CD - 15. Republic of The Philippines Vs Sunlife Assurance of Canada

REPUBLIC v. SUNLIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA, GR NO.
158085, 2005-10-14
Facts:
Sun Life is a mutual life insurance company organized and existing under the laws of Canada. It is
registered and authorized by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Insurance Commission to
engage in business in the Philippines as a mutual life insurance... company with principal office at Paseo
de Roxas, Legaspi Village, Makati City.
Sun Life filed with the [Commissioner of Internal Revenue] (CIR) its insurance premium tax return for the
third quarter of 1997 and paid the premium tax in the amount
"On October 20, 1997, S
On December 29, 1997, the [Court of Tax Appeals] (CTA) rendered its decision in Insular Life Assurance
Co. Ltd. v. [CIR], which held that mutual life insurance companies are purely cooperative companies and
are exempt from the payment of premium tax and DST.
Hence, on August 20, 1999, Sun Life filed with... the CIR an administrative claim for tax credit of its
alleged erroneously paid premium tax and DST for the aforestated tax periods.
"For failure of the CIR to act upon the administrative claim for tax credit and with the 2-year period to file a
claim for tax credit or refund dwindling away and about to expire, Sun Life filed with the CTA a petition for
review
In its petition, it prayed... for the issuance of a tax credit certificate... representing... erroneously paid
premium tax for the third quarter of 1997... and... of DST on policies of insurance from August 21 to
December 18, 1997.
the CTA found in favor of Sun Life.
Seeking reconsideration of the decision of the CTA, the CIR argued that Sun Life ought to have
registered, foremost, with the Cooperative Development Authority before it could enjoy the exemptions
from premium tax and DST extended to purely cooperative companies or associations
For its failure to register, it could not avail of the exemptions prayed for.
"Notwithstanding these arguments, the CTA denied the CIR's motion for reconsideration.
Ruling of the Court of Appeals
In upholding the CTA, the CA reasoned that respondent was a purely cooperative corporation duly
licensed to engage in mutual life insurance business in the Philippines.
Thus, respondent was deemed exempt from premium and documentary stamp taxes, because its affairs
are managed... and conducted by its members with money collected from among themselves, solely for
their own protection, and not for profit.
Hence, this Petition.
Issues:
Whether Respondent Is a Cooperative
Whether CDA Registration Is Necessary
Ruling:
Having satisfactorily proven to the Court of Tax Appeals, to the Court of Appeals and to this Court that it
is a bona fide cooperative, respondent is entitled to exemption from the payment of taxes on life
insurance premiums and documentary stamps. Not being... governed by the Cooperative Code of the
Philippines, it is not required to be registered with the Cooperative Development Authority in order to avail
itself of the tax exemptions. Significantly, neither the Tax Code nor the Insurance Code mandates this
administrative... registration.
The Petition has no merit.
The Tax Code defines a cooperative as an association "conducted by the members thereof with the
money collected from among themselves and solely for their own protection and not for profit."[8] Without
a doubt, respondent is a cooperative engaged in a... mutual life insurance business.
First, it is managed by its members. Both the CA and the CTA found that the management and affairs of
respondent were conducted by its member-policyholders.[9]
Second, it is operated with money collected from its members. Since respondent is composed entirely of
members who are also its policyholders, all premiums collected obviously come only from them.
Third, it is licensed for the mutual protection of its members, not for the profit of anyone.
Under the Tax Code although respondent is a cooperative, registration with the Cooperative Development
Authority (CDA)[45] is not necessary in order for it to be exempt from the payment of both percentage
taxes on insurance premiums, under Section 121; and... documentary stamp taxes on policies of
insurance or annuities it grants, under Section 199.

CD - 15. Republic of The Philippines Vs Sunlife Assurance of Canada

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CD - 15. Republic of The Philippines Vs Sunlife Assurance of Canada

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

CD - 15. Republic of The Philippines Vs Sunlife Assurance of Canada

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

REPUBLIC v. SUNLIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA, GR NO.

You might also like