Accounting Best Practices
Accounting Best Practices
Accounting Best Practices
BEST PRACTICES
GUIDE ON REVENUE RECOGNITION
Published by
Canadian Construction Association
www.cca-acc.com
Printed in Canada
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Purpose of Guide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1
9.0 Appendices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
For the percentage of completion method, the guide will also discuss the use of billings as the basis
for determining the extent of work accomplished versus using costs (or other rational bases) in that
determination. It will demonstrate the effect that these bases will have on a company’s bottom line,
including the income tax effect.
The guide addresses current and future income taxes as they relate to holdbacks on construction
contracts and other temporary differences resulting from amortizing assets for book purposes at
different rates than the capital cost allowance rates stipulated by the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”).
It provides guidance on the special GST/HST rules that apply to the construction industry.
The guide will introduce contractors to the new accounting rules surrounding “financial instruments”
which will become mandatory for private companies in the first fiscal year beginning on or after October
1, 2007. Due to the complexity of the new rules and their application, contractors will need to consult
with their professional accountants to decide on the alternatives that will best serve the needs of their
financial statement users.
This guide is written primarily with a view to help contractors understand that their decision on
recognizing revenue using one of the two methods discussed in this paper, may impact upon the
informational needs of banks in determining debt capacity and covenants for companies in the
construction industry and for credit rating agencies. It is also relevant to the needs of a surety company
in determining the bonding capacity of a contractor, thereby increasing or decreasing a contractor’s
success in receiving a bond. For more information on the banking industry, contractors should also refer
to the “Banking Guide for the Canadian Construction Industry” published on the Canadian Construction
Association (“CCA”) website at www.cca-acc.com.
This guide is targeted to small and medium sized contractors who may not have the resources to employ
in-house expertise and to more sophisticated contractors who may find it useful as a training tool for
new staff in their accounting and finance departments. The objective is to make small and medium sized
contractors aware of the implications of alternative revenue recognition methods and the importance
of adopting sound accounting principles that reflect a contractor’s economic activities. This is critical to
cementing positive business relationships with surety companies and banks.
The CCA believes that adopting sound accounting principles will increase a contractor’s ability to receive
bonding capacity through their surety company and improve their success in securing lines of credit
and equipment loans. This guide also provides practical examples to assist contractors in implementing
the percentage of completion method using costs and costs to complete as the basis for revenue
recognition.
Under GAAP, management has some leeway in selecting accounting policies but once selected,
management is expected to consistently follow the policy unless a change in the company’s business
dictates that a change is warranted or a change in GAAP is issued by the Accounting Standards Board (the
“AcSB”). For the most part, it is important to select the alternative that will produce the most meaningful
financial results and meet the needs of the primary users of the financial statements over time.
• Understandability – financial statements that are unduly complicated can send up a red flag
to banks, surety companies and potential investors; transparency is key to success in today’s
business environment.
• Comparability – financial statements that are comparable allow users to compare a company to
another similar company or to compare a company’s performance over a period of time; both
are techniques used by banks, surety companies and potential investors to evaluate a company’s
performance.
Financial statements provide financial information at a point in time and changes to assets, liabilities
and equities covering a certain period of time. The following makes up a set of traditional financial
statements:
• Balance sheet (a statement of financial position at a specific date, including assets, liabilities and
equity);
• Statement of changes in retained earnings (changes in retained earnings from the previous
period, adding in net income/loss for the year and deducting dividends);
• Statement of changes in cash flow (changes in cash balances from the previous period, which
shows sources and uses of cash); and
• Notes to the financial statements, which provide additional information for users for clarification
purposes.
With the implementation of the new accounting standards for financial instruments, comprehensive
income and its components, when applicable, are displayed with the same prominence as the other
statements.
Internal users such as management, owners and shareholders of private companies rely on financial
statements to:
• Assess the appropriateness of the company’s policies (pricing, credit, payment) to improve
profitability and evaluate success by comparing its financial benchmarks to those of its
competitors; for example, gross profit comparisons to industry standard (note that these are
more meaningful if everyone in the industry prepares their financial information in the same
way).
• Determine net income after taxes, which results from recognizing revenue when it has been
earned and matching the corresponding expenses against that revenue in the same period;
this enables management to determine how profitable the company was in a given year and
measure return on equity invested.
