0% found this document useful (0 votes)
157 views39 pages

NumericalMethods G

This document discusses interpolation, which is a method for approximating values of a function between known data points. It describes linear and quadratic Lagrange interpolation polynomials, which use known function values at nodes to determine coefficients of polynomials that estimate the function values at other points. The polynomials exactly match the function values at the nodes. The document also provides an error estimate formula for Lagrange interpolation and gives examples of applying linear and quadratic interpolation.

Uploaded by

dwight
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
157 views39 pages

NumericalMethods G

This document discusses interpolation, which is a method for approximating values of a function between known data points. It describes linear and quadratic Lagrange interpolation polynomials, which use known function values at nodes to determine coefficients of polynomials that estimate the function values at other points. The polynomials exactly match the function values at the nodes. The document also provides an error estimate formula for Lagrange interpolation and gives examples of applying linear and quadratic interpolation.

Uploaded by

dwight
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 39

Numerics in General: Interpolation

Interpolation
Given: values of f (x ) at different points x0 , x1 , · · · , xn
Unknown: approximate values of f (x ) for “new” x’s that lie
between the given or known points

the given values can be written as

f0 = f (x0 ), f1 = f (x1 ), · · · , fn = f (xn )

or as ordered pairs

(x0 , f0 ), (x1 , f1 ), · · · , (xn , fn )

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Numerics in General: Interpolation
these given function values may come from:
mathematical functions
“empirical” functions
standard idea in interpolation
find a pn (x ) of degree n (or less) that assumes the given values,
thus:
pn (x0 ) = f0 , pn (x1 ) = f1 , · · · , pn (xn ) = fn (1)

where:
x0 , · · · , xn = nodes
pn
interpolation polynomial
called as approximation or polynomial approximation of f if f (x )
is a mathematical function
used to determine (approximate) f for x’s between x0 and xn
(interpolation) or outside the interval x0 5 x 5 xn
(extrapolation)
Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods
Numerics in General: Interpolation

Weierstrass aproximation theorem


|f (x ) − pn (x )| < β, ∀x on J
where:
continuous: f (x )
interval: J : a 5 x 5 b
error bound: β > 0
polynomial of sufficiently high degree n: pn (x )

Existence: pn that satisfies (1) for the given data exists and the
formulas are given

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Numerics in General: Interpolation

Uniqueness: pn is unique
if another polynomial qn satisfies:

qn (x0 ) = f0 , · · · , qn (xn ) = fn

then pn (x ) − qn (x ) = 0 at x0 , · · · , xn
polynomial pn − qn of degree n (or less) with n + 1 roots must
be identically zero, thus pn (x ) = qn (x ), ∀x
Determining pn :
Lagrange interpolation
Newton’s divided difference interpolation
Newton’s backward difference interpolation

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Numerics in General: Interpolation

Given: (x0 , f0 ), (x1 , f1 ), · · · , (xn , fn ), with arbitrarily spaced xj

Lagrange’s idea
multiply each fj with a polynomial that is 1 at xj and 0 at the
other n nodes
add these n + 1 polynomials

Simplest Case: Linear interpolation


interpolation by straight line through (x0 , f0 ), (x1 , f1 )
if L0 is a linear polynomial that is 1 at x0 and 0 at x1
similarly, L1 is 0 at x0 and 1 at x1
thus: p1 = L0 f0 + L1 f1

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Numerics in General: Interpolation

Figure : Linear Interpolation.

x −x 1 x −x 0
L0 (x ) = x0 −x1 , L1 (x ) = x 1 −x 0

linear Lagrange polynomial

p1 (x ) = L0 (x )f0 + L1 (x )f1
x − x1 x − x0
= · f0 + · f1
x0 − x1 x1 − x0

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Numerics in General: Interpolation

Example: Lagrange Interpolation


Compute a 4D-value of ln 9.2 from ln 9.0 = 2.1972,
ln 9.5 = 2.2513 by linear Lagrange interpolation and
determine the error using ln 9.2 = 2.2192 (4D)

Solution:
x0 = 9.0, f0 = ln 9.0
x1 = 9.5, f1 = ln 9.5
L0 (9.2) = 0.6
L1 (9.2) = 0.4

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Numerics in General: Interpolation

Example: Lagrange Interpolation

Answer
ln 9.2 ≈ p1 (9.2) = 2.2188 and  = 0.0004

not sufficient for 4D accuracy

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Numerics in General: Interpolation

Quadratic interpolation:
interpolation of given (x0 , f0 ), (x1 , f1 ), (x2 , f2 ) by a
second-degree polynomial p2 (x )

