Leiomioma
Leiomioma
Leiomioma
ScienceDirect
Chinese Taipei Society of
Ultrasound in Medicine
journal homepage: www.jmu-online.com
REVIEW ARTICLE
1
Bangladesh Specialized Hospital, Department of Radiology and Imaging, and University of Science and
Technology Chittagong, Dhaka, Bangladesh, and 2 Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General
Hospital and National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
KEYWORDS Abstract Leiomyomas or myomas of the uterus, also known as a fibroid uterus, are the
fibroids, most common tumors of the uterus. They are benign neoplasms of smooth muscle origin with
ultrasound, various degrees of fibrous connective tissue. These tumors can develop in any part of the
variants female genital tract where there is smooth muscle or fibrous tissue, even in the ovary, broad
ligament, and vagina. They need to be differentiated from adenomyosis and intracavitary
polyps. They mostly remain asymptomatic but sometimes they cause significant morbidity.
In such situations, hysterectomy or other surgical intervention is indicated. On ultrasonog-
raphy, most uterine leiomyomas typically appear as well-defined, solid masses. Their echo-
genicity is usually similar to that of the myometrium, but sometimes they are hypoechoic.
They often show some posterior acoustic shadowing. Variants of leiomyomas occur when
they undergo cystic degeneration, hyalinization, or calcification. In such situations, deter-
mining a diagnosis is sometimes difficult. Magnetic resonance imaging can be used in this sit-
uation for an accurate diagnosis.
ª 2016, Elsevier Taiwan LLC and the Chinese Taipei Society of Ultrasound in Medicine. This is
an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Introduction
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmu.2015.12.006
0929-6441/ª 2016, Elsevier Taiwan LLC and the Chinese Taipei Society of Ultrasound in Medicine. This is an open access article under the CC
BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
4 S.Q. Rashid et al.
Figure 3 An intramural leiomyoma (large arrows) and a large cervical leiomyoma (myo, small arrow) on the transvaginal scan.
Leiomyomas that occur in the uterine wall can be the 1980s solidified this position by providing a closer and
submucosal, intramural, or subserosal (i.e., adjacent to more accurate ultrasound (US) appraisal of the uterus.
the endometrium) and can develop in the muscle layer or Since the 1990s, improvements in computed tomography
just beneath the serosa. The tumor can also pedunculate (CT) and hysterosalphingography (HSG), and rapid de-
with a stalk connecting the uterus (Figures 6,7). Submu- velopments in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have
cosal leiomyomas are usually clearly visible and separate allowed these modalities to complement the traditional
from the endometrium on a TVS, but can be difficult to sonographic evaluation [4].
differentiate from polyps (Figure 8). Hysterosonography is Leiomyomas or fibroids of the uterus are common neo-
a technique in which sterile saline is instilled into the plasms and most are the conventional type and therefore easy
uterine cavity via a transcervical catheter while per- to diagnose. Throughout the years, several histological sub-
forming a TVS. This method allows better visualization of types have been described. Their importance is largely
the endometrium and is more accurate than the tradi- because of their resemblance in one or more aspects to leio-
tional TVS in detecting submucosal leiomyomas and in myosarcoma and the obvious potential for misdiagnosis [4].
differentiating them from polyps [5]. Most uterine leiomyomas appear as well-defined solid
masses. Their echogenicity is usually similar to the myo-
metrium, but sometimes the echogenicity is hypoechoic.
Ultrasonography The tumors cause the uterus to become bulky or may
change the uterine contour and make it irregular (Figure 3).
Since the late 1970s, clinical ultrasonography has been the Uterine leiomyomas often show some posterior acoustic
“gold standard” of uterine imaging. The advent of TVS in shadowing (Figure 3); this finding is more prominent in fi-
broids that have calcification (Figure 9).
Leiomyomas with cystic degeneration may have a com-
plex appearance (Figure 1). Color Doppler US typically
shows circumferential vascularity [6]; however, leiomyo-
mas that are necrotic or have undergone torsion will show a
lack of blood flow [7]. Transvaginal color Doppler US can be
used to study uterine blood flow and leiomyoma arterial
supply. The color Doppler US depiction of uterine vascu-
larity depends on several factors such as the sensitivity of
the scanner and the age and parity of the patient. In non-
medically suppressed women of childbearing age, myo-
metrial vessels and spiral vessels within the endometrium
during the luteal phase are present. Postmenopausal
women typically have a relatively hypovascular myome-
trium and endometrium [6]. Blood flow impedance
[expressed as the resistance index (RI)], pulsatility index
(PI), and blood velocity can be calculated. Increased blood
Figure 4 A longitudinal transabdominal scan of a largecervical velocity and decreased RI and PI in both uterine arteries
leiomyoma (arrows), which resulted in the patient’s inability to occur in patients with uterine leiomyomas. The same
empty the urinary bladder. U Z uterus; UB Z urinary bladder. technique has been used to study blood flow in the main
6 S.Q. Rashid et al.
Figure 5 (A) Longitudinal and transverse transabdominal scans of a leiomyoma (mass) on the vaginal wall. (B) Longitudinal and
transverse transvaginal scans also show leiomyoma (the arrows indicate the mass) on the vaginal wall. UB Z urinary bladder.
