The document provides a rubric for evaluating presentations with criteria in four areas: Organization, Collaboration, Content, and Presentation Skills. Each area is scored on a scale from Excellent to Poor, with descriptions given for what constitutes scores in each category.
The document provides a rubric for evaluating presentations with criteria in four areas: Organization, Collaboration, Content, and Presentation Skills. Each area is scored on a scale from Excellent to Poor, with descriptions given for what constitutes scores in each category.
The document provides a rubric for evaluating presentations with criteria in four areas: Organization, Collaboration, Content, and Presentation Skills. Each area is scored on a scale from Excellent to Poor, with descriptions given for what constitutes scores in each category.
The document provides a rubric for evaluating presentations with criteria in four areas: Organization, Collaboration, Content, and Presentation Skills. Each area is scored on a scale from Excellent to Poor, with descriptions given for what constitutes scores in each category.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
Rubrics for Reporting
Excellent Good Fair Poor
10 pts 8 pts 6 pts 4 pts
Organization Was the Excellent Good Fair Poor
presentation w The presentation The presentation There were The presentation was well had organizing minimal signs of lacked organized, well ideas but could organization or organization and prepared and easy have been much preparation. had little evidence to follow. stronger with of preparation. better preparation.
Collaboration Did everyone Excellent Good Fair Poor
contribu The teammates The teammates The teammates The teammates always worked worked from sometimes worked never worked from others’ ideas. others’ ideas most from others’ ideas. from others’ ideas. It was evident that of the time. And However it seems It seems as though all of the group it seems like every as though certain only a few people members did some work, people did not do worked on the contributed but some people as much work as presentation. equally to the are carrying the others. presentation. presentation.
Content:Did the presentation Excellent Good Fair Poor
have v Presentation had Presentation had a Presentation had Presentation an exceptional good amount of moments where contained little to amount of material and valuable material no valuable valuable material benefited the was present but as material. and was extremely class. a whole content beneficial to the was lacking. class
Presentation Did the presenters Excellent Good Fair Poor
Spe Presenters were all Presenters were Presenters were Presenters were very confident in occasionally not consistent with unconfident and delivery and they confident with the level of demonstrated little did an excellent their presentation confidence/ evidence of job of engaging however the preparedness they planning prior to the class. presentation was showed the presentation. Preparation is very not as engaging as classroom but had evident. it could have been some strong for the class. moments