Structured Systems Analysis and Design Method
Structured Systems Analysis and Design Method
SSAD Techniques
The three most important techniques that are used in SSAD are:
Stages
When a feasibility study is carried out, there are four main areas of
consideration:
This is one of the most important stages of SSADM. The developers of SSADM
understood that though the tasks and objectives of a new system may be
radically different from the old system, the underlying data will probably
change very little. By coming to a full understanding of the data requirements at
an early stage, the remaining analysis and design stages can be built up on a
firm foundation.
In almost all cases there is some form of current system even if it is entirely
composed of people and paper. Through a combination of interviewing
employees, circulating questionnaires, observations and existing documentation,
the analyst comes to full understanding of the system as it is at the start of the
project. This serves many purposes:
the analyst learns the terminology of the business, what users do and how
they do it
the old system provides the core requirements for the new system
faults, errors and areas of inefficiency are highlighted and their reparation
added to the requirements
the data model can be constructed
the users become involved and learn the techniques and models of the
analyst
the boundaries of the system can be defined
Users Catalogue describing all the users of the system and how they
interact with it
Requirements Catalogues detailing all the requirements of the new
system
Current Services Description further composed of
Current environment logical data structure (ERD)
Context diagram (DFD)
Levelled set of DFDs for current logical system
Full data dictionary including relationship between data stores and
entities
To produce the models, the analyst works through the construction of the
models as we have described. However, the first set of data-flow diagrams
(DFDs) are the current physical model, that is, with full details of how the old
system is implemented. The final version is the current logical model which is
essentially the same as the current physical but with all reference to
implementation removed together with any redundancies such as repetition of
process or data.
In the process of preparing the models, the analyst will discover the information
that makes up the users and requirements catalogues.
Having investigated the current system, the analyst must decide on the overall
design of the new system. To do this, he or she, using the outputs of the
previous stage, develops a set of business system options. These are different
ways in which the new system could be produced varying from doing nothing to
throwing out the old system entirely and building an entirely new one. The
analyst may hold a brainstorming session so that as many and various ideas as
possible are generated.
The ideas are then collected to form a set of two or three different options which
are presented to the user. The options consider the following:
the degree of automation
the boundary between the system and the users
the distribution of the system, for example, is it centralized to one office
or spread out across several?
cost/benefit
impact of the new system
Where necessary, the option will be documented with a logical data structure
and a level 1 data-flow diagram.
The users and analyst together choose a single business option. This may be one
of the ones already defined or may be a synthesis of different aspects of the
existing options. The output of this stage is the single selected business option
together with all the outputs of stage 1.
This is probably the most complex stage in SSAD. Using the requirements
developed in stage 1 and working within the framework of the selected business
option, the analyst must develop a full logical specification of what the new
system must do. The specification must be free from error, ambiguity and
inconsistency. By logical, we mean that the specification does not say how the
system will be implemented but rather describes what the system will do.
To produce the logical specification, the analyst builds the required logical
models for both the data-flow diagrams (DFDs) and the entity relationship
diagrams (ERDs). These are used to produce function definitions of every
function which the users will require of the system, entity life-histories (ELHs)
and effect correspondence diagrams, these are models of how each event
interacts with the system, a complement to entity life-histories. These are
continually matched against the requirements and where necessary, the
requirements are added to and completed.
Though some of these items may be unfamiliar to you, it is beyond the scope of
this unit to go into them in great detail.
This stage is the first towards a physical implementation of the new system.
Like the Business System Options, in this stage a large number of options for
the implementation of the new system are generated. This is honed down to two
or three to present to the user from which the final option is chosen or
synthesized.
All of these aspects must also conform to any constraints imposed by the
business such as available money and standardization of hardware and software.
Though the previous level specifies details of the implementation, the outputs of
this stage are implementation-independent and concentrate on the requirements
for the human computer interface.
The three main areas of activity are the definition of the user dialogues. These
are the main interfaces with which the users will interact with the system. The
logical design specifies the main methods of interaction in terms of menu
structures and command structures.
The other two activities are concerned with analyzing the effects of events in
updating the system and the need to make enquiries about the data on the
system. Both of these uses the events, function descriptions and effect
correspondence diagrams produced in stage 3 to determine precisely how to
update and read data in a consistent and secure way.
The product of this stage is the logical design which is made up of:
Menu structures
Command structures
Requirements catalogue
Data catalogue
Required logical data structure
Logical process model which includes dialogues and model for the update and
enquiry processes
This is the final stage where all the logical specifications of the system are
converted to descriptions of the system in terms of real hardware and software.
This is a very technical stage and an simple overview is presented here.
The product is a complete Physical Design which could tell software engineers
how to build the system in specific details of hardware and software and to the
appropriate standards.