Lagrange’s idea

p2 (x ) = L0 (x )f0 + L1 (x )f1 + L2 (x )f2 (2)

with:
L0 (x0 ) = 1, L1 (x1 ) = 1, L2 (x2 ) = 1
L0 (x1 ) = L0 (x2 ) = 0

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Numerics in General: Interpolation

l0 (x ) (x − x1 )(x − x2 )
L0 (x ) = =
l0 (x0 ) (x0 − x1 )(x0 − x2 )
l1 (x ) (x − x0 )(x − x2 )
L1 (x ) = =
l1 (x1 ) (x1 − x0 )(x1 − x2 )
l2 (x ) (x − x0 )(x − x1 )
L2 (x ) = = .
l2 (x2 ) (x2 − x0 )(x2 − x1 )

numerator: Lk (xj ) = 0 if j , k
denominator: Lk (xk ) = 1 (equals the numerator at x = xk )

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Numerics in General: Interpolation

Example: Quadratic Lagrange Interpolation


Compute ln 9.2 using the data in the previous example
with an additional value ln 11.0 = 2.3979

Solution:
(x − 9.5)(x − 11.0)
L0 (x ) =
(9.0 − 9.5)(9.0 − 11.0)
= x 2 − 20.5x + 104.5,
L0 (9.2) = 0.54,

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Numerics in General: Interpolation

Example: Quadratic Lagrange Interpolation

(x − 9.0)(x − 11.0)
L1 (x ) =
(9.5 − 9.0)(9.5 − 11.0)
1
= − (x 2 − 20x + 99),
0.75
L1 (9.2) = 0.48,

(x − 9.0)(x − 9.5)
L2 (x ) =
(11.0 − 9.0)(11.0 − 9.5)
1 2
(x − 18.5x + 85.5),
=
3
L2 (9.2) = −0.02

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Numerics in General: Interpolation

Example: Quadratic Lagrange Interpolation

Answer

ln 9.2 ≈ p2 (9.2)
= 0.54 · 2.1972 + 0.48 · 2.2513 − 0.02 · 2.3979
= 2.2192

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Numerics in General: Interpolation

General Lagrange Interpolation Polynomial


n
X
f (x ) ≈ pn (x ) = Lk (x )fk (3)
k =0
n
X lk (x )
= fk
lk (xk )
k =0

where:
Lk (xk ) = 1
Lk = 0 at the other nodes
Lk = independent of the function f to be interpolated

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Numerics in General: Interpolation

l0 (x ) = (x − x1 )(x − x2 ) · · · (x − xn )
lk (x ) = (x − x0 ) · · · (x − xk −1 )(x − xk +1 ) · · · (x − xn )
ln (x ) = (x − x0 )(x − x1 ) · · · (x − xn−1 )

0<k <n
pn (xk ) = fk
lk (xj ) = 0 if j , k
so that: x = xk and
lk (xk )
fk = fk
lk (xk )
Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods
Numerics in General: Interpolation

Error Estimate:

n (x ) = f (x ) − pn (x ) (4)
f (n+1) (t )
= (x − x0 )(x − x1 ) · · · (x − xn )
(n + 1)!
where:
f (n+1) exists and is continuous
t between x0 and xn (or between x0 , xn and x)

choose nodes on both sides of x

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Numerics in General: Interpolation

Example:
Estimate the error in the first example using the
interpolation error formula and error principle.

Solution:
Exact: ln 9.2 = 2.2192 (4D)
Approximate: p1 (9.2) = 2.2188
Interpolation Error:

f 2 (t )
1 (x ) = (x − x0 )(x − x1 )
2!
where:
x0 = 9.0
x1 = 9.5
f (t ) = ln t, f 0 (t ) = t −1 , f 00 (t ) = −t −2
Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods
Numerics in General: Interpolation

thus:
1 (9.2) = 0.03t −2

t = 9: maximum 1 (9.2) = 0.00037


t = 9.5: minimum 1 (9.2) = 0.00033
and: 0.00033 5 1 (9.2) 5 0.00037
the error 0.0004 disagrees with the result above

using 5D computation: f0 = 2.19722 and f1 = 2.25129


p1 (9.2) = 2.21885
 = 0.00035 between the range!

discrepancy (0.0004 vs 0.00035) is caused by rounding

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Numerics in General: Interpolation

Error Principle: error estimate of pn (x )

pn+1 (x ) − pn (x )

with 4D: p2 (9.2) − p1 (9.2) = 2.2192 − 2.2188 = 0.0004

with 5D: p2 (9.2) = 2.21916

p2 (9.2) − p1 (9.2) = 2.21916 − 2.21885 = 0.00031

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Interpolation: Newton’s Divided Difference

