Introduction To Research: Understand, Predict Control
Introduction To Research: Understand, Predict Control
2 3 Introduction to Research
2. Business Research
Managers encounter problems that need solutions. Data Types:
Business research is a systematic and organized effort to (i) Quantitative Data (structured questionnaire),
investigate such problems. (ii) Qualitative Data (observation, interviews, open-ended
questionnaire).
2.1 Definition of Research
Business Research is defined as an organized, 2.2 Research and Manager
systematic, data-based, critical, objective, scientific
inquiry or investigation into a specific problem, Research investigation covers, accounting, finance,
undertaken with the purpose of finding answers or management, and marketing, or an interrelated issue.
solutions to it. Problems must be analyzed in the context of external
environment (economic, political, demographic,
The research is based on (i) Primary data: Gathered technological, competitive).
first hand for the given problem (ii) Secondary data:
Already available (company records, industry reports,
publications, or on the net).
5 6
4.1 Benefits of Research and Research
Methods for Managers: 5. The manager and the Consultant-
Because of research and research methods, managers can: Researcher
1. Identify and effectively solve minor problems. Managers are often required to engage consultants or
2. Differentiate between good and bad research. researchers to investigate more complex and time-
3. Understand the multiple influences and multiple effects of consuming problems.
complex factors in the environment. 5.1 How to Locate and Select a Researcher
4. Take calculated risk in decision making, based on known Sources of consultants and researchers;
probabilities of various outcomes. a. Consulting and Research companies (from business
5. Prevent influence of people with vested or personal interests. directories or the Internet)
6. Relate to hired consultants and researchers more effectively. b. Individual Consultants or Researchers (by reference)
7. Combine experience with scientific knowledge when making c. Universities (research faculties and departments)
decisions. d. Full-Service Advertising companies (for marketing
research)
7 8
5.2 The Manager-Researcher Relationship
5.3 Values
The manager must take care of the following aspects when When engaging a researcher or consultant, the
dealing with researchers: manager should ensure that there is a congruence or match
a. The manager must inform the researcher of the relevant between the value systems of the organization and the
variables involved in the problem or issue at hand. consultant company. Specifically, the manager must ensure
b. The manager should provide insights into the problem. that:
c. The manager must clearly identify and explain the roles of a. The roles and expectations of both parties are made
the manager and the researcher in the assignment being explicit and understood.
undertaken. b. Relevant philosophies and value systems (organizational
d. The manager must clearly identify what kind of information culture) are clearly stated and any constraints or
will be made available to the researcher. limitations are clearly communicated.
e. The manager must identify what type of information and c. A good rapport is established between (i) the manager
records are confidential or classified and will not be and the researcher, and (ii) researcher and the employees.
provided to the researcher.
9
6.1 Internal Consultants/Researchers
Large organizations have their own research departments with 10
in-house capacity to undertake management research.
A. Advantages of Internal Consultants/Researchers 6.2 External Consultants/Researchers
a. The Internal Researchers are readily accepted by the employees. External consultants/researchers are members of the team hired from
b. The Internal Research Team already understands the outside.
organizational structure and culture, reducing the orientation time. A. Advantages of External Consultants/Researchers
c. Internal Researchers are available during implementation of the a. The External Research Team is more enriched in experience, brings
recommendations. an outside, independent perspective, and is open to a wider variety
d. The Internal Research Team costs much less. of alternatives.
B. Disadvantages of Internal Consultants/Researchers b. The External Research Team, will have knowledge of more
a. Internal Researchers may be inhibited in taking an independent sophisticated problem-solving techniques and trained in innovative
external perspective, and may miss fresh ideas. theories and technologies.
b. There may be internal coalitions to influence the Internal B. Disadvantages of External Consultants/Researchers
Researchers to conceal, distort, or misrepresent facts. a. The External Research Teams are very expensive.
c. Internal Researchers may be regarded in low esteem and their b. The External Research Team will take a considerable time in
conclusions may not get full value. understanding the structure and the culture of the organization.
d. The Internal Researchers may have their own biases because of c. External Researchers will charge additional fees for any help in the
being employees of the same organization. implementation process.