• Measure the company’s true growth from year to year, avoiding fluctuations in net income due
to the inconsistent application of accounting principles (i.e. changing from one to another in
the following year) or the application of a principle that skews financial results in a particular
industry.
• Assess the financial health of a company and its ability to generate long term returns on
investment, including a risk premium reflecting the nature of the industry; for example, a private
company may want to grow without adding debt by admitting another partner or shareholder,
or an owner may want to sell the company as a going concern and retire.
• Assess the company’s exposure to liability through lawsuits, commitments and contingent
liabilities.
External users such as banks and surety companies rely on financial statements to:
• Assess the credit worthiness of the contractor, as well as ongoing credit worthiness once the
initial position is established (i.e. credit risk);
• Determine the price for which lines of credit, long term debt and surety bonds will be offered
(i.e. premiums, interest rates);
• Determine the terms and conditions (set out in covenants) and security requirements based on
an overall assessment of risk (i.e. financial risk);
• Assess the company’s exposure to foreign exchange fluctuations which may negatively impact
net income (exchange risk); and
• Assess overall company liquidity and its ability to handle any difficult situations that may arise.
• Determine the debt load or bonding capacity that a potential customer can carry and ability to
service debt and meet its obligations (i.e. liquidity risk);
For example, through an in-depth review of a contractor’s financial statements, a bank assesses the
company’s ability to consistently maintain positive cash flow, collect its receivables, pay its employees
and suppliers and meet its obligations to the government and other creditors. Surety companies do
the same, as they want to ensure that a contractor can meet its obligations while waiting for progress
payments to be made to them on a contract. Surety companies want to see that a contractor has
adequate lines of credit to finance (multiple) contracts for which they are providing surety bonds. Surety
companies and banks also assess a company’s profitability as compared to others in the same industry,
the stability of historical profits and the company’s capacity to grow and be profitable.
Establishing and maintaining good supplier credit is also essential to a contractor. External users such
as credit rating agencies rely on financial statements to assess the credit worthiness of a company,
compiling this information and providing it to their subscribers. These subscribers use the agency’s
rating in determining supplier credit to be given to or withheld from a particular contractor. This can be
very important to a contractor who is starting up and is trying to establish credit with various suppliers
when it has no track record to demonstrate its credit worthiness. So although the financial statements
are provided to these agencies by a contractor on a voluntary basis, it is normally in the contractor’s best
interests to do so.
External users such as the CRA rely on financial statements to collect tax that is owing by a company.
In general, under the Income Tax Act, companies are expected to follow GAAP in the preparation of
financial statements.
Absolute assurance is not attainable in an audit because the auditor does not audit 100% of a company’s
transactions and there are also limitations in the quality of audit evidence, a need to place some
reliance on management representations and a need to make professional judgments pertaining to
management’s estimates.
Audit procedures however, are rigorous and are targeted to areas of risk, and the auditor keeps
management’s biases in mind. Audit procedures include physical inspection of assets to confirm
existence, observation and documentation of client procedures, confirmation from external parties
and examination of documents supporting various assets and liabilities on the balance sheet. Audited
financial statements, therefore, have the highest degree of credibility among surety companies, banks
and other external users of the financial statements.
A bank in its debt covenants may set the requirement for an audit of a company’s financial statements.
Many companies, unless they are required to do so, do not have an audit performed on their financial
statements as audit engagements are more costly than non-audit engagements. Instead, if they are
able to do so, most companies opt for a less expensive review of their financial statements by a public
accountant.
2.3.2 Review Engagements
Review engagements are distinguishable from audits in that the level of assurance provided by the
professionally accredited public accountant is lower. Review procedures consist primarily of enquiry,
analytical procedures and discussion related to information supplied by the company. The objective
of a review engagement is to assess whether the information being reported on is plausible. “Plausible
information” is generally that which appears to be worthy of belief based on the information obtained
by the public accountant from company’s management.
Financial statements, which have been “reviewed” by a public accountant normally, have some
credibility among the external users of the financial statements. This however, is based primarily on the
credibility of the public accountant and the perceived independence from the company subject to the
review. Therefore, contractors are encouraged to utilize the services of professionally accredited public
accountants. Contractors should discuss the need for an audit versus a review with their bank and surety
company.
2.3.3 Compilation Engagements
A compilation engagement provides the lowest level of assurance to users of the financial statements.
