Application of Fracture Network Model With Crack Permeability Tensor
Application of Fracture Network Model With Crack Permeability Tensor
Application of Fracture Network Model With Crack Permeability Tensor
Engineering Geology
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w. e l s ev i e r. c o m / l o c a t e / e n g g e o
Application of fracture network model with crack permeability tensor on flow and
transport in fractured rock
Jian-Bang Pan, Chen-Chang Lee, Cheng-Haw Lee ⁎, Hsin-Fu Yeh, Hung-I Lin
Department of Resources Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan 701
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Very efficient and practical models that use a crack tensor in terms of fracture geometry parameters for field
Received 2 March 2010 rock mass are proposed. A framework of the crack tensor approach combined with the identifying fracture-
Received in revised form 19 July 2010 controlled characteristics was successively used in a hypothetical hydro-geological field for determining the
Accepted 4 August 2010
dynamics of flow and transport of nuclides in fractured rock.
Available online 20 August 2010
The modeling results and site-specific data of Lan-Yu Island in Taiwan reveal the characteristics associated
with the geometry of fracture networks under the prescribed boundaries. The simulated fracture networks
Keywords:
Fractures
were transformed into a grid-based simulation procedure under consideration of the delaying effect in
Fracture network model matrix owing to particle migration. Synthetic flow results indicate that the flowing vector is very sensitive to
Crack permeability tensor fracture intensity (P32); high fracture intensity leads to high velocity. Heterogeneity generated by fractures'
Ingrowth-decay transport field will result in the shortest and the longest transmission distance of 12-fold difference. While taking into
Lan-Yu island consideration of the ingrowth-decay transport, the plumes of the daughter product were relatively tortuous
Taiwan and anomalous to predict.
Crown Copyright © 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction other blocks by fractures with various hydraulic behaviors. Thus, the
flow through such a complex system depends on the magnitudes of
Fractured formation, which is the most common and general the permeability in each of the two regimes. However, the
material in rocks, makes it difficult for hydro-geologists, geologists, permeability of the intact rock is relatively low; fractures are regarded
engineers, and scientists to strictly quantify and characterize the as more permeable than the rock matrix by several orders of
flowing mechanism induced by spatial heterogeneity (Berkowitz, magnitude. Consequently, fractures are the major path for fluids to
2002; Neuman, 2005). Geomedia disposal is viewed as the best flow (Priest, 1993; Lee and Farmer, 1993; National Research Council,
method for disposing of radioactive waste. One of the most serious 2001; Berkowitz, 2002; Neuman, 2005).
problems is the isolation of the radioactive waste from the biosphere. When classified according to how heterogeneity is incorporated in
Groundwater flow through geological discontinuities is believed to be the model structure, fluid flow and solute transport fall into one of
the most significant mechanism of radionuclide migration. Theoret- three groups: discrete network models, equivalent continuum
ical models and experimental studies have contributed to the models, and hybrid models (National Research Council, 2001). It
understanding of flow and solute migration fields within fracture could be done via standard approaches such as by increasing the
planes, including the characterization of aperture variation, intersec- permeability of the porous medium to account for the fracture system
tions among various phases, and the transfer between fractures and (or double-porosity models), or by using discrete stochastic fracture
the rock matrix. network models.
The analysis of subsurface fluid flow and mass transport is often In the discrete fracture network model, such as Baecher's model
complicated by the fact that rock masses, especially at shallow depths, (Baecher et al., 1977; Dershowitz, 1984; Dershowitz and Einstein,
may contain various systems of cracks or failure surfaces. The rock 1988; Ivanova, 1998) each fracture is placed in a space centered on
mass can therefore be regarded as an assemblage of intact rock blocks Poisson points and oriented randomly according a specified distribu-
that are separated by discontinuities. These discontinuities may be tion. It is then extended to define a stochastic process for the
faults, joints, fissures, or fractures; the word “fracture” is used here as termination of the fracture shape and size. The usual process is to
the general term. In hydraulic modeling, each solid block can be begin with unbounded Poisson planes and to superimposed on them a
considered as a continuous porous medium that is separated from the series of Poisson lines or the lines of intersection between the
unbounded Poisson planes; this is called the enhanced Baecher model
(Dershowitz, 1984; Dershowitz and Einstein, 1988; Ivanova, 1998).