arteries supplying identifiable leiomyomas. Diastolic flow in undetermined uterine smooth muscle tumors that will
these arteries is always present and increased in compari- require additional diagnostic evaluation before treatment.
son to uterine artery blood flow. The difference in uterine Combined gray-scale and color Doppler US may help
artery blood flow between patients with leiomyomas and distinguish a uterine leiomyosarcoma from a leiomyoma [9].
healthy volunteers is statistically significant and may have A high vascularity score yielded high sensitivity (100%) but a
predictable value in growth rate evaluation of a benign low positive predictive value (PPV; 19%). Considering only
uterine mass [8]. It may be that detecting hypervascularity the presence of marked central vascularity achieved a
in combination with other sonographic findings can identify sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 96% with a 44% PPV.
Figure 6 Longitudinal and transverse transabdominal scans show a subserosal leiomyoma (arrow) on the fundus. UB Z urinary
bladder.
Ultrasonography of Uterine Leiomyomas 7
Figure 9 (A) Leiomyoma (arrows) with calcific changes presents as bright spots within the mass on the transvaginal scan. (B)
Transabdominal scan of curvilinear calcification in the periphery of a leiomyoma (arrows) in a pregnant female. F Z fetus.
Ultrasonography of Uterine Leiomyomas 9
Rare types
Differential diagnosis
Conclusion
References
Leiomyomas are the most common tumors of the uterus and
pelvis. They are benign but can cause significant morbidity. [1] Clarke-Pearson DL, Dawood MY. Benign diseases of the uterus:
They may be detected incidentally when performing ul- leiomyomas, adenomyosis, hyperplasia and polyps. In: Clarke-
Pearson DL, Dawood MY, editors. Green’s gynecology essen-
trasonography for other reasons and are usually easily
tials of clinical practice. Boston (MA): Little Brown and Co;
recognizable. However, degenerate fibroids can have an 1990.
unusual echotexture. Knowledge of the various appear- [2] Entman SS. Uterine leiomyoma and adenomyosis. In:
ances of fibroids enables an accurate diagnosis and proper Jones HW, Wentz AC, Burnett LS, editors. Novak’s textbook of
treatment. They are mostly diagnosed by ultrasonography; gynecology. 11th ed. Baltimore, MD, USA: Williams and Wil-
however, MRI can be more accurate. kins; 1988. p. 443.
12 S.Q. Rashid et al.
[3] Hall DB, Yoder IC. Ultrasound evaluation of the uterus. In: intracavitary uterine abnormalities. Int J Gynaecol Obstet
Callen PW, editor. Ultrasonography in obstetrics and gyne- 2007;97:6e9.
cology. 3rd ed. India: WB Saunders Co; 1997. p. 603. [24] Muniz CJ, Fleischer AC, Donnelly EF, et al. Three-dimensional
[4] Coard K, Plummer J. Massive multilocular cystic leiomyoma of color Doppler sonography and uterine artery arteriography of
the uterus: an extreme example of hydropic degeneration. fibroids. J Ultrasound Med 2002;21:129e33.
South Med J 2007;100:309e12. [25] Salim R, Lee C, Davies A, et al. A comparative study of three-
[5] Cicinelli E, Romano F, Anastasio PS, et al. Transabdominal dimensional saline infusion sonohysterography and diagnostic
sonohysteroscopy, transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy hysteroscopy for the classification of submucous fibroids. Hum
in the evaluation of submucous fibroids. Obstet Gynecol 1995; Reprod 2005;20:253e7.
85:42e7. [26] Sylvestre C, Child TJ, Tulandi T, et al. A prospective study to
[6] Fleischer AC. Color Doppler sonography of uterine disorders. evaluate the efficacy of two and three dimensional sonohys-
Ultrasound Q 2003;19:179e89. terography in women with intrauterine lesions. Fertil Steril
[7] Roy C, Bierry G, El Ghali S, et al. Acute torsion of uterine 2003;79:1222e5.
leiomyoma: CT features. Abdom Imaging 2005;30:120e3. [27] Mavrelos D, Naftalin J, Hoo W, et al. Preoperative assessment
[8] Kurjak A, Kupesic-Urek S, Miric D. The assessment of benign of submucous fibroids by three-dimensional saline contrast
uterine tumor vascularization by transvaginal color Doppler. sonohysterography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;38:350e4.
Ultrasound Med Biol 1992;18:645e9. [28] Ueda H, Togashi K, Konishi I, et al. Unusual appearances of
[9] Exacoustos C, Romanini ME, Amadio A, et al. Can gray-scale uterine leiomyomas: MR imaging findings and their histo-
and color Doppler sonography differentiate between uterine pathologic backgrounds. Radiographics 1999;19:S131e5.
leiomyosarcoma and leiomyoma? J Clin Ultrasound 2007;35: [29] Becker E, Lev-Toaff AS, Kaufman EP, et al. The added value of
449e57. transvaginal sonohysterography over transvaginal sonography
[10] Clement PB, Young RH. Diffuse leiomyomatosis of the uterus: alone in women with known or suspected leiomyoma. J Ul-
a report of four cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1987;6:322e30. trasound Med 2002;21:237e47.
