
of
Learning
from
the
Center
for
Educational
Research
and
Innovation:
OECD
as
a
framework
for
understanding
what
the
learning
experiences
of
your
learners
are
like.
Here
are
some
examples:
Learners
at
the
centre
• Can
learners
describe
in
their
own
words
what
they
are
learning
-‐
and
why
what
they
are
learning
is
important?
• Can
they
use
a
range
of
ways
to
demonstrate
their
learning?
• Can
they
self-‐manage
independent
learning
times?
Uses information from the scan to identify an area for concentrated team learning and action
Usually
requires
collection
of
further
information
to
ensure
accurate
understanding
of
the
situation
Builds on strengths or positives as well as gaining clarity on challenges
Considerations:
• What
popped
out
at
you
during
the
scanning
phase?
What
pleased
you?
What
surprised
you?
What
concerned
you?
• What
additional
evidence
do
you
need?
How
will
you
gather
it?
• What
are
some
strengths
that
your
learners
show
in
this
area?
• How
could
you
build
on
these
strengths?
About getting deeply held beliefs and assumptions out on the table about our own practices
Being obsessed with the actions of others or issues over which we have limited influence
Venting about the past, fuming about the present or finding someone to blame
Considerations:
• How
can
you
express
your
views
in
a
way
that
opens
up
thinking
about
practices?
• How
can
you
create
the
conditions
that
build
curiosity
(not
defensiveness)?
• How
do
you
ensure
that
when
developing
hunches,
you
focus
on
the
areas
over
which
you
have
control
(rather
than
blame
the
parents,
the
system,
the
learners
or
anyone
else)?
• How
will
you
develop
fairly
quick
ways
to
test
out
your
hunches?
• How
might
you
involve
learners
and
their
families
as
you
check
out
your
hunches?
Considerations:
• Now,
that
you
have
explored
some
hunches
and
have
landed
on
a
focus
for
more
in-‐
depth
learning
and
action,
what
is
it
you
need
to
learn
more
about?
• Are
there
schools
with
a
similar
focus
from
which
you
can
learn?
What
resources
can
you
access?
• How
can
you
make
sure
that
the
strategies
you
are
considering
are
evidence-‐informed,
current
and
fit
with
your
context?
• Over
time
how
will
you
build
in
multiple
opportunities
for
learning
during
the
school
day?
• How
will
you
sustain
the
momentum
and
keep
the
learning
engaging?
• How
will
you
address
the
varied
needs
of
educators
in
your
setting?
• How
will
you
ensure
that
everyone
–
formal
leaders,
teachers
and
support
staff
–
are
engaged
in
their
learning?
The
purpose
of
shared
inquiry
is
to
make
a
difference
in
valued
outcomes
for
learners.
The
checking
question
asks
are
we
making
enough
of
a
difference?
How
do
we
know?
Change
does
not
always
equal
improvement
or
transformation.
There
may
be
instances
where
teachers
change
what
they
are
doing
only
to
find
not
much
has
changed
for
their
learners.
Considerations:
• What
evidence
will
you
seek
to
know
you
are
making
a
difference?
How
much
difference
will
be
enough?
• When
will
you
check
and
how
often?
How
can
you
check
in
a
way
that
allows
for
adjustment
–
right
away?
• How
will
you
make
it
safe
for
participants
to
share
what
they
are
learning
in
the
checking
phase?
• How
and
when
will
you
celebrate
the
learning
gains
you
are
making
as
a
team?