Missouri University of Science and Technology

Scholars' Mine
International Specialty Conference on Cold- (1984) - 7th International Specialty Conference on
Formed Steel Structures Cold-Formed Steel Structures

Nov 13th

Load Carrying Capacity of Z-purlins with A.c.

Sheet Cladding
S. Seetharaman

P. R. Natarajan

A. C. R. Djugash

Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarsmine.mst.edu/isccss

Part of the Structural Engineering Commons

Recommended Citation
Seetharaman, S.; Natarajan, P. R.; and Djugash, A. C. R., "Load Carrying Capacity of Z-purlins with A.c. Sheet Cladding" (1984).
International Specialty Conference on Cold-Formed Steel Structures. 3.
http://scholarsmine.mst.edu/isccss/7iccfss/7iccfss-session5/3

This Article - Conference proceedings is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars' Mine. It has been accepted for inclusion in International
Specialty Conference on Cold-Formed Steel Structures by an authorized administrator of Scholars' Mine. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright
Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact
[email protected].
 Seventh International Specialty Conference on Cold-Fonned Steel Structures
St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A., November 13-14, 1984

LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY OF Z-PURLINS WITH A.C. SHEET CLADDING

BY

P.R.NATARAJAN +
A.C.R.DJUGASH +
S.SEETHARAMAN +

SUMMARY

Analytical and experimental studies on Z-purlins made of light gauge steel

strip were carried out in order to find the load-carrying capacity of these
members when cladded with corrugated asbestos cement sheets. The results
are presented.

INTRODUCTION

In India, use of cold rolled steel sections as structural load carrying

member has not been so popular as in other countries such as USA and UK.
This may be due to doubts as regard to mainly stability and corrosion resis-
tance which used to linger in the minds of practicing Engineers. A few firms
have recently started manufacturing. Z-purlins (cross-section in the form of
'Z') from light gauge steel strips by cold forming. Some of these Z-purlins
were tested in the Structural Engineering Research Centre, Madras to study
the structural performance and load carrying capacity. The purlins were
cladded with asbestos cement sheets (A.C. sheets) being the most commonly used
cladding material. The purlins were tested for gravity and wind load condi-
tions. The sizes of purlins tested are given in Fig.l and the tests carried
out are explained in Table 1.

TEST SET UP FOR WIND LOAD

The test set-up consisted of a pair of purlins kept parallel at a spacing of

1.0 m. They were fitted over two continuous spans of 4.0 m each. Sleeves
were used for connections over the supports as detailed in Fig.2. The severe
case of wind load on roof is wind suction wherein the compression flange of
the purlin (bottom flange) under that load condition would be unsupported
laterally. To apply upward load to simulate such wind load was rather diffi-
cult. So, it was decided to attach the A.C. sheets on to the bottom flange
of the purlins after fixing it upside down to the rafters, and then apply
downward load. But, under this condition, the self weight of purlin and
sheets would also act in the same direction. as that of wind load, unlike in
the actual conditions, where they would act in opposite directions. However,
the effect of downward load due to the self weight of purlins and sheets

+ Scientists, Structural Engineering Research Centre

Madras-600l13, INDIA

265
266 SEVENTH SPECIALTY CONFERENCE

(which are very small compared to the wind load) were taken into account
while analyzing the final test results. The loads were applied using
hydraulic jacks through tension rods which were attached to the J-bo1ts
connecting the roof cladding and pur1ins. (it may be noted here that in
the actual case of wind suction also the load will be acting through the
J-bolts only). Strain gauges were fixed at selected points for measure-
ment of strains on the pur1ins. Semi-automatic electronic strain indicator
of 48 channel was used for recording the strains. Dial gauges of least
count 0.01 mm and 50 mm travel were fixed to measure the vertical and
horizontal deflections at various points. The test set-up is shown in
Fig.3 and Fig.5.