⁎ Corresponding author. Tel.: + 886 6 2757575x62833; fax: + 886 6 2380421. The main advantage of the discrete fracture model is that it allows the
E-mail address: [email protected] (C.-H. Lee). inspection of the influence of individual fracture parameters on flow.
0013-7952/$ – see front matter. Crown Copyright © 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.08.007
J.-B. Pan et al. / Engineering Geology 116 (2010) 166–177 167
Substituting Eqs. (1), (5), and (4) into Eqs.(2) and (3) produces an where ρ is the volume density of fractures, defined as m(v)/Vv.
equivalent permeability tensor Kij for the fracture system: Assuming that the random variables f, a, and e are statistically
independent of one another, E(f,a,e) = E(f) E(a) E(e), where E(f), E(a),
1
and E(e) are the density functions of f, a, and e, respectively, then:
Kij = Pkk δij −Pij : ð5Þ
12
em 3 am 2
In this case, Pij and Kij are both symmetric, having principal values Pij = ρ∫ e EðeÞde∫ a EðaÞda∫ fi fj Eð f Þdω: ð9Þ
0 0 w
in the principal directions. Since Kij is a function of Pij, its principal axes
are coaxial with those of Pij, with the major permeability in the minor
Since fractures generally occur in clusters or sets, the density
principal direction of Pij. If i = j in Eq. (5), the scalar hydraulic
function of E(f) for each set can be obtained in the form of a possible
conductivity Ks is given by:
distribution with the goodness-of-test on fracture orientations as
g 1 described above. However, it is difficult to obtain reliable data for the
Ks = P : ð6Þ density functions E(e) and E(a) for each set. It is a time-consuming
3μ 12 ii
work, especially for measuring the fracture apertures in situ (Snow,
1969). To overcome this difficulty, fracture aperture in the present
In this study, the rock masses are assumed to be composed of a
study is estimated from laboratory tests; the value is constant under a
series of fractures and an impermeable matrix. The crack geometry
fixed normal stress. Since the fracture orientation f, fracture size
can generally be regarded as a function of fracture orientation f,
(area) a, and fracture aperture e are independent, Eq. (9) can be given
fracture size (area) a, and fracture aperture e. In addition, the unit
as:
vector f is normal to the fractures that are orientated inside a small
solid angle dω around f and the diameters and the apertures range
Nf Nf
from a to a + da and from e to e + de, respectively. E(f,a,e)dωdade k 3 k k
Pij = ∑ Pij = ∑ e ρ〈a〉 N ij ð10Þ
is the probability of the unit normals of (f,a,e) fractures. In this case, k=1 k=1
E(f,a,e) is defined over the entire solid angle ω. If m(v) fractures are
located within the flow region of volume Vv, the frequency of the 2 3
2
probability of (f,a,e) fractures whose centers are located within Vv, ∑l ∑lm ∑ ln 1
Nij = ∫ ni nj EðnÞdω = 4 ∑ml ∑mn 5
k
∑m 2
ð11Þ
then let dN be a number of (f,a,e) fractures, to estimate the total of ω Rk
∑nl ∑nm ∑n2
fractures,
ðvÞ am
dN = m Eð f ; a; eÞdωdade: ð7Þ k
〈a〉 = ∫0 aEðaÞda ðk = 1; 2; …nÞ ð12Þ
3. Parameter estimation of fractures Since the field data of the fracture orientation are generally scattered
due to geological complexity, the deviation must be reduced to estimate
3.1. Mean orientation of fracture sets the solution of true frequency of each fracture set. Karzulovic and
Goodman (1985) established a method with a least square technique to
Fractures generally occur as fracture sets or clusters. The mean obtain the true frequency of fracture sets of the rock mass. In their
orientation of each cluster is required to estimate various engineering model, when there are Sf non-parallel scanlines, it is possible to obtain
problems. Determining the pattern of a fractured network is an the true frequency of each of the Nf fracture sets. Their approach
essential task for evaluating the contaminant transport in fractured produced the following result, expressed in matrix form:
rock. The statistical description of orientation data in the past was
often expressed as orientations of fracture values of normal in terms ½A½λi = ½B ð15Þ
of spherical co-ordinates (θ, ϕ, 1) or direction cosines (l, m, n). The
where [A] is a symmetrical matrix with Nf by Nf. The term Akl is defined
mean orientation of each cluster is then taken as the orientation of the
as the value of [A] in row k and column l and is given by:
resultant vector R, which is determined by adding all of the fracture
poles: Sf
Akl = ∑ cos δkl cos δlj ð16Þ
h i j=1
2 2 2
R = ∑l + ∑m + ∑n ð13Þ
where Sf are non-parallel scanlines, δkj and δlj are acute angles
between the j-th sampling line and normal to sets k and l, respectively.
