De Facto
De Facto
For other uses, see De facto (disambiguation). legally had to attend, despite in many cases actually living
“Defacto” redirects here. For the steamship, see SS closer to a school designated for the other race. In many
Defacto. cases, the schools for black students were older, had fewer
resources of all kinds, and paid their teachers less than in
[1] white schools.
De facto (/dɨ ˈfæktoʊ/, /deɪ-/, Latin: [deː ˈfaktoː]) is a
Latin expression that means “in fact, in reality, in actual
existence, force, or possession, as a matter of fact” (liter-
ally “from fact”).[2][3] In law, it often means “in practice
but not necessarily ordained by law” or “in practice or 1.2 Standards
actuality, but not officially established.” It is commonly
used in contrast to de jure (which means “according to Main article: De facto standard
(the) law"; literally “from law”) when referring to mat-
ters of law, governance, or technique (such as standards) A de facto standard is a standard (formal or informal)
that are found in the common experience as created or that has achieved a dominant position by tradition, en-
developed without or contrary to a regulation. When dis- forcement, or market dominance. It has not necessarily
cussing a legal situation, de jure designates what the law received formal approval by way of a standardization pro-
says, while de facto designates action of what happens in cess, and may not have an official standards document.
practice.
Technical standards are usually voluntary, like ISO 9000
requirements, but may be obligatory, enforced by gov-
ernment norms, like drinking water quality requirements.
1 Examples The term “de facto standard” is used for both: to contrast
obligatory standards (also known as “de jure standards”);
or to express a dominant standard, when there are more
1.1 Segregation (during the Civil Rights than one proposed standards.
era in the United States)
In social sciences, a voluntary standard that is also a de
De facto racial discrimination and segregation in the USA facto[7]standard, is a typical solution to a coordination prob-
during the 1950s and 1960s was simply discrimination lem.
that was not segregation by law (de jure).
Jim Crow Laws, which were enacted in the 1870s,
brought legal racial segregation against black Americans 1.3 National languages
residing in the American South. These laws were legally
ended in 1964 by the Civil Rights Act of 1964.[4][5][6] Several countries with a de facto national language, in-
Continued practices of expecting blacks to ride in the cluding Australia, Japan, the United Kingdom, the United
back of buses or to step aside onto the street if not enough States, and the Argentine, have no de jure official national
room was present for a white person and "separate but language.
equal" facilities are instances of de facto segregation. The Some countries have a de facto national language in ad-
NAACP fought for the de jure law to be upheld and for dition to an official language. In Lebanon and Morocco
de facto segregation practices to be abolished. the official language is Arabic, but an additional de facto
Public schools in any region of the USA may be de facto language is French. In New Zealand, Maori and New
racially segregated (or nearly so) simply because they are Zealand Sign Language are de jure official languages,
in neighborhoods whose residents are all, or nearly all, while English is a de facto official language.
of one race (such as urban ghettos or conversely, affluent Russian was the de facto official language of the cen-
suburbs). tral government and, to a large extent, republican govern-
This is opposed to de jure segregation, which prevailed in ments of the former Soviet Union, but was not declared
the American South and border states through the 1960s. de jure state language until 1990. A short-lived law ef-
Under de jure segregation, the law provided entirely sep- fected April 24, 1990, installed Russian as the sole de
arate schools for black and white students, which they jure official language of the Union.[8]
1
2 1 EXAMPLES
the same responsibilities in their country as the de jure 2.2 Relationships not recognized outside
head of state (the sovereign) does within the United King- of Australia
dom.
In the Westminster system of government, executive au- Due to Australian federalism, de facto partnerships can
thority is often split between a de jure executive author- only be legally recognised whilst the couple lives within
ity of a head of state and a de facto executive author- a state in Australia. This is because the power to legis-
ity of a prime minister and cabinet who implement ex- late on de facto matters relies on referrals by States to the
ecutive powers in the name of the de jure executive au- Commonwealth in accordance with Section 51(xxxvii) of
thority. In the United Kingdom, the Sovereign is the de the Australian Constitution, where it states the new fed-
[12][13]
jure executive authority, even though executive decisions eral law can only be applied back within a state.
are made by the elected Prime Minister and his Cabinet There must be a state nexus between the de facto rela-
[14]
on the Sovereign’s behalf, hence the term Her Majesty’s tionship itself and the Australian state.
