Business Entities
Business Entities
Business Entities
August 2, 2010 Carl Jolivette Business Entities, Laws, and Regulations Paper The following
paper will include a discussion of two imaginary businesses and which organizational
structure presents the best choice for each business with consideration for control,
taxation, and liability issues as well as the laws, regulations, and risks each business must
face. The paper will also consist of a discussion of a imaginary situation in which a hiring
manager must choose an candidate while considering laws, regulations, and the risks
against which the business must protect itself when making the judgment. Akiva and Tara
are newly licensed as obstetricians and want to open a birth clinic together. The will need
to take out a large loan to finance their start-up costs. Akiva and Tara would be best
served by creating a limited liability partnership (LLP) to organize their business. By forming
the LLP, the partners protect themselves from liability beyond their initial capital
contribution should the partnership fail or face a lawsuit (Cheeseman, 2010). Members of an
LLP are also not individually liable for the malpractice of one partner and states necessitate
LLPs to carry substantial liability insurance in trade for this limited liability. The limited
liability protects Akiva and Tara from being held personally liable for the loan they will take
out should the business become in debt. Forming an LLP ensures that Akiva and Tara
maintain control of their business because they are the only shareholders. For tax purposes,
an LLP is not taxed as a separate entity so Akiva and Tara will only pay taxes for the
business earnings on their individual tax returns. To form their LLP, Akiva and Tara will need
to write and file articles of partnership in the state in which they wish to function
(Cheeseman). If they desire to carry out business in another state, they will first need to
register as a foreign LLP with that state. Organizing their business as a limited liability
partnership offers Akiva and Tara the best blend of liability protection, tax benefits, and
control of their business. Frank is a wealthy investor who plans to open a chain of
exterminating businesses across the United States. Frank should organize his business as a
franchise. Franchising offers benefits to the franchisor including being able to develop into
multiple markets and maintaining control over any trademarks, patents, copyrights, and
trade secrets used in the company. Franchisors may also collect a percentage of the profits
from their franchisees in the form of payments. Franchisees benefit from having access to
the franchisor's knowledge and resources (Cheeseman, 2010). They also do not have to pay
the expenses connected with establishing trademarks, copyrights, and patents. Franchisors
and franchisees are separate legal entities for purposes of taxation and liability, at least in
most cases. This means that the relationship between franchisor and franchisee is one of an
self-regulating contractor and, generally speaking, neither party is responsible for the torts
or contracts of the other (Cheeseman). Organizing his business as a franchise gives Frank
power over who he will license as a franchisee, the fee he will charge for the franchise
agreement, and the markets in which his company will operate. The taxation of the
company will depend on how the franchise company is organized. If Frank incorporates his
business, the company will be taxed as will the payments paid to shareholders. If Frank
chooses to form an LLC as the foundation for his franchise, the company will not be taxed
as a separate entity but its members must report profits and losses on their individual tax
returns. For Frank's purposes, forming a chain-style franchise of exterminating businesses
throughout the country provides the best way to present a uniform service and product to
consumers, maintain control of trademarks and copyrights, and to operate in a diversity of
markets using franchise agreements. Mei-Lin has advertised for a position for a jackhammer
worker and specifies that the successful interviewee must have a high school diploma. She
has received more than a few applications and must make a hiring choice. To remain
amenable with the law, Mei-Lin must consider several factors when choosing an applicant.
She cannot, for example, deem factors such as race, color, age, or gender when making her
choice. The company's requirement for a high school diploma is not discriminatory because
it is a practical prerequisite for the position. This means that for no other grounds, Eric and
Felipe are not eligible for the position because they are not high school graduates. Mei-Lin
can exclude them for the position without apprehension a claim of prejudice based on Erik's
age or Felipe's language obstacle. This leaves Michelle and Nick as candidates. Mei-Lin
notices that Michelle appears to be pregnant; according to the Pregnancy Discrimination Act
of 1978, Mei-Lin cannot base a decision not to employ Michelle on this only (U.S. Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission, 2008). Nick is an epileptic and is therefore protected
under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Mei-Lin may not base a hiring decision on
Nick's disability. She may also not require a physical examination as a condition of
employment unless all job offers are equally trained (Cheeseman, 2010). Nick must be able
to perform the fundamental requirements of the job with reasonable accommodation. In this
case, Mei-Lin should hire Michelle because she has the necessary high school diploma and
prior experience as a jackhammer operator. Michelle's apparent pregnancy cannot be
considered. Although Nick does have a high school diploma, he has no experience operating
a jackhammer. Should he try to file a claim with the Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission for discrimination based on a violation of Title I of the ADA, Mei-Lin can defend
her decision based on Michelle's prior work experience. When deciding how best to organize
a business, factors such as control, taxation, and liability are essential matters.
Professionals such as doctors, lawyers and accountants are best served by limited liability
partnerships that protect members from personal liability beyond their initial capital
offerings. Businesses seeking to work a chain of locations providing uniform services can set
up as a franchise and license others to operate under their trade names. Employment
decisions are complex and must be made in a manner that does not violate civil rights and
other protections afforded under the law. References Cheeseman, H. (2010). The legal
environment of business and online commerce.