3 4
1. Observation
2. Preliminary Information
Gathering
8
3. Theory Formulation
Ch- 3 :TECHNOLOGY AND BUSINESS RESEARCH Ch- 3 :TECHNOLOGY AND BUSINESS RESEARCH
Ch- 3 :TECHNOLOGY AND BUSINESS RESEARCH Ch- 3 :TECHNOLOGY AND BUSINESS RESEARCH
Ch- 3 :15
1
OBSERVATION
Broad area
of research
interest identified
3 4
THEORETICAL 6 7
PROBLEM
FRAMEWORK
5 SCIENTIFIC DATA
DEFINITION
GENERATION RESEARCH COLLECTION,
Research
OF DESIGN ANALYSIS, AND
Problem Variables clearly
HYPOTHESES INTERPRETATION
Identified and
Ch- 4 THE RESEARCH PROCESS delineated
labeled
5 3
Example 3: Conceptual Issue that Needs to be
1.1 Broad Problem Area Researched:
The broad problem area refers to the entire situation A researcher may undertake basic research to study the
where there is a possible need for research and problem phenomenon of punctuality so as to define that concept in
solving. The specific issue might pertain to (1) problems
precise terms.
currently existing in an organizational setting that need to be
solved, (2) areas that a manager believes need to be improved, Example 4: Empirical Answers:
(3) conceptual or theoretical issue that needs to be researched A researcher may want to find answers empirically to the
to understand certain phenomena, and (4) some research issue of perceived punctuality versus the actual punctuality and
questions that a basic researcher wants to answer empirically. its impact on the consequences for the individuals
(psychological stress) and for organizations (poor performance).
Such research is done by gathering data and testing the
relationships between variables.
2. Variables
A variable is anything that can take on differing or varying values.
Ch- 5 THE RESEARCH PROCESS: Steps 4 & 5 Ch- 5 THE RESEARCH PROCESS: Steps 4 & 5
Ch- 5 THE RESEARCH PROCESS: Steps 4 & 5 Ch- 5 THE RESEARCH PROCESS: Steps 4 & 5
Availability of
Independent Dependent Reference # of Rejects
Variable (IV) Variable (DV) Manuals
Moderating Interest
Variable &
(MV) Inclination
Willingness to learn
Workforce Organizational
diversity effectiveness
Managerial
expertise
Training programs
Growth needs
Moderating Variable
Diagram 5.5 A: Influence of Independent
Diagram 5.4:Moderating Variable Variable on Dependent Variable
Training programs
Ch- 5 THE RESEARCH PROCESS: Steps 4 & 5 Ch- 5 THE RESEARCH PROCESS: Steps 4 & 5
Time t₁ t₂ t₃ Time t₁ t₂ t₃
Organization Organizatio
Workforce Creative al Workforce Creative nal
diversity synergy effectiveness
diversity synergy effectivenes
s
Managerial
expertise
3. Theoretical Framework There are five basic features that should be incorporated in the theoretical
framework.
The theoretical framework is the foundation on which the entire research project 1. The variables considered relevant to the study should be clearly identified and
is based. It is a logically developed, described, and elaborated network of labeled in the discussions.
associations among the variables deemed relevant to the problem situation and 2. The discussions should state how two or more variables are related to one another.
identified through such processes as interviews, observations, and literature This should be done for the important relationships that are theorized to exist
survey. Experience and intuition also guide in developing the theoretical among the variables.
framework.
3. If the nature and direction of the relationships can be theorized on the basis of the
findings of previous research, then there should be an indication in the discussions
The relationship between the literature survey and the theoretical framework
as to whether the relationships would be positive or negative.
4. There should be a clear explanation of why we would expect these relationships to
exist. The arguments could be drawn from the previous research findings.
5. A schematic diagram of the theoretical framework should be given so that the
reader can see and easily comprehend the theoretical relationships.
Communication among
Cockpit members Communication among
Cockpit members
Communication between
Communication between
Ground control and cockpit
Ground control and cockpit
Air-safety
Air-safety
violations
violations
Decentralization Decentralization
Nervousness
Training of cockpit crew Training of cockpit crew And
diffidence
Independent Variables Dependent Variable
Independent variables Intervening variable Dependent variable
Diagram 5.8: Schematic diagram for the theoretical Diagram 5.9: Schematic diagram for the theoretical framework
framework in Example 5.13. including the intervening variable.
Communication among
Cockpit members
Example 5.18
Women are more motivated than men.
Ch- 5 THE RESEARCH PROCESS: Steps 4 & 5 Ch- 5 THE RESEARCH PROCESS: Steps 4 & 5
Example 5.20
There is a difference between the work ethic values of American and Asian
employees.