TEST SET UP FOR GRAVITY LOAD

To test the pur1ins under the gravity load condition, rafter inclination
of 23 0 was chosen as it is common. A pair of parallel purl ins were kept
over two continuous spans of 4.56 m each and at a spacing of 1.40 m between
them. The pur1ins were connected at the supporting rafters using cleats
and sleeves as shown in Fig.2. Asbestos cement sheets of 2.5 m length
were fixed to the pur1ins using J-bolts. Instrumentation used were the same
as described for the wind load tests. Cast iron bricks were used for
gravity loads. The test set-up may be seen in the Fig.4 and Fig.6.

PROCEDURE FOR WIND LOAD TEST

Purlins of section 125200 were arranged as described earlier and shown

in Fig.5. The loads were applied through jacks connected to a central
hydraulic pumping unit. One extra jack was connected in series to a
separate proving ring and a dummy test frame to evaluate the uniform load
applied to the J-bolts through tension rods. The purlins failed by lateral
buckling of the compression flange as expected. The test was repeated on
another set of purlins.

For pur1in section 210200, the test span chosen was 7.5 m. It was not
possible to get sufficient space for two continuous spans for the tests.
So, it was decided to have a single span of 7.5 m and make one end connec-
tion rigid enough so that the test span would behave as if it had an
adjacent span of equal length subjected to the same loading as that of the
test span. This was achieved by introducing a short span (about 60 cm)
continuous to the test span through the sleeve (Fig.7). Pur1in section
210200 was used for this short span also so that it would have high rigidity.

PROCEDURE FOR GRAVITY LOAD TEST

Pur1ins of 125230 were connected on the rafters as shown in Fig.4 over two
continuous spans of 4.56 m each. Over the A.C. sheets cast iron bricks were
placed to simulate uniform load on the pur1ins. An overhead crane was used
to lift and place the bricks in position. The load was increased gradually
upto the failure stage (Fig.6).
 Z-PURLINES WITH SHEET CLADDING 267

The first load test on 210200 was carried out to study the diaphragm action
of the A.C. sheeting in carrying the component of load acting along the
slope. So, a sag rod was just fixed in position between the purlins but the
top end of the sag rod was not secured to any rigid point (Fig.8). Now,
the component of load acting in the plane of the roof should be resisted
mainly by the sheeting acting as a diaphragm between purlins. Right from tqe
beginning of the test, the purlin started sagging badly along the slope
pushing the sheeting along with them. The system collapsed after the purlins
twisted and sagged completely (Fig.9). The failure load was less than half
of the calculated working load on the same purlin with effective sag rods.
This result of the test indicates that the A.C. sheeting supported between
the two purlins could not play an effective role in carrying and load acting
in the plane of the roof.

The test was repeated on a new set of purlins after fixing the sag rod to a
rigid point at top. The system failed by buckling of the top flange breaking
the A.C. sheets (Fig.10).

EVALUATION OF TEST RESULTS

The Z-purlins were designed as per IS: 801-1975(2). In the case of gravity
load, tl)was assumed that the compression flanges were braced by the A.C.
sheets • But, in the case of upward wind load, the purlins were designed
assuming no lateral restraint in the compression flange due to sheeting. The
fictitious load concept recommended by Lev Zetlin and George Winter(3) was
used for the computation of safe working load. The experimental stresses at
the working load is given in Xable 2(4). The failure load and the actual load
factor achieved from tests indicated doubts in the stiffening effect of the
roofing sheets in effectively bracing the compression flange.

WIND LOAD TEST RESULTS

The roof purlin was loaded until failure. The load factor achieved was much
more than the required load factor. The larger failure load that the purlin
carried may be due to the partial restraint offered by the loading system
through the J-bolts at the tension flange. The vertical deflection at mid
span was close to the theoretical deflection calculated from simple beam
theory as shown in Fig.11.

