Gahw#2 (00) 0065: Source: Bellsouth, SBC Title: Geran Protocol Structures Document For: Discussion Agenda Item

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

3GPP TSG-GERAN Ad Hoc Meeting#2 GAHW#2 (00)0065

October 9-13, 2000, Munich, Germany

Source: BellSouth, SBC


Title: GERAN Protocol Structures
Document for: Discussion
Agenda Item:

The current version of the GERAN Stage 2 specification (Ref. [1]) contains a model of the User Plane
Protocol Architecture towards the Core Network PS Domain (first section 4.4), but does not include
equivalent models for the Control Plane or for the Protocols towards to the Core Network CS Domain.
This document proposes additional diagrams to complete the Stage 2 specification, taking into account the
open GERAN Work Item to evaluate a potential evolution of the A Interface and/or the support of the Iu-cs
interface (Ref. [2]).

1. User Plane Protocols towards Packet Switched Core Network Domain.


The following diagram showing the User Plane Protocols towards the PS Core Network Domain was
extracted from the Stage 2 specification.

MS GERAN SGSN

SNDCP SNDCP

LLC LLC

Relay
BSSGP BSSGP
GTP-U GTP-U

PDCP Network Network


PDCP
Service UDP/IP UDP/IP Service
Ack/Unack Ack/Unack
RLC RLC RLC
RLC IP IP
FR FR
L2 L2 (AAL5) L2 (AAL5) L2
MAC MAC
Gb
Um L1 L1
PHY PHY L1 (ATM) L1 (ATM)
Iu-ps

Common protocols
Iu influenced protocols
Gb influenced protocols

Figure 1: User Plane Protocols towards Packet Switched Core Network Domain

2. Control Plane Protocols towards Packet Switched Core Network Domain.


The following diagram showing the Control Plane Protocols towards the PS Core Network Domain was built
on the same model as the User Plan, using the GPRS Control Plan Protocols for the Gb Influenced layers
(Ref. [3]) and the Iu-ps Control Plane Protocols for the Iu Influenced layers (Ref. [4]).
The following assumptions were used to create the diagram:
- Both Transport options defined in the 3GPP Iu Specification for the Control Plan towards the CN
PS Domain are kept for GERAN (SS7 based and IP based).
- RANAP is used as the Layer 3 Protocol on the Iu-ps Control Plan.
- On the Air Interface, the Iu-influenced Control Plan is mostly based on the UTRAN RRC with
some GERAN specific adaptation (noted RRC+). This is in line with the agreement reached
during the GERAN AdHoc#1 in Helsinki (see also Ref. [5]).

Page: 1/4
- On the Air Interface, the GSM CS Data Link Layer (LAPDm) is used for the Iu-influenced Control
Plan Protocols in addition to the UTRAN RLC and the existing GSM/GPRS MAC and Physical
Layers. This is in line with the content of section 5.1 of the Stage 2 specification. LAPDm is used
as the Link Layer for all Logical Channels issued from the CS operation and also kept for Real
Time services over Packets (SACCH, FACCH, Common Control CHannels…).

MS GERAN SGSN

GMM/SM GMM/SM

LLC LLC

Relay
BSSGP BSSGP
RANAP RANAP

RRC+ Network Network


RRC+
Service SCCP SCCP Service

Ack/Unack Ack/Unack IP MTP3-B MU3A MU3A MTP3-B IP


RLC RLC SSCF-NNI STCP STCP SSCF-NNI
RLC RLC FR
LAPDm LAPDm FR SSCOP IP IP SSCOP
L2 L2
MAC MAC L2 (AAL5) L2 (AAL5)
Gb
Um L1 L1
PHY PHY L1 (ATM) Iu-ps L1 (ATM)

Common protocols
Iu influenced protocols
Gb influenced protocols

Figure 2: Control Plane Protocols towards Packet Switched Core Network Domain

3. Control Plane Protocols towards Circuit Switched Core Network Domain.


The only GERAN-CS CN Interface officially supported so far is the A-Interface.
However, SMG2 and TSG-GERAN recently approved a new work item to analyze the possible GERAN
support of the Iu-cs Interface and/or an enhanced-A Interface.
The following diagram shows a model for the Control Plan Protocol Architecture towards the CS CN Domain
assuming that the support of the Iu-cs Interface was approved by GERAN. In this model, the Air Interface
Iu-influenced Air Interface Control Plan Protocols are supposed to be identical to the Iu-ps-influenced
Control Plan Protocols. This model respects the principle of protocol independence from the domain
delivering the service adopted in 3GPP.