Ch- 5 THE RESEARCH PROCESS: Steps 4 & 5 Ch- 5 THE RESEARCH PROCESS: Steps 4 & 5
For the nondirectional hypothesis of the mean group differences in work ethic
The null hypothesis in respect of group differences stated in our Example 5.18 values in Example 5.20, the null hypothesis would be:
would be:
H0: µm = µw H0: Meanm = Meanw H0: AM = AS
or
H0: µm - µw = 0 H0: Meanm - Meanw = 0 or
H0: 0
The alternate for the above example would statistically be set as follows: AM - AS =
where H0 represents the null hypothesis, AM is the mean work ethic value of
HA: µM < µW H0: Meanm is less than Meanw
Americans and AS is the mean work ethic value of Asians.
which is the same as
The alternate hypothesis for the above example would statistically be set as:
HA: µW >µM H0: Meanw is greater than Meanm
HA: AM AS
where HA represents the alternate hypothesis and AM and AS are the mean work
ethic values of Americans and Asians, respectively.
Ch- 5 THE RESEARCH PROCESS: Steps 4 & 5 Ch- 5 THE RESEARCH PROCESS: Steps 4 & 5
The null hypothesis for the relationship between the two variables in Example
5.17 would be The alternate hypotheses for the above null, which has been expressed
directionally in Example 5.17, can be statistically expressed as
HO: There is no relationship between stress experienced on the job and the job HA: < 0 (The correlation is
satisfaction of employees. negative.)
This would be statistically expressed by For Example 5.19, which has been stated nondirectionally, while the null
H0: = 0 hypothesis would be statistically expresses as:
H0: = 0
where represents the correlation between stress and job satisfaction, which in
this case is equal to 0 (i.e., no correlation). The alternate hypothesis would be expressed as:
H0: 0
4
Ch- 6 THE RESEARCH PROCESS
3
PROBLEM THEORETICAL
FRAMEWORK
5
6
SCIENTIFIC
7
DATA
Step 6: Elements of Research Design
DEFINITION
GENERATION RESEARCH COLLECTION,
Research
OF DESIGN ANALYSIS, AND
Problem Variables clearly
HYPOTHESES INTERPRETATION
delineated Identified and
labeled
1. The Research Design
2 8
DEDUCTION
PRELIMINARY
Hypotheses Having identified the variables in a problem situation and
DATA GATHERING
Interviewing
Substantiated? development the theoretical framework, the next step is to design the
Research research in a way that the requisite data can be gathered and analyze to
Literature survey
question
answered? arrive at a solution.
Yes
NO
9 10 11
Report Report Managerial
Diagram 6.1: The research process Writing Presentation Decision
Making
simulation
2. Goodness
Example 6.10
Fears of an earthquake predicted recently in the New Madrid fault zone were Example 6.12 Minimal Interference
instrumental (i.e., casual) in an unprecedented number of house owners in the A hospital administrator wants to examine the relationship between the
Midwest region taking out an earthquake insurance policy. perceived emotional support in the system and the stresses experienced by
4. Extent of Researcher Interference with the Study the nursing staff. (correlational study).
The extent of interference by the researcher with the normal flow
of work at the workplace has a direct bearing on whether the Here, the administrator/researcher will collect data from the nurses
study undertaken is casual or correlational. A correlational study is (perhaps through a questionnaire) to indicate hoe much emotional support
conducted in the natural environment of the organization with they get in the hospital and to what extent the experience stress. By
minimum interference by the researcher with the normal flow of correlating the two variables, the answer that is being sought can be found.
work. For example, if a researcher wants to study the factors
influencing training effectiveness (a correlational study), all that In this case, beyond administering a questionnaire to the nurses, the
the individual has to do is develop a theoretical framework, collect researcher has not interfered with the normal activities in the hospital. In
the relevant data, and analyze them to come up with the findings. other words, researcher interference has been minimal.
Experiments done to establish cause and effect relationship beyond the possibility
of the least doubt require the creation of an artificial, contrived environment in
which all the extraneous factors are strictly controlled. Similar subjects are
chosen carefully to respond to certain manipulated stimuli. These studies are
referred to as lab experiments.
Ch- 6 THE RESEARCH PROCESS Ch- 6 THE RESEARCH PROCESS
Step 6: Elements of Research Design Step 6: Elements of Research Design
Example 6.27
A marketing manager is interested in tracing the pattern of sales of a
particular product in four different regions of the country on a quarterly
basis for the next 2 years. Since data are collected several times to answer
the same issue (tracing pattern of sales), the study falls under the
longitudinal category.
