The Club of Rome

The German-based Club of Rome is yet another global group that holds sway with
governments around the world.
More precisely, the Club of Rome is considered a think tank. And there is no shortage of
these well-funded organizations whose goal is to shape the thinking of not only governments but
the governed as well.
According to Wikipedia, a free on-line encyclopedia, a think tank is described as “a
group of individuals dedicated to high-level synergistic research on a variety of subjects, usually
in military laboratories, corporations, or other institutions. Usually this term refers specifically to
organizations which support theorists and intellectuals who endeavor to produce analysis or
policy recommendations.”
Here, again, is an example of unelected bodies making policy for all nations, yet they go
largely unnoticed by anyone.
And why?
Because the same money that has spawned these think tanks and foundations has bought
out mass media, and though we like to yak about our “free press,” these financial heavy hitters
ensured that we peasants have had nothing close to a free press since William Hearst’s campaign
to get Americans behind our first war of aggression: The Spanish-American War.
The Club of Rome was founded April, 1968, by Aurelio Peccei, an Italian scholar and
industrialist, and Alexander King, a Scottish scientist. The Club generated a great deal of public
attention with its 1972 report, The Limits to Growth, which would become a best-selling radical-
environmental book famous for its gloom-and-doom outlook.
This book was not the first Chicken-Little salvo fired by the organization; it was preceded
by Peccei’s The Chasm Ahead, which was published in 1969 and was successful in working the
masses into an orginial frenzy about the imminent demise of our planet.
Peccei’s book, however, did not create this dread without offering a solution.
And what would that solution be?
Why, depopulation, of course.
Peccei writes: “We must brace up and face reality. And this is another tenet of our New
Approach: the growing complexity and magnitude of problems, and the nature of the threat and
calling they pose, require new postures and planning in meeting them, as practically no margin
for error or leeway for subsequent correction is left any longer, as in past periods.
“Overpopulation versus food supply is generally considered the most basic of our
macroproblems, which cannot be bypassed in the nuclear-electronic-supersonic age. Both
phenomena are of such dimensions and character that they demand a global approach. They pose
an immediate threat. Their solution rejects tactical expediency, anything less than total
commitment; it requires long-term strategy and cooperative effort by all the most powerful
nations and at least the major developing countries.
“Though every civilized spirit ought to quiver with shame when facing the tragic
apparition at this late hour in human history of the question of so many mouths to feed and such
an uncertain food supply, I hold that it is despicable and uncivilized—as too often happens—to
locate the contour of the overpopulation problem just, or mainly, around this question.”
Peccei states that if birth control doesn’t counter the rising tide of Earth’s population, the
alternatives remaining will be grim indeed:
 “Otherwise, some solution will come the hard way. Many hypotheses have been
advanced. I will cite three ghastly solutions that are ventilated as belonging to the realm of the
possible. ‘One is biological: nature, which maintains so many balances, will see to it that human
incontinence will be remedied through some new germ or virus. Another is constrictive and
prophylactic: the day may not be far off when—grafting of population from one region to
another, forced exodus, or mass sterilization, or with the help of other clean methods
biochemistry might suggest—a ceiling on population or new births will be enforced, in some
nations by due process of law, in others perhaps by international measures.
“And the third, the harshest, is hinted at in a most pessimistic essay by Professor
J.D.Bernal (Enormity or Logic and Hypocrisy in the Ultimate Solution) . . . in the sense that all
will end, as the only compassionate and rational solutions left, with the elimination of all surplus
humans . . . .”
Did you catch that?
The elimination of all surplus humans.
It’s the same old story time and again. In the radical environmentalists’s schema, the
answer to all earthly problems is the termination of human beings.
I wonder who among us will decide who is surplus?.
Would it come as a surprise to find out that those who will make the decision are the very
ones pushing the depopulation agenda, the elitiests themselves?
Of course it wouldn’t, for in their collective mind, they are royalty, we’re useless feeders;
therefore, they have no compunction about advocating population reduction and today’s
“bioethics,” which is anything but ethical.
What also comes as no surprise is that one of the Club’s founding members is none other
than David Rockefeller, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, The Bilderberg Group,
and the Trilateral Commission.
Joining Rockefeller in the American contingent of the Club’s charter members are Mrs.
Katharine Meyer Graham of The Washington Post, Averill Harriman, former diplomat and
governor of New York and a Skull & Bones initiate (Yale 1913), and John J. McCloy, one of the
forces behind the creation of the Central Intelligence Agency and advisor to every president from
Franklin Roosevelt to Ronald Reagan.
In addition to the Club’s propaganda about overpopulation—and the Club has a history,
as do most pernicious environmentalist groups, of exaggerating the severity of issues and
formulating only the worst-case projections—the Club has spent five decades creating fear
among the masses that resources are running out and there are no alternatives except for self-
sacrifice, that is, the ultimate self-sacrifice.
Now how stupid must people be to support a movement that is, in essence, anti-human?
Author and former British intelligence officer, Dr. John Coleman, sheds light on these
kinds of activities for which the Club of Rome is famous or, rather, infamous.
In his book, Conspirators' Hierarchy: The Story of The Committee of 300, Coleman
writes:
“One needs to have a clear understanding of just why it is that nuclear power is so hated
all over the world, and why the fake "environmentalist" movement, established and financially
supported by the Club of Rome, was called upon to wage war on nuclear-energy. With nuclear-
energy generating electricity in cheap and abundant supplies, Third World countries would
gradually become independent of U.S. foreign-aid and begin to assert their sovereignty. Nuclear
generated electricity is THE key to bringing Third World countries out of their backward state, a
state which The Committee of 300 has ordered to remain in position.
“Less foreign-aid means less control of a country's natural-resources by the I.M.F.
[International Monetary Fund]. It was this idea of developing nations taking charge of their
destiny that was an anathema to the Club of Rome and its ruling The Committee of 300. We
have seen opposition to nuclear power in the United States successfully used to block industrial
development in conformity with the Club's ‘Post-Industrial, Zero-Growth’ plans.”
So what does this all mean?
To fit in with the global elites’ population-reduction program, these fake
environmentalists must brainwash the masses into believing that no form of energy is available
or practical to meet the demands of resource usage.
Sustainability, in this mind set, can only be achieved by reducing the number of humans
inhabiting the Earth. If this is not undertaken soon, warns the Club’s fear-mongering propaganda
machine, then there will be imminent oil, energy, water and food depletion and, by extension,
horrendous catastrophe.
To be sure, there will be shortages of these resources. However, the shortages will not be
organic but contrived by the globalists to consolidate control. More on this issue in the next
article.

Vyzygoth is a radio host persona. His identity is available by request at the news office. Send correspondence to
[email protected] or [email protected]. His radio show, “From The Grassy Knoll,” streams Wednesdays 5-7 pm
on pascoradio.org. Archived shows can be accessed at vyzygoth.com.