Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 115 views

    01 History-Summary PDF

    Uploaded by

    nups

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    01 History-Summary PDF

    Uploaded by

    nups
    115 views2 pages

    Original Title

    01_History-Summary.pdf

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    115 views2 pages

    01 History-Summary PDF

    Uploaded by

    nups

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    Prof. Dr. G.

    Werle SUMMARY (HISTORICAL EVOLUTION)


    Dr. J. Bung INTERNATIONAL C RIMINAL JUSTICE
    Humboldt-Universität zu
    Berlin S OMMERSEMESTER 2010

    The evolution of international criminal law

    The development of international criminal law is closely linked to the establishment of international
    criminal courts, i.e. the punishment of crimes under international law by international courts. In the
    process, the establishment of individual criminal responsibility under international law faced two
    main obstacles: first, in classical international law, states, not individuals, were the exclusive
    subjects. Therefore, establishment of criminal norms in international law first required the
    recognition of the individual as a subject of international law. Second, it was necessary to overcome
    states’ defensive attitude towards outside interference, which was rooted in the concept of
    sovereignty.

    • Versailles Peace Treaty of 28 June 1919


    The treaty made first attempts to establish individual criminal responsibility under international law and to set up
    international criminal courts, see Art. 227-230.

    • Charter of the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg (IMT Charter)


    Article 1 of the London Agreement of 8 August 1945 provided fort the creation of an international military tribunal “for
    the trial of war criminals whose offenses have no particular geographical location.” These major war criminals were to
    be tried on the basis of the IMT-Charter, which was included as an appendix to the Agreement. The trial before the IMT
    at Nuremberg against “Göring et al.” began on 20 November 1945; the court announced its judgment on 30 September
    and 1 October 1946.
    Central provisions of the IMT Charter:
    • Art. 6: crimes: crimes against peace; war crimes; crimes against humanity, (only) if committed in
    connection to crimes against peace or war crimes. The domestic legality of a crime does not prevent its
    prosecution under international law.
    • Art. 7: perpetrator’s official capacity does not bar punishment: no immunity.
    • Art. 10: punishment of crimes committed in the name of certain organizations: punishment of membership in
    organizations whose criminal character was to be determined by the IMT.

    The IMT Charter can be considered the birth certificate of international criminal law. The charter’s main statement was
    that crimes against peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity entail individual responsibility under international
    law. The best-know passage of the judgment commented on this:
    „Crimes against international law are committed by men, not by abstract entities, and only by
    punishing individuals who commit such crimes can the provisions of international law be
    enforced.”
    • Charter of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, on the basis of a directive
    from the Commander-in-Chief of the Allied Forces of 19 January 1946 (IMTFE-Charter)
    The IMTFE-Charter is modeled after the IMT-Charter and shares its provisions on punishable crimes.

    • Control Council Law No. 10 of 20 December 1945 (CCL No. 10)


    With this law, the Allied Control Council for Germany accepted and improved upon the model of the Nuremberg war
    crimes trial. The law was intended to ensure that the subsequent trials in the four occupied zones would rest on a
    uniform legal basis. Numerous national trials took place, including the twelve so-called Nuremberg subsequent trials
    (1946-1949). For crimes against humanity, CCL No. 10 included an improvement that still has an effect today: the
    nexus to war crimes or crimes against peace required by the Nuremberg Charter was eliminated.

    © Prof. Dr. Gerhard Werle, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin 1


    Prof. Dr. G. Werle SUMMARY (HISTORICAL EVOLUTION)
    Dr. J. Bung INTERNATIONAL C RIMINAL JUSTICE
    Humboldt-Universität zu
    Berlin S OMMERSEMESTER 2010

    • International criminal law during the Cold War


    Up to the early 1990s, efforts to codify or develop international criminal law or bring about the creation of an
    international criminal court remained unsuccessful. Some important activities:
    • Codification of international criminal law in international treaties: of particular importance are the
    Genocide Convention of 9 December 1948; and the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, Additional
    Protocols to the Geneva Conventions of 8 June 1977.
    • Activities in the framework of the United Nations: Confirmation of the Nuremberg Principles by the U.N.
    General Assembly on 11 December 1946 (GA Resolution 95); International Law Commission (ILC) drafts for
    an international criminal code and the statute of an international criminal court, in particular ILC Draft Code of
    Crimes Against the Peace and Security of Mankind (1954, 1991, 1996).
    • Some trials before national courts: e.g. Eichmann (District Court of Jerusalem, Judgment of 12 December
    1961)

    • International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, 1993


    The Yugoslavia Tribunal (ICTY) was established by the United Nations Security Council under Chapter VII of the
    U.N. Charter on 25 May 1993 (SC Resolution 827). The ICTY is an ad-hoc Tribunal and has jurisdiction over crimes
    under international law committed in the territories of the former Yugoslavia since 1 January 1991 (see Art. 1 of the
    ICTY Statute). It has jurisdiction only over those crimes that are “beyond doubt customary law”, such as war crimes,
    genocide and crimes against humanity (see Art. 2-5 of the ICTY Statute). The Tribunal is seated in The Hague, The
    Netherlands.

    • International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, 1994


    Like the ICTY, the Rwanda Tribunal (ICTR) was established by the Security Council acting under Chapter VII of the
    U.N. Charter as an ad-hoc Tribunal on 8 November 1994 (SC Resolution 955). The Tribunal has jurisdiction over
    genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes that have been committed on the territory of Rwanda or by Rwandan
    citizens between 1 January and 31 December 1994 (see Art. 2-4 of the ICTR Statute). The court has its seat in Arusha,
    Tanzania.

    • The International Criminal Court and the Rome Statute (ICC Statute)
    On 17 July 1998, the ICC Statute was adopted by 120 States at an international conference in Rome. It entered into
    force on 1 July 2002. Up to now (December 2007) 105 States have ratified the Statute. The Statute establishes the
    International Criminal Court with seat in The Hague, The Netherlands. Unlike the ICTY and ICTR, the ICC is not a
    temporary but permanent court. Its jurisdiction is not limited to certain conflicts or time periods (see Art. 1, 11 et seq. of
    the ICC Statute). However, the Court is subject to the principle of complementarity, that is, it can act only if States are
    unwilling or unable to carry out criminal proceedings (see Art. 17 of the ICC Statute). The ICC Statute contains detailed
    provisions on genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes (see Art. 5-8 of the ICC Statute). For the first time,
    general principles of international criminal law were codified (see Art. 22-33 of the ICC Statute).

    • Hybrid courts
    A new type of transitional justice has recently emerged in a number of states: National ad hoc tribunals working with
    international assistance and partly applying international criminal law. Such “hybrid courts” have been established in
    East Timor (2002), Sierra Leone (2002) and Cambodia (2003)

    Recommended reading: Gerhard Werle, Principles of International Criminal (2005), Part One (A); Antonio Cassese,
    From Nuremberg to Rome: International Military Tribunals to the International Criminal Court, in: Antonio Cassese,
    Paola Gaeta and John R.W.D. Jones (eds.), The Rome Statute of an International Criminal Court: A Commentary,
    Vol. 1 (2002), pp. 23 et seq.

    © Prof. Dr. Gerhard Werle, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin 2

    You might also like