Longitudinal Studies take more time and efforts and cost more than cross-
sectional studies. However, well-planned longitudinal studies could, among
other things, help to identify cause-and-effect relationships.
CHP 8
i. Elements of Dimension 1
Thus, if we can measure how many hours per week individuals spend
on work-related activities, how persevering they are in completing their
A person who is driven by work will (1) be at work all the time, (2) be reluctant
daily tasks, and how frequently and for what reasons they take time off
to take time off from work, and (3) persevere even in the face of some
from their jobs, we would have a measure of the extent to which employees
setbacks. These types of behavior can be measured.
are driven by work.
For instance, we can count the number of hours employees engage themselves
in work-related activities. It would be an index of the extent to work
“drive” them. Diagram 8.1schematically diagrams the dimensions (the main
characteristics) and the elements (representative behaviors) for the concept
Achievement-motivated individuals would not usually want to give up on their
of achievement motivation.
tasks even when confronted by initial failures.
Finally, in order to measure the reluctance to take time off, we need only know
how frequently people take time off from their jobs, and for what reasons.
Diagram 8.1
C
Dimensions (D) and elements (E) of the Achievement
concept (C) learning. motivation
D₁ D₂ D D D
The interval scale, then, taps the differences, the order, and the equality of the magnitude of the
Example 8.6 differences in the variable. As such, it is a more powerful scale than the differences in the variable.
Indicate the extent to which you agree with the following statements as they relate to your job, by As such, it is a more powerful scale than the nominal and ordinal scales, and has for its measure of
circling the appropriate number against each, using the scale given below.
central tendency the arithmetic mean,. Its measures of dispersion are the range, the standard
_________________________________________________________________________________
deviation, and the variance.
Strongly Neither Agree Strongly
Disagree Disagree Nor Disagree Agree Agree
1 2 3 4 5 3.4 Ratio Scale
_________________________________________________________________________________ The ratio scale overcomes the disadvantage of the arbitrary origin point of the interval scale, in that
it has an absolute (in contrast to an arbitrary) zero point, which is a meaningful measurement point.
The following opportunities by the job are very important to me: Thus the ration scale not only measures the magnitude of the differences between points on the scale
Interacting with others 1 2 3 4 5 but also taps the proportions in the differences. It is the most powerful of the four scales because it
Using a number of different skills 1 2 3 4 5 has a unique zero origin (not an arbitrary origin) and subsumes all the properties of the other three
Completing a task from beginning to end 1 2 3 4 5 scales.
Serving others 1 2 3 4 5
Working Independently 1 2 3 4 5
_________________________________________________________________________________
CHP 9
Chapter 9:
Measurement: Scaling, Reliability, Validity
Chapter 9:
1.1 Dichotomous Scale
Measurement: Scaling, Reliability, Validity The dichotomous scale is used to elicit a Yes or No answer, as in example
below. Note that a nominal scale is used to elicit the response.
Example 9.1
Do you own a car? Yes No
1. Rating Scales
Dichotomous scale 1.2 Category Scale
Category scale The category scale uses multiple items to elicit a single response as per the
Likert scale following example. This also uses nominal scale.
Numerical scales
Semantic differential scale
Itemized rating scale Example 9.2
Fixed or constant sum rating scale Where in northern California do you reside? ____North Bay
Stapel scale ____ South Bay
Graphic rating scale ____East Bay
Consensus scale ____Peninsula
____Other
Chapter 9: Chapter 9:
Measurement: Scaling, Reliability, Validity Measurement: Scaling, Reliability, Validity
Chapter 9:
Measurement: Scaling, Reliability, Validity
Chapter 9: 1.6 Itemized Rating Scale
A 5-point or 7-point scale with anchors, as needed, is provided for each item and
Measurement: Scaling, Reliability, Validity the respondent states the appropriate number on the side of each item, or circles
the relevant number against each item. The responses to the items are then
1.5. Numerical Scale summated. This uses an interval scale.
The numerical scale is similar to the semantic differential scale, with the Example 9.6 (i)
difference that numbers on a 5-point or 7-point scale are provided, with bipolar Respond to each item using the scale below, and indicate your response number
adjectives at both ends, as illustrated below. This is also an interval scale. on the line by each item.
