Development of A Sample Tutorial For Metal Forming Using Advanced Computer Aided Engineering Tools
Development of A Sample Tutorial For Metal Forming Using Advanced Computer Aided Engineering Tools
Page 15.407.1
Abstract
In this paper, a sample tutorial has been developed using advanced CAE tools like HyperWorks
and LS-Dyna. The work outlined in this paper is routinely carried by experienced engineers in an
industry environment. However, it is believed that the tutorial presented here is believed to be
unique in an educational setup. Although many CAE software offer online tutorials relevant to
the use of that specific software, there are very few if any that offer help sheets that require a
user to switch between different software for carrying out the numerical simulations. A senior
level course on metal forming simulation requires the use of various CAE tools to do solid
modeling and to carry out the finite element modeling and analysis.
An assessment to measure the effectiveness of the use of this tutorial is yet to be fully developed,
but it appears based on preliminary survey that the students seem to have appreciated the ease
with which the simulations can be carried out based on this tutorial. Also due to an increased
demand for trained engineers in the metal forming area such tutorials are very helpful as a first
step. A step by step procedure has been written that integrates the use of different CAE tools for
metal forming simulation of an example instrument panel (IP) used in automotive applications.
As a first step, solid modeling of the individual sheet metal component using different CAD
programs like Unigraphics is discussed. A discussion on how these solid models can be imported
to different CAE programs to be meshed and then subsequently used in high-end solvers like
HyperForm and LSDyna is then presented.
The analyses that were conducted for this tutorial included formability of the individual
component. Design of Experiments used in this study is also briefly discussed. The main purpose
of doing these types of analyses is to choose the optimum design based on the set constraints.
The DOE studies presented in this paper can be adapted in an educational environment. DOE
was done to determine the effects that the input factors have on the results of the forming
simulations that were conducted. This integrated study can be used in a senior manufacturing
simulation course. Finally, the results of this study are discussed and recommendations for future
work presented.
Introduction
In this paper, a sample tutorial for a metal forming simulation using HyperForm (one-step
solver) of HyperWorks is presented and discussed. Other tutorials based on using the large
deformation nonlinear finite element code – LS-Dyna (incremental solver) has also been
developed. The results from both of these software programs are compared for consistency and
validation purposes. Due to space limitations only a sample tutorial based on HyperForm is
presented below. Students’ feedback indicates that the developed tutorial is very useful for their
easy understanding of both meshing and analysis of large deformation metal stamping analysis.
Page 15.407.2
Modeling, Meshing, and Simulating a Bracket Used in an Instrument Panel using
(UGS NX 5.0 / HyperMesh 9.0 / HyperForm 9.0)1,2
This tutorial creates and analyzes a sheet metal stamped part that is used to hold a steering
column onto an instrument panel shown below. A solid model of the part is created using UGS
NX 5.0 and then is meshed using HyperMesh 9.0. A stamping simulation is then performed
using HyperForm. A DOE is conducted on the results of the simulation and a brief description is
provided.
Solid Modeling
Figure 2 – Name and save the model file using this window
Page 15.407.3
3. Create the Initial Block - Right click on an area in the top portion of the screen and
toggle on the Feature toolbar. Click on the Block icon. If the Block icon isn’t showing
click the drop down arrow on the right side of the Feature toolbar shown here
then mouse over Add or Remove Buttons then Feature then click the Block icon then
click the drop down arrow again and then click the Block icon.
In the Block window that pops up type in the following values then click on the point at
the intersection of the three axes shown then click OK
4. Create Two Darts - From the Feature toolbar click on the Dart icon. If the Dart icon is
not showing it can be toggled on the same way the Block icon was above.
Type in the following values shown below in the Dart window then click the face on the
block that is in the XZ plane (shown as the purple face below) then click the middle
mouse button to accept this face, then click the top face then move the slider (currently
shown as grey out here) to a position of around 25 then click OK.
5. Create a Shell – Right click somewhere on the top of the screen and toggle on the
Feature Operation toolbar. Click the Shell icon. If the Shell icon is not showing it can
be toggled on by click the drop down arrow on the right side of the Feature Operation
toolbar. Type in 2.2 for the Thickness and then click faces to remove them so that the
box looks like the picture below then click OK.
6. Smooth the Edges On the Outside – Click the Edge Blend icon from the Feature
Operation toolbar and type in 5.0 for Radius 1 then click the edges shown here then
click OK. (Although only a couple edges of the darts are selected, the complete perimeter
of the dart is automatically smoothed out)
Figure 8 – Edges that need to be selected Figure 9 – Edges that need to be selected
7. Smooth the Edges On the Inside – Click the Edge Blend icon again and type in 2.8 for
Radius 1 then click the edges shown here then click OK.
The part should now look like the picture shown in Figure 10.
Page 15.407.5
Figure 10 – Correct shape of part
8. Create Two Holes – Go to Insert then Design Feature then Hole. Enter 10 for the
Diameter then click the top surface of the part then click the bottom surface of the part to
specify the thru face and then click Apply.
Figure 11 – Surface to create holes in Figure 12 – First edge used to place the hole
Then click the edge shown below and then type 30 in the box shown then click Apply.
