Report I of the UI
4UBUFXJEF

*OWFTUJHBUJOH
(SBOE
+VSZ

REDACTED
By order of PA Supreme Court July 27, 2018
 Section I. Introduction 1

Section II. The Dioceses 13

Roman Catholic Diocese of Allentown 15

Roman Catholic Diocese of Erie 65

Roman Catholic Diocese of Greensburg 113

Roman Catholic Diocese of Harrisburg 149

Roman Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh 207

Roman Catholic Diocese of Scranton 251

Section III. The Church and Child Abuse, Past and Present 297

Section IV. Recommendations of the Grand Jury 307

Section V. Appendix of Offenders 315

Roman Catholic Diocese of Allentown 317

Roman Catholic Diocese of Erie 389

Roman Catholic Diocese of Greensburg 475

Roman Catholic Diocese of Harrisburg 517

Roman Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh 587

Roman Catholic Diocese of Scranton 799

Society of St. John 877

I. Introduction

We, the members of this grand jury, need you to hear this. We know some of you have

heard some of it before. There have been other reports about child sex abuse within the Catholic

Church. But never on this scale. For many of us, those earlier stories happened someplace else,

someplace away. Now we know the truth: it happened everywhere.

We were given the job of investigating child sex abuse in six dioceses – every diocese in

the state except Philadelphia and Altoona-Johnstown, which were the subject of previous grand

juries. These six dioceses account for 54 of Pennsylvania’s 67 counties. We heard the testimony

of dozens of witnesses concerning clergy sex abuse. We subpoenaed, and reviewed, half a million

pages of internal diocesan documents. They contained credible allegations against over three

hundred predator priests. Over one thousand child victims were identifiable, from the church’s

own records. We believe that the real number – of children whose records were lost, or who were

afraid ever to come forward – is in the thousands.

Most of the victims were boys; but there were girls too. Some were teens; many were pre-

pubescent. Some were manipulated with alcohol or pornography. Some were made to masturbate

their assailants, or were groped by them. Some were raped orally, some vaginally, some anally.

But all of them were brushed aside, in every part of the state, by church leaders who preferred to

protect the abusers and their institution above all

As a consequence of the coverup, almost every instance of abuse we found is too old to be

prosecuted. But that is not to say there are no more predators. This grand jury has issued

presentments against a priest in the Greensburg diocese and a priest in the Erie Diocese, who has

been sexually assaulting children within the last decade. We learned of these abusers directly from

1
their dioceses – which we hope is a sign that the church is finally changing its ways. And there

may be more indictments in the future; investigation continues.

But we are not satisfied by the few charges we can bring, which represent only a tiny

percentage of all the child abusers we saw. We are sick over all the crimes that will go unpunished

and uncompensated. This report is our only recourse. We are going to name their names, and

describe what they did – both the sex offenders and those who concealed them. We are going to

shine a light on their conduct, because that is what the victims deserve. And we are going to make

our recommendations for how the laws should change so that maybe no one will have to conduct

another inquiry like this one. We hereby exercise our historical and statutory right as grand jurors

to inform the public of our findings.

This introduction will briefly describe the sections of the report that follow. We know it is

very long. But the only way to fix these problems is to appreciate their scope.

The dioceses

This section of the report addresses each diocese individually, through two or more case

studies that provide examples of the abuse that occurred and the manner in which diocesan leaders

“managed” it. While each church district had its idiosyncrasies, the pattern was pretty much the

same. The main thing was not to help children, but to avoid “scandal.” That is not our word, but

theirs; it appears over and over again in the documents we recovered. Abuse complaints were kept

locked up in a “secret archive.” That is not our word, but theirs; the church’s Code of Canon Law

specifically requires the diocese to maintain such an archive. Only the bishop can have the key.

The strategies were so common that they were susceptible to behavioral analysis by the

Federal Bureau of Investigation. For our benefit, the FBI agreed to assign members of its National

Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime to review a significant portion of the evidence received

2
by the grand jury. Special agents testified before us that they had identified a series of practices

that regularly appeared, in various configurations, in the diocesan files they had analyzed. It’s like

a playbook for concealing the truth:

First, make sure to use euphemisms rather than real words to describe the sexual assaults

in diocese documents. Never say “rape”; say “inappropriate contact” or “boundary issues.”

Second, don’t conduct genuine investigations with properly trained personnel. Instead,

assign fellow clergy members to ask inadequate questions and then make credibility

determinations about the colleagues with whom they live and work.

Third, for an appearance of integrity, send priests for “evaluation” at church-run psychiatric

treatment centers. Allow these experts to “diagnose” whether the priest was a pedophile, based

largely on the priest’s “self-reports,” and regardless of whether the priest had actually engaged in

sexual contact with a child.

Fourth, when a priest does have to be removed, don’t say why. Tell his parishioners that

he is on “sick leave,” or suffering from “nervous exhaustion.” Or say nothing at all.

Fifth, even if a priest is raping children, keep providing him housing and living expenses,

although he may be using these resources to facilitate more sexual assaults.

Sixth, if a predator’s conduct becomes known to the community, don’t remove him from

the priesthood to ensure that no more children will be victimized. Instead, transfer him to a new

location where no one will know he is a child abuser.

Finally and above all, don’t tell the police. Child sexual abuse, even short of actual

penetration, is and has for all relevant times been a crime. But don’t treat it that way; handle it

like a personnel matter, “in house.”

3
 To be sure, we did come across some cases in which members of law enforcement, despite

what may have been the dioceses’ best efforts, learned of clergy sex abuse allegations. Some of

these were many decades ago, and police or prosecutors at the time simply deferred to church

officials. Other reports arose more recently, but involved old conduct, and so were quickly rejected

on statute of limitations grounds without looking into larger patterns and potential continuing risks.

We recognize that victims in these circumstances were understandably disappointed there was no

place they could go to be heard.

But we have heard them, and will tell their stories, using the church’s own records, which

we reproduce in the body of the report where appropriate. In the Diocese of Allentown, for

example, documents show that a priest was confronted about an abuse complaint. He admitted,

“Please help me. I sexually molested a boy.” The diocese concluded that “the experience will not

necessarily be a horrendous trauma” for the victim, and that the family should just be given “an

opportunity to ventilate.” The priest was left in unrestricted ministry for several more years,

despite his own confession.

Similarly in the Diocese of Erie, despite a priest’s admission to assaulting at least a dozen

young boys, the bishop wrote to thank him for “all that you have done for God’s people…. The

Lord, who sees in private, will reward.” Another priest confessed to anal and oral rape of at least

15 boys, as young as seven years old. The bishop later met with the abuser to commend him as “a

person of candor and sincerity,” and to compliment him “for the progress he has made” in

controlling his “addiction.” When the abuser was finally removed from the priesthood years later,

the bishop ordered the parish not to say why; “nothing else need be noted.”

In the Diocese of Greensburg, a priest impregnated a 17-year-old, forged the head pastor’s

signature on a marriage certificate, then divorced the girl months later. Despite having sex with a

4
minor, despite fathering a child, despite being married and being divorced, the priest was permitted

to stay in ministry thanks to the diocese’s efforts to find a “benevolent bishop” in another state

willing to take him on. Another priest, grooming his middle school students for oral sex, taught

them how Mary had to “bite off the cord” and “lick” Jesus clean after he was born. It took another

15 years, and numerous additional reports of abuse, before the diocese finally removed the priest

from ministry.

A priest in the Diocese of Harrisburg abused five sisters in a single family, despite prior

reports that were never acted on. In addition to sex acts, the priest collected samples of the girls’

urine, pubic hair, and menstrual blood. Eventually, his house was searched and his collection was

found. Without that kind of incontrovertible evidence, apparently, the diocese remained unwilling

to err on the side of children even in the face of multiple reports of abuse. As a high-ranking

official said about one suspect priest: “At this point we are at impasse – allegations and no

admission.” Years later, the abuser did admit what he had done, but by then it was too late.

Elsewhere we saw the same sort of disturbing disdain for victims. In the Diocese of

Pittsburgh, church officials dismissed an incident of abuse on the ground that the 15-year-old had

“pursued” the priest and “literally seduced” him into a relationship. After the priest was arrested,

the church submitted an evaluation on his behalf to the court. The evaluation acknowledged that

the priest had admitted to “sado-masochistic” activities with several boys – but the sado-

masochism was only “mild,” and at least the priest was not “psychotic.”

The Diocese of Scranton also chose to defend its clergy abusers over its children. A diocese

priest was arrested and convicted after decades of abuse reports that had been ignored by the

church. The bishop finally took action only as the sentencing date approached. He wrote a letter

to the judge, with a copy to a state senator, urging the court to release the defendant to a Catholic

5
treatment center. He emphasized the high cost of incarceration. In another case, a priest raped a

girl, got her pregnant, and arranged an abortion. The bishop expressed his feelings in a letter:

“This is a very difficult time in your life, and I realize how upset you are. I too share your grief.”

But the letter was not for the girl. It was addressed to the rapist.

The church and child abuse, past and present

We know that the bulk of the discussion in this report concerns events that occurred before

the early 2000’s. That is simply because the bulk of the material we received from the dioceses

concerned those events. The information in these documents was previously kept hidden from

those whom it most affected. It is exposed now only because of the existence of this grand jury.

That historical record is highly important, for present and future purposes. The thousands

of victims of clergy child sex abuse in Pennsylvania deserve an accounting, to use as best they can

to try to move on with their lives. And the citizens of Pennsylvania deserve an accounting as well,

to help determine how best to make appropriate improvements in the law.

At the same time, we recognize that much has changed over the last fifteen years. We

agreed to hear from each of the six dioceses we investigated, so that they could inform us about

recent developments in their jurisdictions. In response, five of the bishops submitted statements

to us, and the sixth, the bishop of Erie, appeared before us in person. His testimony impressed us

as forthright and heartfelt. It appears that the church is now advising law enforcement of abuse

reports more promptly. Internal review processes have been established. Victims are no longer

quite so invisible.

But the full picture is not yet clear. We know that child abuse in the church has not yet

disappeared, because we are charging two priests, in two different dioceses, with crimes that fall

within the statute of limitations. One of these priests ejaculated in the mouth of a seven-year-old.

6
The other assaulted two different boys, on a monthly basis, for a period of years that ended only

in 2010.

And we know there might be many additional recent victims, who have not yet developed

the resources to come forward either to police or to the church. As we have learned from the

experiences of the victims who we saw, it takes time. We hope this report will encourage others

to speak.

What we can say, though, is that despite some institutional reform, individual leaders of

the church have largely escaped public accountability. Priests were raping little boys and girls,

and the men of God who were responsible for them not only did nothing; they hid it all. For

decades. Monsignors, auxiliary bishops, bishops, archbishops, cardinals have mostly been

protected; many, including some named in this report, have been promoted. Until that changes,

we think it is too early to close the book on the Catholic Church sex scandal.

Recommendations

Grand jurors are just regular people who are randomly selected for service. We don’t get

paid much, the hours are bad, and the work can be heartbreaking. What makes it worthwhile is

knowing we can do some kind of justice. We spent 24 months dredging up the most depraved

behavior, only to find that the laws protect most of its perpetrators, and leave its victims with

nothing. We say laws that do that need to change.

First, we ask the Pennsylvania legislature to stop shielding child sexual predators behind

the criminal statute of limitations. Thanks to a recent amendment, the current law permits victims

to come forward until age 50. That’s better than it was before, but still not good enough; we should

just get rid of it. We heard from plenty of victims who are now in their 50’s, 60’s, 70’s, and even

one who was 83 years old. We want future victims to know they will always have the force of the

7
criminal law behind them, no matter how long they live. And we want future child predators to

know they should always be looking over their shoulder – no matter how long they live.

Second, we call for a “civil window” law, which would let older victims sue the diocese

for the damage inflicted on their lives when they were kids. We saw these victims; they are marked

for life. Many of them wind up addicted, or impaired, or dead before their time. The law in force

right now gives child sex abuse victims twelve years to sue, once they turn 18. But victims who

are already in their 30’s and older fell under a different law; they only got two years. For victims

in this age range, the short two-year period would have expired back in the 1990’s or even earlier

– long before revelations about the institutional nature of clergy sex abuse. We think that’s

unacceptable. These victims ran out of time to sue before they even knew they had a case; the

church was still successfully hiding its complicity. Our proposal would open a limited “window”

offering them a chance, finally, to be heard in court. All we’re asking is to give those two years

back.

Third, we want improvement to the law for mandated reporting of abuse. We saw from

diocesan records that church officials, going back decades, were insisting they had no duty to

report to the government when they learned of child abuse in their parishes. New laws make it

harder to take that position; but we want them tighter. The law penalizes a “continuing” failure to

report, but only if the abuse of “the child” is “active.” We’re not sure what that means and we

don’t want any wiggle room. Make it clear that the duty to report a child abuser continues as long

as there’s reason to believe he will do it again – whether or not he’s “active” on any particular day,

and whether or not he may pick a different kid next time.

Fourth, we need a law concerning confidentiality agreements. They’ve become a hot topic

in recent months in sexual harassment cases – but it turns out the church has been using them for

8
a long time. The subpoenaed records contained quite a few confidentiality agreements, going back

decades: payouts sealed by silence. There are arguments on both sides about whether it’s proper

to use these agreements in securing lawsuit settlements. But there should be no room for debate

on one point: no non-disclosure agreement can or should apply to criminal investigations. If the

subject of a civil lawsuit happens also to concern criminal activity, then a confidentiality agreement

gives neither party either the right or the obligation to decline cooperation with law enforcement.

All future agreements should have to say that in big bold letters. And all this should be enacted

into a law.

We believe these proposals will assist in the exposure and prosecution of child sexual

abuse, and so it is within the scope of our duty to make them. But to be honest it’s not enough.

We don’t just want this abuse punished by criminal and civil penalties. We want it not to happen

at all. We think it’s reasonable to expect one of the world’s great religions, dedicated to the

spiritual well-being of over a billion people, to find ways to organize itself so that the shepherds

stop preying upon the flock. If it does nothing else, this report removes any remaining doubt that

the failure to prevent abuse was a systemic failure, an institutional failure. There are things that

the government can do to help. But we hope there will also be self-reflection within the church,

and a deep commitment to creating a safer environment for its children.

Profiles

This final section of the report is possibly the most important. It contains profiles of more

than 300 clergy members, from all six dioceses we investigated. By comparison, estimates of the

number of abusive priests identified since 2002 in the Boston, Massachusetts archdiocese range

from about 150 to 250. The 2005 Philadelphia archdiocese grand jury report identified over 60

9
priests. The 2016 Altoona-Johnstown report named about 50 abusers. We believe ours is the

largest grand jury report of its kind to date.

Each of the profiles is a summary of the abuse allegations against individual priests and of

the church’s response over time to those allegations. The profiles are based largely on the wealth

of internal documents surrendered by the dioceses. In many cases, we also received testimony

from the victims. And, on over a dozen occasions, the priests themselves appeared before us.

Most of them admitted what they had done.

Even out of these hundreds of odious stories, some stood out. There was the priest, for

example, who raped a seven-year-old girl – while he was visiting her in the hospital after she’d

had her tonsils out. Or the priest who made a nine-year-old give him oral sex, then rinsed out the

boy’s mouth with holy water to purify him. Or the boy who drank some juice at his priest’s house,

and woke up the next morning bleeding from his rectum, unable to remember anything from the

night before. Or the priest, a registered psychologist, who “treated” a young parishioner with

depression by attempting to hypnotize her and directing her to take off her clothes, piece by piece.

One priest was willing to admit to molesting boys, but denied reports from two girls who

had been abused; “they don’t have a penis,” he explained. Another priest, asked about abusing his

parishioners, refused to commit: “with my history,” he said, “anything is possible.” Yet another

priest finally decided to quit after years of child abuse complaints, but asked for, and received, a

letter of reference for his next job – at Walt Disney World.

We came across a file in which the diocese candidly conceded that “this is one of our worst

ones” – but of course told no one about him. Actually we came across the same statement in the

files of several other priests. Then there was the file with a simple celebratory notation: “bad abuse

10
case. [Victim] sued us … we won.” And this happy note, in a case in which a seven-year-old girl

was molested by a priest from outside the diocese:

In addition to describing the abuse and its handling, each of the profiles also includes a list,

as complete as we could make it, of the subject priest’s places of assignment over the course of his

career. That doesn’t mean we received abuse reports associated with each of those assignments.

But the assignment list should provide parishioners with a way to determine whether priests who

were credibly accused of abuse ever served in their area.

We should emphasize that, while the list of priests is long, we don’t think we got them all.

We feel certain that many victims never came forward, and that the dioceses did not create written

records every single time they heard something about abuse. We also couldn’t fully account for

out-of-state travel. Many priests who served in Pennsylvania also spent some of their careers in

other parts of the country. If they abused children elsewhere, reports might have made their way

back to diocesan files here. But we suspect that a lot did not.

Although this section of our report is as comprehensive as we could make it, we did not

automatically name every priest who was mentioned in the documents. We actually received files

on over 400 priests from the dioceses. Some of these are not presented here because the

information contained in the file was too scanty to make a reasonable determination about what

had happened. On other occasions, we present a profile anonymously, because the case reveals a

lot about the diocese’s behavior, but nothing significant about the priest’s. And in numerous other

cases, the evidence contained in the file was clear, but the misconduct was outside the purpose of

this investigation, which focused on criminal child sex abuse. As a result, we do not include files

involving sex between priests and adults, substance abuse, or financial wrongdoing, unless these

relate directly to abuse of children.

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

11 -*5*("5*0/
 Many of the priests who we profile here are dead. We decided it was crucial to include

them anyway, because we suspect that many of their victims may still be alive – including

unreported victims who may have thought they were the only one. Those victims deserve to know

they were not alone. It was not their fault.

We need to end with this note. During our deliberations, one of the victims who had

appeared before us tried to kill herself. From her hospital bed, she asked for one thing: that we

finish our work and tell the world what really happened. We feel a debt to this woman, and to the

many other victims who so exposed themselves by giving us their stories. We hope this report

will make good on what we owe.

12
,, 7KH'LRFHVHV

13
14
Roman Catholic Diocese of Allentown

I. General Overview of the Diocese of Allentown, Pennsylvania

The Diocese of Allentown originated as part of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia. In 1961,

portions of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia were broken off to create the Diocese of Allentown.

As of 2015, the Diocese had a Catholic population of 258,997, which was 20.04% of the total

population within the five counties. The Diocese maintains approximately eighty-nine parishes,

thirty-four elementary schools, six high schools, and two colleges, and has approximately two

hundred forty priests. The Diocese encompasses the Counties of Schuylkill, Berks, Carbon,

Lehigh, and Northampton.

II. History of Bishops of the Diocese of Allentown

1) Bishop Joseph Mark McShea (2/11/1961 through 2/3/1983)

2) Bishop Thomas Jerome Welsh (2/3/1983 through 12/15/1997)

3) Bishop Edward Peter Cullen (12/16/1997 through 5/27/2009)

15
 4) Bishop John Oliver Barres (5/27/2009 through 12/9/2016)

5) Bishop Alfred Andrew Schlert (8/31/2017 to present)

III. Additional Church Leadership within the Diocese of Allentown

Relevant to the Grand Jury's Investigation

The following Church leaders, while not bishops, played an important role in the Diocese

of Allentown’s handling of child sexual abuse complaints.

1) Monsignor Anthony Muntone

2) Monsignor Gerald Gobitas

3) Monsignor Alfred Schlert - (Note: Schlert went on to become Bishop of Allentown.)

IV. Findings of the Grand Jury

The Grand Jury uncovered evidence of child sexual abuse committed by Roman Catholic

priests of the Diocese of Allentown. Evidence showed that priests engaged in sexual contact with

minors, including grooming and fondling of genitals and/or intimate body parts as well as

penetration of the vagina, mouth, or anus. The evidence also showed that Diocesan administrators,

including the Bishops, had knowledge of this conduct and that priests were regularly placed in

ministry after the Diocese was on notice that a complaint of child sexual abuse had been made.

This conduct was enabling to offenders and endangered the welfare of children.

Evidence also showed that the Diocese had discussions with lawyers regarding the sexual

conduct of priests with children and made settlements with victims. Further, these settlements

contained confidentiality agreements forbidding victims from speaking about the abuse under

threat of some penalty, such as legal action to recover previously paid settlement monies.

16
 Finally, the Grand Jury received evidence that several Diocesan administrators, including

the Bishops, often dissuaded victims from reporting to police or conducted their own deficient,

biased investigations without reporting crimes against children to the proper authorities.

V. Offenders Identified by the Grand Jury

1) Thomas J. Bender

2) Thomas J. Benestad

3) Robert G. Cofenas

4) Francis J. Fromholzer

5) James Gaffney

6) Joseph Galko

7) Edward George Ganster

8) Francis T. Gillespie

9) Edward R. Graff

10) Richard J. Guiliani

11) Joseph D. Hulko

12) Joseph H. Kean

13) Thomas J. Kerestus

14) Francis Joseph McNelis

15) Gabriel Patil

16) Henry Paul

17) Paul G. Puza

18) Dennis A. Rigney

19) Joseph A. Rock

17
VI. Examples of Institutional Failure: Fathers Frank Fromholzer, Edward
Graff, and Michael Lawrence
The Grand Jury notes the following examples of child sexual abuse perpetrated by priests

within the Diocese of Allentown. These examples further highlight the wholesale institutional

failure that endangered the welfare of children throughout the Pennsylvania Dioceses, including

the Diocese of Allentown. These examples are not meant to be exhaustive; rather, they provide a

window into the conduct of past Pennsylvania Bishops and the crimes they permitted to occur on

their watch.

19
 The Case of Father Francis J. Fromholzer

Known Assignments

05/1958 – 09/1959 Holy Ghost, Bethlehem

06/1959 – 06/1965 Allentown Central Catholic High School
06/1962 – 09/1962 Holy Ghost (summer assignment)
03/1963 – 06/1965 Mary, Queen of Peace, Pottsville
06/1965 – 10/1970 St. Paul, Reading
10/1970 – 08/1975 St. Mary, Hamburg
08/1975 – 04/1980 St. Paul, Reading
04/1980 – 07/1980 Sick leave
07/1980 – 09/1980 Holy Family Manner, Bethlehem
11/1982 – 06/1992 St. Paul, Allentown
06/1992 – 06/1995 St. Peter, Coplay
06/1995 – 09/2002 St. Paul, Allentown
10/2002 Retired

The case of Father Francis “Frank” Fromholzer highlights the immense challenges faced

by victims when seeking redress from a Diocese that chose to take a position hostile to the victim.

The influence of the institution is evident in many cases. In the case of Frank Fromholzer, it is

particularly evident.

Fromholzer sexually abused at least two students while serving as a religion teacher at

Allentown Central Catholic High School. On June 12, 2016, the victims testified under oath before

the Grand Jury that they were sexually abused by Fromholzer in 1965 when they were

approximately 13 or 14 years old. One victim was Julianne, now 68 years old.

Julianne recalled that, during a trip to the Poconos in approximately 1964, Fromholzer took

Julianne and at least one other girl for a ride in his car. The trip was unsupervised and Julianne’s

family was comfortable with the trip since Fromholzer was a trusted priest. Fromholzer groped

the girls as he encouraged them to take turns sitting next to him. Fromholzer’s conduct escalated

and he touched Julianne under her clothes.

20
 Once at their destination, Fromholzer retrieved a blanket and radio from the car and took

his collar off. Fromholzer told the girls that, while they were on the trip, they were not to call him

Father but to call him Frank. Julianne testified, “Then we went – he laid out a blanket and he

started kissing, feeling, put his finger in me. That hurt. It was confusing because – you were

always told you were going to Hell if you let anybody touch you. But then you’ve got Father

doing it.”

Julianne described to the Grand Jury the position of power that priests hold within the

Catholic faith. She testified, “They – there wasn’t anybody that was more important than, not just

him, but any priest. They were – and to some degree still are, but they are much above anybody

else in your family or they are God in the flesh.”

Julianne went on to describe other incidents after the trip to the Poconos in which

Fromholzer had sexual or inappropriate contact with her. She testified that there was a gym in the

basement of the ninth grade building at Central Catholic. Fromholzer would follow her into the

basement and make comments that she gained a little weight and needed to get on a scale.

Fromholzer would then lift her onto the scale from behind, holding her breast to get her on the

scale. Fromholzer would constantly nuzzle and kiss her neck as well as “kiss and touch.” After

the trip to the Poconos, the touching occurred on top of her clothing and panties.

Julianne told the Grand Jury of an incident in which Fromholzer humiliated her in front of

her religion class. She was participating in a reading of the Passion of Christ around Easter season.

Fromholzer had her read aloud the portion of the story where the words “the cock crows three

times” appear. Fromholzer had her repeat the words several times, which evoked laughter from

Fromholzer and the boys in the class. As Julianne left class that day, Fromholzer leaned in and

nuzzled her neck and asked the victim if she knew what a cock was.

21
 The victim testified that the abuse stopped only when she moved on to tenth grade and was

no longer in the same building as Fromholzer.

Julianne’s friend also testified in front of the Grand Jury about being abused by

Fromholzer. The second victim was taken to the Poconos by Fromholzer with Julianne. She was

in ninth grade and approximately 14 years old when the abuse occurred. On the way to the

Poconos, she observed Fromholzer rubbing his elbow against Julianne’s breasts. Once at the

location in the Poconos, the second victim was also sexually abused by Fromholzer. Fromholzer

began kissing her on the lips and touching her breasts. Reluctantly, she laid down on a blanket

where Fromholzer, using his hands, proceeded to touch her on her vaginal area, inside her clothing.

The second victim reported the abuse to her principal at the time, Father Robert M. Forst.

She told Forst about the trip to the Poconos and how Fromholzer touched her and her friend

inappropriately. Forst responded by indicating to the second victim that the discussion they were

having had “ended.” Forst told her that she was expelled from school and indicated she needed to

bring her father to the school. The second victim came from a single-parent home in which her

mother had left after no longer being able to live with her father. Both parents were alcoholics and

her father was physically abusive. When her father arrived at the school, there was a meeting

between the second victim, her father, and Forst. The second victim recalled Forst telling her,

“Now, I want you to tell that story that you said – the made-up story that you said about the priest

to your father – with your father here.” She again told them about how she was abused by

Fromholzer. Her father did not believe her and proceeded to drag her home, yelling at her and

slapping her along the way. When they finally got home, she was beaten more by her father, this

time with a belt so that the belt buckle would strike her.

22
 The second victim told the Grand Jury that the school then failed her in English and

Algebra, two courses that she loved. She expressed to the Grand Jury how hard it was to talk of

the abuse since she had not told anyone most of her life. The abuse haunted the second victim her

entire life, resulting in two marriages that ended in divorce. Talking about the abuse she endured

at the hands of Fromholzer, she testified, “You can’t get rid of it. You don’t talk about it. It is

always there.” Coming from a broken home, she had counted on the understanding of priests and

nuns. The second victim said that, after being expelled for reporting being sexually abused by

Fromholzer, she felt “worthless.”

The second victim broke years of silence when she testified before the Grand Jury. Her

friend, Julianne, told the Grand Jury that it took her until she was in her thirties, nearly twenty

years later, to find the courage to try to report the abuse to someone in the Diocese. Unfortunately

for Julianne, she tried to report the abuse to another priest, Father Weasel. Weasel was considered

a family friend. When the victim began to tell Weasel of the abuse, he stopped her and told her,

“No, I don’t want to hear it. You go to confession and you pray for him.” As a result, Julianne

said nothing more about the abuse until she was unable to stay silent any longer.

Julianne reported Fromholzer’s conduct to Monsignor John Murphy of St. Thomas Moore

Parish. As she tried to confess the abuse, Murphy told her, “Don’t say the name.” At the time

Julianne tried to report the abuse to Murphy in the 1980’s, Fromholzer was continuing to practice

as a priest at St. Paul’s Church in Allentown.

It was not until approximately August 2002, after the Boston Globe broke the story of child

sexual abuse within the Archdiocese of Boston, that Julianne was ready to pursue reporting

Fromholzer’s criminal conduct to law enforcement. She contacted the Allentown Police

Department to file a police report and informed the police that Fromholzer was still working at a

23
church that had a grade school. Julianne also personally reported the abuse to the District Attorney

and informed him that Fromholzer was still working at a church with a grade school. The District

Attorney elected not to pursue the matter and cited the statute of limitations.

Julianne told the Grand Jury that, if it were not for the clergy abuse being revealed in the

Boston Archdiocese, she would not have come forward to report the abuse she endured. She also

indicated how grateful she was, having been able to tell the Grand Jury about the abuse and

Fromholzer.

Julianne subsequently became involved with a clergy abuse victim’s network. She

testified that she is aware from fielding phone calls that there are hundreds of victims who have

not yet come forward. She described calls in the middle of the night with full-grown men weeping

into the phone as they recounted their sexual abuse at the hands of Roman Catholic priests. This

is a volunteer effort on Julianne’s part, motivated by her own victimization and a desire to help

others. At the close of her testimony, Julianne thanked the Grand Jury for listening to her story

and providing her the opportunity to express their pain. Julianne stated, “… so what does it mean

to have somebody care? It means a lot. So I thank you.”

On September 1, 2016, the Grand Jury issued a subpoena to the Diocese for any and all

records related to clergy or church officials against whom complaints of child sexual abuse had

been made. Records received by the Office of Attorney General from the Diocese numbered into

the thousands. The testimony of the victims was cross-referenced with the records of the Diocese.

Internal Diocesan records do not contain any information from Julianne’s reports to Weasel or

Murphy. However, it is evident that, once Julianne made contact with the Diocese in 2002, the

Diocese and its attorney, Thomas Traud, attempted to undermine and discredit Julianne and her

family.

24
 In 2002, the Diocese was made aware of reports of child sexual abuse against Fromholzer

by Julianne and her friend, Victim Two. Fromholzer was still in active ministry. Internal Diocesan

records show that the Diocese immediately disregarded these complaints as false. However,

Fromholzer “volunteered” to retire.

On September 3, 2002, a fax was sent to Monsignors Schlert and Gobitas. The fax bore

the timestamp of 09:55 A.M. from the Traud Law Offices. After some discussion regarding an

attempt to schedule a meeting with Julianne, Traud reported that he had received information from

a relative of Monsignor Leo Fink. This informant told the Diocese that she had been the closest

of friends with Julianne in high school and that they shared every secret. She reported that Julianne

had once danced as a go-go dancer in the 1960’s and that she believed her to be sexually active.

Traud’s informant stated that she believed it possible that Julianne was one of the girls who had

an affair with a coach at Central Catholic. The informant reported that Julianne also had a family

member once go to prison. Traud reported all of this to the Diocese, specifically to Schlert and

Gobitas. He went on to note that he knew his informant well and that she had been “so candid and

honest.”

Having received a report that one of their priests had violated children, the Diocese and its

attorney immediately began to exchange information meant to discredit the victim with unrelated

and irrelevant attacks on her and her family. Moreover, the fact that information that a Central

Catholic coach may have been sexually abusing students was used as evidence against the victim.

In reality, it is the report of yet another crime not reported to the police.

A memorandum dated September 11, 2002, by Gobitas, recorded a meeting of September

10 between Julianne, her attorney, Gobitas, Schlert, and Traud. In that memorandum, Julianne’s

account of abuse is recorded. Julianne stated that there was a witness to at least one assault. The

25
Diocese recorded the meeting as positive and amicable. The next day a memo was generated by

Gobitas that recorded his interview of that witness. The witness recalled that she observed

Fromholzer rub his arm on Julianne’s breasts on one occasion in a car in front of Allentown

Catholic High School. The witness identified another, possibly a third, victim by first name.

26
The Witness Interview Memo

27
 On September 16, 2002, at 2:48 p.m., a fax was sent from Traud Law Offices to Schlert

and Gobitas. The message contained impressions of the meeting on September 10th. Among other

things, the memo noted that Tom Traud found Julianne to be “overly dramatic in that there were

some times she was crying in the meeting” and that “this woman made an awful amount of

assumptions that just were unwarranted.”

This pattern of investigating the victim continued through 2004 in letters from Traud dated

January 22, 2004, and April 12, 2002. In the first letter to Gobitas and Schlert, Traud noted that

Julianne was recently in the news and was pursuing her lawsuit and that he received information

from a local attorney. The attorney told Traud that Julianne’s daughter was a witness for the

Commonwealth in a murder case. Traud noted that, because Julianne became involved, she could

either be “a mother looking out for her child; or, maybe this is a woman who repeatedly wants her

fifteen minutes of fame.” In the second letter, Traud informed the Diocese that Julianne’s husband

was associated with the Christian Motorcyclists Association which Traud labeled the husband’s

brainchild.

In contrast to the efforts to investigate and discredit the victims of child sexual abuse who

dared to report their abuse to the Diocese and/or report to civil authorities, the internal

documentation regarding the diocesan investigation of Fromholzer is starkly different. The

Diocese asked Fromholzer if he did it. Fromholzer said no. Fromholzer then suggested it might

be a good time for him to retire.

The report of abuse and subsequent investigation of the victim all occurred on the watch

of Cullen. In 2009, Barres took command of the Diocese. In an effort to comply with Diocesan

policy and state law, the Diocese formally reported the complaints against Fromholzer to the

28
District Attorney. Similarly, Julianne’s lawsuit against the Diocese was dismissed due to the civil

statute of limitations. She has received no recovery or recompense for her suffering.

The Grand Jury finds that the Diocese of Allentown and the Allentown Central Catholic

High School knew full well the criminal conduct of Fromholzer. Yet, knowing that Fromholzer

was preying on young girls, the Diocese and School took no action. The victims were told to let

it go. When these victims came forward again years later, they were met with disbelief and scorn.

Ultimately, internal records show that the Diocese itself deemed Julianne’s complaint against

Fromholzer to be credible.

Victims are reluctant to report to law enforcement or take any action for fear of retaliation

from the Dioceses. That retaliation and intimidation takes many forms. Originally Julianne did

not seek any legal action against the Diocese. She simply wished to inform Weasel and Murphy

of her concerns and for the Diocese to take action. Action only occurred when Julianne began to

speak to parties empowered to scrutinize the conduct of the Diocese: her own attorneys, law

enforcement, and the press.

29
 The Case of Father Edward R. Graff

Known Assignments

06/1955 - 04/1957 Annunciation B.V.M., Shenandoah

04/1957 - 05/1958 St. Anthony of Padua, Easton
05/1958 – 09/1958 St. Elizabeth‘s, Pen Argyl
09/1958 – 09/1959 Pius X High School, Roseto
09/1959 – 06/1962 Residence, St. Anthony, Easton
06/1962 – 09/1963 University of Notre Dame
09/1963 – 03/1964 Our Lady Help of Christians, Allentown
03/1964 – 07/1964 St. Elizabeth, Pen Argyl
07/1964 – 02/1965 Pius X High School, Roseto
02/1965 – 11/1966 Holy Rosary, Reading
Central Catholic High School, Reading
11/1966 – 08/1968 Holy Name High School, reading
08/1968 – 10/1969 St. Margaret, Reading
10/1969 – 04/1971 St Peter, Coplay
04/1971 – 04/1974 Annunciation B.V.M., Catasauqua,
04/1974 – 11/1979 Director, Thanksgiving Clothing Drive
11/1979 – 07/1980 Sick Leave
07/1980 – 06/1983 St. Margaret, Reading
06/1983 – 02/1992 Holy Guardian Angels, Reading
02/1992 Departed Diocese of Allentown
1992 – 2002 Served in various capacities in Dioceses in New Mexico and Texas

Father Edward R. Graff served as a priest in the Roman Catholic Church for approximately

forty-five years, approximately thirty-five years in the Diocese of Allentown and ten years in the

Dioceses of Santa Fe, New Mexico, and Amarillo, Texas. During his years in ministry, Graff

raped scores of children. The Grand Jury investigated not only Graff’s conduct but the knowledge

of the relevant Dioceses.

The case of Graff is an example of dioceses that minimized the criminal conduct of one of

their priests, while secretly noting the significant danger the priest posed to the public. The Grand

Jury notes that the use of euphemisms was constant throughout the Dioceses of Pennsylvania, but

particularly apparent in the case of Graff. Terms such as “sick leave” or “health leave” were often

used to reference an absence from ministry related to child sexual abuse. In Graff’s case, it was

30
coded as sick leave and retirement. Additionally, child sexual abuse was often minimized with

terms such as familiarity, boundary issues, or inappropriate contact. In Graff’s case, internal

records and correspondence referred to it as difficulties. Finally, it was common to see collateral

issues highlighted as the primary underlying problem, while the sexual abuse of children was

deemed a collateral and lesser, related form of misconduct. Known child abusers were regularly

referred to as having alcohol problems or classified as naïve. In the case of Graff, his primary

problem was documented as being an alcoholic. A review of the documents obtained by the Grand

Jury stands in stark contrast to the acts described by Graff’s victims.

The Grand Jury obtained internal Diocesan records after the Diocese was served with a

subpoena on September 1, 2016. Those records were maintained in the secret or confidential

archives of the Diocese as well as personnel records. In August 1986, Graff entered the Neumann

Center in Reading for what was reported as chemical dependency. The Grand Jury concluded that

this was not solely a case of chemical dependency but that the Diocese was aware of some type of

sexual conduct with a minor.

After almost thirty years of service in school and parishes in the Diocese, Graff was sent

to New Mexico for treatment of undefined but “serious” conduct on the part of Graff. On

November 28, 1989, there was an exchange of letters between Welsh and Archbishop Robert

Sanchez of the Catholic Center, Santa Fe, New Mexico. The subject of the letters was whether

Sanchez was “aware of the seriousness of these cases.” The context of the letter reflected more

than a mere problem with alcohol. However, no further details were provided in the letters.

By February 1992, Welsh authorized Graff to retire from active ministry in the Diocese.

However, Welsh also authorized Graff to begin ministry to the needy in the Archdiocese of Santa

Fe, New Mexico. On February 25, 1992, three letters were dispatched by Welsh. Welsh wrote to

31
Graff authorizing him to “continue your ministry to the various needy persons you are already

serving.” Welsh noted that this was done by agreement with Sanchez. Welsh reminded Graff that

he was accountable to the Servants of the Paraclete1 in Albuquerque as his supervision was

continued. Welsh also made arrangements to provide Graff with a monthly pension, living

allowance, medical and life insurance, and automobile insurance.

Welsh’s second letter was sent to Sanchez. In this letter, Welsh explained that he had

granted Graff faculties from the Diocese of Allentown and understood that Sanchez had permitted

Graff limited faculties within the Archdiocese of Santa Fe under the supervision of the Servants

of the Paraclete. Welsh’s third letter thanked the clinical director of the Albuquerque Villa for the

care provided to Graff and informed him of the aforementioned arrangement between the Dioceses

of Allentown and Santa Fe.

1
The Servants of the Paraclete was a treatment center regularly used by Pennsylvania Dioceses for the evaluation
and treatment of sexual offenders.

32
33
34
The February 25, 1992 Letters

35
 In 1993, correspondence between Welsh and Bishop Leroy Matthiesen of Amarillo, Texas,

detailed an alarming development. Welsh expressed his concern that Graff had been transferred

within Matthiesen’s Diocese without prior consultation of Welsh. Welsh was also concerned about

Graff’s living arrangements. Welsh wrote, “It had been my understanding that he was residing in

a rectory, but it has now come to light that he has purchased a house. Because of his past history

in this Diocese, this development raises additional concerns about the potential risk surrounding

Father Graff’s activity in your Diocese.”

36
37
Welsh’s “Potential Risk” Letter

38
 Matthiesen responded on November 2, 1993, that Graff tended to be a “loner” and thanked

Welsh for “alerting me to the risk I may be taking.” Matthiesen indicated he planned “to be even

more vigilant and to supervise him even more closely.” On November 11, 1994, Welsh wrote

Reverend Liam Hoare, Servant General, Servants of the Paraclete, and wanted to know whether

Graff was being monitored. Welsh sought a description of the precise nature of the monitoring.

Welsh wrote, “While this is not a new concern, I am prompted to express it anew at this time

because an individual came forward recently and reported that he had had some difficulties with

Father Graff in the past.” Welsh closed his letter stating:

I know that you will appreciate the reasons for my concern, since the matter
presents both your Congregation and the Diocese of Allentown with the potential
of legal liability for anything untoward which may occur in the course of Father
Graff’s ministry in Amarillo.

39
40
Matthiesen’s Letter to Welsh

41
42
Welsh’s Letters of Warning

43
 Welsh had the power to remove Graff’s faculties to minister in light of Graff’s known risk,

concern, and legal liability. However, Welsh left Graff in ministry by agreement with Matthiesen.

On January 5, 1995, Matthiesen wrote to Welsh, “Bishop, I am happy to report to you that Father

Graff is carrying out a wonderful ministry in Silverton, Turkey, and Quitaque. He is well received

and loved by the people who are almost totally Hispanic and among the poorest of the poor.”

In 1997, Cullen took command of the Diocese of Allentown. Diocesan records do not

show any indication that Cullen took any action against Graff. In fact, Graff appears to have

continued in ministry outside of Pennsylvania with no real attempt to understand where he was or

what he was doing.

On October 4, 2002, Graff was arrested in Briscoe County, Texas, for sexually abusing a

15-year-old boy. Several news articles were written about the incident. Graff died on November

25, 2002, due to injuries from an accident while in a Texas prison awaiting trial.

A news article written in the Allentown Morning Call, dated November 27, 2002, reported

that the boy Graff abused in Texas was hired by Graff to work at the church rectory where Graff

was assigned. It was reported that the victim stated that he watched pornographic movies with

Graff and Graff performed oral sex on the victim. The news article quoted investigator Jay Foster

as saying Graff would hire mostly Hispanic boys in their early teens to clean the rectory and mow

the lawn. Foster went on to say Graff “always had things to attract kids, like video games, Cokes,

candy.” The article cited to Texas criminal records related to his arrest.

On October 10, 2002, a victim reported to the Diocese of Allentown that he was sexually

abused by Graff between 1983 and 1984 at the Holy Guardian Angels, Reading. The abuse

involved a series of incidents such as showering together, masturbation, and fondling.

44
 On June 28, 2003, a second known victim wrote a statement detailing the sexual abuse

committed by Graff on him. The second known victim indicated the abuse occurred in the rectory

of the Holy Guardian Angels Elementary/Middle School when the second victim was in seventh

grade. The second victim detailed the grooming techniques of Graff. After the grooming period,

Graff had him take his pants down and sit down. Graff then fondled the second victim’s penis as

Graff masturbated. According to the second victim, when he questioned Graff about the abuse,

Graff responded by telling the second victim that it was “OK” because he was “an instrument of

God.” The second victim indicated the abuse occurred over the next six months as Graff would

have the second victim come to his room, where Graff would masturbate both himself and the

second victim. The second victim believed his friend and other boys were also abused by Graff

during this same period.

In July 2003, after these complaints, the Diocese notified Catholic Mutual Insurance Group

of potential liability.

On January 13, 2005, the Diocese received insurance paperwork regarding coverage for

several sexual abuse allegations, including a claim by a third victim who asserted sexual abuse by

Graff between 1971 and 1978, when the third victim was between twelve and thirteen years old.

The third victim was a parishioner at Annunciation BVM located in Catasauqua when the abuse

occurred. In the suit the third victim stated Graff repeatedly took pictures of him while he was

naked, masturbated the third victim until he ejaculated, and performed oral sex on the third victim.

Graff forced the third victim to masturbate and on one occasion Graff attempted to perform anal

intercourse on the third victim, stopping only after objection. For many years the abuse occurred

on a daily basis. The abuse occurred in Graff’s bedroom or living room of the rectory. Often,

45
before Graff abused the third victim, Graff would force the third victim to drink alcohol until he

was intoxicated.

On January 25, 2007, a fourth victim reported to the Diocese that he was sexually assaulted

by Graff in 1986, within the Holy Guardian Angels Rectory, when he was 17 years old. The fourth

victim died in April of 2015. The Diocese paid for his funeral.

The Grand Jury heard testimony from some of Graff’s victims. In addition, the Grand Jury

learned of Joey from his grandmother, mother, and sister in August 2016.

Some years after his abuse, Joey disclosed his secret to his grandmother, Kitty. Kitty and

Joey had a special relationship. They would go on walks together. They would discuss their life

and the future together. They were best friends.

Kitty recalled that, after years of a downward spiral, Joey finally told her what had

happened to him as a child attending his home parish within the Diocese. Graff had raped Joey.

During the violent assault, Graff had borne down on Joey’s back with such force it had damaged

his back. Kitty believed Joey had tried to tell her this years earlier when he had asked if priests

molest children. Kitty thought then it was just the gossip of children.

Joey eventually told his mother, Judy, and his sister. Suddenly, the changes they noticed

in this happy, out-going, science-fiction-loving boy made sense. He was dealing with trauma and

conflict.

Joey wrote the Diocese on July 31, 2007. Joey described how Graff befriended him and

then violently violated him. Joey wrote, “Father Graff did more than rape me. He killed my

potential and in so doing killed the man I should have become.”

In August 2016, Joey’s mother testified before the Grand Jury. Judy explained that, in

spite of his victimization, Joey had kept the faith. She stated:

46
 He stayed with the church. And he asked me if anything ever happened to him to
have a Catholic mass and I didn't want to do it and he made me promise and I did.
I did what he wanted, but it was the hardest thing to go into that church and being
counseled with by a priest. I listened to him and tried to help him out a little bit but
I was against it. But he -- the religion was very important to him and he was so
afraid of going to hell that I think that is why he stuck with it.

Judy testified that the Diocese did provide some support to Joey before his death. However,

Judy said that financial support was never the thing they most desired. Judy noted, “They never

admitted anything happened. It was like he was trying to prove his entire life what had happened

and that he was telling the truth. They never admitted – they never said there was abuse.”

Joey wrote a letter to Cullen before his death. Joey spoke for all victims of child sexual

abuse who suffered at the hands of Roman Catholic Priests. Joey noted that the Church’s resistance

to providing victims their day in court was inconsistent with supporting victims. Joey wrote:

Pennsylvania law does not, for one moment, bar the Diocese of Allentown from
making financial settlements with persons who were abused as minors, even though
they might not report the abuse until they become adults. Pennsylvania's so-called
statute of limitations is merely a defense, a legalistic prescription which the Diocese
of Allentown may choose to invoke in civil litigation when it wishes to have an
allegation of abuse dismissed without a hearing on the merits.

Joey did not live to have his day in court. He passed away due to an addiction to painkillers.

Joey became addicted to these pain killers after his back was injured during a particularly violent

attack by Graff.

Joey’s account is but one account of many victims who were harmed by Graff as children.

After Graff’s arrest in Texas, public scrutiny turned on the Diocese. On October 14, 2002, the

Allentown Morning Call broke the news that four individuals in Pennsylvania had come forward

with reports of child sexual abuse perpetrated by Graff. The article stated that a Diocesan

spokesman, Matt Kerr, responded that he was “surprised” by the reports and explained that "We

communicated to the Amarillo Diocese rumors that had surfaced, but we never had any contact

47
with actual victims," Kerr said, “This is all new to us." These were the same four victims described

above, who reported their abuse to the Diocese after reporting it to the Morning Call.

However, the Diocesan statement stands in stark contrast to the evidence held within the

records of the Diocese. While the Diocese stated they were “surprised,” internal records

documenting the opinion of the Bishops showed constant references to Graff as being a “risk,” a

“concern,” and a “legal liability.” This language was much more consistent with language used in

relation to predatory priests than a priest with a drinking problem.

Other victims continued to speak out after 2002. One of Graff’s victims testified before

the Grand Jury and provided a compelling and detailed account of a violent assault by Graff. In

particularly graphic testimony, this victim explained how, as Graff prepared to anally penetrate

him, he decided that he could either let the rape happen or run. He explained how he fled into the

street, mostly nude, rather than allow the assault by the formidable and imposing Graff. He further

explained the lasting effect of the assault and its continuing impact on his daily life. This victim’s

mother testified before the Grand Jury as well. She stated that her son immediately reported the

abuse to her after it occurred in 1984. She reported the abuse to Father John A. Krivak and her

son’s school principal. In spite of this report, Graff continued in ministry as a priest.

The Grand Jury heard from still more victims who reported Graff was particularly violent

in his assaults and seemed to take as much pleasure in causing pain as in the criminal sexual acts

themselves. All of Graff’s victims have struggled to move forward, and many question why so

little has been done to hold the institution accountable for enabling the commission of such heinous

crimes by their leaders.

48
 The Case of Father Michael S. Lawrence

Known Assignments

06/1973 - 06/1974 St. Catharine of Siena, Reading

06/1974 - 11/1974 Notre Dame High School, Easton
Sacred Heart, Miller Heights
11/1974 - 12/1974 Coordinator of Adult Religious Education, North Hampton
12/1974 - 06/1975 St. Jane Frances de Chantal, Easton
06/1975 - 12/1975 St. Jane Frances de Chantal, Easton
12/1975 - 06/1977 St. Anne, Bethlehem
06/1977 - 06/1978 Central Catholic High School, Allentown
St. Lawrence, Catasauqua
06/1978 - 08/1978 Diocesan Tribunal
08/1978 - 03/1980 Holy Trinity, Whitehall
03/1980 - 11/1982 St. Catharine of Siena, Reading
11/1982 - 03/1984 St. Anthony, Easton
03/1984 - 06/1984 Notre Dame High School, Easton
St. Anthony, Easton
06/1984 - 08/1984 St. Joseph, Easton
Notre Dame High School, Easton
08/1984 - 01/1987 Immaculate Conception, Jim Thorpe
01/1987 - 06/1987 Sick Leave
06/1987 - 03/1994 St. Paul, Allentown
Diocesan Tribunal
Ministry to the Aging
03/1994 - 06/1998 Diocesan Tribunal
06/1998 - 01/2000 Catholic University of America
Divine Word College
01/2000 - 03/2002 Courage
03/2002 - 04/2015 Retired

Father Michael Lawrence was ordained on May 19, 1973. Suspicions of Lawrence’s

pedophilic behavior were brought to the attention of the Church as early as 1970 while Lawrence

was attending St. Charles Borromeo Seminary. A student evaluation found within the records of

the Diocese and obtained by the Grand Jury indicate that Lawrence was “a mysterious type who

craves the attention of younger students” and that Lawrence showed “a little too much interest in

younger students.” Regardless of these observations, in 1981, Bishop Joseph McShea wished

Lawrence well and noted that Lawrence “and a group of young people from Saint Catherine’s

49
Parish will be making a retreat on the weekend of November 20th-22nd.” The Bishop’s salutations

are contained within his November 5, 1981, letter to Lawrence on the subject.

The Bishop’s Letter

50
 Less than a year later, a 12-year-old boy told his father that Lawrence had sexually abused

him. A report written by Monsignor Anthony Muntone, dated August 18, 1982, indicated that

Father Fred Loeper called the Chancery to report an “unfortunate incident.” Lawrence, then a

priest at St. Catharine’s of Siena, Reading, had sexually abused a 12-year-old boy. The father of

the victim called Loeper to report the details of the incident. The victim told his father that he had

been in Lawrence’s room for a tutoring session. At the end of the session, the talk between

Lawrence and the victim turned to sex. Lawrence then began to touch his genitals, had the victim

take down his pants, and began to fondle the victim’s genitals. The victim’s father reported that

his son had told him there had been “a lot of fondling, so much that he felt pain.” Additionally,

Lawrence made the victim urinate. The victim’s father also reported the victim was having a hard

time sleeping.

Muntone called Lawrence into his office and asked what had happened between Lawrence

and the reporting victim. Lawrence responded “Please help me. I sexually molested a young boy.”

Lawrence then admitted he had the victim come to his room for an English lesson. Lawrence had

the victim remove his pants and underwear and Lawrence touched the boy’s genitals. He then

drove the victim home.

Records indicate that Lawrence was sent to “Downingtown” (St. John Vianney Center) the

same day he confessed to Muntone. Muntone wrote in his report that he spoke to “the doctor” at

Downingtown, who informed him that the family of the victim should be given time to “ventilate”

and what the victim experienced may not “be a horrendous trauma for the boy.”

51
52
53
Muntone’s Confidential Memo of Child Sexual Abuse

54
 Less than two years later, Lawrence was assigned to a high school to teach religion classes.

A handwritten note to Bishop Thomas Welsh, dated April 9, 1984, reported that things were “going

well” since Lawrence had taken over Bill Baker’s religion classes. The note went on to state that

Lawrence would like to be “reassigned to the school with the spring appointments.” The note is

signed Tony, for Anthony Muntone.

55
The Note to the Bishop

56
 Lawrence continued in ministry as a Roman Catholic priest in the Diocese of Allentown in

different parishes, schools, and other assignments. However, he was removed from parish ministry

in 1987 and placed on “sick leave.” A letter from Welsh to Lawrence dated October 20, 1987,

stated:

On the advice of legal counsel, I write to inform you that effective immediately
your faculties to celebrate Mass and otherwise function as a priest of the Diocese
of Allentown are limited to the confines of the Convent at Bethlehem Catholic High
School. I would ask you to make an appointment to see Monsignor Muntone at the
chancery at your earliest opportunity.

The Grand Jury learned that the father of the boy who reported his abuse in 1982 had

continued to complain to the Diocese regarding Lawrence’s continued role in active ministry. The

Diocese found itself, albeit temporarily, unable to maintain the secret of Lawrence’s conduct. On

the advice of legal counsel, they removed Lawrence from ministry.

Lawrence met with Welsh on November 5, 1987. The following day, Lawrence

memorialized his thoughts in a letter. Lawrence admitted that the possibility of legal action and

his removal from ministry had caused him anxiety. He wrote, “I find myself in a very dangerous

position. The deep sense of frustration and anger have led me to act-out sexually in the past and

if my present situation continues it becomes a possibility again.” Lawrence referenced another

known predatory priest, Joseph Rock, and opined that perhaps they could be a source of support

for one another. Lawrence requested a compromise in which he could celebrate the liturgy at the

Manor. Ultimately, Lawrence continued to serve as an active priest on the Diocesan Tribunal

without a documented parish assignment.

But for the perseverance of the victim’s father, the Diocese would have returned Lawrence

to active parish ministry as they had done time and time again, as documented within Diocesan

records reviewed by the Grand Jury. Although hiding Lawrence in ministry within the Diocesan

57
Tribunal was a poor substitute for actual removal from all ministries and titles, the efforts of this

concerned parent kept Lawrence out of parish ministry.

The frustration this devoted father caused the Diocese of Allentown was documented in a

confidential memorandum written by Muntone to Bishop Edward Cullen on May 5, 1998. Father

Alfred Schlert was carbon copied. Muntone wrote:

Something of a sticky situation has arisen with regard to Mike Lawrence who serves
as secretary at the Tribunal. Back in 1987, it has come to light that Mike had been
involved in some very indecent behavior with a young boy about ten or twelve years
old, some five years earlier when he had been serving at St. Catherine of Siena
Parish in Reading. The father of the boy was about as angry as I have ever seen
anyone, and I have the feeling that he was just short of resorting to physical
violence. He was almost irrational and it was very difficult to deal with him.

Muntone noted that once or twice the father of the boy came into the Diocesan offices and vented

his anger. Muntone added, “It was pretty terrible.” Muntone stated that Welsh renewed

Lawrence’s faculties on the Tribunal and that a new appointment for Lawrence was announced in

the Diocesan newspaper. Muntone described the father of the victim as going “ballistic” and

reported that he came to the Chancery once again, where he “complained bitterly that someone as

evil as Mike was now being honored by the Church.” Muntone noted that the Diocese created a

list of priests whose ministry assignments should not be made public without consultation with

Diocesan administrators as a result of this incident. Muntone concluded his memo by highlighting

“the problem” of the twenty-fifth anniversary of Lawrence’s ordination being at hand. Muntone

asked for advice as to how to handle the normal process whereby Diocesan publications

highlighted priest jubilarians of the Diocese under the circumstances. Muntone noted that, if the

regular fanfare was provided for Lawrence’s anniversary, it could be problematic and result in the

victim’s father “banging on the door once again.” Regardless, Lawrence continued in his priestly

duties on the Diocesan Tribunal until 2002.

58
Muntone’s Memo to Cullen and Schlert

59
 On January 6, 2002, the Boston Globe generated national publicity on the issue of child

sexual abuse within the Archdiocese of Boston. In February 2002, Lawrence wrote to Cullen.

Lawrence stated that, “in light of recent events and at the suggestion of Monsignor Alfred Schlert,”

he wished to retire. Lawrence was granted a retirement and received a pension and healthcare

benefits.

The “In Light of Recent Events” Letter

60
 In spite of a documented confession to child molestation, Bishops Joseph McShea, Thomas

Welsh, and Edward Cullen permitted Lawrence to remain in active ministry within the Diocese

with all of the authority and trust of a priest serving on the Tribunal. The Diocese took no action

to warn parents or parishioners of the Diocese that a predator was in their midst.

The 12-year-old boy who reported his abuse to his father in 1982 was not Lawrence’s only

victim. In November 2009, the Diocese received another report of abuse at the hands of Lawrence.

A victim called to report that he had been sexually assaulted on one occasion by Lawrence. He

reported that Lawrence fondled his genitals when he was approximately 13 years of age. Lawrence

was confronted with the complaint by the Diocese. He contested the age of the boy at the time

and indicated that he believed he was 16 or older. Lawrence also indicated that he often helped

the children dress in costumes for parish productions. To the degree contact occurred, Lawrence

claimed it was accidental. There is no indication that the Diocese notified the victim of Lawrence’s

earlier confession to molesting a child in 1982. Moreover, there is no indication that Barres told

the Vatican of Lawrence’s earlier crime or his related confession when the matter was brought to

the attention of the Holy See.

In December 2014, Barres notified the Vatican by letter that he would not seek the removal

of Lawrence from the priesthood. He recommended that he remain in retired status. Lawrence

died in April 2015.

61
62
Barres’ Notification to the Vatican

63
64
 Roman Catholic Diocese of Erie

I. General Overview of the Diocese of Erie Pennsylvania

The Diocese of Erie was founded on July 29, 1853 and includes thirteen counties in

northwestern Pennsylvania. These counties are Erie, Crawford, Mercer, Venango, Warren, Forest,

Clarion, Jefferson, Elk, McKean, Clearfield, Cameron and Potter Counties. This is the largest

geographical diocese in the state of Pennsylvania. Due to its large size the Diocese of Erie is

divided into three sections known as Vicariates: Eastern, Northern and Western. Each of these

Vicariates is run by a priest or Monsignor who takes their direction from, and is answerable to, the

Bishop of Erie. The Diocese serves the roughly 221,508 Catholics of the region or approximately

25.7% of the regional population. The Bishop is the chief authority within the Diocese of Erie.

II. History of Bishops of the Diocese of Erie

1) Bishop John M. Gannon (1920 – 1966)

2) Bishop John F. Whealon (1966 – 1968)

65
 3) Bishop Alfred M. Watson (1969 – 1982)

4) Bishop Michael J. Murphy (1982 – 1990)

5) Bishop Donald W. Trautman (1990 – 2012)

6) Bishop Lawrence T. Persico (2012 – Present)

III. Additional Church Leadership within the Diocese of Erie Relevant to the
Grand Jury's Investigation

The Grand Jury finds that that the following Church leaders, while not Bishops, played an

important role in the Diocese of Erie's handling of allegations of priest sexual abuse.

1) Monsignor Mark Bartchak

2) Father Glen Whitman

IV. Findings of the Grand Jury

The Grand Jury uncovered evidence of child sexual abuse committed by priests in the

Diocese of Erie. Evidence showed that Roman Catholic priests engaged in sexual contact with

minors, including grooming and fondling of genitals and/or intimate body parts, as well as

penetration of the vagina, mouth, or anus. The evidence also showed that Diocesan administrators,

including the Bishops, had knowledge of this conduct and yet priests were regularly placed in

ministry after the Diocese was on notice that a complaint of child sexual abuse had been made.

This conduct enabled offenders and endangered the welfare of children.

Evidence also showed that the Diocese made settlements with victims and had discussions

with lawyers regarding the sexual conduct of priests with children. Further, these settlements

contained confidentiality agreements forbidding victims from speaking about such abuse under

threat of some penalty, such as legal action to recover previously paid settlement monies.

66
 Finally, the Grand Jury received evidence that several Diocesan administrators, including

the Bishops, often dissuaded victims from reporting abuse to police, pressured law enforcement to

terminate or avoid an investigation, or conducted their own deficient, biased investigating without

reporting crimes against children to the proper authorities.

V. Offenders Identified by the Grand Jury

1) Michael J. Amy

2) Michael G. Barletta

3) Donald C. Bolton

4) Robert F. Bower

5) Dennis Chludzinski

6) Donald Cooper

7) Michael R. Freeman

8) Gregory P. Furjanic

9) Chester “Chet” Gawronski

10) Herbert G. Gloeker

11) Robert E. Hannon

12) James P. Hopkins

13) Barry M. Hudock

14) Joseph W. Jerge

15) Stephen E. Jeselnick

16) Thomas C. Kelley

17) Gary L. Ketcham

18) Thaddeus Kondzielski

67
VI. Examples of Institutional Failure: Fathers Chester “Chet” Gawronski,
William Presley, and Thomas Smith
The Grand Jury notes the following examples of child sexual abuse perpetrated by priests

within the Diocese of Erie. These examples further highlight the wholesale institutional failure

that endangered the welfare of children throughout the Pennsylvania Dioceses, including the

Diocese of Erie. These examples are not meant to be exhaustive; rather, they provide a window

into the conduct of past Pennsylvania Bishops and the crimes they permitted to occur on their

watch.

69
 The Case of Father Chester Gawronski

Known Assignments

06/1976 – 09/1978 St. Joseph, Oil City

09/1978 – 07/1979 St Bernard, Bradford
07/1979 – 02/1987 St. Agatha and St. Bernadette Mission, Saegertown
02/1987 – 01/1988 Health Leave
01/1988 – 05/1989 Holy Family Monastery, Erie
01/1988 – 05/1989 St Patrick, Erie
05/1989 – 12/1989 Health Leave
12/1989 – 08/2001 Pleasant Ridge Manor, Girard
06/1992 – 11/1992 Hamot Hospital, Erie
08/1995 St Ann, Erie
09/2001 St Mary’s Asbury Ridge, Erie

Father Chester Gawronski became a priest in the Diocese of Erie in 1976. In August 1986,

Bishop Michael Murphy was notified that Gawronski had fondled and masturbated a 13-to-14-

year-old boy on multiple occasions from 1976 to 1977 under the pretext of showing the victim

how to check for cancer. Complaints continued to be received for decades.

In early 1987, the complaints were commonly made by parents who reported similar

conduct with their sons. An internal Diocesan memorandum was obtained by the Grand Jury and

indicated that the number of victims could be has high as twenty.

Diocesan Records Attempt to Tally the Abuse

Diocesan administrators, concerned about negative publicity and potential legal liability,

attempted to assure the families of the victims that action would be taken. Internally the Diocese

worked to compile data on the number of families affected and how to keep the matter secret.

70
 On January 7, 1987, Father Glenn Whitman, head of the Diocese’s Clergy Personnel

Office, wrote a letter addressed to a parent of one of Gawronski’s 13-year-old victims. Whitman

wrote, among other things, “My only caution to you … is to refrain from probing for any more

information about past events as it may raise undue concern and attention on the part of people

who aren’t involved.” That same day, Whitman documented the need for “discretion” in another

Diocesan communication to an interested party. Among other things, Whitman wrote:

I can’t stress enough the necessity for discretion in this matter. It is obvious at this
time that legal action isn’t pending, or being considered. Undue attention or
publication of this information to other families, or other priests would be harmful
and certainly unnecessary.”

71
Whitman’s “Discretion” Letter

72
 Diocesan records, obtained by the Grand Jury through a subpoena served on September 1,

2016, recorded the ever-growing list of affected and traumatized parishioners. A summary of

potential families affected noted that the mother of a group of brothers that were molested

continued “to be very angry about this whole thing” and is in conversation with at least one other

family on this list. She stated that “going public would be a distinct possibility should (Gawronski)

ever be assigned to parish work.” On February 9, 1987, Gawronski provided the Diocese with a

list of forty-one possible victims. He confirmed at least twelve children as victims on whom he

had performed the “cancer check.”

73
Gawronski Admits Criminal Conduct

74
75
A 1987 List of Families Affected

76
 Additional records, obtained from the secret or confidential archives of the Diocese, noted

that, in April 1987, Gawronski freely confessed to numerous instances of sexual abuse. He was

sent to Chicago for psychological evaluations but denied any problems with boys. He was placed

on a temporary leave of absence. In some instances, entire families of young boys were molested

by Gawronski. Regardless, Gawronski was still permitted to wear the collar of the priesthood as

he engaged the public.

In addition to this information, more victims reported Gawronski for criminal sexual acts

with children to the Diocese in 1988. In 1990, Bishop Donald Trautman took command of the

Diocese. Trautman also received additional complaints in 1995 from a victim who had been

molested at the age of 15 in 1986. The victim reported he had fallen prey to Gawronski’s “cancer

checks.”

By 1996, there was no possible doubt that Gawronski had spent most of his priesthood

preying on the vulnerable. However, even as complaints continued, on November 6, 1996,

Gawronski was notified that Trautman had approved his request to hear confessions for persons

with disabilities. On May 19, 1997, Trautman sent a letter to Gawronski and thanked him for “all

that you have done for God’s people during those twenty-one years of ordination. Only the Lord

knows the many acts of kindnesses on your part and the deep faith that you have shown. The Lord,

who sees in private, will reward.”

For approximately fifteen years, from 1987 to 2002, Murphy and Trautman allowed

Gawronski to remain in active ministry by reassigning him multiple times. As late as 2001,

Trautman assigned Gawronski to a new five-year term as a chaplain for St. Mary’s Home in Erie.

In January 2002, the Boston Globe broke national news by publishing an article detailing

child sexual abuse by clergy in the Archdiocese of Boston. Located within records provided by

77
the Diocese was a petition for “withdrawal from priestly ministry” signed by Gawronski with the

handwritten notation, “EFFECTIVE FEB. 27, 2002.”

On June 2, 2002, one of Gawronski’s 13-year-old victims wrote a letter to Trautman.

Among other things, the victim requested that the Church: 1) stop aiding and abetting priests; 2)

ensure collections were not used to compensate priests; 3) publicize the names of pedophile priests;

4) identify any priest who has molested a child; and 5) establish a policy to ensure offending priests

were reported to law enforcement. The victim also advised that Trautman had never contacted

him since the Erie Times ran an article identifying potential offenders within the Diocese in April

2002. The victim specifically cited that his dealings with his molestation recently resurfaced when

learning of Trautman’s “libelous statement that there were no pedophiles in the Erie Diocese.”

Trautman responded to this victim by letter dated June 21, 2002. Trautman stated that he

was shocked the victim would “go to the press directly rather than to contact me regarding the

past” and argued that the victim was 14 years old when the abuse occurred, not 11 as stated in the

article. Trautman explained that the Diocese had a “zero level tolerance for any abuse situation”;

that he knew of no priest with a pedophile background in any form of ministry; and that he had

never transferred an accused priest from parish to parish as had occurred in other dioceses.

On November 12, 2004, Trautman wrote a ten-page letter to Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger of

the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in Rome. The letter was accompanied by a twelve-

page directory of Gawronski’s victims and crimes. In total, forty-four identified children were

identified in the documents. In providing a basis for Gawronski’s removal from the priesthood,

Trautman stated, “Gawronski identified, pursued, groomed, and then abused his victims. The

classic use of manipulations of the parents, siblings, and friends of the victims in order to get to

78
those victims or cultivate other potential victims is consistently evident throughout.” Trautman

went on to write:

I now see in its totality that his conduct has been deeply harmful to several
individual persons, to the faith communities of St. Joseph Parish, Oil City, PA, St.
Agatha Parish, Meadville, PA and St. Bernadette Mission, Saegertown, PA, and the
common good of the Church. He has gravely offended the dignity of the
priesthood, the Sacrament of Penance, and the dignity of marriage, as well as
against good morals in general. As long as Gawronski exercises priestly ministry
and that is publically known, the effects of scandal among the people of the Diocese
of Erie will continue. Justice has yet to be restored, given the number and kind of
his offenses.

Trautman’s scorching indictment of Gawronski’s decades of child sexual abuse was

necessary to convince Rome to remove Gawronski from ministry. It was also the only full and

fair accounting of Gawronski’s crimes that either Trautman or the Diocese has provided to date.

Unfortunately, it was contained within a private letter to Rome rather than through a public

acknowledgment to Gawronski’s victims or the public. Additionally, it occurred fifteen years after

the Diocese received the first report of child sexual abuse and only occurred after immense external

pressure was placed on the Diocese by press accounts and litigation.

79
 The Case of Father William Presley

Known Assignments

05/1956 - 06/1965 St. Cosmas and Damian, Punxsutawney

06/1965 - 08/1970 Elk County Christian High School, St. Marys
05/1971 - 08/1971 Immaculate Conception, Brookville
05/1972 - 08/1971 Our Lady Queen of the Americas, Conneaut Lake
08/1970 - 06/1976 Leave of Absence, Graduate and Student Counselor, Notre Dame,
Indiana
06/1976 - 06/1977 Leave of Absence, St. Joseph University, Philadelphia
06/1977 - 06/1978 Leave of Absence, Campus Minister, University of Maryland,
Baltimore, Maryland
06/1978 - 08/1981 St. Therese, Shinglehouse
06/1971 - 08/1981 Sacred Heart Mission, Genesee
08/1981 - 03/1983 Leave of Absence, Parish Ministry in Raleigh, North Carolina
03/1983 - 03/1988 St. Agnes, Morrisdale (three separate assignments)
03/1988 - 04/1990 Leave of Absence, Outside the Diocese
04/1990 - 07/2000 Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary, Sykesville (three separate
assignments)
07/2000 Retired in Lancaster (Diocese of Harrisburg)

The Diocese of Erie was first apprised of Father William Presley’s sexual abuses as early

as November 1987, during his assignment as Pastor of St. Agnes. These sexual abuses, as reported

to the Diocese, involved two victims and spanned nearly sixteen years. One of the victims had

been abused as recently as 1986; the second victim was abused prior to 1971 when he was a high

school student in another parish.

Between February and May 1988, various meetings or discussions were held between

Presley and Diocesan officials. Fathers John Rosenhamer, A. Joseph Book, Joseph Bobal, Glen

Whitman, John Beal, and Bishop Michael Murphy participated in the review of the complaints.

The Diocese noted that Presley did not directly deny the allegations. However, Diocesan

memoranda obtained by the Grand Jury recorded the Diocese’s negative view of the complaining

victims. Documents regularly referred to the victims as “troubled” or having psychological

80
“problems.” Indeed, it was noted that one victim may have been the victim of a previous sexual

assault by a family member.

An Excerpt of a Diocesan Memo Regarding a Victim

There was a consensus amongst diocesan officials that Presley was extremely violent and

predisposed to assaultive behavior. On May 16, 1988, Bobal wrote a letter to Murphy containing

his recollection of a meeting with Presley. He confirmed that Presley had given the teenaged

female victim a job and had obtained other items for her, including clothing and money. He also

noted the possibility that Presley would become violent. The meeting concluded with a request

that Presley undergo a psychological evaluation. Presley ultimately refused the evaluation but

agreed to see another doctor at the recommendation of the Diocese.

81
82
83
The Bobal Letter

84
 Following an evaluation in April 1990, Murphy placed Presley in a temporary assignment.

That assignment was made permanent in June 1990. Shortly thereafter, Trautman allowed Presley

to remain in his position as Pastor and Administrator at the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary

Church in Sykesville, Jefferson County. In April 1996, Trautman appointed Presley to a new six-

year term as Administrator of this Church, where Father Presley remained until his retirement in

2000.

In January 2002, an article detailing the practice of reassigning priests accused of sexual

abuse of children was published in the Boston Globe. In April 2002, three separate victims notified

Trautman of sexual abuse perpetrated upon them by Presley from 1963 to 1974. One of the

victims was as young as 13 years old when it occurred. The abuse of these individuals consisted

of “choking, slapping, punching, rape, sodomy, fellatio, anal intercourse,” and other acts according

to Diocesan records reviewed by the Grand Jury. On April 18, 2002, Trautman contacted Presley

by telephone. Trautman recorded that, during that call, Presley admitted the sexual abuse of the

victims. Trautman revoked Presley’s priestly faculties later that year.

In April 2003, and in response to media inquiries about Presley, the Diocese of Erie issued

a press release stating, among other things, that Presley’s priestly faculties were removed in July

2002 shortly after the allegations prompted the Diocese to conduct an internal investigation. The

Diocese stated that Trautman’s understanding of the alleged incidents was that the crimes had

occurred 28 years ago during the time of the late Bishop Watson. The Diocese explained that the

individual making the allegation was twenty years old at the time and enrolled at a college in

another state where the incidents were reported to have occurred. The Diocese told the public that

it had “no information to provide on other possible allegations against the priest.”

85
 This press release was false and misleading. Trautman had personal knowledge of at least

three victims, one as young as 13, who reported their abuse to him in 2002. Only one victim was

an out-of-state college student. Moreover, the Diocese was aware of sexual abuse complaints

against Presley as early as 1987 but permitted him to stay in active ministry for another thirteen

years. Additionally, Diocesan records showed that Presley was so violent that priests who

interacted with him were concerned for their safety.

Later that year, Trautman communicated with the Vatican and outlined additional details

with respect to sexual abuse committed by Presley. Trautman cited information provided by a

doctor who was counseling one of Presley’s victims, the same doctor who counseled Presley in

1988. Trautman reported that the information “…confirms my suspicion that there are even more

victims of the sexual abuse and exploitation perpetrated by Presley.”

By 2005, the Diocese was actively engaged in an attempt to formally remove Presley from

the priesthood. In the course of that effort, personnel for the Diocese interviewed other witnesses

or associates of Presley and identified numerous additional victims or potential victims.

Monsignor Mark Bartchak led the investigation. Several of these individuals stated that they

informed the Diocese of their concerns in the 1980’s, including a report to a parish council

member, who stated that Presley would not allow anyone else inside the rectory when certain

children were present and that some of these children spent the night with him on multiple

occasions.

Bartchak also re-interviewed the male victim who had previously disclosed his abuse to

the Diocese in 1982, 1987, and 2002. He explained that Presley invited him to his rectory after

befriending him. Presley then tried to hypnotize him before assaulting him. Presley took him on

trips to New York and Yosemite. Presley brought other children on some of these trips, including

86
one occasion when he tried to abuse both the victim and another high school student at the same

time. Presley taught the victim how to have sexual intercourse by bringing in a female high school

student and using index cards to show them where to touch each other. On more than one occasion,

Presley gave him some type of a sedative to relax him prior to abusing him. Presley stated that it

was okay “because he was a priest” and used his position as a spiritual guide to further the abuse.

On August 25, 2005, Bartchak sent a confidential memo to Trautman that detailed the

results of his interviews to date. Bartchak stated the following: “I was not surprised to learn from

other witnesses from the Elk County area, that there are likely to be other victims” and that “…

several more witnesses who could attest to the brutality that they were subjected to by Father

Presley.” Bartchak asked, “It is likely that there may be others who were also of the age for the

offenses to be considered delicts, but to what end is it necessary to follow every lead?” He sought

Trautman’s opinion, asking:

Is it worth the further harm and scandal that might occur if this is all brought up
again? I am asking you how you want me to proceed. With due regard for the
potential for more harm to individuals and for more scandal, should I continue to
follow up on potential leads?

Four days later Bartchak documented a meeting earlier that day with Trautman, in which he stated:

Bishop Trautman decided that in order to preclude further scandal, these additional
witnesses should not be contacted, especially given the fact that is not likely that
they will lead to information concerning delicts involving minors under 16 years of
age.

In 2006, Trautman made a confidential, formal request to the Vatican in support of

Presley’s laicization. The Grand Jury reviewed similar requests in Dioceses throughout

Pennsylvania. Often called “The Acts” of the subject priest, the summaries were often the most

detailed documents within Diocesan records and contained decades of long-held secrets only

87
disclosed in an effort finally to remove an offending priest from the priesthood. The “Acts” of

Presley stated, in part:

Presley is a violent man….He managed to work his will and way by fear,
intimidation, charm and deception, all the classic signs of a hardcore predator. How
he managed to escape for so many years defies reason and understanding.

His behavior was carefully planned behavior…..Victimization didn’t happen

spontaneously; it was programmed, masterfully designed, almost perfectly
executed.

Given the pattern of behavior over his years in ministry, I believe that Presley
constitutes a threat to others.

Presley’s abuse has had a rippling effect on the spiritual, mental and emotional lives
of his victims…..Presley’s case has been made public by way of the printed media
– causing scandal among the Christian Faithful.

He manipulated families to welcome him into their homes and worked to garner
the approval of parents. He then used this privileged position to solicit sexual acts
with the children.

Father Presley’s behaviors of manipulating families into giving him their trust and
grooming their children for engaging in sexual acts continued and improved as he
moved to other assignments.

In the course of these proceedings to remove Presley, the Bishop of Harrisburg, Kevin

Rhoades, provided a statement. He acknowledged that Presley had moved to Lancaster,

Pennsylvania after his retirement in 2000. Rhoades wrote that his predecessor, Bishop Nicholas

Dattilo, was personally aware of this matter and that more information regarding the violent

behavior of Presley had come to light since Presley moved to the Diocese of Harrisburg. Further,

the letter stated that “were this information to become known, especially in the light of his offers

of public assistance at Mass in several parishes, great public scandal would arise within this

diocese.”

On July 13, 2006, Trautman wrote to the Lancaster County District Attorney. His letter

stated that Presley was now defrocked and that the Diocese had received “credible allegations

88
regarding sexual misconduct with a minor which allegedly occurred many years ago.” Trautman

falsely wrote, “We were unaware of these allegations until they came to light only a few years ago.

As a result, no criminal charges were ever brought forward because the statue of limitations had

expired.” The truth was that Murphy, Trautman, and the Diocese of Erie intentionally waited out

the statute of limitations and curbed their own investigation to prevent finding additional victims.

The Grand Jury finds that the failure of the Diocese of Erie and of Murphy and Trautman

to aggressively pursue the removal of Presley in a timely fashion had left Presley cloaked in the

authority and respect of the priesthood. Moreover, the lack of transparency and candor with

respect to the concerns surrounding Presley only aided seamless insertion into another Catholic

community. Presley, a priest Trautman would eventually describe as a “hardcore predator,” had

escaped to a new region of Pennsylvania.

89
90
The Statement of Bishop Rhoades

91
Trautman’s Letter to the Lancaster County District Attorney

92
 The Case of Father Thomas Smith

Known Assignments

06/16/1967 – 08/15/1967 Our Lady of Peace, Erie

09/15/1967 – 06/03/1970 Sacred Heart, Erie
06/03/1970 - 02/12/1971 St. Patrick, Franklin
02/12/1971 – 07/16/1972 Notre Dame, Hermitage
07/16/1972 – 06/23/1978 St John the Baptist, Erie
06/23/1978 – 06/01/1981 St. Cosmas and St. Damian, Punxsutawney
06/01/1981 – 10/23/1984 St. Mary of the Assumption, Frenchville
02/01/1984 – 10/01/1984 Health Leave
03/08/1984 – 03/08/1989 Presbyterian Council, Erie
10/23/1984 – 02/05/1985 St. Joseph, DuBois
02/05/1985 - 03/12/1985 St. Hippolyte, Guys Mills
08/08/1985 – 09/16/1985 St. Joseph, Mt. Jewett
09/16/1985 – 12/12/1986 St. Teresa, Union City
12/12/1986 – 04/22/1987 Health Leave, Girard, Ecclesia Center
04/22/1987 – 11/30/1987 Health Leave, Suitland, Maryland, St. Luke’s Institute
12/01/1987 – 09/01/1992 St. Joseph, Warren
09/01/1992 – 05/01/1994 Holy Rosary, Erie
05/01/1994 - Pleasant Ridge Manor, East Mercy Motherhouse
05/01/1994 - Sisters of Mercy Motherhouse, Erie
05/01/1994 - St. Patrick’s, Erie, St. Hedwig Cluster

Father Thomas Smith was ordained in 1967. In 1981 he was assigned to Saint Mary of the

Assumption. Bishop Michael Murphy was first told of child sexual abuse perpetrated by Smith

against a 17-year-old boy in January 1984 while at Saint Mary’s. Smith resigned on January 20,

1984.

From February 1984 to October 1984, Smith was placed on “health leave.” In reality, he

was in residential psychological therapy. In October, Smith was released and reassigned by

Murphy to Saint Joseph’s in DuBois, Pennsylvania until February 1985. In February 1985, Smith

was transferred to Saint Hippolyte in Guys Mills, Pennsylvania for approximately one month.

From March 1985 to August 1985, Murphy sent Smith to residential psychological therapy once

again. Official Diocesan records obtained by the Grand Jury show this was designated as a leave

93
of absence. Upon his release, Smith was sent to Saint Joseph’s in Mount Jewett in August 1985.

After about one month at Saint Joseph’s, Smith was transferred to Saint Teresa in Union City,

Pennsylvania where he remained for approximately 10 months. In spite of Smith’s history of child

abuse, and his need for continued treatment, Murphy continued to permit Smith’s contact with

children. While at St. Teresa’s, Smith sent a letter to Murphy describing his gifts and

accomplishments in “working with young people.”

In December 1986, Smith was placed on a leave of absence yet again. This leave of

absence continued for almost a year while Smith was returned to residential psychological therapy.

In January 1987, Diocesan records indicated that the treatment facility informed Murphy that

Smith suffered from a “driven, compulsive, and long standing” obsession with sexually assaulting

children. The facility warned that since his first treatment in 1984, Smith had not stopped sexually

assaulting children and that interdiction was needed.

These secret Diocesan records obtained by the Grand Jury pursuant to a subpoena showed

that, while in treatment, Smith admitted to sexually molesting at least fifteen children. Smith stated

that all of his victims were boys, some as young as seven. Smith had raped them anally and orally.

This information was provided to Murphy in November 1987. That same month, Smith was

discharged from the facility.

In spite of Smith’s confession to sexually violating at least fifteen prepubescent boys,

Murphy assigned Smith to the parish of Saint Joseph’s in Warren on December 7, 1987.

Approximately three months later, in March 1988, Father Glenn Whitman wrote a letter to Smith

and advised him of recent conduct that placed him in violation of his aftercare agreement with St.

Luke’s Institute. Regardless, Smith continued in ministry at Saint Joseph’s with the approval of

Murphy, and, beginning in 1990, Trautman.

94
 On July 25, 1990, Whitman wrote a memo to Trautman and noted two known parishes

affected by Smith’s abuse. He also wrote that “The number of victims is not clearly known.” The

same day, Trautman wrote his own memo regarding Smith. In this document, Trautman wrote

that he had met with Smith about his problems and that Smith was a person of “candor and

sincerity.” Trautman noted that after another year and a half he would consider a new assignment

for Smith because he wanted Smith to complete his aftercare and was fearful of future litigation.

95
96
The July 25, 1990 Memos of Whitman and Trautman

97
 Smith was so relieved to find a refuge in Trautman that he wrote to him on July 17, 1990

with respect to the aforementioned meeting. He thanked Trautman for truly caring about him. In

reference to his desire to stay in active ministry, Smith wrote, “And so why did I worry?”

On July 20, 1992, Smith was transferred to the Holy Rosary Parish in Erie, Pennsylvania

by Trautman. Smith was very active in the “Isaiah 43” ministry program, a program for Catholic

children.

98
Trautman’s Letter of Appointment to Holy Rosary

99
 A little over a year after Smith was transferred to Holy Rosary, Trautman received a letter.

Dated September 20, 1993, the letter was from the parents of one of Smith’s victims. They

described the abuse suffered by their son when he was only nine years old. Trautman wrote to St.

Luke’s Institute, one of Smith’s treatment providers, and requested information as to the future

ministry of Smith. Among other things, Trautman noted that he was “worried about appearances”

and that “Father Smith does participate in the Isaiah 43 Program which takes him outside of the

Diocese. I have no supervision of his activity away from the Diocese; it is an act of trust in him.”

Trautman explained his sudden interest in Smith’s activities, stating, “The mother of this individual

has raised concerns about Father Smith’s involvement in Isaiah 43 since there are youth present

for this type of retreat.”

St. Luke’s Institute responded on December 28, 1993. Trautman was informed that Smith

had failed to report his involvement with the Isaiah 43 program as part of his continued aftercare.

Trautman sent a letter to Smith and informed him that his duties at Holy Rosary would be altered.

However, Trautman permitted Smith to remain in the Isaiah 43 program until he completed his

duties there in March 1994.

The church bulletin for the Holy Rosary Parish, January 1994, announced the assignment

of Father Thomas Smith, Parochial Vicar, to several chaplaincy positions in the Erie area

beginning at the end of March 1994 and noted that Smith would remain in residence at Holy Rosary

with the title of Resident and Weekend Assistant. This assignment permitted Smith to roam freely

about the Diocese, serving as a chaplain with all the authority and power of the priesthood.

Moreover, he continued to be a friendly face in residence at the parish and a weekend assistant.

Nowhere in the bulletin was it indicated that Trautman notified the parishioners that Smith had

been in treatment since 1984 due to sexually abusing children, nor was it noted that Smith admitted

100
to such conduct with as many as fifteen boys in 1987. Nowhere did it warn that the Diocese was

aware that he had re-offended and that the offenses included anal and oral sex with prepubescent

boys. These warnings were conspicuously absent because Trautman failed to warn his own

parishioners of the danger Smith posed to their children.

101
102
103
The Bulletin for Holy Rosary Parish, January 9, 1994

104
 That same month, all Pennsylvania Bishops received a confidential letter from the Most

Reverend Joseph V. Adamec, Bishop of the Diocese of Altoona-Johnstown. Adamec and the

Diocese of Altoona-Johnstown were involved in the high profile litigation of child sexual abuse

offenses perpetrated by Father Francis Luddy. As discovered by the Thirty-Seventh Statewide

Investigating Grand Jury in their investigation of the Diocese of Altoona-Johnstown, Adamec and

the Diocese were aware of sexual offenses committed by Luddy. Documentation within their

secret archives contained incriminating information regarding numerous priests who had molested

children. In Adamec’s letter to the other Bishops, he explained the steps he had taken to protect

the secret archives from litigation. Notations on the document appear to indicate that Trautman

took note of Diocesan records which Adamec was forced to disclose, and that the Diocese’s

motions in the case, such as seeking bifurcation, jury sequestration, and to dismiss based on a “time

bar,” were being denied.

105
106
Adamec’s Letter Regarding Child Sexual Abuse Litigation

107
 Meanwhile, Smith was unhappy with his new assignment and sought a reprieve from

Murphy, his first enabler. Murphy, now retired, reached out to Trautman on behalf of Smith and

another priest seeking greater leniency. Trautman responded by letter on May 6, 1994. Trautman

explained that he had not been overly restrictive but that the Diocese could not adopt a “posture”

less than what Pittsburgh had done. The Grand Jury noted that Trautman did not cite to the evils

of child sexual abuse as the external pressure which warranted the restriction of offending priests.

Rather, Trautman provided Murphy a copy of an article from Time Magazine on “this problem”

and stated that “[t]he article is vicious and demonstrates, once again, the need for vigilance on the

part of the church.”

108
109
Trautman Responds to Murphy

110
 Ultimately, Smith served as a chaplain as described in the Holy Rosary church bulletin

until his retirement in March 2002. In April 1996, Smith wrote to Trautman and asked to be

appointed to the board of the local YMCA, as well as to be returned to the Isaiah 43 program.

Trautman was aware that Smith continued to seek contact with children and elected not to warn

anyone.

Due to the national coverage following the article about the Archdiocese of Boston,

Trautman was forced to field letters from concerned parishioners and answer inquiries from the

local press. On January 31, 2002, Trautman wrote to parents of one of Smith’s victims and stated,

“I believe appropriate action has been taken in the fact that there is no parish assignment and there

is a definite curtailing of his ministry.” On March 15, 2002, Trautman gave an interview to a news

reporter and stated, “we have no priest or deacon or layperson that I know of that has, in any way,

a pedophile background.” Smith retired that same month and was still a Roman Catholic priest.

By April 2002, some victims had begun litigation in connection with their past abuse. In

a letter dated April 24, 2002, from counsel for the Diocese to the attorney for one of Smith’s

victims, the following statement was made:

… it must be understood that we cannot simply write checks because an event occurred 20,
30, or 40 years ago, but we must limit our assistance to rehabilitation and encourage people
such as your client to attempt to put the past behind them and move on with their lives.

By February 2003, it appeared that Smith had moved on with his own life. A February 26, 2003,

memo by Trautman documented that Smith had obtained employment as a counselor at “Turning

Point” and that Trautman had relied on Smith’s word that he disclosed his past abuses to them.

Trautman wrote a memo on July 22, 2003, documenting that Turning Point had made a

complaint. Smith had never disclosed his history of child sexual abuse offenses to them. Trautman

documented that “I felt he had made a complete recovery from alcoholism and sexual abuse. He

111
had been faithful to his treatment program and gives every indication of having taken full

responsibility for his actions.”

Under public pressure, Trautman submitted a formal request to the Vatican on November

10, 2004, and requested the laicization of Smith. Now that Trautman needed a basis to remove

Smith from the priesthood he acted with candor. Contrary to nearly every one of Trautman’s

previous statements regarding Smith, Trautman now disclosed his knowledge to the Vatican in a

confidential letter. Trautman admitted that the Diocese of Erie had been aware of Smith’s abuses

since at least 1987. Trautman disclosed that Smith abused boys between 7 and 12 years of age.

He described Smith’s acts as chilling and noted that Smith used physical force to bring about the

offenses and threats to secure the secrecy of his crimes. Trautman wrote that Smith invoked the

name of God to justify his actions against his victims while using their faith and the priesthood to

manipulate them and secure their silence. Trautman noted that, even after Smith was told to avoid

any and all occasions that would place him in the company of minors, he continued to do so in a

public manner. For example, he was photographed assisting high school students in the collection

of food for the poor and the photograph was published in the local newspaper. Trautman

summarized Smith’s worldview and stated that he saw his victims as objects rather than people.

The Vatican finally acted in 2006 and removed Smith from the priesthood. Smith’s former

flock was never told the reason for his removal. On August 3, 2006, Trautman directed the pastor

of St. Hippolyte to make the following notation in the record of the parish with respect to Smith:

“Dismissed from the clerical state on June 10, 2006 by Pope Benedict XVI. Nothing else need be

noted.”

112
 Roman Catholic Diocese of Greensburg

I. General Overview of the Diocese of Greensburg, Pennsylvania

The Roman Catholic Diocese of Greensburg was canonically erected on March 10, 1951,

by Pope Pius XII. The Diocese oversees Armstrong, Fayette, Indiana, and Westmoreland counties,

Pennsylvania. As of 2017, the population of Catholics living within the Diocese of Greensburg

was 137,641, which constituted approximately 21% of the total population in the Diocese's

geographic region. The Greensburg Diocese consists of 78 parishes, 14 elementary schools, two

junior/senior high schools, and a school for children of all ages with intellectual and/or

developmental disabilities, and has approximately 100 clergy members (including active, retired,

and international priests, as well as permanent deacons).

113
 Evidence also showed that the Diocese made settlements with victims and had discussions

with lawyers regarding the sexual abuse of children by its priests. These settlements often

contained confidentiality agreements forbidding victims from speaking about such abuse under

threat of some penalty, such as legal action to recover previously paid settlement funds.

Finally, the Grand Jury received evidence that Diocesan administrators, including Bishops,

dissuaded victims from reporting abuse to law enforcement. Meanwhile, the Diocese regularly

failed to independently investigate allegations of child sexual abuse in order to avoid scandal and

possible civil and criminal liability on behalf of the Diocese, accused priests, and Diocesan

leadership. To the extent an investigation was conducted by the Diocese, it was too often deficient

or biased and did not result in reporting credible allegations of crimes against children to the proper

authorities or otherwise faithfully respond to the abuse which was uncovered.

V. Offenders Identified by the Grand Jury

1) Father Dennis Dellamalva

2) Father Greg Flohr

3) Father Charles B. Guth

4) Father Francis Lesniak

5) Father Raymond Lukac

6) Father Henry J. Marcinek

7) "Greensburg Priest #1"

8) Father Robert Moslener

9) Father Fabian G. Oris

10) Edmond A. Parrakow

11) Father George R. Pierce

115
 12) Father Gregory F. Premoshis

13) Father Thomas W. Rogers

14) Father Leonard Sanesi

15) Father Roger A. Sinclair

16) Reverend Joseph L. Sredzinski

17) Father John T. Sweeney

18) Reverend Joseph Anthony Tamikowski

19) Father Roger J. Trott

20) Father Charles Weber, OSB

VI. Examples of Institutional Failure: Fathers Edmond A. Parrakow,

Raymond Lukac and Robert Moslener
The Grand Jury notes the following examples of child sexual abuse perpetrated by priests

within the Diocese of Greensburg. These examples further highlight the wholesale institutional

failure that endangered the welfare of children throughout the Pennsylvania Dioceses, including

the Diocese of Greensburg. These examples are not meant to be exhaustive; rather, they provide

a window into the conduct of past Pennsylvania bishops and the crimes they permitted to occur on

their watch.

116
 The Case of Father Edmond A. Parrakow

Known Assignments

1968 (summer) Catholic University Ponce, Puerto Rico

1968-1969 Assumption Catholic Church, Tuckahoe, New York
1969-1973 St. Peter, Yonkers, New York
1973-1984 St. Martin of Tours, Bronx, New York (St. Thomas Aquinas H.S., Faculty)
1985 Servants of the Paraclete, Jemez Springs, New México
December 1985 Accepted into Greensburg Diocese
1985-1986 Holy Family Catholic Church, Latrobe
1986-1989 St. Pius X Catholic Church, Mount Pleasant
Leave (Return to Archdiocese of New York)
2004 Request for Laicization

Father Edmond Parrakow was born and raised in New York City and ordained on June 1,

1968, at St. Patrick’s Cathedral in New York City at the age of 28. Parrakow thereafter spent

seventeen years serving in various parishes within the Archdiocese of New York. At some point

during his assignment to the parish of St. Martin of Tours, Bronx, New York, and St. Thomas

Aquinas High School, complaints related to the sexual abuse of children were made against

Parrakow.

While records within the Diocese of Greensburg regarding Parrakow's alleged misconduct

in the Archdiocese of New York were somewhat limited, Parrakow's Greensburg Diocesan file

indicated a complaint was made against him around the beginning of 1985 by a man alleging he

was sexually abused by Parrakow fifteen years prior when he was a teenage boy (Victim One).

This abuse allegation appears to have prompted the Archdiocese of New York to arrange for

Parrakow to receive counseling with a Father Benedict during the first months of 1985. Parrakow

underwent an intensive “evaluation” at the St. Bernardine Clinic in Suitland, Maryland, in May

1985, which resulted in his referral for in-patient treatment at the Foundation House operated by

the Servants of the Paraclete in Jemez Springs, New Mexico (“Foundation House”) in July 1985.

117
Foundation House was a facility that provided evaluations and treatment for priests accused of

sexual abuse of children or other improper acts.

According to a memorandum dated February 20, 1985, from Monsignor Thomas Klinzing

of the Diocese of Greenburg to Bishop William Connare, an inquiry was received from the

Archdiocese of New York asking if Parrakow could be accepted into the Diocese of Greensburg

“for the next three or four months.” This initial request from the New York Archdiocese included

information that Parrakow was undergoing counseling at the time, but assured the Greensburg

diocese “that there were no unusual psychological problems but that Father Parrakow needs time

to sort out his problems.”

Parrakow underwent a series of interviews and tests upon his arrival at Foundation House.

During one such interview on July 22, 1985, Parrakow admitted to having molested approximately

thirty-five male children over the previous seventeen years he had served as a priest (he was 45

years old at the time). Parrakow indicated he preferred his victims around the age of 15 or 16 and

admitted to having engaged in sexual touching, mutual masturbation, mutual fellatio, and mutual

anal intercourse. Parrakow further stated that he “thought that sex with a girl was sinful and that

sex with a child was not violating them—it was doing something to them externally.”

The doctor who conducted the July 22, 1985, interview with Parrakow reached the

following conclusion:

My impression is that he [Parrakow] certainly has pedophilia. There is absolutely

no doubt in my mind. The real issue with treating him is going to be giving him
insight and helping to motivate him to change his behavior. I am not sure the level
of motivation that is within him right now [sic]. Basically if he had not got caught
he would be continuing the behavior without really thinking that it was really not
that harmful [sic].

While Parrakow was undergoing “treatment” at Foundation House, letters were exchanged

between the Archdiocese of New York and Connare, confirming that Parrakow would be granted

118
a ministry within the Diocese of Greensburg. On October 7, 1985, Connare wrote to Reverend

Henry Mansell, Vice Chancellor for Priest Personnel for the Archdiocese of New York, and

indicated he would “be happy to help Father [Parrakow] with an assignment” after his release from

Foundation House. On October 11, 1985, Mansell responded with a letter of gratitude and agreed

to facilitate an exchange of information regarding Parrakow’s time in New Mexico. Specifically,

in his October 7 letter, Connare requested “a complete report on that treatment and his needs so

that we can consider his needs when the time for an appointment draws near.” Mansell later

assured Connare that the Greensburg Diocese would “be provided with a complete report on his

treatment and needs.”

While Parrakow’s complete records from Foundation House, including those pertaining to

his interview when he confessed to having sexually abused thirty-five boys, were sent from

Foundation House to the Archdiocese of New York on August 6, 1985, the records of the Diocese

of Greensburg do not reflect whether this information was provided by New York to Greensburg

at that time. For instance, according to a letter sent by Parrakow to Connare on December 9, 1985,

Parrakow was including with the letter several “progress reports” pertaining to his treatment at

Foundation House. These progress reports only addressed his general participation in various

programs at Foundation House and did not include any details of his prior sexual abuse.

In a confidential memorandum dated December 11, 1985, prepared by Connare that was

held within the secret archives of the Diocese of Greensburg, Connare acknowledged receipt of

the progress reports sent with Parrakow's December 9, 1985, letter. In this confidential

memorandum, Connare documented that although the official reason offered for Parrakow's stay

at Foundation House was “‘burn out’ due to his teaching experience,” he was informed during a

telephone conversation with a Father Isaias that the reason Parrakow was dispatched to New

119
Mexico was a complaint of sexual abuse committed by Parrakow on a teenage boy fifteen years

prior. Connare noted that the victim was “older and unbalanced” and had been contacting the

Archdiocese of New York about Parrakow.

Connare further remarked in his confidential memorandum that he spoke with Parrakow

about the matter and that Parrakow confirmed he was sent to Foundation House because of the

accusation of abuse made against him. There is no indication, however, that Parrakow revealed to

Connare his complete history of sexual abuse. In response to learning about the complaint against

Parrakow, Connare wrote the following:

From my interview with Father Ed, it would seem that his problem is in the past. It
would also seem that from the program at Foundation House, he has come a long
way in discovering his own nature and personality, including implications of
sexuality. He realizes he must limit contacts with young people and work on
developing patterns of mature conduct.

In a letter dated November 4, 1985, sent by the Director of Foundation House, Connare

was directly warned not to assign Parrakow to a parish that had a school and recommended he be

assigned with at least one other priest.

A Selection from the Letter of Warning received by Connare

from the Director of Foundation House

On November 20, 1985, Klinzing responded to the Director's letter of warning and advised

that the Diocese of Greenburg would not be able to abide by his recommendations:

120
 As Bishop Connare has previously stated, he is more than willing to have Father
Parrakow serve in the Diocese of Greensburg in the pastoral ministry while on leave
from the Archdiocese of New York. However, the Bishop does not feel he can
comply with your suggestion that Father Parrakow be assigned in a parish setting
that does not have a school. The Diocese of Greensburg is made up of many
parishes with between 600 and 900 families and these parishes usually have a small
parochial school attached. The Parish school usually has under 200 students. The
Bishop feels that in asking Father Parrakow to accept an assignment, he would have
to place him in such a parish.

Klinzing further stated, “If you have a problem with any of the above, please feel free to call me

or Bishop Connare.”

121
Monsignor Klinzing’s Letter of Response

122
 Shortly after Connare's interview with Parrakow in December 1985, Parrakow completed

his tenure at Foundation House and with the consent of the Archdiocese of New York and approval

of Connare, entered into ministry in the Diocese of Greensburg.

Between December 11, 1985, and July 1, 1986, Parrakow was not assigned to a single

parish, but rather aided various parishes in the Diocese. On May 14, 1986, Parrakow wrote a letter

from St. Procopius Parish in New Salem, Fayette County, thanking Connare for his acceptance

and expressing his satisfaction with his involvement in parish ministry. Parrakow also spent a

short time at Holy Family Catholic Church in Latrobe, Westmoreland County, in the early months

of 1986. On July 1, 1986, Parrakow received his first formal appointment in the Diocese when he

was appointed Parochial Vicar of St. Pius X Catholic Church in Mount Pleasant, Westmoreland

County. Throughout his assignments, Parrakow regularly had contact with Catholic schools.

123
Parrakow’s First Assignment in Pennsylvania

124
 Parrakow served in the Diocese until early 1989, when a complaint was made against him

regarding inappropriate contact he had with a seventh grader at Holy Trinity Catholic School

located in Mount Pleasant (Victim Two). Parrakow had been tasked with instructing Victim Two

in the faith and his upcoming sacraments. According to internal Diocesan records, on February

13, 1989, Klinzing met with the child's parents and was informed that, from the outset of their

son's involvement with Parrakow, Parrakow was verbally abusive towards them and accused them

of abusing and harming their son. They stated that Parrakow was “overprotective of [their] child

and interfering with [their] child's life” and that, since his involvement with Parrakow, Victim

Two’s performance in school had suffered. They described that Victim Two’s experience with

Parrakow had “been extremely bad for him.”

The situation escalated during an incident in which Victim Two was taken to the

emergency room because of an illness. While Victim Two’s parents were with him at the hospital,

Parrakow entered the treatment room, insulted the parents, and “began to touch [Victim Two] on

his face and hands and chest while he lay on the emergency room bed.” A violent argument ensued

with the boy’s father. Parrakow called Victim Two’s home that evening inquiring about the boy

and appeared at the hospital the next day, which “terrified and petrified” Victim Two.

Meanwhile, in January of 1989, Parrakow requested incardination with the Diocese of

Greensburg, meaning that he would be formally transferred from the Archdiocese of New York to

the Diocese of Greensburg. The request prompted the disclosure of Parrakow’s full records from

the Archdiocese of New York. This included his complete records from Foundation House, which

included his admission to having molested approximately thirty-five male children while he served

as a priest. At the same time these records were being disclosed in the first weeks of February,

1989, the complaint involving Victim Two was received by the Diocese.

125
 On February 16, 1989, Bishop Anthony Bosco of the Diocese of Greensburg notified

Lawrence M. Connaughton, Vice-Chancellor for Priest Personnel of the Archdiocese of New

York, of his concern over the incident with Victim Two and his parents. Bosco stated that he had

relieved Parrakow of his assignment in the Diocese of Greensburg on February 10, 1989, and

would not provide him any further assignments.

On February 22, 1989, Klinzing wrote a memorandum to Bosco stating, “Father

Connaughton asked if there were any incidents because he’s worried about legal ramifications. I

told him that we have suspicions but no hard evidence.”

Significantly, an undated note in Parrakow’s Diocesan file appeared to confirm that the

Diocese of Greensburg had engaged in no meaningful supervision of Parrakow since his arrival in

1986. The note stated, “We have not & cannot supervising.”

The File Note

According to correspondence between the Archdiocese of New York and the Diocese of

Greensburg in 2003, Parrakow resided in the Greensburg Diocese but did not engage in any priestly

126
activities between 1989 and 2003. In 2004, Parrakow consented to laicization and was formally

removed from the priesthood of the Roman Catholic Church.

Pursuant to the Grand Jury’s investigation, Victim Two was contacted and later

interviewed by Special Agents of the Office of Attorney General (OAG) on April 12, 2017. Victim

Two confirmed the details of the incident as documented within Diocesan records and stated that

Parrakow was “a pervert” and that “he always made me feel uncomfortable and intimidated.”

Victim Two further expressed his firm belief that, had his father not intervened that day at the

hospital, Parrakow would have gone much further than rubbing his body and face. Victim Two

identified a boyhood neighbor of his as another possible victim of Parrakow. This young man had

served as an altar boy before abruptly withdrawing from that role in his local parish. On May 4,

2017, this additional victim (Victim Three) was interviewed by OAG Special Agents.

Victim Three explained that, for approximately one year when he was 10 or 11 years old

and in fourth or fifth grade, he served as an altar boy at St. Pius X Catholic Church in Mount

Pleasant. He stopped being an altar boy due to Parrakow. Victim Three reported that, while he was

an altar boy, Father Ed, as the boys called Parrakow, told the altar boys not to wear any clothing

under their cassocks because God did not want any man-made clothes to be worn next to their skin

while they were serving Mass. Parrakow also told the boys their cassocks had been blessed and

were meant to be worn next to the skin. Victim Three stated he never felt comfortable about this

and that it did not seem right not to wear any clothing under his cassock.

Victim Three also reported that Parrakow took the altar boys into a private room and told

them he had to do a physical examination on them because there had been a report of abuse at the

school. Parrakow told the boys he was checking them for any signs of abuse and further stated

that the school did not want this to be common knowledge because they might never find out which

127
student was being abused. Parrakow told the altar boys not to say anything to their parents,

teachers, or other students. Victim Three further added that Parrakow would touch the children

“all over” during these “examinations,” including their genitals and buttocks. Victim Three

specifically recalled Parrakow breathing on his neck when he was behind him checking his

buttocks.

On December 11, 2017, Parrakow appeared before the Grand Jury pursuant to a subpoena.

During his testimony, Parrakow admitted that he had molested children as a priest, many of whom

were altar boys. When asked if he had abused numerous children, Parrakow stated, “… I don’t –

well, I didn’t keep contact – contact with them, and I didn’t count them. So whatever the Diocese

is saying is probably correct.” Although Parrakow could not recall the names of all the children

he had molested, he did recall that he had sexual contact with the child of a youth minister in

Bethlehem, Lehigh and Northampton Counties, during drives between New York and Greensburg.

Parrakow explained that he had developed a friendship with the youth minister and was invited to

stay at their home as a point of respite on the long drive.

Parrakow further testified that the Diocese never placed any restrictions on his ministry

and never limited his contact with schools, despite the warning and recommendations of the

Director of Foundation House. Parrakow stated he was unaware of any such recommendation and

did, in fact, have frequent contact with school children.

Parrakow testified that he confessed his crimes to his fellow priests, but admitted he would

offend again after he received absolution. During a particular exchange with the attorney for the

Commonwealth, Parrakow conceded that he could not be cured of his desires and indicated that he

was unware of the “serious effects” of his criminal actions. The prosecutor challenged his assertion

regarding the seriousness of his offenses in the following exchange:

128
 Q: Okay. You didn’t know that Scripture itself says it is better to put a
millstone around your neck and be cast into the sea than harm a child?

A: That, I knew.

Neither Edmund Parrakow nor William Connare can be prosecuted for their crimes. The

statute of limitations has expired for the multiple indecent assaults Parrakow committed in

Pennsylvania. Parrakow is currently employed in a shopping mall in Westmoreland County.

Connare died in 1995. The Bishop Connare Center, the Diocese of Greensburg’s

ecumenical retreat, social, and educational conference facility, was named in his honor.

129
 The Case of Father Raymond Lukac

Known Assignments

06/21/1954 Saints Cyril & Methodius, Fairchance

06/29/1955 Holy Trinity, Ford City
1957 Servants of the Paraclete, New Mexico
08/01/1961 Diocese of Gary, Indiana
07/03/1963 St. Stanislaus, Posen, Illinois
01/16/1964 Immaculate Conception, Clarksburg, West Virginia
Various Veterans Administration Service

Father Raymond Lukac was ordained within the Diocese of Greensburg in 1954.

According to records in Lukac's Diocesan file, his ordination in 1954 was preceded by considerable

resistance by Church officials to Lukac joining the priesthood. This resistance was in response to

his refusal to conform his conduct to that expected of a priest and resulted in Lukac being briefly

dropped as a seminary student, before being readmitted under strict conditions. Lukac's refusal or

inability to follow the rules of the priesthood, despite the consistent consternation and discipline

of Church officials, was a trend that continued throughout his tenure as a priest.

In April 1955, soon after Lukac's ordination, the Chancellor of the Diocese of Greensburg,

Cyril Vogel, met with Lukac regarding a “serious matter.” According to numerous handwritten

letters from parishioners of Saints Cyril & Methodius appearing in Lukac's Diocesan file, members

of Lukac's parish were complaining that he appeared to have been romantically involved with the

18-year-old organist for the parish (Victim One). Several parishioners expressed concern over

having seen Lukac with the teen late at night, including one writing that Lukac was observed in

Victim One’s company while “driving away with the lights off.” Father Anthony Hardy, head

pastor at Saints Cyril and Methodius’s, complained to the Diocese that “he is the talk of the parish

and the community everywhere.”

130
 Diocesan records showed that, in order to distance Lukac from the brewing scandal, he was

transferred to Holy Trinity in June 1955. In July 1955, Lukac signed a pledge that he would no

longer see Victim One or have any communication with her whatsoever.

Approximately one year later, Father Matthew Yanosek, the head pastor of the Holy Trinity

parish, discovered that Lukac was involved with a 17-year-old girl (Victim Two). Yanosek made

a verbal report to the Diocese in the summer of 1956 about the matter and, by December 1956,

Yanosek had learned that the relationship between Lukac and Victim Two had continued.

Concerned of possible scandal, Yanosek wrote a three-page letter, dated December 13, 1956, that

the Grand Jury obtained from Diocesan files. The letter, addressed to Bishop Hugh Lamb, stated,

in part:

This past summer I made a verbal report on a scandal in our community which
involved Father Lukac… Your Excellency’s advice at that time was for me to give
him a canonical warning and then if he failed to put it in writing and make it a
matter for the Chancery Office. Father Lukac was advised of this and the rules set
down for him were 1. No social visiting 2. No driving girls in his car. He has
violated these rules. Many times and I have warned him many times.

Yanosek further explained that, upon his return from a trip to Detroit, the housekeeper for

the rectory reported witnessing Lukac enter the rectory with Victim Two and observed the teen in

Lukac’s bed. Yanosek wrote that he “called the father of this child and reported the situation.”

Yanosek also told Bishop Lamb that he had found a wedding ring and a marriage certificate

in Lukac’s room. The marriage certificate indicated Lukac had married Victim Two on November

20, 1956, at Holy Trinity Church and included the seal of the Church and Yanosek’s forged

signature. It did not appear that this forged marriage certificate was associated with a formal, legal

marriage.

The Grand Jury determined that the date of the marriage certificate was not coincidental;

November 20 was the date Victim Two turned 18 years old. Yanosek concluded his letter by

131
stating, “(Lukac) has lied to me so many times and I suspect him of thievery. For the best of all

concerned, I beg your Excellency, please replace him.”

In response to Yanosek's letter, Lamb wrote a letter to the Archbishop of Philadelphia, John

O’Hara, on January 12, 1957, requesting his assistance in the matter. Lamb explained that there

“is a danger of scandal” and that the Diocese felt Lukac should be removed “for the good of his

own soul and for the welfare of the church.” Despite having the marriage certificate as proof of a

relationship between Lukac and a minor, Lamb told O’Hara, “there is no conclusive proof that he

has gone the limit in the three cases brought to our attention of the two parishes to which he has

been assigned.” Additionally, the Grand Jury’s review of Yanosek's Diocesan file found various

letters from parishioners complaining of Lukac’s contact with teens. Specific details regarding the

third case Bishop Lamb referenced were not contained within Diocesan records.

Lamb asked O’Hara to send Lukac to Padua Retreat House in Pocopson, Chester County.

Lamb wrote that “the other two young priests of this diocese who were given hospitality there

profited much by the experience.” It is unclear who these other two priests were or why they were

sent to Padua House. However, Diocesan records revealed that, before Lamb made final

arrangements to send Lukac on the planned retreat, Lukac eloped with Victim Two to Virginia.

By January 18, 1957, the date of the marriage, Victim Two was over 18 and a legal marriage was

recorded on that date.

Despite his elopement, Lukac returned to the Church and, in July 1957, was sent for

treatment and repentance at Foundation House operated by the Servants of the Paraclete in Jemez

Springs, New Mexico. Foundation House was a facility that provided evaluations and treatment

for priests accused of sexual abuse of children or other improper acts. Father Lukac thereafter

132
divorced Victim Two in December 1957. According to several documents in Lukac's file, Victim

Two bore Lukac a child.

Lukac remained in New Mexico until August 1, 1961. Upon his departure from Foundation

House, he did not return to the Diocese. Rather, while still under the authority of the Diocese,

Lukac was granted the necessary permission to serve within the Diocese of Gary, Indiana. In a

letter dated June 30, 1961, the Bishop of Gary, Andrew Grutka, accepted Lukac into his Diocese

on “a trial basis.” Lukac was given all faculties of the priesthood in the Diocese of Gary, with the

exception of the ability to hear confessions.

While the Grand Jury did not locate any documentation formally assigning Lukac to serve

at schools within the Gary Diocese, it is clear from references in various letters and documents

appearing in Lukac's Diocesan file that he served as a high school teacher at Bishop Noll Institute

in Hammond, Indiana.

In a letter from Grutka to Connare dated June 13, 1963, Grutka directed that Lukac was “to

leave the Diocese of Gary” on June 30, 1963. While Grutka explained that the Diocese no longer

had a need for Lukac, he ended his letter with the following: “He is also troubled with impetuosity

with a tendency toward indiscreetness. In my humble opinion an assignment in a Boys’ school

would be in the best interest of Father Lukac.”

On June 15, 1963, a letter was dispatched from Brother I. Conrad, the Superintendent of

Bishop Noll Institute, to Connare. Conrad’s letter offered the following assessment of Lukac:

Father Lukac’s besetting fault seems to be a lack of prudence. This has been noticed
in his dealings with some of the students, particularly the girls… However, I am
not aware of any scandals in this regard, although his conduct at times gave me a
few moments of uneasiness and apprehension.

On June 19, 1963, Connare responded by letter thanking Conrad for the “confidential” information

he had provided.

133
 Lukac’s removal from the Diocese of Gary resulted in Connare endeavoring to find him a

new ministry. On June 17, 1963, Connare wrote a memorandum to Monsignor Norbert Gaughan

of the Diocese of Greensburg in which he sought to move Lukac while instructing Gaughan to

“[w]atch and carefully guard secrecy of this."

Memorandum of Bishop Connare

In numerous letters contained within the secret archives of the Diocese of Greensburg,

Connare attempted to find Lukac a “benevolent bishop” to accept him into another diocese.

On June 21, 1963, the Bishop of Fort Wayne-South Bend, Indiana, Leo Pursley, wrote a

letter to Connare stating, “the truth is that I have taken in quite a number of problem priests without

134
much success, but I will certainly give Father Lukac every possible consideration.” Ultimately,

Lukac was not accepted into the Diocese of Fort Wayne-South Bend.

Lukac moved to St. Stanislaus in Posen, Illinois, in July 1963, although he did not live

there under an official capacity. Rather, according to a July 23, 1963, memorandum written by

Chancellor F. W. Byrne of the Archdiocese of Chicago, Lukac arrived at St. Stanislaus through

his friendship with Father Stanley Dopek, the pastor of St. Stanislaus, who had invited Lukac to

live with him in the parish. Byrne noted that the Archdiocese of Chicago would not accept Lukac

as a priest and instructed him to find a different “benevolent bishop,” while permitting Lukac to

live with Dopek until he found other arrangements.

On August 12, 1963, Dopek wrote to inform Connare that Lukac was serving within his

parish. That same day, Lukac dispatched a letter to Connare asking that Connare petition Rome

for the return of his capacity to hear confessions. In October 1963, Connare granted Lukac's

request and petitioned the Vatican for a full restoration of priestly faculties on behalf of Lukac.

Connare noted his success in returning Lukac’s ability to hear confession in a January 9,

1964, letter to the Bishop of Toledo, George Rehring. At that time, Connare was still working to

place Lukac in ministry in another diocese. Connare stated the following to Bishop Rehring: “This

past fall, however, while in Rome, I reviewed the details of his case with the Holy Office, and

obtained these faculties for Father Lukac. Their use is contingent upon his getting a benevolent

bishop, and limited, for the present, to one year.” Diocesan records showed that Connare and

Lukac continued to write to various bishops asking that he be accepted into ministry within their

respective dioceses.

On January 10, 1964, Joseph Hodges, the Bishop of Wheeling, West Virginia, wrote a letter

to Connare stating that Lukac “is most welcome here, that I know something of his background,

135
and we will be happy to cooperate in helping him serve as a real priest.” Connare responded by

thanking Bishop Hodges, noting that “obviously he [Lukac] is a risk… but who can pre-judge the

workings of divine grace.” Connare then reminded Hodges about his reservations regarding

“assignment in the northern end of the Diocese,” since such a placement may be too close to the

Diocese of Greensburg.

136
Bishop Connare’s Letter to Bishop Hodges

137
 On August 1, 1964, soon after Lukac joined the Wheeling Diocese, Hodges wrote to

Connare informing him “He [Lukac] was rather strong in his language in a talk to some of the high

school students earlier this year.” Hodges wrote that he did not want to lose Lukac, but felt it

might be better for him to be moved and that such a change would be preferable before “classes”

resumed.

Subsequently, Lukac was assigned a position as a part-time chaplain for the Veterans

Administration Service, a position in which he served for two years. In 1967, Lukac requested

permission to take a full time chaplaincy in the Veterans Administration Service.

In 1993, the Diocese of Greensburg was contacted by an individual claiming to be the

daughter of Lukac. This individual wanted to make contact with him and stated in her letter to the

Diocese that she thought he had remarried. The Diocese contacted the Archdiocese for Military

Services for assistance, but they claimed to have no record of Lukac.

In August 2006, the Archdiocese of Chicago requested information regarding Lukac from

the Diocese of Greensburg because they had received a complaint that Lukac had sexually abused

a minor while residing in the Chicago Archdiocese (Victim Three). Victim Three stated that, in

approximately 1962 to 1964, Lukac abused her when she was around 11 years old in the St.

Stanislaus rectory. Lukac was at St. Stanislaus between 1963 and 1964. Victim Three reported

that she felt good when Lukac paid attention to her because she was always picked on and that her

contact with Lukac ended when he left for the Navy.

On April 11, 2012, Kelly Venegas, the Bishop’s Delegate for the Diocese of Gary, Indiana,

called to speak with Father Lawrence Persico of the Diocese of Greenberg regarding an allegation

of sexual misconduct involving Lukac alleged to have occurred while Lukac was serving in the

138
Diocese of Gary. The only note appearing in Lukac's Diocesan file regarding this matter stated the

following: “Woman approx. 1961 – 1964 teenage sex relation” (Victim Four).

The Grand Jury finds that the Diocese of Greensburg was aware from the outset of Father

Lukac's ordination that he posed a serious risk of sexual misconduct to minor females. Despite this

known risk, the Diocese failed to properly address the serious complaints against him and

thereafter enabled his sexual misconduct. After being confronted by parishioners of the Diocese

with Lukac's abusive acts, Connare doggedly sought to keep him active in his ministry and

persisted in his efforts to have Lukac assigned to another diocese and have his priestly faculties

fully restored. These assignments included Catholic high schools, where Lukac would be in regular

contact with teenage girls, to whom he posed a known, immediate threat. The Grand Jury finds

that the bishops who collaborated to keep Lukac active in the priesthood did so knowing he posed

a risk to the public and were, therefore, complicit in the abuse he committed.

139
 The Case of Father Robert Moslener
Known Assignments
1976 – 1978 St. John the Baptist, Scottsdale
1978 – 1979 St. Agnes, North Huntingdon
1979 – 1985 St. Joseph, New Kensington
1985 – 1986 St. Pius X, Mt. Pleasant
1986 – 1986 St. Cajetan, Monesson
1986 – 1987 Saints Simon and Jude, Blairsville
10/1987 St. Luke Institute, Suitland, Maryland
1987 – 1988 Holy Cross, Iselin
1988 – 1992 Assumption Hall, Sisters of Charity Retirement Home, Greensburg
1992 – 1996 St. Patrick, Brady’s Bend
1996 – 2002 St. Mary Church and Sacred Heart Church, Yatesboro
06/2002 The Anodos Center

Father Robert Moslener was ordained into the Diocese of Greensburg in May of 1976. He

thereafter served in a variety of capacities within the Diocese through 2002, including as a school

teacher in the 1980’s. His tenure in the Diocese was marred by the sexual abuse of children nearly

from its outset when, in 1979 and 1980, he acknowledged engaging in “inappropriate behavior”

with a 15-year-old victim (Victim One) and was sent for an evaluation. While information

regarding this incident in Moslener's Diocesan file was limited, it is clear that William Connare

was notified of Moslener’s contact with the 15-year-old boy but nevertheless permitted him to

return to his ministry. According to internal Diocesan documents associated with this incident,

the Diocese viewed Moslener's abuse of Victim One in the following manner: "incident with the

15-year-old boy may well have represented an unacceptable yet understandable waystation on his

path to more adult sexual integration.”

Numerous allegations of child sexual abuse were levied against Moslener six years later.

Diocesan records indicated that, in 1986, several elementary to middle school aged children

provided statements to the Diocese regarding what Moslener had been teaching in his religion

class. The children advised that, among other things, Moslener asked them if they masturbated

140
and described how Mary had to “bite off the cord” and “lick” Jesus after he was born to clean him

off. One letter made clear that Moslener was discussing the physical effects of masturbation with

a child.

On May 26, 1986, Klinzing sent a confidential memorandum to Connare. In this

memorandum, Klinzing recommended that Moslener be put “on ice” due to the complaints made

by these children. In May 1986, Connare dispatched Moslener to a psychologist for the purpose of

an evaluation.

141
 An Example of a Child’s Statement

In April 1986, the North Huntingdon Township Police Department advised the Diocese

that Moslener had been investigated for committing sexual acts against male juveniles and that

they had “records on file to substantiate the charges.” Diocesan records make reference to sexual

contact with a 16-year-old boy (Victim Two) around this time. There are no records indicating

Moslener was prosecuted for his conduct.

142
 The Police Department’s Letter

In 1987, Moslener was sent, over his objection, to St. Luke’s Institute for an evaluation.

Klinzing notified Connare via a confidential internal memorandum dated March 24, 1987, that

Moslener “was involved in an inordinate way with a 16-year-old boy in the North Huntingdon area

and there is a police record verifying this.” Klinzing also noted that “Father Moslener was involved

143
with another individual at the St. Joseph Parish in New Kensington.” In this memorandum,

Klinzing explicitly asked Connare whether Moslener was a risk to children.

Moslener was subsequently assigned as Chaplain of a retirement home from 1988 to 1992.

From 1992 to 2002, however, he served as an active pastor in parishes in the Diocese. He was

assigned as pastor of St. Patrick’s Church in Brady’s Bend, Clarion County, from 1992 to 1996

and at St. Mary Church and Sacred Heart Church in Yatesboro, Armstrong County, from 1996 to

2002.

An internal Diocesan document detailing the timeline of Moslener’s career indicated that,

in 1999, another victim (Victim Four) contacted the Diocese and disclosed sexual abuse

perpetrated by Moslener. The next entry or event appearing in Moslener’s file was his removal

from the priesthood in 2002. Thus, despite Victim Four’s complaint and the numerous complaints

of child sexual abuse levied against Moslener over the years, he was permitted to remain in active

ministry.

In March 2002, two months after the January 2002 publication of a Boston Globe article

detailing accounts of clergy sexual abuse in the Archdiocese of Boston, Bosco placed Moslener

on administrative leave. On August 1, 2002, Bosco resigned as Bishop of the Diocese of

Greensburg.

In 2003, yet another victim came forward with an allegation of sexual abuse by Moslener

(Victim Five). Finally, in 2004, newly-installed requested that the

Vatican dismiss Moslener from the clerical state.

In 2013, the Diocese received an email from an individual (Victim Six) reporting that he

and his siblings had been sexually abused by Moslener when they were children. Victim Six

became concerned when he saw Moslener featured in various photos on the St. Joseph’s parish

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

144 -*5*("5*0/
website, despite his dismissal from the Church approximately a decade earlier. Victim Six

referenced the “irreversible damage” Moslener caused and noted, “His name doesn’t appear on

any sex offender registry. His victims continue to struggle to this day.”

145
Victims Five’s Letter

146
 Connare and Bosco permitted Moslener to continue in ministry for 22 years after the initial

complaint of child sexual abuse against him and the numerous reports of child sexual assault which

followed. During that time, Moslener continued to prey on innocent children within the Diocese

of Greensburg.

147
148
 Roman Catholic Diocese of Harrisburg

I. General Overview of the Diocese of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania

The Roman Catholic Diocese of Harrisburg covers fifteen counties of Central

Pennsylvania: Adams, Columbia, Cumberland, Dauphin, Franklin, Juniata, Lancaster, Lebanon,

Mifflin, Montour, Northumberland, Perry, Snyder, Union and York. Pope Blessed Pius IX

established the Diocese on March 3, 1868. There are 89 parishes in the Diocese of Harrisburg,

including one Cathedral and two Basilicas. The bishop’s seat is in St. Patrick’s Cathedral.

The Diocese of Harrisburg reported on its website as of January, 2018, that it has 92

Diocesan priests; 38 retired Diocesan priests; 34 religious order priests; 67 permanent deacons;

one religious brother; 274 women religious; and 33 seminarians serving the Catholic population.

II. History of Bishops of the Diocese of Harrisburg

1) Bishop George L. Leech (1935 through 1971)

149
Diocese was on notice that a complaint of child sexual abuse had been made. The Diocese’s

actions enabled the offenders and endangered the welfare of children.

Evidence also showed that the Diocese entered into settlements with victims and discussed

with lawyers the sexual conduct of priests with children. Further, these settlements contained

confidentiality agreements forbidding victims from speaking about the abuse they suffered under

threat of some penalty, such as legal action to recover previously paid settlement monies.

Finally, the Grand Jury received evidence that several Diocesan administrators, including

bishops, often dissuaded victims from reporting to police, or conducted their own deficient, biased

investigating without reporting crimes against children to the proper authorities.

V. Offenders Identified by the Grand Jury

1) Francis J. Allen

2) John G. Allen

3) Francis A. Bach

4) Jesus Barajas

5) Richard J. Barry

6) James Beeman

7) John Bostwick

8) Donald Cramer

9) Walter Emala

10) Paul R. Fisher

11) Harrisburg Priest #1

12) Augustine Giella

13) Harrisburg Priest #2

151
 The Case of Father Augustine Giella

Known Assignments

06/1950 — 06/1969 Holy Trinity Church, Hackensack, New Jersey

06/1969 — 06/1970 Our Lady of Sorrows, Jersey City, New Jersey
06/1970 — 03/1976 Church of the Epiphany, Cliffside Park, New Jersey
03/1976 — 02/1980 St. Catherine’s, Glen Rock, New Jersey
03/1980 — 10/1982 St. Joseph’s Church, Hanover
10/1982 — 04/1988 St. John the Evangelist, Enhaut

Father Augustine Giella was ordained in the Archdiocese of Newark, New Jersey on June

3, 1950. After twenty-nine years of ministry in New Jersey, Giella suddenly decided to seek

ministry elsewhere. In November 1979, Giella wrote Bishop Joseph Daley of the Diocese of

Harrisburg to request an assignment. On December 7, 1979, Archbishop Peter Gerety of the

Archdiocese of Newark wrote a letter to confirm that Giella was a priest in good standing and

stated that Giella “has always shown himself to be [an] excellent priest giving himself only for the

greater honor and glory of God and the people of the Catholic Church.” Gerety gave Giella full

permission to seek service outside of the Archdiocese. Though Giella was still an incardinated

priest of the Diocese of Newark, an agreement to serve in another diocese was permissible with

the concession of his home Bishop and the approval of the Bishop of the receiving diocese.

During the interview process with the Diocese of Harrisburg, Giella told Father William

H. Keeler that he sought to have his own parish, which was unlikely to occur in the Archdiocese

of Newark due to an abundance of priests. Keeler conducted the interview because he was acting

in his capacity as Auxiliary Bishop. This interview was recorded in a memorandum prepared by

Keeler and sent to Bishop Daley and Monsignor Hugh Overbaugh. The Diocese of Harrisburg

accepted Giella and assigned him to St. Joseph’s in Hanover, York County, in 1980.

154
 Thereafter, Giella was assigned to St. John the Evangelist Church in Enhaut, Swatara

Township, Dauphin County, in 1982. In 1983, Bishop Daley died and Keeler was appointed

Bishop of the Diocese of Harrisburg.

At St. John the Evangelist Church, Giella met a family who warmly embraced him as their

parish priest. The family included eight girls and one boy. Giella began sexually abusing the girls

almost immediately upon his appointment to the parish. Giella sexually abused five of the eight

girls. Giella also abused other relatives of the family. His conduct included a wide array of crimes

cognizable as misdemeanors or felonies under Pennsylvania law.

In August 2016, the sisters that Giella abused testified before the Grand Jury to the criminal

sexual acts Giella perpetrated upon them. The Grand Jury learned that Giella regularly collected

samples of the girls’ urine, pubic hair, and menstrual blood. Giella utilized a device he would

apply to the toilet to collect some of these samples. Giella would ingest some of the samples he

collected. The abuse occurred in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, where Giella invited the family

for visits.

Giella’s abuse had a lasting effect on the sisters. The sisters testified to the challenges they

have faced in overcoming Giella’s sexual abuse. The emotional, psychological, and interpersonal

damage to the sisters is incalculable. Most of the sisters refrained from sharing any details of their

own abuse with their siblings for fear of what they might learn. The Grand Jury learned that

Giella’s tragic abuse of these girls could have been stopped much earlier if the Diocese of

Harrisburg had acted on a complaint in the 1980’s.

In approximately April 1987, a teacher at Bishop McDevitt High School received a

complaint that Giella was insisting on watching a girl as she used the bathroom. The girl stated

that Giella insisted on watching her go to the bathroom and that he did “wrong things” with

155
children. The teacher reported the complaint to Father Joseph Coyne, who in turn made an

immediate report to the Diocese.

This former teacher testified before the Grand Jury on January 24, 2017. The former

teacher’s testimony is corroborated by an internal memorandum from the secret archives of the

Diocese of Harrisburg. In that memorandum, dated April 14, 1987, Overbaugh recorded the

complaint, as well as an allegation that Giella engaged in similar conduct with one of the above

mentioned sisters. The witness, the reporting victim, and the family of the sisters are all recorded

and identified by name. Overbaugh wrote:

(REDACTED), a teacher for the Intermediate Unit, was informed by one of her
students, (REDACTED), that while she was a student last year at Bishop Neumann
School in Steelton, she was in Saint John’s rectory, Enhaut, and expressed to Father
Giella, the pastor, her need to go to the restroom. Father Giella is reported to have
said that he would like to go with her and watch, that he does this whenever the
(REDACTED) girl goes to the restroom.2

Overbaugh noted at least one other complaint by a girl who reported to her teacher that Giella had

“acted improperly towards her.” Overbaugh concluded his memo, “Father Coyne was instructed

to do nothing in the case until the matter had been discussed with diocesan legal counsel.

was present for this entire discussion between Father Coyne and Msgr. Overbaugh.”

2
The Grand Jury has withheld names otherwise identified within the document for the privacy of
the witnesses and victims.
156 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

-*5*("5*0/



The Overbaugh Memorandum

157
3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

-*5*("5*0/
 This complaint was consistent with the type of deviant interests Giella pursued with the

sisters he victimized. The Grand Jury uncovered another document related to this report in the

secret or confidential archives of the Diocese of Harrisburg. An undated document addressed to

Keeler regarding “Report on Gus Giella” noted: “I spoke with Father Coyne on the pastoral

concerns: A.) Approaching Fr. Giella B.) welfare of the student C.) satisfying the ire of the teacher.

I said we would consult you on these matters. ”

In spite of the detailed memorandum and this note, Giella remained in ministry and neither

Keeler nor the Diocese attempted to remove Giella from ministry. Giella voluntarily retired in

1988. However, in the approximately five years that followed the Overbaugh memorandum,

Giella continued to sexually abuse the girls identified in the Overbaugh memorandum, which

included a reference to the family of girls.

Keeler left the Diocese in 1989 to become Archbishop of the Archdiocese of Baltimore.

Nicholas C. Dattilo became Bishop of the Diocese in 1990. Giella continued to steal the innocence

of children. In 1992, one of the victims came forward and disclosed what Giella had been doing.

The family initially reported the conduct to the Diocese. Father Paul Helwig wrote a memorandum

to Dattilo dated July 18, 1992, regarding the complaint against Giella. Helwig documented the

information he received from the reporting victim’s family at various meetings in attached

supplemental memoranda. The documents detailed the events leading up to the 12-year-old girl’s

disclosure, and described the event believed to have finally triggered the girl to disclose her abuse,

the discovery of nude or partially nude photos of the girl in Giella’s residence.

Helwig wrote that he interviewed Giella on July 30, 1992. Among other admissions, Giella

stated that he began having contact with the girl in the bath and that “as time went on they became

more comfortable with each other the embraces became more intense and involved some fondling

158 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

-*5*("5*0/
on his part.” Giella also confessed that he took pictures of the girl. The July 1992 Helwig

memoranda are set forth below.

159
160
161
 

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

162 -*5*("5*0/
163
164
165
The July 1992 Helwig Memorandums

166
 The family also reported Giella’s abuse to police in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. Police

in Pennsylvania contacted the Office of the Prosecutor in New Jersey and law enforcement began

an investigation. Upon serving a search warrant at Giella’s residence in New Jersey, New Jersey

police confiscated the following: young girl’s panties; plastic containers containing pubic hairs

identified by initials; twelve vials of urine; soiled panties; sex books; feminine sanitary products

(used); numerous photographs of girls in sexually explicit positions; and some photos depicting

children in the act of urination. Giella was arrested in August 1992.

Diocesan records do not indicate if Overbaugh, Helwig, Dattilo, or any Diocesan personnel

ever reported the prior complaints against Giella or his confession to the police. The victims told

the Grand Jury that this information was never relayed to them.

Giella admitted his actions to the police. According to the police report, after Giella was

charged and arrested for child pornography and sexual abuse, numerous calls were received from

women reporting that Giella fondled and abused them in Hackensack, New Jersey. These women

stated they had been afraid to come forward given Giella’s position in the church. Additionally,

the reporting victim’s sisters began to disclose Giella’s sexual abuse of them.

Having learned that her child had been sexually abused by a priest, the mother of the family

of child victims confronted Overbaugh. The family considered Overbaugh a friend and highly

respected his role in the church. At the time of the confrontation, the family did not know that

Giella’s conduct had ever been reported to Overbaugh or the Diocese. However, further evidence

of Diocesan officials’ knowledge of the danger Giella posed to children was demonstrated to the

Grand Jury when the victim’s mother described the confrontation. Overbaugh stated, “I wondered

why you were letting them go to the rectory.” The victims’ mother stated that she later received a

phone call from Helwig. Helwig stated, “You can relax. Father said that (REDACTED) just took

167
his intentions towards her wrong,” and “that he loved her, and he would never hurt her.” This

account bears some semblance to Helwig’s July 1993 memorandum, where he wrote, “Father is

very remorseful that his affection for (REDACTED) has affected her in this way and that he would

be willing to help in any way that he can. He expects that the family will be ‘sore’ with him and

readily agreed to refrain from contacting the family.” Lost in this characterization is the reality

that child sexual abuse is not affection or care, but the criminal violation of innocent children.

On October 12, 1992, an attorney for the family engaged the Diocese of Harrisburg in civil

litigation via a letter of notice sent to the Diocese. Prior to reaching settlement terms, aggressive

litigation resulted in the release of the victims’ psychological and academic records to Diocesan

lawyers, the exchange of offers and counter-offers, the execution of confidentiality agreements,

and prevention of a Harrisburg newspaper from obtaining information about the case. Letters

between attorneys for the family and the Diocese haggled over whether the victim actually had a

diagnosed condition as a result of the abuse. Diocesan lawyers argued that the Diocese was not

responsible for the conduct of its agents.

On October 27, 1992, Dattilo wrote the family, and stated in part, “I share your shock,

anger and hurt, and pledge full cooperation by the diocese in this unfortunate situation.” However,

while Dattilo promised full cooperation, the diocesan lawyers continued to litigate and attempted

to negotiate the family down from their approximately $900,000.00 demand to $225,000.00.3 The

Grand Jury notes this is a familiar pattern.

In October 2017, Chancellor Carol Houghton testified before the Grand Jury. Houghton

was the long-time Chancellor for the Diocese; Dattilo appointed her to that position. As Chancellor

3
The final settlement figure was nearly one million dollars. However, it does not appear that the
1987 Overbaugh memorandum uncovered by the Grand Jury was ever disclosed during that
litigation.
168
and a canon lawyer, Houghton maintained many Diocesan records. Houghton is not a member of

the clergy. Houghton had been tasked with a file review and was extremely knowledgeable as she

maintained notes of her work. Houghton was shown the 1987 Overbaugh memorandum and

questioned regarding the Diocese of Harrisburg’s failure to inform the family or law enforcement

of its contents. Houghton testified she had never seen the 1987 Overbaugh memorandum

concerning Giella. She had no prior knowledge that the Diocese of Harrisburg had warnings about

Giella’s behavior in 1987. Houghton did not have access to the secret archives; only the Bishop

had access pursuant to the Canon Law of the Church. The Grand Jury observed this in numerous

flawed Diocesan investigations across Pennsylvania. The Dioceses’ focus on secrecy often left

even the Dioceses’ own investigators in the dark.

Ultimately, Giella never faced a jury concerning his alleged criminal conduct. He died

while awaiting trial. His criminal actions, and the criminal inaction of Keeler, resulted in continued

victimization and trauma for the family of girls described earlier. The trauma was so fresh that the

youngest sister, the one who finally reported Giella’s criminal conduct, suffered a panic attack

while in the Grand Jury suite after seeing an older gentlemen who bore some resemblance to Giella.

In explaining why she came forward, she testified:

Because it doesn’t have to happen to anybody. They don’t have to live a life
like I have to. I continually have to battle. The man out there is a very nice man.
He is old like Giella and I can’t -- it makes me -- it makes me think about what
happened and he is nice and he doesn’t deserve me to think that. But I can’t --
I can’t walk through there and see him because it makes me feel uncomfortable.
I don’t -- I don’t know. I believe in God. I don’t go to church. My son is the
only reason I’m alive. Thank God I had him because, if I didn’t have him -- I
probably would have killed myself a long time ago.

This survivor of sexual assault attempted to take her own life in the months after her

testimony before the Grand Jury. In recovery, she requested to speak with the attorney for the

Commonwealth and special agent involved in this investigation. Even though she had almost lost

169
her own life, the victim’s primary concern was a fear that in the intervening months since her

testimony, the Grand Jury’s investigation may have stopped and that the truth would never be told

to the public. She was assured it was still an active investigation.

170
 The Case of Father Arthur Long

Known Pennsylvania Assignments

11/1974 Appointed Chaplain Harrisburg Polyclinic Hospital

09/1975 Chaplain for Sacred Heart Villa and Geisinger Medical Center

Father Arthur Long was a Jesuit Priest assigned to ministry within the Diocese of

Harrisburg. Long was ordained in 1955 as a member of a Catholic religious order, the Maryland

Province Society of Jesus. The Grand Jury highlights Long’s case as an example of another

common observation in the course of its investigation—misconduct by religious order priests.

There are over one hundred Catholic religious orders and related sub-groups throughout

the world. Many operate within the United States. In the Roman Catholic Church, these entities

are often referred to as “religious institutes.” A religious institute is “a society or group which

commit to and pronounce public vows which they share in common with the members of their

order or group.” These organizations are often founded upon the teachings of a particular

individual. By way of example, the Franciscan Friars are followers of Saint Francis of Assisi

whereas the Ordo Sancti Benedicti, or the Benedictines, follow the teachings of Saint Benedict.

There is a lengthy list of similar organizations.

The vows of a religious order priest often include things such as a commitment to living a

life of poverty, a promise of chastity, or service within the mission of the order. The headquarters

of an order may be within the United States or in another location. The head of the religious order

is often called the Superior. With the permission of the Superior and the acquiescence of a

Diocesan bishop, an order friar or priest is assigned ministry within a particular diocese. In any

case, an individual can be removed from ministry by his superior for any reason or a bishop may

rescind authorization to minister within his respective diocese.

171
 The Grand Jury finds that record-keeping regarding order members was sporadic, often

lacked detail, and was inconsistently maintained. Records related to an order’s priests are usually

maintained by the religious order. However, in some cases a diocese may create their own

additional records relative to the order priest’s service within their diocese. This was the case of

the Diocese of Harrisburg and Arthur Long, where the Diocese maintained some records primarily

related to a specific complaint against Long.

Long obtained the permission of his superior, as well as the approval of Harrisburg Bishop

Joseph T. Daley, to serve within the Diocese at some point prior to November 27, 1974. Diocesan

records indicated that Long’s service within the Diocese included a November 1974 assignment

as chaplain at the Harrisburg Polyclinic Hospital.

The Diocese recorded complaints against Long in a letter from Overbaugh to Long’s

superior, Frank A. Nugent, on August 11, 1987. Overbaugh noted that “while this documentation

contains numerous complaints, we seldom if ever receive word of all the good which Father Long

accomplished during his years at the Geisinger Medical Center and for which we in the Diocese

of Harrisburg are grateful.” Overbaugh was vague in detailing the complaints but noted that, since

Long’s time in Danville, he had been doing little more than saying Mass at the Motherhouse of the

Sisters of Saints Cyril and Methodius. Overbaugh’s letter indicated that “Sister Raymund,” the

General Superior of the Sisters of Saints Cyril and Methodius, was displeased with Long’s

presence there. Overbaugh wrote, “Sister Raymund wishes Father Long to be out of the home,

certainly before the high school girls return to the Academy in the near future.”

172
173
Overbaugh’s “Complaints” Letter

174
 The Motherhouse of the Sisters of Saints Cyril and Methodius was associated with an

academy for school-aged girls. Father David McAndrew of St. Joseph Church in Danville wrote

a statement in November 1987 to Diocesan officials. McAndrew reported that a 21-year-old

female and an 18-year-old female had approached him with concerns regarding Long. McAndrew

wrote, “(REDACTED) said Father Long sought to have sex with her four years ago when she was

17 years old. (REDACTED) refused his advances.” McAndrew continued, “In conversation

Father Long admitted to (REDACTED) that he has had sexual relationships with ‘four or five’

girls since he was stationed in Baltimore. Father Long told (REDACTED) ‘God wants us to

express our love for each other in this [sexual] way.’ When, in response, (REDACTED) told him

the Bible warns that such conduct will be punished by God, Father Long said, ‘there is no hell.’”

McAndrew’s letter noted that the victim had been warned when she was six or seven years

old to “never play in Father Long’s yard.” The conclusion of McAndrew’s letter identified another

victim who is believed to have come into contact with Long when she was 13 years old. His

statement recorded, “they were involved sexually.” Attached to McAndrew’s two-page letter is

an “assessment” of the women who reported Long’s conduct. McAndrew concluded that he had

“no doubt” that the victim was telling the truth and believed her companion was “telling the truth”

in regards to the additional 13-year-old victim. He noted that neither victim was in need of

professional counseling since he had surmised that the “process of healing” had begun.

175
176
177
McAndrew’s Statement and Assessment

178
 Overbaugh notified Harrisburg Diocesan Bishop William Keeler of the complaints and

forwarded McAndrew’s report to the superior-in-charge of Long’s religious order in Maryland on

December 1, 1987. Overbaugh reported that he and had met with Long.

Long admitted he had a “relationship” with the girl, whom he identified by name. He stated the

relationship was over. He had gone to confession and was receiving spiritual counseling. Long

claimed that, while she may have been a girl, there was no sexual involvement while she was a

student at the school. Overbaugh noted, “Thus eliminating the possibility later of a pedophilia

suit.” Near the conclusion of his letter, Overbaugh wrote that Keeler preferred that Long be

“reassigned by his Religious Community,” and then memorialized the following: “I told Father

Long that the report of his misconduct and the prudent decision concerning his transfer from

Danville would have to be given to his Superiors in Baltimore. He understood this.”

On January 6, 1988, McAndrew wrote a note to Overbaugh that the Grand Jury obtained

from Diocesan records through a subpoena. The note stated:

Hughie, This is a private communication separate from the foregoing official letter.
My real fear is that (victim) may reach the point where she will seek to embarrass
all her ‘enemies’ by one rash step. By exposing Father Long’s misdoings she would
succeed in hurting him, the Sisters, and (especially) her parents whom she considers
hypocrites. This is not so far-fetched. Remember her brother publically lifted the
Offertory collection at St. Joseph’s to (I think) embarrass his parents. I do not like
to play amateur psychiatrist, but these are my fears. Dave

179 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

-*5*("5*0/
McAndrew’s Note to Overbaugh

180
 Another letter bearing the same date was sent by McAndrew to Overbaugh. This letter

referenced the above mentioned victim of sexual solicitation. McAndrew reported that the victim

met with him and disclosed that more than solicitation had occurred. The victim reported that she

was angry and was discussing the details of what occurred for the first time. The victim reported

that she had been forced to have sex with Long. For support, the victim had again brought the 18-

year-old girl with her. That victim also elaborated and stated that both victims felt “intense anger

and hatred toward Father Long.” McAndrew wrote that he had advised her against “public protest”

and stated, “Her anger is not merely internal but taking a form of public protest which will cause

her trouble and eventually lead to public scandal as she is forced to reveal the reasons for her

anger.” Overbaugh responded to McAndrew and stated that the Jesuits were apprised of the

developments.

On January 17, 1988, McAndrew reported to Overbaugh that the victim smashed the lower

windows of Long’s former residence, which was part of the Sister’s Convent. He wrote, “The

Sister’s called the police and the police are seeking the perpetrator. If the police learn (victim) did

the vandalism and arrest her for it, she will probably tell her attorney her reason. This could lead

to a chain of legal actions far more damaging to the Sisters than a few broken windows. I think

the time has arrived when it may be advisable to brief the Sisters as regards this entire situation.

Otherwise, they may unknowingly take steps they may later regret.” Shortly thereafter, Long’s

Superior transferred him to another location.

On January 15, 1988, McAndrew wrote to Overbaugh again. This time, McAndrew had

learned the victim saw Long in Danville. The victim learned he was asking about her. McAndrew

wrote to Overbaugh, “Please use every effort to assure that Father Long will not come to Danville

again. If he does, everything will fall apart.”

181
 On January 18, 1988, the Sisters of Saints Cyril and Methodius were finally briefed on the

situation and allegations against Long by McAndrew at Overbaugh’s direction. They were upset

and felt betrayed. They asked why Long was allowed to stay at the Villa until Christmas instead

of being withdrawn when the allegations were made. In his letter detailing this interaction,

McAndrew noted that the superior of the order, Sister Raymund, demanded that Long “never again

visit the Villa Sacred Heart” or communicate in any way with the Sisters of St. Cyril and

Methodius.

McAndrew’s Report Regarding the Sisters of Saints Cyril and Methodius

In July 1988, the victim reported that Long had visited Danville. Long was seen visiting

with a nun at the convent, even though the head Sister forbade any such contact. McAndrew wrote

this to Overbaugh and noted: “Such a prohibition would be difficult to enforce without revealing

to the entire community the reasons for the boycott.”

In August 1988, Monsignor William Richardson wrote a memorandum to Keeler, which

stated that Long had asked to leave the Jesuits after he refused to receive therapy. Long’s superior

182
had written to Rome requesting dispensation from the priesthood. That same month, Overbaugh

wrote a memorandum to Keeler that stated the Sisters of Saints Cyril and Methodius received

wedding invitations from one of Long’s child victims. The wedding was between Long and his

child victim. However, Long called off the engagement in September 1988.

On February 12, 1990, the Diocese was informed that Long had been appointed a co-pastor

at St. James Church in Jessup, Lackawanna County. The nun who reported this information stated

that she had reported it to a priest, who advised that he would inform Diocese of Scranton Bishop

James Timlin of the situation with Long. This information was located in a handwritten

memorandum from McAndrew to Overbaugh. McAndrew noted that the reporting nun was

concerned that, if news of Long’s assignment made it back to the victim, “the whole matter could

explode again.” It was noted that she had been promised by Long’s order that he would never “be

placed in an assignment where he could again prey upon young women.”

In a memorandum dated June 30, 1995, Helwig wrote to Dattilo that, in 1988, Long applied

for laicization and was granted dispensation. However, Long refused to sign the necessary

documents. Thus, Long was still a religious order priest.

Long was eventually reassigned by the Society’s superior and continued in ministry until

Father Glynn, Long’s superior in 1995, removed Long from ministry when he learned of Long’s

history. Long was sent to St. Luke’s Institute for five months.

Near the close of this memorandum, Helwig noted that, in 1991-1992, “Cardinal Keeler

granted Long permission to work in the Archdiocese of Baltimore. Shortly after his assignment

reports were again received of inappropriate behavior on his part.” Long went on vacation and

never returned to his community.

183
Keeler Returned Long to Ministry in Baltimore

184
 The Grand Jury finds that Keeler presided over the Diocese of Harrisburg when it received

complaints that Long had sexually abused children. Keeler was informed that Long had admitted

to the conduct. In spite of such knowledge, Keeler, now in his capacity as Cardinal of the

Archdiocese of Baltimore, returned Long to ministry in a Roman Catholic Archdiocese.

The Grand Jury finds that this practice of transferring dangerous priests to other locations

only expanded the pool of unknowing potential victims on which these offenders could re-offend.

Often the priest was simply transferred to another parish within a diocese. Sometimes, the priest

was transferred to another diocese with a “benevolent bishop” or without notice to that bishop of

the priest’s past crimes. This practice occurred throughout Pennsylvania and, as in this case, even

included transfers to other states or countries. Such conduct endangered the welfare of children,

Catholic parishioners, and the public.