The public accountant simply compiles the financial statements of a company from information
• Revenue from the sale of goods or provision of services should be recorded in the financial
statements when a seller has transferred to a buyer, the significant risk and rewards of ownership
and when the consideration (i.e. the selling price) can be reasonably determined.
• Revenue from the sale of goods or provision of services should be recorded when ultimate
collection is reasonably assured.
GAAP currently provides additional guidance allowing contractors to use either the completed contract
or the percentage of completion method of revenue recognition, depending on their situation. When
a contractor’s contracts typically extend past two years, the CRA requires that the contractor use the
percentage of completion method. A contractor can currently select the completed contract method
for tax purposes (i.e. if contracts are less than two years in duration) and the percentage of completion
method for financial statement purposes.
Since most construction contracts involve the execution of many acts by a contractor, the completed
contract method is not appropriate under GAAP. And it is likely only in exceptional circumstances
that the stage of completion of a contract cannot be reasonably estimated. Nonetheless, some small
contractors have adopted this method for the following reasons:
• There is no need to estimate costs to complete a project (i.e. costs are all known when the profit
is booked); and
• Assuming that the contractor is profitable, the income tax is deferred to the end of the
contract.
For very small contractors, where the contract duration is relatively short (less than one year), this method
is acceptable, provided it meets one of the two criteria. The contractor (small or otherwise) however has
In reviewing a contractor’s financial statements, surety companies and banks look at stability of
operations and growth. The misapplication of the completed contract method to contracts involving
the execution of a number of acts could produce unfavourable financial results in some years and very
positive results in others. This can negatively impact on the contractor’s bonding capacity and on the
small contractor’s ability to grow. And, under the completed contract method, if management becomes
aware that a contract will end in a loss, under GAAP the loss is to be recorded immediately (i.e. not at the
end of the contract).
Appendix A-1 provides an example of the completed contract method as compared to the percentage
of completion method for a construction company, spanning a period of four years. The completed
contract method produces a balance sheet with inventory and work in progress relating to costs
incurred and deferred revenue, which reflects over-billings to owners for work accomplished. The costs
and the corresponding revenue do not appear on the contractor’s income statement until the contract is
complete. Net income and gross profit percentages therefore are skewed from year to year. For financial
statement presentation purposes, under and over billings on multiple contracts may not be netted on
the balance sheet. Since contractors often must complete monthly progress applications/billings in
advance of the actual end of the period covered by the invoice/application, (i.e. submit on the 27th of
the month and invoice for work completed to the 31st), it is not uncommon for the amount invoiced to
be more than the actual work performed.
This Appendix also provides the journal entries to record revenue under both methods. The percentage
of completion method clearly is superior, resulting in steady growth in revenues and net income. As
mentioned earlier in this guide, CRA currently allows contractors to use the completed contract method
for tax purposes although the contractor’s financial statements are prepared using the percentage of
completion method. As a result, the contractor can, with the additional effort have the best of both
worlds.
It should be noted that the AcSB has approved the adoption of International Financial Reporting
Standards (“IFRSs”) in Canada with a targeted transition date of 2011. IFRSs do not permit the use of the
completed contract method. The AcSB has not determined whether IFRSs will be required for private
companies but it is unlikely that the standards applicable to private companies will be significantly
different from those for publicly accountable entities. Contractors can expect to have to adopt the
percentage of completion method. As a result, given that surety companies and banks are interested
in historical profitability as a measure of the future success, contractors should seriously consider early
adoption of the percentage of completion method.
Many contractors have adopted what they believe to be the percentage of completion method using
billings or periodic payment certificates as a basis for recognizing revenue. This is only appropriate
under GAAP if the amount billed is representative of the extent of work accomplished. For the reasons
stated above, the amount billed can be greater than the work actually completed. This is a practical bias
as it can be up to two months or more before the contractor is paid and under billing, from a cash flow
perspective, can be hazardous to a contractor’s health. Using billings as a base also distorts revenue
recognition, causing more revenue to be earned at the front end and a mismatch with costs incurred.
This has implications for tax purposes, as income tax may be paid prematurely. Contractors should use
deferred or accrued revenue to report incomplete jobs at the expected final profit percentage.
Included in Appendix A-2 is an example of the percentage of completion method, using billings as a
basis for measuring the extent of work accomplished versus the cost based method.