Example 9.5
How pleased are you with your new real estate agent?
1. I will be changing my job within the next 12 months. -------
Extremely Extremely 2. I will take on new assignments in the near future. --------
Pleased 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Displeased 3. It is possible that I will be out of this organization within
the next 12 months. --------
Note that the above is a balanced rating scale with a neutral point.
Chapter 9: Chapter 9:
Measurement: Scaling, Reliability, Validity Measurement: Scaling, Reliability, Validity
Example 9.6 (ii) 1.7 Fixed or Constant Sum Scale
Circle the number that is closest to how you feel for item below. The respondents are here asked to distribute a given number of points
across various items as per the example below. This is more in the nature of
an ordinal scale.
Example 9.7
In choosing a toilet soap, indicate the importance you attach to each of the
following five aspects by allotting points for each to total 100 in all.
How would you rate your interest in 1 2 3 4 Fragrance ____
Changing current organizational policies? Color ____
Shape ____
Size ____
This is an unbalanced rating scale which does not have a neutral point. Texture of lather ____
______________________
Total Points 100
Chapter 9: Chapter 9:
Measurement: Scaling, Reliability, Validity Measurement: Scaling, Reliability, Validity
Chapter 9: Chapter 9:
Measurement: Scaling, Reliability, Validity Measurement: Scaling, Reliability, Validity
Chapter 9: Chapter 9:
Measurement: Scaling, Reliability, Validity Measurement: Scaling, Reliability, Validity
2.2 Forced Choice 2.3 Comparative Scale
The forced choice enables respondents to rank objects relative to one The comparative scale provides a benchmark or a point of reference to
another, among the alternatives provided. This is easier for the respondents, assess attitudes towards the current object, event, or situation under study.
particularly if the number of choices to be ranked is limited in number. An example of the use of comparative scale follows.
Example 9.10 Example 9.11
Rank the following magazines that you would like to subscribe to in the In a volatile financial environment, compared to stocks, how wise or useful is
order of preference, it to invest in Treasury bonds? Please circle the appropriate response.
assignment 1 for the most preferred choice and 5 for the least preferred. ________________________________________________________________
More Useful About the Same Less Useful
Fortune ____ 1 2 3 4 5
Playboy ____ ________________________________________________________________
Time ____ Rating scales are used to measure most behavioral concepts. Ranking scales
People ____ are used to make comparisons or rank the variables that have been tapped on
Prevention ____ a nominal scale.
Chapter 9:
Measurement: Scaling, Reliability, Validity Chapter 9:
Measurement: Scaling, Reliability, Validity
3. Goodness of Measures
It is important to make sure that the instrument that the instrument that we
develop to measure a particular concept is instrument that we develop to
4. Reliability
measures a particular concept is indeed accurately measuring the variable,
The reliability of a measure indicates the extent to which it is without bias
and that in fact, we are actually measuring the concept that we set out to (error free) and hence ensures consistent measurement across time and across
measure. This ensures that in operationally defining perceptual and the various items in the instrument. In other words, the reliability of a
attitudinal variables, we have not overlooked some important dimensions and measure is an indication of the stability and consistency with which the
elements or included some irrelevant ones. instrument measures the concept and helps to assess the “goodness” of a
3.1. Item Analysis measure.
Item analysis is done to see if the items in the instrument belong there or not. 4.1 Stability of Measures
Each item is examined for its ability to discriminate between those subjects The ability of a measure to remain the same over time—despite uncontrollable
whose total scores are high, and those will low scores. In item analysis, the testing conditions or the state of the respondents themselves—is indicative of
means between the high-score group and the low-score group are tested to its stability and low vulnerability to changes in the situation. This attests to its
detect significant differences through the t-values. The items with a high t- “goodness” because the concept is stably measured, no matter when it is done.
value (test which is able to identify the highly discriminating items in the Two tests of stability are test-retest reliability and parallel-form reliability.
instrument) are then included in the instrument.
Diagram 9.1
Testing Goodness of Measures: Forms of Reliability and Validity.
Test-retest reliability
Chapter 9:
Stability Measurement: Scaling, Reliability, Validity
Parallel-form reliability
Reliability
(accuracy in
measurement) Interitem consistency reliability
Goodness
Consistency 4.2 Test-Retest Reliability
Split-half reliability
of data The reliability coefficient obtained with a repetition of the same measure on
a second occasion is called test-retest reliability. That is, when a
Validity questionnaire is administered to a set of respondents now, and again to the
(are we same respondents, says several weeks to 6 months later, then the correlation
measuring
the right between the scores obtained at the two different times from one and the
thing?) same set of respondents is called the test-retest coefficient. The higher it is,
the better the test-retest reliability, and consequently, the stability of the
measure across time.