Newton’s form
practically more important for solving ODEs
involves fewer arithmetic operations

let pn−1 (x ) be the (n − 1)st Newton polynomial


thus:
pn−1 (x0 ) = f0 ,
pn−1 (x1 ) = f1 , · · · ,
pn−1 (xn−1 ) = fn−1
the nth Newton polynomial

pn (x ) = pn−1 (x ) + gn (x )

and
gn (x ) = pn (x ) − pn−1 (x )

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Interpolation: Newton’s Divided Difference

gn (x ) = an (x − x0 )(x − x1 ) · · · (x − xn−1 )
to determine an :
set x = xn and pn (xn ) = fn
solve for an
fn − pn−1 (xn )
an = (5)
(xn − x0 )(xn − x1 ) · · · (xn − xn−1 )
k th divided difference:
f1 − f0
a1 = f [x0 , x1 ] =
x1 − x0

f [x1 , x2 ] − f [x0 , x1 ]
a2 = f [x0 , x1 , x2 ] =
x2 − x0

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Interpolation: Newton’s Divided Difference

k th divided difference
f [x1 , · · · , xk ] − f [x0 , · · · , xk −1 ]
ak = f [x0 , · · · , xk ] = (6)
xk − x0

if n = 1:
f1 − p0 (x1 ) f1 − f0
a1 = = = f [ x0 , x1 ]
x1 − x0 x1 − x0

Newton interpolation polynomial of the first degree:

p1 (x ) = f0 + (x − x0 )f [x0 , x1 ]

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Interpolation: Newton’s Divided Difference

if n = 2:
f2 − p1 (x2 ) f2 − f0 − (x2 − x0 )f [x0 , x1 ]
a2 = = = f [ x0 , x1 , x2 ]
(x2 − x0 )(x2 − x1 ) (x2 − x0 )(x2 − x1 )

second Newton polynomial

p2 (x ) = f0 + (x − x0 )f [x0 , x1 ] + (x − x0 )(x − x1 )f [x0 , x1 , x2 ]

Newton’s Divided Difference Interpolation Formula

f (x ) ≈ f0 + (x − x0 )f [x0 , x1 ] + (x − x0 )(x − x1 )f [x0 , x1 , x2 ] (7)


+ · · · + (x − x0 )(x − x1 ) · · · (x − xn−1 )f [x0 , · · · , xn ]

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Interpolation: Newton’s Divided Difference
ALGORITHM INTERPOL (x0 , · · · , xn ; f0 , · · · , fn ; x̂)
This algorithm computes an approximation pn (x̂ ) of f (x̂ ) at x̂.
INPUT: Data (x0 , f0 ), (x1 , f1 ), · · · , (xn , fn ); x̂
OUTPUT: Approximation pn (x̂ ) of f (x̂ )
Set f [xj ] = fj (j = 0, · · · , n)
For m = 1, · · · , n − 1 do
For j = 0, · · · , n − m do
f [xj +1 , · · · , xj +m ] − f [xj , · · · , xj +m−1 ]
f [xj , · · · , xj +m ] =
xj +m − xj
End
End
Set p0 (x ) = f0
For k = 1, · · · , n do
pk (x̂ ) = pk −1 (x̂ ) + (x̂ − x0 ) · · · (x̂ − xk −1 )f [x0 , · · · , xk ]
End
OUTPUT pn (x̂ )
End INTERPOL
Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods
Interpolation: Newton’s Divided Difference
Example: Compute f (9.2) from the values shown in the
difference table:

xj fj = f (xj ) f [xj , xj +1 ] f [xj , xj +1 , xj +2 ] f [xj , · · · , xj +3 ]


8.0 2.079442
0.117783
9.0 2.197225 −0.006433
0.108134 0.000411
9.5 2.251292 −0.005200
0.097735
11.0 2.397895

f (x ) ≈ p3 (x ) = 2.079442 + 0.117783(x − 8.0)


−0.006433(x − 8.0)(x − 9.0)
+0.000411(x − 8.0)(x − 9.0)(x − 9.5)

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Interpolation: Newton’s Divided Difference

at x = 9.2

exact value to 6D: f (9.2) = ln 9.2 = 2.219203

approximate values :

p1 (9.2) = 2.220782
p2 (9.2) = 2.219238
p3 (9.2) = 2.219208

accuracy increases as the order increases

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Interpolation: Newton’s Forward Difference

in many applications xj ’s are regularly spaced:

x0 , x1 = x0 + h , x2 = x0 + 2h , · · · , xn = x0 + nh

where h = distance

first forward difference of f at xj :

∆fj = fj +1 − fj

second forward difference of f at xj :

∆2 fj = ∆fj +1 − ∆fj

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Interpolation: Newton’s Forward Difference

k th forward difference

∆k fj = ∆k −1 fj +1 − ∆k −1 fj (k = 1, 2, · · · ) (8)
if we have a regular spacing:

∆k f0
f [x0 , · · · , xk ] = (9)
k !h k

Newton’s Forward Difference Interpolation Formula

n !
X r
f (x ) ≈ pn (x ) = ∆s f0 , (10)
s
s =0
(x = x0 + rh , r = (x − x0 )/h )

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Interpolation: Newton’s Forward Difference

where:
! !
r r r (r −1)(r −2)···(r −s +1)
= 1, = s! (s > 0, integer)
0 s

in expanded form:

r (r − 1) 2
f (x ) = f0 + r ∆f0 + ∆ f0 + · · ·
2!
r (r − 1) · · · (r − n + 1) n
+ ∆ f0
n!

