Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 47 views

    CIVN4002 Test Memo

    Uploaded by

    Lesego Matojane
    1) The document analyzes vibration in a machine system. It finds that the running frequency is very close to the natural frequency, causing resonance and serious vibration. 2) It evaluates ways to reduce vibration, such as increasing the beam stiffness with a fixed-fixed support or adding a dynamic vibration absorber. 3) Additional analysis is provided of a two degree of freedom system, finding the natural frequencies and mode shapes. The theoretical and computed natural frequencies are close, with a small percent error.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    CIVN4002 Test Memo

    Uploaded by

    Lesego Matojane
    47 views8 pages
    1) The document analyzes vibration in a machine system. It finds that the running frequency is very close to the natural frequency, causing resonance and serious vibration. 2) It evaluates ways to reduce vibration, such as increasing the beam stiffness with a fixed-fixed support or adding a dynamic vibration absorber. 3) Additional analysis is provided of a two degree of freedom system, finding the natural frequencies and mode shapes. The theoretical and computed natural frequencies are close, with a small percent error.

    Original Description:

    CIVN4002 Test Memo

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1) The document analyzes vibration in a machine system. It finds that the running frequency is very close to the natural frequency, causing resonance and serious vibration. 2) It evaluates ways to reduce vibration, such as increasing the beam stiffness with a fixed-fixed support or adding a dynamic vibration absorber. 3) Additional analysis is provided of a two degree of freedom system, finding the natural frequencies and mode shapes. The theoretical and computed natural frequencies are close, with a small percent error.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    47 views8 pages

    CIVN4002 Test Memo

    Uploaded by

    Lesego Matojane
    1) The document analyzes vibration in a machine system. It finds that the running frequency is very close to the natural frequency, causing resonance and serious vibration. 2) It evaluates ways to reduce vibration, such as increasing the beam stiffness with a fixed-fixed support or adding a dynamic vibration absorber. 3) Additional analysis is provided of a two degree of freedom system, finding the natural frequencies and mode shapes. The theoretical and computed natural frequencies are close, with a small percent error.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 8

    CIVN4002 Test memo-2012

    Q1: 1)

    Dynamic coefficient:

    1 1 1
        95.92
    1 r 2
     57 .1
    1  ( )2 1  ( )2
     57.4

    P0
    [ y (t )]max  yst  
    k
    𝐺+𝛽𝑃0 3 (35+95.92×10)×1000×43
    𝑦𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝑙 =
    48𝐸𝐼 48×2.1×105 ×106 ×7480×104 ×10−12

    =84.39×10−3 m=84.39mm

    It is clear that the running frequency of the machine is very close to


    the natural frequency of the system. The serious vibration is resulted
    from resonance.

    2)

    Solve this one degree static indeterminacy


    Find out the deflection at the mid-span (where the machine is):

    1 1 𝐿 5𝐿 2 5𝐿 1 6𝐿 6𝐿 2 6𝐿 1 5𝐿 5𝐿 2
    δ= ( × × × × + × × × × + × × × ×
    𝐸𝐼 2 2 32 3 32 2 22 32 3 32 2 32 22 3
    5𝐿 7𝐿3
    )=
    32 768𝐸𝐼

    Therefore, the natural frequency of the new system is:


    7GL3
     st 
    k 1 g g 768EI
       
    m m W  st

    768EIg 768  2.1  10 5 N / mm 2  7480  10 4 mm 4  9.8  1000mm / s


       86.83S 1
    7GL3
    7  35  1000 N  (4  1000mm) 3

    1 1 1
     new     1.762
    1 r 2
     57. 1
    1  ( )2 1  ( )2
     86.83

    𝑛𝑒𝑤 𝐺+𝛽𝑛𝑒𝑤 𝑃0 3 (35+1.762×10)×1000×43


    𝑦𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝑙 = =4.47×
    48𝐸𝐼 48×2.1×105 ×106 ×7480×104 ×10−12
    10−3 𝑚=4.5mm

    It can be seen that the improvement is significant.

    3)
    a) Further increase the stiffness of the beam, for example, fixed-fixed
    supports,….

    b) Dynamic vibration absorber

    Q2:

     2m 0   7k  2k 
    M   K
     0 m   2k 2k 

    Characteristic Equation:
     2 2m 0   7k  2k  
    det    0 m   2k 2k   0
        

    2 4 m 2  11km 2  10k 2  0

    11  41 k 11  41 k
    12  , 22 
    4 m 4 m

    k k
    1  1.1492 2  4.3508
    m m
    Mode shape corresponding to the first natural frequency

     x1   1 
       A1 sin 1t
     x2  2.35

    2.35
    Mode shape corresponding to the second natural frequency
     x1   1 
       A2 sin 2t
     x2   0.85

    -0.85

    1
    Q3:

    2𝑚 0 0
    M=[ 0 2𝑚 0]
    0 0 𝑚

    12𝐸𝐼
    𝑘=
    ℎ3
    K1=3k; k2=3k, k3=2k
    6𝑘 −3𝑘 0
    K[−3𝑘 5𝑘 −2𝑘]
    0 −2𝑘 2𝑘
    1
    Assume X1={1.5}
    2

    4.25𝑘 𝑘
    =10.5𝑚 = 0.405 𝑚

    𝑘
    (𝜔12 =0.3927𝑚, theoretical,error:+3.1%)

    You might also like