Flipped Classroom

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

FLIPPED CLASSROOM

OVERVIEW:
Instructors across disciplines have looked for ways to hauser, 2011); flipped
promote long-lasting student learning and for approach- teaching (e.g., Teo, Tan,
es that lead to more effective teaching and learning Yan, Teo, & Yeo, 2014) and
experiences in higher education (Bligh, 2000). One reverse teaching (e.g., Foertsch,
such tactic involves students completing outside-class Strikwerda, & Litzkow, 2002). We will refer to this
reading, assignments, and understanding of key content, teaching and learning method as “flipped classroom”.

“Students’ performance on the final examination significantly improved compared to performance of


students the previous year who completed the same module in a traditional classroom setting.” (Pierce,
& Fox, 2012)

so instructors can make use of class time with activities The following sections offer a summary of what research-
that demand the application and deep understanding ers and instructors across disciplines have reported
of the content matter learned by students before class. around the implementation of a flipped classroom in
In other words, content coverage is moved outside the different university-level teaching and learning contexts.
classroom in order to employ in-class time stimulat-
ing the upper levels of Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive
skills (Anderson, Krathwohl, & Bloom, 2001; Bloom &
COURSES & STUDENT
Krathwohl, 1984). ENROLMENT:
Instructors have flipped their classrooms in varied topics
“Students developed a better understanding of that include, but are not restricted to, STEM disciplines
the theory underlining the procedures and expe- (engineering, chemistry, calculus, statistics); the arts
rienced less anxiety about the complex practical (visual arts); information systems and computer scienc-
es; architecture; economics; and pharmacy. Reported
steps and setup, and subsequently, improved work
flipped courses range from 100 to 400 level, manda-
efficiency.” (Teo, Tan, Yan, Teo, & Yeo, 2014) tory, prerequisite, capstone, or specialization courses.
Enrolments also fluctuate between low (20 students)
to high (500+ students) and anything in between.
This teaching method has a long history of implementa-
tion in the humanities as students are frequently tasked
with reading texts that will prepare them for in-class
discussions and other active learning activities. How-
ever, across institutions and disciplines, it has received “The approach takes advantage of the benefits of
different titles that include: Just-in-Time-Teaching (e.g., both collaborative learning and distance learning
Novak et al, 1999); inverted classroom (e.g., Gannod, while at the same time targeting the millennial
Burge, & Helmick, 2008; Strayer, 2012); flipped class- student.” (Gannod, Burge, & Helmick, 2008)
room (e.g., Jensen, Kummer, & Godoy, 2015; Smith,
2013; Wilson, 2013); backwards classroom (e.g., Schaff-

flexible.learning.ubc.ca
PRE CLASS ACTIVITIES: IN CLASS ACTIVE LEARNING:
• Assigned/targeted readings • Clinical cases
• Participation in blogs, forums, etc. • Discussion/reflection
• Problem solving/worksheets • Experiments/demonstrations
• Quiz prep questions • Inquiry learning
• Tutorials • Peer assessment/instruction
• Video lectures/screencasts/video podcasts, • Problem solving/worksheets
content and practice/labs • Programming/software use
• Quizzes/exams/concept inventories
• Review questions
• Team/group work

EVIDENCE OF IMPACT:
The following are some of the benefits and limitations reported in the flipped classroom literature.

BENEFITS:
• Anytime/multiple access to materials • Increased motivation/engagement towards learning
• Better performance in tests/quizzes/homework • Increased practice time
• Better time management • Increased self-efficacy
• Enhanced collaboration skills • Increased student-instructor interactions
• Enhanced communication skills • Larger content coverage
• Existing resources that can be adopted • More opportunities to receive feedback
• Facilitation of problem solving strategies/skills • Reduced anxiety towards new challenges
• Improved understanding of new concepts • Self-regulated pace/independent learning
• Increased knowledge retention of material • Support of multiple learning/instructional preferences

LIMITATIONS:
• Greater upfront investment for development of resources (e.g., targeted reading, videos, etc.)
• Higher set-up cost
• Increased requirement for self-discipline
• Increased student workload
• Limited opportunity to ask questions during pre-class activities
• Reduced motivation/engagement in class
• Technology challenges (e.g., videos not complete/with errors; not working)

REFERENCES AND RESOURCES:


For a complete list of references and resources, please visit: flexible.learning.ubc.ca/flipped-references

flexible.learning.ubc.ca

You might also like