185
 The Case of Father Joseph M. Pease

Known Assignments

02/1961 — 10/1962 St. Joseph, Hanover

10/1962 — 08/1963 St. Peter Church, Mount Carmel
08/1963 — 05/1966 St. Patrick, York
05/1966 Diocesan Director of Vocations; Diocesan Director of Youth;
St. Theresa, New Cumberland
05/1966 — 06/1971 St. Theresa, New Cumberland
05/1970 Temporarily assigned Our Lady of Lourdes, Enola
06/1971 — 11/1973 Our Lady of Mt. Carmel, Mt. Carmel
11/1973 — 04/1978 St. John the Baptist, New Freedom
04/1978 — 06/1995 St. Joseph, Mechanicsburg
09/1995 Anodos Center, Downingtown
06/1995 — 12/2002 Divine Redeemer, Mt. Carmel
12/2002 Retires; admits to allegations

Father Joseph M. Pease was ordained on May 20, 1961. From 1961 through June 1995,

Pease continued in ministry in various parishes throughout the Diocese of Harrisburg. At some

point prior to May 16, 1995, the Diocese received a letter alleging Pease was a danger to the

Church. The letter made accusations against Pease, another priest, and one former bishop. The

writer interchanged the designations of “pedophile,” “homosexual,” and “transvestite” as part of a

complaint that Dattilo had failed to “clean up” the Diocese from “sexual crimes.” The letter

concluded by addressing the allegations against the two priests, stating, “If you don’t want more

trouble on your hands along with old scandals and revelations, you better keep those 2 out. What

I say is true, why don’t you do some investigation before you act. You have done enough harm to

the good people of the coal regions.” The Grand Jury reviewed this letter as one of thousands of

documents the Diocese of Harrisburg relinquished to the Grand Jury upon service of a subpoena

for records related to child sexual abuse in September 2016.

186
The Letter of Complaint

187
 On May 16, 1995, Helwig wrote a memorandum to Dattilo stating that he had reviewed

the “private” files and found nothing on Pease. He indicated that the review was triggered by the

above letter and that the accusations were damaging and disturbing. He noted, “She has lobbed a

huge ball into our court which I don’t think we can ignore. If we throw it back to her side of the

net we may be able to find out if there is any substance to her allegations or if it is simply coming

out of small town gossip and, for whatever reason, a vindictive or malicious spirit.”

On June 27, 1995, a 36-year-old victim contacted Helwig at the direction of Father John

Dorff. The man sought to report that Pease sexually abused him when Pease was Pastor at St.

Paul’s Church in Atlas, Pennsylvania. As a result, Helwig wrote another memorandum to Dattilo

outlining the sexual abuse perpetrated by Pease. The victim reported that the sexual abuse occurred

between 1971 and 1973, when the victim was between 13 and 15 years old. The victim stated

Pease asked him, “Have you ever come yet?,” placed his hand in the victim’s pants, and began to

fondle the victim’s genitals. Pease took the victim’s hand and placed it inside his pants, placing

the victim’s hand on his genitals. The victim stated that Pease co-owned a boat with Father Francis

Bach. The boat was located in the Chesapeake Bay. While on this boat with the victim and some

other boys, Pease performed oral sex on the child victim.

The victim explained that he was prompted to report at that time because he saw an article

in The Catholic Witness that noted the names and pictures of the pastors of the new parishes. Until

that moment, the victim had not realized that Pease was still in ministry. The victim wrote that he

was concerned about his 12-year-old nephew who was, at the time, an altar server in the parish

where Pease was assigned. Helwig wrote regarding the victim and stated, “He has felt some guilt

over his cowardice at not being able to report these incidents to someone in authority, but he always

hoped that someone else would come forward first.”

188
 The Diocese received more than one complaint about Pease. Pease had been in ministry

since 1961. A thoughtful consideration of these facts, and a real concern for the welfare of

children, should have resulted in a report to law enforcement, notice to Pease’s past parishes, and

a meaningful investigation into the existence of additional potential victims. Instead, the Diocese

began plans to utilize a “treatment facility” to treat priests, such as Pease, who were accused of

sexual abuse. These facilities were observed throughout the Grand Jury’s investigation.

Commonly used facilities were St. John Vianney Center in Downingtown, Pennsylvania, St.

Luke’s in Suitland, Maryland, and the Servants of the Paraclete in Jemez Springs, New Mexico.

These entities relied almost entirely on the priests self-reporting their request for treatment. When

a priest denied allegations of sexual abuse, he usually avoided any diagnosis related to the sexual

abuse of children. Moreover, these institutions focused on a clinical diagnosis over actual behavior

as reported by the victims. Put plainly, these institutions laundered accused priests, provided

plausible deniability to the bishops, and permitted hundreds of known offenders to return to

ministry.

189
190
191
The June 1995 Helwig Memorandum to Dattilo

192
 On July 19, 1995, and Monsignor Overbaugh met

with Pease to discuss the allegations. Pease denied engaging in any sexual misconduct with the

victim. He acknowledged that the victim spent time at the rectory and that there was “horse play”

but claimed that “nothing sexual occurred.” He remembered the victim and he went to the boat

“…belonging to Father Bach.” Pease recalled an incident in which the victim was riding in the

car with him and the victim laid his head on his right leg. He also recalled an incident in which he

and the victim were at the rectory and he found the victim upstairs naked. The report indicates,

“Father Pease admits to saying what are you doing or some sort of comment like that and pushing

him over towards the bed and then leaving immediately.” In spite of these bizarre statements by

Pease, Dattilo took no immediate action to remove Pease from ministry. Moreover, the Grand

Jury learned that Pease was co-owner of the aforementioned boat with Bach. Bach and Pease were

members of a group of predators who shared information regarding their victims and utilized that

intelligence to share victims between each other. This group consisted entirely of priests from the

Diocese of Harrisburg.

On July 20, 1995, called Pease to check on him. Pease questioned the status of the

inquiry regarding the victim’s complaint and asked what would happen if the victim “really pushed

this, would there be a ‘compromise?’” generated an internal report that recorded, “Pease

then said that if anything happened ‘it was not my intention of how he [the victim] interpreted it.’”

asked him if he could deny that any of the victim’s accusations occurred, to which Pease

replied, “No, I don’t remember.” Pease explained that, twenty to twenty-five years before, he was

drinking heavily but that he was now in control. asked if sexual behavior with young boys

could have happened, to which Pease replied, “I don’t know,” with nervous laughter. Pease further

stated, “I hate to go on record accusing myself. You know when you are drinking you are not in

193
3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

-*5*("5*0/
control as much, not thinking correctly. With kids I was usually a little more discreet.” Pease

again addressed the reported sexual assault involving a naked child upstairs in the rectory. In this

second account, Pease said he remembered that incident and that the victim “must have gotten

excited. I must have turned him on more than I thought.”

194
 

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

195 -*5*("5*0/
 

Pease Can’t Remember if he Molested Children

196




3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

-*5*("5*0/
 On September 7, 1995, Helwig sent a completed “Assessment Referral Information” form

to the Anodos Center. In response to the question, “Disciplinary or legal action pending,” the

Diocesan response was, “None at this time.” The response to the question, “Future ministry

placement” was, “The purpose of this assessment is to find out if there are any reasons the diocese

should be concerned about present or future ministry. At the present time he is in an active

assignment as a pastor.”

On September 11, 1995, Helwig wrote a memorandum, labelled “CONFIDENTIAL,” to

Dr. Ronald Karney at the Anodos Center regarding the complaint made against Father Pease. The

purpose of the memorandum was to refer Pease for a psychological assessment at the Anodos

Center. Helwig detailed information about the victim’s complaints, including an incident in which

Pease requested that a boy wash some venetian blinds and stated, “Rather than getting his clothes

wet, the boy [took] them off.” Additionally, Helwig discussed the occasion in which the

complaining victim and two companions were “treated to a boating trip on the Chesapeake Bay”

and there was an attempt to grope the boy’s genitals by Pease. Helwig wrote that Pease “has no

recollection of the first two events happening.” He also provided information about an incident

that Pease recalled in which Pease happened upon the victim naked while upstairs in the rectory.

Helwig also noted at least one instance where Pease suggested that the victim met with him.

Helwig closed the letter with, “At this point we are at an impasse – allegations and no admission.

What we are hoping to accomplish through this assessment and other inquiries is to establish a

foundation on which to stand should reports begin to circulate about the alleged misconduct and

questions are asked as to why Father has been retained in ministry.” In September 1995, The

Anodos Center informed the Diocese that no diagnosis of Pease had been issued based on the

information provided to the Center.

197
 On December 4, 1995, Helwig and met with the victim and obtained further details

regarding abusive incidents. Helwig and also informed the victim that Pease underwent a

psychological assessment and the professionals “could find no reason to recommend that Father

[Pease] not be active in ministry [sic] at this time.” Dattilo dispatched a one page letter on January

11, 1996, and reminded Pease that it was “inappropriate” for minors to be in any place other than

the public areas of the rectory and that minors should not be employed in parish offices. Dattilo

closed the letter by stating, “Parish settings offer priests a variety of opportunities to interact with

young people….” With Dattilo’s approval, Pease continued in active ministry at Divine Redeemer

in Mr. Carmel until December 2002.

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

198 -*5*("5*0/
Dattilo Noted Opportunities to Interact with Young People

199
 On January 6, 2002, the Boston Globe brought national attention to clergy abuse cases after

uncovering child sexual abuse and a cover-up within the Archdiocese of Boston. On September

13, 2002, an attorney representing a sexual abuse victim wrote a letter to Carol Houghton of the

Diocese and requested an investigation into incidents of alleged sexual abuse by Pease committed

in approximately 1972. About one week later, Dattilo issued a decree ordering an investigation.

The decree indicated, “To safeguard the reputation of all persons involved, all acts of this

investigation, including this Decree, are to be kept in the secret archives of the Diocesan curia

unless they become necessary for penal process (canon 1719).”

On December 13, 2002, exactly three months after receiving the letter from the victim’s

attorney, Dattilo issued a decree announcing the conclusion of the investigation based on Pease’s

admission of guilt when confronted with the allegations. Dattilo indicated that a temporary penal

precept had been issued pending arrangements for permanent removal from active ministry. Pease

wrote a letter which requested retirement, effective immediately. The letter contained a note

reading “Accepted” and dated December 17, 2002, initialed by Dattilo.

On December 21, 2002, Dattilo personally delivered a prepared statement to the Divine

Redeemer Parish, Mount Carmel, and subsequently read this same statement at St. Joseph’s Parish.

In his statement, Dattilo explained that Pease had admitted to “inappropriate sexual contact with

an adolescent.” He stated:

Initially, this report came to the attention of the diocese in June of 1995. Following
the diocesan policy in force at that time, Father Pease was confronted immediately
with the allegation. Because of serious discrepancies in the accounts, and in the
absence of an admission of guilt, Father Pease was asked to undergo a professional
assessment. The results of that evaluation, which included medical, spiritual and
psychiatric examinations, provided insufficient basis to resolve the discrepancies
and to determine guilt.

200
Following this announcement, three other victims came forward and reported that Pease sexually

abused them.

In January 2003, Pease officially retired as a priest. On January 10, 2003, Carol Houghton

and Father Edward Malesic were engaged in an investigation regarding alleged sex abuse

committed by another priest, Father John Allen. As part of that investigation, Houghton and

Malesic interviewed .

The Grand Jury heard from Houghton in her live

testimony before the Grand Jury.

recalled that Pease told him that he had been asked to go for an

evaluation in 1995. Pease disclosed that he had been accused of sexual misconduct with a child.

also reported that he and Pease were out

one day and encountered an adult male. Pease told that he had “fondled” the man when

the man was a child.

201 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

-*5*("5*0/
 also disclosed he was aware of another predatory priest named David Luck.

told Houghton that Pease was very concerned that he might be brought up in a 2002 investigation

regarding Luck’s contact with two brothers.

202 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

-*5*("5*0/
 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

203
-*5*("5*0/
Knew Pease was Molesting Children

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

204
-*5*("5*0/
 Pease was no longer in active ministry in 2014, but a determination had not been made as

to whether he should remain a suspended priest or be removed from the priesthood. On September

2, 2014, Bishop Ronald Gainer wrote a letter to the Congregation for Doctrine of the Faith in Rome

and explained the history of allegations and responses by the Diocese of Harrisburg. He detailed

the initial report of sexual abuse in June of 1995 regarding conduct that occurred between 1971

and 1973. Gainer detailed the various statements of Pease and his statements regarding his

inability to recall if he committed the offenses and the possibility that he “turned on” the victim.

He then documented that this same victim raised the sexual abuse complaint a second time in 2002

and Diocesan staff again confronted Pease. During the second confrontation, he noted that, Pease

admitted multiple inappropriate sexual contacts with the victim. Gainer noted that Dattilo had

issued a Penal Precept and that three additional victims came forward after Pease was removed

from ministry.

In Gainer’s letter to the Vatican he stated that the “scandal caused by his [Pease’s]

admission of the sexual abuse of a minor has been sufficiently repaired by his acceptance of the

December 2002 Penal Precept…” He wrote, “I am not certain that Joseph Pease fully understands

the gravity of his actions (he kept wanting to deny the accusation, kept going back to not

remembering, but saying if the accuser had such clear recollections, then it had to be true).” In the

next paragraph, Gainer stated “…I believe that the harm done by his past sexual misconduct is

being sufficiently repaired. Therefore, before God, Your Eminence, and in all good conscience, I

am not requesting at this time, that any judicial trial or administrative process be initiated that may

lead to his dismissal from the clerical state.” As he closed his letter, Gainer wrote:

I am not seeking the initiation of a trial, nor dismissal from the clerical state.
Instead, I request from the Congregation for Doctrine of the Faith that Joseph
Michael Pease be permitted to live out his remaining years in prayer and penance,
without adding further anxiety or suffering to his situation, and without risking

205
 public knowledge of his crimes. Allow him, Your Eminence, to live out his life
peacefully, in prayer and penance, recognizing the harm he has caused in the lives
of others, and making amends for it.

The Grand Jury disagrees. While removing Pease from ministry was a start, he was clearly

unfit to carry the title of priest. Moreover, public knowledge of Pease’s crime is exactly what was

required in service to the public and Pease’s victims. Therefore, the Grand Jury details the case of

Father Pease, as permitted by law, in service to the victims and the Commonwealth of

Pennsylvania.

206
Roman Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh

I. General Overview of the Diocese of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

The Diocese of Pittsburgh was canonically erected on August 11, 1843, by Pope

Gregory XVI. This Diocese covers Allegheny, Beaver, Butler, Greene, Lawrence and

Washington counties. As of 2017, the population of Catholics living within the Diocese of

Pittsburgh was 632,138, which constitutes approximately 33% of the total population in the

geographic region. There are approximately 211 Diocesan priests in active ministry, and a total

of 188 parishes. The Diocese of Pittsburgh is also comprised of four regional vicariates, which

includes parishes, schools and Catholic institutions. Each regional vicariate is led by a full-

207
 time regional vicar to assist the bishop in carrying out his responsibilities, and is a

representative of the bishop in his given region.4

Vicariate 1 is currently led by Vicar General William Waltersheid. This region is composed

of 43 parishes and 21 elementary and high schools in the city neighborhoods and some east

and north suburbs of Pittsburgh.

Vicariate 2 is currently led by Regional Vicar Frederick Cain. This region is composed of 56

parishes and 17 elementary and high schools in some east and north suburbs of Pittsburgh and

northeast Washington County areas.

Vicariate 3 is currently led by Regional Vicar Howard Campbell. This region is composed of

39 parishes and 12 elementary and high schools in the west suburbs of Pittsburgh, Beaver, and

Greene counties and west and southeast Washington County areas.

Vicariate 4 is currently led by Regional Vicar Philip Farrell. This region is composed of 50

parishes and 14 elementary and high schools in the north suburbs of Pittsburgh, Butler and

Lawrence Counties.

II. History of Bishops of the Diocese of Pittsburgh

a) Bishop Hugh C. Boyle (6/16/1921 through 2/22/1950)

b) John Cardinal Dearden (12/22/1950 through 12/18/1958)

c) John Cardinal Wright (1/23/1959 through 4/28/1969)

d) Bishop Vincent M. Leonard (6/1/1969 through 6/30/1983)

e) Anthony Cardinal Bevilacqua (10/10/1983 through 02/10/1988)

4
As of April 2018, the Diocese of Pittsburgh is implementing a plan to reorganize the regional
vicariates.
208
 f) Donald Cardinal Wuerl (2/12/1988 through 5/15/2006)

g) Bishop David Zubik (Appointed September 28, 2007)

III. Additional Church Leadership within the Diocese of Pittsburgh

Relevant to the Grand Jury's Investigation

The following Church leaders, while not bishops, played an important role in the Diocese

of Pittsburgh’s handling of child sexual abuse complaints.

1) Father Robert Guay, Secretary for Clergy and Pastoral Life

2) Father Anthony Bosco, Chancellor of the Diocese of Pittsburgh

3) Rita Flaherty, Diocesan Assistance Coordinator

4) Father Ronald Lengwin

5) Father James Young

IV. Findings of the Grand Jury

The Grand Jury uncovered evidence of sexual abuse of minors committed by dozens of

priests and, in one case, an aspiring priest, in the Diocese of Pittsburgh. This sexual abuse included

grooming and fondling of genitals and/or intimate body parts, as well as penetration of the vagina,

mouth, or anus. The evidence also showed that Diocesan administrators, including the bishops,

had knowledge of this conduct yet regularly placed the priests in ministry after the Diocese was

on notice that a complaint of child sexual abuse had been made. This conduct was enabling to the

offenders and endangered the welfare of children.

The evidence demonstrated that the Diocese had discussions with lawyers regarding the

sexual conduct of priests with children and made settlements with the victims. These settlements

209
 87) William B. Yockey

88) Theodore P. Zabowski

89) George Zirwas

90) Richard Zula

91-99) Pittsburgh Priests #2-10

V. Examples of Institutional Failure: Fathers Ernest Paone, George Zirwas

and Richard Zula
The Grand Jury notes the following examples of child sexual abuse perpetrated by priests

within the Diocese of Pittsburgh. These examples further highlight the wholesale institutional

failure that endangered the welfare of children throughout the Pennsylvania Dioceses including

the Diocese of Pittsburgh. These examples are not meant to be exhaustive; rather, they provide a

window into the conduct of past Pennsylvania Bishops and the crimes they permitted to occur on

their watch. In the Diocese of Pittsburgh, the acts of Ernest Paone, George Zirwas, and Richard

Zula speak for themselves.

214
 The Case of Father Ernest Paone

Known Assignments

06/1957 - 12/1960 St. Titus, Aliquippa

12/1960 - 05/1961 Epiphany, Uptown
05/1961 - 10/1961 Mother of Sorrows, McKees Rocks
10/1961 - 05/1962 St. Monica, Wampum/ St. Theresa, Koppel
05/1962 - 05/1966 Madonna of Jerusalem, Sharpsburg
05/1966 - 02/2001 Leave of Absence/ Health Reasons
09/1966 - 02/2001 Ministry in Los Angeles & San Diego, California and Las Vegas,
Nevada
02/19/2001 Retired from Active Ministry

Father Ernest Paone was ordained in 1957 and was assigned to five separate parishes within

the first nine years of his ministry.

On May 1, 1962, Father Edmund Sheedy, the Pastor of St. Monica where Paone was

serving as Parochial Vicar, notified Bishop John Wright that he had interceded to prevent Paone

from being arrested for “molesting young boys of the parish and the illegal use of guns with even

younger parishioners.” Sheedy advised Wright that Paone was involved in “conduct degrading to

the priesthood” and “scandalous to the parishioners.” In response, the Diocese reassigned Paone

to Madonna of Jerusalem, in Sharpsburg.

On August 4, 1964, Robert Masters, the District Attorney of Beaver County, sent a letter

to Bishop Vincent Leonard of the Diocese of Pittsburgh with respect to a sexual abuse investigation

of Paone. The District Attorney advised the Diocese that “in order to prevent unfavorable

publicity,” he had “halted all investigations into similar incidents involving young boys.” No

further action was taken against Paone.

On September 15, 2017, Masters testified before the Grand Jury. Masters was confronted

with his letter which the Grand Jury obtained from Diocesan files. When asked by the attorney

for the Commonwealth why he would defer to the Bishop on a criminal matter, Master replied,

215
“Probably respect for the Bishop. I really have no proper answer.” Masters also admitted he was

desirous of support from the Diocese for his political career.

The District Attorney’s Letter to Bishop Leonard

216
 For approximately one year, Paone was without a clear assignment within the Diocese. On

May 20, 1966, Wright granted Paone an indefinite leave of absence “for reasons bound up with

your psychological and physical health as well as spiritual well-being.” Following this leave of

absence, Paone relocated to the Archdiocese of Los Angeles. In 1967, he relocated again to the

Diocese of San Diego.

Paone’s home Diocese remained the Diocese of Pittsburgh. The ability to remove Paone

from ministry or permit him to continue in ministry resided in the Bishop of Pittsburgh. In the

subsequent years, Paone would require continued authorization from the Diocese of Pittsburgh to

remain in active ministry among the Catholic faithful and their children. This was demonstrated

in documents obtained by the Grand Jury from the secret or confidential archives of the Diocese

of Pittsburgh.

On August 14, 1968, Paone requested that the Diocese recommend him for faculties within

the Archdiocese of Los Angeles. Paone indicated that he had spoken with Wright and had obtained

his approval. On August 27, 1968, the Diocese complied with this request by letter. Father

Anthony Bosco, Chancellor of the Diocese of Pittsburgh, wrote Monsignor Benjamin Hawkes of

the Archdiocese of Los Angeles and informed him that Paone was living in California with the

knowledge and approval of Wright. Bosco stated, “There would, therefore, be no objection to

Father being granted the faculties of the Archdiocese of Los Angeles.”

217
Paone Requests a Letter of Good Standing

218
The Diocese of Pittsburgh’s Letter

219
 Again in 1975, a similar request was made for a letter of good standing. On March 3, 1975,

the Diocese complied. Bosco provided a letter “to certify that the Reverend Ernest C. Paone is a

priest of the Diocese of Pittsburgh on leave of absence, but in good standing. He has permission

of his Ordinary to offer Mass.”

During the decades between Paone’s departure from Pennsylvania in 1966 and 1991,

Paone served as pastor of a parish in Diamond Bar, California.5 Paone reported to the Diocese

that his service included hearing “many confessions in that parish.” Paone also served in two

parishes in the Diocese of San Diego. Paone taught in public schools, and attended at least one

course at Catholic University in San Diego, while maintaining all priestly faculties through the

Diocese of Pittsburgh. There is no indication that the Diocese provided any interested parties

information that Paone had sexually abused children or that the Diocese had played a role in

preventing his prosecution for that conduct.

5
Diocesan records note that during this time Paone was “supplying assistance on Sundays and Holy Days in a parish
for 21 years.”

220
Another Letter of Good Standing From the Diocese

221
 As Paone continued in ministry, he did so with approval from the Diocese in spite of the

Diocese’s knowledge that Paone was a child molester. The aforementioned period of time

encompassed the entire tenure of Bishop Anthony Bevilacqua from October 1983 to February

1988. Diocesan records, obtained by the Grand Jury, show the least amount of internal

correspondence regarding Paone during that time. The Grand Jury concluded that Bevilacqua left

Paone to his ministries and provided little to no oversight. While the lack of meaningful

supervision is consistent with the conduct of other Bishops of Pittsburgh and detailed herein, a

relevant observation specific to Bevilacqua himself is the apparent lack of documentation of any

of Paone’s activities in contrast to the internal documentation executed by the other Bishops.

On June 30, 1989, Bishop Donald Wuerl sent a letter to the Vatican with respect to several

diocesan priests who had recently been accused of sexually abusing children and whose cases had

generated significant publicity. In the letter, Wuerl documented his diocesan policies for sexual

abuse and stated his responsibility as Bishop was to determine the course of action in these cases.

Wuerl wrote that Catholic parishioners had a right to know whether a priest accused of such crimes

had been reassigned to their parish. Further, Wuerl advised that due to the scandal caused by these

priests, he initiated a review of any previous cases of diocesan priests who had been accused of

“pedophilic activities” with minors.

Wuerl warned the Vatican that Catholic bishops and dioceses could become liable once

they are made aware of sexual abuse complaints and that priests who deny the “crime” of

pedophilic activity with minors is “common in pedophiles” and that pedophilia is “incurable.”

Wuerl noted his exclusive role and stated that the “unassignability” of a priest must rest solely

with the bishop due to the potential victims’ parents “who have a moral right to expect chaste

222
conduct from the priest” and the parishioners who “would be gravely unsettled and scandalized in

the knowledge that a priest pedophile has been assigned in their midst.”

However, despite Wuerl’s summary of the serious and criminal nature of the problem to

the Vatican, Diocesan records revealed that Wuerl granted Paone’s request to be reassigned again

on October 22, 1991. This time, Paone was permitted to transfer to the Diocese of Reno – Las

Vegas to serve as the Parochial Vicar at a local parish. Wuerl wrote that he had been updated on

Paone’s recent meeting with Father Robert Guay, Secretary for Clergy and Pastoral Life, and

Father David Zubik, Director of the Office of Clergy. Wuerl noted that Paone has most recently

served on a high school faculty in the Archdiocese of Los Angeles. Wuerl’s continued approval

permitted Paone to enjoy all the faculties of the Diocese. On November 20, 1991, Zubik wrote to

Paone to confirm that Wuerl had approved his new assignment.

223
Bishop Wuerl Receives Paone’s Request to Transfer

224
 In March, 1992, Paone took a leave of absence from the Archdiocese of Los Angeles for

“reasons of health.” On July 25, 1994, the Diocese of Pittsburgh received another complaint of

child sexual abuse committed by Paone in the 1960’s. The victim’s sister came forward and

reported that after becoming aware of the abuse, her father “went to the rectory with a shotgun and

told Father Paone that he better leave town.” The Diocese sent him to St. Luke’s Institute for an

evaluation.

In a confidential letter sent to St. Luke’s, the Diocese acknowledged that Paone had been

teaching seventh and eighth grade students in the Diocese of San Diego for 19 years. Further, in

another confidential memorandum sent from Zubik to Wuerl, Paone’s various assignments and

sexual abuse complaints were again listed in detail. The Grand Jury noted that this process showed

no concern for public safety or the victims of child sexual abuse. The handling of these matters

was commonplace. In spite of the complaint, Paone continued in active ministry following his

brief evaluation at a church-based treatment facility.

The Grand Jury discovered that this 1994 complaint resulted in the generation of Diocesan

records that noted an even greater extent of knowledge regarding Paone’s sexual conduct with

children. An August 5, 1994 confidential memorandum sent from Zubik to Wuerl advised him of

this new complaint against Paone and that due to this complaint, his file was reviewed “with great

care.” Among other things, Zubik advised Wuerl that questions about Paone’s emotional and

physical health were raised as early as the 1950’s, while he was still in seminary. Zubik further

advised of Paone’s various assignments and correspondence over the years, before also describing

the multiple records documenting the Diocese’s knowledge of his sexual abuse of children as early

as 1962. Zubik then noted that with respect to these latter records, “You should know that these

last three pieces of correspondence were placed in the confidential files.”

225
 Wuerl responded by dispatching letters notifying the relevant California and Nevada

Dioceses of the 1994 complaint. However, Wuerl did not report the more detailed information

contained within Diocesan records. The Diocese did not recall Paone; nor did it suspend his

faculties as a priest. To the contrary, Paone continued to have the support of the Diocese. On July

29, 1996, Wuerl was informed by the Chancellor of the Diocese of San Diego that Paone had

continued with his ministry, but, “acting on the advice of our insurance carrier,” he was requesting

that Wuerl complete the enclosed affidavit, which stated, among other things, that Paone has “not

had any problems involving sexual abuse, any history of sexual involvement with minors or others,

or any other inappropriate sexual behavior.”

226
The Insurance Letter

227
On August 12, 1996, Wuerl directed Father Kozar, Secretary for Clergy and Religious, to respond

to the request. Kozar then sent a confidential letter to the Diocese of San Diego and advised, among

other things, that:

Father Paone has not had an assignment in this diocese for over thirty years. Thus,
the only appropriate information about him has already been communicated to you
in a letter from Father Robert Guay, Secretary for Clergy and Religious, dated
January 30, 1996.

Paone again continued in ministry.

On January 6, 2002, an article which detailed the Catholic Church’s practice of reassigning

priests accused of sexual abuse of children was published in the Boston Globe newspaper. In

response, a letter was dispatched in May 2002, by Father James Young, Episcopal Vicar for Clergy

and Religious, to Father Michael Murphy of the Diocese of San Diego, advising him that due to

the “recent difficulties in the Church and having raised the bar on allegations brought against our

priests,” the Diocese of Pittsburgh was removing the faculties of Paone and placing him on

administrative leave. The Grand Jury noted that only this external force generated the action which

should have occurred decades earlier.

In June, 2002, another victim advised the Diocese of Pittsburgh that he was sexually abused

by Paone in the 1960’s. The abuse included fondling, oral sex, and anal sex. It occurred at the

victim’s house, at a hunting camp to which Paone had access to in the woods, and, in Paone’s car.

Paone also provided the victim with alcohol, pornographic magazines, and cash. In July, the

Diocese notified Paone about this new complaint. Then, on July 9, 2002, the Diocese of Pittsburgh

notified the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office of “inappropriate touching that occurred

around 1962-63 when the alleged victim was age 15. Incidents occurred in a cabin owned by Father

Paone but alleged victim does not know where it was located.” It does not appear any information

228
regarding Paone’s history was provided to the District Attorney and this notice was sent long after

the statute of limitations had expired.

In February, 2003, Wuerl accepted Paone’s resignation from ministry. Wuerl wrote a letter

acknowledging Paone’s request while providing assurance that “sustenance needs and benefits will

continue according to the norms of law.” Approximately 41 years after the Diocese learned that

Paone was sexually assaulting children, he was finally retired from active ministry. In spite of

Wuerl’s statements to the Vatican, the clear and present threat that Paone posed to children was

hidden and kept secret from parishioners in three states. Wuerl’s statements had been meaningless

without any action.

Three years after Paone’s retirement, the Diocese received an update. A February 2006

confidential memorandum from Father John Rushofsky, Clergy Personnel, was obtained by the

Grand Jury and revealed that Paone had been “assisting with confessions for confirmation-age

children, apparently asking inappropriate questions of the young penitents.” When questioned

about this, Paone told local Diocesan officials that he had received permission from the Diocese.

The Diocese dispatched a letter to Paone to remind him that his faculties had been revoked.

On May 10, 2012, Paone died.

229
 The Case of Father George Zirwas

Known Assignments

10/1979 - 05/18/1980 Resurrection, Brookline

05/1980 - 04/1981 St. Adalbert, South Side
04/1981 - 02/1982 St. Joseph the Worker, New Castle
02/1982 - 06/1989 St. Michael, Elizabeth
06/1989 - 12/1991 St. Bartholomew, Penn Hills
12/1991 - 05/1994 St. Scholastica, Aspinwall
05/1994 - 12/1994 St. Joseph, Verona
12/1994 - 07/1995 Leave of Absence, Personal Reasons
07/1995 - 11/2/1995 St. Maurice, Forest Hills
11/1995 - 05/2001 Leave of Absence, Personal Reasons

Father George Zirwas was ordained in September 1979. Zirwas was assigned to eight

different parishes as Parochial Vicar until 1995 when he was placed on a leave of absence. He

appeared to have remained in this status until his death in May 2001.

On September 1, 2016, the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General served the Diocese of

Pittsburgh with a Grand Jury subpoena requesting any and all documents related to clergy

members or diocesan leadership personnel who had been accused of sexually abusing children. In

response, the Diocese produced thousands of documents. In the course of this investigation, the

Grand Jury took testimony from live witnesses, reviewed Diocesan records, and consulted with

experts from the Federal Bureau of Investigation in the field of behavioral analysis. However, the

Grand Jury learned that some original documents related to deceased priests were intentionally

destroyed by the Diocese. Fortunately, Canon 489 of the Canon Law governing the operations of

the Roman Catholic Church requires the maintenance of a summary of the facts and any text of a

definitive judgement. In the case of Zirwas, while many original records were destroyed, the

230
summary of meetings, memoranda, and Diocesan actions remained.6 The Grand Jury learned that

the Diocese was aware of complaints against Zirwas for sexually abusing children as early as 1987.

Additional complaints were received between 1987 and 1995. However, Zirwas continued to

function as a priest during this period and was reassigned to several parishes.

Documents obtained by the Grand Jury from the secret or confidential files of the Diocese

recorded that in October, 1987, Father Garbin met with a little boy and his family about an

“incident of inappropriate touch” by Zirwas at St. Joseph the Worker parish. No action was taken

by Bishop Anthony Bevilacqua, nor the Diocese, and Zirwas remained in ministry.

In February, 1988, another internal memorandum recorded that Father Ted Rutkowski met

with Zirwas. The meeting was arranged after Zirwas was accused of unwanted sexual contact with

a young man. Zirwas admitted to having contact with the young man in multiple parish rectories

and explained that the young man had asked Zirwas to massage his legs. Zirwas stated that he

massaged his legs, but did nothing more. He noted that sometime after the contact, the “boy left,

then the allegation came.” Zirwas was thereafter sent to St. Francis Hospital for an evaluation in

March, 1988. Upon his release, he continued in ministry.

In November, 1988, Diocesan officials met with a mother who reported that her 16-year-

old son was given alcohol by Zirwas and that Zirwas fondled the boy’s genitals. That same month,

the Diocese received another report from a victim who revealed that he was groped by Zirwas

when he was 17 years old. Zirwas was sent to St. Luke’s Institute for an evaluation in December,

1988. Upon his release he once again continued in ministry.

6
The Grand Jury notes that where any institution or individual destroys evidence of a crime when an investigation is
about to be instituted, such conduct could be pursued as a criminal offense in Pennsylvania under 18 Pa. C.S.A. §4910,
Tampering with or Fabricating Physical Evidence.

231
 Internal assignment records documented that from January, 1989 until June, 1989 Zirwas

served as Parochial Vicar of St. Michael. From June, 1989 to December, 1991, he served at St.

Bartholomew as Parochial Vicar. In June, 1991, a meeting was held between Father David Zubick,

Father Downs, and Father Robert Guay with respect to a victim’s complaint regarding his contact

with Zirwas. Among other things, this victim reported that Zirwas massaged his feet, calves,

thighs, and then groped his penis. The victim informed the Diocese that he was too embarrassed

to speak publically regarding the abuse or go to court.

In December, 1991, Zirwas was reassigned to St. Scholastica as Parochial Vicar. Then, in

May, 1994, Zirwas was again reassigned to St. Joseph as Parochial Vicar. Diocesan records,

obtained by the Grand Jury, revealed that Zirwas was then placed on a leave of absence for

“personal reasons” in December, 1994.

In July, 1995, Zirwas met with Zubik and requested permission to take an assignment in

Miami, Florida. Zirwas stated that his desire to leave the Diocese was due to “false rumors about

him.” Zirwas threatened to pursue legal action against other Diocesan personnel for “raising the

consciousness of some of the people at St. Joseph Parish concerning his relationship to the public

scandals which surfaced in 1988.” This meeting was memorialized in a confidential internal

memorandum obtained by the Grand Jury.

Within days, Zirwas was returned to ministry by Bishop Donald Wuerl. In 1995, Zirwas

was assigned as Parochial Vicar of St. Maurice. In November, 1995, the Diocese received another

complaint from a victim who reported that Zirwas fondled him and performed oral sex on him

when he was approximately 15 years old. In response, Zirwas was again placed on a leave of

absence for “personal reasons.” A status he would keep until the time of his death.

232
 In January, 1996, a mother of a victim demanded a meeting with the Diocese. That meeting

was granted. Diocesan records noted the mother’s outrage and disappointment. She stated that

she had originally reported her son’s abuse in 1988 and believed that proper action would be taken

to remove Zirwas from ministry. However, she learned that this did not occur. She noted that she

had written at least one letter and received no response. Moreover, when she pursued the matter,

she was told by Father Ted Rutkowski that it was “a one-time occurrence and that it had been

handled.”

After being placed on a leave of absence in 1995, Zirwas relocated to Florida before

ultimately moving to Cuba. Zirwas’s activities in Florida and Cuba are largely unknown and no

detailed Diocesan records were provided to the Grand Jury. However, in 1996, Zirwas informed

the Diocese that he had knowledge of other Pittsburgh Diocese priests’ involvement in illegal

sexual activity. In exchange for this information, he demanded that his sustenance payments be

increased.

In response to this request, Wuerl instructed him to document in writing the names of the

priests involved, or, state that he had no knowledge of what he had previously claimed. Wuerl

advised that this action had to be undertaken before Zirwas could receive any additional assistance.

After Zirwas disavowed any knowledge of priest involvement in illegal sexual activity in a letter

to the Diocese, he was granted an additional financial stipend and his sustenance payments were

continued. Zirwas continued to work with the poor and needy in Cuba until May 2001, when he

was murdered inside his Havana apartment.

During the course of this investigation, the Grand Jury uncovered a ring of predatory priests

operating within the Diocese who shared intelligence or information regarding victims as well as

exchanging the victims amongst themselves. This ring also manufactured child pornography on

233
Diocesan property, including parishes and rectories. This group included: Zirwas, Francis Pucci,

Robert Wolk, and Richard Zula. This group of priests used whips, violence and sadism in raping

their victims.

On December 17, 2017, a victim (hereinafter identified as “George”) appeared before the

Grand Jury to provide information regarding his sexual abuse as a child by priests in the Diocese.

George’s experience is not only a personal tragedy but an institutional tragedy. His testimony

corroborated evidence found within Diocesan records that predatory priests existed; that these

predators shared information; and, that these men sexually offended on children.

George was raised as a Catholic and attended Catholic School from first through twelfth

grade. While at St. Adalbert’s on the South Side of Pittsburgh, George served as an altar boy.

George became friends with Zirwas in the mid-1970’s. Zirwas would spend time at

George’s home and take George to lunch or dinner on occasion. George’s family encouraged the

contact with Zirwas based upon the belief that Zirwas would be a good influence on George.

George noted that that his Catholic family looked at priests as “very truth worthy, very elevated.”

As George was transitioning from middle school to high school, Zirwas took him on trips, took

him to see St. Paul Seminary, and, even taught him how to drive. Over time, Zirwas began to take

George with him as he carried out priestly duties and on his visits with parishioners.

Zirwas started introducing George to his “friends” who were priests who seemed to share

similar interests. On one occasion, Zirwas took George to a parish rectory in Munhall where the

following priests were present: Father Francis L. Pucci, Father Richard Zula, and Father Francis

Luddy of the Diocese of Altoona-Johnstown. The priests began a conversation about religious

statues and asked George to get up on a bed. As the priests watched, they asked George to remove

his shirt. They then drew an analogy to the image of Christ on the cross, and told George to remove

234
his pants so that his pose would be more consistent with the image of Christ in a loincloth. At that

point, the priests began taking Polaroid pictures of George. As the picture taking continued, the

priests directed George to take off his underwear. George was nervous and complied.

George recalled that either Zula or Pucci operated the camera. He stated that all of the men

giggled and stated that the pictures would be used as a reference for new religious statues for the

parishes. George testified that this occurred before he turned 18-years-old and that his genitals

were exposed in the photographs. George stated that his photographs were added to a collection

of similar photographs depicting other teenage boys.

George recalled that each of these priests had a group of favored boys who they would take

on trips. The boys received gifts; specifically, gold cross necklaces. George stated, “He [Zirwas]

had told me that they, the priests, would give their boys, their altar boys or their favorite boys these

crosses. So he gave me a big gold cross to wear.” The Grand Jury observed that these crosses

served another purpose beyond the grooming of the victims: They were a visible designation that

these children were victims of sexual abuse. They were a signal to other predators that the children

had been desensitized to sexual abuse and were optimal targets for further victimization. 7

7
George still has the cross and it was shown to the Grand Jury.

235
 The Cross that Zirwas Gave to Altar Boys

The Grand Jury noted that George’s testimony revealed how a group of priests, all

offenders in their own right, collaborated together to manufacture child pornography within the

236
Diocese of Pittsburgh. George’s last contact with Zirwas occurred prior to his departure to join

the United States military. However, other boys became victims of abuse.

In 1988, the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office charged Zula, Pucci and Wolk

with sexually assaulting two altar boys. Zula pled guilty and was sentenced to up to five years in

prison. Wolk was sentenced to up to ten years in prison. Pucci’s charges were dropped because

the criminal statute of limitations had expired.

Zula was a pastor at Saints Mary and Ann Church in Marianna. Wolk had been a pastor of

St. Thomas Church in Bethel Park.

George testified that he looks back now with disdain. He questions how this activity could

occur, involve multiple priests, and not have created suspicion on the part of Diocesan

administrators. George stated,

To me, between going to St. Paul Seminary, Father Zula, Father Pucci, that there
was just an insidious pedophile community that permeated through at least the
Pittsburgh Diocese. And you know, my assumption as I grow older is that this was
something that was happening all over the United States and it just – you know, it
is very disappointing.

George went on to explain his reluctance to come forward, stating,

I don’t think there was anybody I could trust to tell, number 1. There was never –
who do you tell? Like, at the time, I was a tough kid from the South Side. It didn’t
like – I just kind of – I was a survivor at the time. So that was just part of the
lifestyle, I guess, and you know, I just kind of moved on… as a man, you know,
who do you want to tell that other priests took pictures of you. It was pretty
degrading. It is humiliating. I know some people it went further than that. I’m
lucky it hasn’t. It is still really hard to get it out there that you were in a room when
you were 14 or 15 and getting naked pictures taken from priests.

George’s testimony to the Grand Jury was one of the first times he had ever disclosed his

abuse. The Grand Jury’s review of records revealed that the Diocese was aware of the conduct of

these predatory priests and the records corroborated George’s testimony. It does not appear that

the Diocese disclosed any information to the police during the prosecution of some of these

237
offenders in the late 1980’s. Moreover, it does not appear that the Diocese shared with the police

Zirwas’s statement that he had information on other priests’ criminal activity.

After Zirwas’ death in 2001, the spokesman for the Diocese was interviewed by the

Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Among other things, the Diocese refused to disclose any of the reasons

why Zirwas was placed on a leave of absence, citing the confidentiality of his personnel files.

However, when Wuerl presided over Zirwas’ funeral, he stated, among other things, that “a priest

is a priest. Once he is ordained, he is a priest forever.”

238
 The Case of Father Richard Zula

Known Assignments

06/1966 – 06/1971 St. Cyril of Alexandria, North Side, Pittsburgh

06/1971 - 12/1973 Most Blessed Sacrament, Natrona Heights
12/1973 - 06/1980 Our Lady of Czestochowa, New Castle
06/1980 - 05/1984 St. Michael Archangel, Munhall
05/1984 - 06/1986 Sisters of St. Mary & Ann, Marianna
06/1986 - 09/1987 St. Clement, Tarentum (Resigned)
09/1987 Leave of Absence (Withdrawn); Zula is admitted to the Institute of
Living, Hartford, Connecticut
04/1996 Withdrawn from Ministry

Father Richard Zula was ordained in 1966 and assigned to six different parishes through

1987. In 1987, the Diocese was under the command of Bishop Anthony Bevilacqua. In September

of that year, the Diocese received a complaint that Zula had engaged in violent sexual activity with

a minor at a rectory. This conduct involved three other adult males who were not priests.

On September 25, 1987, a meeting was held between Zula, Father Ted Rutkowski,

Secretary for Clergy and Pastoral Life, and Father Robert Guay. Documentation of the meeting

consisted of handwritten notes that included the name of the child victim at the top of the page,

followed by three additional names and another notation of the victim’s name. Among other

things, this document listed “parties at Marianna rectory (assigned May 1984)8” “alcohol,

marijuana;” “oral sex, attempt anal sex, whips, rectory bedroom, offer to pay private room fee at

St. V., present activity.” This was followed by the notation, “Institute of Living Tues Sept 29”

and the following notes: “No public celebration of mass, No return to parish once out, No

communication with [victim] or family, No communication with others involved, Resignation

8
1987 was the year when Zula became pastor at St. Clement.
239
from parish.” Zula was subsequently sent to the Institute of Living, in Hartford, Connecticut on

September 29, 1987.

The Handwritten Notes

240
 On December 9, 1987, Rutkowski documented his thoughts that Zula was a “mama’s boy”

who was “pursued” by the victim. He also described the victim as being “16 – 17 years of age.”

A confidential memorandum from Father Farmer to Rutkowski dated December 29, 1987,

outlined three proposed scenarios for placing Zula back into ministry. Among other things, these

proposals included assigning him as Chaplain at various parishes or assigning him to provide

pastoral care at nursing homes.

Zula was discharged on January 13, 1988. The Diocese was advised that Zula again

confessed his criminal conduct. He stated, “I got involved in some inappropriate sexual behavior

and my bishop has sent me here for an evaluation.” The summary further noted this other

“individual” was “very sexually promiscuous and needy.” The Grand Jury’s review of these

materials compels the conclusion that the Diocese was prepared to return yet another admitted

child molester to ministry. Indeed, notes in Zula’s personnel file indicated that “re Zula” the

“sooner reassigned the better.” However, intervening and external factors changed that judgment.

241
Planning Zula’s Return to Ministry

242
 In May, 1988, a summary of facts was prepared in connection with a lawsuit filed on behalf

of victim against the Diocese of Pittsburgh. Among other things, the summary documented the

victim’s abuse, and the abuse of the victim’s brother, by Fr. Robert Wolk. However, the summary

also stated that at some point Wolk himself had criticized Zula for “having wild parties with drugs

and alcohol.”

By September 1988, a criminal investigation was underway. On September 22, 1988, the

Pennsylvania State Police interviewed the victim who, among other things, reported that he was

first sexually abused by Wolk in 1981. Zula then began sexually assaulting him in 1984 at which

time the victim was still under the age of 16. The victim further advised that the sexual abuse

occurred approximately once a week for another three years and that it included oral sex, sado-

masochistic behavior, and attempts at anal sex. On November 10, 1988, an arrest warrant was

issued for Zula. There is no indication that the Diocese disclosed their prior knowledge of Zula’s

conduct or Zula’s confession to the police or to the public.

Zula was charged with over 130 counts related to child sexual abuse. His arrest generated

significant press coverage. In the midst of the public outcry, Charles P. Nemeth, Esquire wrote a

letter to the editor of the Pittsburgh Catholic magazine dated October 20, 1988. A copy of this

letter was found within the Diocesan records. Among other things, Nemeth advised that he was a

practicing Catholic and has been a criminal defense attorney for 10 years, which included

representing sex offenders. Further, Nemeth advised that he held an LLM degree in Law

Psychiatry and Criminology from Georgetown University. Nemeth then advised that he was “awe-

struck by how reticent church officials are to condemn this activity as being criminal in scope and

form.” He criticized the “academic ponderings” and “other esoteric psychiatric diagnoses” that

characterized child sexual abuse as “deviance and social aberration” and added that “in fact, it is

243
probably one of the more heinous criminal activities that individuals can ever engage in. The

reasons are self-evident.” He then stated some of these reasons, which included the “higher

standard of conduct” that should be required of priests; the “pedestal” on which priests are placed;

that “sexual molestation between adults and minors is one of the most reprehensible forms of

conduct outlined in statutory and codified law;” and that to “equate the social diseases of

alcoholism and drug dependency with child molestation is an absolute and unadulterated folly.”

In November 1988, personnel from the Diocese, including its attorney, met with the

Western Regional Office of Children, Youth, and Families (“WROCYF”). A summary of the

meeting was then provided to Wuerl in an April 24, 1989 letter from the WROCYF. Among other

things, Wuerl was reminded that the Diocese was considered to be a “mandated reporter” of child

abuse and thereby required to report any suspected cases of which it became aware. Further, Wuerl

was notified that the Diocese was prohibited from conducting its own internal investigations to

decide whether or not to report the abuse and was required to report it immediately. The letters

exchanged between the WROCYF and the Bishop illustrated a disagreement as to whether the

law’s mandates applied to Diocesan personnel.

In the midst of this public scandal, on March 1, 1989, Wuerl authorized a confidential

settlement between the Diocese and the family of the victim and his brother (who was also a

victim) in the amount of a $500,000 lump sum with a separate amount of $400,000 to be paid over

a period of 30 years. The settlement contained a “confidentiality agreement” which prohibited the

victims from discussing the settlement or basis for the settlement with any third parties - unless

agreed to by the Diocese. The settlement released the Bishop, the Diocese, and the Roman

Catholic Church from any further liability with respect to the matter.

244
 By the fall of 1989, Zula had entered a guilty plea to two counts and was awaiting

sentencing. At that time, the Diocese began to receive additional complaints of child sexual abuse

against Zula. Father Ron Lengwin documented a telephone call that he received from a parishioner

on August 25, 1989. The caller advised that Zula had made frequent sexual advances on her son

and at least two of his friends when they were 13-year-old altar boys. The mother reported that

Zula asked the boys to pose like statues and attempted to tie them up using rope. The Grand Jury

found this mother’s report to be consistent with the testimony of George. However, there was no

indication that the Diocese reported this complaint to law enforcement. In fact, the Diocese was

utilizing diocesan resources and personnel to advocate for Zula at his upcoming sentencing

proceeding.

On October 23, 1989, Kenneth Stanko, a doctor obtained by the Diocese to work with Zula,

wrote a letter to Father Rutkowski. Stanko enclosed a copy of his evaluation of Zula which he

conducted for presentation at Zula’s sentencing. Stanko advised that this evaluation was also sent

to the court. Among other things, Stanko opined that Zula’s “personality style is one of being

passive-dependent and that he would not likely be a person to initiate sexual activity.” By this

letter, the Diocese was placed on notice that the services it had procured for Zula were being used

as mitigation evidence at Zula’s sentencing. Moreover, these assertions blamed the child victim

rather than the adult criminal.

Stanko wrote that Zula had admitted to “mutual masturbation and fellatio with one sixteen-

year male” but only because “the boy first suggested sexual behaviors.” Stanko further noted that

Zula had also admitted to “mild sado-masochistic” behaviors with several boys. However, Stanko

concluded that Zula “has never exhibited psychotic symptoms or any disturbance to his thinking

and reasoning. I have never doubted his sincerity or honesty.” The Grand Jury notes that while

245
Diocesan resources were being used in such a fashion, unknowing parishioners were still actively

tithing from their income without knowledge that church funds were being used to mitigate a

convicted sex offender’s sentence.

In preparation for Zula’s sentencing, a press release issued by Wuerl stated, in part, “ . . .

the judicial system has run its course in arriving at its decision.”

The Bishop’s Public Statement

In 1990, after Zula was sentenced to state prison, the Diocese agreed to set aside $500.00

per month until his release, at which time he would be paid the full amount in a lump sum. The

Diocese also informed Zula that he would not be given any new assignments and asked him to

consider requesting a dispensation from the priestly ministry. Zula responded in a letter dated

246
September 11, 1990. He wrote that had the Diocese supported him, he may not have pleaded

guilty. He then accused the Diocese of paying for his treatment in order to “save their own hide.”

Zula further advised that the District Attorney had offered to make a deal with him if he divulged

names of other priests involved in pedophilia and that he

could have named several priests; however, out of a sense of loyalty to my brother
priests, and to try to protect the Church from any further scandal, I would not
divulge their names, even to save myself from a jail term.

Zula stated he would sign the petition for dispensation if the Diocese arranged for his release from

prison first.

In March, 1992, Zula informed the Diocese that he might be eligible for early release in

July and requested that Wuerl confirm his future salary payments to assist him in obtaining his

release. In response to Zula’s request, internal Diocesan documents revealed that Wuerl directed

his subordinates to provide the requested information. The Diocese also agreed to increase Zula’s

sustenance payments to $750 per month after his release and to provide him with medical coverage.

When Zula was released in July, 1992, he received a check in the amount of $11,542.68 from the

Diocese.

247
Zula’s Letter to Wuerl Regarding Early Release from Prison

248
 The Diocese continued to receive reports of past criminal conduct on the part of Zula after

his release. In a 1993 letter to Wuerl, a victim reported that Zula “systematically ask[ed] me to

strip, assume a kneeling position, have my hands tied by a closeline type rope and subject me to a

beating with various types of whips and leather straps.” Shortly after this report, the Diocese

finally began “laicization,” the process to remove Zula as a priest.

On January 20, 1995, Wuerl met with Zula to discuss his future salary and medical benefits.

They discussed his dispensation from priestly vows but Zula was hesitant to agree to his removal

because he did not think he could support himself. Zula suggested the possibility of a lump-sum

payment which Wuerl referred to as “cushion income.” After further discussion, Wuerl was open

to the idea of Zula receiving a lump-sum payment of $180,000.00. Zula countered, however, with

a request for “$240,000.00 (TAX FREE).” Additional internal documents indicated that the

Diocese weighed Zula’s request. Three pages of undated handwritten notes with the heading

“FROM THE DESK OF Father Guay” referenced Zula’s concern regarding his July, 1995

payments and the figures of $180,000 and $240,000. The words “slush fund – under table” were

also included on the notes. Similarly, in a November 24, 1995 letter sent from Zula to Wuerl, Zula

stated that he had recently met with Guay and Father Dinardo who informed him that if he were

to resign from the active priestly ministry, he would still be entitled to receive his monthly

sustenance payments and medical coverage. In light of this representation, Zula stated his desire

to resign.

In 1996, the Diocese entered into a memorandum of understanding with Zula whereby he

was allowed to resign and was prohibited from ever seeking future assignments within the Diocese.

In return, the Diocese agreed that it would continue to pay him $750.00 per month for sustenance

and provide medical coverage for him.

249
 On January 31, 2001, another victim disclosed abuse by Zula. The victim reported that

Zula asked him to remove his clothes so that he could beat him with a belt. On December 14,

2001, the Diocese increased Zula’s sustenance payments to $1,000 per month as of January, 2002.

In July, 2007 the Diocese learned that Zula had been volunteering at the Good Shepherd

Church in Braddock. The Diocese dispatched a letter to Zula reminding him that such activity was

not permitted.

250
 Roman Catholic Diocese of Scranton

I. General Overview of the Diocese of Scranton, Pennsylvania

The Roman Catholic Diocese of Scranton is a suffragan see of the Archdiocese of

Philadelphia, established on March 3, 1868. The seat of the Bishop is St. Peter’s Cathedral in

Scranton, Pennsylvania. Other cities in the Diocese include Wilkes-Barre, Williamsport,

Hazleton, Carbondale and Pittston. There are an estimated 348,600 catholics served by the

Diocese which is approximately 31.2% of the general population of the region. The Diocese is

located in the northeastern portion of the Commonwealth and is comprised of the counties of

Lackawanna, Luzerne, Bradford, Susquehanna, Wayne, Tioga, Sullivan, Wyoming, Lycoming,

Pike, and Monroe.

251
II. History of Bishops of the Diocese of Scranton
a) Bishop Jerome Hannan (8/17/1954 through 12/15/1965)

b) Bishop J. Carroll McCormick (3/4/1966 through 2/15/1983)

c) Bishop John O'Connor (5/6/1983 through 1/26/1984)

d) Bishop James Timlin (4/24/1984 through July 7/25/2003)

e) Bishop Joseph Martino (7/25/2003 through 6/2009)

f) Bishop Joseph Bambera (04/26/2010 to Present)

III. Additional Church Leadership within the Diocese of Scranton

Relevant to the Grand Jury's Investigation

In any Diocese, the chief executive of the Diocese is the bishop. It was not uncommon to

observe evidence of other high ranking members of the Diocese involved in the handling of child

sexual abuse complaints or internal investigations at the bishop’s request. The Grand Jury

observed that with respect to the Diocese of Scranton, most matters were personally handled by

the bishop himself. As such, there is insufficient evidence to designate additional relevant

leadership in this report.

IV. Findings of the Grand Jury

The Grand Jury uncovered evidence of sexual abuse of minors committed by dozens of

priests in the Diocese of Scranton. This sexual abuse included grooming and fondling of genitals

and/or intimate body parts, as well as penetration of the vagina, mouth, or anus. The evidence also

showed that diocesan administrators, including the bishops, had knowledge of this conduct yet

regularly placed the priests in ministry after the Diocese was on notice that a complaint of child

sexual abuse had been made. This conduct enabled the offenders and endangered the welfare of

children.

252
VI. Examples of Institutional Failure: Fathers Robert Caparelli, Joseph
Hammond, and Thomas Skotek
The Grand Jury notes the following examples of child sexual abuse perpetrated by priests

within the Diocese of Scranton. These examples further highlight the wholesale institutional

failure that endangered the welfare of children throughout the Pennsylvania Dioceses including

the Diocese of Scranton. These examples are not meant to be exhaustive; rather, they provide a

window into the conduct of past Pennsylvania Bishops and the crimes they permitted to occur on

their watch. In the Diocese of Scranton, the acts of Robert Caparelli, Joseph Hammond, and

Thomas Skotek, speak for themselves.

256
 The Case of Father Robert N. Caparelli
Known Assignments
06/1964 – 09/1964 Queen of Peace, Hawley
09/1964 – 09/1967 St. Francis, Nanticoke
09/1967 – 10/1968 Most Precious Blood, Hazleton
10/1968 – 09/1974 St. Mary, Old Forge
09/1974 – 06/1981 Mercy Center, Dallas
06/1981 – 09/1991 St. Vincent, Milford
09/1991 Relieved of Duties
12/1994 Died in state prison

On May 23, 1964, Robert N. Caparelli was ordained a Roman Catholic Priest within the

Diocese of Scranton. Between September, 1967 and October, 1968, Caparelli served as an

assistant pastor at the parish of Most Precious Blood in Hazelton. On August 14, 1968, less than

four years after Caparellis’ ministry began, a letter was sent to Bishop J. Carroll McCormick from

a police officer in Hazleton. The officer reported to the Bishop that Caparelli was contributing to

the delinquency of two altar boys. These boys were brothers and were 11 and 12 years old. The

police officer stated that Caparelli was “demoralizing them in a manner that is not natural for any

human that has all his proper faculties.” The officer stated that the mother had made the complaint

to him, but that he was reporting it to McCormick. He explained that the mother of the victims

was afraid to tell the boys’ father due to the possible “deadly nature” of the ensuing confrontation.

The policeman closed his letter with an offer to meet with the Bishop or provide additional

information, if needed. He noted that there were “other situations” as well. The officer commented

that if the situations were not curbed, violence would take place.

257
The Policeman’s Letter to Bishop McCormick

258
 Three days later, the head pastor of Most Precious Blood contacted McCormick. Father

Mark Mecca had also reviewed the letter that the Bishop had received. Regarding it, he wrote to

McCormick:

I have to say that it expresses the voice of many of my parishioners. I referred this
matter to you at Thanksgiving-tide of last year, when I told you that I would try to
solve this problem, to relieve Your Excellency of at least one of the many problems.
This problem is too big for me. It has grown into something that is unbelievable.
In other words all that this gentleman writes is true… but there is so much that is
missing, and all very, very serious.

Mecca went on to note that at least one fellow priest, Monsignor Mussari, simply did not wish to

know the details. He noted that Monsignor James Timlin was aware of at least one area of concern

due to his presence when Mecca broached the subject on a previous occasion. Mecca closed his

letter noting, “Your Excellency has definitely noticed that I am under an incubus . . . all on account

of some of these things.” The Grand Jury noted that “incubus” is a Latin term for “a male demon

obsessed with the sexual” and can be a “nightmare known for causing oppression or burden.”

259
Mecca Reports the “Incubus”

260
 On August 19, 1968, another concerned parishioner wrote to McCormick. While noting

general concerns about Caparelli’s demeanor, the parishioner stated:

We tolerated all this but it is now a known fact in Hazelton that he is demoralizing
young boys especially those that serve as altar boys. Many parents have withdrawn
them and are being retained not to report him to the juvenile division of the Police
Dept. We want to avert scandal. This is the consensus that we would overlook all
the former complaints but this last one, may present a tragic situation.

On September 2, 1968, McCormick wrote a secret note that the Grand Jury obtained from

the confidential Diocesan archives. McCormick wrote that he had spoken with Caparelli who

“admitted acting too freely with 2 altar boys.” Contrary to the reports about him, Caparelli insisted

that he did not do anything immoral. While Caparelli agreed that the Bishop had to take action

against him, he begged to be assured that he would be able to continue working as a priest in the

Diocese.

261
262
The Bishop’s Notes

263
 Caparelli was subsequently sent to the Padua Retreat House. An internal Diocesan

memorandum from October 1968 noted that based upon Caparelli’s version of events, “the mother,

a nurse, may have exaggerated.” Any child sexual abuse was dismissed as “immaturity” and a

change was suggested. McCormick ultimately assigned Caparelli to serve in the parish of St.

Mary’s in Old Forge in October, 1968. In 1981, Caparelli was appointed head pastor of St.

Vincent’s in Milford.

In 1985, while Caparelli was still in active ministry as head pastor at St. Vincent’s, then-

Bishop James Timlin dispatched a memorandum to all priests, religious and lay personnel of the

Diocese of Scranton. The memorandum explained that the Pennsylvania Child Protective Services

Act required reporting to civil authorities both “actual and suspected cases of child abuse.” The

memorandum explained that a report must be made to the head priest of a parish or the superior of

a given diocesan institution. The Chancery noted that it stood ready to assist. In spite of this

mandate, Timlin permitted Caparelli’s continued ministry and no report was made regarding his

conduct.

264
The Mandated Reporter Memorandum

265
 Within Caparelli’s personnel file, the Grand Jury found a letter from John M. Quinn,

Esquire. The letter, dated September 3, 1991 and marked received September 6, 1991, appeared

to have been shared with the Diocese of Scranton through Bishop Donald Trautman of the Diocese

of Erie. The letter suggested a way to reorganize any diocese to minimize recovery by victims of

child sexual abuse in the event that “a large judgement is rendered against the Bishop and the

Diocese in a pedophile case.” The Grand Jury noted that at that time scores of predatory priests

were still in active ministry in the dioceses of Pennsylvania, and one of them was Caparelli.

However, before the end of 1991, Caparelli was criminally charged for the sexual abuse of a child.

266
267
Reorganization to Avoid Liability

268
 Following the filing of criminal charges against Caparelli, Timlin issued a statement on

behalf of the Diocese of Scranton. The statement announced the Diocese’s full cooperation with

law enforcement and its own thorough investigation. No comment regarding the Diocese’s pre-

existing knowledge of Caparelli’s criminal conduct was made.

On December 17, 1991, Timlin personally took another complaint from a respected

medical doctor and faithful catholic parishioner. The doctor disclosed that he had been a victim

of Caparelli’s when Caparelli had served at St. Mary’s. He reported that he was 11 or 12 years old

when Caparelli “sexually molested” him. The doctor reported that there were “other boys involved

as well.”

269
270
The Diocese’s Public Statement and Another Complaint to the Bishop

271
 On December 23, 1991, a civil lawsuit was initiated against the Diocese for Caparelli’s

criminal conduct. The Diocese aggressively fought back for a period of years before ultimately

settling the matter. Timlin specifically took actions to protect the secret archives of the Diocese

from legal discovery during the course of the litigation. These actions were taken despite the fact

that the plaintiff’s complaints were clearly consistent with diocesan knowledge that Caparelli had,

in fact, molested the child. The lawsuit alleged that the child had been molested from September,

1985 through June, 1986 in the rectory of Saint Vincent DePaul. Specifically, the lawsuit alleged

that Caparelli forcibly sodomized the child.

Catholic parishioners were not pleased at having been endangered and kept uninformed

by the Bishops of Scranton. On January 9, 1992, one such parishioner, who attended St.

Vincent’s, wrote to Timlin stating:

Your misleading and deceptive tactics by sending a representative to the parish only
was a further effort to circumvent the truth and cover up what possibly could be a
true situation. To deal with parishioners in this matter as if they have no intelligence
is perhaps more of a shock then what is presently facing us. To be dealt with as
fools by those we trusted speaks of nothing but further non concern by you and the
Diocese of Scranton. The Parishioners “rights to know the truth” has been violated
and a distrust of the church and its hierarchy prevails. Perhaps this is even a greater
scandal than the immediate crisis facing St. Vincent’s parishioners.

272
273
The Parishioner’s Letter

274
The letter bore a notation from Timlin, “Never got the first letter! Everything ok - now she

understands.”

Another letter dated April 6, 1992 was found within the Diocesan records written by a

retired captain of the Pennsylvania State Police. He stated that in 1974, a high school friend told

him that Caparelli was touching the genitals of his son and others. In response, the captain met

with the head pastor and Caparelli. Caparelli was confronted with the complaint that he was

molesting children and he admitted that it was true.

The captain informed the head pastor and Caparelli that no one wanted to press criminal

charges but that Caparelli’s conduct had to change. The head pastor assured him that he would

take care of it. Caparelli was transferred within the year. Diocesan records showed that Caparelli

was assigned as a chaplain at the Mercy Center in Dallas in 1974. In 1981, he was transferred

again to St. Vincent’s as head pastor.

On July 14, 1992, yet another complaint about Caparelli was received by Timlin. The letter

advised that Caparelli had abused 10-, 11-, and 12-year-old boys as far back as 1967 at Most

Precious Blood parish. The writer indicated that he had knowledge of the abuse because he, his

brother, and their friends were all victims. The letter stated:

There must have been other reported incidents of abuse in Caparelli’s career. It is
inconceivable to me that this man molested altar boys in 1967 and never
transgressed until 1991 when he committed 32 counts of indecent exposure,
indecent assault, and involuntary deviate sexual intercourse with children.

275
The Letter of a Victim

276
 Over the years, many more victims came forward. Caparelli faced additional charges and

ultimately pled guilty to offenses against children and received prison time. While in prison it was

discovered that Caparelli had been HIV-positive for years. In December, 1994, Caparelli died

while incarcerated.

Timlin and the Diocese of Scranton never fully disclosed the decades of knowledge and

inaction that left children in danger and in contact with Caparelli. Press accounts and some limited

public statements provided a few details of the abuse while the Diocese largely relied upon excuses

related to a claimed lack of understanding of the depth of Caparelli’s problem. The Grand Jury

noted that even when no doubt could be left regarding Caparelli’s guilt, the Diocese was

determined to provide more aid to Caparelli than to his victims. A stunning example of this was

found in a letter from Timlin to Caparelli’s sentencing judge in October 1993 following Caparelli’s

convictions for crimes against children. The letter carbon copied the President pro tempore of the

Pennsylvania Senate, Senator Robert Mellow. In it, Timlin requested that Caparelli be released

from prison to a Catholic treatment facility – like those that had so often authorized the return of

Pennsylvania’s predatory priests to active ministry - Saint Luke’s Institute in Maryland and the

Servants of the Paraclete in New Mexico.

277
The Bishop’s Letter to the Sentencing Judge

278
 The Case of Father Joseph T. Hammond
Known Assignments
06/1931 – 09/1932 St. Mary, Mt. Pocono
09/1932 – 09/1935 St. Theresa, Wilkes-Barre
09/1935 – 09/1936 Asst. Director of Charities, Diocese of Scranton
06/1936 – 09/1937 St. Michael Industrial School, Tobyhanna
09/1937 – 12/1938 Director Diocesan Rural Life
12/1938 – 09/1943 Director of Catholic Hospitals, Diocese of Scranton
06/1943 – 09/1943 St. Mary Convent
09/1943 – 04/1946 Director of Catholic Charities
04/1946 – 06/1947 Blessed Sacrament, Miners Mills
06/1947 – 06/1950 St. Charles Borromeo, Sugar Notch
06/1950 – 09/1970 St. Leo, Ashley

Father Joseph T. Hammond was ordained on May 30, 1931. The Diocese of Scranton

provided no records relevant to Hammond in its initial production of documents pursuant to a

Grand Jury subpoena served on September 1, 2016. Through counsel, the Diocese explained that

it did not have any records indicating that Hammond had engaged in any sexual misconduct with

children. Hammond illustrates another type of case within the Dioceses of Pennsylvania: a case

unknown to the modern Diocese of Scranton and an injustice only remembered by the victim.

Today Joe is 72 years old. On June 21, 2016, he testified before the Grand Jury and

explained that in 1961, he was a high school student. His high school was affiliated with St. Leo

the Great within the Diocese of Scranton. Hammond was a priest at that parish.

Hammond taught the boys to play cards and would invite them into the rectory. On one

occasion, the boys were at the rectory playing cards and Joe went up to the room at Hammond’s

invitation. Joe explained,

I knocked on the door, knocked on the door and there was no one there. So I come
back down and I said he's not there. They said, yeah, he's there, go up. So I went
up there. I knocked on the door and he had opened the door. He was in the bed and
he had himself covered. And he wanted me to come and sit on the edge of the bed
with him. I'm thinking this is kind of odd. So I went over there and I sat on the edge
of the bed. And he threw off the covers and he was naked and he was masturbating.

279
Joe was shocked. He explained his shock, stating, “He was right below God as far as I was

concerned and I had a lot of respect for him.”

Joe testified that Hammond attempted to molest him:

he tried to fondle me even though I had my clothes on. And then he says, I want
you to take your pants off and get into bed with me. I said, no, I didn't think it was
a good idea. So I says, I'll be right back.

Joe rushed back to his friends and reported what had occurred. At first, his friends refused to

believe him. In fact, an older boy struck him for speaking ill of Hammond. Joe then asked the

boys to accompany him. They went upstairs and peered into Hammond’s room where they

observed Hammond masturbating. When Hammond saw the boys, he invited them into his room.

The children ran away.

Joe told the Grand Jury that he was panicked by what had happened. He called his

girlfriend even though it was almost 3:00 A.M. His girlfriend ultimately became his wife and she

also testified before the Grand Jury. She explained that her father would never let her speak with

a boy at 3:00 A.M. but her father could tell that Joe was panicked and that something was very

wrong. She advised Joe to get out of the rectory. Joe saw the keys to Hammond’s large sedan and

grabbed them and drove off in Hammond’s car. He explained that he drove straight to the police

station:

I went to the police station in that little town I lived in, Ashley, Pennsylvania. I
thought, well, this guy will be able to steer us the right way. The guy who was on
duty that night, his name was Chief McGowen. He was also a member of that Saint
Leo's Church and he was the guy who would take up the collections on Sunday.
When I went there and told him what had happened, I said I stole his car. I said, I
have it out in the parking lot. He says, I don't want to know anything about this. I
want you to leave, get out of here. I don't want the car here. I says, I can't take the
car. I said, I want you to arrest me because I don't have a driver's license. He says,
well, I just want you to get out of here, get rid of the car. I don't care what you do

280
 with it. So we went and I dropped my friends off at their homes. And I went to my
home and woke up my parents and told them what happened.

Joe’s mother contacted the Diocese the next day. She wanted Bishop Jerome D. Hannan to be

aware of Hammond’s criminal conduct. The Diocesan leadership advised that they would look

into the matter and take action. Joe specifically recalled that his mother received the assurances

of the Chancery that the bishop had been informed and the matter would be addressed. The

following day, members of the Diocese retrieved Hammond’s sedan from the front yard of Joe’s

home.

According to Diocesan records, no action was taken against Hammond and he continued

in ministry until his death in 1985. A review of Hammond’s Diocesan file revealed that there was

no record of the complaint made by Joe’s mother.

Over the years, Joe made numerous efforts to find someone who cared about his

experience. His wife testified that the experience completely changed Joe as a person. It made

him angry and less trusting. In spite of Joe’s anger at Hammond’s conduct and the Diocese’s

inaction, Joe and his wife went on to have a happy life together. They grew their family and their

children went on to have successful careers but Joe never forgot what Hammond tried to do and

what the Diocese failed to do. That desire to see the matter pursued, even 55 years later, led Joe

to contact the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General in 2016.

While Joe is now a Methodist, he did not leave the Catholic Church willingly. Joe

explained the impact that Hammond had on his faith:

He definitely did because I didn't want to be any part of that Catholic faith anymore,
especially since we were trying to report what happened to his supervisor or boss
like you would in a workplace. If someone does something bad, you report it to the
boss and something happens. But this wasn't happening. When my parents got
involved and the other parents got involved, I'm thinking now something is going

281
 to happen. It was just totally ignored. I had lost my faith basically because I didn't
believe in all that stuff I was growing up with.

The Grand Jury was able to corroborate Joe’s account through one of the boys who was

with him that evening, as well as through the testimony of his wife. It should be noted that when

the Grand Jury served a subpoena on the Ashley Police Department for records of the report, we

were informed that no records existed. From a review of Hammond’s assignments, the Grand Jury

learned that he was assigned to St. Leo’s in 1961.

A careful examination of Hammond’s Diocesan records revealed Hammond’s request to

be incardinated into the Diocese of Scranton in 1931; letters which documented his role in advising

Bishop William Hafey in Governor’s Day celebrations in 1944; a proclamation which granted

Hammond the title and honor “Monsignor” in 1968; and the approval letters of various Bishops

granting Hammond permission for various cruises and trips to the West Indies, the Holy Land,

Mexico, New Orleans, the Mediterranean, Canada, and the Caribbean. Buried within these

documents, investigators located a small newspaper clipping. It was from the September 7, 1970

edition of the Wilkes-Barre Record. The article was entitled “Forced to Retire, Msgr. Hammond

Says” and stated:

Msgr. Joseph T. Hammond, who will become pastor-emeritus of St. Leo’s church,
Ashley, this week, yesterday announced he did not retire as pastor of the church,
but that he had been retired. He also stated he was in good health.

282
The Newspaper Clipping

283
 The Grand Jury found Joe’s testimony to be credible and this case demonstrative of the

lasting effect of child sexual abuse. Joe sought justice at 72 years of age and the Grand Jury was

able to corroborate that testimony despite the passage of time. While Hammond may be dead, the

impact of his actions live on. This is a sobering reminder that although over 500,000 records were

admitted into evidence before the Grand Jury, there are still crimes that could only be discovered

through the voices of the victims.

284
 The Case of Father Thomas D. Skotek
Known Assignments
07/1963 – 09/1963 St. Patrick, Milford
09/1963 – 11/1967 SS Peter and Paul, Plains
11/1967 – 06/1969 St. Joseph, Wyoming
06/1969 – 09/1972 St. Mary of the Mount, Mount, Pocono
09/1972 – 05/1977 St. Hedwig, Kingston
05/1977 – 01/1980 Lady of Mount Carmel, Lake Silkworth
01/1980 – 03/1985 St. Casimir, Freeland
03/1985 – 10/1986 St. Stanislaus, Hazleton
12/13/1986 Resigns from St. Stanislaus, Hazleton
01/1987 – 06/1999 St. Aloysius, Wilkes-Barre
06/1999 – 04/2002 St. Mary and Ascension, Mocanaqua
04/08/2002 Resigned from St. Mary and Ascension, Mocanaqua
06/14/2002 Removed from Active Ministry

Father Thomas D. Skotek was ordained on June 8, 1963 in the Diocese of Scranton. Skotek

sexually assaulted a minor female while serving as pastor of St. Casimir in Freeland between

January, 1980 and March, 1985. The female became pregnant and Skotek aided the girl in

obtaining an abortion. Diocesan records obtained by the Grand Jury showed that Bishop James C.

Timlin was fully aware of the conduct by October, 1986. Timlin accepted Skotek’s resignation

from St. Stanislaus on October 9, 1986, and dispatched Skotek to St. Luke’s Institute in Suitland,

Maryland for an evaluation. In January, 1987, Skotek was reassigned to ministry at St. Aloysius,

in Wilkes-Barre.

285
Timlin Accepts Skotek’s Resignation from the Parish

286
 On January 20, 1989, Timlin sent a letter to Rome and reported that:

a priest in the diocese has been rendered irregular as a result of having assisted in
the procurement of a completed abortion . . . Although I cannot absolutely give
assurance that this priest’s criminal action will never become public, I do not
foresee that such would likely be the case. This priest is currently residing in a
parish quite far from the town where the crime was committed. He is awaiting a
response to his request for a dispensation.”

Timlin closed his letter with his “sincere hope” that he would receive a favorable response since

such a response would be to the “spiritual benefit” of the priest involved as well as to the benefit

of the “people of this diocese who heed the gifts he shares in priestly ministry.” Timlin noted that

he was convinced of Skotek’s sincere repentance and permitted Skotek to continue in ministry.

The Grand Jury noted that the focus of Timlin’s letter seemed to exclusively address the

procurement of the abortion with little concern that Skotek had impregnated a child. In 1988,

Diocesan records indicated that the victim contacted the church and indicated that she was

struggling with her faith.

287
288
Timlin Reports to Rome

289
 On December 13, 1989, the victim and her parents entered into an agreement with the

Diocese and received a payment of $75,000. In exchange, the Diocese secured a confidentiality

agreement and liability waiver for the Diocese and Skotek. The agreement prohibited the victim

and her family from disclosing what had occurred, and released the Diocese from any

responsibility, liability, or damages. The agreement stated, in part,

It is expressly understood and agreed that this release and settlement is intended to
cover and does cover not only known injuries, losses and damages, but any further
injuries, losses and damages which arise from or are related to the occurrences
arising from the alleged sexual conduct of Reverend Thomas Skotek.

290
291
292
293
The Confidentiality Agreement

294
 On January 6, 2002, the Boston Globe newspaper ran an article on child sexual abuse by

clergy within the Archdiocese of Boston. Subsequently, on February 19, 2002, the Diocese was

contacted by legal counsel for a 47-year-old woman. It was reported that while attending Pocono

Central Catholic High School, and working at the rectory at St. Mary’s in Mount Pocono, she was

sexually abused by Skotek. Skotek admitted to his conduct when confronted.

On March 15, 2002, an issue arose with the victim whose family had settled with the

Diocese in December, 1989. Recent hardships, and her original abusive trauma, had placed her in

need. She contacted the Diocese and obtained $4,000.00 from Skotek. Timlin acted as the

intermediary and noted, “This settles the matter – for now!” On June 14, 2002, Skotek was finally

removed from active ministry approximately two decades after he impregnated a minor and

procured an abortion.

295
Timlin’s Note – “This settles the matter –for now!”

296
III. The Church and child abuse, past and present

We’re not sure this should even have to be said, but we’ll say it anyway: this investigation

is not an attack on the Catholic faith. Many of us, the grand jurors, are practicing Catholics. Many

of the people we heard from, victims and witnesses, are Catholics. If anything we feel aligned

with, not opposed to, the members of that faith. Child abuse, after all, is not just illegal; it is against

the creeds of every major religion, including Catholicism. People of all faiths and of no faith want

their children to be safe. But we were presented with a conspicuous concentration of child sex

abuse cases that have come from the church. Because our investigation produced information

from so many dioceses over so many decades, we think it’s important to report on some of the

changes we’ve seen – or at least the potential for change.

Pre-2002: before the Boston story broke

It seemed as if there was a script. Through the end of the 20th century, the dioceses

developed consistent strategies for hiding child sex abuse. While the patterns were fairly apparent

to us from the documents, we also had experts review them: special agents assigned to the FBI’s

Critical Incident Response Group: Behavioral Analysis Unit III – Crimes Against Children.

The agents identified seven factors that arose repeatedly in the diocesan response to child

abuse complaints:

Use of euphemisms: Mischaracterization of assaults and misleading designations for the

removal of a priest for a complaint of child sexual abuse. Violent criminal sexual acts, for example,

were often described only as “inappropriate” contact or “boundary issues.” The temporary or

permanent removal of a priest from service was often coded as “sick leave” or “leave.”

297
 Deficient or biased diocesan investigations: Investigations conducted by untrained

clergy or teachers, given authority to make credibility determinations about fellow clergy

members. Use of untrained support personnel for victims services.

Treatment provider bias: Use of church-run psychological facilities that regularly relied

upon the “self-reports” of the offenders, who typically downplayed or denied their criminal

conduct. Failure to provide contrary information supplied by victims. Reliance on clinical

“diagnosis” rather than actual conduct. Misallocation of the burden of proof: absent a definitive

diagnosis, child abusers were often simply returned to ministry.

Lack of public disclosure: Failure to disclose criminal sexual conduct to parishioners –

information that the community needed to protect children. Use of terms such as “retired” or

“reassigned” that disarmed parents who might otherwise have looked for signs of abuse.

Financial support: Continuing to fund abusive priests, providing them with housing,

transportation, benefits, and stipends – and leaving abusers with the resources to locate, groom and

assault more children.

Transfer rather than removal: Regular, systemic, and institutionalized practice of

reassigning a priest to a new location – rather than removing him from ministry – after complaints

of child sexual abuse. Priests regularly returned to ministry even after confessing to sexually

abusing children. Only bishops and certain high level diocesan administrators knew, and they held

information within secret or confidential archives of the diocese. Not surprisingly, priests

reassigned to ministry often abused additional children.

Insufficient reports to law enforcement: Refusal to make any report to law enforcement,

or significantly delaying reports, or providing stripped-down reports. These minimal reports often

298
lacked sufficient specificity to relay the gravity of the crime, the scope of the conduct, or relevant

dates and locations. Even confessions or corroborating pieces of evidence were often withheld.

We think of this constellation of factors as the “the circle of secrecy.” We didn’t come up

with that phrase on our own, and neither did the FBI. We got it from Bishop Wuerl of Pittsburgh,

now Cardinal of Washington D.C., in one of the documents we reviewed; these were his own

words for the church’s child sex abuse coverup.

299
 Although the FBI could see how the dioceses were doing it, that doesn’t mean we know

how much they were doing it. The agents were clear that we will never really know how many

abusers there were, and how many victims there were. It was hard enough for victims to come

forward; but when they did, the complaints were often forgotten about, misplaced, shrugged off,

or immediately discounted. The church’s response not only depressed the number of “confirmed”

complaints, but discouraged additional victims from reporting, knowing they might be rebuffed or

ridiculed. As the bishop said, it was a circle.

The repeating pattern of the bishops’ behavior left us with no doubt that, even decades ago,

the church understood that the problem was prevalent. Remember, when they were finally

subpoenaed, the dioceses produced over half a million pages of documents. The abuse was

occurring not only by its own people, but on its own property. Children were raped in places of

worship, in schools, and in diocesan owned vehicles, and were groomed through diocesan

programs and retreats.

The bishops weren’t just aware of what was going on; they were immersed in it. And they

went to great lengths to keep it secret. The secrecy helped spread the disease.

Secure as it was, though, we can’t help thinking that the circle of secrecy could have been

pierced sooner. As we’ve noted, there were numerous instances where law enforcement gave

deference to the religious institution. Whatever the motives for that deference, it left children

without their rightful civic watchdogs. It wasn’t really until the press exposed the story, in Boston,

that things began to change.

300
2002: A Transition

Sixteen years ago, the media – not law enforcement – exposed a significant coverup of

clergy sex abuse. While that exposure represents a fraction of what we’ve found in Pennsylvania,

the effect of the investigative reporting of the Boston Globe on this issue can’t be overstated. The

newspaper’s articles created a national scandal that altered the atmosphere. Something the

dioceses had long attempted to avoid was now a daily occurrence – a public call for transparency.

In June 2002, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops developed the “Charter for

the Protection of Children and Young People.” The Charter established procedures calling on

dioceses to take stronger action when crimes against children were reported. The Charter didn’t

require bishops to actually expel abusers, but it did for the first time acknowledge publicly that

they should be kept away from children. Norm 6 of the Charter provided that bishops should

remove priests from active ministry “when there is sufficient evidence that sexual abuse of a minor

has occurred.” Of course, it was still up to the bishop to decide whether there was “sufficient

evidence.”

We heard testimony from another expert about the effect of these reforms. Thomas Doyle

is a Catholic priest, published author, and canon law authority who has testified before numerous

legal bodies about the history of the church’s handling of child sexual abuse complaints. Doyle

noted that the Charter did not overturn the secrecy provisions that canon law had long established.

And it left it up to the bishop to determine what was, or wasn’t, a credible allegation.

The next step, then, was the creation by the dioceses of review boards for internal

investigations. While a welcome idea in principle, we learned that these processes were sometimes

used as investigative mechanisms to build a defense case for potential litigation against victims.

Some review board members were very well qualified, although others lacked training, or weren’t

301
provided all relevant records secretly maintained by the bishops in the archives. And ultimately,

any review board decision was left to the bishop, and to priest-administrators whose ascension

within the diocese required alignment with the bishop’s goals. In the end, only the bishop could

take the action needed to remove an offender from the diocese or the priesthood.

That process of removal, or laicization, did not always do much to penetrate the circle of

secrecy. In many cases, bishops invoked the process only when the priest would voluntarily accept

removal. And when laicization papers were filed, they were often far more detailed than the

statements that were given out to the public. We know, because we saw these laicization papers

among the subpoenaed documents. But the public was supposed to never know.

On the whole, the 2002 Charter did move things in the right direction. The grand jury

found a significant increase in the number of crimes against children reported to the police,

although these were usually only current reports – past complaints from the diocese’s secret

archives were seldom turned over.

Of course, external forces have also generated much of the change. Mandated reporter

laws, longer statutes of limitation, and increased public awareness have made it much harder for

institutions to hide child sex crimes. In nearly every diocese some example of a criminal

prosecution of a priest could be found. While there were still abusers, there were also more

prosecutions.

Thanks to the documents, though, our inside look revealed that there were still

discrepancies between the church’s internal behavior and public positions. Known offenders were

still secretly provided financial support. “Retired” child abusers were permitted to live in church-

run facilities located near schools. Dioceses resisted calls to release abusers’ names, while

heralding their compliance with new mandated reporter laws. And most striking to us were cases

302
in which the dioceses obtained child abuse “clearances” for employees who had no criminal record

– because the bishop had never reported prior incidents of abuse. So there would be the clearance,

right in the same file documenting unreported abuse. That is not where we needed the dioceses to

be.

Today

Today we sense some progress is being made. As Father Doyle testified, meaningful

change on child abuse has been largely generated by forces external to the church – mostly by

media attention and grand jury reports like this one. Doyle explained that diocesan bishops tend

to be resistant to anything that reduces or questions their power. It’s all about the bishops. If

diocesan bishops respond to these external pressures, then real change is possible.

During the course of the investigation, Bishop Bambera of Scranton disclosed the names

of all accused priests within his diocese to local law enforcement. Bishop Gainer of Harrisburg

began a process to publicly identify offenders within his own diocese, and provided some

confirmation of offenders’ identities in response to press inquiries.

As a result of this sort of assistance, this grand jury has discovered and issued presentments

in two different cases of child sex abuse: one against Father James Sweeney of the Diocese of

Greensburg and the other against Father David Poulson of the Diocese of Erie. In both instances,

the dioceses provided important information. This isn’t to say that the church is cured of the

scourge of child sexual abuse; these active prosecutions show that there are still priests abusing

children in Pennsylvania. But with better cooperation, they can be stopped sooner.

To that end, we heard directly from the sitting bishops of all six dioceses under

investigation. All but one submitted a written statement. Each bishop laid out the policies in

303
place for his respective diocese. All indicated that they promptly report allegations of child sexual

abuse to the police.

One bishop, Bishop Persico of Erie, chose to appear in person before the grand jury.

Cooperation with this investigation was not his first impulse. When the grand jury issued a

subpoena many months ago, the Diocese of Erie, on advice of counsel, withheld material. We got

the documents anyway using a search warrant. At that point, the bishop decided things were on

the wrong track. He switched lawyers and resolved to take a different approach. That decision

eventually led him to meet us, face to face.

Bishop Persico told us that he has come to a greater understanding of the scope of the

trauma embodied within the diocesan records, and that it has motivated him to develop a new

policy. He said the mishandling of certain complaints by his predecessors made him “angry,” and

that he wanted to “do the right thing.” As a result, and in consultation with his legal counsel, he

determined that upon receipt of any allegation of child sexual abuse, the Diocese will report the

allegation to law enforcement, and relinquish any relevant records. Moreover, Persico stated that

even where prosecution is not possible, the Diocese will hold offenders to a higher standard. He

spoke of an example in recent months where law enforcement was unable to charge a priest for

exchanging inappropriate text messages with a teenage girl. Persico nevertheless removed that

priest from any assignment within the Diocese of Erie.

On April 6, 2018, Bishop Persico issued a public statement announcing a new policy on

child sexual abuse for the Diocese of Erie:

But before I share details of those changes with you, I want to express my sincere
sorrow and apologies for the sexual abuse that has occurred within the church,
particularly here in the Diocese of Erie. I have met with victims and listened to the
pain they and their loved ones experienced. It is appalling to learn what they went
through. Abuse is traumatic enough—but it’s earth-shattering when it’s perpetrated

304
 by someone who is in a position of trust. I have a profound personal respect for
survivors of abuse.

The changes Persico announced included an expanded set of definitions of child abuse;

new efforts to cross-check personnel with previously withheld diocesan records through the

Diocesan Office for the Protection of Children and Youth; and the public identification of persons

who have been credibly accused of actions ranging from furnishing pornography to direct, sexual

assaults of minors.

These are wise and welcome policies; we encourage other bishops to follow Erie’s

example. As Bishop Persico explained to his parishioners:

In publishing the list of those who have credible allegations against them, the first
goal is to protect children. It is not possible for us to monitor all the people on the
list. This is an important step in helping the public become aware of information
that is important for the community’s well-being.

Some are concerned that publicizing these names will open old wounds. Very
importantly, we are actually publishing the names in the hope of helping the
victims/survivors move one step closer to healing those same wounds. It is
important they know they are not alone.

We encourage victims of sexual abuse by people affiliated with the Catholic

Church to come forward for their own benefit and to help us have an even more
comprehensive understanding of the past. We know that with their help, the list of
names may grow.

We understand that victims’ memories may be incomplete. We want to tell victims

not to be concerned if they do not have exact dates or locations of their abuse. We
are willing to listen to them and accompany them as we all search for the truth.
We do not know when the grand jury report will be forthcoming, but I am sure it
will be a sobering moment for all of us. I encourage the wide distribution of the
information you’ll find at the end of this statement in the hope that all victims who
feel locked in darkness will consider coming forward to begin the healing process.”

We commend Bishop Persico for acknowledging past abuse, unmasking the abusers, and

encouraging accountability. In his testimony we find hope.

305
306
IV. Recommendations of the Grand Jury

Until the day we got our summons, none of us even really knew what a grand jury does.

We wound up having to interrupt our lives for a period of two full years. We were told to appear

for court several times a month, which meant traveling considerable distances to hear long days of

testimony. We did it because we understood it was our duty. In performing that duty, we have

been exposed to, buried in, unspeakable crimes committed against countless children. Now we

want something to show for it. Courtesy of the long years of coverup, we can’t charge most of the

culprits. What we can do is tell our fellow citizens what happened, and try to get something done

about it. That is why we make these recommendations for legal changes that respond to what we

have learned in our investigation.

A. Eliminate the criminal statute of limitations for sexually abusing children.

This grand jury exists because Pennsylvania dioceses routinely hid reports of child sex

crimes while the statutes of limitations for those crimes expired. We just do not understand why

that should be allowed to happen. If child abusers knew they could never become immune for

their crimes by outrunning the statute of limitations, maybe there would be less child abuse.

We know our statute of limitations has been extended recently, so that now abusers can

potentially be prosecuted until the victim reaches age 50. And that’s good. It just doesn’t help a

lot of the victims we saw. No piece of legislation can predict the point at which a victim of child

sex abuse will find the strength to come forward. And no victim can know whether anyone will

believe her, or how long she will have to wait for justice.

If that seems hard to understand, think about Julianne. She was taught without question

that priests are superior to other adults, even superior to her own parents – because “they are God

307
in the flesh.” So when one of these flesh gods put his fingers in her vagina, who was she going to

tell? Julianne was 14 when she was assaulted; now she’s almost 70.

Or Joe from Scranton. At the time he couldn’t find anyone who was willing to hear about

the naked, masturbating priest who told him to take off his pants and get into bed. It took 55 years

before he found us.

Or Bob, from Reading. He told us “there is not a day that goes by” that he doesn’t think

about what happened to him. He can’t bear to be touched by a man, not even to shake hands, or

to hug his own sons. He never reported it, because he thought “I was the only one.” But if he

could still put that priest on trial, even now, he would. “Somebody has to be accountable,” he told

us. “This has to stop.” Bob is 83.

So yes, we say no statute of limitations at all. Not for this kind of crime. And it’s not like

we are asking for anything that unusual. It turns out that this is the rule in well over half the states

across the country: no free pass for serious sexual violation of children, no matter how long it

takes. That includes almost every state in our region, except us. If we lived in New Jersey, or

Delaware, or New York or Maryland, we would today be issuing a presentment charging dozens

of priests. But because we happen to live here instead, the number is two. Not something for

Pennsylvania to be proud of.

B. Create a two-year “civil window” for child sex abuse victims who couldn’t file lawsuits
before.

Victims don’t just need sex criminals prosecuted; they need care and compensation for

harm done by the abusers and the institutions that empowered them. The way you get that is by

suing. We understand that civil cases are different than criminal prosecutions, and that it’s

appropriate to have a statute of limitation that prohibits lawsuits after a certain amount of time.

308
We’re OK with a time limit for lawsuits, as long as it’s a long time limit, and Pennsylvania’s is

pretty good – until the victim reaches age 30, which is longer than in most other states.

The problem is that this law doesn’t apply to most of our victims. It’s only been in effect

for about 15 years, and most of the victims from before then were under a much tighter time limit

for suing – only two years. But even that two-year limit was something of a sham. Until not too

long ago, the church was actively and systematically concealing clergy sex abuse. Victims didn’t

know if their attackers had a history of abuse, and they didn’t know the diocese had been enabling

that abuse. You can’t very well exercise your right to sue when the people responsible are doing

their best to cover up.

We think those older victims should get their two years back, now that the church is finally

being forced to come clean. Several other states, at least six of them, have paved the way by

creating a “window” of time that gives child sex abuse victims a second chance to bring lawsuits

that would otherwise be too late.

We’ve heard this has been tried before in Pennsylvania, several times. And every time it

is opposed by representatives of the church and its insurance companies. They say it would cost

too much to let these child sex abuse victims get back their right to sue.

We wonder how they decide how much is “too much.” Maybe they should meet with Al,

as we did. Al was abused in sixth grade by a priest who put him in a locked room, made him take

off the pants of his Catholic school uniform, and rubbed his penis. He managed to slip away and

tried hiding under a desk, but the priest found him and told him he would go to hell if he ever told

anyone. Afterward, Al flunked the sixth grade and had to repeat it. He began drinking, working

up to as much as a bottle of whiskey a day. He started scratching his genitals so hard they would

bleed. He thought he must be gay, which made him a mortal sinner. He tried joining the Navy,

309
but was diagnosed with PTSD and eventually discharged. He tried to kill himself on multiple

occasions, most recently by hanging himself with a coaxial cable. He was institutionalized in the

locked ward of a psychiatric hospital. He wanted to keep going to church, but he would become

nauseous and have to throw up when he entered the building.

Maybe, if he’d had money for good medical and psychological resources, Al’s life

wouldn’t have been quite so hard after that priest knocked it off track. Maybe, if he could file a

lawsuit now, he could make up for some of the pain and suffering. We wonder what people would

think is “too much” money if it had been one of their kids. Al should get his two years back.

We also hear they have an argument that there is a legal problem with the civil window.

We are laypeople; we’ll leave that to the lawyers. One thing we believe, though, is that if the

legislature and the lobbyists really want to get it done – if they really want to get real compensation

to the victims of child sex abuse – they will find a way. They’ve found a way to stop things from

happening all these years. Maybe now they can put their expertise into actually getting something

passed.

We remember a letter we found in the church files from a victim named Joey. He was

forcibly raped as a boy, became addicted to drugs, and died of an overdose as an adult. Before his

death he wrote this to the bishop:

Pennsylvania law does not, for one moment, bar the Diocese of
Allentown from making financial settlements with persons who were
abused as minors, even though they might not report the abuse until
they become adults. Pennsylvania’s so-called statute of limitations is
merely a defense, a legalistic prescription which the Diocese of
Allentown may choose to invoke in civil litigation when it wishes.

If Joey could figure that out, we think the leaders of the church can figure it out too. They

don’t have to hind behind the statute of limitations.

310
C. Clarify the penalties for a continuing failure to report child abuse.

Reporting child abusers isn’t just a moral obligation; it’s the law. We can’t pass laws

telling the church how to administer its internal operations – but we can demand that it inform

authorities about rapists and molesters. Unfortunately, document after document told us the same

story: church officials repeatedly received word of crimes against kids, yet repeatedly refused to

alert law enforcement.

Thanks to prior grand juries, the legislature has addressed that by eliminating some

loopholes in reporting requirements for institutions like the church. Now there is a new, higher

penalty for an ongoing failure to report continuing sexual abuse.

After looking at that law, though, we’re concerned that the new language might not be clear

enough to cover all the covering up we have seen. Right now the statute punishes a reporting

failure that continues “while the person knows or has reasonable cause to believe the child is

actively being subjected to child abuse.” We think that in the more common case, the abuser may

not be “active” at any particular moment, and the next instance of abuse may not be against the

same child. But if the pattern is clear, the responsibility to report should continue, and the penalty

for not doing so should increase. We recommend changing the language to impose a continuing

obligation to report “while the person knows or has reasonable cause to believe the abuser is likely

to commit additional acts of child abuse.”

We’re also concerned about the statute of limitations for starting a prosecution against

someone who commits this new crime of ongoing failure to report. Under the law now, if you fail

to report a one-time act of abuse, you can be arrested and subject to prosecution for the same period

of time as the abuser himself: the statute of limitations is the same as the statute of limitations for

the crime you didn’t report. That’s good. But, if you continually fail to report ongoing acts of

311
abuse, which is obviously a more serious crime than not reporting a single act of abuse, the statute

of limitations is only two years. That’s got to be a mistake. We think it can be pretty easily fixed,

and we call on the legislature to take care of it.

D. Prohibit “non-disclosure” agreements regarding cooperation with law enforcement.

We also think it’s time to tackle an issue that hasn’t be mentioned in prior grand jury

investigations of clergy sex abuse. We’ve heard the reports over the last year about the use of

confidentiality agreements to make sexual harassments suits go away. We can tell you that it

doesn’t just happen to women in the workplace; we’ve seen the same tactic used by the dioceses

to hush up child sex abuse in the church. In the rare case where a child was able to report abuse

within the statute of limitations for filing a lawsuit, the bishops would avoid “scandal” by paying

off the family to keep quiet.

We know there have been bills proposed in some of the states, including Pennsylvania, that

would restrict the use of confidentiality agreements, or even outlaw them entirely. And we’ve

heard arguments on both sides. If an abuser or employer can purchase silence, then other targets

will never learn of the danger, and the abuser will be free to go after new victims. On the other

hand, some victims don’t want to be whistleblowers; they just want to move on with their lives. If

a confidentiality agreement lets them preserve their anonymity and settle a lawsuit on good terms,

maybe we shouldn’t stop them from doing that.

Wherever that debate winds up, we want to focus on one particular problem with

confidentiality agreements: their impact on the ability of law enforcement officials to chase down

child abusers and put them away. Confidentiality agreements are usually written to keep the victim

afraid of talking to anyone at all. We’re sure a lot of victims assume this means they can’t even

312
talk to the police. We saw it in this investigation – people who were scared to speak, because they

thought they would get sued for violating a non-disclosure agreement.

That’s understandable, but it’s a misunderstanding and we need to clear it up. If an abuser

– or an institution shielding abusers – tried to use a non-disclosure agreement to keep victims from

reporting crimes to law enforcement, they would likely be committing obstruction of justice.

Courts are not entitled to enforce confidentiality agreements if they’re used for that purpose.

The problem is, most people don’t know that. That’s why legislation is needed: to protect

abuse victims who have signed a non-disclosure agreement, but who approach or are approached

by the police. We recommend a new statute declaring that no past or present non-disclosure

agreement prevents an abuse victim from going to the police, or from talking to the police if they

come to her. The statute should also require that every future settlement agreement, if it contains

any form of confidentiality provision, must state plainly on its face that contact with law

enforcement is permitted, and that any attempt to use the agreement to prevent or discourage such

contact is illegal.

If we learn nothing else from this and prior investigations, let it be this: that sexual abuse,

in particular child sexual abuse, is not just a private wrong, to be handled “in house.” It is a crime

against society. We’re issuing this report to make that clear, and to push for action.

313
314
9 $SSHQGL[RI2IIHQGHUV

315
316
DIOCESE OF
ALLENTOWN

317
318
 Reverend Thomas J. Bender

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1933
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 13, 1967

Employment/Assignment History
5/1961 – 6/1962 St. Joseph, Ashland, PA
6/1962 – 6/1965 St. Joseph, Girardville, PA
6/1965 – 6/1966 Holy Family, New Philadelphia, PA
6/1965 – 6/1966 Marian High School, Tamaqua, PA
6/1966 – 6/1971 Nativity High School, Pottsville, PA
6/1966 – 1/1970 St. Kiern, Heckscherville, PA
1/1970 – 6/1970 St. Mary, St. Clair, PA
6/1970 – 6/1971 St. John the Baptist, Pottsville, PA
6/1971 – 10/1971 Bethlehem Catholic HS, Bethlehem, PA
10/1971 – 12/1972 St. Francis Orphanage, Orwigsburg, PA
12/1972 – 2/1982 Our Lady of Good Counsel, Gordon, PA
6/1973 – 2/1982 Diocesan Tribunal, Allentown, PA
2/1982 – 6/1986 Most Blessed Sacrament, Bally
6/1983 – 6/1987 Liturgical Commission, Diocese of Allentown
6/1986 – 6/1987 St. Francis of Assisi, Allentown, PA
6/1987 – 7/1987 St. Anthony of Padua, Easton, PA
Northampton Deanery, Ministry to Aging
7/1987 Regional Director, Council of Catholic Nurses
7/24/1987 Leave of Absence
3/01/2002 Retired
5/06/2005 Dismissed form Priesthood

319
Summary

A review of information received from the Diocese of Allentown indicates that the
church was aware of Father Thomas J. Bender’s predatory behavior as early as 1972, when
Bender was caught in a car with a male student from Nativity High School, where Bender was
assigned. It was reported by a Deacon, who also was a Pennsylvania State Trooper, that a second
Trooper discovered the two in the car, both with their pants off. A report by Monsignor Anthony
Muntone to Thomas J. Welsh, then Bishop of the Diocese, stated that the first Trooper gave
Bender “a lecture and sent him on his way.” A “Summary of Case” memorandum relating to
Bender indicated that, when confronted, Bender admitted to the incident but claimed this was
the first time anything like this had happened. He continued to serve as a priest.

In 1984, a known victim reported that Bender abused him in 1981, while the victim was
in seventh grade. The victim reported that he was abused in Bender’s bed, where oral and anal
sex occurred. When confronted at the Chancery, Bender admitted to abusing the victim. He
was sent to psychotherapy but again continued to serve as priest. In 1986, the victim was
hospitalized for a drug overdose and subsequently admitted to the Northwest Institute of
Psychiatry. The Diocese paid the first week’s fee of $4,000. The victim and his family decided
to report Bender to legal authorities and also filed a civil suit.

In 1987, Bender was put on a leave of absence. He was eventually arrested, convicted
and, in 1988, sentenced to probation. A condition of his probation was that he could not have
an occupation where children would be exposed to his influence or intentions. In the same year,
the Diocese encouraged Bender to seek laicization. Instead, Bender remained on his leave of
absence until 2002, when he applied for retirement benefits. The Church granted Bender his
retirement and provided him a monthly living allowance and paid for health insurance, life
insurance, retreat and workshop fees, and car insurance.

In 2004, the Diocese received additional reports of sexual abuse by Bender. One known
victim reported being abused in the early 1960’s. Another known victim reported being abused
by Bender in 1966. The second victim reported that the abuse occurred in the parish rectory and
while on camping trips. On both occasions, the Diocese reported the allegations to the
appropriate District Attorney’s Office. No further information was provided as to the outcome
of these reports of abuse.

In 2006, while collecting retirement benefits from the church, Bender was arrested in
Long Island, New York, while traveling to meet what he believed was a fourteen-year-old boy
for sex. The “boy” was an undercover detective whom Bender had attempted to lure to a hotel
room in Levittown, New York. At the time of arrest, Bender was found to be in possession of
condoms, beer, pornography, a digital camera, candy, gum, toothpaste, and a laptop computer.
Bender was sentenced to 10 years of incarceration and lifetime probation. As of April 2018, he
remains on the sex offender registry of the State of New York.

320
 Monsignor Thomas J. Benestad

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1945
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 23, 1970

Employment/Assignment History
1970 St. Bernard, Easton, PA
Lafayette College Newman Center
Notre Dame High School
1973 St. Thomas More
1978 Leave of Absence
Holy Rosary
1980 St. Bernard
1988 Our Lady of Perpetual Help
Papal Foundation
2001 Sabbatical
2002 St. Francis of Assisi
2005 Notre Dame of Bethlehem
2006 Leave of Absence
6/2007 Resigned as Pastor
Leave of Absence
9/2007 Ascension, Boca Raton, FL
6/2009 Retired-Pastor Emeritus, Notre Dame of Bethlehem

Summary

Records including e-mail exchanges between the victim and the Diocese of Allentown
indicate that, in 2011, a known victim reported to the Diocese that Monsignor Thomas J.
Benestad sexually abused him from 1981 through 1983. The victim was nine years old when
the abuse began. Correspondence demonstrated that the Diocese reported the allegation to the
Northampton County District Attorney’s Office, which conducted an investigation and found
the victim’s allegations to be credible.

In a statement to Northampton County Detectives, the victim said that his first memory
of abuse happened while he attended CCD class at St. Bernard’s, where Benestad was assigned.
The victim was taken out of class by a nun and delivered to Benestad in his office. The victim
had worn shorts to CCD, which was against the rules. The victim was told that shorts were not
proper attire and that not wearing proper attire was sinful. The victim was told to get on his
knees and start praying. Benestad unzipped his pants and told the victim to perform oral sex on
him. The victim did as he was told. Benestad also performed oral sex on the victim. The victim
recalls that, after the abuse, Benestad would produce a clear bottle of holy water and squirt it

321
Summary
into the victim’s mouth to purify him. The District Attorney’s Office found the applicable statute
of limitations had expired and no charges were brought against Benestad.

Additional complaints have been made against Benestad, who has denied all accusations.
The Diocese elected to rely on Benestad’s word rather than the word of the victims and the
determinations of law enforcement. No attempt was made to remove Benestad from ministry.
Benestad was granted retirement, resides in Boca Raton, Florida, and assists with a local parish.

322
 Reverend Robert G. Cofenas

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1941
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: January 6, 1973

Employment/Assignment History
1/1973 – 6/1979 Newman Center, Bethlehem, PA
6/1973 – 6/1975 Assistant Superintendent, Secondary Education, Diocese of
Allentown, PA
6/1975 – 2/1979 Catholic Students Advisor, Newman Apostolate, Lehigh
University, PA
6/1975 – 2/1979 Catholic Students Advisor, Newman Apostolate, Moravian
College, PA
6/1975 – 2/1979 Guidance Counsellor, Norte Dame High School, Easton, PA
6/1975 – 2/1979 Director, Newman Apostolate, Diocese of Allentown
2/1979 – 7/1980 Assistant Superintendent of Education, Diocese of Allentown
2/1979 – 7/1980 St.s Simon and Jude, Bethlehem, PA
7/1980 – 5/1981 St. Mary’s College, Emmitsburg, Maryland
5/1981 – 6/1988 St. Ignatius Loyola, Sinking Spring, PA
9/1981 Regional Director, American Catholic Overseas Aid Fund
11/1983 – 11/1986 Council of Priests, Diocese of Allentown
6/1988 – 9/1988 St. Ignatius Loyola, Sinking Spring, PA
6/1988 – 10/1989 Diocesan Newspaper
9/1988 – 10/1989 Our Lady of Help of Christians, Allentown, PA
10/1989 – 8/1990 Sabbatical (The Servants of the Paraclete, Jemez Springs, New
Mexico)
8/1990 – 6/1997 Our Lady of Help of Christians, Allentown, PA
2/24/1992 Special Advocate, Diocesan Tribunal
6/1997 – 10/2000 St. Catharine of Siena, Reading, PA
2/2000 – 3/2000 Sabbatical (St. John Vianney Treatment Facility, Downingtown)
4/11/2000 Decree of Suspension
2/11/2005 Dismissed from Priesthood

Summary

Records received from the Diocese of Allentown indicate the church was aware of Father
Robert G. Cofenas’ sexual attraction to young males as early as 1979. In a handwritten letter to
Bishop Joseph Mark McShea, a secretary at The Newman Center of Lehigh University reported
that she observed concerning behavior on the part of Cofenas. The secretary reported witnessing
Cofenas befriend a “young boy (about 16 years of age).” The boy’s name was known to the

323
Summary
secretary. According to the letter, the boy had a serious drug problem and arrived at the Newman
Center “half-starved and in pretty bad shape.”

The boy was hospitalized and upon discharge continued to visit the Newman Center.
The secretary observed that, as soon as the boy arrived at the center, Cofenas would take him to
his upstairs room and would lock the door. Cofenas told the secretary that the boy spent the
night at the Center. According to the secretary, Cofenas showed a “great deal of inappropriate
affection toward the boy.” The secretary recommended that Cofenas be transferred “before
something disastrous occurs.” She added that she believed that Cofenas knew of her suspicions
and felt that it was a cry for help on Cofenas’ part when he told her of the boy staying the night
at the Newman Center. Cofenas was reassigned approximately six months after the letter was
written to the Bishop.

While assigned to St. Mary’s College in Emmitsburg, Maryland, Cofenas wrote a letter
to Bishop McShea dated April 6, 1981. Cofenas wrote: “Yes, I have failed again, but my
problem is not so totally out of hand that I cannot with God’s help and Dr. Zanni, work to master
my situation. Incidentally, prior to now, I had experienced no failure in this matter since 1978.”
Cofenas went on to write: “I am deeply sorry for letting you down again. You can imagine how
hard it is for me to write this letter—especially when you trusted me and released me to the
Mount.” Before ending the letter, Cofenas wrote, “I know you want to protect me and I
appreciate your concern for me, but I ask you to consider the possibility of my staying at the
Mount.” Approximately one month later, Cofenas was transferred to St. Ignatius of Loyola,
Sinking Spring, Pennsylvania.

A Confidential Memorandum written by Monsignor John B. McCann and dated

February 3, 2000, indicates that a known victim and the victim’s father met with McCann and
Monsignor Alfred A. Schlert to report sexual abuse at the hands of Cofenas. The victim reported
that, in 1986 at the age of seventeen, he was abused by Cofenas. At the time of the abuse,
Cofenas was assigned to St. Ignatius of Loyola Church in Sinking Spring and served as the
moderator of the Youth Group. As a high school graduation gift, Cofenas proposed taking the
victim to the shore. Initially, the father of the victim was reluctant to allow this to occur but
permitted it because of the trust he placed in Cofenas as a priest. The victim went on to describe
in detail the events of the three-day trip with Cofenas. The victim and Cofenas held hands for
the duration of the car ride to the shore. Once at the hotel, Cofenas provided alcohol to the
victim, masturbated the victim, and coerced him to engage in oral sex. Cofenas and the victim
showered together and slept in the same bed. According to the victim, sexual encounters with
Cofenas continued until 1992, when Cofenas began blaming the victim for what had occurred.
The victim’s father reported that Cofenas made a sexual advance to his other son, which was
rebuffed.

In a January 12, 2004, report to the Vatican, and addressed to “Your Eminence,” Bishop
Edward P. Cullen admitted that the Diocese knew about Cofenas’ inappropriate relationship
with a sixteen-year-old boy in 1979. Cullen added that, on February 17, 2000, Cofenas admitted
to the abuse of the victim in 1986. After his admission, Cofenas was sent to St. John Vianney
Treatment Facility in Downingtown for therapy. Cullen wrote that the abused victim and his

324
Summary
family were demanding that Cofenas be laicized and “threatening to go to the public media if
he is not.” Cullen also wrote, “Currently there is great danger that this case could become
public.” The report recommended that Cofenas be laicized. Cofenas was receiving a monthly
stipend and healthcare benefits from the Diocese. Cullen’s final recommendation was that an
“Administrative Penal Process be applied in this case.”

325
 Reverend David Connell
Reverend Timothy Johnson
Jim Gross

Summary

David Connell and Timothy Johnson were Carmelite priests and Jim Gross was a lay
person. No additional assignments could be located within Diocesan files. A record received
from the Diocese in form of a memorandum written by the Victim Assistance Coordinator
indicates that, in September 2007, a known victim reported he had been sexually abused by
Gross, a basketball coach at St. Patrick’s in Pottsville. He reported that the abuse began in the
1970’s while he was in sixth grade. Information provided by the Diocese indicates Gross was
employed at St. Patrick’s in 1972. The victim did not provide any further details as to the abuse
he endured from Gross.

In the summer of 1984, Gross resigned from teaching at St. Francis School in
Minersville, Schuylkill County. In the narrative of his last evaluation from June 1984 is written,
“He had too familiar relationships with his pupils.” The victim reported that he knew Gross had
later been charged for sexual abuse of a child but was acquitted. The victim stated he spoke
with Gross’ attorney, who confided in the victim that Gross was certainly guilty and he was only
doing his job. The victim did not report where or when Gross stood trial.

The victim also reported that he was sexually abused by a Carmelite priest named Father
David Connell and physically abused by a Carmelite brother named Timothy Johnson while
attending Nativity High School. The abuse was reported to the Provincial of the Carmelites,
Father Michael Kissane, in October 2007. The victim stated that his family’s house had burned
down and the Carmelites took him and his brother in and had them live in a priory. During the
time he was living in the priory, the victim was sexually abused by Connell. The victim
remembered drinking juice that Connell gave him and the next memory the victim had was
waking up in his own bed naked, with Connell in the room. The victim had no memory of the
prior evening but, on waking, he was bleeding from his rectum. On another occasion, Connell
made him tea and after drinking it he began to get a bad headache. The victim reported he was
then sexually abused by Connell. The victim gave no further details about the abuse but stated
that, even though he was strong and athletic, he could not stop Connell from abusing him
because he was drugged.

The victim went on to report to Kissane that he went to Brother Johnson for help and
told Johnson about the abuse he endured at the hands of Connell and his former basketball coach
Gross. The victim told Johnson he was going to also report the abuse to the police. Johnson
told the victim not to report the abuse to the police but the victim insisted on reporting. At this
point Johnson began to severely beat the victim with a big leather belt and told the victim that,
if he reported the abuse to the police, he would beat him even worse. The victim reported to
Kissane that the victim’s brother was also abused by Connell but that his brother never spoke
about it.

326
Summary

Kissane informed the victim that other allegations of sexual abuse had been made against
Connell. A “Confidential Report,” presumably written by Chancellor Anthony D. Muntone,
indicated that, in May 1976, it was reported to Muntone that Connell made a sexual advance on
a male high school student while on a camping trip. While camping, Connell convinced the
student that they sleep together to stay warm. The student reported that Connell “made a pass
at him” while they were sleeping together. The student was able to rebuff the advance and
Connell stopped. It was reported that the student was very upset over the incident and was a
“reliable and trustworthy” individual. No further information exists as to any additional steps
taken in regards to the sexual advance by Connell.

Kissane informed the victim that Connell was no longer with the Carmelite priests.
Kissane told the victim that, after his time in Pottsville, Connell was assigned to a diocese in
Texas but Kissane believed he was removed from ministry and no longer active. Kissane said
he had no idea where Connell was. Kissane stated that Johnson had been ordained a priest and
was living in retirement in Florida. Kissane indicated he would confront Johnson in the near
future since he would soon be making a trip to Florida. No other information exists indicating
whether Kissane followed through with confronting Johnson about the victim’s allegations.
Other records show the Diocese and the Carmelite priests split a cost of $4,500 for therapy for
the victim.

Johnson died in 2016.

327
 Reverend James Gaffney

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1957
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: June 8, 1985

Employment/Assignment History
5/1985 – 6/1987 St. Ursula, Fountain Hill, PA
6/1987 – 6/1991 Reading Central Catholic High School
6/1987 – 1/1992 St. Catherine of Siena, Mt. Penn, PA
1/1992 – 6/1992 Sick Leave (The Servants of the Paraclete, New Mexico)
6/1992 – 1/1995 St. Jane Frances de Chantal, Easton, PA
4/1994 – 1/1995 Sick Leave (The Servants of the Paraclete)
1/1995 – 2/1995 Notre Dame of Bethlehem, Bethlehem, PA
2/1995 – 6/1995 St. Mary of the Assumption, Coaldale, PA
6/1995 – 6/1999 Assisted with six parishes in Shenandoah
6/1999 – 4/2002 St. Patrick, Pottsville
4/2002 Abandoned ministry
6/26/2015 Dismissed from Priesthood

Summary

Father James Gaffney began work as a Diocesan priest in 1985. However, records
received from the Diocese of Allentown indicate that, in 1980, years before being ordained as a
priest, Gaffney questioned his vocation and wrote in a letter to Monsignor Muntone that he was
“convinced beyond all doubt that I need time off and will not return to the Roman Seminary or
any other seminary this year.” In 1982, it was recommended that Gaffney be dropped from “our
program of formation.” Monsignors Thompson and Muntone and Chancery personnel met and
the decision was made not to dismiss. Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, Gaffney was reported
to have been involved in inappropriate and even sexual relations with adult women, one of which
had a learning disability and whom he was counseling. Gaffney was placed on sick leave on
two different occasions.

In 1999, a known victim reported to Monsignor John B. McCann that she had been
sexually abused by Gaffney while he was assigned as Assistant Pastor at St. Ursula’s Church.
Other than a one-paragraph memorandum reporting the abuse, no more information was
provided to the Diocese until the mother of the victim renewed the allegation of abuse on April
24, 2002. The victim met with Chancery personnel and informed them that, when she was
fourteen years old and in eighth grade, Gaffney befriended her. The victim worked at the rectory
answering phones. Gaffney had her undress and “measured her body parts.” Gaffney had sexual
contact with her that continued throughout the time Gaffney was at the parish. Monsignors
McCann and Schlert confronted Gaffney with the report of abuse. Gaffney denied the

328
Summary
allegations. McCann and Schlert told Gaffney to carefully think about the allegations and to
consider taking a leave of absence if there was any truth to them. As he was on his way home
after the meeting, Gaffney called to tell McCann and Schlert that he was taking a leave of
absence.

On September 27, 2004, a second victim filed a civil complaint in the Court of Common
Pleas of Berks County. The second victim reported that the abuse began in 1990 when she was
sixteen and a student at Reading Central Catholic High School, where Gaffney was Vice
Principal and Disciplinarian. Gaffney provided her counseling, which led to the sexual abuse.
The second victim reported that her parents were going through a divorce and she was
experiencing depression. Gaffney took advantage of her depressed state. The second victim
reported that Gaffney routinely took her for car rides and would discuss topics such as
intercourse, oral sex, and masturbation. During the rides Gaffney started to require her to place
her hands on his penis. On one occasion, Gaffney exposed his erect penis to the second victim
in his office at the high school. The second victim reported that eventually Gaffney took her to
a private residence where he required her to submit to intercourse with him. Gaffney also
repeatedly required the second victim to submit to him performing numerous sex acts on her
and required her to perform sex acts on him.

On December 2, 2004, a third known victim reported abuse at the hands of Gaffney in
1986-1987, when Gaffney was assigned to St. Catharine of Siena in Mount Penn, Berks County.
The third victim worked in the rectory answering phones in the evening. She had a very poor
home life and Gaffney counseled her. The third victim reported that Gaffney would hug her and
inappropriately touch and kiss her, which led to sexual arousal. The Diocese referred the third
victim to counseling and spiritual direction.

A report by Monsignors Gobitas and James to Bishop Barres, dated July 18, 2011,
indicates that the reports of abuse by the first and third victims were credible, while the report
of abuse by the second victim was “entitled to a presumption of truth.” Also, Gobitas and James
found that all three reports of abuse “point to a consistent pattern of behavior on the part of
Father Gaffney.” Although Gaffney took a leave of absence in 2002, he continued to receive
health and other insurance for the next nine years from the Diocese, even though he abandoned
all ministry. Gobitas and James recommended that Gaffney be dismissed from the clerical state
and that he never be able to exercise public ministry for the remainder of his life. Based on
reports from both “qualified and professional personnel,” it was the belief of Gobitas and James
that Gaffney remained a potential danger to minors. However, Gaffney went on to obtain
employment as a college professor at Albright College. The Diocese never warned the College
of Gaffney’s history of sexually abusing children.

Gaffney was called as a witness before the Grand Jury on September 14, 2016 and again
on May 8, 2017. Gaffney stated that no member of law enforcement had ever contacted him
regarding his conduct until he received a subpoena ordering him to appear before the Grand
Jury. Gaffney admitted to sexual contact with at least one female student. The attorney for the
Commonwealth reminded Gaffney that he was under oath. Gaffney was then asked if he had
sexual contact with other children as a priest and he answered, “Yes. It is possible.” Gaffney

329
Summary
blamed a faulty memory for a lack of specifics. However, Gaffney detailed sexual contact with
a minor in a car, on school property, and at other locations.

Gaffey admitted he also disclosed that, while interning at St. Joseph’s in Summit Hill in
1980, he located child pornography within the parish. The image depicted Father David
Soderlund masturbating a 12-year-old boy. Gaffney reported his finding to the Diocese and
Monsignor Muntone. Gaffney and Muntone located albums of photographs depicting Soderlund
sexually abusing children. A meeting was held with the District Attorney of Carbon County,
who promised not to prosecute Soderlund if he was transferred and received treatment. After a
brief removal from ministry on health leave, Soderlund was returned to ministry. The volumes
of evidence of sexually abused children that were manufactured by Soderlund as he committed
the crimes, after being found by Gaffney and Muntone, were never seen again.

330
 Reverend Joseph Galko

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1944
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: 1980

Employment/Assignment History
5/1980 – 6/1982 St. Paul, Reading, PA
6/1982 – 1/1983 St. Anne, Bethlehem, PA
1/1983 – 6/1986 St. Ambrose, Schuylkill Haven, PA
6/1986 – 7/1987 St. Bernard, Easton, PA
2/12/1988 Placed on Administrative leave
6/2010 Dismissed from the Priesthood

Summary

Father Joseph Galko was ordained and began work in the Diocese in 1980. Records
received from the Diocese indicate that, as early as 1984, the Diocese was aware of inappropriate
sexual conduct by Galko. Galko admitted to the Diocesan Chancellor in 1984 to having sexual
contact with a male parishioner who was eighteen at the time. Galko also admitted that, while
at St. Ambrose in Schuylkill Haven, Schuylkill County, he inappropriately touched a male while
they were in the rectory. Galko performed oral sex on the male and had the male perform oral
sex on him. Galko further admitted to “occasional occurrences” over a span of many years
including the time before he entered the seminary, while he was in the seminary, and after his
ordination. Galko was moved to St. Bernard’s in Easton in 1986.

A “Summary of Case” time-line and other documents received from the Diocese indicate
that, in 1987, while serving at St. Bernard’s, Galko “spends too much time with the altar
servers,” and another pastor in the parish expressed concern regarding Galko’s interaction with
adolescent males in the parish. Galko was then sent for treatment at the “Downingtown facility.”
The Summary of Case time-line indicates a therapist at the facility described Galko as a
“pathological liar.” Additionally, it was noted that the therapist did not know “if anything can
be done for him.” In 1988, Galko was placed on administrative leave but was not dismissed
from the priesthood until 2010.

In 2002, the Diocese received a report of sexual abuse from a known victim. The victim
reported that, in 1980 or 1981, when he was 17 to 18-years-old, Galko fondled him after giving
him alcohol. The abuse occurred in Galko’s room in the rectory and lasted about twenty minutes.
A second incident occurred as the victim was leaving the confessional and Galko touched his

331
Summary
buttocks. The Diocese offered the victim their condolences, offered counseling, and encouraged
the victim to go the Berks county District Attorney if he desired.

In 2007, the Diocese received a report of sexual abuse by Galko from a second known
victim. This victim reported that, when he was approximately thirteen years old and in eighth
grade at St. Anne’s School in Bethlehem, Galko was assigned to St. Anne’s. The second victim
met Galko when he had taken some things to the rectory. He stated that Galko made him feel
special and that he really liked Galko. When the second victim was in eighth grade, Galko began
to take him to the rectory and give him alcohol. Once the second victim was drunk, Galko would
touch him inappropriately and have the victim touch Galko inappropriately. Galko was
confronted with the allegation by Monsignors Gobitas and Schlert. Galko admitted that the
allegation was true. The Diocese laicized Galko and he was eventually dismissed from the
priesthood.

332
 Reverend Edward George Ganster

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1943
YEAR OF DEATH: 2014
ORDINATION: March 27, 1971

Employment/Assignment History
4/13/1971 – 8/19/1975 Assistant Pastor, Notre Dame, Bethlehem, PA
4/13/1971 – 2/4/1972 Associate Professor, Bethlehem Catholic HIGH SCHOOL, PA
7/9/1973 – 10/10/1978 Regional Director, C.Y. O., Bethlehem District
8/19/1975 – 9/9/1976 Assistant, Our Lady of Perpetual Help, Bethlehem, PA
9/9/1976 – 10/10/1978 St. Joseph, Easton, PA
10/10/1978 – 6/15/1981 Assistant, St. Ignatius Loyola, Sinking Spring, PA
10/10/1978 – 6/15/1981 American Catholic Overseas Aid Fund
6/15/1981 – 5/4/1982 Pastor, St. Joseph, Frackville, PA
9/18/1981 – 4/2919/1986 Catholic Daughters of the Americas Court St. James
10/08/1981 – 2/1/1982 Sick Leave
2/1/1982 – 5/4/1982 Returned as Pastor, St. Joseph, Frackville, PA
5/4/1982 – 9/7/1982 Sick Leave
9/7/1982 – 1/18/1983 Assistant, St. Ambrose, Schuylkill Haven, PA
10/01/1982 – 7/25/1983 Catholic Student Advisor, Penn State University Campus
Ministry
1/18/1983 – 4/29/1986 Pastor, SS. Peter and Paul, Tower City, PA
1/13/1984 Member, Diocesan Building Committee
2/10/1984 – 4/29/1986 Member, Budget Board, Cardinal Brennan HIGH SCHOOL
4/29/1986 – 3/3/1988 Holy Ghost, Bethlehem, PA
7/10/1986 – 6/13/1988 Regional Director, Pro-Life, Northampton Deanery, PA
12/27/1987 Sick Leave
8/8/1990 Laicized
7/3/2014 Deceased

333
Summary

In 2002, a victim, then aged thirty-seven, married, and the father of two children,
contacted the Diocese and reported that, when he was 14 years old and an altar boy at St. Joseph
in Frackville, he was fondled and groped by Father Edward George Ganster. On one occasion,
Ganster dragged the boy across a living room floor, pulling him by the underwear. Ganster also
beat the victim repeatedly, once using a metal cross. The abuse at the hands of Ganster lasted
for over one and a half years and all happened in St. Joseph’s Rectory. The victim made a second
report to the Diocese in March 2004. Despite having two reports and having given counseling
to the victim, the Diocese did not report the abuse to the Northampton County District Attorney’s
Office until 2007.

In 2005, the mother of a second victim reported to the Diocese that her now adult son
was sexually abused in 1977 by Ganster, when the second victim was thirteen years of age. The
mother permitted the second victim to accompany Ganster to the beach on an overnight trip.
Sometime after that trip, the second victim told his parents that Ganster hurt him and got in bed
with him. He also stated that something happened in the confessional. The second victim told
his parents not long after the incidents occurred. The mother immediately told Monsignor
Connelly about the abuse. According to the second victim’s mother, Monsignor Connelly said
he would take care of the situation. Connelly told her that Ganster would be given some
counseling and would be removed from the parish. The following Sunday at Mass, Ganster
announced he was being reassigned. Still, the second victim’s life spiraled out of control with
broken relationships and anger issues resulting from the abuse.

In 2015, the mother of a third victim contacted the Diocese and reported that her son was
abused by Ganster in the summer of 1977, when the third victim was twelve years old. No more
information regarding this incident was provided by the Diocese.

Ganster was placed on sick leave at the end of 1987 and sent to St. John Vianney Hospital
in Downingtown in 1988. Ganster was eventually laicized at his request, as he wanted to get
married and was already working in the secular world. The Diocese agreed and laicized him in
1990. As he was in the process of being laicized, Ganster wrote the Diocese indicating he would
be seeking employment at Walt Disney World and hoped to use the Diocese as a reference.
Ganster also indicated he was planning on marrying a woman he met at St. John Vianney.

In a letter to the Bishop of Orlando, Nobert Dorsey, from the Bishop of Allentown,
Thomas Welsh, Welsh informed Dorsey that Ganster intended to marry. Welsh told Dorsey
Ganster met his future bride while at St. John Vianney, adding, “I don’t know her problems. His
were at least partially sexual and led to my decision that I could not reassign him.” Despite
knowing Ganster was a sexual predator, Monsignor Muntone responded to Ganster’s request
for a reference by writing, “I am quite sure that the Diocese will be able to give you a positive
reference in regard to the work you did during your years of service here as a priest.” With the
reference, Ganster was hired by Walt Disney World and worked there for the next eighteen years.

334
 Reverend Francis T. Gillespie

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1931
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 7, 1959

Employment/Assignment History
5/1959 – 5/1963 St. Joseph’s, Girardville, PA
5/1963 – 10/1965 Nativity HS, Pottsville, PA
6/1963 – 9/1963 St. Patrick’s, Pottsville, PA (Asst. Pro Tem)
6/1965 – 3/1969 Notre Dame of Bethlehem, Bethlehem, PA
3/1966 – 5/1972 St. Jane Frances de Chantal, Easton, PA / Moravian College
(student advisor)
5/1972 – 11/1974 Our lady of Mount Carmel, Minersville, PA
11/1974 – 9/1994 St. Joseph’s, Girardville, PA
9/1994 – 11/1996 St. Margaret, Reading, PA
11/1996 – 12/2002 Annunciation of B.V.M., Catasauqua, PA
12/13/2002 Retired

Summary

In September 2002, a victim wrote a letter reporting sexual abuse by Father Francis T.
Gillespie. The victim reported that, while he was an altar boy at about the age of ten at St.
Joseph’s in Girardville, Gillespie began grooming him for future abuse. Gillespie acted overly
affectionately towards the victim and began hugging him in private. The victim wrote that he
had been taught to “respect and trust these religious figureheads.” Gillespie then had the victim
stay after Mass and help count the collection money. The victim’s parents allowed it since they
too trusted the clergy and believed Gillespie would be a good influence on the victim. During
his time with Gillespie, Gillespie would ask the victim questions about lust and sex, and how
much he weighed. The victim remembers Gillespie had a scale in his room and would weigh
the victim. Gillespie would have the victim undress to his underwear and get on the scale. Even
though he was a child at the time, the victim knew this behavior was strange and not right but
thought Gillespie, a clergyman, could not have bad intentions. Gillespie then had the victim
take off his underwear to get an “exact weight.” Gillespie then used a measuring tape to measure
the victim around the waist and inseam. The victim remembers Gillespie putting his fingers and
measuring tape against the victim’s groin. At that point the victim froze and did not know what
to do. He felt he could not say anything since Gillespie was a priest. Later, the victim heard
other altar boys talking about Gillespie and his scale and measuring tape.

The victim reported that he stayed the night at Gillespie’s residence on several occasions.
Gillespie would have the victim dress in costumes and then take pictures of the victim. The
victim would then undress from the costume into his clothes. The victim can still remember the

335
Summary
flash of a Polaroid camera going off as he changed. The victim reported that Gillespie would
drink alcohol during the sleepovers.

The victim recalled an occasion when Gillespie gave him cold medication and in addition
had him drink alcohol. The victim described this night as a “blackout” and “confusing.” The
victim recalls waking up naked in bed with Gillespie, Gillespie had his arm around the victim.
The victim felt Gillespie’s erect penis against his back. The victim recalls freezing at that point.
Gillespie eventually allowed the victim to get out of bed and take a shower. As the victim was
finishing up with his shower, Gillespie walked into the bathroom naked and tried to enter the
shower with the victim. The victim quickly got out of the shower and tried to pretend that the
entire abusive situation was normal. In three separate documents regarding the victim, all
provided by the Diocese, the victim reported that Gillespie performed oral sex on him.

A known second victim, the older brother of the first victim, wrote a letter to the Diocese
in 2003 describing abuse by Gillespie. The second victim wrote that he was an altar boy at St.
Joseph’s in Girardville. When the second victim was about fourteen years old, Gillespie began
grooming him in the same fashion as his brother, befriending him and having him help count
the collection money. The second victim wrote, “My respect and admiration for this man was
very great and I trusted him with my life; a mistake I would pay for the rest of my life.” The
second victim reported that Gillespie would weigh and measure him in a room on the second
floor of the rectory while he was naked. Gillespie also would have the second victim measure
Gillespie while Gillespie was naked. The second victim said Gillespie would touch his genitals
and buttocks during the weighing and measuring.

The second victim described the last time he went to the parish rectory to be measured
and weighed by Gillespie. Gillespie came up behind the second victim while he stood naked on
the scale and placed the second victim in a wrestling hold called a full nelson. While in the full
nelson, the second victim’s arms were pinned back and controlled by Gillespie. The second
victim was smaller than Gillespie and could not fight him off. The second victim reported that
Gillespie then “rubbed his penis off my anus and sexually abused me. This sickened me to my
stomach and never again would I return to St. Joseph’s Rectory.” The second victim was so
ashamed of what had happened he could not tell his mother. Shortly after the incidents occurred
in the 1980s, the second victim wrote a letter to the Diocese describing the abuse by Gillespie.
The victim never received a response.

After reports of abuse in the Boston Diocese in 2002, the second victim told his wife that
Gillespie had abused him. Prior to writing a letter to the Diocese in 2003, the second victim
learned through his mother that Gillespie had abused his brother as well. The second victim
wrote, “It was his courage and bravery in coming forward that gave me the strength to write
this letter.”

336
 Richard J. Guiliani

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1942
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: March 9, 1968

Employment/Assignment History
3/1968 – 5/6198 Assistant, St. Peter, Reading, PA.
5/1968 – 6/1969 Regional Director, Thanksgiving Clothing Drive, Berks Co
6/1969 – 9/1969 Assistant, St. Canicus, Mahanoy City, PA
9/1969 – 6/1970 Assistant, Our Lady of Perpetual Help, Bethlehem, PA
6/1970 – 6/1970 Professor, Notre Dame High School, Easton, PA
6/1970 – 6/1973 Resident, Sacred Heart, Miller Heights, PA
6/1973 – 6/1974 Vice Principal, Notre Dame High School, Easton, PA
6/1974 – 6/1974 Principal, Cardinal Brennan High School, Fount Springs
6/1974 – 6/1974 Resident, St. Vincent de Paul, Girardville, PA.
1977 Absent without leave from the Allentown Diocese
2011 Last known address: St. Augustine, Florida

Summary

In October 2003, a victim wrote to Bishop Edward Cullen stating that she had been
sexually abused by Father Richard Guiliani. The victim was abused from the time she was
fourteen through age eighteen, between the years 1971 and 1975. Guiliani befriended the victim
and her family at a time when the victim was having difficulties with her family. Guiliani began
with hugging and kissing the victim and increased with fondling the victim’s genitals through
her clothing. Guiliani simulated sex with the victim through the victim’s clothing. Guiliani
fondled the victim’s genitals and buttocks and forced the victim to fondle his genitals. Guiliani
made the victim masturbate him and forcibly masturbated and digitally penetrated the victim.
Guiliani simulated anal sex on the victim and forced the victim to perform oral sex on him. The
abuse occurred at the victim’s high school, Norte Dame High School in Easton, at the victim’s
home, at Guiliani’s sister’s home, or in Guiliani’s car. The victim remembers Guiliani was often
drinking heavily when the abuse occurred. The victim recalled Guiliani telling her that he would
protect her, that she could trust him, and that she should keep coming to him for help. Guiliani
told the victim she deserved to be “cared for” and “loved.”

The victim recalled the last time she had contact with Guiliani was when she was a
freshman in college. Guiliani visited the victim and brought her an eighteenth birthday present.
Guiliani wanted to have sex with the victim and asked her to marry him. The victim refused to
have further sexual involvement with Guiliani and declined his marriage proposal. Guiliani
never contacted the victim again.

337
Summary
The victim reported that two other priests at her high school knew about Guiliani’s sexual
abuse of her. The two other priests were Father Leo Houseknecht and Father William Jones,
who were friends of Guiliani. Additionally, Jones would be verbally crude in school towards
the victim and Houseknecht was physically affectionate to the victim, hugging her and rubbing
his erect penis against her while at school or while visiting her at her home.

The victim reported the sexual abuse when she was twenty years old and in college. She
spoke to Father Hubert J. Kealy of the Newman House on the campus of Millersville State
College and told him of the abuse by Guiliani. During this same time, the victim also told Father
Steven Maco, a family friend, about the abuse. Both priests failed to act and were “unresponsive
and in denial” about what the victim told them.

The Diocese did not report the abuse to the Northampton County District Attorney’s
Office until January 2011, over seven years after they were first notified of the abuse.

In May 2004, a second victim came forward to report abuse by Guiliani. The second
victim was sixteen years old and a student at Cardinal Brennan High School in Ashland,
Schuylkill County, where Guiliani was the principal. In December 1976, as the victim was doing
her homework in the gymnasium of Cardinal Brennan, Guiliani approached and asked second
victim to accompany him to Boscov’s Department Store in Pottsville to assist him in buying
Christmas presents for his nieces and nephews. The second victim held Guiliani in a position
of trust and went with him to shop. During the ride back in the car, Guiliani asked the second
victim to get something out of the back seat. When the second victim did so, Guiliani reached
under the second victim’s dress and squeezed and fondled her vagina and buttocks. Guiliani
abused his position of power and trust as a priest and principal to take advantage of the second
victim’s sexual naiveté.

In January 2011, over seven years after learning of the abuse, the Diocese reported the
abuse of the second victim to the Schuylkill County District Attorney’s Office.

Records reflect that Guiliani left the ministry in 1977 and his whereabouts are unknown.
Houseknecht was deceased at the time victim number one reported the abuse and Jones had been
“removed” from ministry.

338 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

-*5*("5*0/
 Reverend Joseph D. Hulko

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1940
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 20, 1967

Employment/Assignment History
6/1/1967 – 8/24/1970 Priest Professor, Reading Central Catholic High School
6/1/1967 – 8/17/1970 Resident, SS Cyril and Methodius, Reading, PA
7/9/1969 Advocate, Diocesan Tribunal
7/6/1970 – 8/17/1970 Newman Center, Bethlehem, PA
8/17/1970 – 8/24/1970 Resident, St. Catharine of Siena, Reading, PA
8/24/1970 – 6/20/1977 Principal, Nativity High School, Pottsville, PA
8/24/1970 – 6/18/1971 Resident, Mary Queen of Peace, Pottsville, PA
6/18/1971 – 10/18/1971 Chaplain, St. Francis Orphanage, Orwigsburg, PA
10/18/1971 – 6/20/1977 Resident, St. John the Baptist, Pottsville, PA
6/20/1977 – 1/6/1978 Assistant, St. John the Baptist, Pottsville, PA
1/6/1978 – 8/16/1982 Pastor, St. Michael, Lansford, PA
6/20/1978 – 10/1/1982 Regional Director, Family Life Center, Berks, Carbon and East
Schuylkill Counties, PA
9/4/1981 – 2/15/1982 Sick Leave
8/16/1982 – 6/20/1985 Sick Leave
6/20/1985 – 6/16/1987 Assistant Pastor, St. Margaret, Reading, PA
11/1/1986 – 11/1/1989 Assistant Pastor Representative, Council of Priests
6/16/1987 – 9/27/1988 Assistant Pastor, St. John Baptist de LaSalle, Shillington, PA
9/27/1988 – 6/14/1990 Assistant Pastor, St. Bernard, Easton, PA
11/1/1989 – 10/31/1992 Pastor Representative, Council of Priests
6/14/1990 – 9/2/1994 Assistant Professor, St. Joseph, Limeport, PA
8/3/1992 Assistant Pastor Representative, Advisory Committee, Priestly
Life and Ministry
11/1/1992 – 10/31/1995 Assistant Pastor Representative, Council of Priests
9/2/1994 – 1/01/1995 Assistant Pastor, Our Lady of Perpetual Help, Bethlehem, PA
1/1/1995 – 6/15/1995 Resident, Holy Family Villa,
6/15/1995 – 6/13/2000 Assistant Pastor, St. Anthony of Padua, Easton, PA
6/13/2000 – 8/31/2003 Assistant Pastor, Notre Dame of Bethlehem, Bethlehem, PA
9/1/2003 Retired

339
Summary

In September 2003, Father Joseph Hulko admitted to the Diocese that he sexually abused
a minor female while he was the Chaplain at St. Francis Orphanage in Orwigsburg, between
June 18, 1971, and October 18, 1971. Hulko expressed that he had been troubled by it for a
number of years, which prompted him to admit the abuse.

Hulko was interviewed in 2012. At the outset of the interview, Hulko volunteered that
he did not engage in oral sex with the victim. Hulko met the victim at the orphanage and had
sexual contact with her. The victim was a teenage resident of the orphanage. Shortly after
starting his assignment at the orphanage, Hulko sat in the television room with female minor
residents. It was night and the girls were dressed in sleeping clothes. Hulko sat next to the
victim, who was wearing “low cut” sleeping clothes so that her breasts were partially exposed.
Hulko, motivated by “curiosity,” touched the victim’s right bare breast. Hulko claimed that this
was his first sexual contact with the victim. Hulko stated he did not know how old the victim
was at the time but believed she was of high school age. Based on the victim’s date of birth, she
was fourteen years old when Hulko touched her breast. Hulko said that he knew what he did
was “wrong” and “I’m a priest and she’s an orphan girl.”

The second time Hulko had sexual contact with the victim was when he kissed her at her
grandmother’s house. Hulko told the investigator that, between the time he touched the victim’s
breast and the time he kissed her, he was never alone with the victim. As the interview
progressed, Hulko revised his story and told the investigator that on multiple occasions he was
alone with the victim and kissed her. Hulko described the kisses as “long passionate kisses” and
described himself as a “sex addict.” When the investigator challenged Hulko’s truthfulness,
Hulko ended the interview. The investigator wrote in his report that he believed “Hulko
deliberately tried to conceal the truth about type and frequency of sexual contact” with the
victim.

A document produced by the Diocese, dated July 2012, was entitled “Personal Safety
Plan, Rev. Joseph D. Hulko (HJA).” In a section entitled “Summary of Problem Behaviors,” the
following was written:

The victim has recently been identified and alleges that there were many
instances of HJA kissing her, touching her genitals, grabbing at her body and
clothes in HJA’s orphanage room, in his car, in the victim’s orphanage room, and
whenever and wherever HJA found time alone with the victim on orphanage
property. The victim reported that there was oral sex between her and HJA in
his room. The victim was 14 or 15 years old at the time of the abuse and the
abuse occurred over approximately a one year period, as much as twice a week.

Prior to Hulko admitting to the sexual abuse of a minor, he was sent for “treatment” six
different times between 1982 and 2003.

In a letter to Hulko’s mother dated August 11, 1982, in which Monsignor Muntone was
carbon copied, a psychologist from Lehigh Valley Associates wrote, “At your request I spoke to

340
Summary
Monsignor Muntone regarding your son’s temporary placement … Monsignor has assured me
that Joe is safe and doing well … Considering the delicacy of the situation, I agree that no one
should know where Joe is at this time.” Hulko was at Trinity Retreat Center, New Rochelle,
New York.

After his stay at Trinity, Hulko was reported to be on “Sick Leave” for three years, until
1985. Over the next two decades, Hulko was given twelve different assignments and sent for
“treatment” an additional five times before his retirement in 2003. Monsignor Gerald E. Gobitas
wrote in a memorandum dated January 15, 2015, to administrative personnel that Hulko had
moved to Robertsville, Missouri, and “please send his pension checks directly to him.”

341
 Monsignor William E. Jones, V. F.

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1934
YEAR OF DEATH: 2004
ORDINATION: May 14, 1960

Employment/Assignment History
5/27/1960 – 3/12/1963 Annunciation B.V.M., Shenandoah, PA
3/12/1963 – 3/26/1968 St. Ambrose, Schuylkill Haven, PA
3/26/1968 – 12/119/69 St. Francis of Assisi, Allentown, PA
12/1/1969 – 8/24/1970 St. Jane Frances, Easton, PA
8/24/1970 – 4/4/1972 Notre Dame High School, Easton, PA
4/4/1972 – 6/20/1972 St. Jane Frances, Easton, PA
Notre Dame High School, Easton, PA
6/20/1972 – 6/11/1973 St. Jane Frances, Easton, PA
6/11/1973 – 6/14/1974 St. Jane Frances de Chantal, Easton, PA
6/14/1974 – 6/17/1975 St. Mary, St. Clair, PA
Nativity B.V.M. High School, Pottsville, PA
6/17/1975 – 7/1/1978 St. Joseph, Summit Hill, PA
7/1/1978 – 11/7/1978 St. Joseph, Summit Hill, PA
11/7/1978 – 3/10/1981 St. Vincent de Paul, Minersville, PA
3/1019/81 – 11/7/1983 Representative, Diocesan Board of Education, West Schuylkill
County, PA
11/7/1983 – 5/24/1984 St. Patrick’s, Pottsville, PA
5/24/1984 – 11/1/1984 South Schuylkill Deanery, Council of Priests, PA
11/1/1984 – 3/13/1985 South Schuylkill Deanery, PA
3/13/1985 – 8/20/1991 Budget Board Nativity B.V.M. High Sch.
8/20/1991 – 11/1/1993 Honorary Prelate of His Holiness, John Paul II
11/1/1993 – 11/26/1996 South Schuylkill Deanery
11/26/1996 – 5/3/1996 Dean of South Schuylkill Deanery (post was held until 11/26/99
in conjunction with the following duties/dates)
503/1996 – 10/29/1997 Diocesan Negotiating Team
10/29/1997 – 4/04/1998 Board of Seton Manor, Inc.
4/4/1998 – 3/25/1999 Nativity B.V.M. High School Budget/Audit Board. (held until
09/2001)
3/25/1999 – 10/1/1999 South Schuylkill Deanery, Diocesan Negotiating Team
10/1/1999 – 2/1/2000 President of the Catholic Housing Corporation, Queen of Peace
Apartments, Pottsville, PA
2/1/2000 – 9/20/2000 Vicar Forane of South Schuylkill Deanery (held until 1/31/03)
9/20/2000 – 4/11/2002 Pastor designated to consult on removal/transfer
4/11/2002 Resigned as pastor of St. Patrick’s, Pottsville, PA

342
 Reverend Michael S. Lawrence

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1947
YEAR OF DEATH: 2015
ORDINATION: May 19, 1973

Employment/Assignment History
6/11/1973 – 6/14/1974 St. Catharine of Siena, Reading, PA
6/14/1974 – 11/14/1974 Notre Dame High School, Easton, PA
Sacred Heart, Miller Heights (resident/assistant)
11/14/1974 – 12/10/1974 Reg. Coordinator of Adult Religious Education,
North Hampton, PA
12/10/1974 – 6/17/1975 St. Jane Frances de Chantal, Easton, PA
6/17/1975 – 12/15/1975 St. Jane Frances de Chantal, Easton, PA
12/15/1975 – 6/20/1977 St. Anne, Bethlehem, PA
6/20/1977 – 6/20/1978 Central Catholic High School, Allentown, PA
St. Lawrence, Catasauqua, PA
6/20/1978 – 8/1/1978 Diocesan Tribunal
8/1/1978 – 3/25/1980 Holy Trinity, Whitehall, PA
3/25/1980 – 11/9/1982 St. Catharine of Siena, Reading, PA
11/9/1982 – 3/23/1984 St. Anthony, Easton, PA
3/23/1984 – 6/18/1984 Notre Dame High School, Easton, PA
St. Anthony, Easton, PA
6/18/1984 – 8/9/1984 St. Joseph, Easton, PA
Notre Dame High School, Easton, PA
8/9/1984 – 1/15/1987 Immaculate Conception, Jim Thorpe, PA
1/15/1987 – 6/22/1987 Sick Leave
6/22/1987 – 3/8/1994 St. Paul, Allentown, PA
Diocesan Tribunal
Ministry to the Aging
3/8/1994 – 6/1/1998 Diocesan Tribunal
6/1/1998 – 1/1/2000 Catholic University of America (Graduate Studies-Canon Law)
Divine Word College
3/1/2002 – 4/22/2015 Retired

343
Biographical Information

Summary

Information in the form of correspondence provided by the Diocese indicates that, on

May 17, 2011, the wife of a known victim called the Diocese to report that her husband had been
sexually abused by priests when he was in elementary and high school. It was reported that
Lawrence abused the victim while he attended Sacred Heart Elementary School in Bethlehem,
Jones abused the victim while he attended Notre Dame High School in Easton, and
abused the victim on an occasion when he visited the Seminary. The caller did not give any
further information about the abuse. Attempts were made by the Diocese to interview the victim.
The victim did not participate in any interviews or give any further information about the abuse.
Information provided by the Diocese shows that they contacted the appropriate District
Attorneys about the reported abuse. No further information was provided.

On April 9, 2002, another known victim reported in writing to the Diocese that he was
abused by Jones beginning when he was approximately fourteen and lasting until he was
approximately sixteen. The abuse began when Jones hired him to work at bingo games at St.
Vincent’s in Minersville, Schuylkill County. The victim’s mother was dying at the time and his
father was rarely around. Jones began the abuse by placing his hand into the money apron of
the victim and touching his penis on several occasions. Jones continued the abusive behavior
on another occasion when the victim was locking up the gym at St. Vincent’s after playing
basketball with other boys. Jones approached the victim, placed his hand inside the victim’s
underwear, and touched his penis for several minutes.

344 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

-*5*("5*0/
Summary
According to the victim, Jones also was physically abuse, once hitting him in the face
with a “full wing” open hand after Jones believed the victim had misbehaved by running on a
recently waxed floor.

When the victim was fifteen, he went to the rectory looking for friends who often hung
out there. He found Jones at the rectory, not his friends. Jones took him upstairs to watch
television in a room next the Jones’ bedroom. Jones took down the victim’s pants, performed
oral sex on the victim and told the victim he had a great body and not to get fat.

Jones then shared the victim and friends of the victim with another sexual predator,
Father Kean. Kean took the victim and five other boys to his home in Tower City, Schuylkill
County. Kean performed oral sex on the victim and several other boys in the bedrooms of his
home. Kean was undressed when he performed oral sex on the victim, who was fifteen at the
time of abuse. Kean performed oral sex on him three times.