Logical validity Criterion-related Congruent validity
(content) validity (construct)
Chapter 9: Chapter 9:
Measurement: Scaling, Reliability, Validity Measurement: Scaling, Reliability, Validity
4.3 Parallel-Form Reliability a. Interitem Consistency Reliability
When responses on two comparable sets of measures tapping the same This is a test of the consistency of respondents’ answers to all the items in a
construct are highly correlated, we have parallel-form reliability. Both forms measure. To the degree that items are independent measures of the same
have similar items and the same response format, the only changes being the concept, they will be correlated with one another. The most popular test of
wordings and the order or sequence of the questions. What we try to interitem consistency reliability is the Cronbach’s coefficient alpha
establish here is the error variability resulting from wording and ordering of (Cronbach’s alpha; Cronbach, 1946), which is used for multipoint-scaled
the questions. If two such comparable forms are highly correlated the items, and the Kuder-Richardson formulas (Kuder & Richardson, 1937),
used for dichotomous items. The higher the coefficients, the better the
measures are reasonably reliable.
measuring instrument.
4.4 Internal Consistency of Measures b. Split-Half Reliability
The internal consistency of measures is indicative of the homogeneity of the
Split-half reliability reflects the correlations between two halves of an
items in the measure that tap the construct. In other words, the items should
instrument. The estimates would vary depending on how the items in the
“hang together as a set,” and be capable of independently measuring the measure are split into two halves. Split-half reliabilities could be higher than
same concept so that the respondents attach the same overall meaning to Cronbach’s alpha only in the circumstance of there being more than one
each of the items. This can be seen by examining if the items and the subsets underlying response dimension tapped by the measure and when certain
of items in the measuring instruments are correlated highly. Consistency can other conditions are met as well. Hence, in almost all cases, Cronbach’s alpha
be examined through the inter-item consistency reliability and split-half can be considered a perfectly adequate index of the interitem consistency
reliability tests. reliability.
Chapter 9:
Chapter 9: Measurement: Scaling, Reliability, Validity
Measurement: Scaling, Reliability, Validity
5.2 Criterion-Related Validity
5. Validity Criterion-related validity is established when the measure differentiates
Several types of validity tests are used to test the goodness of measures and individuals on a criterion it is expected to predict. This can be done by
writers use different terms to denote them. For the sake of clarity, we may establishing con-current validity or predictive validity, as explained below.
Concurrent validity is established when the scale discriminates individuals who
content validity,
group validity tests under three broad headings: are known to be different; that is, they should score differently on the
criterion-related validity, and construct validity. instrument as in the example that follows.
5.1 Content Validity 5.3 Construct Validity
Content validity ensures that the measure includes an adequate and Construct validity testifies to how well the results obtained from the use of the
representative set of items that tap the concept. The more the scale items measure fit the theories around which the test is designed. This is assessed
represent the domain or universe of the concept being measured, the greater through convergent and discriminant validity, which are explained below.
the content validity. To put it differently, content validity is a function of how Convergent validity is established when the scores obtained with two different
instruments measuring the same concept are highly correlated.
well the dimensions and elements of a concept have been delineated.
Discriminant Validity is established when, based on theory, two variables are
Face validity is considered by some as a basic and a very minimum index of
predicted to be uncorrelated, and the scores obtained by measuring them are
content validity. Face validity indicates that the items that are intended to
indeed empirically found to be so.
measure a concept, do on the face of it look like they measure the concept.
Chapter 9:
Measurement: Scaling, Reliability, Validity
Validity Description
Content validity Does the measure adequately measure the concept?
Face validity Do “experts” validate that the instrument measures what its
name suggests it measure?
Criterion-related validity Does the measure differentiate in a manner that helps to
predict a criterion variable?
Concurrent validity Does the measure differentiate in a manner that helps to
predict a criterion variable currently?
Predictive validity Does the measure differentiate individuals in a manner as to
help predict a future criterion?
Construct validity Does the instrument tap the concept as theorized?
Convergent validity Does the measure have low correlation with a variable
That is supposed to be unrelated to this variable?