Strain variation across the mid span and at mid support are given in Figs.12
and 13. The strain variation behaved in a conventional way as an unrestrained
beam about its natural neutral axis. The strain pattern on the top flange of
the mid support followed the principal axes of the section. The overall
behaviour concurred with the tests reported by Rhodes(5) et. al.
268 SEVENTH SPECIALTY CONFERENCE

GRAVITY LOAD TEST RESULTS

The actual collapse load is less than predicted load, especially, in Test 4
where the actual factor of safety is 1.42 as against the calculated value
of 1.85. Probably the A.C. sheet could not offer sufficient restraint against
buckling as assumed.

The strain distribution measured and plotted is shown in Figs.14 and 15. The
stress at the junction of top flange and lip is critical. It can be seen
from the strain distribution in the flanges that the sheets do not contribute
much in carrying the load in the plane of the roof.

The predicted deflection values are compared with actual values in Fig.16 and
there is a fairly good agreement in the values.

CONCLUSION

The load carrying capacity of the Z-purlins could be calculated using the
fictitious load method. Effective sag rods contribute significantly in improv-
ing the performan~e.

The A.C. sheet cladding fixed using J-boits does not play an effective role
in carrying the load acting in the plane of roof.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The work reported in this paper is a part of the project sponsored by

MIs. T.I.Metal Sections Limited, Madras, India. The paper is published with
the permission of Dr.M.Ramaiah, the Director of SERC, Madras.

APPENDIX.--REFERENCES

1. Djugash, A.C.R., "Buckling Behaviour of Z-beams", Review Report, Structural

Engineering Research Centre, Madras, India, 1983.

2. IS:801-1975, "Code of Practice for Use of Cold-formed light Gauge Steel

Structural Members in General Building Construction", Indian Standards Insti-
tution, January 1976.

3. Lev Zetlin and George Winter, "Unsymmetrical Bending of Beams with and
without Lateral Bracing", Proceedings ASCE, Vo1.81, August 1955, pp 774-1 to
20.

4. Natarajan, P.R., Djugash, A.C.R., Seetharaman, S., "Experimental Investi-

gations on Z-purlins to Study the Structural Performance and Resistance against
Corrosion", Report No.S-004/80, Structural -Engineering Research Centre, Madras,
India, August 1981.

5. Rhodes, J.. et. al. "Tes ts on a Continuous Purlin Roofing System", Fourth
International Speciality Conference on Cold-Formed Steel Structures. June 1-2,
1978. University of Missouri, Rolla, pp 253-282.
 TABLE 1

DETAILS OF TESTS CARRIED OUT

N
Test No. Purlin Simulated Span Spacing No. of Sag No. of purlins Slope of ~
Section loading Length (m) spans rods tested rafter C
case (m) ~
t""'
.....
Z
trj
1 125200 Wind Load 4.00 1.00 2 Nil 2 Horizontal 00
~
.....
2 125230 Gravity 4.56 1.40 2 Nil 2 23 0 ~
Load ::r:
00
3 210200 Wind Load 7.50 1.00 One full One 2 Horizontal ::r:
span with trj
trj
provision ~
for conti- (')
nuity t""'
>
t::J
4 210200 Gravity 7.50 1.40 -do- One 2 23 0
Load t::J
.....
Z
0

~
0')
~
 t-:)
-1
o

TABLE 2
COMPARISON OF ANALYTICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

Analysis Experiment 00
Load Factor tz:j
Simulated <:
Test Purlin Failure load tz:j
loading Span ~afe work- Calculated Failure Measured
No Section Safe load
case (m) ing load stress at load stress at
(kN/m) safe load (kN/m) l~orking load
~
Expected Actual =
(MPa) (MPa) 00
~
tz:j
1 125200 Wind load 4.0 0.80 57.26 2.49 48.05 1.57 3.10 o
~

~
._---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >
2 125230 Gravity load 4.56 1.49 122.63 2.74 111.25 1.85 1.84 ~
o
._---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Z "
3 210200 Wind load 7.5 0.68 74.94 1.58 95.16 1.57 2.34
~
~
4 210200 Gravi ty load 7.5 0.91 122.63 1.30 109.19 1.85 1.42 Z
otz:j
 Z-PURLINS WITH SHEET CLADDING 271