The victim further reported that, when he was almost sixteen, Jones took him driving as
practice for his driver’s license test. While the victim was driving, Jones would fondle the
victim’s genitals. The victim reported this happening on several occasion. When the victim was
sixteen, Jones took him into Jones’ bedroom, took off his clothes, and then removed the victim’s
clothes. The victim and Jones were on the bed, where Jones performed oral sex on the victim
and wanted the victim to touch Jones.

Two days after the victim reported the abuse, the Diocese confronted Jones about the
allegation. In a memorandum-to-file marked confidential, Monsignor John McCann wrote that
he and Monsignor Alfred Schlert confronted Jones with the allegation of sexual abuse. Jones
admitted to one specific instance of abuse in which he performed oral sex on the victim while
the victim was fifteen. Jones denied all other allegations but offered his resignation and was
advised he could not exercise any public ministry in the Diocese or elsewhere. A letter was
prepared by Bishop Edward Cullen to be read to the parish of Jones’ assignment at the time, St.
Patrick’s in Pottsville. The letter, which was eventually read to the parish, indicated that a
“credible allegation of sexual misconduct” was made against Jones and that Jones was
confronted with the allegation. The letter mentioned nothing about Jones actually admitting to
the sexual abuse of a minor. According to information provided, then-District Attorney Frank
Cori declined prosecution, citing the statute of limitations. The Diocese offered the victim
counseling.

On May 10, 2002, a second known victim came forward and advised Monsignor
McCann in person that he too was sexually abused by Jones. The abuse occurred when the
victim was thirteen years old and attending St. Francis in Allentown. The victim reported that
the abuse was a single incident, about which he told his mother. The mother advised the victim
to stay away from Jones and reported it no further. The victim told McCann he had not allowed
this incident to ruin his life and declined counseling offered by McCann. No further information
was provided as to the allegation brought by the second victim.

345
Summary
On June 19, 2002, a third victim came forward to report Jones’ predatory behavior to the
Diocese. The third victim reported in writing to Bishop Cullen that, when he was fourteen years
old, Jones took a “special interest” in him while he was attending St. Jane Francis in Easton.
Jones encouraged him to take trips to the seminary in Philadelphia and would take the victim to
dinner during the week, at one point serving him alcohol. Eventually Jones made it clear to the
third victim that he wanted their relationship to become physical, telling the victim, “Don’t knock
it until you tried it.” On another occasion when Jones made a sexual advance on the victim and
the victim resisted, Jones became very agitated and in a threatening tone told the victim it would
“not be prudent” to tell anyone about their conversations. The victim reported a final incident
that occurred in 1972, when Jones asked him to “house sit” the rectory. While at the rectory,
Jones “very directly” made his intentions clear for more “intimacy.” Again the victim resisted.
Jones’ attitude towards him and his family became one of “rarely speaking to my parents or me”
during the rest of his time at St. Jane Francis. The third victim ended his letter by pleading with
the Bishop to “please protect people from this charming and articulate but very dangerous and
damaged man.” Cullen told the victim in a responsive letter that the information he provided
would be shared with the District Attorney’s Office.

Jones was never laicized and remained a priest until his death in 2004. According to an
article in the Pottsville Republican & Herald, at a memorial Mass held for Jones, Reverend
Joseph T. Whalen delivered an emotional homily about Jones’ life, describing Jones as a “jolly”
man who “never neglected his priestly and Christian duties.” Whalen told the paper that
delivering the homily was very difficult since he had a close friendship with Jones. Even though
Jones had confessed to the Diocese two years prior to his death that he sexually abused a boy,
Whalen publicly proclaimed at the Mass that it was Jones who “suffered greatly his last years
because of scandal” and “he suffered for more than a year at the hands of scandal.” Records
provided by the Diocese, including memos, e-mails, and other correspondence between the
victim and Diocesan representatives, show that the first victim and his family truly suffered as
they battled with the Diocese for the next eight years to receive paid counseling as they
attempted to put their lives back together.

Suspicions of Lawrence’s pedophilic behavior were brought the attention of the church
as early as 1970, when Lawrence was attending St. Charles Borromeo Seminary. Lawrence’s
conduct is discussed at length in the body of this Report.

346 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

-*5*("5*0/
 Reverend Joseph H. Kean

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1937
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: March 7, 1964

Employment/Assignment History
3/1964 – 8/1964 St. Joseph, Ashland, PA
8/1964 – 6/1965 St. Mary, St. Clair, PA
6/1965 – 11/1967 St. Paul, Allentown, PA
1/1967 – 8/1970 St. Paul, Reading, PA
8/1970 – 2/1971 Annunciation, Shenandoah, PA
2/1971 – 12/1973 Marian HS, Tamaqua, PA
2/1971 – 12/1973 Our Lady of Mt. Carmel, Nesquehoning, PA
6/1973 – 6/1975 St.s Simon and Jude, Bethlehem, PA
6/1975 – 1/1977 St. Jane, Easton, PA
1/1977 – 1/1983 SS Peter and Paul, Tower City, PA
1/1983 – 9/1987 SS Peter and Paul, Lehighton, PA
9/1987 – 3/1993 St. Joseph, Ashland, PA
2/1/2002 Retired
6/26/2007 Dismissed from Priesthood

Summary

On December 22, 1992, Reverend Francis J. Shuster wrote a letter to Bishop Thomas J.
Welsh. Shuster related that he had been in contact with a parishioner who told him that her son
was molested by Father Joseph H. Kean, then Pastor in Tower City. The sexual abuse was
reported to have occurred when the victim was twelve years old and continued for several years.
The mother of the victim told Shuster that her son had stayed the night with Kean in the rectory
and had also spent a weekend with Kean once Kean was transferred to Lehighton. The mother
of the victim also recalled Kean taking her son to Kean’s parents’ home to spend the night. The
mother of the victim told Shuster she and her husband allowed these overnight stays to occur
because they had “absolute trust and confidence in Father.”

On January 13, 1993, the mother of the victim personally informed the Chancellor of the
sexual abuse of her son by Kean. The mother also reported that Kean had sexually abused a
friend of her son’s.

On February 23, 1993, Welsh and Monsignor Anthony Muntone met with Kean and
informed him of the accusation brought by the victim. Kean admitted to Welsh and Muntone
that he had abused the victim and “apologized for any embarrassment he may have caused.”
Welsh asked Kean if he “had similar difficulties with other persons.” Kean told Welsh and

347
Summary
Muntone that there was another individual, a friend of the reporting victim that he abused around
the same time. Kean indicated that if Welsh wished, he could apply for laicization. Welsh
informed Kean he would have to go to the treatment center run by the Servants of the Paraclete
in New Mexico. Kean asked if he would be returning to his current assignment at St. Joseph’s
in Ashland, Schuylkill. Bishop Welsh informed Kean that he would not be returning to St.
Joseph.

After reviewing information obtained from the Diocese by subpoena, the Grand Jury
learned that additional victims of sexual abuse perpetrated by Kean existed and were identified
within the secret or confidential archives of the Diocese.

A second victim of abuse by Kean came forward in 1999. The second victim wrote a
letter to Kean shortly after meeting with Kean on April 30, 1999. In the letter, the second victim
thanked Kean for Kean’s admission of fault for sexually abusing him many years prior. He also
enclosed another letter he had written two years earlier to Kean while in therapy but did not
send. In the enclosed letter, the second victim wrote that he “decided to deal with the
feelings/emotions I’ve repressed for many years regarding the sexual abuse I experienced with
you” and “You took advantage of my innocence. You were so manipulative. If only I would
have known, but I was only a child.” He added, “You have many fine qualities, but many do
not know your dark side. The person who took advantage of a young boy for his own sexual
gratification.” The second victim went on to say how dealing with the abuse at such a vulnerable
age has had a significant negative impact on his life.

On April 5, 2018, the second victim contacted the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney
General by telephone and provided more detail on his encounter with Kean. As a minor boy in
the 1970’s, he attended SS Peter and Paul Church in Tower City. He was in his early teens and
an altar boy when he developed a close relationship with Kean. He noted Father Kean liked to
wrestle with the altar boys often. The second victim remembered going to the movies, hanging
out and playing at Kean’s parents’ house. On one occasion, he stayed the night at Kean’s
parents’ house. Kean had the boy sleep in the same bed, which was located in the basement. The
boy lay on his side while Kean gave him a massage. Kean started with the second victim’s back
and moved downward towards the genitals. Kean massaged his penis overtop his
underwear. The second victim developed an erection and ejaculated, then left the room and
cleaned up. He returned to sleep the rest of the night. Kean did not say anything to the child
regarding what happened. In 1999, the victim contacted the Diocesan hotline for Clergy
Abuse. He also confronted Kean about the abuse. At this time in 1999, Kean was on leave from
ministry.

In April 2002, a third victim reported being abused by Kean. The third victim reported
that another priest, Monsignor William Jones, introduced and shared the victim and additional
friends of the victim with Kean. The third victim reported that Kean took him and five other
boys to his home in Tower City. Kean performed oral sex on the third victim and several other
boys in the bedrooms of his home. The third victim reported that Kean was undressed when he
performed oral sex on him. The third victim reported he was fifteen years old at the time of the
abuse and that Kean performed oral sex on him three times.

348
Summary

In February 2002, Kean retired from the priesthood and began to collect his pension,
health insurance, life insurance, and car insurance benefits.

In July 2005, the mother of a fourth victim called the Diocese to report that her son was
sexually abused by Kean. It was reported that the abuse happened when her son was between
the ages of ten and fifteen years old and an altar boy in Tower City. The fourth victim’s mother
stated the Kean clearly favored her son and that it was not unusual for Kean to take her son to
Kean’s parents’ home. The fourth victim’s parents had known about the abuse since their son
was in his late teens but never came forward to tell anyone.

In October 2005, the parents of a fifth victim reported to Monsignor Gobitas that their
son had been sexually abused by Kean. After meeting with the parents of the fifth victim,
Gobitas composed a one-page memorandum-to-file concerning the abuse. The fifth victim was
reported by his parents to be addicted to heroin and suicidal. Kean abused the fifth victim in
1987 and 1988, while the fifth victim has in eight and ninth grades. The abuse occurred in St.
Joseph’s Rectory in Ashland and at Kean’s parent’s home. Gobitas wrote “the activity” ended
when the fifth victim went into tenth grade. In a “Morality Incident Report,” Gobitas reported
that Kean would engage in immature behavior with the fifth victim such as “wrestling, chasing
each other, tying each other up with rope, etc. In the midst of this behavior there were sexual
assaults.” Gobitas wrote that the fifth victim was unable to discuss many of the details at the
time of reporting.

349
 Reverend Thomas J. Kerestus

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1942
YEAR OF DEATH: 2014
ORDINATION: May 24, 1969

Employment/Assignment History
6/11/1969 – 10/27/1969 Assistant, Annunciation B.V.M., Shenandoah, PA
10/27/1969 – 1/6/1970 Regional Director, C.Y.O., Mid-Schuylkill County
1/6/1970 – 8/24/1970 Area Chaplain, Appalachian Trail Scouting Council
Regional Director, Bishop’s Overseas Aid, East Schuylkill
County, PA
8/24/1970 – 6/18/1970 Assistant, St. Peter, Reading, PA
6/18/1970 – 7/8/1971 Assistant, Our Lady of Hungary, Northampton, PA
7/8/1971 – 11/4/1974 Regional Director, C.Y.O., Northampton County, PA
11/4/1974 – 9/9/1976 Assistant, Sacred Heart, W. Reading, PA
9/9/1976 – 12/15/1977 Assistant, St. Ambrose, Schuylkill Haven, PA
Regional Director, C.Y.O. West Schuylkill County, PA
12/15/1977 – 2/25/1982 Pastor, St. Stephen of Hungary, Allentown, PA
2/25/1982 – 5/29/1986 Pastor, St. John Capistrano, Bethlehem, PA
5/29/1986 – 6/19/1986 Leave of Absence
6/19/1986 – 6/14/1990 Assistant Pastor, Sacred Heart, Allentown, PA
6/14/1990 – 7/27/1993 Chaplain, Sacred Heart Hospital, Allentown, PA
7/27/1993 – 3/1/2002 Resident, Holy Family Villa
3/1/2002 – 9/17/2014 Retired

Summary

Records of the Diocese of Allentown revealed that parishioners of St. John Capistrano
in Bethlehem wrote multiple letters to Bishop Welsh between March 1985 and April 1986
informing him of their concern about Father Thomas Kerestus’ relationship with a 16-year-old
boy. The parishioners were aware that Kerestus would take the boy to and from school daily,
had taken the boy on vacations to Canada, Florida, and the New Jersey shore. Kerestus also
bought the boy new clothes, a videocassette recorder, an organ, a guitar, and music lessons, and
paid for the boy’s dental bills. Additionally, Kerestus bought new furniture for the boy’s family.
Parishioners purchased a vehicle for the church, which was taken control of by Kerestus,
registered in his name, and essentially given to the boy to drive. Several parishioners reported
that the boy spent nights at the rectory with Kerestus despite living only two blocks away. One
parishioner wrote that Kerestus has become “very deeply involved emotionally” with the boy
and Kerestus and the boy were “inseparable.” The same parishioner wrote that Kerestus’
behavior around the boy was “inappropriate—very childish, wrestling, indecent touching.”

350
Summary
Another parishioner wrote that Kerestus drank heavily and “I think he gets drunk because he is
hiding a problem.” A different parishioner called the parish office and reported, “I see him
[Kerestus] go after that kids balls. Forgive my language. This happened last year when we
were in church decorating and cleaning up.” Kerestus later admitted to the indecent touching
of the boy while at Jemez Springs Center in New Mexico.

The Diocese also produced very limited documents on another victim of Kerestus. In
October 1992, the second victim called St. Ann’s Rectory in Emmaus, Lehigh County, asking to
speak with Monsignor Hoban, but spoke with Father Brennan. Father Coyle wrote a
memorandum to Bishop Welsh summarizing the phone call to Brennan. The second victim
reported that he had been sexually abused by Kerestus for five years. He was eighteen at the
time of the report. Kerestus was a friend of the second victim’s family. In the memorandum
summarizing the phone call, Coyle wrote that the victim “spoke in detail about the relationship”
and that the victim “sounded disturbed.” During the phone call, the victim mentioned he had
witnesses to the abuse. The victim was a given a phone number and advised to call Monsignor
Muntone. The memorandum provided no further details. The Diocese provided a news article
from the Allentown Morning Call detailing the arrest and troubled past of the second victim.
The second victim attempted to kill his parents in a house fire and threatened to shoot himself
in 1990, threatened to jump off his roof in 1992, and was arrested for statutory rape of a thirteen-
year-old girl, also in 1992. Diocesan records show that Kerestus began receiving his retirement
in March 2002.

The Diocese also provided a one page memorandum, dated June 16, 2005, from Thomas
Dugan, Administrator of St. John Vianney Center, to Gobitas. In the memorandum, Dugan
wrote, “Based on the results of a risk assessment, Father Thomas Kerestus’ degree of risk for
sexual re-offense was estimated in the moderate-high range.” Dugan added:

He was defensive on testing and does not take full accountability for his offense
behaviors. He shows little contrition for his actions. Test results suggest he has
attributes and behaviors very highly similar to those of known sex offenders and
the condition of sexual deviance may be a component of his personality make-
up.

Kerestus remained on retirement status until his death in 2014.

In April 2016, a third victim came forward to report sexual abuse by Kerestus. The third
victim reported that Kerestus abused him beginning when he was fifteen years old. The abuse
occurred from 1975 to 1980, while the victim was a student at Holy Name High School in West
Reading.

351
 Reverend Francis Joseph McNelis

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1938
YEAR OF DEATH: 2005
ORDINATION: May 22, 1965

Employment/Assignment History
6/1/1965 – 6/1/1966 Annunciation B.V.M., Shenandoah, PA
6/1/1966 – 11/1/1966 St. Joseph, Girardville, PA
11/1/1966 – 8/4/1967 Regional Director, C.Y.O., East Schuylkill County, PA
8/4/1967 – 6/11/1969 Regional Director, Thanksgiving Clothing Drive, East Schuylkill
County, PA
6/11/1969 – 6/3/1970 St. Jerome, Tamaqua, PA
6/3/1970 – 6/9/1970 St. Theresa, Hellertown, PA
6/9/1970 – 9/25/1970 Regional Director, C.Y.O., Northampton County, PA
9/25/1970 – 4/4/1972 St. John the Baptist, Shillington, PA
4/4/1972 – 9/19/1972 St. Francis, Easton, PA
9/19/1972 – 8/30/1974 Regional Director, Thanksgiving Clothing Drive, Northampton
County, PA
8/30/1974 – 6/17/1975 St. Ann, Emmaus, PA
6/17/1975 – 6/16/1980 St. Mary, and St. Boniface, St. Clair, Schuylkill County, PA
6/16/1980 – 6/20/1985 St. Mary, St. Clair, Schuylkill County, PA
6/20/1985 – 6/4/1993 St. Mary, Hamburg, PA
6/4/1993 – 1/14/1994 Sick Leave (Jemez Springs, New Mexico)
1/14/1994 – 3/1/2002 St. Ignatius, Loyola, Sinking Spring, PA
3/1/2002 Retired

Summary

In December 1992, a known victim reported that, between 1966 and 1968, Father Francis
McNelis sexually abused him when he was between the ages of 10 and 13. McNelis masturbated
the victim after having him lay on his back on McNelis’ bed in the rectory. McNelis eventually
forced the victim to masturbate McNelis. McNelis also told the victim he wanted to have anal
sex with him. According to the victim, McNelis masturbated him on five or six occasions but
anal sex did not occur. Records provided by the Diocese show McNelis was sent to Jemez
Springs for “spiritual and professional care.” After his stay at Jemez Springs, the Diocese
assigned McNelis to St. Ignatius Loyola as an Associate Pastor. On McNelis’ assignment listing,
which was provided by the Diocese, and next to his St. Ignatius assignment in parenthesis is a
notation, “Not for Publication.” Despite repeated requests by McNelis to be reassigned, McNelis
remained at St. Ignatius until he retired in 2002.

352
Summary
In 2004, a second victim came forward and reported sexual abuse by McNelis. After
several years of grooming by McNelis, in 1968, when the second victim was approximately 16,
McNelis forced the second victim to submit to McNelis performing fellatio on him. Soon after
this incident, a second incident of abuse occurred in the rectory of St. Joseph, where again
McNelis forcibly performed oral sex on the second victim.

353
 Reverend Gabriel Patil

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: Unknown
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: 1972

Employment/Assignment History
6/3/1974 Permission to exercise mission within Diocese
Other assignments noted in Summary

Summary

Father Gabriel Patil, a priest of the Clerics Regular of St. Paul, known as the Barnabites,
was given permission by Bishop Joseph McShea on June 3, 1974, to exercise his ministry within
the Diocese of Allentown. The Diocese provided no other assignment history.

Correspondence between the Diocese and the Barnabites shows that, in 2003, a victim
reported to the Diocese that he and four of his friends were abused by Patil. The abuse occurred
on the property of the Bethlehem Catholic High School during the late 1970’s and early 1980’s,
when the victims were seven to nine years old. The victim reported that he and the four other
known victims were living near the high school at the time. Patil would invite the boys into his
residence at the high school and play hide and seek with the boys. While playing hide and seek
Patil would have the boys sit on his lap. Patil would open the boys’ pants and fondle their
genitals. One of the victims also reported that Patil had the victim undress in his presence. Patil
leered at the victim as the victim tried on new clothes Patil had bought for the victim. Lawsuits
were filed but ultimately dismissed since the statutory limits had expired.

At the time the abuse was reported and lawsuits filed, Patil was a Provincial Superior at
St. James in Ontario, Canada. Patil met with Bishop Cullen. Patil also inquired about insurance
coverage from the Diocese against potential claims for damages in connection with the reported
abuse. The Diocese provided no insurance coverage, informing Patil that coverage is only
provided to priests who are incardinated in the Diocese and, “as you know, the priests of the
Barnabite Fathers are not incardinated in the Diocese of Allentown.”

Four months after receiving the report of abuse, the Diocese forwarded the information
to the Northampton County District Attorney’s Office on March 5, 2004. In the letter to the
District Attorney’s Office, the attorney for the Diocese wrote

It is important for you to note the following. Father Patil is not a priest of the
Diocese of Allentown. Father Patil is a member of the Barnabite Fathers
religious order, not under the supervision of the Diocese of Allentown.

354
Summary

Patil went on to serve as a priest in Buffalo, New York, Youngstown, Ohio, and then with
a delegation in the country of India. In 2010, Patil requested that he be allowed to return to the
Diocese and exercise his public ministry. The Diocese did not permit Patil to return.

In 2012, the Barnabite Fathers asked the Review Board of the Diocese to accept Patil’s
case for review for suitability for ministry. The Diocese denied reviewing Patil’s case and
informed the Barnabite Fathers they should establish their own review board. No further
information was provided by the Diocese on Patil or his whereabouts. Any disciplinary action
was left to the discretion of Patil’s religious order.

355
 Reverend Henry Paul

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: Unknown
YEAR OF DEATH: 1982
ORDINATION: 1941

Employment/Assignment History
To the extent they are known, assignments are noted in the Summary.

Summary

Father Henry Paul was ordained in 1941 as a religious priest from an Order known as
the Oblates of St. Francis de Sales. He worked in various positions in the Pennsylvania Dioceses
of Erie, Philadelphia, and Allentown, the New York Dioceses of Buffalo and New York City,
and Salesianum School in Wilmington, Delaware.

In April 1979, a known individual wrote a letter to Bishop McShea of the Diocese of
Allentown stating that her niece and “a few other little girls” from the parish of the Sacred Heart
Church, New Philadelphia, Schuylkill County, had been “bothered” by Paul. The individual
reported that Paul took the little girls to the rectory and kissed them. One girl went home and
told her mother that she knew how to “French kiss.” When the mother asked how the little girl
knew that, the little girl responded that Father Paul had showed her. The individual reported
that Paul had her niece and another little girl in the rectory one day and her niece ran home
terrified. Her niece’s mother and some of the other mothers wanted to keep the incidents quiet.
The individual wrote, “I think to keep it quiet is wrong. If this continues some innocent people
are going to be hurt. And it will be too late then.” The individual went on to describe that,
during Easter preparation, Paul would have the children sit on his lap for confession and then
give him a kiss.

In a handwritten letter to Bishop McShea from “Tony” (apparently Monsignor Anthony

Muntone), Tony reported that he confronted Paul with the accusations. Paul admitted that he
had a deep love for children and that he did kiss younger children but that it was done in an
appropriate way. Paul denied any inappropriate conduct. Tony wrote that he had a very strong
feeling that Paul was not telling the truth. As a result of not believing Paul, Tony dug further
and asked an individual named Bob Fagan what he knew about the matter. Fagan’s role in the
Diocese is not known. Fagan spoke to fifteen to twenty children in the parish about Paul. He
reported that three or four of the children told Fagan that they had kissed Paul and, while they
did not use the term, they described a French kiss. None of the children with whom Fagan spoke
was over the age of twelve.

Fagan then spoke to Paul about what he had learned and Paul became “panic stricken.”
Paul began to pack his belongings in preparation to leave the parish. Fagan then promised not

356
Summary
to report Paul since the situation “seemed under control.” Fagan apparently did speak and report
the issue to Paul’s Oblate Superior, Dennis Murphy.

Fagan heard nothing about the matter for approximately two months, when another
parishioner called to report another incident. The parishioner stated that her daughter was told
by Paul to go home and take her underwear off and then return to him at the chapel. It was at
this point that Fagan and “Tony” recommended to McShea that Paul be removed from the parish.

In documents received by the Allentown Diocese, it is shown that Paul was relieved of
his responsibilities at Sacred Heart Church in April 1979. He was believed to have returned to
his religious order and continued in ministry.

On August 5, 2011, the Wilmington News Journal reported that the Oblates of St. Francis
de Sales had settled some 39 lawsuits filed by the victims of sexual abuse for $24.8 million. As
part of the settlement, the Oblates named twelve priests said to have committed the abuse,
including Paul. According to information released by the Oblates, after leaving Sacred Heart,
Paul was assigned to St. Joachim in Philadelphia. He died in 1982.

357
 Reverend Paul G. Puza

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1949
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 31, 1975

Employment/Assignment History
6/1975 – 6/1976 St. Bernard, Easton, PA
6/1975 – 6/1976 Lafayette college, Easton, PA
6/1976 – 6/1977 Northampton County Regional Director of Vocations
6/1976 – 6/1977 St. Anne, Bethlehem, PA
6/1977 – 6/1978 Central Catholic High School, Reading, PA
6/1977 – 6/1978 St. Joseph, Reading, PA
6/1978 – 6/1981 St. Casimir, Shenandoah, PA
6/1978 – 6/1981 Catholic Scouting, Schuylkill County, PA
6/1981 – 11/1981 St. Anthony, Easton, PA
11/1985 – 8/1983 St. Stanislaus Kostka, Minersville, PA
8/1983 – 6/1989 St. Anthony of Padua, Cumbola
8/1983 – 6/1989 Nativity B.V.M. High School, Pottsville, PA
6/1989 – 2/2002 St. Richard, Barnesville, PA
6/1989 – 3/2002 Marian High School, Tamaqua, PA
2002 Resignedand ordered to refrain from public ministry
6/2010 Dismissed from Priesthood

Summary

On September 9, 1991, a former seminarian from the Diocese met with Bishop Welsh
and advised that he was molested three times, involving oral sex by Father Paul Puza when the
seminarian was in the eighth grade. On September 13, 1991, a Chancery official met with Puza,
who admitted to one sexual encounter, not three. Puza also maintained his victim was a senior
in high school, not in eighth grade.

On September 19, 1991, a Chancery official spoke with Puza’s therapist, who stated that
Puza admitted to “quite a bit of male and female involvement, but insisted that the seminarian
was the only minor.”

On February 12, 1995, an 18-year-old high school student reported sexual contact by
Puza to Welsh. On February 4, 2002, Puza admitted to sexual misconduct with a minor. On
February 7, 2002, Puza resigned as Pastor of St. Richard of Chichester. On February 8, 2002,
Puza’s resignation was accepted by Bishop Cullen effective immediately. Cullen also asked

358
Summary

Puza to meet with the Secretary for Clergy to discuss his needs. The Diocese and Cullen made
sure the needs of Puza were met until his dismissal from the priesthood in 2010.

359
 Reverend Dennis A. Rigney

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1940
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 21, 1966

Employment/Assignment History
5/21/1966-6/01/1966 Ordained in Cathedral of St. Cathedral of Siena, Allentown, PA.
by Bishop McShea
6/1/1966 – 6/1/1966 St. Peter, Reading, PA
6/1/1966 – 3/27/1969 Secretary Tribunal, Diocese of Allentown
3/27/1969 – 7/9/1969 Spanish Apostolate
7/9/1969 – 7/9/1969 Diocesan Tribunal
7/9/1969 – 11/1/1969 Regional Director, Spanish Apostolate, Berks County, PA
11/1/1969 – 1/1/1970 Council of Priests-Diocesan Consultors
1/1/1970 – 10/12/1971 Executive Dire. And Moderator, Social Action Bureau
10/12/1971 – 6/14/1974 Council of Priests-Diocesan Consultors
6/14/1974 – 6/14/1974 Executive Secretary and Coordinator Council of Social Services
6/14/1974 – 6/14/1974 Director, Family Life Bureau
6/14/1974 – 6/14/1974 Director, Catholic Charities & Catholic Social Agency
6/14/1974 – 6/14/1974 St. Peter, Reading, PA
6/14/1974 – 8/19/1975 Pastoral Council, Diocese of Allentown
8/19/1975 – 9/26/1975 Our Lady Help of Christians, Allentown, PA
9/26/1975 – 11/1/1975 Director of Marriage Encounter, Allentown, PA
11/1/1975 – 8/1/1977 Council of Priests-Diocesan Consultors
8/1/1977 – 11/1/1978 St. Paul, Allentown, PA
11/1/1978 – 6/1/1981 Council of Priests-Diocesan Consultors
6/1/1981 – 11/1/1981 Diocesan Consultor
11/1/1981 – 1/26/1982 Council of Priests
1/26/1982 – 9/26/1983 St. Vincent de Paul Society
9/26/1983 – 9/26/1983 Holy Family Manor, Bethlehem, PA
9/26/1983 – 11/15/1983 Holy Family Villa, Bethlehem, PA
11/15/1983 – 11/15/1983 Diocesan director, Holy Family Health Care Agency,
Schuylkill County, PA
11/15/1983 – 1/1/1984 Diocesan Director; Project H.E.A.D.
1/1/1984 – 12/31/1985 PCC Administrative Board
6/16/1987 – 6/16/1987 St. Francis of Assisi, Allentown, PA
6/16/1987 – 6/8/1995 Bethlehem Priest Director, Holy Family Manor,
(President and CEO)
6/8/1995 – 10/29/1997 Board of Directors Catholic Social Agency
10/29/1997 – 12/3/2000 Board of Seton Manor, Inc.
12/3/2000 – 5/1/2002 Board of Covenant Home Care, Inc.

360
Summary

On August 9, 1989, a former employee of Holy Family Manor wrote a letter to Bishop
Welsh with a complaint against Rigney, who had pressured the employee to resign her positon
as a nurse’s aide. The employee continued by asserting that she refused to resign and was
subsequently fired. The employee stated, “Monsignor Rigney regards himself as a ladies man
and he’s crazy about women,” and “if you don’t give him certain rights . . . i.e . . . to hug, grab,
or kiss, he gets ‘even’ with you.” The employee said he got “even” with her because she wanted
no part of his physical advances. The Diocese later learned that this was not Rigney’s first
incident and that the abusive conduct began much earlier.

On April 6, 1987, Father Thomas Kuhn of the Archdiocese of Cincinnati wrote a letter
to Archbishop Daniel E. Pilarczyk of Cincinnati regarding a parishioner claiming she was
“fondled in the area of the vagina “when she was about 12 or 13” by Rigney. Kuhn’s letter was
forwarded to the Allentown Diocese.

On April 4, 1988, Rigney wrote a 23 page document to Welsh after allegations were
made that Rigney “digitally stroked a female minor’s vagina.” The letter denied any
inappropriate touching or actions and painted both the victim and her family as highly
dysfunctional and not credible, trying to convince the bishop of the same. Rigney’s letter was
in response to a letter sent to the Allentown Diocese from a relative of the victim.

On April 9, 2002, a woman telephoned the Chancery stating she had been touched
inappropriately by a priest when she was about age nine or 10. The touching occurred over a
one-year period in 1966 1967. Fifteen to twenty years later, the victim’s sister told her that she
too was touched by the same priest. The victim identified the offending priest as Rigney. The
victim stated that she and her sister attended St. Peter’s School in Reading and were members
of St. Peter’s Church, where Rigney was stationed. The victim stated Rigney had a house “at the
river,” where he took them water skiing at the “beach on the river.” According to the victim,
Rigney digitally stroked her vagina and caressed the rest of her body, kissed her on the lips, and
“petted” her on various parts of her body, including her breasts, buttocks, shoulder, neck, back,
legs, stomach, and vagina.

On April 18, 2002, Rigney requested early retirement citing medical reasons. On April
29, 2002, Rigney was granted early retirement by the Diocese, for medical reasons. On July
31, 2003, Monsignor Schlert, the Vicar General, sent a letter to Monsignor Gobitas indicating
that Rigney was apprehensive about attending a “special retreat” he was encouraged to attend
by the Diocese, because “he retired without Scandal, if he goes to the retreat with the other
‘known’ offenders, it will implicate him.”

361
 Reverend Joseph A. Rock

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1941
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: February 5, 1972

Employment/Assignment History
2/1972 – 9/1972 Sacred Heart of Jesus, Allentown, PA
5/1972 – 5/1975 Catholic Scouting, Allentown Area
6/1972 – 2/1975 Catholic Youth Organization, Lehigh County, PA
9/1972 – 2/1975 St. Catherine of Siena, Allentown, PA
2/1975 – 9/1976 St. Ignatius Loyola, Reading, PA
3/1975 – 9/1976 Scouts, Hawk Mountain, Berks County, PA
6/1975 – 9/1976 Catholic Youth Organization, Berks County, PA
9/1976 – 8/1977 St.s Simon and Jude, Bethlehem, PA
9/1976 – 4/1982 Scouts, Minsi Trails Council, Lehigh County, PA
9/1976 – 6/1982 Catholic Youth Organization, Bethlehem, PA
8/1977 – 3/1982 Our Lady Help of Christians, Allentown, PA
3/1982 – 2/1986 St. Francis de Sales, Mount Carbon, PA
6/1983 – 2/1986 Catholic Scouting, Diocese of Allentown
9/1983 – 9/1986 Social Action Bureau Advisory Board, West Schuylkill County
6/1985 – 2/1986 Youth Ministry
2/1986 – 9/1986 Sick Leave
9/1986 – 10/2001 Holy Family Manor
10/1999 – 10/2001 Retired
5/2005 Dismissed from Priesthood

Summary

In 1986, two reports were made to the Diocese of Allentown indicating sexual contact
with three boys by Father Joseph Rock. One incident occurred in 1983 when the victim was
nine years old. The victim stated that Rock touched him by fondling and masturbation. In
addition, two brothers came forward claiming that, in the early 1980’s while they were still
minors, Rock sexually touched them through their clothes.

In February 1986, Rock was placed on “sick leave” and sent to Servants of the Paraclete
in Jemez Springs, New Mexico. On February 3, 1986, according to Diocesan records, the
Chancery was offered a “bleak picture” for Rock’s prognosis by staff at Servants of the
Paraclete. On February 9, 1986, the Chancery was advised by treatment staff, “He . . . is no
longer capable of functioning in a responsible work situation, and his life is unmanageable.”
On June 12, 1986, the Chancery was advised by a staff member at the Servants of the Paraclete
that Rock was “one of the worst cases he ever encountered.” On October 20, 1987, Bishop

362
Summary
Welsh limited Rock’s faculties for priestly ministry to a nursing home and the priest’s retirement
facility.

On December 29, 1989, Rock’s civil attorney asked the Diocese for a retainer fee, which
the Diocese paid. On August 6, 1991, there was a meeting held with Rock at the Chancery to
“discuss the matters.” On January 21, 1992, another meeting was held at the Chancery to inform
Rock of the second allegations made against him. Rock admitted to “roughhousing” with the
boys and, in the process, feeling their genitals.

On March 25, 2000, the Diocese received a letter written from another victim who
complained that Rock was always “grabbing kids from behind,” including the victim. The victim
continued by stating, “I recall he was always pulling me closer, always odd, I recall him pushing
himself into my body…” The victim was an adult at the time of reporting but in fourth or fifth
grade at the time of the assaults. He said that Rock would begin “touching him” and his penis
but always “through his pants,” and that Rock told him that he “shouldn’t tell anyone that it was
a blessing and that if [he] told [he] would go to hell.” The victim was in Rock’s company about
three times a week and that this touching would go on almost every time. The victim claimed
it went on in front of parishioners and even once in front of his parents, explaining that a priest’s
vestments are long and flowing and that Rock had his hands beneath the material of his sleeves
so that they could not be seen by his parents. By the time the victim was twelve or thirteen,
Rock’s touching went so far as Rock putting his hand down the victim’s pants and directly on
the victim’s penis.

On June 2, 2000, the final release of the civil lawsuit against the Diocese was received
and the Diocese agreed to pay $305,000. The Diocese secured a release from the victim in
exchange.

On November 9, 2001, Rock offered a letter of retirement as Chaplain of the nursing

home. The resignation was triggered by an investigation by the Pennsylvania Department of
Public Welfare, which received complaints that Rock had sexually abused two elderly male
patients.

On August 20, 2003, the Diocese received yet another complaint concerning Rock. The
complaint was that Rock molested a minor when the victim was in the seventh or eighth grade.

On September 2, 2003, Chancery officials met with Rock to go over allegation.

Although Rock could not recall the incident, he stated that it could have happened “since the
incident is in keeping with the way he acted with other victims.”

In 2007 another victim reported that, from 1979 to 1981 while he was in the sixth through
eighth grades, he was subjected to oral sex, fondling, and anal sex by Rock. In 2007, the Diocese
dismissed Rock from the priesthood.

363
 Reverend Gerald Royer

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1917
YEAR OF DEATH: 2003
ORDINATION: June 1, 1947

Employment/Assignment History
6/1947 – 1/1948 St. Bartholomew, Brockton
1/1948 – 6/1948 St.s Simon and Jude, Bethlehem
6/1948 – 12/1948 St. Bartholomew, Brockton
12/1948 – 6/1950 St. Catherine of Siena, Reading
6/1950 – 5/1952 St. Joseph, Girardsville
5/1952 – 1/1953 Annunciation, Shenandoah
1/1953 – 3/1954 Chaplain, Convent of Divine Love
3/1954 – 11/1955 St. Mary of the Assumption, Philadelphia
11/1955 – 2/1956 Leave of Absence
2/1956 – 5/1956 St. Jane Frances de Chantal, Easton
5/1956 – 4/1960 St. Paul, Reading
4/1960 – 7/1961 Leave of Absence
7/1961 – 8/1964 Chaplain, St. Joseph’s Manor
8/1964 – 2/1965 Left active ministry (laicized)

Summary

Held in the secret archives of the Diocese of Allentown was a folder titled by a victim’s
name. Inside the folder was information describing the sexual abuse of a minor that occurred in
1948. The abuser was Father Gerald Royer. At the time of the abuse in 1948, the Diocese of
Allentown did not exist and the location was under the control of the Archdiocese of
Philadelphia.

In January 2003, the victim, then in his sixties, made a report of sexual abuse to the
Diocese against Royer. Because Royer was under the authority of the Archdiocese of
Philadelphia at the time of the sexual abuse, the Diocese referred this victim to Monsignor
William Lynn, Vicar for Clergy of the Archdiocese. The Diocese of Allentown began paying
for counseling then referred the costs to the Archdiocese of Philadelphia in June 2003.

In 2009, this victim contacted the Diocese again to discuss his sexual abuse. He brought
his therapist along. While in Saint’s Simon and Jude church, he saw a chair in which he was
repeatedly sexually abused by Royer.

On April 18, 2018, now an 83-year-old man, the victim testified before the Fortieth
Statewide Investigating Grand Jury. He disclosed that the abuse that occurred in 1948 still

364
Summary
haunts him to this day. The victim attended Saint’s Simon and Jude in Bethlehem. He was a
fatherless, 12-year-old boy. His mother was happy that a priest took interest in her son. Royer
would kiss the victim and the kissing progressed to molestation. Royer would abuse the child
behind the airport in Allentown, in his home, and in the rectory. Royer would have the child sit
in a green chair located near a closet and the rectory’s safe. Royer would fondle the victim’s
genitals. The child told a friend who did not believe him. During one abuse, the friend hid in
the closet and watched Royer molest the victim. The child who witnessed the abuse could not
fathom what had just occurred.

The victim testified that, after the 2002 Boston, Massachusetts, scandal broken by the
Boston Globe, he found the strength to finally disclose his abuse to the Catholic church. During
a meeting with a priest in the Diocese, the priest acknowledged that Royer was a “bad actor,”
stating that the priest had counseled Royer. The victim never told his wife why he could not
hug or kiss his own children, who were boys. He was unable to be affectionate with his
grandchildren. To this day, he cannot shake hands with men. He cannot be seen by male doctors
or dentists. His therapist had to be a female.

The victim told the Grand Jury that he was in the Army, fought in Korea, and was
stationed on Okinawa in the 1950’s. However, every day of this victim’s life has been tormented
by what Royer did to him as a child in 1948.

365
 Reverend Charles J. Ruffenach

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1901
YEAR OF DEATH: 1980
ORDINATION: May 29, 1930

Employment/Assignment History
6/11/1930 – 6/8/1931 Holy Ghost, Bethlehem, PA
608/1931 – 9/20/1934 St. Mary of the Assumption, Philadelphia, PA
9/20/1934 – 7/2/1979 St. John the Baptist, Stiles
7/02/1979 – 7/4/1980 St. John the Baptist, Stiles Holy Family Villa
7/04/1980 Deceased

Summary

On August 29, 2001, an adult victim contacted the Diocese to report physical and sexual
abuse at the hands of Father Charles Ruffenach beginning in approximately 1945, when the
victim was in first grade, and continuing through the eighth grade. The victim stated that
Ruffenach beat, paddled, and sexually abused him when he attended St. John the Baptist school.
The abuse took place on the premises of the parish, specifically in the “boiler room.” The victim
also reported at the time of abuse Ruffenach referred to it as “washing his penis.”

In the late 1980’s, the victim confronted Ruffenach regarding the abuse. Ruffenach
denied the allegations. However, during the confrontation, Ruffenach claimed that during the
time of incident the victim wanted him to “wash his penis.”

At the time of the report by the victim, the Diocese responded by stating that Ruffenach
was deceased and therefore it could not pursue the victim’s claims any further but offered the
victim counseling. The victim advised he had been in counseling since age 29, and requested
that the Diocese fund additional counseling sessions. Ultimately, the Diocese paid for eight
months of counseling, amounting to several thousand dollars’ worth of counseling.

366
 Reverend J. Pascal Sabas

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1923
YEAR OF DEATH: 1996
ORDINATION: June 20, 1954 (Wappinger Falls, New York)

Employment/Assignment History
10/1955 – 10/1957 Vocation Director, New York
10/1957 – 10/1958 House Discretus and Purser, New York
10/1958 – 10/1960 Administrator, St. Vincent de Paul, Pittsburgh, PA
10/1960 – 10/1962 Assistant, Sacred Heart, Yarmouth, Maine
10/1962 – 5/21/1963 Assistant, St. Joseph, Portland, Maine
5/21/1963 – 5/20/1964 Assistant, St. Francis of Assisi, Minersville, PA
5/20/1964 – 9/1/1965 Assistant, St. Francis of Assisi, Allentown, PA
9/1/1965 – 11/1/1966 Assistant, St. Patrick, Pottsville, PA
11/1/1966 – 4/4/1967 Regional Director, Bishop’s Relief Agency, West Schuylkill, PA
4/4/1967 – 1/18/1971 Administrator, St. Vincent de Paul, Girardville, PA
1/18/1971 – 8/1/1977 Pastor, St. Vincent de Paul, Girardville, PA
8/1/1977 – 10/1/1977 Administrator, St. Ignatius Loyola, Sinking Spring, PA
10/1/1977 – 3/4/1980 Pastor, St. Ignatius Loyola, Sinking Spring, PA
3/4/1980 – 6/1/1983 Pro-Synodal Examiner
6/1/1983 – 8/16/1983 Priest Representative Diocesan Board of Education,
Berks County, PA
8/16/1983 – 10/1/1985 Pastor, St. George, Shenandoah, PA
10/1/1985 – 12/16/1986 Returning to Religious Life
12/16/1986 – 3/19/1987 Assistant, St. Anthony, Easton, PA
3/19/1987 – 6/14/1988 Chaplain, Catholic Daughters of the Americas
6/14/1988 – 6/1989 Assistant Pastor, St. John the Baptist, Shillington, PA
6/1989 – 11/1/1991 Sick Leave
11/1/1991 – 1996 Retired

Summary

At the age of 14, a boy who is now a renowned sculptor and artist in New York, was
sexually abused by Father J. Pascal Sabas beginning in 1964. Sabas bought the victim a slot car
racing set and had the victim set it up in the victim’s basement. Sabas would come over to the
play slot cars and then abuse the victim while they were alone in the basement. Sabas also
abused the victim while in the corridor of his school and after the victim served Mass as an altar
boy with Sabas. Sabas also threatened the victim, telling him, “Don’t tell your parents. They
would be very hurt if they knew what you were doing.” The abuse only ended when Sabas was
transferred out of the victim’s parish.

367
Summary
In 1974, the victim reported the abuse to Bishop McShea. The victim entered into
counseling which he paid. In 1989, the victim filed a civil lawsuit against the Diocese and
Sabas. The lawsuit was settled out of court in 1991 for $40,000.

After years of counseling and three marriages, the victim reported it again and requested
a group meeting with Bishop Cullen and three other survivors of sexual abuse by clergy. Cullen
refused the meeting.

368
 Reverend William J. Shields

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1929
YEAR OF DEATH: 2000
ORDINATION: March 15, 1958

Employment/Assignment History
5/29/1958 – 5/27/1960 Assistant, St. Ambrose, Schuylkill Haven, PA
5/27/1960 – 2/23/1962 Assistant, St. John Baptist de la Salle, Shillington, PA
2/23/1962 – 9/4/1962 Assistant, St. Mary, Hamburg, PA
9/4/1962 – 10/30/1964 Assistant, Annunciation B.V.M., Shenandoah, PA
10/30/1964 – 12/9/1966 Regional Director, Bishop’s Relief, Upper Schuylkill County, PA
12/9/1966 – 11/29/1967 Bishop’s Relief Agency, East Schuylkill County, PA
11/29/1967 – 8/30/1968 Assistant, St. Paul, Allentown, PA
8/30/1968 – 3/27/1969 Assistant, St. Lawrence, Catasauqua, PA
3/27/1969 – 3/8/1972 Administrator, St. Ann, Lansford, PA
3/8/1972 – 1/11/1974 Assistant, St. Peter, Reading, PA
1/11/1974 – 6/15/1995 Pastor, St. Nicholas, Weatherly, PA
6/15/1995 – 8/28/2000 Pastor Emeritus, St. Nicholas, Weatherly, PA

Summary

In April 2002, a victim reported that he had been sexually abused by Father William J.
Shields. The victim reported that the abuse occurred when he was approximately 12 or 13 years
old in the rectory of St. Ann’s in Lansford. After a night of working a parish picnic, the victim
and the victim’s friend helped Shields take money back to the rectory. Shields told the victim’s
friend that he could leave but that the victim should stay at the rectory. At the time of the abuse,
the victim revered priests and the Catholic Church and “did not know how to say no to a priest
or nun.” Shields asked the victim sit in the television room and lay down on the couch because
Shields wanted to give him a massage. Shields began by massaging the victim’s shoulders and
working his way down to the victim’s waistline. Shields unbuttoned the victim’s pants and
began fondling the victim’s genitals. Shields then made the victim stand up as Shields knelt in
front of the victim and began removing the victim’s pants and underwear. At this point the
victim had the courage to stop Shields and tell Shields he had to leave. As the victim was getting
ready to leave, Shields told the victim, “Let this be our little secret.”

The victim went home and told his mother what had happened. The victim’s mother
advised him not to tell anyone of the incident and to stay away from Shields. The victim
believed his mother was worried that, if the incident was reported, the victim could be
stigmatized if others in the parish knew about it. The victim told a deacon who worked at the
parish and with whom the victim was close at the time about the incident. The victim reported
that about three months after the abuse occurred Shields announced at mass that he was being

369
Summary
transferred to another parish. The victim believed the deacon reported the incident to someone
in the Diocese, resulting in Shields’ transfer. Records provided by the Diocese indicate Shields
was transferred to St. Peter’s in Reading and then St. Nicholas’ in Weatherly. Shields remained
at St. Nicholas’ until his death in 2000.

In March 2004, a second victim called the Diocese and reported that he had been sexually
abused by Shields at St. Ann’s parish 25 to 30 years prior. The second victim did not give any
further details off the sexual abuse. The second victim only wanted to report he was abused by
Shields and wanted no counseling or compensation in return. Records indicated that the Diocese
contacted the Carbon County District Attorney’s Office about the second victim’s report of
abuse.

370
 Reverend Stephen F. Shigo

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1953
YEAR OF DEATH: 1991
ORDINATION: May 13, 1978

Employment/Assignment History
6/20/1978 – 6/15/1981 Holy Guardian Angels, Hyde Park, PA
6/15/1981 – 9/1/1981 St. Ambrose, Schuylkill Haven, PA
9/1/1981 – 7/11/1983 Area Chaplain Catholic Scouting, West Schuylkill County, PA
7/11/1983 – 8/31/1984 Regional Director, CYO West Schuylkill County, PA
8/31/1984 – 12/4/1985 Regional Director, Youth Ministry, South Schuylkill County, PA
12/4/1985 – 11/2/1991 Regional Director, Family Life Bureau, South Schuylkill
County, PA

Summary

The Diocese of Allentown was informed of one victim of sexual abuse by Father
Stephem Shigo. On November 17, 2011, the victim’s father contacted Diocesan officials on
behalf of his son. The victim’s father reported that his son had a successful business as a builder
but had previous issues with alcohol, drugs, and maintaining stable relationships. The victim’s
father also told officials that he only heard about the sexual abuse from his daughter, who in turn
found out from the victim’s ex-girlfriend. The victim was sexually abused by Shigo on a road
behind the victim’s house during a ride home from the church.

The victim, who finally came forward at the encouragement of his father, reported his
abuse in February 2012. The victim told the Diocese he was sexually abused by Shigo when
the victim was an altar boy during his eighth and ninth grades and that the abuse occurred at St.
Ambrose church. The Diocese offered six months of counseling. However records indicate the
victim was participating in counseling at least through June 2016, for which the Diocese paid.

Shigo died in 1991.

371
 Reverend David A. Soderlund

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1938
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 22, 1965

Employment/Assignment History
6/1965 – 12/1966 St. Peter, Coplay, PA
12/1966 – 4/1971 Sacred Heart, West Reading, PA
4/1971 – 6/1973 St. Catharine of Siena, Reading, PA
4/1971 – 6/1974 Holy Name High School, Reading, PA
6/1971 – 11/1971 St. Catharine of Siena, Reading, PA
10/1971 – 11/1978 Adult Religious Education, Berks County, PA
6/1973 – 1/1974 St. John the Baptist, Shillington, PA
1/1974 – 11/1978 St. Benedict, Reading, PA
6/1974 – 11/1978 Holy Name High School, Reading, PA
11/1978 – 7/1980 St. Joseph, Summit Hill, PA
7/1980 – 9/1980 Sick Leave (Villa St. John Vianney Hospital)
9/1980 – 6/1981 Our Lady of Hungary, Northampton, PA
6/1981 St. Catharine of Siena, Reading, PA
10/1986 – 1/1989 Good Samaritan Hospital, Pottsville, PA
2/1989 Administrative Leave (faculties withdrawn)
5/2005 Dismissed from Priesthood
2009 Arrested

Summary

As early as August 5, 1961, while in Seminary, Father David Soderlund expressed a

desire to work with children. In 1980, three separate complaints were made against him. The
complaints asserted that Soderlund had engaged in sexual acts with three different children. The
children were aged 12 to 13 years old. The Diocesan record, a “summary of case” relating to
Soderlund, generalized the sexual conduct without referencing specific acts or crimes.

On June 11, 1980, a meeting was held at the Chancery during which photo albums were
examined depicting nude photographs of a young boy engaged in sex acts with Soderlund.
Soderlund appeared in the photographs unclothed with the boy. After the meeting, Monsignor
Anthony Muntone went to the rectory and completed a search. Muntone located a second photo
album of another young boy and negatives of the first young boy, along with “other
pornographic materials.” Father James Gaffney was present at the parish at the time of the
search. Gaffney testified before the Grand Jury and recalled the child pornography being
removed from the church by Muntone.

372
Summary
On June 29, 1980, Soderlund admitted to Chancery officials that he engaged in sexual
activity with the three young boys. While documents created at the time of the admission
minimized the conduct, the facts became available through a detailed account of the abuse
obtained from a victim in 1997 by the Diocese. That account was obtained by the Grand Jury
from within the secret or confidential archives of the Diocese. The victim reported that:

[H]e was an altar boy (7th grade), and David, had a trailer which he kept at the
Appalachian Trail Sites in Shartlesville, brought him there almost weekly, over a
period of about 5 years, where they engaged in sexual acts. The victim said, he
was not a willing participant, but David threatened to harm or kill him.
***
David also took pictures of the victim engaged in sexual acts and threatened to
use them to embarrass him. David offered to leave the priesthood, if the victim
would go away with him.

The victim then indicated that he knew of many other boys who were victimized by Soderlund.
The victim added that he struggled greatly with substance abuse and intimacy due to the abuse.
The trauma from the abuse had cost him his marriage and a relationship with his two sons.

Soderlund was placed on “sick leave” in July 1980 and was sent to Villa St. John Vianney
Hospital. On July 3, 1980, a document written by Muntone recorded the following;

After James [Gaffney] left, the attorney questioned me a bit and spoke of his plan
to make contact with the prosecutor over the weekend. I spoke with the attorney
by telephone on Saturday evening, July 5th. He informed me that the prosecutor
had assured him if the parents would not make an issue of the matter, he would
not prosecute. The prosecutor made it clear that he understood Father Soderlund
would no longer be stationed in Carbon County.

This account of the Diocese entering into an arrangement with law enforcement to avoid
prosecution of Soderlund corroborates the testimony of Gaffney before the Grand Jury.
Additionally, on Tuesday, July 8, 1980, Muntone wrote:

I met with [the attorney]. . . at 10 a.m. He spoke in greater detail of his approach
to [the prosecutor], and of the assurance he had received that the matter would
not be pursued if the parents chose not to press it. In a letter sent by [the attorney]
to Monsignor Muntone dated September 12, 1980, [the attorney] reiterates what
[the prosecutor] told him regarding the pornographic photos taken by Soderlund
and that “the Diocese should retain these photographs for a reasonable period
of time. [The prosecutor] did not want to view any of the commercially produced
pornographic material and stated you (Muntone) could destroy this material.

On October 11, 1986, after two months characterized by the Diocese as “sick leave,”
Soderlund was assigned to serve as a priest in two other parishes. Soderlund was also sent to
Good Samaritan Hospital, where he was to minister as chaplain.

373
Summary

The Grand Jury reviewed additional documentation in the form of a letter from Bishop
Welsh to Antonio Cardinal Innocenti, Prefect of the Congregation for Clergy, showing that
Soderlund was permitted to be involved in parish life as a priest immediately upon his return
from “sick leave.” Diocesan records indicated that at this time Soderlund began to “act out
sexually with a young boy.” According to Diocesan records, “He invited the child to vacation
with him in Yellowstone National Park.” The records further indicate, “Father Soderlund
continued to groom the boy by informing the boy of his own bisexuality.”

The letter written by Welsh noted, “Once again, Father Soderlund was relieved of his
duties and this time placed under the spiritual care of Father John Harvey, O.S.F.S. and the
clinical care of Doctor John Kinnane.”

Soderlund continued to minster even after the latest complaint. On April 28, 1987, the
Good Samaritan Hospital Administrator contacted the Diocese, advising them that Soderlund
was spending a lot of time with an eight-year-old boy. Soderlund had spent an hour talking to
the boy on the telephone, saying that he wanted to take the boy on a trip to a museum. Good
Samaritan officials wanted Soderlund to be fired.

An excerpt taken from a transcription of a handwritten report from Muntone stated the
following:

I related all of the above to [the Diocesan attorney] and asked for his
recommendation. Much to my surprise, he recommended that the chaplain at
Sacred Heart Hospital and Soderlund trade places. I tried to explain to him that
that was not exactly the way things worked, that the chaplains are employees of
the hospital, etc. He said, that however that may be, Good Samaritan Hospital
contributed significantly to Soderlund’s problems. He said they should have
structured his day more fully, and seen to it that his living accommodations were
better supervised, etc.

Muntone added that, if Soderlund lived at the rectory at Sacred Heart and “the hospital held him
more accountable for his time, there shouldn’t be any problems.” Muntone responded to Traud’s
advice by telling the Bishop, “Also if we do manage to place Soderlund after being fired by
Good Samaritan we will have an even harder time convincing the others we have no place for
them.”

On February 23, 1989, Soderlund was placed on administrative leave. During much of
1989 through the early 1990’s, Soderlund battled the Diocese in court. Soderlund commenced
a civil action against the Bishop in 1996, admitting a “sexual addiction” but claiming that his
due process rights were violated. In 1997, a judge in Lehigh County dismissed the lawsuit.
Soderlund appealed to the Pennsylvania Superior Court, which affirmed the dismissal.

In 2009, Soderlund, now living in Dubois, Wyoming, within the Diocese of Cheyenne,
was arrested, convicted, and sentenced to incarceration for two to five years for sexual

374
Summary
exploitation of children/possession of child pornography on his computer. He is a registered sex
offender in Wyoming.

375
 Very Reverend Henry E. Strassner, V.F.

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1922
YEAR OF DEATH: 2009
ORDINATION: May 31, 1947

Employment/Assignment History
6/14/1947-9/2/1947 Assistant Pastor, St. Charles Borromeo, Cornwell Heights, PA
9/2/1947-5/16/1961 Allentown Central Catholic High School, Professor (Res. Notre
Dame, Bethlehem, 09/08/1954)
5/16/1961 – 6/19/1962 Regional Director, Holy Name Society, Lehigh County, PA
6/19/1962 – 5/21/1963 Assistant, Notre Dame, Bethlehem (Summer Assignment)
5/21/1963 – 3/20/1964 Principal, Notre Dame High School, Green Pond, PA
3/20/1964 – 12/16/1964 St. Michael, Easton, In Residence
12/16/1964 – 11/9/1966 St. Bernard, Easton, In Residence
11/9/1966 – 8/30/1968 Member, Council of Priests-Diocesan Consultors
8/30/1968 – 11/27/1968 Administrator, St. Paul, Allentown, PA
11/27/1968 – 10/6/1968 Member, Council of Priests-Diocesan Consultor
10/6/1968 – 11/1/1969 Director, Family Life Bureau, Lehigh County, PA
11/1/1969 – 11/1/1972 Member, Council of Priests-Diocesan Consultors
11/1/1972 – 1/17/1974 Council of Priests-Diocesan Consultors, Ex Officio Member
1/17/1974 – 12/1/1974 Pastor, St. Paul, Allentown
12/1/1974 – 12/9/1983 Regional Director, Family Life Bureau, Lehigh County, PA
12/9/1983 – 11/1/1984 Member, Diocesan Development and Endowment Committee
11/1/1984 – 6/22/1988 Dean, Lehigh County Diocese of Allentown
6/22/1988 – 8/1/1993 Member, Advisory Board, Allentown Central Catholic
High School, PA
8/1/1993 – 2/18/1994 Sick Leave
2/18/1994 – 3/16/2000 Senior Priest/Assistant Pastor, St. Jerome, Tamaqua, PA
3/16/2000 – 6/17/2003 Council of Priests Rep. Parochial Vicars
6/17/2003 – 11/20/2009 Retired
Pastor Emeritus of St. Paul Church, Allentown, PA

376
Summary

Included in documents subpoenaed from the Diocese of Allentown was a handwritten

document by Monsignor Muntone dated August 22, 1988, which documented the complaint of
a 19-year-old man. The victim reported that Father Henry Strassner kissed him four times on
the lips, “in the same way a woman would kiss,” within the first hour and a half of a counseling
session. Strassner, after being confronted and initially denying even knowing the victim,
admitted to the conduct but claimed he “did not intend anything sexual.” Strassner claimed the
victim “was essentially parentless and I wanted to simply affirm his sense of self-worth.”
Strassner was sent to see a counselor who, after meeting with Strassner, advised the Diocese that
there was “a lot more going on here than Father Strassner has admitted.”

Also included in the Diocese’s internal documents was a handwritten memorandum

dated July 11, 1991, written by Muntone that recorded two additional complaints of child sexual
abuse against Strassner. The memorandum recorded that both victims had been molested as a
children. One victim recalled that Strassner sexually abused him between the ages of six and
nine while he was struggling with childhood behavioral issues. The other victim provided less
detail but was explicit in his characterization of the “viciousness” of abusers. He also reported
at least one other priest was involved in his abuse.

In the more detailed complaint, the victim reported that his mother had heard Strassner
give a lecture on drugs. She invited Strassner into her home to speak to her son. The victim
trusted Strassner and was taught to respect him. The victim revealed intimate details of his life
to Strassner, who was his counselor and confessor. Strassner told the victim that he needed to
“touch him” as part of his priestly duties. Touching progressed to Strassner masturbating the
victim and performing oral sex on him.

The accounts of both victims were similar. Each victim was devoted to their parish.
Each victim was groomed and sexually assaulted by Strassner. One victim reported the abuse
to explain why he was withdrawing from his volunteer role in the church. The trauma of his
abuse was making his involvement impossible. The other victim was reporting to request that
the parish be informed of Strassner’s conduct. He was concerned that others could be victims.
At the time of the 1991 report, Strassner was assigned to the Advisory Board of the Allentown
Central Catholic High School. There is no indication that the Diocese took any action.

In 2001, a parishioner came forward to report that Strassner had used his authority and
position as a priest to make sexual advances during counseling sessions. The parishioner
reported that, while seeking counseling during a difficult time in his life, Strassner assaulted the
thirty-one-year-old man and took advantage of the man’s vulnerability.

In 2004, a 53-year-old man reported that he was sexually assaulted by Strassner in 1977
when he was aged 26 or 27. The abuse occurred at St. Paul’s church located at Second and
Susquehanna Streets in Allentown. The victim stated that Strassner “French kissed” him and
asked the victim to show him his genitalia. The victim refused. Diocesan records indicated that
this assault occurred while Strassner was acting in his official capacity as counselor or in hearing
confessions. The victim, at the time of the report to the Diocese, produced a sheet of paper with

377
Summary
handwritten notes containing the names of approximately 25 or 30 other individuals who he
alleged were similarly sexually assaulted by Strassner. The Diocese provided the victim
counseling.

In November 2011, a then-63-year-old victim reported to the Diocese he had been

sexually abused by Strassner when he was in the seventh or eighth grade. The victim was made
to perform oral sex on Strassner and Strassner performed oral sex on the victim. The victim did
not report the abuse because he felt humiliated and subsequently became a “criminal all his life.”

Within undated documents provided by the Diocese were handwritten notes indicating
two victims, both with deep personal issues, whom Strassner exploited for purposes of grooming
and ultimately sexually abused. According to the document, counseling was a part of their lives
as they battled drugs and alcohol and even contemplated suicide. One of the victims was
diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder.

Secret or confidential documents of the Diocese showed that the Diocese was aware of
Strassner’s abuse of his position as early as 1988. Notes by Muntone relating to the allegations
was a common observation throughout this investigation. Those notes were commonly
addressed to the bishop at the time or forwarded to the bishop through another memorandum or
note. Personnel decisions were ultimately within the exclusive purview of the bishops, who
continued to return Strassner to ministry within the Diocese after each allegation with little
regard for Strassner’s record of abusing his position. By way of example, in August 1993,
Strassner took “sick leave” and went to Jemez Springs, New Mexico, for approximately six
months. After his return, Strassner continued as an active priest until his retirement in June
2003. Even after retirement, Strassner was granted the status of “Pastor Emeritus” of St. Paul in
Allentown.

378
 Reverend Bruno M. Tucci

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1942
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: March 27, 1971

Employment/Assignment History
4/1971 – 4/1972 St. Margaret, Reading, PA
10/1971 – 4/1972 Confraternity of Christian Doctrine, Berks County, PA
4/1972 – 6/1972 Cardinal Brennan High School, Fountain Spring, PA
4/1972 – 6/1972 Annunciation, Shenandoah, PA
6/1972 – 9/1972 St. Canicus, Mahanoy City, PA
6/1972 – 6/1977 Marian High School, Tamaqua, PA
9/1972 – 6/1974 St. Canicus, Mahanoy City, PA
6/1974 – 2/1975 St.s Peter and Paul, Lehighton, PA
2/1975 – 6/1977 Our Lady of Mount Carmel, Nesquehoning, PA
6/1975 – 8/1975 Marian High School, Tamaqua, PA
6/1977 – 6/1979 Holy Name High School, Reading, PA
6/1977 – 9/1977 St, Columbkill, Boyertown, PA
9/1977 – 6/1978 Most Blessed Sacrament, Bally, PA
6/1978 – 4/1981 St. Peter, Reading, PA
6/1979 – 4/1981 Central Catholic High School, Reading, PA
4/1981 – 6/1986 Immaculate Conception, Kelayres, PA
6/1986 – 3/2002 Our Lady of Mount Carmel and Immaculate Conception,
Nesquehoning, PA
3/1/2002 Retired
2/9/2007 Dismissed from priesthood

379
Summary

The Diocese of Allentown became aware of Father Bruno Tucci’s abuse of children in
1991. A victim called the Chancery and stated he was sexually molested by Tucci when he was
14 years old. Tucci tickled him and put his hands down the back of the victim’s pants. On
another occasion, Tucci unbuttoned his pants and the victim’s pants. Tucci pulled them both
down and made skin to skin contact. Tucci normalized the conduct by tickling the victim in
front of the victim’s parents.

The victim recalled that Tucci visited the victim while his parents were at Christmas Eve
mass and took off his pants and “played with him.” Later that same evening at the midnight
mass, the victim served at the altar for Tucci. During this telephone call, the victim advised the
Diocese that he would like to confront Tucci about the abuse.

Soon after the call, a Chancery official met with Tucci, who admitted the allegations and
stated that the incidents occurred “exactly as the victim reported.” Tucci said it was “just
touching” and clarified he had not engaged in “sodomy.” The Diocese sent Tucci to The
Servants of the Paraclete, Jemez Springs, New Mexico, later that year. One year later, Tucci
return to active ministry as Pastor of two parishes in Nesquehoning.

On November 30, 1993, Chancery officials met with the victim, who expressed his
outrage that Tucci was still functioning as a priest. Seeing no action from the Diocese, the victim
again expressed his desire to confront Tucci. On February 11, 2002, Chancery officials met
again with Tucci, who reiterated his guilt concerning the victim. Tucci offered to resign as
Pastor. Four days later, the Bishop accepted Tucci’s resignation.

On May 6, 2002, the Diocese received a letter from another victim stating he was
sexually molested by Tucci between 1977 and 1978, when he was a minor. Tucci did not deny
the complaint, saying merely that he could not recall the incident. In March 2002, Tucci retired.
His retirement came just weeks after the Boston Globe garnered national attention after
publishing articles detailing child sexual abuse within the Archdiocese of Boston.

In 2005, Tucci requested to be laicized, a request granted and completed in 2007. Tucci
is last known to be a resident of Salisbury, Maryland.

380
 Reverend A. Gregory Uhrig

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1947
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: September 29, 1973

Employment/Assignment History
1974 Secretary, Diocesan Tribunal
Assistant, St. Francis of Assisi, Allentown, PA
8/30/1974 – 6/17/1975 Professor, Allentown Central Catholic High School, PA
Resident, St. Elizabeth, Whitehall, PA
6/17/1975 – 9/29/1975 Resident and Assistant, Immaculate Conception, Allentown, PA
9/29/1975 – 6/15/1976 Member, Liturgical Commission
6/15/1976 – 10/4/1976 Secretary, Diocesan Tribunal
10/4/1976 – 6/20/1976 Defender of the Bond, Diocesan Tribunal
6/20/1976 – 6/20/1978 Professor, Reading Central High School, PA
Resident, Holy Rosary, Reading, PA
6/20/1978 – 6/16/1980 Assistant, St. Anthony, Easton, PA
6/16/1980 – 10/1/1981 Coordinator, CCD Adult Regular Education, Northampton, PA
10/1/1981 – 2/25/1982 Regional Director, Family Life Bureau, Northampton, PA
2/25/1982 – 6/20/1983 Assistant Pastor, St. Ursula, Fountain Hill, Bethlehem, PA
6/20/1983 – 12/8/1985 Assistant Pastor, Our Lady of Perpetual Help, Bernardsville, PA
12/8/1985 – 6/19/1986 Assistant, St. Francis Cathedral, Metuchen, New Jersey
6/19/1986 – 12/1/1986 Resident, Holy Trinity, Egypt
Chaplain, Muhlenberg/Cedar Crest Colleges
10/1/1986 – 6/14/1988 Resident, St. Thomas More, Allentown, PA
6/14/1988 – 6/15/1989 Assistant Pastor, St. Thomas More, Allentown, PA
6/15/1989 – 9/6/1989 Pastor, John the Baptist, Whitehall, PA
9/6/1989 – 7/15/1993 Regional Director, CCD Lehigh County, PA
7/15/1993 – 1/19/1995 Assigned to ministry in New Jersey
1/19/1995 Excardinated from Diocese of Allentown
Incardinated into Diocese of Metuchen
10/2010 Placed on leave due to allegations stemming from incidents in
1978-1980.

381
Summary

The Diocese of Allentown became aware of Father A. Gregory Uhrig’s sexual abuse of
children by 2010.

On May 5, 2010, a 44-year-old female victim made a complaint to the Diocese of sexual
abuse at the hands of Uhrig when she was 13-years-old and attended the seventh grade at St.
Anthony school in Easton. Uhrig was assigned to St. Anthony at that time. The victim’s parents
encouraged her involvement in the parish and were comfortable with her taking a job answering
parish telephones. While working afternoons in the rectory, the victim came to know Uhrig.
Also, the victim’s parents would routinely invite priests to their home for dinner. Through
working at the parish and frequenting family dinners, Uhrig became a close family friend.

Uhrig began to groom the victim by showing her attention and complimenting her. She
suffered from low self-esteem and expressed that to Uhrig. Uhrig’s compliments built trust
between them. Eventually, Uhrig initiated physical contact such as hugging, holding hands, and
kissing the victim on the lips. Uhrig eventually progressed to groping the victim’s breasts over
her clothing. The victim would touch Uhrig’s leg and lap area over his clothing with her hands,
taking notice that his penis would be erect.

The victim reported that these types of interactions occurred approximately twice a week
for about four years. The incidents took place at the rectory and in Uhrig’s vehicle. The victim
was often in Uhrig’s vehicle as he would drive her home from working in the rectory or when
she would accompany him on “family visits.”

When the victim reached her sophomore year, she realized her relationship with Uhrig
was wrong and began to avoid Uhrig. One month prior to her formal complaint, the victim
contacted Father Anthony Mongillo. Mongillo had been a long-time family friend. Mongillo,
who was a friend of Uhrig, offered no advice or instruction on how she should deal with her
abuse.

The victim described the impact of the abuse in detail. Due to her victimization, she had
suffered three failed marriages. The victim was able to disclose the abuse to her mother, who
was shocked and upset at the disclosure. However, the victim remained unable to tell her father
of the abuse.

In 1995, Uhrig left the Diocese and was incardinated to the Diocese of Metuchen in New
Jersey. Following a report to that Diocese, he was placed on leave. The Diocese appears to
have reported the complaint to local law enforcement upon receipt of the complaint. However,
no prosecution was initiated because the statute of limitations had expired.

382
 Reverend Andrew Aloysius Ulincy

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1936
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 21, 1966

Employment/Assignment History
6/1/1966 – 9/2/1967 Professor, Marian High School, Hometown, PA
6/1/1966 – 3/27/1969 Resident, St. Joseph, Jim Thorpe, PA
11/1/1966 – 3/27/1969 Regional Director of Vocations, Carbon County, PA
12/9/1966 – 11/1/1970 Secretary, Committee on Ecumenism
3/27/1969 – 10/30/1979 Pastor, St. Mary, Mahanoy City, PA
11/1/1970 Member, Committee on Ecumenism
12/1/1974 – 10/30/1979 Regional Director, Family Life Bureau, E. Schuylkill, PA
10/30/1979 – 12/1/1981 Pastor, St. Simon and Jude, Bethlehem, PA
3/4/1980 – 12/1/1981 Parish Priest Consultor
12/1/1981 – 2/15/1982 Sick leave
2/15/1982 – 5/4/1982 Assistant Pastor, St. Michael, Lansford, PA
5/4/1982 – 1/3/1995 Pastor, St. Joseph, Frackville, PA
12/21/1992 – 12/21/1995 Advisory Board Member, Cardinal Brennan High School
1/3/1995 – 8/21/1996 Assistant Pastor, Holy Rosary, Reading, PA
8/21/1996 – 6/5/1997 Administrator Pro Tempore, Immaculate Conception,
Birdsboro, PA
6/5/1997 – 9/11/1997 Administrator, St. Paul, Reading, PA
9/11/1997 – 9/21/2010 Pastor Pro Tempore, St. Paul, Reading, PA
8/28/2001 – 9/21/2010 Spiritual Director, Holy Name Society for Berks Deanery,
12/1/2009 – 9/21/2010 Pastors of Berks Deanery, Council of Priests, Representative
3/1/2011 Retired

383
Summary

The Diocese of Allentown became aware of Father Andrew Ulincy’s sexual abuse of
children in 1981. On November 16, 1981, a 17-year-old victim reported to the Bethlehem Police
that Ulincy had sexually propositioned him. Ulincy was contacted by the police and admitted
that the victim’s complaint was true. There is no evidence that the solicitation resulted in any
criminal charges.

The Grand Jury has learned that it is not uncommon for Diocesan investigators to make
contact with previously reported victims during a review of confidential files within any given
diocese. In this case, the 1981 victim was re-interviewed in June 2010 by an investigator for
the Diocese. That interview was preserved in a report, stating:

“[The victim] had run away from home . . .He thought a good place to go for
help was a church. The victim went to the rectory and was invited in by Father
Ulincy. The priest told him to take a shower while the priest put his clothes in the
dryer. The victim came out of the shower and was met by Father Ulincy who
offered to help “dry him [the victim] off”, and offered the victim alcohol. Father
Ulincy then fondled the victim’s penis. Father Ulincy then turned the victim over,
held him down on the bed, and anally penetrated him [the victim].”

Evidence of one other incident involving Ulincy was presented to the Grand Jury.
Memorandums obtained from the Diocese showed that, during remodeling in the early 1990’s,
a group of contractors were working within the rectory at St. Joseph in Frackville. Ulincy was
the pastor and lived in the rectory. Ulincy “dropped his pants” in front of a 25-year-old male
contractor. Ulincy appeared to be under the influence of alcohol and the contractor appeared to
be specifically targeted by Ulincy for this indecent exposure. The incident was reported to law
enforcement but appears to have been dropped as the result of a $2,500.00 payment to the
contractor and Ulincy’s transfer from St. Joseph.

In September 2010, some 29 years after the first report, Ulincy was removed from active
ministry. By that time, he had served in at least nine other parishes or assignments, one of which
was as an Advisory Board Member for the Cardinal Brennan Catholic High School.

384
 Reverend Ronald Yarrosh

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1947
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: October 19, 1974

Employment/Assignment History
11/1974 – 12/1975 Assistant Promotion Director P.I.M.E. (Pontifical Institute for
Foreign Missions), Detroit, MI,
2/1976 – 6/1976 Language Student, P.I.M.E., Rome, Italy
8/1976 – 11/1976 Missionary, P.I.M.E., Hong Kong
2/1977 – 11/1981 Mission Appeal, P.I.M.E., Detroit, MI
2/1982 – 6/1982 Assistant Pastor, St. Anthony, Easton, PA
6/1982 – 10/1985 Assistant Pastor, Holy Rosary, Reading, PA
6/1986 – 6/1988 Assistant Pastor, St. Patrick, Pottsville, PA
6/1988 – 11/1991 Assistant Pastor, St. Francis of Assisi, Allentown, PA
5/1990 Incardination into the Diocese of Allentown
11/1991 – 6/1996 Assistant Pastor, St. Anne, Bethlehem, PA
6/1996 – 6/1998 Assistant Pastor, St. Margaret, Reading, PA
6/1996 – 6/1997 Campus Minister, Albright College, Reading, PA
6/1997 – 7/1997 Assistant Pastor Pro Tempore, St. Peter, Reading, PA
6/1998 – 6/1999 Assistant Pastor, St. Jane Frances de Chantel, Easton, PA
6/1999 – 6/2001 Pastor, Holy Family, Sacred Heart Churches,
New Philadelphia, PA
6/1999 – 6/2001 Pastor, St. Anthony, Cumbola,
6/2001 – 6/2003 Assistant Pastor, St. Bernard, Easton, PA
6/2003 – 4/2004 Assistant Pastor, St. Ambrose, Schuylkill Haven, PA

Summary

On April 22, 2004, Diocesan documents recorded that the Pennsylvania State Police
searched the rooms of Father Ronald Yarrosh and found a “tremendous amount” of child
pornography. On April 29, 2004, Yarrosh was removed from priestly ministry and entered St.
John Vianney Hospital for evaluation and treatment.

On May 12, 2004, the Pennsylvania State Police filed charges against Yarrosh,
specifically, 110 counts of sexual abuse of children after discovering hundreds of child
pornography photos, books, magazines, videos, and DVD’s in his possession. As law
enforcement began its prosecution, Diocesan Support Services conducted an audit and
determined that Yarrosh embezzled approximately $23,000.00 from the parish. Charges were
filed related to this theft.

385
Summary
On April 27, 2005, Yarrosh entered a plea of guilty to charges of theft and possession of child
pornography. Yarrosh was sentenced pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement to imprisonment
for three to 23 months, $250.00 in fines, and restitution to the parish.

On May 3, 2005, Yarrosh was discharged from St. John Vianney Hospital and took
residence at St. Francis Villa, Orwigsburg. Yarrosh was to begin his term of incarceration later
that year. However, on July 18, 2005, the Diocese was made aware that Yarrosh was leaving his
residence at St. Francis Villa.

On July 19, 2005, a letter was written to Yarrosh informing him that he was to remain at
the residence, under supervision, until he was ordered to report to prison. Yarrosh subsequently
met with the Secretary of Clergy and informed him that he could not remain at the Villa and
would be leaving. On July 21, 2005, Yarrosh left St. Francis Villa and moved into a motel.
Yarrosh continued in residence at the motel until August 8, 2005, at which time he was
incarcerated in Schuylkill County Prison in Pottsville. Upon his release on November 31, 2005,
Yarrosh registered with the Pennsylvania State Police as a sexual offender.

Upon his release from prison, Yarrosh was still a priest. On December 6, 2005, Yarrosh
was released from prison as a convicted and registered sex offender. The Diocese granted him
residence at St. Francis Villa in Orwigsburg. The Diocese’s own designation of Yarrosh noted
he was a “moderate to high risk to again use pornography and/or consort with prostitutes.”

In November 2006, it was discovered that Father Yarrosh had taken trips to New York
City with a seven-year-old child. Yarrosh was also found to be in possession of pornography in
violation of his court supervision. The Schuylkill County Court of Common Pleas subsequently
sentenced Yarrosh to four to ten years in state prison for violating the terms of his supervision.
Finally, in June 2007, the Diocese dismissed Yarrosh from the priesthood.

386
 Reverend Joseph A. Zmijewski, D.D.

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1910
YEAR OF DEATH: 1968
ORDINATION: December 6, 1936

Employment/Assignment History
8/18/1938 – 7/8/1942 Assistant, St. Ladislaus, Philadelphia, PA
7/8/1942 – 5/8/1961 Chaplain, Bernardine Sisters, Reading, PA
5/8/1961 – 10/27/1961 Defender of the Bond
10/27/1961 – 1/27/1964 Administrator Pro Tempore, St. Mary’s, Reading, PA
1/27/1964 – 8/4/1967 Member, Diocesan Liturgical Commission
8/4/1967 Promoter of Justice, The Tribunal

Summary

On October 26, 2004, an adult woman reported to the Diocese of Allentown that she was
a victim of child sexual abuse at the hands of a Diocesan priest. The victim grew up in Reading
and had been a member of the St. Mary Greek church. She also attended St. Peter school on
South Fifth Street in Reading. In 1950, while in the ninth grade, the victim met Father Joseph
A. Zmijewski. She was in a new school and was experiencing unhappiness mixed with missing
her friends at her previous school. The victim began regular counseling session with Zmijewski.
Zmijewski was a registered psychologist and had been recommended by another priest.

Zmijewski proposed a course of alternative treatment. He directed the victim to come

to his personal residence where he could help the victim through hypnosis. The victim complied
and attended four hypnosis sessions with Zmijewski at his residence.

The victim became increasingly frustrated with this routine. After the first three attempts
by Zmijewski to hypnotize her, she agreed to a fourth session. In an effort to expedite her
“treatment,” she feigned hypnosis during her fourth session. While she pretended to be
hypnotized, Zmijewski instructed her to take off one piece of clothing after another. The victim
was scared and complied until she was nude. Zmijewski then left the room for a short period of
time. Upon his return, he instructed the victim to get dressed. The victim never returned for
any further “treatment” and kept the incident to herself into adulthood.

Upon receiving the victim’s report, the Diocese noted that the abuse would have occurred
prior to the formation of the Allentown Diocese from within the Archdiocese of Philadelphia.
The Allentown Diocese referred the complaint to the Archdiocese of Philadelphia. Zmijewski
died in 1968.

387
388
DIOCESE OF ERIE

389
390
 Reverend Michael J. Amy

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1952
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: August 11, 1978

Employment/Assignment History
6/23/1978 – 7/05/1979 Asst. Pastor, Our Lady of Peace, Erie, PA
7/05/1979 – 8/28/1981 Faculty, Cathedral Preparatory. Residence at
Blessed Sacrament, Erie, PA
8/28/1981 – 6/14/1985 Faculty, Cathedral Preparatory, Residence at
Holy Trinity Rectory, Erie, PA
4/23/1983 Chaplin, Catholic Scouting Committee
6/14/1985 – 1/20/1986 Faculty, Elk Co. Christian, Residing at Holy Rosary
Johnsonburg PA. Weekend Asst. St. Callistus, Kane, PA
1/20/1986 Weekend Asst. Holy Rosary, Johnsonburg, PA
6/14/1985 – 6/17/1988 Faculty, Elk Co. Catholic. Residing at
Holy Rosary, St. Mary’s, PA
6/17/1988 – 1/31/1990 Faculty, Bradford Central Christian HS.
Residing at St. Bernard, Bradford, PA
4/19/1989 – 12/15/1989 Administration, St. Callistus, Kane, PA
Residing at St. Callistus Rectory, Kane, PA
12/15/1989 – 12/22/1991 Pastor, St. Callistus. Residing at
St. Callistus Rectory, Kane, PA
12/22/1991 – 2/05/1992 Sick leave
1/05/1992 – 3/01/1993 Sick leave
11/1993 Living in private residence

Summary

Between 1974 and 1975, Father Michael Amy - - a Seminarian at the time - - worked as
a camp counselor at Camp Notre Dame in Fairview. In an October 25, 1993 letter to the Diocese
of , Amy wrote:

I took the opportunity to touch the genitals of several boys at night. Two, at least
were aware of my fondling. In 1974 one of them ran away because of my
molesting him. The PA State Police were involved in the search. When he was
found, he spoke of the molesting.

Amy went on to describe how he was initially taken into custody by the State Police but
was not arrested, nor were charges ever brought against him.

391 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

-*5*("5*0/
Summary
Amy was ordained on August 11, 1978, and served in over eight parishes over the course
of the next 14 years. He later admitted that while serving as a priest he was involved with male
prostitutes in the Erie area, as well as in Pittsburgh and Baltimore. Many of these male
prostitutes were minors.

In December 1991, a male contacted the Diocese to report that he met Amy in the early
1980s when he was 14-years-old. He and Amy met in Erie on West 18th street, which was an
area known for prostitution at that time. The male reported that he was an underage prostitute
dealing with substance abuse issues at that time. Amy gave him money and, in exchange, they
would engage in sexual contact, sometimes at the rectory of Holy Trinity Church. Bishop
Trautman sent Amy to St. Luke’s Institute for psychiatric treatment following this report.

In 1993, the Diocese acted to remove Amy. At the laicization proceeding, Father Sal
Luzzi and Father Leon Muroski, who were spiritual counselors to Amy and other seminarians
were asked to fill out a questionnaire about Amy. Additionally, Father Lawrence T. Speice, a
member of the Board of Directors at Camp Notre Dame in the 1970’s, was asked to complete a
questionnaire. The questionnaire asked nineteen questions about the depth of the relationship
they had with Amy, as well as Amy’s background, work ethic, and moral character.

One question asked, “Has his conduct as a priest ever been a source of scandal or
wonderment?” Part of Luzzi’s answer stated that he [Luzzi] was “amazed that [Amy] was made
a pastor in a place where something happened before,” and that “there certainly should have
been something in his Seminary day files.” Luzzi added, “I personally wondered when these
things would resurface.”

In Muroski statement, he flatly denied any knowledge of Amy’s predatory behavior at

Camp Notre Dame. This behavior included the very incident that he, Luzzi and Speice helped
to cover up by interceding with the victims’ parents and the Pennsyvlania State Police. Muroski
wrote, “Not to my knowledge. In fact, I’ve heard positive comment about him. I believe he’s a
hard and conscientious worker.”

On September 29, 1993, Speice answered the same question by writing, “It is my
understanding now that Mike’s conduct through the years may have caused scandal or
wonderment to some extent to some persons. I know no detail in this regard and am aware of
the possibility only after the fact.” He then adds, “One instance before ordination is a dim
memory of mine and probably was a source of scandal at that time.”

After Amy’s laicization process was finally concluded, an additional allegation was
made against him stemming from an incident that happened in the early 1980s while the victim
was a high school student at Erie Cathedral Preparatory. The victim e-mailed the Diocese on
December 3, 2002 to report his molestation by Amy. He described how he had regarded Amy
as a friend, mentor, and someone who always took time to listen to him. Then, one day when
Amy got him alone in a confessional booth, Amy questioned him about touching himself. Amy
then went on to fondle the victim on more than one occasion.

392
 Reverend Michael G. Barletta

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1939
YEAR OF DEATH: Unknown
ORDINATION: May 19, 1966

Employment/Assignment History
6/04/1966 – 5/30/1975 Secondary Education Kennedy Catholic
High School, Hermitage, PA
6/04/1966 – 6/03/1970 Weekend Asst. Sacred Heart, Sharon, PA
6/03/1970 – 6/30/1975 Weekend Asst. St. Joseph, Sharon, PA
1975 Teen Action Club at Cathedral Preparatory, Erie, PA
5/30/1975 – 9/07/1994 Secondary Education Erie Cathedral Preparatory HS
5/30/1975 – 9/07/1994 Weekend Assistant, St Luke’s, Erie, PA
9/07/1994 – 8/01/1995 Sabbatical, Other
Sabbatical at Southdown Treatment Center Toronto, Canada for
Psychological Treatment
8/01/1995 – 2/28/2002 Dioceses Office, Catholic Charities, Erie, PA
8/01/1995 – 2/28/2002 Dioceses Office, Office of Matrimonial Concerns, Erie, PA
8/01/1995 – 2/28/2002 Resident St. Patrick’s Resident, Erie, PA
2/28/2002 Retired

Summary

The Grand Jury received several documents describing Father Michael Barletta’s
behavior and also heard the testimony of a retired priest who witnessed Barletta with his
genitalia exposed in the presence of a child under the age of eighteen years old. This incident
occurred between 1969 and 1970. Specifically, on a Saturday afternoon at St Joseph’s church
in Sharon, Barletta was scheduled to hear confessions along with fellow priest Father John
Fischer. When Barletta failed to arrive, Fischer went looking for him. Fischer testified that he
walked in on Barletta and a young high school student in Barletta’s locked private chambers.
Upon entering the room, Fischer observed this young student totally naked from the waist down,
with his genitalia exposed. As Fischer withdrew from Barletta’s room, he observed the child
attempting to pull up his underwear and pants while Barletta stood in the corner and watched.
Fischer did not call the police nor notify Barletta’s supervisor. Instead, Fischer testified that he
reported the incident to a fellow priest and to Bishop Watson, head of the Erie Diocese, two
months later. He recalled that Monsignor Hastings dismissed his report of Barletta and the naked
child. He also recalled his meeting with Watson and testified that both Hastings and Watson
brushed him off and told him to, “Go home, be a good priest.” Fischer also testified that when
he told his fellow priests about Barletta and the child, they laughed it off. Not long after this
incident, Barletta was re-assigned to Erie Cathedral Preparatory.

393
Summary
Fischer referred to the Erie Cathedral Preparatory students who received most of
Barletta’s attention as Barletta’s “pretty people.” These children participated in a program that
Barletta started and called the Teen Action Club (“TAC”). This club was made up of students
who were active in the community, church, athletics, and academics. Barletta would provide the
students with a shoulder rub, hypnosis, or massage. He would often take his students on vacation
with him to places such as Niagara Falls or to his own private camp in a secluded, rural part of
Pennsylvania.

In Bishop Trautman’s handwritten notes, he recorded the details of a conversation that

he had with Sister Donna Markham about Barletta. In those notes, Trautman wrote that Barletta
has abused 25 children. Trautman noted that Barletta admitted to the number himself. Trautman
also noted that Barletta needed a restricted ministry, possibly a nursing apostolate. He added
that Barletta was very defensive and that his abuse included nudity and rub downs, including
genital groping, and that Barletta vacationed exclusively with teens.

Barletta was confronted with allegations of oral sex, naked massages, digital anal
penetration, and masturbation against a victim in 1994. When confronted, Barletta admitted his
guilt to Trautman. This abuse took place when the first victim was a freshman at Erie Cathedral
Preparatory. The Diocese paid for the victim’s counseling. However, once the victim shared
the sexual abuse with the newspaper, Trautman advised that the first victim should seek payment
directly from Barletta.

In August of 1994, Monsignor Lawrence Speice notified Bishop Trautman of an

allegation from Victim #1, who reported that Barletta or “Barts,” attempted to use hypnosis
techniques, in conjunction with rub downs, in sexual encounters that included mutual
masturbation. Victim #1 reported that “Barts” had a fascination with Victim #1’s uncircumcised
penis compared to his own and had Victim #1 masturbate while he watched. The Diocese
confronted Barletta with Victim #1’s accusation, which he denied. The Diocese nevertheless
ended up paying out $14,420.00 to Victim #1.

Victim #2 was a high school senior when he and Victim #1 went on a retreat to Toronto,
Canada, with Barletta. In the hotel room, Barletta engaged the boys in nude massages, relaxation
techniques, fondling, and eventually masturbation. Barletta denied any sexual encounter with
Victim #2, but in his April 2012 letter to the Bishop, Barletta admits to vacationing in Toronto
with Victim #2 and Victim #1.

Victim #3 was another of Barletta’s victims but little information has been found about
him in the Diocese-supplied files. He is referenced as possibly one of the boys who went to the
press with Victim #1 about Barletta. The Diocese lists Victim #3 as a victim in their 2003 report
to John Jay College with no further details included. That report was compiled nationally by
the John Jay College in New York in an attempt to quantify the scope of the problem of child
sexual abuse within the Roman Catholic Church. The Grand Jury has found that many dioceses
minimized the number of offenders and victims in their responses to this survey.

394
Summary
Victim #4 was listed as “Not Verified” in the 2003 John Jay Report and few files were
turned over by the Diocese pursuant to the subpoena by the Grand Jury. Victim #4’s name was
found on handwritten notes from Bishop Trautman, who recorded Victim #4 as having traveled
to Niagara Falls with Barletta. In those notes Trautman wrote, “2 bed, rub down, masturbated,
run off to bathroom and tried same thing.”

Victim #5 had a conversation with Bishop Trautman in 2004 about his abuse at the hands
of Barletta. Trautman’s notes recorded that Barletta gave Victim #5 several massages during his
Junior and Senior years at Erie Cathedral Preparatory. Trautman noted that Barletta attempted
to sexually abuse Victim #5 and that Victim #5 wanted to support his friends who were abused,
so he came forward to report Barletta’s advances. In the John Jay Report, the Diocese lists
Victim #5 as “Allegation Withdrawn.”

Victim #6 was another high school-aged student whose life was impacted by Barletta’s
predation. Victim #6’s incident occurred while he was a student at Kennedy Catholic. Victim
#6 reported his abuse in 2003 to Trautman and the Bishop confronted Barletta about the incident.
At this time, Victim #6 was going through a divorce and came forward to the Diocese for
assistance. In his conversation with the Bishop, Barletta admitted to giving Victim #6 a rub
down, but did not admit to any further sexual contact. This conversation with Barletta was noted
by Trautman on October 2, 2003. In that same document, Trautman made several notes
regarding Barletta and Victim #6, such as “gave massage to calm him, perhaps no clothes and
stripped down.”

Victim #7 was a Kennedy Catholic student who found himself in a vulnerable position
at Barletta’s camp. Victim #7 was part of a group of boys who were taken to the camp, where
Barletta suggested naked massages. Victim #7 refused and reported that he was never touched
on that trip. Victim #7 reported this attempted sexual assault to Monsignor James Burke on
November 4, 1988. That complaint was consistent with his complaint to Monsignor Robert
Smith on November 25, 2003. However, in his report to Smith, Victim #7 added that he was
now aware of several other children who had fallen victim to Barletta.

At the time of Victim #7’s original report to Monsignor Burke in 1988, Barletta was a
full-time teacher at Erie Cathedral Preparatory and actively abusing students. Neither Burke nor
the Diocese took any action as a result of the 1988 report. Burke memorialized Victim #7’s
complaint on January 14, 1991. In a written report to Trautman, Burke explained Victim #7’s
complaint and concluded writing, “I didn’t feel the need to go any further with this at this time.”

In Victim #7’s 2003 conversation with Smith, he reported that he was mad at the Diocese
for its failure to remove Barletta sooner. Victim #7 told Smith that when he made his report to
Burke in 1988, the Diocese already knew about Barletta as far back as his days at Kennedy
Christian, yet they did nothing. This is an accurate statement. Father Fischer, Bishop Watson
and Father Hastings all knew that Fischer had observed Barletta commit a sex crime against a
child, yet Fischer was directed to remain silent by Bishop Watson.

395
Summary
In 2009, after many years of counseling, Victim #8 notified the Diocese of his abuse at
the hands of Barletta. His account is consistent with the tactics that Barletta used against other
children. Bishop Trautman documented his conversation with Victim #8 on September 10,
2009. Trautman noted that Victim #8 was befriended by Barletta, taken to a rural farm owned
by Barletta in DuBois and abused. Trautman noted that Barletta was “a calculated abuser who
tried to hypnotize him.”

From 1975 through 1994, when he was finally dismissed from Erie Cathedral
Preparatory, Barletta admittedly abused 25 children and young men. After 1994, there are
reports and documents that proved that Barletta was allowed to continue ministering to the
faithful in the Diocese of Erie. He was appointed to be an Assessor in the Diocesan Tribunal in
July 1995 and was appointed to work in the Office of Catholic Charities in 1997. These
assignments were granted after Bishop Trautman discovered Barletta’s misdeeds and removed
him from public ministry. In one document, written in 1997, Barletta was congratulated on his
“outstanding sermons at Carmel” by Bishop Trautman.

In 1994, the Diocese listed Barletta as being on sabbatical. He had actually been sent to
the Southdown Treatment Center. This information was never released to the parishoners of the
Diocese of Erie. Barletta was housed, fed and given therapy at Southdown at a significant cost
to the parishioners of Erie, which is detailed in the Diocesan records.

Deeper in the recesses of the diocesan secret archives was a handwritten note from 1968.
In this note, Bishop Watson wrote that Barletta “Spends much time in counselling high school
boys – a small number only.” Thus, the concerns regarding Barletta appear to have been raised
early in his career. Diocesan files indicate that in 1993, Monsignor Andrew Karg received a
complaint from five fellow priests expressing serious concerns about Barletta. On April 29,
1993, Karg wrote to Trautman about the priests’ fears that Barletta could be “crossing the line”
into the private lives of the students at Preparatory. Karg adds that Barletta is known to take
pictures inside the boys’ locker room of the kids’ crotch area and that Barletta maintains a book
of “crotch shots” in his residence. These priests questioned Barletta’s personal vacations with
the good looking boys and his trips to San Francisco with students. In another bullet point, Karg
reported “Father Dollinger’s” fear is that if the Catholic Preparatoryaratory school ever had a
law suit about a pedophile, “will the 18 years of Father Barletta also come to light?”

396
 Father Donald C. Bolton, C.S.S.R.

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1926
YEAR OF DEATH: Unknown
ORDINATION: 1952

Employment/Assignment History
1952 – 1954 Mt. St. Alphonsus, Esopus, NY
1954 – 1959 Bela Vista, Mato Grosso, Brazil
1959 – 1962 Campo Grande, Mato Grosso, Brazil
1962 – 1967 Bela Vista, Mato Grosso, Brazil
1967 – 1969 Monte Alegre, Parana, Brazil
1969 – 1970 Rocio, Parana, Brazil
1970 – 1974 Notre Dame Retreat House, Canadaigua, NY
1974 – 1984 St. Gregory Thaumaturgus, North East, PA
1984 – 1987 Our Lady of Perpetual Help Basilica, Brooklyn, NY
1987 – 1990 Holy Family Retreat House, Hampton, VA
1990 – 2003 St. Alphonsus Villa, Redemptorist Fathers and Brothers, New
Smyrna Beach, FL
2003 – 2006 St. John Neumann Residence, Sarasota Springs, FL
10/27/2006 Death

Summary

In 1986, the parents of a seven-year-old girl came forward to the Erie County District
Attorney’s Office with a complaint that Father Donald C. Bolton molested their daughter. They
came forward after they discovered that Bolton was working with children in New York. They
had been promised by Bolton’s holy order, The Redemptorists, that he would never again be in
a position to harm children. As a result of this complaint, Bolton was charged with indecent
assault and corruption of minors. He pled guilty in 1987 and was sentenced to three years’
probation. Records from that arrest also noted that several other girls were molested as well, but
the statute of limitations had already expired, thus prohibiting further prosecution.

One of Bolton’s victims would later file a lawsuit and received a settlement of $100,000.
This victim was labeled Jane Doe 1 in court records. Jane Doe 1’s lawsuit named the following
defendants: The Redemptorists Mission of the Baltimore Province, Most Reverend(s) Kevin
Moley and Joseph Kenan (Redemptorists), The Diocese of Erie, Bishop(s) Donald Trautman
and Michael Murphy.

Jane Doe 1’s abuse began in 1976 when she was seven years old and continued until she
was eleven years old. In 1976, Bolton came to her house to console her family over the death

397
Summary
of a grandparent. Jane Doe 1 reported that Bolton held her on his lap and rubbed her back, legs,
bottom, and rear.

Bolton’s second assault on Jane Doe 1 occurred in 1977, when she was eight-years-old.
This time, Jane Doe 1 was preparing to make her First Holy Communion at St. Gregory. When
she was practicing confession, Bolton entered her side of the confession booth. He then slid his
hands up her dress and pulled her panties down. He fondled her and rubbed his penis against
her. When Bolton was done, he instructed Jane Doe 1 not to tell anyone because no one would
believe a child’s word against his word. Jane Doe 1 recalled this type of abuse occurred for nine
months, at least every other week.

Beginning in 1977 and continuing into 1978, Bolton took Jane Doe 1 and her five friends
to the Peak ’N Peak ski resort in New York on several occasions. Bolton would take the girls
to the swimming pool at the resort. Once they were done swimming, Bolton toweled the girls
off and drove them home. Jane Doe 1 explained that while Bolton drove, he assaulted her in the
front seat. She described how Bolton would rub her genitals and poke her with his finger as
though he was trying to put a hole in her pants. Jane Doe 1 recalled this as a physically painful
experience. She recalled that it happened to her at least twice when she was eight or nine years
old.

In 1978 and 1979, Jane Doe 1 attended Confraternity of Christian Doctrine (“CCD”)
classes at St. Gregory. Her classes met every Wednesday night during the regular school year
from September to June. Jane Doe 1 reported that Bolton would have the nuns pull her out of
class and send her to Bolton’s bedroom in the rectory to help him with assignments. This
happened approximately every other week. Once in Bolton’s bedroom, he would take off her
pants and put her on his lap. She recalled that she would be in a position that her back was to
him. When in this position, Bolton would rub his penis back and forth on her buttocks and
vagina while he moaned and groaned. Bolton told Jane Doe 1 that he was preparing her for
womanhood. She added that while he would rub himself on her, he often had his hand and
fingers inside her vagina. When Bolton came close to ejaculation he would simply move Jane
Doe 1 slightly forward with his hand inside her vagina being careful not ejaculate on her.

Bolton’s last series of assaults on Jane Doe 1 occurred when she was eleven-years-old
at Lake Chautauqua in New York. Her parents rented a cottage in the resort town and invited
Bolton along for the family vacation. Her family was vacationing with at least two other girls.
These were two of the girls who had accompanied her and Bolton on the trips to Peak ’N Peak.
One day when Jane Doe 1 was done swimming with these two friends, Bolton found her alone
in her bedroom. Bolton closed the door behind him, proceeded to pull off her bathing suit and
turned her around. Bolton began to masturbate himself while inserting his fingers into Jane Doe
1’s vagina. Jane Doe 1 recalled this incident in particular because Bolton placed his fingers far
enough inside her to hurt her. She recalled that the assault only stopped when he thought he was
going to be discovered by a passerby. Once again, Bolton instructed Jane Doe 1 to be quiet
about the abuse because she was a lying child and nobody would believe a lying child over a
man of God’s word.

398
Summary
Jane Doe 1 finally began to disclose the abuse in 1993. That year, while attending a
funeral for an in-law, Bishop Michael Murphy was introduced to her in the funeral home lobby.
Jane Doe 1 had an emotional breakdown. She thereafter sought counseling. Bishop Donald
Trautman’s handwritten note documents that Bolton’s Redemptorists Order paid $50,000.00 and
the Diocese of Erie’s insurance carrier paid the balance.

Jane Doe 1 reported that she never witnessed Bolton assault any of her friends, but
believes they were also abused. She believes several, if not all, of her five friends with whom
she travelled to New York in the company of Bolton were assaulted in the same fashion as she
was. Diocesan records confirm part of her suspicions. The complainant in Bolton’s 1987
conviction was indeed one of Jane Doe 1’s friends. Other victims of Bolton’s predation came
forward years later and also proved to be childhood friends of Jane Doe 1. The Diocesan records
show correspondence with some of these victims. One female victim was with Jane Doe 1 on
her trips to Peak ’N Peak and also with her on the family vacation to Lake Chautauqua, New
York. This young victim was approximately the same age as Jane Doe, between seven and
eleven years old, when Bolton preyed upon her. The Diocesan records documented the efforts
the Diocese of Erie and the Redemptorists Order went through to get this victim and her son
counseling. As of 2003, both religious orders were in correspondence with this victim to assist
her. No mention of a lawsuit or cash settlement was found in her file.

In another file, the mother of five children alleged that Bolton may have sexually
assaulted four of them. No details of their assault were provided to the Grand Jury; however, as
of 2004, the Diocese of Erie’s representative, Monsignor Robert Smith, on behalf of Bishop
Donald Trautman, was corresponding with the family to offer them counseling assistance.

Bolton’s only other documented victim was a fourth grade boy who was abused between
1976 and 1977. Diocesan representative Monsignor Mark L. Bartchak made contact with him
in 2001 and reported his findings back to Monsignor Robert Smith and Bishop Trautman. This
victim reported that Bolton sexually assaulted him. Internal documents from Bartchak to Smith
record the Diocese’s preparation for a lawsuit and their intention to notify the Redemptorists of
this victim’s possible course of action. The Diocese made arrangements to have a representative
from Catholic Charities counsel the victim and to arrange for various agencies to assist him and
his family financially and by providing food aid.

In 2001, Monsignor Smith met with this victim in person to record his complaints.
When asked about Bolton’s abuse, this victim reported that he had a desire to be an alter server
and went to Bolton’s office one day to inquire about it. The victim explained that when he
opened the door without knocking, he saw Father Bolton with a young girl whose tights were
down around her ankles. He told Smith that this girl was crying and that Bolton yelled at him,
“What the hell are you doing here?” His only other answer to inquiries about Bolton was to say
that Bolton “Wanted me to do things to him.” He implied that these things that Bolton suggested
were sexual and that Father Bolton asked this victim to touch him.

In the Diocese response to the John Jay College Study in 2003, the Diocese of Erie listed
this last victim as “Not Verified”.

399
Summary

Ultimately, the Diocese of Erie returned Bolton to his religious order. The
Redemptorists continued to place Bolton in ministry until his death in 2006.

400
 Reverend Robert F. Bower

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1932
YEAR OF DEATH:
ORDINATION: May 7, 1959

Employment/Assignment History
5/23/1959 – 8/29/1964 Gannon University, Erie, PA
8/29/1964 – 6/03/1970 Parochial Vicar, Our Lady of the Lake, Edinboro, PA
6/03/1970 – 8/20/1993 Faculty, Newman Center, Edinboro University
8/29/1992 – 3/11/1999 Pastor, St Anthony, Cambridge Springs, PA
8/29/1992 – N/A Resident, other, Private Residence, Edinboro, PA
8/31/1993 – 8/29/1998 Weekend Asst., Our Lady of the Lake. Edinboro, PA
3/11/1999 – 3/01/2001 Leave of Absence.
3/01/2001 – N/A Special ministry, Weekend Asst. Johnsonburg, nursing home,
Meadville, PA

Summary

Reverend Robert Bower was a priest who served in campus ministry for over 40 years
in the Diocese of Erie. In 1981, Bower was found to have collected child pornography
photographs. Seventh grade children found these images in Bower’s office while they served as
janitors at the Edinboro University Newman Center. One of these children, now an adult,
testified to the images before the Grand Jury. The witness testified that he and his friends found
several photographs and pamphlets in Bower’s office depicting children having sex with adults.
He testified that he told his mother about it

The witness’s mother began working for the Diocese in 1977. In 1981, she was fired two
days after she and her three coworkers reported that Bower had a problem with child
pornography. Another Diocesan employee testified before the Grand Jury that at approximately
the same time the students found child pornography in Bower’s office, she also found illegal
pornography on his desk. She testified that, as Bower’s secretary, she collected it and hid it away
so none of the children who frequented Bower’s office would come across it.

The four coworkers first took their findings to the Father Doleski. After they showed
Doleski what was found in Bower’s office, he suggested that they see Bishop Murphy. They
requested a meeting with Murphy. Murphy delayed the meeting for weeks. Only after the
women threatened to go to the media did Murphy finally agree to meet with them.

In their meeting with Murphy, the women explained that they did not wish to get Bower
in trouble; rather, they wanted him to get help for his issues with child pornography. Both

401
Summary
witnesses testified that Murphy preached to them and made them feel guilty to the point that
they left the meeting in tears. They were told they were destroying Bower and the Church.

Two days after the meeting with the Bishop, one of the witnesses was notified that the
Diocese had fired her without reason. Over the course of the next several years, she was denied
jobs in the area and another witness was denied promotions inside the Diocese where she still
worked. This witness testified that she kept the child pornography that she found that day in
Bower’s office for 17 years hoping that someday someone would believe her story. Both women
were concerned that the influence of the Diocese could destroy their lives. Father Bower
continued in ministry unabated.

In 1999, the Pennsylvania State Police received a telephone call from a local computer
repair company. Technicians reported that they had a computer in their store with suspected
child pornography on it. That computer belonged to Bower. The Grand Jury heard testimony
from a former Pennsylvania State Trooper and from Bower himself confirming the presence of
this child pornography on the computer. While Bower initially confessed to the Pennsylvania
State Police, he minimized the significance of the material when he appeared before the Grand
Jury and indicated he was unsure as to how the now-lost material came to be on his computer.
Criminal charges were filed but were later dropped due to improper handling of the evidence.

During the timeframe of the 1999 investigation, the two aforementioned Diocesan
employees took action. The women took their long-held collection of Bower’s child
pornography to the State Police. Both women reported that the State Police took the Bower
material. The women hoped that their preservation of this evidence would result in some action
or aid the existing case, but no additional charges were ever filed and the materials were
destroyed.

Bower retired from active ministry in the early 2000’s but continues to live on the
campus of Edinboro University.

The Grand Jury found the testimony of the witnesses to be credible. It was Bower’s own
testimony, however, that most disturbed the Grand Jury. When the attorney for the
Commonwealth asked Bower if he had ever had sexual contact with a child under the age of
eighteen. Bower answered, “What am I supposed to say?” When the prosecutor persisted,
Bower added, “I’ll go to jail.”

402
 Reverend Dennis Chludzinski

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1946
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 14, 1976

Employment/Assignment History
6/05/1976 – 6/02/1977 Sacred Heart, Sharon, PA
6/03/1977 – 1/23/1978 Holy Rosary, Erie, PA
1/24/1978 – 6/30/1979 Leave of Absence
7/01/1979 – 8/24/1980 Unassigned / Under Father Kelly’s Supervision
8/25/1980 – 6/00/1984 Faculty at Villa Maria High School Erie, PA
St. Benedict’s Academy Erie, PA
Mercyhurst Preparatory Erie, PA
6/00/1984 – 10/08/1984 Attending Gannon University, Our Lady of Mercy
10/09/1985 – 8/31/1986 No Information provided by the Diocese of Erie
9/01/1986 - 8/02/1987 Chaplain, Sisters Community at Mercyhurst College, Hamot
Medical Center

Summary

The Grand Jury reviewed the files of the Diocese of Erie with respect to Father Dennis
Chludzinski. The record contained evidence that the Diocese became aware of sexual
misconduct by Chludzinski as early as 1984 that occurred while he was on the faculty of Villa
Maria High School.

In notarized testimony to the Diocese of Erie, Chludzinski admitted that in 1984, while
he was assigned as a Chaplain at Mercyhurst High School, he had inappropriate sexual contact
with an 18-year-old boy in his senior year. He stated that the abuse occurred in 1984, possibly
extending into 1985. In a letter dated January 30, 1991 addressed to Bishop Donald Trautman
and detailing his progress in therapy, Chludzinski admitted that he and a friend engaged in sexual
contact with an 18-year-old male from his high school. This included mutual masturbation and
oral sex. The sexual contact occurred approximately four times.

Similarly, in notarized testimony, Chludzinski admitted that after being granted a leave
from the Chaplain position at Mercyhurst High School, he became sexually involved with a 14-
year-old boy for approximately nine months. He stated that this abuse occurred in 1984 and
possibly 1985. The victim said that Chludzinski introduced him to his homosexual lifestyle.

Finally, a letter dated July 26, 2004 to Monsignor Robert J. Smith, Vicar General, from
Monsignor Mark L. Bartchak reported that a father recently discovered that Chludzinski had
molested his young son years ago during a camping trip. A file note dated September 20, 2004,

403
Summary
written by Smith, records that he and Bartchak met with the victim on September 17, 2004. The
victim reported that he met Chludzinski while he was an altar boy at Our Lady of Mercy. He
said that Chludinski kissed him, touched his genitals, and engaged in oral sex with him on at
least one occasion. On another occasion, Chludzinski shoved his hands down the victim’s pants
while driving a car. The abuse happened for about six months between the years 1983 and 1985
and occurred approximately six times. The victim reported that another altar boy was also
abused.

On October 1, 2004, Bishop Trautman notified the Erie County District Attorney’s
Office of the allegation.

In a memorandum to file dated October 2, 2004, Bishop Trautman memorialized that he

had called and informed Chludzinski of the allegation. Chludzinski replied, “Sorry.” A second
handwritten note by Trautman stated, “On Oct. 6 Dennis Chuldzinski called and admitted sexual
involvement with (the victim).”

404
 Father Donald Cooper

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1936
YEAR OF DEATH: December 16, 2011
ORDINATION: May 23, 1963

Employment/Assignment History
6/1963-5/1964 Bradford Central High Christian High School, Bradford, PA
5/1964-6/1971 St. Titus, Titusville, PA
6/1971-6/1975 St. George, Erie, PA
6/1975-11/1984 St. Charles, New Bethlehem, PA
11/1984-6/1987 Mount Calvary, Erie, PA
6/1987-3/1988 Assumption, Oil City, PA
3/1988-6/1989 St. Catherine, DuBois, PA
3/1988-4/1989 St. Anthony, Walston, PA
6/1989-7/2002 St. Joseph, Force, PA
7/2002-6/2005 Christ the King, Houtzdale, PA
10/2002-6/2005 Holy Trinity, Ramey, PA
6/2005 Retired

Summary

In 2005, a 40-year-old man sent an e-mail communication to the Diocese of Erie to report
that he had been subjected to inappropriate sexual contact by Father Donald Cooper between
1981 and 1982. Cooper was a priest at St. Charles during the time period of the allegation. The
victim stated that Cooper had abused him multiple times over that time period and had left him
with years of emotional trauma.

The victim explained that, at the time, he was a 16-year-old boy who was looking for
spiritual fulfillment in his life. His immediate family were not church goers, but the victim was
introduced to the Catholic church by a family friend. The victim soon took a strong liking to
the faith and wanted to learn more about it. The victim was attending St. Charles when Cooper
offered him personalized catechism lessons to instruct him in the faith. Over time, a relationship
developed and Cooper started to take the victim on overnight trips where they would stay in
various hotels and motels. Cooper would convince the young victim to take a shower with him
or to spend time with him in a sauna. This is when the molestation would take place. Cooper
would massage the victim and fondle his genitals. The victim was also subjected to Cooper
masturbating in front of him. The abuse took place in various hotels and also occurred in the
church rectory. The victim stated that a retired priest, Father William Smith, lived in the rectory
and knew of the abuse but did nothing about it.

405
Summary
When the victim reported the abuse in 2005, an internal investigation was conducted by
Monsignor Robert Smith. When confronted, Cooper admitted that he did shower and use the
sauna with the victim, and that he gave the victim massages. However, he did not admit to the
masturbation. Once the interviews were conducted, it was the opinion of Smith that the victim
was telling the truth and that his account was credible. Cooper agreed that he would retire and
would no longer be able serve as a priest. Additionally, the church and the victim came to an
agreement wherein the Diocese would pay for the victim’s past and future therapy sessions and
medication and also pay off $19,530 of the victim’s personal debt.

406
 Father Michael Robert Freeman

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1946
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDIANTION: May 27, 1972

Employment/Assignment History
6/10/1972 St. Margaret, Buffalo, NY
2/15/1975 St. Lawrence, Buffalo
Part-time teacher, Bishop Turner High School
7/31/1976 Sacred Heart, Niagara Falls, NY
7/01/1980 Chaplain, United States Army
11/09/1981 Ecclesiastical Endorsement revoked
9/11/1982 St. Christopher, Tonawanda, PA
9/01/1984 St. Mary, Lancaster, PA
3/21/1989 Faculties Revoked

Summary

Based on the information provided to the Grand Jury by the Diocese of Erie, the Grand
Jury learned that Father Robert Freeman had some contact with the Diocese of Erie but he was
not incardinated into the Diocese as a Diocesan priest. In fact, Freeman was a Priest in the
Diocese of Buffalo, New York. Father Freeman was ordained May 27, 1972. In five of his six
subsequent assignments he admitted inappropriate sexual behavior with young men on multiple
occasions. These instances of sexual abuse occurred while he acted in his capacity as a priest
of the Diocese of Buffalo but while he ministered in various assignments to include locations
within Pennsylvania. The Diocese of Buffalo first became aware of Freeman’s criminal activity
in November 1981. Freeman admitted prior sexual misconduct at both St. Margaret and St.
Lawrence Parishes in New York. This included his term of service at Bishop Turner High
School. The Buffalo Diocese continued to permit Freeman to serve in active ministry until
March 1989 and continued to provide financial aid to Freeman until July 31, 1999, at which
time he informed the Diocese that his salary and health insurance would be covered by his new
employer.

The Grand Jury found no documentation in Freeman’s file that indicated that the
Dioceses of Buffalo or Erie ever notified law enforcement officials, despite the fact that Freeman
admitted to sexually violating children in at least five of his six ministry assignments. On two
occasions he was treated at the Southdown Institute, a psychiatric facility for clergy and religious
personnel in Aurora, Ontario. While one of Freeman’s assignments was as a military chaplain,
locations within Pennsylvania at which Freeman may have sexually abused children include the
counties of Bradford and Lancaster.

407
 Reverend Gregory P. Furjanic

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1945
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: Unknown

Employment/Assignment History
1985 Staff, Kennedy Catholic High School
1985 - Unknown Unknown duties, St. Anthony of Padua Sharon, PA
1987 – Unknown Residing in a Convent at 1039 East 27th Street., Erie PA
7/08/1996 Faculties removed
2003 – Unknown Croatian Franciscan Friars, Chicago, IL.
2005 - Unknown Lutheran Social Services, St. Petersburg, FL

Summary

Reverend Gregory P. Furjanic served in the St. Anthony of Padua parish as a religious
Friar attached to the Croatian Franciscan Friars out of Chicago, Illinois. At that time, the
Diocese of Erie permitted an outside religious order priest to handle the ministry in one of their
parishes. The Diocese retained minimal paperwork on Furjanic, since he was technically not one
of their priests.

In 2005, there was an accusation made against Furjanic related to an incident that
occurred in the early 1970s. The second incident occurred in the mid-1980s. Then, the records
showed that in the 1990s an accusation against Furjanic came into the Diocese. The Diocese
sent Furjanic to the Erie Ecclesia center for counseling and then on to the St. Luke’s Institute
for advanced counseling. His case was ultimately forwarded to the Congregation for Institutions
of Consecrated Life and of Societies of Apostolic Life. On July 8, 1996, the Congregation
removed Furjanic’s priestly authority.

The Grand Jury learned that one of Furjanic’s victims later took his own life.

In 2005, an individual from Lutheran Social Services in St. Petersburg, Florida contacted
Father Robert Smith, Vicar General of the Diocese of Erie, to investigate Furjanic’s history.
Furjanic had allegedly attempted to obtain religious credentials in Mobile, Alabama and in St.
Petersburg, but was rejected based upon his past history. It was documented that Furjanic
represented himself as a clergy member associated with Lutheran Ministry and had the title
“Reverend” on his business cards.

408
 Father Herbert G. Gloekler

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1923
YEAR OF DEATH: 1985
ORDINATION: June 4, 1949

Employment/Assignment History
6/1949-9/1967 Sacred Heart, Erie, PA
9/1967-10/1974 St. Bibiana, Galeton, PA
10/1974-1/1985 Mount Calvary, Erie, PA
1/1985 Died, St. Mary’s Home

Summary

Father Herbert Gloekler was accused of sexually abusing young females during the
1950s while serving as a priest at Sacred Heart. Most of the allegations involved girls who
helped to sort paperwork in the rectory.

An April 28, 2002 Erie Times-News article described the abuse of the first victim while
she was a student at Sacred Heart School in the 1950s. She wanted to bring to light the abuse
that had taken place for years within the Catholic church. In addition to the article, on March
21, 2002, the victim had sent an e-mail communication to Bishop Trautman requesting that the
church stop the abuse and help the victims who suffered from sexual abuse.

The second victim wrote a letter to Trautman in May 2002 in order to support the claims
that had been set forth in the newspaper article. She was a student at Sacred Heart School in the
late 1950s. She remembered that she, a female classmate (Victim #1), and Victim #2’s sister
(Victim #3) would assist Gloekler in the rectory by folding church bulletins. Victim #2 stated
that Gloekler would fondle all of their breasts by putting his hand down their shirts. He would
also look down their dresses in the summer time to check for sunburn. Victim #2’s sister
confided in her that Gloekler once took her into his bedroom while they were alone in the
rectory. It was not until Victim #3 was an adult that she was able to tell anyone that Gloekler
had raped her.

Victim #4 wrote a letter to Bishop Trautman in May of 2002 and referenced the news
article in the Erie Times-News. Victim #4 stated that she was a student at Sacred Heart School
and would help in the rectory on Fridays along with other female students. She was excited to
have to opportunity to work with Gloekler. As a gesture of thanks to the girls who had assisted
him at the rectory, Gloekler planned to take them out for dinner. Before dinner, however,
Gloekler stopped at his mother’s house with the girls. Victim #4 stated that Gloekler pulled her
into an empty room and kissed her. He instructed her that this interaction was to be keep private.
The next week, Victim #4 returned to the rectory to help on Friday. Gloekler pulled her aside

409
Summary
again into a room where he kissed her and molested her. This was the last time that she helped
at the rectory.

There were two additional women who came forward and contacted Bishop Trautman
about sexual abuse that they had witnessed, but were not victims themselves. One of the woman
who came forward was a nun in the Catholic Church who wrote a letter to Bishop Trautman in
April of 2002. She was prompted to write the letter to corroborate Victim #1’s sexual abuse
claims in the April 28, 2002 article in the Erie Times-News. The nun was a classmate of Victim
#1 at Sacred Heart School. While she was a student, she had heard other students’ state that
Gloekler had sexually abused them.

A second woman wrote an e-mail directly to Bishop Trautman on June 1, 2002. She was
a student of Sacred Heart School from 1957-1959, and she would help fold the church bulletins
on Fridays. In the e-mail, she recalled witnessing Gloekler fondling young girls’ breasts in front
of her. Her e-mail was also intended to help substantiate the accusation of Victim #1.

An allegation was brought against Gloekler by a female housekeeper at Mt. Calvary

Church in Erie, a church were Gloekler had served as a priest in 1974. This woman said that
she was the housekeeper for Gloekler before his replacement, Father Cooper, took over and
eventually fired her. This woman indicated that she had knowledge that both Gloekler and
Cooper were involved in sexual misconduct. She made this accusation in August of 2003 when
she appeared in person at the St. Mark’s Catholic Center in Erie. Although the former
housekeeper did not state that she wanted money, she inferred that she had an arrangement with
Gloekler for her to receive a pension. The Diocese responded to her by saying that there was
not a pension agreement in place and accordingly no money had been deducted from her pay.
The Diocese did not mention the abuse allegation. There were no further documents or follow-
up reports regarding this allegation in the files.

410
 Father Robert E. Hannon

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1926
YEAR OF DEATH: 2006
ORDINATION: May 27, 1954

Employment/Assignment History
6/03/1954 – 2/03/1955 Assistant Pastor, Holy Rosary, Erie, PA,
2/03/1955 – 3/27/1957 Assistant Pastor, Sacred Heart, Sharon, PA
3/27/1957 – 2/03/1958 Assistant Pastor, St. Boniface, Kersey, PA
Resident Pastor (Hacherl) asked to have Hannon Removed
2/03/1958– 5/31/1958 Assistant Pastor, St Luke’s, Erie, PA
Resident Pastor (Goodill) asked to have Hannon Removed
5/31/1958 – 6/12/1965 Administrator, Sacred Heart, Genesee, PA
9/01/1959 – N/A Appointed Assistant Director of Lay Retreats for the Diocese
6/12/1965 – 6/4/1966 Holy Cross, Brandy Camp, PA
6/04/1966 – N/A Administrator, St. Mathew, Erie, PA
6/06/1966 – 6/16/1967 Administrator, St. Cyprian, Waterford, PA
6/16/1967 – 6/01/1979 Pastor, St. Mathew in the Wood, Erie, PA
4/13/1978 Requests transfer to Diocese of Hawaii
6/01/1979 Released to Diocese of Hawaii
9/19/1979 – 7/18/1980 Asst. Pastor, St. John the Apostle, HI
7/18/1980 – 6/1/1981 Associate Pastor, St. Cattistus, Kane, PA
6/01/1981 Associate Pastor, St. Elizabeth, Aiea, HI
4/26/1984 Holy Trinity Church, Honolulu, HI
7/17/1984 Incardinated into Diocese of Hawaii
10/20/2003 – 1/16/2006 Residence at Cathedral of Our Lady of Peace, Diocese of
Hawaii, Honolulu, HI
1/16/2006 Death Announcement

Summary

Father Robert Hannon was a Roman Catholic Priest who was posted in several states
and abused children in each Diocese to which he was assigned. In 1962, he began his ministry
in the Diocese of Erie, where he was assigned until 1978. At that time, Hannon turned his
attention toward the Diocese of Hawaii.

In 2003, in response to the John Jay College study on clergy sexual abuse, the Diocese
of Erie acknowledged the existence of eight known victims of Hannon’s sexual assaults. The
Grand Jury has found from subpoenaed documents that as early as 1986 that the Diocese of
Hawaii, and possibly the Diocese of Erie as well, knew that Father Hannon had admittedly
abused at least twenty youths between twelve and nineteen years of age. This admission came

411
Summary
to light while Hannon was receiving treatment for his behavior at Foundation House, which is a
psychiatric facility operated by servants of the Paraclete in New Mexico. Documentation was
found in the subpoenaed files discussing which Diocese was going to foot the bill for Hannon’s
extensive treatment.

Of the eight victims acknowledged by the Diocese of Erie, one is categorized as “claim
denied, not verified” based solely upon a denial by Hannon himself. That victim, Hannon’s only
known female victim, was abused in Hawaii by Hannon on one of his many trips to the islands
before he was incardinated into the Diocese of Hawaii in 1979. This abuse occurred in
approximately 1974 while Hannon was visiting Victim #1’s parents in Hawaii. Victim #1 claims
that while Hannon was tucking her and her sister into bed, he fondled her underneath her
underpants. Victim #1 stated that this abuse happened more than once but she could not state a
number of times she was abused.

In 2004, this female victim was interviewed by a professional chosen by the Diocese of
Hawaii. Ms. Barbara Mullen, who worked in that Diocese with Victim Assistance for Catholic
Charities, interviewed Victim #1 in February of 2004. It was the professional opinion of Mullen
and Rev. Gary Secor from Hawaii that Victim #1’s claims against Hannon were “extremely
credible.” Nonetheless, the Diocese of Erie sided with Hannon because he had previously
admitted to abusing only boys. On May 5, 2004, Hannon denied having ever abused any females
stating, “They do not have a penis.”

Much, if not all, of Hannon’s abuse came to light only after he was incardinated into the
Diocese of Hawaii. This is why he received most of his professional counseling in the western
part of the United States. The subpoenaed documents supplied to the Grand Jury contain
voluminous correspondence between the two Dioceses discussing which was responsible for the
costs of Hannon’s care and pension. Also contained in this file is correspondence between
Hannon and the Diocese of Erie. These letters consist of Hannon’s apologies for all the trouble
he has caused and acknowledgment of the funds sent back to the Erie Diocese by Hannon. These
funds were sent to Erie to be applied toward financial settlements with his victims. In one such
handwritten document, Hannon apologized to Bishop Trautman and thanked him for his phone
call prior to Hannon’s annual flight to Erie. Hannon expressed his concerns about airport
security to Trautman and wrote that Trautman’s call reminded him that cancelling his trip to
Erie was “a good thing – to avoid any warrants.”

As a result of Hannon’s denial, Victim #1 was sent a letter by the law firm of Quinn,
Buseck, Leemhuis, Toohey and Kroto, Inc. This is the law firm that represented the Diocese of
Erie on January 3, 2005, when the letter was sent. In that document, Victim #1 was told that the
Erie Review Board could not verify any of her allegations made against Hannon. The Diocese
would agree to provide four to six months of counseling to assist her in reconciling her present
situation, however. Attorney Kroto still works for the Diocese to this day.

Hannon’s victims were, in most cases, the children of parishioners and/or alter servers.
By his own admission, he would congratulate his alter servers after mass with a friendly hug
and “a little green”, as Hannon referred to cash. This hug and gift of money soon grew into an

412
Summary
ostensible friendship between Hannon and his victims that helped pave the way for their
exploitation. Another one of Hannon’s methods was to ingratiate himself with his victims’
families. Hannon was charming enough to get himself invited into his victims’ homes to have
drinks with their parents and even be invited to stay the night. Once the other adults were asleep,
Hannon would molest his victims while their parents slept. Another one of Hannon’s tactics was
to take the children of parents he had befriended to his residence at the rectory for “sleep overs”,
where he would have unfettered access to the children.

The following is a brief recitation of Hannon’s eight known victims within the Diocese
of Erie. It is unknown to what extent, if any, the Diocese ever informed law enforcement officials
about Hannon’s conduct.

Victim #1, as detailed above, was Hannon’s only known female victim. She was six to
seven years old when Hannon fondled her. The Diocese of Hawaii found her claim to be credible
but the Diocese of Erie did not and only offered to counsel her for four to six months.

Victim #2 was sixteen years old at the time of his sexual assault in the mid 1970’s.
Hannon testified at Victim #2’s military court martial trial that he performed oral sex on Victim
#2 at least twelve times when he was an alter server at Hannon’s parish. Victim #2 was found
guilty of espionage and sentenced to federal prison;

Victim #3 was twelve years old at the time Hannon fondled his genitals. The Diocese
and Victim #3 came to a $20,000 settlement in 2002.

Very little is documented by the Diocese about Victim #4, only that Bishop Trautman
found his claim to be a “good report.” Trautman notes that Hannon abused Victim #4 for over
one-and-a-half years. Trautman offered to personally counsel Victim #4.

Victim #5 was fifteen to sixteen years old in 1978–1979 when Hannon abused him.
Details of his abuse were not found in the Diocesan files. The Diocese settled with Victim #5
for $5,000 on November 14, 2003, however. Also found in the Diocese files was a copy of a
check written to the Diocese of Erie by Hannon dated November 3, 2003 in the amount of
$5,000.

Victim #6 was eight to ten years old in the late 1950’s when Hannon befriended him,
took him on trips, and engaged him in oral sex. This victim first notified the Diocese of Erie of
his abuse in 1993, several years after Hannon went to Hawaii.

Victim #7 was approximately nine years old when Hannon began molesting him in 1976.
His abuse lasted until 1981. Hannon endeared himself to Victim #7’s family and was invited to
their home for meals, holidays, and sleep-overs. Over these years, Hannon sexually abused
Victim #7 late at night and forced him to pose in explicit positions that Hannon then
photographed. Victim #7’s parents became aware of Hannon’s acts in 1981 and called for a
meeting with the Bishop. This meeting never happened and Victim #7’s parents let the matter
drop. In 1995, Victim #7 and his family settled with the Diocese of Erie for $39,000.

413
Summary

Victim #8 was approximately eleven years old in the early 1970’s when Hannon abused
him. Hannon fondled him, had oral sex with him, and penetrated Victim #8’s anus with his
fingers. This abuse all occurred while Victim #8 worked as an alter server and performed
cleaning duties at Hannon’s parish. Victim #8 reported his abuse to Bishop Trautman in July
2006. Trautman noted that he assured Victim #8 and his wife that “the priest accused of
molesting him has long died.” In reality, Hannon had only passed away six months prior.

These eight are only the known victims of Father Hannon. Hannon admitted to abusing
at least twenty victims, which leads the Grand Jury to conclude that there were many more, as
yet unknown, victims, both in the Diocese of Erie and in Hawaii. The investigation was unable
to uncover the identities and experiences of these additional victims. This is due, in part, to the
fact that the Grand Jury did not have access to the pertinent files from the Diocese of Hawaii.

Hannon passed away on January 16, 2006, while in residence at the Cathedral of Our
Lady of Peace in the Diocese of Hawaii. He apparently remained in the good graces of both the
Dioceses of Erie and Hawaii at the time of his death.

414
 Monsignor James P. Hopkins

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: Unknown
YEAR OF DEATH: 1957
ORDINATION: N/A

Employment/Assignment History
Unknown Dates: Pastor St. Titus Church in Titusville, PA
1920s Pastor at unknown church in East Brady, PA

Summary

On August 3, 1993, a victim wrote a letter to Bishop Trautman at the Diocese of Erie.
She stated in the letter that in 1945, when she was 13 years of age, she experienced abuse at the
hands of Monsignor Hopkins in the rectory of St. Titus. She stated that Hopkins would, “grab
our face in his hands, force us to look up, and then plant a sloppy kiss on our mouths. He would
also grab us and pull us close, wrap his cape around us, and fondle us wherever he pleased.”
She further stated that she remembered the dinners held on the weekend of forty hours, at which
the girls at the convent were invited to serve. She only served one time. Whenever anyone would
voice concern over Hopkins’s behavior, she would always hear the conduct dismissed by others
as, “Oh well, he’s old, he doesn’t mean anything by it.” The victim told the Bishop that she
knows that there is no excuse for such behavior nor is there any excuse for those who see it and
do nothing about it.

On August 23, 1993, Trautman received a letter from the Office of Clergy Personnel.
This letter stated that the office reviewed Hopkins’s file, which included sacramental records,
applications of various pastoral positions, health-related correspondence, pictures, press releases
including that of his death in 1957, and one letter of complaint. The letter of complaint contained
in this file related to an incident in the 1920s that did not involve any sort of physical abuse or
assault.

On January 11, 1994, the victim wrote another letter to Trautman. She enclosed a copy
of the first letter and asked the Bishop to please respond. On January 24, 1994, Trautman wrote
to the victim, acknowledging her recent letter about the accusation against Hopkins. The Bishop
wrote that “Since Monsignor Hopkins died in July of 1957, there is no possible way to investigate
your accusation.”

415
 Father Barry M. Hudock

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1969
YEAR OF DEATH: Unknown
ORDINATION: N/A

Employment/Assignment History
8/01/1997 – N/A Catholic University, Faculty, Washington, DC

Summary

Father Barry Hudock was a 27-year-old priest in 1996 when he engaged in inappropriate
sexual conduct with a girl in her junior year of high school. Bishop Donald Trautman’s notes
detailed that the victim was a 17-year-old high school junior at Mercyhurst Preparatory when
she was targeted by Hudock. This sexual abuse occurred in several different locations within the
victim’s local parish community, as well as in different states. In 1997, the Diocese of Erie
assigned Hudock to The Catholic University in Washington, D.C. Prior to that appointment,
Hudock, the victim, and another high school student traveled to Washington in the summer of
1997. Trautman documented that Hudock and the victim had engaged in kissing prior to the trip
in the church rectory. He also wrote that a “major episode occurred” in a hotel room where the
three stopped to stay for the night. Subpoenaed Diocesan records revealed that Hudock groped
and kissed the victim on numerous occasions. It was also reported that Hudock showed the
victim pornographic videos, undressed her in his rectory and sexually assaulted her.

In 2008, the victim was having a difficult time dealing with the psychological issues
stemming from her victimization at the hands of Hudock. She had been seeing a professional
counsellor in Texas when she contacted the Diocese of Erie. The Diocese agreed to pay for her
medical bills and provided her with airfare to be seen by the team at St. Luke’s Institute in
Suitland, Maryland.

Trautman notified Hudock’s then-employer, Christian Brother Academy, a Catholic

Preparatory high school in Syracuse, New York. Hudock was working there as a teacher.
Trautman also notified the Bishop of Syracuse and Hudock himself. Soon after this notification,
the school terminated Hudock. Trautman also notified the Erie County District Attorney’s
Office. At that time, Hudock was no longer a priest, was living in the Syracuse area, and was
married with 7 children.

Hudock’s current employment status is unknown, but he operates his own religious
website titled, “Faith Meets World” and has written several religious books for Liturgical Press
under his given name, as well as under the pen name “Barry Michaels.” On his webpage he lists
his credentials in the “About” section. His service as a priest is not listed.

416
 Reverend Joseph W. Jerge

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1927
YEAR OF DEATH: 2006
ORDINATION: May 3, 1951

Employment/Assignment History
5/18/1951 – 6/30/1952 Parochial Vicar, St. Boniface, Erie, PA
6/30/1952 – 5/23/1959 Parochial Vicar, St. John the Baptist, Erie, PA
5/23/1959 – 8/29/1964 Parochial Vicars, St. Joseph, Oil City, PA
8/29/1964 – 6/03/1970 Pastor, St. Hippolyte, Guys Mills, PA
6/30/1970 – 12/04/1989 Pastor, St. Callistus, Kane, PA
4/19/1989 – 11/22/1989 Sick Leave
12/04/1989 – 6/14/1991 Parochial Vicar, St. John the Evangelist, Girard, PA
6/14/1991 – 9/01/1992 Parochial Vicar, St. Francis Xavier, McKean, PA
9/01/1992 – 2006 St. Patrick’s Retirement Resident, Erie, PA

Summary

The Diocese of Erie was first made aware of sexual abuse allegations against Joseph W.
Jerge in early 1989. On April 19, 1989, he was sent to St. Luke’s Institute for sexual
psychological therapy. In the fall of 1989, he was released from St. Luke’s and signed an
aftercare contract that restricted his contact and ministry with young boys. He was placed back
into ministry at St. John the Evangelist.

On April 10, 1991, Jerge had a meeting with several members of the clergy, including
Father Fischer. In this meeting, the support team voiced their concerns about Jerge’s violations
of his post-care contract, specifically about his continued contact with young boys. As a result,
Bishop Trautman re-assigned Jerge to St. Francis Xavier parish in McKean on June 14, 1991.
At that time Fischer, wrote several letters to the administration at St. Luke’s voicing his concerns
that Jerge was failing in his efforts to stay away from the youth of the Diocese. In his letters,
Fischer reported that Jerge had admittedly offended upon numerous children and was
nevertheless coaching youth basketball, hearing confessions, and ministering at a parish that had
a swimming pool. Fischer went on to write that he felt that this swimming pool “will only
nourish the sickness.”

In that same month, June 1991, Jerge again agreed to adhere to the conditions set forth in
his original post-treatment conditions that restricted his contact with the young men of his parish.
This clergy meeting took place in the presence of Father Glenn Whitman, Director of Clergy
Personnel, and Father John Kirk.

417
Summary

Jerge’s ministerial timeline places him at two parishes after the Diocese had officially
confirmed the existence of several child victims of his sexual abuse and after he had been sent
to St. Luke’s for psychological counseling. It is unclear which victims came forward with
allegations against Jerge, but one such victim is particularly well-documented by the Diocese.
Victim #1 was a sophomore in high school when Jerge befriended him, took him on trips alone,
and fondled him on a number of occasions. Later in Victim #1’s life he would be blackballed
from employment and preemptively blocked from any attempt to be admitted to seminary. In
1995, Victim #1 applied for a position as Director of Religious Education at one of the Diocesan
schools. The Grand Jury found documentation in Diocese files that Bishop Trautman personally
instructed school administrators not to hire Victim #1, noting in a letter to Father William Kuba
that Victim #1 may be homosexual and may have attempted suicide. Also found in Victim #1’s
file was a notation that he was living an openly gay lifestyle and going to gay bars. This “File
Update” marked Confidential is dated August 23, 1996. The same File Update which accuses
Victim #1 of being homosexual concludes with this sentence: “This file update is provided in
the event that [Victim #1] would seek admission to the seminary studies here in this Diocese or
elsewhere.” This clear evidence that Victim #1 had been blackballed from employment or
admission to seminary is contrary to the compassionate image the Church has historically sought
to portray. It is also noted that the Diocese paid at least $1,200 of Victim #1’s counselling fees.

Jerge’s abuse of Victim #2 was documented in detail by the Diocese. Victim #2 stated
that his sexual abuse by Jerge began in approximately 1981 to 1985, when he was between the
ages of thirteen and eighteen at St. Callistus. Victim #2 stated that all sexual assaults by Jerge
occurred inside Jerge’s car. He stated that Father Jerge would invite a small group of altar boys
to go out with him after finishing their tasks at church. Victim #2 stated that he and three to five
other boys would accompany Jerge to a movie or to a restaurant for a meal. Victim #2 said that
he was always the last boy in the car to be taken home by Jerge. He stated that Jerge would
drive around in his car with him for approximately twenty to thirty minutes. Victim #2 stated
that Jerge would place his hand on Victim #2’s crotch area and caress and rub it. Victim #2
explained that Jerge would put his fingers between Victim #2’s button fly and stimulate that
area. Victim #2 estimated that Jerge would molest him in the manner described above
approximately two to four times a month when he was between the ages of thirteen and eighteen.

Victim #2 reported that he remembered an incident when he was in high school where
Jerge’s name came up. Victim #2 advised that he was at a party with similar-aged friends and
a small group of youths were playing a game of truth or dare. Victim #2 stated that during the
game a female classmate asked Victim #2 “Truth or Dare? Has Father Jerge ever touched you?
After this remark, Victim #2 wondered if others had also been sexually abused by Father Jerge.

Victim #2 eventually entered the priesthood and was ordained.

418
Summary

Victim #2 made his history of sexual abuse known to Bishop Donald Trautman in 2003.
He obtained an attorney who sent a letter to Trautman notifying him of the allegations that had
been made. A letter from Monsignor Robert J. Smith, Vicar General, on July 9, 2003 noted that
there was a meeting between Trautman and Jerge. This letter stated that Trautman advised Jerge
to consider securing both legal and canonical counsel. Trautman then advised Jerge that he
intended to report Victim #2’s allegations to the McKean County District Attorney. According
to the letter, immediately following the meeting Trautman called the District Attorney for
McKean County and gave her a full report of the allegations against Jerge. This letter also stated
that Trautman called the District Attorney of Erie County to appraise him of the situation and to
assure him of their compliance with the applicable standards and guidelines.

On August 10, 1992, while Jerge was the Parochial Vicar at St. Francis Xavier, a mother
filed a complaint against Jerge. She accused Jerge of having an inappropriate friendship with
her teenage son. The following day, several members of Trautman’s administration met with
Jerge. Monsignor Smith and Father Whitman concluded that the facts of the complaint, as they
had been presented to the Diocese, were accurate and that Jerge did not deny them. As a result
of this “grooming” behavior and in light of Jerge’s history of child abuse, Trautman was forced
to take Jerge out of ministry and place him in St. Patrick’s Retirement Residence. Jerge spent
the next fourteen years living in the Diocese’s retirement facility, eventually dying in 2006.

419
 Father Stephen E. Jeselnick

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1951
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 20, 1977

Employment/Assignment History
5/01/1976 Associate, Our Lady of the Americas, Conneaut, PA
6/03/1977 Granted full faculties of the Diocese of Erie
9/06/1977 Faculty, Venango Christian HIGH SCHOOL w/residence at
Assumption of
the Blessed Virgin Mary, Oil City, PA
2/09/1987 Requests new assignment/residence. Wanted campus ministry
6/23/1978 Associate, St. Brigid and Campus Minister, Allegheny College
w/Father William Karg
1/12/1980 Requests to be assigned to Notre Dame, IN (Holy Cross)
6/19/1980 Associate, St. Michael, Greenville, PA
7/31/1980 Appointed Defender of the Bond/Advocate for the Tribunal
3/31/1981 Bishop Watson agrees/recommends to release to
Notre Dame, IN
6/02/1981 Accepted into Graduate Candidate Program at Notre Dame
11/06/1982 Withdraws voluntarily from Holy Cross, IN (Novitiate)
12/03/1982 Permitted to minister in Denver, CO, for a six-month assignment
by Bishop Murphy
12/10/1982 Accepted by Archbishop Casey, Denver, CO
12/18/1982 Assigned to St. Mary’s, Littleton, CO
Spring 1983 Re-assigned to Shrine of St. Anne, Arvada, CO
3/18/1983 Requests to enter/serve as Military Chaplain
4/08/1983 Bishop Murphy approves appointment to Military
5/13/1983 Requests incardination into Diocese of Colorado Springs, CO
9/12/1985 Incardination denied; Requests Leave of Absence
10/10/1985 Colorado Springs withdraws their faculties
11/5/1985 Requests permission to enter Air Force to be Chaplain and
Additional Leave of Absence
4/1/1986 Requests to enter Archdiocese of Military
8/11/1986 Residence at Ecclesia Center, Erie, PA
10/03/1986 Parochial Vicar, St. Catherine, DuBois, PA; Chaplain, DuBois
Medical Center; and Father Brugger’s weekend assistant at Sigel
and Corsica, PA
4/21/1987 Archdiocese Military endorses for Active Duty
11/18/1996 Military Archdiocese to facilitate the change from active to

420
 reserve; the following month the Military endorses for inactive
reserve duty
7/14/1997 Veterans Administration Hospital, Baltimore, MD
5/01/2014 Faculties revoked

Summary

Father Stephen E. Jeselnick began service in the Diocese of Erie in May 1977, and it is
unclear when he officially retired.

A review of the Diocese’s files on Jeselnick reflected no abuse of children under the age
of 18 and therefore he was not reportable under the guidelines established by the Church in
2002. This “Charter for the Protection of Young Children and Young People” was established
by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. Jeselnick’s file only listed two known
victims and both were over the age of legal adulthood.

The same cannot be said, however, for three of Jeselnick’s victims who were not included
in the Diocese’s files. The Grand Jury heard in-person testimony from three members of a family
who each testified to their abuse at the hands of Jeselnick. Their accounts of Jeselnick’s abuse
included genital fondling, oral, and anal sex. This occurred in the late 1970’s when Jeselnick
was stationed at St. Brigid in Meadville. All three men and several of their sisters testified that
Jeselnick and a previously unidentified Deacon would come to their house and get intoxicated
with their parents. Once the adults were sufficiently drunk, Jeselnick would find the boys, who
were usually alone, and prey upon them. The three men testified that their mother worked for
the parish and would sometimes take the boys to work with her. Jeselnick would sexually violate
them both at home and on church grounds, and this abuse still haunts them to this day.

No record of this family’s abuse were located in the Diocesan files because the abuse
was never reported to the Diocese and these victims only came forward in 2017. When they did
come forward, the Diocese directed them to the Crawford County District Attorney’s Office. In
early 2017, both the Diocese and its law firm had been notified that any and all incoming child
sexual assault cases were to be referred to the attention of the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney
General. However, it was only after a family member reached out to a local newspaper reporter
that they were referred to the Office of Attorney General.

In 2014 the newly appointed Bishop of Erie, Lawrence Persico, received a letter from
Jeselnick requesting a letter of suitability for ministry. After reviewing his file and doing an
internet search, Persico denied Jeselnick’s faculties as a priest and informed him that he will
never again be granted permission to serve in public ministry.

421
 Reverend Thomas C. Kelley

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1943
YEAR OF DEATH: 2005
ORDINATION: December 21, 1967

Employment/Assignment History
7/25/1968 – 7/16/1972 Parochial Vicar, St. Peter Cathedral, Erie, PA
7/16/1972 – 3/17/1978 Special Ministry, St. Mark’s Seminary, Erie, PA
7/16/1972 – 5/05/1979 Weekend Asst., Our Lady of Mercy, Harborcreek, PA
3/17/1979 – 5/05/1979 Special Ministry, St. Mark’s Seminary, Erie, PA
5/05/1979 – 9/01/1985 Special Ministry, St. Mark’s Seminary, Erie, PA
9/01/1985 – 6/30/1989 Dean, North American College, Rome, Italy
8/28/1989 – 3/27/1990 Administrator, St. Michael, Greenville, PA
3/27/1990 – 6/15/1994 Pastor, St. Michael, Greenville, PA
3/01/1992 – 6/15/1994 Diocesan Review Board
6/15/1994 – 12/31/1995 Leave of Absence, Odessa, TX/Erie, PA
9/18/1995 – 9/22/1995 Psychological Assessment, Southdown Treatment Center,
Canada
4/1996 – 9/1996 Residential Treatment, Southdown Center, Aurora, Ontario,
Canada
9/06/1994 – 12/31/1996 Pastor, St. Agnes, Ft. Stockton, TX
12/31/1995 – 3/31/1995 Chaplain, Holy Faith Monastery
3/31/1996 – 11/25/1996 Assigned to Diocese of San Angelo, TX
11/25/1996 – 1/01/2001 Incarnated into Diocese of San Angelo, TX
2/21/2005 Death

Summary

Reverend Thomas C. Kelley served two different dioceses in two states, as well as in
Europe, over the course of his 30 year career. He was accused of inappropriate sexual conduct
with at least five victims and was named in a lawsuit that paid one sexual assault victim $34,500.
His victims of choice were eighteen to twenty-five-year-old males in high school or in seminary.
Kelley engaged in mutual masturbation, oral, and anal sex with his victims.

Although the Diocesan records do not reflect which one of his victims’ complaints
prompted the Diocese to send him to psychotherapy, in the fall of 1995 Kelley was sent to the
Southdown Center in Aurora, Ontario, Canada. Southdown is an inpatient residential treatment
facility that specializes in treating men and women in ministry. Kelley was sent there for a
week-long assessment period. Per this assessment, it was determined that Kelley should have a
restricted ministry that kept him away from young parishioners. Kelley disagreed with this
assessment and asked Bishop Trautman to send him to a different facility for a second opinion.

422
Summary
A physician from DuBois, Pennsylvania saw Kelley in 1996 and in March of that year agreed
with the course of action that Southdown recommended. Soon afterward, Kelley was sent to
Southdown for several months of treatment. After his release, Kelley traveled to Odessa, Texas
to take some time off and meet with an old friend with whom he attended seminary. He reported
to Trautman that he had reflected on his conduct while in Odessa and decided that he was not
ready to quit serving God. According to the documents, Kelley became interested in staying in
active ministry in the West Texas area during this time period. Over the course of the next
several years Kelley spent most of his time in the Diocese of San Angelo, Texas as a priest in
that Diocese. It was found that Bishop Trautman had told Kelley that if he returned to the Erie
Diocese, he would need to be assigned a severely restricted ministry. Faced with this harsh
restriction, Kelley asked to be assigned full time in Texas by permission of Trautman and Bishop
Michael Pfeifer of the Diocese of San Angelo. Both Bishops agreed to Kelley’s request. In their
correspondence, Trautman and Pfeifer often referenced telephone conversations they had about
Kelley and his troubled past.

During his visits to Erie during this period, Kelley also had some interaction with a
licensed social worker and therapist in the Erie area. She would confer with Trautman, Kelley,
and Pfeifer on Kelley’s treatment plan. She questioned Kelley’s suitability to be a priest and, in
an e-mail message to Trautman, she wrote, “If Tom Kelley has in fact been a predator, I think it
is time he is removed from the priesthood.” In another e-mail she advised Trautman that, “I
think it is time to ensure that Tom Kelley (although in Texas) no longer abuses children.” She
also criticized Pfeifer, writing, “it appears to me that he did not take responsibility to ensure the
safety of those under his care.”

Kelley passed away in February, 2005.

423
 Father Gary L. Ketcham

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1949
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: September 10, 1977

Employment/Assignment History
9/10/1977 – 1/23/1984 St. Bonaventure University, Faculty Franciscan Friars, NY
5/1983–1/23/1984 St. Patrick’s, Buffalo, NY
1/23/1984 – 9/11/1985 Parochial Vicar, St. John the Baptist, Erie, PA
9/11/1985 – 8/01/1989 Parochial Vicar, St. George, Erie, PA
3/05/1989 – 6/14/1989 Health Leave, Guest House, Rochester, MN
6/14/1989 – 6/08/1990 Health Leave, St. Luke’s Institute, Suitland, MD
6/08/1990 – 7/16/1990 Health Leave, St. Patrick’s/St. Hedwig Cluster, Erie, PA
11/13/1998 – 2004 Suspended/Other
2004– Present Privately employed; not functioning as a Priest

Summary

Sometime prior to March 1989, allegations of sexual misconduct by Father Gary L.

Ketcham became known by the Diocese of Erie. He was accused of molesting two boys while
in a drunken state. This occurred while he was visiting friends in Mobile, Alabama. Ketcham
was officially charged with two counts of sexual abuse of minors in Baldwin County, Alabama,
on February 2, 1990. He was sent to therapy as soon as the Diocese was made aware of the
Alabama incident. He was housed in a Diocese-owned treatment facility, which they called the
Ecclesia Center.