In the construction industry, the most reliable measurement of the extent of work accomplished tends
to be cost based, in particular when materials, labour and equipment costs/rentals are inputs to the
“production” process. Other bases that would be considered appropriate are labour hours or machine
hours, where material costs in a contract are negligible (i.e. site work for road construction). The
percentage of completion is then derived from a simple formula, “actual costs incurred (or hours spent)
to date” divided by “total costs (or hours) to complete the contract”. The total cost to complete a project
is equal to actual costs incurred to date for a project plus estimated costs to complete the project.
Since the initial costing of a contract in the bidding phase is based on estimated total costs, actual
total costs to complete a contract will change as the project progresses. As a result, it is necessary for
management to make its best estimate of costs to complete a project to determine the expected total
cost of the project. So while the formula is simple, there is effort required on the part of management to
estimate costs to complete contracts that are in process.
The frequency with which a contractor is required to provide financial statements to its bank or surety
company will determine how frequently these estimates will need to be made. Most contractors are
required to report on an interim basis (monthly or quarterly) and on an annual basis with a complete set
of GAAP compliant financial statements each reporting period; some small or mid sized contractors may
only be required to provide a complete set of GAAP compliant financial statements on an annual basis.
The intent of the recommendation to use costs as a basis for determining work completed (or another
rational base such as labour hours or machine hours), is not to change the way in which contractors
bill for work performed on contracts. Current practices involving owner sign off and certifications by
architects and/or engineers are industry practice and are not affected by these recommendations.
These recommendations are targeted to revenue recognition in a contractor’s financial statements not
changing the contractor’s billing practices.
The most compelling reason for adopting the cost based (or machine or labour hours, as appropriate)
percentage of completion method, is that the contractor’s financial statements will meet the needs of
The current portion is equal to the principal due within one year of the balance sheet date.
Examples of long term debt include a bond, debenture, an equipment loan or a mortgage against real
property. Bank debt may also be classified as long term, when a maturity date beyond one year is set by
a banking agreement.
• the interest rate, whether it is fixed (7%, for example) or floating (prime + 3%, for example);
• the currency;
• the maturity date of the debt (due March 31, 2017, for example) or if it is payable on demand;
• if the loan is secured and type of security (for example, a personal guarantee by a shareholder,
pledging of cash or accounts receivable, a mortgage against real property or a chattel against
equipment); and
• any conditions which if breached would change the terms of the debt.
Where an asset is pledged as security against liabilities, the nature and carrying amount of the asset
needs to be disclosed. This information will be of interest to the surety company.
Interest on short term and long term debt also needs to be disclosed separately on the income statement.
In addition, principal repayments over the next five years, following the balance sheet date are disclosed
in the notes to the financial statements.
Because loan agreements with a contractor’s bank can impact on bonding capacity, it is critical that the
contractor ensure that both the bank and surety company are aware of a contractor’s bonding needs.
Since the bank’s security interests will normally place above that of the surety company’s interests, in
negotiations with the bank, the pledging of assets as collateral needs to be carefully considered.
To qualify for differential reporting, a company must meet the following two criteria:
• It must be privately held (i.e. the company is a non-publicly accountable enterprise); and
• Its owners must unanimously consent, in writing, to the application of each differential reporting
option chosen, prior to the date of completion of the company’s financial statements.
• Investments (a company may choose to account for its investment in other companies in which
it has significant influence using the cost method as opposed to the equity method);
• Interests in joint ventures (a company may choose to account for its interest in a joint venture
using either the cost or equity method, rather than a proportionate consolidation);
• Share capital (a company may choose to disclose details only on authorized share capital that
has actually been issued);
• Income taxes (a company may choose to account for income taxes on a current taxes payable
basis, as opposed to reporting on current and future income taxes);
• Financial instruments (a company may choose to measure available for sale financial assets
at cost or amortized cost, under certain conditions, and present preferred shares as equity, as
opposed to a liability on the balance sheet); and
• Goodwill and intangibles (a company may choose to test for an impairment in value of goodwill
only when an event or circumstance suggests that the fair value is lower than the carrying value,
as opposed to annually).
There are a number of choices to be made between accounting principles and a number of disclosures
that will need to be made, including the fact that the company has chosen to report using differential
reporting. As a result, contractors are encouraged to seek the advice of a professionally accredited public
accountant. Contractors should also discuss their intent to use differential reporting with their bank and
surety company.