TOP FLANGE

DEPTH
- I-- t ( THICKNESS)

BOTTOM FLANGE
.. I

DEPTH IN TOP FLANGE BOTTOM fLANGE THICKNESS AREA IN

SECTION mm. IN mm. IN mm. IN mm. cm~

125200 125 55 50 2.0 5.08

125230 125 55 50 2.3 5.81
210' 200 210 66 59 2.0 7.19

FIG. 1. Z -PURLIN DIMENSIONS

272 SEVENTH SPECIALTY CONFERENCE

1&1
>
1&1
1&1

1~
~

i~ :1
z
~
0
~
i U
.1&1
S
Q.
VI

Z
•
Q.
VI -rr-r-I'

I II
I II ~
- I 1 Q:
0
(l.
II +11 1 Q..
II ~

i II III j
(/)

0
I

! ~
II I 1
~~ w
~
-
0 _
+
II t - - --+-1
-
~
-
1&. •
• 1&1
12:111
:t:
~

litI +1 I~
,.. 1ft ~
'- <
w
II
II
1 1~5~ 1
>
~
w
-'
(/)
II II d.
N

z II +1 I c)
::::;
s- I 1 U-
~ I~
'f I ~; VI
II J\"
~
z
~ 1-- !9 --I

{~ 1
III
.D
~
9
VI
 Z -PURLIN
1_ 1000 .1
1- RAFTER

I
w:- I': rAC SHEET
, l- r
'\ '\
21[/ ! t;'l
lJ lJ I
I I I I-t:I
L.!... J c::::
, ~PEDESTAL
I ]~ t
II zt.".J
I rn
I :a
H
i i .>-3
I , , , ' , : I: ' ,-=- ::t:
~ , - /4 ''p' rn
" - f ' -,' 'T ::t:
~ ~ " ' 'iJ CO \, ' • EST
, I! , . t.".J
- , - '. " ", ' A' f.:,:~ '.. ' FLOOR t.".J
- " 500 >-3
<t " ,<I
-
~'
rt '

~
"'\, I
'
• A
•
' .
.
~
T (")
. ,: ':,' c~: " -" ,
.' , I 6', 1), ..l! " ' ~
.-- ........ .-,...- --r - I t:I
t:I
JACK
1 H
Z
TENSION ~
RODS m o
II
Jl T 11 }

FIG. 3· TEST SET UP FOR WI NO LOAD t.:l

-l
(PURLINS ARE INVERTED AND LOADS AND APPliED DOWNWARD) I:IJ
274 SEVENTH SPECIALTY CONFERENCE

W
..J
C)
Z II::
• ..J
~ §
~
\I)

iii
iii
C
"-
..J iii I-
U \I)
0. iii
I-
\I)
I-
l:
!2
iii
~

~
~
I-
11)

•u 0
«
0
....J

>
I--
~
II! >
«
a:
ffi
l- e.!)
•"-a: a:
0
LL..
a..
::::>
I--
w
I./)

I--
I./)
W
I--
-.t
cj
LL..

;z:
i
i I
N
Z-PURLINES WITH SHEET CLADDING 275

FIG.5 WIND LOAD TEST

FIG.6 GRAVITY LOAD TEST

276 SEVENTH SPECIALTY CONFERENCE

FIG.7 EQUIVALENT CONTINUOUS TWO SPAN ARRANGEMENT

FIG.8 NO SAG ROD AT TOP PURLIN

Z-PURLINES WITH SHEET CLADDING 277

FIG. 9 AT THE FAILURE LOAD

FIG.lO FAILURE PATTERN WITH SAG ROD AT TOP

 /Z - PURlI.. 210200 A

~
!(§! ~ 1lct liSic5! (il
SlFPORT CD Q ~TS
~ 7500 .. 163~1
DIAL GAUGE POSITIONS
[ GAUGES 1,3 - HORIZONTAL AT MID HEIGHT]
AlL DIMENSIONS ARE IN INII. 2,4 - YERTICAl AT BOTTOM
2.4rl----------------------------------~-----------------=----------,