Diocesan preparation for Ketcham’s court case started in September 1989, when the
Diocese loaned Ketchum $5,000 for attorney fees. Subpoenaed documents revealed that this
was the first of a number of loans to Ketcham. Additionally, the Grand Jury found a promissory
note to Ketcham from the Diocese in which they pledged to front him $25,000 for lawyer fees
and bond. In that letter, the Director of Clergy Personnel wrote “Don’t worry . . . you’re good
for it.”

Ketcham ultimately pled guilty to both counts and was ordered to pay a $15,000 fine.
He received a permanent felony record.

In 2002, Bishop Trautman initiated the laicization process to formally remove Ketcham
from the church. Ketcham cooperated with this process. Trautman would note that it was
Ketcham’s own free will that drove the process. Ketcham was officially laicized by 2004.

424
 Father Thaddeus Kondzielski

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1941
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 27, 1967

Employment/Assignment History
6/16/1967-8/31/1986 Secondary Education, Cathedral Preparatory., Erie Facility
6/16/1967-6/03/1970 Weekend Asst., St. Stanislaus, Erie, PA
6/03/1970-8/31/1986 Weekend Asst., St. Hedwig, Erie, PA
8/31/1986-10/01/1988 Health Leave, Other
10/01/1988-6/30/1994 Administrator, St. Philip (Crossingville) Edinboro, PA
6/30/1994-5/04/2000 Pastor, St. Philip (Crossingville) Edinboro, PA
5/04/2000-6/29/2006 Pastor, St. Philip (Crossingville) Edinboro, PA
(Reappointed 2nd 6 yr. term)
6/30/2006-8/31/2012 Pastor, St. Philip (Crossingville) Edinboro, PA
(Reassigned 3rd 6 yr. term)
9/01/2012-4/28/2013 Pastor, St. Philip Crossingville) Edinboro, PA
(Reappointed 4th 6 Yr. term)
4/29/2013- Retired

Summary

Father Thaddeus Kondzielski was assigned as a teacher at Erie Cathedral Preparatory for
19 years. In January 2013, a victim contacted the Diocese to advise that 30 years earlier, when
he was a sophomore at Cathedral Preparatory, Kondzielski would ask him to assist with grading
papers in the rectory. On one occasion, Kondzielski asked him to stay and lift weights. When
he said he did not have the proper clothes, Kondzielski suggested that they lift weights naked.
They then proceeded to lift weights together while they were naked. When he told his parents
about the naked weight lifting incident, they were shocked and told him to stay away from
Kondzielski. When confronted with this allegations, Kondzielski claimed he did not remember
the incident, but did not deny it because it could have happened. Kondzielski changed his
version of lifting weights naked to him wearing a “Speedo” to lift weights.

The victim also reported, and Kondzielski admitted, that it was common practice for he
and the students to swim naked in the school pool. Kondzielski stated that he did not think this
was a big deal since the headmaster knew about it and never said anything about it. He did not
admit to any physical contact with any of his students. He did admit, however, that students
who helped him grade papers slept overnight in his bed.

425
Summary
The Grand Jury did not find any evidence that the Diocese of Erie notified law
enforcement about Kondzielski’s behavior.

426
 Father Gerard Krebs

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1938
YEAR OF DEATH: 2005
ORDINATION: December 18, 1963

Employment/Assignment History
7/26/1964 – 6/3/1970 Secondary Education Venango Christian High School, Oil City,
PA
7/26/1964 – 6/3/1970 Weekend Assistant, St. Stephen’s, Oil City, PA
6/3/1970 – 9/8/1970 Parochial Vicar, Our Lady Queen of the Americas, Conneaut
Lake, PA
6/3/1970 – 9/8/1970 Resident, St. Stephen’s Rectory, Oil City, PA
9/8/1970 – 12/6/1978 Parochial Vicar, Erie, St. John the Baptist
12/6/1978 – 1/27/1983 Pastor, Holy Cross Church, Brandy Camp, PA
1/27/1983 – 6/30/1990 Pastor, St. Patrick, Erie, PA
3/1/1990 – 5/4/1990 Health Leave, Guest House, Rochester, MN
6/30/1990 – 1/6/1992 Pastor, St. Patrick, Erie, PA
1/6/1992 – 12/31/2003 Director of RCIA, Diocesan Office, Erie, PA
1/6/1992 – 2/4/1994 Resident, Blessed Sacrament, Erie, PA
2/4/1994 – 3/27/2004 Resident, St. Joseph/Bread of Life, Erie, PA
4/10/1996 – 10/1/1996 Chaplain, Soldiers & Sailors Home
11/17/1996 – 5/8/1997 Weekend Assistant, St. Patrick, Erie, PA
11/22/1996 – 12/31/2003 Director of Activities/Coming Millennium, Diocesan Office,
Erie, PA
1/1/04 – 5/25/2005 Retired, Priest Retirement Residence, Erie, PA

Summary

Three known victims came forward indicating that they were sexually abused by Father
Gerard Krebs. The first victim claimed in a March 19, 2002 e-mail communication to Bishop
Donald Trautman that he was sexually abused by Krebs in 1968. At that time Krebs was an
English teacher at Venango Christian High School (“VCHS”). Sometime around graduation,
Victim #1 learned that he had impregnated his girlfriend. Distraught, he sought out Krebs for
counseling and guidance. Krebs stated that he was once a pre-med student and in order to
determine whether or not Victim was capable of impregnating a woman Krebs needed to check
Victim #1’s prostate. Krebs did so through penetration of Victim #1’s anus with his finger.

A second victim alleged that Krebs sexually abused him sometime in the late 1960s at
VCHS. In a letter to Father Tom Brown of St. Thomas the Apostle in Corry dated April 6, 2002,
a woman stated that her brother was “sexually molested” by Krebs and that she had learned of

427
Summary
it through conversation with her brother. She further alleged that Krebs was known to take the
victim and other male students to different places and to give them wine.

The third victim stated in an October 20, 2006 e-mail that he attended VCHS from 1964
to 1968. Victim #3, who was Episcopalian, approached Krebs during his junior year about the
possibility of becoming Catholic. Victim #3 alleged that Krebs led him through “a series of
sexual rituals to both prove my faith and the fact that I was not a homosexual.” Moreover,
Victim #3 referenced a 1969 graduate of VCHS who described numerous experiences of the
same nature that he and other classmates endured but did not divulge any additional information.

In 2002, following these allegations, Krebs underwent psychological evaluation at St.

Luke’s Institute in Silver Spring, Maryland. At this time, Krebs expressed acceptance of his
homosexuality during his evaluations but stated he could not recall any specific instances in
which he had sexually abused young boys. Krebs did, however, indicate that his drinking was
so severe at that point in his life that he could not rule out the possibility of it having happened.
Krebs did appear to recall Victim #2 and stated that they slept together in the same bed in a hotel
room but had had no sexual contact.

The Grand Jury found no documentation indicating that law enforcement was ever
notified about any of Krebs interactions with his victims.

428
 Father Jerry (John) Kucan

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1924
YEAR OF DEATH: 2010
ORDINATION: June 24, 1951

Employment/Assignment History
1952-1954 St. Anthony’s, Sharon, PA
1954-1961 St. Joseph’s, Bethlehem, PA
1961-1972 St. Mary’s, Steelton, PA
1972-1973 Our Lady of Peace Friary, Beaver Falls, PA
1973-1977 St. Anthony’s, Sharon, PA
1977-1978 Sacred Heart, Milwaukee, WI
1978-1979 Beaver Falls Friary, Beaver Falls, PA
1979-1982 St. Mary’s, Steelton, PA
1982-1985 St. Jerome’s, Chicago, IL
1985-1986 Sacred Heart, Milwaukee, WI
1986-1988 St. Anthony’s, Chicago, IL
1988-1994 At. Augustine’s, West Allis, WI
1994-1995 Sacred Heart, Chicago, IL
1995-2005 St. Anthony’s Friary, Chicago, IL

Summary

In February of 2005, a thirty-nine-year-old man wrote a letter to the Diocese of Erie in

which he stated that he had attended St. Anthony’s School in Sharon, Pennsylvania and that in
1974 he began serving midnight mass. Victim #1 stated that “Father Jerry” began an
inappropriate relationship with him at that time. Victim #1 wrote that Father Jerry gave him a
St. Christopher necklace as a gift and soon afterward the inappropriate behavior began. The
letter said that Kucan instructed Victim #1 to serve morning mass before school, at which time
the behavior continued. Victim #1 wrote that he would be called out of class at times, where he
would meet with Father Jerry and a Brother who wore a brown robe. These “meetings” would
take place in a room on the second floor of the gym. The letter explained that Kucan told Victim
#1 that if he ever told anyone about their relationship, Victim #1’s mother would lose her job in
the school kitchen and he would be kicked out of school. Victim #1 wrote in the letter that he
would go to confession weekly to confess his sins and that Kucan would tell him that the slate
was wiped clean. Victim #1 stated in his letter that he was now having trouble dealing with
many issues such as trust, intimacy, and questioning of his sexual orientation. Victim #1 asked
if the Diocese had an assistance program available for those suffering from such emotional
difficulties.

429
Summary
In March of 2005, Bishop Donald Trautman wrote back to Victim #1. The Bishop stated
that St. Anthony’s Croatian Catholic Church in Sharon was staffed by Croatian Franciscan
priests at the time in question and that “Father Jerry” could have been Father Jerry Kucan. The
Bishop stated that after he received Victim #1’s letter, he called and spoke to Father Marko
Puljic of the Croatian Franciscan Custody of the Holy Family of the United States and Canada.
The Bishop said that he read Victim #1’s letter to Puljic and that he asked Puljic to call Victim
#1. The Bishop stated that he was sending Victim #1’s letter, along with the Bishop’s return
letter, to Puljic. The Bishop then stated that Kucan was not a priest of the Erie Diocese and the
resolution of the matter rested with the Croatian Franciscans. The Bishop then wrote that Victim
#1 should contact Catholic Charities in Dallas, where he lived at the time, to help with his
emotional difficulties. The Bishop included a phone number for the Director of that office.

In June of 2005, Father Puljic received a letter from Attorney Richard Serbin of the Law
Firm Serbin, Kovacs & Nypaver of Altoona, PA. The letter advised Puljic that the firm had been
retained by Victim #1 on this matter and described Kucan’s “inappropriate behavior” in detail.
This letter stated that Victim #1 was eight years old when he met Kucan and that Kucan
thereafter molested the boy on a regular basis. This letter stated that Kucan would take Victim
#1 to the second floor of the gym, where Kucan would perform oral sex on the eight year old.
The letter also alleged that Kucan would have a brother in a brown robe present on some
occasions and that this brother would also perform oral sex on Victim #1. The letter stated that
Victim #1 was currently undergoing counseling.

The letter concluded with Attorney Serbin stating that he had represented individuals
that had been victims of clergy abuse for eighteen years. He stated that it was his policy to
“attempt amicable resolution of all claims on behalf of my clients prior to filing suit. I have been
able to achieve settlements on behalf of abuse victims with multiple Dioceses and religious
communities. I have found that when there is a sincere desire on the part of the church leaders
to correct wrongs of the past, recognition of the long term effects of clergy abuse upon victims,
and reasonableness on part of all parties, that these cases can be resolved without resorting to
the courts. It is my sincere hope that the Croatian Franciscans will accept responsibility for
Father Jerry Kucan, and do the right thing by [Victim #1] in fairly compensating him for the
horrible injuries that he has suffered as a result of his abuse.” It appears as though Victim #1
did attend counseling at the Catholic Charities in Dallas, which was set up by the Diocese of
Erie. In 2016, Victim #1 wrote to the Erie Diocese seeking to obtain counseling/progress notes
that his Dallas counselor had provided to the Erie Diocese.

On January 8, 2007, Vicar General, Monsignor Robert J. Smith received a letter from a
woman who stated that her husband had been molested by a priest in the mid 1950’s when he
served as an altar boy at St. Anthony’s on Idaho Street in Sharon. The letter stated that her
husband’s cousins were also victims. This writer stated in the letter that her husband committed
suicide in 1993 after a long struggle with depression. She had spoken to her husband’s therapist
after his death and the therapist told her that her husband’s severe depression was a direct result
of being molested at St. Anthony’s as a child. The writer stated that she has heard that other men
who were molested at St. Anthony’s had committed suicide. She stated that she knew that the
offending priest was now dead, but that the Catholic Church was not excused for the abuse. She

430
Summary
concluded her letter by asking Monsignor Smith how she could see any other reports on cases
similar to this.

On January 16, 2007, Monsignor Smith responded. In his letter, Monsignor Smith writes
that he was very sorry to hear about the molestation of the writer’s husband as a young boy in
the 1950s and his subsequent suicide in 1993. The letter then stated that Monsignor Smith was
not aware of the priest who may have committed the crime against her husband. The letter stated
that St. Anthony’s was staffed by priests from the Croatian Franciscan Custody of the Holy
Family and that the priest who abused her husband most probably was from that order. The letter
contained the name and address of Father Marko Puljic for her to contact.

The letter then addresses apparent requests made by the writer. Smith wrote “Regarding
your request for reports of other like incidents in the parish, two others have come to our
attention over the years. The first involved a Croatian Franciscan assigned to the parish in the
early 70s. The report came to us in February 2005. The Diocese notified the Croatian Provincial
on March 1st, got back to the individual several days later and offered him counseling assistance.
The second incident involved another Croatian Franciscan. It allegedly happened in the mid
80’s. One of our Episcopal Vicars serving in the Western Vicariate was made aware of it,
reported it to then Bishop Michael Murphy and the priest was removed immediately from the
ministry.” Smith was contacted by a social service agency in Florida after this second Croatian
Franciscan had applied for a secular position there. Smith called the Director and advised them
that a complaint of abuse had been filed against the individual, that he had been removed from
the ministry when it was reported, and that he had left the religious order. The letter concluded
with this paragraph: “Bishop Trautman has been our bishop since 1990. He has been vigilant
and aggressive in dealing with this tragic issue. Sexual abuse is abhorrent to all of us and when
committed by a trusted member of the church, doubly so.”

A file-note contained within the files claimed that on January 25, 2007, Bishop Trautman
notified Attorney Frank Kroto about the recent complaint from Victim #1, as well as a complaint
from another man. The file note states that Bishop Trautman asked Attorney Kroto to inform
District Attorney Bradley Foulk of the complaints, the identity of the priests, and the names of
the alleged victims. Kroto was also asked to assure the DA that the Diocese would comply with
any requests for additional facts and information.

A file note showed that on July 31, 2007, Vicar General Smith wrote that he spoke with
Father Marko Puljic to get an update on Kucan and to determine when he was removed from
the ministry. Puljic said that Father Kucan was taken out of the ministry in March 2005, when
the Order received its first complaint against him. The Order settled with Victim #1 filing the
complaint. The file note also indicated that Kucan was then in his mid- eighties and in the early
stages of dementia.

There is nothing contained in this file that shows that any actual correspondence between
the Church and the District Attorney occurred.

431
 Monsignor Louis Lorei

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1921
YEAR OF DEATH: 1986
ORDINATION: N/A

Employment/Assignment History
9/1981 – 9/1985 Pastor, Our Lady of Peace, Erie, PA
Unknown Possibly Gannon University

Summary

In December 2009, Father Mark Hoffman called the Bishop’s office to report an
allegation involving child sexual abuse by Monsignor Louis Lorei. The parents of a boy had
approached him to report that their son stated he “was touched by Monsignor Lorei” in the early
1980’s. Bishop Trautman later met with the victim. The victim stated that about 1980 or 1981,
he was a student, roughly age 11 to 13, at Our Lady of Peace school. He was also an altar server
during early mass with Lorei. On one occasion, Lorei invited him into the rectory and into his
bedroom. Lorei had the victim sit on the bed while Lorei sat next to him and hugged and kissed
him on the lips. This would occur several days in a row, stop, and then begin again. The victim
eventually refused to serve mass with Lorei. Lorei was soon removed by then-Bishop Murphy.
In his own handwritten words, Trautman expressed the personal belief that Lorei’s sudden
departure may likely have been indicative of some kind of significant event. Trautman offered
the victim counseling services. Financial assistance was also discussed.

In a memorandum dated March 30, 2007, Hoffman also documented an additional victim
of Lorei. Hoffman found out through the father of the second victim that his son was allegedly
abused by Lorei. The victim reportedly described the incident during a United Methodist retreat
in 2000.

A small note in the file states “Review Board found no merit in processing since
supposed victim did not come forth even after requests.” It is unclear as to whom that note refers.

Despite a grand jury subpoena, no file for Monsignor Louis Lorei was made available
by the Erie Diocese. A public records database search listed one additional, potential address
associated with Lorei in Erie, which appears to be the address of Gannon University.

432
 Father Salvatore P. Luzzi

Biographical Information
DATE OF BIRTH: 1935
YEAR OF DEATH:
ORDINATION: May 31, 1962

Employment/Assignment History
6/09/1962 – 8/29/1968 Faculty, Venango Christian High. Residence at St. Joseph,
Oil City, PA
8/28/1968 – 8/28/1969 Sp. Ministry, St. Mark’s Seminary, Erie, PA
8/28/1968 – 7/16/1972 Dean/Collegians, St. Mark’s Seminary, Erie, PA
7/16/1972 – 5/05/1979 Sp. Ministry, St. Mark’s Seminary, Erie, PA
5/05/1979 – 7/19/1994 Pastor, St. Joseph, Warren, PA
3/19/1991 – 8/01/1994 Sp. Ministry, Dean/Warren Co. Deanery, St Joseph, Warren, PA
7/19/1994 – 2/10/1995 Sick Leave
5/05/1979 – 9/15/1995 Resided at St. Joseph
9/15/1995 - currently Faculties removed

Summary

After several years teaching at Venango Christian High School, Reverend Salvatore P.
Luzzi was moved to St. Mark’s Seminary, where he filled several roles. Over the course of his
30 year ministry, he was accused of sexual misconduct by eight male victims ranging in age
from early teens to early twenties. Some of these victims were groped, inappropriately kissed,
hugged, and/or fondled. He also faced allegations of responsibility for the suicide of a former
student/victim.

Luzzi worked extensively with young would-be priests at St. Mark’s where he and fellow
priest Leon Muroski served as Spiritual Directors to the seminarians. Luzzi’s inappropriate
touching and fondling of at least two seminarians prompted the Diocese to settle with those
seminarians for large sums of money. The first former Seminarian’s case was settled in civil
court for $34,500 and this individual received several thousand dollars over the course of the
many years that the Diocese paid for his counseling and medication costs.

Several other former juvenile victims of Luzzi received letters or phone calls of apology
from the Diocese. These victims were counseled by the Diocese through correspondence or in-
person interviews wherein Luzzi’s behavior was dismissed as “Sal’s way of expressing himself”
and his “touching approach” to ministry was attributed to his Italian upbringing.

The Diocese listed several Luzzi victims in its internal reports, but little to no
documentation was contained in the files. It was alleged that Luzzi groped the buttocks of one

433
Summary
victim in a hardware store in 1998. This individual was 19 at the time of the incident. Luzzi
denied the touching and only admitted to patting this individual on the back.

In 1974-1975, Luzzi and Father Leon Muroski were working at Camp Notre Dame in
Fairview when a young seminarian named Michael Amy was accused of fondling two juveniles.
These victims reported the incident to the Pennsylvania State Police, the Diocese of Erie, and to
their parents. The Diocese representative for this incident at Camp Notre Dame was Father
Lawrence Speice. Speice assisted Amy by interceding on Amy’s behalf with the State Police
and the boys’ parents. No arrest was made. Luzzi and Muroski dealt with Amy by making him
attend counselling and keeping him in seminary. Amy would go on to abuse at least two more
juveniles, along with several other unidentified juvenile prostitutes as an ordained priest prior
to being laicized.

During Amy’s laicization process, he called Speice, Muroski and Luzzi as his witnesses.
Muroski denied knowledge of any wrongdoings by Amy. Speice and Luzzi both admitted some
knowledge of Amy’s molestation of children in 1974-1975. Luzzi wrote on Amy’s Witness
Statement that he was “amazed that he was made a pastor in a place where something happened
before,” and that “there certainly should have been something in his Seminary day files.” Luzzi
added, “I personally wondered when these things would resurface.”

In 1994, Bishop Trautman sent both Luzzi and Muroski to St. Luke’s Institute for
therapy. The Diocese publicly announced that Luzzi was going on an extended sabbatical for
“personal, spiritual and academic growth.” Once Luzzi was discharged, the Bishop welcomed
him back into pastoral ministry by letter on February 14, 1995. However, the welcome also came
with several conditions and a Penial Precept, a formal notification in the church that restricts
ministry. Trautman directed Luzzi to refrain from all contact with youth under 19 years of age
and to avoid travel and social interaction with such parishioners. Later that same year, in
September 1995, Trautman had Luzzi’s faculties as a priest removed and Luzzi began residing
in a private residence, where he remains today.

It was Luzzi’s position that Trautman forced him to retire. It was the position of
Trautman and the Diocese that what led to Luzzi’s resignation was the weight of new allegations
and the real possibility of widespread publicity. It was found in subpoenaed files that Luzzi’s
accusers threatened to take “appropriate steps” if Luzzi was not removed from ministry. This
information was found in an internal document written by Monsignor Robert Smith and placed
into Luzzi’s file on October 12, 1995. Smith and Trautman informed Luzzi that if he did not
retire of his own free will, the Diocese would follow the canonical process specified in church
law to remove Luzzi. Luzzi resigned less than 30 days later.

434
 Father Richard D. Lynch

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1937
YEAR OF DEATH: 2000
ORDINATION: May 5, 1963

Employment/Assignment History
6/01/1963 - 5/26/1972 Secondary Education Bradford Central Christian
High School, Bradford, PA
5/26/1972 - 2/18/1983 Headmaster, Secondary Education Bradford Central Christian
High School, Bradford, PA
2/18/1983 - 8/30/1999 Pastor, Erie Holy Rosary, Erie, PA
1984-1994 Dean, East Erie Deanery, Erie, PA
8/31/1999 – Death Pastor, St. Mark’s the Evangelist, Erie, PA

Summary

A memorandum located in the files from the Diocese of Erie - - apparently written by a
secretary to Bishop Trautman - - stated that an individual called on July 26, 2004 and stated
that he had called one month earlier and had spoken to a priest because the Bishop was
unavailable on the subject of “sexual involvement years ago.” This caller stated that the priest
told him that he would be contacted but nobody had returned his call to date. The caller also said
that he was very upset about what had recently been written in the USA Today newspaper about
an Erie Benedictine nun and that he had cut the article out and sent it to Cardinal Rigali.

In the Diocesan files the Grand Jury found a handwritten note that was titled with the
above caller’s name. The page appears to be a hand written notes from an interview with the
caller/Victim #1. The Grand Jury read the notes to indicate the following:

[The victim] attended school and was a senior in 1978. He worked after
hours at school and while he was cleaning the locker room, Father Richard
Lynch touched him in a private area and later also pushed him against the
wall. Another Father told Lynch not to touch [the victim].

On an undated official document from the Office of the Bishop, handwritten in ink, the
writer states that Victim #1 came to see Monsignor Smith and Bishop Trautman regarding
incidents of supposed abusive and aggressive behavior by Father Richard Lynch, the former
Headmaster of the Bradford Central Christian High School. The document further states,
“[Victim 1] claims Lynch slammed him into the wall and this resulted in a trauma for [Victim
#1]. Father Grady had Lynch removed and Father Welter then came as Headmaster. (All of this
transpired before I came to the Diocese)”. Victim #1 claimed he went to the doctor in April of
1979 and had to have back surgery at the Erie Metro Health Center. The note then states that

435
Summary
“There are psychological issues present in [Victim #1], He receives money from Social Security
because of DISABILITY” At the bottom of the document, the writer writes that Victim #1 is
agitated, but that “he usually calms down as you talk with him.” There was also a form titled
“Advisory Statement for Report of Sexual Misconduct” in the file, which was dated August 11,
2004 and signed by Victim #1. This form advises the signee that they have the right to report
alleged sexual misconduct directly to the Office of District Attorney, that they have the right to
seek an Attorney of their choice, and lastly that the Church representative would not give them
legal advice.

On July 2, 2014, a letter was sent to Victim #1 from Father Gramata, who oversees the
St. Bernard of Claurvaux Cemetery advising Victim #1 that he was in violation of several
regulations regarding his parents burial plot in the cemetery and that he had fifteen days to
resolve the violations. On September 06, 2014, Father Gramata sent a letter to Bishop Persico
advising him that the Cemetery removed the items in violation at Victim #1’s parents’ plot and
had them stored. In May of 2015, Father Gramata wrote a letter to Persico and included a letter
that Gramata had received from Victim #1, who was incarcerated at this time in the Albion State
Correctional Institution and was angry at the removal of the gravesite items.

Another letter sent to Gramata by Victim #1 in September of 2015 was forwarded to

Bishop Persico. In this letter, Victim #1 again went on at length about his displeasure with the
cemetery. He stated in this letter “I didn’t fight the Church back in ‘79 when things happened
to me in the high school.”

Victim #1 sent letters to Bishop Persico from March through September of 2016. He was
writing letters to the Bishop because he was very upset over treatment that he was receiving
from two Catholic Deacons inside Albion Prison. Victim #1 did not think the Deacons were
being fair or sufficiently nice to him.

In a letter dated June 3, 2016, Victim #1 stated that he wanted to write the Bishop to get
some things off his chest. He alleged that Father Richard Lynch was responsible for the sexual
abuse that he went through while attending Bradford Central Catholic Christian High School
1978-1979. Victim #1 stated that he told Bishop Trautman about some physical abuse but was
too ashamed to talk about the sexual abuse. There is a hand written notation in black ink on top
of the letter that said, “Reported to District Attorney Daneri 7-28-2016”

There is also a memorandum in the file, dated August 5, 2016 from Deacon DeCecco to
Smith that states that DeCecco had not met with Victim #1 about any abuse issues before that
date. It goes on to say that DeCecco met with Victim #1 for forty five minutes and he mostly
wanted to talk about how poorly the Church is being administered. Victim #1 did say that he
was abused by Lynch while a student at Bradford Central and also that Trautman was aware of
it. The memorandum stated that Victim #1 was offered counseling from Trautman at the time
and had turned it down, but that he would accept it now if offered.

Victim #1 said that he had told others that he had never been abused, but that was because
he was ashamed and afraid to speak about it back then. Victim #1 also told Deacon DeCecco

436
Summary
that he believed it was wrong to take money from God’s House and that he would therefore not
seek compensation.

On August 15, 2016, Victim #1 wrote another letter to Persico and stated that he had a
talk with DeCecco in the prison and discussed with him some of his concerns. Victim #1 went
on to say that the main issue that concerned him was what happened to him at the Bradford
Catholic High School. Victim #1 then wrote, “I want you to consider making me an offer
Monetary to end this with me and get me some counseling. The Priest that did this is gone now
but it will always be with me.” Victim #1 also referred to an incident in Altoona and reported
that Bishop Barcheck now has a death on his shoulders. He wrote “I would sign off on a check
for $20,000 to just close the books on this era. I’m trying to keep it quiet so this case never
becomes public.” Victim #1 told the Bishop that he could just send the $20,000 check to him at
Camp Hill.

On September 6, 2016, Persico wrote back to Victim #1 and told him that he was very
sorry to hear of his claim of sexual abuse and apologized. The letter went on to state,

Since Father Lynch is dead, the Diocese of Erie has nothing in its file
regarding him sexually abusing students. This claim was never reported to the
Diocese of Erie. I want you to know that I called the Erie County District
Attorney’s Office on July 25, 2016 to report the alleged sexual abuse. Also Child
line was called on August 23, 2016 and the alleged abuse was reported to them.
We want to help you in your healing process by offering counseling. The Diocese
of Erie has a policy not to make monetary settlements. We are more concerned
in the healing of victim survivors than by keeping the sexual abuse quiet. We
need to know how the Diocese can assist in providing counseling while you are
a resident of SCI Albion. Please let me know.”

Victim #1 responded to Persico’s letter on September 12, 2016. In his letter to the
Bishop, Victim #1 asked the Bishop why he did not notify McKean County, where the abuse
occurred. Victim #1 also told the Bishop to ask Smith why he or retired Bishop Trautman never
reported it, since he came up there and met with both of them.

Victim #1 then said that the Bishop could check with DeCecco and he could help with
setting up counseling for him in Albion. Victim #1 then said that what the Bishop could do for
him is to help the Catholic parish of St. Bernard’s in Bradford make the goal of refurbishing the
Church and have the Diocese donate on Victim #1’s behalf to the building fund.

There were no further allegations contained in this particular file from other persons
against Father Lynch. Lynch died prior to the allegations being reported to the District
Attorney’s Office.

437
 Monsignor Daniel Martin

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1917
YEAR OF DEATH: 2006
ORDINATION: November 17, 1943

Employment/Assignment History
1943 – 1945 Parochial Vicar, Sacred Heart, Sharon, PA
1945 – 1962 Faculty, Erie Cathedral Preparatory High School, Erie, PA
1948 – 1962 Assistant Headmaster, Erie Cathedral Preparatory, Erie, PA
1950 – 1962 Chaplain, Mercyhurst College
1962 – 1970 Pastor, St. Boniface, Kersey, PA
1962 – 1970 Headmaster, Elk Co. Christian High School, St. Mary’s, PA
1970 – 1974 Pastor, St. Joseph, Oil City, PA
1974 – 1986 Pastor, St. George, Erie, PA
1984 Prelate of Honor, titled Monsignor
1986 – 1987 Retired, Residence at Mt. Calvary, Erie, PA
1987 Chaplain, Mercyhurst College for Religious women
2003 Blessed Sacrament, Residence

Summary

Monsignor Daniel Martin was a priest the in the Diocese of Erie for 43-three years who
faced two known allegations of sexual abuse. The Grand Jury’s review of his files found very
little documented evidence of his abuse of a teenager who was an alter server in his parish. That
victim would go on to become a priest himself and appeared in front of the Grand Jury to tell
his story. Martin’s second victim was a Seminarian who named Martin, along with Bishop
Trautman and Fathers Salvatore Luzzi, Leon Muroski and Thomas Kelley, in a civil suit that
was settled by the Diocese for $34,500 on October 3, 1995. This Victim (Victim #2) claimed to
have been sexually harassed and assaulted by the priests named in his suit.

Victim #2’s abuse occurred at St. Mark’s Seminary in Erie, amidst what he described as
a ‘culture of sexuality’ among the priests. He reported to the Diocese that the priests in the
seminary have a ‘fierce competition’ among themselves to sexually prey upon kids who had
absentee fathers or children who had poor relationships with their fathers. Victim #2 explained
that in the Seminary, the priests who acted as spiritual advisors to the seminarians would engage
them in sexual misconduct. He reported that one of his spiritual counsellors, Gene Humenay,
was upset when he learned that this type of sexual behavior was going on in the seminary, but
Humenay did nothing to stop the abuse. Victim #2 believed the Diocese knew that the priests
were sexually abusing the seminarians but did nothing about it. In his lawsuit, he named Bishop
Donald Trautman, not as an abuser but as an enabler.

438
Summary
Gene Humenay was subpoenaed into the Grand Jury to answer question regarding his
knowledge of clergy sex assault. He had left the priesthood in 1987 to get married.

One of Victim #2’s demands of the Diocese when he sued was to have all the priests
named in his suit removed from ministry and given professional counselling. The Diocesan
records did not specify if Martin was sent for treatment, but it was acknowledged in a letter to
Victim #2 from the Diocese that Martin was seen at St. Luke’s Institute in September 1995.
This information cannot be corroborated by the documents provided to the Grand Jury.

This investigation found a document dated July 24, 1994 and labeled “confidential
memorandum for the file, RE: Daniel Martin.” It documents the interaction between Bishop
Trautman, Victim #2, and Daniel Martin. It records Trautman confronting Martin about the
allegations of the sexual abuse of Victim #2. In it, Trautman wrote that Martin offered to donate
$3,500 towards Victim #2 receiving proper therapy. Martin also apologized to Trautman for the
incident. Trautman accepted Martin’s check and forwarded it on to Victim #2.

The first aforementioned accusation of sexual abuse against Martin was much less well-
documented in the Diocese records and only came to light via the cooperation of another victim.
Victim #1 contacted the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General’s Catholic Church Hotline to
report his story. Victim #1 is also an ordained Catholic priest and has served the Diocese of Erie
for many years. He was subpoenaed into the Grand Jury to tell his story. Victim #1 testified that
Martin was his parish pastor and a role model for him because he had a dysfunctional family
and he felt isolated from his friends. He explained that he felt the church and Martin became his
‘surrogate family’. This gave him access to all parts of the rectory. Victim #1 reported that when
he would be upset over the troubles of his life, he would seek Martin’s counsel. It is in these
moments of weakness and vulnerability that predators look to exploit their victims, and Martin
was no different. Victim #1 testified that Martin sexually fondled him on at least sixteen
occasions between the ages of sixteen and nineteen. Victim #1 reported to this investigation that
Martin abused him three times at St. George, eight times at Mt. Calvary and five times at
Mercyhurst College.

Victim #1 testified that Martin was friends with several other priests that were known
pedophiles. He said that on a number of occasions, Martin’s friend, Father Gary Ketcham (see
Father. Gary Ketcham narrative), invited him to play racquetball or took him to nice dinners.
When he did play racquetball with Ketcham, he would always be instructed to bring a towel
because Ketcham would insist on taking a shower with Victim #1 and the other boys he took to
the racquetball court. Another known pedophile priest with whom Martin would often associate
was Father Robert Hannon (see Rev. Robert Hannon narrative). Victim #1 testified that Hannon
retired early and relocated to Hawaii. Victim #1 reported that Hannon retired early due to
inappropriate behavior with children and he would often return to the Erie area to visit with
Martin. Victim #1 told the Grand Jury that Hannon’s way of befriending the altar boys was to
hand out cash. Victim #1 testified that he personally experienced Hannon handing out money.
He said Hannon would call it “green” and give it to any boy working the rectory. He added that
Hannon and Martin were old friends from when they both worked in Oil City.

439
Summary
Victim #1 went on to report that from his personal experience he did not see the problems
in the Catholic Church to be one of clergy sex abuse or an issue of gay men. He testified that
the real issue is that of power and the ability to force your will over those under you. He informed
this investigation that he believes that the Diocese knew full well what Martin was and that he
had been preying upon Victim #1 for some time. He said the rumors of his abuse at the hands
of Martin were openly talked about with his spiritual advisors while he was in the seminary in
1989-1990.

A review of the subpoenaed files supplied to the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney

General found little to no mention of Martin’s molestation of Victim #1 What can be determined
is that approximately the same time Victim #1 was in seminary openly decrying Martin’s
conduct, the Diocese had Martin assigned to Mercyhurst College. The Diocese would later
restrict Martin’s ministry at the college to dealings only with the Catholic nuns at the school.

440
Biographical Information

Employment/Assignment History

Summary

, who as early as the 1960’s stated his preference for

ministering to youth, was reported by one of the Diocese of Erie’s
to have taken multiple seventh and eighth grade boys to his rectory for “cancer
and prostate checks” in 1988. In spite of this information, , who notified
Bishop Trautman about the specific complaints in 1991, admitted that the Diocese did nothing
further with respect to these complaints because he ( ) had known for
his entire priesthood and “did not see the need.” ‘Trautman continued to assign to
various parishes, even though the Diocese’s own records show that by 1991 the Bishop already
had knowledge that other priests within the Diocese had used “cancer checks” as a pretext to
commit acts of sexual abuse against children (see Rev. Chester Gawronski).

441 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

-*5*("5*0/
Summary
On December 4, 1988 a meeting was held between the Diocese and a parishioner who
had recently changed parishes. Among other things, the report documented that the parishioner
switched parishes partially due to “sexual improprieties involving two of [her] children.” One
of these involved counseling sessions with in which he repeatedly asked one of her
children sexually-oriented questions and that this continued even after he had been advised to
stop. The second involved another child who claimed that had placed his hand on
the boy’s crotch.

Further, at the time of the meeting, the from the same parish advised that her own
children told her about other boys in the seventh and eighth grades who were taken by to
the rectory where he “check[ed] them for testicular/prostate cancer.” She further advised that
she remembered these children returning to the classrooms “acting kind of sheepish” and that
she was so concerned that she also switched parishes so that her children would not be involved.

Handwritten notes that appear to have been generated by Diocese personnel during the
December 4, 1988 meeting described the above and a follow-up meeting with on
December 20, 1988. Among other things, the notes appear to state that had made sexually
explicit comments to the boy described above, whom he was counseling, on at least three
separate occasions and that the boy’s father removed the boy from any further counseling unless
he or the boy’s mother were present. The notes further appear to state that had
called the boy on at least one occasion to tell him that if he was planning to run away, he could
stay with at the rectory.

On January 1, 1991 a memorandum sent from to Bishop Trautman

with documentation of the December 1988 meeting described the above. Among other things,
advised Trautman that he has known all his priesthood and the original
complainant all her life. He stated he met with her and her husband about her complaints and
that she retracted her statement about placing his hand on her son’s crotch.

The memo further advised that was “morally certain that there was
no cause to believe any inappropriate advice or sexual abuse took place in either case.”
then stated that it must be remembered most of the complainant’s children
were adopted or foster children and most have a handicap of some type.
advised that he did not ever contact ‘ since he “did not feel there was any need to take
this any further.”

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

442
-*5*("5*0/
 Reverend Leon T. Muroski

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1934
YEAR OF DEATH:
ORDINATION: May 26, 1960

Employment/Assignment History
6/11/1960 – 9/01/1967 Parochial Vicar, St. Luke, Erie, PA
3/30/1961 – N/A Chaplain, Erie County T.B. Hospital
9/01/1960 – 6/16/1967 Special Ministry, Faculty, St. Mark’s, Erie, PA
6/16/1967 – 10/12/1982 Diocese Office, St. Mark’s Seminary, Erie, PA
10/12/1982 – 9/01/1995 Pastor, Our Lady of the Lake, Edinboro, PA
5/1994 Sent to St. Luke’s Institute for Psychological Treatment
9/01/1995 – 6/01/1997 Retired, St. Casimirs, Rectory, Erie, PA
6/01/1997 – 4/01/2001 The Christophers, Unknown duties,
New York, NY,
5/03/2001 Resident, St. Patrick’s, Erie, PA
9/01/2001 – 3/11/2002 Chaplain, Pleasant Ridge Manor West, Girard, PA
1/2320/03 – N/A St. Patrick’s, Unassigned
12/10/2015 – Present Diocese Retirement Home, Erie, PA

Summary

Father Leon Muroski served the Diocese of Erie from 1960 through 2002. Most of his
ministry was spent serving in Special Ministry as an Administrator for the Diocese and working
with young people aspiring to become priests at St. Mark’s Seminary. After 20 years of
administrative duties, Muroski finally got his own parish. This ministry lasted from 1982 until
1995, but was abruptly halted when in the early 1990s Muroski was accused of sexual
misconduct while he was a Spiritual Director at the seminary. Muroski was sent to St. Luke’s
Institute in Suitland, Maryland, for individual psychotherapy in 1994 after he admitted to
inappropriate contact with the seminarians under his watch. These seminarians were all male,
eighteen to twenty-three years old, when Muroski would counsel them. This counselling
included allegations of full body massages, kissing, masturbation and fondling of the
seminarians’ buttocks and genitals. Muroski would eventually be placed back into ministry after
therapy at St. Luke’s and served in the Diocese of Erie and in The Christophers program in New
York City.

While some of these seminarians were not legally juveniles at the time of their abuse, at
least three of them were under Muroski’s tutelage. At this time Muroski and his fellow priest,

443
Summary
Salvatore Luzzi (who also faced sexual misconduct allegations and was sent to SLI with
Muroski), were assigned as Spiritual Directors to these seminarians.

In 1974-1975, Muroski and Luzzi were working at Camp Notre Dame in Fairview,
Pennsylvania, when a young seminarian named Michael Amy (see Amy’s narrative) was
accused of fondling two juveniles. These victims reported the incident to the Pennsylvania State
Police, the Diocese of Erie Administration, and to their parents. The Diocese representative for
this incident and Camp Notre Dame was Father. Lawrence Speice. Speice assisted Amy by
interceding on Amy’s behalf with the State Police and the boy’s parents. No arrest was made
and the Diocese does not have a file on the victims. Muroski and Luzzi dealt with Amy by
directing him to go to counselling and keeping him in seminary. Amy would go on to abuse at
least two more juveniles as an ordained priest, along with several other undocumented juvenile
prostitutes before being laicized.

During Amy’s laicization process, he would call Speice, Muroski and Luzzi as his
witnesses. Muroski denied knowledge of any wrongdoings by Amy. Speice and Luzzi both
admitted some knowledge of Amy’s molestation of children in 1974-1975.

The sexual abuse of seminarians by Muroski and Luzzi cost the Diocese of Erie over
$89,500.00 in civil payments to three former college seminarians were overseen by Muroski and
Luzzi while they studied at St. Mark’s. Another former seminarian had several thousand dollars
of counselling paid for by the Diocese over the course of many years.

Soon after Muroski finished his therapy at St. Luke’s, Bishop Trautman welcomed him
back to pastoral ministry on February 22, 1995. This ministry came with several restrictions.
Trautman restricted Muroski from contact with youth under the age of 19. In particular,
Trautman specified restrictions on counselling, travelling, marriage preparation, recreation and
socialization. This was ordered by penal precept dated the same date as Muroski’s welcome
back letter.

Little was found on Muroski’s whereabouts or duties within the Diocese in 1995-1996,
but in 1997, it was found that Muroski was serving in ministry for The Christophers in New
York City. Once again, little is documented about his duties with The Christophers and it is
unknown if The Christophers were notified of his past sexual involvement with young people
in Erie.

In 2001, Muroski returned to the Diocese of Erie from The Christophers and was retired.
Muroski was permitted to move into the retired priest home in 2002, which is where he still
resides. In 2016, the Diocese rostered a list of all the retired clergy living in the home and made
it public. Muroski was not listed as a resident. It was at this residence that the Grand Jury found
him living in 2017, however.

444
 Brother Edmundus Murphy

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1931
YEAR OF DEATH: Unknown
ORDINATION: 1953

Summary

On December 21, 2007 an e-mail communication was sent to Monsignor Robert Smith,
Vicar General of the Diocese of Erie from the Society of the Divine Word in Techny, Ilinois.
The purpose of the e-mail was to inform Smith that a victim was sexually abused by a staff
member while he was a minor at Sacred Heart High School in 1964. This school was operated
by the Society of the Divine Word Missionaries in Girard.

The victim claimed that during the summer between his freshman and sophomore years
of high school, Brother Edmundus Murphy, who was 33 years of age at this time, was the
wrestling coach at the school. Murphy encouraged the victim to join the team and, under the
pretense of teaching him some wrestling moves, the two wrestled naked “as the ancient Greeks
and Romans did.” The victim alleged that during these “wrestling” sessions he was sodomized
by Murphy.

Immediately after the incident, the victim asked Murphy what he was doing and,
according to the victim, Murphy sat on the floor and began to cry.

The Grand Jury investigation found no documentation that the Diocese notified local
law enforcement or the District Attorney’s Office about Murphy’s behavior. The only note in
the file was a handwritten notation on top of the printed out e-mail which read; “not
responsible—Priest/Deacon only,” “Call Helen Schumacher to verify on 7/18/08.” This was
signed by R. Smith 7/18/08.

445
 Reverend John L. Murray

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1922
YEAR OF DEATH:
ORDINATION: May 15, 1947

Employment/Assignment History
5/31/1947 – 5/28/1955 Sacred Heart, Parochial Vicar with Residence, Sharon, PA
5/28/1955 – 6/11/1960 St. Paul, Parochial Vicar with Residence, Erie, PA
8/25/1959 – 6/11/1960 St. Paul, Parochial Vicar with Residence. Special
Duties, Part-Time Faculty, Erie Cathedral Preparatory, Erie, PA
6/11/1960 – 8/01/1966 Special Ministry, Erie Cathedral Preparatory, Erie, PA
8/27/1966 – 1/31/1969 Special Ministry, DuBois Central Catholic HS, Special Duties,
Headmaster, DuBois, PA
6/16/1967 – 10/15/1968 St. Bernard, Administration with Residence, Falls Creek, PA
10/15/1968 – 5/26/1972 Health Leave
5/26/1972 – 1/04/1974 Special Ministry, Vicar Assistant with Residence,
Our Lady Queen of the Americas, Conneaut Lake, PA
1/04/1974 – 6/01/1979 Pastor with Residence, Our Lady Queen of the Americas,
Conneaut Lake, PA
6/01/1979 – 10/15/1985 Pastor with Residence, St. Matthew in the Wood, Erie, PA
10/15/1985 – 6/01/1987 Sick Leave
6/01/1987 Restricted, Erie, PA

Summary

The Diocese of Erie received reports that Father John L. Murray sexually molested
young boys in a church rectory before serving mass, as well as in recreational settings such as
the lake shore. A review of his Diocesan file revealed that, as a result, the Diocese paid thousands
of dollars in therapy fees and civil settlements. Two of his victims each received monetary
settlements in the amount of $25,000 each.

The first allegation of sexual abuse against Murray was made in 1967. In was reported
that in the summer of 1966, Murray, while in a social setting with the victim’s family at the
shore, allegedly fondled the young boy in the water and on shore. This incident was brought to
the attention of the boy’s parents and Bishop John F. Whealon in 1967. There was no indication
in the file that law enforcement was notified. Whealon’s personal notes revealed that he
confronted Murray with the accusation and spoke with the victim’s father on a number of
occasions. Murray partially denied the allegation by telling the Bishop that the victim has “an
overactive imagination,” and that any touching was accidental due to normal roughhousing with
the boy. The notes further indicated that the victim’s father met with Murray and Murray
apologized to him for the incident. The records revealed that Whealon convinced the family that

446
Summary
nothing could be done in this case. Whealon wrote that the victim’s mother and father have “no
doubt that this priest (Murray) did something wrong, in the water and on the shore.” Whealon
recorded the father as saying, “If it was the first time, Father Murray is now so frightened that
it will not happen again.”

In April of 1985, Murray was charged by the Pennsylvania State Police with one count
each of indecent assault and corruption of minors. He eventually pled guilty to both charges,
was sentenced to twelve months’ probation and fined. This incident was the result of Murray
sexually molesting a 12-year-old boy who was preparing to serve mass in the church rectory.
One year later, the church paid the victim’s family a settlement in the amount of of $25,000.

As a result of Murray’s second instance of child molestation, the Diocese disciplined

him by removing his priestly faculties in 1985. While awaiting sentencing on his criminal
charges, the Diocese sent Murray to two treatment facilities. After several years of treatment,
paid for by the Diocese, Murray was retired and moved to his family home in Philadelphia. As
of 2007, he was still receiving money to pay for his therapy.

Finally, in 2016, Bishop Lawrence Persico received the latest complaint against Murray.
This incident came to the attention of the Diocese when the victim was visiting the Conneaut
Lake area. According to Persico’s handwritten file note, the victim, now 55 years of age, was a
12-year-old boy in 1973. He was cutting grass at Our Lady of the Americas church where
Murray was the Pastor. Murray allegedly grabbed the child’s genitals through the boy’s clothes.
Persico wrote to the victim on September 15, 2016 and advised him that the Diocese notified
the Erie County District Attorney’s Office and reported the incident to Childline. He further
advised that Murray was out of ministry, was not permitted to function as a priest and offered
to speak with the victim should he have any further questions.

447
 Father Giles L. Nealen, O.S.B.

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1923
YEAR OF DEATH: 1996
ORDINATION: May 15, 1951

Employment/Assignment History
1944-1951 Monastic maintenance department, St. Vincent Arch Abbey
1954-1963 Monastic maintenance department, St. Vincent Arch Abbey
1949-1951 Scholasticate Perfect
1951-1954 Assistant Pastor, Sacred Heart, St. Mary’s, PA
1954-1963 Prefect, St. Vincent Scholasticate
1954-1963 Director of Food Service
1956-1963 Master of Brothers
1964 Pastor, St. James, Waynesburg, OH
1964-1967 Superior, St. Benedictine Priort, Vinhedo, S. P. Brazil
1967-1968 Administrator, St. Benedict, Marguerite
1968-1971 Assistant Pastor, Queen of the World, St. Mary’s, PA
1971-1972 Pastor, St. Bruno, South Greensburg, PA
1972-1980 Pastor, St. James, Waynesburg, OH
1990-1992 Pastor, Sacred Heart, St. Mary’s, PA

Summary

A letter dated January 25, 1993 from a victim stated that 23 years earlier, when he was
13 years of age, he was sexually abused by Father Giles L. Nealen. At that time, Nealon was
assigned to Queen of the World church in St. Mary. This letter stated that Nealen sexually
abused him and two of his friends, but he was unsure if the other two victims would come
forward. In this letter, the victim begged the church to keep Nealen away from other young
boys so that they would not also be sexually assaulted by the priest.

A follow up letter, dated February 5, 1993 and addressed to Bishop Donald Trautman
stated that the victitm had sent the January 25 letter to Archbishop Nowicki at St. Vincent’s
Archabbey in Latrobe. There was no response to the victim or any correspondence regarding
these letters in the file provided by the Diocese of Erie.

A May 10, 2002 e-mail correspondence to Trautman stated that a woman wanted to
report the sexual abuse of young boys by Nealen. This woman claimed that she knew of at least
three boys that were sexually abused by Nealen. Specifically, she had recently found out that
an old friend of hers, Victim #1, was arrested for also sexually abusing young boys. The e-
mailer was very distressed about this and when she discussed this information with her brother,

448
Summary
he told her that Nealen had made sexual advances toward him and two of his friends while on a
camping trip. She was told by her brother that both other boys, Victim #1 being one of them,
were forced to perform sex acts on Nealen. The writer went on to say that during Victim #1’s
trial he testified that he had been an altar boy and had been sexually abused during that time.

The only response that was enclosed in the files provided by the Erie Diocese to this e-
mailer was a four sentence e-mail from Bishop Trautman telling her that Father Giles Nealen
died on December 29, 1996. He also told her that he spoke with the Archabbot, who asked the
Bishop to forward the e-mail to him and that he hoped she would hear from him shortly. It
should be noted that there is no response correspondence from the Archabbot to this e-mailer in
the file provided by the Erie Diocese.

In an undated letter from another woman, she claimed that thirty years prior her eleven-
year-old son was sexually abused by Nealen. She stated that she and her family were members
of The Queen of the World in Elk County where Nealen was the priest assigned at that time.
The letter tells how she noticed a drastic change in her son’s behavior from a “happy go lucky
child to a pensive and irritable child.” She noted that even his handwriting changed from a “bold
nature to a restricted light hand” and how she could not figure out why. She claimed that around
this same time, Nealen was abruptly removed from the parish and that no explanation was given
to the members of the parish for this removal. The letter writer stated that a few years later she
was talking with two other women who mentioned something about Nealen and the reason he
left the parish. She claims that she was shocked, but suddenly things fell into place and she
berated herself for being so stupid. This writer claimed that thirty years later her son had never
married, would not enter a Catholic church and was still severely affected by the sexual abuse
he endured from Nealen. An electronic mail response from Trautman, dated March 31, 2004,
stated that he received her March 19th letter. He told her that what happened to her son was
before his time and “certainly unknown to my predecessors.” He apologized and told her that
he would forward her letter to Archabbot Douglas Nowicki for his response. It should be noted
that Bishop wrote a letter and forwarded it to the Archabbot, but that no response letter to this
writer by the Archabbot was found in the files provided by the Diocese.

A cassette tape enclosed in the file of Nealen labeled “victim’s father” is a recording of
an on-air interview from radio show “Erie in the morning” of a father of one of the victims of
sexual abuse of an unnamed priest. The father of the unnamed victim tells a heart-wrenching
story of how he and his family went to the local parish in the mid-1970s and befriended the
priest there. The victim’s father told the hosts of the radio show that he was approached by a
friend who told him that he had “walked in on” this priest sexually abusing his own son and was
concerned that the son of this man had also been sexually abused. When the father asked his
young son if anyone had ever touched him, he claimed that his son started to cry and told him
that their local priest had. The victim’s father told the radio hosts how this priest was “part of
their family” and that he would come and stay the entire weekend at their home. His son told
him that the priest would come into his room after he and his wife went to bed to sexually abuse
him. The victim’s father claims his son would have been between the ages of nine and fourteen
at the time of this abuse. When the victim’s father confronted the priest, who had recently left
the parish, he claimed the priest did not deny that he sexually abused his son and told him the

449
Summary
reason he did it was because “his son needed love.” When the victim’s father told the priest he
wanted them to go to the Bishop and tell him what happened, that the priest refused to go because
he didn’t want to be removed and that he would lose his pension. The victim’s father tried
several times to set up a meeting with the Bishop to discuss the sexual abuse, but he claims it
never worked out.

The Diocesan files received pursuant to subpoena contained no information on any of

these victim’s statuses or if any of them were offered counseling. The Grand Jury investigation
found no documentation that the Diocese of Erie notified local law enforcement or the District
Attorney’s office about Nealen’s long history of sexually abusing numerous young boys.

The Diocese of Greensburg also provided limited information regarding Nealen in

response to the subpoena. An unmarked folder within the Diocese of Greensburg’s files
contained a letter, dated July 13, 1972, from Father Egbert Donovan, O.S.B to Bishop Connare.
The letter described a series of transfers for multiple priests. More significantly, the letter
contained one sentence regarding Nealen, and suggested that he was involved in an
inappropriate incident. The sentence stated, “For reasons already known by you, it is wise and
prudent to reassign the present Pastor, Father Giles Nealen, O.S.B., at this time.” This letter
suggested that both the Diocese of Greensburg and the Archabbot of St. Vincent were aware of
Nealen’s actions.

A hand written note contained in the file (author unknown) lists:

“Pastor St. Bruno – July 1971 – July 1972
Served in Marguerite – Oct 1967 – Aug 1968
Died December 29, 1996”

It does not appear that the Diocese of Greensburg provided any further information
regarding Nealen.

450
 Father Jan Olowin

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1942
YEAR OF DEATH: Unknown
ORDINATION: May 18, 1968

Employment/Assignment History
1966 Jesuit Missions, Juliaca, Peru
1967 Migrant Ministry, Erie, PA
6/16/1968 – 9/02/1970 St. Patrick, Erie, PA
6/16/1968 – 9/02/1970 Faculty, Cathedral Preparatory, Erie, PA
9/02/1970 – 3/09/1984 St. Patrick, Erie, PA
8/16/1971 – 1/31/1983 Chaplain, Soldiers and Sailors Home
3/09/1984 – 8/25/1986 St. Adalbert, Sharon, PA
8/25/1986 – 11/07/1992 St. Joseph, Oil City, PA
11/07/1992 – 6/28/1998 St. George, Erie, PA
6/28/1998 – 12/21/1998 Sabbatical, American College of Louvain
12/21/1998 – 6/05/1999 St. Joseph, Sharon, PA
6/06/1999 – 12/31/2007 Chaplain, FCI McKean, Bradford, PA
1/01/2008 – 8/21/2008 Sabbatical
8/22/2008 – 8/31/2012 St. Michael, Emlenton, PA
8/22/2008 – 8/31/2012 Chaplain, Clarion University of Pennsylvania, Clarion, PA
10/21/2016 – 11/04/2016 Temporary Parochial Administrator, St. Elizabeth Seton,
Sun City, AZ

Summary

The Diocese of Erie personnel file for Father Jan Olowin contained a document entitled
“Summary of Phone Conversation.” It was the memorialization of a telephone conversation that
was written by Robert J. Smith, Vicar General, on May 27, 1993. The document recorded the
alleged abuse of a victim by Olowin. Victim #1. It is the Diocesan notes regarding a phone call
Smith had with Victim #2, who is a victim of clergy sex abuse himself. These notes record some
of Victim #2’s abuse and record Victim #2 informing the Diocese of his friend’s (Victim #1)
abuse. Victim #2 said he was disillusioned with the Church when Olowin was appointed pastor
of St. George. Victim #2 explains that Victim #3, who was also a friend of his, was sexually
accosted by Olowin while on a trip to Mexico. The document does not record the age of Victim
#3, only that he was young at the time of the assault. Victim #2 tells Smith that Victim #3 was
able to fight off Olowin’s sexual advances by pushing him away. Sometime later Victim #3
shared the incident with Victim #2, who subsequently shared the story with Smith in 1993.

On November 4, 2016, Bishop Lawrence Persico wrote a letter to Olowin, now retired
in Peoria, Arizona, indicating that he had learned of an allegation of clerical misconduct made

451
Summary
several decades ago against Olowin. Persico’s letter did not mention details, but it referenced a
phone call that Persico and Olowin had the day before. The Grand Jury can infer that Persico
outlined Olowin’s offences in this call and articulated the reason for the letter in greater detail.
This letter officially restricted Olowin from public exercise of all priestly ministry until further
notice.

The Grand Jury was unable to determine from the subpoenaed files what prompted
Persico to restrict Olowin’s priestly faculties twenty-three years after Olowin’s name was first
associated with sexual abuse. In a later production of files to the Grand Jury, a letter from the
Bishop of Phoenix, Arizona to Olowin was found. This document was dated November 18, 2016
and was written to Olowin and carbon copied Persico in Erie. It thanked Olowin for his service
and informed him that, due to a letter received from Persico, Olowin would be restricted from
all ministry until the matter of the alleged abuse was resolved. It is unknown if the investigation
of Olowin is continuing or if law enforcement was ever notified.

452
 Father Andrew Pawlaczyk

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1936
YEAR OF DEATH: 1982
ORDINATION: May 31, 1962

Employment/Assignment History
6/09/1962 – 1971 Faculty, Cathedral Preparatory, Erie PA
1/22/1971 – 1976 Chaplain, United States Army
8 /1976 – 1978 Chaplain, Hamot Medical Center, Erie PA
5/01/1978 – 1982 Chaplain, Unites States Army

Summary

In a letter dated April 20, 2011 and addressed to Bishop Trautman, a victim reported
abuse by Father Andrew Pawlaczyk. The victim explained that it began when the victim was a
student at Erie Cathedral Preparatory. and Pawlaczyk took him to football games where they
were permitted to sit in the press box. Soon after that, Pawlaczyk began taking the victim to
steam baths, one on the East side, and another on West 8th Street. They sat naked together and
Pawlaczyk noted that it was not unusual for one man to whisk the back of another with a strange
looking brush while in the steam bath.

Pawlaczyk built a fairly strong relationship with the victim’s parents and began visiting
their home regularly. That type of relationship building continued for several months. The
following summer, Pawlaczyk picked up the victim and took him to a cottage on the lakefront.
The first thing they did was go swimming without swim suits. Although the victim thought it
was strange, he attributed the behavior to simply being rebellious. After swimming they went
back to the cottage. Pawlaczyk took the victim into the bedroom and told him that he was going
to give him a massage. The victim was face down on the bed with no clothes on. Pawlaczyk
then sat on the victim’s buttocks - - wearing no clothers - - while he massaged him. Then they
reversed roles. After they were done, the victim found ejaculate in the bed which was not from
him.

When Pawlaczyk was serving in the United States Army and stationed at Walter Reed
Hospital, the victim’s parents arranged for the victim to fly to Washington, D.C. by himself.
When he arrived, Pawlaczyk took him to the Kennedy Center for a concert and to a basketball
game to watch “Pistol” Pete Maravich. From the time he arrived, Pawlaczyk supplied him with
cigarettes and alcohol. After a few nights, Pawlaczyk suggested that instead of sleeping in
separate rooms, they should sleep on fold out beds in the living room. They again performed
mutual massages and then Pawlaczyk fondled the victim’s genitals. Pawlaczyk asked him,
“Have you ever had an erection like this?” That same evening Pawlaczyk took the victim into
the shower so they could wash each other. Pawlaczyk also let the victim drink heavily amd the

453
Summary
victim did not recall what occurred the following night. The next day, the victim left for home
and never saw Pawlaczyk again.

The Grand Jury did not find any documentation that indicated that the Diocese ever
reported the case to local law enforcement. Additionally, there is no indication that the Diocese
offered any counselling to the victim.

454
 Reverend John A. Piatkowski

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1898
YEAR OF DEATH: 1970
ORDINATION: November 10, 1935

Employment/Assignment History
11/11/1935 – 5/21/1948 St. Stanislaus Koska, Erie/Tyler, PA
5/22/1948 – 11/16/1970 Assumption, Sykesville, PA

Summary

In a letter dated March 16, 1955 and addressed to the Bishop of Erie, a victim reported
abuse by Father John A. Piatkowski. He advised that at the age of 12, he became an altar boy.
Growing up, he was taught by his parents and the Catechism that priests were Christ’s
representative and would not do anything wrong.

During his time as an altar boy, Piatkowski began to kiss the victim and tell him that he
loved him. He took the victim for rides and to the movies. It was during this time that
Piatkowski would play with the victim’s penis until he had an orgasm. On numerous other
occasions, Piatkowski committed similar abuse on the victim in the church basement and in the
parish house where Piatkowski lived. The victim related that while he felt that the entire
situation did not seem right, he was afraid to tell his parents for fear that they would not have
believed him.

The Grand Jury reviewed a letter dated October 29, 1959 authored by “A married and
devout Catholic” that was addressed to the Archbishop of Erie, Reverend John Mark Gannon.
The letter indicated that the writer was requesting on behalf of the parish in Sykesville that the
parish be assigned a new priest. The letter stated that Piatkowski had been molesting little boys,
and that the boys were afraid to talk. The letter alleged that Piatkowski made nervous wrecks
out of the children and that they were afraid of him. It is unknown to the Grand Jury if this
incident was ever referred to law enforcement by the Diocese.

In a report authored by Bishop Donald W. Troutman, he indicated that on December 19,

2008, he met with a victim and his wife at the St. Catherine rectory in DuBois. The victim
reported that Piatkowski repeatedly sexually abused him when he was approximately seven or
eight years old. The sexual abuse took place in the 1940’s in a small parish in Tyler. Troutman
referred the victim to counseling and reported the matter to Erie County District Attorney’s
Office on January 5, 2009.

455
 Father David L. Poulson

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1953
YEAR OF DEATH: Unknown
ORDINATION: June 22, 1979

Employment/Assignment History
7/05/1979 - 6/09/1982 Faculty, Bradford Central Christian High School, Bradford, PA
Weekend Education, St. Francis of Assisi, Bradford, PA
6/09/1982 - 8/24/1997 Faculty, Gannon University
6/01/1991 - 8/24/1997 Director, Parochial Administrator Gannon University
8/24/1997 - 12/03/1997 Administrator, St. Francis of Assisi, Clearfield, PA
12/03/1997 - 6/06/2000 Pastor, St. Agnes, Morrisdale, PA
6/06/2000 - 7/24/2001 Sp. Ministries, Clarion University/Catholic Chaplain
6/07/2000 - 6/30/2006 Pastor, St. Michael, Fryburg, PA
8/08/2000 Chaplain, Dio. Div. of World Apostolate of Fatima
7/01/2006 - 11/08/2010 Pastor, St Michael (2nd 6 year term), Fryburg, PA
11/08/2010 - 11/08/2016 Pastor, St. Anthony of Padua
11/08/2010 - 11/08/2016 Pastor, St. Bernadette, Cambridge Springs, PA
1/13/2012 - 9/11/2014 Dean, Meadville Deanery, Complete term of Father
O’Hern
11/01/2013 - 10/31/2018* Other, Bishop’s Delegate to Mass in the Extraordinary
11/29/2013 - 11/28/2018* Other, Diocesan Liaison to the Catholic Charismatic Renewal
9/12/2014 - 9/11/2019* Dean, Meadville Deanery
9/12/2014 - 9/11/2019* Diocesan Board, Presbyteral Council, Erie, PA
* Refers to unifinished appointment

Summary
See presentment of Fortieth Statewide Investigating Grand Jury.

456
 Father John Philip Schanz

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1924
YEAR OF DEATH: 2010
ORDINATION: May 18, 1950

Employment/Assignment History
6/05/1950 – 09/01/1950 Temporary Parochial Administrator
St. Elizabeth, Smethport, PA
9/01/1950 – 10/01/1996 Faculty; Professor of Theology
Gannon University, Erie, PA
9/01/1950 – 10/01/1996 Weekend Assistant
Holy Cross, Fairview, PA
6/13/1960 – 10/01/1996 Regional Director of the College Branch
Of the Confraternity of Christian Doctrine
Gannon College, Mercyhurst College & Villa Maria College
4/06/1962 Examiner of Junior Clergy of the
Diocese of Erie
3/08/1967 Appointed as Advocate of the Tribunal of the
Diocese of Erie
5/14/1969 Advocate of the Tribunal of the Diocese of Erie
10/01/1996 – 4/17/2002 Retires from Gannon University to private residence
4/17/2002 Withdraws from Priestly Ministry and removed of any faculties
4/16/2010 Deceased

Summary

Based on information provided by the Diocese of Erie, a victim wrote a letter to Bishop
Donald Trautman that was postmarked April 11, 2002. In the letter, the victim detailed an
assault which occurred in 1969 or 1970 when he was going into seventh or eighth grade and was
an altar boy at St. Andrew and The Villa. According to the victim, he met John Philip Schanz,
who invited him to his apartment on the southwest corner of 6th and Sassafras Street. Schanz
began to wrestle the boy and grab his body. When the victim asked his older brother, who was
a Gannon College student at the time, if he knew of Schanz, his brother began to laugh and
remarked “you mean the one who likes little boys?”

It should be noted that there is a gap in documentation in the file from when the initial
letter was sent by the victim and May 2014.

In a letter dated November 17, 2015, Bishop Lawrence T. Persico stated that, based on
the information he was provided, Bishop Trautman had offered the victim professional

457
Summary
counseling in 2002 but the victim had declined this offer. Additionally, in an e-mail from victim
to Persico, the victim acknowledged that he had declined Trautman’s offer of help in 2002.

Within the Diocese file provided, there was also a Post-It note that stated that there was
a message left for Monsignor Smith from Victim #1 on May 12, 2014. The message was attached
to a piece of paper on which Smith noted that he called the victim on May 12, 2014 and May
14, 2014.

A handwritten note by Trautman revealed that on Sunday, May 18, 2014, he called the
victim. They two discussed the victim’s “situation.” Trautman wrote that he reviewed the
actions which had been taken for the removal of Schanz, a teacher at Gannon University, and
later stated that he himself had removed Schanz from the active ministry. Trautman also noted
that the victim was still bothered by the incident of abuse and that Trautman had assured him of
“our help & guidance.” Trautman noted in these documents that the victim suffered from a
troubled marriage, anxiety, nightmares, and guilt regarding the incident with Schanz.

In a letter written to victim from Persico and dated February 23, 2016, it was noted that
enclosed with the letter was a check in the amount of $32,000 as a final reimbursement owed to
him from the Diocese of Erie for his counseling. It was also stated that the check supplemented
the $12,500 check which he had already received from the Diocese and concluded all financial
reimbursement.

In a letter postmarked May 9, 2002 and addressed “Attn: Bishop Catholic Diocese,” a
second victim wrote that in the early 1970’s he had attended a Gannon University basketball
game and was approached by Schanz. Schanz asked he victim if he would like to go to all of the
games, to which the victim replied that he would. According to the victim, after the games, they
would go to Schanz’s apartment at the rectory on West 6th Street, where Schanz always wanted
to drink and wrestle. The victim was 12 or 13 years of age at the time.

The victim went on to note that he was writing the letter from prison. He stated that he
was incarcerated as a result of crimes that he had committed under the influence of drugs and
alcohol. He attributed his substance abuse problem to the sexual abuse that he had endured at
the hands of Schanz years prior. The victim sought acknowledgement from the church that they
had received the letter and expressed a desire to know if Schanz was still alive and whether or
not he was still victimizing individuals.

Trautman responded to the victim’s letter. He stated that he wished to acknowledge the
unfortunate incidents that occurred to him in the early 1970’s. Trautman informed the victim
that Schanz was no longer celebrating the sacraments or mass publicly and that he was in frail
health. Additionally, Trautman noted that Schanz was no longer representing the church in any
public way and did not wear clerical garb.

Bishop Trautman went on to write that he was glad the victim brought his concerns to
the Bishop’s attention and that he deeply regretted the tragic circumstances of his life that may
have been influenced by his contact with Schanz. The Bishop told the victim that he prayed that

458
Summary
the Lord would bring him healing and to leave the past in the past and go on to find happiness
and peace in his life.

The second victim wrote to Trautman again on October 30, 2002, seeking assistance
from the Catholic Charities upon his release from prison. Ultimately, at the request of Trautman,
the Director of Catholic Charities Counseling and Adoption Services reached out to the victim
and offered assistance upon his release.

The second victim’s allegations were reported to the Erie County District Attorney’s
Office.

On January 2, 2007, Monsignor Robert Smith received an e-mail outlining an incident

that occurred in 1974 when the writer was 17 years old and in a supervisory role at Camp
Glinoda. The writer would later state that the incident had actually occurred at Camp Notre
Dame. The writer recalled an instance when approximately 20 children jumped into the pool.
Schanz jumped into the pool as well, but seemed to focus on one boy in particular. The lifeguard
noticed Schanz hugging the boy, as well as picking the boy up out of the water and dunking him
under water. The lifeguard told the writer to get the children out of the water. The unknown boy
then told the writer that he wanted to show Schanz something in the cabin. A few minutes passed
and the writer went looking for them. The boy and Schanz eventually emerged from the woods.
The writer did not recall whether or not the pair were clothed, as he looked away. He asked the
boy later in the day what had been going on. The boy described the incident as “weird.” The
writer reported the incident to camp administrators. He was advised that they would take care
of the matter and that they should keep it to themselves.

The Diocese was able to identify a James O’Connor as being the Director of Camp Notre
Dame in the 1970’s possibly in 1974 at the time of the allegation. However, O’Connor stated
that he did not recall anyone coming forward in his five years as Director to report an incident
of clergy sexual abuse.

The allegation was reported to the Erie County District Attorney’s Office.

On April 15, 2002, another victim sent an e-mail messge to Trautman about abuse that
he had suffered at the hand of Schanz. He stated that in 1974, he was an altar boy at Holy Cross
Church. Shortly thereafter, Schanz began taking him to his cottage on Lake Erie to go boating
and provided him with alcohol nearly every weekend. The victim stated that he would fall asleep
and wake up to Schanz kissing him on the lips or touching his genitals. Additionally, Schanz
would take off the victim’s clothing while he believed the victim was sleeping and photograph
him nude, specifically his genitals. Schanz would also masturbate in front of the victim after he
had removed his clothing and believed him to be asleep. The victim stated that Schanz would
kiss him a lot, at times attempting to French kiss him, but that he would not allow that to happen.
According to the victim, Schanz would buy him gifts and clothes and take him to dinner, the
movies and even on trips to Florida in the winter months. While he knew what had happened to
him was wrong, he never told anyone.

459
Summary
The victim reported that when he was 20 years old, he and his now ex-wife, went to
Father Orbaniek to be married. Prior to their marriage, Orbaniek told the victim’s now ex-wife
about what had happened between the victim and Schanz. Orbaniek also told her about incidents
between Schanz and other boys. As a result of Orbaniek’s statements, the victim and his wife
ended up divorcing after 18 years of marriage. Finally, the victim stated that he had letters he
had written to Schanz about the abuse.

In the e-mail that the victim sent to Trautman, he stated that an attorney he had been in
contact with wanted to file suit against the Diocese, the Vatican, Schanz and Orbaniek.

In the documents provided pursuant to subpoena, it was noted that Schanz’s attorney
reached out to the victim and requested that all correspondence go through him. On the copy of
the correspondence that the attorney sent to the victim, there was a hand written note by
Trautman which stated, “this case was settled directly by Father Schanz & [his attorney] for
$50,000” –DWT June 21, 2002.

Based on the information provided by the Diocese of Erie, namely two sheets of notes
handwritten by Bishop Donald Trautman, in an unknown year an unidentified additional victim
came forward with allegations that Schanz had sexually abused him. The abuse took place in
1978 or 1979 when Victim #5 was sixteen or seventeen years old. Schanz befriended Victim #5
and invited him to his home on West 6th Street in Erie. Victim #5 went on to state that Schanz
had given him alcohol, which caused him to be “tipsy” and that Schanz French kissed him while
attempting to pull his pants down. Additionally, Victim #5 stated that the worst incident had
occurred at Schanz’s cabin in Fairview, PA.

The notes go on to say that the Victim #5 had visited Schanz 3 or 4 months prior to the
handwritten notes. Additionally, the notes state that Father Schanz had given Victim #5 an ‘F’
in a course that he taught. Another written note outlined “pay for counseling” with the
calculations of $85.00 per session, one session per week for fifty-two weeks. There is also a note
about schooling at the cost of $17,000, but no indication as to where this schooling may have
been. It should be noted that these handwritten notes, which do not identify the Victim #5, were
found in the file of Victim #6.

The first page of this file received from the Diocese of Erie is a single sheet of paper
with the word “Redacted” printed on it. In the Diocese of Erie File labeled Victim #6-SCHANZ,
there are handwritten notes by Bishop Donald Trautman that outline the abuse which was
suffered by Victim #6 at the hand of Schanz. At the time of the abuse, Schanz was working at
the Cathedral at Gannon University (G.U.). Victim #6’s abuse began when he was 15 years old
and took place between the years 1980 and 1983. The file contains a note that states “told
Monsignor Slatin”. The notes read that Victim #6 had no friends and was from a dysfunctional
family. His father was an abusive alcoholic. Schanz had invited Victim #6 to his West 6th Street
residence and gave him alcohol on many occasions. Bishop Trautman notes that the worst
incidents of abuse occurred at Schanz’s cabin in Fairview, Pennsylvania where Schanz would
French kiss the Victim, massage him while clothed and unclothed, and rub oil on his body. It
was noted that Victim #6 massaged Schanz as well. As a result of the abuse that Victim #6

460
Summary
endured, he suffered from severe depression and considered himself to be a womanizer. His wife
deserted him and he was actively receiving counseling. Perhaps the most telling sentence in
Bishop Trautman’s handwritten notes is the statement “another person abused by Father
Schanz.”

In what appears to be a list of compensation that Victim #6 was to receive, Bishop

Trautman noted “small settlement, education, therapy costs.” Additionally, Bishop Trautman
made a list that appears to outline his plan for dealing with Schanz stating “1. Retire from G.U.
2. Change location/residence 3. WE-what is being done 4. Counseling- St. Zavier or St. Luke’s”

Bishop Trautman made notes from information which he appears to have obtained from
Schanz as a result of Victim #6 coming forward. It notes “72” which is the age that Father
Schanz would have been in 1996 when Victim #6 came forward. “No sex attraction, 3 in area,
craving for friendship no sex involvement would call from Cleveland. Did give rubdown to other
fellow.” The notes continue stating “Admits no guilt but some settlement (Aug. 5) give up Holy
Cross- no contact w. youth stay at (illegible) house.”

The remainder of the file contains documentation related to Schanz’s retirement from
Gannon University, including a letter from Monsignor David A. Rubino, President of Gannon
University dated August 19, 1996, which is the same date that Victim #6 met with Bishop
Trautman. The letter stated that Schanz was paid at his normal salary until his insurance was
transferred to the Diocese of Erie. Additionally, Monsignor Rubino allowed Schanz to take his
mattress with him, as a token of the University’s appreciation for his service.

A letter written to Bishop Trautman by Victim #6’s attorney, John H. Moore, Esq. of
Erie, stated that he discussed the “ramifications of trying to pursue a legal claim for something
that occurred so long ago as well as the additional trauma that would be an inevitable result of
the litigation.” Victim #6 sought compensation from the Diocese of Erie for his counseling
sessions with Psychologist Jacqueline Phillips, as well as payment for tuition, books, room and
board for Cuyahoga Community College where Victim #6 was pursuing his Associates Degree.
Copies of the course catalog were included in the file to show proof of enrollment costs.
Ultimately, on September 18, 1996, Victim #6 signed a General Release stating that he received
$8,800 in “full satisfaction of payment for or on account of any and all liability of any kind
whatsoever including vicarious liability for alleged indecent assaults and/or acts perpetrated
by Reverend John P. Schanz. This release forever discharged Reverend John. P Schanz, Gannon
College, now known as Gannon University, Bishop Michael J. Murphy, Bishop Donald W.
Trautman and the Diocese of Erie.” Additionally, there is a bill from Daniel J. Brabender, Jr.,
Esquire for $425.00 for his services to the Diocese of Erie for the matter of Victim #6/Father
Schanz.

A supplemental document written by Monsignor Robert J. Smith, Vicar General, on

April 18, 2002, which was not in the Diocese file for Schanz and is titled “Summary Report
#4”, outlines the sexual abuse allegation by a thirty-two-year-old male believed to be Victim
#6 and the steps taken by the Diocese of Erie to settle the matter. Additionally, though there are

461
Summary
no victim names listed in this document, the document appears to outline the reporting of sexual
abuse by victims #1 and #4 at the hand of Schanz.

Based on the documents received from the Diocese of Erie, on March 1, 2005, Barbara
Edwards, a psychologist local to the Erie area, called the Diocese to alert them that one of her
clients, Victim #7, had alleged that he was abused by Schanz.

In a letter written to Monsignor Smith dated February 28, 2005, Victim #7 described
how his life since a young age had been filled with drug and alcohol abuse, promiscuous sexual
activity, emotional issues, and physical health problems. Victim #7 was an altar boy who only
felt at home and purposeful in the church. According to this victim, Schanz enjoyed engaging
in recreational activities with the altar boys. Schanz would intimidate Victim #7 and hold him
underwater repeatedly, scaring him terribly. Schanz then took Victim #7 to a bath house, where
he “did things he should not have done.” Victim #7 does not recall how many times this
happened. According to Victim #7, his life is now clean and sober. He is happily married with
three children and is a successful licensed professional counselor, yet he misses the closeness of
the parish community.

On Diocese of Erie letterhead, Bishop Donald Trautman recalled the following

interaction with himself, Monsignor Smith and Barbara Edwards. According to Bishop
Trautman, Victim #7 was in the sixth grade at St. Andrew’s in Erie, PA at the time of the abuse
suffered at the hands of Schanz. According to Bishop Trautman, Schanz helped at St. Andrews
in the summer. Bishop Trautman wrote that Schanz took Victim #7 and a few other boys to the
beach to go swimming, where Schanz became aggressive with Victim #7. Bishop Trautman
went on to write that Schanz took Victim #7 to a bath house or sauna, where he rubbed Victim
#7 down with oak leaves. Victim #7 stated “he spent too much time on my genital and rectum.”
This bothered Victim #7 greatly and he told his father. His father told him to stay away from
Schanz. Bishop Trautman wrote that the Victim did not want Schanz “hurt” or “disciplined.”
Additionally, Bishop Trautman offered to pay for counseling, Victim #7 told him that he did not
think it was necessary because he had insurance.

Bishop Trautman went on to write that Victim #7 wanted to return to the Church, so
Monsignor Smith took his confession and they discussed reentry to Mass. Bishop Trautman
wrote that he called Schanz, who admitted to taking boys to the beach, but that Schanz adamantly
denied ever going to a sauna or bath house. Bishop Trautman wrote that he informed Edwards
of Schanz’s statements.

462
 Reverend Samuel B. Slocum

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1951
YEAR OF DEATH:
ORDINATION: May 16, 1980

Employment/Assignment History
6/0519/80 – 8/12/1983 Secondary Education, DuBois C.C. High School, DuBois, PA
6/05/1980 – 8/12/1983 Weekend Asst. St. Michael, DuBois, PA
8/12/1983 – 6/14/1985 Secondary Education, Elk Co. Catholic St. Mary’s, PA
8/12/1983 – 6/14/1985 Resident at Faculty House, Elk Co. Catholic School,
St Mary’s, PA
11/15/1984 – 6/14/1985 Resident at Holy Rosary, Johnsonburg, PA
1/05/1985 – 6/14/1985 Administrator, St. Benedict, Ridgway, PA
6/14/1985 – 8/07/1989 Secondary Education, Erie Cathedral Preparatory, Erie, PA
6/14/1985 – 8/07/1989 Weekend Asst. Holy Trinity, Erie, PA
8/07/1989 – 11/01/1994 Secondary Education, Bradford Central
Christian High School, Bradford, PA
8/07/1989 – 11/19/1990 Weekend Asst., St. Bernard, Eldred, PA
11/19/1990 – 11/01/1994 Administrator, St. Bernard, Eldred, PA
11/01/1994 – 11/0319/97 Administrator, St. Bernard, Eldred, PA
11/01/1994 – 8/01/1995 Secondary Education, Bradford Central Christian High School,
Bradford, PA
8/01/1995 – 12/15/1997 Sick Leave
1/26/1997 – 6/30/1999 Administrator, St. Theresa Shinglehouse
11/0319/97 – 7/31/2001 Pastor with residence, St. Raphael, Eldred, PA
8/01/2001 – 4/01/2011 Pastor with residence, Our Mother of
Perpetual Help, Ephrata, PA
8/01/2001 – 4/01/2011 Pastor, St. Francis of Assisi
4/01/2011 - Leave of Absence/Suspension

Summary

Father Samuel B. Slocum testified before the Grand Jury on September 14, 2017,
detailing his days as a priest in the Diocese of Erie. In 2012, a jury found him guilty of the
crimes of concealment of the whereabouts of a child and corruption of minors

Slocum testified that in 1980 he had been reported to Monsignor Heberlein by a fellow
priest for an alleged inappropriate relationship with a fourteen-year-old girl. Slocum testified
that Heberlein and then-Bishop Michael Murphy knew about his relationship with the young
girl, but did nothing about it. In this same year, Slocum also recalled having a relationship with
a sixteen-year-old boy. He testified that he would not call his relationships with these children

463
Summary
inappropriate. He said that he did get some sort of emotional or sexual gratification from
relationships with children, however. Slocum testified that while he never touched the girl, he
did engage in physical wrestling, tickling and touching of the young boy. Slocum befriended his
intended victims by gaining the trust of their parents and then engaging the children in
inappropriate relationships or what is now known as “grooming”. Slocum engaged in grooming
behavior with four children before he was finally arrested.

When Slocum described his relationships with fourteen-year-old Victim #1 and

seventeen-year-old Victim #2, he testified to the Grand Jury that these girls were in love with
him and wrote him love letters. When questioned about groping Victim #2’s buttocks and upper
thigh, Slocum summed up the touching as accidental in nature. He informed the Grand Jury that
to escape the accusation by Victim #2, he enlisted the assistance of a third party to apply pressure
to Victim #2 and have her recant her accusation against him. Slocum testified that he had this
mutual friend talk to Victim #2’s family because, “I felt like I was saving my neck, to be honest.”

Slocum added that he and Victim #2’s family remain friendly to this day and exchange
Christmas cards. Diocesan records showed that Bishop Trautman and the Diocese opened an
investigation into the Victim #2 groping incident and quickly closed it in less than two days.
Trautman’s handwritten notes in the Slocum–Victim #2 file reads, “Sam Slocum – Denied
Categorically All Aspects.”

Slocum testified in the Grand Jury about Victim #3’s case, the fifteen-year-old victim
for whom Slocum was eventually convicted of felony and misdemeanor charges relating to
grooming behavior. Slocum admitted to buying the friendship of Victim #3 and others with gifts
and allowing them to stay at his residence in the rectory, even when their parents forbid it.
Slocum taught Victim #3 how to hide their communications on social media by deleting text
and photographs. Some of the texts that Slocum sent to Victim #3 would later be used against
him in court and are sexually suggestive in nature. Slocum texted Victim #3, “I always knew
there was something special about you, but I never knew what it was, Majic,” and, “I’m trying
not to say bad stuff but your [sic] pushing it.”

In Victim #3’s case, Slocum bought him items from Abercrombie and Fitch and would
later make Victim #3 negotiate to get them. In one text exchange, Slocum informed Victim #3
that a package has arrived. When Victim #3 texted back asking what it was, Slocum responded
that the Abercrombie and Fitch package is now in. Slocum texted, “It’s in my bedroom, it came
from the post office today. You can start negotiations anytime…” Slocum claimed that Victim
#3 memorized his credit card number and made the purchases himself. Slocum asserted that he
never reported this theft to law enforcement or the boy’s parents because he did not want to get
the boy in trouble. It also came out in court proceedings that Slocum hid the whereabouts of
Victim #3 from his parents and coached Victim #3 to lie to his parents.

This behavior that Slocum exhibited in the aforementioned cases was again apparent in
1995 when the Diocese became aware of another target of Slocum’s grooming. This incident
was addressed in a letter dated May 10, 1995, from Monsignor Charles Kaza to Bishop
Trautman. In that letter, Kaza outlines Slocum’s “unhealthy relationship” with a high school

464
Summary
senior. The letter described how Slocum worked late hours with this student outside the school
grounds, offered the student cash, and invited him to drink beer. This report came from the
student’s own mother to Monsignor Kaza at great risk to her employment. This mother was, at
the time, a teacher employed by the Diocese. The letter went on to describe how the victim felt
uncomfortable with the level of Slocum’s closeness and that Slocum routinely violated his
personal space. Slocum denied any physical sexual contact with this student, but admitted that
the relationship certainly filled a void in his life.

In an attempt to get Slocum help for his inappropriate behavior toward children, the
Diocese sent him to psychotherapy on two occasions. His first stint in therapy occurred in 1991
at the Diocese’s own treatment facility in Erie called the Ecclesiastic Center. There Slocum
received treatment that the Diocese called “Growth Counseling,” along with fellow accused
pedophiles Rev. Thomas Smith and Rev. Gary Ketchum. Slocum’s second stint at
psychotherapy occurred in 1995 at the St. Michael Center in St. Louis, Missouri, which is an
inpatient facility. Slocum was sent there eight days after the Monsignor Kaza letter to Trautman
was sent regarding the student discussed above. Upon his discharge from the St. Michael
Treatment Center in January of 1997, Slocum was placed back into ministry, where he remained
until 2011. In 2011, the allegations that led to Slocum’s eventual arrest surfaced and the Diocese
placed him on suspension until he was laicized by Rome and removed from ministry.

Slocum’s canon law case and Slocum’s conviction were documented in what the
Catholic Church called “The Acts of the Case” or “The Acts of Slocum.” In the documents
provided to the Grand Jury, nowhere was it found that Trautman informed his superiors in Rome
that Slocum had a history dating back to 1980 involving four other victims. Slocum’s dismissal
from ministry was based solely on his criminal arrest and the incidents involving Victim #3.
Additionally, no evidence was ever found that the Diocese of Erie had ever notified law
enforcement of Slocum’s predatory behavior, nor was there any evidence found that the Diocese
notified law enforcement at the time of the Victim #3 investigation that Slocum had a predatory
history that dated back 30 years.

465
 Monsignor Thomas Snyderwine

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1943
YEAR OF DEATH:
ORDINATION: May 8, 1968

Employment/Assignment History
6/05/1968 - 6/03/1971 Weekend Asst., St. Michael, DuBois, PA
6/05/1968 - 6/03/1971 Faculty, DuBois Central Catholic, DuBois, PA
1/01/1970 – 6/01/1970 Administrator, St. Joseph, DuBois, PA
6/03/1971 – 6/05/1976 Faculty, Erie Cathedral Preparatory, Erie, PA
6/03/1971 – 5/31/1974 Weekend Asst., St. Boniface, Erie, PA
5/31/1974 – 6/05/1976 Weekend Asst., St. Patrick’s School, Erie, PA
6/05/1976 – 9/01/1979 Parochial Vicar, St. Patrick’s, Erie, PA
9/01/1979 – 8/17/1992 Weekend Asst., St. George, Erie, PA
9/01/1979 – 8/17/1992 Higher Education, Gannon University, Erie PA
8/17/1992 – 9/05/1997 Pastor, St Paul, Erie, PA
9/05/1997 – 8/10/2012 Pastor, St. Luke’s, Erie, PA
9/01/2009 – 8/10/2014 Diocesan Presbyterian Council, Erie, PA
8/10/2012 Retired, Private residence
10/14/2013 – 10/13/2018 Other. Sr. Priest Advocate
9/12/2014 – 9/11/2019 Diocesan Board. Presbyterian Council, Erie, PA

Summary

Sometime in 1996, a young fifth grade girl came to talk with Sister Steff at St. Boniface
school. The child was a student of Steff’s. Steff also served as the principal at the school. The
girl approached her with her friends because she had disturbing news to report. The young girl
told Steff that her godfather, Monsignor Thomas Snyderwine, had taken a shower with her and
touched her in ways that she was uncomfortable with. The child reported that this incident
occurred five years prior when she stayed overnight at Snyderwine’s trailer. The girl added that
Snyderwine would buy her dresses and shower her with gifts.

Steff took the girl’s information and approached Snyderwine and the girl’s parents with
the accusation. The parents confirmed the incident and told Steff that they had become friends
with Snyderwine, but felt awkward talking to him about the incident. The parents explained that
they had informed their daughter to never be alone with him and expressed their gratitude to
Steff if she would talk with Snyderwine for them.

When Steff approached Snyderwine with the accusation, she informed him of the
incident and threatened to go to Bishop Murphy if this behavior ever happened again. She further
admonished Snyderwine by telling him that he had better change his behavior.

466
Summary

This incident resurfaced in 2002 because of the increased scrutiny being cast upon the
Catholic church in the United States. On May 2, 2002, Steff wrote Bishop Trautman to inform
him of the incident that happened six years earlier. Steff wrote that she notified Trautman
because of an article she had read in Time Magazine titled, “What the Nuns Didn’t Know.” Steff
also asked Trautman several questions in this letter. She asked Trautman, “Is showering with a
young non relative (in this case, a young girl) an act of Pedophile? I’m not sure. Is it normal
Action? I don’t think so.” This letter and Trautman’s handwritten notes were discovered in
subpoenaed Diocesan files. In his notes, Trautman wrote that he would speak to the Diocesan
Review Board on the issue and make a decision on Snyderwine’s future in ministry. The only
issue was that Steff refused to give the Bishop and the Review Board the name of the family or
the victim. Trautman noted that Steff told him, “she would have to pray and think about that
and that she would give me (Trautman) the name only after she spoke with them (victim’s
parents).”

In later notes written by Trautman, he documented that the victim was now a freshman
in college and the parents (both teachers themselves) did not want to pursue the matter. He also
noted that Steff informed him that Snyderwine recently said mass for the family when a death
in the family occurred.

Several additional points of interest were found in subpoenaed files, which included
Snyderwine’s personnel file. A handwritten note by Trautman indicated the following: “I
contacted [the Diocesan lawyer] who said I am not a mandated reporter in this case.” These
documents also contained notes that Trautman took while he was talking with Steff. In one such
note, Trautman wrote, “Sister feels the matter is over with and priest deserves a second chance.”

467
 Seminarian John Tome

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1949
YEAR OF DEATH:
ORDINATION: Failed out of seminary

Employment/Assignment History
9/03/1963 – 5/31/1967 St. Marks’s Seminary High School, Erie PA
Unknown-5/14/1974 St. Mark’s Major Seminary, Erie, PA

Summary

Very little is known about Seminarian John Tome. The subpoenaed Diocesan records
contained only four documents. These documents include three documents that state his grades
from high school and one letter from Rev. Salvatore Luzzi to Rev. Alban Maguire, Rector of
Christ the King Seminary in St. Bonaventure, New York. Salvatore Luzzi is an accused sex
offender in the Diocese of Erie (see Luzzi Narrative). This letter shed little light onto Tome’s
past, it only expressed that Tome had problems communicating with others while in seminary
in 1974.

This investigation was able to locate several survivors of Tome’s abuse. The Grand
Jury heard testimony from and about five members of the same family that Tome had abused
in the 1970s. The survivors reported that they were poor, dysfunctional, and dependent upon
the diocese for their mother’s employment at St. Brigid parish. Furthermore, the parents were
befriended by the abusers and the family would often invite them over to engage in drinking
parties. Each of the victims testified to the Grand Jury about similar statements that their
abuser made to threaten them if they ever disclosed the abuse.

Victim #1 was a twelve year old girl living in the Meadville area who was abused in
her home in the mid-1970s. She testified that Tome fondled her on one occasion and that
Tome represented to her family that he was a Deacon in the Diocese of Erie at the time of the
abuse. She recalled him wearing all black and displaying the trademark white collar that clergy
wore. She reported that Tome, whom she knew as “Jack Tome” and Father Stephen Jeselnick
would come to her home and drink with her parents until late at night. Stephen Jeselnick is an
accused sex offender in the Diocese of Erie (See Jeselnick Narrative). She further testified
that her mother worked for the Diocese, specifically, Monsignor Karg, during this time period.
This victim testified that on one occasion after a night of drinking with her parents, her mother
let Tome put her to bed after she had her night time bath. She testified that as she lay on her
stomach in the top bed of a bunk bed, Tome placed his hand under her night gown, then under
her panties to her buttocks. She told the Jurists that she was frozen with fear as he rubbed and
squeezed her bare buttocks.

468
Summary
Victim #1 recalled that as Tome was fondling her, she held her arms tight to her body
with her hands over her face. She didn’t recall when he left the room or how long the assault
lasted. She added that her memory was dark, and that she was only able to talk about the
assault after Agents from the Attorney General’s Office visited her. After some time, Victim
#1 gained the courage to tell her mother what had happened. She said that her mother scolded
her for trying to ruin Tome’s life and reputation. She added that she believes that her mother
informed Monsignor Karg of the incident because Tome “disappeared for a while and then
came back.” It was this chain of events that made Victim #1 believe her mother told Karg,
who in turn sent Tome away.

Much of Victim #1’s testimony came in the form a written document that she prepared
for the Grand Jury. She explained that reading the details even after so much time would still
be difficult for her. Part of her letter read, “The sexual and emotional torture I built in my
head, one man, a man of God, had done so much harm that I was not prepared to face the
realities or the gravity of the situation.” She also wrote, “This man corrupted my deepest
belief system and tarnished my faith and modeled by distrust for others and made it difficult to
develop meaningful or trusted relationships. I also developed poor self-image and low self-
esteem, identity confusion, sexual confusion, early onset of depression, becoming a defiant
teenager, suffering a strong sense of guilt and shame over the experience, and obsessive
rumination over the abuse and recurring flashbacks.”

Victim #2, the younger brother of Victim #1, was approximately eight or nine years old
at the time of his abuse at the hands of the man he knew as Deacon Tome. He explained that at
his age he did not know the difference between a Deacon and a Priest, however, he often saw
Tome wearing vestments. Victim #2 testified that he never told anyone of the abuse for over
40 years. He testified that the abuse began in approximately 1974 and lasted for about a year
and a half, occurring as often as once a week. He explained that it consisted of mostly oral
sex. The act was performed on him and he was forced to perform the same on Tome. He was
emotional as he testified, recalling his sexual abuse and remembering that he saw Tome naked,
adding that Tome would often fondle him in front of his parents while they were all in the car
together.

Victim #2 testified that he believes that Monsignor Karg knew full well of Tome’s
behavior, since he would often come over to the family home with Tome and drink with his
parents. Victim #2 testified that once he would fall asleep, Tome would find him and sexually
abuse him. He expressed anger and frustration that Karg did nothing about Tome’s behavior.
Victim #2 went on to testify that he feared his little brother also becoming a victim of Tome so
he took the abuse, hoping that Tome would not turn his attention to the younger brother.

Victims #3 and #4 are the younger sisters of Victim #1 and asked that their testimony
be read into the Grand Jury by an Agent of the Attorney General’s Office. In an interview with
them about their abuse at the hands of Deacon Tome, they expressed the belief that it would be
too emotionally traumatic for them to tell their story in person to a large crowd. They indicated
that their interview with the Agents would be the last time they ever wanted to speak of either
their abuse or Deacon Tome.

469
Summary

Their abuse occurred separately after they went to bed and after Tome was done
drinking with their parents, who they described as “drunks.” They were very emotional in
telling their story, often pausing to regain their composure. Each family member reported that
they worked very hard for several years to try to forget about the abuse. Some of the few
details they did recall was that it occurred between 1973 and 1979, however they could not
recall their exact ages.

Victim #3 said she was abused at least ten times and her sister, Victim #4, stated that
she was abused less than ten times but more than five times. A few of the lingering details that
they recalled were that Tome would often have a red hat on and that the abuse often involved a
pool cue stick. Victim #3 reported that Tome would often attempt to penetrate her with the
pool cue and that when she would cry out he would use his fingers to digitally penetrate her.
Her sister, Victim #4 said that she did recall the pool cue but had blocked from her memory
how Tome had used it on her. She did recall that he used his hands to abuse her.

All three of the sisters recalled how Tome would come to their house to drink and
would often play hide and seek or tag with them. Victim #1 told the Agents that Tome would
put his hands all over her and her sisters while playing these games. She said she didn’t think
much of it when she was younger, however, after the abuse and getting older, she now sees
that this horseplay was Tome’s way of groping the sisters.

Finally, the Grand Jury heard from Victim #5, who was between the ages of 10 to 13
years old when he was abused by both Tome and Jeselnick. He testified that Tome and
Jeselnick would both engage him in oral sex and anally rape him. Victim #5 indicted that
Tome’s abuse occurred at his home and that Jeselnick sexually abused him in the rectory of St.
Brigid. He informed the Agents in his interview that he was abused ten to fifteen times, off
and on with no regularity. He added that he is currently in therapy that is being paid for
privately and that no assistance has been offered by the Diocese to date. This victim also
testified that he observed both men naked and that he witnessed them sexually assaulting his
sister, Victim #3, as well as his oldest sister, who is now deceased. It was the opinion of
Victim #1 and her brother, who was not abused because he was in the military during this time
frame, that the oldest and now deceased sister was also victimized by Tome and/or Jeselnick
when she was a young girl. It is their belief that she was abused more than any of the other
family members.

470
 Father Patrick Vallimont

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1948
YEAR OF DEATH:
ORDINATION: May 17, 1974

Employment/Assignment History

Summary

On September 23, 1976, Father Patrick Vallimont was admitted to St. Vincent Health
Center, suffering from severe depression. In a letter to the Vatican dated July 7, 1977, Vallimont
requested laicization. He disclosed in that document that he had serious doubts about living a
life of celibacy. His file noted that he had short sexual relationship with a 13-year-old female
parishioner. The Grand Jury found little to no documentation of this relationship in the
subpoenaed files received from the Diocese.

Vallimont ended the relationship with the 13-year-old victim when he was released from
St. Vincent Health Center.

There were no documents found in the file that indicate that the case was ever turned
over to law enforcement.

471
Biographical Information

Employment/Assignment History

Summary

In ,a law firm sent a letter to advising that

a civil suit was planned by a victim wherein it was claimed, among other things, that :

repeatedly fondled and harassed the under-age victim, despite protestations. You
also intentionally encouraged [victim] to engage in perverse and unnatural
homosexual acts as well as romantic relationships with other priests. Further,
you caused [victim] to become exposed to your consecration of a homosexual
marriage.

Ultimately, a confidential settlement agreement between the Diocese of ,

, and the victim in the was signed on with the parties
agreeing not to disclose the contents of the settlement.

In records received from the pursuant to Grand Jury subpoena, there was
a handwritten note from , dated that stated, “ testified to me he
was in presence of the victim a total of 6 times. or the victim’s parents were always

472 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

-*5*("5*0/
Summary
present….. denies all sex contact….. met the victim in – the victim was 20
yrs…. offers ; case settled for paid by . Release given. Pure
extortion!” The note further states that admitted he attended a gay wedding with
another priest, , but did not bless it or offer a prayer and wore a sport jacket
during it. The note ended with the following, “Our investigation shows no truth to any of
allegations. is guilty of going to a gay wedding. No proof of any other charge. Settlement
was done to protect from publicity of wedding.”

The Grand Jury found handwritten notes by that also make

references to preference for young boys and a complaint about his unwanted
touching. Furthermore, an undated letter from the
appeared to contain some type of warning to about his handling of
. This warning referred to the friendship between
because
of his sexual abuse of a 16-year-old boy. This victim would eventually settle with
out of court for .

Two noteworthy undated documents were included in file. Their

approximate timing appeared consistent with the Diocese first having been made aware of the
complaint against in . An undated, handwritten note titled “ ” stated,
among other things, that “3 yrs ago [name] brought suit against – settled out of court…”
It should be noted that according to media reports,
was dismissed from the clerical state in 2005 for the sexual abuse of children. The
second document was an undated letter sent from
, to and was located in the files on . It was a clear reference
to the connection between stating, “Dear Bishop, I understand what you
are going through. The man here was guilty but we went through much denial. He is still totally
unrealistic about his status. Just Bishop be very careful because there are connections…maybe
they go back over the years but they come home to haunt us.”

The Diocese of continued to assign to positions where children were

abundant. These assignments included weekend duties at , as
well as renewing his assignment as
.

The Grand Jury also found a handwritten note by , dated

, stating, among other things, that he “met with on about allegations, which
denied. Allegations consisted of a young man now at being
uncomfortable with touch and rubbing of shoulders. This young man refused to see
. Therefore no formal complaint received. Allegations come from
his mother (name listed). I admonished with regard to demonstrative exhibitions of
friendship. He simply responded he is part .”

473 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

-*5*("5*0/
Summary
These reports of suspicious rumors and sexual touching by continued on into
and . This review of Diocesan documents found another handwritten note by
dated 2008 documenting some type of meeting or report issued about .
The note stated, among other things, that “in the past young men complained about
favoring young boys.” On an e-mail was sent from the Principal of
, advising that they have called the Childline number to
report possible sexual abuse by Childline is a state run child advocacy program
run by the Pennsylvania Department of Human Services. Their website states “Childline is part
of a mandated statewide child protective services program designed to accept child abuse
referrals and general child well-being concerns, and transmit the information quickly to the
appropriate investigating agency.” Attached to the e-mail was a copy of a comment made on
what appeared to be a rating site for the . The comment, referring to “
” stated, “He sexually abused my son.” No further details were found in the records other
than a handwritten note by on a printout of the e-mail advising that they have
met with and he denied the allegation. It is unknown whether this complaint has
been verified, although it does appear the Diocese reported it to law enforcement upon learning
of it.

474 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

-*5*("5*0/
DIOCESE OF
GREENSBURG

475
476
 Father Dennis Dellamalva

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1949
YEAR OF DEATH: 1994
ORDINATION: May 3, 1975

Employment/Assignment History
6/03/1975 Mt. St. Peter, New Kensington, PA
8/17/1977 Mother of Sorrows, Murrysville, PA
5/25/1982 Holy Family, Latrobe, PA
10/01/1983 Leave of Absence

Summary

During the relatively short time period Father Dennis Dellamalva served as a priest in
the Diocese of Greensburg, numerous allegations of child sexual abuse were made against him.

In 1983, as conveyed in complaints to the Church and various legal filings, two
adolescent brothers went to their parents and told them of sexual assaults committed against
them by Father “Denny,” as Dellamalva was known. These sexual assaults occurred throughout
1981 and 1982.

The reports revealed that on occasions when Dellamalva would be welcomed into the
family home, Dellamalva would get the brothers alone in their respective bedrooms and pray
with them when they went to bed for the night. He would massage their necks and rub their
backs before ultimately massaging their buttocks and working his way into the bottoms of their
pajamas. He would fondle their genitals and, on occasion, place the boys' hands on their own
genitals and have them massage themselves while he held their hand. This molestation happened
both in the boys' home and on trips Dellamalva would be invited on with their family, such as
to the Seven Springs Ski Resort and Rehoboth Beach, Delaware.

While at the ski resort, Dellamalva shared a bed with the younger brother because beds
were at a premium. Again, he fondled the boy’s penis on this occasion.

On another occasion while at the family home, Dellamalva attempted to rub and massage
the back of the younger brother. He yelled at Dellamalva to stop and screamed that he hated
when the priest would rub his neck and back. When this occurred, the boys' parents became
concerned and spoke to the boys about Dellamalva, at which point the brothers finally told their
parents what Dellamalva had been doing to them. The boys told their parents they were afraid
to tell them about what had been happening because their parents seemed to like Dellamalva so
much.

477
Summary
Between 1981 and 1982, Dellamalva had also become friendly with the family of a boy
who was friends with the brothers. Dellamalva engaged in the same sexual behavior with the
third victim as he did with the brothers.

The families of all of the victims reported Dellamalva's abuse to Bishop William Connare
and ultimately filed a lawsuit against Dellamalva, the Diocese, and the Bishop. Neither set of
parents wanted criminal charges filed, however, because they did not want the matter publicized
nor did they want to put the boys through a criminal trial.

In August of 1985, a settlement offer totaling $375,000 was extended to, and accepted
by, all three victims.

Records provided by the Diocese also contained voluminous documents on two other
juvenile boys who were sexually assaulted by Dellamalva. One of these individuals - - the fourth
victim - - described his time serving as an altar boy at Mother of Sorrows in Murrysville. He
stated that while in grades nine through twelve, "I had the misfortune of attending an annual
mountain 'retreat,'" which he explained was specifically created by Dellamalva so that he could
“get closer to the church’s young people.”

The fourth victim stated that he was sexually assaulted by Dellamalva while on the
mountain retreat.

The fourth victim eventually left the Murrysville area is now an attorney in California.
He explained the horrors of fighting the depression and addiction brought on by Dellamalva's
sexual abuse and the difficulties he had to overcome in order to accomplish what he had in his
life. He stated that in spite of his success, he is still haunted by the memories of being molested
by Dellamalva. He placed the blame for his struggles with depression and addiction squarely on
Dellamalva and Connare for letting Dellamalva prey on the church’s youth.

The fourth victim ultimately reached a $25,000 settlement with the Diocese.

Another lawsuit was filed against Dellamalva, the Diocese, and church officials by a fifth
victim who alleged that he was molested by Dellamalva when he was between 13 and 15 years
old and playing junior varsity football for Franklin Regional High School.

According to this victim, while alone with Dellamalva in the rectory at Mother of
Sorrows, Dellamalva had him lay on a blanket on the floor while Dellamalva laid beside him
and removed the victim’s pants and t-shirt. Although he was not comfortable with what was
happening, he went along with it, in part because Dellamalva had been in the locker room with
the football team after games and had seen them undressed.

Dellamalva told the victim to close his eyes and meditate, at which point he removed the
victim’s shorts and massaged his penis, before performing oral sex on him. Dellamalva then had
the victim hold his erect penis as he ejaculated on the victim’s face. When Dellamarva then
began kissing the victim on the mouth, the victim fled.

478
Summary

The fifth victim ultimately reached a settlement with the Diocese in the amount of
$25,000.

From 1982 to 1983 - - at the time the Diocese received complaints of sexual abuse by
Dellamalva - - he was given a leave of absence and sent to the Spencer Abbey treatment center
in Massachusetts.

With respect to Bishop William Connare, among the pertinent facts appearing in his
deposition in connection with civil litigation was that after the parents of the first two victims
came and personally confronted him with the allegation that Dellamalva had molested their sons,
Dellamalva was transferred to Holy Family. When Connare was asked whether Dellamalva had
admitted to molesting the two boys, the Bishop stated that he did.

Further, in his deposition, when Connare was specifically asked if he informed the pastor
of Holy Family of the reason Dellamalva was being transferred to his parish, Connare stated that
he did not. When Connare was asked why he failed to do so, he stated he did not believe it was
necessary due to the fact that Dellamalva had been to treatment and was reportedly dealing with
his issues. This was after Dellamalva had admitted to Connare that he had sexually molested
children in the Mother of Sorrows.

Connare also never informed the pastor of Mother of Sorrows, Monsignor Donald Fisher,
of Dellamalva's admitted molestation of boys. When Connare was asked why he did not inform
Fisher of Dellamalva’s apparent sexual attraction to, and abuse of children, he once again stated
he believed Dellamalva had dealt with his problems and did not feel he should get involved.

Eventually, according to church records, after several other parents complained about
Dellamalva’s behavior with their children (no specifics provided with respect to these
complaints), Connare stated he informed the pastor of Holy Family that it may be best to limit
Dellamalva’s contact with children.

Dellamalva last functioned as a priest in the Diocese in 1984, before resigning from the
priesthood in 1986. He died in 1994.

479
 Father Gregory Flohr

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1937
YEAR OF DEATH: 2004
ORDINATION: August 15, 1963

Employment/Assignment History
6/3/1964 – 6/24/1968 All Saints, Masontown, PA
6/25/1968 – 6/10/1971 Immaculate Conception, Irwin, PA
6/11/1971 – 6/2/1975 Seton Hill College, Greensburg, PA
6/3/1975 – 8/20/1975 Holy Cross, Iselin, PA
8/21/1975 – 1/28/1981 St. Anthony, Clymer, PA
1/30/1981 – 1/14/1985 St. Mary, Yatesboro & its Mission, St. Gabriel, Nu Mine, PA
1/15/1985 – 1/2/1992 St. Cecilia, Grindstone, PA
1/3/1992 – 1/29/1996 Holy Rosary, Republic, PA
1/30/1996 – 1/2002 St. Matthew, Saltsburg, PA

Summary

A Victim Assistance Coordinator in the Diocese of San Bernardino, California received

an allegation in November 2004 regarding Father Gregory Flohr of the Diocese of Greensburg.
The abuse allegedly occurred when the victim was approximately 10 or 11 years old in 1967 to
1968 and attended Immaculate Conception school in Irwin. The Office of Catholic Schools
had a record that the victim attended Immaculate Conception from 1965 to 1969.

According to the victim, when he became an altar server in 1965, Flohr was the leader
of the Junior Altar Boys Association. While Flohr always paid him special attention, he did not
begin abusing him until 1967. Flohr allegedly touched the victim’s genitals for the first time
while saying “God loved all His children.”

The abuse escalated to Flohr instructing the victim on how to touch Flohr’s genitals.
However, the victim “reportedly displayed reluctance to do so, the priest reportedly sat the
[victim] on his knee while he touched the [victim’s] genitals, showing him what the priest wanted
him to do.” Flohr then took the victim’s hands and placed them on his own genitals.

The abuse further escalated to oral sex. Flohr wanted the victim to “kiss the priest’s
genitals.” When he did not do so in a manner to Flohr’s liking, Flohr performed oral sex on the
victim to show him how it was to be performed. Flohr continued to force the victim to perform
oral sex on him for one year.

Flohr's final act of sexual abuse against the victim occurred in November 1969, when
Flohr allegedly took the victim into the confessional of the Immaculate Conception church and

480
Summary
began kissing him and tied him up with rope into a “praying position.” The victim began to
scream, so Flohr tried to silence him by forcing his penis into his mouth. “When the [victim]
refused the priest allegedly became angry and sodomized the [victim] with a crucifix
approximately 7”x 5”x 1” in size.” Flohr then stated that the victim was a “bad boy” and let
him go. Following this incident, the victim deliberately set the church carpet on fire.

Between 2005 and 2007, the Diocese of Greensburg reimbursed the victim for 107
therapy sessions, eight hospitalizations, and four medication bills; a value totaling $51,163.
According to a letter to the victim from Father Lawrence Persico;

It is not now, or ever has been the policy of the Diocese of Greensburg to provide
financial support for hospitalization, direct medical treatment, or medication.
We extended such coverage to you only after the fact of your multiple emergency
treatments, and as an act of Christian charity in your dire need.

Flohr died in 2004.

481
 Father Charles B. Guth

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1896
YEAR OF DEATH: 1986
ORDINATION: June 22, 1924

Employment/Assignment History
7/1924-4/1925 St. Peter, N.S., Pittsburgh, PA
4/1925-3/1926 St. Andrew, N.S., Pittsburgh, PA
3/1926-8/1928 St. Joseph, Braddock, PA
8/1928-1/1929 St. Bernard, Dormont, PA
1/1929-1/1932 St. Ambrose, N.S. Pittsburgh, PA
1/1932-7/1932 St. Wendelin, Carrick, PA
7/1932-5/1935 Presentation, Midland, PA
5/1935-6/1935 St. Mary, McKees Rocks, PA
6/1935-10/1942 St. James, W. E. Pittsburgh, PA
10/1942-8/1944 St. Mary, Parkers Landing and Mission, St. James, Petrolia, PA
8/1944-11/1962 Holy Family, West Newton, PA
11/1962-5/1973 St. Mary, Kittanning, PA
5/1973 Retired, Residing at St. Mary, Kittanning, PA
8/1982 St. Anne’s Home for the elderly, Greensburg, PA (Resident)

Summary

On July 31, 2005, an adult male sent an e-mail communication to Father Roger Statnick
of the Diocese of Greensburg with the subject line entitled, "abuse memory." In this message,
the victim shared the details of abuse he suffered at the hands of Father Charles Guth when Guth
was assigned to Holy Family in West Newton. The e-mail message was forwarded to Monsignor
Lawrence Persico.

In his message, the victim revealed that while living in West Newton when he was around
seven years old, he was told by a Sunday school teacher that missing mass could make you die.
Concerned for his mother who was missing mass, the victim went down to the church to plead
the case of his mother. The victim related that “Father Gooth” (Guth) took the victim into the
rectory office where Guth sat in a chair as the victim stood before him, sobbing and pleading for
his mother’s soul.

Guth asked the victim whether he believed that Jesus suffered and died for our sins, in
response to which the victim said "of course” as that is what he was taught. Guth talked about
penance and having crosses to bear and asked the victim if he would do anything to save his
mother. Guth then spoke of secret confessions and penance before reaching over and unbuckling
the victim’s pants, pulling them down, fondling him, and sticking his finger up the victim’s anus.

482
Summary
The victim believed Guth then spoke in Latin. The victim stated he was frozen stiff when the
abuse was occurring and that when Guth was done, he was instructed to pull up his pants and
that if he told anyone about the secret penance, not only would his mother go to hell, but he [the
victim] would burn with her. Guth then gave the victim a nickel and warned him again not to
say anything to anyone or his whole family would burn in hell.

The victim stated he was in therapy as a result of his abuse by Guth but stopped going
when his insurance refused to pay for his sessions. He explained he was suffering and
withdrawing from people and that he had shared his story with another priest and a support
group, but was angry, scared, lonely, and felt betrayed.

Persico responded to the victim’s e-mail message, telling him he was willing to assist
and wanted to meet to discuss his issues. The victim replied that he was not yet ready to meet
face-to-face. About six weeks later, on September 27, 2005, Father Job Foote, O.S.B., who was
separately described by the victim as "my friend and semi mentor," wrote an e-mail to Persico
indicating that he had spoken with the victim and while the victim appreciated Persico’s
attention to the matter, he would not contact him again and was in therapy.

483
 Father Francis Lesniak

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1916
YEAR OF DEATH: 1991
ORDINATION: June 6, 1943

Employment/Assignment History
8/12/1943 –2/27/1946 St. Monica, Wampum and St. Theresa, Hoytdale, PA
2/28/1946 –2/10/1953 St. Mary, New Kensignton, PA
2/11/1953 –5/14/1953 St. Bernard, Indiana, PA
5/15/1953 –8/3/1954 Transfiguration Church, Mount Pleasant, PA
8/4/1954 –4/3/1956 St. Mary, New Kensington, PA
4/4/1956 –9/7/1960 St. Michael, Glen Campbell and SS Peter &
Paul, Arcadia, PA
9/8/1960 –8/31/1965 St. Stanislaus, Calmut, PA
9/1/1965 –6/26/1969 St. Anne, Fellsburg and Holy Cross, Webster, PA
6/27/1969 –5/24/1976 Seven Dolors, Yukon, PA
5/25/1976 –8/1987 St. Francis de Paul, Ford City, PA

Summary

Via a telephone call placed on March 3, 2004, the Diocese of Greensburg received its
first sexual abuse allegation against Father Francis Lesniak. A victim reported that in
approximately 1977 when he was 13 years old, Lesniak fondled his genitals in a church rectory.
Although the summary of the complaint did not specify in which rectory the abuse occurred,
Lesniak’s assignment history would place the incident at St. Francis de Paul church.

In describing the incident, the victim explained that Lesniak invited him to “an overnight
social for the altar boys at the parish.” When he arrived at the rectory, he realized that he was
the only boy to attend. While watching television, he claimed Lesniak began rubbing his genitals
over his clothes.

When the victim initially informed his mother about what had occurred with Lesniak,
she did not believe him.

Although the victim requested financial compensation for the alleged abuse by Lesniak,
the Diocese of Greensburg initially stated such compensation was not available. However, in
January of 2006, the Diocese ultimately settled with the victim for $5,000 and 90 counseling
sessions.

In September of 2004, a second victim alleged that he was sexually assaulted by Lesniak
in 1962. In this incident, Lesniak took the victim and a friend ice-skating, followed by an

484
Summary
overnight stay at the rectory. Although the summary of the incident did not specify in which
rectory the abuse occurred, Lesniak’s assignment history would place it at St. Stanislaus. The
victim claimed that as he was on the verge of falling asleep, Lesniak fondled his genitals on the
sofa. The victim feigned waking up and then went to bed. He later awoke to find Lesniak
attempting to fondle his genitals again.

The second victim ultimately settled with the Diocese for $5,000 and 90 counseling
sessions.

A third victim approached the Diocese on May 13, 2005 and alleged that in 1965 or
1966, Lesniak fondled his genitals during an overnight stay at the rectory. Once again, the
summary of the complaint did not specify in which rectory the abuse occurred, but Lesniak’s
assignment history would place the incident in either St. Stanislaus, St. Anne, or Holy Cross.
The third victim claimed that when Lesniak took him swimming, he would, on occasion, attempt
to fondle his genitals in the pool.

In January of 2006, the Diocese settled a civil lawsuit with the third victim for $5,000
and 90 counseling sessions.

In 2007, a fourth victim alleged that Lesniak sexually abused him from 1983 through
approximately 1987 or 1988 while he was attending St. Francis of Paola in Ford City. According
to the victim, the abuse began when he was approximately seven or eight years old and occurred
during the summer after his first Holy Communion at a picnic at Falcon Park. Lesniak took the
victim on a walk, which eventually led to Lesniak’s vehicle, where Lesniak forced the victim to
perform oral sex on him. After this incident, the victim became an altar boy. Lesniak informed
him that altar boys must go to confession each time before they served mass. Instead of taking
the victim to the confessional, however, Lesniak took him into a back room of the church.
“Father Lesniak would listen to his sins and indicated to him that if he was not too bad he would
‘get to suck on a strawberry lollipop or popsicle.’” The victim stated that after confession,
Lesniak would expose his penis and tell him it was his “strawberry lollipop.” This particular
scenario occurred dozens of times.

Lesniak's abuse of the fourth victim eventually escalated to anal rape. During these rapes,
Lesniak reportedly told the victim, “this is what all good altar boys do.” The victim claimed that
Lesniak provided him with wine every time he anally raped him. As he stated, “I remember that
he gave me wine before every time that he put his penis in me. I can remember drinking whole
large containers full of wine.” This abuse occurred well over 100 times over the course of
approximately four years.

The fourth victim reported that he experienced a number of problems as a result of

Lesniak's abuse, including severe issues with intimacy and trust, poor anger management,
depression, low self-esteem, and stomach cramps when he was nervous or upset. Additionally,
he became an alcoholic by the time he turned twelve years old.

485
Summary
The Diocese of Greensburg provided the victim with 90 sessions of counseling following
his complaint of Lesniak's sexual abuse. Additionally, the Diocese offered him $5,000 in
financial compensation, which he rejected.

On May 14, 2015, the attorney for the victim contacted the Diocese to again ask for
additional counseling for the victim. Counsel requested the Diocese honor their earlier
agreement and pay for additional counseling sessions. In a May 28, 2015 letter, Monsignor Larry
Kulick agreed pay for an independent psychological evaluation for the victim and additional
counseling following the evaluation.

According to Diocesan records, Lesniak retired in 1987. He died in 1991.

486
 Father Henry J. Marcinek

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1930
YEAR OF DEATH: 1987
ORDINATION: May 26, 1956

Employment/Assignment History
7/1956-7/1957 Holy Name, Monessen, PA
7/1957-8/1958 SS Cyril & Methodius, Fairchance, PA
8/1958-6/1960 Holy Trinity, Ford City, PA
6/1960-8/1965 Holy Rosary Church, Republic, PA
8/1965-6/1967 St. Mary Church, Uniontown, PA
6/1967-6/1970 St. Elizabeth Church, Starford, PA & Sacred Heart,
Dixonville, PA
6/1970-5/1973 Holy Rosary Church, Republic, PA
5/1973-1/1982 Holy Cross, Youngwood and St. Gilbert Church,
Hunker, PA
1/1982-1/1985 St. Pius X, Mt. Pleasant, PA

Summary

In November of 2007, a 45-year-old male sent a letter to the parish in Fayette County
alleging that he had been sexually assaulted by Father Henry Marcinek. The abuse allegedly
began in approximately 1972, when the victim was around ten years old and attending the Holy
Rosary school. The abuse continued until the early 1980’s.

The victim wrote to the Diocese of Greensburg detailing his deep depression and
problems with nerves stemming from the abuse he suffered at the hands of Marcinek, including
bed wetting into adulthood, suffering from hives and other skin disorders, as well as significant
family-related problems. He stated, “I don’t remember the last time I laughed" and "I try to
fake a smile as much as possible.” Out of a feeling a desperation, he had reached out to the
church for “mental help.”

On November 14, 2007, the victim was interviewed by Monsignor Lawrence Persico.
As detailed in a typed account of an interview, the victim detailed how Marcinek regularly
requested that he, an altar server, carry firewood to the rectory, where Marcinek would have oral
sex with him. A year or two after the abuse began, Marcinek took the victim to his cabin, where
he provided him with alcohol and attempted to have anal sex with him. The victim stated that it
would not work and hurt, so they proceeded with performing oral sex on each other.

The victim explained that Marcinek had the complete trust of his family. Marcinek
exploited that trust by taking the victim on vacations where he would share a bed with him. For

487
Summary
example, when the victim was around age 11, Marcinek took him to Sea World and Geauga
Lake amusement park in Ohio. They stayed in a hotel room together and Marcinek sexually
abused him. They similarly took a trip to Niagara Falls where they shared a room together.

The victim explained that Marcinek bestowed gifts and money upon him, including a car
when victim was older, which was registered in Marcinek’s name. The victim confided that he
liked receiving money from Marcinek because his family was very poor. The victim worried
that Marcinek may have targeted the victim's brother as well, in that the victim overheard him
say that “Father Henry kissed me on the lips and he kissed me real hard.”
According to the victim, Marcinek's abuse was deeply degrading and caused profound
and long-lasting damage to his emotional and psychological well-being. For example, he shared
the following with Persico: “You want to hear the low down, how disgusting our world is, I peed
in his mouth, because he used to cum in mine and I thought that was what I was supposed to
do.” He felt that “he was fricking prostituting himself, basically at the age of 12-13.”

The victim reported that he confronted Marcinek as an adult and that Marcinek told him
he had washed his hands of him.

The victim requested the Diocese’s assistance in helping him move out of the country
and/or help him get his driver’s license back. He further let Persico know he blamed the church
for “ruining my life. I have not relaxed since I was 10 years old, I have been fighting and full of
rage and it was a pretty miserable existence that I spent on this earth.” He accused the church
of breeding pedophiles, saying:

It was just rampant, disgusting . . . it had to be so rampant that none of you guys
could say you did not know what was going on, not a one. You can’t say there
was not a lot of pedophile shit going on . . .

The Church ultimately settled with the victim for $10,000 and he was to receive 90
sessions of counseling.

488
 Greensburg Priest #1

Biographical Information
Omitted

Employment/Assignment History
Omitted

Summary

In November 1962, Bishop William Connare wrote a memorandum to Monsignors Cyril

Vogel and Norbert Gaughan regarding allegations involving a priest then serving in the Diocese
of Greensburg "Greensburg Priest #1"9 and an unnamed victim who was a seminarian. While
the nature of the allegation and age of victim were not specified, Connare consistently referred
to the victim as a “boy.”

In the letter, Connare acknowledged that only Vogel, Gaughan, Father Leonard Sanesi,
and the “Father’s pastor” (meaning the pastor of the father of victim) knew of the situation.
Connare expressed that he “sincerely hopes that we can contain the whole matter within this
circle.” Connare consistently conveyed his concern should this knowledge become public, so
much so that he agreed not to confront Greensburg Priest #1 with the accusation. Connare did
not reassign the accused priest out of fear that “too many would connect the two incidents, the
dismissal of the seminarian and the removal of a priest.” Furthermore, Connare expressed
concern that the victim’s family would find out, while then reassuring himself that the family
would only know if the victim told them. Connare ended the memorandum by instructing those
“in the circle” to keep an eye on Greensburg Priest #1 and to send him to Via Coeli if the
incident was made public until “the whole thing could be resolved.” Via Coeli was a treatment
facility where the church would send priests known to have engaged in, among other aberrant
behaviors, sexual abuse.

Greensburg Priest #1 was not made aware of the 1962 accusation until 2002, when he
was questioned regarding the incident during a Diocesan file review. When questioned about
the matter, he stated the incident was not previously brought to his attention, that he knew
nothing about the accusation, and did not know who the seminarian could be.

9
Consistent with the Grand Jury's methodology used to determine which clergy members to identify and
describe in its Report, the Grand Jury finds the allegation against "Greensburg Priest #1" were insufficient
to warrant naming him in its Report. The Diocese of Greensburg's response to the complaint made against
Greensburg Priest #1 was relevant to the Report, however, so the Grand Jury has decided to include the
above information with respect to the allegation made against this Priest.

489
 Father Fabian G. Oris

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1915
YEAR OF DEATH: 2007
ORDINATION: June 14, 1942

Employment/Assignment History
8/27/1942 – 5/14/1953 St. Mary, Brownsville, PA
5/15/1953 – 1/31/1955 St. Bernard, Indiana, PA
2/1/1955 – 3/21/1962 St. Hedwig, Smock, PA
3/22/1962 – 6/10/1971 St. Florian, United, PA
6/11/1971 – 5/2/1973 Holy Rosary, Republic, PA
5/2/1973 – 2/10/1990 St. Mary, Uniontown, PA

Summary

In an April 16, 2002 letter to Bishop Anthony Bosco, a woman alleged that Father Fabian
Oris sexually abused her beginning when she was around four or five years old until she was
approximately 12 years of age. Her parents were friends with Oris as her father had attended
high school with him.

According to the victim, Oris fondled and performed oral sex on her while they shared
the same bed in the St. Hedwig rectory. Oris also forced her to fondle him, which caused Oris
to have an erection. Oris took her on trips locally and out of state, including to the New York
State Fair and Atlantic City, New Jersey. Their relationship was sufficiently close that other
children in her class would tease her that she was sleeping with a priest.

The abuse continued even after Oris was transferred to St. Florian in United. She related
that Oris explained “the birds and the bees” and told her, “I want to make you my woman.” She
began to cry and ran to another room

The victim reported that Oris sexually abused her older sister, as well. According to a
memorandum from Father Lawrence Persico dated April 23, 2002 regarding a telephone call
detailing the abuse, "it wasn't until she (the victim) was 18 and visited her sister in Florida, that
in the course of conversation this relationship with Father Oris came up." Oris frequently asked
the girls’ parents if the older sister could stay overnight with him at the St. Hedwig rectory
because he was lonely. The abuse began when the older sister was in third or fourth grade and
continued until she was in fifth grade.

According to an April 25, 2002 memorandum by Persico, Oris stopped inviting the older
sister to the rectory because he began inviting another one of her younger sisters to stay with
him instead.

490
Summary

Oris frequently fondled and slept in the same bed as the older sister. She reported that
her family frequently watched television at the rectory, since Oris had a color television. During
these occasions, Oris forced her to sit on his lap and slid his hands up her skirt. She stated that
her parents either did not notice or did not want to address the issue.

The Diocese notified Oris of the allegation and instructed him that he was no longer
permitted to publicly present himself as a priest. Although Oris claimed to not recall any details
of the allegations, he did apologize. As indicated in his file:

He [Oris] said I have been praying all these years, asking god that they
forgive me, asking all these girls to forgive me . . . he added I’m praying
for them and I am sorry for what I have done. I am deeply sorry. I never
thought that it would come to this, but young girls are pretty and they
throw themselves at you, you say thing and do things I guess I never
meant to hurt anybody. Their mother knew, but never said anything. I
asked him if she knew that he sexually abused them and he said no, but
she knew that they came to the rectory to sleep overnight.

In 2014, an additional victim alleged that Oris kissed her on the mouth when she was
approximately 10 or 11 years old in 1977 or 1978. This additional victim attended St. Mary in
Uniontown and was sent to the rectory by her principal for disciplinary action on approximately
five occasions. It was during these meetings that Oris kissed her on the mouth. While the incident
was reported to the Fayette County District Attorney’s Office, the Diocese took no further action
because Oris had died in 2007.

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

491 -*5*("5*0/
 Father George R. Pierce

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1933
YEAR OF DEATH: 2009
ORDINATION: May 23, 1959

Employment/Assignment History
6/23/1959 – 12/8/1960 St. Mary, Freeport, PA
12/9/1960 – 2/13/1963 All Saints, Masontown, PA
2/14/1963 – 6/12/1966 Immaculate Conception, Connellsville, PA
6/13/1966 – 6/19/1967 St. Mary and Holy Trinity, Ford City, PA
6/20/1967 – 6/24/1968 Immaculate Conception, Irwin, PA
6/25/1968 – 6/7/1972 St. Gertrude, McIntyre and its mission St. Anthony,
Aultman, PA
6/7/1972 – 6/4/1985 Holy Family, Seward and its missions: St. Mary, Bolivar and
St. Mary, Florence, PA
6/4/1985 – 6/20/1995 Our Lady of Perpetual Help, Leckrone, PA
6/20/1995 – 5/14/1997 St. James, Maxwell, PA
5/14/1997 Leave of Absence
8/1998 Retired

Summary

In 1997, the Diocese of Greensburg received an allegation of sexual abuse against Father
George Pierce. The victim claimed that the abuse began in 1968 when she was 12 years old and
continued until she was approximately age 20. She explained that had worked for Pierce,
cleaning the St. Gertrude rectory. According to the victim, a normal evening with Pierce
included dinner and alcoholic drinks followed by sexual intercourse in the rectory. She
continued to visit Pierce even after he was transferred to Holy Family and its missions in 1972.

The victim felt that she had a legitimate romantic relationship with Pierce and became
jealous of another female from Jeannette with whom Pierce also had a sexual relationship (it is
unclear if the other female was a minor or an adult). According to the typed Diocesan notes from
a meeting with the victim on April 28, 1997, “he [Pierce] picked me up and we took her home
to Jeannette. On the way home he had her perform oral sex on him in the car. I [Victim #1] was
15 or 16.”10

10
It is somewhat unclear who the “her” is in the notes. Handwritten notes indicate that the “her”
is Victim #1 by stating, “he [Pierce] picked me up and we took her home to Jeannette. On the way
home, he had me perform oral sex on him in the car.” However, the typed version of the notes
changed “me” to “her,” which would indicate that the other female performed oral sex on Pierce.

492
Summary
Pierce's Diocesan file reveals that Bishop William Connare knew about inappropriate
behavior between Pierce and a young woman in his parish as early as 1972. Connare instructed
Pierce not to hire “a teenage woman from his former parish as housekeeper.” Connare received
several complaints from parishioners about young women staying overnight at the parish. While
Connare sent Pierce several letters of warning, he took no further action on the matter.
According to the files, parishioners from every parish (except St. James) complained to the
Diocese about Pierce’s relationship with a “particular female” (understood to be the victim
descrbied above).

Pierce acknowledged having an inappropriate relationship with the victim, but denied
having sexual intercourse with her. Rather, he contended they only engaged in mutual
masturbation. Pierce further stated he was in love with the victim and also claimed that “after
[the victim], he ‘white knuckled’ it.”

Following the report of the allegation, Pierce received therapy and an evaluation from
November 1997 to May 1998 through the Anodos Center. He soon thereafter retired from the
priesthood in August of 1998. Upon his retirement, he was not permitted to function as a priest.

A handwritten note in the file by an unknown author referenced a conference call with
Pierce dated April 20, 1998. It stated, “Contact Erie and ask what their mind is about his helping
out there. Invite them into dialogue with us.” The Grand Jury understands that the Diocese of
Erie had been known to accept and assist priests living in their Diocese who previously had
sexual misconduct allegations made against them. After retiring, Pierce moved to Linesville
which is within the Diocese of Erie. According to Pierce's Diocesan file, the Diocese of Erie
received no allegations of misconduct against Pierce while he lived there.

The victim filed a civil suit against the Diocese of Greensburg in 1997. The case was
settled for $30,000. The settlement include strict confidentiality terms which barred the victim
from discussing its terms or publicizing the facts of the settlement through any media form.

In 2002, the Diocese of Greensburg received an allegation from a second victim who
claimed that Pierce sexually abused him for three years during Pierce's assignment at St.
Anthony and St. Gertrude. Pierce was assigned to this parish from June of 1968 to June of 1972.
According to the victim, when he was approximately 10 years of age, he confided in Pierce that
he was “gang raped” by his older brother and his friends shortly before his seventh birthday.
Pierce reportedly told the victim he had to provide oral and anal sex to him in order to be saved
and go to heaven. Feeling Pierce could be trusted due to his position and authority within the
church, the victim engaged in anal and oral sex with Pierce for three years beginning in 1969
until 1972, when Pierce was transferred to Holy Family and its missions.

In a letter dated August 28, 2003, Father Roger Statnick offered the victim counseling
and assured him that Pierce had undergone a psychological evaluation, had retired from active
ministry, and was banned from any public functioning as a priest.

493
Summary
On November 18, 2004, requested that Cardinal Joseph
Ratzinger (later Pope Benedict XVI) dismiss Pierce from the clerical state due to the sexual
abuse allegations against him. The letter indicated a judicial process to assess Pierce's guilt
would be unnecessary because he had admitted to committing the allegations in question.
Additionally, request included a representation that the first victim had agreed not to
publicize the abuse she suffered at the hands of Pierce.

Pierce died in 2009.

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

494
-*5*("5*0/
 Father Gregory F. Premoshis

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1938
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 18, 1968

Employment/Assignment History
6/25/1968 St. Paul, Greensburg, PA
6/27/1969 Religion Teacher, Greensburg Catholic High School;
Residence at St. Paul
6/9/1980 Religion Teacher, Geibel High School, Connellsville, PA;
Residence at Immaculate Conception, Connellsville, PA
7/15/1986 Religion Teacher, Geibel High School, Connellsville, PA;
Residence at St. Rita, Connellsville, PA
10/12/1987 Visitation Church, Mt. Pleasant, PA
7/7/1998 President of Geibel Catholic High School, Connellsville;
Residence, St. Stanislaus, Calumet, PA
3/19/2002 Administrative Leave
8/2002 Retired

Summary

In March 2002, a victim alleged that Father Gregory Premoshis sexually abused him
from 1980 to 1982 when he was a student at Geibel High School in Connellsville. The victim
explained that he had developed a close relationship with Premoshis because he did not have a
good relationship with his father and that by the time he was approximately 16 or 17 years old,
Premoshis had become his mentor and surrogate father. Premoshis bought the victim many gifts
and dinners, supplied him with alcohol, and allowed him to borrow his car.

The victim reported that he spent many evenings at the Immaculate Conception rectory,
during which he and Premoshis would engage in “rough-housing.” This entailed Premoshis
fondling and wrestling with the victim while Premoshis in his underwear. Premoshis would
often have an erection during these “wrestling matches.” Ultimately, the victim started staying
overnight at the rectory and slept in the same bed as Premoshis. One morning, the victim awoke
with “cream” on him, which he later realized was semen.

Premoshis also took the victim on numerous overnight trips and vacations, including to
Waynesboro, Virginia, Atlantic City, New Jersey, Dayton, Ohio, and to Myrtle Beach, South
Carolina. During one trip, the victim awoke to find Premoshis fondling the victim’s genitals, at
which point Premoshis jumped back into his own bed. When the victim asked Premoshis about
what he was doing the previous night, Premoshis said he did not remember.

495
Summary
Upon being confronted by a Bishop's representative on March 18, 2002, Premoshis
admitted to giving gifts to the victim, buying him dinner, supplying him with alcohol, and
loaning him his vehicle. He further admitted to wrestling with the victim and acknowledged
becoming slightly aroused while doing so. He also confirmed having slept in the same bed with
the victim on multiple occasions, both in the rectory and on trips. Premoshis denied, however,
ejaculating on the victim, but explained he may have had a “wet dream” while they were
sleeping in the same bed.

Bishop Anthony Bosco wrote a decree in July of 2002 regarding Premoshis, which stated
the following:

1. Examination by doctors at the Anodos Center, experts in psychology, has

indicated that Father Premoshis engaged in inappropriate boundary
violations with a minor involving physical contact and providing alcohol.

2. That behavior of the part of Father Premoshis has created disturbance

including scandal if he would minister publicly.

3. According to the experts, this behavior, which afflicts Father Premoshis,

could grow worse if he doesn’t receive psychotherapy to address
inappropriate boundaries in ministry especially in relationship with
adolescents.

The Diocese of Greensburg revoked Premoshis’s public ministry in this decree. Bosco further
stated, however, that if Premoshis accepted treatment, his “case would be reviewed.” In August
of 2002, Bosco notified Premoshis that since he “retired early,” he would receive 70% of his
full benefits, $200 per month for a living allotment until age 65, and full health benefits.

In 2002, the victim filed a lawsuit against the Diocese of Greensburg, Bishop Bosco, and
Premoshis. Although the lawsuit was dismissed in 2003 due the expiration of the statute of
limitations, the victim ultimately received a settlement of $5,000 plus 90 counseling sessions.

496
 Father Thomas W. Rogers

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1923
YEAR OF DEATH: 2005
ORDINATION: January 26, 1952

Employment/Assignment History
1953 St. Edward, Herminie, PA
1953 – 1954 St. Mary, Freeport, PA
1954 – 1955 Immaculate Conception, Connellsville, PA
6/29/1955 – 7/4/1956 Immaculate Conception, Irwin, PA
7/5/1956 – 7/7/1958 SS Simon and Jude, Blairsville, PA
7/8/1958 – 1960 St. John the Baptist, Scottdale, PA
1/6/1961 Incardinated in the Diocese of Greensburg, PA
6/3/1965 – 6/24/1968 St. Anthony, Clymer, PA
6/25/1968 – 8/7/1972 St. Charles Borromeo, Suatersville, PA
8/8/1972 – 2/18/1981 St. Mary, Ford City, PA
2/19/1981 – 1/21/1991 Seven Dolars, Yukon, PA
1/22/1992 – 11/4/1998 St. Anne, Rostraver, PA
11/4/1998 Retired

Summary

On August 14, 1962, Monsignor Robert J. Giroux of the Diocese of Ogdensburg, New
York wrote a letter to Bishop William Connare of the Diocese of Greensburg regarding an
incident in which Father Thomas Rogers was alleged to have attempted to sexually assault a
high school-aged boy. According to Giroux, state and local police received a complaint from
the boy that a man attempted to sexually assault him while he was hitch-hiking near Saranac
Lake. The boy was able to escape, however, and provided a detailed description of his attacker,
the vehicle he was driving and a license plate number. The police determined that the vehicle
was registered to Rogers, who was visiting his mother in the area at the time. The police also
located two witnesses who were willing to testify to seeing the boy with Rogers.

According to Giroux, "[k]nowing that a priest might be involved the police did not wish
to follow their usual procedures." When Rogers was confronted by police in the rectory of the
local church, he denied the incident and claimed to have been at the local parish at the time it
occurred. Rogers claimed that his vehicle could have been stolen and thereafter returned while
he was at the church, which the police noted would have been impossible given the time in
which this would have had to occur. Further, the victim’s description of Rogers as his assailant
was "perfect" and detailed. Regardless, Rogers maintained his innocence, and even later
provided Connare with a letter in 1963 from an anonymous person who admitted to stealing the

497
Summary
vehicle and attacking the minor. Rogers left town the same day that he was interviewed by
police.

The victim’s father was called to the rectory to discuss the matter with police and Church
officials. Described as "a good Catholic," he agreed not to pursue charges so long as there was
an admission of guilt by Rogers and he left town. Similarly, the police offered to drop the matter
so long as Rogers stayed away from the community.

On August 22, 1962, Connare responded to Giroux via letter. Connare indicated he had
confronted Rogers, who categorically denied the accusations. Connare appeared to be conflicted
by Rogers' denial and reluctant to "flatly call him a 'liar.'" Connare also mentioned that Rogers
claimed to personally know the Chief of Police in Saranac Lake, who he called by his first name.
Rogers also remarked that his brother was also on the force. Connare expressed concern about
Rogers returning to the Saranac Lake area given his mother living there, but that he would forbid
him if necessary. Ultimately, driven by a perceived need to "proceed cautiously to protect his
[Roger's] reputation," no further action was taken and Connare assured Giroux that he would
“wait, and watch carefully.”

Connare received a reply letter from the Bishop of Ogdensburg written September 10,
1962. Noting that the matter of Roger's attempted sexual assault had "been well handed here,"
he pressed Connare not to permit Rogers to return to the area because of the involvement of the
state police, whom he described as heavily patrolling the area, and the father of the victim, who
he believed would pursue charges should Rogers return.

A review of Rogers' file in 2002 prompted Bishop Anthony Bosco to inform Rogers that
he was no longer permitted to publicly present himself as a priest.

498
 Father Leonard Sanesi

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1923
YEAR OF DEATH: 1992
ORDINATION: 1953

Employment/Assignment History
6/16/1953 – 6/21/1955 St. Rita, Connellsville, PA
6/22/1955 – 7/7/1958 St. Cajetan, Monesson, PA
7/8/1958 – 1/15/1962 Immaculate Conception, Irwin, PA
1/16/1962 – 6/12/1966 St. Joseph Minor Seminary, Greensburg, PA
6/13/1966 – 5/28/1974 Holy Family, West Newton, PA
5/29/1974 – 8/22/1983 Immaculate Conception, Irwin, PA
8/23/1983 – 6/17/1990 Mount St. Peter, New Kensington, PA
6/18/1990 – 1/10/1992 All Saints, Arnold, PA

Summary

In 2002, the Diocese of Greensburg received its first allegation of sexual abuse
committed by Father Leonard Sanesi. The victim alleged in a letter that during the early 1960's
when Sanesi served at St. Joseph’s Diocesan Minor Seminary - - a school for boys who had
completed high school and believe they may be called to the seminary - - Sanesi repeatedly
sexually abused him.

The victim stated that he suffered from psoriasis, the treatment of which required the
application of a variety of lotions and salves. Sanesi suggested to the victim that “I’d [the victim]
be more comfortable with these applications in the privacy of his [Sanesi’s] residence rather
than in the dorm room.” According to the victim, during Sanesi helping him apply his lotions
and salves, Sanesi's contact escalated to fondling the victim’s genitals. This would happen as a
nightly occurrence. The victim related that Sanesi “always took care of me – trips, gifts, clothes,
restaurant meals.”

According to notes in Sanesi’s file, Bishop Anthony Bosco wrote back to the victim and
apologized for Sanesi’s abuse. However, no response was received. The victim’s complaint was
forwarded to the Westmoreland County District Attorney’s Office but because Sanesi had been
deceased for a decade at the time the abuse was reported, no action was taken.

In 2013, via an e-mail communication exchange with Monsignor Raymond Riffle, a

second victim alleged that Sanesi sexually abused him at St. Joseph Hall beginning in 1962. The
second victim alleged that Sanesi came into his dormitory room on two or three occasions in the
middle of the night and attempted to fondle his genitals and masturbate him. In response and to
deter Sanesi, the victim pretended to be asleep and rolled onto his stomach. On another occasion

499
Summary
when the victim was sick, Sanesi took him to his quarters and provided him with alcohol and
again attempted to fondle him. The victim also claimed “there was another occurrence in
January 1963 which ended in the same fashion.” Because of Sanesi’s repeated attempts at
fondling him, the victim began sleeping on his stomach. He continued to do so throughout the
remainder of his life.

Riffle apologized to the second victim and offered him counseling sessions, which he
declined.

500
 Father Roger A. Sinclair

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1947
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 4, 1974

Employment/Assignment History
1974 - 1977 Immaculate Conception, Connellsville, PA
1977 – 1979 Holy Family, Latrobe, PA
1979 - 1980 St. Therese, Uniontown, PA
1980 – 1983 St. Mary, Kittanning, PA
1983 - 1984 Sick Leave
1984 - 2002 Released to the Archdiocese of Military Services
3/7/2002 Facilities Revoked
4/12/2002 Removed from the Archdiocese of Military Services

Summary

In May of 1981, two mothers wrote letters to Bishop Norbert F. Gaughan of the Diocese
of Greensburg alleging that Father Roger Sinclair molested their sons (first victim and second
victim) when they were approximately 14 years old. In approximately September 1980, Sinclair
visited the first victim’s father for a drink late one night while the two victims were watching
television during a sleepover. After the father went to bed, Sinclair proceeded to chase the
victims around the room attempting to “shake hands” with them. Each time Sinclair shook
hands with one of the boys, however, he pushed their hands towards their genitals. The first
victim reported that Sinclair tried to put his hands down his pants as well.

According to a May 26, 1981 letter from the second victim’s mother to Gaughan, both
parents first reported the incident to Father Thomas Bertolina, the pastor of St. Mary. She
reported, however, that Bertolina failed to address or acknowledge the situation and “wanted to
keep it all hush-hush and swept under the rug.” Bertolina's inaction on the matter prompted the
second victim’s mother to report the incident to Gaughan. She pleaded with Gaughan that
Sinclair “needs professional help away from parish life where he cannot bother others” and
expressed concern that although she felt her son was safe, Sinclair could pose a risk to other
children if proper action was not taken.

In June of 1981, Bishop William Connare requested therapy for Sinclair through the
Catholic Social Services for “possible hidden hostility and anger which leads to occasional
drinking and evinces itself in aggressive behavior.”

Father Thomas J. Klinzing wrote a memorandum dated August 5, 1981 titled “Father
Sinclair’s Problem” which indicated that Sinclair visited the first victim’s father on August 4,

501
Summary
1981 after Sinclair's abuse had occurred and been reported to the church by the mothers of the
boys. During this visit, the father yelled at Klinzing for making up stories about Sinclair, while
Sinclair “just sat there and drank.” According to the first victim, “Sinclair tells his dad
everything and then ‘I get it.’” The first victim became frightened and upset by Sinclair’s
presence and ran to his mother’s home.

During her visit with Klinzing on August 5, 1981, the first victim’s mother indicated she
wanted to call the police to keep Sinclair away from her son. However, Klinzing urged her to
calm down and that “I would talk to Bishop Gaughan and get back to her later this afternoon.”
Later that afternoon, Klinzing spoke with Monsignor John Conway (described above) regarding
the incident. Conway relayed the following information to Klinzing:

When Father Sinclair was in Latrobe there was an incident with a young man
whom he took on vacation to Florida with him. The young man’s father refused,
however, to confront Father Sinclair.

It does not appear the Diocese of Greensburg maintained a record of any incident involving
Sinclair and a young boy in Florida.

In March 1982, Gaughan stated in a letter to the Catholic Social Services of Allegheny
County that “a number of people were after us to see that Father Roger Sinclair was
transferred.” According to Connare, when he asked Sinclair about a transfer, “he [Sinclair]
made it quite clear to me [Connare] that he prefers to remain in his present assignment and to
work through his problems.” Connare permitted Sinclair to remain at St. Mary at that time.

An undated document appearing in Sinclair's Diocesan file addressed facts related to the
accusations against him. According to this document, the Diocese acknowledged only the
complaints of the first two victims'. However, a letter from the second victim’s mother dated
February 25, 1983 indicated that Sinclair may have had more victims. As the letter stated: “She
[another mother] said a group of mothers was having a meeting regarding Father Sinclair and
would I come tell our story as other boys were involved.” During the meeting, the mothers
decided to contact the Chief of Police for advice. When the Chief arrived, he indicated he had
already heard the “rumors” and spoken with Bertolina the previous day.

Despite the assertions of the victims’ mothers that they notified Bertolina of the incident
between Sinclair and their sons in 1981, during a meeting he had with them, Bertolina “tried to
tell them he did not know the real story of what had happened” between the victims and Sinclair.
The August 5, 1981 memorandum indicated that Klinzing had also spoken with Bertolina
regarding details of the incident.

No action was taken against Sinclair.

The mother’s February 25, 1983 letter also indicated that Sinclair had unsupervised
access to minor boys. She questioned Connare regarding the lack of proper action following the
original incident. As she stated:

502
Summary

Why did he have to bother other boys before something was done – Why Father
Bertolina did nothing, even let Father Sinclair have the boys in the rectory to
play Atari and eat pizza for many hours at a time – Why no one was concerned
for the safety of the young boys of the parish.

Further, according to the second victim’s mother, she had heard rumors that Sinclair had
exposed himself to male minors and showed “dirty movies” in the rectory.

In a March 2, 1983 letter responding to the mother's letter, Connare stated:

I regret the developments, as I felt the individual concerned was working through
his problem with a professional counsellor. I have already arranged a further
evaluation and treatment for the individual beginning with approximately the
next ten days. He will no longer be in the parish.

On March 3, 1983, Connare wrote a letter to Richard Gilmartin, the Acting Director of
the House of Affirmation (a treatment facility for priests). In this letter, Connare thanked
Gilmartin for consenting to see Sinclair and provided additional background and contextual
information on Sinclair. Significantly, Connare stated that:

On Wednesday, February 23, I received a call telling me that Father had again
made some attempts on young boys [to what extent is not clear]. Because it was
the second incident in that parish, I felt it necessary to take him from there and
to turn to you for help

From June of 1983 to June of 1984 the Diocese placed Sinclair on sick leave and he
received therapy for “emotional problems" at the House of Affirmation in Missouri. Following
Sinclair’s treatment, Connare allowed him to apply for chaplaincy with the Air Force, stating
that Sinclair was “a priest in good standing.” In a letter dated May 23, 1984 to Archbishop John
May of the Archdiocese of St. Louis, Connare stated that Sinclair had been at the House of
Affirmation “for emotional problems” Connare also stated that Sinclair would leave the program
soon and that his therapists suggested he be assigned as an “auxiliary chaplain for one of the
military establishments of the area.” Connare assured May that Sinclair had his permission to
work in such a setting if it were agreeable to May.

According to a letter from November of 1991, the Topeka State Hospital reported that in
November of 1991 Sinclair “managed to gain access to a locked unit deceitfully” and attempted
to check out teenage boys from the hospital to go see a movie on two separate occasions.
However, the hospital refused to allow Sinclair to escort the minors out of the building. He was
subsequently dismissed from the hospital.