• temporary deductible differences between capital cost allowance and amortization of capital
assets, resulting in the net book value differing from the unamortized capital cost, as calculated
following the CRA’s rules;
Differences between the unamortized capital cost of capital assets and the net book value typically
have been managed by adopting amortization rates equal to those specified by the CRA. Contractors,
however, should be cautious in adopting this approach since using the CRA’s rates may not reflect
the useful life of the assets and hence, the value of capital assets may be under or over stated on a
contractor’s financial statements.
Under GAAP, future tax assets are recognized in the financial statements to the extent that they are more
likely to be realized than not. Future tax liabilities, on the other hand, are to be recognized immediately.
The calculation of future tax assets and liabilities are based on the tax rates and laws that are expected
to apply when the asset is realized or the liability is settled. On the income statement, future income
tax provisions (recoveries), combined with current tax provisions (i.e. taxes based on the company’s tax
return with the CRA) have the effect of smoothing taxes, and hence net income. The use of future taxes
better matches tax obligations with the economic activities of a company.
The taxes payable basis is the method of accounting which is allowed under the differential reporting
options. Under this method, a company reports as an expense (income) of the period only the cost
(recovery) of current income taxes for that period, determined in accordance with CRA’s rules. Contractors
should discuss their intent to use the taxes payable method with their bank and surety company.
From an accounting perspective, GST and HST collected on a contractor’s sales are not revenues of the
contractor, but liabilities. Contractors who are GST/HST registrants are also eligible to claim, for refund,
the GST/HST paid on all of their purchases in the form of input tax credits. The net payable (receivable)
is remitted to (refunded by) CRA on a periodic basis (monthly, quarterly, annually).
In this situation, the application for payment is NOT considered to be an invoice for GST/HST purposes,
since it is only a request that a certificate for payment be issued. Therefore, GST/HST does not become
payable when the application is issued.
Where an invoice is not issued in respect of the certified amount, GST/HST becomes payable on
the amount certified on the day the client pays the amount, or on the day the client has to pay the
amount under the terms of the contract, whichever day is earlier.
Example: A contractor submits a monthly progress application on June 30th for work performed in the
previous 30-day period. That amount is certified on July 8th and is due and payable under the contract
on July 18th. No invoice is issued in respect of the certified amount. The GST is payable on the certified
amount on July 18th, unless payment is made earlier.
The same timing situation would apply in the case of progress payments made under subcontract
agreements where such agreements state that payments to the subcontractor are dependant upon the
amount being certified.
Example: A contractor submits a monthly progress draw on June 30th for work performed in the previous
30-day period. That amount is subject to a statutory holdback of 10%. The statutory holdback period
does not expire until September. The GST/HST on the holdback amount would not be payable until
September unless payment of the holdback amount is made earlier.
Under GAAP, contractors must disclose information for each type of risk arising from its financial
instruments:
• Credit risk (the amount that best represents a contractor’s maximum exposure to credit risk at
the balance sheet date without taking any collateral held or other credit enhancements into
consideration, a description of collateral held as security and other credit enhancements and
information about the credit quality of its financial assets);
• Liquidity risk (a maturity analysis for financial liabilities that shows remaining contractual
maturities and a description of how it manages liquidity risk); and
Disclosures on risk enable banks and surety companies to evaluate the nature and extent of risks arising
from financial instruments to which the contractor is exposed at the balance sheet date. Hence, these
disclosures are an important source of information for these users when evaluating a contractor’s
management strength and financial stability.
In 2005, the AcSB introduced new GAAP for “financial instruments” to be applied in fiscal years
commencing on or after October 1, 2006 (2007 for private companies).
If a contractor doesn’t have any financial instruments other than cash, accounts receivable and payable
and arm’s length debt (i.e. debt with an unrelated third party such as a bank), there will be little change
from current accounting under GAAP. However, if a contractor has investments in common shares or debt
securities, uses derivatives or hedges interest rate and foreign exchange risk, there will be a significant
impact. Loans that are not at market rates may also need to be adjusted to ensure the appropriate
amount of interest expense is recognized. There are also policy choices that must be made for costs
associated with loans and investments.