[11] Norris HJ, Parmley T. Mesenchymal tumors of the uterus. V. [30] Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen ES, et al. Accuracy of magnetic
Intravenous leiomyomatosis. A clinical and pathologic study of resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography in the
14 cases. Cancer 1975;36:2164e78. diagnosis, mapping, and measurement of uterine myomas. Am
[12] Roth LM, Reed RJ, Sternberg WH. Cotyledonoid dissecting J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:409e15.
leiomyoma of the uterus. The Sternberg tumor. Am J Surg [31] Rha SE, Byun JY, Jung SE, et al. CT and MRI of uterine sar-
Pathol 1996;20:1455e61. comas and their mimickers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:
[13] Kim MJ, Park YK, Cho JH. Cotyledonoid dissecting leiomyoma 1369e74.
of the uterus: a case report and review of the literature. J [32] Simpson Jr WL, Beitia LG, Mester J. Hysterosalpingography: a
Korean Med Sci 2002;17:840e4. reemerging study. Radiographics 2006;26:419e31.
[14] Cheuk W, Chan JK, Liu JY. Cotyledonoid leiomyoma: a benign [33] Eng CW, Tang PH, Ong CL. Hysterosalpingography: current
uterine tumor with alarming gross appearance. Arch Pathol applications. Singapore Med J 2007;48:368e73.
Lab Med 2002;126:210e3. [34] Tamura-Sadamori R, Emoto M, Naganuma Y, et al. The sono-
[15] Zaloudek C, Hendrickson MR. Mesenchymal tumors of the hysterographic difference in submucosal uterine fibroids and
uterus. In: Kurman RJ, editor. Blaustein’s pathology of the endometrial polyps treated by hysteroscopic surgery. J Ul-
female genital tract. 5th ed. New York (NY): Springer; 2002. trasound Med 2007;26:941e6.
p. 561e615. [35] Lane BF, Wong-You-Cheong JJ. Imaging of endometrial pa-
[16] Hendrickson MR, Kemson RL. Surgical pathology of the uterine thology. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2009;52:57e72.
corpus. In: Bennington J, editor. Major problems in pathology. [36] Yang T, Pandya A, Marcal L, et al. Sonohysterography: prin-
Philadelphia (PA): WB Saunders; 1980. p. 473e84. ciples, technique and role in diagnosis of endometrial pa-
[17] Clement PB, Young RH, Scully RE. Diffuse, perinodular, and thology. World J Radiol 2013;5:81e7.
other patterns of hydropic degeneration within and adjacent [37] Maebayashi T, Imai K, Takekawa Y, et al. Radiologic features
to uterine leiomyomas. Problems in differential diagnosis. Am of uterine lipoleiomyoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2003;27:
J Surg Pathol 1992;16:26e32. 162e5.
[18] Walker CL, Stewart EA. Uterine fibroids: the elephant in the [38] Avritscher R, Iyer RB, Ro J, et al. Lipoleiomyoma of the uterus.
room. Science 2005;308:1589e92. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:856.
[19] Parker WH, FuYS Berek JS. Uterine sarcoma in patients [39] Prieto A, Crespo C, Pardo A, et al. Uterine lipoleiomyomas: US
operated on for presumed leiomyoma and rapidly growing and CT findings. Abdom Imaging 2000;25:655e7.
leiomyoma. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:414e8. [40] Dhillon GS, Datta V, Voci S. Uterine lipoleiomyoma. Ultrasound
[20] Leibsohn S, d’Ablaing G, Mishell DR, et al. Leiomyosarcoma in Q 2011;27:133e4.
a series of hysterectomies performed for presumed uterine [41] Prayson RA, Hart WR. Pathologic considerations of uterine
leiomyomas. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:968e74. discus- smooth muscle tumors. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1995;
sion, 974e976. 22:637e57.
[21] Weinreb JC, Barkoff ND, Megibow A, et al. The value of MR [42] Mayer DP, Shipilov V. Ultrasonography and magnetic reso-
imaging in distinguishing leiomyomas from other solid pelvic nance imaging of uterine fibroids. Obstet Gynecol Clin North
masses when sonography is indeterminate. AJR Am J Roent- Am 1995;22:667e725.
genol 1990;154:295e9. [43] Aydin C, Eris S, Yalçin Y, et al. A giant cystic leiomyoma
[22] Coyne L, Jayaprakasan K, Raine-Fenning N. 3D ultrasound in mimicking an ovarian malignancy. Int J Surg Case Rep 2013;4:
gynecology and reproductive medicine. Womens Health (Lond 1010e2.
Engl) 2008;4:501e16. [44] Togashi K, Ozasa H, Konishi I, et al. Enlarged uterus: differ-
[23] Makris N, Kalmantis K, Skartados N, et al. Three-dimensional entiation between adenomyosis and leiomyoma with MR im-
hysterosonography versus hysteroscopy for the detection of aging. Radiology 1989;171:531e4.