Then click the top edge shown then type in 20 in the box shown then click OK.
Page 15.407.6
Figure 13 – Second edge used to place the hole Figure 14 – Current shape of the component
Repeat the same process to create another hole that has a distance of 90 from the first edge
and 20 from the second edge so that the part looks like the following picture.
9. Remove Lower Edge – Go to Insert then Sketch then click the face shown below then
click OK.
Go to Insert then Rectangle to create a rectangle that is approximately the same size as
shown. Make sure the right side and bottom of the rectangle are outside of the part as
shown. Then click the Finish Sketch icon.
Then go to Insert then Combine Bodies then Subtract then click the original part then click
the solid box that was just created then click OK. The part should now look like the picture
shown below.
The blue sketch can be hidden by hitting the keys ctrl-w and then expanding the Geomtry
tree and then clicking the minus sign next to Sketches.
10. Create Radii at the Edges – Click the Edge Blend icon on the Feature Operation
toolbar and then enter 10 for the Radius 1 value then click the five highlighted edges
shown below then click OK.
Page 15.407.8
Figure 19 – Edges that need to be selected Figure 20 – Final shape of the component
The part should now look like the picture shown in Figure 20.
11. Create an .igs file - Save the part. Then go to File then Export then IGES then click the
yellow folder icon to name it something and save it to a location that you can remember.
This creates a .igs file that can be imported into HyperMesh for the simulation. An .igs
file is a standard file that describes the geometry of the parts it was made from so that the
geometry that was created can be imported into different types of software programs.
Meshing
1. Open HyperMesh – Start HyperMesh by going to the Start button then All Programs
then Altair HyperWorks 9.0 then HyperMesh. A User Profiles window should pop up.
If the User Profiles window doesn’t pop up go to Preferences then User Profiles. Under
the Application drop down list select Manufacturing Solutions then select
HyperForm then select 1Step from the drop down list then click OK.
2. Import the .igs File – Go to File then Import then for the Import Type choose
Geometry then for the File type choose Auto Detect then click the yellow folder icon
and browse to where the .igs file is located that contains the geometry of the part from the
instrument panel and click Open then click Apply.
Page 15.407.9
3. Shade the Geometry – Click the icon to shade the geometry. By holding down the
ctrl key on the key board and left clicking on the screen and holding down the left mouse
button and moving the mouse around the part can be moved around. To change the origin
of rotation hold down the ctrl key and left click somewhere on the part and let go.
4. Create a Midsurface – Go to
Geometry then AutoCleanup
then click the green edit
parameters box and then the
following window will pop up.
Change the Target element size:
to a value of 6 and then add a
check mark in the box next to
Extract midsurfaces and then
uncheck the box next to Sheet
metal only. Leave everything
else as the default values as
shown below and then click OK.
Click the green edit criteria box then change the Target element size: to a value of 6
then change the Min Size value to 3 and leave everything else as their default values as
shown below and then click OK.
5. Mesh the Part – Click the F12 key on the keyboard (if nothing happens when you hit the
shortcut function keys make sure there is no red return box in the bottom right corner of
the screen and also click somewhere on the screen next to the model) then change the
element size to a value of 6 then click the first drop down box and select surfs then click
the yellow surfs box then click all then mesh then click return. Click the icon in
the lower middle portion of the screen to shade the mesh. This creates rectangular and
triangular shell elements on the midsurface of the part. Shell elements are used as
opposed to brick elements because they should be more accurate for thin sheet metal
parts.
Page 15.407.11
7. Cleanup the Mesh – Hit the F6 key on the keyboard then click the cleanup button then
select displayed elements from the drop down box then click cleanup.
Then click the set ranges box and enter the numbers as shown below.
Check the boxes next to skew and length and leave the other boxes checked. The part should
look similar to what is shown below.
be cleaned up
The red elements are the elements that are badly deformed and could lead to nonrealistic results
during the simulation. These red elements fail the element checking criteria based off of the
ranges that were set above, which are reasonable for this sheet metal part that is 2.2mm thick. By
clicking on the nodes and dragging them small distances (i.e. less than about 1.0mm) to different
locations the red elements can be corrected. If the nodes have to be moved a relatively large
distance leave them where they are so that the part doesn’t get badly distorted. After moving a
node it can be moved back to its original position by clicking undo. If all the red elements
cannot be corrected hit the F10 key on the keyboard then click the 2-d button and type 5 next to
warpage then click the warpage box, then the elements that are badly warped will be
highlighted, then click save failed.
Then go to Mesh then Edit then Elements then Split Elements then click the plate
elements button then select the drop down box and pick divide quads then click the
yellow elems box and select retrieve then click split then click return.
Page 15.407.13
1. Orient the Part – For the stamping simulation it is assumed that the undeformed blank
that the part is made from lies along the XY plane and that the die travels along the
negative Z axis to stamp the part into shape. When the part was created in UGS NX 5.0
the part should have been oriented the correct way for the stamping simulation as shown
here.