With the introduction of new GAAP for financial instruments, came the creation of the concept of
“comprehensive income”. Comprehensive income is the change in equity from non-owner sources. It
includes net income plus all other changes in equity except those resulting from investments by or
distributions to owners. Some standards require certain revenues, expenses, gains, or losses to be
recognized in comprehensive income but not in net income. Those “other comprehensive income” items
include foreign currency translation gains and losses on investments in self-sustain foreign operations,
unrecognized gains and losses (including foreign currency translation) on assets classified as available
for sale and gains or losses on qualified cash flow hedging items.
Because of the complexity of these standards, contractors are encouraged to seek the advice of a
professionally accredited public accountant.
XYZ Construction
Income Statement % of Completion
Years 1 to 4
Pros.
1. Stability in operation.
3. Billings based on understanding of total expected cost of project.
4. More stable gross profit %.
5. More closely reflects economic activities of XYZ.
6. Accounting not significantly more difficult than completed contract.
Cons:
1. Tax disadvantage (mitigated by CRA, allows completed contract for tax only).
2. Need for management to estimate cost to complete.
XYZ Construction
Balance Sheet Completed Contract Page 2
Years 1 to 4
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
XYZ Construction
Income Statement Completed Contract
Years 1 to 4
Pros:
1. Simplicity.
2. Tax deferral opportunities.
Cons:
1. Justifying this method under GAAP.
2. Volatility in sales and net income.
3. High inventory and deferred revenue values.
4. Billings based on costs to date, ignores overall picture.
5. Skewed gross profit %.
6. Determining/justifying projects as virtually complete (judgement required).
17
Estimated Management’s Revenue Revenue
Total Contract (Actual) Costs Estimated Costs Incurred Customer Estimate of Cost Recognized Recognized %
Projects Year 3 Amount as per Quote (Actual) Profit During the Year Billings to Complete Completed Contract Completion
Word Pharmacy (Project Closed) 350,000.00 315,000.00 35,000.00
Excel Manufacturing (96.9% complete) 1,600,000.00 1,300,000.00 300,000.00 750,000.00 925,000.00 40,000.00 1,551,145.00 896,027.00
Time Foods (100% complete) 100,000.00 90,000.00 10,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 - 100,000.00 27,778.00
Web Design (10% complete) 200,000.00 180,000.00 20,000.00 18,000.00 25,000.00 162,000.00 - 20,000.00
Outlook Manufacturing (35.7% complete) 800,000.00 700,000.00 100,000.00 250,000.00 325,000.00 450,000.00 - 285,714.00
3,050,000.00 2,585,000.00 465,000.00 1,043,000.00 1,300,000.00 652,000.00 1,651,145.00 1,229,519.00
XYZ Construction
Completed Contract vs Percentage of Completion
Journal Entries Year 1 to 4
Year 1 Year 2
Entries Required (Completed Contract): Entries Required (Completed Contract):
Dr. Direct Wages, Benefits & Materials 200,000.00 Dr. Direct Wages, Benefits & Materials 200,000.00
Cr. Cash/Accounts Payable 200,000.00 Cr. Work in Process (Inventory) 200,000.00
To record the payment of wages, benefits and material cost of sales for the Word To reallocate first year costs to cost of sales for Word Pharmacy contract.
Pharmacy contract during the year.
Dr. Direct Wages, Benefits & Materials 115,000.00
Dr Work in Process (Inventory) 200,000.00 Cr. Cash/Accounts Payable 115,000.00
Cr. Direct Wages, Benefits & Materials 200,000.00 To record second year costs in cost of sales for Word Pharmacy contract; project 100%
To reallocate direct costs for the Word Pharmacy contract to Inventory. complete.
Dr. Cash 230,000.00 Dr. Cash/Accounts Receivable 120,000.00
Cr. Deferred Revenue 230,000.00 Dr. Deferred Revenue 230,000.00
To record progress billing re Word Pharmacy. Cr. Sales 350,000.00
Entries Required (% Completion): To reallocate first year Deferred Revenue to sales and record second years sale re Word
Dr. Direct Wages, Benefits & Materials 200,000.00 Pharmacy contract.
Cr. Cash/Accounts Payable 200,000.00 Dr. Direct Wages, Benefits & Materials 585,000.00
To record the payment of wages, benefits and material cost of sales for the Word Cr. Cash/Accounts Payable 585,000.00
Pharmacy contract during the year. To record the payment of wages, benefits and material cost of sales for the Excel &
Dr. Cash 230,000.00 Time contracts.