where l = sinϕcosθ, m = sinϕ sinθ, and n = cosϕ. The angles (θ and ϕ)
The matrix [B] has one column and A rows. The term Lk in row k of [B]
are related to the dip angle φ, and the dip direction α, by θ = 2π − α
is given by:
(0 ≤ θ ≤ 2π) and ϕ = φ (0 ≤ θ ≤ π/2). It should be noted that, before
Eq. (13) can be used in estimating the mean orientation for each set, Sf
poles of fractures for each set must be identified. Bk = ∑ λj cos δkj ð17Þ
Therefore, a delineation of the fracture data is necessary before the j=1
When the fracture orientation is delineated as sets or clusters, the Numerical models have been developed to describe aperture
mean fracture orientation for each set can be estimated from the poles deformation (Barton et al., 1985). A hyperbolic function was suggested
of each set, as shown in Eq. (13). In order to estimate the principle for describing the relationship between stress and closure or opening of
frequency for each set, Priest and Hudson (1981) showed that the fractures in terms of joint wall compressive strength (JCS), joint
fracture frequency λθ along a scanline can be represented as: roughness coefficient (JRC), and normal stress. Barton et al. (1985)
showed that an empirical relationship between the mechanical aperture
Nf em and the hydraulic aperture ec can be expressed in empirical form as:
λθ = ∑ λi cos θi ð14Þ
i=1
e2m
ec = ð20Þ
JRC 2:5
where λi is the true frequency of the i-th fracture set along the
direction of its normal, θi is the acute angle between the scanline and where em and ec are in micro-meters and JRC is in a range of 0 (smoothest
the mean normal to the i-th set, and Nf is the number of fracture sets. surface) to 20 (roughest surface). Eq. (20) is valid only if ec ≤ em.
170 J.-B. Pan et al. / Engineering Geology 116 (2010) 166–177
Since the effective stress is normal to the plane of the fracture, the aperture, and transmissivity variation (2) and the arrangement of
amount of normal closure primarily depends on the mechanical the fractures in space, defined by the type of point process their
aperture em and the roughness of the fracture surface represented by locations followed (Baecher model), and the way they truncate each
JRC and JCS. JCS is the unconfined compressive strength of wall rock other. When dealing with a three-dimensional model, many of these
estimated from Schmidt hammer test. JRC can also be easily estimated choices must be made somewhat arbitrarily because only 1- or 2-D
from tilt tests, preferably with direct measurement (Barton et al., 1985), samples were taken from the 3-D system of the rock mass. A detail
using: description and analysis of fracture parameter sampling and variation
can be found elsewhere (Dershowitz, 1984; Dershowitz and Einstein,
αo −ϕor 1988). For all models, fracture termination is specified by the
JRC =
logð JCSÞ
ð21Þ
σ no
termination probability PT, which is the probability that a fracture
will terminate, given an intersection with another fracture.