In February 2002, a third victim came forward and made a complaint against Sinclair
due to abuse that began when the victim was approximately nine or 10 years old. The abuse
continued in periodic episodes throughout his early teenage years. This complaint was made to

503
Summary
the Diocese via an e-mail communication on February 5, 2002 from the victim to Bishop
Anthony Bosco. The victim subsequently met with a representative of the Diocese and thereafter
engaged in a series of e-mail communications with Father Roger Statnick in March 2002.

According to the victim, he met Sinclair when he was an altar server at the Immaculate
Conception church. Sinclair would invite him into the rectory to watch television and eat
breakfast prior to serving the early mass. During these visits, Sinclair would often tickle him,
although reportedly did not sexually abuse him at that time. Sinclair was then transferred to
Latrobe.

The victim had no further contact with Sinclair until he was reassigned to St. Teresa in
Uniontown. Because his family considered Sinclair trustworthy and a friend, Sinclair saw the
victim and his brothers over the holidays and took them to the Kennywood amusement park in
Pittsburgh. Sinclair began inviting the victim and his brothers to the rectory in Uniontown to
watch televisions. During these visits, Sinclair would often tickle and wrestle with the boys,
with occasional “inappropriate contact” (it is unclear whether Sinclair abused the victim’s
brothers as well). According to the victim, Sinclair then began to only invite him to the rectory,
rather than all of his brothers.

During an overnight stay at Seven Springs Mountain Resort for a convention in 1978 or
1979, Sinclair reportedly slept in the same bed as the victim with only his underwear on.
According to the victim, Sinclair kept trying to get closer to him throughout the night. During
the second night, Sinclair did not wear any clothing to bed. The victim became uncomfortable,
went to the other room to watch television, and ultimately asked to be taken home. According
to the victim, Sinclair attempted to inappropriately touch him on this occasion.

Following receipt of this allegation in 2002, the Diocese revoked Sinclair’s Diocesan
faculties, rescinded their Archdiocese of Military Services endorsement, and sent him for
treatment at the Anodos Center. On March 14, 2002 Statnick e-mailed him and stated, “I would
prefer that we meet again after the assessment and the board’s review.” However, according to
the victim, the Diocese did not follow-through with him. Rather, years later on September 18,
2007, the victim e-mailed Monsignor Lawrence Persico, introduced himself, and informed
Persico of his contact with the Diocese in 2002. The victim stated:

The priest at the time took information regarding these incidents and I was told
that he would investigate and get back to me. I never received a response. I have
tried over the years to make my peace with not only the incidents with Father
Sinclair, but also the lack of response from the diocese.

In response to this e-mail, Persico offered the third victim 90 counseling sessions and a
meeting with

In April 2002, a fourth victim, via a telephone call from his attorney, notified the Diocese
that he had been sexually abused by Sinclair in 1979 at Holy Family in Latrobe. The victim was
approximately 13 years old at the time. According to Diocesan files, “the event happened in the

504 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

-*5*("5*0/
Summary
sacristy of the church after serving Mass. It was interrupted by an older couple that walked into
the sacristy.” The victim alleged that Sinclair began wrestling with him and the other altar
server. When the other altar server left, “he [Sinclair] continued to wrestle with me and it got
rough. It developed into his rubbing up against me, caressing my genitals, and breathing hard
on me.” He never told anyone about what had happened and avoided Sinclair after the incident.
According to the victim, he could tell “he [Father Sinclair] wanted to revisit the event, so I
would leave directly after serving.”

In 2004, wrote to Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (later Pope Benedict XVI) requesting
Sinclair be dismissed from the clerical state. In his letter to Ratzinger, stated that:
Sinclair has a history of acting out, and has freely admitted that, in the past, he
has engaged in inappropriate sexual contact with minor males during the early
years of his priestly ministry.

requested to forgo the penal process, since Sinclair had already confessed to the
allegations against him and because a trial would only place an additional burden on the Diocese.
Meanwhile, on December 23, 2004, Sinclair wrote a letter to His Holiness John Paul II
requesting dismissal from the clerical state. On January 1, 2005, he resigned from the priesthood.

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

505
-*5*("5*0/
 Father Joseph L. Sredzinski

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1944
YEAR OF DEATH: 2015
ORDINATION: May 9, 1970

Employment/Assignment History
1970-1972 St. Margaret Mary, Lower Burrell PA
1972-1974 Holy Rosary, Republic, PA
1974-1979 St. Mary Czestochowa, New Kensington, PA
1979-1984 St. Peter, Brownsville, PA
06/05/1984-06/05/1989 St. Stanislaus, Calumet, PA
09/1989-12/1989 Theological Studies, North American College, Rome
06/05/1989-1999 St. Joseph, Everson, PA
06/18/1999-07/05/2007 St. Hubert, Point Marion, PA
7/05/2007-04/01/2009 St. Emma’s Monastery, Greensburg, PA
7/05/2007-04/24/2009 SCI Greensburg, Greensburg, PA
7/05/2007-8/18/2010 Chaplain, Westmoreland Manor Nursing Home,
Greensburg, PA
8/18/2010-/2014 Sacred Heart Church, Jeannette, PA

Summary

According to notes in the Diocesan file of Father Joseph Sredzinski, on May 29, 1991, a
meeting was held between Father Roger Statnick and Tim Shoemaker, the then Mayor of
Everson, PA. The purpose of the meeting was for Mayor Shoemaker to convey his concerns,
and the concerns of the community, to the Diocese of Greensburg regarding Sredzinski's
perceived inappropriate relationships with several local boys. Mayor Shoemaker informed
Statnick that a local police officer had discovered Sredzinski parked in his car in a cemetery at
night with a young boy on May 18, 1991 and written an "incident report" regarding the matter.
According to Shoemaker's account of the incident, when approached by the police officer,
Sredzinski abruptly exited his vehicle, told the officer nothing was wrong, and that he was
merely talking to the boy about some problems he was having.

Additionally, Shoemaker informed Statnick that numerous people in the community had
made comments to him about Sredzinski spending too much time with local boys in
inappropriate circumstances, such as in the church rectory at night and in the woods at night
around a camp fire. Another witness informed the Diocese that she had seen Sredzinski alone
in an alley with a young boy around 2:00 a.m. in and around the time he was discovered in the

506
 Summary
cemetery with a young boy.11 This boy in the alley was identified by Shoemaker as one of three
boys Sredzinski was, according the community, too-often seen with, the other two being Victim
#1 and his younger brother. Shoemaker also informed Statnick about an additional boy who
had served as an altar boy and was heavily involved with the church, but had suddenly
completely withdrawn from the parish. Shoemaker indicated "an atmosphere of fear and
suspicion" hung over this occurrence.

On May 30, 1991, Statnick confronted Sredzinski with the information Mayor
Shoemaker shared with him and documented their conversation. Sredzinski told Statnick who
the boy he was alone with in the cemetery was ("Witness #1") and that he was a high school
junior at the time. Sredzinski claimed he picked up Witness #1 and took him to a Dairy Queen
before driving to the cemetery to talk to him privately about some problems the boy was having.
The incident with the police officer discovering them at the cemetery occurred around 10:00
p.m. Sredzinski stated he wanted the police officer to know he was in control of the situation
and that nothing was wrong. Otherwise, he denied spending too much time with boys in the
community, that various kids came to the rectory at night because they felt comfortable there,
and that he was not, as the Mayor claimed, constantly with the three boys identified by
Shoemaker.

Statnick instructed Sredzinski during this May 30, 1991 meeting that he was to have no
further contact with young people outside of business hours and in public areas of the rectory.
When Sredzinski requested time to adjust his customary way of interacting with the young
people of the parish, Statnick told him he was to change his ways immediately.

Undated handwritten notes in Sredzinski's file included information regarding Witness

#1; the young man Sredzinski claimed he was discovered alone with in the cemetery. Witness
#1 repeatedly contacted the church regarding his concern over Sredzinski's relationship with
Victim #1. Specifically, Witness #1 informed the Diocese that on the afternoon of June 18, 1991,
Sredzinski took Victim #1 swimming at the Bridgeport dam. Victim #1 told Witness #1 that
Sredzinski had "roaming hands" while they were swimming and could see that Sredzinski had
an erection. Additionally, on June 20, 1991, Sredzinski took Victim #1 and another boy to
Cleveland. Victim #1 told Witness #1 that Sredzinski made Victim #1 sit in the front seat of his
car during the trip and held his hand like you would hold a girl’s hand. Additionally, Sredzinski
put his hand on Victim #1's leg and had Victim #1 put his hand on Sredzinski’s leg. After this
trip to Cleveland, according to Witness #1, Victim #1's parents told Sredzinski to stay away
from their son.

11
Diocesan notes indicate that the incident with the boy in the alley was discussed with his father.
While the father indicated his son had spent time with Sredzinski and taken short trips with him
on several occasions, he did not believe anything inappropriate occurred and that his son
understood what a pedophile was and that nothing sexual had occurred. He also indicated that
Victim #1 was always with him and Sredzinski when they were together.

507
 Summary
Significantly, Witness #1 informed the Diocese of his belief that that the boy in the car
with Sredzinski at cemetery was Victim #1; meaning it was not Witness #1 with Sredzinski, as
Sredzinski had claimed. Meanwhile, Witness #1 indicated Sredzinski never tried anything
inappropriate or sexual with him.

Another undated handwritten page in Sredzinski's file included an incident conveyed by

Witness #1 in which Sredzinski went to Witness #1's house one night and told him, with his face
in his hands, that he was distraught that Victim #1 would not go out for ice cream with him.

There is a notation in Sredzinski's Diocesan file dated May 30, 1991 that Witness #1
called Father Statnick and told him it was getting worse and that Sredzinski took Victim #1 to
Washington D.C. on a trip.

Handwritten notes appeared in Sredzinski's file dated July 23, 1991 document an
interview with "Sister McCarthy." This interview appears to have been focused on McCarthy's
knowledge of Sredzinski's behavior with young people. As she indicated, she worked with
Sredzinski with Kindergarten through 8th grade students and that Sredzinski was very active at
the school. She specifically noted that Sredzinski took four boys on a vocational trip (all of
whom were named and none of whom included Victim #1 or appear to have accused Sredzinski
of any impropriety). Notably, Sister McCarthy indicated she was asked by Sredzinski to tutor
Victim #1. She mentioned an "altar boy situation" with Victim #1, although this was not further
explained, and that the accusations she heard were primarily ones of Sredzinski being partial
towards Victim #1.

An August 8, 1991 memorandum written by Statnick stated that Statnick met with
Sredzinski to discuss the May 18, 1991 police incident report,12 Sredzinski’s trips with young
people since their May 30th meeting, and the effect rumors regarding Sredzinski could have on
the Church. Sredzinski explained that he went on the trips despite Statnick's instructions to
restrict his contacts with young people because they were pre-arranged. Statnick stated that
Sredzinski had broached a direct order regarding his conduct following their May 30th meeting
by traveling with young boys.

Two letters written by Sredzinski to Victim #1 appear in Sredzinski's diocesan file. The
first letter, dated June 26, 1992 and written on "St. Joseph R.C. Church, Everson, PA" letterhead,
stated that Sredzinski was responding to a thank you note he had received from Victim #1 for a
graduation gift Sredzinski had given him. Sredzinski stated there was another part of the gift,
in that he wanted to take Victim #1 and his friend to Amish Country. Sredzinski wrote that
someone had told him Victim #1 was not permitted to ride in his red car, but that when Victim
#1 was ready, they would go together. Sredzinski also stated he had several items belonging to
Victim #1 and that he could come by the rectory to pick them up. Sredzinski said he would be

12
In an undated letter from Mayor Shoemaker to Bishop Anthony Bosco, Shoemaker stated
Sredzinski had no police record in the Borough of Everson, suggesting the record involving
Sredzinski was destroyed.
508
Summary
waiting to hear from Victim #1 and would include his name on the new high school serving
schedule.

A second letter dated September 8, 1992, also on "St. Joseph R.C. Church, Everson, PA"
letterhead, stated, “when you came to pick up your lantern I wanted to talk but I was speechless.”
Sredzinski went on to write that no matter what others may say, he was not mad at Victim #1
and still considered him his friend and that he also kept a picture of Victim #1 above his desk.
Sredzinski also stated that the youth group was going to Colorado the following year and asked
Victim #1 to join them.

On April 17, 2002, Father John Cindric wrote a memorandum to Statnick referencing an
April 2, 2002 conversation between the two of them which also involved letters written by
Sredzinski to Victim #1. Cindric stated he had letters provided to him by Witness #1 which
Witness #1 indicated were from Sredzinski to Victim #1. Witness #1 also indicated that seven
years prior, two similar letters were given to the Diocese (presumably the two letters described
above). Additionally, Witness #1 informed Cindric of an incident in which Sredzinski took
Victim #1 swimming one afternoon (presumably the incident described above in which Victim
#1 told Witness #1 that while swimming with Sredzinski, he had roaming hands and could see
that Sredzinski had an erection). Cindric indicated to Statnick that Victim #1's family would
probably remain silent on the matter, but believed it needed to be brought to his attention.

On January 14, 1994, Bishop Anthony Bosco of the Greensburg Diocese wrote a letter
to Sister Jolenta Sredzinski - Sredzinski’s sister - in response to a letter Sister Jolenta apparently
sent expressing concern over her brother being aggrieved by his treatment by the Diocese. While
Sister Jolenta, via her brother, appears to have been told that Mayor Shoemaker was fully
supportive of Sredzinski, Bosco informed her that it was the Mayor who had contacted the
Diocese and initiated actions on their behalf to address Sredzinski's improper behavior. Bosco
expressed that Sredzinski's conduct, contact with law enforcement, and rumors in the
community had "created great anxiety and concern in me." He repeatedly emphasized the
danger Sredzinski's actions posed to the Diocese in terms of civil and criminal liability and to
its leadership specifically, including Bosco. Bosco indicated the focus of the Diocese's response
was to protect the Church and its reputation, with the interest of Sredzinski's possible victims
being secondary. As Bosco wrote:

At no time did we conduct an investigation with any of the families

precisely because we did not want to agitate the waters any more.
Some families involved initiated contact with Father Statnick. He met
with them at their requests, and took down the points of view they
presented, most of which were supportive of your brother.

A March 18, 1994 memorandum to Sredzinski from Statnick addressed ongoing

developments with Victim #1's father. According to Victim #1's father, Sredzinski filed a civil
complaint against him for $513.00 for unpaid tuition. Victim #1's father stated he believed this
civil complaint was filed by Sredzinski because he would not allow his son to be around the
priest. According to the memorandum, Victim #1's father further stated he would not reveal the

509
Summary
matter that his son shared with him about Sredzinski. Statnick wrote that he told Victim #1's
father that he investigated reports in the past regarding Sredzinski’s contact with minors, but
that any allegations made were withdrawn. Statnick further emphasized that he needed the
information about what Sredzinski was alleged to have done to Victim #1 in order to take further
action. Statnick documented that he tried to call Sredzinski twice about the matter, but could
not reach him.

Around the time of Statnick's March, 1994 discussions with Victim #1's father, the matter
involving Sredzinski and Victim #1 appears to have abated within the Diocese of Greensburg.

On April 12, 2002, a phone call was received by Father Lawrence Persico from a witness
("Witness #1"), the contents of which were provided to Statnick. Witness #1 claimed that
Sredzinski abused a relative of hers in Brownsville, PA in 1985 and that Sredzinski should be
looked into further. There was nothing otherwise noted in the file regarding this phone call,
including whether there was any follow-up by the Diocese.

Three letters dated April 22, 2002, June 15, 2002, and August 4, 2002 from a witness
("Witness #2") to Bishop Bosco stated that Sredzinski bought Victim #1 presents, took him on
overnight trips, to all night bowling, let him drive his car, and opened a bank account for him.
She also said that Sredzinski had been caught by a police officer with a young boy in his car
while parked in St. Joseph’s cemetery. Witness #2 expressed her awareness that Sredzinski was
obsessed with Victim #1 and even had the boy’s picture on his desk, expressed her belief that
the Diocese had a file on Sredzinski, and speculated that the family of Victim #1 must have been
paid off by the Church.

According to notes in Sredzinski's Diocesan file, on April 9, 2007, the mother of a

classmates of Victim #1 placed a telephone call to Persico and informed him that her son had
told her that when he was in 7th or 8th grade, Sredzinski abused Victim #1. It was her
understanding that Victim #1's parents tried to report the incident to Statnick when Victim #1
was in 7th or 8th grade, but that nothing was ever done about it. She also indicated that Sredzinski
took Victim #1 and her son overnight to Seven Springs when they were young. Persico's
response was that because Victim #1 was 28 years old at the time of the mother's call, Victim
#1 needed to report any abuse by Sredzinski himself.

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

510 -*5*("5*0/
Summary

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

511 -*5*("5*0/
 Father John T. Sweeney

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1942
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 9, 1970

Employment/Assignment History
1970-1975 Holy Family, Latrobe, PA
1975-1980 Blessed Sacrament Cathedral, Greensburg, PA
1980-1982 St. Hedwig, Smock, PA
1982-1985 St. Mary, Freeport, PA
1985-1998 St. Margaret Mary, Lower Burrell, PA
1998-2008 St. James, Apollo, PA
2008-2016 Holy Family, West Newton, PA
12/31/2016 Retired

Summary

Father John Sweeney was the Pastor of St. Margaret Mary in Lower Burrell for
approximately twelve years spanning from 1985 to 1998. St. Margaret Mary Catholic School,
grades kindergarten through eighth, was associated with this parish.

In August of 2016, the Lower Burrell Police Department received information through
child services (ChildLine) of an anonymous report of child sexual abuse against Sweeney. On
September 6, 2016, separate from that anonymous report, a United States Marshal made contact
with the Lower Burrell Police Department and informed them that his brother had confided to
him that he had been sexually molested by Sweeney when he was a fourth grade student at St.
Margaret Mary. The brother of the United States Marshall and the subject of the ChildLine
report were the same individual.

According to the victim, who was 35 years old at the time of the investigation, he was
10 years old when the assault occurred. He stated that while in fourth grade at St. Margaret
Mary, he had been sent to the principal (now deceased) because of his misbehavior. He was
then sent to see Sweeney. According to the victim, Sweeney threatened to punish him and told
him he would not do so if the victim performed oral sex on him, which he did.

Testimony regarding Sweeney's sexual assault was taken before this Grand Jury and, on
July 11, 2017, we issued Presentment No. 16 wherein it was recommended that criminal charges
be filed against Sweeney for violations of the Crimes Code of Pennsylvania. Sweeney was
thereafter arrested and charged with involuntary deviate sexual intercourse. He is presently
awaiting trial in the Westmoreland County Court of Common Pleas.

512
 Reverend Joseph A. Tamilowski

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1928
YEAR OF DEATH: 1994
ORDINATION: May 29, 1954

Employment/Assignment History
6/1954-7/1956 Transfiguration, Mt. Pleasant, PA
7/1956-2/1959 St Mary, New Kensington, PA
2/1959-12/1960 St. Hyacinth, Monessen, PA
12/1960-6/1967 Assumption in Leechburg, and the Mission of St. Mary Church,
Schenley, PA
6/1967-11/1971 Holy Spirit, Fayette City, PA
12//1971-Unknown St. Barbara, Harrison City, PA
8/1977-5/1984 St. Hyacinth, Monessen, PA
5/1984-4/1994 St. Joseph, Uniontown, PA
4/1994 Retired

Summary

According to a handwritten note appearing in the Diocesan file of Father Joseph

Tamilowski, on April 5, 2002, a victim came forth with an allegation that Tamilowski
inappropriately touched him while he served as an altar boy at Assumption in Leechburg and
the Mission of St. Mary.

The victim reported that on a few occasions while serving as an altar boy, he entered the
sacristy and Tamilowski pushed him into the corner and grabbed him in the crotch area. He
reported that Tamilowski remarked that even if the boy told his parents about what he had done,
they would not believe him. The assaults prompted the victim to quit serving as an altar boy.
Additionally, the victim noted that his stepfather would allow no criticisms of Tamilowski.

"Many years" prior to making a report in April 2002, the victim told the office manager
for the Diocese of Greensburg what Tamilowski had done to him. The victim was told to leave
the issue alone and not “rock the boat” any further.

Tamilowski would later go on to hold pastor positions at four other churches within the
Diocese before resigning due to health reasons in April of 1994.

513
 Father Roger J. Trott

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1944
YEAR OF DEATH: 2017
ORDINATION: May 9, 1970

Employment/Assignment History
1970 - 1975 Blessed Sacrament Cathedral, Greensburg, PA
1975 – 1982 Holy Trinity, Ligonier, PA
1982 – 1985 St. Matthew, Saltsburg, PA
1985 – 1987 St. John the Baptist de la Salle, Delmont, PA
1987 Leave of Absence

Summary

In 1987, the families of 12 altar boys alleged that Father Roger Trott committed sexual
acts on them during his assignment as Pastor at St. John the Baptist de la Salle. An investigation
was conducted and Trott ultimately confessed in a written statement. He admitted that on
numerous occasions he invited boys and young men on “outings” and to the rectory. Trott
acknowledged his sexual motive in these invitations.

While specific sexual acts were not described, according to court records associated with
criminal charges later filed against Trott, Trott fondled and masturbated at least four of his
victims and massaged and performed oral sex on an additional eight. It should be noted that
although one of the victims was listed as 21 years of age at the time of the abuse, he was
described as being a "mongoloid"13 who was reportedly hospitalized for “surgery for a blockage
of the lower bowel, which the doctors say is directly linked to the incidents with Father Trott.”

On February 26, 1987, Trott pled guilty to one count of corruption of minors and was
sentenced to five years’ probation. The parents of all the victims, the Westmoreland County
District Attorney's Office, the investigating officers, and Westmoreland County Child Services
all agreed to the disposition of Trott's criminal case, believing it was in the best interest of his
victims. Representatives of the Diocese of Greensburg were present for the meeting during
which this agreement was reached.

Following his guilty plea, Trott went to the St. Luke’s Institute in Suitland, MD, for
inpatient treatment. He was discharged on January 12, 1988.

13
"Mongoloid" is an outdated term that was once used to describe a person with Down
syndrome.
514
Summary
Among the penalties imposed upon Trott by the church were: “Suspension of all priestly
Power of Orders in the public forum until an evaluation can be made in conjunction with
medical advisors,” “Absence from the Delmont area for a period of five years,” as well as “No
unsupervised contact with any person under the age of eighteen for a period of five years.”

The files regarding Trott provided by the Diocese of Greensburg also contained a
complaint made on April 17, 2002 from an adult male who was approximately 39 years of age
at the time. He alleged abusive behavior by Trott in 1973, when he was ten years of age. While
hist complaint stated he was abused by Trott on numerous occasions, the victim specifically
mentioned an occasion in the sacristy of the church during which Trott “sexually fondled” him.
The victim further alleged that on another occasion, after serving for the Bishop, Trott took him
out for dinner and while sitting in the parking lot of the restaurant, Trott performed oral sex on
him in his car.

Also in the files provided by the Diocese of Greensburg were numerous newspaper
reports related to the victim’s allegations of sexual abuse by Trott. In these articles, it was
reported that he accused Trott of repeatedly raping him while he was an altar boy in 1973.

The victim ultimately filed a lawsuit against the Diocese of Greensburg and was awarded
$130,000.

Diocesan files also contained handwritten letters by Trott to Bishop Anthony Bosco and
retired Bishop William Connare requesting permission to return to his priestly duties at the
completion of his five years’ probation. Trott was informed that if he could find a "benevolent
bishop" to accept him into his diocese, then Bishop Bosco would not stand in his way, but that
he would be required to inform any such bishop of his previous misconduct. Bosco also pointed
out to Trott that his return to active church service involved numerous problems, including the
liability of placing an offending priest into a diocese, regardless of him having completed his
treatment requirements, and the issue of whether parishioners would accept him. Additional
obstacles were posed by the effect his return to ministry would have on his victims' families
should they find out about it and the potential for renewed bad publicity.

After Trott's five year leave of absence was set to expire, he contacted the Diocese of
Greensburg - Connare specifically - in an effort to be reinstated as an active priest. Connare,
who was retired at the time, appeared to have been supportive of Trott in his attempt to be
reinstated into a diocese. Bosco, in contrast, while telling Trott he would not block his efforts to
transfer to another diocese, did not encourage or otherwise support his efforts. Bosco told Trott
he did not believe he would ever find a diocese which would accept him and that his arrest for
child molestation had brought about the death of his career as a priest.

On November 18, 2004, shortly after taking over as Bishop of

the Greensburg Diocese, petitioned the Vatican to have Trott dismissed from the Roman
Catholic Church. request was granted. Trott died in 2017 in Florida.

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

515 -*5*("5*0/
 Father Charles Weber, O.S.B.

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1919
YEAR OF DEATH: 2000
ORDINATION: November 4, 1945

Employment/Assignment History
Full Assignment History Not Available

Summary

On May 11, 2015, the Diocese of Greensburg received an allegation regarding child
sexual abuse against Father Charles Weber. The victim claimed that in the early 1980's, Weber
gave a lecture to children about the meaning of impure thoughts and actions at St. Gertrude
Church in Vandergrift. After the lecture, the victim, who was between 11 and 13 years old at
the time, was alone with Weber when asked if he was fully aware of what the lecture meant. At
this point, Weber began to fondle the boy’s genitals. The victim reported, “the inappropriate
contact was limited to fondling and not any penetration or sexual intercourse.”

According to a document titled "Bishops Delegate Report" by Monsignor Raymond

Riffle, the victim requested "counseling with somebody who, in his words "knows about this
stuff.”” Riffle put the victim in contact with the Diocese's Victim’s Assistance Coordinator one
week later. The file does not contain any further information regarding counseling for the victim.

The Diocese encouraged the victim to contact ChildLine regarding the abuse. While he
was initially reluctant to do so, he contacted ChildLine, who reportedly stated that since the
perpetrator was deceased, they would not be able to conduct a full investigation. Riffle then
forwarded the information to Westmoreland County District Attorney’s Office.

516
DIOCESE OF
HARRISBURG

517
518
 Reverend Francis J. Allen

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1945
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: Diocesan seminarian, not a priest

Employment/Assignment History
1974-1978 Allen worked around St. Patrick in York, PA and assisted with
altar boys

Summary

In 1989, the Diocese of Harrisburg learned that a boy alleged that Francis “Scotty” Allen
sexually abused him in the 1970’s. The Diocese documented the allegation. The Diocese’s
documents revealed the following information.

The boy’s mother reported the alleged abuse to Monsignor Thomas Brenner; Brenner
informed . The boy alleged that Allen had “sexual encounters” with him
on three occasions; once at St. Mary’s Seminary and twice at the boy’s home. The boy’s mother
reported that she came home one day and “caught them with egg on their face.”
summarized the allegation and noted, “[t]his matter is confidential with us. We would never
revealed [sic] unless he would have any work in a parish, church or exercise with the diocese.”
The mother reported her son’s abuse again in 2002.

In 1994, a woman reported to the Diocese that her son was molested by Allen from 1974
to 1975. Her son was 11 to 12 years old at the time of the abuse. The boy then informed the
Diocese that in 1974, while he was in fifth grade, he remembered that Allen went to a park where
boys skateboarded and Allen photographed the skateboarders. Allen obtained permission from
the boy’s parents to take the boy to St. Mary’s Seminary for an overnight stay. At the Seminary
and during the overnight stay, there were no other seminarians around. During the night, Allen
began to massage the boy and fondle the boy’s genitals until the boy ejaculated. Diocesan
documents dated January of 1994 and February of 1994 reveal that there were more
“encounters” between the victim and Allen. The use of the term “encounters” in the Diocesan
documents suggests the “encounters” included Allen sexually abusing the boy. The boy ceased
contact with Allen shortly after starting the sixth grade.

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

519 -*5*("5*0/
 Reverend John G. Allen

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1944
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 16, 1970

Employment/Assignment History
5/29/1970-9/01/1971 Assumption Blessed Virgin Mary, Lebanon, PA
9/01/1971-5/06/1976 St. Patrick, Harrisburg, PA
5/06/1976-8/12/1976 St. Francis Xavier, Gettysburg, PA
8/12/1976-4/21/1978 St. Francis of Assisi, Harrisburg, PA
4/21/1978-5/05/1980 St. Ann, Steelton, PA
5/05/1980-6/20/1986 St. Pius X, Selinsgrove, PA
6/20/1986-11/01/1992 St. Joseph, Lancaster, PA
4/29/1991-5/01/1991 The Anodos Center at St. John Vianney
1/31/1992 Arrested by Lancaster City Police for solicitation of undercover
police officer, pleaded guilty to harassment and paid fine
11/01/1992-7/06/1993 Leave of Absence
7/06/1993-6/28/1995 St. Theresa, New Cumberland, PA
6/28/1995-4/05/2002 St. Margaret Mary, Harrisburg, PA
4/05/2002 Resigned
2/17/2006 Dispensed

Summary

Diocesan documents reveal the Diocese was concerned with Father John G. Allen’s
sexual behavior as early as January 1970. In 1991, the Diocese sent Allen to the Anodos Center
at St. John Vianney for an evaluation.

In 1992, parishioners contacted the Diocese of Harrisburg by letter and telephone after
learning that Lancaster City Police had arrested Allen for soliciting an undercover officer.
Parishioners also heard that Allen had invited altar boys in his room at the church rectory.

In 1993, Father Paul Helwig authored a memorandum to Bishop Nicholas Dattilo, which
stated he received information that Allen attended a Sex and Love Addicts Anonymous (SLAA)
meeting where Allen gave the impression to members that he was a pedophile and had an
“obsession with young boys.”

In April 2002, a man reported to the Diocese that Allen had abused him. The man
reported that he was abused from age 14 to age 18. Allen picked up the then-boy along State
Street in Harrisburg during the 1990’s. Allen reportedly sexually abused the boy approximately

520
Summary
10 to 15 times; the abuse included fondling, oral sex and mutual masturbation. The Diocese
issued a penal precept suspending Allen’s ability to function publically as a priest.

In a note dated July 23, 2002, Father M. McFadden stated the Diocese received a call to
verify “employment” for Allen. The caller did not want any additional information, nor a
reference. McFadden noted, “I did not volunteer any additional information.”

In January 2003, another man reported abuse to the Diocese. He stated he was under 18
years old at the time of the abuse. He stated that he and others met with Allen when he was
stationed in Selinsgrove. The then-boy, Allen, and the others undressed and sat in a circle
around a lit candle. They all masturbated themselves. Allen paid the victims either $40.00 or
$50.00 each. The man stated that anytime Allen sexually abused him, Allen paid him money.

The same man who reported to the Diocese in 2003 stated that Allen brought him to a
hotel in Harrisburg when he was a teenager and they engaged in “touching” and oral sex. On
some occasions, Allen and the boy watched pornographic movies. The man said prices were
negotiated for sex acts. The man stated that Allen paid him between $40.00 and $80.00
depending on the sex act.

When Allen was stationed in Lancaster from 1986 to 1992, the same man who reported
to the Diocese in 2003 was an adult. The reporting man stated that sexual encounters between
Allen and himself continued and Allen paid him for the sexual encounters.

In July of 2004, the Diocese of Harrisburg for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the
Faith produced a document regarding the process for dismissing clergy. In that document, three
sexual abuse victims (two who were underage at the time of sexual abuse) were identified.

On September 28, 2005, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith presented and
supported a petition presented by the Diocese of Harrisburg to dismiss Allen from the clergy.
Pope Benedict XVI granted the dispensation on February 17, 2006.

In December of 2016, another man contacted the Diocese of Harrisburg. As a minor,

and altar server, Allen made the boy engage in strip poker in 1971. Allen also took the boy to
his private quarters at the rectory.

521
 Reverend Francis A. Bach

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1936
YEAR OF DEATH: 2010
ORDINATION: May 19, 1962

Employment/Assignment History
6/01/1962-6/30/1964 St. Theresa, New Cumberland, PA
6/30/1964-5/28/1965 St. Patrick, York, PA
5/28/1965-5/29/1970 St. Patrick Cathedral, Harrisburg, PA
1/06/1967 Relieved of duties, Young Adult Ministry, Harrisburg, PA
5/29/1970-6/24/1970 St. Joseph, Danville, PA
6/24/1970 Appointed Area Scout Chaplain, Columbia-Montour area
8/27/1970 Coordinator, Family Life Apostolate
10/04/1971 Campus Minister, Millersville University, Lancaster, PA
9/03/1974 St. Joan of Arc, Hershey, PA
4/15/1975 Inappropriate behavior with adult at seminary
5/14/1975-4/12/1976 St. Rose of Lima, York, PA
4/14/1976 Leave of Absence
10/19/76-8/01/1977 Annunciation Blessed Virgin Mary, McSherrystown, PA
8/01/77-12/01/1980 Holy Family, Harrisburg, PA
12/01/80-4/21/1983 Assumption Blessed Virgin Mary, Lebanon, PA
4/22/91 Appointed Dean, Lebanon, PA
5/09/94 Resigned; early retirement

Summary

In a letter dated May 1, 2007, Bishop Kevin C. Rhodes informed the Congregation for
the Doctrine of Faith of complaints that Bach sexually abused minors. Rhodes attached multiple
exhibits to the letter. The first report of abuse concerning Bach occurred in 1994. A man
reported that in 1969, when he was 13 years old, Bach invited him to his boat in Maryland. They
went to sleep in separate beds on the boat. The then-boy woke to Bach stroking his penis. The
man stated the sexual abuse included kissing and oral sex. The man also reported Bach took
Polaroid pictures of his naked body.

Father Paul Helwig interviewed Bach. Bach did not admit, nor deny the allegation
concerning the boat incident. When asked if there were other situations like this one with the
boy discussed above, Bach admitted there were. Bach stated he recognized his situation was a
“timebomb;” he was willing to leave active ministry, but he did not request laicization.

522
Summary
The Diocese issued Bach a penal precept and sent Bach to be evaluated at St. John
Vianney Center. A Diocesan document summarizing his treatment stated Bach admitted to
sexually abusing 14 victims, between 14 and 16 years old.

In 2002, the Diocese of Harrisburg learned that Bach abused another victim, whose
identity at that time was unknown. This victim stated Bach sexually abused him in the 1970’s
on Bach’s boat in Maryland and in the Cathedral parish in Harrisburg. This victim reported that
Bach and another priest jointly owned the boat in Maryland. This victim died in 2004.

In 2007, the Diocese received an e-mail from another man. When this man was in the
fifth or sixth grade, he was sexually abused three times. The then-boy was 12 years old during
the first incident when Bach touched him inappropriately while staying in a motel.

The second incident of abuse also occurred in a motel. The boy swam in the motel’s
pool. When he returned to the motel room, he removed his swimsuit and was naked. He turned
to find Bach was also naked. Bach wrestled with the boy, which led to Bach attempting to anally
penetrate the boy.

When the boy was 17 years old, Bach took him to his boat in Maryland. Bach gave him
alcohol and attempted to anally penetrate the boy.

In 2007, Bishop Rhoades sent a summary of Bach’s sexually abusive behavior to the
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Rhoades wrote that he did not believe there was a
need for any trial or process, judicial or administrative. Bach was living his life in “basic
solitude, doing good when he can,” and “spending time in prayer and penance, trying to make
reparation for the harm he has caused others through his acts of sexual abuse that occurred
early in his priesthood.” Rhoades also stated, “[f]urthermore, the true reason Francis Bach
left all priestly ministry is unknown to others. If his case is now brought to trial or given any
kind of publicity, I fear it will cause scandal to many, as he is still a priest who is beloved by
many in our diocese.” The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith agreed with Rhoades.

In 2009, another man came forward and reported to the Diocese that he was abused by
Bach. The then-boy was between 9 and 13 years old when Bach took him to a motel to stay
overnight. Bach directed the boy to remove his clothes. The boy complied and undressed to his
underwear. Bach photographed the boy in his underwear. Bach then removed his clothes and
wrestled with the boy. Bach fondled the boy and anally penetrated the boy. Afterwards, the
boy showered and Bach fondled the boy’s penis again.

The Diocese interviewed Bach about this allegation in 2009. Bach stated he could not
remember the incidents raised by the victim in 2009. Bach stated, “with my history, anything
is possible. I’m not saying he is fabricating the story.”

In 2016, the Diocese received a phone call from another man. This man was an altar boy
at St. Patrick in York in 1960. He stated that he was eight years old when Bach fondled him.

523
 Reverend Jesus Barajas

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1947
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: June 6, 1982

Employment/Assignment History
3/1987-11/1989 Office of the Vicar for the Spanish-Speaking People (assigned to
York, Lebanon and Bendersville)
11/1989 Columbia, South America

Summary

Father Jesus Barajas was a Trinitarian Father from Columbia who assisted the Diocese
of Harrisburg with the Spanish speaking population of York and Lebanon. On June 30, 1989,
Monsignor Hugh Overbaugh wrote a memorandum to Monsignor Damian McGovern.
Overbaugh noted that Father Bernardo Pistone cited ongoing problems with Barajas and whether
Barajas should continue to serve in the Diocese of Harrisburg. Overbaugh described that Pistone
outlined three specific concerns related to Barajas. One of those concerns provided, “[i]n spite
of past allegations with respect to his associations with the youth of the parish about which he
received special warnings, he continues these associations.”

In a letter dated November 7, 1989, Pistone informed McGovern that he received two
telephone calls from parishioners that “quite clearly repeated the past accusations of child
molestation.” Pistone asserted in the letter that he knew the parishioners who made the
complaints and Pistone questioned their credibility. Pistone stated, “I think that the accusation
of child molestation has no basis, however, because of his immaturity and other bad habits
people could easily read them in the wrong sense.” Pistone also stated he “was hoping we could
keep Father Jesus in Lebanon until the Spring changes; but, with all these issues flaring up
again I do not know if it would be wise to keep him here.”

In a memorandum dated November 16, 1989, Monsignor William M. Richardson

informed Edward G. Faraday that Barajas would leave the Diocese on November 20, 1989. The
Diocese provided Barajas with $2,000 to help cover his transportation costs to Columbia and to
help with his resettlement expenses. The Chancellor of the Diocese would later testify that this
was “disturbing”.

On January 17, 1990, McGovern wrote to the Very Reverend Antonio Caprarola, O.SS.T
in Rome, Italy. McGovern stated, “I deeply regret to inform you that, for many serious reasons,
the life and ministry of Father Barajas proved to be most unsatisfactory and, accordingly, he
was asked to terminate his association with the Diocese of Harrisburg.”

524
Summary
On June 16, 1995, Father Paul Helwig wrote a memorandum to the file of Barajas.
Helwig stated that the Archdiocese of New York had contacted the Diocese of Harrisburg. An
allegation that Barajas committed sexual misconduct was presented to the Archdiocese of New
York. The Archdiocese stated, “there were some concerns raised about Father Jesus, but
nothing specific was presented.” Based on a letter written by the Diocese of Harrisburg, the
Archdiocese was informed that the Diocese of Brooklyn denied Barajas faculties.

525
 Reverend Richard J. Barry

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1949
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 20, 1978

Employment/Assignment History
9/02/1981-7/1983 St. Joseph, Dallastown, PA
1983 Reassigned by his community
9/01/1984-9/02/1986 St. Margaret Mary, Harrisburg, PA
9/02/1986 Recalled by religious community
1991 Leave of Absence

Summary

On April 5, 2001, Father Edward Malesic wrote a memorandum to the file of Father
Richard J. Barry. He received a phone call from a woman who reported that Barry had molested
her son when her son was an elementary school age student from 1978 to 1980.

On April 6, 2001, Malesic wrote a memorandum regarding a phone conversation with

Father Dave Kalert, the Provincial of the Eastern Province of Oblates of Mary Immaculate.
Malesic informed the Provincial that a report of sexual misconduct was made against Barry,
which occurred at the St. Margaret Mary church in the late 1970’s.

Kalert stated that Barry was not in active ministry because he took a leave of absence 10
years prior, in 1991, at Kalert’s request. Kalert stated he did not recall any allegations of sexual
misconduct against Barry, however, “there were some indications of strange situations with
him.”

In 2002, a second man reported a sexual abuse allegation against Barry to the Diocese.
The man, age 11 at the time of the abuse, reported to the Diocese that Barry developed a
friendship with the then-boy’s mother, who was going through a divorce at the time. The man
recalled this was between 1981 and 1982. On one occasion, the then-boy stated he went to
Barry’s mother’s house in Philadelphia and stayed the night. Barry asked the boy if he wanted
to stay in Barry’s father’s bed or with him. Barry informed the boy that his father was an old
man who sweated a lot and his father’s bed probably smelled bad. The boy decided to sleep in
the same bed with Barry. The boy woke up to Barry fondling him and then performing oral sex
on him. He was reassured by Barry that “it was O.K.”

The man who reported abuse to the Diocese in 2002 remembered another boy, about his
same age at the time, who spent time with Barry. He stated this boy had a similar experience

526
Summary
with Barry. This boy developed issues with alcohol and drug use. The man who reported abuse
to the Diocese in 2002 stated the other boy committed suicide.

In December 2002, a third allegation of sexual abuse against Barry was reported to the
Diocese. A male called the Diocese and stated in approximately 1985 or 1986 his son was a
victim of sexual advances by Barry while on a trip to Twin Falls, Minnesota.

On August 9, 2004, Bishop Nicholas Dattilo summarized the Diocese’s review of the
third report of sexual misconduct made against Barry. Dattilo stated the victim was unwilling
to discuss the matter. Dattilo also stated Barry was not under his supervision, did not hold office
in the Diocese, did not live within the Diocese’s territory, and would not be reassigned to
ministry within the Diocese. Dattilo then stated the Diocesan investigation into this matter was
concluded.

527
 Reverend James Beeman

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1926
YEAR OF DEATH: 2016
ORDINATION: May 30, 1953

Employment/Assignment History
6/0419/53-5/29/1958 St. Mary Church, Lancaster, PA
5/29/1958-8/20/1959 St. Patrick, Carlisle, PA
8/20/1959-6/02/1961 St. Joseph, Danville, PA
6/02/1961-6/30/1964 St. Columba’s, Bloomsburg, PA
6/30/1964-7/10/1968 Our Lady of Visitation, Shippensburg, PA
7/10/1968-9/15/1968 St. Joseph, Milton, PA
9/15/1968-11/13/1968 St. Ignatius, Centralia, PA
11/13/1968-10/10/1969 St. Francis of Assisi, Harrisburg, PA
10/10/1969-1/20/1973 Our Lady of Blessed Sacrament, Harrisburg, PA
1/20/1973-3/19/1973 St. Columba, Bloomsburg, PA
3/19/1973-2/19/1975 Inner-city ministry,
2/19/1975-3/26/1975 Sacred Heart, Williamstown, PA
3/26/1975-4/21/1977 Inner-city ministry,
4/21/1977-4/25/1980 Our Lady of Blessed Sacrament, Harrisburg, PA
4/25/1980-7/01/1980 Inner-city ministry,
7/01/1980-12/02/1991 Chaplain, Harrisburg State Hospital
1/22/1981-7/07/1983 Our Lady of Blessed Sacrament, Harrisburg, PA
7/07/1983-12/02/1991 Chaplain, State Correctional Institution, Camp Hill, PA

Summary

In July of 1991, a woman reported that Father James Beeman sexually abused her
daughter at St. Columbia in Bloomsburg from 1961 to 1964. When her daughter was eight years
old, the mother remembered seeing blood in her daughter’s underwear. The daughter reported
to the Diocese of Harrisburg in September 1991 that Beeman sexually assaulted her four times
from 1961 to 1973. The daughter reported the following information, which was documented
in a Diocesan summary of all allegations against Beeman.

1) In catechism class, Beeman set up a projector to show films and held the
daughter on his lap and touched her inappropriately;

2) At age seven, the daughter had her tonsils removed and she was recovering
in the hospital. Beeman raped her when he visited the hospital room;

528
Summary
3) At age 13, he came to her house when her parents were away. He raped her
at her house;

4) At age 19, the abuse continued. Beeman raped her when she was pregnant;

5) Due to the constant abuse by Beeman, the daughter considered suicide.

Beeman was confronted about the allegations in October 1991. He admitted the sexual
abuse of this victim. He was issued a penal precept that revoked any priestly faculties. In
February 1992, the Diocese sent Beeman for an assessment. Diocesan officials summarized his
treatment and included the following:

1) From 1953 to 1958, Beeman sexually abused a girl, who was age six to 12
during that time frame, by fondling her genitals on two to three occasions;

2) In 1968, he fondled the genitals of a six year old girl, approximately three to
four times;

3) In 1972, he fondled the genitals of a 6 year old girl twice.

In 2002, the victim from the 1953 to 1958 sexual abuse came forward and reported her
molestation. She stated Beeman kissed her and fondled her genitals. The Diocese spoke with
Beeman regarding the victim’s allegations from 1953 to 1958. Beeman admitted to the
allegations and stated he had a “deep love” for this victim. He stated she was “still in my mind;
I guess I am still in love with her.” He kept pictures of this victim. Beeman turned over to
Diocesan officials the following items: one large framed portrait of this victim, one medium
framed portrait of this victim, and five photographs of this victim. He admitted to Diocesan
officials that he sexually abused seven young girls while a practicing priest in the Diocese of
Harrisburg. In September 2014, Bishop Ronald Gainer submitted Beeman’s acts to the
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith for final resolution. Bishop Gainer wrote, “I believe
that the scandal caused by his admission of the sexual abuse of minor girls has been sufficiently
repaired by his acceptance of the penal precepts.” The Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith
responded that the Dicastery carefully and attentively studied the facts for review and decided
Beeman was to live a life of prayer and penance.

In November 2016, another woman came forward and stated that when she was a child
Beeman forced his tongue down her throat while having her sit on his lap.

529
 Reverend John Bostwick

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1941
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 17, 1969

Employment/Assignment History
1976-1990 St. Catherine Laboure, Harrisburg, PA (weekends,
holidays and summer)
12/05/1990-10/23/1991 St. Leo the Great, Lancaster, PA
10/23/1991-2/17/1992 Assumption Blessed Virgin Mary, Lebanon, PA
2/17/1992 Transferred to Lafayette, Louisiana

Summary

In December 1989, Bishop Walter Sullivan, of the Diocese of Richmond, wrote a letter
to the Diocese of Harrisburg Chancery Office regarding Father John Bostwick. Sullivan learned
that Bostwick was staying in Harrisburg at St. Catherine Laboure church. Bostwick did not have
permission to minister in the Diocese of Harrisburg because he did not cooperate with the Bishop
of Richmond’s efforts to have Bostwick receive proper counseling. The Diocese did not suspend
him; however, the Diocese did not give him any assignments. In 1990, Bostwick officially
received permission to minister outside of the Diocese of Richmond.

In March 1996, Father Paul Helwig and Monsignor Hugh Overbaugh wrote a
memorandum to Bishop Nicholas Dattilo regarding an accusation made against Bostwick
concerning the 1980 to 1982 time period. Bostwick befriended a family and eventually stayed
overnight at their house. The family had a boy between 12 and 14 years of age. The boy drank
beer with Bostwick and Bostwick fondled the boy’s genitals. Bostwick took the boy to St.
Mary’s Seminary when school was out of session. Bostwick fondled the boy’s genitals while
the boy was sleeping overnight. The last incident involved Bostwick attempting to have the boy
touch Bostwick’s genitals. The boy became scared and locked himself in a room. The boy
remembered Bostwick becoming emotional, falling to the floor crying and apologizing to the
boy. Bostwick expressed his regret. In 1997, Sullivan authored a report that provided that
Dattilo informed Sullivan that Bostwick was not welcomed back in the Diocese of Harrisburg.
The Diocese of Harrisburg issued a public statement regarding Bostwick in the newspaper.

According to Diocesan documents, another man contacted the Diocese to make a report
of abuse. During the summer of 1987, the man was between 14 and 15 years old and went to
Bostwick’s home in Virginia. Bostwick attempted to “make genital contact with him” but did
not persist when the then-boy rejected his attempt.

530
Summary
In 2002, the same victim made the same report to the Diocese of Harrisburg regarding
an attempt at inappropriate touching that occurred in 1987 when he was between 14 and 15 years
old. He stated he passed out from drinking alcohol while he watched a movie with Bostwick.
He woke up in another room when Bostwick reached for his genitals and he stopped Bostwick
from making contact.

531
 Reverend Donald Cramer

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1970
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: June 2, 2001

Employment/Assignment History
6/2001-6/2004 Good Shepherd, Camp Hill, PA
6/2004-6/2005 St. John the Baptist, New Freedom, PA
6/2005-2/2006 Leave of Absence
6/2006-6/2010 Christ the King Mission & Bloomsburg University
6/2010-8/2012 St. Monica
8/2012 Leave of absence
11/2014 Dispensed

Summary

Diocesan documents contained information summarized below.

On August 17, 2012, the Department of Homeland Security and the Postal Inspection
Service were present at the Diocese of Harrisburg for an investigation into Father Donald
Cramer. The investigation revealed that Cramer was in an online chatroom using the screen
name “Bigmark512.” While online, he communicated with an individual in Connecticut who
was charged criminally for possessing child pornography. In his online communications,
Cramer mentioned he wanted to go to Mexico where he could “rent” boys. After an
investigation, Cramer was not arrested because he was not in possession of child pornography.
However, the Department of Homeland Security’s investigative report listed, in detail, the nature
of the e-mail communication where Cramer expressed an interest in minor boys. The
Department of Homeland Security eventually terminated its investigation and closed its file.

The Diocesan files for Cramer also contained a letter that Cramer wrote to Pope Francis
in September of 2013, where Cramer requested dispensation from the priesthood. He was
officially dispensed in November of 2014.

Chancellor Carol Houghton of the Diocese of Harrisburg wrote a handwritten note dated
January 24, 2013, which described a summary of a forensic examination of an electronic device
that Cramer possessed. A forensic company in Harrisburg conducted the examination. The
examiner told Houghton that Cramer “was ‘definitely’ looking for underage boys/teens (w/ all
the websites w/ those names) – then he shifted to hardcore sites.”

532 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

-*5*("5*0/
Summary

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

533 -*5*("5*0/
 Reverend Walter Emala

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1927
YEAR OF DEATH: 2008
ORDINATION: 1952

Employment/Assignment History
1981-1985 Part-time (functioned without faculties); St. Peter, Mount
Carmel, PA
1981-1985 St. John, New Freedom, PA

Summary

In May 1979, the Diocese of Memphis wrote to the Diocese of Harrisburg and stated that
Father Walter Emala was “once accused of sexually handling some of the children where he
was an associate, but this does not seem to have been proven definitely.” On May 31, 1979,
then Chancellor William Keeler responded to the Diocese of Memphis, in writing and stated,
“in light of the information which you provide, this diocese certainly would not refrain from the
granting of the faculties to Emala for occasional, weekend help.”

In December 1985, a memorandum was written by Keeler that reported that Emala had
been “accused of being overly and overtly familiar with certain boys” by parents in St. Peter’s
parish. The memorandum noted the parents made reports to the parish priest, Father Frederick
Farace. There was no abuse reported. The parents stated Emala gave boys wine and the parents
were concerned about over familiarity. One parent was “a state policeman” who spoke to Farace
at length. Keeler noted Emala was informed he no longer had faculties in the Diocese of
Harrisburg.

In a letter dated March 8, 1986, Farace wrote to Keeler regarding Emala. The letter
stated that the parents of three boys ages 12, 13, and 13, reported to Father DiChico “about what
they termed undue familiarity between Father Emala and their boys.” Some person or persons
contacted Children and Youth Services concerning the incident involving Emala from December
1985. The parents complained to the Diocese that they were disturbed that their children were
questioned regarding the incident.

On April 29, 1986, Monsignor Overbaugh wrote a letter to the Chancellor of the Diocese
of Memphis. The letter stated that in 1979 the Diocese of Harrisburg did not accept Emala and
he was not granted faculties to minister. Overbaugh stated, “unbeknown to the Chancery,”
Emala was invited to assist a priest in a parish. Keeler was going to withhold the granting of
faculties to Emala should he have sought pastoral ministry in the Diocese of Harrisburg.
However, as described above, then Keeler in 1979 stated the Diocese would grant faculties to
Emala for occasional, weekend help, which contradicts the statement in Overbaugh’s letter.

534
Summary

In December 2002, a woman called the Diocese of Harrisburg and spoke with Father
William King. She reported that she heard that a woman in Mount Carmel saw Emala kissing
an altar boy on the lips in 1985. In January 2003, the woman who actually witnessed Emala
kiss the altar boy reported the kissing incident to the Diocese. King contacted Father Thomas
Kujovsky and asked if he had any recollections of Emala. Kujovsky recalled Father Farace
telling him that he once walked into Emala’s room at the rectory and found a “shoe-box full of
photographs of adolescent males, all undressed from the waist up.”

In 2004, the Diocese of Harrisburg wrote to “Rev. Walter Emala.” The Diocese told
Emala the statute of limitations for criminal prosecution is suspended when an accused leaves
Pennsylvania. The Diocese informed Emala, “In order to avoid scandal and to avoid exposing
you to continued accusation and possible criminal investigation, it is important that you not be
present at any time within the territory of the Diocese of Harrisburg.”

535
 Reverend Paul R. Fisher

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1967
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: January 1, 1977

Employment/Assignment History
1995-1997 St. Norbert, Paoli, PA
1997-1998 Archmere Academy, Claymont, Delaware
6/16/1998-6/19/2003 Queen of Peace, Millersburg, PA
6/2003 Incardinated as a Priest of the Diocese of Harrisburg
6/19/2003-6/18/2009 Sacred Heart of Jesus, Cornwall, PA
6/18/2009-6/20/2011 St. Columbia, Bloomsburg, PA
6/20/2011-6/20/2016 Our Lady of the Blessed Sacrament, Harrisburg, PA

Summary

On February 18, 2011, Bishop Joseph McFadden issued a Decree after receiving a report
from the Secretary of Clergy and Consecrated Life that Father Paul Fisher made a self-
incriminating report involving pornography, “which may include child pornography.” The
Decree was/is to remain in the Diocese’s secret archives to safeguard the reputation of all
persons involved. Fisher agreed to allow the Diocese of Harrisburg to obtain his electronic
devices (laptop and cell phone) and have them forensically examined by a local company.

In February 2011, Diocesan officials interviewed Fisher. Fisher stated that he conducted
online searches for pornography that included “incest” and “really sick, abusive stories.” He
stated that he was more interested in fantasy stories. He admitted sometimes the “son character
in the story (or eventually, the brother/sister characters) looked under 18.” He stated that he
was not interested in the images, however, he noted the images depicted naked people, including
“all out porn, including penetration.” He admitted he went to nudist websites where there were
images of nude children playing volleyball, but no sexual acts were depicted on said websites.

The Diocese sent Fisher for treatment and evaluation. The forensic examination of
Fisher’s electronic devices did not identify images depicting the sexual abuse of children, even
though Fisher admitted it was possible.

Bishop McFadden placed Fisher back into ministry.

The Diocese of Harrisburg’s subsequent bishop, Bishop Ronald Gainer, reviewed the
restricted files in 2016. In June 2016, Gainer issued a decree to reinvestigate the matter
involving Fisher due to his admission of viewing pornographic images of minors.

536
Summary
On June 20, 2016, the Diocese interviewed Fisher a second time. He consented to the
Diocese forensically examining his current laptop, which was not Fisher’s laptop from 2011.
He noted he only had the new laptop for a few months, stating his previous laptop had been
stolen. Diocesan officials told Fisher that they would have to turn over to the Dauphin District
Attorney’s Office what was found in the forensic examination conducted in 2011 of Fisher’s
first laptop. The Diocese gave the new laptop to the same forensic company. Later that day,
Fisher called and rescinded his consent for an examination of the new
laptop and stated that he had obtained civil counsel.

A second forensic examination was conducted on the 2011 hard drive image. This time,
a questionable image was found. As in 2011, numerous elicit websites were also in the search
history. The Office of Attorney General obtained a search warrant, which resulted in a law
enforcement forensic examination of the 2011 hard drive image (results pending).

wrote a Diocesan document dated August 8, 2016, which

appeared to summarize a conference call that occurred in the morning of that same day. The
document appeared to also summarize a meeting that occurred on August 4, 2016.
stated there was a collective disappointment at the results of a risk assessment of Fisher that was
conducted at St. John Vianney Center. Additionally, also stated there was collective
disappointment at the “countermeasures he [Fisher] was believed to have employed to
invalidate the results of the polygraph [administered to Fisher].” A sentence in the document
stated, “His [Fisher] clarification on the polygraph question regarding masturbating to the
images of minors, his persistent need to clarify his responses to our committee and his decision
not to take a second polygraph test because of his belief that his answers ‘were always more
than yes or no’ left Bishop Gainer with too little certitude about returning him to ministry.”

On August 8, 2016, Fisher was discharged from the evaluation program at St. John
Vianney Center and requested to reside at the Canonry of his former’s Order, the Norbertines in
Delaware. Gainer wrote a letter to the Bishop of Wilmington, Delaware, advising him of
Fisher’s stay at the Norbertines’ Canonry and he has no active ministry at this time. He noted
that Fisher wished to return to the Norbertine community and be reinstated as a Norbertine priest
instead of a Diocesan priest. Gainer also noted he was sending paperwork to the Congregation
for the Doctrine of the Faith for guidance and advice. He noted: “if he is at that time considered
suitable for active ministry, I will then be willing to consider his return to active ministry as a
Norbertine.”

Chancellor Carol Houghton of the Diocese of Harrisburg testified before the Grand Jury
on October 20, 2017. She stated she had a great concern with Fisher being placed back in
ministry in 2011 when he admitted to viewing images of naked children. Houghton stated she
questioned McFadden about his decision. McFadden told her to forget it because nothing was
found criminal on the laptop. Chancellor Houghton reviewed the clergy files in 2016 and
remained concerned with how the Diocese handled the Fisher matter in 2011. She raised her
concern to and they approached Gainer, which resulted in the Diocese
interviewing Fisher again in 2016, which is summarized above.

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

537 -*5*("5*0/
 Harrisburg Priest #1

Biographical Information
Omitted

Employment/Assignment History
Omitted

Summary

In , a parent reported to the Diocese of that his son had a close

relationship with this priest, which started when the boy was a senior in high school.
.

A memorandum located this priests’ restricted file, dated , detailed an

anonymous report to the Diocese. The anonymous caller stated

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

538 -*5*("5*0/
 Harrisburg Priest #2

Biographical Information
Omitted

Employment/Assignment History
Omitted

Summary
A Grand Jury subpoena was served on the Diocese of Harrisburg in September of
2016. While reviewing documents to turn over pursuant to the subpoena, the Diocese
identified an allegation from against a priest, which the Diocese did not follow up on.

In , a mother reported to Father that she believed her may

have been molested by a priest at
spoke with the mother and stated this priest denied the allegations, even
though and this priest did not know what abuse was alleged. The mother stated the
were and she believed abuse occurred
then.

A Special Agent of the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General, Bureau of Criminal

Investigations, interviewed the mother in December of 2016. She could not recall the priest’s
name. She stated her denied ever being abused. She stated her never made
allegations, but she felt there were “signs” of possible abuse. She also stated the boys would
most likely not talk with law enforcement. The Special Agent attempted contact with the
alleged victims. Neither victim responded.

This priest spoke with the Office of Attorney General. He stated he was made aware
of an allegation against him in by . This priest noted he was not told what the
actual accusation entailed. This priest stated he was never interviewed, sent for counseling or
treatment, nor placed on leave in It was not until he looked at his Diocesan file to find
out what happened concerning the accusation. He stated he did so to find out the outcome and
if anyone was identified as the abuser.

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

539 -*5*("5*0/
 Deacon Donald “Tim” Hackman

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1946
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: June 4, 1983

Employment/Assignment History
1983-1999 St. James, Lititz, PA

Summary

The Diocese of Harrisburg’s restricted file for Deacon Donald “Tim” Hackman
contained a resignation letter dated January 22, 1999, and a Decree dated February 3, 1999.
Hackman had mailed child pornography to an undercover law enforcement officer. The federal
government charged him with crimes. Bishop Dattilo issued a Decree, which noted Hackman’s
“sincere and credible display of remorse” and he was forbidden to exercise functions of any
ecclesiastical office. Documents in the restricted file also showed the Diocese offered and
followed through with counseling for Hackman.

The church asked the parishioners to pray for Hackman and his family during a difficult
and trying time. The allegations against Hackman were reported in a newspaper in 2001 when
Hackman pled guilty to the federal charges described above. Parishioners complained to the
Diocese and the parish after they read the newspaper article. The Diocese had not notified the
parishioners of the real reason for Hackman’s departure.

The Diocese wrote, “civil authorities saw no reason to make the arrest public, which
they would have done if they felt that it was necessary to protect children or to gain testimony
from others.” This was the Diocese’s justification for not notifying the parishioners of the
reason for Hackman’s resignation.

540
 Reverend T. Ronald Haney

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1952
YEAR OF DEATH: 2012
ORDINATION: May 15, 1958

Employment/Assignment History
5/20/1958-6/02/1961 St. Anne, Lancaster, PA
6/02/1961-8/01/1961 St. Peter, Columbia, PA
8/01/1961-12/14/1961 Assumption BVM, Lancaster, PA (canonical reasons)
12/14/1961-9/12/1963 St. Peter, Columbia, PA (canonical reasons)
9/12/1963-6/30/1964 Sacred Heart, Lancaster, PA (canonical reasons)
6/30/1964-1/12/1967 St. James and Bishop McDevitt High School
6/12/1967-6/02/1967 St. Ann, Steelton, PA (canonical reasons)
6/02/1967-6/02/1970 St. Edward, Shamokin, PA
6/02/1967-1/22/1976 Our Lady of Lourdes Regional High School, St. Edward;
St. Anthony of Padua, Shamokin, PA
1/22/1976-6/18/1981 Holy Spirit, Palmyra, PA
6/18/1981-6/28/1985 St. Ann, Steelton, PA
2/28/1985-7/31/1992 St. Catherine, Harrisburg, PA
7/31/1992-3/03/2006 St. Theresa, New Cumberland, PA (canonical only)
3/03/2006 Retired

Summary

Father T. Ronald Haney entered the priest seminary at age 14. He attended the seminary
until being ordained a priest in the Diocese of Harrisburg in 1958.

Diocesan officials wrote memorandums wherein officials noted that in 1995 a husband
and wife informed the Diocese that Father Haney was a family friend who frequented their
household for dinner. The family had a seven year old daughter and a four year old son. One
evening, the parents’ heard Haney say to their daughter, “I guess you have heard about
pedaphilia [sic].” He repeated the sentence a second time after the daughter’s mother overheard
and called his name.

The daughter’s mother also reported that another female parishioner confided in her that
Haney commented that her daughter had a “cute firm ass.” This comment was made before
Christmas of 1994. On Christmas Day, Haney stopped at the second woman’s home. He put
his hand on the daughters’ buttocks and said “she has a nice tight ass.” The woman stated,
after speaking with her husband, they felt this was an “error in judgment” by Haney.

541
Summary
After speaking with Diocesan officials, the first daughter’s mother and the female
parishioner who confided in her about another allegation of abuse, decided to confront Haney
regarding their complaints and concerns. The women reported back to the Diocese that Haney
felt embarrassed and hurt and “apologized profusely for the difficulties he caused them.”

542
 Reverend John Herber

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1939
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: N/A

Employment/Assignment History
7/10/1980-7/29/1982 St. Joseph Convent & School, Columbia, PA
8/01/1995-2/18/1998 St. Ann Home, Columbia, PA

Summary

A memorandum dated April 29, 1997, provided that a priest stationed in Lancaster
received a disturbing report of sexual misconduct from a parishioner. The parishioner attended
one Mass that was celebrated by a visiting priest, Father John Herber. The parishioner
recognized the priest. The parishioner was aware of an abuse allegation made against Herber in
1990. Bishop Nicholas Dattilo issued a Decree authorizing an investigation.

According to a handwritten memorandum dated July 30, 1997 by ,a

woman called the Diocese of Harrisburg and reported that Herber abused her when she was
seven years. In a report dated July 30, 1997, wrote: “at the age of 7 she was molested
by a religious priest. .” The molestation occurred between 1981
and 1982. The victim told her father in 1990 when she was 15 years old. Her father then
reported the molestation to the Missionaries of the Precious Blood Order.

Father Paul Helwig searched Herber’s file and found a statement from the Superior of
the Precious Blood Order that was dated March 13, 1995. The statement provided: “to the best
of my knowledge in the external forum, I am of the opinion that Father Herber is of good
character and reputation. I believe that he is qualified to perform his ministerial duties in an
effective and suitable manner. More specifically, I have not been made aware of any pattern of
sexual abuse.”

In a memorandum from 1997, Helwig contacted the Missionaries of the Precious Blood
Order and requested a statement about Herber. The Provincial of the Order stated he recalled a
report about inappropriate touching of a young girl and that Herber was sent for treatment. The
report provided that the victim rode in a car and Herber touched her genitals.

On August 1, 1997, the Order sent a statement outlining that Herber was sent for an
evaluation and received treatment in 1991. He received aftercare treatment from 1991 to 1993.
As of 1997, he had attended AA (alcoholics anonymous) and SA (sexaholics anonymous)
meetings for approximately four years.

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

543
-*5*("5*0/
Summary
Memorandums are contained in the Diocese’s records that outline discussions with the
Provincial for the Precious Blood Order and Helwig regarding when to remove Herber from
ministry in the Diocese of Harrisburg. The Diocese requested the Provincial recall Herber. They
allowed Herber to remain in active ministry until February 18, 1998, when he was transferred
by his order.

According to Diocesan documents, in 2012, a woman called the Diocese of Harrisburg

to report she was molested by Herber (the woman’s sister has also alleged that Herber had
abused her). The woman was four years old and alleged Herber digitally penetrated her. This
occurred between 1982 and 1983. She wanted to know what happened to Herber. The Diocese
contacted the Missionaries of the Precious Blood Order and determined that Herber was living
as a “lay brother.” Herber had no sacramental ministry and was on a safety plan, monitored,
and was repentant and compliant.

Bishop Joseph McFadden sent a letter to the Provincial in 2012 informing him that
Herber does not have any faculties in the Diocese of Harrisburg. The Provincial responded to
McFadden and stated, “with the announcement of the Charter for the Protection of Children in
May of 2002, John was removed from all ministry.” This letter also mentioned a third victim
reporting that Herber abused her. This allegation was made by another sister of the original
victimized family. The Order allowed Herber to remain in active ministry from the time of the
1997 report until 2002.

544
 Philip Hower

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1969
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: Never ordained

Employment/Assignment History
1981 Seminarian at Pontifical College, Josephinum

Summary

Philip Hower was a seminarian sponsored by the Diocese of Harrisburg in 1985. The
Diocese discontinued the sponsorship of Hower. In a Diocesan letter, the Diocese stated he was
“brusque and officious in his dealings with others,” and he asked sexual inquiries of people and
was too negative of a person.

Hower’s sister wrote to the Diocese of Harrisburg in 1988 and reported that Hower
molested her son while her son was between ages five and seven. She alleged Hower performed
oral sex on her son. The alleged victim never came forward.

At the time of the 1988 report, Hower was a seminarian for the Diocese of Tucson,
Arizona. He was never ordained. The Diocese informed the Diocese of Tucson of the
allegations made by Mr. Hower’s sister.

545
 Reverend Kevin Kayda

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1985
YEAR OF DEATH: 2013
ORDINATION: June 1, 2013

Employment/Assignment History
6/01/2013-10/03/2013 St. John the Baptist, New Freedom, PA

Summary

In September of 2013, the Diocese of Harrisburg received a complaint from a concerned

parent. The parent reported that Father Kevin Kayda was having inappropriate online
communications with their minor daughter on Facebook. The Diocese confronted Kayda and
requested permission to forensically examine his computer. Kayda consented to the forensic
examination. On October 1, 2013, Kayda’s electronic items were turned over to a forensic
company. The Diocese also prepared to send Kayda to St. John Vianney Center for treatment.
The forensic examination revealed pornographic material that included “adolescents.” On
October 3, 2013, Kayda committed suicide. Kayda wrote multiple suicide notes; Kayda alluded
to being an abuse victim, but he did not disclose the name of his alleged abuser.

546
 Reverend Edward Konat

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: N/A
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: June 13, 1975

Employment/Assignment History
5/28/1987-10/08/1987 Asst. Pastor St. Theresa, New Cumberland, PA

Summary

In August of 1987, Monsignor Hugh Overbaugh wrote a memorandum to Bishop

William Keeler regarding Father Edward Konat. Overbaugh received a phone call from the
Diocese of Salt Lake City, Utah. The Diocese of Salt Lake advised that they heard Father Konat
was working in the Diocese of Harrisburg. While Konat was at the Diocese of Salt Lake, he
was accused of pedophilia. Konat had been accused at least four times of sexual advances
towards young boys. On one occasion, Konat conducted “scrotum” checks of minor boys. His
priestly faculties were withdrawn.

According to a memorandum by Overbaugh in August of 1987, Keeler requested Konat

resign because Konat failed to disclose the allegations against Konat from the Diocese of Salt
Lake. In November of 1987, the Diocese notified the Province of the Society of Jesus regarding
Konat.

Diocesan documents provide the following information. In June 1988, the Diocese of
Miami contacted the Diocese of Harrisburg regarding Konat. Keeler noted that he received and
contacted the references provided by Konat in 1987. The references checked out positively.
Overbaugh reported to the Diocese of Miami that Konat had not disclosed the events from Utah.
Overbaugh advised Konat to disclose his past history to the Diocese of Miami. Overbaugh
advised that Keeler affirmed that Konat “worked well in the short amount of time he served in
the Diocese of Harrisburg but could not condone the fact that Father Konat had deliberately
withheld information concerning his time spent in Utah.”

547
 Reverend George Koychick

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1922
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: April 2, 1949

Employment/Assignment History
4/22/1949-9/23/1949 Annunciation Blessed Virgin Mary, McSherrystown, PA
9/23/1949-5/23/1952 St. Francis of Assisi, Harrisburg, PA
5/23/1952-6/04/1953 Our Lady of Mt. Carmel, Mount Carmel, PA
6/04/1953-5/23/1957 St. Joseph, York, PA
5/23/1957-11/08/1957 Assumption Blessed Virgin Mary, Lebanon, PA
11/08/1957-10/02/1962 Chaplain, Penna. Industrial School
10/02/1962-11/24/1967 Sacred Heart, Williamstown, PA
11/24/1967-6/18/1981 St. Patrick, York, PA
6/18/1981-6/04/1997 Church of the Holy Spirit, Palmyra, PA
1997 Retired

Summary

Multiple individuals alleged that Father George Koychick sexually abused them. In
2003, a woman notified the Diocese of Harrisburg via an anonymous e-mail account. The
woman stated in the 1970’s, when she was 13 or 14 years old, Koychick touched her sensually.
He rubbed her upper thighs. She reported that Koychick rubbed multiple girls. This occurred
at St. Patrick’s, York.

Diocesan officials followed up on the e-mail complaint. A report summarizing an

interview between the Diocese and Koychick was located in Koychick’s Diocesan files.
Koychick was asked if there was any truth to the allegation of sexual touching of minor girls.
Koychick responded, “yes, it was when I was going through a touchy/feely time in my life.”
Koychick stated he had eighth grade girls record the collections the church received from
attendees at the rectory. He sat close to girls and touched or patted the girls’ inner thighs or the
top part of their thighs. He admitted touching skin on skin, under the girls’ skirts. Koychick
admitted “it was sensual rubbing.” He stated he sensually touched multiple young girls. He
admitted that one time he touched the breasts of one young girl, but immediately apologized
afterwards. He admitted he felt an attraction to the young girls and the touching was for his own
sexual pleasure. Koychick stated, “This is a test of ones [sic] faith. I have prayed over this for
years. I have lived in fear for years wondering if anyone would come forward with an
allegation…I have said more Acts of Contrition than anybody.”

Koychick was immediately suspended from active ministry and issued a penal precept.
In 2004, the Diocese of Harrisburg authored a document noting a 2003 allegation that provided:

548
Summary
“By the actions taken (removing him permanently from all active ministry, forbidding him from
residence in any rectory, and admonishing him to lead a life of prayer and penance), Bishop
Dattilo believed that the harm done by his past actions has been sufficiently repaired, and
therefore did not seek his dismissal from the clerical state.” Koychick was allowed to remain
retired. In 2005, the Diocese of Harrisburg and the Archbishop of Alabama granted Koychick
permission to celebrate a funeral mass for his sister. There was to be no publicity regarding his
celebration of mass.

In 2013, another woman came forward and made a report to the Diocese of Harrisburg
against Koychick. She asserted that she was abused from age 12 to age 15, between 1976 and
1979. She reported that Koychick touched her breasts over top of her clothing. She reported
that Koychick also exposed his genitalia. This occurred while Koychick was at St. Patrick’s in
York. Koychick took the victim on boating trips and touched her breasts on the trips. She stated
he never touched her in the rectory. An additional penal precept was issued detailing the
suspension of priestly activities.

A news article dated March 24, 2014, from Fairhope, Alabama, announced the Marietta
Johnson Museum was planning a christening of its Memory Garden and its donors. Listed as a
donor was “Father George Koychick.” This was a direct violation of the penal precept issued
May 10, 2013, which stated in relevant part: “You are not to present yourself as a priest or a
cleric. Accordingly you may not wear the attire appropriate to the clerical state, or employ the
title ‘Father’ or ‘Reverend’.” There was no document establishing that the Diocese of
Harrisburg undertook any action concerning Koychick’s violation.

The Diocese received notice that in 2015 Koychick’s cousin wrote Archbishop Vigano
at the Apostolic Nunciature of the Holy See in the United States asking Pope Francis to send a
note of encouragement to Koychick, who was suffering his final illness. Koychick’s cousin
noted that Koychick resided in Fairhope, Alabama and was a Catholic priest in the Harrisburg
Diocese for 64 years, currently retired.

Archbishop Vigano sent a letter to the Diocese of Harrisburg to be forwarded to

Koychick. The letter stated, “As the personal representative of His Holiness Pope Francis to
the United States of America, I wish to express my gratitude for your long and fruitful ministry
as a priest of Jesus Christ. During these days especially, when the accumulation of years has
rendered your health frail, I pray that the good Lord may let His face shine upon you and give
you His peace.” A note was found attached to the letter from Archbishop Vigano to the Diocese
of Harrisburg from an unknown person that stated Archbishop Vigano should have checked with
the Diocese before writing a letter. It is unknown if a copy was ever sent to Koychick.

In 2016, another victim came forward to report she was sexually abused by Koychick
from 1976 to 1979. The victim stated Koychick touched her breasts and sunbathed nude.

The allegations were reported to the York County District Attorney’s Office.

549
 Reverend Thomas Kujovsky

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1930
YEAR OF DEATH: 2015
ORDINATION: May 11, 1957

Employment/Assignment History
5/23/1957-6/01/1962 St. Casimir, Kulpmont, PA
6/01/1962-8/09/1963 St. Joseph, York, PA
8/09/1963-5/29/1964 St. Catherine, Oakleigh, PA
5/29/1964-6/22/1972 Mt. Carmel Elementary School, Mt. Carmel, PA
9/23/1966-2/03/1967 Our Lady of Mercy, Roaring Creek, PA
2/03/1967-12/15/1969 St. Joseph, Locust Dale, PA
12/15/1969-6/22/1972 St. John the Baptist, Mt. Carmel, PA
6/22/1972-6/02/1983 Immaculate Conception Blessed Virgin Mary, Berwick, PA
6/02/1983-8/26/1986 St. Columbia, Bloomsburg, PA
8/26/1986-6/09/1989 Corpus Christi, Chambersburg, PA
6/09/1989-11/11/1990 St. Anne, Lancaster, PA
11/11/1990 Villa Vianney
12/15/1990 Retired
8/26/1994 Administrator Pro Tem, Villa Vianney
6/28/1995 Secretary to the Lebanon Tribunal
4/27/1999 Administrator Pro Tem at St. Peter, Elizabethtown, PA
1/01/2003 Retired

Summary

In 1981, Bishop Joseph Daley documented a report against Father Thomas Kujovsky.
Two women reported to Father Coakley that a person found magazines that contained
photographs of former altar boys in the nude. The items were found by Kujovsky’s bed in the
rectory. Bishop Daley discussed the nude photographs with Kujovsky. Daley noted Kujovsky
expressed “utter surprise and absolute disbelief concerning them.” He denied “absolutely that
he had any sexual aberrations.” Bishop Daley noted he did not reveal the source of the
information and accepted Kujovsky’s word. The Diocese identified one of the boys that was
photographed naked. However, there was no record in the file that the child was ever
interviewed, nor was there any police involvement. Kujovsky stayed in ministry.

Kujovsky wrote a letter, which is contained in Diocesan files. In the letter, he referenced
what he deemed were false charges leveled against him in August of 1990. The Diocese referred
Kujovsky for an evaluation after receiving the 1990 allegations. The allegation was later
recanted when the accuser admitted that the allegation was made up for the sole purpose of

550
Summary
trying to get money via a settlement. Kujovsky was reinstated with faculties; however, he was
retired.

551
 Reverend Thomas Lawler

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1925
YEAR OF DEATH: 1987
ORDINATION: November 1, 1955

Employment/Assignment History
11/11/1955-5/24/1960 Sacred Heart, Lewistown; Youth Chaplain and Scout Chaplain,
Juniata Valley Area, PA
5/24/1960-10/26/1960 St. Aloysius, Littlestown, PA
10/26/1960-12/14/1960 Good Shepherd, Camp Hill, PA
12/14/1960-6/02/1961 St. Vincent, Hanover, PA
6/02/1961-6/01/1962 St. Joseph, York, PA
6/01/1962-10/10/1969 Annunciation Blessed Virgin Mary, McSherrystown, PA
10/10/1969-9/01/1971 St. Peter, Columbia, PA
9/01/1971-10/19/1987 Sacred Heart of Jesus, Lewisburg, PA

Summary

A document issued by Diocesan officials discussed a 2002 allegation made by a man

against Father Thomas Lawler. The man stated the abuse occurred in 1963 when he was 10
years old. Lawler hugged the boy and placed his hands inside the back of the boy’s pants and
underwear. Lawler squeezed and fondled the boy’s buttocks. The Diocese of Harrisburg
reported this boy’s allegation to the Dauphin County District Attorney’s Office.

A Diocesan document provided that another man came forward in 2014 and notified the
Diocese that Lawler abused him while Lawyer was assigned to Sacred Heart of Jesus in
Lewisburg. The reported abuse started in 1985 and ended when Lawler died in 1987. The man
was 13 years old when the abuse started. Lawler kissed the then-boy and told the boy that he
was proud of him. The abuse progressed to touching and “French” kissing. The man stated the
abuse occurred in the basement of the rectory. The man remembered one instance when he
painted a table in the basement. Lawler crawled under the table and pulled the boy’s pants
down. Lawler then fondled the boy’s genitalia and kissed his buttocks.

The man told his parents about the abuse in 1987. Initially, his parents did not believe
him. After the boy was able to convince his parents the abuse occurred, his stepfather decided
to contact the police. The next morning, the man was told Father Lawler died. The man noted
no report was made to the police. The Diocese made a report to the Union County District
Attorney’s Office in 2014.

552
 Reverend Robert Logue

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: N/A
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: N/A

Employment/Assignment History
Unknown

Summary

The Diocese of Harrisburg’s file for Father Robert Logue contained a “supplement”
dated August 24, 1968. The supplement was to a previous report written by Father Frederick
Bradel. The supplement noted that a 13 year-old-boy and his father reported Logue showed an
interest in the boy, which disturbed the boy and his father. Logue reportedly asked the boy to
expose his genitalia. The boy stated the contact with Logue started the year before, which was
1967. The boy stated that he and his friends had discussed that Logue was preoccupied with
sex.

Bradel confronted Logue. Logue “admitted his tendencies and stated they were
becoming more pronounced and were a source of great and increasing concern for him.”
Bishop Joseph Daley was notified and advised Logue to contact his spiritual director, consult a
psychiatrist, and resign from his orders. Logue agreed to contact his spiritual director and
consult a psychiatrist, but Logue decided to request a leave of absence instead of resigning from
his orders.

Daley wrote to Bradel on September 5, 1968, thanking him for the confidential report.
He stated “we shall follow closely the immediate future of the individual concerned.” No other
documents were in this file.

553
 Reverend David H. Luck

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1961
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 30, 1987

Employment/Assignment History
Summer 1986 St. Paul the Apostle, Annville, PA (Deacon)
Spring 1987 St. Paul the Apostle, Annville, PA (Deacon)
6/19/1987-1/01/1989 St. Joseph, Mechanicsburg, PA

Summary

Diocesan documents held in secret archives detailed the following information. David
Luck was a deacon at St. Paul the Apostle during 1986 and 1987. He was successfully ordained
a priest in May of 1987. In December of 1988, a family reported to their local priest that their
two minor sons were molested by Luck. The local priest notified Bishop William Keeler. Luck,
while a deacon, was close with the reporting family and often stayed overnight at the family’s
home. The abuse occurred during the overnight stays.

It was reported that Luck anally penetrated a 15 year old boy. He fondled the genitals
of the 15 year old boy and an 11 year old boy. The Diocese sent Luck to St. Luke’s Institute in
February 1989 for an evaluation. Luck sent a letter to seventh grade children at his local school
telling them he could not wait to see them again.

Notes of St. Luke’s Institute’s evaluation of Luck were summarized on Office of Judicial
Vicar letterhead in 1989. St. Luke’s diagnosed Luck with Paraphilia, a sexual deviation. Luck
admitted to fantasizing about sex with boys, fondling and touching them, and performing mutual
fellatio with them. St. Luke’s recommended Luck not be in ministry around children or
adolescents. Luck began writing letters to other dioceses around the country asking to be
allowed to minister. Bishop Nicholas Dattilo was installed as the Bishop of Harrisburg in
January of 1990. Dattilo suspended Luck in May of 1990.

In October of 1990, hand wrote a memorandum to Dattilo

outlining a September meeting with Luck. Luck stated, “I am a pedophile” to and
Father McGovern. Luck was told not to have any contact with the victims, per Dattilo’s notes.
Shortly thereafter, Luck approached one of the victims at a parish festival.

There is no evidence in Luck’s files, which were turned over by the Diocese of
Harrisburg, that anyone from the Diocese called the police when Luck’s abuse was reported.
There was a 1996 document, which discussed that the family of the victims went to the police

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

554
-*5*("5*0/
Summary
(even naming the officer), and if the Diocese was contacted about Luck, they would cooperate.
Luck was never criminally charged.

The Diocese of Harrisburg was contacted by a mental health agency where Luck applied
for a job in 1996. In a memorandum from Father Paul Helwig to Dattilo on July 15, 1996,
Helwig noted he received a form from a mental health employment agency asking for a reference
for Luck. Helwig wrote that the Diocese “received a standard form, but instead of responding
to the questions on the form, I wrote a letter and stated that, ‘Because of conduct unbefitting a
minister of the Church, David was relieved of his duties and does not have authorization to
present himself or work as a priest.’”

After many years of Canonical appeals, Luck was dispensed from priestly ministry in
2005.

555
 Reverend Monsignor Robert Maher

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1911
YEAR OF DEATH: 1990
ORDINATION: May 22, 1937

Employment/Assignment History
6/03/1937-6/09/1939 St. Rose of Lima, York, PA
6/09/1939-12/1939 St. Mary’s, Kulpmont, PA (left due to health)
1/06/1940-4/04/1941 St. Peter, Columbia, PA
4/1941 Chaplain to Boy Scouts
1/1946-10/1961 Superintendent of schools
4/04/1941-7/10/1946 St. Mary Assumption, Lebanon, PA
7/10/1946-5/24/1960 St. Peter, Columbia, PA
5/24/1960-12/14/1961 St. Patrick’s Cathedral, Harrisburg, PA
12/14/1961-8/1974 St. Vincent, Hanover, PA
4/23/1975 Resignation accepted; faculties not revoked; Villa Vianney
Retirement home
1979 to 1986 Archivist for the Diocese of Harrisburg

Summary

An undated, unsigned, handwritten chronology for Monsignor Robert Maher was found
in his restricted file in the Diocese of Harrisburg. This chronology noted that in April of 1975
Maher submitted his resignation to St. Vincent in Hanover. A quote from Maher is documented
as: “I cannot pretend, nor do you, that this whole experience is without pain. But like surgery
it must be endured trusting no metastasis will overtake our spiritual therapy.” Maher further
stated, “most important is that Father Christie has a rather complete knowledge of my personal
history.”

The following entry in the chronology reads: “Bishop [Joseph] Daley accepts
resignation and grants approval for residence at Villa Vianney. Faculties not revoked.”

There were no documents in the file that discussed the reason for the resignation and/or
why faculties were not revoked.

In 1994, Father Paul Helwig wrote to Bishop Nicholas Dattilo regarding a man’s
allegation that Maher committed sexual abuse. Dattilo wrote:

Is there anything in his file? Monsignor is dead and can’t defend himself. Are
we in the situation of having to treat and/or support everyone who makes an
allegation? To what extent? +NCD

556
Summary

The man who made the report in 1994 stated Maher kissed him, touched him in an
“immodest” way, and performed oral sex on him to the point of ejaculation. The then-boy was
in sixth or seventh grade. This abuse occurred sometime during Maher’s assignment at St.
Vincent (1961-1975).

This same man made the same reports to the Diocese in 1997, 2002 and 2007.

In 1997, a Secular Franciscan Brother reported to the Diocese via a letter that as an adult
he had sought Maher for counseling. During counseling, Maher hugged him, kissed him on the
lips, and “stuck his tongue” in the victim’s mouth.

In 2012, another man reported to the Diocese that Maher had sexually abused him when
he was a boy. This was documented in a summary interview written by Father Paul Clark. The
then-boy’s mother took him to Maher because she found her son to be “intractably bad.” This
boy had to sit on Maher’s lap and he was kissed when he was nine years old.

In 2015, another man’s statement was summarized in an interview report by Diocese of

Harrisburg officials. When this boy was 10 years old, he broke his collarbone. Maher
commented on the boy’s broken bone and leaned in as to kiss him on the mouth. The boy backed
away. During confession, Maher asked this boy if he masturbated, got a “hard on,” and how
big was his penis.

A parishioner of St. Vincent wrote a letter in 2015 describing that 15 boys were sexually
abused by Maher during his assignment at the parish from 1961 to 1975. The reporting
parishioner was interviewed by Diocesan officials. The parishioner was a student at the time of
the alleged abuse, essentially the same age of the other boys. The parishioner did not disclose
the names of the 15 boys; he stated they had the right to privacy and the right to come forward
on their own.

In 2016, another man’s statement was summarized in an interview report by the Diocese.
The man reported that Maher touched the genitals of a seven year old boy; Maher also reportedly
performed oral sex on the boy.

557
 Reverend Daniel Mahoney

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1926
YEAR OF DEATH: 2007
ORDINATION: May 10, 1952

Employment/Assignment History
5/23/1952-4/21/1954 St. Patrick, York, PA
4/21/1954-8/01/1956 St. Edward, Shamokin, PA
8/01/1956-6/02/1961 St. Joan of Arc, Hershey, PA
6/02/1961-6/30/1964 St. Joseph, Shamokin, PA
6/30/1964-5/31/1968 Immaculate Conception, Fairfield, PA
5/31/1968-6/13/2002 Holy Name of Jesus, Harrisburg, PA
6/13/2002 Retired

Summary
Father Daniel Mahoney’s file contained complaints regarding inappropriate publishing
in the Holy Name Jesus Church bulletin. More complaints were made to the Diocese of
Harrisburg regarding postings on his personal website, http://www.revmahoney.com. The
website had links to “Puberty for BOYS” and “Puberty for GIRLS.” Mahoney provided
descriptions of growing up and sexuality. One description regarding pregnancy in a section
titled Purity for Boys stated, “The semen is squirted into a girl’s body through the penis into the
vagina or little opening between her legs.” In another section titled Purity for Girls, Mahoney
provided great detail regarding menstruation and periods for girls. It was reported to the Diocese
of Harrisburg that Mahoney handed out these documents at Bishop McCort High School in
2003.

During an interview with a catechist of Immaculate Conception Blessed Virgin Mary

Church in 2002, she provided information concerning Mahoney. Diocesan records of the 2002
interview stated her brother disclosed to her that Mahoney sexually abused him. The alleged
abuse occurred between 1966 and 1968. The brother never reported the abuse to the Diocese.

In 2016, a Diocesan document noted a different woman reported to the Diocese of

Harrisburg that her brother was also sexually abused by Mahoney. Mahoney reportedly took
her brother out of classes and took him to the Holy Name rectory. The boy never reported abuse
to the Diocese.

558
 Reverend Guy Marsico

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1947
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 19, 1973

Employment/Assignment History
6/01/1973-10/10/1977 Assumption Blessed Virgin Mary, Lebanon, PA
10/10/1977-4/29/1982 St. Leo the Great, Rohrerstown, PA
4/29/1982-8/01/1985 St. Rose of Lima, York, PA
8/01/1985-7/28/1994 St. Gregory the Great, Lebanon, PA
7/28/1994 Leave of Absence
2010 Requested laicization

Summary

The following information was obtained from a summary written by Diocesan officials
for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and by a man testifying before the Grand Jury
on October 18, 2016.

The man came forward in 1994 and reported he had been sexually molested by Father
Guy Marsico while at St. Leo the Great. Marsico asked the boy’s parents for permission for the
boy to spend the night at the rectory. The boy’s parents knew he wanted to be a priest and
granted permission for the boy to stay overnight. The boy went to the rectory to stay overnight.
Marsico had boxes on a spare bed. Marsico told the victim he could not remove the boxes and
that he had to sleep in the same bed with Marsico. Marsico made the boy undress. Marsico
gave the boy full body massages and touched the boy’s penis. Marsico put his mouth on the
boy’s penis. The boy stated that Marsico and he slept together in the same bed overnight. The
boy also blacked out for a period of time due to fear. The boy was 13 years old at the time.

The boy disclosed that he told his mother about the abuse when he was 14 years old. His
mother did not tell anyone. The boy told his father about the abuse when he was 16 years old.
His father did not tell anyone.

The boy felt strong enough to report the abuse to the Diocese of Harrisburg. Diocesan
officials confronted Marsico. Marsico admitted to sleeping in the same bed with the boy and
giving him massages. Marsico stated that he “brushed his penis aside” when massaging the
boy’s stomach and pelvic area. Marsico sent the boy a letter of apology.

The Diocese of Harrisburg agreed to pay for prescription medications and counseling for
the boy. The boy later found out that his counselor reported what occurred during his counseling
to the Diocese. The boy disclosed that he attempted suicide in 1986.
3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

559
-*5*("5*0/
Summary

Marsico admitted to being sexually involved with three other minors while at
Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary and St. Leo the Great. Marsico took a leave of absence
and resigned from his parish. He went to the Anodos Center for an evaluation.

Diocesan officials wrote a summary, which stated while at treatment Marsico

specifically named his victims. As a result of admitting his sexual abuse, the Diocese issued a
penal precept in 1995.

In September 1996, another victim came forward and reported abuse by Marsico. The
victim was previously identified during Marsico’s admission. The victim was between fifth and
sixth grade when molested by Marsico. Marsico fondled the victim, slept in the same bed naked
with the victim, and engaged in oral sex and masturbated the victim.

Marsico requested laicization in 2010. Marsico paid for the first victim’s counseling and
prescription medication for a period of time.

Marsico testified before the grand jury on November 9, 2016. Marsico explained to the
attorney for the Commonwealth that when he was in fifth grade he obtained paperwork to
become a priest. At age 14, Marsico went to the Seminary in Columbus, Ohio and stayed there
for 12 years. During his testimony, Marsico confessed to molesting children. A relevant excerpt
of Marsico’s testimony follows:

Q: But to be clear, though, while you were engaged in the sexual conduct with
these boys, you were admitting the conduct to your confessor, Father Michael
Homola?

A: Correct.

Q: And he was a parish priest in which parish?

A: He was in various parishes. The last one was St. Philip in Millersville.

Q: And his advice to you certainly was not, you know, call the police and turn
yourself in; but it was to essentially pray about it?

A: Pray about it and try to get away from it. Reform your life.

Q: And then you would come back and say, it happened again; and he would say
pray about it, reform your life?

A: Basically.

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

560
-*5*("5*0/
 Reverend John M. McDevitt

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1924
YEAR OF DEATH: 1999
ORDINATION: Unknown

Employment/Assignment History
1960’s Bishop McDevitt School
8/23/1982 Transferred out of Diocese of Harrisburg

Summary

In , reported to Chancellor Carol Houghton of

the Diocese of Harrisburg that a man from Seven Sorrows in Middletown approached him. The
man reported that Father John McDevitt of the Oblates of St. Francis de Sales abused him.
Houghton notified via e-mail. The man stated McDevitt kissed him in
the confessional at Bishop McDevitt High School. The year of the abuse is unknown, but the
reporting man was 50 years old in 2012.

The Diocese of Harrisburg notified the Provincial for the Oblates of St. Francis de Sales,
Wilmington-Philadelphia Province of the abuse allegation. No other information was found in
Diocesan records.

However, on August 5, 2011, an article located on www.delawareonline.com reported

the Oblates of St. Francis de Sales reached a $24.8 million settlement with survivors of abuse
committed by priests. As part of the settlement, the Oblates of St. Francis de Sales released the
names of 12 priests who either admitted to committing sexual abuse or sexual abuse allegations
against them were substantiated. McDevitt was one of the 12 priests listed.

561 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

-*5*("5*0/
 Reverend Anthony McGinley

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1920
YEAR OF DEATH: 2006
ORDINATION: December 1945

Employment/Assignment History
12/20/1945-8/25/1953 Annunciation Blessed Virgin Mary, McSherrystown, PA
8/25/1953-11/20/1953 Assumption Blessed Virgin Mary, Lebanon, PA
11/20/1953-10/11/1957 Our Lady of Mt. Carmel, Mt. Carmel, PA
10/11/1957-12/14/1961 St. Thomas More, Northumberland, PA
12/14/1961-4/30/1970 St. Patrick, Carlisle, forced to resign as pastor at in Carlisle and
permitted to continue his education
4/30/1970-10/24/1972 Catholic University; Graduate School of Education for Guidance
(Counseling)
1970’s-1982 Marymount College; forced to resign 1982
5/10/1972-9/01/1972 St. Joseph, Mechanicsburg, PA (part-time)
11/26/1987 Retired; faculties revoked

Summary

The Diocesan file for Father Anthony McGinley contained a handwritten memorandum,
dated November of 1953, by Father Robert Gribbin, who was stationed at the Lebanon Catholic
High School. Three high school boys reported that McGinley made “immoral advances”
towards them. Gribbin asked the boys “if they realized the terrible gravity of these charges.”
He asked if they “were so convinced of them, would they testify under oath to their truth.” The
boys notified Gribbin that two senior boys knew of the “immoral advances.” Gribbin “warned
them to be absolutely silent and dismissed them.” The memorandum stated, “I spent most of
the day in shocked disbelief – I could not believe these charges. Yet the evidence seemed so
grave, and the danger of scandal so imminent, that I felt bound in conscience to inform the
pastor, who I felt to be the competent superior in the case.”

One boy reported that McGinley took him to a funeral and then stayed overnight.
McGinley encouraged the boy to drink alcohol. They slept in the same bed together and
McGinley touched the boy. Another boy reported that McGinley took him to Centralia for a
funeral, gave him alcohol, and touched him inappropriately. This boy went on a trip to
McSherrystown and McGinley tried to touch him. A third boy reported he went on trips to
McSherrystown with McGinley and McGinley engaged in “soft talk” and then touched his
genitals over his clothes.

Bishop Leech suspended McGinley until he reported for an interview in the Bishop’s
Office in November of 1953. According to a document, McGinley stated he was innocent

562
Summary
however “there may have been imprudent association w/ boys and that conduct w/ them might
be construed wrongly.” On November 20, 1953, McGinley was transferred to Our Lady of Mt.
Carmel.

From 1953 to 1982, there were many reports that McGinley had sexual encounters with
other males. Bishop Keeler revoked his faculties and the Diocese sent him to St. Luke’s Institute
for treatment. His faculties were not reinstated. He was caught practicing ministry in the
Diocese of Allentown, without faculties.

In 1987, Father Hugh Overbaugh wrote a memorandum about a meeting between Bishop
Keeler and McGinley. Keeler met with McGinley and explained the “moral and legal
ramifications resulting from priests accused of improper sexual activity, especially cases of
pedophilia” and revoked all faculties.

In 2004, a man came forward and made a report to the Diocese of Harrisburg. The man
alleged that McGinley molested him when he was 11 years old in 1950. The reported abuse
started with genital fondling and moved to oral sex. This abuse happened six to eight times.

In 2008, the Diocese received a letter from a prison inmate reporting that he was molested
by McGinley in 1969 at St. Patrick’s in Carlisle. The boy was in fifth grade at the time. When
the boy was in the eighth grade, he told the pastor of the church, Father Braubitz, of the
molestation. Braubitz replied to the victim that McGinley was “ill” and no longer with that
church.

563
 Reverend James McLucas

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: N/A
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: N/A

Employment/Assignment History
Summer 2014 Carmel of Jesus, Mary and Joseph Monastery, Elysburg, PA

Summary

In 2014, Father James McLucas was a priest in the Archdiocese of New York living in
Elysburg as the Chaplain to the Monastery. The Archdiocese of New York sent the Diocese of
Harrisburg a testimonial letter of good standing for McLucas.

The head Mother of the Monastery called the Diocese of Harrisburg after finding out
McLucas had sexually abused a 14 year old girl and continued a relationship with her into her
adulthood. This was reported to the Archdiocese of New York in 2012.

The Diocese of Harrisburg revoked McLucas’ faculties to perform ministry.

564
 Reverend Ibarra Mercado

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: N/A
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: Archdiocese of Military Services

Employment/Assignment History
7/01/1994 Lebanon V.A. Hospital

Summary

On June 8, 1994, Monsignor Hugh Overbaugh wrote a memorandum to Bishop Nicholas

Dattilo marked as “CONFIDENTIAL.” The Diocese of Harrisburg was notified by Father
Michael Connelly, Oblates of St. Francis de Sales who served as the Judicial Vicar for the
Military Archdiocese under the Archbishop of Military Services, of child sex abuse allegations
against Mercado. The Archdiocese of Military Services advised they would conduct the
investigation. The Judicial Vicar stated because the abuse occurred at the Veteran’s
Administration (“VA”) hospital, it was on federal territory. A memorandum stated, “There is
no danger, therefore, that the Diocese of Harrisburg will be involved.”

The allegations involved Mercado “French kissing” a 12 year old girl. The girl’s mother
was an organist for masses that Mercado celebrated at the Lebanon VA Hospital.

On July 1, 1994, Father Paul Helwig wrote a memorandum to Bishop Nicholas Dattilo
that stated he received word that Mercado was being “reassigned.”

565
Biographical Information

Employment/Assignment History

Summary
In , the County District Attorney’s Office wrote a letter to Bishop
concerning “serious allegations” lodged against . The letter provided the
following information.

. The District Attorney’s Office informed the Bishop of

the defendant’s sentence for and that actions “may constitute criminal
activity and require some disposition by this office.” The District Attorney’s Office informed
the Bishop that it would be “most happy to co-operate with Your Excellency in reaching a
reasonable resolution to this matter.” The letter concluded by offering assistance to the Diocese:
“Please do not hesitate to contact us if we can be of any further assistance or provide you with
additional information.”

According to an undated, handwritten chronology found in the Diocesan records, in

,

566 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

-*5*("5*0/
Summary

responded that was transferred from

The Diocese instructed not to return to the
area. The memorandums noted continued to frequent the
area.

On January 16, 2018, Diocese of Chancellor testified that

recalled an internal Diocesan memorandum in the restricted file for that

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

567
-*5*("5*0/
 Reverend Charles Procopio

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1927
YEAR OF DEATH: 1997
ORDINATION: May 10, 1956

Employment/Assignment History
5/25/1956-8/01/1956 St. Theresa’s Church, New Cumberland, PA
8/01/1956-4/09/1959 St. Joseph, Danville, PA
4/09/1959-12/14/1961 St. Anthony of Padua, Lancaster, PA
12/14/1961-10/02/1962 St. Andrew, Waynesboro, PA
10/02/1962-12/11/1964 St. Joan of Arc, Hershey, PA
12/11/1964-10/12/1967 Sacred Heart of Jesus, Harrisburg, PA
10/12/1967-5/31/1968 Assumption Blessed Virgin Mary, Lancaster, PA
5/31/1968-6/04/1971 St. Rita, Fairfield, PA
6/04/1971-8/10/1979 St. Peter, Mount Carmel, PA
8/10/1979-7/28/1983 Holy Name of Jesus, Harrisburg, PA
7/28/1983-5/30/1984 St. Joseph, Hanover, PA
5/30/1984-2/04/1991 Christ the King, Benton, PA
2/04/1991-1/11/1994 St. Casimir, Kulpmont, PA
1/11/1994-6/28/1995 Villa Vianney/Our Lady of Mt. Carmel
6/28/1995 Retired

Summary

Diocese of Harrisburg documents reveal an allegation of sexual abuse was made against
Father Charles Procopio in October 1965. Father McAndrew wrote a memorandum dated
October 18, 1965, which stated he was informed via a telephone call that Procopio had molested
girls in the seventh and eighth grades at Sacred Heart of Jesus in Harrisburg. The person who
made the report to McAndrew stated the girls told the principal of the school about the
molestation, but nothing happened in response to the report. McAndrew described one
allegation of abuse as “immodest touches.” He detailed how Procopio kissed the girls and felt
their breasts. Procopio pressed one girl against the wall in the rectory and touched the girl “in
an immodest manner” and he made motions simulating intercourse while his body was pressed
against the girl. Procopio touched another girl in an “indecent manner” in a school hallway,
which caused her to scream. A teacher heard the scream and found her in the hallway frightened.

The person making this report in 1965 stated “if nothing were done about this matter,
he would be forced to take it to the police. However, he says that he would do nothing without
consulting with the Chancery Office.”

568
Summary
The next day, on October 19, 1965, McGovern reviewed McAndrew’s memorandum
regarding Procopio. McGovern noted,

“Father Propocio’s so-called immodest touches were actually manifestations of

his effusive nature, imprudent but pure on his part. We also agree that the
touches were not objectively immoral but only interpreted as such by pre-
adolescent girls.”

He also wrote they

“concluded that the more recent actions received a distorted interpretation in

the highly imaginative minds of pubescent girls.”

The memorandum from 1965 also provided that McGovern spoke with Procopio
regarding the complaint. McGovern explained to Procopio that

“a girl of that age is so conscious of her womanhood that she feels all other
people likewise are constantly noticing it all the times. She considers any touch
a ‘sex’ touch. The pre-adolescent girl indulges in fantasy quite often.”

The Diocese of Harrisburg allowed Procopio to stay in ministry.

569
 Reverend Guido Miguel Quiroz Reyes, OFM

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: N/A
YEAR OF DEATH: 2006
ORDINATION: Order of St. Francis (Franciscan Fathers from Peru)

Employment/Assignment History
12/1975-1/1980 Hispanic Center, Lancaster, PA

Summary

Father Guido Miguel Quiroz Reyes of the Order of St. Francis in Peru obtained faculties
in the Diocese of Harrisburg verbally on December 11, 1975. In a memorandum dated
December 12, 1975, Bishop Joseph Daley decided no written faculties would be granted to
Reyes. However, Monsignor Keeler was authorized to grant faculties verbally to Reyes.

Multiple Diocesan memorandums provided that in September of 1994 the Diocese of

Harrisburg was advised that a family living in Florida, formerly from Lancaster, made sexual
molestation allegations against Reyes. The memorandums summarized the following
information. The family met Reyes in Lancaster while he was stationed at the Hispanic Center.
He befriended the family. When the family moved to Florida, they asked Reyes if he wanted to
live with them. He lived with the family from 1980 to 1993. In 1993, the family confronted
him with accusations that he sexually abused three girls in the family. Specifically, the family
believed that Reyes sexually abused two daughters of the family in the 1970’s when they were
minors. That abuse reportedly continued when the family moved to Florida. The family also
believed that Reyes sexually abused a minor granddaughter when he lived with the family in
Florida.

After the family confronted Reyes, the following occurred. Reyes denied the
accusations. The family asked him to leave their home. Reyes left the family’s home. In 1994,
Reyes asked the family to not take legal action against him in relation to the sexual abuse
allegations. The family then contacted law enforcement. Law enforcement in Florida
apparently began an investigation. The Diocese’s files do not contain any other information
about the investigation that was apparently commenced in Florida.

570
 Deacon James Rush

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1944
YEAR OF DEATH: 2016
ORDINATION: June 3, 1979

Employment/Assignment History
Prior to 2001 Archdiocese of New York
2002-2005 St. Richard, Manheim; Our Lady of Good Counsel,
Marysville; St. Bernadette Mission, Duncannon, PA
11/2015 Retired

Summary

Diocesan documents provided that the Archdiocese of New York had authority over
Deacon James Rush when he applied for employment in the Diocese of Harrisburg. In 2015,
two adult woman complained that Rush engaged in inappropriate actions that crossed boundary
lines. After being confronted by the Diocese of Harrisburg, Rush retired. Bishop Ronald Gainer
issued a penal precept that prevented Rush from ministering in the Diocese without explicit
permission.

In 2016, a woman reported to Children and Youth Services and to the Diocese of
Harrisburg that Rush had developed an inappropriate relationship with a 14 year old girl. He
recently took the girl to a hockey game and held her hand. He told her he only had eyes for her
and told her she was his “girlfriend.” The girl also told the woman who reported the allegation
that Rush kissed her. Rush told the girl not to tell her mother because her mother would get the
wrong impression. Although retired, Rush was still assisting around the local parish.

In a letter to the Archdiocese of New York dated June 1, 2016, the Diocese of Harrisburg
disclosed the two complaints, the penal precept, and the new allegations against Rush. The
Diocese of Harrisburg determined no sexual abuse occurred against the girl in relation to the
most recent allegation, but the Diocese determined what happened, “we might deem grooming
behavior.”

571
Biographical Information

Employment/Assignment History

Summary

The Diocese of restricted file for contained a

memorandum from to dated .
The memorandum stated was called and asked to report to the Pennsylvania State Police
Barracks in . went to the Barracks where a corporal questioned him regarding
an incident from the prior week.
.

572 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

-*5*("5*0/
Summary

573 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

-*5*("5*0/
 Bryan Schlager

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1990
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: N/A

Employment/Assignment History
8/2009 Seminary applicant
12/2010 Withdrew from seminary

Summary

In August of 2009, Bryan Schlager was a seminarian for the Diocese of Harrisburg. In
December of 2010, he withdrew from the seminary and was no longer studying to be a priest for
the Diocese of Harrisburg.

According to a Diocesan memorandum, in February of 2011, a 15 year old boy reported

to Father Sawicki (St. Joan of Arc) that he had received inappropriate communications from
Schlager during a private Facebook chat. Schlager asked the 15 year old about masturbation
and pornography. After being confronted by the Diocese of Harrisburg, Schlager “voluntarily
withdr[e]w” from all activities on a parish or Diocesan level to include “working with the youth
in any capacity whether that be through religious education, youth groups or diocesan parochial
or high schools.” The Diocese requested Schlager be removed from a substitute teacher list at
Lancaster Catholic High School. He retained his Youth Protection credentials, which is
apparently a Diocesan program.

The Diocese of Harrisburg conducted an investigation and found a minor in 2008 had
received inappropriate communications from Schlager prior to him entering the Seminary. The
Diocese produced a report of the investigation. Another minor received inappropriate
communications from Schlager in November of 2010. Schlager withdrew from the Seminary
in December of 2010 after he had inappropriate sexual conversations with seminarians. Another
minor received inappropriate communications from Schlager in 2011.

In 2012, Schlager was the organist at St. Ignatius in Sinking Springs. He was removed
from this position because he had befriended a family with small children. He passed an
inappropriate note to a young boy who was in the family. The pastor at St. Ignatius did not
disclose the contents of the note to Chancellor Carol Houghton.

In March 2014, Schlager was observed volunteering at a faith-based retreat. The Diocese
removed his Youth Protection credentials.

574
 Reverend Herbert Shank

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1941
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 20, 1967

Employment/Assignment History
6/02/1967-6/04/1971 Sacred Heart, Lewistown, PA
6/20/1969-unknown Chaplain for Boy and Girl Scouts, Juniata Valley area
6/04/1971-9/03/1974 St. Joan of Arc, Hershey, PA
9/03/1974-5/14/1975 Sacred Heart, Lancaster, PA
5/14/1975-1/01/1981 Holy Spirit Hospital, Camp Hill, PA
1/01/1981-4/09/1984 St. Patrick, Carlisle, PA
4/09/1984-5/30/1984 Immaculate Conception Blessed Virgin Mary,
Fairfield, PA
5/30/1984-11/21/1994 St. Rose of Lima, York, PA
11/21/1994 Leave of Absence

Summary

According to the Diocese of Harrisburg’s records, in 1994, one boy alleged that Father
Herbert Shank molested his brother, himself, and five altar boys.

The reporting boy stated Shank took him on trips and he would stay at the parish
overnight. One night at the rectory, Shank showed the boy a box full of half-naked photographs
of other boys his age. He recognized some of the boys as altar boys. Once the report was made,
Shank requested a leave of absence, which Bishop Nicholas Dattilo granted.

A maintenance man approached the Diocese with information about a relationship

between Shank and a minor. The maintenance man also had knowledge of the disturbing
photographs of minor boys. In an undated memorandum written by Father Paul Helwig to the
case file, he emphasized that the maintenance man was not Catholic. The memorandum
mentioned a second maintenance man, who also had knowledge of the photographs. Helwig’s
memorandum included the second maintenance man’s prior history of alcohol abuse.

Vicar General, wrote a memorandum that discussed a telephone

call from Father Leo Goodman. Goodman found hundreds of pictures of young boys in drawers
in Shank’s room at the rectory. Goodman also found “negatives of pictures of young boys – mid
teens – including shots of genitalia. No corresponding pictures were found, only negatives.”
Goodman wanted to allow the victim, one of the altar boys referenced above, to pack up

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

575
-*5*("5*0/
Summary
photographs of himself, although the victim would not be allowed to keep the photographs of
himself. suggested that was not a good idea. Goodman allowed the victim to help gather
Shank’s belongings. Goodman left the room briefly, and when he returned the negatives were
missing. The victim admitted he took the negatives from Shank’s room.

Another victim contacted the Diocese of Harrisburg to report abuse by Shank. This
victim was very concerned about the photographs Shank had taken of him. A memorandum
written on November 18, 1994 by noted that Shank called the victim the day before. The
priest from the rectory suggested the Diocese look at the VHS tapes Shank had in his
“collection” noting “especially the ones that appear to be blank tapes.”

Helwig wrote a memorandum that noted Diocesan officials removed Shank’s

photographic collection from his room.

On December 2, 1994, another victim contacted the Diocese of Harrisburg. This is the
brother of the first victim who made a report. This victim stated between 1971 and 1974 Shank
molested him. He first met Shank when he was in sixth grade and acted as an altar boy. Shank
took the victim and other boys to drive-in movies, swimming, and on field trips to other states.
In seventh grade, Shank took this victim to different places alone. Shank gave him massages,
which led to overnight stays with this victim that included naked rubdowns, kissing and Shank
photographed the victim. Shank photographed this child’s erect penis. Shank placed his mouth
on the child’s penis until it became erect and then he took photographs. The victim remembered
he was under 16 when this occurred. He stated in 1998 Shank wrote him an apology letter.

On December 31, 1994, Helwig wrote a memorandum to Dattilo noting he had a

conference call with Shank and others regarding his stay at the Institute of Living, a treatment
center. He mentioned there was a legal obligation to contact the District Attorney. The
memorandum stated, “Father Shank said that, if this must be done, it must be done.” Two
other priests at the conference offered to help and support Shank through this “difficult time;”
“both said that they have had experience in matters such as this.”

In February 1995, the Diocese of Harrisburg notified the York County District
Attorney’s office. The Diocese turned over “photographic negatives and videotape cassettes.”
The Diocese disclosed the name of one of the victims who was in the photographs. The Diocese
offered to assist in identifying other victims in the photographs.

After the Thirty-Seventh Statewide Grand Jury Report into the Diocese of Altoona-
Johnstown was made public, the Office of Attorney General, received information from another
victim of Shank. The Agent interviewed the victim in 2016. The victim reported that in 1981
Shank preyed on him while he was an altar boy. Shank massaged the victim’s naked body and
kissed the victim. Shank photographed him at age 10 when he was in his underwear and also
when he was completely naked. He often times went to New York with Shank where Shank
gave him alcohol. The victim recalled one night at the rectory. While sleeping, Shank stood
over top of the victim in bed. Shank was naked and rubbed his penis on the victim. The victim
stated Shank kept photographs of naked boys in a binder. One day, he snooped around Shank’s

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

576
-*5*("5*0/
Summary
room and found a letter addressed to another victim. A few years later, Shank arrived at the
victim’s home and informed him that someone made a report that he was inappropriate with a
minor. Shank asked the victim, “why didn’t you stop me.”

In 2017, agents from the Office of Attorney General spoke with the York City Police
Department regarding the 1995 report. An officer who was not working on the case, but familiar
with it, stated Shank recorded television shows on VHS tapes. Shank then recorded himself
assaulting young boys. Shank preserved his assaultive recordings on VHS tape spliced in the
middle of recorded shows. The officer stated the victim made it clear he would not testify and
that the Diocese of Harrisburg shipped Shank out of the area.

The Diocese’s file noted that Shank was sent to the Institute of Living in Connecticut
for treatment from December 1994 to at least mid-1997.

577
 Reverend Patrick Shannon

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1940
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: 1972

Employment/Assignment History
1993-2005 Sacred Heart and of St. George’s Mission, Mifflinburg, PA

Summary

On November 2, 2005, the Diocese of Harrisburg was copied on a letter written to the
Provincial Superior of the Oblates of St. Francis de Sales in Wilmington, Delaware. The letter
was written by an individual who alleged that Father Patrick Shannon sexually abused him in
1973 as follows. The victim worked at Camp Brisson in Maryland as a counselor in training.
He was 16 years old at the time. While on a camping trip overnight, Shannon shared his blanket
with the victim. Once under the blanket, Shannon fondled the victim’s genitals underneath his
clothing. The victim told Shannon, “no.” Shannon responded, “sometime [sic] we say no when
we really mean yes.” Shannon eventually stopped molesting the victim. The victim woke up
in the morning to Shannon having his arm wrapped around him and his genitals cupped in
Shannon’s other hand.

The Diocese of Harrisburg removed Shannon’s faculties to practice ministry.

578
 Reverend Timothy Sperber

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1949
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: April 8, 1978

Employment/Assignment History
4/18/1978-4/21/1983 St. Joan of Arc, Hershey, PA
4/21/1983-12/1/1992 St. Philip, Millersville, PA
12/1992 Transfer to Florida
12/01/1992-2/15/1996 St. Gregory, Plantation, Florida
2/15/1996-9/01/1998 St. Boniface Church, Pembrooke Pines, Florida
9/01/1998 Leave of Absence
10/10/2000 Suspended for failing to appear for assignment

Summary

The Diocese of Harrisburg received a report in 2004 from a female alleging that a priest
sexually abused her around 1979. Diocese of Harrisburg Chancellor Carol Houghton
interviewed the victim and generated interview notes. The victim was between nine and ten
years old and a student at St. Joan of Arc in Hershey. She was not doing well with math and the
Principal, assigned Father Timothy Sperber to tutor her. Sperber was part of the parish, but not
the school.

Chancellor Houghton’s interview notes also provided that the victim went to the rectory
and met Sperber in a room she identified as having lots of books. Sperber rubbed her hand.
Sperger progressed to having the victim remove her shirt. He looked at her breasts and fondled
them. He made her turn around, with her shirt up, so she had her back to him. He touched her
bare back with things she believed to be his finger and/or penis. She heard him make noise and
then she believed he ejaculated on her back. She remembered having to sit all day at school
with the stickiness of something on her back.

The interview notes also established that she begged her mother to remove her from St.
Joan of Arc School. When the new school year began, she tried her best to improve at math.
The principal told her she had to tutor with Sperber again. The victim told the principal that
Sperber touched her in weird ways. The Principal became angry with the victim. The victim
continued telling her that Sperber made her remove her shirt. The principal scolded the victim
and stated, “How dare you make these terrible accusations. You are a demon-child.” The
Principal made the victim’s mother pick her up from school immediately. The victim was placed
in public school. When the victim tried to talk with her mother, her mother replied, “We’re not
going to talk about this. I don’t want anyone thinking that this was our fault.”

579
Summary
Sperber transferred to the Archdiocese of Miami in 1992; however, he was still
considered a priest in the Diocese of Harrisburg. Bishop Nicholas Dattilo wrote the Archbishop
of Miami that Sperber has permission to seek ministry in Miami due to his sick mother. On
September 4, 2000, Sperber wrote a letter to Dattilo, which stated he did not intend to return to
active ministry. Dattilo suspended Sperber in October of 2000.

580
 Reverend Carl J. Steffen

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1930
YEAR OF DEATH: 2015
ORDINATION: May 15, 1958

Employment/Assignment History
6/29/1958-4/09/1959 Assumption Blessed Virgin Mary, Lancaster, PA
5/24/1960 Assistant Director of Youth for Boy Scouts
4/09/1959-6/02/1961 St. Gertrude, Lebanon, PA
6/02/1961-8/09/1963 St. Joan of Arc, Hershey, PA
8/09/1963-6/02/1967 Bishop McDevitt High School, Harrisburg, PA
8/09/1963-6/18/1969 St. Joseph, Shamokin, PA
6/02/1967 Local Director, Shamokin Office Catholic Charities
7/01/1969 Chaplain to the Newman Apostolate for Gettysburg College
1969 “Temporary leave for retreat work,” Gettysburg for weekends
6/18/1969-5/06/1976 St. Francis Xavier, Gettysburg, PA
1/13/1972 Permission reaffirmed for Retreat Apostolate
4/18/1978-2005 (retired) St. Ignatius Loyola, Buchanan Valley, PA

Summary

According to the Diocese of Harrisburg’s file, Diocesan officials learned of sexual abuse
allegations against Father Carl J. Steffen. The first allegation the Diocese knew about was in
May 1966 when Steffen was a Chaplain at a local high school. Father Joseph Hilbert of St.
Francis of Assis wrote a report that stated that Bishop Joseph Daley had been briefed on the
accusations. The following information was obtained from a report written on January 11, 1967.
The report begins with “several complaints from reputable parents” regarding Father Steffen’s
“questionable procedures during interviews of high school boys.” “He was alleged to fondle,
caress and touch them.” Daley ordered Hilbert to speak with Steffen. Hilbert stated Steffen
was in a cold sweat at the end of the interview. Steffen stated that sometimes he sat on a couch
with the boys and gave them a “gesture of friendliness.” Hilbert gave Steffen the following
commands:

1) He cannot use his couch for counseling, but must always have a desk between
himself and a student;

2) Discontinue all face to face confessions “which he had continued in spite of

an explicit warning from Father Shaull during the middle of the year”;

3) He must cease touches and friendly embraces;

581
Summary
4) Confessions were never to be held outside of the confessional;

Diocesan documents revealed that additional individuals also complained of Steffen’s

conduct. He went to high school football practices and patted the boys on their back; Steffen
also showed the same signs of affection reported in May of 1966. Hilbert stated, “I immediately
informed Father Steffen that the boys were misinterpreting his signs of friendliness.” A female
student reported that Steffen spoke to her about masturbation, intercourse and “certain
aberrations of the marital act.” Parents of three other students reported to Hilbert that Steffen
gave children “purity talks.” Steffen was not removed from his position as Chaplain at the high
school until May of 1969.

In 1993, Diocesan documents noted more accusations leveled against Steffen. The
victim stated in high school Steffen asked him about the size of his penis and discussed
masturbation. In 1997, a deacon reported to Hilbert a family left the parish because Steffen
asked their three sons about sex.

In July 2002, the Diocese asked a psychologist to interview the victim from 1993 (who
also made another report in 2002). He stated in 1968, when he was 10 years old, he had his
appendix removed. Steffen went to the hospital and touched his genital area over top of the bed
sheets. The victim stated Steffen discussed masturbation and climaxing. They psychologist
wrote to the Diocese, “a case could readily be made that the priest in question was taking a
parental role in educating these boys to their evolving sexuality.” She stated in her report, “that
it may be expedient for the priest in question to take early retirement.” (underlined in report).

In September 2002, Bishop Dattilo issued a Decree, which provided, “insufficient

evidence exists to suggest that an offense has been committed which is deserving of a penalty.
Father Steffen’s offense seems to have been a violation of prudence rather than an overt offense
of sexual misconduct or abuse.”

Finally, in 2003, a penal precept was issued warning Steffen of his actions. In February
of 2009, Steffen had the faculty for hearing confessions revoked for “consistent pattern of
inappropriate sexual questioning within the sacrament of penance.”

582
 Reverend Frederick Vaughn

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1909
YEAR OF DEATH: 1992
ORDINATION: December 18, 1937

Employment/Assignment History
7/30/1958-8/09/1963 St. Catherine Laboure, Harrisburg, PA
8/09/1963-9/10/1965 St. Joseph, York, PA
9/10/1965-1/08/1971 St. Peter, Elizabethtown, PA
1/08/1971-8/26/1986 St. Mark the Evangelist, Greencastle, PA
1986 Retired

Summary

The following information was obtained from the restricted file for Father Frederick
Joseph Vaughn, born Frederick Joseph Von Hartensten, from the Diocese of Harrisburg. On
April 17, 2002, the Diocese received a letter from a woman who stated Vaughn molested both
of her daughters from about 1961 to about 1966. The abuse started when the daughters were
approximately nine years old. Vaughn fondled the girls’ genitals.

A Diocesan document provided that on July 15, 2002, the Diocese received a letter from
different parents alleging one of their daughters was sexually abused by Vaughn from age three
to age 13. The abuse occurred between 1961 and 1974. The abuse consisted of genital fondling,
as well as vaginal and anal intercourse. The parents’ other daughter was also sexually abused
from age five to age 10. Vaughn’s abuse consisted of genital fondling. The abuse occurred
between 1958 and 1963.

A Diocesan document provided that on July 26, 2004, the Diocese received a call from
another female stating Vaughn abused her around 1958 when she was 11 or 12 years old. She
was in grade school at St. Catherine Laboure at the time. She reported Vaughn pressed himself
up against her body and fondled her from behind. He held her tight to his body and rubbed up
against her.

On August 30, 2004, a parent reported to the Diocese that Vaughn abused her daughter
when she attended St. Catherine Laboure. Vaughn was a constant guest at her home. While at
her home, the mother walked into a room and saw Vaughn with both his hands on her minor
daughter’s breasts, over top of her clothing. Vaughn saw the mother and calmly put his coat on
and left the home. He continued to visit the family at their residence. The mother never told
her husband, nor Diocesan officials of the incident. She reported this caused a rift between her
and her daughter for years.

583
Summary
In May of 2012, a letter was sent to St. Catherine Laboure that stated Vaughn molested
a female from 1959 to 1963. Vaughn fondled the girl underneath her bathing suit while
swimming in nearby Mermaid Lake.

In 2016, a witness and victim spoke with Diocesan officials about an allegation against
another priest and about her own victimization. As an 11 year old girl, Vaughn visited her home
to see her father. If her father was not at home, Vaughn wrestled with her on the floor. One
time, she fought back and he whispered, “I like a fighter.” Vaughn then moaned and made
noises that scared her. She refused to let him back in the home the next time he stopped over.
She stated she witnessed Vaughn grab little girls as young as two years old and Vaughn bounced
the girls on his lap. Vaughn fondled the girls’ breasts while doing this. The victim never spoke
of the abuse. The victim knew of another victim who was fondled while swimming with
Vaughn.

584
 Reverend Salvatore V. Zangari

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1918
YEAR OF DEATH: 2004
ORDINATION: June 3, 1944

Employment/Assignment History
6/09/1944-3/22/1946 St. Patrick, York, PA
3/22/1946-6/20/1951 St. Peter, Mt. Carmel, PA
6/20/1951-11/08/1957 United States Army Chaplain; Industrial School in Camp Hill,
PA
11/08/1957-8/20/1959 Assumption Blessed Virgin Mary, Lebanon, PA
8/20/1959-6/30/1964 Our Lady of Visitation, Shippensburg, PA
6/30/1964-10/10/1969 St. Thomas More, Northumberland, PA
10/10/1969-10/10/1973 St. Ann, Steelton, PA
10/10/1973-12/12/1975 Immaculate Conception Blessed Virgin Mary, Fairfield, PA
12/12/1975-6/12/1986 Moderator, Council of Catholic Women; Permanent Diaconate
Program; St. Peter and Chaplain at Elizabethtown, PA
6/12/1986 Retired

Summary

Multiple allegations of unwanted sexual misconduct between Father Salvatore Zangari

and adult women were reported to the Diocese of Harrisburg in 1980 and in 1986. In 1986, the
Diocese sent Zangari to St. Luke Institute for evaluation. Monsignor Hugh Overbaugh wrote a
memorandum, on June 12, 1986, to Bishop William Keeler that reported the results of Zangari’s
evaluation. The Institute relayed that Zangari reported he was “literally married” for eight or
nine years and had fathered a child.

A Diocesan report provided that in 2002 Diocese of Harrisburg Chancellor Carol

Houghton and Father Mike McFadden met Zangari to inquire about the revelations revealed in
1986 because it had appeared they had never been followed up on. Zangari denied being married
or ever saying he was married. However, he admitted to fathering a child with a former student.
At one time, she was a high school student at St. Mary (Assumption Blessed Virgin Mary).
Zangari stated they reacquainted when she was maybe 18 years old. He gave consent for Bishop
Nicholas Dattilo to receive a full copy of the 1986 evaluation from St. Luke’s.

On December 13, 2002, after reviewing the evaluation report by St. Luke’s, Bishop
Dattilo issued a decree and penal precept stating, “Such admissions on the part of Father
Zangari constitute full proof of his sexual misconduct with minors.” Even though he was retired,
his faculties to perform priestly ministry were removed.

585
586
DIOCESE OF
PITTSBURGH

587
588
Biographical Information

Employment/Assignment History

Summary

589 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

-*5*("5*0/
Summary

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

590
-*5*("5*0/
Summary

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

591
-*5*("5*0/
Summary

592
 Reverend James R. Adams

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1935
YEAR OF DEATH: 2011
ORDINATION: May 4, 1963

Employment/Assignment History
5/1963-2/1966 St. Francis Xavier, Pittsburgh, PA
2/1966-8/1966 St. Peter, McKeesport, PA
8/1966-5/1972 St. Raphael, Morningside, PA
5/1972-10/1977 St. Francis of Assisi, Finleyville, PA
10/1977-9/1979 Resurrection, West Mifflin, PA
9/1979-10/1992 St. Isaac Jogues, Elrama, PA
6/17/85-11/19/85 Leave of Absence
10/4/1992-3/31/93 Leave of Absence
3/31/1993-3/1/2003 Leave of Absence
3/1/2003 Withdrew/Dismissed from Ministry

Summary

On July 24, 1992, then-Father David Zubik had a telephone conversation with a young
man who accused Father James R. Adams of sexually assaulting him in the 1970’s when the
victim was between eight and 12 years old and a member of St. Francis of Assisi. The victim
said that Adams had touched his genitals while the victim was fully clothed on at least two
occasions, both times, while Adams was driving the victim and other boys to outings. The victim
and the other boys discussed that Adams was “strange” and fought over where to be seated in
his vehicle because no one wanted to sit next to him. The victim indicated that Adams had done
this to other pre-adolescent boys as well.

In light of the allegation, Adams’ ministerial faculties were withdrawn and he was sent
to St. Michael’s Community in St. Louis, Missouri for evaluation and treatment. Adams left
before completing the program.

In January 2003, his faculties were withdrawn and he was permanently removed from
ecclesiastical ministry, referencing the publication of Charter for the Protection of Children and
Young People.

593
 Reverend James L. Armstrong

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1950
YEAR OF DEATH: 2012
ORDINATION: October 1, 1977

Employment/Assignment History
10/13/1977 – 7/07/1982 St. Elizabeth of Hungary, Pittsburgh, PA
7/08/1982 – 6/02/1985 St. Francis Xavier, Pittsburgh, PA
6/03/1985 – 6/21/1989 Resurrection, West Mifflin, PA
6/21/1989 – 2/20/1990 St. Ursula, Allison Park, PA
7/23/1990 – 6/27/1991 Holy Sepulcher, Butler, PA
6/27/1991 – 12/27/1991 Leave of Absence
10/24/1992 – 8/02/1999 St. Paul, Butler, PA
8/02/1999 – 7/23/2007 Newman Center, Slippery Rock, PA
8/02/1999 – 7/23/2007 St. Peter, Slippery Rock, PA
7/24/2007 Administrative Leave

Summary

According to a “File Synopsis” contained in records subpoenaed from the Diocese of

Pittsburgh, a file was opened on Father James Armstrong on February 16, 1990. That synopsis
and attached documents reflected that there was an allegation that Armstrong gave homeless
boys from Pittsburgh drugs, alcohol, and money in exchange for sex.

In May 1991, Armstrong was sent to St. Luke Institute in Maryland for evaluation.
Residential treatment was recommended and the Diocese placed Armstrong on administrative
leave. Armstrong was granted a leave of absence for health reasons on June 27, 1991. He was
admitted to St. Michael Center in St. Louis for residential treatment in July of 1991 and was
discharged on December 27, 1991. He completed his aftercare program in December, 1993.

A confidential memorandum authored by Rita Flaherty, Diocesan Assistance

Coordinator, indicated that a victim contacted the Diocese on September 30, 2009 and requested
counseling. He reported that he had been abused by several priests in the course of his life,
including a priest whom he knew as “Father Tom.” The male stated that his father was a heroin
addict and his mother was a prostitute. He eventually ran away from home and became a “street
kid.” He said he was struggling to put the pieces of his abuse together. Flaherty asked the male
to put his allegation in writing to the best of his ability.

The male’s therapist subsequently indicated that he was sure that something happened
to the male; that the names, places, and other information was very specific. The therapist

594
Summary
advised that the incidents invovlved “sex for pay” and occurred when the male was 14 to 15
years old.

Within the Diocesan records was a letter dated August 3, 2011 informing Armstrong of
the sexual abuse allegations against him. The letter that the victim wrote to the Diocese dated
January 22, 2010 was attached and referred to Armstrong as “Father Tom.” The victim indicated
that he was introduced to him when he was 16 years old in the winter of 1985-86.

According to the victim, Armstrong would drive him [the victim] and a “hustler” far out
Route 28 to Route 8, the Red Belt, toward Shaler Township up a winding road, always late night
around 11:00 PM to midnight. In his letter, the victim wrote that Father Tom had them do
various violent sex acts like calling him degrading things while he gave them oral sex. They
beat his body, slapped his face, and spanked him too. This lasted for a couple of years.

In the period following his placement on administrative leave, there was correspondence
between Armstrong and the Diocese for approximately four years, until 2011, which reflected
he was still receiving treatment in Maryland. Armstrong died in 2012.

595
 Reverend John M. Bauer

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1947
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 5, 1973

Employment/Assignment History
5/22/1973-10/02/1978 Parochial Vicar, St. Joan of Arc, South Hills, PA
10/02/1978-1/17/1988 Parochial Vicar, Immaculate Conception,
Washington, PA
6/17/1988-6/27/1994 Pastor, Immaculate Conception, Washington, PA
6/27/1994-2/18/1998 Pastor, Good Samaritan, Ambridge, PA
2/18/1998-1/20/1999 Leave of Absence
1/20/1999-6/04/2006 Administrator, Our Lady of Consolation,
Carmichaels, PA
1/20/1999-present Pastor, St. Hugh, Carmichaels, PA
6/04/2006-present Pastor, Our Lady of Consolation, Carmichaels, PA

Summary

Documents subpoenaed from the Diocese of Pittsburgh revealed that an allegation of

sexual abuse by Father John Bauer first surfaced when it was included in another complaint that
was lodged against Father Michael Romero.

A memorandum to the file dated October 13, 2013 from Rita Flaherty, Diocesan
Assistance Coordinator, indicated that, during a telephone conversation with the male, he told
her that Romero and Bauer would provide him alcohol and encourage him to drink it. He stated
that he has suffered with alcoholism for years while he was trying to suppress the memories of
sexual abuse as a minor child. He stated that he attributes the majority of his problems with
alcohol to his early exposure to alcohol by Romero and Bauer.

This memorandum also stated that Romero and Bauer would engage him and the other
young boys in conversation about masturbation a lot. The male stated that he remembers Bauer
taking him to a wrestling tournament on Columbus, Ohio along with two other students. They
were all drinking alcohol as they drove.

The victim reported that Bauer would “wrestle” with him but maintained that there was
no genital contact. He found this to be strange that Bauer would want to wrestle with all the
boys since he was not a wrestling coach or was not really involved in the wrestling program.

The victim asked for assistance with counseling to help him deal with his repressed
issues of sexual abuse. Flaherty told him that she would contact her counterpart in Florida, where
596
Summary
the victim was living, and would forward some referral information to him. Flaherty also asked
him to make a written statement and told him that she would be obligated to share this
information with the Washington County District Attorney’s Office.

On October 17, 2013, Flaherty sent a follow up e-mail to the victim, providing him with
contact information for a local counselor. She also asked him to make a written statement
outlining his allegations because the Diocese wanted want to follow up with Bauer and would
like to have the written statement to discuss with him.

In a memorandum to the file dated October 17, 2013, Flaherty outlined a meeting that
she, Bishop William Waltersheild, Father Mark Eckman had with Bauer to address the
allegations. Bauer stated that he recalled the victim and that he remembered him as one of the
young boys who would work out in the “wrestling room.” Bauer said he remembered wrestling
with some of the boys on occasion in the “wrestling room.” Bauer stated he would often “join
them” since he enjoyed doing a good workout.

Bauer was specifically asked about the trip when he took three young boys to Columbus,
Ohio and provided them alcohol. Bauer initially denied taking this trip but then then recalled
this trip did occur. Bauer denied providing the boys alcohol in their car ride and suggested that
maybe they had their own alcohol that they were drinking but he was unaware of that happening.
Bauer also suggested that the victim may have mistaken him for the deceased Romero who was
also assigned to the parish at the same time. Bauer stated that some of the boys would ask him
to provide them alcohol but that he never did.

The victim’s allegation was forwarded to the Washington County District Attorney’s
office on August 5, 2014.

597
 Reverend John E. Brueckner

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1915
YEAR OF DEATH: 1960
ORDINATION: June 16, 1940

Employment/Assignment History
2/20/1940 – 9/6/1944 Immaculate Conception, Pittsburgh, PA
9/7/1944 – 9/11/1947 St. Joseph, New Kensington, PA
9/11/1947 – 4/6/1949 St. Mary and New Castle Hospital, New Castle, PA
4/7/1949 – 11/7/1951 St. Mary, Beaver Falls, PA
11/ 8/1951 – 6/13/1956 St. Lawrence, Pittsburgh, PA
6/14/1956 – 5/27/1959 Annunciation, North Side, PA
5/23/1959 – 10/2/1960 St. Luke, Carnegie, PA

Summary

The Diocesan records contained a memorandum dated May, 4, 2016 that was written by
Father William J. Waltersheid. He reported that a woman had contacted the Diocese of
Greensburg to report that her husband suffered abuse at the hand of a Catholic priest when he
was only a child. Prior to the creation of the Diocese of Greensburg on March 10, 1951, the
parishes in Armstrong, Fayette, Indiana, and Westmoreland counties were encompassed by the
Diocese of Pittsburgh.

According to the memorandum, the woman stated that in 2002 her husband informed
her that he had been abused by a priest from St. Joseph sometime between the years of 1947 and
1951. He stated that the abuse occurred in the priest’s car after they saw a baseball game
together. She could not recall the name of the priest who abused her husband.

A search of Diocesan records revealed that Father Brueckner and Father Stewart were
assigned to St. Joseph during this time period.

On May 6, 2016, the Diocese sent a confidential memorandum to the Westmoreland

County District Attorney’s Office, reporting that sometime between 1947 and 1951, a catholic
priest stationed at St. Joseph Church abused a boy “just going into puberty.” The memorandum
provided a list of priests who were assigned to St. Joseph. Brueckner and Stewart’s names were
contained on the list. The letter also mentioned a May 3, 2016 e-mail communication that had
previously been sent to the District Attorney’s Office. However, the Diocesan files do not
contain a copy of this e-mail.

598
Summary
It does not appear that the Diocese of Pittsburgh took any further action in connection
with the allegation.

599
 Reverend Leo Burchianti

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1939
YEAR OF DEATH: 2013
ORDINATION: 1964

Employment/Assignment History
5/27/1964-8/21/1966 St. Joseph, Natrona, PA
8/22/1966-6/09/1968 Immaculate Conception, Bloomfield, PA
6/10/1968-5/21/1973 Our Lady of Grace, Scott Township, PA
5/22/1973-1/24/1979 St. James, Sewickley, PA
1/25/1979-11/21/1980 St. Philip Neri, Donora, PA
11/22/1980-2/12/1981 Leave of Absence, health reasons
2/13/1981-12/03/1981 St. Rosalia, Greenfield, PA
12/04/1981-4/12/1993 St. Joseph, West Aliquippa, PA
4/12/1993-1/30/1995 Leave of Absence, health reasons/administrative
1/30/1995 Retired
1/31/2003 Withdrew from ministry

Summary

Records subpoenaed from the Diocese of Pittsburgh, including a confidential

memorandum dated May 10, 2012, medical records, and victim files, reflected that from
approximately 1967 to 1993, Father Leo Burchianti was alleged to have had inappropriate
contact with at least eight young boys. These allegations included but were not limited to
Burchianti: having anal or oral sex with them; inappropriately touching them; making suggestive
comments to them; providing alcohol to them; allowing them to use drugs in the rectory; and
inviting some to stay overnight to sleep in his bed with him.

In February/March 1979, a minor boy was asked by Burchianti to go over to the parish
house by himself. While there, the boy was given alcohol by Burchianti and told by Burchianti
that “he gets very horny after one beer.” Burchianti also stated, “Love the one you’re with, if
you’re not with the one you love, and since you are not with the one you love (your girlfriend),
he should love the one he was with.” Burchianti then dimmed the lights in the room. A fuse
then blew and the boy used this opportunity to leave the room very quickly. As he was leaving,
he received the impression that Burchianti was going to kiss him, but Burchianti did not.

In the summer of 1979, another minor boy was given alcohol by Burchianti and on two
distinct occasions, was told by Burchianti that he “wanted to rape” the boy. In September 1979,
while the boy was at the rectory doing work for Burchianti, Burchianti attempted to go into the
bathroom with the boy. He later placed his hand under the elastic in the boy’s shorts. When he

600
Summary
told Burchianti not to tickle him, Burchianti responded, “I’m not trying to tickle you, I’m trying
to grab for something.” The boy quickly left.

In January 1980, another minor boy was having personal issues and was persuaded to
talk to his parish priest. It was agreed that he would talk to Burchianti and spend the night at
the rectory with him. While in Burchianti’s room, he saw a picture of a young boy,
approximately 17 years old. Burchianti pointed to the picture and said, “You see that young boy,
he is making $20.00 to $25.00 a hit and you could be too.” Burchianti then stated that he had
pornographic films and he could show them to the boy. As they both got ready for bed and
undressed to their underwear, Burchianti sat next to the boy on the bed and grabbed at the boy’s
genital area. The boy hit Burchianti and Burchianti made the boy promise to not tell his mother.
The boy then got into the bed and Burchianti got in beside him. The boy immediately got out
of the bed and slept on the couch. The next morning, Burchianti asked the boy if it would help
him if Burchianti made love to him. The boy, in response, twisted Burchianti’s arm behind his
back and told him not to try anything ever again.

On several unknown occasions in 1979/1980, another minor boy was involved in a

number of incidents with Burchianti. On one occasion, Burchianti offered to watch “films” of
guys or girls with him, but Burchianti noted that he preferred to watch guys. On another
occasion, Burchianti stated “you could have just as much fun with a man as with a woman” and
then asked the boy, “you mean to tell me you wouldn’t take a blowjob from a guy?” Burchianti
then told the boy that he would like to kiss him. On another occasion, Burchianti told the boy
that he was his “secret admirer” and that he “wanted to rape him.” The boy reported that
Burchianti provided him alcohol several times.

In the early 1980s, a 12-year-old boy alleged that he was kissed and groped numerous
times by Burchianti, while Burchianti was assigned to St. Joseph.

It should be noted that on October 26, 1980, Burchianti admitted to all of these
allegations except the “ones concerning abuse.”

In 1985, a mother of a minor boy informed Father Nicholas Dattilo that Burchianti had
made sexual advances toward her son in 1977. Burchianti reportedly told her son that they
should go to bed together. The boy told his mother about this incident in 1982.

In November 28, 1990, a 30-year-old adult male (hereinafter referred to as John Doe 1)
confronted Burchianti at his home about being sexually abused by him when the male was 14
years old. John Doe 1 was encouraged by his therapist to meet with Burchianti to obtain closure
and so that he could be assured that Burchianti was receiving therapy for his “problem.”
Burchianti assured John Doe 1 that he was receiving therapy. According to John Doe 1, the
sexual abuse included Burchianti providing and receiving oral sex from him for a period of a
year and a half starting in approximately 1974. During this time, Burchianti was assigned to St.
Joseph.

601
Summary
On November 29, 1990, Father Theodore Rutkowski included a handwritten letter in
Burchianti’s file. That letter concerned his conversation with Burchianti about Burchianti’s
meeting with John Doe 1 the night before. Rutkowski stated at the end of his letter that:

Besides the usual assurances of our support, I advised . . . Burchianti that,

legally, the statute of limitations had long since expired and that he should direct
all contact from [John Doe 1’s] family to me [Rutkowski].”

Nothing more was done at the time.

On April 6, 1993, then-Father David Zubik and Father Robert Guay met with another
victim (hereinafter referred to as John Doe 2) who stated that from the ages of 13/14 (from
approximately 1976 or 1977) to age 21, he had engaged in oral and anal sex with Burchianti.
John Doe 2 was initially referred to Burchianti by his father to discuss John Doe 2 having been
being sodomized by another young boy. John Doe 2 stated that the abuse with Burchianti
occurred approximately 200-300 times while Burchianti was assigned to St. Philip’s in Donora
and then approximately 20-30 times while Burchianti was at St. Joseph. John Doe 2 stated that
he was coming forward now with the allegations because he saw Burchianti recently and it
caused these memories to resurface.

On April 12, 1993, Zubik and Guay met with Burchianti to inform Burchianti of the
allegations made by John Doe 2. Burchianti admitted to having had a sexual relationship with
him over the years, but disputed the number of times it occurred. As a result of the meeting,
Burchianti resigned as pastor of St. Joseph, effective immediately and then requested a leave of
absence for health reasons. On April 13, 1993, Burchianti was admitted to St. Francis Hospital.
On May 6, 1993, Burchianti was admitted to St. Michael’s for assessment and treatment

Ultimately, on March 18, 1994, a signed settlement agreement for $15,000 was reached
between the Diocese and John Doe 2.

On April 16, 1994, Burchianti asked the Assessment Board and Clergy Task Force to
consider his request for reassignment. On August 29, 1994, the report of the Ministerial
Assessment Board unanimously recommended that Burchianti not be given any assignment in
the diocese. On September 22, 1994, Burchianti asked Bishop Wuerl to be reassigned
somewhere within the diocese. On September 29, 1994, Bishop Wuerl informed Burchianti that
given the recommendation of both the Assessment Board and the Clergy Task Force, his request
would not be granted and no assignment would be given to him. On October 18, 1994,
Burchianti requested early retirement “for reasons of health,” which was ultimately approved.

On October 27, 1994, Zubik sent a letter to Bishop Donald Wuerl which referred to
“Retirement Request: Reverend Leo R. Burchianti” The letter stated:

Attached you will find a draft letter granting Father Leo Burchianti early
retirement from active ministry for reasons of health. I purposely did not indicate
any reference to the possible arrangements for his work with the retired priests

602
Summary
at St. John Vianney Manor nor his residence there. In light of the
recommendation made by the Assessment Board, I feared this might appear to
be an assignment. Because I indicated a reference in the letter to being in contact
with me, I feel it would be better to work out the details of his work and residence
at St. John Vianney with both Father Burchianti and Sister Joyce. If you feel the
letter needs to be more explicit in this regard, I will make the appropriate
changes.

Burchianti began residing at St. John Vianney Manor on February 1, 1995 and remained
there until at least 2012.

On January 16, 2003, Father Young wrote to Burchianti, informing him that with the
publication of the Charter for the Protection of Children and Young People by the United States
Conference of Catholic Bishops, and with the approval by the Holy See of the Essential Norms
for Diocesan/Eparchial Policies Dealing with Allegations of Sexual Abuse of Minors by Priests
or Deacons, he was being permanently removed from ecclesiastical ministry. Young also told
Burchianti, “Given this significant development, I would ask that you write Bishop Wuerl
indicating that you are withdrawing from priestly ministry.”

On September 21, 2007, John Doe 1 met with Rita Flaherty, Diocesan Assistance
Coordinator, regarding the sexual abuse he endured by Burchianti, which was discussed above.
He told Flaherty of the sexual abuse that occurred when he was in seventh and eight grades and
that these assaults occurred in the rectory, in Burchianti’s room and car. Joe Doe 1 also recalled
being taken to the seminary pool during this time frame, where he would see other boys from
his class. These boys came to the pool with Father Bob Castelucci and Father Rudy Smoley,
friends of Burchianti. He stated that the “priests would make statements to each other, bragging
about the boy that each of them brought.”

On September 25, 2007, Father David Bonnar, Father John Rushofsky and Flaherty, met
with Burchianti to discuss the allegations. During this meeting, Burchianti admitted to sexual
contact with John Doe 1 and “wished he could erase his past.” Burchianti also admitted to being
“sexually involved with [John Doe 1’s] mother for 6-8 months” and that he along with
Castelucci and Smoley, would take young boys to the seminary pool and brag to one another
about them.

On June 10, 2008, the Diocese provided John Doe 1 with for $24,000 for counseling he
was receiving as a result of this abuse.

During his tenure as a priest, Burchianti appears to have been evaluated and treated at
St. Luke’s and/or St. Michael’s Institute on at least three separate occasions in 1989, 1993 and
2012 for “inappropriate relationships with male minors.” Burchianti died in 2013.

603
 Reverend Robert Castelucci

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1938
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 9, 1964

Employment/Assignment History
5/27/1964-3/07/1965 St. Rosalia, Greenfield, PA
5/08/1965-5/21/1973 St. Joseph, Coraopolis, PA
5/08/1965-5/21/1973 St. Martha, Groveton, PA
5/22/1973-5/29/1974 St. Patrick, Canonsburg, PA
5/30/1974-6/29/1981 St. Mary of Mt. Carmel, Braddock, PA
6/30/1981-12/09/1994 St. Lawrence, Hillsville, PA
12/09/1994-7/27/1999 Leave of Absence
7/28/1999-3/25/2002 Administrative Leave
3/25/2002 Withdrew from active ministry

Summary

Documents obtained by subpoena from the Diocese of Pittsburgh show that Father
Robert Castelucci is alleged to have engaged in inappropriate sexual conduct with several
minors throughout his active ministry. The Diocese determined the allegations to be credible
based on one victim’s knowledge of Castelucci’s anatomy, and Castelucci’s psychological
evaluation at St. Luke Institute. Despite having knowledge since 1994 of Castelucci’s sexual
abuse of children, the Diocese did not remove him from ministry, instead initially allowing him
to take a leave of absence for personal reasons. Eventually, they requested Castelucci to
voluntarily withdraw from the active priestly ministry in March 2002.

The first victim met with Fathers Robert Guay, David Zubik, Joseph Karabin and Rita
Flaherty, Diocesan Assistance Coordinator on October 27, 1994. The victim stated that
Castelucci molested him at the St. Mary rectory and in Castelucci’s car. The victim said the
abuse occurred from age 13 or 14 until age 17 in the 1970’s. The victim alleged that sexual
activity with Castelucci included masturbation, oral sex and one attempt at anal sex. He stated
that he was a “troubled” youth at the time of the abuse. He reported that Castelucci gave him
money and cigarettes.

The victim initially sent a letter to Castelucci on October 22, 1994, and wanted to speak
with Castelucci regarding the abuse. In that letter, the victim stated, “I was 13 or 14 when you
talked me into masturbation parties only to offer me money later.” According to a letter written
by Bishop Donald Wuerl to the Vatican on May 6, 2005, after the victim confronted him,
Castelucci reportedly called the victim and stated

604
Summary
not to get diocesan officials involved in the matter, and told [the victim] that he
would never have gotten sexually involved with him had he known how much
difficulty it would have caused him.

Castelucci also allegedly reminded the victim that he was “a messed up young man already
when he had met him.”

The Diocese determined the allegation was credible due to the victim having detailed
knowledge of Castelucci’s anatomy. Based on the information available, it does not appear that
the Diocese notified law enforcement of the allegations. The victim eventually filed a civil
lawsuit along with 32 other individuals, which resulted in a $1.25 million settlement in October
2007. Diocesan records revealed that this victim signed a “Settlement Agreement and Release”
document on October 3, 2007. The Diocese later forwarded three checks to the victim’s
therapist: One in 2008 for $1,130; one in 2010 for $1,820; and one in 2011 for $,1620.

Information about an additional victim was contained in materials obtained from the
Diocese pursuant to subpoena. This additional victim appears to be a brother of the first victim.
According to the civil lawsuit documents, this victim “was a minor child approximately eight
(8) years old when he was first sexually abused by Father Robert Castelucci.” Based on the
victim’s date of birth and his approximate age, the abuse would have occurred in approximately
1978. It does not appear that the Diocese provided any further information regarding this victim
or his alleged abuse. This victim also signed a “Settlement Agreement and Release” document
on October 3, 2007.