MS GERAN MSC

MM/CC/SS MM/CC/SS

Relay
BSSAP BSSAP
RR RR RANAP RANAP

RRC+ RRC+ SCCP SCCP


SCCP SCCP MTP
MTP
MTP3-B MTP3-B
RLC RLC SSCF-NNI SSCF-NNI
LAPDm LAPDm SSCOP SSCOP
MAC MAC
L2 (AAL5) L2 (AAL5)
A
Um L1 L1
PHY PHY L1 (ATM) L1 (ATM)
Iu-cs

Common protocols
Iu influenced protocols
A influenced protocols

Figure 3: Control Plane Protocols towards Circuit Switched Core Network Domain (Alternative 1)

Page: 2/4
The previous diagram shows a lot of commonalities between:
- The Iu-ps and Iu-cs influenced protocols (as expected). It appears that the support in GERAN of
the Iu-cs interface could be provided with a minimum incremental development effort, providing
that the system is upgraded to provide Real Time over Packet services and consequently
upgraded to support the Iu-ps interface. This is especially true if the Iu-ps uses the SS7 based
transport option (only option supported for the Iu-cs interface in UTRAN)
- The Iu-cs and A influenced protocols, since LAPDm and SCCP are used in both cases. The key
differences relate to the transport network (ATM for the Iu-cs, SDM for the A Interface) and in the
Layer 3 Protocols (BSSAP vs. RANAP and RRC vs. RR).
Another problem with this architecture is that both interfaces would have to be supported to continue to
provide CS services to the R99 and older Terminals. This would create a similar situation to the PS domain
where both the Iu-ps and the Gb Interfaces must be supported when an operator wants at the same time to
provide Real Time services over Packets and continue to serve R99 and older GPRS Terminals.

However, considering that RRC must already be enhanced for compatibility with GERAN, it should be
possible to consider another alternative for the Control Plane Protocols towards the CS CN Domain
involving an Iu-based enhanced-A Interface, as shown in the following diagram.

MS GERAN MSC

MM/CC/SS MM/CC/SS

Relay
BSSAP RANAP RANAP BSSAP
04.18 + RRC 04.18 + RRC
SCCP SCCP

MTP3-B MTP3-B
RLC RLC MTP MTP
SSCF-NNI SSCF-NNI
LAPDm LAPDm SSCOP SSCOP
MAC MAC
L2 (AAL5) L2 (AAL5)
A
Um L1 Iu-cs based L1
PHY PHY L1 (ATM) L1 (ATM)
Evolved A

Common protocols
Iu influenced protocols
A influenced protocols

Figure 4: Control Plane Protocols towards Circuit Switched Core Network Domain (Alternative 2)
The key characteristics of this alternative are:
- Both BSSAP and RANAP are supported with the enhanced-A Interface. BSSAP would be used
for R99 and older Terminals while RANAP would be used for R00 Terminals. This does not
appear to be critical or at least it should be in line with the assumed definition of a 2G/3G MSC.
The Iu-based enhanced-A Interface would use the Iu-cs Transport Layers, which could possibly
be similar to the Iu-ps Transport Layers.
- RRC is enhanced to include all R99 RR procedures as defined in the GSM 04.18. That means
that the R00/R4 04.18 (or 44.018) will include the RRC procedures required for GERAN and not
that the RRC specification is enhanced to support specific GERAN procedures.
- It is not necessary to support both the A and enhanced-A Interfaces simultaneously, since the
support of the enhanced-A Interface would be totally transparent to the MS.
- Because the type of GERAN-CN interface would be transparent to the MS, all R99 features and
capabilities, including DTM, would be supported through an enhanced-A interface without impact.
More accurately, DTM would be supported in a Gb/enhanced-A configuration while simultaneous
CS/PS operation would also be possible, as in UMTS, through an enhanced-A/Iu-ps
configuration.

Page: 3/4
- The support of the enhanced-A Interface would only be an option, considered beneficial when the
network is upgraded to support Real Time Service over Packets.

A more complete analysis of the rationale for supporting this new Iu-based enhanced-A Interface is provided
in a separate contribution.

4. User Plane Protocols towards Circuit Switched Core Network Domain.


No diagram is proposed for the User Plan Protocol Architecture, because there is no identifiable Protocol
Layer for the User Plane in the CS Domain in a conventional GSM system.
The key problem for the User Plan is related to the location of the Transcoders, since they are located in the
BSS in a conventional GSM network and in the CN in a 3G network.
The location of the Transcoders in R00/R4 GERAN is believed to be an item for further study.

5. Conclusion and Recommendation


This document includes Protocol Architecture Diagrams for the GERAN Control Plan towards the PS and
CS Domains.
For the protocols towards the CS Domain, it is proposed to adopt a Protocol Architecture including a new Iu-
based enhanced-A Interface allowing at the same time to support Legacy Terminals and Iu based CS
services.
The enhanced-A Interface would require to support both BSSAP and RANAP and the Iu-cs Transport Layers.
Note that BSSAP and RANAP must already be supported in a GERAN network supporting the A and Iu-ps
interfaces.
For the support of the enhanced-A Interface it is proposed to keep the GSM 04.18 specification as the basis
of the R00/R4 Radio Resource Protocol Layer specification and to enhance it, as required, with procedures
extracted from the UTRAN RRC specification (TS 25.331).

References:
1. 3G TS 43.051 GERAN Overall Description – Stage 2, Tdoc GP-000471, TSG-GERAN#1
2. Work Item Description for GERAN/UTRAN interface evolution, Tdoc GP-000478, TSG-GERAN#1
3. 3G TS 23.060 General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) Service description; Stage 2
4. 3G TR 25.410 Version 3.2.0: UTRAN Iu Interface: General Aspects and Principles
5 Analysis of GERAN R00 RR Functionality, Tdoc 2g00-092, Nokia, GERAN AdHoc#1

Page: 4/4

You might also like