where σno = γhucos2α, γ is the rock density, hu is the thickness of the
upper block, ϕor is the residual friction angle of intact rock, and α is the NT
PT = ð24Þ
tilt angle. The empirical value em is given by (Bandis et al., 1983): NFi
JRC σ where NT is the number of T intersections for fractures in the present
em = 0:2 c −0:1 ð22Þ
5 JCS set with fractures from previously generated sets, and NFi is the
number of fractures in the set having intersections with fractures from
where σc is the uniaxial compressive strength. Substituting Eq.(22) previously generated sets.
into Eq.(20) gives the hydraulic aperture: This form of termination disturbs the distribution of fracture size,
since portions of fractures are “discarded” if they are beyond the
2 intersection where termination occurs. This is only a problem for high
1 JRC σc
ec = 0:2 −0:1 : ð23Þ termination percentages (Dershowitz et al., 2004). In the present
JRC 2:5 5 JCS
study, the enhanced Baecher's model was used to obtain the more
realistic representation of robustness in fractures at intersections with
Knowing the hydraulic aperture is aimed for the assessment on pre-existing fractures.
flow's influence on each section of the fractured rock.
7. Flow and transport simulation
6. Generation of enhanced Baecher's model
Using a continuum approach (Oda, 1985; Lee et al., 1995), the
The three-dimensional model shown in Figure 2 (using FracMan permeability of fracture networks was translated onto a grid of
code developed by Golder's Associate) was applied in the present equally-sized cells, and FEHM (finite element heat and mass transfer
study. The choice of a stochastic conceptual model for a three- code developed by Los Alamos National Laboratory and could be
dimensional fracture system involved specifying (1) the individual downloaded by signing some agreement with DOE of USA) was used
characteristics of the fracture such as shape, size, orientation, to solve for fluid flow in both the fracture network and the less
permeable matrix assigned to cells not occupied by fractures. This
resulted in a discrete network solution which is a set of linear
equations of pressures at intersections.
FEHM was modeled within a non-isothermal, multiphase flow and
transport code that simulated the flow of water and air and the
transport of heat and solutes in two- and three-dimensional saturated
or partially saturated heterogeneous media. It also included compre-
hensive reactive geochemistry and transport modules, and particle
tracking capability. Fractured media can be modeled using the
continuum approach used in the present study, discrete fracture,
dual porosity, or dual permeability approaches (Zyvoloski et al.,
2008). The conservation of fluid mass can be written as:
∂Amass ̅
+ ∇⋅ f mass + qmass = 0 ð25Þ
∂t
where:
Amass ϕρ
→ →
f mass ρv
Amass fluid mass per unit volume (M/L3)
→
f mass fluid mass flux (M/L3t)
qmass fluid mass source (M/L3t)
ϕ porosity in the system
ρ fluid density (M/L3).
→ k →
Fig. 2. Example of a three-dimensional stochastic fracture network generated within a v = − ∇ P−ρ g ð26Þ
100 (m) cube. μ
J.-B. Pan et al. / Engineering Geology 116 (2010) 166–177 171
where:
∂As →
= ∇⋅ðρϕDs ∇Cs Þ−∇⋅ fs −qc ð27Þ
∂t
where:
As ϕCsρ
→ →
fs ρCs v
Fig. 3. Pole diagram of fracture orientation at the Lan-Yu site on a Schmidt net. Numbers
As solute mass storage per unit total volume for aqueous indicates the set number.
component liquid concentration
Cs concentration of solute (mole/ M)
Ds dispersion coefficient (L2/t) fracture network was assumed to be 10 m × 10 m × 10 m. The reference
→
fs dvective mass flux of solute parameters are shown in Table 1.