~
~
'/' t;J
2.0 /"
;r..".....
/' ~
.."..... ~THEORETlCAl
.."..... DEFLECTION AT ~
u ./ CENTRE C')
0..0 ..".....
~ /./
,/./ ~
1.2 ,/ C')
./ o
.."..... z
/ ~
0.8 ~
z
C')
trj

OJ.

o 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40
DEFlECTION IN "''''
~I~ 11 PI~IIN n~~1 ~rTlnN ~n~ WINn I nAn
r------------ - - - -----,--

Z-PURLINES WITH SHEET CLADDING 279

C2
STRAIN SCALE :
1 DIV. = 100 X 10-6 m/m
EQUIVALENT STRESS SCALE:
1 DIV. = 20.3 M Pa
LINE 1 LOAD 0 · 54 Po
2
3
4
O· 74 Po
o·
93 Po
1.13 Po ----
5
6
7
8
1.32 Po
1.52 Po
1. 71
1.91
Po
Po
-- -
-- -----
9 2.10 Po

PURLIN 125200
TENSION

55

SCALE AND LINE LOADS

ARE COMMON TO
FIGS. 12 AND 13.

ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN mm.

- -T
NEUTRAL AXIS

62.36

50

COM ESSION

---
J"
C4 C3
STRAIN GAUGE
POSITIONS

C3

FIG.12. STRAIN RECORDED AT MAXIMUM MOMENT SECTION

( WIND UPWARD LOAD)
280 SEVENTH SPECIALTY CONFERENCE
E3

COMPRESSION

TENSION

-~IlHf- _--=.N=EUTRAL AXIS

ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN mm.

55

JE<
TENSION

EI E2
STRAIN GAUGE
POSITIONS

FIG. 13. STRAIN RECORD AT MID SUPPORT-ON SLEEVE

( WIND UPWARD LOAD )
 Z-PURLINS WITH SHEET CLADDING
STRAIN SCALE:
1 DIV. = 200 X 10-6 m/m
EQUIVALENT STRESS SCALE:
1 DIV. = 40.6 MPa
PURLIN 125230 Gl

LINE 1 LOAD O· 26 Po
---_------
-- --
2 0.51 Po
G2 .---- --
3 O· 74 Po ,.." .---
4 0.97 Po
5 1.19 Po ------
6 1. 43Po
-------
--------
7 1.70 Po
COMPRESSION

SCALE AND LINE LOADS

ARE COMMON TO
FIGS. 14 AND 15.
55

ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN mm. NE~l

62.22
50

~===~,.::L----\-J~---,L Tt/2
1 .2.'I'
TENSION ~
G4 GJ
STRAIN GAUGE
POSITIONS

G4

FIG.14. STRAIN MEASUREMENT AT MAXIMUM MOMENT SECTION

(GRAVITY LOAD)
 282 SEVENTH SPECIALTY CONFERENCE

Bl

-- ------ -
B2

TENSION
------
------

50

_\---W~=N~UTRAL AXIS

ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN mm.

COMPRESSIO!'!

3
2_-----
_---
B2 B1

S
B4 B3
STRAIN GAUGE
POSITIONS
B4

FIG.15.STRAIN GAUGE MEASUREMENT AT MID -SUPPORT: ON SLEEVE

(GRAVITY LOAD )
 Z-PURLINS WITH SHEET CLADDING 283

Z -PURLI N 125 230

I
SUPPORT SUPPORT 2 SUPPORT
4560 4560
-I • •I

DIAL GAUGE POSITIONS

GAUGES 1,3 HORIZONTAL AT MID DEPTH]
[
2,4 VERTICAL AT BOTTOM J
ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN mm.
1.6 ~-------------------------,

1.4

1.2

1.0

0..0

~ 0.8

()'6

0.4

0·2

o 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32
DEFLECTION IN mm.

FIG. 16. PURLIN DEFLECTION FOR GRAVITY LOAD