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Interpolation: Newton’s Forward Difference

Error

n (x ) = f (x ) − pn (x ) (11)
n +1
h
= r (r − 1) · · · (r − n)f (n+1) (t )
(n + 1)!
consider:
∆n+1 f (t ) |r (r −1)···(r −n)|
f n+1 (t ) ≈ h n+1
, 1·2···(n+1)
5 1 if |r | 5 1
choose x0 , · · · , xn such that x is as well
centered between x0 , · · · , xn as possible

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Interpolation: Newton’s Forward Difference

Example:
Compute cosh 0.56 using the forward difference interpolation
formula and the four values in the table below

j xj fj = cosh xj ∆fj ∆2 fj ∆3 fj
0 0.5 1.127626
0.057839
1 0.6 1.185465 0.011865
0.069704 0.000697
2 0.7 1.255169 0.012562
0.082266
3 0.8 1.337435

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Interpolation: Newton’s Forward Difference

Solution:
0.6(−0.4)
cosh 0.56 ≈ 1.127626 + 0.6 · 0.057839 + · 0.011865
2
0.6(−0.4)(−1.4)
+ · 0.000697
6
= 1.160944

Error estimate:

0.14
3 (0.56) = · 0.6(−0.4)(−1.4)(−2.4) cosh t
4!
= A cosh t

where:
A = −0.00000336
0.5 5 t 5 0.8

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Interpolation: Newton’s Forward Difference

using the given interval:

A cosh 0.8 5 3 (0.56) 5 A cosh 0.5

the resulting estimation:

p3 (0.56) + A cosh 0.8 5 cosh 0.56 5 p3 (0.56) + A cosh 0.5

exact 6D-value: cosh 0.56 = 1.160941


numerical estimates: 1.160939 5 cosh 0.56 5 1.160941

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Interpolation: Newton’s Backward Difference

Differences with the Forward Difference


employs backward-sloping differences
has the same difference table except for the
subscripts
first backward difference of f at xj

∇fj = fj − fj −1

second backward difference of f at xj

∇2 f j = ∇f j − ∇ f j − 1

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Interpolation: Newton’s Backward Difference
k th backward difference

∇k fj = ∇k −1 fj − ∇k −1 fj −1 (k = 1, 2, · · · ) (12)

using the backward differences:


Newton’s backward difference interpolation formula

n !
X r +s−1
f (x ) ≈ pn (x ) = ∇s f0 (13)
s
s =0
(x = x0 + rh , r = (x − x0 )/h )

in expanded form:
r (r + 1 ) 2
f (x ) = f0 + r ∇f0 + ∇ f0 + · · ·
2!
r (r + 1) · · · (r + n − 1) n
+ ∇ f0
n!
Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods
Interpolation: Newton’s Backward Difference

Example:
Compute a 7D-value of the Bessel function J0 (x ) for x = 1.72
from the four values in the table below, using the forward and
backward formulas.

jfor jback xj J0 (xj ) 1st Diff 2nd Diff 3rd Diff


0 −3 1.7 0.3979849
−0.0579985
1 −2 1.8 0.3399864 −0.0001693
−0.0581678 0.0004093
2 −1 1.9 0.2818186 0.0002400
−0.0579278
3 0 2.0 0.2238908

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Interpolation: Newton’s Backward Difference

Solution: Forward
r = (1.72 − 1.70)/0.1 = 0.2
j = 0 to 3

J0 (1.72) ≈ 0.3979849 + 0.2(−0.0579985)


0.2(−0.8)
+ · (−0.0001693)
2
0.2(−0.8)(−1.8)
+ · 0.0004093
6
= 0.3864183

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Interpolation: Newton’s Backward Difference

Solution: Backward
r = (1.72 − 2.00)/0.1 = −2.8

J0 (1.72) ≈ 0.2238908 − 2.8(−0.0579278)


−2.8(−1.8)
+ · (0.0002400)
2
−2.8(−1.8)(−0.8)
+ · 0.0004093
6
= 0.3864184

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods


Next: Final Exam

Engr. Rachel Mabanag Chong, PhD CITU–ECE416: Numerical Methods

You might also like