qc solute source or sink (moles/L3t). A general study of enhanced Baecher's model was proposed to
determine the importance of variability on structures based on spatial
intersections of fractures. Simulated within a 10 m cubic-block region
8. Model construction and application of a 1% gradient from upstream to downstream flow was used to
mimic a small portion of andersite rock mass. Generic boundary
A disposal site of intermediate radioactive waste in freshly fractured conditions were chosen to obtain a globally unidirectional flow forced
andesite located in the southeast part of Lan-Yu Island, about 49 miles from one vertical face to the opposite face by assigning a constant
southeast of Taitung City in the southeast part of Taiwan, was used to head boundary condition at the faces, as shown in Figure 4. Other
verify the proposed method (see Fig. 1). Investigations of the fracture boundaries were sealed by a no-flow condition in order to lower the
geometric parameters, such as the fracture sets, the mean orientation, significance of the boundary effects. Then, the crack tensor approach
the frequency, the spacing, and the trace length, were conducted on the combined with discrete fractures (Oda, 1985) was decided with the
fields listed in Table 1. Four sets of fracture orientation were represented topological characteristics of the fracture-clustered area of a specified
at the sampling area shown in Figure 3 (marked in red). Not only the volume, while other volumes not coincident with fractures were
surface survey on geology but also the hydrogeology experiments were treated as a matrix of low permeability on the magnitude of 10− 13
made here (Lee et al., 1996). The transmissivity was estimated as
8.9 × 10− 4 m/s where the upper and lower bound of transmissivity
distributions was 3.81 × 10− 4 m/s and 2.27 × 10− 5 m/s, respectively.
The average hydraulic conductivity of 8.04 × 10− 5 m/s was converted to
a permeability of 1.02 × 10− 10 m2 at 20 °C. The domain in the 3-D
Table 1
Input parameters considered in this study (Chen et al., 2001).
P32 is the areal intensity variant with respect to the distribution of fracture size Fig. 4. Modeling domains with no-flow conditions on upper, lower, front and back
(Dershowitz, 1984). boundaries where the flow is forced by a gradient of 1%.
172 J.-B. Pan et al. / Engineering Geology 116 (2010) 166–177
(m2). Finally, the grids were assigned to the mesh and numerically
solved using the finite element tool (FEHM) to get the subsequent
flow dynamics and transport behavior.
Fig. 8. The fracture intensity distribution associated with the velocity vector.
174 J.-B. Pan et al. / Engineering Geology 116 (2010) 166–177
in Figure 9. Following the distributed concentration of Figure 14, the connection of void space and the inherent decay from the parent
plumes of A are aligned within the dominant flowing direction such as product.
flow in Figure 11, but in Figure 14(b) the plumes of B are moving quite
totally different. The relative concentration of B is smaller than that of 10. Conclusion
A because of the effect on decay, and simultaneously the higher
concentration of B is not obviously under the same way that parent A An approach for developing an applicable model from a site-
did. A possible reason for this anomalous transport is that the complex specific discrete fractured network was demonstrated for a small
structures of fracture intersections give rise to a non-continuous synthetic block on a 10 × 10 × 10 m scale. The initial model included
Fig. 12. The fastest and slowest movement of particles. (a) Fastest movement of particles at Z = 5, (b) Fastest movement of particles at X = 5, (c) Slowest movement of particles at
Z = 5 and (d) Slowest movement of particles at X = 5.
References
Ando, K., Kostner, A., Neuman, S.P., 2003. Stochastic continuum modeling of flow and
transport in a crystalline rock mass: Fanay-Augeres, France, revisited. Hydrogeol-
ogy Journal 11 (5), 521–535.
Baecher, G.B., Lanney, N.A., Einstein, H.H., 1977. Statistical Description of Rock
Properties and Sampling, Proceedings of the 18th U.S. Symposium on Rock
Mechanics, vol. 5. American Institute of Mining Engineers, pp. C1–C8.
Bandis, S.C., Lumsden, A.C., Barton, N.R., 1983. Fundamental of rock joint deformation.
International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences & Geomechanics
Abstracts 20, 249–268.
Barton, N., Bandis, S., Bakhtar, K., 1985. Strength. deformation and conductivity
coupling of rock joints, International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences
& Geomechanics Abstracts 22, 121–140.
Bear, J., 1972. Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. American Elsevier, New York.
Berkowitz, B., 2002. Characterizing flow and transport in fractured geological media. A
review, Advances in Water Resource 25 (8–12), 861–884.
