Scribd
Upload
69 views5 pages

D - R M L N L U L: R AM Anohar Ohiya Ational AW Niversity Ucknow

The report discusses 4 cases that were heard during the visit. The cases covered issues related to filling job posts without proper rules, the validity of state ordinances, an appeal where the assessee did not appear, and an appointment as a clerk where the petitioner was suspected of a crime. The report concludes that the visit was a great experience that helped students understand real legal proceedings better than simulations, and that their professor Dr. R.K. Yadav provided valuable lessons on advocacy.

Uploaded by

Thakur Digvijay Singh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
69 views5 pages

D - R M L N L U L: R AM Anohar Ohiya Ational AW Niversity Ucknow

The report discusses 4 cases that were heard during the visit. The cases covered issues related to filling job posts without proper rules, the validity of state ordinances, an appeal where the assessee did not appear, and an appointment as a clerk where the petitioner was suspected of a crime. The report concludes that the visit was a great experience that helped students understand real legal proceedings better than simulations, and that their professor Dr. R.K. Yadav provided valuable lessons on advocacy.

Uploaded by

Thakur Digvijay Singh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

REPORT 2017-18

DR. RAM MANOHAR LOHIYA NATIONAL LAW


UNIVERSITY LUCKNOW

ACADEMIC SESSION 2017-18

MOOT COURT AND CLINICAL LEGAL EDUCATION


REPORT OF HIGH COURT VISIT (04/04/2018)

Submitted to: - Submitted by:-

Digivjay Singh

Dr. R.K. Yadav Enrollment no.- 160101064

Asstt. Professor (LAW) Section- A.

Dr. RMLNLU, Lucknow. Semester IV.

1|Page
REPORT 2017-18

REPORT

Court Name-

Court no. - 03 (Service and Government Cases)

Judge Bench-

Division bench (Bench of 2 Judges)

Judge’s name-

Hon’ble Justice Ajai Lamba and Hon’ble Justice Anant Kumar

Cases Discussed-

1- Aniket Srivastava v. Leelavati.

Facts-

The basic issue raised in the case was that the posts in the company against
whom the case was filed were being filled up without any rules and regulations
in spite of the fact that an order was made by the division bench earlier under
Section 25 and 26 to frame rules and regulations for the same.

In written petition the petitioner side said that rules and regulations have been
framed but were unable to produce them in the court.

The court heard the arguments from both sides and provided Monday as next
day for further proceedings to support the case.

2- Ali Shahab Khan v. Custodian of enemy property-

Facts-

2|Page
REPORT 2017-18

The basic issue was regarding the constitutional validity of two state ordinances
that were passed during that year.

The honourable judge heard the arguments and provided another day for further
proceedings.

3- Isabella Thoburn College FAI v. State of U.P. thru Principal

Facts-

The assesse in person did not appear for the hearing of this appeal. J Dhayanand
Chandrachud was called as an amicus curiae in this case.

Honourable judge listened to the pleadings from both the sides and gave next
day for another hearing.

4- Smt. Sunita v. National Insurance Company

The commission of the society was the appointing authority. The petitioner of
this case was appointed as a clerk in the society. He was suspected because of
an FIR lodged against him under the sec. E C act. The writ petitioner was filed
that day.

3|Page
REPORT 2017-18

CONCLUSION-

The moot court visit organised by our very experienced, proficient teacher and
our very own guide Dr. R.K. Yadav on 4th April 2018, seemed to be a great
experience for the us as law students. Only because of efforts from our highly
active and learned professor we were able to see real life court proceedings
instead of the moot court simulation that we take part in. We were told to make
notes of the same by our professor who wanted us to thoroughly analyse the
proceedings so that we could understand the basics of litigation and apply the
same for our benefit. At the end of moot court visit, the students were highly
inspired. It is only because of hard work and help and so much of efforts that
were put in for the students from our eminent professor Dr. R.K. Yadav that we
got to learn so much that day. Dr R.K. Yadav taught us during the court visit the
standard of conduct that we as an advocate shall be following, he taught us the
true spirit of advocacy that shows up in every great lawyer. We as students are
highly obliged to thank him for putting in so much of efforts and to make our
court visit a really informative one.

4|Page
REPORT 2017-18

SUBMITTED BY-

ROLL NOS. - NAMES - SIGNATURES

160101064 Digvijay Singh

5|Page

You might also like