Block 2 Static Structure Example v.03
Block 2 Static Structure Example v.03
Fig1 shows a truss that carries a floor of a building. Walls at each end support it. The
floor loads the truss by 2000N uniformly distributed.
(a) Describe the principle of static equilibrium and explain how it may be used to
determine the internal forces in the truss.
(b) Estimate the maximum internal force in the truss and state in which member
it will occur. Assume that the truss is a pin-jointed network, fixed at one end
and freely supported at the other. Ignore the weight of the truss itself and
distribute the weight of the floor as shown in Fig.2.
(c) Outline how you could use information about the distribution of forces in the truss
to optimize its design.
(b) Sign Convention I shall assume the normal graphical sign convention e.g.. ‘X’
direction: is +’ve and is -’ve. , ‘Y’ direction upwards is +’ve
N.B sin(45o) = cos(45o) =1/√ 2 = 0.7071
Intuitive Solution: If the truss were a beam the lower surface would be in tension
with the greatest force at the centre. As materials are stronger in compression than in
tension this( middle of HG) is the weakest point. See also computer solution at
http://www.jhu.edu/~virtlab/bridge/bridge.htm . This model gives solutions that agree
with these notes. You may NOT present this model as a way of answering your TMA;
but it is very useful as a check on your work
Vertical reactions: The weight is carried evenly by reactions at ‘A’ and ‘E’. There
will thus be a vertical upward force of 1000N at each node.
If you have any problems try the Bridge Software I recommended overleaf but please
take care to get the angles correct!
(c) To design truss members one needs to combine materials properties with the
force data derived above to get minimum dimensions.
Tensile members can be dimensioned from the maximum force with an
appropriate ‘safety factor’
Compression members need an additional consideration to optimise resistance to
buckling; but will still depend on force and safety factor
‘Safety Factor ‘ depends critically on the consequences of failure. For a major
bridge, carrying say a railway, the probability of failure should be <1 in106
This sort of design needs not just the Young’s Modulus and the UTS of the
material but also the ‘Weibull Modulus’ of the UTS. This gives an idea of the
variability of strength observed when a large number of specimens are tested from
which one can de-rate the UTS sufficiently to ensure a failure probability < 1 in
106