Click the comps box from the drop down box on the left side of the
screen. Highlight the comps box by clicking next to it then click
the meshed component on the screen. Select which axis you want to
rotate the meshed component about by selecting it from the other
drop down box. Highlight the purple B box by clicking next to it
then click a node on the meshed component to indicate the origin the
part will be rotated about. Specify the angle that you wish to rotate
the component by typing it into the angle box then click the rotate +
or rotate – box to reorient the meshed component. Repeat for
theother two axes if necessary. Click return.
Page 15.407.14
Select comps from the drop down box then highlight comps by clicking next to it
then click the meshed component on the screen and then click calc autotip then click
return.
You can tell if the part is oriented correctly later when the simulation is ran because if it
isn’t an undercut error will occur and the orientation will need to be adjusted again. The
side of the part that is being undercut will be highlighted when the simulation is ran to
indicate where the error is.
2. Create the Material Collector – On the left side of the screen click Material then click
the create button then rename the material and type in the vales as shown below (which
is for AISI 1008 steel) and then click the create box or update if there is already a
material collector with this name.
Page 15.407.15
Figure 35 – Material parameters
3. Create the Component Collector – Click Components on the left side of the screen
then click the component: box (you may need to click it twice) then click the box with
the name of the component (there should only be one and it may be named different than
lvl1) then click the material box and click the material collector that was created earlier
then type in 2.2 for the thickness then click update. (do not click create since a
component should already exists)
4. Create Constraints – Click Constraints on the left side of the screen then click two
nodes in the approximate location as shown (the nodes need to be on elements that lie
along the XY plane) then click update.
Page 15.407.16
6. Save and Run the Simulation – Click Save on the left side of the screen then click save
as then save the file as a Hyperform Binary File (*.hf*) to a separate folder called
Simulation someplace you can remember.
Click Run on the left side of the screen and then click run analysis.
Page 15.407.17
Figure 40 – Window used to run the simulation
A DOS window should pop up and after a few seconds should say that the processing is
complete. The simulation is ran in the Simulation folder that was created earlier and all
the results are copied to this folder.
1. Load the Results – Go to File then Load then Results then browse to where the
Simulation folder is and open the .res file then click Open.
2. View Thinning – Click % Thinning on the left side of the screen and then the results
should look similar to what is shown below. The results show that the maximum %
thinning is 20% at the corner shown in red. This is usually the value where splits in sheet
metal start to occur (depending on the type of material used) from too much thinning of
the material. If this was an issue the lower edge of the part could be raised which should
lower the % thinning to correct the problem or the initial thickness of the part could be
increased as well. This % thinning is the percentage that the thickness of the sheet metal
will be reduced from its original thickness during the stamping process.
Design of Experiments3-5
Since many simulations can be performed on a stamping process to analyze several designs, a
DOE (design of experiments) is used in this paper to determine which factors and interactions
play the most important role in the forming process and hence effect the thinning. The same
stamping simulation is performed while adjusting different factors like friction, material
thickness, and tonnage for each simulation to determine which factors influence the formability
(e.g. % thinning) of the part. One of the easiest DOE’s to perform is the 2k Factorial Design. The
2 represents the two levels (values) that each of the k factors can assume in the experiment. For
this analysis there were originally four (k = 4) factors in the process, the yield strength of the
sheet metal, its thickness, the friction coefficient, and the tonnage of the press. For each complete
trial or replication of the experiment all possible combinations of the levels of the factors are
investigated. The number of runs can grow quickly though if more than four factors want to be
investigated because a 2k factorial requires 2k combinations. With four factors this DOE
required 24 = 16 complete trials. The 2k factorial can be performed easily by setting up a
spreadsheet that uses factor values and the thinning (response) of each complete trial as inputs
and then the results (effects and interactions) are determined by using contrasts5. This can also
easily be done using the regression data analysis tool in Excel. The results of the DOE can be
Page 15.407.19
used to find the optimum settings of the four factors to minimize the percent thinning (the
response) of one of the corners of the part. Table 1 shows the factor values that were used in the
analysis.
Table 1 – Factor level used in the DOE Studies
Yield
Factor Thickness Tonnage
Strength Friction
Level (mm) (Tons)
(Mpa)
-1 186 0.8 0.05 20
+1 500 3.2 0.70 80
The results of the DOE experiments showed that the yield strength was insignificant and could
be disregarded. Since the forming analysis showed that no splits should occur in the bracket the
yield stress should not have any effect on the results though. The least significant of the
remaining three factors was tonnage. Therefore, using only the two most significant factors a
response surface plot of the % thinning of the bracket could be produced and is shown below.
The graph shows that to keep the % thinning as low as possible, to reduce the chance that splits
will occur, the friction and thickness should be kept as low as possible.
Conclusions
In this paper, a sample tutorial has been developed for use in the class room. This dealt with an
integrated forming and preliminary DOE studies to understand the correlation between different
forming parameters that affect successful forming of a part. To our knowledge, no such tutorial
is available for use by the students in a class room set up. Students’ response and course
evaluation indicates that the tutorial was helpful for their easy understanding of the stamping
Page 15.407.20
simulation and analysis. More tutorials are needed to guide the student learners to work
seamlessly between different software platforms.
Bibliography
Page 15.407.21