Government. If an Australian de facto couple moves out of a state, they
The de facto boundaries of a country are defined by the do not take the state with them and the new federal law
area that its government is actually able to enforce its laws is tied to the territorial limits of a state. The legal status
in, and to defend against encroachments by other coun- and rights and obligations of the de facto or unmarried
tries that may also claim the same territory de jure. The couple would then be recognised by the laws of the coun-
Durand Line is an example of a de facto boundary. As try where they are ordinarily resident. See the section
well as cases of border disputes, de facto boundaries may on Family Court of Australia for further explanation on
also arise in relatively unpopulated areas in which the bor- jurisdiction on de facto relationships.
der was never formally established or in which the agreed This is unlike marriage and ‘matrimonial causes’ which
border was never surveyed and its exact position is un- are recognised by sections 51(xxi) and (xxii) of the
clear. The same concepts may also apply to a boundary Australian Constitution and internationally by Marriage
between provinces or other subdivisions of a federal state. law and conventions, Hague Convention on Marriages
(1978).[15]
A de facto monopoly is a system where many suppliers De Facto [Relationship] is comparable to non-marital re-
of a product are allowed, but the market is so completely lationship contracts (sometimes called “Palimony Agree-
dominated by one that the others might as well not exist. ments”) and certain limited forms of domestic partner-
The related terms oligopoly and monopsony are similar ship, which are found in many jurisdictions throughout
in meaning and this is the type of situation that antitrust the world.
laws are intended to eliminate. A “De Facto Relationship” is not comparable to common-
law marriage, which is a fully legal marriage that has
merely been contracted in an irregular way (including by
2.1 Relationships habit and repute). Only nine U.S. states and the District
of Columbia still permit this irregular form of marriage;
A domestic partner outside marriage is referred to as a de but common law marriages are otherwise valid and recog-
facto husband or wife by some authorities.[11] In Australia nised by and in all jurisdictions whose rules of comity
and New Zealand, the phrase de facto by itself has be- mandate the recognition of any marriage that was legally
come a colloquial term for one’s domestic partner. In formed in the jurisdiction where it was contracted.
Australian law, it is the legally recognized relationship of
a couple living together (opposite-sex or same-sex).
The above sense of de facto is related to the relationship 3 Other uses of the term
between common law traditions and formal (statutory,
regulatory, civil) law, and common-law marriages. Com- In finance, the World Bank has a pertinent definition:
mon law norms for settling disputes in practical situations,
often worked out over many generations to establishing A “de facto government” comes into, or re-
precedent, are a core element informing decision mak- mains in, power by means not provided for in
ing in legal systems around the world. Because its early the country’s constitution, such as a coup d'état,
forms originated in England in the Middle Ages, this is revolution, usurpation, abrogation or suspen-
particularly true in Anglo-American legal traditions and sion of the constitution.[16]
in former colonies of the British Empire, while also play-
ing a role in some countries that have mixed systems with A de facto state of war is a situation where two nations are
significant admixtures of civil law. actively engaging, or are engaged, in aggressive military
4 5 REFERENCES
actions against the other without a formal declaration of [16] “OP 7.30 – Dealings with De Facto Governments”. Oper-
war. ational Manual. The World Bank. July 2001. Retrieved
2010-11-28.
In engineering, a de facto technology refers to systems in
which the intellectual property and know-how is privately
held. Usually only the owner of the technology manu-
factures the related equipment. Meanwhile, a standard
technology consists of systems that have been publicly re-
leased to a certain degree so that anybody can manufac-
ture equipment supporting the technology. For instance,
in cell phone communications, CDMA1X is a de facto
technology, while GSM is a standard technology.
4 See also
• List of Latin phrases
5 References
[1] dictionary.reference.com: de facto
6.2 Images
• File:Wiktionary-logo-en.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f8/Wiktionary-logo-en.svg License: Public
domain Contributors: Vector version of Image:Wiktionary-logo-en.png. Original artist: Vectorized by Fvasconcellos (talk · contribs),
based on original logo tossed together by Brion Vibber