Laplace Transform
Laplace Transform
Laplace Transform
PETE-3205
Laplace Transform
You know, it’s always a little scary when we devote a whole section just to the definition of
something. Laplace transforms (or just transforms) can seem scary when we first start looking
at them. However, as we will see, they aren’t as bad as they may appear at first.
Before we start with the definition of the Laplace transform we need to get another definition
out of the way.
A function is called piecewise continuous on an interval if the interval can be broken into a
finite number of subintervals on which the function is continuous on each open subinterval
(i.e. the subinterval without its endpoints) and has a finite limit at the endpoints of each
subinterval. Below is a sketch of a piecewise continuous function.
In other words, a piecewise continuous function is a function that has a finite number of breaks
in it and doesn’t blow up to infinity anywhere.
Definition
Suppose that f(t) is a piecewise continuous function. The Laplace transform of f(t) is
(1)
There is an alternate notation for Laplace transforms. For the sake of convenience we will
often denote Laplace transforms as,
With this alternate notation, note that the transform is really a function of a new variable, s,
and that all the t’s will drop out in the integration process.
Now, the integral in the definition of the transform is called an improper integral and it would
probably be best to recall how these kinds of integrals work before we actually jump into
computing some transforms.
Linearity
It is obvious that the ROC of the linear combination of and should be the
both and exist. But also note that in some cases when zero-pole
cancellation occurs, the ROC of the linear combination could be larger than
, as shown in the example below.
Example: Let
then
We see that the ROC of the combination is larger than the intersection of the ROCs of
the two individual terms.
Time Shifting
Shifting in s-Domain
Time Scaling
Note that the ROC is horizontally scaled by , which could be either positive (
) or negative ( ) in which case both the signal and the ROC of its
Laplace transform are horizontally flipped.
Conjugation
Proof:
Convolution
Note that the ROC of the convolution could be larger than the intersection
then
In general, we have
we have:
Differentiation in s-Domain
Also note that as the ROC of is the right half plane , the