In October 1994, Castelucci reluctantly agreed to go to St. Luke Institute for a

psychological evaluation. According to a document entitled, “Reverend Robert Castelucci –
Confidential File Chronological Review,” St. Luke Institute recommended that Castelucci
undergo testify to determine, inter alia, “to what degree this includes sexual attraction to
adolescents.” According to a letter in Castelucci’s file from Bishop Wuerl dated February 28,
1996, Castelucci was unwilling to accept the recommendation for inpatient treatment, instead
citing that he needed to take care of his ailing mother. Castelucci requested three extensions of
his personal leave of absence. In May 1999, Castelucci requested an early retirement, which
Wuerl “did not grant since he did not meet the requirements in place for such a request.”

Shortly after Castelucci requested an early retirement, the Diocese received information
in July 1999 regarding an allegation that Castelucci had given a 17-year-old male a pornographic
video, and performed oral sex on him. This third victim lived in Ohio where Castelucci moved
after he took an extended leave of absence to care for his sick mother. Castelucci was placed on
administrative leave. The Diocese reached out to the victim’s family regarding assistance with
counseling. According to the Diocese, they never received a response from the victim’s family.
In February 2000, Castelucci notified the Diocese that “the authorities of Columbiana County,
Ohio had decided not to press any charges against him.”

According to a memorandum dated February 12, 2002, a fourth victim met with
Diocesan officials to report a sexual conduct allegation against Castelucci. The victim alleged

605
Summary
that the abuse occurred while he employed as an organist at St. Mary, beginning in May or June
1974, when he was approximately 17 years old. The victim stated that almost immediately upon
his arrival, he began to experience “touchy feely” behavior from Castelucci. He said that
Castelucci would come up behind him, grab him, and put his hands down his pants. He would
also attempt to kiss him.

The victim recalled that in July 1974, Castelucci offered him alcohol in the rectory living
room. Castelucci came over to him and began to caress his legs, shoulders and chest, eventually
performed oral sex on him. These incidents occurred off and on while the victim was employed
at Mt. Carmel, ending in June 1977. He also recalled an incident where he stayed in the rectory
to watch Castelucci’s dogs while he was out. Castelucci returned around two in the morning,
and suggested that the victim stay the night. He agreed to stay in the guest room, but Castelucci
came into the room several times during the night to “bother him.” The memorandum does not
detail what “bother” involved.

The victim further stated that there were multiple times that he told Castelucci he wanted
the sexual activity to stop, but Castelucci made it known that sexual activity was expected as a
condition for employment. The victim recalled, “Father Castelucci saying on more than one
occasion that ‘this is why I hired you’ or ‘you can just leave your keys then.’” The victim
mentioned that he was paid by check for playing the organ but was also given cash.

The victim also said that his friend (the first victim mentioned in this report) told him
that Castelucci abused him. He also mentioned another young male who lived in the rectory for
two months until he eventually grew tired of the sexual arrangement and moved out. According
to the victim, this male “had a suspect background and who implied to (victim’s name) that his
living arrangement was in exchange for sexual favors provided to Father Castelucci.”

The victim recalled nearly walking in on Castelucci and another unknown boy as they
were about to engage in some type of sexual activity. The victim did not know the identity of
this boy. Finally, the victim said that Burchianti would frequently visit St. Mary along with a
“TOR priest” named “John,” and both were also “touchy feely with him.” (See narrative
regarding Leonard Burchianti in this report for further information regarding sexual abuse
allegations against him.)

Diocesan officials offered counselling which the victim declined. They then advised the
victim that if he became aware of other individuals who have been harmed by Castelucci he
should direct them to the clergy office so assistance can be offered to them.

In March 2002, after the fourth victim’s allegation, Diocesan officials met with
Castelucci and indicated that it was in his best interest to voluntarily withdraw from ministry
rather than be subjected to a canonical process. On March 25, 2002, Castelucci submitted a
handwritten letter to Bishop Wuerl withdrawing from active ministry. On the same date,
Castelucci sent a second letter to Bishop Wuerl which denied all allegations against him.

606
Summary
A fifth victim sent an allegation to the Diocese in October 2002. The victim claimed that
in the 1970’s when he was a 12 or 13-year-old altar boy, Castelucci had asked his mother if he
could stay overnight at the St. Joseph rectory. According to the victim, his mother readily agreed
since his father was no longer around. She wanted him to spend time with a man, particularly a
priest for a positive role model. The victim had heard from other altar boys that Castelucci had
“dirty movies” that some of the boys watched. During the overnight stay, the victim asked to see
Castelucci’s “dirty movies.” Castelucci allegedly responded, “he [the vicimt] would have to
allow Father Castelucci to put his hand in a ‘dirty place’ on [victim’s name] before he would
show him a movie.” According to the victim, he declined. However, the victim stated that he
awoke to Castelucci masturbating him while the two of them slept in the same bed. The victim
also stated that he remembered “seeing Father Castelucci standing by the window in the room
and saying, ‘What have I done[?]’”

The Diocese offered to assist with the victim’s counseling costs, which he initially
declined. However, he called in November 2002 to accept the offer. On November 22, 2002, the
Diocese issued two checks: One to the victim totaling $2,550 and the other to the provider of
the therapy the victim was receiving (Clover Psychological Assoc.) for $494. The Diocese noted
that the victim’s allegation were credible, and the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office
was allegedly notified. However, it does not appear that there were any documents with the
victim’s actual name in the file containing the written allegation.

Father David Bonnar and Flaherty, wrote to Castelucci on February 10, 2009 to explain
the Charter for the Protection of Children and Young People promulgated in 2002. Bonnar and
Flaherty reassured Castelucci, “Please understand that all of these allegations are past the
current Statute of Limitations and therefore time barred.”

Another victim called Flaherty in May 2011 to report sex abuse by Castelucci at St. Mary
when he was 15 or 16 in the late-1970s. The victim would not go into much detail, but stated
that the alleged incident happened once when he was alone with Castelucci. The victim
remembered that Castelucci took him to see an “X” rated movie. On another occasion when the
same victim spoke with Flaherty, the victim’s friend, who had also been molested, was present.
The victim mentioned that he did not believe that his friend was inclined to come forward
because he was mentally slow. Flaherty told the victim that the Diocese would be happy to help
his friend if he decided to come forward.

In January 2015, Flaherty sent a letter to the victim’s former therapist which indicated
that the Diocese was moving towards a more time-limited approach to the therapy they would
cover. The Diocese would offer a limitation of three years or 90 sessions for alleged victims. In
this victim’s file there were three photocopied checks made out to the victim’s counselor in the
amounts of $190, $814 and $1,447 for therapy. An allegation with the victim’s name was sent
to the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office on December 5, 2012.

607
 Reverend Mauro James Cautela

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1948
YEAR OF DEATH: 2005
ORDINATION: May 4, 1974

Employment/Assignment History
5/1974-5/1979 Our Lady of Joy, Pittsburgh, PA
6/1979-8/1983 St. Vitus, New Castle, PA
8/1983-5/1984 St. James, Sewickley, PA
5/1984-1/1989 Mother of Good Counsel, Pittsburgh, PA
1/1989-10/1992 St. Norbert, Pittsburgh, PA
10/1992-2/2000 Purification of the Blessed Virgin Mary, Ellwood City, PA
7/1998-2-2000 St. Agatha, Ellwood City, PA
2/2000-8/2005 Holy Redeemer, Ellwood City, PA

Summary

According to records subpoenaed from the Diocese of Pittsburgh, Father Mauro Cautela
was alleged to have inappropriately touched three young boys during the times that he
respectively served as pastor of Our Lady of Joy, St. Norbert, Purification of the Blessed Virgin
Mary, and Holy Redeemer. Additionally, Cautela is alleged to have used church donations and
other funds to further some of his relationships with young boys as well as to purchase
homosexual pornography on church computers.

In a confidential memorandum dated August 9, 2006, Rita Flaherty, Diocesan Assistance

Coordinator, detailed a telephone call she had with an adult male who reported that Cautela had
abused him. He stated that between 1975 and 1981, when he was about 14 years of age, Cautela
molested him multiple times while on church property and at Bear Lake in Seven Springs. The
victim alleged that he was provided alcohol on some occasions as well. The victim reportedly
brought these allegations up directly to Cautela in a voice-mail message in November 2003.
Cautela claimed that the victim asked for $20,000 in exchange for not exposing him as a
pedophile. Cautela claimed that he deleted the message because he was upset by the allegation
but reported the voicemail to Father James Young. Young said that the allegations had been
forwarded to the Lawrence County District Attorney’s Office. The records revealed that an
Ellwood City Police Officer advised that a case number was never assigned to the matter out of
respect for Cautela.

On July 7, 2005, Flaherty prepared a confidential memorandum regarding a telephone

call she received from an attorney concerning possible sex abuse allegations against Cautela.

608
Summary
Flaherty indicated that she and other representatives would want to meet with this potential
victim.

On August 17, 2005, Diocesan officials met with the victim about whom the attorney
had called on July 7, 2005 and his parents. This adult male alleged that Cautela sexually abused
him between 1998 and 2005 when he was between 12 and 19 years old. He explained that
Cautela had befriended him during a very difficult time in his life, He reported that he was
inappropriately touched repeatedly by Cautela. This victim said that Cautela first encouraged
him to begin lifting weights at a nearby gym. There Cautela would “massage” the boy to keep
him loose, touching around his body including his upper buttocks and upper leg. While lifting
weights, Cautela constantly touched the boy’s muscles commenting how much progress he was
making. The victim also reported that on two different trips to Hilton Head, Cautela set up
lodging to have the victim share a room and a bed with him. On one such occasion, the victim
reported that Cautela began rubbing him down as he often did but ran his hands into the waistline
of his shorts touching the top of his buttocks. The victim also reported that while on these trips
Cautela was very insistent on applying sunscreen to the victim, partially exposing his buttocks
in one instance while doing so. The victim further alleged that after he had suffered a staph
infection, Cautela insisted on checking the boy for other abscesses on his leg. While pulling up
his pant leg the victim incidentally revealed his scrotum to Cautela. After a football injury, the
victim reported that Cautela came over his house while his parents were not home. Cautela
began rubbing his leg, eventually sliding his hand up his shorts and further rubbing his groin.

The victim alleged that there were other males that Cautela was “helping” lift weights,
massaging them in the same way as him. On August 23, 2005, he sent a 10-page letter to the
Diocese in which he detailed his abuse.

The victim claimed that Cautela had purchased weight sets, a gym membership, a
necklace, and a celllar telephone for him, gave the victim his car and paid for the insurance.

After the allegations were made, Cautela resigned from his position as pastor in August
2005 and was placed on administrative leave by the Diocese shortly thereafter in the same
month. The Diocese advised the victim and his family that the allegations were forwarded to the
Lawrence County District Attorney’s Office.

On August 23, 2005, Trooper Janice Wilson of the Pennsylvania State Police (“PSP”)
took the initial information from the victim, and ultimately wrote a 24-page report of
investigation detailing the abuse. The report of investigation included a number of allegations
previously detailed above. Wilson noted the following in the narrative of the report:

x In the fall of 1998 when the victim was approximately 12 years

old, Cautela and the victim developed a close, friendly
relationship after Cautela suggested that the victim begin lifting

609
Summary
weights as a form of discipline while his parents went through a
divorce.

x Prior to working out, Cautela massaged the victim’s

thighs and buttocks to “loosen” the victim.

x Cautela exposed the victim to homosexual pornography.

x In the summer of 1999, the victim began to work at the rectory

(unspecified) on a volunteer basis.

x Cautela requested the victim’s help with one of the computers,

and had the victim sit on his lap while he worked. Cautela would
then massage the victim’s legs, arms, shoulders, back, neck and
buttocks.

x When the victim turned 14 in 2000, Cautela provided the victim

alcohol and gave him two fifty dollar bills for his birthday.

x The victim noted that Cautela would never give the victim
gifts in front of anyone else.

x In August of 2001, Cautela took the victim and two additional

minors to Hilton Head, South Carolina.

x Prior to the trip, Cautela promised the victim that he

would have his own room, however when they got to the
condominium, they had to share a king size bed.

x When the victim went to sleep in the same bed as Cautela,

he began to rub the victim’s back and proceeded to fondle
the victim’s genitals and buttocks under the victim’s
underwear.

x The victim claims to have left, and slept on the couch for
the remainder of the trip.

x In the fall of 2001, the victim injured his leg, and “Cautela would
rub his leg, continuing up under his shorts, and rubbing his
groin”

x The victim noted that Cautela had an extensive amount of

homosexual pornography on his computer in the rectory, and
would often have the victim delete Cautela’s internet history.

610
Summary

x On August 25, 2005, the New Castle Police Department received

a complaint of unauthorized dumping in their dumpster. The trash
contained VHS tapes and DVDs of nude wrestling and
homosexual pornography, at least 23 envelopes addressed to
Cautela and a framed photograph of the victim and his two
siblings.

In addition, Wilson contacted an individual regarding his two sons. According to the
father, his two sons did not want to speak with the trooper, stating:

he could see no advantage to his sons to speak with me. He stated that what
happened was thirteen or fourteen years ago, and they didn’t want to talk about
it.

Wilson also interviewed the first victim, mentioned above. According to the first victim,
Cautela took him and a friend to a cabin that belonged to a friend of Cautela’s at Bear Lake near
Seven Springs. All three of them slept in the same bed because the other room was “mice
infested.” The victim stated that Cautela provided them beer. When they went to bed, the victim
reported that Cautela “pulled his shorts aside and was performing oral sex on [the victim].” The
victim then rolled over, pretended to wake up and went to sleep on a lounger in the room.

Wilson also interviewed the cook/housekeeper of the St. Agatha rectory regarding
Cautela. The housekeeper stated that Cautela “often had young men up in his room even though
that was against the rules.” According to the housekeeper, Cautela told her that the young men
needed to use his computer. The housekeeper also noted that the young man noted above
frequently came to the rectory in 1998 and/or 1999.

Based on Wilson’s report, PSP noted three potential charges: Endangering the welfare
of children; corruption of minors; and indecent assault.

Between October and November 2005, Cautela wrote letters to the Diocese requesting
that it postpone both his evaluation at St. Luke Institute and the Diocesan Review Board process.
The Diocese accepted the proposal to defer the church-based proceedings.

According to Wilson, on December 9, 2005, the Federal Bureau of Investigation agreed

to file federal charges against Cautela for the incidents that occurred outside the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania.

Cautela suffered a heart attack and died in 2005, however, thus concluding the criminal
investigation.

611
Summary
On June 1, 2006, the second victim’s attorney filed a civil lawsuit. The civil complaint
stated:

Although aware of Cautela’s history of sexually abusing children, including the

plaintiff, the Diocesan defendants nevertheless made deliberate decisions:

a. Not to notify police;

b. Not to notify Children and Youth Services or other civil

authorities;

c. Not to suspend Cautela from his priestly duties and/or contact

with children;

d. Not to warn parishioners at Holy Redeemer Church that Cautela

posed a serious risk to children; and

e. Not to conduct an investigation to determine the identity of other

children sexually abused.”

Ultimately, the second victim signed a “Full and Final Release” document on November
2, 2006, which released the Diocese of Pittsburgh of responsibility for the abuse. As part of the
settlement, the Diocese of Pittsburgh agreed to pay the victim a total amount of $250,000.

612
 Reverend Charles J. Chatt

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1936
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 9, 1964

Employment/Assignment History
5/27/1964-3/27/1969 St. Alphonsus, Springdale, PA
3/28/1969-5/29/1974 St. Anne, Castle Shannon, PA
5/30/1974-8/23/1981 St. Albert the Great, Baldwin, PA
8/24/1981-7/27/1992 Our Lady of Loreto, Brookline, PA
7/27/1992-1/31/2003 Leave of Absence
1/31/2003 Withdrew from Active Ministry

Summary

Subpoenaed Diocesan files concerning Father Charles J. Chatt, including confidential,

personnel and victim files, indicate that on July 27, 1992, the father of a young man reported his
son’s sexually abuse by Chatt. These incidents occurred in either 1970 or 1971, when the victim
was in seventh or eighth grade at St. Anne. According to the Diocesan report, the father reported
that he had gone to see Chatt and had told Chatt that he (Chatt) needed to call the Diocese or he
(the victim’s father) would.

That same day, Chatt met with Diocesan officials and admitted to the sexual contact
which began at St. Anne when victim one was 14 years of age. The report recited that: “Chatt
states he never felt ‘it’ was wrong, felt it was a service—later felt like their whore.” The sexual
contact continued after Chatt’s assignment at St. Anne’s had ended because “they came to him.”
Chatt advised that the “relationship” lasted during his assignment at St. Anne’s and that it
(sexual contact) “tapered off” after that. He claimed that the victim would ask for money and
that the “relationship” stopped when the victim was 20 years of age.

The report further disclosed that when Chatt was assigned to St. Albert’s, he had sexual
contact for a few months with a 15-year-old from that parish. Chatt admitted this conduct during
his meeting.

Chatt denied ever having contact with anyone from Our Lady of Loreto, but admitted to
having contact with the first victim and his two brothers at Our Lady of Loreto when the boys
were over 18. Chatt submitted his letter of resignation from Our Lady of Loreto on July 27,
1992. According to Diocese-provided documents, after submitting his resignation, Chatt sought
treatment at St. Michael’s Community in St. Louis, Missouri. Documents in the file indicated
that he worked at St. Michael’s and at “Vianney Renewal Center” until approximately 1999.

613
Summary
A letter in the file dated August 3, 1992 provided further details of the sexual abuse
against the first victim. The letter was addressed to Father William D. Perri of the St. Michael’s
Community and was written by then-Father David Zubik.

The letter provided the details about the abuse of the first victim. It also furnished
additional details about Chatt’s subsequent statements to Diocesan representatives. The letter
indicated that Chatt confirmed for church representatives that he was “involved in sexual
relationships” with the fist victim as well as “five other youngsters under the age of eighteen in
the 1970’s.” He attributed his behavior to the “free spirit” of that time when the “anything goes”
mentality was in “vogue,” in addition to his own sexual weaknesses and what he described as
the “promiscuity of the adolescent boys involved.”

On February 3, 1994, the first victim and his wife met with Diocesan officials. He
advised that in 1970, he was 13 years old and in the seventh grade at St. Anne school. The victim
went to Chatt, who was principal of the school, to tell him that the basketball coach, Mr. Giles,
had been fondling the genitals of many boys on the basketball team. He further reported that
Giles would also spank the boys. The victim advised that Chatt did nothing about the reported
incidents.

The victim further recalled going to the rectory to visit Chatt on many occasions after
Saturday night mass. The victim said that they would listen to the radio, have Cokes, etc. The
abuse began shortly after he reported the incidents involving Giles.

The victim reported that he knew of at least five other victims. He said that Chatt had
confessed to him about three of them and that he [the victim] was present when two others were
abused at the same time he was. This occurred in the rectory and at a cottage on the
Youghiogheny Reservoir that belonged to Father Mihock. The victim stated that there was a
lot of alcohol consumption, mostly at the cottage.

The victim described sexual acts to include, oral sex, anal sex and said that Chatt would
insert objects into his anus. The victim recalled that he and Chatt would pair up and that Chatt
would encourage the other two victims to be partners.

There were also instances of abuse within the victim’s home by Chatt, who was a
frequent guest. Chatt would go up to the victim’s room after he went to bed and abuse him.

The victim stated that Chatt had bought him expensive gifts, including: a dirt bike, a
drum set and hockey equipment. When he was 15, the victim told his mother about the abuse.
The victim, his mother and Chatt then went to Father Hugh McCormley for confession. The
victim’s relationship with Chatt “tapered off around the age of 16.” Chatt then moved to St.
Albert the Great, but the victim continued to occasionally visit Chatt.

The victim said that Chatt kept pornographic magazines in a safe in the rectory. He
recalled one magazine in particular, “Blue Boys,” which contained images of young men and

614
Summary
boys together. Chatt then moved on to his assignment at Our Lady of Loreto. The victim further
recalled seeing a pornographic video there that Chatt claimed he found in a dumpster.

The victim’s wife recalled seeing nude photographs of a six-year-old girl, who lived next
door to Chatt’s parents. She said that Chatt had told her and the victim that he took showers with
the girl.

The Diocese’s file indicated that on February 16, 1994, officials met with Chatt to
discuss the meeting they had had with the victim and his wife. According to the file, Chatt was
“disheartened” that the victim and his wife were “still focusing so much anger and hatred
towards him.”

Documentation, including correspondence, receipts and treatment plans, indicated that

the Diocese paid for counseling for the first victim and members of his family for several years
after the allegations were reported.

In July 2001, another allegation involving Chatt was brought to the attention of the
Diocese. This victim (the third victim) reported that Chatt had fondled him on many occasions
while the victim worked in the rectory answering phones in the evening. This occurred in the
early 1980’s at Our Lady of Loreto when the victim was approximately 15 to 16 years of age.
The abuse occurred one to two times per week, about every week or two, and lasted for several
years. The fondling then abruptly stopped.

The victim explained that he was part of a small group of boys that worked within the
rectory and parish. The boys were seen as “Father Chatt’s favorites.”

The victim recalled an incident when Chatt asked him to retrieve something from his
(Chatt’s) room. The victim found a nude photograph of one of the boys who worked at the
rectory. The victim said that, based on the photograph, he assumed that at least one of the other
boys was sexually involved with Chatt. The file indicated that the Diocese offered assistance
with counseling to to this victim.

In August of 2001, Diocesan representatives spoke with Chatt, via telephone, regarding
the incident reported in July 2001. The details of the conversation were documented in a
memorandum and contained the following information. Chatt admitted that there were occasions
that he “playfully groped” the victim, but advised that they were infrequent and denied that the
fondling occurred several times per week, off and on, for a year.

Chatt stated that he was not sexually involved with the victim. He was confronted with,
but did not respond to, questions about the nude photograph of a boy that the victim found in
the rectory. In notes of the conversation, Chatt was described as “remorseful” and concerned
that he may have hurt the victim. The report further indicated that, “Charles minimized his
behavior as being ‘much less than' his behavior that ultimately led to his treatment at St.
Michael’s.” Chatt further expressed concern about possible legal action, but was advised that
the victim’s allegation was “time barred” so no legal action could take place.

615
Summary

The Diocese’s file further documents a series of e-mail conversations with Rita Flaherty,
Diocesan Assistance Coordinator, and a fourth victim in July and August of 2003. He alleged
“sexual, moral, and mental manipulation” that occurred at St. Anne, St. Alphonsus in Springdale
and at also a cottage outside of Pittsburgh. The abuse initially occurred when the victim was 15
years old. In speaking of Chatt, the victim stated, “Due to his [modus] operandi of taking nude
photos as part of his grooming process, it is safe to say that [dozens] of individuals are affected.”
“I am in contact with a family where all of the brothers were sexually abused in Castle
Shannon.” Flaherty advised him in the e-mails to file a formal complaint, however nothing
appears in the file.

Following the first documented report of sexual abuse of children reported in July 1992
that occurred in 1970 or 1971 at St. Anne’s Parish, Chatt resigned as pastor of Our Lady of
Loreto Parish. The parishioners were told that he had resigned for health reasons and to allow
him time to better care for his aging parents. Chatt was sent to St. Michael’s Community for an
evaluation and thereafter returned to the facility for treatment where he remained for
approximately five months. At the completion of treatment, St. Michael’s staff recommended
he be returned to ministry. Bishop Donald Wuerl did not honor Chatt’s request for ministerial
assignment and instead encouraged him to consider offers for assignment at St. Michael’s. Chatt
began an assignment at St. Michael’s where it appears he remained on staff until approximately
1999. Thereafter, it appears that he began to do “telephone work” assisting the elderly and later
became a social worker. In January 2003, at the request of the Bishop, Chatt withdrew from
ministry and the Bishop withdrew his faculties and permissions.

616
 Reverend Anthony J. Cipolla

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1943
YEAR OF DEATH: 2016
ORDINATION: October 28, 1972

Employment/Assignment History
12/06/1972-11/14/1974 Parochial Vicar, St. Bernard Church, Mt. Lebanon, PA
11/15/1974-5/20/1975 Parochial Vicar, Immaculate Conception, Washington, PA
5/21/1975-9/22/1975 Parochial Vicar, St. Philomena, Beaver Falls, PA
9/23/1976-7/04/1978 Parochial Vicar, St. Agatha, Bridgeville, PA
7/05/1976-10/08/1978 Parochial Vicar, St. Francis Xavier, Pittsburgh, PA
10/09/1978-6/28/1983 Parochial Vicar, St. Canice, Knoxville, PA
6/28/1983-7/05/1983 Parochial Vicar, St. Philip, Crafton, PA (7 days)
12/01/1983-11/01/1988 Chaplin, McGuire Memorial Home for Exceptional Children,
New Brighton, PA
11/01/1988-9/19/2002 Leave of Absence
9/19/2002 Laicized

Summary

Pursuant to a Grand Jury subpoena, records concerning Father Anthony Cipolla were
provided by the Diocese of Pittsburgh, including a confidential Diocesan file, personnel and
legal document files, victim files and files containing numerous copies of documents related to
civil litigation. As detailed further below, the Grand Jury heard testimony from two of Cipolla’s
victims, their mother and by members of the Pittsburgh Police Department who investigated the
victims’ allegations.

These files and testimony reflected that during the time Cipolla served as a priest, three
different Bishops headed the Diocese. Cipolla was moved by his superiors from parish to parish,
throughout the Diocese, several times during his tenure, for a total of eight moves in a sixteen
year period.

Cipolla was first accused of sexually abusing children, specifically, two brothers who
were ages 9 (first victim) and 12 (second victim) in 1978 while Cipolla was assigned to St.
Francis Xavier. The abuses occurred in Cipolla’s bedroom in the rectory and also in a hotel room
in Dearborn, Michigan. On July 25, 1978, the victims’ mother called the Pittsburgh Police
Department and criminal charges were filed. Ultimately, the criminal charges were not pursued
to a conclusion because, according to the mother, she was harassed and threatened by church
officials to drop the charges and to “let the church handle it.”

617
Summary
Members of the Pittsburgh Police Department who investigated the abuse of the brothers
testified before the Grand Jury. The Grand Jury learned that on July 25, 1978, police responded
to a residence in Upper Brighton Heights where they met the first victim and his mother. The
first victim was taken to the hospital for an examination and detectives thereafter took over the
investigation.

The Grand Jury was informed that the detectives subsequently interviewed the first
victim, with his mother and father present. During the interview, the first victim related that on
July 25, 1978 at approximately 1515 hours, he had gone to St. Francis Xavier church/rectory for
the purpose of communion instructions as communion was scheduled to take place on July 29,
1978. The victim reported that he was taken to the bedroom of Cipolla after he had answered
some questions pertaining to his catechism instructions. In the bedroom, the victim was told, “I
(Cipolla) did this to you before. I'll do this again.” According to the victim, Cipolla shut all of
the curtains and told the victim to take off his clothes. Cipolla took all of his clothes off and
Cipolla placed a thermometer in the boy’s mouth and stethoscope to his chest and told him he
was going to examine him again. The boy reported that Cipolla sat in a chair by the bed and he
sat on his lap while Cipolla reached around and touched the boy’s penis in a squeezing motion;
first, 20 times and then 50 times. The victim stated that he knew this because Cipolla counted
every time he squeezed the victim’s penis. The victim also reported that Cipolla placed his finger
inside the victim’s anus at one time. The child stated that he got up when Cipolla was done and
sat on the bed. Cipolla told him that this was their secret and it would be a sin if he told anyone.
He was made to sign a paper saying he would not tell anyone. The victim reported that he
believed there was a list of names under a table in the room but he did not know what it meant.
Detectives were told by parents that when the victim came home, he seemed scared. When they
questioned him about it, he told them what had happened.

The first victim told investigators that Cipolla had done the same thing to him
approximately three weeks earlier. Cipolla had also stated, “I went through this same thing with
your brother, and the doctor would charge $60 for this.”

The second victim was interviewed by the detectives and reported that he was a victim
of the same type of conduct as his brother. He believed that these incidents occurred “during
the early vacation period of the summer of 1977.” He explained that after school let out for the
summer and before a trip to Dearborn, Michigan, he was told to get a physical examination.
Cipolla informed his mother that if her son came to the rectory, he would check her son's heart
and blood pressure and they would not have to spend any money. When the second victim
arrived at the rectory he was told to take off all of his clothing. Cipolla then took his blood
pressure and checked his heart with a stethoscope. Cipolla then checked him for a hernia and
the second victim was made to bend over. Cipolla checked his rectum by placing his finger into
it. When the child asked what that was for, Cipolla stated that he was checking to see if there
was anything in there. When asked why he never told his parents, he stated that he just thought
he was getting a physical examination. He further stated that the priest asked him to come to
the rectory and that he would pay him to clean up his room, but that the victim never went. The
victim noted that the price of $3.00 was mentioned.

618
Summary
On July 25, 1978, a search warrant was executed at the St. Francis Xavier rectory.
Investigators recovered the following: 1) One stethoscope; 2) One blood pressure gauge; 3) One
thermometer; and, 4) Three 3x5” index cards containing the names of the [victims]. Although
Cipolla admitted that he “examined’ the two children, he said he did it “because they had related
that they were a bit ill and he felt he was being of service for the family.” When detectives asked
him why he told the youths to take off all of their clothing, Cipolla stated that he had not given
them such an instruction; instead, he claimed that when he had entered the room, “that is the
way they were.” Cipolla denied placing his finger in the victim’s anus and denied placing his
hand on the victim’s penis.

After speaking with the mother of the boys and hearing her request to prosecute, the
detectives obtained an arrest warrant for Cipolla. However, when investigators arrived for the
preliminary hearing on August 28, the charges were dismissed. As one of the investigators told
the Grand Jury:

[I] didn't recall seeing Father Cipolla, but I do recall there was - -
approximately - - there was five men and it has been a while back. I don't know
if they were all attorneys or who they belonged to. But one of them approached
me and told me that the mother doesn't want to press charges and they - - to the
effect they didn't want to get the priest in any trouble or hurt the priest. Something
to that effect. And I said, ‘Well, what about the boy?’ And I didn't get an answer.
So I kind of asked again. I said, ‘What do we want to do with the boy? He is the
one who is the victim here.’ And I was kind of ignored, to be honest about it. And
the case was dropped, thrown out, whatever you want to call it, and it was
nothing that the police - - that we could do because the Magistrate went along
with it and dumped the case. So here we are today.

On August 18, 2017, the mother of the victims testified before the Grand Jury. She
recounted how her family was friendly with Cipolla, trusted him and thought that he was “a nice
man.” With respect to her younger son (first victim), she described the following events when
he came home following his catechism class with Cipolla:

When he came back, his two eyes were all puffy . . . Everybody was upset because
I couldn't -- I'm asking them, ‘What's wrong with you? Why are your eyes all
red? What's going on?’ [The first victim] said, ‘I can't tell you, mom.’ I said,
well, ‘You better tell me or I'm going to whoop you if you don't tell.’ [The first
victim] said, ‘Well, I can't because I swore on a Bible that I wouldn't.’ I'm like,
‘What do you mean? There's isn't anything you can't tell your mother. You know,
your mother would understand anything. So what's going on?’ [The first victim]
says, ‘Well, Father Cipolla gave me a physical.’ I said, ‘A physical?’ [The first
victim] said, ‘Yeah, he made me take my clothes off and gave me a physical.’ And
I'm thinking, boy, they really changed things since I was going to school. They
never made us get a physical for First Holy Communication. I said, ‘Why are
you crying like that?’ He says, ‘Because I can't tell you.’
***

619
Summary
It took me a while to get it out of him because Father Cipolla made him sign a
paper in the Bible saying that he would not tell anyone what had happened to
him or that he even had a physical. Anyway, [the first victim] told me that Cipolla
put his finger up his behind and started playing with him. [The first victim]
called it his dingdong. He said Cipolla played with his dingdong and that sort of
thing. And then [the first victim] was like, ‘I got to get out of here. My mom's
making dinner.’ But Cipolla wouldn't let him leave until he signed that paper
saying I promise, I swear to God -- or how did it -- it had something to do with
God, you know, that he had to swear on the Bible that he would not tell. So that's
how I found out.

The Grand Jury learned that records from the first victim’s hospital examination revealed
the presence of a lubricant on his underwear.

The mother testified that when she arrived at the preliminary hearing, she believed that
both of her boys were going to testify. She stated that even though charges had yet to be filed
for the abuse of the second victim, it was known that Cipolla had offended on both of them.
However, upon arrival, an attorney from the District Attorney’s office and an attorney for the
Diocese took her into a room. The attorney for the Diocese then began “firing questions at [the
first victim and the second vitim] really fast.” The second victim “had tears in his eyes” and the
first victim “was just shaking like a leaf.” She stated that the prosecutor permitted the attorney
for the Diocese to interrogate both of her sons. The mother stated:

[T]the Diocese attorney was writing all this stuff down and I thought they were
going to do something with it. But the next thing I know, the big tall attorney
(Diocese Attorney) just started - - he became a bully. He was telling my kids,
‘Well, look, you go into court.’ He said, ‘You're going to be talking - - if you
don't want to talk about it now, there could be 100 people in there that you're
going to have to talk about it in front of and we're going to tear your testimony
apart.’ My kids are like, you know, and I was just as scared as they were because
how do I know what they can do? They're pushing the District Attorney around
or this guy is ignoring the District Attorney. And the District Attorney is not
sticking up for us. He isn't telling them, you know, ‘Hey, don't talk to them kids
like that’ or ‘Don't talk to that woman like that.’ He just let him say whatever he
wanted to do and he did. And he intimidated us really bad.

The mother further recounted that the Diocesan attorney was relentless regarding how
this would negatively affect her children. According to the mother:

The Diocese Attorney said, ‘Don't you understand how embarrassed -- you see
them kids. You see how embarrassed they are. They're not going to want to go in
in front of a hundred people.’ And they kept talking like that. They were scaring
my kids half to death and it scared me too.

620
Summary
The mother testified that the Diocesan attorney also brought up the impact that the case would
have on the church. He asked her why they wanted to “hurt the church?” She told the Grand
Jury, however, “We weren't there to hurt the church. We were there to stop Cipolla before he
did it again with some other kids.” According to the mother, the prosecutor told her that if she
signed to expunge the charges against Cipolla and he “does it again” within 10 years, “we can
bring those charges back up.” She was told that “it would be kept quiet unless he committed the
crime again.”

The mother also reported that one day prior to the preliminary hearing, Bishop Vincent
Leonard phoned her. Leonard told her that Cipolla “was going to go through this intensive
therapy or something like that to get his mind right and all that.” Leonard told her that Cipolla
“got that way from hearing confessions and the devil, you know, influenced him.” Leonard
further told her to “let the church handle it. We've got good psychiatrists. We got good doctors.”
Leonard called her a total of three times stating, “Just let the church handle it . . .”

In addition to Leonard calling her immediately following the abuse and prior to the
preliminary hearing, Cipolla also attempted to get in touch with the first victim. According to
the mother, Cipolla came to their house a few times and tried to call on the telephone. Cipolla
wanted to talk to the first victim “really bad” but she wouldn’t let him. The mother explained
that Cipolla was trying to convince them to drop the charges against him.

The mother further explained that her family was harassed by numerous people in the
community who believed that Cipolla was innocent and that her sons were making up the
accusations. Some of the harassment included having their car windows shot out, a tire being
slashed, an apartment window broken, the first victim being slapped, including in the face “for
telling lies on a poor blessed priest,” and receiving numerous threatening telephone calls and
letters. Due to this harassment, she and her family moved out of the state.

On October 20, 2017, the first victim testified before the Grand Jury and recounted the
details of how, on two separate occasions, he was sexually abused by Cipolla. When describing
when Cipolla placed a finger in his anus, he stated, “I felt like that there was—you know, smart
to know that - - you know, just something wasn’t right about it. And then for him to make me
swear like that (not to tell anyone).” He explained that if he told anyone, “it would be an
unforgiveable sin.”

With respect to the charges being dropped against Cipolla, his recollection/interpretation
as a nine-year-old child was:

I remember my mom being in tears, bawling in tears and, you know, them just
trying to make liars out of us. And I remember some compassion from some
police officers, though, you know, and them just being like, you know, they - -
they felt like their hands were tied. I know there was a jail in that building, too;
but I don't remember exactly what building it was. And I just remember asking
them questions as a kid would, and I was just - - I was kind of - - you know, how
kids have a tendency to block stuff out. I wasn't really bumming except for

621
Summary
watching my mother bawling her eyes out. But I remember - - yeah, I remember
them. Just from what I understand and remember, they (the attorneys) tried to
just say, you know, they would make me look like a liar and there was nothing
we could do.

The first victim explained to the Grand Jury how the abuse affected his life. He noted his
suffering (losing his father to suicide and losing his brother who was struck and killed by a car)
and stated that he would have been able to handle it better “without [the sexual abuse] happening
to me, you know. I feel like I would've had a way more sound mind.” He ended his testimony
with the statement, “God's word never returns void.”

The Grand Jury also heard testimony by the second victim about his abuse by Cipolla.
He stated tha Cipolla gave him an anal exam once at the St. Francis Xavier rectory and a second
time at a hotel room in Dearborn. He ended his testimony by stating:

Basically, when a child is fooled with in any way, shape, or form, it is a lasting
injury. It is a lifelong injury. And I'm assuming some recover from fully others
never recover from. I consider myself one of the lucky ones that - - having a
stronger mind and ability to deal with adversity, but it is ongoing. I still have,
you know, my issues with authority at points; and I still have my anger issues,
but making great strides. And if there is anything that you as a grand jury can
do to ensure that you - - if you can save just one child, I have done my job. You
have done yours. Please, please protect the children. Please.

After these sexual abuses occurred and the charges were dropped, the Diocese reassigned
Cipolla immediately to St. Canice where he reoffended on another young male.

In 1988, a third victim reported that he was sexually abused by Cipolla for approximately
a four year period when he was 13 to 17 years old. Notes by Father Theodore Rutkowski dated
June 22, 1988 which were contained in subpoenaed Diocesan files, stated that the boy moved to
the Pittsburgh area when he was 12 years of age and Cipolla asked him to become an altar boy
at St. Canice. Cipolla became a father figure to him.

The third victim reported that he saw nude pictures of young boys in some files in
Cipolla’s room and that some of the boys were masturbating in these pictures; Cipolla would
give him “physicals” telling the victim that he (Cipolla) was a “missionary doctor;” that after he
showered Cipolla would insist on putting talcum powder all over his body including his genitals;
and that he would go on vacations with Cipolla, who would hug and him while they shared a
bed.

The third victim advised that in September 1987 he entered St. Paul Seminary to become
a priest but left in November 1987 because of his confused, four year relationship with Cipolla.

Documents dated July 1, 1988 contained within the subpoenaed files, indicated that the
Diocese conducted an “internal review” and concluded that the third victim’s allegations “were

622
Summary
without foundation and the matter be dropped.” The police were not informed of these
allegations against Cipolla.

In December of 1988, the third victim reported the sexual abuse to the Beaver County
District Attorney’s Office.

Because of the allegations lodged against him again, Cipolla was sent by Bishop Wuerl
to St. Luke Institute for a psychiatric examination and evaluation. The staff at St. Luke’s
recommended that Cipolla “not have any ministry which involves children.” It was further
recommended that Cipolla report immediately to St. John Vianney Hospital in Downingtown.
Cipolla adamantly refused to go there. Wuerl informed Cipolla that he did not have to go for
treatment to St. John Vianney specifically, but that he did have to go to a “bona fide” church-
approved facility that they both agreed on and that he needed to do this sooner rather than later.

Cipolla refused to cooperate and insisted on going to a facility of his choosing, St.
Michael’s Institute in New York City, which is an outpatient counseling center. Wuerl tried to
discourage him from going there because St. Michael’s was not a church-approved facility.

Cipolla nonetheless went to St. Michael’s and from it received a “glowing” evaluation
that basically disagreed with everything in the report from St. Luke’s. Cipolla hired an attorney
who wrote to Wuerl requesting that he reassign Cipolla to a parish based on the report from St.
Michael’s, which found no bar to such an assignment.

In a letter to Wuerl dated March 16, 1989, Cipolla indicated that he had changed his
mind and was going to cooperate. The letter said Cipolla would go to St. John’s.

However, three weeks later, in a letter from Cipolla to Wuerl dated April 6, 1989, Cipolla
asked to be released from the Diocese so that he might seek another diocese in which to serve.
In reply correspondence, Wuerl indicated that Cipolla had to secure a letter from the Bishop of
the Diocese in which he wished to serve. Wuerl also told Cipolla that he (Wuerl) would have
to write to that Bishop and tell him of the sexual abuse allegations that had been lodged against
Cipolla, as well as the findings and recommendations of St. Luke’s.

In a May 15, 1989 letter, Wuerl informed Cipolla that he (Wuerl) would be meeting with
his advisors to discuss Cipolla’s situation including his refusal to report to St. John’s and his
request to leave the Diocese of Pittsburgh. Wuerl warned Cipolla that he would not be able to
exercise his priestly ministry unless he went for the recommended evaluation. In a letter dated
June 6, 1989, Wuerl told Cipolla that he is still unassignable to pastoral ministry. In a subsequent
letter dated June 30, 1989, Wuerl notified Cipolla that he could not be reinstated until he
underwent the evaluation (at St. John’s) recommended by St. Luke’s. Cipolla repeatedly wrote
to Wuerl requesting to be reinstated. His requests were all denied because he continued to refuse
to go for the recommended evaluation and counseling.

While these communications were occurring, Cipolla continued to present himself as a

priest in good standing despite being repeatedly warned by Wuerl to stop doing so. On

623
Summary
September 17, 1990, Wuerl wrote to Cipolla, and notified him that his canonical facilities had
been removed because he failed to take the actions directed. He therefore could not act as a
priest in good standing; could not conduct any public celebrations as a priest; and could not wear
priestly attire. He could not resume doing any of these things until he obtained a church-
approved evaluation.

In October 1992, the third victim filed a civil suit against Cipolla, the Pittsburgh Diocese
and several officials of the Diocese. The lawsuit maintained that as a result of the above-detailed
1978 sexual allegations involving the two brothers, the defendants should have known that
Cipolla was using his position as a Catholic priest to gain access to and to acquire the confidence
of others and otherwise seduce minor male children for his sexual gratification. It also alleged
that Cipolla’s superiors in the Diocese covered that up.

On March 9, 1993 an order from the Vatican called a “Signatura” ruled that Wuerl
violated Canon Law and ordered that Cipolla should be reinstated as a priest in good standing.

On March 27, 1993 Wuerl asked the Supreme Tribunal to re-open the case involving
Cipolla because there were factual errors.

On September 30, 1993 this civil lawsuit was settled out of court with an undisclosed
financial settlement.

In April 1993, Wuerl traveled to Rome in connection with the appeal to the Supreme
Tribunal. When he returned, he issued a precept reminding Cipolla that he was not to celebrate
the sacraments publicly or to identify himself as a priest in good standing. Wuerl again
instructed Cipolla to go get the recommended psychological evaluation at a church-approved
hospital or it would be considered an act of disobedience.

In September 1995, the Vatican reversed the “Signatura” and declared that Wuerl acted
properly when he banned Cipolla from ministry. Even after the “official” ruling from the Vatican
that he was no longer a priest in good standing, Cipolla continued to perform masses and to
present himself as a priest in good standing, even though he was advised in person, several times,
that he was barred from doing these things. Cippola’s appeal to the Vatican was denied in
November 1996.

Following the Vatican’s September 1995 ruling, Cipolla was assigned to St. John
Vianney Manor and was told he must report for this assignment by February 29, 1996. They
reminded him again that he was not to present himself as a priest in good standing and that in
order for him to be reinstated he would have to undergo the recommended psychological
evaluation. Cipolla told Diocese officials that they could not force him to do this and not even
the pope could make him.

Wuerl repeatedly insisted that Cipolla meet with him and the other church officials, but
Cipolla kept declining to meet, offering excuses as to why he could not meet.

624
Summary
In March 1996, Cipolla wrote to Wuerl requesting additional money. He complained
that he had not received his priestly salary since December 1995. In April 1996, Father John
Kozar wrote to Cipolla, telling him that, since he was put on leave in 1988, the Diocese had
provided him with a monthly check along with his medical insurance benefits which, to date,
then totaled $135,000. Kozar added that in return for this the church had received nothing in
the way of priestly ministry, service or cooperation and an increase scandal in the eyes of the
community. Kozar wrote:

At the present you are being provided a residence by the diocese at St. John
Vianney Manor, a residence for priest of this diocese. The cost of providing this
residence for you is $782 per month in addition to the $638 afforded you monthly
by way of the medical coverage offered for active priest[s]; namely Blue
Cross/Blue Shield coverage in the amount of $190 per monthly; Major Medical
coverage at the expense of $90 per month; dental insurance in the amount of $25
per month; and a monthly payment in the amount of $333 to the Priest Benefit
Plan in anticipation of your retirement. With all these provisions, the Church of
Pittsburgh is more than meeting your need to substances and social assistance.

In May 1996, Cipolla caught again acting as a priest in good standing, Wuerl issued
another degree forbidding him to do so and asked to meet with Cipolla. Cipolla refused claiming
medical stress.

In July 1996, Cipolla wrote Wuerl again asking for his priestly salary. By this time the
Diocese had received his tax statements (although not all of the documents requested in March
of 1996) which showed he had significant money elsewhere (because of the interest he reported)
and determined Cipolla was not “a priest in need.” The Diocese therefore refused to provide
him any more money.

In September 1996, the Diocese received a letter from an individual in Warren, Ohio
which claimed that Cipolla’s parents were helping him financially and that he was performing
masses regularly in their home where he was staying part time. In November of 1996 the
Diocese also received information from several people who said that they were on a recent
pilgrimage and that Cipolla was there celebrating masses and telling everyone he was a priest in
good standing. Over the next six years numerous reports were received that Cipolla was
continuing to conduct himself in the same manner.

In July 2002 Wuerl wrote to the Pope asking for Cipolla’s dismissal from priesthood.
Official approval for Cipolla’s dismissal as a priest was issued on September 19, 2002. Despite
this, in December of 2003 the Diocese received information that Cipolla was still saying masses
and acting as a priest.

In August 2015 Cipolla wrote to Bishop Zubik asking him for retirement and a monthly
stipend and pension for the time he served as a priest. Cipolla was informed in a January 2016
letter that that he did not qualify for a pension because he was dismissed as a priest.

625
 Reverend John P. Connor

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1934
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: April 4, 1962

Employment/Assignment History
4/28/1962 Assistant, St. Francis of Assisi, Vineland, NJ
1/08/1966 Assistant, St. Mary, Gloucester, NJ
6/18/1966 Assistant in Residence, St. Rose of Lima, Haddon Heights, NJ
6/18/1966 Faculty, Paul VI High School, Haddon Township, NJ
1969-1970 Assistant CYO Director of Diocese, Diocese Center
1970-1985 Chairperson, Bishop Eustace Preparatory, Pennsauken
Township, NJ
2/2002 Removed from active ministry/retirement

Summary

Records obtained by subpoena from the Diocese of Pittsburgh, show that in October of
1984, Father John P. Connor was arrested in New Jersey for sexually molesting a 14-year-old
child. The sexual abuse for which Connor was apprehended took place in Connor’s home in the
Diocese of Camden during the time he was a theology teacher and golf coach at Bishop Eustace
Preparatory School in Pennsauken. According to the 2005 Philadelphia Grand Jury Report,
Connor never went to trial on the charges because lawyers for the Diocese of Camden negotiated
a pretrial intervention with the Cape May Prosecutor’s Office. The terms of the agreement were
that if Connor would admit to sexually molesting the 14-year-old child, he would have the record
of his arrest erased, as long as he were not re-arrested within one year. In Connor’s Diocesan
file, a letter dated March 29, 1985 from the Office of the Prosecutor, County of Cape May to
Connor’s attorney stated:

[W]e have placed explicit reliance on the internal discipline of the institutional
church in assuring that Father Connor takes all the steps reasonably necessary
to live up to the letter and the spirit of the Participations Agreement—even after
the period of court supervision expires.

The subpoenaed Diocesan files contained several memoranda and letters from the
Southdown Institute outside of Toronto, Canada where Connor spent approximately eight
months in treatment after his arrest. The documents from Southdown indicated an assessment
that because of Connor’s problem with alcohol: “he acts out sexually with some preference to
late adolescent males.” They specifically warned against giving Connor responsibility for
adolescents. In a September 3, 1985 memorandum to Bishop George Guilfoyle of Camden from
the Executive Director of Southdown specifically cautioned that “because of the incident for

626
Summary
which he was apprehended, we would not recommend any ministry that would directly put him
in a positions of responsibility for adolescents such as a teaching situation.”

In a letter dated September 11, 1985, Guilfoyle, wrote to Bishop Anthony Bevilacqua,
the Bishop of Pittsburgh asking if Bevilacqua would consider accepting Connor. Guilfoyle later
acknowledged in a letter dated September 12, 1985 that he could not keep Connor in Camden
stating; “If it were not for the matter of scandal, I would be willing to keep him here.”

In a memorandum dated September 11, 1985 to Bevilacqua, Father Nicholas Dattilo

expressed several concerns about the request from Guilfoyle. Dattilo specifically pointed out
that: “If the problem is homosexuality or pedophilia we could be accepting a difficulty with
which we have had no post-therapeutic experience.” He also stated in this memorandum:

If, after you have talked with Bishop Guilfoyle you believe there is no serious risk
in accepting Father Connor, we will do everything we can to keep the tradition
of bishops helping bishops intact.

It should be noted that there is a hand-written note at the bottom of the memo which reads: “I
cannot guarantee that there is no serious risk.” It is initialed “AJB” (Anthony Joseph
Bevilacqua) and dated September 17, 1985. Despite this acknowledgement, and after receiving
reports from Southdown. Bevilacqua agreed to give Connor an assignment in the Diocese.

According to the 2005 Philadelphia Grand Jury Report, an additional memorandum

dated September 11, 1985 from Dattilo documented his concern about bringing Connor to the
Diocese which stressed the “serious consequences of recurrence” given “the nature of the
incident for which he was apprehended.” Bevilacqua initialed this memorandum and added a
note stating; “He must also be told that his pastor/supervisor will be informed confidentially of
his situation.” There is no documentation regarding this September 1985 memorandum in the
file that was provided by the Diocese.

In a letter to Connor dated October 9, 1985, Bevilacqua appointed him as Chaplin to the
Catholic patients at Sewickley Valley Hospital and assigned him to reside at St. James.

However, less than a year later, in a letter dated September 5, 1986, Bevilacqua informed
Connor that he had appointed another priest as Chaplain at Sewickley Valley Hospital, and
reassigned Connor to St. Alphonsus in Wexford. Connor’s new assignment gave him an
unrestricted ministry. There was no warning to the parishioners of the church that he was an
admitted child molester.

According to Philadelphia Grand Jury Report, after Bevilacqua left Pittsburgh to become
the Archbishop of Philadelphia, Dattilo revoked Connor’s assignment citing “legal
complications” and suggested Connor apply to the Philadelphia Diocese since Bevilacqua had
been willing to accept Connor before. In a memorandum to Connor dated September 7, 1988,
Bevilacqua appointed him as assistant pastor of St. Matthew in Conshohocken, a parish with a
grade school. Bevilacqua encouraged Connor, among other things, to “educate youth.” Once

627
Summary
again Connor was given an unrestricted ministry and there was no warning to the parishioners
of the church that Connor was an admitted child molester.

According to the Philadelphia Grand Jury Report, Bevilacqua told the Grand Jury that
he recalled Connor calling him directly to request the new assignment in Conshohocken. He
stated that while he asked Monsignor Samuel Shoemaker to handle the appointment, he did nor
recall whether he had told Shoemaker about Connor’s history. An excerpt from the 2005 Grand
Jury Report reads as follow:

Bevilacqua and the Philadelphia Archdiocese accepted this dangerous priest

readily but did nothing to ensure the propriety of his future conduct. Father
James W. Donlon, the pastor of St. Matthew Church since March 1989,
testified to the Grand Jury that Cardinal Bevilacqua never told him about
Father Connor’s arrest or that he had been treated at Southdown for abusing
alcohol and a 14-year old boy. The Archbishop met with Father Donlon for a
half hour in February 1989 to familiarize Father Donlon with his new parish.
Rather than share information that might have aided the pastor in protecting
the children of St. Matthew, Archbishop Bevilacqua chose to say that Father
Connor was brought from Pittsburgh to be closer to his family. Moreover,
Father Donlon was given no guidance as to what activities Father Connor
should or should not participate in, even though the Southdown report that
Cardinal Bevilacqua had received explicitly recommended that Father Connor
not be put in a position of responsibility for adolescents. Since Father Donlon
received no warning from the Archbishop, he allowed Father Connor full
access to the youth of the parish. The pastor did not know to be concerned
about an especially close relationship that was developing between Father
Connor and a young boy from the parish grade school, named “Timothy.”

The Grand Jury further heard that Archbishop Bevilacqua also neglected to tell
that pastor that Father Connor had a history of alcohol abuse and that
Southdown had warned that excessive use of alcohol could increase the risk
that the priest would act out sexually with adolescents. Thus, when Father
Connor continued to drink, Father Donlon did not know to be especially
concerned.

Donlon also told the Grand Jury that it was not until a newspaper reporter called him in 2002
that he became aware of Connor’s arrest for the sexual abuse of a minor. Donlon explained to
the Grand Jury that he “would have been more careful about everything” meaning Connor’s
activities and his association with the school.

The Grand Jury report went on to say that “Timothy,” the child from St. Matthew in
Conshohocken to whom Connor was paying a great deal of attention, had been located and was
now 24 years old. Although Timothy did not openly admit to the sexual abuse, he claimed that
from third grade until the beginning of high school Connor took him, once a week, to the movies,
dinner, bowling and golfing and that Connor bought him golf clubs and a bike.

628
Summary

In 1993, Connor was suddenly moved back to Camden because his 1984 victim of sexual
abuse had sued and received a settlement from the Diocese of Camden.

In 1994, it was reported that Connor (who was assigned to a church in New Jersey) was
still continuing to visit “Timothy” in Conshohocken weekly to take him on trips and give him
gifts. Monsignor Lynn called Camden Chancellor and the Archdiocese attorney to notify them
of Connor’s “imprudent” behavior, but according to the Grand Jury Report, there was still no
attempt to notify Timothy’s mother that Connor was an admitted child molester.

In 1995, Father John Kelly, the parochial vicar at St. Matthew reported that Connor was
back in the parish and still in “Timothy’s” life. The 2005 Grand Jury report quoted Lynn as
saying: “I told Father Kelly that all I could do was inform the Camden Diocese, as I did before,
that Connor was back in the picture with this young boy here in Conshohocken.”

Included in the file for Connor that was provided by the Diocese, is a letter to Father
Ronald P. Lengwin, from Father Peter Murphy, pastor of St. Alphonsus. Murphy’s letter stated
that on October 27, 2008 a man called the rectory. The caller apparently wanted the current
priest to apologize to the whole church during the homily for assigning Connor to the church
and about the terrible things Connor did. When the man was asked if he had been abused by
Connor, he said he had. Murphy told the man to call the Diocese of Pittsburgh to make the
accusation.

In a memorandum dated November 5, 2008 to Diocesan Assistance Coordinator Rita

Flaherty, Lengwin stated that he spoke to the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office on
October 27, 2008 about an allegation of sexual abuse made against Connor. There was concern
that a threat was being made against the church and was asking for help on how to deal with it.

More recently, in the files obtained from the Diocese, there is a letter to Bishop David
Zubik dated December 18, 2014 from an attorney who represented a victim who claimed that
he was repeatedly sexually molested by Connor from approximately 1986 to 1988 when he was
a 12 to 14 years of age. During that time, Connor was assigned to St. Alphonsus. The male, then
40 years old, claimed that Connor ruined his life and that Connor stole his innocence. The letter
stated that the victim suffered from trust issues, low self-esteem, suicidal ideation, alcohol abuse,
estrangement from the Catholic Church, guilt, shame, embarrassment, etc. As a result of his
suffering, the victim demanded a settlement for $1 million. .

In a “Confidential Memorandum” to the Diocese file dated January 21, 2015, Flaherty
stated that she and Father Mark Eckman phoned Father Terry Odien, the current Vicar for Clergy
in the Diocese of Camden, to alert him of the allegations they had received. Odien advised that
Connor was out of active ministry and living in a retirement facility for priests. They also called
the Archdiocese of Philadelphia and spoke to Monsignor Daniel Sullivan to inform him of the
recent allegations. Flaherty stated, “we had little information about him [the victim] and that
we have had no contact with the alleged victim.”

629
Summary
The subpoenaed Diocesan files contain little to no information on the victim’s status or
whether he was offered counseling. The Grand Jury investigation found little to no
documentation that the Dioceses of Pittsburgh, Philadelphia or Camden notified local law
enforcement or the District Attorney’s office about Connor’s sexual abuse.

630
 Reverend John David Crowley

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1929
YEAR OF DEATH: 2006
ORDINATION: May 29, 1954

Employment/Assignment History
6/10/1954-6/9/1968 St. Elizabeth, Pleasant Hills, PA
6/10/1968-3/27/1969 St. Margaret, Green Tree, PA
3/28/1969-1/17/2003 Holy Angels, Hay, PA
1/10/2003 Resigned

Summary

Subpoenaed Diocesan records indicate that, at the time of his release from seminary in
1954, there were reports that Father John David Crowley would need “constant supervision”
because he was “inclined to look for ‘loop-holes,’ special privileges, etc.”

In 1992, a complaint was made by a mother and her twin adult daughters, one of whom
was 16 years old at the time of victimization. Crowley was presented with the allegations in
June 1992 and a referral for a mental health evaluation at St. Michael’s Community was made
in September 1992. In the interim, Crowley remained in his assigned parish. Evaluators at St.
Michael’s opined that Crowley was being truthful in his denials regarding the sexual abuse of
the mother and her twin daughters and recommended outpatient therapeutic support to address
insecurities, low self-esteem and obsessive-compulsive tendencies. Upon his discharge from St.
Michael’s following the one week evaluation period, Crowley was returned to his parish.

In late-2001, the mother and twin daughters renewed their complaint with the Diocese.
The 2002 Charter for the Protection of Children and Young People triggered a report of this
allegation on August 30, 2002, to the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office.
Additionally, the allegation was presented to the Diocesan Review Board. The Board found the
victims’ allegations to be credible and rejected Crowley’s testimony. On December 9, 2002, the
Board recommended that Crowley be asked to resign his position as pastor and should he refuse,
that he be removed according to the norms of Canon Law. They further recommended that
Crowley be requested to retire from active ministry, that his faculties be withdrawn and that he
be asked to begin intensive counseling.

Following the recommendations, Bishop Donald Wuerl gave Crowley an option to

voluntarily resign and withdraw from active ministry, or undergo a judicial canonical process.
Crowley chose resignation and submitted the same on January 7, 2003. Wuerl permitted him to
announce to his parish that he was “voluntarily accepting an earlier retirement since he was
only two years away from submitting a mandatory letter of retirement at age 75.” This was

631
Summary
permitted, according to Wuerl, to “protect his [Crowley’s] reputation in the widespread
community.” Wuerl faced great scrutiny regarding Crowley’s departure by members of the
parish and the media who loved Crowley and thought there was more to the story (they believed
that Wuerl had forced Crowley out). Wuerl maintained that “Father Crowley, for reasons of his
own, asked to retire.”

Crowley was notified by Wuerl on May 30, 2003, that his ministerial faculties had been
withdrawn. On June 9, 2004, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith confirmed Wuerl’s
decision that Crowley remain in retirement and that he not exercise any public ministry

Crowley died in 2006.

On July 24, 2008, Rita Flaherty, Diocesan Assistance Coordinator, prepared a

memorandum to Crowley’s file that documented a meeting with an adult male who stated that
he was sexually abused by Crowley in the 1970s when he was 11 to 12 years old. The Diocese
reported this complaint to the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office on August 13, 2009.

632
 Reverend Richard Deakin

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1955
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: April 13, 1985

Employment/Assignment History
3/1984-6/1987 Deacon until ordained; Assistant Pastor after ordination,
St. Martin, Baltimore, MD
6/1987-8/1988 Parochial Vicar, St. Cecilia Church and Friary, Rochester, PA
1988 St. Francis Friary, Brookline, PA (in residence only)
8/15/1989 Leave of Absence
12/29/1992 Dismissed from clerical state

Summary

Documents subpoenaed from the Diocese of Pittsburgh reflected that in May 1990,
Father Richard Deakin was contacted by the Baltimore City Police Department about allegations
that he had sexually abused a 13-year-old girl for more than a two year-period while his was the
assistant pastor of St. Martin in Baltimore, Maryland. At the time police contacted him, Deakin
was on a leave of absence from his Order and the priesthood.

Deakin was arrested on June 25, 1990. He was charged with and, in October 1990, pled
guilty to charges of second degree rape and sexual abuse of a child, who was identified in court
filings as “Jane Doe.” He was sentenced to a 15-year suspended prison sentence and five years
of probation.

Correspondence from the victim’s attorneys which was included in subpoenaed

Diocesan files reflected that when the victim was 13 years old, she underwent serious surgery
to remove a tumor from her chest. During this vulnerable period, Deakin assumed a prominent
role in her life, being both her friend and confidant. He would visit her in the hospital regularly
and they became very close. “In the winter of 1985-86,” Deakin began sexually abusing her.
“The sexual relationship intensified and sex occurred in St. Martin’s Church, the rectory, Father
Rich’s car, (redacted) home, and various other locations.”

In an undated letter by Deakin which was addressed to “Most Holy Father,” he described
in his own words, details of his inappropriate relationship with this young girl. He stated:

During my last year to sixteen months at St. Martins’ I became progressively

more sexually involved with a teenage girl in the parish. I had become friends
with her and her family. Our relationship started by this girl and her brother
accompanying me when I went out shopping or to the movies or to the park. Our

633
Summary
physical contact progressed from occasional playful contact to kissing and
petting to sexual intercourse.

Deakin wrote that he “[had] never forced [redacted] to have any sexual contact without
her consent” and that she “[had] initiated the sexual behavior between us as often as I did.”
“We both knew that this behavior was inappropriate and wrong.” He went on to say that he
believed that he and the victim “were both so emotionally needy that we overlooked what was
right and wrong” and that he “was using this teenage girl to gain a sense of power, as well as,
to feel needed by someone not as a priest but as a man.”

Deakin admitted that “[i]t was a very sick relationship,” and added that ‘[n]o one was
aware of the sexual behavior between myself and this teenage girl.” Deakin also admitted that
he never told his psychiatrist about his relationship with the victim because he “knew there were
legal consequences.” Deakin’s abuse of this girl which lasted over a year and a half, continued
after he was transferred to St. Cecelia in Rochester, PA. Deakin returned to Baltimore on several
occasions, however, and would meet the victim at a motel. The relationship was finally
terminated when Deakin told the victim that he was in love with another woman whom he
intended to marry.

Shortly after Deakin ended the relationship, she became a troubled child, acting out in
school and eventually failing tenth grade. In December, 1989, she began to have nightmares
about the sexual abuse she endured. She entered counseling and revealed her relationship with
Deakin to her mother and to her psychiatrist. She became despondent and suicidal and she had
to be hospitalized.

In October 1990, she was hospitalized again and was not released until January, 1991.
She reentered the hospital again in March of 1991 for a short stay. She underwent psychotherapy
on an outpatient basis. She was eventually diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder and
major depression, all the result of the sexual abuse.

This victim and her mother subsequently filed a civil lawsuit.

On November 17, 1992, Father Robert F. Guay of the Diocese of Pittsburgh testified in
a deposition taken in connection with the litigation. Guay had served as the Director of the
Department of Clergy Personnel for the Diocese during the time that Deakin was transferred to
St. Cecilia. During his testimony, he stated that after the Diocese found out about the ongoing
sexual abuse of this victim, it did not investigate or inquire of anyone at St. Cecelia to learn if
Deakin had engaged in sexual misconduct with any of the children in that parish. Guay also
testified that he only learned that Deakin had been formally charged for sexual abuse of a minor
through a newspaper article. Guay said that he was not aware if anyone from the Diocese of
Pittsburgh had contacted the Archdiocese of Baltimore to find out more information regarding
the charges.

The lawsuit was settled on October 11, 1993 for $2,705,000.

634
 Reverend Ferdinand B. Demsher

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1914
YEAR OF DEATH: 1983
ORDINATION: May 25, 1946

Employment/Assignment History
8/22/1946 – 7/16/1947 St. Peter, New Kensington, PA
7/17/1947 – 6/29/1949 Christ the King, Ambridge, PA
6/30/1949 – 5/20/1951 St. James, West End, PA
5/20/1951 – 6/29/1963 United States Army
7/02/1963 – 6/06/1966 Resurrection, Brookline, PA
6/07/1966 – 6/24/1983 St. Mary of the Assumption, Pittsburgh, PA

Summary

Documents subpoenaed from the Diocese of Pittsburgh revealed that on March 18, 2002,
a victim contacted the Diocese via e-mail to report sexual abuse by Father Ferdinand Demsher.
The victim stated that the abuse occurred from 1975 to 1976 at St. Mary of the Assumption
church. The victim was approximately 13 to 14 years old at that time.

Demsher died in 1983.

According to the victim, his grandparents arranged for him to be employed at St. Mary
doing odd jobs for Demsher. One summer day, he complained of a heat rash on his inner thigh.
Demsher offered to look at the rash, and the victim remembered being in Demsher’s office in
the rectory with his pants down. He stated that Demsher had “manipulated his penis until it was
hard” and when he could no longer “stand it he ejaculated.” The victim stated that he knew it
was wrong, but “he [Demsher] could cause problems for me.” Demsher continued this pattern
of abuse while the victim had the heat rash.

The victim further claimed that Demsher attempted to manipulate him into sexually
touching him [Demsher] by using a ruse related to a prostate check. He explained:

[Demsher]would stick a finger into his anus and massage the prostate until he
[Demsher] would ejaculate and this would “help open his urinary tract.” He
[Demsher] said I [the victim] had large hands and my long fingers could reach
the prostate muscle.

Demsher also asked the victim to massage his back thighs and buttocks to ease Demsher’s sciatic
nerve pain.

635
Summary

One of the victim’s job duties was to straighten up clutter on the second floor of the
rectory. He related:

[A]t some point I don’t remember exactly how it happened but he had managed
to get me naked in his bed and was manipulating me with a hand held electrical
vibrator and after as long as I could try to hold out I ejaculated. He took off his
cloths (sic) and I ended up doing the same thing to him. This was the first time I
had ever manipulated his penis to orgasm.

The abuse finally ended when the boy started Lawrenceville Catholic High School as a
freshman. He got a different job at a country club and made excuses as to why he could no
longer visit the rectory.

The victim requested counseling from the Diocese. An internal Dioesan memorandum
dated April 4, 2002 ended with “we found [the victim’s] allegation to be credible.”

In May 2005, the victim contacted the Diocese again seeking assistance in the form of
counseling because of the sexual abuse he suffered. There were several documents in the file
which reflected that the victim participated in therapy. The Diocese also agreed to cover the
cost of tuition for his daughters to attend Catholic school in the Florida area.

On March 12, 2012, an individual called the Diocese to report that a male friend had
been molested by Demsher as a child in the late-1970’s to early-1980’s. Rita Flaherty, the
Diocesan Assistance Coordinator, gave the individual contact information to forward to her
friend. The individual provided the potential victim’s first name. Diocesan documents do not
reveal that this potential victim contacted the Diocese.

In February 2015, a confidential memorandum was prepared regarding a complaint of

sexual abuse by Demsher. On February 4, 2015, a second victim met with Bishop William J.
Waltersheid and Flaherty to discuss allegations of abuse. In that complaint, he advised that
Demsher engaged in sexual activity with him while he was approximately 14 years old. He
stated that the abuse occurred when he was a freshman at Central Catholic High School. The
victim explained that the first time that he went to pick up his report card from Demsher, the
victim had a cold. According to the memorandum, “Demsher told [the victim] he had been a
chaplain in the Army. (Somehow he must have implied or given the impression from that
comment that he knew how the victim] should take care of his cold.)” The victim was instructed
by Demsher to drop his pants and Demsher then began to fondle his genitals.

The second victim reported that Demsher also fondled his genitals the second time that
he had to pick up his report card. By the time he had to pick up his third report card, the victim
asked a friend to go with him. Demsher again “made the suggestion about ‘examining him’].”
In response, the victim explained that his friend was waiting outside, and Demsher did not
attempt to fondle his genitals that day. As a result of the abuse, the victim’s grades began to

636
Summary
drop, and he lost faith in the Catholic Church. He was offered counseling, which he ultimately
accepted.

In a “Confidential Memorandum” to Demsher’s file dated February 1, 2016, it was noted

that a third victim claimed to have been fondled by Demsher when he was approximately 10 to
11 years old. This victim had attended Resurrection grade school and had been an altar server
for the parish. The notes regarding the allegation did not provide any further information or
details of the abuse. On February 11, 2016, Flaherty contacted the victim again to offer him
counseling.

In February 2015, the Diocese notified the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office
that a complaint of sexual abuse by Demsher had been made to the Diocese. The Diocese stated
that the activities occurred in 1964-1965 at a church in Allegheny County.

In a “Confidential Memorandum” dated April 27, 2016, it was noted that a fourth victim
called to report sexual abuse by Demsher. In the complaint, this victim reported that Demsher
abused him in the mid-late 1960’s. The memorandum did not provide a detailed account of the
abuse. The victim further advised that Demsher took him and several other boys to Wildwood,
New Jersey and provided alcohol to them on two occasions. On one occasion, another boy
started to choke on his own vomit as a result of drinking too much alcohol. Flaherty attempted
to set up a meeting with the victim to further discuss the abuse allegation, however the victim
cancelled several times. The victim indicated that although he knew it was the right thing to do,
“I am fighting with myself about doing it. I guess it is my ‘Catholic guilt.’” On May 20, 2016,
the Diocese notified the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office that a complaint of sexual
abuse by Demsher had been made to the Diocese. The Diocese provided the fourth victim with
financial help on September 9, 2016.

637
 Reverend Myles Eric Diskin

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1948
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: March 1, 1975

Employment/Assignment History
3/12/1975 – 7/17/1979 St. Paul, Butler, PA
7/18/1975 – 11/26/1981 Purification of the Blessed Virgin Mary, Ellwood City, PA
11/27/1981 – 7/05/1987 Sacred Heart, Pittsburgh, PA
7/06/1987 – 1/01/1991 Diocese of Pittsburgh
1/31/1991 – 5/24/2002 Diocese of Pittsburgh
3/19/2003 Resigned

Summary

Documents subpoenaed from the Diocese of Pittsburgh indicated that in April 2002, a
complaint of sexual abuse by Father Myles Eric Diskin was made to the Butler County District
Attorney’s Office. In that complaint, an adult male reported that Diskin had engaged in sexual
activity with him when he was a minor child. The abuse occurred in the mid-1970’s at a church
in Butler.

In October 2002, another complaint of sexual abuse by Diskin was made to the Butler
County District Attorney’s Office. In that complaint, a woman reported that Diskin had
inappropriately touched her while she was a minor child. She stated that the activities occurred
in the mid-1970’s at a church located in Butler.

In June 2004, another complaint of sexual abuse by Diskin was made to the Butler
County District Attorney’s Office. In that complaint, “John Doe” advised that Diskin sexually
abused him in the school, in the rectory, in Diskin’s automobile, in the sanctuary of the church
(St. Paul), and in the male’s home. The abuse included fondling of the genitals and performing
oral sex. The abuse took place in 1976 to 1977 when the victim was 12 to 13 years old.

In November 2004, a complaint was made to the Diocese of sexual abuse by Diskin. A
“Confidential Memorandum” from the Diocesan Assistance Coordinator indicated that the
complaint filed by an adult male asserted that Diskin sexually abused him at St. Paul when he
was a minor.

In February 2009, a complaint of sexual abuse by Diskin was made to the Allegheny
County District Attorney’s Office. In the complaint, two victims reported that Diskin sexually
abused them in the mid-1970’s. Internal Diocesan records indicated that the victims would have
been approximately 11 and 14 years old, respectively, at the time of the abuse.

638
Summary

In January 2015, a complaint of sexual abuse by Diskin was made to the Allegheny
County District Attorney’s Office. In the complaint, “John Doe” advised that Diskin sexually
abused him by inappropriately touching him. The abuse took place Butler County in 1976 to
1977 when the victim was 15 to 16 years old.

In January, 2015, a complaint was made to the Diocese of sexual abuse by Diskin. In
that particular complaint, a woman advised that Diskin sexually abused her by inappropriately
touching her. The abuse took place in the mid-1970’s in Butler County when she was a minor.

In a letter dated July 7, 2003, Father Lawrence Dinardo wrote to Diskin following a
meeting during which Diskin admitted to having had a sexual relationship with a young man for
a few years while Diskin was assigned as a priest in Butler. The young man was a minor at the
time of the sexual activity. Their interaction ended in 1979 or 1980.

Diocesan records also contained a letter dated June 23, 2004 to Butler County District
Attorney’s Office which acknowledges a series of civil lawsuits relating to Diskin’s conduct.

639
 Father Richard J. Dorsch

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1944
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May, 1970

Employment/Assignment History
6/15/1970-5/20/1975 Parochial Vicar, St. Basil, Carrick, PA
5/21/1975-10/12/1977 Parochial Vicar, St. Philip, Crafton, PA
10/13/1977-3/07/1983 Parochial Vicar, All Saints, Etna, PA
3/08/1983-5/25/1985 Parochial Vicar, St. Michael, Butler, PA
6/26/1985-9/23/1991 Pastor, St. Francis De Sale, McKees Rocks, PA,
9/23/1991-2/07/1994 Administrator, St. Coleman, Turtle Creek, PA
2/07/1994-8/26/1994 Team Ministry, Risen Lord, Pittsburgh, PA
8/26/1994 Leave of Absence
5/28/1996 Withdrawn from Ministry

Summary

In early August 1994, a 13-year-old boy was taken by his parents for a routine physical
examination. During the examination, the boy disclosed to his doctor that he was sexually
assaulted by Father Richard Dorsch. The doctor informed the victim’s mother of the assault and
reported it to Children & Youth Services in Allegheny County. The Allegheny County Police
Department thereafter initiated an investigation into the complaint.

At the time of the victim’s complaint, Dorsch was serving as pastor at the Risen Lord on
the North Side of Pittsburgh. It was determined that the sexual assault of the victim took place
at "North Park" in Allegheny County on August 2, 1994. An investigation by law enforcement
resulted in Dorsch's arrest on August 26, 1994.

Dorsch's arrest prompted the Diocese of Pittsburgh to place him on administrative leave.
Arrangements were then made to send Dorsch to St. Luke Institute in Suitland, Maryland for an
evaluation. The evaluation was scheduled for the week of October 9, 1994.

On August 26, 1994 - - the day of Dorsch's arrest - - a meeting was held with Dorsch
and officials with the Diocese regarding the victim’s allegations. Handwritten notes from the
Diocesan file detailed what occurred during this meeting. Dorsch admitted to “inappropriately”
touching the victim, holding him longer than necessary, and sitting the victim on his (Dorsch’s)
lap while stroking the victim’s stomach and touching his nipples. When asked if he touched the
victim’s genitals, Dorsch replied, “I didn’t touch his genitals . . . I don’t think I did?” Dorsch
also admitted during the meeting that he had always been attracted to young boys, but that he
had been able to control this attraction by making sure he was never alone with them.
640
Summary

In April 1995, a jury convicted Dorsch of two counts of indecent assault and one count
of corrupting the morals of a minor. On June 23, 1995, Dorsch was sentenced to 11 ½ to 23
months incarceration. However, only a week later (June 30, 1995), Dorsch was released on
parole and admitted back to St. Luke Institute in Maryland.

In a letter dated June 29, 1995 from Rita Flaherty of the Diocese to a physician at St.
Luke Institute, Flaherty wrote, inter alia:

I look forward to working with you and maintaining the excellent

working relationship that the Diocese of Pittsburgh currently has
with St. Luke Institute. I also want to thank you for “going the
extra mile” on behalf of Father Richard Dorsch.

Flaherty continued the letter by stating, “Again, I thank you and all of the staff at St. Luke
Institute for all that you do for the priests of our diocese.”

On December 9, 1994, a handwritten letter was sent to Father Guay by another victim.
In his letter, a second victim indicated he was sexually assaulted by Dorsch at the All Saints
church in Etna when he was 10 years old. The victim indicated the assaults first occurred in the
spring of 1981 and that on the first such occasion, Dorsch had the victim touch his (Dorsch’s)
bare chest, while Dorsch kissed the victim on the head.

Dorsch thereafter began taking the second victim to a racquetball club in Shaler. After
playing racquetball, Dorsch and the victim would sit naked in a hot tub together and Dorsch
would put his hand on the victim’s leg under the water. In the fall of 1991, Dorsch reportedly
sat in the hot tub and fondled the victim's genitals by sitting the victim on his lap and placing
his hands on the victim’s penis and testicles. During the following weeks, Dorsch assaulted the
second victim at the church by placing his hand down his pants and, again, fondling his genital
area.

On another occasion, the second victim went to Moraine State Park with Dorsch and
three or four other youths. While swimming in a lake, one of the other boys, who the victim
told Diocesan officials he could identify, complained that Dorsch had tried to fondle his testicles.

The second victim indicated that Dorsch's sexual abuse stopped only when Dorsch was
transferred from All Saints when the victim was in eighth grade. He estimated that, in total,
Dorsch assaulted him on 50 to 70 separate occasions. The second victim later filed a lawsuit
against the Diocese alleging a decades-long conspiracy to protect priests who molested minors.
A review of Dorsch's Diocesan file did not reveal how this lawsuit was ultimately resolved.

Between July and November 1996, the Diocese made various payments and
reimbursements to Dorsch, including $140 for a computer course, $1,732 for classes and $622
for student fees at the University of Pittsburgh at Greensburg, and $2,493 for “courses and
books.”

641
Summary

On January 23, 1997, a letter was sent from the Diocese to St. Luke Institute. The letter
read, in part:

Dear Bill, As I am sure you are aware, Father Richard Dorsch will be returning
to St. Luke’s for his second Aftercare workshop the week of February 16 . . .
Since Richard’s last Aftercare workshop, several new developments have
occurred. On a positive note, Richard recently received word that civil charges
have been dropped as a result of a mediation process and out of court settlement.
This resolution has alleviated a lot of anxiety for Richard regarding his future.

On May 22, 1997, Dorsch wrote a letter to Bishop Donald Wuerl. A portion of the letter
read:

Dear Bishop Wuerl, I was speaking with Rita Flaherty today and she informed
me that the time period for my receiving an increase in my monthly stipend
($1,000) has expired. She suggested that I write you if I need an extension on
this benefit.

There was a handwritten notation on this letter which read, “5/30 called Richard to give O.K. by
Bishop W.”

On May 30, 1997, a letter was sent to Dorsch confirming that he would continue to
receive a monthly sustenance check of $1,000 from the Diocese. Dorsch continued to receive
monthly sustenance checks from the Diocese from the year of his conviction through 2009. In
total, Dorsch received $159,700.00 in “sustenance” payments.

On July 6, 2000, a letter regarding Dorsch was sent from Father James Ruggiero,
Episcopal Vicar for Clergy and Religious, to Father Douglas Nowicki of St. Vincent Archabbey
in Latrobe. In the letter, Ruggiero acknowledged that Dorsch had been arrested and convicted
of molesting a 13-year-old boy. In the letter, Ruggiero asked for Nowicki’s assistance in getting
Dorsch a job in an infirmary setting within a “religious community.” Ruggiero further added
that Dorsch was trying to stay out of the Pittsburgh area to avoid causing any additional scandal
for the Diocese. In asking for Nowicki's assistance, Ruggiero stated, “It would be greatly
appreciated by Bishop Wuerl, myself and all those in the Clergy Office . . . His salary would not
need to be large. It could be subsidized by the diocese.”

On May 20, 2002, Rita Flaherty, Diocesan Assistance Coordinatr, sent a letter to Dorsch.
A portion of the letter read,

I am embarrassed that only now am I responding to your

February 25 letter. At about the time your letter arrived, I was
knee deep in work related to fallout from the Boston situation.
Lent and Easter have passed me by. On day runs into the next
and now it is May. These past few months have been very difficult.

642
Summary
So many people are in pain with lives being turned upside down.
By far, this is the most difficult time I have ever spent in the clergy
office since I started there over eight years ago. Your support and
prayers are deeply appreciated. Should a circumstance arise
where a priest feels the need to speak to someone who has
travelled the same journey as you, I will not hesitate to pass along
your name. I’m sure that all the media attention related to clergy
misconduct has also been difficult for you. . . I’m sure your
example and courage in facing your own situation would be a
tremendous witness to the many priests who are new to facing an
uncertain future.

On February 25, 2004, a Pittsburgh law firm sent a letter to Wuerl informing him of yet
another reported victim of Dorsch. The victim who was an adult in 2004, reported through the
law firm that when he was in the fourth, fifth and sixth grades, he was repeatedly sexually
assaulted by Dorsch. This third victim, who served as an altar boy and attended a school
associated with All Saints, described how after Dorsch taught him to play racquetball at the gym,
he would make him sit on his lap in the hot tub. After masses at church, Dorsch would take the
victim to play board games and put his hands down the victim’s pants. On other occasions,
Dorsch would take him for car rides and make the victim touch him sexually while he drove.

On February 27, 2004, Counsel for the Diocese sent a letter responding to the law firm.
The letter read, in part, “

I have been asked to respond initially to your letter on behalf of

Bishop Wuerl. The matter that you presented in your letter is
tragic and very sad. The Diocese of Pittsburgh is concerned
utmost about the safety and well-being of children, victims and
their families.

On July 20, 2008, the third victim wrote a letter to the Diocese outlining the sexual
assaults committed against him by Dorsch. In his letter, he explained how he was sexually,
physically, and emotionally abused by Dorsch from 1982 to 1985 while he was a student at All
Saints and an altar boy at All Saints church. The abuse occurred a year after his father had
passed away. The letter describes one particularly damaging assault by Dorsch.

One occasion stands out due to the violent intensity of the abuse,
sexual, physical and emotional. Dorsch led me down to a trail,
then known as the “Braille Trail” (located in North
Park/Allegheny County), saying he wanted to teach me how blind
people read. This incident replayed itself and resulted in my
attempt to take my own life the night of Friday, 20 June 2008.
That day on the trail back in 1983, Dorsch had me close my eyes.
He guided my hand across a Braille sign. Then, his hand
squeezed tight on mine. He forcibly restrained me. I said,

643
Summary
“Father, that hurts!” He said, “It’s going to be okay” as he
gripped my hand around his penis. I cried out through tears, “No,
Father!” His grip got even tighter and he kept his hand clasped
around mine as he forced me to masturbate him to ejaculate. I
was sobbing, I felt disgusting. He said this is what made our love
special, and that only he and I were to know. He always said that,
as if to threaten me.

The victim further informed Diocesan officials that he also sexually abused by Dorsch in the
sacristy, the rectory, the Shaler Racquetball Court, and in the parking lot of a local shopping
center. These sexual assaults reportedly included oral and anal sex.

On July 22, 2008, Dorsch was confronted with the allegations. In a “Confidential
Memorandum,” Flaherty documented that she asked Dorsch if the allegations were true. Dorsch
responded that he did know the victim and admitted he was “inappropriate with him.”

In the years following his abuse, the third victim attempted suicide on numerous
occasions, including in 2008 and 2009. The Diocese thereafter began paying for his mental
health treatment in July 2008, a month after his attempted suicide.

On December 11, 2008, the victim sent an e-mail communication to Flaherty, the
contents of which Flaherty forwarded to Bishop Zubik. A portion of the e-mail message read:

Early in the summer this year – in fact, it was the day of the
summer solstice itself- I attempted to take my own life. It
happened in the wee hours of the morning following a night of
heavy drink, which my doctors have explained may have induced
an inescapable episodic flashback of sexual abuse, which has
haunted me over the years. This time, however, the pain of that
flashback I couldn’t stand any longer, and decided that enough
was enough. No more pain I thought as I swallowed dozens of
pills.

In March 2010, the Diocese announced it would stop paying for the victim’s mental
health treatment. On May 4, 2010, the victim committed suicide.

On January 13, 2012, Flaherty and Bishop William John Waltersheid met with yet
another victim of Dorsch. The fourth victim, who was 45 years old at the time of the meeting,
indicated his abuse by Dorsch occurred when he attended All Saints school. This meeting was
memorialized in a “Confidential Memorandum” to Bishop Zubik.

The fourth victim reported that when he was in sixth grade, he became an altar server
and was considering becoming a priest. He stated that when he was in the seventh and eighth
grade, Dorsch began sexually abusing him and that for all his young life, carrying the dark secret
of Dorsch's abuse placed a heavy burden on him. As a result of this abuse, by the end of his

644
Summary
eighth grade school year, he was drinking heavily. At his worst, he was drinking a half gallon
of vodka per day in the hopes that his drinking would kill him.

The memorandum stated that the fourth victim’s “purpose in coming to meet with us
(Flaherty and Waltersheid) was to be able to tell his story and to be heard as a person who
mattered.” He also hoped that the church could help him rebuild his life, as he was homeless.
The Diocese ultimately decided to help the victim and paid for a bed and bus pass for him.

On July 2, 2012, Flaherty, at the direction of Waltersheid, contacted a woman whose son
was reportedly molested by Dorsch when he served as an altar boy at St. Coleman. The
molestation took place when the victim, who was 32 years old at the time of reporting, was 12
to 14 years of age.

The mother of this fifth victim stated that she learned of the molestation when “Father
Dorsch was arrested back in 1994 or 1995.” She stated that once she became aware of what
happened to her son, she approached Father Markell, the parochial vicar assigned at the time
with Dorsch at the parish. She stated that Markell discouraged her from pursuing the matter any
further and asked her son - “what did you do?” - as if to imply he was responsible for or
encouraged Dorsch's sexual misconduct. Markell asked them whether they were going to sue
the church and instructed her not to take her complaint to the Diocese, as there was nothing they
could do or offer.

The fifth victim’s mother also told Flaherty, “she took [her son] to a child psychologist
in Monroeville for 2 ½ years. She said she, her husband and daughter also entered family
counseling.” The mother stated that she paid privately for her son’s therapy. Flaherty told the
mother that as part of the Diocese policy, they have to turn over all allegations of abuse to the
District Attorney’s Office in the location where the abuse occurred. The mother stated that she
would talk to her son.

On July 18, 2012, Flaherty spoke with the mother, who said she had not yet spoken to
her son about the matter. She asked Flaherty not to do anything with this information until she
spoke with her son.

On July 19, 2012, an Allegation Report listed “Alleged Victim: John Doe, Age 32,
Address Unknown and Accused Priest: (Rev.) Richard Dorsch” was sent to counsel for the
Diocese. Because of the concerns expressed by the victim’s mother, the initial report did not
identify him by name but only as a “John Doe.”

On June 29, 2016, Diocesan officials met with an adult male who reported that when he
was 10 to 12 years of age, he was sexually abused by Dorsch. The abuse took place when the
victim was a member of St. Coleman. The victim, who was an altar boy and enjoyed basketball,
explained how he and Dorsch became friendly after Dorsch would come to his games. He
recalled Dorsch giving him gifts and taking pictures of the two of them together. Dorsch soon
began fondling the victim in his (Dorsch’s) bedroom at the rectory and at the gym.

645
Summary
The victim also reported he and Dorsch would get into a hot tub together while they were
both naked.

646
 Reverend David F. Dzermejko

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1948
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 4, 1974

Employment/Assignment History
5/30/1974-6/10/1979 Our Lady of the Most Blessed Sacrament, Natrona Heights, PA
6/11/1979-6/03/1984 St. Teresa of Avila, Pittsburgh, PA
6/04/1984-6/10/1991 St. Susanna, Penn Hills, PA
6/10/1991-10/26/1992 St. Jerome, Charleroi, PA
10/26/1992-6/15/2009 Mary, Mother of the Church, Charleroi, PA
6/15/2009 Leave of Absence
6/15/2009-1/18/2013 Resides at St. John Vianney Manor, Pittsburgh, PA
10/2015 Laicized

Summary

Files obtained by subpoena from the Diocese of Pittsburgh, including a confidential

report from the Diocesan Review Board, as well as personnel, confidential and victim files,
reflected that Father David Dzermejko was reported to have had inappropriate contact with
several young boys, conduct which included anal and oral sexual assaults of young minors.

In June 2009, the Diocese first received a report that Dzermejko had sexually abused a
minor child. A woman called to report that prior to her husband’s suicide in April, 2009, he told
her that he had been sexually abused by Dzermejkko. It occurred sometime between 1979 and
1984. The first incident took place in Dzermejko’s car where the victim “had been pushed back
in the seat of the car and Dzermejko touched his chest and did other things to him that he would
not detail.” The second incident occurred when the victim was on a ferris wheel ride with
Dzermejko during a church festival. During this incident, Dzermejko “fondled” the victim and
the victim wrote in a journal he was keeping at the time that, “I wasn’t raped or sodomized just
fondled.” The victim went on to add that Dzermejko had warned him, “You can’t tell anyone.
I’ll tell your mother.” The victim also stated in the journal that he could not get off of the ride
because Dzermejko told the operator to keep the ride going three times longer than it should
have. The victim wrote, “I was trapped and couldn’t get off.” After meeting with representatives
from the Diocese, it was decided that this victim’s family would be provided with funds for
counseling.

On June 19, 2009, counsel for the Diocese received a telephone call from a second
victim. The victim had previously contacted the Allegheny County District Attorney’s office
and was encouraged to make an “official report” to the Diocese. The victim stated that he was
an altar boy at St. Teresa of Avila while he was a student at the school. This was during the

647
Summary
time period of 1979-1982, while he was in the fifth, sixth and seventh grades. He said that
“Father Dave” (Dzermejko) was very friendly with his family and they “went on picnics and
spent time at each other’s homes.” This victim also said that:

Numerous times he stayed overnight at the rectory and his parents never had a
problem with him doing so. Dave had attractive things to young people such as
a video console and a CB radio among other things.

This victim reported that he was “raped, had anal and oral sex and performed oral sex with
Dave over a course of three years.” He feared Dave because his parents were friendly with him
and they drank and shared meals together. The victim stated that the last abuse occurred in the
summertime when his father was working the night shift. His mother and Dave were on the
porch drinking and the victim was with them. Dave became intoxicated and the victim’s mom
encouraged Dzermejko to stay the night. After his mother went to bed, he and Dave performed
oral sex on each other and then the victim got scared and ran away and hid in the basement.

On January 31, 2012, a third victim contacted the Diocese. This adult male reported that
he was sexually abused by Dzermejko in the late 1980’s when he was 15 to 16 years of age. In
correspondence to the Assistant Prosecuting Attorney in Ohio County, West Virginia, it was
noted by Diocesan counsel that the victim had called the Diocese several times in the past but
did not leave his name. Only after speaking with the prosecutor’s office did the victim decide
to give more complete information.

The third victim reported that he was initially introduced to Dzermejko by one of his
friends. At the time, he was living in Cambridge, Ohio. He had stated that Dzermejko would
take him to bars in Wheeling, West Virginia and in Pittsburgh. The victim advised that he had
been on Dzermejko’s boat “The Seaman,” and had been to the rectory in Charleroi. He was also
in Dzermejko’s various cars.

The victim advised that when he initially met Dzermejko, he did not know that
Dzermejko was a priest. Dzermejko had told this victim that he was a “hospital administrator”
and had a “teddy bear strapped in the backseat of his car that wore a doctor outfit.” This victim
had said that “when he first met Dzermejko, he did not do anything sexually to him.” He said
there “were other boys ages to 14-16.”

The victim reported that “eventually Dzermejko had oral sex with him but he never
performed oral sex on Dzermejko and never had intercourse with him.” The victim gave the
following locations as the places where he had “sexual encounters” with Dzermejko: 1) Outside
the “True Colors” bar in Elm Grove, West Virginia (the victim stated he was 15 to 16 years old
at the time); 2) Outside the Lamont restaurant (the victim stated he was about 15 to 16 years old
at the time); 3) On Dzermejko’s boat somewhere between Charleroi and Pittsburgh (the victim
stated that he was 15 to 16 years old); 4) In Dzermejko’s rectory in Charleroi (though the victim
said that he was 15 to 16, based on the date when Dzermejko first arrived in Charleroi, he would
have been 18. The victim further reported that he went to the Crowne Plaza Hotel in Columbus
with Dzermejko but he could not recall if oral sex occurred there.

648
Summary
By letter dated June 15, 2009, Dzermejko was notified that he was being placed on
administrative leave “[i]n light of an allegation made against [him] involving the sexual abuse
of a minor . . . .” That correspondence also directed Dzermejko “to take up residence at St.
John Vianney Manor . . . , effective immediately.”

On January 11, 2013, law enforcement officers executed a warrant to search

Dzermejko’s rooms at St. John Vianney Manor. They seized child pornography, located on his
computer and also found firearms and illegal drugs. He was arrested in April 2013 for
possession of child pornography. When Dzermejko spoke with law enforcement, he admitted:
That he had been viewing child pornography for in excess of 10 years; that he had historically
travelled to Thailand to have sexual encounters with teen boys; and, that he had gone there as
recently as the same calendar year.

In November 2013, Dzermejko pled guilty to possession of child pornography in federal

court. He was sentenced to three years in prison. He began serving that sentence in June, 2014.

On September 11, 2015, Zubik wrote to Vatican authorities requesting that Dzermejko
“be dismissed from the clerical state in the most expedient manner possible.” The official decree
dismissing Dzermejko from the clerical state was issued on October 31, 2015 and the Diocese
received it on November 16, 2015.

Records subpoenaed from the Diocese reflected that financial assistance to Dzermejko
was not suspended upon his incarceration, but appear to have continued for approximately one
year after he went to prison. On March 1, 2016, Dzermejko wrote to Zubik indicating that the
$350 a month he had been receiving for prison commissary expenses and to pay home bills had
stopped and requested financial assistance. In response to Dzermejko’s letter, on March 11,
2016, Zubik wrote:

Having just received your heartfelt-letter, please know that I am quickly

following up on your request for financial assistance. I have asked Bishop
William J. Waltersheild to make this a top priority. Please know that you will be
hearing from him very shortly.

The records received from the Diocese do not reflect what, if any, action was taken to provide
Dzermejko with financial assistance.

649
Biographical Information

Employment/Assignment History

Summary

In a memorandum dated , the Diocese of documented a meeting

wherein a woman reported an incident involving and her younger
brother. Her brother told her that when , he and went to
for a retreat. While there,
. At that time, was

Diocesan records also contained a confidential memorandum dated that

was written by Father stated that he had received a telephone call on that
date from Father . reported that he had been contacted by an individual
who stated that in the early
. Specifically, it was reported that
. It was further reported that
was encouraged to have the individuals contact or

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

650 -*5*("5*0/
 Reverend John P. Fitzgerald

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1948
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 4, 1974

Employment/Assignment History
5/30/1974 – 2/7/1977 St. Thomas, Braddock, PA
5/30/1974 – 2/7/1977 St. Michael, Braddock, PA
2/8/1977 – 7/7/1982 St. Michael the Archangel, Butler, PA
7/8/1982 – 3/7/1983 St. Alexis, Wexford, PA
3/8/1983 – 6/12/1988 All Saint’s, Pittsburgh, PA
6/13/1988 – 6/21/1989 St. Anselm, Pittsburgh, PA
6/21/1989 – 8/2/1991 St. Teresa of Avila, Pittsburgh, PA
8/2/1991 – 7/17/1995 St. Anthony, Bessemer, PA
11/28/1994 – 6/17/1996 Pittsburgh International Airport
1/3/1995 – 7/17/1995 St. Lawrence, Hillsville, PA
7/17/1995 – 6/17/1996 St. John Neumann, Pittsburgh, PA
6/17/1996 – 7/1/2009 Pittsburgh International Airport
7/1/2009 – 7/31/2014 Our Lady of Peace, Conway, PA

Summary

On March 10, 2014, a priest contacted the Diocese of Pittsburgh to advise that a male
family member had been molested as a boy by Father John P. Fitzgerald in 1996 while Fitzgerald
resided at Holy Trinity Church and was the Chaplain at the Pittsburgh International Airport. It
was reported that on one occasion, Fitzgerald droved the boy to a hanger in New Castle where
Fitzgerald’s airplane was kept. During the ride, Fitzgerald moved his arms to the beat of the
music playing on the radio and then touched the boy’s genital area. On another occasion, while
they were in Fitzgerald’s airplane, Fitzgerald touched the boy’s genital area and attempted to
put his hand down the boy’s pants. The boy further reported that Fitzgerald exposed himself in
the Pittsburgh International Airport chapel and also had the boy perform oral sex on him “maybe
half a dozen times.” Fitzgerald instructed the boy not to tell anyone, warning that he would do
the same thing to his mother and sister. Fitzgerald told him, “I know when your father isn’t at
home.”

Fitzgerald denied the allegations. A memorandum of a telephone conversation with

Fitzgerald from August 1, 2014 indicated the following:

Today I received a phone call from Father Jack Fitzgerald. Father Fitzgerald
stated that this would be the only time that I heard from him directly, that all
other conversations would be done through his canonical advocate. Father

651
Summary
Fitzgerald told me that he wanted me to communicate to [the male’s] family that
they had one opportunity to recant their statement or else all hell would break
loose, it will be like World War III. Then Father Fitzgerald hung up.

On December 12, 2014, the Diocese held a Diocesan Review Board hearing relative to
the allegations made against Fitzgerald. Their findings included the following:

1. The Review Board did not completely accept the testimony of the family of
(the victim). However, some of the board members believe the testimony at
certain points was consistent with abuse and those members tend to believe
that abuse had occurred.

2. There was a great deal of discrepancy in the facts between the family’s
testimony and Father Fitzgerald’s.

3. This abuse could have occurred but there is some disagreement regarding
how to interpret all of the testimony given.”

The following were the recommendations of the Diocesan Review Board:

1. That the allegations brought forward by (the victim) demonstrate that a

semblance of truth exists.

2. That Reverend John P. Fitzgerald not be returned to his assignment and

that a further hearing of the case take place according to the norms of the
document from the Holy See Sacramentorum Sanctitatis Tutela.”

The current status of proceedings against Fitzgerald is unknown.

The Diocese paid for some of the counseling and drug treatment for the male in addition
to providing the family with a $40,000 reimbursement for drug treatment expenses that were
incurred prior to the report being made.

652
 Reverend Joseph M. Ganter

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1892
YEAR OF DEATH: Unknown
ORDINATION: May 25, 1922

Employment/Assignment History
7/1922-9/1923 Saint’s Peter & Paul, Pittsburgh, PA
9/1923-7/1932 St. Martin Church, West End, Pittsburgh, PA
7/1932-3/1942 St. Athanasius Church, West View, PA
3/1942-6/1964 St. Boniface Church, Penn, PA
6/3/1964 Retired

Summary

In 2008, an 80-year-old male contacted the Diocese of Pittsburgh to report that Father
Joseph M. Ganter had abused him in the 1930’s when he was approximately 10 years of age and
an altar server at St. Anthanasius. He advised that he stopped serving mass after the abuse
occurred. He further advised of five boys who had slept with Ganter as well as an unknown boy
from West View who spent his vacation with Ganter. When a Bishop’s delegate reviewed
Ganter’s personal file, an allegation from 1944 was discovered whererin an adult male had
complained of immoral and corrupt relationships between Ganter and at least three teenage boys,
ages 13 to 15.

The first teenage boy was 14-years-old when Ganter approached him in January, 1943 in
his office. Ganter asked the boy to engage in a sex act. The boy became frightened, started to
cry and then asked to go home. Ganter gave the boy $3.00 and instructed him to never tell
anyone.

The second teenage boy was 15-years-old when Ganter asked him to commit a sex act in
his office. This occurred on a Sunday evening in April, 1943. The boy refused. Ganter gave
him $12.00 and one ticket for bingo, instructing him not to tell anyone. A witness informed the
boy that he should do whatever Ganter requested because it was not sinful. The witness futher
advised the boy not to be afraid because Ganter told him that everybody does it.

The third teen entered the parish house on the evening of September 30, 1943 with
another boy. The other boy then went to the school hall. When the other boy returned to the
house with two others, they witnessed the teen and Ganter engaged in a sex act. This occurred
in the office opposite the dining room.

653
Summary
In 1945, at the request of Ganter, a Justice of the Peace conducted an investigation into
the accusations. The individuals were interviewed, having given different stories and denied
any supposed immoral relations with Ganter.

654
 Reverend John A. Genizer

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1941
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: December 23, 1967

Employment/Assignment History
7/31/1968-5/21/1973 Parochial Vicar, St. Paul, Butler, PA
5/22/1973-2/17/1975 Special Assignment, Office of Religious Education,
Diocese of Pittsburgh Pastoral Center
5/22/1973-2/17/1975 Duquesne University—Graduate Studies
2/17/1975-8/21/1980 Assistant Director, Adult Religious Education
Diocese of Pittsburgh Pastoral Center
8/25/1980-4/29/1990 Associate Spiritual Director, Mount St. Mary Seminary,
Emmitsburg, MD
6/11/1990-6/10/1991 Parochial Vicar, Holy Innocents, Pittsburgh, PA
6/01/1991-2/07/1994 Assistant Chaplain Nursing Home, McGuire Memorial Home,
New Brighton, PA
6/10/1991-2/07/1994 Administrator, St. Cyril & Methodius, New Brighton, PA
2/07/1994-1/17/2000 Pastor, St. Colman, Turtle Creek, PA
1/17/2000-3/12/2007 Chaplain Military-US Navy, Archdiocese for Military Services,
Washington, DC
3/12/2007-7/07/2008 Administrator, St. Barbara, Bridgeville, PA
7/07/2008-6/06/2011 Parochial Vicar, St. John the Baptist, Pittsburgh, PA
6/06/2011-present Chaplain, Little Sisters of the Poor

Summary

In a document dated July 7, 1995 and initialed “R.F.G.” (Father Robert F. Guay), it was
noted that a telephone call had been received from Father William Lynn, Secretary for the Clergy
of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia. It was reported that the son of a member of the Archdiocese
had revealed that was fondled by Father John A. Genizer in 1980 when he was 13-years-old.
Lynn advised that the son’s parents were very involved in the church and were reputable. He
further stated that the parents did not want to make the information public.

Guay sent a letter to the family dated August 7, 1995 wherein he explained that in order
for the Diocese of Pittsburgh to conduct an investigation, a statement or written allegation was
necessary so that they had something documented to review with the priest involved.

In February, 2009, Geinzer wrote a letter to Bishop Zubik, asking for his endorsement to
serve under the supervision of the Apostleship of the Holy See USA as a chaplain aboard a
passenger cruise ship. In a confidential memorandum to the file dated March 24, 2009, the
655
Summary
Diocese reported that Father Bonner met with Geinzer to discuss his recent request. It was noted
that Genizer needed the endorsement of the Bishop and that the Bishop would have to sign a
document stating that Genizer; “Enjoys a good reputation and has no problems of a moral
nature.” They then discussed the 1995 report of abuse. Genizer denied the allegation.

It was subsequently determined that because of the sexual allegation listed in his
confidential file, Genizer would not be endorsed by the Bishop to serve as chaplain. Genizer
was assured, however, that the allegation would not affect his current standing in the Diocese
because the Diocese deemed it to be an “inconclusive allegation.”

In a confidential memorandum dated May 28, 2014, a telephone call from a woman was
documented wherein she complained about Genizer’s conduct around her son. She stated that
three years ealier, she and her family went to the Little Sisters of the Poor to visit her parents.
Her son was eight-years-old at that time. While they were there, Genizer took her children to
get candy. When they returned, she noticed that Genizer was showing a little too much interest
in her son’s clothes and how her son looked. This made her son feel very uneasy. During their
next visit, Genizer approached her son. He stated that “he looked so handsome” and touched
the boy as he made this comment. She stated that her son broke into tears and told her that he
did not want to talk to Genizer. The boy further stated, “I don’t want him touching me.” Finally,
the woman revealed that on a more recent vistit to Little Sisters of the Poor, they attended mass.
As they were leaving, Genizer approached another young boy who was approximately 13 years
of age. She stated that Genizer began touching the boy and made comments about how he was
dressed. The woman advised that she had just attended a “safe environment training” and
thought that Genizer’s behavior towards young boys needed attention.

Another memorandum in the file dated May 30, 2014 revealed that a discussion of the
allegations with Genizer occurred. Father Eckman told Genizer that he had received a complaint
through Father Rushofsky that Genizer was making the boy uncomfortable by patting him on
the back for prolonged periods of time, making comments about his clothes and focusing on the
child in unusual ways. He also explained that Genizer had been observed exhibiting this same
type of behavior with other young boys, but never with any of the girls. Genizer responded that
he was unaware of his behavior and how it made others feel. He advised that he would make
extra effort not to touch any minors.

After these specific allegations of unnatural interest in young boys were made and
documented in his file, Diocesan officials continued to write and sign letters advising that
Genizer was a priest in “good standing.” Specifically in a May 19, 2016 document entitled;
“Testimonial of the Diocese of Pittsburgh of Suitability for Priestly Ministry” that was signed
and initialed by Eckman, it was stated that not only was Genizer a priest in good standing, “[n]o
accusations of misconduct have ever been made against him, nor has he ever been involved in
any incident, to my knowledge, which has led to potential or public scandal.” The letter further
stated; “To the best of my knowledge, he has never engaged in sexual behavior inconsistent with
priestly celibacy, nor had he ever acted in an inappropriate manner with minors.”

656
 Reverend Charles R. Ginder

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1914
YEAR OF DEATH: 1984
ORDINATION: June 11, 1940

Employment/Assignment History
8/1940-9/1942 St. Gregory, Zelienople, PA and St. Mathias, Evans City, PA
9/1972-2/1946 Society of St. Suplice (NFI)
2/1946-6/1950 Saint’s Simon & Jude, Blairsville, PA
6/1950-12/1953 St. George, Pittsburgh, PA (South Side)
12/1953-6/1959 St. Joseph, Pittsburgh, PA (North Side)
12/1954-7/1962 Censor Librorum
6/1959-2/1961 St. Mary, New Castle, PA
2/1961-8/1962 School Sisters of St. Francis, Bellevue, PA
7/1962-7/1963 Health related leave of absence
8/1963-5/1964 Our Lady of Mercy Academy (NFI)
5/1964-6/1964 St. Januarius, Pittsburgh, PA
5/1964-6/1964 St. John the Baptist, Pittsburgh, PA
6/1964-1/1967 Sick Leave
1/1967-? St. John the Baptist, Baden, PA
1970-6/1984 Sick Leave

Summary

Over the course of the years, an adult male residing in Seattle, WA contacted the Diocese
of Pittsburgh on multiple occasions. He never provided details of his abuse, but he threatened to
sue the Diocese and recorded telephone calls that he made. The male was advised in 1999 that
the records pertaining to Father Charles R. Ginder were destroyed as Ginder had died in 1984.
The male subsequently sent a letter wherein he stated that he was taken to New York, New
Jersey and Philadelphia by Ginder. He estimated that the trips occurred between 1958 and 1961.
He did not provide details of any abuse, but advised that the details would be contained in a
book that he planned to write. The male also advised that he was abused by another priest in
Pittsburgh who now lived in Florida. He refused to name the other priest, however, in order to
maintain “the element of surprise.”

In September, 2005, the male called the Diocese to say that he would be in Pittsburgh in
the near future and wanted to make the abuse publicly known. He advised that he had requested
that CNN and 60 Minutes accompany him. In 2006, he called the Diocese to advise that he was
expecting reimbursement for the cost of many years of counseling and medication that he has
incurred due to abuse by Ginder.

657
Summary
On November 28, 2007, a letter was went to the male from the Ministerial Assistance
Coordinator of the Diocese which included a check in the amount of $4,092.00 for monthly
insurance premiums. A copy of a Receipt and Release was also enclosed which stated:

I hereby forever remise, release and discharge the Diocese of Pittsburgh . . .

from any and all continuing obligations, liabilities or claims that I may have in
the future for counseling and counseling benefits.

Additionally, there was a June 20, 2008 letter in the file that was sent to the male. This letter
stated that the Diocese had entered into a mediation process in connection with a lawsuit and
that sums of money were apportioned to the plaintiffs. The male was advised that, as a plaintiff,
he was to receive $16,000.00 as his portion of the resolution.

In 2002, a 50-year-old male living in New Jersey reported that he had been abused by
Ginder when he was between the ages of 15 and 17. He stated that he and a boy from Denmark
would gather at the residence of the Bishop on many occasions. He stated that they would drink
alcohol and “sexual activity would occur there.” According to the male, the sexual activity
occurred with Ginder and the Bishop was aware of it. The male further stated that he lived with
Ginder on Murray Avenue for a short time. He stated that the relationship with Ginder and
others was “out of control.” He described Ginder as “a physically abusive monster.”

In 2007, a 69-year old male living in Florida called the Diocese to report that he had been
molested by Ginder. He stated that he attended St. Mary’s on the North Side as a child in the
late 1940s. Ginder, who was assigned to a neighboring parish, would wait outside of St. Mary’s
early in the morning to offer him rides. He did not provide specific details. However, he
explained that after a few occasions, he no longer accepted rides from Ginder. He stated that
the abuse he suffered caused his marriage to fail; that he had feelings of guilt; and, that he had
attempted suicide. He further related that he was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder;
had been in and out of hospitals; and experienced terrible nightmares.

In 2011, an adult male reported sexual abuse through the Diocese of Manchester in New
Hampshire. He stated that in 1980, when he was approximately 15 or 16-years-old, he attended
an overnight retreat at Hundred Acres in New Boston. Another man, possibly a priest, attempted
to assault him in his bed. When he screamed loudly, Ginder came into the room. Ginder then
offered to drive him home. During the car ride, Ginder pulled over by a river. He then fondled
the young man on the top of his clothes. The young man got out of the vehicle before it went
any further and took a bus home.

In 2013, an adult male reported that he was befriended by Ginder following the death of
his brother in 1960. He stated that they often made trips from New Castle to Pittsburgh and had
dinner together. The male recalled that on one occasion, he fell asleep in the front seat of the
car following dinner with Ginder. He awoke to Ginder putting his hand up his pant leg, touching
his thigh. When asked what he was doing, Ginder explained that he was checking to see if the
boy was cold. After this incident, he did not accompany Ginder anywhere else.

658
 Reverend James G. Graham

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1940
YEAR OF DEATH: 2015
ORDINATION: May 14, 1966

Employment/Assignment History
6/07/1966 – 1/23/1972 St. Lawrence O’Toole, Pittsburgh, PA
1/24/1972 – 5/29/1974 St. Elizabeth of Hungary, Pittsburgh, PA
5/30/1974 – 9/18/1978 St. Bernadette, Monroeville, PA
9/19/1978 – 4/13/2012 St. Lawrence O’Toole, Garfield, PA
4/13/2012 – 3/06/2015 Leave of Absence

Summary

On July 24, 2012 the Diocesan Review Board heard and reviewed testimony pertaining
to the following allegations of abuse by Father James G. Graham:

1. A long-time female partner of a male victim verified a letter that he wrote

prior to his drug overdose death wherein he detailed his abuse at the hands
of Graham which started when he was 9 years old. The abuse lasted two
or three yeaars. The female partner became aware of the abuse after the
birth of her daughter when the victim refused to allow Graham to baptize
her. The victim died in 2012.

2. The sister of a victim testified that when her brother was placed on a liver
transplant list, she had several conversations with him about Graham. He
told her about the intimacy and sex he had with Graham when he was 15-
years-old. The victim died in 2002.

3. This victim did not appear before the Review Board as assigned; instead,
his interview by the Clergy Office was accepted as his testimony. He
stated that Graham once wrote him a love letter. On April 30, 2012, the
victim had a telephone conversation with the Diocesan Assistance
Coordinator. He advised that on two occasions while he was playing pool,
Graham came up behind him, lowered his pants and inserted his penis into
the victim’s anus. The victim was 16-years-old at the time. He advised
that shortly thereafter he began using drugs and alcohol.

All three allegations were deemed to be credible. Graham’s testimony before the Review
Board was deemed not to be credible. The Review Board believed that Graham’s mental
capacity was diminished due to his alcoholism. It was recommended to Bishop Zubik that

659
Summary
Graham was no longer suitable for public ministry. This recommendation was accepted and
Zubik perrmanently removed Graham as a priest.

The Diocese forwarded information regarding all three allegations to the Allegheny
County District Attorney’s Office.

660
 Brother William Hildebrand

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: Unknown
YEAR OF DEATH: 1979
ORDINATION: N/A

Employment/Assignment History
Unknown

Summary

In May 2014, four adult males reported that they were abused by Brother William
Hildebrand, who was a member of the Marianist Order. The first male stated that he was a
student at North Catholic High School during the 1952-1956 school year. During a time period
when the young man was utilizing crutches, Hildebrand rubbed his behind. The young man told
Hildebrand to get away from him.

The second male reported that he was a student at North Catholic High School during
the 1960’s school year. He stated that Hildebrand managed the school bookstore and would get
the students to go behind the counter so that he could have sex education talks with them and
touch them. He accused Hildebrand of inappropriately touching him.

The third male advised that he was a student at North Catholic High School from 1959-
1961. He explained that Hildebrand was his Latin teacher and would make him stay after school.
He reported that Hildebrand made him pull down his pants and then groped him. He stated that
this occurred on three to four occasions before he dropped out of school.

The fourth male was a student at North Catholic High School from 1956-1960. He
accused Hildebrand of inappropriately touching him.

In June, 2014, a 69-year-old male reported that he was abused by Hildebrand when he
was a student at North Catholic High School during the 1959 school year. He stated that during
his freshman year, he went to the school bookstore in order to purchase a new notebook. While
there, he stated that Hildebrand grabbed his genitals.

The records indicated that the Diocese attempted to reach out to the victims regarding
counseling.

661
 Reverend John S. Hoehl

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1938
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 9, 1963

Employment/Assignment History
1964 St. Mary Magdalene, Homestead, PA
1966 St. Francis Xavier, Pittsburgh, PA
1971 Quigley Catholic High School, Baden, PA
1985 Bishop Boyle High School, Homestead, PA
1985 St. John Joachim, Greenfield, PA
1986 Secretariat for Education, Pittsburgh, PA
1987 Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA

Summary

On May 2, 1986, a 28-year-old male made a report to the Diocese of Pittsburgh that he
had been sexually abused by Father John S. Hoehl. He stated that from 1972, when he was a
14-year-old freshman at Quigley High School, until 1979, when he was a senior at Duquesne
University, Hoehl fondled his genitals and they performed mutual masturbation and oral sex on
each other on a regular basis. At the time when this disclosure was made to Diocesan officials,
a young man was living with Hoehl at the rectory at St. Joachim. Found within the rectory were
various drug paraphernalia, condoms and other pornographic materials, including videos and
literature.

In 1993, a 29-year-old adult male reported that he had been sexually involved with Hoehl
beginning in 1978 when he was 15-years-old. He stated that it continued from his sophomore
year at Quigley until 1980 when he was a senior. He stated that he was sodomized on at least
two occasions. He further stated that oral sex and mutual masturbation occurred on many
occasions during that time period. He advised that he had sought the assistance of Hoehl in
connection with sexual abuse that he had suffered prior to attending Quigley.

In 1997, a 29-year-old male reported that in 1976, when he was nine years of age, Hoehl
touched and rubbed his genitals, and, performed oral sex on him. He stated that the sexual
activity lasted until he was 18-years-old. It then occurred again when he was a sophomore in
college. He indicated that there were many boys who stayed at Hoehl’s residence at Quigley and
that some of them had similar experiences with Hoehl. On September 22, 2000, the male and
his wife filed a lawsuit against Hoehl and the Diocese in connection with the sexual abuse. On
December 14, 2007, Bishop Zubick provided the male’s parents with a check in the amount of
$10,000.00. The accompanying letter stated that the money was for emotional and financial
hardship suffered.

662
Summary

On April 26, 2002, a 33-year-old male reported sexual abuse by Hoehl. He stated that
the sexual contact occurred at Hoehl’s private residence at Quigley in 1979 when he was 16
years of age. The male reported that Hoehl sexually abused him and provided him with drugs
and alcohol until 1982.

In 2004, an adult male informed the Diocese that he was sexually abused by Hoehl when
he was 16 years old and in his sophomore year at Quigley. He stated that in April, 1978, he was
outside of the school building when a friend came out to tell him that a girl (hereinafter referred
to “Jane Doe”) was in trouble in Hoehl’s office. The two boys ran into the office where they
saw her. She was naked from the waist down. She was being held down by an older student
and Hohel was about to rape her. The boys helped Jane Doe retrieve her clothes and wanted to
get her out of the office as quickly as possible. Hoehl told them that he would release Jane Doe
if they stayed behind to take her place. They agreed and Jane Doe was released. Hoehl locked
the office on both sides. He then sodomized both boys. The adult male reported that he and
Jane Doe told a female teacher what had occurred but the teacher did not take any action. The
male further stated that he came forward after receiving the letter wherein Bishop Wuerl invited
people to contact the Diocese if they had been abused.

Another additional victim came forward in 2004 to report that Hoehl had touched him
inappropriately between 1980 and 1984. The incidents occurred in Beaver County. The male
attended therapy and was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder. The Diocese assumed
responsibility for the costs of the therapy sessions and his prescriptions. On April 21, 2008, the
Diocese issued a check to the male in the amount of $10,000.00 as a pastoral gesture for the
financial difficulties he had experienced.

The Diocese received additional reports regarding abuse at the hands of Hoehl.
Specifically:

x Hoehl entered the shower with a 14-year-old boy in 1975. He also engaged
in manual masturbation with the boy and oral sex. The abuse occurred in
the school locker room, Hoehl’s residence at Quigley and at a cabin near
Youghiogheny Lake;
x Hoehl sexually touched a boy from 1972 to 1973 when he was 15 to 16
years of age. The incidents occurred in Beaver County;
x Hoehl inappropriately touched a boy from 1979 to 1980 when the boy was
12 to 13 years of age. The incidents occurred in Beaver County;
x Hoehl fondled the genitals of a 16-year-old boy in 1976. The incidents
occurred at Quigley and at the Youghiogheny Reservoir.

The Diocese was also notified that Hoehl fondled the genitals of a 13-year-old boy in
1979. He also approached the boy in the shower. These incidents occurred at Quigley and in a
“cabin at a lake.” The victim received $40,000.00 from the Diocese to settle his part of a 32
victim lawsuit against the Diocese. He later received a check in the amount of $10,000.00 to
help with his additional expenses.

663
Summary

The following is a summary of further allegations of sexual abuse committed by Hoehl:

x Hoehl fondled the genitals of a boy and washed his back. This occurred
between 1974 (when the boy was 10-years-old) and 1981. The conduct
occurred at Quigley and at a cabin at Youghiogheny Lake. He is the brother
of the immediate victim listed above;
x In 1973, Hoehl wrestled and showered with a 15-year-old boy. He removed
the boy’s underwear and rubbed his genitals. The incidents occurred at
Hoehl’s private home at Quigley. He is the brother of the immediate victim
listed above;
x A male reported that Hoehl would make the boys go to bed wearing long
shirts with no underwear so that he could fondle their genitals in the middle
of the night; and
x From 1975 to 1976, Hoehl kissed a boy, provided him with alcohol,
performed oral sex on him, fondled his genitals and took nude photographs
of him. The incidents occurred from 1975 to 1976 when the boy was 17 to
18 years of age.

On May 18, 2015, Father David DeWitt, Pastor of Risen Lord, telephoned Father Mark
Eckman. DeWitt explained that he was scheduled to preside over a funeral and was contacted
by the son of the deceased who stated that he was having a difficult time dealing with his father’s
death. The son further advised that he felt uncomfortable coming back to Pittsburgh because he
was sexually abused by Hoehl when he was a student at St. Francis Xavier from 1966 to1967.

An adult male met with Diocesan officials on May 11, 2005. The male explained that he
was a student at Quigley and, when he was approximately 15-16 years of age, Hoehl took him
and several other boys to his cabin. While at the cabin, everyone was divided up to sleep in
various places. He was assigned to sleep with Hoehl and Hoehl insisted that the boy sleep in a
long t-shirt with no underwear. During the night, Hoehl fondled him. The male also reported
that Hoehl had him work around his property during the summer. Afterwards, Hoehl instructed
him to take a shower. When he got out of the shower, Hoehl was there waiting with a towel to
dry him off. After three days in a row of this behavior by Hoehl, the male did not return. Finally,
the male reported that on graduation day, his diploma case was empty. Hoehl informed him that
if he wanted his diploma, he needed to come to see him. He cried all the way home and never
returned to get his diploma because he did not want to deal with Hoehl.

The file contained a confidential memorandum that revaled that on May 20, 2009, Bishop
Zubik met with a man whose brother was abused by Hoehl. The family had heard second-hand
information that the brother was also abused by another priest who served at St. Teresa of Avila
in Perrysville. Zubik stated in his report that he reached out to the widow of the brother several
times, but she never returned any of his messages. Attached to the confidential memorandum
were what appeared to be journal writings authored by the brother wherein he described certain
incidents at Quigley.

664
Summary
In an e-mail commnunication on November 2, 2004, a 1979 Quigley graduate wrote to
Father Ronald Lengwin about Hoehl. He stated that when he was a student, he was approached
by Hoehl. However, he was able to avoid being molested by him. Others in his class were not
so lucky. The male advised that his cousin was molested by Hoehl “that creature” and that
another good friend of his committed suicide because of what Hoehl did to him. He expressed
a strong concern because other priests and adults affiliated with the school were aware that
Hoehl was giving the boys drugs and alcohol and having them spend the night at his house. He
stated that as an adult, he now he realizes how the adults at the school buried their heads in the
sand. He wrote: “Not one adult did anything to stop it” and “To say that there was no knowledge
or conspiracy is ludicrous and a flat-out lie.”

In 2010, a woman telephoned the Diocese Hotline to report that her son was abused by
Hoehl in the late 1980’s or early 1990’s. She stated that Hoehl “grabbed” her son and asked to
sleep naked with him while at his cabin on the Youghiogheny River. Her son, now 33 years of
age, did not want to see or speak with Hoehl.

Following the first report of sexual abuse on May 2, 1986, Hoehl was removed as pastor
of St. Joachim and as Headmaster of Bishop Boyle High School on May 4, 1986. He was
admitted to Southdown treatment facility in Aurora, Canada on May 6, 1986. While at
Southdown, he underwent therapy for approximately six months and was discharged on
November 21, 1986. During his treatment at Southdown, the Director informed the Diocese
that Hoehl had admitted that he had been sexually involved with several high school students
when he was Headmaster at Quigley. At the conclusion of his treatment, Southdown provided
the Diocese with an assessment that Hoehl, in fact, was/is a pedophile. On December 3, 1986,
Hoehl was assigned as an educational consultant to Father Douglas Nowicki, then Secretary of
Education for the Diocese.

On July 1, 1987, Hoehl was appointed as a chaplain at Shadyside Hospital. However, on

November 29, 1988, he was informed by the Diocese that he could no longer continue in
ministry. Hoehl resigned. After the Diocese withdrew his priestly faculties, he was provided
with subsistence and medical benefits for three and one half years. The Diocesan records
indicated that each report of sexual abuse was brought to the attention of the District Attorney’s
Office and that counseling for the victims and their families was provided.

The expiration of the statute of limitations prevented Hoehl from being arrested and
charged criminally for sexual abuse of minors.

On April 26, 2002, several victims reported to WTAE Channel 4 that they were sexually
abused by Hoehl when they attended Quigley.

In October, 2007, following an initiation of a lawsuit, 32 victims settled with the Diocese.

In 2009, Hoehl was reported to be living in Addison, Pennsylvania. In a letter to the

Diocese of Altoona-Johnstown, the Diocese of Pittsburgh reported the allegations against Hoehl
and where he was living.

665
 Reverend James Hopkins

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: Unknown
YEAR OF DEATH: Unknown
ORDINATION: 1968

Employment/Assignment History
Unknown

Summary

In November 2012, the Diocese of Pittsburgh received an e-mail communication from

an adult male about Father James Hopkins. He stated that several decades earlier, Hopkins
performed a “medical exam” on him when he was freshman at St. Fidelis Seminary High School.
The exam involved the young man bending over naked in front of Hopkins and listening to
Hopkins make creepy comments about his behind. There was no indication in the records that
the Diocese conducted an investigation or attempted to contact the male about counseling.

That same month, the Diocese sent a letter to the Butler County District Attorney’s
Office, advising of the allegation. The letter stated that Hopkins was transferred to the Diocese
of Camden, New Jersey in 1973. In 1995, he pled guilty to sexually molesting an altar boy in
Camden County. He received a ten year prison sentence and was ordered to register as a sex
offender.

666
 Reverend John J. Huber

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1942
YEAR OF DEATH: 1998
ORDINATION: 05/18/1968

Employment/Assignment History
6/1968-5/1973 St. Canice Church, Knoxville, PA
5/1973-5/1979 St. Joseph Church, Duquesne, PA
5/1979-6-1983 St. James Church, Sewickley, PA
6/1983-7/1984 St. Joseph Home for Aged, Pittsburgh, PA
7/1984-8/1985 St. Bernard, Mt. Lebanon, PA
8/1985-8/1991 St. Thomas Aquinas, California, PA
8/1991-12/1998 St. Catherine of Siena, Wireton, PA

Summary

In March 2009, a report was made to the Diocese of Pittsburgh of sexual abuse committed
by Father John J. Huber when he served as the pastor at St. Canice. An adult male reported that
when he was in fourth or fifth grade, another priest by the name of Father Adams had touched
him in his genital area. Sometime later, the boy went to confession and told Huber that he may
be attracted to men. Huber responded that he should attend one-on-one counseling sessions.
During one of those sessions, Huber performed oral sex on him and then gave him $20.00
afterwards. The male stated that this occurred on more than one occasion.

On March 30, 2009, counsel for the Diocese sent a letter to the Allegheny County District
Attorney’s Office, advising of the allegations.

667
 Reverend Edward G. Huff

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1947
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 5, 1973

Employment/Assignment History
5/22/1973 – 2/27/1978 Holy Innocents, Pittsburgh, PA
2/27/1978 – 6/29/1983 North American Martyrs, Monroeville, PA
6/29/1983 – 1/10/1987 St. Gabriel of the Sorrowful Mother, Whitehall, PA
1/10/1987 – 6/17/1991 St. Anthony, Bessemer, PA
6/17/1991 – 2/27/1992 St. Anselm, Swissvale, PA
2/27/1992 – 11/2/1992 Leave of Absence
11/2/1992 – 1/7/1993 Office for Chaplaincies and Campus Ministry
1/7/1993 – 2/16/1993 Leave of Absence
2/16/1993 Resigned

Summary

Beginning in 1992, several victims reported to the Diocese of Pittsburgh that while Father
Edward G. Huff was a priest at St. Anthony, he inappropriately touched them. It was reported
that he would invite teenage male students to the rectory, provide them with alcohol, and wrestle
with them, at times. Huff would also attempt to take students with him to go bowling, to see
Pittsburgh Pirates games, and to go to Cedar Point.

One victim stated that Huff would repeatedly ask him to go places with him. Eventually,
the victim agreed to attend a Pittsburgh Pirates game alone with Huff. While Huff was driving
them home, he asked the victim to move closer to him in the front seat of the car. Huff then
allowed the victim to drive the car by taking control of the steering wheel while the car was
travelling at 55 mph on the interstate. Huff then pulled up the victim’s pant legs and began
feeling his legs. Huff then moved his hand up to the victim’s thigh, untucked his shirt and
rubbed his stomach. Huff then unbuttoned the victim’s pants and attempted to place his hand
down the front of the victim’s pants. At that point, the victim told Huff he no longer wanted to
drive and moved back to the passenger seat. Once again, Huff began rubbing the victim’s
stomach and attempted to move his hand down into the vicitm’s pants. This continued off and
on until Huff took the victim home. The records revealed that other victims provided similar
accounts of Huff allowing them to drive his car while touching them inappropriately.

Prior to the victim’s Confirmation, Huff met with him privately in the rectory. While
sitting, Huff pulled the victim’s chair closer to his and began touching the victim’s knees and
rubbing his thighs. The victim grabbed Huff’s wrist and pushed him away. The victim reported
these incidents to the Diocese in the form of a letter dated December 31, 1992.

668
Summary

On February 27, 1992, while a priest at St. Anselm, Huff was removed from his
assignment. Subsequently on March 5, 1992, Huff was evaluated by St. Michael’s Community
Program in St. Louis, Missouri and began treatment there on April 16, 1992. In October, 1992,
Huff returned to Pittsburgh and was assigned to the Office for Chaplains and Campus Ministry
where he was responsible for supervising chaplains at hospitals and nursing home facilities.

On January 7, 1993, Huff was placed on administrative leave and then returned to St.
Michael’s the following day for further treatment. On February 16, 1993, Huff resigned from
active ministry.

On June 22, 1994, Huff was arrested and charged with several crimes in Lawrence
County, Pennsylvania for conduct that occurred when he was a priest at St. Anthony’s. On
August 21, 1996, Huff pled guilty and was sentenced to serve 18 months to 5 years in prison.
He was paroled on August 5, 1999.

There was a May 5, 2000 handwritten note (author unknown) in Huff’s file. The note
stated that Huff, “admitted to touching 500 kids and targeting at least 1200 . . .”

On May 5, 2008, another victim disclosed that in the early 1980s, while he was an altar
server at St. Gabriel, he was inappropriately touched by Huff. Huff often took the victim to
Pittsburgh Pirates games and provided him with alcohol. While the victim was in Huff’s car,
Huff would stroke the victim’s leg and gradually move up to his genital area. The victim could
not remember everything that occurred due to being intoxicated. He stated that he passed out
from alcohol provided by Huff.

A narrative contained in Diocesan files indicated that on June 14, 2015, altar server
training was conducted at St. Joseph the Worker in New Castle. Huff came into the church and
was overheard asking a teenage male if he would like to go to a Pittsburgh Pirates game with
him in the future. The teen declined the offer and his mother contacted church officials about
the incident.

669
 Monsignor Edward Joyce

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1915
YEAR OF DEATH: 1969
ORDINATION: June 16, 1940

Employment/Assignment History
3/15/1941 – 12/04/1946 Parochial Vicar, St. James, Wilkinsburg, PA
12/05/1946 – 6/15/1955 Parochial Vicar, St. Andrew, North Side, PA
6/16/1955 – 7/29/1959 Parochial Vicar, St. Titus, Aliquippa, PA
7/29/1959 – 10/05/1959 Parochial Vicar, St. Joseph, Sharpsburg, PA
10/06/1959 – 9/21/1959 Vic Enc, St. Joseph, Sharpsburg, PA
9/22/1959 – 7/22/1963 Pastor, St. Joseph, Sharpsburg, PA
7/23/1963 – 8/27/1968 Pastor, St. Joseph, North Side, PA
8/28/1968 – 1/11/1969 Chaplain, Sisters of St. Francis, Mt. Assisi, PA

Summary

In December 2002, an allegation of sexual abuse by Monsignor Edward Joyce was made
to the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office. A male had reported to the Diocese of
Pittsburgh that Joyce had inappropriately touched him from 1966 to 1968 at a church in
Allegheny County. He stated that he and Joyce gave each other massages which eventually led
to naked massages and heavy touching. On one occasion, he and Joyce were caught in a
compromising position by Father Patrick Jones. After the incident, Joyce was quickly
reassigned to an all-girls school.

In April, 2010 a female requested her school records from St. Joseph. She provided
“troubling information” about. Joyce in connection with the request. The “troubling
information” was never described, however, and there was no other documentation in the file to
detail the incident and/or how it was resolved.

670
 Reverend Marvin Justi

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1933
YEAR OF DEATH: 2009
ORDINATION: June 7, 1958

Employment/Assignment History
1958-1969 St. Fidelis Seminary
1969-1972 Quigley High School, Ambridge, PA
1972- Good Shepard Catholic Church, Shawnee, KS
1980 St. Cecilia Catholic Church, Ambridge, PA
2002 St. Joseph Church, Cabot, PA

Summary

In August 2016, an adult female reported that in June, 1969, she was a 17-year-old
nursing student at Sewickley Valley Hospital. During that time, Father Marvin Justi was a
patient at the hospital and she gave him a sponge bath. During the bath, he became sexually
aroused and and insisted that she continue to wash his genitals. After that, Justi began sending
her suggestive letters and notes. Her mother found the notes and reported Justi to his superior.

In 1982, the female was working at a physical therapy facility in Ambridge when Justi
arrived as a patient. He proceeded to undress and refused to get dressed when she attempted to
start the session. He was asked to leave and seek therapy elsewhere.

In 1985, Justi appeared at the female’s house unannounced. She allowed him to enter.
While there, he used the restroom. He then re-appeared in the living room naked with a freshly
shaven genital area. He left after she picked up the telephone to call the police.

Diocesan records contained little to no documentation on any investigation conducted by

the Diocese of Pittsburgh.

671
 Reverend Bernard J. Kaczmarczyk

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1929
YEAR OF DEATH: Unknown
ORDINATION: May 25, 1957

Employment/Assignment History
6/13/1957-10/19/1959 Assistant, St. Robert Bellarmine, E. McKeesport PA
10/20/1959-5/30/1961 Assistant, St. Ladislaus, Natrona, PA
5/31/1961-9/21/1967 Assistant, St. Adalbert, South Side, PA
9/22/1967-9/19/1968 Assistant, St. Stanislaus, Ambridge, PA
9/20/1968-3/01/1970 Assistant, Holy Family, Lawrenceville, PA
3/01/1970-10/26/1992 Pastor, Holy Name of Mary, Donora, PA
10/30/1992 Leave of Absence
2/28/1994 Faculties withdrawn
11/1997-1/1998 Halfway house
6/1998 Suspended as a priest

Summary

On February 8, 1994, the Diocese of Pittsburgh was informed that allegations had been
lodged against Father Bernard J. Kaczmarczyk concerning sexual abuse of at least three minors.
These allegations were investigated by the Diocese and deemed to be credible.

On February 8, 1994, the Coordinator of Clergy Support Services received a telephone

call from a female who allegd that Kaczmarczyk had sexually abused her three nephews, ages
11, 14 and 15. She explained that she and her entire family had been life-long friends with
Kaczmarczyk and had total access to the rectory because of their relationship with him. She
stated that her nephews were sexually abused by Kaczmarczyk at the rectory in Donora and also
at his home in Florida.

The caller reported that when her oldest nephew was approximately 12 years old,
Kaczmarczyk would meet with him every day in Kaczmarczyk’s bedroom. Kaczmarczyk would
also go into the bathroom when her nephew was showering to make sure he was “showering
properly.” She also reported that her nephew would frequently sleep with Kaczmarczyk, who
wore his sister’s dresses as pajamas.

One morning her oldest nephew awoke to find Kaczmarczyk performing oral sex on him.
Kaczmarczyk was very controlling of the boy and would slap him if he said anything about it.
Kaczmarczyk often bought things for the child and had the child’s name on some bank accounts.

672
Summary
At one point all three boys and their mother moved to Florida with Kaczmarczyk. When
the mother moved back to Donora, Kaczmarczyk insisted that the two oldest boys stay in Florida
with him. The caller reported that a detective went to the house and later called the boy’s mother
to inform her that Kaczmarczyk was “using all three boys.”

The woman went on to state in June, 1992, Kaczmarczyk had her nephew make a
“Consecration to the Mystical Rose” and had him wear a rosary ring on his left hand. (There
were notes in the file that suggested that this was some sort of marriage ceremony, similar to
vows, between the boy and Kaczmarczyk).

The woman reported that she spoke with the mother of her nephews on February 11,
1994. According to the mother, her children became involved with Kaczmarczyk when her
oldest son was approximately seven-years-old. Kaczmarczyk then trained him as an altar boy
when he was around 10 years of age and he began staying overnight at the rectory with
Kaczmarczyk. When her son was between the ages of 10 and 12, he recalled waking up in the
morning with his underwear removed and found Kaczmarczyk kneeling next to his bed.

From October 1992 through February 1993, the mother stated that she and her boys lived
in Florida to help Kaczmarczyk. Thereafter, Kaczmarczyk insisted that her two oldest boys stay
in Florida with him (approximately two more weeks.) Her oldest son later told her that there
was an occasion when he woke up and Kaczmarczyk was performing oral sex on him. He also
told her that once he woke up and Kaczmarczyk was trying to “put his penis in his butt.”
Kaczmarczyk also gave him wine to help him sleep. He told his mother that Kaczmarczyk did
not want him looking at girls and that he and Kaczmarczyk had taken vows which he wanted
the boy to renew every year.

673
 Reverend Joseph D. Karabin

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1947
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 4, 1974

Employment/Assignment History
1974 - 1979 Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary, Midland, PA
1979 – 1980 St. Joan of Arc, Library, PA
1980 St. Joseph the Worker, New Castle, PA
1980 – 1981 Holy Name, Duquesne, PA
1981 – 1986 St. Albert the Great, Baldwin, PA
1986 – 2002 Braddock Hospital, Braddock , PA

Summary

In March 1980, the Diocese of Pittsburgh received a report from a victim who was
sexually abused by Father Joseph D. Karabin while Karabin was assigned to St. Joan of Arc.
Bishop Vincent Leonard then sent a letter to the House of Affirmation, a treatment center,
notifying them that Karabin would arrive on March 25, 1980 for an evaluation with respect to
the “incident” which Leonard advised he did not want to describe in the letter. Karabin was
returned to active ministry after he completed treatment.

In March, 1985, Father Raymond Froelich, Pastor of St. Albert the Great where Karabin
was assigned as Parochial Vicar, notified Bishop Bevilacqua of another child whom Father
Karabin had sexually abused.

On March 7, 1985, two memorandums by Bishop Bosco documented a meeting held

between himself and Karabin in with respect to the new report. Bosco advised Karabin that he
would have to be reassigned due to the complaint. Karabin agreed, but “did not seem happy”
with the possibility that his reassignment may not be immediate due to this being a “recurrence
of a previous problem.” According to Karabin, this “latest incident” was caused by stress he
was under from not having his own pastorate. He related that if he was assigned as a pastor of
a parish, it would prevent him from “acting out.” Handwritten notes by Bishop Bevilacqua on
one of the memorandums stated, among other things, “I do not feel Father Karabin should be
given another immediate assignment after leaving his present one. There should be some sign
to him that what he did was very grave.”

Diocesan records contained undated handwritten notes that appeared to have been written
by Father Dattilo in 1985 after the second report of sexual abuse by Karabin had been received
by the Diocese. Among other things, Dattilo made the following notations:

674
Summary
x “How is the Diocese liable for his actions?”
x “It is best he hear this in therapy and that we be honest about his status
and not protect him.”
x “What is his standing in the Diocese after 2 incidents?”
x “Is not like an alcoholic mistake. Can mean jail & scandal & lawsuit.”
x “Joe [Karabin] wants to know if the incident was reported. Does he have
a record? Can legal action be taken___for how long?”

On March 13, 1985, Karabin was sent to St. Luke Institute for evaluation and treatment.

From April 1985 through September 1985, the Diocese documented that St. Luke
Insttitute advised that Karabin was not a pedophile but had a “homosexual interest in boys 15 –
18” and that the “two incidents” of “acting out” were partially due to alcohol. However, because
the initial treatment center in 1980 advised Karabin that he was not an alcoholic, this “confused
him and gave him permission to drink.” Furthermore, it was noted that because the treatment
center informed him that he was not a homosexual, this “gave him permission to act out
sexually.”

The records also contained handwritten notes from August 27, 1985 which appeared to
have been written by Dattilo with respect to Karabin. Among other things, the notes documented
that approximately two weeks prior to Easter in 1985, an eighth grade boy reported to Father
Froelich that Karabin had “touched him in private parts” and that he was afraid of Karabin.

On April 24, 1989, a letter was sent from the Western Regional Office of Children,
Youth, and Families (“WROCYF”) to Bishop Wuerl documenting a meeting held on November
16, 1988 between WROCYF, Diocesan representatives and counsel for the Diocese. Among
other things, the WROCYF advised Wuerl that the Diocese was considered to be a mandated
reporter of child sexual abuse and was therefore required to report any suspected abuse
immediately. Further, the WROCYF advised that the Diocese was not permitted to conduct its
own internal investigation to determine whether or not to report such abuse, but was required to
report it immediately on becoming aware of it.

On June 30, 1989, a letter was sent by Wuerl to the Vatican with respect to other priests
recently accused of child sexual abuse. Wuerl advised the Vatican of actions taken against the
priests, details of the Diocesan policies for dealing with the sexual abuse of children by priests,
and his own judgements in regards to the serious nature of child sexual abuse. Further, Wuerl
advised that due to the scandal caused by these priests, he initiated a review of any previous
cases of Diocesan priests who had been accused of “pedophilic activities” with minors. He
stated that Bishops and Dioceses could become liable once they were made aware of sexual
abuse complaints; that priests who denied the “crime” of pedophilic activity with minors was
“common in pedophiles;” that pedophilia was “incurable;” and that the “unassignability” of a
priest must rest solely with the Bishop. This was due to “parents who have a moral right to
expect chaste conduct from the priest,” and the parishioners who “would be gravely unsettled
and scandalized in the knowledge that a priest pedophile has been assigned in their midst.”

675
Summary
On October 30, 1991, Father Robert Guay, Secretary for Clergy and Religious and Vicar
for Clergy, met with a third victim who advised that he had been sexually abused by Karabin.
The victim advised that when he was approximately 13 to 14-years-old and an altar boy, Karabin
undressed him, fondled him, and attempted anal sex with him.

On November 1, 1991, Guay and then-Bishop David Zubik met with Karabin with
respect to the latest report. Karabin advised that he made a sexual pass at the victim and although
he did not remember touching him, this “isn’t to say he didn’t” and that he was in an “alcoholic
stupor” at the time. Karabin then admitted to sexually abusing two additional boys as well.
From the handwritten notes in the file, it appears that Karabin may have been referring to the
two previous cases set forth above.

On April 23, 1993, Guay sent a letter to Karabin with respect to recent work that Karabin
had been performing. Guay advised that Wuerl was “very much concerned” that

such activities, while helpful in conveying the message of priests in recovery and
ministry, might eventually compromise your ministry as well as the diocese
should the anonymity ever be broken.

Guay advised that he believed that Wuerl was “very nervous about this.”

On June 21, 1993, Karabin sent a handwritten letter to Wuerl requesting an assignment
to a parish. Included on the letter were separate handwritten notes that appear to state that the
“circle of secrecy has to be broken- if you want another assignment- if not work in our confines,”
“Can’t make us responsible for his viewpoint,” “Recognition from himself or others,” “Dignity,”
“Policy- this is what he has to do.”

On July 1, 1997, Karabin sent a handwritten letter to Wuerl requesting an assignment as

pastor of the Risen Lord. Separate handwritten notes on the letter stated, “I met w Joe on July
3 and shared with him that Bishop Wuerl feels that it is best that he remain at Braddock Hospital
and that Joe keep a ‘low profile’.”

Diocesan records contained a September 5, 1997 a memorandum that was sent to Zubik
from Father Ruggiero. Ruggiero advised that, “There is nothing in our file relating to the more
recent allegation you spoke of made by a college youth who met Father Karabin at Braddock
Hospital.”

On January 6, 2002, an article detailing the Catholic Church practice of reassigning

priests accused of sexual abuse of children was published in the Boston Globe. Several weeks
later on February 22, 2002, Father John Rushofsky, Director of Clergy Personnel, sent a letter
to Father Thomas Wagner at Good Shepherd advising him that Wuerl had appointed Karabin as
Chaplain to the residents and staff at the Vincentian Home and Vincentian Regency, effective
February 25, 2002. However, on February 28, 2002, letters were sent from Rushofsky advising
that Wuerl had withdrawn this appointment. That same day, Father James Young, Episcopal
Vicar for Clergy and Religious, sent a letter to Karabin advising him that Wuerl had withdrawn

676
Summary
his faculties and that he was no longer a priest in good standing.

Wuerl sent Karabin a letter dated July 16, 2002 wherein he advised that Karabin’s
resignation had been accepted. However, Wuerl further advised that “I assure you that your
sustenance needs and benefits will continue according to the norms of law.”

On November 2, 2004, a Votum to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith was
submitted to the Vatican by Wuerl documenting Karabin’s history. Wuerl requested that
Karabin’s withdrawal from active ministry be accepted by the Congregation. Wuerl noted that
Karabin continued to receive his sustenance and health benefits. The request was accepted. In
a letter to Wuerl dated April 4, 2005, the Congregation noted that it had decided that Wuerl’s
methods to “deal with the issue at hand are canonically and pastorally sound.” The letter further
noted that the “incident” of abuse, “while serious in nature, occurred over twenty-five years ago
and at a time when the priest was in an alcoholic stupor.”

On November 3, 2004, Father Young sent a letter to Karabin wherein Karabin was
advised that his current sustenance payments would be reduced to the normal amount of $750
per month, plus his other benefits of health insurance, room, board, and residence. His monthly
sustenance had been equal to his full salary from the time he was placed on administrative leave
on February 28, 2002 until this date.

On July 20, 2006, Diocesan personnel sent a confidential memorandum to Bishop

Bradley advising him that Karabin had requested to move out of the Cardinal Dearden Center
and into his sister’s home. Karabin requested that the $475 per month cost to house him at the
Center be added to his continued sustenance payments and paid directly to him once he moved.
The Clergy Task Force approved this request.

On October 1, 2007 Father David Bonnar, Secretary for Parish Life and Ministerial
Leadership, sent a letter to Karabin. In the letter, he stated that the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette had
recently published an article that named a number of priests allegedly involved in cases of sexual
abuse that prompted lawsuits against the Diocese. Bonnar advised, “Please know that the
Diocese of Pittsburgh did not furnish the names for this article.”

677
 Brother John Keegan

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1925
YEAR OF DEATH: Unknown
ORDINATION: Unknown

Employment/Assignment History
Unknown

Summary

In April 2014, an adult male contacted the Diocese of Pittsburgh to report that from 1957
through 1961, while he was a student at North Catholic High School, Keegan fondled his
genitals and masturbated him. He stated that Keegan asked to meet with him monthly and that
is when the abuse occurred. The allegation was shared with the Marianist Provincial and the
Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office.

In May 2014 an adult male reported to the Diocese that Keegan fondled his genitals in
1958 or 1959 while he was a student at North Catholic High School. This report was shared
with the the Marianist Provincial and the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office.

A second report was made to the Diocese in May 2014 about Keegan. A male alleged
that in 1958 or 1959, while he was a student at North Catholic High School, Keegan fondled his
genitals. Keegan also provided him with an “obscene, vile sexual script” in order for him to
become erect. When he could not become erect, he left Keegan. The allegation was shared with
the Marianist Provincial and the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office.

A third allegation against Keegan was made to the Diocese that same month (May 2014).
A male alleged that in 1958 or 1959, Keegan fondled his genitals when he was a minor attending
North Catholic High School. This report was shared with the Marianist Provincial and the
Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office.

In May, 2014, a fourth adult male reported incidents to the Diocese involving Keegan
and Brother Hildebrand. The male stated that from 1956 through 1960, Keegan fondled his
genitals when he was a minor attending North Catholic High School. Keegan also offered to
“examine” the male’s penis because of the male’s masturbation habits. The male further
reported that Hildebrand asked him whether he ever saw his sister naked. Hildebrand then
attempted to fondle him sexually. These allegations were shared with the Marianist Provincial
and the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office.

A fifth allegation was reported to the Diocese in May 2014 by an adult male. He stated
that when he was a student at North Catholic High School from 1958 through 1959, Keegan

678
Summary
spoke with him in a very sexual manner. Keegan also asked him what he thought about men
having sex together. He further reported that Brother Meder, who ran the cafeteria, would
provide minor children with pop and candy and then require them to sit on his lap while he was
seated in his rocking chair. The male stated that he could feel Meder’s erection through his
pants. These reports were shared with the Marianist Provincial and the Allegheny County
District Attorney’s Office.

In May 2014, the Diocese received a sixth complaint about Keegan. An adult male
reported that when he was a student in 1958 or 1959 at North Catholic High School, Keegan
fondled his gentials. He also stated that Keegan asked to examine his genitals while they were
together in the band pit area at the school. The allegation was shared with the Marianist
Provincial and the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office.

679
Biographical Information

Employment/Assignment History

Summary

In a St. Bernadine Clinic report dated May 28, 1987, admitted to

enagaging in relationships with parishioners, but did not specify whether they were sexual or
non-sexual in nature. He stated that he became aware of his constant struggle to meet his
affectionate needs without violating the norm of celibacy. He admitted to affectionate interest
in a teenager whom he met when she was 15 years of age. He stated that they did not become
romantically involved until she was “close to her 18th birthday.” acknowledged that the
age disparity and his priestly role made the relationship somewhat inappropriate.

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

680 -*5*("5*0/
 Reverend Henry Krawczyk

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1952
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: September 30, 1978

Employment/Assignment History
10/09/1978 – 6/28/1983 Parochial Vicar, St. Mary, McKeesport, PA
6/29/1983 – 6/12/1988 Parochial Vicar, Our Lady of Joy, Pittsburgh, PA
6/13/1988 – 10/26/1992 Parochial Vicar, St. Therese, Munhall, PA
10/26/1992 – 10/31/1994 Team Ministry, St. Maximillian, Homestead, PA
10/31/1994 – 6/23/2003 Pastor, St. Maximillian, Homestead, PA
6/23/2003 - Present Administrative Leave

Summary

A review of Diocesan records revealed an internal document entitled “File Review” that
contained the following three allegations against Father Henry Krawczyk:

1. On October 19, 1986, a mother filed a complaint against Krawczyk for

providing alcohol and marijuana to minors and for making sexual
advances towards those minors (including her son). Krawczyk only
admitted to providing alcohol to minors.

2. On August 24, 1988, a complaint was filed against Krawczyk for

providing alcohol to minors at a graduation party where no other adults
were present.

3. On November 2, 1992, a mother filed a complaint against Krawczyk for

drinking alcohol with her underage son.

In February 2005, Krawczyk pled guilty to one count of involuntary manslaughter. The
charge stemmed from a cookout that Krawczyk hosted on June 17, 2003 wherein he supplied
alcohol to several underage University of Pittsburgh football players. One of the players fell
from the roof of St. Anne to his death.