Cr. Deferred Revenue 230,000.00 Dr Work in Process (Inventory) 585,000.00
To record progress billing re Word Pharmacy. Cr. Direct Wages, Benefits & Materials 585,000.00
Dr. Deferred Revenue 222,222.00 To reallocate direct costs for the Excel & Time contracts to Inventory in first year of
Cr. Sales 222,222.00 these contracts.
To record sales based on the Word Pharmacy contract which is 63.5% complete at year Dr. Cash 700,000.00
end. Cr. Deferred Revenue 700,000.00
Dr. Income Taxes 4,444.40 To record progress billing re Excel and Time contracts in the first year of these contracts.
Cr. Income Tax Payable 4,444.40 Dr. Income Taxes 7,000.00
To record current income taxes payable at 20%. Cr. Income Tax Payable 7,000.00
To record current income taxes payable at 20%.
Entries Required (% Completion):
Dr. Direct Wages, Benefits & Materials 115,000.00
Cr. Cash/Accounts Payable 115,000.00
To record second year costs in cost of sales for Word Pharmacy contract; project 100%
complete.
Dr. Cash/Accounts Receivable 120,000.00
Dr. Deferred Revenue 7,778.00
Cr. Sales 127,778.00
To reallocate first year Deferred Revenue to sales and record the second year’s sale re
Word Pharmacy contract.
Dr. Direct Wages, Benefits & Materials 585,000.00
Cr. Cash/Accounts Payable 585,000.00
To record the payment of wages, benefits and material cost of sales for the Excel &
Time contracts.
Dr. Cash/Accounts Receivable 700,000.00
Cr. Deferred Revenue 700,000.00
To record progress billings re Excel and Time contracts in the first year of these contracts.
Dr. Deferred Revenue 727,340.00
Cr. Sales 727,340.00
To record sales for the Excel and Time contracts which iare 40.9% and 72.2% complete.
Dr. Income Taxes Payable 4,444.40
Cr. Cash 4,444.40
To record income taxes paid.
Dr. Income Taxes 31,023.60
Cr. Income Tax Payable 31,023.60
To record current income taxes payable at 20%.
continued on next page
XYZ Construction
Balance Sheet % of Completion
XYZ Construction
Income Statement % of Completion
Although the cost basis requires that management estimate the cost to complete it imposes a discipline for
management to revisit the profitability around its contracts, providing the opportunity to take remedial action to
avoid losses. There are, however, other serious shortfalls of using billings as basis for recording revenue:
1. Not acceptable under GAAP as it does not reflect “extent of accomplishment”.
2. Overstates revenue.
3. Distorts the true gross profit that will be earned on the contracts - misleading.
4. Results in the prepayment of income taxes.
With regard to distorting the true gross profit, the billings basis suggests a gross profit of 20%, when in fact
management estimates the overall gross profit for these projects at 14.3% (see Appendix A-2-1) when they are all
completed. The 15.6% above, using the cost basis is closer, to reality.
Note that the cash balance under the billings and cost basis are the same. The intent is not to change how
management progress bills its contracts. The practice of billing to ensure good cash flow would continue.
Word Pharmacy 350,000.00 297,500.00 52,500.00 200,000.00 230,000.00 115,000.00 315,000.00 63.5% 230,000.00 222,222.22 7,777.78
Excel
21
Manufacturing 1,600,000.00 1,300,000.00 300,000.00 1,270,000.00 1,550,000.00 40,000.00 1,310,000.00 96.9% 1,550,000.00 1,551,145.04 (1,145.04)
Web Design 200,000.00 180,000.00 20,000.00 18,000.00 25,000.00 185,000.00 203,000.00 8.9% 25,000.00 17,733.99 7,266.01
Outlook
Manufacturing 800,000.00 700,000.00 100,000.00 250,000.00 325,000.00 440,000.00 690,000.00 36.2% 325,000.00 289,855.07 35,144.93
AdWare
Enterprises 1,500,000.00 1,275,000.00 225,000.00 765,000.00 1,000,000.00 530,000.00 1,295,000.00 59.1% 1,000,000.00 886,100.39 113,899.61
4,450,000.00 3,752,500.00 697,500.00 2,503,000.00 3,130,000.00 1,310,000.00 3,813,000.00 3,130,000.00 2,967,056.71 162,943.29