Bluma, P., Mackay, R., Riley, M.S., Knight, J.L., 2005. Performance assessment of a nuclear
waste repository: Upscaling coupled hydro-mechanical properties for far-field
transport analysis. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 42,
781–792.
Chen, R.H., Lee, C.H., Chen, C.S., 2001. Evaluation of transport of radioactive
contaminant in fracture rock. Environmental Geology 41, 440–450.
Christophe, G., Bernard-Michel, Gilles, Hakim, B., 2008. Evaluation of retention
properties of a semi-synthetic fractured block from modelling at performance
assessment time scales (Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory, Sweden). Hydrogeology
Journal. doi:10.1007/s10040-008-0415-x.
Deng, B.W., Lee, C.H., Chang, J.L., 1995. Characterization and interpretation of variability
of fracture pattern in jointed andesites Lan-Yu, Taiwan. Journal of the Chinese
Institute of Engineers 18, 787–799.
Dershowitz, W., Lee, G., Geier, J., Foxford, T., LaPointe, P., Thomas, A., 2004. FracMan,
Interactive Discrete Feature Data Analysis, Geometric Modelling, and Explora-
tion Simulation, User Documentation. Golder Associates Inc., Seattle,
Washington.
Dershowitz, W.S., (1984) Rock joint system, PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Dershowitz, W.S., Einstein, H.H., 1988. Characterizing rock joint geometry with joint
system models1,. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 21, 21–51.
Hsieh, P.A., Neuman, S.P., Stiles, G.K., Simpson, E.S., 1985. Field determination of the three-
dimensional hydraulic conductivity tensor of anisotropic media 2. Methodology and
application to fractured rocks. Water Resources Research 21 (11), 1667–1676.
Ivanova, V.M., (1998) Geologic and stochastic modeling of fracture systems in rocks,
PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Karzulovic, A., Goodman, R.E., 1985. Determination of principal joint frequencies.
International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences & Geomechanics
Abstracts 22, 471–473.
Langevin, C.D., 2003. Stochastic ground water flow simulation with a fracture zone
continuum model. Ground Water 41 (5), 587–601.
Lee, C.H., Farmer, I., 1993. Fluid Flow in Discontinuous Rock. Chapman & Hall, London.
169 pp.
Lee, C.H., Lee, C.C., Lin, B.S., 2007. The estimation of dispersion behavior in discrete
fractured networks of Andesite in Lan-Yu Island, Taiwan. Environmental Geology
52 (7), 1297–1306.
Lee, C.H., Chang, J.L., Deng, B.W., 1995. A continuum approach for estimating
permeability in naturally fractured rocks. Engineering Geology 39, 71–85.
Lee, C.H., Chang, J.L., Hsu, K.T., 1996. Investigation of hydraulic aperture at surface-
exposed rock fractures in situ. Geotechnique 46, 343–349.
Long, J.C.S., Remer, J.S., Wilson, C.R., Witherspoon, P.A., 1982. Porous media equivalents
Fig. 14. Particles within decay. (a) Plumes of parent product A and (b) Plumes of for network of discontinuous fracture. Water Resource Research 18, 645–658.
daughter product B. McKenna, S.A., Reeves, P.C., 2006. Fractured continuum approach to stochastic
permeability modeling, Stochastic Modeling and Geostatistics: Principles, Methods,
and Case Studies, AAPG Comput. Appl. Geol., vol. 3, 2nd ed. Am. Assoc. of Pet. Geol,
Tulsa, Okla, pp. 173–186.
such the retention properties of the block, found on Christophe et al. Miller, S.M., 1983. A statistical method to evaluate homogeneity of structural
(2008). populations. Mathematical Geology 15, 317–328.