In November 2006, the Diocese of Pittsburgh drafted a confidential memorandum

pertaining to an allegation of sexual abuse against Krawczyk. Two brothers reported that
Krawczyk engaged in sexual activity with their younger brother. Their younger brother told
them that he and Krawczyk would frequently get high and drunk together. On one occasion, he
passed out and awoke to Krawczyk performing oral sex on him. He committed suicide in

681
Summary
August, 2006. The brothers requested that the Diocese pay and/or reimburse them for their
brother’s drug treatment as well as funeral expenses. These requests were granted.

682
Biographical Information

Employment/Assignment History

Summary

In an undated, handwritten letter to received in , an anonymous

sender advised that had asked several before
and after . No further documentation was provided about the allegation.

In an allegation of sexual abuse was made against In the complaint

to the County Distict Attorney’s Office, it was reported that

A report was issued by the Diocesan Review Board. Their Findings and
Recommendations included the following:

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

683 -*5*("5*0/
 Reverend Edward L. Kryston

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1946
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 4, 1974

Employment/Assignment History
5/30/1974-6/17/1979 Assistant, St. Luke, Carnegie, PA
6/18/1979-10/05/1980 Assistant, St. John, Unity, PA
10/06/1980-7/15/1984 Assistant, St Pius X, Pittsburgh, PA
7/16/1984-6/12/1988 Parochial Vicar, St. Martin, Pittsburgh, PA
6/13/1988-6/21/1989 Parochial Vicar, Our Lady of Joy, Holiday Park, PA
6/22/1989-1/11/1996 Parochial Vicar, Holy Trinity, Moon Run, PA
1/17/1996-9/23/1996 Leave of Absence
9/23/1996-8/27/1999 Parochial Vicar, St. Albert the Great, Baldwin, PA
8/27/1999- Pastor, St. Albert the Great, Baldwin, PA

Summary

On May 1, 1984, a letter was sent to Bishop Bevilacqua from Father Thomas Marpes of
St. Pius X regarding his associate, Father Edward L. Kryston. In part, the letter stated:

His major problem is his inordinate interest and association for and with grade
school girls. Many unsavory remarks have been made to me relevant to this
situation. He has even had these “little” girls in his room, behind closed doors.
At times the girls have been of high school age. Climaxing all of this a few
months ago was the incident involving a High School Junior girl, whom he took
to his room. Evidently, advances were made which terrified her. The next day
she reported this incident to her CCD teacher, who is a very fine person with
shock, surprise, etc. The CCD teacher and the Religious Education Coordinator
came to me with troubled minds. I suggested she write to Bishop Bosco. In the
meantime, I spoke to Bishop Bosco about the problem, and he requested to speak
to the teacher personally about the same matter. At this point it has been referred
to Father Campbell. It is my understanding that Father Kryston has had this
problem for some time.

On May 3, 1984, a letter was sent to the Diocese of Pittsburgh from the president of the
St. Pius Parish Council. A portion of the letter stated:

Your Excellency, Over the past 2 ½ years, I have received several complaints, as
President of St. Pius X Parish Council, about one associate pastor, Father

684
Summary
Edward Kryston. The complaints deal with his negative attitude, his lack of
concern for the Parish, and his seemingly strong interest in young women.

On May 17, 1984, Father Philip Campbell questioned Kryston “regarding complaints
that had been received by Bishop Bosco regarding his conduct with young women.” Kryston
denied any inappropriate conduct or behavior. There was a notation in the memorandum that
Kryston admitted that he took girls into his room to watch television. However, Kryston stated
that the girls were always in “groups.” At the conclusion of the meeting, Campbell sent a letter
to Bevilacqua, recommending that Kryston be transferred. Kryston was then transferred to St.
Martin.

On November 1, 1984, a letter was sent to Bevilacqua from Judith Kanya, a CCD teacher
associated with St. Pius. The letter stated:

Last December one of my CCD students talked to me about how to handle a priest
who was making passes at her. After talking to our Pastor Father Marpes and
at his request writing to Bishop Bosco and then talking to him around February
1, 1984, I was assured that something would be done. In July, Kryston, the priest
in question, was transferred to another parish. I was very prayerful that he was
getting help with this problem. But I have been very concerned that he was just
moved to shut me up. He has returned to St. Pius on many occasions and last
Saturday he came to our home football game with four teenage girls (I did not
know the girls so they were not from St. Pius) and sat at the game with a group
of our young teenage girls. I keep worrying about these girls. . . I really feel
disappointed in the hierarchy of the church that this problem is being glossed
over . . . why is this being covered up?”

On December 17, 1985, Father Dattilo wrote notes pertaining to a meeting he had with
Mona Rush, a CCD teacher. Rush reported that she was concerned about Kryston’s attention to
eighth and ninth grade girls, while ignoring boys. Rush advised that Kryston invited girls to the
rectory to talk at 11:15 p.m. He also circled the block of a young girl and then invited her to
accompany him alone on a shopping trip. By January 7, 1986, Dattilo documented additional
concerns regarding Kryston, including “drinking and fooling around with girls,” arranging a
dinner for two in the rectory with an eighth grade girl, and asking a CCD class how they would
feel if they were naked answering the telephone.

On November 8, 1995, a meeting was held with Father Guay, Father Zubik, Rita Flaherty
and the mother of an eighth grade school girl. The mother reported that her daughter recently
attended a school dance. Kryston was at the dance and encouraged the boys and girls to dance
together. During the dance, Kryston reportedly lifted up two different school girls by grabbing
them by the buttocks.

By November 15, 1995, additional information was obtained by Diocesan officials

regarding Kryston’s actions at this same school dance. The additional information came from
the mother of a 13-year-old girl. The girl reported that she felt uncomfortable with the way

685
Summary
Kryston was holding her during a dance. Later, Kryston grabbed her buttocks as she walked by
the DJ booth. The girl went home and cried over the incident. It was learned that Kryston
committed a similar indecent assault on another seventh grade girl. Additionally, it was learned
that Kryston had invited an 11-year-old girl to his room. It was reported that there were
pornographic magazines under Kryston’s bed and that he had pictures of a young girl from the
school on his wall. The young girl in the photographs was situated in various poses, such as
sitting under a tree, in a bikini. The identity of this girl was known and it was reported to the
Diocese that Kryston had invited the girl on an overnight trip to an amusement park. They were
to share the same motel room. The young girl’s parents refused to give Kryston permission to
take their daughter on the trip, however.

On November 27, 1995, Flaherty placed a telephone call to Sister Mary Ann Lostoski,
Principal of the Holy Trinity school. Sister Mary Ann reported that Kryston was always around
seventh and eighth grade girls and often smelled of alcohol. She added that a family had left
the school because of Kryston’s interest in school girls. Sister Mary Ann stated that she did not
“want her [Sister Mary Ann] name used” regarding this information.

On December 4, 1995, Guay, Zubik and Flaherty held a meeting with Kryston. Kryston
was asked about his actions at the school dance. He “did not deny’ dancing with the two girls.
He acknowledged physical contact, but “denied any sexual intent.” It was then explained to
Kryston that he would be placed on administrative leave until he was evaluated at St. Luke
Institute.

On December 28, 1995, the Diocese received an evaluation report from St. Luke’s. The
report indicated that there was a disparity between Kryston’s self-report and the observations of
others. The report stated that there was reason for “extreme caution” and that Kryston was at
risk and in need of much support. It was recommended that he enter residential treatment as
soon as possible and it was “very important that he have NO contact with adolescents.”

On July 26, 1996, Flaherty sent a letter to St. Luke’s regarding the release of Kryston
from treatment. There was a question as to whether or not the issue of “ephebophilia” had been
decided, because this issue would contribute to the decision about Kryston’s “assignability.”
By August 14, 1996, Kryston was released from St. Luke’s and living with his mother in the
Pittsburgh area. On August 26, 1996, Flaherty received a letter from St. Luke’s that advised
that “treatment did not identify ephebophilia;” however, it would be wise to err on the side of
caution and avoid ministry focused specifically with junior or high school students, and to avoid
situations of being alone with vulnerable women. Flaherty forwarded this information to Bishop
Wuerl.

On August 31, 1996, Wuerl met with Kryston regarding Kryston’s return to active
ministry. Thereafter, on September 17, 1996, Wuerl appointed Kryston as parochial vicar at St.
Albert the Great. The effective date of this appointment was September 23, 1996.

686
Summary
On February 28, 2002, Wuerl placed Kryston on administrative leave and assigned him
to a residence at St. John Vianney Manor, a retirement home for priests. Situated on the same
property and in close proximity to the retirement home is Bishop Canevin High School.

On August 4, 2002, Kryston wrote to Wuerl and asked for permission to withdraw from
active ministry. On August 9, 2002, Wuerl granted Kryston permission to withdraw, while at
the same time assuring him that the Diocese would continue to pay for his sustenance and
benefits.

On May 17, 2016, Father Mark Eckman sent a letter to Kryston advising Kryston that he
could continue to live at St. John Vianney.

687
 Reverend Anujit Kumar

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1954
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: 04/13/2002

Employment/Assignment History
4/13 2002 Parochial Vicar, India
9/2008 Missionary, St. Joan of Arc, South Park, PA

Summary

In September 2008 an allegation of sexual abuse was made against Father Anujit Kumar
to the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office. A minor female reported that Kumar had
kissed her on her lips several times using his “tongue” and was “sucking her lips.” He then
asked for her telephone number and gave her his business card along with a gift. Several other
altar servers witnessed the incident.

Kumar was interviewed by the Clergy Office concerning the incident and admitted to the
conduct. He stated that his reason for kissing her inappropriately was that he was trying to
“recruit her for the convent.”

The incident was reported to the South Park Police Department but the victim and her
parents declined to go forward with prosecution.

688
 Reverend George Kurutz

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1917
YEAR OF DEATH: 1977
ORDINATION: June 11, 1944

Employment/Assignment History
9/21/1944 – 11/08/1944 St. Stephen, Pittsburgh, PA
11/09/1944 – 6/25/1952 St. Joseph, West Aliquippa/St. Catherine Parish, Wireton, PA
6/26/1952 – 6/15/1955 St. George, South Side, PA
6/16/1955 – 10/05/1955 Holy Trinity, McKeesport, PA
10/06/1955 – 4/10/1960 Immaculate Conception, Washington, PA
4/11/1960 – 5/30/1961 Our Lady of Consolation, Nemacolin/St. Mary Parish,
Crucible/Sacred Heart, Rices Landing, PA
5/31/1961 – 5/07/1965 St Lawrence O’Toole, Pittsburgh, PA
5/08/1965 – 6/06/1967 St. Michael, New Castle PA
6/07/1967 – 8/31/1976 St. Helen, East Pitsburgh, PA
9/01/1976 Resigned

Summary

Diocesan records contained a handwritten letter dated June 15, 1996 indicating that the
Diocese of Pittsburgh had received a telephone call from a 47-year-old female who stated that
she and her sister were molested by Father George Kurutz in the late 1950’s and early 1960’s.
The caller stated that Kurutz came into a room and laid with her. He put his hands under her
shirt and squeezed her close to him. She stated that their mother sent them with Kurutz to his
new parish in New Castle when she was in sixth grade. She believed that is when he laid with
her and fondled her. She reported that more serious incidents occurred with her sister. She also
advised that her sister walked in on their mother performing oral sex on Kurutz. Her sister
stated, “Mother knew what was going on and she did nothing to stop it, no one helped me.”

689
 Reverend Fidelis Lazar

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1936
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: August 15, 1963

Employment/Assignment History
1966 – 1969 St. Vincent / Latrobe, Instructor
1970 – 1975 St. Bede / Bovard, Instructor
1975 – 1976 Sacred Heart / St. Mary, Instructor
08/16/1976 – 03/22/1981 St. Clare / Clairton, Parochial Vicar
03/23/1981 – 07/07/1982 St. Joan of Arc / Library, Parochial Vicar
07/08/1982 – 05/31/1984 St. Mary / New Castle, Parochial Vicar
06/01/1984 – 06/13/1986 St. Joseph / Bloomfield, Parochial Vicar
06/14/1984 – 04/23/1987 St. Teresa / Koppel, Parochial Vicar
04/23/1987 – 09/25/1989 Leave of Absence
09/25/1989 Withdrew from active priestly ministry

Summary

In October 1986, the Diocese of Pittsburgh received a report from an adolescent male
that he had been sexually abused by Father Fidelis Lazar in June, 1986. Lazar took this victim
on overnight trips. They slept in the same bed. The victim stated Lazar kissed him and began
touching the child’s genitals. While in bed, Lazar pulled the victim close to him, close enough
the victim felt the erect penis of Lazar.

In the same confidential summary, it was noted by Diocesan officials that Father
Nicholas Dattilo, then Secretary for Clergy, confronted Lazar about the sexual abuse allegation.
Lazar initially denied the allegation, stating the family was “troubled” and was singling him out.
Dattilo sent Lazar to a Diocesan treatment facility for evaluation in November 1987. While in
treatment, the Diocese documented the summaries provided by the treating doctors. It was noted
that Lazar admitted being sexually active with children after his ordination.

Lazar took a personal leave of absence from ministry citing health reasons. In
September 1989, he withdrew from active ministry. The Bishop determined Lazar could not
continue in ministry due to the allegation and his diagnosis of Ephebophilia. Ephebophilia is
the primary sexual interest in mid-to-late adolescents.

In September 1994, another male contacted the Diocese and gave an in-person account
of his abuse by Lazar. He reported that he was only 15 or 16 years of age when Lazar sexually
molested him. He explained that Lazar had befriended his family. There were many incidents

690
Summary
where Lazar would kiss him, remove his pants and fondle his penis. This occurred when Lazar
was assigned at St. Joan of Arc.

In March 2002, the Diocese received an e-mail communication from a male asking for
the status of Lazar. This male reported that when Lazar was a Benedictine monk in the 1960’s,
Lazar abused him while he was at St. Vincent’s Preparatory School in Latrobe. The male was
provided with the contact information for the Archabbot of the Benedictine Monks.

691
Biographical Information

Employment/Assignment History

Summary

In and , the Diocese of received letters from an

adult male who reported that he had been sexually abused by for several
years beginning when he was years of age. It continued until he was years of
age.

The victim first met after the victim’s and became

involved with his family. After awhile, they went on overnight trips together and
provided him with alcohol and “dirty” magazines. They also began sleeping together and
showering together. then began performing oral sex on him. This abuse occurred
approximately once a month for a period of years. Once the victim turned 15 or 16 years old,
he told he wanted the sexual activities to stop and threatened “to tell on” him. In
response, grabbed him by the throat and threatened to kill him if he told anyone.

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

692 -*5*("5*0/
Summary
also threatened to tell the victim’s parents that he was gay and that he [the victim] was the one
who initiated and pursued the sexual contact with
According to the file, the victim “asked nothing of the Diocese” and that
He made no threats to sue [n]or make his allegations public. His only motivation
appeared to be to make someone in the diocese aware of what had occurred.
[The victim’s] concern for his own children brought home the awareness that
might be abusing others.

Based upon the meeting with the victim and a separate telephone call with him, the
Diocese found that his “allegations were consistent in detail.”

693 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

-*5*("5*0/
Summary

then recommended that be returned to active ministry.

and referred to time at as being due to
or

On , a letter was sent from to requesting that he remain

as pastor
further requested that if the

On , a confidential report sent from to the Diocese advised, among

other things, that

thereafter sent a letter to on wherein he welcomed him

back “following your leave of absence for personal reasons.” further advised, “I share
with you my joy at your return to full-time ministry.”

File documents revealed that from to , the Diocese paid for

counseling sessions for the victim.
.
On January 6, 2002 an article detailing the Catholic Church’s practice of reassigning
priests accused of sexual abuse of children was published in the Boston Globe. sent
a letter dated advising him that his ministerial faculties were
restricted to and that he was no longer permitted to function as a priest
without permission. A memorandum in the file dated documented a
conversation between and wherein “in confidence” explained to
that it had become necessary for him to restrict faculties. The memorandum
revealed that advised that “he would keep it confidential.”

On , the victim notified the Diocese again about his abuse and advised that
he was seeking compensation. In a letter to the victim dated , the Diocese advised
him that his allegation was never fully substantiated and it had been denied by . The
Diocese further advised that because there was no clear resolution, “the priest in question is
asking to appear before the Ministerial Assessment Board for a review of this allegation.” The
victim was invited to appear before the Board to tell his story.

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

694 -*5*("5*0/
Summary
On , sent a letter to , advising
him that the “enclosed confidential information comes by way of a friend in law
enforcement.” Among other things, provided the victim’s current address and date of
birth and requested that the Diocese re-send the letter to him (as it had been returned as
undeliverable). That way, it could be demonstrated that he had been given an opportunity to
appear before the Board. then provided details of the victim’s criminal history in order
to show that he was not a “credible accuser.”

Following a meeting of the Diocesan Review Board, the Board concluded that it could
not determine “with certainty” the credibility of the victim’s claim. The Board recommended
that be allowed to continue in “non-parochial ministry” without access to children, in
spite of his admission to the Board of his “attraction to minors.” Included with the supporting
documents for the Board’s recommendation was a four-page letter by denying any
sexual abuse and requesting a return to ministry.

On , the Diocese notified the County District Attorney’s

Office of “inappropriate sexual contact that occurred sometime between when [the
victim] was a minor of age .”

In a letter dated , the Diocese advised the victim that had

accepted the Board’s recommendation that be given a “limited non-parish assignment.”
It should be noted that in a that
was completed by Diocesan personnel, it was documented that the complaint against
was both internally consistent and consistent with known facts.

On ,
sent a letter to granting him 17 faculties in his role as
. These faculties included
.

On , Pennsylvania Child Abuse History Clearance was granted to

certifying that no record existed in the Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare’s statewide
central registry listing as a perpetrator of an indicated or founded report of child abuse.

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

695 -*5*("5*0/
 Reverend Albert Leonard

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1954
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: Unknown

Employment/Assignment History
1987 Parochial Vicar, Saint Ursula, Allison Park, PA
November 1993 Leave of Absence

Summary
In 1989 and 1993, the Diocese of Pittsburgh received complaints about Father Leonard’s
behavior with children. In one case, parents expressed their concern about Leonard’s
relationship with their 14-year-old son. In another case, parents expressed concern about
Leonard’s relationship with their minor son and reported that he swam nude with boys.

Shortly after the 1993 complaint, Leonard requested a six month leave of absence in
November, 1993.

In September 1994, Leonard attempted to onbtain employment with Holy Family

Institute. The Holy Family Institute is a residential treatment facility for children. The Diocese
disclosed information regarding Leonard’s sexual history with minors to the institute. Leonard
complained to the Diocese that the disclosure of that information had hindered his employment.

The Diocese did not notify law enforcement of Leonard’s conduct.

696
 Reverend Casimir F. Lewandowski

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1918
YEAR OF DEATH: 1978
ORDINATION: November 4, 1945

Employment/Assignment History
12/6/1945 – 10/23/1946 St. Matthew, Pittsburgh, PA (Southside)
10/24/1946 – 6/17/1953 St. Kieran, Pittsburgh, PA (Lawrenceville)
6/18/1953 – 9/16/1953 Mercy Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA
9/17/1953 – 6/7/1955 Catholic University, Washington, DC (Studies)
7/8/1954 – 9/1/1954 St. Leocadia Parish, Wilmerding, PA
6/16/1955 – 3/13/1964 Diocesan Charities
3/14/1964 – 12/16/1973 Madonna of Czestochowa, New Castle, PA
12/17/1973 Resigned

Summary

Diocesan records contained a confidential memorandum dated February 8, 2016, that

reflected a telephone conversation with a 64-year-old female. She reported to the Diocese of
Pittsburgh that she was sexually abused by Father Casimir F. Lewandowski when she was
approximately 12 years of age and in sixth grade. The incident occurred when he was assigned
to Madonna of Czestochowa.

The female reported that she recalled walking upstairs in the rectory with Lewandowski.
She was wearing a yellow dress. She recalled his erect penis and semen on her dress. He said
to her, “You are a dirty little girl, aren’t you?” The Diocese informed her that the Lawrence
County District Attorney’s Office would need to be contacted. The Diocese reimbursed her for
the cost of years of therapy.

697
 Reverend John P. Maloney

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1938
YEAR OF DEATH: 2007
ORDINATION: May 9, 1964

Employment/Assignment History
5/27/1964 – 6/01/1971 Nativity of Our Lord, Pittsburgh, PA
6/02/1971 – 9/30/1973 St. Phillip, Pittsburgh, PA
10/01/1973 – 2/04/1979 St. Kieran, Pittsburgh, PA
2/05/1979 – 10/12/1982 St. Michael, Pittsburgh, PA
10/13/1982 - 9/03/2004 Holy Sepulcher, Butler, PA

Summary

On January 7, 2004, the Diocese of Pittsburgh received a report from an adult male that
he had been sexually abused as a child by Father John P. Maloney beginning when he was in
the eighth grade. The male explained that he was one of nine children and that his father passed
away in November 1970, leaving the family with financial difficulties. He, along with his
brothers and sisters, obtained part-time jobs to assist the family financially. His job was to
deliver newspapers and one of his stops was at the rectory of St. Philip. When he would deliver
the paper, Maloney would sometimes invite him into the rectory to sit and talk. This usually
occurred around 5:30-6:00 AM. The male reported that during these times together, Maloney
would take photographs of him. At first, he was fully clothed when photographed but it
eventually progressed to Maloney taking pictures of him in his underwear. He stated that after
this started to occur, he woke up around 3:00 a.m. when the papers arrived so that he could
deliver the paper before Maloney awoke. He stated that while this plan worked sometimes,
there were other times when. Maloney would still grab him by his arm and bring him into the
rectory. He further reported that when he brought his younger brother along with him, Maloney
would just have his brother wait in another room. Eventually, he told his mother about the
abuse, but she did not believe him. The abuse continued until he was a freshman in high school.

The male stated that he was not reporting the abuse for financial gain. He explained that
he wanted to protect his family from discovering the evidence of the embarrassing photograaphs
taken of him and to prevent such actions in the future.

When confronted with the allegations that he had taken photographs of the male,
Maloney stated that he did ask the boy to take his shirt off to show his muscles. Maloney denied
that he took photographs of the boy in his underwear or that he had any sexual contact with him.
Maloney contended that he did not do anything inappropriate.

698
Summary
On January 9, 2004, the Diocese placed Maloney on administrative leave and he resigned
as pastor at Holy Sepulcher. On September 3, 2004, Maloney’s priestly faculties were
withdrawn by Bishop Donald Wuerl.

The male reported that after the abuse by Maloney, he befriended a priest at Canevin by
the name of “Dom McGee.” McGee was a teacher of his freshman religion class and became a
family friend who would come to their house two or three times per month for dinner or to watch
a Steelers game. McGee provided him with counselling with respect to the abuse. However,
McGee then began abusing him. He recalled McGee taking him to Williamsburg once. He
stated that there was a lot of hugging that occurred; however, at that particular time, he did not
really think anything of it. He then stated that when he was a sophomore around the year 1973,
he went to the home of McGee’s parents to help McGee paint. While there, he went into the
bathroom to use the toilet while McGee was in the shower. McGee became extremely upset
that he had entered into the bathroom. McGee got out of the shower and then grabbed him,
pulled his pants down and masturbated him. McGee then said, “Now how do you like that, don’t
you ever walk in on me again!”

The male also reported that McGee molested his brother. On January 15, 2004, his
brother reported to Father Canice Connors and Rita Flaherty that he had been groped by McGee
on one occasion while sitting on the couch with him, watching television. He stated that he fell
asleep and awoke to find McGee groping his genitals. He also stated that there was a time when
he and another boy went to Erie with McGee and McGee encouraged them to undress along
with him behind a picnic pavilion so that they could go swimming. He recalled that he and the
other boy were embarrassed to undress in front of McGee. Finally, he recalled a time in class
when McGee made each child talk about their sexual experiences. He stated that he so
embarrassed that he never said a word during that class or any other time.

699
 Brother Julius May

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: Unknown
YEAR OF DEATH: 1970
ORDINATION: N/A

Employment/Assignment History

Summary

In May 2011, an adult male reported when he was a student at North Catholic High
School durnng the 1963-1964 school year, he had developed a medical condition known as
orchitis which is a form of mumps that settles in the testicles. He stated that Brother Julis May,
who was a counselor at the high school, demanded to conduct a medical examination of his
genitals. He refused and left May’s office.

In May 2014, a 66-year-old male reported that he was inappropriately touched by May
when he was a student at North Catholic High School during the 1962-1963 school year. He
accused May of running his hand up his pant leg. The young man left before May touched his
genital area. When he informed the principal of May’s actions, the principal passed off the
experience as May just being friendly.

The files indicated that the Diocese attempted to reach out to the victims with respect to
counseling services.

700
 Reverend Dominic McGee

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: Unknown
YEAR OF DEATH: Unknown
ORDINATION: Unknown

Employment/Assignment History
Unknown

Summary

The Grand Jury was provided little to no information on Father McGee. The only
documents that were provided were three internal Diocese of Pittsburgh memorandums. The
memorandums revealed that in January 2004 a sexual allegation was made against McGee
wherein an adult male alleged that McGee masturbated him when he was a high school student
in the early to mid-1970’s at Canevin High School in Allegheny County. The male’s younger
brother further advised that McGee groped his genitals while he slept on a couch.

These allegations were shared with the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office.

701
 Reverend Donald W. McIlvane

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1925
YEAR OF DEATH: 2014
ORDINATION: June 7, 1952

Employment/Assignment History
6/26/1952-6/12/1957 Parochial Vicar, St. Stephen, Pittsburgh, PA
6/13/1957-10/31/1960 Parochial Vicar, St. Paul Cathedral, Pittsburgh, PA
11/01/1960-6/26/1962 Parochial Vicar, Resurrection, Pittsburgh, PA
6/27/1962-4/20/1966 Chaplain Correctional Institution, Allegheny County Jail
4/21/1966-6/07/1976 Administrator, St. Richard, Pittsburgh, PA
6/08/1976-11/22/1985 Pastor, Corpus Christi, Pittsburgh, PA
11/23/1985-6/01/1992 Pastor, Presentation of Virgin Mary, Midland, PA
6/01/1992-12/01/1992 Sabbatical at St. John Fisher, Pittsburgh, PA
12/01/1992-1/22/1993 Awaiting Assignment at St. John Fisher, Pittsburgh, PA
1/22/1993-6/27/1994 Parochial Vicar (Part-time), St. John Fisher, Pittsburgh, PA
6/27/1994-12/30/1994 Chaplain, Motherhouse at Sisters of Divine Providence,
Allison Park, PA
9/29/2008-12/15/2008 Leave of Absence

Summary

On July 22, 2008, the Diocese of Pittsburgh received a letter from a 43-year-old man
who reported that in 1973, he was in the third grade at St. Richard’s and served as an altar boy.
On one particular day that year, he was not feeling well and Father Donald W. McIIvane escorted
him up to a bedroom in the rectory. After he lay down, McIIvane began to rub his stomach and
thighs. McIIvane then started to rub his penis through his clothing and his penis became erect.
McIIvane then unzipped his pants and performed oral sex on him. He was given $5.00 by
McIlvane. The male reported that between 1973 and 1977, McIIvane performed oral sex on him
at least 40 times per year and that he was always paid afterwards with money from the parish
donations.

On September 9, 2008, the Diocese provided the male with a check in the amount of
$5,000.00 to help him through some additional financial difficulties. The money was not
intended to be considered as any type of reimbursement or “settlement” related to his claim.

On October 29, 2008, the Diocesan Review Board met and reviewed the allegations.
The Board accepted the written material submitted by the male and heard testimony from him.
The Board determined that the allegation could not be substantiated because the information
was inconclusive and unable to be verified. The Board then recommended, and Bishop Zubik

702
Summary
accepted, that McIIvane be restored to priestly ministry. The Board voted unanimously that
there was no semblance of truth to the allegations.

On January 20, 2009, Father David Bonnar wrote a letter to the male wherein he stated:

I am sorry that the Independent Review Board did not come back with an
outcome for which you were hoping. Nevertheless, the Diocese of Pittsburgh is
still willing to offer counseling and spiritual direction to you.

703
 Reverend Thomas McKenna

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1935
YEAR OF DEATH: Unknown
ORDINATION: May 6, 1972

Employment/Assignment History
5/31/1972 – 5/21/1973 Parochial Vicar, St. Anselm, Swissvale, PA
5/22/1973 – 2/13/1978 Parochial Vicar, Immaculate Conception,Washington, PA
2/14/1978 – 10/01/1978 Chaplain, Marian Manor Nursing
10/02/1978 – 2/04/1979 Parochial Vicar, St. Maurice, Forest Hills, PA
11/01/1978 – 2/04/1979 Leave of absence, Health reasons
2/05/1979 – 8/15/1982 Parochial Vicar, St. Kieran, Lawrenceville, PA
8/16/1992 – 5/31/1984 Parochial Vicar, St. John Fisher, Churchill, PA
6/01/1984 – 9/11/1986 Parochial Vicar, Holy Innocents, Sheraden, PA
9/12/1986 – 7/21/1987 Chaplain, Sewickley Valley Hospital, PA
7/22/1987 – 8/22/1988 Chaplain, Forbes Regional Hospital, PA
8/22/1988 – 5/23/1994 Pastor, St. Edward, Blawnox, PA
5/23/1994 – 1/05/1998 Pastor, Our Lady of Fatima, Hopewell, PA
1/05/1998 – 7/31/1998 Chaplain, SCI – Pittsburgh, PA
8/31/1998 – 10/30/1998 Asst. Chaplain, Allegheny University Medical Center, PA
10/30/1998 Administrator, St. Patrick – St. Stanislaus, Pittsburgh, PA
9/13/2004 Withdrew from active priestly ministry

Summary

Diocesan records contained a handwritten letter dated July 28, 1992 authored by a priest
(name illegible) about sexual allegations against Father Thomas McKenna. It noted that two
teenage brothers claimed to have been sexually assaulted by McKenna in the 1970’s.

An October 1996 Diocesan memorandum documented the fact that McKenna was
confronted with several allegations of improper sexual activity.

On October 18, 1999, a lawsuit was filed against McKenna by an inmate incarcerated at
the State Correctional Institution at Pittsburgh. He alleged that McKenna had sexually assaulted
him while he was in prison.

In May, 2002, the Diocese of Pittsburgh received a report from a woman who stated that
McKenna had sexually abused her son in 1975. No other documentation was found in the file.

704
Summary
In December, 2004 a final summary of treatment for Father McKenna from St. Luke
Institute was completed. He was diagnosed with, inter alia, Ephebophilia (attraction to
teenagers).

705
 Reverend Albert McMahon

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: Unknown
YEAR OF DEATH: Unknown
ORDINATION: Unknown

Employment/Assignment History
7/05/1961- 7/01/1964 Team Ministry at St. Pamphilus, Beechview, PA
Unknown - 9/14/1967 Parochial Vicar at Our Lady Help of Christians, Pittsburgh, PA
Unknown - 2004 Province of the Immaculate Conception, New York
10/2004 Removed from active ministry

Summary

On April 22, 2004, thie Diocese of Pittsburgh received a telephone call from a 54-year-
old female who reported that she was sexually abused by Father Albert McMahon when she was
approximately 11 years of age. She explained that she went to St. Pamphilus in order to play.
While there, “Father Albert” always showed her a lot of attention and that on a few occasions,
he would have her sit on his lap. He would then fondle her breasts and genitals. She noted that
Father Albert smelled of alcohol.

The Diocese contacted Father Campagna, Provincial Minister for the Province of the
Immaculate Conception, in New York where McMahon was living at the time. On October 22,
2004, Campagna sent a letter to the female which stated, in part:

Once again I need to reiterate that I have not ignored, nor disbelieved, your
accusations made against Father McMahon. If that were the case, I would not
have removed him from active ministry. At the present time, Father McMahon
does not enjoy participation in active ministerial priesthood, based solely on
your complaint . . .I also assure you, as I have from the very beginning, I
committed myself to provide for an appropriate time, access to therapeutic
counseling that will hopefully bring some healing to your life.

On January 10, 2014, a 63-year-old adult male contacted the Diocse to report that in the
mid-1960’s, when he was approximately 11 to 14 years of age, he served as an altar boy at St.
Pamphilus. That is where he met McMahon. He stated that “Father Albert” would invite the
altar boys to his friary room on Saturdays in order to wrestle. To the best of his knowledge,
Father Albert would always invite the boys to wrestle with him individually, never in a group.

The male reported that when they would wrestle, McMahon would always get on top of
him and that McMahon would always have an erection.

706
Summary
The male was offered counseling and advised that the allegation would be forwarded to
the District Attorney’s office where the incident occurred (Allegheny County).

On January 14, 2014, the Diocese sent a letter to Father Primo Piscitello, Provincial
Minister for the Province of the Immaculate Conception. The letter stated, in part:

As I promised, I am including with this letter a copy of my file memo on the

allegation I received against Father Albert McMahon, OFM. I am also including
the brief notification we make to the District Attorney’s Office in Allegheny
County. As I mentioned, this is part of our policy here in the Diocese of
Pittsburgh. . . I shared with [the male] that Father Albert is no longer in ministry
given his age and current struggles with the onset of dementia. . . . I shared with
him that you had been very honest in telling me that Father Albert had complaints
about his behavior in the past but none that would be considered sexual abuse.

On January 31, 2014, Bishop David Zubik addressed a letter to parishioners at St.
Pamphilus that explained that allegations had been made against McMahon. The contact
information for the abuse hotline was provided in the event that a parishioner was harmed by
McMahon.

On February 5, 2014, a 64-year-old male contacted the Diocese to advise that he became
aware of the fact that a letter was read and distributed at St. Pamphilus concerning McMahon.
He reported that when he was approximately 12 to 13 years of age, he would wrestle with
McMahon. He recalled that McMahon would have an erect penis and would attempt to put it in
his “behind.” At first, the wrestling seemed innocent; however, once he realized that McMahon
had an erect penis near his “back side,” he got out of the rectory and never came back.

On February 17, 2014, the male met with Rita Flaherty, Bishop Waltersheid and Father
Eckman. The male recounted two incidents of abuse. During the first incident, while he was
wrestling with McMahon, his hand slightly passed over McMahon’s penis. He did not know if
McMahon did this on purpose, or if it was an accident. During the second incident, McMahon
placed him on his lap. McMahon had an erection at the time. According to a confidential
memorandum in the file documenting this meeting, the male was very tearful at times while
telling his story. At the conclusion of the meeting, Diocesan officials offered counseling to him.
They further advised that his allegations had been forwarded to the Allegheny County District
Attorney’s Office and the Provincial for the Franciscan community.

The Diocese ultimately provided up to 90 counseling sessions for the male over a three
year period

No information could be located within the files as to whether if/when McMahon was
confronted with any/all of the allegations.

707
 Reverend John H. McMahon

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1914
YEAR OF DEATH: 1993
ORDINATION: June 16, 1940

Employment/Assignment History
12/05/1940-1/14/1942 Parochial Vicar, Holy Family, Latrobe, PA
1/15/1942-6/17/1953 Parochial Vicar, St. Mary Mercy, Pittsburgh, PA
1/15/1942-6/17/1953 CCD Assistant, St. Mary Mercy, Pittsburgh, PA
6/18/1953-6/12/1957 Parochial Vicar, St. John the Baptist, Pittsburgh, PA
6/13/1957-2/19/1958 Parochial Vicar, St. Sylvester, Brentwood, PA
2/20/1958-1/19/1960 Parochial Vicar, St. Peter, Pittsburgh, PA
1/20/1960-6/07/1960 Parochial Vicar, St. Catherine, Pittsburgh, PA
6/08/1960-6/14/1970 Pastor, North American Martyr, Monroeville, PA
6/15/1970-6/30/1984 Pastor, Resurrection, Pittsburgh, PA
6/30/1984 Retired

Summary

On June 7, 2004, the Diocese of Pittsburgh received a telephone call from a therapist
who was counseling an adult female patient. The call was to inquire about the process for
bringing a sexual abuse allegation to the attention of the Diocese.

Seven days later, a meeting took place between the therapist, the adult female and Rita
Flaherty, Father James Young and Father John Rushofsky. The female explained that between
1969 and 1976, she was molested by Father John H. McMahon and while
she was a student at Resurrection. She advised that her recollection of the events was not
completely clear but she estimated that it occurred when she was seven to 15 years of age. She
stated that the molestation took place on the second floor of the rectory where the two priests
maintained private residences. Some of the abuse occurred during school hours, while other
abuse took place during the summer. She stated that she could recall being with McMahon
when he was naked. McMahon encouraged her to touch him in inappropriate areas of his body.
On other occasions, other children were present and McMahon encouraged them to touch each
other.

The female stated that she recalled seeing pictures of naked boys and girls scattered on
McMahon’s desk.

The female reported that the abuse by McMahon and progressed over time from
touching and fondling to sexual intercourse. She disclosed that on one particular occasion, she

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

708 -*5*("5*0/
Summary
was in the school cloakroom with He exposed his penis to her. He then touched her
inappropriately and ejaculated on her underwear.

At the conclusion of the meeting, Diocesan officials stated that they would investigate
the allegations and address them with . Officials advised that should deny the
allegations, a Diocesan Review Board would make a ruling on suitability in the ministry.

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

709 -*5*("5*0/
 Brother Frank Meder

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: Unknown
YEAR OF DEATH: 1976
ORDINATION: N/A

Employment/Assignment History
Unavailable
Marianist Community

Summary

On August 1, 2011, Bishop Zubik received a letter from an adult female who reported
that Brother Frank Meder inappropriately touched her in the late 1950’s when she was
approximately eight or nine years of age. She stated that Meder would invite the Troy Hill
neighborhood children into the North Catholic High School to give them leftovers from the
cafeteria such as drinks or candy. She stated that she followed Meder into his office and sat on
his lap. He then fondled her. She stated that this abuse occurred to many children who visited
the school.

On April 6, 2014, an adult male contacted the Diocese of Pittsburgh to report that he also
had been abused by Meder when he was approximately 10 or 11 years of age (1953 or 1954).
He stated that Meder invited the Troy Hill neighborhood children into North Catholic High
Shool to see his stamp collection on Saturdays. Meder then took each child into his office
located behind the kitchen and molested them. He reported that this occurred for at least two
years. He also reported abuse by Brother Hildebrand.

On May 5, 2014, another adult male reported inappropriate sexual contact by Meder that
occurred between 1955 and 1957 at North Catholic High School, when he was approximately
eight to 10 years of age. He came to know Meder because his mother worked at the school.
After his father died, Meder offered to cut his hair as well as his brother’s hair for free in order
to help his mother save money. During these monthly haircuts (which always occurred on
Saturdays), Meder would rub the boys’ thighs and smack their buttocks. Meder would then give
them a bag of chips and some pop. The male’s brother was contacted and confirmed this
information.

On May 7, 2014 a third adult male contacted the Diocese to report inappropriate sexual
contact by Meder that occurred in the mid-1960’s at North Catholic High School when he was
approximately nine to 10 years of age. He stated that he and other children from the Troy Hill
neighborhood encountered Meder in the summer. Meder invited them into the school where he
took each child into his office, one at a time. He reported hat Meder gave them candy, but only
after he spanked them. This occurred on approximately six occasions.

710
Summary

On May 8, 2014, a fourth adult male contacted the Diocese to report sexual abuse by
Meder in 1953 or 1954 when he was 10 or 11 years of age. He stated that, Meder invited the
children into North Catholic High School on Saturdays. He often gave the children pop and
candy. He would then line the children up, and have them take turns sitting on his lap in a rocking
chair in his office. The office was located behind the kitchen. He recalled that as a child, he
“always wondered what was in Brother Franks’ pants.” When he got older, he realized that
Brother Frank had an erection. He also provided information about abuse by Brother Keegan.

The Diocese offered counseling to the victims, but they declined. They were informed
that the incidents would be reported to the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office and to
the Provincial for the Marianist community.

711
Biographical Information

Employment/Assignment History

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&
-*5*("5*0/
712
Summary

According to a confidential memorandum, received a

telephone call from in the Archdiocese
, , regarding an allegation of sexual abuse made aainst
. Later that day, the Diocese contacted the male who
reported

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

713
-*5*("5*0/
 Reverend Arthur R. Merrell

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: Unknown
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: 1970

Employment/Assignment History
Not specified Chaplain, Allegheny County Jail and Shuman
Juvenile Detention Center
2/20/1998 Resigned

Summary

In September, 1997, the Diocese of Pittsburgh received a report that Father Arthur R.
Merrell had innapropriately touched a boy under the age of 15. Merrell admitted to the
inappropriate sexual act and withdrew from the priestly ministry in February, 1998. The
Diocese did not forward the information to the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office.

A handwritten note in the file dated February 2, 1998, detailed a sexual relationship that
Merrell had with “James,” a mentally ill man. “James” stated that he and Merrell masturbated
together and that Merrell stuck his finger up his [James’] rectum and they kissed on several
occasions. Merrell admitted to these acts.

In a confidential memorandum dated July, 2014, Rita Flaherty of the Diocese recounted
a meeting with Merrell wherein he minimized his inappropriate actions with minors and asked
the Diocese for money. The Diocese granted Merrell’s request for a “charitable gift of money”
in the sum of $5,000. In 2015, Merrell requested another sum of money from the Diocese.

714
Biographical Information

Employment/Assignment History

Summary

During the year 1990, the Diocese of Pittsburgh received a report from a 30-year-old
male that he had engaged in sexual activity with in the early 1980’s
when he was 22 or 23 years of age. acknowledged the sexual activity.

On December 23, 1993, a 28-year-old male met with Father Guay, Father Zubik and Rita
Flaherty. He reported that he was sexually assaulted by when he was 17 years of age.
He stated that shortly after his father’s death, he went to see at the rectory. During the
visit, offered him a “joint” to smoke. He and then started to drink alcoholic
beverages while smoking marijuana. The male reported that then grabbed his genital
area. Stunned by this incident, he left the rectory. He stated that he not have any contact with
again until 1986, when he was a junior in college. He described their relationship as
being one of a social nature with “sexual overtones.” In 1988, after being away from the
Pittsburgh area, the male made contact with . On this occasion, again grabbed for
his genital area. The male resisted and no conduct occurred.

Diocesan officials thereafter conducted an interview with who denied having

made any attempt at sexual contact with the male when he was 17. He did acknowledge,
however, that he saw the male at his rectory socially when he was a young adult. stated
that on those occasions, there was movement toward sexual activity but it never progressed very
far. Eventually, felt that the male was just “toying with him” so the friendship ended.

The male was provided with therapy/counseling through the Diocese.

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

715
-*5*("5*0/
 Reverend Joseph Mueller

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1936
YEAR OF DEATH: 2010
ORDINATION: June 25, 1983

Employment/Assignment History
7/05/1983 – 7/14/1984 Parochial Vicar, St. Bernard, Mt. Lebanon, PA
7/15/1984 – 6/16/1986 Parochial Vicar, Holy Spirit, West Mifflin, PA
6/16/1986 – 1/22/1987 In Residence, Cardinal Wright Center
1/23/1987 – 2/1988 St. John’s Hospital, Ministry
11/29/1988 – 2/24/2003 Administrative Leave
2/24/2003 Withdrew from Active Ministry

Summary

In April 1986, an allegation of sexual abuse against Father Joseph Mueller was made to
Father Wilt, Pastor at St. Bernard. A young man advised that when he was approximately 13 to
14 years of age, Mueller attempted to remove or pull down his shorts on several occasions. This
occurred when he stayed overnight with Mueller at the Holy Spirit rectory.

In December 1986, in a letter to the Diocese, St. Luke’s stated that that they stood by
their recommendation that Mueller “not work with children or adolescents.” As of November,
1988, Mueller’s faculties were withdrawn.

In a confidential memorandum to Bishop Wuerl, it was suggested that Mueller was

“unassignable.” In a November 1988 letter to Mueller, he was presented with three options: 1)
Enroll in an interim program at St. Luke’s to assist with the vocational discernment process; 2)
Withdraw from active ministry; or 3) Petition the Holy See for a dispensation from the
obligations of priesthood.

In September 1987, the Diocese received a complaint about Mueller. Specifically, a

mother advised that Mueller paid “inappropriate attention” to her 16-year-old son.

716
 Reverend Lawrence O’Connell

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1906
YEAR OF DEATH: 1986
ORDINATION: June 15, 1930

Employment/Assignment History
7/03/1930-7/21/1948 Parochial Vicar, Annunciation, North Side, PA
1/04/1940-7/23/1941 Administrator, Annunciation, North Side, PA
3/10/1946-3/27/1946 Vicar ENC, Annunciations, North Side, PA
7/22/1948-10/16/1948 Vicar ENC PRO TEM, Master Dolorosa, Chicora, PA
10/16/1948-6/25/1952 Pastor, Master Dolorosa, Chicora, PA
6/26/1952-6/28/1983 Pastor, St. Gabriel, Whitehall, PA
6/29/1983 Resigned

Summary

On January 7, 2004, an adult female alleged that Father Lawrence O’Connell sexually
abused her on numerous occasions when she was approximately 11 to 13 years of age. She
stated that she and a friend worked in the rectory at St. Gabriel on Mondays, counting the loose
change from the Sunday services. She stated that, inevitably, O’Connell would ask her to stay
behind and then invite her into his office where he would touch her inappropriately, french-kiss
her and have her perform oral sex on him. She reported that the abuse occurred once a week for
over a year. O’Connell told her; “You are special and this is our special time together.” He also
told her not to tell anyone about their secret because otherwise it would not be special anymore.
Additionally, he told her he loved her.

The female further related that O’Connell took her and her friends out for lunch or to a
movie and bought gifts for them. She stated that she remembers the feeling of dread that she
had on Sunday nights knowing that she would be subjected to the sexual abuse the next day.
Although she told her parents about the abuse many years later, they did not pursue the subject.

The Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office was notifed of the allegation.

On April 28, 2004, a local reporter for KDKA TV contacted Father Lengwin to advise
that she had heard there were sexual allegations against O’Connell. The reporter noted that she
and her family had been members of his parish and that she had attended school at St. Gabriel.
She then reported that she and three other girls worked at the rectory and that O’Connell would
occasionally call them into another room where he would kiss them; “place his tongue down
your throat, fondle you and make overtures.” He also bought them gifts. The reporter noted
that although she had “no desire to make a case,” it was something that she would never forget.

717
Summary
In a memorandum to the file dated April 28, 2004, it was documented that the Diocese
of Pittsburgh contacted the reporter and invited her to talk about the allegation that she had made
involving O’Connell. The reporter responded that she did not feel that coming in to talk was
something that she would like to do. She stated that the reason she had called Lengwin was to
add credibility to the allegation that she had become aware of during her morning staff meeting
at KDKA. She stated that she was not currently interested in counseling and that she did not
want her allegation to go any further due to her public position. She then reiterated the nature
of the abuse that occurred in O’Connell’s office. She stated that when she told her mother
shortly after it occurred, her mother told her that she needed to focus more on her schoolwork
and that she really did not have time to work at the rectory anymore. The other girl quit aroud
the same time. The reporter noted that O’Connell would often buy gifts for the girls or take
them to dinner at the Lamont.

On April 29, 2004, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette published an article reporting that a
lawsuit had been filed against the Diocese for ignoring and concealing the sexual abuse of six
people by priests dating back to 1954. The article stated:

The suit claims the church was negligent, acted in concert to conceal incidence
of sexual abuse, misrepresented the status of the various priests, violated the
statute by not publicly acknowledging incidents, did not care for and provide safe
environments for children, did not protect children against risks of abuse, did
not warn anyone of repeat offenders, and did not properly supervise the priests.

The article continuing, stating that “[t]he suit further claims church officials were incompetent
in allowing the abuse, that their negligence caused emotional distress, and that the plaintiffs
were harmed because of official inaction.”

The article reported that O’Connell was named in the lawsuit by an adult female who
stated that when she was 12 years old, O’Connell had her perform sex acts with him. She
explained that the abuse started with kissing and fondling, while two other girls watched. It
ended three years later when O’Connell hired a new girl to work with him at St. Gabriel.

In a letter dated June 29, 2004, the Diocese provided the Allegheny County District
Attorney’s Office with a list of the most recent allegations of abuse received. O’Connell’s name
was on the list. It was noted that a female known as Jane Doe 1, who wished to remain
anonymous, was abused by O’Connell at St. Gabriel when she was between the ages of 12 and
15 years of age.

On July 1, 2004 the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette and the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review both
published articles reporting that six more lawsuits were filed against the Diocese. O’Connell
was named as one of the abusers. The article stated that two women reported that O’Connell
often fondled them as they arrived for class at St. Gabriel. They were seven and 14 years of age,
respectively, when this occurred. The lawsuit named the Diocese, Bishop Donald Wuerl and
Cardinal Anthony Bevilacqua as the defendants.

718
Summary
In a September 30, 2004 article printed in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, it was reported
that eight more lawsuits were filed against the Diocese in connection with sexual abuse
allegations. O’Connell was once again named in the lawsuit. The plaintiffs asked the court to
hold church leaders, Wuerl and Bevilacqua responsible for allowing the alleged assaults to
occur.

In Diocesan memorandums from May 2008, it was noted that one of the victims was
seeking counseling through the church. There was also a payment agreement signed by the
victim along with a check issued to her by the Diocese for counseling.

719
 Reverend Thomas M. O’Donnell

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1934
YEAR OF DEATH: Unknown
ORDINATION: May 21, 1960

Employment/Assignment History
6/1960-5/1964 St. Kieran, Lawrenceville, PA
5/1964-6/1966 St. John the Evangelist, Pittsburgh, PA
6/1966-8/1971 St. Norbert, Pittsburgh, PA
9/1971-4/1975 St. Clare, Clairton, PA
5/1975-6/1983 Annunciation, Pittsburgh, PA
6/1983-7/2000 St. Wendelin, Carrick, PA
7/2000-9/2001 St. Maximilian Kolbe, Homestead, PA
9/2001-11/2005 St. John Vianney, Pittsburgh, PA
11/2005-8/2006 St. Cyril of Alexandria, Pittsburgh, PA
8/2006-7/2014 St. Mary of Mercy, Pittsburgh, PA
7/2014-Present Epiphany, Pittsburgh, PA

Summary

In 1988, parents complainied to administrators at St. Wendelin that Father Thomas M.

O’Donnell was requiring boys, who were around the age of 12 at the time, to shower after
basketball games. It was reported that O’Donnell was also making them get weighed while they
were naked. Many parents expressed displeasure that all of this was occurring while O’Donnell
was present in the locker room and shower areas. The parents also noted that some of the
children were embarrassed to get weighed while naked; however, they ultimately agreed to it at
the insistence of O’Donnell.

In early November 1988, Father Guay and Father Nowicki met with O’Donnell who
acknowledged that while these incidents did occur, it was an error in judgement. He further
stated that other coaches were present in the locker room at the time. O’Donnell was advised
that he was not to be in the locker room or shower areas moving forward.

In mid-November 1988, a group of 10 parents sent a letter requesting that O’Donnell

completely resign from the athletic programs due to his inappropriate behaviors in the locker
room. They noted that it had been confirmed with the Director of Diocesan Athletic Programs
that there was no requirement that the children be weighed or measured. The letter further stated
that O’Donnell had already defied a June, 1987 order given to him by Father Rutkowski to stay
out of the locker rooms.

720
Summary
In mid-November, 1988, a letter was also sent to Rutkowski from a parent who
complained about the showering and nude weigh-in requirements. Then, another parent who
had previously sent in a complaint, wrote that she was removing her child from the athletic
program amid the inaction by the church to correct O’Donnell’s behavior. On the same day,
Rutkowski also met with Father Nowicki, Father Guay and Father Steidle about the situation.

In early December, 1988, Rutkowski sent a letter to O’Donnell wherein he outlined the
complaints against him. He informed O’Donnell that he was to disassociate himself from the
supervision of the athletic programs. Rutkowski also required that O’Donnell inform his
coaching staff that showers and weigh-ins were not mandatory. On that same day, Rutkowski
sent out a memorandum to the group of parents who had written the November letter. He
advised that Diocesan officials met with O’Donnell on November 30, 1988 and that the matter
was now resolved. It should be noted that there was no documentation in the file that Diocesan
officials met O’Donnell on November 30, 1988.

From late December, 1988 through mid-March, 2002, parents continued to provide
reports to the Diocese that O’Donnell had engaged in inappropriate behavior with children. In
one instance, a parent disclosed that her son went on two trips with O’Donnell. During one of
those trips, one of the boys had to sleep with O’Donnell twice. Another parent recounted that
when her son and other players returned to St. Wendelin to shower after away games, it made
O’Donnell excited. Another set of parents revealed that their son had a sexual conversation with
O’Donnell and they requested that O’Donnell be removed from all children’s programs. One
parent advised that before her son entered eighth grade, he went on a trip with O’Donnell and
other boys. When her son returned home, he was very upset and stated that he did not want to
go anywhere with O’Donnell again. He told her that O’Donnell permitted the boys to undress
in front of him, which made him [her son] uncomfortable. Next, a set of parents claimed that
after their son went to a local wave pool with O’Donnell, O’Donnell insisted that her son and
the other boys shower with him before getting into his car. Finally, a parent wrote a letter
wherein she expressed that she could have done more to protect her child and others from
O’Donnell. She stated that on one occasion, her son went to help O’Donnell with chores. When
O’Donnell asked her son to wash the dog, O’Donnell insisted that her son get completely naked.
Her son complied. The mother indicated that she approached O’Donnell about it, but no further
information was provided about this encounter.

In late January 1989, the results of a psychological evaluation indicated that O’Donnell
had no psychiatric issues. He was noted to be mentally fit to perform any duty.

In early June, 2000, Bishop Wuerl notified O’Donnell that he was being appointed full
time judge to the Diocesan Marriage Tribunal and was relieved of his pastoral duties at St.
Wendelin. On March 30, 2004, O’Donnell officially retired from the Diocese.

In November 2005, Wuerl assigned O’Donnell residency at St. Cyril to continue his role
as a part-time judge and to assist the current pastor. Shortly afterwards, the principal of the St.
Cyril grade school received two complaints concerning issues surrounding O’Donnell and his
interactions with young children in his previous assignments.

721
Summary

In a memorandum dated December 1, 2005, the Diocese documented a second encounter

between one of the initial complainants and the principal. The complainant was a grandparent
of a few students at the school. He stated that he was one of 12 families who went to the Diocese
in 1981 to report O’Donnell’s inappropriate behavior towards children on the different sporting
teams. This behavior included being present in the locker rooms and posting a bulletin that
required the young boys to shower after events. The complainant told the principal that he was
not inerested in bringing his allegations to the attention of the Diocese because the Diocese did
nothing when he previously brought O’Donnell’s behavior to its attention.

There was no documentation in the file that allegations of misconduct were received by
the Diocese in 1981.

Shortly after the initial complaints regarding O’Donnell’s residency at St. Cyril, Father
Young notified Wuerl of these complaints as well as O’Donnell’s past inappropriate behavior
around children. Young noted that after reviewing O’Donnell’s file and convening the Clergy
Task Force, there was unanimous concern about that information surfacing in the public. They
further indicated that a change of residency may be necessary to avoid a potential “ . . .
groundswell of gossip that might harm the reputation of one of our priests or possibly appear
to be negative in terms of the diocese dealing with a situation that occurred in the past.”

In late November, 2005, Wuerl sent a memorandum to Young and Auxiliary Bishop
Bradley wherein he requested that O’Donnell’s file be reviewed again to ensure there was never
an allegation of abuse received by the Diocese.

In early January, 2006, Diocesan officials met with O’Donnell regarding the recent
complaints made to the principal of St. Cyril. O’Donnell stated that he never did anything to
harm a child. The Diocesan staff cautioned O’Donnell not to spend time at the school for any
reason moving forward.

In mid-March 2006, the Diocese contacted the principal at St. Cyril to ensure that there
were no further allegations brought to her attention. The principal responded that while there
were no new complaints, some of the children had remarked that O’Donnell was very nice to
them during the First Reconciliation ceremony. The next day, Diocesan officials held another
meeting with O’Donnell wherein he was questioned about, inter alia, why he was present during
the First Reconciliation ceremony when he was cautioned not to be anywhere near the school.
O’Donnell responded that he had been asked to help by Father Bruney. O’Donnell was
instructed again not to be around the school for any reason.

In late November, 2006, O’Donnell applied to an Apostleship of the Sea program which
required a letter from the Diocese that indicated that he was in good standing. Rushofsky, who
had been present for the meetings with O’Donnell about the complaints against him, provided
the letter.

722
Summary
In late February, 2008, O’Donnell asked Bishop Zubik to provide another letter of good
standing to re-certify him for the Apostleship at Sea program. In a letter from Father Bonnar to
Zubik, the allegations made against O’Donnell were outlined. Bonnar advised that if Zubik
believed that O’Donnell should be recommended for the program, the signature should not come
from him. On the letter, Zubik initialed handwritten notations, which read in part that the matter
needed to be discussed by the Special Clergy Task Force before any decision was to be made.

O’Donnell was ultimately informed that he would not be recommended for the program.

In January 2014, O’Donnell requested permission to attend a memorial mass performed

by the United States Navy. The Navy required that a Diocesan representative provide a letter of
good standing in order for O’Donnell to attend. The Diocese not only provided a letter of good
standing, but also provided a form which indicated that all files and records maintained by the
church about O’Donnell had been reviewed and the Diocese could attest to the following
statements, inter alia: “No accusations of misconduct have ever been made against him, nor
has he ever been involved in any incident, to my knowledge, which has led to potential or public
scandal;” and “To the best of my knowledge, he has never engaged in sexual behavior
inconsistent with priestly celibacy, nor has he ever acted in an inappropriate manner with
minors.” Father Mark Eckman initialed the statements and signed the form attesting that
O’Donnell was fully permitted to participate in the memorial event.

723
 Reverend William P. O’Malley, III

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1944
YEAR OF DEATH: 2008
ORDINATION: May 16, 1970

Employment/Assignment History
6/15/1970-5/23/1973 Assistant, St. Jerome, Charleroi, PA
5/22/1973-9/14/1978 Assistant, St. Canice, Pittsburgh (Knoxville), PA
9/15/1978-3/28/1982 Assistant, St. Francis de Sales, McKees Rocks, PA
3/29/1982-11/15/1985 Assistant, St. Paul, Butler, PA
11/16/1985-8/24/1992 Pastor, St. Conrad, Meridian, PA
8/25/1992-8/10/1995 Auditor-Assessor Tribunal, Diocese of Pittsburgh
8/11/1995-6/29/1997 Pastor at Devine Mercy, Beaver Falls, PA
6/30/1997-12/14/1997 Pastor at St. Irenaeus, Oakmont, PA
12/15/1997-11/15/1998 Requested Leave of Absence for Personal Reasons
11/16/1998-5/18/2003 Canonical Consultant Tribunal, Diocese of Pittsburgh,
5/19/2003 Withdrawn from active Priestly Ministry

Summary

On April 21, 1991, the Diocese of Pittsburgh received a complaint that Father William
P. O’Malley was having young people spend too much time at the St. Conrad rectory. No names
were provided. On this same date, two ministers advised Father Guay, Vicar for the Clergy, that
O’Malley had given at least one underage boy numerous gifts, including remote control cars,
electronic devices, use of O’Malley’s credit card, and at least one trip to the Bahamas. On April
24, 1992, the father of this same boy (who was in tenth grade at the time) advised that he had
concerns about O’Malley and both of his sons. The father stated that his oldest son had keys to
the rectory and spent nights and weekends there with O’Malley. On May 1, 1992, Diocesan
officials questioned O’Malley about the complaint but he denied any wrongdoing.

On March 24, 1993, a financial audit was conducted at St. Conrad due to complaints of
financial mismanagement by O’Malley. Through the audit, it was discovered, inter alia, that
O’Malley had given money to a local 17-year-old boy who stayed at the rectory and was the
primary user of new guest furniture that had been purchased by O’Malley. It was also
discovered that O’Malley and the teenager had a joint bank account together.

On December 23, 1993, an adult male contacted the Diocese to report that he was sexualy
assaulted by O’Malley when he was approximately 22 years of age. He explained that
O’Malley’s residence had a pool table and hot tub and was always available as a “place for kids
to go.” When questioned by Diocesan officials regarding the complaint, O’Malley admitted to
receiving a backrub from the male but advised that he did not recall if any sexual contact had

724
Summary
occurred. O’Malley admitted that adolescents were still coming into the rectory to use the pool
tables and pinball machine. Father Guay cautioned O’Malley against this activity, “[e]specially
since [the complainant] made reference to this as an opportunity for O’Malley to have access
to other adolescents.”

On December 12, 1997, Diocesan officials interviewed an adult male who advised that
he was sexually abused by O’Malley in 1978 when he was approximately 11 to 12 years of age.
He stated that O’Malley provided him with alcohol and then, after he went to bed, O’Malley got
into bed with him, removed his shorts, and fondled his genitals. On another occasion, O’Malley
showed him photographs of three other boys in their underwear. O’Malley then asked if he
could take similar photographs of him. The male futher advised that O’Malley kept a drawer
filled with large candy bars, that kids were around the rectory all the time, and that O’Malley
was still seen with groups of young boys.

When interviewed about the allegation made on December 12, 1997, O’Malley stated
that the incident “probably happened” and that “kids were around all the time.” O’Malley went
on to state that he was “much more careful now not to touch kids,” and that he recently had taken
a group of young boys to a festival held at St. John Vianney.

Bishop Wuerl granted O’Malley a leave of absence. O’Malley was then sent to St.
Francis Hospital and then to St. Luke Institute in Maryland for evaluation and treatment. He
was later sent to Southdown Institute for continued treatment.

On January 12, 1998, a confidential memorandum was sent to Wuerl advising that
O’Malley was given a diagnosis of “ephebophilia,” based on his admitted sexual interest in
adolescents and that O’Malley was at a high risk for seeking emotional gratification with
adolescents. In spite of this diagnosis, only four days later, Wuerl sent a memorandum to the
file documenting his meeting with O’Malley on January 15, 1998. Wuerl stated that O’Malley
was “anxious to return to his priestly ministry.” Wuerl continued, “I expressed to him our desire
to help him in whatever way we can do to all of the things that are necessary to present him for
priestly ministry.”

On February 12, 1998, a letter was sent from a psychiatrist to Wuerl regarding O’Malley.
Th psychiatrist noted that O’Malley “describes no sexual interest or experiences with any
youngster who was not a teenager” and that “the incidents that occurred number 5 or less, were
never repeated with the same individual, and never included anything more than touching with
his hands.” The doctor further stated that no sexual activity with minors had reoccurred since
1982 and that O’Malley should be allowed to return to his ministry.

On February 20, 1998, a confidential letter was sent from Southdown to Father Ruggiero,
advising that during treatment, O’Malley stated that he had a fantasy for “well built 16, 17 or 18
year olds,” along with a continued over-involvement with youth, and an inappropriate
preoccupation with things that attract youth. From April 1998 through October 1998, O’Malley
remained in residential treatment at Southdown. While there, O’Malley received a letter from
the Diocese including a $1,000 payment to O’Malley for his car insurance.

725
Summary

On November 9, 1998, Wuerl sent a letter to O’Malley appointing him as Canonical

Consultant in the Tribunal of the Diocese, with continued residence at St. John Vianney. Among
other things, Wuerl stated:

At the same time I welcome you back to priestly ministry following your leave of
absence for personal reasons. Your willingness to serve in this capacity and to
be of assistance . . . is a sign of your dedication and priestly zeal.

On December 12, 1998, a letter was sent to Wuerl from the same victim who had
disclosed being sexually assaulted by O’Malley a year earlier (as described above). The victim
stated that it had been one year since he originally made his complaint to the Diocese about his
abuse and his disclosure of three additional boys - - whom he stated he knew personally from
school - - whom O’Malley had photographed in their underwear. The victim further stated that
he believed the church was supporting O’Malley’s behavior and cited as an example O’Malley’s
new position in the Diocesan building and the publishing of his appointment.

On May 17, 1999, a letter was sent from Ruggiero to O’Malley stating, among other
things, that the Diocese had become aware that O’Malley had violated protocol by appearing in
clerical attire and celebrating mass in public ceremonies. Ruggiero advised that any future
violation(s) could affect O’Malley’s position as Canonical Consultant.

On July 9, 1999, a recommendation was made by the Diocesan Clergy Task Force that
O’Malley be moved from St. John Vianney to St. Mary of Mercy to “cut down on some of his
appearances at parishes and events which have been problematic in the past.” It was suggested
that O’Malley be placed back on administrative leave, but that he could “continue to do tribunal
work unofficially despite the fact that he no longer is assigned to the tribunal.” This
memorandum was initialed at the bottom as being approved by the Bishop.

On August 16, 1999, a confidential memorandum was sent from Ruggiero to Wuerl
documenting the finalization of a loan made by the Diocese to O’Malley. The loan was in the
amount of $37,800 and was to assist O’Malley with his current debts. The loan was approved
by Wuerl. Weeks later, on September 24, 1999, another confidential memorandum was sent by
Ruggiero regarding O’Malley. The memorandum referenced earlier information that O’Malley
had been conducting research on child-care institutions located within the Diocese of Erie. As
stated in the memorandum, it was Ruggiero’s opinion that the Diocese should not allow
O’Malley’s name to be associated with any publication that may receive public notice,
“especially in an area related to child care.”

From April 5, 2002 to January 13, 2006, a total of six additional victims independently
came forward to report that they were sexually assaulted by O’Malley. Three of the victims
advised that they were sexually abused in the 1970’s. At the time of their victimization, their
ages ranged from 8 to 14. The three remaining victims advised that they were sexually assaulted
in the mid-1990’s and as recently as 1999. These three victims ranged in age from 11 to 17.
Many of the victims indicated that during the time period in question, O’Malley would provide

726
Summary
them with gifts and trips. It should be noted that a portion of this period of sexual abuse, (from
the end of 1998 through 1999), occurred after Wuerl placed O’Malley back into ministry as
Canonical Consultant.

On May 19, 2003, a letter was sent to O’Malley from Wuerl wherein Wuerl advised that
he accepted O’Malley’s resignation from active ministry. However, Wuerl also advised
O’Malley that his “sustenance needs and benefits would continue according to the norms of
law.”

On January 13, 2006, a memorandum was sent from Father Young to Wuerl advising
that another victim had disclosed that he was “sexually molested by Father William O’Malley
from 1996 when he was 14 years old until 1999, when he was 17 years old.” The victim stated
that the abuse occurred in three different counties. In January, 2006, the Diocese reported this
complaint to the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office. Diocesan records revealed that
the District Attorney’s Office subsequently advised that the victim did not wish to pursue the
investigation.

727
 Reverend George Parme

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1923
YEAR OF DEATH: 2002
ORDINATION: June 13, 1948

Employment/Assignment History
7/22/1948 – 2/6/1952 St. Peter, Butler, PA
2/7/1952 – 1/30/1957 St. Aloysius, Wilmerding, PA
1/31/1957 – 8/11/1958 Presentation BVM, Midland, PA
8/12/1958 – 10/15/1958 No Assignment
10/16/1958 – 1/19/1960 Most Holy Name, Troy Hill
1/20/1960 – 6/7/1960 No Assignment, in residence at St. Patrick, Strip District
6/8/1960 – 10/13/1963 St. Catherine, Beechview, PA
10/14/1963 – 12/13/1963 St. Agnes, Oakland, PA
12/14/1963 – 5/26/1964 St. Joseph, North Side, PA
5/27/1964 – 1/30/1968 Mt. Nazareth Academy, Bellevue, PA
1/31/1968 – 11/17/1969 Mother of Good Council, Brushton, PA
11/18/1969 – 11/14/1974 St. Louis and St. Pascal, Argentine
11/15/1974 – 6/19/1989 St. Cecilia, Glassport, PA

Summary

The only information regarding an allegation against Father George Parme was found
with documents detailing a civil lawsuit against the Diocese of Pittsburgh, Bishop Donald Wuerl
and Cardinal Bevilacqua. According to the lawsuit, the victim served as an altar boy at St.
Aloysius. In 1954, when the victm was approximately 13 years old, Parme fondled his genitals
while he was getting dressed before mass in the sacristy. It was also alleged that abuse occurred
in Parme’s car. The abuse continued for one year.

The lawsuit contended,

[O]n information and belief, Diocesan Defendants knew and/or had constructive
knowledge of the sexual abuse of minors by a number of Diocesan priests,
including Father Parme, and that such abusive behavior was a longstanding
problem within the Diocese, having received actual notice of such abuse.

On October 1, 2007, the victim signed a document releasing the Diocese, Wuerl,
Bevilacqua, Bishop Paul Bradley and Bishop Zubik of all responsibility regarding the abuse.
The Diocese agreed to pay a total amount of $1.25 Million to 31 plaintiffs in the lawsuit.

728
 Reverend Paul E. Pindel

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1924
YEAR OF DEATH: 1991
ORDINATION: May 19, 1951

Employment/Assignment History
6/21/1951-12/03/1952 St. Stanislaus, Ambridge, PA
12/04/1952-12/16/1953 St. John Cantius, Sharpsburg, PA
12/17/1953-6/12/1957 St. Robert Bellarmine, E. McKeesport, PA
6/13/1957-6/09/1959 Holy Family, Pittsburgh, PA
6/10/1059-12/07/1960 Holy Angels, Hays, PA
12/08/1960-6/06/1966 St. William, E. Pittsburgh, PA
6/07/1966-3/27/1969 St. Martin, Pittsburgh, PA
3/28/1969-11/01/1971 St. Rose of Lima, Darlington
St. Ann, New Galilee
11/02/1971-10/13/1973 Chaplain, Gilmary School, Coraopolis, PA
10/14/1973-12/09/1985 St. Genevieve, Canonsburg, PA
12/10/1985-7/06/1989 St. Hyacinth, Pittsburgh, PA
7/06/1989-2/26/1991 Leave of Absence (Brain Tumor)

Summary

In April 2012, the Diocese of Pittsburgh received an allegation from an adult male that
Father Paul E. Pindel inappropriately touched him when he was between 13 and 15 years of age.
This occurred from 1957 through 1960 in Allegheny County and Butler County.

The male reported that he and other boys would frequently go places with Pindel. On
one occasion, Pindel took him and his brother to the farm where Pindel’s sister lived. They spent
the night there. Pindel slept between him and his brother on a mattress on the floor and
inappropriately touched him during the night.

The victim also stated that when Pindel would take him and other boys swimming in
Slippery Rock, Pindel would pull their trunks down while in the water and then laugh as if was
a funny prank.

The victim also recalled going to a drive-in with Pindel at which time Pindel performed
oral sex on him. Even after Pindel was transferred, he would continue to go to the victim’s
house, take the victim places and often give the victim money.

The victim recalled that after Pindel was transferred, he was taken to the new rectory.
He was then taken to Pindel’s bedroom where he became naked. The victim stated that this was

729
Summary
the first time that Pindel placed the victim’s hand on his penis and it was the first time that Pindel
attempted to have the victim touch him in a sexual way. That was the last time that he ever went
back to the rectory or went anywhere else with Pindel.

The Diocese offered the victim assistance in finding counseling services.

In May, 2003, the Diocese received an allegation that Pindel engaged in inappropriate
sexual contact with a minor who was an eighth grade student at St. William around the year
1965. According to the victim, once he entered high school, Pindel had senior boys threaten
and beat him up so that he would not disclose the prior sexual contact. According to the victim,
he attempted several times to discuss what happened to him but was told it would never go
anywhere because they would believe a priest over a boy. Later in life, the victim attempted to
talk to another priest and was told that he should be ashamed of himself.

The Diocese received an allegation in February, 2002 regarding Pindel. It was alleged
that Pindel engaged in inappropriate sexual contact with a minor who was a student in eighth or
ninth grade at St. William. This occurred in the 1960’s. The victim advised that Pindel would
often take boys to a farm that he owned. During a visit to the farm, the victim was given wine.
Pindel then performed oral sex on him and “simulated anal intercourse.”

According to the victim, Pindel would also enter the locker room after a game while the
boys were changing cloths.

The Diocese received an allegation in August, 2011 regarding Pindel. Specifically, it was
reported that Pindel engaged in inappropriate sexual contact with a minor between the ages of
six and nine that occurred between 1980 and 1984 in Washington County. The victim stated that
the abuse began when he was six years old and attending CCD classes. He related that he would
be pulled out of class by Pindel and taken to the rectory where he would be sexual assaulted.
The victim was instructed by Pindel to put on a red robe and lay across the desk. Pindel then
inserted his fingers into the victim’s anus. It was very painful. The victim reported that
eventually Pindel started using a number two pencil. This went on for three years. The victim
advised that there was an usher who would watch the door so that no one would enter. The usher
would also touch the victim inappropriately on occasion. The Diocese offered the victim
assistance in finding counseling services and provided reimbursement for treatment.

730
 Pittsburgh Priest #1

Biographical Information
Omittted

Employment/Assignment History
Omitted

Summary

In a “Memo to File” dated April 21, 2004, Father Ronald P. Lengwin documented a
discussion that he had with a KDKA TV reporter. The reporter had advised Lengwin that they
were preparing to do a story about allegations being made by an 85-year-old World War II
veteran that he was sexually abused by a priest 70 years earlier. While Lengwin never
mentioned the priest’s name in the memorandum, he did state that the priest in question died in
1958. The memorandum further stated that the victim spoke with Diocesan officials who offered
him counseling services for assistance in dealing with this abuse. It also noted that the victim
was comforted by the fact that the Diocese found his allegations to be credible.

The documents received via subpoena contained invoices and checks made payable to a
psychologist who treated the victim. It appeared that the Diocese paid for those treatments and
created a treatment plan for his recovery.

731
 Reverend Francis Pucci

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1931
YEAR OF DEATH: 2002
ORDINATION: May 25, 1957

Employment/Assignment History
6/13/1957 – 11/28/1961 Parochial Vicar, St. Vitus, New Castle, PA
11/29/1961 – 6/16/1962 Parochial Vicar, Our Lady of Mount Carmel, Braddock, PA
6/17/1962 – 5/12/1965 Parochial Vicar, St. Vitus, New Castle, PA
5/13/1965 – 6/06/1966 Parochial Vicar, St. Mary, McKeesport, PA
6/07/1966 – 6/09/1968 Parochial Vicar, Epiphany, Uptown, PA
6/10/1968 – 3/27/1969 Headmaster, Lawrenceville Catholic
3/28/1969 – 6/14/1970 South Side Catholic, Consolidation
6/15/1970 – 5/21/1972 Administration, St. Januarius, Renton, PA
5/22/1972 – 7/01/1973 Pastor, St. Eugene, Liberty Boro, PA
7/02/1973 – 10/05/1980 Pastor, Purification, Ellwood City, PA
10/06/1980 – 9/29/1981 Pastor, St. Joseph, Coraopolis, PA
9/30/1981 – 6/30/1984 Pastor, St. Alphonsus, McDonald, PA
7/01/1984 – 2/14/1987 Pastor, Our Lady of Lourdes, Burgettstown, PA
2/15/1987 – 10/29/1987 Pastor, Immaculate Conception, Washington, PA
10/29/1987 – 2/10/1992 Leave of Absence, Health reasons
2/10/1992 Retired

Summary

In April 2002 an allegation of sexual abuse was made to the Diocese of Pittsburgh. An
adult male revealed that Father Francis Pucci fondled him to the point of ejaculation in 1962
when he was a minor at St. Vitus school.

In February 2004, a sexual abuse allegation was made to the Washington County District
Attorney’s Office. An adult male advised that Pucci engaged in inappropriate sexual touching
with him in 1988 at a chuch. This occurred when he was a minor.

The Diocese received another allegation of sexual abuse in September 2007. An adult
male reported that Pucci engaged in inappropriate sexual touching with him when he was a
minor. This conduct occurred at a church in Coraopolis. In information contained in the file
suugested that the male never moved forward with the complaint after the initial allegation was
made.

In November 2014, the Diocese received a report from an adult male that Pucci engaged
in inappropriate sexual touching with him in 1981 to 1982 at a church in Corapolis. He stated

732
Summary
that he was an altar server during that time period and Pucci would instruct him to wear either
nothing or jock straps underneath his cassocks. Pucci would also pat his buttocks along with
the buttocks of other altar servers. The male also reported this information to the Allegheny
County District Attorney’s Office.

In December, 2014, an adult male reported to the Allegheny County District Attorney’s
Office that Pucci engaged in inappropriate sexual touching with him when he was a minor. He
stated that the abuse occurred in 1981-1982 at a church in Allegheny County.

In May, 2016, the Washington County District Attorney’s Office received a report from
a male who wished to remain anonymous. The male alleged that Pucci had engaged in
inappropriate sexual touching with him in 1983 at a church in McDonald.

Several months later, in October, 2016, an adult male reported to the Diocese that Pucci
engaged in inappropriate sexual touching with him in 1980 at a church in Coraopolis.

Information pertaining to allegations of sexual abuse involving Pucci were also contained
within the file of Father Robert Wolk. Wolk was apparently a friend of Pucci’s in the Diocese.
Wolk’s file contained the following information:

In August 1988, two victims filed a lawsuit against the Pittsburgh Diocese. The
two victims name Father Robert Wolk as a defendant in the sexual assaults, along
with Father Francis Pucci and Father Richard Zula, all of the Pittsburgh
Diocese. [Victim 1] alleges Pucci sexually assaulted him. On or about
September of 1988, the victims report the assaults to law enforcement. In
November 1988, Pucci was charged with sexually abusing [Victim 1]. More
specific, in the summer of 1986, at the Marianna Parish House, where Zula
resided at the time, Pucci touched and fondled [Victim 1’s] genitals.

Acording to articles from the Associated Press and Pittsburgh Post-Gazette:

Washington County District Attorney John Pettit, filed the sexual abuse charges
against three Roman Catholic priests for allegedly molesting two brothers who
were altar boys, and accused the church of foot-dragging during the
investigation. ‘It was not the spirit of cooperation we would like to see,’ Pettit
said, calling it ‘minimal at best.’

Pittsburgh Bishop Donald W. Wuerl denied the allegation, saying, ‘I think the
diocese has made every effort to be cooperative.’

Pettit charged the Rev. Richard F. Zula, 47, former pastor at Sts. Mary and Ann
Church in Marianna; the Rev. Robert Wolk, a former paster and diocesan
assistant chancellor of St. Thomas More Church in the Pittsburgh suburb of
Bethel Park; and the Rev. Francis Pucci, former pastor of Immaculate

733
Summary
Conception Church in Washington. All three men have been relieved of their
pastoral duties.

In more than 150 counts, Pettit alleged that the priests sexually abused the two
boys from 1981 to 1987. The homosexual acts allegedly took place in a barn, a
church basement, a parked car and at a mountain resort.

Pettit said investigators do not believe the three priests acted in concert, although
Zula and Pucci were charged with one count each of conspiracy because Pucci
allegedly knew of Zula's intentions when he let Zula use his bedroom at a parish
home to have sex with one of the youths.

Some of the incidents involved whips, chains, drugs and alcohol, Pettit said.

Pucci also was charged with conspiracy for allowing the Rev. Richard Zula to
have sexual activity with one of the boys at the Our Lady of Lourdes parish house
in Burgettstown, Washington County, in 1986. At the time, Father Pucci was
pastor there.

The charges against Father Pucci were dropped after officials determined the statute of
limitations had expired.

734
 Reverend John W. Rebel

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1937
YEAR OF DEATH: 2013
ORDINATION: May 1, 1965

Employment/Assignment History
5/13/1965 – 6/6/1967 St. Bernard, Mt. Lebanon, PA
6/7/1967 – 8/27/1967 St. Veronica, Ambridge, PA
8/28/1967 – 9/19/1968 St. Joseph, Verona, PA
9/20/1968 – 5/22/1973 St. Michael, Elizabeth, PA
5/23/1973 – 8/15/1974 Leave of Absence
6/8/1973 – 8/15/1974 St. Kieran, Lawrenceville, PA
8/16/1974 – 11/4/1976 Assumption, Bellevue, PA
11/5/1976 – 6/29/1981 St. Margaret Mary, Moon Township, PA
6/30/1981 – 7/7/1982 St. Anselm, Swissvale, PA
7/8/1982 – 7/2/2001 St. Killian, Mars, PA
7/2/2001 – 6/15/2002 St. Bartholomew, Penn Hills, PA
Sabbatical Second Semester of 2001-2002
1/15/2002 – 7/3/2002 Sabbatical at North American College in Rome
7/3/2002 – 9/1/2010 St. James the Apostle, Bedford, PA

Summary

The Diocese of Pittsburgh received a report that Father John W. Rebel molested a boy in
the 1970’s. The abuse occurred in the boy’s bedroom when he was 10 to 12 years of age. It
happened after a “home mass.” The file contained a memorandum dated March 18, 2009, that
revealed that Diocesan officials met with the parents of the victim who advised that their son
(now deceased) told them of the abuse years after it happened. They stated that Rebel would
often drive their son home after CCD. The memorandum stated that while his parents did not
know for certain what occurred during those rides, it became clear from their son’s level of
emotion and sobbing, that sexual abuse may have occurred. Their son begged them to not make
him go to CCD classes. The partents reported that after the abuse, their son became withdrawn
from his family and friends.

On March 27, 2009, Diocesan officials confronted Rebel with the allegations. Rebel
stated that while he remembered the victim’s parents, he had no recollection of their children
nor having a “home mass” at their residence. He denied taking the victim for rides in his car
after CCD classes.

On May 28, 2009, the victim’s parents met with Bishop Zubik and recounted their son’s
abuse. Zubik advised that he had spoken to Rebel and that he had denied harming their son.

735
Summary
Zubik also stated that he felt that Rebel was telling him the truth. In the end, while Zubik
believed what their son had alleged, he felt that perhaps the abuse was committed by another
priest. Zubik stated that after reviewing church records, it was in all likelihood that another
priest was the parish priest at the time when the abuse occurred. He advised the family that the
church would conduct more research.

Based on the files presented in response to the subpoena, it does not appear that any
further investigation was conducted.

In a letter dated August 13, 2009, counsel for the Diocese forwarded information to the
Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office pertaining to allegations made against clergy
members. The allegation invoving Rebel was included.

736
 Reverend Raymond R. Rhoden

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1950
YEAR OF DEATH: 2006
ORDINATION: October 23, 1976

Employment/Assignment History
11/05/1976-7/07/1982 Parochial Vicar, Nativity of Our Lord, Pittsburgh, PA
7/08/1982-6/21/1989 Parochial Vicar, St. Francis of Assisi, Finleyville, PA
8/25/1988-6/21/1989 Chaplain, part-time, Monongahela Valley Catholic High School,
Monongahela, PA
6/21/1989-10/05/1992 Chaplain, part-time, Our Lady of Sacred Heart High School,
Coraopolis, PA
6/21/1989-10/05/1992 Parochial Vicar, St. Joseph, Coraopolis, PA
10/05/1992-10/26/1992 Administrator, St. Philip Neri, Donora, PA
10/26/1992-6/30/1997 Team Ministry-Moderator, Our Lady of the Valley,
Donora, PA
6/30/1997-5/17/2002 Pastor, St. James, Sewickley, PA
5/17/2002 Administrative Leave
7/05/2002 Withdrew from active priestly ministry; Retired

Summary

On April 29, 2002, the parents of an adult male met with officials from the Diocese of
Pittsburgh to report that their son was sexually abused by Father Raymond R. Rhoden between
1976 and 1977. The mother stated that they considered Rhoden a family friend and that he had
spent a lot of time at their home. Her son informed them that Rhoden fondled his genitals and
performed oral sex on him over a number of months when he was 16 and 17 years of age.

The parents stated that they had previously spoken to Bishop McDowell (date unknown)
about the sexual abuse and he told them that he would take care of the allegations. However,
they never heard from him again. The parents related that they prayed for a long time before
reporting the incident again.

A memorandum to the file dated April 30, 2002, indicates that Diocesan officials spoke
with the victim via telephone. The victim told them that Rhoden spent a lot of time in his family
home and that when he was 16 and 17 years of age, Rhoden performed oral sex on him. He
explained that Rhoden would come into his room after he went to bed and begin to massage his
back, fondle his genitals and eventually perform oral sex on him. He stated that this occurred
on multiple occasions. The victim was presently taken antidepressants.

737
Summary
The victim explained that he came forward with this information because his parents told
him that Rhoden had recently come over to their home and spent some time alone with his
younger brother in his room. His younger brother advised that Rhoden did not touch him.

The victim was asked to write a statement about the abuse, and on May 20, 2002, the
allegations were brought to the attention of the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office.

A handwritten note on the bottom of the memorandum dated May 21, 2002, stated that
the Diocese met with Rhoden and he admitted to the sexual abuse. The note further stated that
the Diocese turned the matter over to civil authorities and that Rhoden was removed from his
assignment.

In a memorandum to the file dated May 17, 2002, it was noted that Rhoden agreed to go
to St. Luke Institute for a physiological evaluation. An evaluation was not included in the
materials provided.

The file contained a church document marked “confidential” and dated July, 2004. It
was addressed to Bishop Wuerl from Angelo Amato, Titular Archbishop of Sila. The document
stated that the Dicastery had examined the case and agreed with the decision to allow Rhoden
to remain in retirement. They stated that because the case involved “a single case of abuse” and
it “occurred over 25 years ago,” penal procedures and penalties would not apply.

A document entitled “File Review for Compliance with the Charter for the Protection of
Children and Young People” noted that Rhoden moved to Sarasota, Florida. He received $750
per month for sustenance. In January 2003, Wuerl granted Rhoden an additional $400 per month
to assist with housing and food.

738
 Reverend Carl Roemele

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1934
YEAR OF DEATH: Unknown
ORDINATION: May 6, 1963

Employment/Assignment History
5/1963-5/1964 St. Joseph, Mt. Oliver, PA
5/1964-6/1966 St. Alexis, Wexford, PA
6/1966-8/1967 St. William, Pittsburgh, PA
8/1967-5/1972 St. Joseph, Duquesne, PA
5/1972-9/1975 St. Agatha, Bridgeville, PA
9/1975-2/1976 Allegheny Community College, Pittsburgh, PA
9/1975-2/1976 Epiphany, Pittsburgh, PA
9/1975-2/1976 Allegheny County Jail, Pittsburgh, PA
2/1976-8/1976 Leave of absence; voluntary laicization

Summary

In late June 1967, the Diocese of Pittsburgh received a letter from a mother regading
sexual abuse committed by Father Carl Roemele. The letter was addressed to “Your Excellency”
and revealed that Roemele engaged in sexual misconduct towards four different young boys
while he was a parochial vicar at St. William. She alleged that Roemele made sexual advances
towards her son (first victim), his friend, and then another boy in a separate incident, when he
took them to a cabin. Additionally, she alleged that on a fourth occasion while at the camp site
with a boy, Roemele told him to shower after swimming. She stated that Roemele then entered
the shower with the boy and when Roemele dropped the soap, he tried to bite the boy while
bending to pick it up. The mother also expressed concern that Roemele gave the eighth graders
a talk about sex prior to leaving his assignment. In the file provided by the Diocese, there is no
documentation to indicate that any official action was taken towards Roemele.

In mid-August 2004, a letter was sent to Bishop Wuerl wherein an adult male alleged
that he was continually abused by Roemele when he was an altar boy at St. Joseph. He reported
that Roemele would grope and fondle him - - as well as two other altar servers - - before mass.
The male also reported that when he was in sixth grade, Roemele took him and other members
of a basketball team to a cabin at Aleo Lake. While there, he witnessed Roemele masturbating
a young boy in the middle of the night.

In September 2004, Diocesan officials met with the victim to discuss his recent complaint
to Wuerl. There, the victim further outlined his allegations and was offered counseling. He
declined. He was asked to pass along the information for clergy staff to the other victims. In

739
Summary
late September, 2004, the Diocese sent a letter to the Allegheny District Attorney’s Office,
advising of the allegation.

Contained within the file was a March, 2008 letter from a law firm. Included in the
correspondence was an undated letter from another victim of Roemele. The third victim alleged
that he was abused around the year 1968 when he seved as an altar boy at St. Joseph. He was
either 11 or 12 years of age. He stated the abuse started after Roemele convinced him to stay
with him after mass. There, he fondled his genitals over his clothes. This conduct escalated to
exposing the boy’s genitals and Roemele exposing his own genitals to the boy. The victim
stated that Roemele would often fondle him with the goal of giving the boy an erection. Roemele
sometimes squeezed the boy’s testicles to the point where he experienced pain, but Roemele
encouraged the boy to try to endure it. The victim estimated that the abuse occurred after every
mass for approximately one year, if not longer, and lasted 20 to 30 minutes each time. The
victim felt as though he had to appease Roemele while waiting for the abuse to stop.

The victim further outlined a particular instance when he went to the cabin with Roemele.
Although Roemele told him that he would be going to the camp with other boys, it turned out
that the victim was the only boy there. Upon arrival, Roemele instructed him to strip down to
his underwear and shoot baskets at a hoop outside. Later, while in the cabin, Roemele began to
fondle the victim, eventually removing the victim’s clothes as well as his own. Roemele then
placed the victim’s hand on his erection and began masturbating himself using the victim’s hand.
Roemele asked him several times if he wanted to “taste it,” but the victim declined. The victim
reported that when he would try to pull back his hand, Roemele would put it back on his penis.
The victim stated that despite him being visibly uncomfortable, the abuse by Roemele continued
on and off again for six hours before he was finally taken home.

In another letter from a law firm, the attorney inquired if a list of four victims would be
able to settle their cases with the Diocese. The second and third victims’ names were included
on this list. It is unknown whether any settlement was reached. In late, August 2008, the Diocese
sent a letter to the Allegheny District Attorney’s Office regarding their receipt of the allegations.

In late October 2010, the Diocese received a telephone call from a mother who reported
that Roemele had sexually abused her son when he was 10 years old. She alleged that her son
and others were molested by Roemele at St. Joseph. She stated that Roemele would have the
boys come in early for mass or devotions and then molest them. He also took them to a cabin
that she referred to as “Mo’s cabin.” She went on to explain that her son had passed away in
2003 from complications from his alcoholism, adding that he began drinking in 1969 when he
was just 10 years old.

In early November 2010, Diocesan officials met with the mother at her home. She stated
that she believed her son would still be alive if not for the abuse he suffered by Roemele leading
him to drink. The clergy staff offered to provide her with counseling services over the telephone
since she was not able to leave her house. In July, 2011, the Diocese sent a letter to the
Allegheny District Attorney’s Office regarding their receipt of the victim’s allegation. It was

740
Summary
indicated that the reasons for the delay in the submittal was due to the fact that the Diocese was
unsure whether the allegation needed to be reported since the victim was deceased.

Roemele took a leave of absence from his assignment on February 2, 1976. He later
resigned from active ministry in early August, 1976 and was officially laicized on February 25,
1978.

In early February 2009, Diocesan offiicials met with Roemele and confronted him with
the allegations from the second and third victims. Roemele responded that he did not recall the
second victim by name but did recognize the third victim by name, along with two of the altar
boys identified by the second victim. Roemele ultimately denied all the allegations of sexual
abuse, stating that they likely misinterpreted his actions towards them as sexually abusive in
nature when they were not meant that way. The clergy staff informed Roemele that as part of a
new policy, his name and address would need to be provided to the District Attorney where he
lived (Butler County) advising that a priest with allegations of sexual abuse was residing in the
county. In the memorandum documenting the meeting, it was reported that Roemele seemed
calm and lacked curiosity about the allegations presented to him. He had no questions and did
not seem upset about the policy of providing his information to the Butler County District
Attorney’s Office.

741
 Reverend Michael C. Romero

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1937
YEAR OF DEATH: 2000
ORDINATION: October 1, 1977

Employment/Assignment History
10/13/1977-2/23/1978 Parochial Vicar, North American Martyrs, Monroeville, PA
2/24/1978-7/07/1982 Parochial Vicar, Immaculate Conception, Washington, PA
7/08/1982-6/02/1985 Parochial Vicar, St. Veronica, Ambridge, PA
6/03/1985-3/15/1990 Parochial Vicar, St. Basil, Carrick, PA
3/15/1990-6/17/2000 Leave of Absence

Summary

The first allegation of sexual abuse against Father Michael C. Romero surfaced on June
14, 2013. A memorandum to the file indicated that on that date, the Diocese of Pittsburgh
received a telephone call from a woman named “Andrea.” Andrea advised that her boyfriend
was sexually abused by Romero when Romero was assigned to Immaculate Conception.

Andrea advised that her boyfriend’s mother had previously contacted the Diocese to
report the abuse and to obtain referral information to help her son. In the internal memorandum,
it was observed that notes from a June, 2012 telephone conversation with the mother were
located. According to the notes, the mother had provided some information about her son and
asked if the Diocese would be able to help him. It was represented that the Diocese provided
the mother with some referral information for the area in which her son lived. There was no
report about the allegation made at that time.

Andrea subsequently contacted her boyfriend’s mother and asked her to re-contact the
Diocese. The mother called again and advised that her son was sexualy abused by a priest and
that she believed that the priest was Romero. She stated that the abuse occurred at Immaculate
Conception when her son was a student there. She stated that Romero bought her son all kinds
of gifts, including a ski jacket. On one occasion many years later, her son came home for a visit
and knocked a picture of himself off the wall and broke it. It was a picture of her son wearing
the ski jacket. She also reported that Romero once took her son on a trip to Cleveland and gave
him alcohol. Her son got so drunk that he could not remember anything afterward. She stated
that her son was now a heavy drinker and she believed that it stemmed back to the sexual abuse
and his early exposure to alcohol by the priest.

In a memorandum to the file dated October 2013, it was noted that the son contacted the
Diocese and advised that he wanted to report “questionable behavior” that occurred when he
was a child. He stated that he was an altar server at Immaculate Conception in grade school

742
Summary
through freshman year of high school. He stated that Romero would encourage him to drink
wine after mass before he returned to class. He also recalled that, on occasion, Romero also
took him to the racetrack and bought him alcohol there. He recalled Romero buying him gifts,
specifically, a sweat suit that Romero asked him to change into. The male reported that other
“things” happened but that he was reluctant to talk about anything else. He stated that Father
John Bauer also provided him with alcohol and encouraged him to drink it. He stated that Bauer
would also engage him in “wrestling” matches. He recalled that Romero and Bauer would talk
about masturbation a lot in front of him and the other young boys. The male stated that he has
spent his life dealing with issues of alcohol abuse and addiction. He attributed it to his early
exposure to alcohol by Romero and Bauer.

The male advised that he was seeking assistance with counseling to deal with his
repressed issues of sexual abuse. The Diocese advised that its counterpart in Florida (where the
male now lived) would be contacted and that referral information would be provided to him. He
was asked to make a written statement and that this information would be shared with the
Washington County District Attorney’s Office.

On October 17, 2013, the Diocese sent a follow up e-mail message to the victim
providing him with contact information for a local counselor. She also asked him to make a
written statement.

A letter in the file revealed that the Diocese forwarded the victim’s information to the
Washington County District Attorney’s office on August 5, 2014.

The file also contained a January 19, 2012 memorandum from Father Harry Bielewicz
that included information about a second allegation of abuse against Romero. The memorandum
documented that on January 19, 2012, Father George Moneck called to report that he had
received a telephone call from a male victim who alleged that he was sexually abused by Romero
while he was a parishioner at Immaculate Conception. The memorandum stated that Moneck
was advised by telephone and in a letter to have the victim call Rita Flaherty of the Diocese.

No other information about the victim was provided in the files obtained from the
Diocese.

743
 Reverend Oswald E. Romero

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1919
YEAR OF DEATH: 1997
ORDINATION: July 15, 1950

Employment/Assignment History
1955-1965 St. Francis Borja HS, Quito, Ecuador
1961-1965 Jesuit College & University, Quito, Ecuador
1961-1965 Catholic University, Quito, Ecuador
1966-1977 University of Pittsburgh
1977-1993 Chaplin, St. Joseph House of Hospitality, Pittsburgh, PA
1993 Retired
1991-1997 St. Mary of Mercy, (Confessor), Pittsburgh, PA

Summary

In April 2006, a 53-year-old man came forward with allegations that Father Oswald E.
Romero had sexually abused him while he was between the ages of 13 and 14 (1966 or 1967).
This occurred when Romero was assisting at a parish in a suburb of Pittsburgh. The male
reported that this abuse has had a lasting impact on his life.

The victim was interviewed by Father James Young and Father John Rushofsky to
discuss the abuse. The victim was prompted to come forward after speaking with his priest.
The victim explained that he attended St. Regis in Oakland and was familiar with Romero. It
should be noted that church records indicate that while Romero was never assigned to St. Regis,
he would assist the parish at various times. As a young teenager, the victim thought Romero
was friendly and trusted him enough to enter his car while at a local park.

Romero asked the victim if he wanted a driving lesson. Eager to learn, the victim got
into the car. Romero instructed him to sit on his lap so it would be easier to use the stick shift
along with the gas and brake pedals. Nothing happened during this lesson and Romero drove
him home without incident. A few weeks later, Romero inquired if the victim wanted another
driving instruction in the same park. The victim accepted the offer. It was much later in the day
then the previous lesson when they arrived at the park. The victim stated that Romero soon
began to rub his leg and eventually his genitals. Romero then proceeded to perform oral sex on
him. It was only when Romero realized that he could not finish the sexual act that he stopped.
The victim stated he felt immobile during the abuse and the moment Romeo stopped, he jumped
out of the car and fled home.

During the interview, the victim noted that he suffered from severe depression and
prescription drugs as a result of trauma from abuse. He noted that he had sought psychological

744
Summary
treatment in the past. Young and Rushofsky offered continued therapy; the victim was open to
the option. The allegations were brought to the attention of the Allegheny County District
Attorney’s Office.

In May 2006, the victim called Flaherty and informed her that he was seeking outpatient
treatment at Mercy Hospital in Pittsburgh. He called her again in June of 2006 and claimed that
he was seeking additional outpatient treatments at Mercy Hospital. He asked for financial help
and was directed to contact a local charitable organization for further assistance with counseling
and financial support.

745
 Reverend David Scharf

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1957
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 11, 1985

Employment/Assignment History
6/03/1985 – 6/14/1987 Parochial Vicar, St. Michael Archangel, Butler, PA
6/15/1987 – 2/10/1992 Parochial Vicar, Our Lady of Grace, Scott Township, PA
2/11/1992 – 1/27/1997 Parochial Vicar, Our Lady of Fatima, Hopewell Township, PA
1/27/1997 – 8/31/1998 Parochial Vicar, St. Robert Bellarmine, East McKeesport, PA
8/31/1998 – 1/20/1999 Sabbatical
1/20/1999 – 12/13/1999 Parochial Vicar, St. Hugh, Carmichaels, PA
12/13/1999 – 11/21/2003 Pastor, St. Philomena, Beaver Falls, PA
11/21/2003 – 8/17/2009 Leave of Absence
8/17/2009 – Undetermined Chaplain, Sisters of St. Joseph, Baden, PA

Summary

In December, 2002 a sexual allegation (foot fetish) complaint against Father David
Scharf was made to the Diocese of Pittsburgh. Several males (both adults and minors)
complained of Scharf massaging their feet.

In August 2003, Scharf requested a leave of absence to attend St. Luke Institute for
evaluation in order to “end accusations.” The request was granted. In July, 2004 St. Luke’s
staff wrote in Scharf’s discharge from the residential treatment program the following: “Father
Scharf recognizes his practice of foot reflexology should be discontinued immediately.”

In February 2005 St. Luke’s staff noted Scharf’s discharge from the halfway house that
Scharf did not successfully complete the program and was at a high risk for re-offending.

In October 2007, Scharf wrote a letter requesting re-entry into ministry. He stated that he
was at peace with himself and had taken responsibility for his past actions. He wrote another
letter requesting re-entry into ministry in June, 2008. Both requests were denied.

It should be noted during several St. Luke Institute Continuing Care Workshops from
2005 to 2010, Scharf admitted to massaging the feet of minors and later masturbating to the
image of the minors’ feet.

746
 Reverend Richard Scherer

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1924
YEAR OF DEATH: 2007
ORDINATION: June 12, 1949

Employment/Assignment History
6/30/1949 – 6/09/1954 Assistant, St. Charles, Donora,
6/10/1954 – 3/03/1964 Assistant, St. Anne, Castle Shannon,
3/04/1964 – 2/02/1965 Assistant, St. Coleman, Turtle Creek,
2/03/1965 – 6/1965 Assistant, St. Patrick, Canonsburg, PA
6/1965 – 5/1968 Sick Leave
5/1968 – 1992 Chaplain, Holy Cross Hospital, Diocese of Miami, FL
1992 Retired

Summary

Records from the Diocese of Pittsburgh revealed that in August 1991, a woman reported
to the Diocese that she was sexually molested by Father Richard Scherer when she was a student
at St. Anne. The abuse occurred between 1957 and 1961 at the church.

Records further revealed that in a letter dated October 24, 1965, Scherer wrote of his
“revelation” of his nervous breakdown resulting from the “relationship” with the woman. It
should be noted that no other documentation was supplied to the Grand Jury regarding a
description or exaplanation of the “relationship.”

In a letter dated January 17, 1966, Scherer wrote about his continued improvement in
health, body, and mind and stated that the “severe feeling of guilt” had left him.

In a letter to the Diocese dated April 5, 1966, Father Tobin from Our Lady of the
Snow/Clergy House Retreat located in Minnesota wrote that he had been counseling Scherer for
three months; that Scherer was making progress in the tensions that plagued his priesthood; that
Scherer suffered a nervous breakdown; and, that involvement with the “young lady” was part of
his emotional escape.

747
 Monsignor Raymond T. Schultz

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1922
YEAR OF DEATH: 1999
ORDINATION: June 15, 1947

Employment/Assignment History
7/17/1947-1/19/1949 St. Mary, Kittaning, PA
1/20/1949-6/28/1950 St. Leonard, Monessen, PA
6/29/1950-6/15/1955 Holy Rosary, Homewood, PA
6/16/1955-6/12/1957 St. Margaret, Greentree, PA
6/13/1957-4/20/1966 Catholic Information Center, Diocese
12/29/1964-4/20/1966 St. Richard, Pittsburgh, PA
4/21/1966-1/22/1997 Pastor, SS Peter & Paul, Beaver, PA
1/22/1997-10/15/1999 ADM, SS Peter & Paul, Beaver, PA

Summary

In 2009, an adult male reported to the Diocese of Pittsburgh that he was sexually abused
by Monsignor Raymond T. Schultz around the year 1978 when he attended SS Peter and Paul
Catholic School in Beaver. ,

. Correspondence in the file from the male’s mother and father indicated that they were not
aware of the sexual abuse until around the time when it was reported in 2009. The victim’s
mother indicated that she recalled one incident when she was doing laundry and she discovered
that her son’s underrwear was in the pocket of his pants. He told her that he had an accident.
She did not ask any further questions. But, she realized now that the underwear had a pinkish-
red stain.

In 2010, a psychologist reported that she had been seeing the victim since 2007 and that
he was being treated for symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder and panic relative to
reported sexual molestation by a priest during his elementary school years. The victim reported
during treatments that he had nocturnal memories of the sensation of breath on the back of his
neck from when Schultz was sexually assaulting him. He also recalled a particularly distressing
incident of anal penetration by Schultz that occurred on a rainy day when his clothes were wet.
He participated in 67 therapy sessions and required inpatient hospitalization. He also suffered
from substance abuse.

748 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

-*5*("5*0/
 An attorney representing the victim subsequently wrote a letter to the Diocese stating
that the victim did not wish to discuss or accept the offer for counseling and spiritual assistance.
The Diocese indicated that it was unable to confirm independently the allegation of sexual abuse.

The Diocese contacted some of the nuns and teachers that taught at SS Peter and Paul
during the years when the victim was a student. The responses to questions about confession
indicated that the children went to confession as a classroom group until eighth grade when three
to four students could go at a time. However, it was reported that no single child was sent to
confession alone. The nuns also stated that there were often secretaries and parents present at
the school and that students were not placed in a room alone. The nuns also stated that there
were only a few bus riders.

A report of the allegation of sexual abuse by Schultz was reported to the

Beaver County District Attorney’s Office by the Diocese in 2010.

On April 11, 2017, the victim testifed before the Grand Jury. He explained that he made
a complaint to the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General on September 22, 2016 through the
child sexual abuse hotline that was opened after the investigation into the Diocese of Altoona-
Johnstown.

Prior to testifying, the victim provided a document detailing his ordeal as a victim of
clergy abuse. This document was read to the Grand Jury. The document stated:

.
749 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&
-*5*("5*0/
The abuse from Monsignor Schultz occurred when I first started to serve the
early mass. At first, he would tell me to turn around and not move. He would --
then he would stand behind me and rub his private area on my behind as he
made some noises. I then noticed something on the floor, which I would later
realize was his (Schultz’s) semen and that he had had an orgasm. After a few
times of doing this, he had me take down my pants and he stood behind me. Then
he rubbed his penis on my behind and put his penis into my rectum as I screamed
loudly in pain. After that, he covered my mouth and told me no one will ever
hear me scream again. I now know he had an orgasm, as I felt his semen on my
back. No one could hear me because I served the early masses alone. Usually,
the masses were served by two altar boys. As a child, I didn't realize that I was
the only one serving alone; but now I know why I was. This all started at the end
of my seventh grade year. After he told me no one would hear me scream again
and I won't be able to tell anyone, he never let me go back to class again.

One day, after an instance of abuse by Monsignor Schultz,

I thought I
had had an accident in my pants.
I didn't know then,
but the wetness I was feeling was the drainage of semen from my rectum.

When I would go to confession,

I would always be last. When it was my time to go in, Monsignor Schultz told me
to sit down and
,

When everyone was gone, Monsignor Schultz would come into the confessional
with me. This happened about five times. He would get very angry with me
because he would take his penis out and make me kneel in front of him as he put
his penis towards my face. He got angry because I didn't know what he wanted
me to do. When I asked him, he started to hit me in the head and then he
masturbated. When he had an orgasm, some of the semen got on my face. He
took his white handkerchief from his pocket and told me to wipe my face. To this
day when I see a white handkerchief, I go from sad to angry. When it rains, I just
try to make the best of that day.

As I look back on this now, I try to figure out when I could have asked someone
to help me. There was a time when, after I was abused by Monsignor Schultz

Then I had to put my pants back on without underwear because it was

almost time for the buses to come take us home. I put my underwear in my pocket,

750 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&
-*5*("5*0/
 I can remember my mother asking me as she
was doing laundry why my underwear was in my pocket. I told her I put them
there because I had tinkled a little in my pants. Really, they were in my pocket
because, if I would have taken the time to put them back on, I would have missed
my bus and would have had to have called for a ride home. That is the only time
that I can remember when I had a chance to get help.

When I look back now, it was made very clear to me that I was a, quote, bad boy,
unquote, and would be punished more if I ever told anyone what was happening.
Most of these abuses happened after my dad dropped me off for early morning
masses. I try to see through a child's eyes; but as an adult, it is very difficult to
look back.

As another form of punishment, I would have to clean and organize the altar and
the altar boy's closet. I was also abused by Monsignor Schultz behind the altar
in the room where we got dressed as altar boys or in the confessional. I would
say Monsignor Schultz touched or raped me about 10 to 15 times.

The victim estimated that this abuse occurred “From around fourth grade to the end of
-- middle of seventh grade probably. Eleven, 12.”

The victim stated that the first time he came forward about this abuse was seven years
ago when he informed his wife. The next time he spoke of the abuse was when he was in
counseling. He said that approximately five years ago, he along with his mother and father, had
a meeting with Bishop Zubik. According to the victim, Zubik responded by saying “he was
sympathetic. He [Zubik] made it very clear that he believed in me. Asked me if -- started to offer
me certain things.” Zubik offered, “College tuition for my children, little bit of money, and then
the last one was to pay for counseling.”

The victim stated that he ultimately refused Zubik’s offer because by taking the offer,
the Diocese told him that:

you are going to have to meet with our lawyer and this and sign these documents
that basically say you are done with -- you can't come after us. It is over. No
public. Your mouth is closed.

He said the greatest insult was that by taking the offer, he would not be allowed to talk about
the abuse and what he endured.

In addition to testimony, the victim provided a letter from a former classmate. Some of
the excerpts from the letter read to the Grand Jury stated:

My first memories of [the victim] were in the third grade. He was well liked
and popular with the students. He was funny. Once we got older, I remember
seeing [the victim] less and less in the classes. When we asked, there was

751 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&
-*5*("5*0/
 always a reason why he wasn't there. The reason I most remember is that it
was not our business. I remember seeing him sleeping in the room we called
the health room. It was on the right near the exit stairs. It was the room we
had physicals in when the doctor was there. It was also the room that we used
when we weren't feeling well. [The victim] was in there on more than one
occasion. I remember wondering why he was always lying down there. I
remember seeing him in there on a consistent basis. Another memory I have
of [the victim] is in what was the learning center on the first floor. We were in
a small tutoring group of some kind.

The victim recalled being offended on by Schultz first, with the sexual assaults
consisting of oral and anal sex and also Schultz ejaculating onto the victim’s face. He testifed
that these assaults occurred in Schultz’s residence, next to the school, and, in the church.

.
The victim testified:

It started with me having a tummy ache . . .

when I became an adult, I realized what that stuff was.

The “stuff” was Schultz’s seminal fluid.

Approximately six years ago, the victim met with Beaver County investigators to
officially report the abuse. He stated that the Beaver County District Attorney’s Office
contacted him and advised that nothing could be pursued because of the statute of limitations.

The victim concluded his testimony by stating that this abuse has had a destructive
impact on his life “that consumes you.” When asked how important it was for him to be able to
come into a grand jury after all of these years of wanting transparency, he responded, “This is
the most important thing besides my wife and children on this planet in this world. This is a
sign for hope.”

752 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

-*5*("5*0/
 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&
-*5*("5*0/
753
 Reverend Francis Siler

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1937
YEAR OF DEATH: 2015
ORDINATION: May 4, 1963

Employment/Assignment History
5/20/1963 – 6/14/1970 Parochial Vicar, Nativity, Broughton, PA
6/15/1970 – 12/05/1972 Parochial Vicar St. Bernard, Mt Lebanon, PA
12/06/1972 – 8/07/1974 Parochial Vicar, St. Titus, Aliquippa, PA
8/08/1974 – 5/20/1975 Leave of Absence
5/21/1975 – 10/10/1976 Parochial Vicar, St. Catherine, Wildwood, PA
10/11/1976 – 2/07/1983 Pastor, St. Margaret, New Castle, PA
2/08/1983 – 5/02/1984 Pastor, St. Catherine, Wildwood, PA
5/12/1984 – 6/30/1985 Parochial Vicar, St. Agnes, West Mifflin, PA
7/01/1985 – 2/23/1986 Leave of Absence, Health Reasons
2/24/1986 – 9/27/1987 Chaplain, Allegheny Valley Hospital, PA
9/27/1987 – 2/25/2002 Parochial Vicar, St. Mary Mercy, Pittsburgh, PA
2/25/2002 – 7/05/2002 Leave of Absence
7/05/2002 Withdrew from Active Ministry

Summary

A review of the Diocesan records pertaining to Father Francis Siler revealed a reference
made in a St. Bernadine Clinic report that “sexual problems with adolescents” had occurred in
1972 which caused Bishop Leonard to change Siler’s assignment. In 1974, Leonard wrote in a
letter to the House of Affirmation that “in the last three years the problem arose about which I
spoke to you in a phone conversation.”

In a 1985 memorandum written to Bishop Bevilacqua, Father Campbell recounted that:

You may recall from our conversation that Frank [Siler] made a pass at a young
boy whose father is a policeman. The irate father was about to take the matter
to court. It was this that necessitated our quick removal of Father Siler from the
post.

In 1994, an adult male came to see Siler in order to confront him about molesting him
as a child. After being confronted by the man, Siler required hospitalization at St. Francis for
suicidal feelings. Thereafter, he was sent to St. Luke Institute Continuing Care Workshop.

During a workshop held in May, 1994, St. Luke’s expressed concern that Siler was
engaging in parish ministry. The concern was that because he had a history of sexual behavior

754
Summary
with minors, and since he had been experiencing relapse behavior around sexual issues, there
was some concern about the possibility of his behavior with minors recurring. It was suggested
that Siler avoid all contact and ministry with minors.

In 1995, an adult male reported to the Diocese of Pittsburgh that Siler fondled him on
several occasions when he was an altar boy at St. Catherine church and in the second or third
grade. Siler denied the allegations. Some of the dates provided by the male did not correspond
to Siler’s age or assignment at the time, however, Siler was placed in restricted ministry.

In December 2002, another allegation of sexual abuse was made against Siler. An adult
male reported that Siler had touched him inappropriately when he was a child. This occurred in
a church in Beaver County between 1972 and 1973. The male demanded answeres from the
Diocese as to what happened with Siler and why he was “protected.”

In November 2011, the Diocese received a report of sexual abuse by Siler that occurred
between 1972 and 1974 at a Beaver County church. An adult male reported that Siler had groped
and fondled him through his clothes when he was just a child. He also reported that a Father
Hoehl tried to “make some moves on him” but he was bigger thatn Hoehl and was able to protect
himself.

755
 Reverend Rudolph M. Silvers

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1949
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 3, 1975

Employment/Assignment History
5/21/1975-5/18/1980 Parochial Vicar, St. Sylvester, Pittsburgh, PA
5/19/1980-7/07/1982 Parochial Vicar, St. Robert Bellarmine,
East McKeesport, PA
7/08/1982-6/28/1983 Parochial Vicar, St. Canice, Pittsburgh, PA
6/06/1983-6/15/1986 Assist. Dir. Vocation Office, Diocese of Pittsburgh
Pastoral Center
6/16/1986-8/01/1986 Parochial Vicar, St. Peter, Butler, PA
8/02/1986-2/07/1994 Pastor, St. Peter, Butler, PA
2/07/1994-6/27/1994 Replacement Ministry, St. Vincent de Paul,
New Castle, PA
6/27/1994-2/25/2002 Pastor, St. Ann, Bulger, PA
2/25/2002-7/24/2002 Leave of Absence
7/24/2002 Withdrawn from service

Summary

The first allegation of sexual abuse involving Father Rudolph M. Silvers occurred on
November 14, 1988 when an 18-year-old male reported that Silvers had sexually fondled him
when he was between the ages of 12 and 15. He further reported that Silvers pinned him down
and had “taken advantage of him.” He stated that he felt overwhelmed and that people did not
believe him. The victim subsequently requested counseling but was informed by Father
Rutkowski that there were no funds available for counseling. Silvers denied the allegation.

On March 26, 2002, the victim met with Diocesan officials to provide details of his abuse
by Silvers. He explained that his relationship with Silvers began when he was 13- years-old in
1977. His family lived across the street from St. Sylvester and the victim was one of the kids
that hung around the rectory. He reported that it was not uncommon for Silvers to “rough house”
with the boys and sometimes he would “reach into the boys shorts and feel around.” The victim
stated that eventually this behavior evolved into more one-on-one activity between Silvers and
him. He recalled that Silvers was a “significant presence” in his life and that Silvers would tease
him in front of the other boys about his sexual inexperience. This made the victim feel
inadequate compared with his peers. The victim reported that Silvers would rub his beard over
his chest and nibble and lick the victim’s neck.

756
Summary
On one particular occasion when the victim was 15, Silvers became more sexually
aggressive. He pinned the victim down by putting his arms behind him. Silvers then kneeled
over him and reached down and grabbed his genitals. After this sexual assault, the victim’s life
spiraled out of control. He ran away from home several times but eventually graduated from
high school in December of 1981. He then began counseling.

After years of moving from place to place and receiving counseling from numerous
counselors, the victim decided to confront Silvers. In a letter to Bishop Wuerl, the victim
recounted that sometime in 1993, he drove to St. Anne’s in Butler to confront Silvers “man to
man.” When Silvers saw the victim, he “froze and turned white.” The victim told Silvers how
he screwed up his life because of what he had done to him and that his family knew and would
be watching him. Silvers had nothing to say in response.

During the March 26, 2002 meeting, the victim made three requests: 1) That Silvers not
be in ministry where he would have contact with children and harm someone else; 2) An
apology; and, (3) that he be compensated for the years of counseling expenses he had incurred.

On April 15, 2002, Silvers was confronted with the allegations. He denied any sexual
contact. When confronted with the fact that the victim had traveled to St. Anne’s to confront
him, Silvers became vague and evasive, claiming that while he had some recollection of the
visit, he could not recall the content of the conversation.

Diocesan records contained several letters between the victim and the Diocese with
respect to the reimbursement of funds for years of counseling. Eventually, on April 6, 2002, the
Diocese forwarded a check to the victim in the amount of $96,750.00 for compensation for
counseling received from 1979 through the present. There was also a promise of future
counseling, if needed.

A letter from the Diocese of Pittsburgh to the Allegheny County District Attorney’s
Office dated April 29, 2002 provided the name of the victim and a description of the allegations
against Silvers.

The records provided by the Diocese contained a document entitled, “Chronology of

Reverend Rudolph Silvers.” In the chronology, there was an entry dated July 9, 1990 wherein
a mother met with Father Gloninger in Butler to express her concerns with Silver’s inappropriate
and unnatural attachment to her 13-year-old son. There were several handwritten letters from
her in the file about this subject. The mother asserted that her complaints about Silvers and his
inappropriate interest in young boys was not being taken seriously. She reported that when her
son was 14 years of age, Silvers called him at least three times per week and offered him various
gifts. He also stayed overnight at the rectory without parental permission and no one was there
except Silvers. She stated that Silvers was now showing inappropriate interest in another young
boy, just like he did with her son, but the boy’s family did not want to get involved. Her son
also wrote a letter wherein he stated:

757
Summary
I am deeply disturbed about the issue with Father Silvers. I feel that this issue
has been overlooked and needs much more attention . . . But I do know one thing
and that is what Father Silvers is doing is wrong and should be stopped
immediately before someone gets seriously hurt . . . This has been going on for a
year and a half now and I have seen no progress. I find it hard to believe that a
man can go on for so long and get away with it. Especially when he know what
he is doing is wrong.

He ended the letter by writing, “I feel that this matter better be looked into a lot more closely
for Father Silvers’sake and some other helpless kid.”

In a file notation dated July 18, 1991, Gloninger wrote that he had reviewed the concerns
of the mother about Silver’s association with young boys but that there were never any
accusations of sexual misbehavior on the part of Silvers. However, a notation dated February
2002, revealed that Silvers was placed on administrative leave after a review of his confidential
files. Silvers resigned.

A document dated October 20, 2004 and entitled “Confidential File Summary” was
found in Silvers’ file. It stated:

Issue with [mother] and her complaint-file not clear. [Mother] was told that the
matter was to be addressed on a “local level”-i.e. with Father Gloninger-7-27-
90. Not clear if [mother’s] situation is ever properly addressed.

In a “Confidential Memorandum” to the file written by Rita Flaherty on January 20,

2012, she noted that she received a call on the 1-800 number from a male who reported that he
was sexually abused by Silvers in the mid-late 1970’s at St. Sylvester when he was
approximately 10 to 11 years of age. This victim stated that he was receiving individual
counseling from a therapist at Catholic Family Services and would like assistance with the cost
for counseling. The memorandum recounted that Flaherty advised the victim that the Diocese
could assist him and ask for the contact information for his therapist. She also asked the victim
to provide the details of abuse in writing for their records.

On January 31, 2012, the victim sent a letter pursuant to Flaherty’s request. He stated
that Silvers would invite several boys to the rectory on Friday and Saturday evenings and that
they would go down to the recreation area in the basement to play games. During these visits,
Silvers grabbed at the boys’ buttocks and genitals. He would also grab them and pinch their
chests. The victim reported that Silvers would get very excited during this “horse play” and that
eventually he would take one of the boys up to his private living quarters and be gone for
approximately 30 to 45 minutes. When they returned, the boy who had gone with Silvers looked
very pale and would not talk for the rest of the evening. The victim reported that this conduct
lasted a few years. He explained that he blocked out much of this time and did not currently
recall whether he went to Silvers’ private quarters. He related that his brother once went to the
private quarters but he refused to discuss what occurred there.

758
Summary
Diocesan officials confronted Silvers and read a portion of the letter to him that was
written by the victim. Silvers stated that the allegations were absolutely false. While he
acknowledged that minors came to the rectory basement for recreations, he stated that he would
not tolerate such pinching and grabbing behavior. He also denied that anyone went upstairs to
his private living quarters. He did recall that the victim and his brother had been altar servers.
Silvers asked, “What is [the victim] looking for?” It was explained to him that the victim was
looking for assistance with the cost of his counseling.

The file documents revealed that the Diocese of Pittsburgh paid approximately $1,000
for 10 weeks of the victim’s counseling. A letter from the Diocese to the Allegheny County
District Attorney’s Office dated February 3, 2012 provided the name of the victim and that
allegations of sexual abuse against Silver had been made.

A memorandum from Bishop Wuerl dated July 24, 2002, was located in Silvers’ file. It
stated that on July 22, 2002, Silvers had written and requested permission to withdraw from
active priestly ministry with the understanding that his priestly faculties would be withdrawn.
Wuerl noted that he granted such permission in a letter to Silvers dated July 24, 2002.

759
 Reverend Edward P. Smith

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: N/A
YEAR OF DEATH: 1956
ORDINATION: N/A

Employment/Assignment History
Unavailable Sacred Heart Church, Emsworth, PA

Summary

Several legal documents contained in Diocesan records revealed that Father Edward P.
Smith was accused of sexually abusing a 16-year-old female during the time period when he
was assigned to Sacred Heart. The girl reported that the abuse occurred in the church rectory
when Smith counseled her. The abuse included Smith “fondling her breasts and her genitals.”
The documents also stated that the girl:

believed that it would be sinful or wrong to make any kind of accusation against
a priest or a bishop; and that priests and bishops could not and would not engage
in conduct considered evil or wrong or illegal.

A section of the legal documents was entitled “Fraud and Concealment.” Within that
section, several allegations were made including the following:

x In furtherance of their own interest, including the continued financial support of

parishioners, the primary concern of Diocesan Defendants has been the
protection of the reputation of its priests and therefore its Diocese, including
Father Smith.”

x Diocesan Defendants have concealed the danger the predator clerics presented
by misrepresenting them as priests in good standing in the following ways:

1. Enabling their continued unrestricted access to minors;

2. Assigning them and/or allowing them to reside and serve at
parishes and/or schools within the Diocese;
3. Allowing them free and unrestricted use of premises of the
Diocese for otherwise unchaperoned activities with minors;
4. Assigning them to duties specifically involving minors;
5. Announcing to the public or allowing offending clerics to give the
public less disagreeable or less serious reasons for leaving an

760
Summary
assignment or position, other than sexual misconduct with
children;
6. Promoting offending clerics within the church hierarchy;
7. Privately assuring concerned parents that offending cleric’s
problems would be taken care of;
8. Providing and/or subsidizing education, maintenance and/or
living arrangements for offending clerics after removal from
their assignments or upon their suspension; and
9. Continuously listing offending clerics in official directories
and/or publications by phrases such as absent on leave,
advanced studies, special assignment or retired after removal or
transfer from their assignment or suspension for sexual
misconduct with children; and
10. Allowing offending clerics to honorably retire.

On November 5, 2007, the Diocese of Pittsburgh entered a settlement with 31 individuals

for the total amount of $1.25 Million.

761
 Reverend James E. Somma, M.Ed.

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1934
YEAR OF DEATH: 2004
ORDINATION: May 30, 1959

Employment/Assignment History
7/10/1959 – 4/19/1964 Purification of the Blessed Virgin Mary, Ellwood City, PA
4/20/1964 – 5/04/1964 St. Pius V., McKeesport, PA
5/05/1964 – 6/21/1984 Archdiocese for Military Services, Washington, DC
6/22/1984 – 5/11/1985 St. Aloysius, Pittsburgh, PA
5/12/1985 – 1/08/1992 Nativity, Pittsburgh, PA
1/08/1992 – 2/07/1994 Holy Trinity, West Mifflin, PA
2/07/1994 – 2/07/2002 Forbes Regional Hospital- Monroeville &
St. Michael, Pitcairn, PA

Summary

In a handwritten letter dated September 17, 1986, Father Nicholas Dattilo stated that he
spoke with a victim over the telephone. She claimed that a priest sexually abused her for seven
years from age 11 ½ until age 18. She provided the priest’s name, but the name was not provided
in Dattilo’s letter. The victim stated that she “expressed concern that the priest was now a
pastor and could be out there harming other children.” When Dattilo spoke with Bishop Bosco
and Nick Cafardi on the matter, Cafardi stated, “until she gives her name, we have no credible
evidence.”

Dattilo and another priest subsequently met with Father James E. Somma following
another telephone call from the victim in January, 1988. Dattilo concluded that Somma should
not be removed from ministry based on his “strong denial, sterling military career, the passage
of time and the victim’s admitted psychiatric treatment.” According to handwritten notes dated
February 18, 1988, Somma was evaluated at the St. Luke Institute. A portion of the notes stated,
“May need counseling from neuro-psycho rehabilitation person.”

A March 8, 1988 evaluation report from St. Luke’s recommended that children and
adolescents not have free access to Somma’s home given the present day sensitivity to priests’
relationships with children.

On March 20, 2002, the victim sent a letter to Dattilo advising that she was in counseling,
had obtained an attorney, and had filed a lawsuit. Articles from several newspapers do not
provide her name, but report that Somma forced her to engage in oral sex and sexual intercourse
with him until her late teens. The lawsuit was dismissed based upon the statute of limitations.
Since then, she reported that she has been hospitalized for serious, clinical depression and

762
Summary
attempted suicide twice. She requested a settlement of $900,000 ($20,000 per year since the
beginning of her ordeal).

A second victim contacted the Diocese in a letter dated April 28, 2002. An adult male
provided the following account of abuse:

I’m not sure how I met Father James E. Somma (Lt. Col., USAF, Ret.), I can
only remember that my mom helped him find the house that would later become
my prison. When I would help out at his [Somma’s] house, which was secluded
from town and off the Air Force Base, he would treat me to dinner and movies
and give me pocket money for doing chores when I was 13. This went on for the
first few months, and then I would start spending the weekends at his place,
spending the night there. I thought of him as a “father figure” who praised me,
and all was pretty normal the first few months. Then I remember one night when
we were coming home from somewhere that we stopped by his [Somma’s] office
to pick up some videos. I never thought anything of it, then when he played the
tape I knew it was a XXX rated film. I don’t think I said anything, I was thrilled,
I mean all young kids dream about this stuff, and here I was getting it with
someone I cared about. Someone who I felt knew what was my best interest,
someone who has two adopted kids of his own.

He explained that he watched these XXX movies while lying in bed with Somma, Somma placed
his hands down his own pants and talked about masturbation or “wacking off.” They fell asleep
under the covers and Somma “cuddled him like a teddy bear.” The second victim wrote, “I
don’t think I knew what was really happening at the time. Anyway I felt protected by him, and
my parents trusted him and I knew they wouldn’t let anyone harm me.”

From 1984 until 1992, Somma had the second victim fly from Ludwig, Illinois to the
Pittsburgh area. In the Pittsburgh area, Somma showed him pornography and talked about
masturbation. He stated that Somma would explain that when he and his friends were younger,
they would “‘jerk’ each other off and stand around naked and see who could shoot the farthest
load (while erect).” The second victim stated that he was sexually abused by Somma but not
molested. The victim further advised that each time Somma visited his family in Illinois, he
came with a different young boy. He specifically remembered three boys who looked like him,
except for the color of their hair. He then wrote, “When I visited Pittsburgh [at Somma’s
expense] the same boys hung around the rectory with him.” In addition, the second victim wrote,
“I have not spoken to Father Somma in several years, I do remember him apologizing to me
about the past, but I didn’t want to talk about it, only that I felt in my heart that I forgave him.”

In April 2000, the second victim was at the seminary and told Father Charles Bober about
Somma’s sexual abuse. Bober supported the victim and told him to inform the clergy office of
the abuse, where it could be addressed. The second victim ultimately left the seminary and
entered the military.

763
Summary
In April of 2002, the Diocese referred the second victim’s allegation to the Allegheny
County District Attorney’s Office.

Also on April 4, 2002, a note in the Diocesan records was made that stated that there was
a conference call with the second victim and that the victim mentioned that he knew of a woman
who came forward and Somma said, “they didn’t believe her, they won’t believe you.”

In May 2002, the Diocese offered to provide the second victim with financial assistance
for counseling and provided him with the names and telephone numbers of several therapists.

By January 2009, the second victim had moved to Illinois and e-mailed the Diocese,
asking for help with therapy. The Diocese offered to pay for his therapy. In October 2011, the
victim had moved to California and again asked the Diocese for help. The Diocese provided
him with the names of 16 therapists and offered to pay for the therapy. In June and September
of 2012, the victim sent e-mail messages to the Diocese advising that he still had not seen a
therapist. Again, the Diocese offered to help by giving him the name and telephone number of
an assistance coordinator and offering financial assistance.

In a March 2002 telephone call and an April 2002 letter to the Diocese, a male claimed
that Somma had sexual contact with him in 1983 when he was in seventh grade at Nativity, and
then on and off from 1984 to 1992 in Pittsburgh. The contact started with tickling and
progressed to Somma performing oral sex on the victim and forcing the victim to perform oral
sex on Somma. The abuse allegedly happened at least once a week. Somma took the victim on
numerous trips, bought him gifts, even a car. The victim reported that Somma also bought him
pornography and offered to pay for a female prostitute. According to the victim, Somma
threatened to kill his parents if he told anyone. The Diocese offered to assist with psychological
and spiritual help. In May 2002, the Diocese gave the victim the names of several counselors
and priests. The Diocese also offered to pay for therapy.

In July 2002, the Diocese referred the third victim’s allegation to the Allegheny County
District Attorney’s Office.

Diocesan records also contained a letter dated December 14, 1988 wherein the Diocese
informed Bishop Donald Wuerl about “suspicions of Father Somma’s misbehavior involving
four named, potential male victims.”

764
 Reverend Bartley A. Sorensen

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1949
YEAR OF DEATH: Unknown
ORDINATION: October 23, 1976

Employment/Assignment History
11/1/1976 – 6/29/1981 St. Ferdinand, Cranberry, PA
6/30/1981 – 6/28/1983 St. Colman, Turtle Creek, PA
6/29/1983 – 1/31/1985 St. James, Sewickley, PA
2/1/1985 – 6/11/1990 St. Valentine, Bethal Park, PA
6/11/1990 – 6/1/1992 Our Lady of the Most Blessed Sacrament
6/1/1992 – 9/1/1995 Mater Dolorosa, Chicora, PA
9/1/1995 – 9/10/1999 St. Joseph, Chicora, PA
9/1/1995 – 9/10/1999 Mater Dolorosa, Chicora, PA
9/10/1999 – 1/27/2003 St. Victor, Bairdford, PA
2/9/2004 – 2/4/2011 West Penn Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA
2/4/2011 – 11/14/2011 St. Ann, Pittsburgh, PA
11/14/2011 – 12/9/2011 St. John Fisher, Pittsburgh, PA

Summary

On December 9, 2011, a woman went to the residence of Father Bartley A. Sorensen in

order to speak with him. Upon entering his office, she observed him looking at child
pornography on his computer. She believed that the child was older than five years of age, but
no more than 10 years of age. When she questioned him about it, he acknowledged it. The
woman left and immediately reported the incident to the Diocese of Pittsburgh.

By special mandate, the Bishop placed Sorensen on administrative leave and all his
faculties were revoked. The Diocese then immediately contacted the Allegheny County District
Attorney’s Office. Sorensen was arrested that same day. A search of Sorensen’s residence
revealed over 5,000 images of child pornography on his computer, as well as on CDs, DVDs
and various print books. The information was then turned over to the United States Attorney
for the Western District of Pennsylvania who prosecuted the crime federally.

On May 23, 2012, Sorensen entered a guilty plea and was incarcerated immediately. On
January 2, 2013, he was sentenced to 97 months of incarceration, followed by five years of
supervised release. Additionally, he is required to permanently register as a convicted sex
offender and pay a fine of $25,000

765
 Reverend Robert E. Spangenberg, C.S.Sp.

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1947
YEAR OF DEATH: 2006
ORDINATION: June 15, 1974

Employment/Assignment History
1974 Faculty, Holy Ghost Preparatory School, Bensalem, PA
N/A Associate Pastor, St. Mary Detroit, MI
N/A – 1977 Associate Pastor, St. Anthony Millvale, PA
1977 – 1979 Unknown ministry, North Carolina
1979 – 1980 Assistant Pastor, St. Mary, Sharpsburg, PA
1980 – N/A Chaplain, St. Francis de Sale High School, Chicago, IL
1982 – 1984 Pastor, St. Stanislaus, Pittsburgh, PA
1984 – 1989 Pastor, St. Anthony, Millvale, PA
1989 – 1990 Superior of the Congregation Retirement home, Sarasota, FL
1990 – 1993 Pastor, St. Patrick, Charleston, SC
1993 – N/A Administrator, St. Peter Claver, Philadelphia, PA
1994 - N/A Pastor, St. James, Hamlet, NC
1997 – N/A Pastor, Epiphany, Pittsburgh, PA
2002 Director of Retirement community, Sarasota, FL
2003 Retired

Summary

Father Robert E. Spangenberg professed vows to The Congregation of the Holy Spirit
Province of the United States Order, also known as the Spiritans which is based in Bethel Park.

Much of the information recounted here was discovered through newspaper articles and
Spangenberg’s own obituary. The documents provided by the Diocese of Pittsburgh revealed
that Spangenberg was involved with at least two children, possibly more. Since Spangenberg’s
holy obligation was to the Spiritans, the Diocese had very few documents on his ministry.

The Diocese was first notified that there was a problem with Spangenberg’s ministry in
1988. At that time, a woman wrote to the Diocese and to the Vatican in order to obtain help for
her son. She named Spangenberg as her son’s abuser and stated that another priest from
Spangenberg’s order was helping them with counseling. She wrote that she was upset that her
letter was simply “noted” and that she has not heard from anyone regarding the matter since.

The priest that was giving counseling to the boy’s family was Father Norman E. Bevan,
C.S.Sp from Spangenberg’s holy order. In Spangenberg’s file, there was a letter dated January
12, 1989, that Bevan wrote to the Father Theodore Rutowski, Associate General Secretary for

766
Summary
the Diocese. He reported that they had investigated the issue and were enclosing a report of their
findings. Although the Spiritans did not take the accusation by the victim’s family serious
enough to remove him, they did reassign Spangenberg to a retirement home in Florida shortly
thereafter. Bevan wrote,

If we felt them to be true, we would recognize our responsibility to remove Father

X from ministry and to insist on therapeutic rehabilitation. At the same time, we
realize that a priest’s reputation could be irreparably damaged by false
accusations.

No report on the Spiritans findings were included in Spangenberg’s file to the Grand Jury.

On March 9, 1989, Bevan wrote a letter to the boy’s family wherein he stated that he had
spoken with both Spangenberg and the boy about the incident or incidents. He mentioned the
responsibility of the church and that their failure to act could hold them culpable for not
responding. He referred several times to the fact that the incident was more than five years old.
Later in the letter, Bevan stated, “Excessive use of alcohol contributed significantly to clouding
the judgment and perception and further exacerbates the reliability of memory both at the time
of the alleged incident.” He acknowledged that “I do believe that Father Spangenberg exercised
questionable judgment.”

In 2009, an adult male reported that when he was 15 to 16 years of age, he and
Spangenberg engaged in many types of sexual encounters. The boy reported that he was
involved in street prostitution with young boys known as “Hustlers.” He was befriended by
Spangenberg during this period and Spangenberg actually promoted the activity by engaging
the boy in a sexual activities after he ran away from home. Spangenberg also paid the boy a
finder’s fee for him to locate younger hustlers (known as “Chickens”) to have sex with
Spangenberg.

The boy reported that Spangenberg enjoyed using “huff” (sniffing glue) while
Spangenberg performed oral sex on him. Additionally, Spangenberg would pay for his sexual
services with money from the collection box (typically one dollar bills) and would even pay the
boy in drugs and alcohol. In a note in the Diocesan files, it was documented that the boy thought
Spangenberg was a “really sick guy – he would have person urinate and defecate on him.”

The Diocese and the Spiritans continue to share financial responsibility for the cost of
the male’s therapy, medication, job searches, criminal court costs and assistance with child
support.

767
 Reverend Paul G. Spisak

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1944
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 5, 1973

Employment/Assignment History
5/22/1973-10/01/1978 St. Mary of the Mount, Pittsburgh, PA
10/02/1978-10/05/1980 St. Benedict the Abbot, McMurray, PA
10/06/1980-11/19/1981 Sacred Heart, Pittsburgh, PA
11/20/1981-6/29/1990 St. Dominic, Donora, PA
6/25/1988-6/29/1990 St. Charles, Donora, PA
6/30/1990-2/07/1994 St. Philip, Pittsburgh, PA
2/07/1994-2/12/1997 St. Andrew, Butler, PA
2/16/1998-10/26/1998 St. Mary, Cecil, PA
7/03/2000-7/11/2002 Chaplain Nursing Home, Allison Park, PA
7/03/2000-7/11/2002 Chaplain Nursing Home, Pittsburgh, PA
5/30/2003 Removed from ministry

Summary

In October 1998, parish staff from St. Dominic reported Father Paul G. Spisak to the
Diocese of Pittsburgh. Parish staff had found pornographic magazines, tapes and internet
material in Spisak’s room that depicted homosexual and sadomasochistic activity. There were
also several pictures of Spisak with two different underage boys including pictures of the boys
showing their buttocks and pictures of Spisak pulling down his swim trunks and pulling down
the boy’s pants. According to the staff, Spisak allegedly destroyed these pictures of the boys.
The staff estimated that the boys were 15 years old.

In October 1998, the Coordinator of Clergy Support Services for the Diocese met with a
Diocesan employee. She stated that Spisak had written her a note that month wherein he
indicated that he would be going to St. Luke Institute for evaluation but wanted to reassure her
that he “hadn’t done anything wrong in the past or in the present.” The secretary advised that
Spisak had always shown a particular interest in her son and had taken him on vacation many
years earlier. She stated that she felt uncomfortable about the attention he gave her son and that
her son would often leave their house and Spisak was expected to arrive.

Spisak was interviewed in October 1998 by the Diocese with respect to the pornography
and pictures that were found. The records indicated that “Spisak denied ever having any sexual
contact with minors or adults” but did admit that “he has been struggling with the problem of
viewing pornography for several years.” Further, he did admit to taking several young men of
high school age on vacation with him during his time in Donora sometime between 1981 and

768
Summary
1990. When asked about the photographs that were seen by the parish housekeeper, Spisak
stated they were taken years ago during these vacations and that the photographs were very
innocent and “just for fun.”

In a letter from the Diocese to Wuerl pertaining to Spisak’s evaluation dated November
10, 1998, the findings were recounted as follows:

1. Spisak has both sexual and interpersonal issues that are significant
enough to warrant residential treatment;
2. Spisak was diagnosed as having a sexual disorder that is compulsive in
nature and is currently manifested in his use of porn;
3. Some of the testing identified Spisak shows a “significant interest in
grade school age males” and his interest in one of the boys pictured in a
photo found in the rectory began when the boy was in 7th or 8th grade.

In a letter dated April 23, 1999, Father Ruggiero wrote to the Diocesan employee’s son
and requested to meet with him to discuss disturbing information that his mother had provided
to the church “concerning a priest of the Diocese.” Ruggiero stated in the letter, “I am sure
revisiting these painful memories is not easy for you . . . I can only imagine how difficult it must
have been to discuss this with your mother.”

A June 21, 1999 letter was sent from Flaherty to Wuerl regarding a meeting with Spisak
at St. Luke:

While Spisak has been vague about the extent of his past involvement with [the
victim], he has been able to acknowledge the sexual motivation in this
relationship. Spisak has also acknowledged a sexual attraction to minors as well
as to adult men. Spisak will need to continue to develop both internal & external
resources to control his emotional impulsivity and his tendency to isolate himself.
Without such control, Spisak is at risk to act out his problematic behavior again
(i.e. use of pornography, compulsive masturbation and possible sexual activity
either with minors or adults).

In July 1999, Wuerl assigned Spisak to residence at St. Mary of Mercy to assist with
certain duties in the care of the parish.

On October 15, 2017, Diocesan officials wrote to Wuerl about a request made by Spisak
to expand his “ministerial functions;” specifically “to be able to hear confessions during the
penace services that routinely occur during Advent and Lent.” The letter stated that Spisak “has
done well in his recovery.” The following recommendations were suggested: That Spisak
continue his current assignment as chaplain to the patients of Vincentian Home and Regency
Hall and continue in residence at St. Alexis with “limited involvement in sacramental work
within the parish at the discretion of the pastor.” The other recommendations listed were that
Spisak be permitted to hear confessions only during Advent and Lent in the parishes of St.
Alexis, St. Alphonsus, Sts John and Paul and St. John Neumann.

769
Summary

On May 24, 2002, a memorandum was sent to the Diocese from Sister Margaret. It
included a letter from a psychotherapist to Wuerl. The psychotherapist reported that he had
been Spisak’s psychotherapist for almost two years and was writing with hope that “Father
Spisak’s priestly ministry can be reestablished in the future.” The psychotherapist went on to
say:

[A]llegations of inappropriate sexual contact with a young man who was

mentored by Spisak are not only unsubstantiated, but also not highly credible.
As a friend of the family, Spisak knew [X], the man who made the allegations,
from his infancy . . . The alleged inappropriate contact occurred when Spisak,
[X] and [others] went on a trip to the shore. The allegations were made 15 years
after the trip, after [X] was told by his mother that Spisak was in treatment at St.
Luke’s. Upon questioning, [X] described possible fondling by Spisak while they
were both in bed fully clothed. No one from the church spoke directly to [X] or
[others]. Spisak’s memory is quite clear . . . he strongly asserts his behavior
with young men was always proper.

It should be noted that no information regarding this fondling incident was given to the
Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General.

In July 9, 2002, Spisak requested to withdraw from active priestly ministry for personal
reasons.

On May 9, 2003, Wuerl sent a letter to Spisak stating:

In light of allegations of sexual abuse of a minor which are deemed to be

established . . . and in consideration of the pastoral needs of the faithful and the
scandal which arises regarding the assignment of a priest to any form of ministry
who has been involved with sexual abuse of a minor, the judgment has been made
that your ministry would be ineffectual and possibly harmful . . . You are
prohibited from performing any public celebration of the sacraments or
sacramental, from wearing clerical attire, presenting yourself as a priest in good
standing or as a representative of the Diocese of Pittsburgh.

On May 15, 2006, Wuerl was advised via letter of the arrest of Spisak. Spisak pled guilty
to a disorderly conduct charge and had to pay a $300.00 fine. Spisak was also required to
“provide a letter from his therapist verifying that he is still in therapy dealing with the sexual
difficulties that have been a part of his life.” No further information regarding this issue was
provided by the Diocese.

In June 2017, Special Agents in the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General obtained
the police reports from Upper St. Clair Police Department regarding the arrest of Spisak. The
reports revealed that on April 21, 2006, police responded to the South Hills Village Mall for a
complaint in a first floor men’s bathroom. A male reported while in the men’s bathroom stall,

770
Summary
he observed a camera recording him from the rear corner of his stall. The camera was protruding
through the opening of the stall and was being recorded by Spisak. When initially approached
by mall security, Spisak denied having a camera. Spisak then faked that he was ill and ran into
the bathroom. A security guard followed Spisak and saw him flush the memory card from the
camera down the toilet.

On April 26, 2017, Spisak arrived at the police station for further questioning. He
admitted to having the camera, recording the victim in the stall and then flushing the memory
card. Spisak also admitted to police that he had a “sexual fixation with the male buttocks.”

771
 Reverend Lawrence F. Stebler

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1934
YEAR OF DEATH: 1997
ORDINATION: May 4, 1963

Employment/Assignment History
5/20/1963 – 8/27/1967 St. Hilary, Washington, PA
8/28/1967 – 11/30/1969 Our Lady of Fatima, Hopewell Township, PA
12/1/1969 – 6/13/1988 St. Stephen, Hazelwood, PA
6/14/1988 – 1/1/1996 St. Victor, Bairdford, PA
1/1/1996 – 6/17/1996 Leave of Absence
6/17/1996 – 6/9/1997 St. Theresa of Avila, Perrysville, PA

Summary

The Diocese of Pittsburgh received a report from an adult male who recounted that when
he was approximately eight to nine years of age, he was sexually abused by Father Stebler when
Stebler was assigned to St. Hilary. He explained that his family was very close with Stebler and
that when Stebler would visit their home, he would ask the boy’s parents if he could tuck him
into bed at night. The male provided a written statement where he stated:

Once we would get to my room he would lay me down on the bed. He

would then touch my head, eyes, chest, belly, waist and then lower than
that. I remember not liking that and asking him what he was doing? He
told me to lay quietly and not say anything. He said my mom and dad said
it was OK and that he was blessing my organs.”

He reported that this abuse occurred for two or three years. The victim also noted that he
did in fact previously disclose the abuse to two priests “who basically told him not to discuss it
further.” The documents do not indicate the names of those two priests.

In a letter dated February 13, 2006, the victim’s therapist wrote to the Diocese to
document the “severity of the mental health issues that the victim is struggling with as a result
of being sexually abused by a priest as a child in the diocese of Pittsburgh.” She further noted
that:

the sexual abuse has stunted the (male’s) emotional development to the
point where he cannot emotionally connect with others, which
subsequently leads to severe depression . . . (male) also has a history of
anxiety and panic attack, drug and alcohol abuse, as well as suicidal
ideation…(male) has had two suicide attempts . . . (male) has flashbacks

772
Summary
to the abuse in the form of dreams which is one of the criteria for
diagnosing Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD . . . he also experiences
anxiety and panic attacks as well as a fear of being watched.

Diocesan records contained invoices from, and payments made to, the Village of St.
Joseph Counseling Services for therapy sessions. The Diocese paid a total amount of $1,000.
On September 20, 2006, in a letter to Bishop Paul Bradley, an attorney notified the Diocese that
his firm was retained to represent the victim. There was no mention of any pending litigation
made at this time.

On May 1, 2007, the attorney wrote a letter to the Diocese wherein he expressed his
disappointment in not receiving a response to his September 20, 2006 letter. Based on the
dcouments provided by the Diocese, it does not appear that a response was sent to the attorney

773
 Reverend Richard Gerard Terdine

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1938
YEAR OF DEATH: Unknown
ORDINATION: May 1, 1965

Employment/Assignment History
5/13/1965 – 12/05/1965 St. Vitus, New Castle, PA
12/06/1965 – 9/21/1967 St. Scholastica, Aspinwall, PA
9/22/1967 – 6/09/1968 Our Lady of Grace, Scott Township, PA
6/10/1968 – 4/13/1970 St. Lawrence O’Toole, Garfield, PA
6/15/1970 – 8/31/1971 Epiphany, Uptown, Pittsburgh, PA
9/01/1971 – 5/30/1972 Duquesne University, Graduate Assistant, Pittsburgh, PA
5/31/1972 – 8/08/1973 St. Basil, Carrick, PA
8/09/1973 – 5/30/1974 Purification of the Blessed Virgin Mary
5/31/1974 – 11/21/1986 Intermediate Schools Unit, Psychologist
11/22/1986 – 1/16/1989 St. Peter, McKeesport, PA
1/16/1989 – 11/05/1989 Cardinal Wright Center/ Without Assignment
11/06/1989 - 7/02/1990 Leave of Absence
7/02/1990 - 6/17/1991 UPMC Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA
6/17/1996 – 7/01/2009 UPMC Presbyterian Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA
7/01/2009 – 11/01/2009 UPMC Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA
6/25/2012 - Present St John Vianney Manor, Pittsburgh, PA

Summary

A Ministerial Assessment Board Report dated April 9, 2003 detailed an allegation that
Father Richard Gerard Terdine abused a 16-year-old boy who worked part-time at the rectory
of St. Peter’s church. The report revealed that in December, 1988, Terdine touched or patted the
genital area of the boy on two-to-three occasions, gave the boy an x-rated videotape to watch,
provided him with condoms, and massaged his back.

Shortly afterwards, Diocesan officials met with Terdine to discuss the allegations.
Terdine denied any sexual touching of the boy. However, he did admit that he gave the boy an
x-rated video as well as condoms. He stated that he wanted to educate the boy because he
seemed naïve about human sexuality. Terdine subsequently resigned from his assignment at St.
Peter. The Diocese sent him to St. Luke Institute for a psychological evaluation.

On May 11, 1990, St. Luke’s provided the Diocese with the following assessment of
Terdine that stated:

774
Summary
Father Terdine does not have a sexual behavior disorder. We see him as at very
little risk of acting out sexually, either with youth or others, and this good
prognosis is supported by the formal psychological testing which indicates good
impulse control and a very high need to comply and obey. One downside element
is noted in that there does appear to be little growth in his sexual awareness and
understanding.

The Ministerial Assessment Board subsequently made the following finding about the
allegation:

x The purchase of condoms and x-rated video was wrong to the point
of immoral;
x While not illegal or immoral, it was poor judgement for Father
Terdine to massage the young boy’s neck;
x Given the totality of the circumstances acknowledged by Father
Terdine, it was extremely poor judgement for him not to inform the
victim’s parents or at least his school guidance counselor of the
social or sexual concerns expressed by the victim leading to the
purchase of the condoms and the X-rated video tape.

As a result, the Board recommended that Terdine not be assigned to any parish. The
Board stated:

It is the opinion of this Board that Father Terdine’s admitted conduct is sufficient
to warrant this recommendation. Moreover, given the possibility of the truth of
averments made by the (victim), the moral integrity of the Diocese cannot be
jeopardized by any assignment of Father Terdine.

Terdine was thereafter placed in restricted ministry and assigned as the chaplain at
UPMC Hospitals throughout Pittsburgh.

775
Biographical Information

Employment/Assignment History

Summary

In , an adult female reported an allegation of sexual abuse to the Diocese of

involving and The abuse occurred
in the early when she was a student at At the time of the complaint,
was deceased.

On , Diocesan officials interviewed the female who advised that she was

On , was interviewed in connection with the allegations. He denied

them. He was placed on administrative leave and was scheduled to undergo a psychological
evaluation at St. Luke Institute.

On , counsel for the Diocese sent a letter to the County District

Attorney’s Office advising that the allegations included “inappropriate touch of a minor that

776 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

-*5*("5*0/
Summary
occurred sometime between , when the alleged victim was between years of
age.”

