Eng
Eng
Eng
Summary
In order for pharmacists to have a meaningful role in patient care in the future, they must be
prepared to utilize and even capitalize on the use of emerging technologies and electronic
communication capabilities. These technologies will become an accepted part of patient care and
of professional–patient and professional–professional communication. Patients want access to
email consultations with their personal providers. E-mail consultations may be attractive to
pharmacy patrons because of the privacy involved and their ability to communicate when they are
feeling better; often they can’t do this when filling a prescription. One important barrier to use of
the Internet and e-mail in patient care has been the lack of a reimbursement structure for
professional consultations. When e-mail consultation services have been implemented in the
pharmacy, patients have reported satisfaction with the service. However, establishment of e-mail
services with patients requires careful planning. Information privacy and security are crucial. E-
mail that contains PHI of patients requires password protection for computers, encryption, and
authentication in transmission of patient information. Typical e-mail services are not adequate for
protection of PHI. Pharmacists who wish to begin using e-mail as part of their patient care services
should carefully examine guidelines established for physicians using e-mail communication in
medical practice. A consent form that expresses the patient’s desire to use e-mail communication
must be signed. The circumstances under which e-mail should not be used, such as emergency
situations, as well as the types of e-mail requests or questions that are acceptable must be described.
Patients should be told who in your pharmacy will have access to e-mail and who may handle
specific types of e-mail inquiries or requests. While use of e-mail has become ubiquitous in
society, its use in health care presents special challenges and unique dangers that must be
addressed.
Chapter 14
You are working as a relief pharmacist in a community pharmacy. You notice that Megan,
the 17-year-old daughter of a very close family friend, is receiving prescriptions for oral
contraceptives and for the treatment of a sexually transmitted disease (STD). Apparently,
Megan has been hanging out with a group of students whom her parents disapprove of and
have forbidden her to see. You are very concerned about Megan and wonder whether her
use of oral contraceptives may lead her to forego the use of condoms that could offer
protection from STDs. When Megan enters the pharmacy to pick up her prescriptions, she
becomes upset at seeing you and hurries out, refusing to talk to you. You know that if you
were in her parents’ shoes, you would want to know about the prescriptions. You are
convinced that Megan is in trouble and needs the help of her family.
Each of these patient cases presents decisions that must be made on the basis of legal and
ethical principles. Your ability to choose a proper course of action in these situations
depends on your understanding of the ethical principles involved. The legal aspects of these
cases are covered under state and federal law. However, many elements are not specifically
addressed in laws and regulations but do involve underlying ethical principles of patient–
health professional interaction. Principles related to ethical decision making in patient care
include beneficence, autonomy, and honesty. This is by no means a complete list, but the
principles seem to be most relevant to the communication responsibilities of pharmacists.
Other issues that are derived from these principles and are particularly important in patient
counseling are informed consent, confidentiality, and fidelity. These important concepts
will be discussed in later sections of this chapter.
You are working as a relief pharmacist in a community pharmacy. You notice that Megan,
the 17-year-old daughter of a very close family friend, is receiving prescriptions for oral
contraceptives and for the treatment of a sexually transmitted disease (STD). Apparently,
Megan has been hanging out with a group of students whom her parents disapprove of and
have forbidden her to see. You are very concerned about Megan and wonder whether her
use of oral contraceptives may lead her to forego the use of condoms that could offer
protection from STDs. When Megan enters the pharmacy to pick up her prescriptions, she
becomes upset at seeing you and hurries out, refusing to talk to you. You know that if you
were in her parents’ shoes, you would want to know about the prescriptions. You are
convinced\ that Megan is in trouble and needs the help of her family.
When reviewing Megan’s case, consider the following questions:
What is the ethical dilemma?
What additional facts may be needed to help you reach a decision in this case?
What alternatives might you consider in resolving this dilemma?
What ethical principles are involved in the decision?
What alternative would you choose and why?
How would you proceed in carrying out your decision?
In listing the ethical principles involved with this case, you probably identified patient
confidentiality and beneficence as two of the most important principles. The first principle
implies that, as a pharmacist, you must protect the confidential nature of the patient–
provider relationship and therefore must not discuss this issue with Megan’s parents. On
the other hand, this may conflict with your need to do something to act in Megan’s best
interest (beneficence). You may feel compelled to tell her parents (since she is a minor)
and get them involved in dealing with Megan’s medical, psychological, and social issues.
In evaluating each approach, the confidentiality issues appear to be clearer than the
beneficence issues. Confidentiality simply states that you should not tell Megan’s parents
without her consent. You may resolve the confidentiality issue by urging Megan to grant
you permission to speak with her parents based on your appeal that, in the long run, it will
be the best for all parties concerned. The beneficence issues are more complex, since you
need to identify the real underlying issues. You must ask yourself, “Am I really looking
out for Megan’s interest or am I responding to my own parental instincts?” In addition, you
may be responding out of fear of what would happen if Megan’s parents eventually found
out that you knew about her situation. Fear of losing friends and their business should not
be the primary motivators in this situation. Pharmacists may certainly break confidentiality
when a patient’s life is in danger, such as when concerns about suicide exist. However,
resolving a confidentiality issue when the threat to a patient’s health is more psychological
than physical is more difficult.