Although using a three-dimensional approach is difficult in real National Research Council, 2001. Conceptual models of flow and transport in the
fractured vadose zone. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. 374.
world applications, tentative studies on simple academic cases and Neuman, S.P., 1987. Stochastic continuum representation of fractured rock permeabil-
geometries can still provide valuable insights, following, for instance, ity as an alternative to the REV and fracture network concepts, in Rock Mechanics.
the line of Rubin et al. (1999) or Wu et al. (2004). This integrated In: Farmer, I.W., et al. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 28th U.S. Symposium. A.A. Balkema,
Rotterdam, Netherlands, pp. 533–561.
framework can be used to determine the benefit of using the crack
Neuman, S.P., 2005. Trends, prospects and challenges in quantifying flow and transport
tensor approach to capture the characteristics or non-uniformity of through fractured rocks. Hydrogeology Journal 13 (1), 124–147.
the geologic structure. Oda, M., 1985. Permeability tensor for discontinuous rock masses. Geotechnique 35,
483–495.
Pohlmann, K., Pohll, G., Chapman, J., Hassan, A.E., Carroll, R., Shirley, C., 2004. Modeling
Acknowledgements to support groundwater contaminant boundaries for the Shoal underground
nuclear test, Publ. 45184. Desert Res. Inst, Reno, Nev.
The authors would like to thank "Final LLW and HLW Disoposal Priest, S.D., 1993. Discontinuity Analysis for Rock Engineering. Chapman & Hall.
Priest, S.D., Hudson, J.A., 1981. Estimation of discontinuity space and trace length using
Team" at the Institute of Nuclear Energy Research in Taiwan for scanline survey. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences &
helping generate the fracture networks and flow simulation and also Geomechanics Abstracts 18, 183–197.
J.-B. Pan et al. / Engineering Geology 116 (2010) 166–177 177
Reeves, D.M., Benson, D.A., Meerschaert, M.M., 2008. Transport of conservative solutes Teimoori, A., Chen, Z., Rahman, S.S., Tran, T., 2005. Effective permeability calculation using
in simulated fracture networks: 1. Synthetic data generation, Water Resource boundary element method in naturally fractured reservoirs. Petroleum Science and
Research 44, W05404. Technology 23 (5), 693–709.
Rubin, G., Jansen, D., Forkel, C., Köngeter, J., 1999. Simulation of contaminant transport Wang, M., Kulatilakea, P.H.S.W., Uma, J., Narvaiz, J., 2002. Estimation of REV size and
in fractured permeable formations by multiporosity modeling. Journal of three-dimensional hydraulic conductivity tensor for a fractured rock mass through
Hydrology 223, 107–130. a single well packer test and discrete fracture fluid flow modeling,. International
Selroos, J.-O., Walker, D.D., Stro¨m, A., Grylling, B., Follin, S., 2002. Comparison of Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 39, 887–904.
alternative modeling approaches for groundwater flow in fractured rock. Journal of Wide´n, H., Walker, D., 1999. SR 97—Alternative models project: Stochastic continuum
Hydrology 257, 174–188. modelling of Aberg, S.K.B. Rep. (R-99-42).
Shanley, R.J., Mahtab, M.A., 1976. Delineation and analysis of clusters in orientation Wu, Y.S., Liu, H.H., Bodvarsson, G.S., 2004. A triple-continuum approach for modeling flow and
data. Mathematics Geology 8, 9–13. transport processes in fractured rock. Journal of Containment Hydrology 73, 145–179.
Snow, D.T., 1969. Anisotropic permeability of fractured media. Water Resource Zyvoloski, G.A., Robinson, B.A., Viswanathan, H.S., 2008. Generalized dual porosity: a
Research 5, 1273–1289. numerical method for representing spatially variable sub-grid scale processes.
Svensson, U., 2001a. A continuum representation of fracture networks. part I: Method Advances in Water Resources 31, 535–544.
and basic test cases, Journal of Hydrology 250, 170–186. Zyvoloski, G.A., Dash, Z.V., Kelkar, S., 1988. FEHM: Finite-element heat- and mass-
Svensson, U., 2001b. A continuum representation of fracture networks. part II: transfer code, Los Alamos National Laboratory Report, LA-11224-MS.
Application to the Aspo Hard Rock laboratory, Journal of Hydrology 250, 187–205.