In a memorandum sent by to ,
advised that the victim’s account “seemed to have a semblance of credibility.” However,
also advised that denied the abuse had ever occurred and that the “Clergy Office felt very
strongly that was believable in his denial of the allegation.”

In , Diocesan Assistance Coordinator, contacted several priests,

a secretary, and at least one teacher who were assigned to during the same time
that and were there. These individuals wrote letters advising that they did not

On documented a meeting with the victim. Among other things,

the victim provided a drawing of her recollection of the .

On sent a memorandum to providing him

with details of . Among other things, advised that

On , a letter was sent to advising that as of , the

administrative leave placed upon him had been lifted and that the findings of the investigation
were “proven to be unsupported and lacking a semblance of truth.” The letter then restored all
of his priestly faculties. No restrictions were included in the letter.

On , the Diocese sent a letter to the victim advising that the Diocesan
Review Board was unable to reach the conclusion that was involved in any activity that
she had alleged and that he would continue in his ministry.

On , the victim received a letter from the Diocese that included a check
in the amount of $3,965 to pay for her continued therapy from January 2004 through July 2004.

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

777
-*5*("5*0/
Summary
issued a
stating that
was seeking to be given faculties and/or exercise priestly ministry in the Diocese of
Among other things, stated that was in good standing and that
“no accusations of misconduct have ever been made against him, nor has he ever been involved
in any incident, to my knowledge, which has led to potential or public scandal.”

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

778 -*5*("5*0/
 Reverend Charles Thomas

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1909
YEAR OF DEATH: 1967
ORDINATION: June 16, 1935

Employment/Assignment History
1935 - 1937 St. Killian, Mars, PA
1937 - 1940 St. Peter, Pittsburgh, PA
3/1940 – 11/1940 St. Wendelin, Carrick PA
1940 – 1941 St. Martin, Pittsburgh, PA
1941 – 1944 St. Mary Mercy, Pittsburgh, PA
1944 – 1952 St. Coleman, Turtle Creek, PA
1952 – 1957 St. Hugh. Carmichaels, PA
1952 – 1957 St. Marcullus, Pittsburgh, PA
1957 – 1965 St. Paul, Butler, PA
8/1965 – 9/1965 St. Christopher, Prospect, PA
1965 – 1967 St. Robert Bellarmine, Pittsburgh, PA
6/1966 Resigned

Summary

Dioecesan records contained a memorandum dated April 2, 1996 that was written to
Father Charles Thomas regarding an allegation that had been made against him. The
memorandum stated that an adult male had reported that, when he was a minor, he was sexually
assaulted by Thomas on several occasions beginning in 1958 when Thomas was asssigned to
the St. Hugh. The male stated that the assaults began with Thomas fondling him and showing
him pornographic material. The assaults then progressed to anal penetration of the victim by
Thomas. The victim also related that a nun (name unknown) assigned to St. Hugh helped
Thomas in some of the assaults. He explained that this unknown nun had sexually assaulted
him on separate occasions as well.

The records revealed that the victim was compensated $15,042.50 by the Diocese of
Pittsburgh in connection with his private psychiatric counseling sessions from 2011 throughout
2016.

779
Biographical Information

Employment/Assignment History

Summary

In a letter to the Diocese dated , an adult male reported that he was sexually
abused by on three occasions in the
. He stated that had asked him and

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

780 -*5*("5*0/
 Reverend John William Wellinger

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1944
YEAR OF DEATH: 2011
ORDINATION: May 16, 1970

Employment/Assignment History
6/15/1970-5/20/79 Assistant at St. Wendelin, Pittsburgh, PA
5/21/1975-5/1977 Graduate Studies in Theology, Catholic University of America,
Washington, D.C.
6/08/1977-8/31/1979 Assistant Pro Tem, St. Athanasius, West View, PA
9/01/1979-6/29/1981 Faculty of the Pontifical College Josephinum, Worthington, OH
for the scholastic year of 1979-1980
6/30/1980-6/29/1981 Assistant Pro Tem, St. Cyril of Alexandria, Pittsburgh, PA
6/30/1981-7/14/1985 Assistant, St. James, Wilkinsburg, PA
7/15/1985-1/25/1987 Parochial Vicar Assistant, St. Clare, Clairton, PA
1/26/1987-6/23/1987 Parochial Vicar Assistant, Our Lady of Grace,
Scott Township, PA
6/24/1987-6/24/1991 Pastor, Holy Spirit, West Mifflin, PA
8/01/1987 Campus Ministries, Community College of Allegheny County
South Campus, West Mifflin, PA
6/11/1991 Resignation for reasons of health
1/24/1992-2/06/1994 Parochial Vicar (Pro Tem) at St. George, Allentown, PA
2/07/1994-6/01/1995 Parochial Vicar, St. Philip, Crafton, PA
5/16/1995 Resigned for personal reasons
5/18/1995 Leave of Absence
1/16/2003 Placed on Administrative Leave
3/01/2003 Declared de facto withdrawn from active ministry

Summary

On or about February 19, 1986, Father John Wellinger was sent to the St. Luke’s Institute
for a number of issues, including drug and alcohol abuse.

Diocesan records received pursuant to a Grand Jury subpoena revealed that on the
evening of October 8, 1987, Wellinger provided alcohol and drugs to an 18-year-old parishioner
of the Holy Spirit church. The parishioner had a “bad reaction” to the drugs and had to be taken
to Shadyside Hospital for treatment. Within days, Wellinger was confronted by the victim’s
parents. Efforts were made by the church to promote a reconciliation between Wellinger, the
victim and the victim’s parents.

781
Summary
On July 12, 1988, a letter was sent to Bishop Wuerl from “Concerned Parishioners” of
Holy Spirit. This letter outlined concerns about drug use and excessive drinking to the point of
intoxication by Wellinger. The parishioners also expressed concern about Wellinger exposing
the young people of the church to illegal drugs.

On June 22, 1989, Father Theodore Rutkowski of the Office of Clergy and Pastoral Life
received a letter from a parishioner at Holy Spirit. Bishop Wuerl was carbon copied in the
correspondence. In this letter, the parishioner listed a number of problems that the parish was
having with Wellinger. In part, the letter read “Just to refresh your memory and bring you up
to date on John’s ministry here at Holy Spirit here are some of the significant problems . . .”
The list included: “Giving drugs and alcohol to teens;” “Teens in the parish have been warned
by their parents about drugs from Father;” and “Young men staying at the parish house.”

On June 3, 1991, Wellinger was drinking alcoholic beverages with a 24-year-old man in
the rectory. Wellinger unbuttoned the man’s pants and began to perform oral sex on him without
consent. A few days later, the victim reported the incident to the Diocese. Wellinger was
subsequently questioned by Diocesan officials, at which time he admitted to the unsolicited
sexual activity with the victim. Wellinger was then sent to St. Michael’s Community in St.
Louis, Missouri for an evaluation. Wellinger’s absence from the parish was explained as a
request for resignation for “reasons of health.”

On January 2, 1992, a meeting took place between Wuerl and Wellinger. The Bishop
agreed that Wellinger could return to priestly ministry and was appointed as Parochial Vicar
(Pro Tem) at St. George in Allentown.

On July 30, 1994, Wellinger was stopped by officers of the Borough of Crafton Police
Department for driving under the influence of alcohol. Father David Zubik, Director of Clergy
Personnel, subsequently notified Wellinger that he had been placed on a leave of absence until
he returned from an evaluation at St. Luke’s Institute. Wellinger was at St. Luke’s from
September 29, 1994 to March 27, 1995. Because he did not complete the required treatment,
his leaving was unauthorized by the Diocese. On May 18, 1995, Wuerl granted Wellinger a
leave of absence from June 1, 1995 to December 1, 1995 for “personal reasons.”

On September 22, 1995, Diocesan officials met with the parents of a 17-year-old boy.
The parents said that a week earlier, their son told them he had been sexually molested by
Wellinger. This abuse reportedly occurred in June 1991, when he the victim was 13 years old.
The victim stated he and some of his friends were watching videos with Wellinger late into the
night. They all fell asleep on the floor. The victim awakened to find that Wellinger had put his
hands down the victim’s pants and was fondling his penis. More than two weeks later, on
October 10, 1995, Diocesan officials met with Wellinger to discuss the allegations. Wellinger
admitted to spending a lot of time with the victim. Wellinger denied consciously touching the
victim’s genitals. Wellinger explained that he did fall asleep on the floor with the victim. He
said it was “pretty tight quarters” so he may have “unknowingly” touched the victim’s genitals.
The Diocese did not report the matter to law enforcement for years. Instead, arrrangments were
made to provide counseling for the victim. The victim later notified Diocesan officials that

782
Summary
during counseling, he was informed that the sexual abuse that occurred was his own fault. By
the year 2004, the victim’s allegations against Wellinger became part of a lawsuit that accused
the Diocese of conspiracy to cover up the sexual abuse of minors. By March 21, 2005, the
victim had disclosed Wellinger had molested him on several occasions. He stated these
incidents occurred both in the rectory where Wellinger lived and at the victim’s home. In 2007,
Bishop Paul Bradley settled the lawsuit, which included accusations from 32 individuals against
17 priests, for $1.25 million.

On November 9, 2012, a woman contacted the Diocese to report that her brother had just
died in August of that year. She indicated that about a month prior to his death, he told her he
had been molested by Wellinger, while Wellinger was assigned to St. James. The woman
explained that her brother was an altar boy when the abuse occurred and he was about 11 or 12
years of age at that time. She estimated the assault(s) took place in 1981 to 1982. She added
that Wellinger used illegal drugs and he provided drugs to some of the children.

783
 Reverend Joseph S. Wichmanowski

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1919
YEAR OF DEATH: 1977
ORDINATION: Unknown

Employment/Assignment History
7/13/1944- 12/15/1945 St. Mary (Polish) in McKeesport, PA
12/06/1945- 10/23/1946 Holy Cross in Glassport, PA
10/24/1946- 5/18/1949 St. Albert on South Side Pittsburgh, PA
5/19/1949- 12/03/1952 St. John Cantius in Sharpsburg, PA
12/04/1952- 6/12/1957 St. Stanislaus in Ambridge, PA
6/13/1957- 6/27/1962 Chaplin Allegheny Co. Workhouse
6/27/1962- 1/31/1969 Pastor St. Cyprian in Pittsburgh, PA
2/01/1969- 4/28/1977 Pastor St. Stanislaus in Ambridge, PA

Summary

The files provided by the Diocese of Pittsburgh included an April 29, 2004 article entitled
“Conway Woman Alleges Priest Abuse.” This article reported that a victim alleged that Father
Joseph S. Wichmanowski repeatedly forced her to perform sexual acts on him beginning when
she was 12 years old. The victim alleged that Wichmanowski forced her to perform oral sex on
him, provided her with alcohol in the form of church wine, and made her dress provocatively.
The victim related that at one point Wichmanowski invited her to New York, where he told her
he would/wanted to impregnate her.

On June 23, 2004, a personal and confidential letter was sent from counsel for the
Diocese to the Beaver County District Attorney’s Office. The letter described allegations of
abuse by Wichmanowski while “he was at St. Stanislaus Parish in Ambridge, PA.” This letter
appeared to refer to the victim described above.

In an article dated September 17, 2007, it was reported that this victim, along with 31
other victim of abuse, was part of a settlement with the church for payments totaling $1.2
Million.

784
 Reverend George A. Wilt

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1931
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 30, 1959

Employment/Assignment History
6/10/1959 – 3/17/1968 Sacred Heart, Pittsburgh, PA
3/18/1968 – 5/26/2003 St Bernard, Pittsburgh, PA

Summary

In a memorandum dated November 17, 2000, and authored by Rita Flaherty of the
Diocese of Pittsburgh, it was recorded that a woman had reported that Father George A. Wilt
made unwanted advances and embraced and kissed her on her mouth. She reported that Wilt
embraced her two more times and again tried to kiss her on her mouth, but that she was able to
turn her head. Wilt also made what she felt were inappropriate comments to her.

In another memorandum dated April 11, 2003, and authored by Flaherty, it was noted
that the Director of the Religious Education Department at St. Bernard expressed several
concerns about Wilt’s behavior. She stated that Wilt failed to take immediate action when it
was discovered that the janitor was viewing pornography on a school computer. Furthermore,
he dismissed several incidents where the same janitor walked in on women and girls while they
were using the bathroom. Wilt was also alleged to have engaged in inappropriate physical
contact with adult women and teenage girls. It was further reported that people had left the
parish because of inappropriate touching and kissing on the mouth, often during first
communions. Also mentioned in this memorandum were two other allegations of inappropriate
conduct by Wilt that were made by adult women. One incident occurred in November 2002 in
Wilt’s office with an intern. The other incident occurred several months prior to April 2003 and
stemmed from a confession in the church sanctuary.

In another Diocesan memorandum dated April 24, 2003, it was noted that Wilt denied
kissing eighth grade girls on the lips and inappropriately touching adult women. Flaherty also
wrote in the memorandum that Wilt was informed of the situation with the janitor. While Wilt
agreed that the behavior was inappropriate, he asked officials several times if the janitor could
be re-hired.

In a memorandum dated May 2, 2003, Flaherty noted that two women, a youth minister
and CCD secretary, met with Diocesan officials. Both women stated they had seen Wilt
inappropriately touch women during various celebrations and kiss eighth grade girls.

785
Summary
In a memorandum dated December 10, 2003, Flaherty wrote that adult women had
accused Wilt of inappropriate advances. It was the recommendation of the Diocesan Review
Board, however, that Wilt retain his faculties as they found him suitable for ministry.

On March 8, 2004, a victim reported she had been sexually abused by Wilt sometime
between 1961 and 1963. She stated the abuse occurred when she was in the seventh or eighth
grade at St. Bernard. The victim explained that she had sought counseling from Wilt because
she was being sexually abused by her father at the time. She thought Wilt could make it stop.
Wilt invited her into a small room in the parish house and during their conversation, he fondled
her. On another occasion she was called out of class and asked to go to the rectory. The victim
stated that Wilt began to fondle her again and she ran out of the room and hid for the rest of the
day until school was out. She never met with Wilt again.

Wilt was not assigned to St. Bernard until 1968. Wilt said that he was only at the parish
once prior to his assignment there, when he paid his respects of the passing of the pastor
(Monsignor Quigley). He said he was there for about 15 minutes.

786
 Reverend Robert G. Wolk

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1940
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 4, 1966

Employment/Assignment History
6/07/1966-5/30/1972 St. Athanasius, West View, PA
9/1972-5/1974 Attended Catholic University of America
5/30/1974-1986 Assistant Chancellor of the Diocese of Pittsburgh
7/22/1979-6/10/1981 La Roche College, Pittsburgh, PA
5/13/1986-9/23/1987 St. Thomas More Church, Bethel Park, PA
9/24/1987 Resigned

Summary

Located within the confidential files of the Diocese of Pittsburgh was a handwritten
memorandum from “T.R.”, presumably Reverend Theodore Rutkowski, regarding Father Robert
Wolk. It indicated that on September 22, 1987, Father Bober and Rutkowski met with an adult
male who attended St. Vincent College in Latrobe, PA. The victim explained that he had been
experiencing anger and frustration because he felt that he had been used and abused. The victim
explained that when he was 12 years old and in the sixth grade, he became friendly with Wolk,
a resident at St. Thomas More. The victim stated he was invited into the rectory by Wolk to
watch football games and to socialize. Eventually the use of cigarettes and alcohol became part
of this socializing. The socialization progressed into “belly rubs” and then “oral sex on the
part of both.” The victim added that x-rated movies were sometimes involved as well. The
victim reported sometimes he would stay overnight at the rectory in Wolk’s apartment. The
victim indicated that his sexual relationship continued with Wolk for an extended period of time.
The victim added, however, that he was greatly concerned about his brother, who was two years
younger than him. The victim indicated that his younger brother had a similar sexual
relationship with Wolk, which included “oral sex on the part of both.” The victim indicated
that neither he, nor his brother, had a current relationship with Wolk.

Located within this same memorandum was a notation that read:

On 9-24-87, Father Wolk came to the Clergy office to meet with Father
Rutkowksi and Father Guay. Father Wolk admitted without hesitation his sexual
relationship with [the two minor victims]. He said his relationship with the
victims was over. He understood the necessary action to be taken by the Diocese,
as explained by Father Rutkowski and Father Guay. Father Wolk will leave the
rectory today. He will go to St Fidelis Monastery, Herman, PA., under the
supervision of Fathers Brendan Malloy and Bernard Finerty, where he will

787
Summary
remain until he departs for St. Luke Institute for an October 12-23, 1987
evaluation there. He will not celebrate mass publicly. He will not return to the
parish after today’s departure. He will not communicate with (the victims), nor
the (victims’ family).”

From October 9, 1987 until June 21, 1988, Wolk received treatment/therapy at St. Luke
Institute in Maryland.

On or about August 1988, a lawsuit was filed by the two above-mentioned victims. Wolk
was named as a defendant along with Father Francis Pucci and Father Richard Zula.

On or about September 1988, the two victims reported the assaults to the Bethel Park
Police Department and the Pennsylvania State Police. It was subsequently determined that some
of the sexual assaults committed by Wolk on one of the victims occurred in Washington County.
This happened on or about 1982, when the victim’s family moved to Washington County.

On October 11, 1988, Wolk was charged in Allegheny County with sexually assaulting
the two victims, who were altar boys at the time of the assaults. These assaults occurred over a
six year period. The charges against Wolk involved oral sodomy and attempted anal sex. During
the investigation it was alleged that other unnamed priests conducted sado-masochistic rituals
on several young boys in Washington and Somerset Counties, as well as in Florida and Canada.
Contacted shortly after news that charges had been filed against Wolk, Father Ron Lengwin,
spokesman for the Diocese, was quoted in an October 11, 1988 article in the Pittsburgh Press as
stating:

Our response was to follow the diocesan policy that was set for cases of alleged
sexual misconduct. The policy calls for the diocese to interview the person said
to be abused, that person’s parents or both, as circumstances dictate, then
interview the subject of the allegation. The third step is the removal of the priest
from his assignment if that is deemed appropriate after the initial interviews.
The fourth step would be medical and psychological assessment, including
counseling, of the alleged offender and finally, pastoral concern and support for
the alleged victims and the priest. St. Luke’s is an extended psychiatric care
facility for priests.

On January 24, 1990, Wolk pled guilty in Allegheny County to four counts of involuntary
deviate sexual intercourse and to corruption of minors. He was sentenced to five to 10 years of
incarceration. At his sentencing, a clinical psychologist from St. Luke’s testified on Wolk’s
behalf. He stated that Wolk underwent about seven months of inpatient treatment and attended
outpatient therapy at the hospital. He stated that Wolk suffered from a psychological disorder-
a compulsive attraction to adolescents which the psychologist “likened to alcoholism.”

On June 28, 1990, Wolk pleaded guilty in Washington County to two counts of
involuntary deviate sexual intercourse. In the Washington County case, Wolk received a
sentence of five to 10 years, to be served concurrently to his Allegheny County sentence.

788
Summary

A Pittsburgh Press newspaper article quoted then-Washington County District Attorney

John C. Pettit as saying the cooperation of the Diocese in the investigation was “minimal at
best.” Pettit accused church leaders of making his investigators’ job more difficult. He noted
a difficulty in locating the whereabouts of certain priests that the investigators were trying to
interview. Pettit also said investigators were looking into more than 200 acts Wolk allegedly
committed with one of the youths in Canada, Virginia, Florida and Ohio.

On June 30, 1994, Wolk requested that the Diocesan Bishop proceed with the formal
process of seeking a dispensation from the obligations of priesthood.

On October 3, 2003, Diocesan officials met with a 37-year-old man about alleged abuse
by Wolk in the mid-to-late 1980’s. The man said that as a teen he had worked in the rectory of
St. Thomas Moore. He stated that on one occasion he was in the bathroom when Wolk entered.
Wolk complained that he [Wolk] was in pain and needed to use the bathroom. He asked the
teen if he would help him use the bathroom by holding his [Wolk’s] penis. The teen felt it was
an odd request, but did so, viewing it as someone who needed help. On another occasion, Wolk
gave the teen a massage. As the massage continued, the teen heard the sound of Wolk undoing
his belt buckle. When the teen asked Wolk what he was doing, Wolk replied he was just
loosening his belt to get comfortable. A little while later, Wolk told the teen he would be putting
some lotion on his neck. Although the teen did not see any lotion, he felt Wolk put something
wet over his neck. Wolk then took out a handkerchief and wiped off the excess. During the
meeting, the victim told the Diocesan representatives that he wanted a face-to-face meeting with
Wolk. The representatives explained to the victim that Wolk was no longer a priest. They
suggested that the victim discuss the matter with his therapist.

Diocesan records also contained an October 18, 2017 “Confidential Memorandum” to

the file. The memorandum memorialized a telephone call made to Sister Marilyn Welch, Victim
Assistance Coordinator in the Altoona/Johnstown Diocese. In the memorandum, it was noted
that an attorney had contacted the Diocese of Pittsburgh on behalf of his client. The attorney
stated his client was accusing Father Francis Luddy and Wolk of abusing and molesting him. It
was soon determined Luddy was a priest from the Altoona/Johnstown Diocese

On March 12, 2009, yet another adult male contacted the Diocese alleging abuse by
Wolk. On March 17, 2009, this individual was interviewed by Diocesan representatives and he
stated that he was abused by Wolk in 1968 to 1970 or 1971, while Wolk was assigned to St.
Athanasius. The victim stated he was 14 to 17 years of age when the abuse took place. Some
of the incidents occurred at the parish, while others occurred at a retreat house on Route 8.
Through negotiations, the Diocese subsequently paid tuition for the victim’s children to attend
Catholic schools in Allegheny County.

On September 9, 2010, the Diocese received a telephone call from Father Michael
Yaksick of Midland. Yaksick reported that one of his parishioners came to him regarding sexual
abuse that occurred during his childhood. This particular victim indicated that the priests

789
Summary
involved in the abuse were Wolk and Father Leo Burchianti. (See narrative regarding Leonard
Burchianti in this report for further information regarding sexual abuse allegations against him)

On September 14, 2010, Diocesan Assistance Coordinator Rita Flaherty conducted an

interview of this victim. The victim told her he was now 44 years of age. He stated that when
he was 12 years of age, Wolk took him to St. Vincent’s in Westmoreland County for an
overnight stay. While at the campus, Wolk allowed him to drive Wolk’s car. He stated that this
was pretty exciting, since he was only 12 years old at the time. He stated that during the
overnight stay Wolk inappropriately touched him and performed oral sex on him. He also
advised that several years later, when he was between 16 and 20 years of age, Burchianti
cornered him in the sacristy and passionately kissed him, including putting his tongue “down
his throat.”

790
 Reverend William B. Yockey

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1952
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: October 1, 1977

Employment/Assignment History
10/13/1977-10/01/1978 Assumption Church, Bellevue, PA
10/02/1978-6/28/1983 St. Bernadette, Monroeville, PA
6/29/1983-5/31/1984 Department of Social & Community Development,
Diocese of Pittsburgh
6/29/1983-5/31/1984 St. Canice, Pittsburgh, PA
6/01/1984-2/16/1986 St. Therese of Lisieux, Munhall, PA
2/17/1986-10/11/1987 St. Winifred, Mt. Lebanon, PA
10/12/1987-1/22/1989 Allegheny County Jail
1/23/1989-7/25/1991 Chaplain/Coordinator, Allegheny County Jail
1/23/1989-4/20/1989 St. Luke, Carnegie, PA (In Reserve)
4/21/1989-7/25/1991 St. Anthony, Bridgeville, PA (In Reserve)
7/25/1991 Leave of Absence
7/25/1991 Withdrawn from Active Ministry

Summary

Located in the files of the Diocese of Pittsburgh for Father William B. Yockey was a
handwritten letter dated May 27, 1991 by Father Robert Guay. In part, the letter stated,

In May of 1991, a gentlemen, age 25, came to one of our diocesan priests and
alleged that he had been sexually molested by Yockey at the age of 16. This
same gentleman also indicated that a friend of his had also been sexually
molested by Yockey at the age of 18. A meeting was arranged with these two
gentlemen regarding their allegations with diocesan officials. The gentlemen
indicated they had gotten to know Yockey during his first parish assignment
when they were in 6th or 7th grade. They became friends with Yockey, going to
movies and shooting the breeze with him in his room at the parish. After a year,
Yockey was transferred to a new parish assignment and the friendship would
continue. Yockey would often take (them) to his cabin outside the city to go
fishing. They indicated that Yockey would always allow them to drink beer.
One of the gentlemen would spend an overnight or weekends at Father Yockey’s
new assignment. On one occasion [one gentleman] indicated that Yockey
sexually molested him in October of 1981. The pair had returned to the rectory
following a Halloween party. Both had been drinking. [The first victim] was a
junior in High School, age 16. [The first victim] told us he “crashed out”

791
Summary
following the party after drinking too much. He fell asleep on the couch in
Yockey’s den. Yockey went to his own bedroom. At some point the victim fell
off the couch and found Yockey fondling his genitals. Yockey then got on top of
the victim and tried to kiss him. . . Another gentleman said a similar thing
happened to him at another parish assignment in 1983. The [second victim]
was 18 years of age at the time. Once again alcohol was involved by both
Father Yockey and [the second victim]. The victim passed out and awoke to
find Yockey feeling his genitals and attempting to kiss his genitals. . . When
Yockey was confronted about these allegations on May 20, 1991, he
acknowledged that the incident with the [first victim], age 16, was true. He also
acknowledged that he, Yockey was drinking quite a lot during his first few years
of ministry. When asked about the allegations regarding [the second victim],
age 18, Father Yockey does not recall anything, but he did note that they were
probably drinking and that it was not impossible and won’t deny it, but he
cannot remember it. Yockey has been put on administrative leave from his
assignment as chaplain to the County Jail. He is not to celebrate sacraments
or … publicly. I trust this information is helpful to you in helping us discern
what might be best for Father Yockey in the future. I might add that Yockey
told us that he was never involved with anyone else that he is aware of.

On July 18, 1991, Yockey sent a letter of resignation to Bishop Donald Wuerl. A portion
of the letter stated, “I have discussed my decision with Father Guay and he informed me that
medical coverage and perhaps some salary would be available if I request it. I would appreciate
it.”

On April 3, 2006, a letter was sent from Father James G. Young, Episcopal Vicar for
Clergy to “whom it may concern.” The letter stated:

Enclosed is a questionnaire that you sent in regards to William B. Yockey who

has applied for a position with the Veterans Administration. William B. Yockey
was a priest in the Diocese of Pittsburgh from May 1976 to August 1991, when
he asked for and was granted a leave of absence for personal reasons. We have
had no contact with him since that time and therefore are not able to provide
any information for you.

In this letter, there was no mention of Yockey’s admission to sexually molesting a minor, or of
Yockey’s potential threat to prospective victims.

On July 10, 2009, a letter was received by Bishop Zubik from an individual who attended
the Assumption in Bellevue. A portion of the letter stated:

Bishop Zubik, I was a victim of a sexual assault when I was in high school.
Years later, a close friend shared a similar story involving the same priest. At
that time we contacted Father John Gallagher at Assumption Parish. Father
Gallagher set up a meeting with Father Guay and yourself. At some time in the

792
Summary
near future, Bill Yockey was dismissed or left the priesthood. I have never
received a phone call or any contact from the Diocese concerning this matter.

On August 7, 2009, a confidential memorandum was sent from Rita Flaherty, Diocesan
Assistance Coordinator, to Zubik. A portion of the letter read:

“In preparation for your meeting with [the victim] on August 11, 2009 at 12:00
p.m., I share the following information. The [victim] called me on July 9, 2009
to say that he was an abuse victim of Father William Yockey. He stated that he
came forward in the early 1990’s when Father Bob Guay was in the Clergy
Office. Father John Gallagher initially notified our office about his allegation
as [the victim] first talked with Father Gallagher about this. The victim’s
allegation against Yockey involved inappropriate sexual contact with [the victim
and another individual]. At the time of the incident, [victim] was a senior in
high school (age 18) but his friend was only 16. (Our confidential files confirms
that both the victim and his friend, did indeed come to the diocese in 1991.)
[Victim] stated that since he came forward, he has not asked anything of the
diocese. At this time, he is requesting some assistance with the tuition for his
three children so they can continue with their Catholic education . . . Since my
first contact with [victim], I have been working with Ron Bowes, Father Kris
Stubna and Father Jim Young to see what help might be available to the victim’s
children. I have included a letter that was sent out to the victim’s family on July
27, 2009 showing the original amount of aid that was offered along with a
revised amount. Father Young is also willing to offer an additional $2,000 in
financial aid to the family as soon as he is able to figure out a confidential way
to do this while at the same time, having a record for auditing purposes. Father
Young planned to talk with either Fred O’Brien or Joe Luttringer about how best
to accomplish this.”

In a letter from Zubik to the aforementioned victim, the Bishop wrote, “I have received
your letter requesting tuition support for your three children and I will make sure that your
request is taken care of.” The Diocesan records contained records specifying certain payments
to the victim. One such document dated April 10, 2012, noted that a total of $10,065 was
provided to three of the victim’s children for their Catholic education. The money was taken
from the “Catholic Charities Fund.” A document dated June 12, 2012, indicated that a total of
$12,690 was provided for the catholic education of two of the victim’s children. The money
was listed as “tuition assistance grants” for the 2012-2013 school year. A document dated June
6, 2013 listed that $7,860 was provided to two of the victim’s children from the Bishop’s
Education Fund and Scholastic Opportunity Scholarship Fund. The payment was listed under
an “educational grant award” for the 2013-2014 school year. Additional payments were made
to the victim for the 2014-2015, 2015-2016 and 2016-2017 school years that totaled $24,130.00.

On December 17, 2013, a letter was received by Bishop Waltersheid. It was sent from
an individual who stated that he was molested as a young boy by Yockey. On December 20,
2013, a meeting took place with the victim at the Diocese office. During the meeting, the victim

793
Summary
stated his father died when he was nine years old and his mother died the following year. The
victim was then raised by his maternal aunt, who lived in Wilkinsburg. The victim attended St.
Bernadette in nearby Monroeville where Yockey was assigned from 1978 to 1983. While the
boy attended the parish, Yockey began to molest him. The victim stated that Yockey performed
oral sex on him in the rectory, in his [Yockey’s] car, and even at the home of his aunt. During
the meeting, the victim asked if there had been any other allegations made against Yockey.
Waltersheid responded, “that there have been.” The victim was offered counseling by the
Diocese.

Although the Diocese had information regarding alleged criminal actions on the part of
Yockey as far back as the year 1986, there was only one document located in their files that was
dated January 6, 2014 that illustrated a report to the Allegheny County District Attorney’s
Office. The document was dated January 6, 2014. There was no mention of the history of
Yockey’s reported sexual assaults.

794
 Reverend Theodore P. Zabowski

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1943
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 16, 1970

Employment/Assignment History
6/15/1970 – 5/20/1975 Parochial Vicar, St. Lawrence O’Toole, Garfield, PA
5/21/1975 – 10/05/1980 Parochial Vicar, Most Holy Name, North Side, PA
10/06/1980 – 1/13/1981 Parochial Vicar, Holy Family, Lawrenceville, PA
1/14/1981 – 1/10/1982 Parochial Vicar, St. Catherine of Sweden, Wildwood, PA
1/11/1982 – 6/28/1985 Parochial Vicar, St. Mary, Glenshaw, PA
6/29/1985 – 10/26/1992 Pastor, St. Adalbert, South Side, PA
10/27/1992 – 7/08/1996 Pastor/Resigned, St. Richard, Richland Township, PA
1/08/1996 – 9/16/1996 Leave of absence
9/16/1996 – 7/14/2000 Parochial Vicar, Immaculate Conception, Washington, PA
7/14/2000 – 7/29/2002 Leave of Absence
7/29/2002 Withdrew from ministry

Summary

An internal Diocese of Pittsburgh document labeled “Chronology of Father Zabowski”,

stated that in October, 1995 an allegation of sexual abuse was made against Zabowski. An adult
male stated that between 1975 and 1979 he engaged in wrestling with Zabowski and then
Zabowski asked him to remove his clothes. After he removed his clothes, Zabowski fondled
him. This conduct occurred at a church in Pittsburgh. The male further advised that he and
Zabowski took a trip to Canada where they slept in the same bed and Zabowski served him
alcohol. Following the allegations, Zabowski was placed on administrative leave.

In a November, 1995 confidential memorandum, the Diocese noted that Zabowski had
acknowledged the possibility of inappropriate touching and acknowledged sharing his bed with
boys for “companionship.”

Zabowski was sent to St. Luke’s Institute for an evaluation. In an evaluation dated
November 28, 1995, it was noted that Zabowski admitted to “affectionate hugging” of teenage
boys

In an August, 1996 confidential memorandum, the Diocese observed that Zabowski had
admitted that the allegations against him “could potentially be true” and that he should not be
involved in any relationship with teenage males.

795
Summary
In a letter dated June 26, 2003 Zabowski informed Bishop Wuerl the “therapy helped
him deal with allegations of placing himself with adolescent boys in a sexually inappropriate
manner, gave him the ability to deal with and yes, overcome the sexual ignorance and social
backwardness of his life.”

796
 Pittsburgh Priests #2-10

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: Various
ORDINATION: Various

Employment/Assignment History
1980-2013 Various Assignments within the Diocese of Pittsburgh

Summary
This group of nine unnamed priests contained specific complaints against identified
priests within the Diocese of Pittsburgh. A review of documents surrendered by the Diocese of
Pittsburgh did not contain sufficient information to determine the validity of the complaints in
every case.

The Grand Jury noted that in each case a detailed confidential memorandum was
completed which provided the identities of the complainants and the accused priest. These
confidential memoranda also contained information obtained through internal diocesan
investigations. That information included specific allegations of sexual crimes and identified
locations where the crimes occurred. In some cases it was documented that the priest was
interviewed and confessed child sexual abuse to diocesan personnel.

In contrast to the detailed confidential memoranda, an “allegation report” was also

generated and provided to law enforcement. The “allegation report” was substantially different
from the more detailed diocesan internal memoranda. Rather than containing specific
information, the “allegation report” provided a general timeframe of offenses, the identity of the
“alleged victim” and “accused”, a disclosure of “inappropriate touching” regardless of the actual
offenses reported by the complainant, and the geographic area of the crime as identified by
county rather than by specific parish or school.

The Grand Jury noted that the allegations included offenses against children as young as
five years old. Some reports were made as recently as 2017.

797
798
DIOCESE OF SCRANTON

799
800
 Reverend Philip A. Altavilla

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1966
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: June 27, 1992

Employment/Assignment History
7/1992 – 6/1995 Asst. Pastor, St. Mary of Mt. Carmel, Dunmore, PA
6/1996 – 7/1996 Asst. Pastor, Holy Trinity, Nanticoke, PA
7/1996 – 3/2000 Asst. Pastor, St. Patrick, St. John the Baptist, Immaculate Heart
of Mary Chapel, Holy Cross, Scranton, PA
3/2000 – 7/2000 Administrator, Church of the Immaculate Conception,
Taylor, PA
7/2000 – 11/2004 Pastor, Immaculate Conception, St. John the Baptist, Taylor, PA
11/2004 – 2/2008 Pastor, St. Thomas More, Lake Ariel, PA
2/2008 – 7/2009 Administrator, Nativity of Our Lord Church, Scranton, PA
7/2009 – 9/2009 Chaplain, Holy Cross High School, Dunmore, PA
9/2009 – 7/2010 Administrator, Sacred Hearts of Jesus and Mary,
St. John the Evangelist, Scranton, PA
7/2010 – 11/2010 Administrator, Immaculate Conception, Scranton, PA
7/2010 – 4/2014 Pastor, St. Peter’s Cathedral, Scranton, PA
4/04/2014 Removed from assignment
4/17/2014 Resigned

Summary

On April 3, 2014, the Diocese of Scranton was notified by law enforcement that Father
Philip A. Altavilla had been arrested for indecent assault, criminal attempt - indecent assault and
corruption of minors in connection with a sexual assault on a female that occurred on December
15, 1998 when she was 13-years-old.

The victim reported that on that occasion she had been an altar server assisting Altavilla
with midnight mass. Afterwards, Altavilla provided alcohol to her and gave her a ride home.
During the ride to her house, Altavilla pulled into a parking lot and parked the vehicle. He then
swung her legs across his lap, touched her feet and worked his hands up her thigh towards her
vagina. The victim told him to stop and he did.

During the course of the investigation, Altavilla admitted to having fetishes with feet,
legs, pantyhose, strangulation and chloroform.

On April 4, 2014, Father Thomas Muldowney removed Altavilla from his assignment as
pastor and revoked his faculties to exercise priestly ministry.

801
Summary
On April 27, 2014, Altavilla submitted his resignation letter to Bishop Joseph C.
Bambera advising that his resignation was effective April 3, 2014 “the day of my being arrested
and charged.”

In a letter from the Diocese dated June 3, 2015, it was noted that Altavilla “had admitted
to the alleged victim in a consensual phone intercept that he had touched her inappropriately.”

Prior to trial it was determined the statute of limitations had expired for the charges that
were filed against Altavilla in connection with the assault on the victim. The case was dismissed
but as observed in the June 3, 2015 letter, “not for lack of merit.”

A civil lawsuit against Altavilla and the Diocese was settled in 2014.

The Diocese placed a notice in the bulletins distributed within of all the churches to
which Altavilla was assigned, inquiring as to whether any minor in those congregations had
been sexually abused by a priest, deacon, religious or lay employee of the Diocese. The victims
were encouraged to immediately report such abuse to law enforcement.

802
 Reverend Girard F. Angelo

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1927
YEAR OF DEATH: 2009
ORDINATION: June 4, 1955

Employment/Assignment History
6/1955 – 10/1955 Asst. Pastor, St. Matthew’s, East Stroudsburg, PA
10/1955 – 9/1959 Asst. Pastor, St. Thomas, Archbald, PA
9/1959 – 9/1962 Asst. Pastor, St. Lucy, Scranton, PA
9/1962 – 7/1963 Asst. Pastor, St. Francis, Scranton, PA
7/1963 – 9/1967 Asst. Pastor, Mater Delorosa, Williamsport, PA
9/1967 – 3/1972 Asst. Pastor, Our Lady of Grace, Hazleton, PA
3/1972 – 9/1973 Administrator, St. Raphael, Harleigh, PA
9/1973 – 7/2003 Pastor, St. Raphael, Harleigh, PA
7/2003 Pastor Emeritus, Sacred Heart of Jesus, Harleigh, PA

Summary

In September, 2002, Bishop James C. Timlin received a letter from an adult male who
wanted to report to the Diocese of Scranton that he had been sexually abused by Father Girard
F. Angelo when he was 14-years-old. This occurred during the time period when Angelo was
assigned to Mater Delorosa in the early 1960s. The first victim noted that he did not wish to
sue, nor make a spectacle of himself or those involved.

Timlin contacted the male and advised that the allegations would be brought to the
attention of the Lycoming County District Attorney’s Office even though the statute of
limitations appeared to have expired.

Timlin interviewed Angelo who denied that any sexual abuse had occurred.

Timlin advised the male that any compensation that he felt was due to him would be the
responsibility of Angelo. The Bishop then suggested that the male contact Angelo about the
allegations and provided him with Angelo’s contact information. The male did not contact
Angelo.

The statute of limitations period had expired under Pennsylvania law.

803
 Reverend Mark G. Balczeniuk

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1957
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: November 5, 1983

Employment/Assignment History
11/1983 – 9/1984 Asst. Pastor, St. Thomas, Archbald, PA
9/1984 – 9/1985 Asst. Pastor, St’s. Peter and Paul, Plains, PA
9/1985 – 7/1990 Asst. Pastor, Holy Trinity, Swoyersville, PA
7/1990 – 9/1997 Asst. Pastor, Maternity of the Blessed Virgin Mary,
Wilkes-Barre, PA
9/1997 – 7/2006 Pastor, Our Lady Help of Christians, Dorrance, PA
7/2006 – 7/2009 Pastor, St’s. Peter and Paul. Hazleton, PA, Transfiguration,
West Hazleton, PA
7/2009 – 3/2010 Episcopal Vicar of the Eastern Pastoral Region of the Diocese
of Scranton, PA
3/2010 Leave of Absence
10/7/2011 Dispensation from the clerical state

Summary

On March 30, 2010, Father Mark G. Balczeniuk contacted the Reverend Richard J. Loch,
Episcopal Vicar for Priests, and arranged a meeting with him. Balczeniuk stated that on the
previous Friday he had spent the night at the home of a family with whom he had a close
relationship. He admitted that while he was at their home, he kissed and hugged the family’s
son, whom he estimated to be in his twenties. Balczeniuk described the boy as having mental
difficulties and being a little slow. He explained that he was reporting this conduct because he
was informed by the Reverend Mark A. Honhardt that the boy’s father was very upset and was
going to report the incident to the Diocese of Scranton.

On March 30, 2010, the father did report the incident to the Diocese. He stated that
Balczeniuk had kissed his 18-year-old stepson on the mouth, embraced him, and rubbed his back
underneath his shirt.

That same day, Loch notified Balczeniuk that his conduct warranted immediate and
aggressive action. Loch advised Balczeniuk that he could not continue to function as a priest
and that he would be sent to the St. John Vianney Center as soon as possible.

On April 1, 2010, the Diocese notified the Luzerne County District Attorney’s Office of
the allegation.

804
Summary
On June 11, 2010, Earley also sent a letter to the Wyoming County District Attorney’s
Office wherein he stated that Balczeniuk had made certain statements to Loch on June 7, 2010.
The letter stated, “when he was a seminarian he was assigned as a counsel at Camp St. Andrew
in Wyoming County. The priest stated that he touched the genitals of some of the young boys
who attended the camp. This self-disclosed behavior is supposed to have taken place in the mid-
1970s.”

On March 24, 2011, Balczeniuk notified Pope Benedict XVI of his request to be
dismissed from the clerical state. Dispensation from the clerical state was approved on October
7, 2011.

805
Biographical Information

Employment/Assignment History

Summary

On , it was brought to the attention of the Diocese that had an

806 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&
-*5*("5*0/
Summary

On , the Diocese reported this incident to the District

Attorney’s Office. It was determined that the behavior did not rise to the level of criminal
conduct.

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&
-*5*("5*0/
807
 Reverend Joseph P. Bonner

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1926
YEAR OF DEATH: 2007
ORDINATION: May 30, 1953

Employment/Assignment History
6/1953 – 9/1954 Asst. Pastor, St. Ann’s, Freeland, PA
9/1954 – 3/1964 Asst. Pastor, St. Nicholas, Wilkes-Barre, PA
3/1964 – 6/1964 Asst. Pastor, Ascension, Williamsport, PA
6/1964 – 1/1970 Asst. Pastor, St. Francis, Nanticoke, PA
1/1970 – 9/1970 Asst. Pastor, St. Cecilia, Wyoming, PA
9/1970 – 1/1972 Asst. Pastor, St. Juliana, Rock Lake, PA
1/1972 – 6/1981 Pastor, Resurrection, Muncy, PA
6/1981 – 6/1982 Pastor, St. Patrick’s, Milford, PA
6/1982 – 9/1982 Pastor, St. Paul’s, Scranton, PA
9/1982 – 9/1985 Pastor, St. James’, Pleasant Mount, PA
9/1985 – 7/1998 Pastor, Sacred Heart of Jesus, Weston, PA
7/1998 – 6/2002 Retired, Pastor Emeritus, Sacred Heart of Jesus, Weston, PA
6/2002 Removed from ministry

Summary

On May 13, 2002, the Diocese of Scranton was notified by an attorney via letter
correspondence that his client had been sexually molested by Father Joseph P. Bonner in 1975.
The attorney explained that the victim and his family had been visiting from Arizona that year
and were invited to visit with Bonner in the rectory. They spent the night there. The victim’s
two aunts and his cousin were provided with accommodations on the third floor while the victim
was given a pull-out bed that was located directly across from Bonner’s bedroom on the second
floor. After the victim fell asleep, he awoke to discover Bonner lying in bed with him, stroking
his [the victim’s] penis. The letter stated that when the client asked Bonner what he was doing,
Bonner replied, “I am sorry . . . I shouldn’t have done that; Go back to bed.”

On May 30, 2002, the Diocese notified the Lycoming County District Attorney’s Office
of the allegation. The Diocese was subsequently advised that the statute of limitations period
had expired. The District Attorney advised, however, that he would alert the local police to the
allegation. He further advised stated that he may have an investigator speak with Bonner and
the victim.

On May 30, 2002, Bishop James C. Timlin sent a letter to the attorney, advising him that
Bonner had retired. He stated that the Diocese was appalled that alleged behavior would ever
happen, or that such an accusation would be made against one of their priests. Timlin suggested

808
Summary
that the victim contact Bonner directly in order to achieve a reconciliation of the troubling
matter.

On July 31, 2002, counsel for the Diocese notified the victim’s counsel that the Diocese
would make no payment of any kind to his client as it had no responsibility for the alleged
conduct. The letter suggested that “you seek whatever redress you feel is appropriate from the
responsible party.”

On January 27, 2003, a settlement was reached and the victim received $25,000. It was
agreed that the settlement did not constitute an admission by Bonner and that the parties could
not release the contents of the settlement agreement to the public.

On March 12, 2004, the victim contacted the Diocese to report that he felt that he had
not received any support from Timlin. He pointed out that Timlin refused to inform the parishes
where Bonner had been assigned so that other victims might feel comfortable to come forward
with any reports of abuse. On April 13, 2004, the Diocese requested that the pastors of the
parishes to which Bonner had been assigned publish a “Notice Regarding Sexual Abuse” in their
bulletin. The Notice stated, in part, that “clerical sexual abuse may have occurred in this parish
in the past. If this is the case, please come forward and make it known.”

On November 29, 2004, the Diocese received a report from a 47-year-old male who
advised that he had been sexually abused by Bonner when he was 14 to 16 years old. He stated
that he was not interested in pursuing a lawsuit against Bonner or the Diocese. The Diocese
sent a letter to the Lycoming County District Attorney’s Office, advising of the allegation. On
December 6, 2004, the Diocese agreed to assume financial responsibility for 20 psychiatric
sessions for the victim.

809
 Reverend Martin M. Boylan

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1947
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: August 30, 1980

Employment/Assignment History
8/1980 – 6/1982 Asst. Pastor, St. Jude, Mountaintop, PA
6/1982 – 9/1983 Asst. Pastor, St. Gabriel, Hazleton, PA
9/1983 – 9/1985 Asst. Pastor, St. Patrick, Scranton, PA
9/1985 – 2/1986 Asst. Pastor, St. Peter, Scranton, PA
2/1986 – 9/1986 Administrator, Blessed Sacrament, Wilkes-Barre, PA
9/1986 – 9/1987 Asst. Pastor, St. Mary of the Immaculate Conception,
Wilkes-Barre, PA
9/1987 – 9/1988 Chaplain and Procurator, Bishop Hannan High School,
Scranton, PA
9/1988 – 9/1989 Confessor, Spiritual Director, St. Pius X Seminary, Dalton, PA
9/1989 – 4/1993 Chaplain, College, Scranton, PA
6/1993 – 1/1994 Sabbatical leave
7/1994 – 6/1997 Administrator, St. Rita, Gouldsboro, PA
7/1997 – 7/2001 Pastor, St. Rita, Gouldsboro, PA
7/2001 – 7/2007 Pastor, St. John the Evangelist, Honesdale, PA
7/2007 – 7/2009 Pastor, St. Joseph, White Mills, PA
7/2009 – 7/2011 Pastor, St’s. Peter and Paul, Towanda, PA, St. Michael,
Canton, PA, St. John Nepomucene, Troy, PA and
St. Aloysius, Ralston, PA
7/2011 – 4/2016 Pastor, St. Patrick, Scranton, PA
4/05/2016 Leave of Absence

Summary

In April, 1993, while Father Martin M. Boylan was serving as a chaplain at Marywood
College, a male graduate student alleged that Boylan sexually harassed him and propositioned
him for sex. The Diocese of Scranton sent Boylan for a comprehensive psychological evaluation
at the Anodos Center in Downingtown, and, after the evaluation was completed, it was
determined that Boylan would take leave from the ministry and undergo two to three years of
outpatient psychotherapy.

After completing the therapy, Boylan underwent evaluations in 1994, 1997, and 2004.
According to a note in the file, the evaluations did not raise any serious concerns that would
prevent Boylan from exercising public ministry.

810
Summary
On March 31, 2016, the Victim Assistance Coordinator for the Diocese of Florida
notified the Diocese that an 18-year-old male had reported that he was touched inappropriately
by Boylan when he was eight-years-old. On April 1, 2016, this victim contacted the Diocese
and advised that the assault occurred at a summer event at St. Vincent’s Camp in Honesdale.
The victim reported that Boylan inserted his penis into the victim’s rectum and touched many
of his body parts, including his private parts. A report was immediately made to ChildLine.

Boylan was subsequently interviewed by the Diocese and denied the allegation. He
stated that he had no recollection of the victim. Boylan was informed that his faculties to
exercise public ministry were immediately suspended and that he would need to vacate the
rectory. He was encouraged to undergo residential treatment at St. John Vianney Center to
which he agreed.

On April 3, 2016, the Diocese notified the Wayne County District Attorney’s Office of
the allegation.

Bishop James C. Timlin created an Independent Review Board in the early 1990s. In a
letter dated April 5, 2016, a former member of the Board wrote to Bishop Joseph Bambera and
noted that throughout the years, Boylan’s case had returned to the Board. The member stated
that the Board noted that Boylan had resisted treatment and had resented the recommendations
made by the Board and the team from Downingtown. In 1996, the Board had recommended
that Boylan return to Downington, but this recommendation was ignored. The official notes of
the Board observed that Boylan “attempts to orchestrate his own approach to therapy.” The
letter further stated that “[o]ver the course of time, Boylan often wrote to Timlin, requesting to
be appointed pastor. The Board always objected to this possibility. Nevertheless, Timlin
appointed him pastor and Boylan continued to consistently appear at public events throughout
the diocese.”

On April 6, 2016, the Diocese received a call from an anonymous male who advised that
he was a student at Marywood University in 1983. The caller reported that Boylan had
approached him with sexually suggestive overtures. The male reported this to the Marywood
Administration. Although a contract was agreed to between Marywood University and Boylan
- - which included Boylan’s departure from the University - - and this eased the tension between
Boylan and the male student, the male advised that he was upset to learn that Boylan was still
practicing as a priest.

On May 25, 2016, the Diocese received a call from a former parishioner who advised of
an incident of sexual abuse by Boylan that occurred in 1984. The caller advised that he did not
intend to file charges and wished to remain anonymous. On August 23, 2017, the Pennsylvania
State Police closed the investigation into this allegation of sexual abuse because of the victim’s
refusal to testify. A statement was subsequently released by the Diocese which stated, “While
civil authorities have made this determination, the ecclesiastical process in Father Boylan’s case
continues. Father Boylan’s status as a priest removed from ministry with his faculties to exercise
priestly ministry suspended continues to remain unchanged.”

811
 Reverend Robert J. Brague

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1941
YEAR OF DEATH: 1997
ORDINATION: May 9, 1970

Employment/Assignment History
5/1970 – 9/1970 Asst. Pastor, St. Ann, Tobyhanna, PA
9/1970 – 4/1972 Asst. Pastor, St. Peter, Wellsboro, PA
4/1972 – 9/1979 Asst. Pastor, St. John the Evangelist, Pittston, PA
9/1979 – 6/1980 Leave of Absence
6/1980 – 9/1980 Asst. Pastor, St. Maria Goretti, Laflin, PA
9/1980 – 9/1982 Asst. Pastor, St. Ann, Tobyhanna, PA
9/1982 – 9/1984 Asst. Pastor, St. Ann, Williamsport, PA
9/1984 – 9/1988 Pastor, SS Peter & Paul, Towanda, PA
9/01/1988 Leave of absence
1/19/1990 Appointed Parochial Vicar, St. Ann, Naples, FL

Summary

On August 20, 1979, Father Robert J. Brague requested a leave of absence from Bishop
J. Carroll McCormick. Brague stated that he had had doubts about continuing in the active
ministry for several years. McCormick granted his request.

On March 24, 1988, Bishop James C. Timlin received an anonymous letter from a
parishioner advising that rumors were circulating about Brague and a high school female. On
June 16, 1988, that same anonymous parishioner sent a second letter to Timlin, advising that the
relationship between Brague and the teenage female was still continuing. The parishioner stated
that it was assumed that Timlin had disregarded the previous letter and further suggested that
Timlan did not have very much control over his priests.

On August 29, 1988, Timlin received a letter from the sister of the high school female.
She advised that Brague had had sexual relations with her sister at age 17 who became pregnant.
She further advised that Brague had had at least two other affairs.

On September 6, 1988, Timlin responded to the letter by stating that as soon as the matter
was brought to his attention, Brague was removed from office. Timlin noted that it was better
to say as little as possible about the circumstances surrounding his removal rather than cause
greater scandal through undue publicity. In the letter he further noted that, “Father Brague and
your sister have a long, difficult road ahead. . . What has happened is their responsibility and
certainly Father Brague will take care of his obligations.”

812
Summary
On December 1, 1988, the Reverend Neil Van Loon, Chancellor for the Diocese, sent a
letter thanking Monsignor Henry Mansell of the Archdiocese of New York for his assistance in
helping Brague secure a priestly assignment in his Dioecese. On December 7, 1988, the
Archdiocese of New York notified Van Loon that the approval was not finalized, however.

In April, 1989, the victim gave birth to a baby boy.

On August 25, 1989, Timlin sent a letter to the Reverend John Nevins, Bishop of Venice,
Florida, wherein he advised that Brague would no longer be able to exercise his priesthood in
the Diocese of Scranton due to circumstances that had been discussed with Father Moretti.
Timlin wrote that he wholeheartedly approved of Brague exercising his priesthood in Venice
and highly recommended Brague.

On January 19, 1990, Brague was appointed Parochial Vicar of St. Ann’s church in
Naples, Florida, effective immediately.

On July 24, 1996, the victim requested that the Diocese cover the cost of tuition, or
eliminate the tuition charge altogether, in order for her son to attend St. Agnes School in
Towanda. On August 6, 1996, the victim was notified that her son would be able to attend the
school, even though enrollment numbers were rather high for the following year. She was
further advised that the school was willing to arrange for a scholarship for him.

813
 Reverend Francis T. Brennan

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1928
YEAR OF DEATH: 1974
ORDINATION: June 5, 1954

Employment/Assignment History
6/1954 – 10/1957 Asst. Pastor, St. Therese, Shavetown, PA
10/1957 – 6/1965 Vicar Econome, St. Therese, Shavertown, PA
6/1965 – 9/1970 Chaplain, Marian Convent, Marywood, PA
9/1970 – 7/1974 Pastor, St. Maria Goretti, Laflin, PA

Summary

On August 4, 2010, the Diocese received a telephone call from a 65-year-old male who
reported that he was sexually abused by Father Francis T. Brennan when he was 15 or 16-years-
old. He reported that Brennan took him to a drive-in movie and put his hands inside the victim’s
pants. The Diocese offered to arrange for counseling for the victim.

That same day, an e-mail communication was sent from Chancellor James Earley to
Bishop Joseph Bambera wherein he advised that in 2005, the Diocese had been sued by Richard
Serbin, Esquire who was representing a client who stated that he had been abused by Brennan
in 1966 when he was an altar boy. The Court rejected the case, however, concluding that the
victim had waited too long to sue the diocese. A post-it note was attached to a print-out of this
e-mail communication which stated “bad abuse case. perpetrator. [Victim] sued us . . . we
won.”

814
 Reverend Joseph Bucolo

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1923
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 29, 1954

Employment/Assignment History
6/1954 – 9/1954 St. Patrick, Milford, PA
9/1954 – 9/1966 Most Precious Blood, Hazleton, PA
9/1966 – 9/1967 Asst. Pastor, Our Lady of Mt. Carmel, Carbondale, PA
9/1967 – 5/1970 Asst. Pastor, St. Lucy, Scranton, PA
5/1970 – 9/1972 Asst. Pastor, St. Anthony, Dunmore, PA
9/1972 – 4/1973 Asst. Pastor, Our Lady of Grace, Hazleton, PA
4/1973 – 9/1974 Pastor, St. Thomas, Elkland, PA
9/1974 – 7/1992 Pastor, St. Nazorius, Pardeesville, PA
7/1992 – 6/2002 Pastor, St. Mary, Lattimer Mines, PA
7/03/2002 Removed from ministry
7/25/2002 Pastor Emeritus, St. Nazarius, Pardeesville, PA

Summary

On January 4, 1971, Bishop J. Carroll McCormick was notified that the parents of a 10-
year-old boy had reported that during the previous summer, Father Joseph Bucolo took their son
on a two day vacation to the New Jersey shore area. They advised that during this trip, Bucolo
committed acts with their son that were “unbecoming a catholic priest.” It was recommended
that Bucolo be transferred immediately to another parish within the Diocese of Scranton. It was
also recommended that Bucolo see his personal physician.

McCormick memorialized the following on the memorandum:

Father Bucolo called to see me this afternoon at my direction. He readily

admitted the charge, insisting that once and once only did he commit an immoral
act with the individual mentioned above – while on vacation last summer. He
stated he had never before or since become involved in that way and said he was
very sorry. He claimed that it was in a moment of weakness it had occurred.

Bucolo agreed to go to St. John Vianney to see a psychiatrist. He was further advised
that he would be transferred from St. Lucy.

Bucolo was placed under Charter restrictions in June, 2002 due to his admissions to
abusing the 10-year-old boy.

815
Summary
On September 1, 2010, a 64-year-old male reported to the Diocese that he was sexually
abused by Bucolo when he was an eight-year-old altar boy. On September 7, 2010, the victim
met with the Victim Assistance Coordinator and agreed to meet with Bucolo face to face.

On September 8, 2010, the Diocese notified the Luzerne County District Attorney’s
Office of this allegation.

On September 20, 2010, the victim attended a meeting where he confronted Bucolo.
Bucolo told the victim that he did wrong and asked for forgiveness.

On December 9, 2010, the victim and Bucolo entered into a settlement agreement and
release of all claims for the agreed upon amount of $20,000.00.

816
 Monsignor Gerald J. Burns

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1924
YEAR OF DEATH: 1999
ORDINATION: June 3, 1950

Employment/Assignment History
6/1950 – 9/1950 Asst. Pastor, St. Ann, Shohola, PA
9/1950 – 9/1950 Asst. Pastor, St. Patrick, Wilkes-Barre, PA
9/1950 – 6/1952 Asst. Pastor, St. John, Honesdale, PA
6/1952 – 6/1953 Asst. Pastor, St. Peter, Wellsboro, PA
6/1953 – 9/1962 Asst. Pastor, St. John the Evangelist, Wilkes-Barre, PA
9/1962 – 9/1968 Asst. Pastor, St. Dominic, Wilkes-Barre, PA
9/1968 – 9/1970 Chaplain, Mercy Heights Hospital, Scranton, PA
9/1970 – 6/1982 Pastor, Blessed Sacraments, Wilkes-Barre, PA
6/1982 – 9/1984 Pastor, St. Gabriel, Hazleton, PA
9/1984 – 1/1994 Pastor, St. John the Evangelist, Pittston, PA
1/24/1994 Retired
1/1994 Pastor Emeritus, St. John the Evangelist, Pittston, PA

Summary

On January 11, 1994, Bishop James C. Timlin received a letter from a woman who
advised that her husband was sexually molested for years by Monsignor Gerald J. Burns during
the time when he was an altar server at St. John’s in the 1950’s.

On January 17, 1994, Timlin spoke to Burns and he denied any wrongdoing. Timlin
suggested that it would be best for him to retire. Burns agreed. Timlin accepted the resignation
effective January 24, 1994

On January 21, 1994, Timlin sent a letter to the victim and his wife apologizing for the
pain and hurt that the victim had experienced. He advised that Burns had resigned and would
never be assigned to another parish again. Timlin pledged to help both of them.

On February 15, 1994, Timlin notified the victim that the Diocese would assume
responsibility for the cost for his counseling. This responsibility was to be shared with Burns.

On April 26, 1996, Timlin notified the victim that he had to bring some closure to the
Diocese’s payments for his therapy.

On June 10, 1996, Timlin wrote a note wherein he indicated that he contacted the attorney
who represented the victim and requested that the attorney return his call. He also noted that he

817
Summary
had spoken with the victim and his wife, informing them that Burns had agreed to continue to
pay for counseling for the victim, without any admission of guilt. An arrangement was made
whereby the bills would be sent to the Chancery, who, in turn, would bill Burns. The victim
and his wife agreed to this arrangement.

In 1999, Burns passed away. Nothing could be located in the files to indicate that any
further assistance was provided to the victim after this event occurred.

818
 Reverend Anthony P. Conmy

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1927
YEAR OF DEATH: Unknown
ORDINATION: May 30, 1953

Employment/Assignment History
6/1953 – 9/1953 Asst. Pastor, St. Patrick, Milford, PA, St. Ann’s, Tobyhanna, PA
9/1953 – 10/1955 Asst. Pastor, St. Francis, West Hazleton, PA
10/1955 – Unknown Asst. Pastor, St. Patrick, Scranton, PA

Summary

On July 23, 1955, Rt. Reverend Monsignor Dennis Kane sent a letter to Bishop Jerome
D. Hannan advising that a situation in West Hazleton had been brought to his notice. He wrote
that:

It appears that Father Conmy is exposed to a danger because of a friendship

which is not good for him and which is the occasion of gossip. If my judgment is
correct and I think it is, a change to be effected when September comes around,
will mean much for his protection. My thought is that he should be sent to one
of the more remote parishes where the occasion would be remote. Moreover, he
might be instructed to stay away from this Deanery.

On August 5, 1955, Hannan responded to this letter by stating Conmy had agreed to
Hannan’s invitation for an interview. Hannan further stated that he felt that Kane’s suggestion
would be very acceptable to Comny since he had showed a willingness to cooperate in any
manner that seemed advisable.

On April 7, 2008, a 49-year-old female reported to the Diocese of Scranton that she was
sexually assaulted by Conmy when she was 10-years-old. She explained that she and a friend
had stopped at the rectory to talk to Conmy and thereafter got into a car with him. He dropped
off her friend at her home. Conmy then drove to a wooded area where he molested her. He
grabbed her wrist tightly and put his hand over her mouth as she struggled. He also put his knee
in her stomach in order to hold her down. When he removed his hand from her mouth, she
begged him not to kill her. Conmy told her that he would not kill her if she would lie quietly.
He then took her off her clothes and touched her. He took her hand and made her touch him.
Next, he performed oral sex on her. The victim wrote that:

my whole world was being turned up-side-down, all my perceptions of ow things

should be, of what good and bad were, or how people, especially priests, were
supposed to act, of who to trust, were shattered.

819
Summary

The victim requested that the Diocese not report this abuse to the Lycoming County District
Attorney’s Office. The Diocese agreed.

In a letter to the victim dated May 30, 2008, Bishop James F. Martino advised that
Comny had died. He offered to meet with her and assured her that the Diocese would assist her
with professional counseling services.

820
 Monsignor J. Peter Crynes

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1941
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 27, 1967

Employment/Assignment History
6/1967 – 9/1967 Asst. Director, Camp St. Andrew, Tunkhannock, PA
9/1967 – 9/1968 Asst. Pastor, St. Patrick, White Haven, PA
9/1968 – 9/1972 Asst. Pastor, Holy Rosary, Scranton, PA
9/1972 – 9/1975 Chaplain, St. Joseph’s Children’s and Maternity Hospital,
Scranton, PA
9/1975 – 6/1988 Director, Our Lady of Fatima Center, Elmhurst, PA
6/1988 – 7/1994 Pastor, Church of Corpus Christi, Montdale, PA
7/1994 – 5/2006 Pastor, St. Therese, Shavertown, PA
5/2006 Removed from active ministry
5/19/2006 Resigned

Summary

On March 2, 2006, the Diocese received a letter from a law firm stating they represented
a female that was sexually abused by Father J. Peter Crynes from 1974 until 1977. The abuse
began when she was 17 years old and Crynes kissed her at a retreat. Over the course of the next
three years, the abuse included fondling, fellatio and intercourse. At the suggestion of another
priest during the victim’s sophomore year at college, she confronted Crynes. When she did so,
he laughed at her and told her that he wanted to continue even once she was married.

On March 2, 2006 Bishop Joseph F. Martino issued a Decree that a preliminary

investigation be opened concerning the allegations against Crynes. The allegation was reported
to the Lackawanna County District Attorney’s Office on March 8, 2006.

The Diocese was made aware of another allegation of sexual abuse against Crynes on
March 7, 2006. A female reported that when she was 15 years of age, she suffered from anorexia
and her parents sent her to Crynes for counseling and direction. She stated that for two years
the counseling was fine but then she rebelled at her situation at home. Her parents called Crynes
to intervene. Crynes picked her up from a hotel and took her to Fatima Center for evaluation
and counseling. The first night there, Crynes came into her room, sat on her bed, lifted her
nightgown up and rubbed her thigh. A few days later, he stopped by to see her and asked her to
rub his shoulders. He pulled her around and sat her on his lap where she felt his erection. Later
that month, Crynes kissed her, putting his tongue in her mouth.

821
Summary
Upon returning home, the girl discovered that she was pregnant. Her parents were upset
and called Crynes for help. He came to the house and drove her to Keystone College. When
they arrived, he parked the car and pulled her over onto his lap. That was her last contact with
him.

On March 12, 2006, Father Kopacz met with Crynes about the allegations of the first two
women. He admitted to the sexual contact. He stated that he always saw his physical behavior
with women as gestures of loving paternal affection.

On March 29, 2006, the third woman met with Father Kopacz and the Diocesan Victim
Assistance Coordinator. It was discovered that she first consulted with Kopacz in 2002. She
had brought her concerns to Kopacz on the advice of her confessor and had difficulty
understanding why Kopacz did not take her concerns to Diocesan personnel. Kopacz explained
that he had been her confessor in the past and felt that her trust in him meant that he would not
reveal her experiences to anyone. He stressed that he believed her and that he never forgot what
she had revealed. Kopacz further explained to her that, at that time, there was no defined policy
mandating disclosure of such matters.

On May 19, 2006, Crynes resigned from St. Therese.

On June 6, 2006, a woman and her husband met with Kopacz and the woman revealed
that she was sexually abused by Crynes in 1970 and 1971 during her junior and senior years in
high school. She stated that it began with her going for rides to various points around the area
with Crynes after school. Crynes would park the car and pull her onto himself to hold and kiss
her. He kept it at the level of holding, touching and kissing, and told her they would only
progress to the level at which she was comfortable. He also told her that Jesus would say this
behavior was okay as a sign of their special friendship. Stated noted that she had written a letter
to Crynes in April, 2002 wherein she told him how she agonized over the years because of what
he did to her and how it ruined her life. She demanded an apology from him. That same month,
she received a letter from him. He asked her to please accept his deepest and most heartfelt
apology. He then asked her to forgive him for the pain and trauma she experienced.

On June 13, 2006, an adult female was interviewed by the Diocese. She was born in
October, 1957. Throughout the course of her senior year, she and other friends attended events
on a monthly basis (sometimes more than that) that were sponsored by the Diocese. Crynes was
at these events. She reported that the abuse involved hugging and kissing and, on one of those
occasions, he put his tongue in her mouth. She relayed that there was one occasion during the
Sacrament of Confession where Father Crynes hugged her and told her that God loved her very
much. He stated that he loved her and she was very special to God and very special to him. He
then put his mouth on her mouth with his tongue going in and out of her mouth like a snake. He
pulled her close to him and she could feel he had an erection. He continued to kiss her and was
moaning during it.

On June 21, 2011, the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith, issued a Decree that Crynes
was removed from any public ministry and shall live a life of prayer and penance.

822
Summary
On January 15, 2016, a law firm notified the Diocese that they represented a 59-year-old
woman who reported that she was repeatedly sexually molested by Crynes from approximately
1972 to 1973 when she was 16 to 17 years of age. She met him through an encounter program
sponsored by the Diocese. On January 21, 2016, the Diocese notified the Lackawanna County
District Attorney’s Office of these allegations.

The Diocese of Scranton assisted with therapy for those victims that followed through
with the protocol set up by the Diocese.

823
 Reverend Raymond L. Deviney

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1932
YEAR OF DEATH: Unknown
ORDINATION: May 23, 1959

Employment/Assignment History
6/1959 – 10/1959 Asst. Pastor, St. Mary of the Mount, Mt. Pocono, PA
10/1959 – 10/1960 Asst. Pastor, St. John Evangelist, Susquehanna, PA
10/1960 – 3/1964 Asst. Pastor, St. Thomas More, Lake Ariel, PA
3/1964 – 9/1968 Asst. Pastor, St. Gabriel’s, Hazleton, PA
9/1968 – 9/1969 Asst. Pastor, St. John Evangelist, Pittston, PA
9/1969 – 9/1976 Asst. Pastor, St. John Evangelist, Wilkes-Barre, PA
9/1976 – 7/2007 Pastor, Christ the King, Blakeslee, PA
7/2007 Pastor Emeritus, Christ the King, Blakeslee, PA

Summary

On October 8, 1994, an adult female informed Bishop James C. Timlin that she was
sexually abused by Father Raymond L. Deviney when she was a teenager in high school. She
stated that he repeatedly acted sexually inappropriately with her, placing his hand on her thigh
and asking her if she trusted him as he moved his hand further up her leg. She further reported
that when she approached Deviney and confided in him after losing a baby and her husband, he
took advantage of her and violated her. Timlin, in turn, sent her a letter dated January 6, 1995
wherein he apologized for Deviney’s actions. He informed her that he would address the matter
with Deviney and deal with it appropriately. Timlin asked that she contact him so he could talk
to her before he met with Deviney.

On June 17, 2001, the female wrote to Timlin, inquiring as to whether Deviney had ever
received treatment for his alcoholism and abuse of women. She indicated that she was touched
by his previous letter and telephone call and held onto the belief that the Bishop was a good and
honest man of deep religious faith. She told Timlin that she would be in the area on a certain
date and provided contact information for where she could be reached.

On July 9, 2001, Timlin sent the female a letter apologizing for the delay in his response
and for being unable to call her when she was in the Scranton area. He advised that he was not
aware of any formal treatment that Deviney had received. Furthermore, he stated that he did not
believe Deviney would ever admit that he had a problem with alcoholism and abuse of women.
He advised that Deviney was approximately 67 years old and it was unlikely that he would ever
see himself as a candidate for any kind of residential treatment. Timlin stated that he was sorry
that she was still upset about whatever had occurred between her and Deviney and that he hoped
that she would be able to put it all behind her.

824
Summary

On October 6, 2002, the female wrote a letter to Timlin, stressing that she had delayed
writing it because she was appalled by his complete change in attitude. She stated that she was
quite angry and distraught that the seriousness of Deviney’s actions had been swept under the
carpet.

On December 10, 2002, Timlin sent a letter to her wherein he apologized for giving her
the impression that her complaint was somehow “swept under the carpet” or not taken seriously.
He stated that he was finally able to talk to Deviney in person and reviewed her letter with him,
along with her request that he be given some treatment. While Deviney did not admit to doing
anything that was seriously wrong, he did agree to attend therapy. Timlin stated that he hoped
that this would be of some help to Deviney and would be a source of peace of mind for her.

On May 6, 2006, the Diocese sent a certified letter to each of the District Attorney’s
Offices within the Diocese. The District Attorneys were notified by Bishop Joseph Bambera that
in in an effort to further the Church’s ongoing commitment to transparency as it continues to
address the sad reality of child sexual abuse, he was submitting for their information a
confidential comprehensive list of all priests in the Diocese of Scranton against whom
accusations of sexual abuse of children had been made. While Deviney’s name was on the list,
the incident involving the female was not reported.

The Diocesan file indicates that the allegation against Deviney was unsubstantiated.

825
Biographical Information

Employment/Assignment History

Summary

On , the Diocese of was notified by a law firm that their client, a

, was by when

No report was sent to the District Attorney’s Office

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&
-*5*("5*0/
826
 Reverend Donald J. Dorsey

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1929
YEAR OF DEATH: 2007
ORDINATION: June 4, 1955

Employment/Assignment History
6/1955 – 10/1955 Asst. Pastor, St. Ann, Shohola, PA
10/1955 – 2/1959 Asst. Pastor, St. Leo, Ashley, PA,
2/1959 - 10/1959 Faculties withdrawn, Sent to Hospice
10/1959 - 12/1960 Asst. Pastor, St. Ann, Shohola, PA, Faculties reinstated
12/1960 Sent to Hospice
6/29/1964 Faculties revoked

Summary

On February 3, 1959 and February 6, 1959, the Diocese of Scranton received two
complaints about Father Donald J. Dorsey. One complaint indicated that Dorsey was with a
high school girl. The other complaint indicated that Dorsey was creating scandal by spending
time with - - and being too close with - - females in the town. On February 13, 1959, Bishop
Hannon directed Dorsey to report to hospice and that his faculties were to be withdrawn. He
further directed that Dorsey was forbidden to enter any house in Ashley, or in the territory of St.
Leo’s parish, and that he was forbidden to meet at any place under any circumstances - - or to
communicate in any way with - - any person of the female sex whose domicile or quasi-domicile
was at this time, or at any time within the territory of Ashley or within the territory of St. Leo’s
parish.

On October 1, 1959, the Diocese reinstated Dorsey and appointed him to St. Ann. With
this appointment, Hannon forbid Dorsey to visit any homes in Ashley or Wilkes-Barre. Dorsey
was again placed in hospice.

On June 29, 1964, Hannon revoked the faculties of the Diocese for Dorsey.

Hannon subsequently received inquiries from the Diocese of New York and the Diocese
of Burlington, Vermont about Dorsey. Hannon notified them that Dorsey was an incorrigible
recidivist. He advised that Dorsey was first sent to the Diocesan hospice after he became
sexually involved with a high school girl.

Dorsey was listed as withdrawing from the Diocese in 1975.

827
Biographical Information

Employment/Assignment History

Summary

A letter dated was sent to the Diocese from a parishioner who advised
that during the previous Sunday, she had received a telephone call from a local police officer
who asked her to meet him at the police station.

On the Diocese received an anonymous letter from a parishioner

who reported that
.

. The Diocese referred the anonymous letter

to the District Attorney’s Office. was questioned and denied the
allegation.

On , the Diocese sent a letter to the District Attorney’s

Office recounting an allegation that was made by . It was written
that

828 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

-*5*("5*0/
Summary

829 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

-*5*("5*0/
 Reverend John M. Duggan

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: Unknown
YEAR OF DEATH: Unknown
ORDINATION: Unknown

Employment/Assignment History
5/1988 Asst. Pastor, St. Paul, Scranton, PA

Summary

Father John M. Duggan was assigned to the Jesuit community in Scranton in the 1970s.
In the late 1980s, he was approved by the Diocese of Scranton to assist pastors in the area. Then,
in 1988, Bishop James C. Timlin appointed Duggan to be the Assistant Pastor at St. Paul.

In 1993, Duggan was sent for a psychological evaluation and admitted to sexually
abusing young children in his early priesthood. He denied that any of the abuse occurred within
the Diocese. Upon his release, Timlin reinstated Duggan. However, Duggan was restricted to
supervised ministry and was required to meet regularly with his aftercare counseling team.

On December 11, 1996, an adult male reported to Timlin that he was sexually abused by
Duggan in the 1970s when he was a teenager engaged in spiritual counseling at the Jesuit house
in Scranton. Timlin thereafter imposed a ban on Duggan’s parish work and restricted him to
convent and prison ministry.

In 1999, the same male reported that he believed Duggan was participating in
unsupervised ministry. The Diocesan Review Board recommended to Timlin that the only
ministries that would be open to Duggan were the celebration of mass and the administration of
sacraments in correctional facilities, nursing homes and convents.

In May, 2002, the male contacted the Diocese and requested assurances that Duggan
posed no threat to young people. Timlin then suggested to the Maryland Provincial that it would
not be a good idea for Duggan to return to Scranton. The Provincial notified Timlin that Duggan
had been removed from the Jesuit Community in Scranton.

The victim reported his sexual abuse to the Lackawanna County District Attorney’s
Office but the statute of limitations had expired. Paperwork was located wherein it indicated
that the Jesuit Community provided free tuition to the victim’s children and transferred Duggan
from the Jesuit Community in Scranton.

830
 Reverend John J. Dzurko

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1904
YEAR OF DEATH: 1991
ORDINATION: May 21, 1932

Employment/Assignment History
6/1932 – 9/1932 Asst. Pastor, St. Joseph’s, Matamoras, PA
9/1932 – 10/1932 Asst. Pastor, St. Mary’s, Wilkes-Barre, PA
10/1932 – 6/1934 Asst. Pastor, St. Patrick’s, White Haven, PA
6/1934 – 9/1934 Asst. Pastor, St. Mary’s, Lackawaxen, PA
9/1934 – 2/1938 Asst. Pastor, Holy Trinity, Hazleton, PA
2/1938 – 6/1943 Pastor, St. Michael’s, Forest City, PA
6/1943 – 9/1959 Pastor, Holy Trinity, Simpson, PA
9/1959 – 1/1970 Pastor, St. Joseph’s, Nanticoke, PA
1/1970 – 9/1979 Pastor, St. Joseph’s, Wilkes-Barre, PA
9/1979 – 8/1991 Pastor Emeritus, St. Joseph’s, Wilkes-Barre, PA

Summary

On November 28, 2005, the Diocese of Scanton received a complaint from a 48-year-old
female who stated that she was sexually molested by Father John J. Dzurko in 1957 when she
was 11 years of age. The Diocese believed the victim to credible and deserved to receive
assistance in healing from her childhood trauma. The Diocese subsequently paid the cost of art
therapy for the victim.

831
 Reverend James F. Farry

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1921
YEAR OF DEATH: 1990
ORDINATION: June 29, 1946

Employment/Assignment History
7/1946 – 6/1948 Asst. Pastor, Our Lady of Mt. Carmel, Carbondale, PA
6/1948 – 1/1953 Asst. Pastor, St. Francis, Scranton, PA
1/1953 Suffered aneurysm, Confined to hospital
1/1954 – 5/1960 Resident, St. Michael’s School for Boys, Hoban Heights, PA
6/1960 Cure of Ars Hospice
9/1966 – 9/1968 Asst. Pastor, St. Mary, Old Forge, PA
9/1968 – 11/1976 Chaplain, St. Mary’s Villa, Elmhurst, PA
11/1976 – 6/1990 In Residence, St. Boniface, Williamsport, PA

Summary

In January 1953, Father James F. Farry suffered an aneurism and was unable to perform
full time duties during his recovery.

On January 1, 1954, Farry was assigned to St. Michael’s School for Boys. On May 29.
1960, Farry was notified by Bishop Hannan that his relations with the guests of St. Michael’s
had made it intolerable for him to continue to live there. Additionally, Hannan stated that since
he would not be able to meet the responsibilities of the ministry in any available post which
needed priestly service, Farry was invited to take up residence at the Cure of Ars Hospice.

On August 21, 2006, the Diocese received a report that resident at St. Michael’s from
1953 to 1954 stated that he was sexually abused by a Father Collins. The victim later revealed
that it was Farry.

The Diocese filed a report of the abuse with the District Attorney’s Office of Wyoming
County.

The Diocese agreed to assume responsibility for the co-payments associated with the
victim’s psychological counseling services.

832
 Reverend James F. Fedor

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1947
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 12, 1973

Employment/Assignment History
5/1973 – 9/1977 Asst. Pastor, Holy Trinity, Swoyersville, PA
9/1977 – 9/1979 Asst. Pastor, St. Peter’s, Scranton, PA
9/1979 – 9/1980 Asst. Pastor, St. John the Evangelist, Scranton, PA
9/1980 – 6/1982 Asst. Pastor, St. Rose of Lima, Carbondale, PA
6/1982 – 7/1983 Asst. Pastor, St. Patrick’s, Scranton, PA
7/1983 – 9/1983 Administrator, St. Mary’s, Avoca, PA
9/1983 – 9/1984 Chaplain, Holy Family Residence, Scranton, PA
9/1984 – 8/1985 Pastor, St. Joseph, Wilkes-Barre, PA
8/1985 – 7/1986 Pastor, Holy Ghost, Olyphant, PA
7/1986 – 1/1987 Administrator, Christ the King, Dunmore, PA
9/1987 – 7/1991 Chaplain, Holy Family Residence, Scranton, PA
7/08/1991 Indefinite leave of Absence
5/03/1994 Laicized

Summary

From 1981 to 1986, Father James F. Fedor sought counseling on his own for
issues/concerns relating to his desire to have contact with young girls. From 1986 to 1987,
Fedor received psychological treatment/evaluation.

On July 7, 1991, Fedor was granted an indefinite leave of absence by Bishop James C.
Timlin and he was laicized on May 3, 1994.

On November 1, 2012, the Diocese of Scranton received an anonymous letter from an

adult female. She claimed that Fedor abused her in 1978 when she was 10-years-old. She stated
that he engaged in grooming behavior which led to sexual abuse for a period of two years.

On November 15, 2012, a letter was sent to the Lackawanna County District Attorney’s
Office about the allegation.

833
 Reverend Ralph N. Ferraldo

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1943
YEAR OF DEATH: 1997
ORDINATION: May 10, 1970

Employment/Assignment History
5/1970 – 9/1970 Asst. Pastor, St. Mary, Jessup, PA
9/1970 – 9/1976 Asst. Pastor, St. Francis, Nanticoke, PA
9/1976 – 9/1979 Catechist, Bishop O’Reilly High School, Kingston, PA
In Residence, Maternity BVM, Wilkes-Barre, PA
9/1979 – 9/1980 Chaplain, St. Joseph Hospital, Carbondale, PA
9/1980 – 9/1984 Our Lady of Grace, Hazleton, PA
9/1984 – 2/1986 Chaplain, GWV Medical Center
2/1986 – 11/1986 Leave of Absence
11/1986 – 11/1988 In Residence, St. Boniface, Williamsport, PA
11/22/1988 Leave of Absence
11/30/1988 Indefinite Leave of Absence, removed from active ministry

Summary

On December 3, 1974, Chancellor James C. Timlin received a telephone call from a

female who stated that her 16-year-old son had been touched by Father Ralph N. Ferraldo in an
immoral manner. She further reported that Ferraldo had done this to other altar boys and to an
orderly at a local hospital. The female did not want to provide her name. When questioned by
Timlin and Bishop J. Carroll McCormick, Ferraldo denied the allegations. He did admit that he
had older boys visit his room in the rectory, but nothing wrong had occurred. He was asked not
to do that anymore. Ferraldo thereafter asked for a transfer out of Nanticoke if things were being
said about him. He was informed that it was their understanding that the talk was not widespread
and it would be an admission of guilt for him to be moved.

The caller was subsequently notified of the meeting between McCormick, Timlin and
Ferraldo. She maintained that her son was telling the truth. She was told that if she wanted to
pursue the matter, her son would have to come forward and face Ferraldo. Timlin pointed out
that it was possible that her son was mistaken.

An October 3, 1985 note in the Diocesan records reveals that an evaluation on Ferraldo
was undertaken after a report of inappropriate behavior with a hospital patient was received.

On February 14, 1986, two staff members from Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical
Center called Timlin to report that Ferraldo made improper sexual advances against a 23-year-

834
Summary
old male patient. Ferraldo admitted to this allegation, stating that he did not know what comes
over him.

Ferraldo agreed to immediately leave his assignment and not return to the hospital.
Timlin instructed Ferraldo to make arrangements for other priests to cover his masses and to tell
them that he was not feeling well. He was further directed to report for evaluation and
counseling.

On November 30, 1988, Timlin granted Ferraldo an indefinite leave of absence.

On May 14, 2002, the Archdiocese of New York notified the Diocese of Scranton that a
male had reported that he was sexually abused by Ferraldo in 1982-1983 when he was 16 or 17
years of age. On June 6, 2002, Father Kopacz, Vicar for Priests, wrote that he had spoken with
the victim and advised him that Ferraldo was removed from the ministry in the late 1980s and
that he died in the early 1990s. The victim informed Kopacz that he did not report the sexual
misconduct in order to expose Ferraldo, to embarrass the Church, or, to bring suit against the
Church. Instead, he revealed the abuse for the sake of reconciliation.

835
 Reverend Angelus Ferrara

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: Unknown
YEAR OF DEATH: Unknown
ORDINATION: 1990

Employment/Assignment History
ASSIGNMENTS: N/A

Summary

On September 20, 2000, Bishop James C. Timlin received a request from Father Angelus
Ferrara to establish the Society of the Annunciation of the Lord, which would serve as a retreat
for priests and lay persons. The facilities were also to include the Mary Mother of God
Monastery. Ferrara wanted to settle this religious community and monastery in the eastern part
of Pennsylvania; however, he needed the sponsorship of a Diocesan Bishop in order to do so.

Upon receiving the approval from Rome, Timlin notified Ferrara that he was willing to
receive him into the Diocese of Scranton for the purpose of establishing the new religious
community as of January 1, 2001. The Society of the Annunciation of the Lord was not to
become a separate parish, however, so as to take people away from their local churches and be
viewed as a competitor. The community settled in Warren Center.

On November 26, 2003, Ferrara asked for the transfer of canonical sponsorship from the
Diocese to the Eparchy of Newton for Melkite Greek Catholics in the USA.

On January 10, 2011, the Executive Director of Catholic Charities received a report from
the mother of a 14-year-old boy who revealed that he was sexually abused by Ferrara at the
retreat house. It was reported that Ferrara had the boy massage his male parts. Ferrara admitted
that this conduct occurred.

On March 28, 2011, Ferrara was terminated from his monastic venture. He was
criminally charged and pled guilty. He was sentenced to state prison.

836
 Reverend Austin E. Flanagan

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1941
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 28, 1966

Employment/Assignment History
6/1966 – 9/1966 Parochial Vicar, Queen of Peace, Hawley, PA
9/1966 – 9/1969 Parochial Vicar, Nativity of BVM, Tunkhannock, PA
9/1969 – 9/1971 Parochial Vicar, St. Mary’s, Avoca, PA
9/1971 – 9/1973 Parochial Vicar, St. Ignatius, Kingston, PA
9/1973 – 9/1975 Parochial Vicar, St. Mary, Avoca, PA
9/1975 – 9/1979 Chaplain, Little Flower Manor, Wilkes-Barre, PA
9/1979 – 9/1980 Pastor, St. Thomas the Apostle, Elkland, PA
9/1980 – 6/1982 Pastor, St. Francis of Assisi, Mildred, PA
6/1982 – 9/1985 Pastor, St. Mark, Inkerman, PA
9/1985 – 9/1986 Pastor, St. Agnes, Forest City, PA
9/1986 – 4/1990 Pastor, Blessed Sacrament & St. John the Baptist,
Wilkes-Barre, PA
4/1990 – 6/1990 Sick Leave
6/1990 – 6/1993 Residence, St. Thomas Aquinas, Archbald, PA
6/1993 – 7/1994 Residence, St. Lucy, Scranton, PA
7/1994 – 7/1998 Residence, Most Precious Blood, Hazleton, PA
Chaplain, St. Joseph Medical Center, Hazleton, PA
71998 – 9/1999 Residence, St. Francis of Assisi, West Hazleton, PA
Chaplain, St. Joseph Medical Center, Hazleton, PA
7/2002 Removed from active ministry

Summary

On September 11, 1980, Bishop J. Carroll McCormick received a letter from a

parishioner who advised that the parishioners were disgusted with Father Austin E. Flanagan.
The letter stated that Flanagan would not let anyone in the rectory and that he was sleeping in
sleeping bags with young boys.

On June 27, 1990, Bishop James C. Timlin received a letter from Dr. Richard D. Malone,
Associate Medical Director, St. Vincent’s Hospital and Medical Center in Harrison, New York
concerning Flanagan. The letter was sent upon the request of, and with the permission of,
Flanagan himself.

Flanagan related that approximately one month prior to his admission to St. Vincent’s
Hospital, he had been questioned about fondling two boys at a summer camp two years earlier.

837
Summary
The boys had reported it to another priest who, in turn, reported it to Timlin. Flanagan told
Malone that he did not deny what happened. However, he stated, “I thought they were asleep
and also I had a lot to drink.” Flanagan acknowledge that several other similar instances in the
past had occurred.

There was no information in the files concerning the identity of the two boys.

On July 3, 2002, Flanagan was removed from active ministry.

In June, 2005, the Diocese was contacted by a 34-year-old male who claimed that he was
sodomized by Flanagan in the rectory at St. Mary’s in 1973 when he was 11-years-old. Flanagan
was questioned by Father Kopacz and denied any wrongdoing.

On June 27, 2005, the Diocese of Scranton reported the allegation to the Luzerne County
District Attorney’s Office.

On May 6, 2016, the Diocese sent a certified letter to each of the District Attorney’s
Offices within the Diocese. The letter included a list that contained the names of all priests
against whom complaints of sexual abuse of minors had been made. Flanagan’s name was on
the list and several victims were identified.

838
 Reverend Joseph D. Flannery

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1928
YEAR OF DEATH: 2005
ORDINATION: May 30, 1953

Employment/Assignment History
6/1953 – 6/1959 Asst. Pastor, St. John, Honesdale, PA
6/1959 – 4/1963 Asst. Pastor, St. John, Pittston, PA
4/1963 – 6/1963 Asst. Pastor, Holy Savior, Wilkes-Barre, PA
6/1963 – 9/1966 Asst. Pastor, Ascension, Williamsport, PA
9/1966 – 9/1967 Asst. Pastor, Sacred Heart, Jermyn, PA
9/1967 – 9/1970 Asst. Pastor, St. Jude, Mountain Top, PA
9/1970 – 9/1980 Pastor, St. Francis of Assisi, Mildred, PA
9/1980 – 9/1985 Pastor, St. Patrick, Nicholson, PA
9/1985 – 3/2000 Pastor, Immaculate Conception, Taylor, PA
3/2000 Pastor Emeritus, Immaculate Conception, Taylor, PA

Summary

In 1964, 1965 and 1966, the Diocese of Scranton received letters about Father Joseph D.
Flannery’s affairs with women, his dating a young girl and getting her pregnant, and, being seen
on vacation in Atlantic City with this female. The letters were received from a member of the
clergy, a parishioner and the mother of the young girl.

Nothing was found in the file reflecting an investigation or questioning of the priest.

The matter was not referred to the District Attorney’s Office.

On May 6, 2016, the Diocese sent a certified letter to each of the District Attorney’s
Offices within the Diocese. The letter included a list that contained the names of all priests
against whom complaints of sexual abuse of minors had been made. Flannery was included on
that list.

839
 Reverend Martin J. Fleming

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1869
YEAR OF DEATH: 1950
ORDINATION: September 14, 1898

Employment/Assignment History
9/1898 – 11/1898 Cathedral, Scranton, PA
11/1898 – 3/1899 Wellsboro, PA
3/1899 – 4/1899 Plymouth, PA
4/1899 – 1901 Sugar Notch, PA, St. John’s, Scranton, PA
1901 - 1902 Hazleton, PA
1902 – 1907 Freeland, PA
1907 – 1919 Moscow, PA
1919 – Unknown Swoyersville, PA

Summary

On April 14, 2006, the Diocese of Venice, Florida notified the Diocese of Scranton that
a female victim had reported that she was sexually abused by Father Martin F. Fleming in 1940
when she was six-years-old. The victim reported that she underwent counseling over the years.

On June 30, 2006, the victim met with Bishop Dougherty and other members of the
Diocese. She noted that she was in heart failure and “wants to put all of her ducks in a row.”
She stated that she desired to be counted as a victim of a priest from the Diocese of Scranton.
She advised that this deepest secret came back again and again to trouble her spirit and cause
her emotional distress.

Dougherty called the abuse an abomination, expressing his deep sorrow for the wounding
of her child self. The victim was strongly encouraged to consult with a woman therapist or
trusted female friend.

On May 6, 2016, the Diocese sent a certified letter to each of the District Attorney’s
Offices within the Diocese. The letter included a list that contained the names of all priests
against whom complaints of sexual abuse of minors had been made. Fleming was included on
that list.

840
 Reverend Robert J. Gibson

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1932
YEAR OF DEATH: 2012
ORDINATION: May 31, 1958

Employment/Assignment History
6/1958 – 10/1958 Camp St. Andrew, Tunkhannock, PA
10/1958 – 9/1965 Asst. Pastor, St. Paul, Scranton, PA
9/1965 – 9/1968 Asst. Pastor, St. Matthew, Stroudsburg, PA
9/1968 – 1/1974 Asst. Pastor, St. Luke, Stroudsburg, PA
1/1974 – 9/1982 Administrator, Our Lady Queen of Peace, Broadheadsville, PA
9/1982 – 1/1983 Pastor, St. John Bosco, Conyngham, PA
1/1983 – 1/1995 Pastor, St. Bernadette, Canadensis, PA
1995 Resigns as Pastor, St. Bernadette
1/1995 – 8/1995 Leave of Absence
8/1995 – 1997 Residence, St. Ignatius Rectory, Kingston, PA
2/01/1998 Faculties removed

Summary

On January 5, 1995, the Diocese of Scranton was contacted by an attorney representing

a man who claimed to have been sexually abused by Father Robert J. Gibson in 1975 when the
victim was 14 years old. Gibson admitted to the sexual misconduct. A civil action was filed
against the Diocese and a $30,000 settlement was reached.

On January 9, 1995, Gibson resigned as pastor of St. Bernadette. He was admitted to St.
John Vianney Hospital in Downington for evaluation and treatment.

In August 1995, Gibson was discharged with a recommendation that he reside at a parish
under supervision and continue to receive therapy. He was placed in residence at St. Ignatius
Rectory.

In the spring of 1997, a complaint was received from a mother who accused Gibson of
“grooming behavior” involving her son. Gibson was re-admitted to St. John Vianney Hospital
for further assessment.

On September 16, 1997, the decision was made that Gibson could no longer exercise
priestly ministry or reside in a Diocesan facility. He remained under supervision until he was
able to be placed in a residential treatment facility.

841
Summary
On February 1, 1998, Gibson was placed in the St. John Vianney Renewal Center in
Dittmer, Missouri. The facility monitors priests so as to prevent any behavior that would be
harmful to the faithful. Bishop James C. Timlin removed Gibson’s priestly faculties and
directed him to refrain from wearing clerical attire outside of the Renewal Center. Gibson
refused to seek voluntary laicization.

On February 26, 1998, the Diocese received information that Gibson was involved in
sexual misconduct with his nephew, who was a minor at the time.

On April 5, 2002, the Diocese received a letter from an adult male who accused Gibson
of sexual misconduct and providing pornographic material to him when he was a minor. A copy
of the letter were shared with law enforcement.

On October 5, 2005, the Diocese was contacted by an adult male who reported that
Gibson sexually assaulted him when he was a minor. The victim sought financial compensation.
Gibson admitted to the allegations and arranged to pay the victim $700 a month until his own
death.

On July 16, 2007, an adult male reported to the Diocese that he was sexually abused by
Gibson frrom 1973 through 1974. The Monroe County District Attorney’s Office was notified
of the allegations. The Diocese offered to arrange for counseling for the victim and to arrange
for the victim to meet with the Bishop. The victim declined. Gibson was questioned about the
allegations but had no memory of the allegations. Gibson was diagnosed with dementia.

842
 Monsignor Joseph G. Gilgallon

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1934
YEAR OF DEATH: 1991
ORDINATION: May 23, 1959

Employment/Assignment History
6/1959 – 6/1966 Asst. Pastor, St. Basil, Dushore, PA
6/1966 – 9/1966 Asst. Pastor, St. Francis, Eagles Mere, PA
9/1966 – 9/1972 Pastor, St. Ignatius, Kingston, PA
9/1972 – 9/1985 Pastor, St. Peter, Scranton, PA
9/1985 – 9/1987 Pastor, St. Therese, Shavertown, PA
9/1987 – 2/1991 Pastor, St. Francis, West Hazleton, PA

Summary

On January 31, 2006, the Diocese of Scranton was notified that a 40-year-old adult male
who was undergoing counseling had alleged that he was sexually abused by Monsignor Joseph
G. Gilgallon on December 31, 1986. Although the Diocese could not locate any paperwork that
the incident had been reported by the victim, the Diocese spoke with other priests in service
during that time period and confirmed that the abuse took place in the rectory. Counseling was
continued for the victim.

On May 6, 2016, the Diocese sent a certified letter to each of the District Attorney’s
Offices within the Diocese. The letter included a list that contained the names of all priests
against whom complaints of sexual abuse of minors had been made. Gilgallon was included in
that list.

843
 Reverend Joseph A. Griffin

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1901
YEAR OF DEATH: 1988
ORDINATION: June 11, 1927

Employment/Assignment History
6/1927 – 9/1927 Asst. Pastor, St. Matthew, East Stroudsburg, PA
9/1927 – 2/1928 Asst. Pastor, St. Andrew, Blossburg, PA
2/1928 – 9/1929 Asst. Pastor, Annunciation, Williamsport, PA
9/1929 – 1/1932 Studies – Catholic University
1/1932 – 9/1938 Chaplain, & Teacher, Marywood College, Scranton, PA
9/1938 – 6/1944 Chaplain, St. Joseph Children and Maternity Hospital,
Scranton, PA
6/1944 – 9/1951 Pastor, St. Catherine, Moscow, PA
9/1951 – 9/1952 Administrator, St. Basil, Dushore, PA
9/1952 – 1/1967 Pastor, St’s Peter & Paul, Towanda, PA
1/1967 – 9/1974 Pastor, St. Mary, Avoca, PA
9/1974 – 9/1976 Chaplain, Marian Convent, Scranton, PA
9/1976 Retired
5/1980 – 7/1980 Part-time Administrator, St. Catherine, Moscow, PA
7/1980 Part-time Administrator, Blessed Sacrament, Hughestown, PA

Summary

In September, 2009, the Diocese of Scranton was contacted by a 42-year-old male who
reported that he was sexually abused by Father Joseph A. Griffin in 1967 when he was nine
years old. This occurred when Griffin took the victim and other boys on boat trips to Seneca
Lake, NY and to a summer cottage at Lake Henry in the Poconos. The caller stated that Griffin
touched him, rubbed his backside and slept with his arm around him. The victim stated that he
did not wish to pursue any action against the Diocese; rather, he just wanted the Diocese to be
aware of what had occurred.

The victim contacted the Diocese again in 2011, just wanting to talk about what had
happened to him.

844
 Reverend P. Lawrence Homer

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1933
YEAR OF DEATH: 2015
ORDINATION: May 23, 1959

Employment/Assignment History
8/1959 – 10/1961 Asst. Pastor, Vicar, Holy Rosary, Scranton, PA
10/1961 – 6/1964 Asst. Pastor, St. John the Baptist, Scranton, PA
3/1965 – 9/1965 Asst. Pastor, Gate of Heaven, Dallas, PA
9/1965 – 9/1966 Asst. Pastor, Holy Trinity, Hazleton, PA
9/1966 – 2/1967 Asst. Pastor, St. Boniface, Williamsport, PA
2/1967 – 1/1970 Asst. Pastor, Queen of Peace, Hawley, PA
1/1970 – 1/1977 Asst. Pastor, St. John the Baptist, Pittston, PA
1/1977 – 10/1993 Pastor, Holy Trinity, Hazleton, PA
9/1987 – 10/1993 Pastor, Our Lady of Mt. Carmel, Hazleton, PA
10/1993 Resignation Effective October 03, 1993
10/1993 – 7/1994 Residence, Marian Convent, Marywood College, Scranton, PA
7/1994 – 6/2002 Residence, Our Lady Queen of Peace Rectory,
Brodheadsville, PA
7/03/2002 Removed from ministry

Summary

On January 15, 1967, Father Post was advised that Father P. Lawrence Homer had a 14-
year-old female in his locked office for the duration of an entire class period. It was reported
that he engaged in a sexual conversation with her wherein he asked her about her “sex hair” and
the development of her breasts and nipples. He told her that while she was only 14 years old,
she had the body of an 18-year-old.

Post was also made aware of a second victim that Homer brought into his office. This
victim was also approximately 14 years old. It was reported that she was in his locked office
for more than one hour. During that time period, he asked her sexual questions about herself
and told her that one day he would have her come to his office and he would undress her. He
also took her into the examination room next to the health office where he unbuttoned the front
of her blouse, french-kissed her and stated that she “would be nice to marry even though it meant
leaving the Priesthood.” Homer was subsequently transferred to another parish.

On January 24, 1988, a female notified the Diocese that she was sexually molested by
Homer in 1964 when she was 14 years old. She advised that Homer had fondled her breasts
under her blouse.

845
Summary
The Diocese received multiple complaints from adult female victims over the years who
alleged that they were sexually involved with Homer during a fragile time in their lives. One
incident involved a nun whom Homer touched, hugged and kissed.

Homer was sent for evaluation and treatment on two separate occasions. Information
contained within the Diocesan files was very vague, however. None of the incidents were
reported to law enforcement.

He was removed from ministry in July 2002.

846
 Reverend Mark A. Honart

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1946
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: February 2, 1980

Employment/Assignment History
2/1980 – 8/1981 Asst. Pastor, Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary,
Kansas City, MO
8/1981 – 7/1986 Asst. Pastor, Holy Cross, Kansas City, MO
7/1986 – 10/1990 Pastor, St. Patrick’s, St. Joseph, MO
10/1990 – 1/1991 Sabbatical Leave
1/1991 – 6/1991 Asst. Pastor, Immaculate Conception, Kansas City, MO
6/1991 – 8/2000 Pastor, Immaculate Conception, Richmond, MO
8/2000 – 1/2001 Pastor, St. Rose of Lima, Savannah, MO
1/2001 – 1/2004 On loan to the Archdiocese of Santa Fe, NM
6/2004 – 6/2009 On loan to the Diocese of Scranton
6/2004 – 6/2005 Asst. Pastor, St. Rose of Lima, Carbondale, MO
6/2005 – 7/2007 Administrator, St. Anthony, St. Bridget, St. John the Baptist,
Throop, PA
7/2007 – 7/2010 Administrator, Our Lady Help of Christians, Dorrance, PA
6/12/2009 Excardinated to the Diocese of Kansas City
6/13/2009 Incardinated to the Diocese of Scranton
7/2010 – 2/2011 Asst. Pastor, Ascension, Forest City, PA; St. Katherine Drexel,
Pleasant Mount, PA
2/03/2011 Faculties removed

Summary

On February 2, 2011, the Diocese of Scranton was notified by the Diocese of Kansas
City that there was an allegation that Father Mark A. Honart had sexually abused a young boy
in 1985-1986 when he was in the fourth grade at Holy Cross. The Diocese of Scranton withdrew
Honart’s faculties and notified local law enforcement. Arrangements were made to relay the
incident to law enforcement in Kansas City. In 2015, the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph
reached a settlement with the victim in the civil lawsuit.

On February 3, 2011, Honart was assigned to a leave of absence for health reasons.

847
 Reverend Joseph F. Houston

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1937
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: February 8, 1964

Employment/Assignment History
3/1964 – 9/1966 Asst. Pastor, St. Thomas More, Lake Ariel, PA
9/1966 – 9/1970 Asst. Pastor, St. Peter, Wellsboro, PA
9/1970 – 6/1977 Asst. Pastor, St. Paul, Scranton, PA
9/1977 – 9/1980 Pastor, Holy Child, Mansfield, PA
9/1980 – 9/1982 Pastor, St. Thomas More, Lake Ariel, PA
9/1982 Resigned
11/1982 – 6/2002 Pastor, St. Vincent de Paul, Plymouth, PA
6/2002 Removal from ministry

Summary

On June 29, 1971, Father George Jeffrey reported to Bishop J. Carroll McCormick that
Father Joseph F. Houston and a minor female were observed going into a motel room late at
night on multiple occasions. They had also been seen together in public on a regular basis.

On May 4, 2002, Bishop James C. Timlin received a letter from this female victim,
advising that Houston had taken advantage of her from the age of 14 to the age of 17. She asked
that the incident not be brought to the attention of law enforcement. On May 11, 2002, Houston
sent a letter to her, apologizing for the pain that he caused her by his inexcusable behavior.

On June 28, 2002, Houston was removed from his priestly duties by the Diocese.

On July 06, 2004, Pope John Paul II granted Houston dispensation.

On May 6, 2016, the Diocese sent a certified letter to each of the District Attorney’s
Offices within the Diocese. The letter included a list that contained the names of all priests
against whom complaints of sexual abuse of minors had been made. Houston’s name was on the
list along with the name of the victim.

848
Biographical Information

Employment/Assignment History

Summary

On received a letter from an individual

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&
-*5*("5*0/
849
Biographical Information

Employment/Assignment History

Summary

The Diocese of Scranton received complaints from three adult males who claimed that
they were sexually molested by in the 1970’s during the time period
when they the . The first two complaints
were received in 2007.

The Diocese issued a Decree that the allegations were to be investigated. A private
detective was hired. Although the two victims were shown photo line-ups containing
photographs of priests from the 1970’s, they could not positively identify . The Diocese
determined that the complaints were unsubstantiated but did offer to pay for counseling for the
two victims. Law enforcement was not notified.

In 2014, the Diocese received the complaint from the third victim who alleged that he
was sexually molested by . The Diocese listed this complaint as unsubstantiated.
However, it was referred to law enforcement.
850 3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

-*5*("5*0/
 Reverend Francis G. Kulig

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1948
YEAR OF DEATH: Unknown
ORDINATION: May 18, 1974

Employment/Assignment History
6/1974 – 9/1974 Asst. Pastor, St. Matthew, East Stroudsburg, PA
9/1974 – 9/1979 Asst. Pastor, Immaculate Conception, Scranton, PA
9/1979 – 10/1985 Asst. Pastor, St. John the Evangelist, Wilkes-Barre, PA
10/1985 – 9/1986 Asst. Nativity BVM, Tunkhannock, PA
9/1986 – 8/1987 Pastor, St. Mary of the Lake, Lake Winola, PA
8/01/1987 Resigned from St. Mary of the Lake
9/1987 – 1/2001 Chaplain, Mercy Center Convent, Dallas, PA
1/2001 – 6/2002 Chaplain, Holy Family Residence, Scranton, PA,
7/03/2002 Removed from ministry

Summary

On November 4, 1986, a concerned father wrote a letter to the Diocese of Scranton

wherein he alleged that his son was sexually molested by Father Francis G. Kulig beginning in
1979 when the boy was 12 years old. The abuse continued until Kulig was transferred on
October 2, 1985. It was alleged that there was mutual masturbation, oral sex and anal sex.

When he was interviewed, Kulig admitted to having a relationship with the victim. He
stated that mutual masturbation was the only activity that occurred.

On December 30, 1986, Bishop Timlin acknowledged that Kulig would receive
treatment. He underwent treatment from February 17, 1987 through August 14, 1987.

At the request of Timlin, Kulig submitted his resignation from St. Mary of the Lake.

Following his treatment, Kulig was assigned to the Mercy Center Convent. Upon
learning of this assignment, the victim’s father began writing Timlin, expressing his concerns
that Kulig was still a priest.

A sum of $10,000 was ultimately paid to the family.

Effective July 3, 2002, Kulig had his faculties removed. He was prohibited from wearing
clerical garb and presenting himself as a priest. He was further prohibited from celebrating mass
or the sacraments as a priest.

851
 Reverend Albert M. Libertore, Jr.

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1964
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: August 26, 1989

Employment/Assignment History
8/1989 – 6/1990 Student, Louvain, Belgium
7/1990 – 2/1991 Parochial Vicar, St. John the Evangelist, Pittston, PA
2/1991 – 6/1993 Parochial Vicar, St. Peter’s Cathedral, Scranton, PA
7/1993 – 6/1995 Student, Louvain, Belgium
7/1995 – 6/1997 Director of Vocations, Scranton, PA
7/1995 – 4/1997 St. Pius X Seminary, Faculty, Dalton, PA
4/1997 – 6/1997 Resident, St. Clare, Scranton, PA
7/1997 – 1/2004 Administrator, Sacred Heart of Jesus, Duryea, PA
5/2004 Faculties removed
5/26/2006 Removed from the clerical state

Summary

On November 27, 1996, Father Joseph Bambera sent a memorandum to Bishop James
C. Timlin expressing his concern about a close relationship between Father Albert M.
Liberatore, Jr. and a young adult male. He wrote that he perceived it to be a potentially
problematic situation. He stated that Liberatore knew the young male was not old enough to
drink in Pennsylvania so therefore he took him to New York to consume alcohol. They spent
the night there. Timlin wrote on the memorandum, “Confidential – no action taken.”

In March, 1997, a note was written that contained a summary of concerns about
Liberatore.

One concern was about inappropriate behavior by Liberatore in February, 1997 when 20
young men from Bishop Hoban High School toured St. Pius X Seminary. As they walked by a
room with the door ajar, Liberatore was observed lying on the bed being given a back rub by a
seminarian. Timlin noted on the summary, “Strictly Confidential, spoke to Father Liberatore
about all of this. Matter was resolved.”

On December 16, 2002, Timlin received a letter from The American College in Louvain,
Belgium. It was reported that while Liberatore was visiting there, a seminarian observed
Liberatore taking a young man in his teens or early twenties into his bedroom. Liberatore was
visibly inebriated.

852
Summary
On December 30, 2002, Bishop Dougherty and Timlin met with Liberatore. He admitted
to the activity described in the letter but assured them that the person was out of college. It was
agreed that Liberatore would go for an evaluation in January, 2003.

On January 3, 2004, the Diocese received a complaint that Liberatore had sexually
abused two young men. The allegations were determined to be credible and they were reported
to law enforcement.

On July 15, 2004, Liberatore was arrested by the Lackawanna County District Attorney’s
Office. He was charged with indecent assault, corruption of minors, endangering the welfare of
children and furnishing alcohol to a minor in connection with the sexual abuse of an altar boy
between May, 1999 and May, 2004. Liberatore was also arrested by the New York City Police
for a felony for a sexual assault on the same minor. Liberatore pled guilty in both cases.

A civil action was also filed regarding this abuse and a settlement was reached in the
amount of $3 million.

853
 Reverend John A. Madaj

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1914
YEAR OF DEATH: 1998
ORDINATION: June 3, 1939

Employment/Assignment History
6/1939 – 9/1944 Asst. Pastor, Nativity, Plymouth, PA
9/1944 – 1/1946 Asst. Pastor, St. Mary, Wilkes-Barre, PA
1/1946 – 9/1946 Asst. Pastor, St. Hedwig, Kingston, PA
9/1946 – 5/1950 Asst. Pastor, St. Adalbert, Glen Lyon, PA
5/1950 – 10/1955 Pastor, St. Joseph, Morrris Run, PA
10/1955 – 1/1970 Pastor, Sacred Heart, Forest City, PA
1/1970 – 9/1984 Pastor, Transfiguration, West Hazleton, PA
9/1984 – 1/1985 Pastor, St. Mary of Czestochowa, Eynon, PA
1/1985 – 9/1989 Pastor, SS Peter and Paul, Scranton, PA
9/1989 – 11/1998 Pastor Emeritus, St. Peter and Paul, Scranton, PA

Summary

In December, 1952, Father McHugh received two anonymous letters alleging that Father
John A. Madaj was having an affair with his housekeeper. Nothing was found in the file to
indicate that any action was taken on the part of the Diocese.

On March 12, 1990, the Diocese received a letter from the parents of a 19-year-old male,
alleging that Madaj had sexually molested their son when he was nine or 10 years of age. When
Bishop James C. Timlin confronted Madaj, Madaj denied the allegation. Timlin then contacted
the parents of the victim and informed them of Madaj’s denial. Timlin recommended that their
son speak to a counselor. He also suggested that they meet with Madaj.

854
Biographical Information

Employment/Assignment History

Summary

On was notified of an incident that occurred

in involving .

3&%"$5&%

0/(0*/(
"11&--"5&

855 -*5*("5*0/
 Reverend James M. McAuliffe

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1914
YEAR OF DEATH: 1989
ORDINATION: May 30, 1942

Employment/Assignment History
6/1942 – 9/1942 Asst. Pastor, St. Ann, Tobyhanna, PA
9/1942 – 3/1945 Asst. Pastor, St. Thomas, Archbald, PA
3/1945 – 6/1945 Asst. Pastor, Our Lady of the Snows, Clarks Summit, PA
6/1945 – 4/1947 Asst. Pastor, St. Mary’s, Pittston, PA
4/1947 – 6/1953 Asst. Pastor, St. Paul, Scranton, PA
6/1953 – 6/1954 Asst. Pastor, St. Therese, Shavertown, PA
6/1954 – 9/1954 Asst. Pastor, St. Ann, Tobyhanna, PA
9/1954 – 2/1966 Asst. Pastor, Holy Saviour, Wilkes-Barre, PA
2/1966 – 9/1969 Asst. Pastor, St. Thomas, Dickson City, PA
9/1969 – 9/1973 Pastor, St. James, Pleasant Mount, PA
9/1973 – 9/1989 Pastor, St. David, Scranton, PA
9/1989 Pastor Emeritus, St. David, Scranton, PA

Summary

On June 24, 2010, an advertisement was placed in a Scranton newspaper, inquiring as to

whether anyone had served as an altar boy at a certain parish and was sexually abused by Father
James M. McAuliffe. If so, they were asked to contact the listed telephone number. As a result
of this advertisement, the Diocese placed an announcement in the bulletins that were circulated
to all of the parishes to which McAuliffe had been assigned. The announcement requested
victims of sexual abuse by a member of the clergy to come forward. Several victims responded.
Financial assistance was offered in connection with counseling for them and law enforcement
was notified. These incidents of reported sexual abuse occurred between September 18, 1954
and April 3, 1963.

On August 23, 2010, one of the victim met with Bishop Joseph Bambera. He expressed
concern that his report of the abuse was made in 1963 but McAuliffe continued to serve as a
priest. Bambera confirmed that this incident was in fact documented in McAuliffe’s file. In
March 1963, the victim had informed his father that he was sexually abused and sodomized by
McAuliffe. This was reported to the Diocese and McAuliffe was removed almost immediately.
He was sent to Kentucky to spend time in a rehabilitation facility. Bishop Hannon was notified
by the psychiatrist in charge that McAuliffe was cured of his problems and was ready to be
reassigned. Hannon refused to follow that advice, however, and noted in the file that no altar
boy should ever be put in danger of being hurt again by this priest. McAuliffe went to live with
his sister in Scranton.

856
Summary

Hannon then traveled to Rome to participate in the Second Vatican Council. He passed
away during the end of the Council. Thereafter, McAuliffe managed to return to ministry.
Although the Diocese is now aware that McAuliffe re-offended on other young boys, there was
no information in his file until the recent reports in response to the newspaper advertisement.

On March 20, 1963, it was announced McAuliffe was assigned to St. Christopher’s
effective April 5, 1963. On April 3, 1963, Hannon rescinded this assignment, stating that an
unforeseen physical indisposition had intervened to prevent McAuliffe from accepting the
appointment.

Monsignor Joseph A. Madden wrote in 1963 that McAuliffe was in need of some
psychiatric attention. He also wrote to the parents of the victim that to report this was the best
thing that could have been done for the interest of the Catholic Church; specifically, that
Almighty God had seized this opportunity to make McAuliffe a better priest following his
experience of being apprehended. Madden also made the following remark to the father of the
victim, “after all your son was over the age of reason.”

857
 Reverend Neil McLaughlin

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: Unknown
YEAR OF DEATH: Unknown
ORDINATION: 1959

Employment/Assignment History
1961 – 1983 Taught at Scranton Preparatory School
1971 – 1995 Celebrated weekend masses at St. John Bosco, Conyngham, PA
1985 – 1986 Served as the Assistant Director of Campus Ministries,
University of Scranton
1985 – 2006 Administrative jobs with the Alumni Association at
the University of Scranton
1990s Celebrated weekend masses at St. Mary of the Assumption,
Scranton, PA
1996 – 2006 Ministered part-time at St. Thomas More, Lake Ariel, PA

Summary

Father Neil McLaughlin was a Jesuit priest from the Maryland Province of the Society
of Jesus.

The Province had a Jesuit Community within the Diocese of Scranton. When Bishop
Martino was installed as the Bishop of Scranton, he directed that a comprehensive review of all
allegations of sexual misconduct involving clerics of the Diocese be conducted. A concern
about McLaughlin was discovered.

Jesuit priests are not governed by the Diocesan Bishop in the area where they are serving;
instead, they are governed by their Provincial leader. As a result of the Dallas Charter in 2002,
the Society of Jesus notified the Diocese of Scranton of an allegation made against McLaughlin
by his niece. While in therapy, the niece had recovered a memory that in 1959, McLaughlin
hugged her in a sexual manner at his ordination.

McLaughlin was sent for an evaluation and was diagnosed as a latent pedophile.

The Society recently sent McLaughlin for another evaluation and that the physician felt
that there was an error in the first evaluation and that McLaughlin was not a threat to children.

On January 30, 2006, the Diocese received notification from the Society of Jesus that it
was recommended that McLaughlin continue ministry but that it be restricted to ministry that
did not involve children.

858
Summary
On January 11, 2007, McLaughlin was assigned to the Jesuit Provincial Community in
Baltimore, MD. McLaughlin was notified by the Diocese of Scranton that his faculties were
withdrawn.

In December, 2008, an adult female reported to the Society of Jesus that Father
McLaughlin touched her in a sexual and inappropriate manner in 1963, when she was 10 years
old. The allegation was reported to the local police department in Maryland.

859
 Reverend Joseph F. Meighan

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1943
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 25, 1968

Employment/Assignment History
6/1968 – 9/1968 Asst. Pastor, St. Ann, Shohola, PA
9/1968 – 5/1970 Asst. Pastor, St. Boniface, Williamsport, PA
5/18/1970 Removed from St. Boniface and ordered to report
for psychological evaluation and treatment
5/1970 – 6/1975 Asst. Pastor, St. Matthew, East Stroudsburg, PA
6/1975 – 5/1976 St. Meinrad, IN for further studies
5/1976 – 12/1981 Asst. Pastor, St. Nicholas, Wilkes-Barre, PA
12/1981 – 9/1984 Pastor, St. Martin of Tours, Jackson, PA
9/1984 – 9/1987 Pastor, St. Boniface, Wilkes-Barre, PA
9/1987 – 7/1990 Pastor, St. Therese, Shavertown, PA
Resigned as pastor, St. Therese
8/1991 – 1/2001 Chaplain, Holy Family Residence, Scranton, PA
1/2001 – 2/2001 Chaplain, Mercy Center Convent, Dallas, PA
2/2001 – 6/2002 St. Mary’s Villa Nursing Home, Elmhurst, PA
7/03/2002 Removed from ministry

Summary

In 1970, at least four boys were interviewed by the Diocese of Scranton and reported that
Father Joseph F. Meighan had disrobed and fondled them. Meighan was transferred and ordered
to report for psychological evaluation and treatment.

In 1990, a mother observed Meighan in the process of disrobing her 17-year-old son in
the parlor of the rectory. Meighan thereafter resigned as pastor at St. Therese and was again
sent for psychological evaluation and treatment. After he was released, he was assigned to Holy
Family Residence. He was then transferred to Mercy Center. The father of one of the victims
protested this assignment, however, because it was too close to the area where his son had been
molested. Meighan was then immediately assigned to St. Mary’s Villa Nursing Home until his
removal from ministry.

At least 3 more complaints were made in 2003, 2007 and 2008.

860
 Reverend Russell E. Motsay

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1946
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 13, 1972

Employment/Assignment History
5/1972 – 3/1973 Asst. Pastor, Most Precious Blood, Hazleton, PA
3/1973 – 9/1974 St. Aloysius, Wilkes-Barre, PA
9/1974 – 1/1975 St. Lawrence, Williamsport, PA
1/1975 – 9/1977 5Sacred Heart, Peckville, PA
9/1977 – 8/1978 Asst. Pastor, Our Lady of Grace, Hazleton, PA
8/1978 – 6/1982 Asst. Pastor, St. John the Evangelist, Wilkes-Barre, PA
6/1982 – 9/1985 Asst. Pastor, Holy Name of Jesus, Swoyersville, PA
9/1985 – 7/1989 Pastor, St. James, Pleasant Mount, PA,
7/1989 – 7/1996 Pastor, St. Juliana, Rock Lake, PA
7/1996 – 4/2012 Pastor, Our Lady of Mount Carmel, Carbondale, PA
4/13/2012 Resigned
9/15/2015 Removed from priestly ministry

Summary

On March 16, 2012, the Diocese of Scranton received an e-mail communication from a
sender only known as “Jeff” he wrote that he needed to speak with the “Bishop only” concerning
sexual abuse by a clergy member. A reply was sent to “Jeff” wherein he was encouraged to
contact law enforcement immediately regarding the allegation. After receiving no response, a
copy of the e-mail correspondence was given to the Lackawanna County District Attorney’s
Office. The victim was ultimately located and the case was turned over to the Wayne County
District Attorney’s Office.

The Pennsylvania State Police interviewed the victim who reported that he was touched
and fondled by Father Russell E. Motsay. He explained that he would stay overnight at the
rectory and sleep in the same bed as Motsay. They would only be dressed in their underwear
and Motsay would massage the victim, rubbing his inner thighs and fondling him. He reported
that Motsay was sexually aroused during these incidents.

The Pennsylvania State Police subsequently identified four additional victims who
experienced similar abuse. Because the statute of limitations had expired, however, no criminal
action could be taken.

861
Summary
Motsay was interviewed and admitted to the allegations. On September 15, 2015, he was
permanently removed from priestly ministry.

862
 Reverend James F. Nolan

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1897
YEAR OF DEATH: 1957
ORDINATION: May 15, 1929

Employment/Assignment History
6/1929 – 9/1929 Asst. Pastor, St. Mary, Lackawaxen, PA
9/1929 – 1/1931 Asst. Pastor, St. Patrick, Wilkes-Barre, PA
1/1931 – 9/1939 Asst. Pastor, SS. Peter and Paul, Towanda, PA
9/1939 – 6/1944 Asst. Pastor, St. Vincent, Scranton, PA
6/1944 – 6/1950 Pastor, St. James, Pleasant Mount, PA
6/1950 – 6/1956 Pastor, St. Charles, Sugar Notch, PA
6/25/1956 Resigned

Summary

On November 7, 2003, the Diocese of Scranton was contacted by a 75-year-old male

who reported that he was groped by Father James F. Nolan when he was a 15 years old altar
boy. The male stated that Nolan had touched his genitals on the outside of his clothing.

The victim was advised that Nolan had died. The victim declined an offer to speak with
the Victim Assistance Coordinator for the Diocese and stated that he believed that he could now
put the matter behind him. This matter was not reported to law enforcement.

On May 6, 2016, the Diocese sent a certified letter to each of the District Attorney’s
Offices within the Diocese. The District Attorneys were notified by Bishop Joseph Bambera that
in in an effort to further the Church’s ongoing commitment to transparency as it continues to
address the sad reality of child sexual abuse, he was submitting for their information a
confidential comprehensive list of all priests in the Diocese of Scranton against whom
accusations of sexual abuse of children had been made. Nolan’s name was contained on the list.

863
 Reverend W. Jeffrey Paulish

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1956
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: September 3, 1988

Employment/Assignment History
9/1988 – 6/1991 Asst. Pastor, Our Lady of the Snows, Clarks Summit, PA
6/1991 – 1/1992 Asst. Pastor, Annunciation, Williamsport, PA
1/1992 – 6/1992 Asst. Pastor, St. Cecilia, Exeter, PA
6/1992 – 7/1993 Asst. Pastor, Most Precious Blood, Hazleton, PA
7/1993 – 1/1994 Asst. Pastor, Sacred Heart, Peckville, PA
1/1994 – 7/2000 Chaplain, Little Flower Manor, Wilkes-Barre, PA
7/2000 – 7/2004 Pastor, St. Francis Xavier, Friendsville, PA,
St. Patrick, Middletown, PA and
St. Thomas the Apostle, Little Meadows, PA
7/2004 – 11/2004 Leave of Absence
11/2004 – 6/2005 Asst. Pastor, St. Joseph’s, Minooka, PA,
Immaculate Conception and St. John the Baptist, Taylor, PA
6/2005 – 9/2005 Chaplain, St. Mary’s Villa, Elmhurst, PA
9/2005 – 11/2005 Asst. Pastor, St. Patrick, Scranton, PA
11/2005 – 3/2006 Leave of Absence
3/2006 – 10/2006 Residence, St. Cecilia, Exeter, PA
10/2006 – 7/2008 Asst. Pastor, St. Mary, Old Forge, PA
7/2008 – 7/2011 Administrator, St. Elizabeth, Bear Creek, PA
7/2011 – 8/2012 Leave of Absence
8/2012 – 11/2012 Asst. Pastor, Holy Cross, Olyphant, PA
11/2012 – 7/2013 Leave of Absence
7/2013 – 11/2013 Asst. Pastor, Prince of Peace, Old Forge, PA
9/20/2013 Leave of Absence

Summary

On September 20, 2013, the Diocese of Scranton was notified by the Lackawanna County
District Attorney’s Office that Father W. Jeffrey Paulish was in custody. Campus security
officers at the University of Scranton had caught Paulish having sex with a 15-year-old boy.
Paulish ultimately pled guilty to the charge of corruption of a minor and was sentenced to eight
to 23 months in prison.

The Diocese instructed the pastors of any churches to which Paulish had been assigned
to advise their congregations that law enforcement had found Paulish engaged in an
inappropriate act with a minor. The pastors were further instructed to encourage anyone who

864
Summary
may have been involved in, or may be aware of, any abusive situation involving Paulish to
contact the District Attorney’s Office or local law enforcement.

865
 Reverend John A. Pender

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1936
YEAR OF DEATH: 2009
ORDINATION: June 6, 1962

Employment/Assignment History
6/1962 – 9/1962 Asst. Pastor, Queen of Peace, Hawley, PA
9/1962 – 2/1966 Asst. Pastor, Sacred Heart, Peckville, PA
2/1966 – 6/1967 Asst. Pastor, St. Leo, Ashley, PA
6/1967 – 10/1968 St. John, Susquehanna, PA
10/15/1968 Left the Diocese of Scranton without permission

Summary

Father John A. Pender was instructed to submit himself for psychiatric study by Bishop
J. Carroll McCormick in October, 1968. Although Pender agreed to go to an institution for
priests and nuns, he never reported for the treatment.

Years later, the Diocese of Scranton was contacted by the Diocese of Jefferson City and
advised that Pender was practicing in their Diocese.

On May 6, 2016, the Diocese sent a certified letter to each of the District Attorney’s
Offices within the Diocese. The District Attorneys were notified by Bishop Joseph Bambera that
in in an effort to further the Church’s ongoing commitment to transparency as it continues to
address the sad reality of child sexual abuse, he was submitting for their information a
confidential comprehensive list of all priests in the Diocese of Scranton against whom
accusations of sexual abuse of children had been made. Pender’s name was on the list, noting
that an allegation from a “John Doe” was made in 2014.

866
 Reverend Mark T. Rossetti

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1959
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: August 31, 1985

Employment/Assignment History
9/1985 – 1/1987 Asst. Pastor, St. John the Evangelist, Wilkes-Barre, PA
1/1987 – 9/1987 Asst. Pastor, SS Peter and Paul, Plains, PA
9/1987 – 7/1990 Asst. Pastor, St. John the Evangelist, Pittston, PA
7/1990 – 1991 Asst. Pastor, Holy Name, Swoyersville, PA
1991 Asst. Pastor, St. John the Evangelist, Pittston, PA
1994 Administrator, St. John the Baptist, Pittston, PA
7/1994 – 11/1995 Pastor, St. Joseph, St. Joseph, PA
11/29/1995 Resigned

Summary

On November 1, 1995, the Diocese of Scranton was made aware of an incident between
Father Mark T. Rossetti and a 13-year-old boy that occurred when the boy was in eighth grade.
It involving hugging, french-kissing and inappropriate conversations about how far they should
go. The incident was immediately reported to the police. Rossetti was removed from ministry
and sent for psychological evaluation and rehabilitation.

On November 21, 1995, the victim and his family signed a waiver of prosecution to end
the investigation.

On October 17, 1997, Bishop James C. Timlin sent a letter to the Archbishop of New
York. Although the Review Board for the Diocese of Scranton had reacted negatively to giving
Rossetti an assignment in Scranton, it was Timlin’s personal opinion that Rossetti was not a risk
and that he should be allowed to perform some priestly work. In his letter, Timlin stated that he
would be deeply grateful if the Archbishop could allow Rossetti to work in New York, at least
temporarily. The Archdiocese of New York released Rossetti back to the Diocese of Scranton
in 2002.

On November 11, 2014, Bishop Martino notified Rossetti that he was disturbed to find
that his case had not yet been handled so as to comply with the requirements of the Code of
Canon Law. He noted, “Bishop Timlin, I believe, felt that he had looked into the matter but was
unable to decide on the truthfulness of the claims made by you and [the victim].”

Rossetti was withdrawn from the sacred ministry. He was laicized in 2007.

867
 Reverend Edward J. Shoback

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1942
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 27, 1967

Employment/Assignment History
6/1967 – 9/1967 Asst. Pastor, St. Ann, Shohola, PA
9/1967 – 9/1968 Asst. Pastor, St. Stephen, Plymouth, PA
9/1968 – 9/1970 Asst. Pastor, Holy Rosary, Ashley, PA
9/1970 – 9/1974 In residence, St. Therese, Wilkes-Barre, PA
9/1974 – 12/1980 Asst. Pastor, St. Aloysius, Wilkes-Barre, PA
12/1980 – 9/1987 Pastor, St. John Nepomucene, Luzerne, PA
9/1987 – 9/1989 Pastor, Transfiguration, West Hazleton, PA
9/1989 – 7/2004 Pastor, St.’s Peter and Paul, Scranton, PA
7/20/2004 Removed from active ministry
5/22/2009 Dismissed from the clerical state

Summary

On June 27, 2002, the Diocese of Scranton met with a male in his thirties who stated that
he had been sexually molested by Father Edward J. Shoback 25 years earlier. The male was in
theological formation and the Diocese of Raleigh terminated its relationship with him.
Additionally, the St. Mary’s Seminary in Baltimore dismissed him. The male stated that his
troubles in the seminary were due to the sexual abuse. The male stated that he did not want to
pursue the matter with Shoback because he liked him. He stated that he had put the matter
behind him following several years of therapy and did not want to see Shoback defrocked.

When confronted, Shoback denied the allegation.

On July 19, 2004, an adult male contacted the Diocese to report that he was sexually
abused by Shoback in 1981 at the age of 12. The incident occurred when Shoback invited him
to watch a movie. Shoback removed the victim’s clothing and performed oral sex on him at that
time. The victim stated that he was certain that Shoback had sexually abused other boys. Three
days later, a second male contacted the Diocese after speaking with the victim. He reported that
Shoback had touched his genitals on the outside of his clothing. A third adult male then
contacted the Diocese on July 26, 2014, and reported that Shoback introduced him to wine/liquor
and pornography. The male reported sexual abuse by Shoback involving genital contact. When
confronted, Shoback admitted to the allegations made by the first victim. He was removed from
ministry.

868
Summary
As a result of the 2002 Charter, the Diocese was required to place a notice in the church
bulletins that were distributed to congregations to which Shoback had been assigned. The notice
requested that anyone who may have been sexually abused by Shoback to come forward. As a
result of the notice, three additional victims came forward. The statute of limitations had
expired, however, in connection with their cases. The Diocese offered to assist with counseling
services.

Complaints received in 2007 and 2009 were referred to the Luzerne County District
Attorney’s Office.

869
 Reverend Thomas P. Shoback

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1951
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 7, 1977

Employment/Assignment History
5/1977 – 8/1977 Asst. Pastor, St. Matthew, East Stroudsburg, PA
9/1977 – 1/1984 Asst. Pastor, Nativity of the Blessed Mary, Plymouth, PA
1/1984 – 8/1984 Asst. Pastor, St. Joseph, Hazleton, PA
8/1984 – 2/1989 In residence, Sacred Heart, Plains, PA
2/1989 – 6/1997 Pastor, St. Andrew and St. Mary, Blossburg, PA
7/1997 – 7/2002 Pastor, Our Lady of Lourdes, Montoursville, PA
7/2002 – 7/2004 Pastor, Holy Redeemer, Harding-Falls, PA
7/2004 – 7/2006 Pastor, St. Joseph, Hudson, PA, Sacred Heart, Plains, PA
7/2006 – 11/2011 Pastor, Sacred Heart of Mary, Jermyn, PA
11/15/2011 Leave of Absence
5/01/2013 Resignation
11/14/2014 Removed from ministry

Summary

On May 20, 2006, the Diocese of Scranton received a report that an 11-year-old boy was
sexually assaulted by Father Thomas P. Shoback when the victim was an altar boy. The
allegation was reported to the Tioga County District Attorney’s Office and was investigated by
the Diocese. When questioned about the allegation, Shoback denied that anything inappropriate
had occurred. The victim provided the name of another former altar boy who was also a victim.
This second male was interviewed and denied that anything had occurred. No criminal charges
were filed. Shoback was sent for an evaluation.

On November 14, 2011, the male who had denied that anything had occurred when he
was interviewed in 2006 revealed that he was sexually abused by Shoback when he was 11years
old and serving as an altar boy. The Diocese filed a report with the Tioga County District
Attorney’s Office and also filed a report with ChildLine. Criminal charges for child sexual
abuse were filed against Shoback for assaults that occurred between 1991 and 1997. In April,
2013, Shoback was found guilty. He was sentenced to five to ten years in state prison.

On November 14, 2014, Shoback was removed from ministry.

870
 Reverend John J. Tamalis

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1944
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: May 1, 1971

Employment/Assignment History
5/1971 – 9/1971 Asst. Pastor, St. Mary of the Mount, Mount Pocono, PA
9/1971 – 9/1976 Asst. Pastor, Queen of Peace, Hawley, PA
St. Boniface, Williamsport, PA
9/1976 – 8/1985 Campus Ministry, Lycoming College, Williamsport, PA
9/1985 – 7/1990 Pastor, Holy Child, Mansfield, PA
7/1990 – 7/1996 Pastor, St. Lawrence, South Williamsport, PA
7/1996 – 3/1997 Pastor, St. Boniface, Williamsport, PA
4/03/1997 Leave of Absence
2/02/1998 Removed from ministry
12/21/2007 Dispensation from clerical state

Summary

On February 28, 1997, a 33-year-old male reported to the Diocese of Scranton that he
had been sexually abused by Father John J. Tamalis in 1976 when he was 13 years of age. He
stated that Tamalis furnished alcohol to him and performed oral sex on him.

On March 10, 1997, Tamalis was sent for an evaluation wherein he admitted that he
probably abused nine boys/young men. The Vicar for Priests was advised by professional staff
that there was likely far more than nine victims. Additional victims subsequently came forward
to the Diocese to report that they were sexually abused by Tamalis. However, the statute of
limitations had expired. The Diocese offered to assist with counselling services for the victims.

On December 21, 2007, Tamalis was dispensed from his obligations to the priesthood by
Pope Benedict XVI.

871
 Reverend Virgil B. Thetherow

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1964
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: June 29, 2002

Employment/Assignment History
ASSIGNMENTS: None
1/23/2015 Dispensation from clerical state

Summary

On July 1, 1998 Father Virgil B. Tetherow was a professed member of the Franciscan
Friars of the Renewal in New York and known as Brother Gabriel Francis Tetherow. He
communicated with Bishop James C. Timlin about setting up a religious community within the
Diocese of Scranton. Timlin agreed and on February 1, 2001 the establishment of the Servants
Minor of St. Francis was approved.

Timlin assisted Tetherow with his ordination at Our Lady of Guadalupe in Denton,
Nebraska. Upon his ordination, Tetherow was incardinated within the Diocese of Scranton.
After his ordination, Tetherow was never given an assignment in the Diocese, but was allowed
to reside within the Diocese.

In January, 2005, it was brought to the attention of the Pocono Mountain Regional Police
that child pornography was found on a computer at a rectory within the Diocese. The police
interviewed Tetherow and he admitted to downloading the child pornography. Tetherow was
arrested and removed from ministry on March 24, 2005. He pled guilty to criminal charges and
received a probationary sentence.

Complaints began to come in from the Diocese of Harrisburg that Tetherow had opened
a church in York County after his faculties had been removed. Tetherow was thereafter
dismissed from the clerical state by the Holy Father on January 23, 2015.

872
 Reverend Robert M. Timchak

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1965
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: June 27, 1992

Employment/Assignment History
7/1992 – 7/1994 Asst. Pastor, St. Mary of the Immaculate Conception,
Wilkes-Barre, PA
7/1994 – 7/1996 Director of Religious Formation, Seton Catholic High School,
Pittston, PA
7/1996 – 7/1998 Director of Religious Formation, Bishop Hoban High School,
Wilkes-Barre, PA
Holy Savior, Wilkes-Barre, PA
7/1998 – 7/2006 Asst. Pastor, Annunciation, Williamsport, PA
6/2000 – 7/2006 Transfiguration, West Hazleton, PA St’s. Peter &
Paul, Hazleton, PA
7/2006 – 7/2007 Leave of Absence
7/2007 – 4/2009 Asst. Pastor, St. Vincent de Paul, Milford, PA
St. John Neumann, Lords Valley, PA
4/04/2009 Leave of Absence
1/24/2014 Dispensation from clerical state

Summary

On December 9, 2008, the Diocese of Scranton received an anonymous letter alleging

that Father Robert M. Timchak was viewing / downloading child pornography. The Diocese
turned over the material that was received to the Pike County District Attorney’s Office. At the
conclusion of a police investigation, Timchak was charged with possessing /downloading child
pornography. He pled guilty and was sentenced to state prison.

On January 24, 2014, Pope Francis granted dispensation to Timchak.

873
 Reverend Lawrence P. Weniger

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1910
YEAR OF DEATH: 1972
ORDINATION: May 26, 1934

Employment/Assignment History
6/1934 – 9/1940 Asst. Pastor, St. Boniface, Wilkes-Barre, PA
9/1940 – 6/1941 Asst. Pastor, St. Mary Magdolen, Honesdale, PA
6/1941 – 6/1949 Asst. Pastor, St. Mary, Scranton, PA
6/1949 – 9/1951 Pastor, St. Thomas, Little Meadows, PA
9/1951 – 9/1960 Pastor, St. John, Troy, PA
9/1960 – 5/1961 Pastor, St. Mary’s Assumption, Pittston, PA
5/1961 – 5/1968 Pastor, Sacred Heart, Luzerne, PA
5/19/1968 Prelate of Honor
3/08/1971 Diocesan Consultor

Summary

On February 26, 2002, the Diocese of Scranton was contacted by an adult male who
stated that he was sexually abused by Father Lawrence P. Weniger in the 1960s when he served
as an altar boy. No further information was contained in the file.

On June 3, 2002, the Diocese was contacted by another adult male who stated that he
was sexually abused by Weniger in the 1960’s. The male stated that he was seeking information
and inquired about compensation for his painful memories. Bishop James C. Timlin wrote a
note stating that he had a good conversation with the male. Timlin wrote that he answered his
questions and expressed how sorry he was. The note indicated that the male felt that
compensation was sufficient for him.

On December 27, 2011, the Diocese was contacted by Catholic Social Services who
reported that an adult male had revealed that he had been sexually molested by Weniger in the
1960’s. The male was offered assistance with counseling and the allegation was reported to law
enforcement.

874
 Reverend Joseph B. Wilson

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1925
YEAR OF DEATH: Unknown
ORDINATION: December 18, 1994

Employment/Assignment History
12/1994 – 7/1996 Asst. Pastor, St. Ignatius, Kingston, PA
7/1996 – 1/1998 Administrator, Ascension, Williamsport, PA
2/1998 – 7/1999 Chaplain, Marian Convent, Scranton, PA
7/1999 – 1/2000 Asst. Pastor, St. Nicholas, Wilkes-Barre, PA
1/2000 – 7/2002 Chaplain, Divine Providence Hospital, Williamsport, PA
7/03/2002 Resigned
8/19/2002 Removed from ministry

Summary

In 1994, Father Joseph B. Wilson was known as Brother Raphael Wilson, a member of
the Order of Holy Cross Province. He approached Bishop James C. Timlin and requested to be
accepted into the Diocese of Scranton. He was approved by the Admissions Committee. After
several months of confirming his records, Wilson was ordained as a priest at 69 years of age.

Handwritten notes in the file reflected that in July, 2002, the Diocese became aware that
while Wilson was a Religious Brother at Holy Cross, there were allegations made that he had
sexually abused two boys. Wilson admitted to abusing one of the boys and he was sent for
evaluation and treatment.

A confidential settlement in the amount of $250,000 was reached with the victim.

875
876
Society of St. John

877
878
 Reverend Christopher R. Clay

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1964
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: June 27, 1998

Employment/Assignment History
7/1998 – 7/2000 Catechist, Notre Dame High School, East Stroudsburg, PA
7/2000 – 5/2002 Chaplain, Bishop Hafey High School, Hazleton, PA
5/2002 – 2/2003 Administrative Leave, Removed from active ministry
2/2003 – 2/2003 Asst. Pastor, St. Thomas More, Lake Ariel. PA
2/2003 Leave of Absence

Reverend Eric S. Ensey

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: 1966
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: June 24, 1995

Employment/Assignment History
11/1997 – 4/2001 Incardinated, Diocese of Scranton
4/2001 – 4/2002 Administrator Pro Tempore, St. Patrick, Milford, PA
4/2002 Removed From Active Ministry
11/2011 Tribunal – Diocese of Harrisburg, Pa: Removed From the Clerical
State

879
 Reverend Carlos Urrutigoity

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: Unknown
YEAR OF DEATH: N/A
ORDINATION: July 22, 1991

Employment/Assignment History
5/24/1998 Decree issued by Bishop James C. Timlin establishing the Society
of St John
Urrutigoity not issued a religious assignment
4/2002 Removed from active ministry

Summary
The Society of St. Pius X (“SSPX”) was founded in 1970 by a retired missionary bishop,
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, in order to perpetuate the traditional liturgical rites of the church.
In 1971, a seminary was started in Econe, Switzerland in order to train priests for the SSPX.
Despite being specifically warned by the Pope not to ordain them, the founder ordained the first
seminarians to the priesthood in 1976. Those ordinations were valid, but illicit. Pope Paul VI
immediately suspended the founder’s faculties and those of the men he had ordained.

In 1988, the founder sought an agreement with the Holy See for the lawful continuation
of SSPX and an agreement was reached. The founder then broke the agreement, in an act that
was schismatic, by ordaining four bishops without papal mandate. This action incurred an
automatic ex-communication that was later lifted by Pope Benedict XVI. However, until the
status of the Society was regularized by the Holy See, the bishops and priests remained
suspended from the exercise of Holy Orders.

In 1989, some SSPX clergy and seminarians who did not want to go into schism
(separation from the church), sought an agreement with the Holy See. The agreement resulted
in the founding of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter (“FSSP”).

In an effort to return disaffected members of the SSPX to membership in the Catholic

Church, Bishop James C. Timlin interviewed a group of men who claimed that they were
seeking to return to the true church. The group of men called themselves the Society of St. John
and included four priests: Carlos Urrutigoity, Eric Ensey, Daniel Fullerton and Marshall
Roberts. There were no background checks or reviews of their seminary or priestly formation
records at that time. Timlin presumed that the SSPX had prepared the men for ordination by
adhering to the standards that were established by that organization. Father Urrutigoity and
Father Ensey were subsequently incardinated into the Diocese. Timlin had the censures lifted
and the priests took up residence with the FSSP in Elmhurst.

880
 The FSSP established St. Gregory’s Academy, a high school for boys, with FSSP
headquarters located in the same building as the high school. While residing there, Ensey served
as chaplain at the Academy during the 1997-1998 and the 1998-1999 school years. He and other
members of the FSSP served as teachers at the Academy.

On May 24, 1998, Timlin issued a decree formally establishing the Society of St. John
(“SSJ”) as a public association of the faithful in the Diocese. SSJ informed Timlin of its intent
to establish a Catholic community wherein lay people who were committed to the rites of the
1962 missal would live in close connection with the SSJ. The members also wanted to establish
a college and Timlin approved this request. This decision went against the recommendation of
Diocesan officials.

On September 16, 1999, SSJ, with Timlin’s permission, purchased one thousand acres
in Shohola, Pike County. The real estate was not placed in the Bishop’s name as was the practice
with all Diocesan property, however. Complaints were subsequently made to the Diocese that
the SSJ was spending money beyond their means. Timlin, in turn, explored ways to assist the
SSJ.

On September 15, 2001, Timlin was informed that Urrutigoity had made it a practice to
sleep in the same bed with boys and young men. Timlin immediately questioned Urrutigoity
who denied any immoral behavior. Urrutigoity did admit that there may have been occasions
when overcrowded conditions prompted shared sleeping arrangements. Timlin ordered
Urrutigoity to stop the behavior and the allegation was brought before the Diocesan Review
Board. Because there was no specific complaint, however, the Board believed that Timlin’s
instruction was all that could be done.

On January 12, 2002, Timlin received correspondence from a representative of the Pope.
Attached was a letter written by a victim’s father accusing Urrutigoity and Ensey of sexual
misconduct. Father Clay, who was staying at the Shohola property, was also accused. These
allegations were investigated by the Lackawanna County District Attorney’s Office. However,
because the statute of limitations had expired, no criminal charges were filed against Urrutigoity
and Ensey. Clay’s case was referred to the Pike County District Attorney’s Office but no
criminal charges were ever filed.

The Diocese, along with Urrutigoity and Ensey, were ultimately sued by the minor
victim. The victim received a $380,000 settlement.

Urrutigoity, Ensey and Clay were sent for clinical assessments and removed from active
ministry, pending the outcome of the diocese investigation.

With respect to Ensey, the panel determined that Ensey did commit the grave delict of
sexual abuse of a minor. The clinical assessments of Urrutigoity and Ensey resulted in the
determination that neither one should be engaged in active ministry involving children.

881
 Timlin reinstated Clay. Clay declined the appointment, however, and was granted a leave
of absence. Clay ultimately moved to the Diocese of Fort Worth, Texas, where he became active
in a Catholic Church.

While awaiting an investigation by the Diocese, Ensey travelled to Canada where it was
learned that he was active in a Catholic Church. He was also involved in soliciting donations
for the reinstatement of the SSJ in Paraguay.

Clay and Ensey’s participation in another Diocese after decrees had been issued whereby
they were forbidden to be part of any active ministry created negative publicity both for the
Diocese of Scranton and the Dioceses where they were living.

In May, 2003, the Society had a debt of $2,650,000. On July 25, 2003, the Holy See
announced that Bishop Joseph Martino had been appointed to the See of Scranton. Prior to
Martino’s installation, Timlin authorized an arrangement with PNC Bank wherein the Diocese
guaranteed a loan in the amount of $2,650,000.

On November 19, 2004, Martino issued a decree suppressing the SSJ.

While awaiting the Diocesan investigation, Urrutigoity and Ensey requested to be

excardinated from the Diocese so they could be incardinated by Bishop Livieres Plano into the
Diocese of Ciudad del Este, Paraguay, with the hopes of re-establishing the SSJ. The request
was initially denied. In 2008, however, Urrutigoity was excardinated from the Diocese and
incardinated into the Diocese of Ciudad del Este, Paraguay. The Bishop of the Diocese of
Ciudad del Este praised Urrutigoity, citing the letter written by Timlin wherein Timlin gave a
glowing opinion of the SSJ and Urrutigoity. The SSJ was re-created in Paraguay and Urrutigoity
was promoted to second in charge under Plano. In 2014, the Vatican initiated an investigation
into Urrutigoity and Plano. Urrutigoity was removed as second in command and Plano was
removed as Bishop.

882
 Reverend Benedict J. Van der Putten

Biographical Information
YEAR OF BIRTH: Unknown
YEAR OF DEATH: Unknown
ORDINATION: Unknown

Employment/Assignment History
Not Applicable

Summary

While in Los Gatos, California, van der Putten had “indecent acts” with a 15-year-old
girl and attempted the same with another girl, age 17. (no description of acts) This occurred
around 2000.

He was immediately sent to the International Headquarters for the Society of St. Pius X
in Switzerland. He was sent on sabbatical to the island monastery in Orkney Islands of
Scotland. While in Ireland, he was expelled from the Society.

In 2001, he became a member of the Society of Saint John and worked in relations with
the Diocese of Scranton. When Bishop James C. Timlin sent the paperwork to Rome for van
der Putten to be “regularized” with the Diocese of Scranton, Rome reported the sexual abuse
allegation made by the Society of St. Pius X. In 2001 Bishop Timlin was notified that there
was a past sexual abuse allegation against van der Putten while in California. In 2002, van der
Putten was interviewed by Timlin and other Diocesan administrators. Van der Putten admitted
involvement with a 16-year-old girl. He advised he kissed her and caressed her breast. He also
exposed his genitalia. Van der Putten claimed there was “nothing erotic” about the encounter,
just attempts “to build trust”.

Timlin sent van der Putten for evaluation at the Southdown Institute in Ontario. In a
report written by Diocesan officials, they summarized the evaluation of van der Putten. He
admitted to recently fondling a young woman he met while on Christmas vacation in 2001. The
Southdown Institute found van der Putten had “predatory behavior.” The Diocese received a
call from a woman in January, 2002. She reported van der Putten molested her 18-year-old
daughter in December,2001. This woman tracked van der Putten to Sacramento, California
where he was giving liturgy. The Diocese noted in a report documenting the woman’s complaint
that van der Putten had a “Celebret” from the Congregation in Rome, Ecclesiae Dei, which
provided him, with legitimacy, to engage in liturgy.

In 2002, Timlin advised van der Putten he would not be given faculties with the Diocese
of Scranton. In December 2003, a memorandum went out to all bishops by the United States
Conference of Catholic Bishops, Office of the General Secretary advising that van der Putten

883
Summary
was a former member of the Society of St. Pius X and that he did not have faculties in the
Diocese of Scranton due to admitted sexual misconduct.

Van der Putten is using a website, www.paxvobis.org, to advertise his availability for
conferences, retreats and youth camps while stating he is a priest in good standing. He is also
asking for Mass stipends.

The Diocese of Scranton did not have any contact with van der Putten after April 2002.

884