Antifungal and Antioxidant Activities of Organic and Aqueous Extracts of Annona Squamosa Linn. Leaves
Antifungal and Antioxidant Activities of Organic and Aqueous Extracts of Annona Squamosa Linn. Leaves
Antifungal and Antioxidant Activities of Organic and Aqueous Extracts of Annona Squamosa Linn. Leaves
ScienceDirect
Original Article
Article history: An increasing demand for natural additives has shifted the attention from synthetic to
Received 2 October 2014 natural antioxidants and antifungal agents. This study was carried out to evaluate the
Received in revised form antifungal and antioxidant activities of methanol, chloroform, and aqueous extracts of
16 February 2015 Annona squamosa Linn. leaves. The antifungal activities of all extracts of A. squamosa leaves
Accepted 5 May 2015 against five different strains of fungi (Alternaria alternata, Candida albicans, Fusarium solani,
Available online 26 July 2015 Microsporum canis, and Aspergillus niger) were evaluated by the agar well diffusion method and
the minimum inhibitory concentration of each extract was assessed by antifungal suscep-
Keywords: tibility using the broth microdilution method. The antioxidant potential of each extract was
acetogenins determined by free radicals (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl, nitric oxide, and hydrogen
Annona peroxide) scavenging activity and reducing power property of A. squamosa leaves. Both
antifungal organic and aqueous extracts were found to express dose-dependent inhibition against all
antioxidant tested fungi strains in both agar well diffusion and broth dilution methods. The free radical
extract scavenging activity and reducing power property of all extracts were found to be concen-
tration dependent, with the methanol extract exhibiting higher antioxidant activity than the
chloroform extract, which was more effective than the aqueous extract of A. squamosa
leaves. Results of phytochemical analysis of extracts showed the presence of glycosides,
saponins, tannins, flavonoids, phenols, etc. The results obtained from in vitro studies of
antifungal and antioxidant activities clearly suggest that the methanol, chloroform, and
aqueous extracts of A. squamosa leaves possess antifungal and antioxidant activity.
Copyright © 2015, Food and Drug Administration, Taiwan. Published by Elsevier Taiwan
LLC. Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license.
* Corresponding author. Department of Pharmacology, Visveswarapura Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 22nd Main, 24th Cross,
Banashankari II Stage, Bangalore 560 070, Karnataka, India.
E-mail address: [email protected] (N. Kalidindi).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfda.2015.04.012
1021-9498/Copyright © 2015, Food and Drug Administration, Taiwan. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license.
796 j o u r n a l o f f o o d a n d d r u g a n a l y s i s 2 3 ( 2 0 1 5 ) 7 9 5 e8 0 2
1. Introduction
2.5. Assessment of antifungal activity The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values
were determined as the concentration of the test mixture that
Five pathogenic strains of fungi were used in the study, gave 50% reduction in absorbance from that of the control.
namely, Alternaria alternata, Candida albicans, Fusarium solani,
Microsporum canis, and Aspergillus niger, which were collected 2.6.1.1. DPPH free radical scavenging activity. The DPPH assay
from the Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India. was performed as described by Koleva et al [17]. Approxi-
They were maintained in culture on Sabouraud glucose (4%) mately 10 mL of different concentrations (10e500 mg/mL) of test
agar medium and used for antifungal assays as needed. sample solutions were added to 190 mL DPPH (150 mM) in
ethanol solution. The solutions were later vortex mixed and
2.5.1. Zone of inhibition of fungal growth incubated for 20 minutes at 37 C. The solvent alone was
The antifungal activity of the leaf extracts was evaluated considered “blank.” The decrease in absorbance of test mix-
by the agar well diffusion method. The fungal inoculates tures (due to quenching of DPPH free radicals) was determined
were aseptically swabbed on sterile and solidified Sabouraud at 517 nm; ascorbic acid (5e250 mg/mL) was used as the stan-
dextrose agar plates. Then, aseptically, 7-mm diameter dard [18].
wells were bored in the inoculated plates and the extracts
[1 mg/mL and 2 mg/mL of 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)], 2.6.1.2. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) scavenging activity. To
standard (ketoconazole 100 mg/mL), and blank (10% DMSO) evaluate the hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) scavenging activity of
were added separately into the respective labeled wells. the extracts, the H2O2 solution was prepared in phosphate
The plates were incubated at 35 C for 72 hours in an upright buffer (pH 7.4) and then 0.6 mL of 40 mM H2O2 solution was
position and the zone of inhibition formed around the well mixed with 0.1 mL of different concentrations (10e500 mg/mL)
was recorded. The experiment was carried out in triplicates of the extracts. Absorbance of hydrogen peroxide at 230 nm
to get the average reading [14]. The percentage inhibition was determined after 10 minutes against a blank solution
of the methanol, chloroform, and aqueous extracts of A. containing phosphate buffer without hydrogen peroxide.
squamosa leaves was calculated using the following formula: Ascorbic acid (5e250 mg/mL) was taken as the reference
% inhibition ¼ (diameter zone of sample/diameter zone of compound [19].
ketoconazole) 100 [15].
2.6.1.3. Nitric oxide radical scavenging activity. Nitric oxide
2.5.2. Minimum inhibitory concentration against different (NO) generated from sodium nitroprusside was measured by
fungal strains the Griess reaction [20]. Sodium nitroprusside (5mM) in
The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined phosphate-buffered saline was mixed with 3 mL of different
using the broth dilution method. The fungal inoculum (105 concentrations (10e500 mg/mL) of A. squamosa extracts and the
dilution) was taken in test tubes with nutrient broth (1800 mL) mixture was incubated at 25 C for 150 minutes. The samples
supplemented with eight different concentrations (50 mg/mL, were then allowed to react with the Griess reagent (1% sulfa-
100 mg/mL, 200 mg/mL, 300 mg/mL, 400 mg/mL, 600 mg/mL, nilamide and 0.1% naphthyl ethylenediamine dihydrochloride
800 mg/mL, and 1000 mg/mL) of all leaf extracts separately. The in 2% H3PO4). The absorbance of the chromophore during the
results of the extracts were compared with a standard, posi- diazotization of nitrite with sulfanilamide and subsequent
tive control (100 mg/mL ketoconazole), and negative control coupling with naphthyl ethylenediamine was measured at
(respective solvent of each extract). All the test tubes were 546 nm. A similar procedure was repeated with respective
incubated at 35 C for 24e48 hours. The tubes were examined solvent instead of the extract, which served as the control; L-
for visual turbidity. The MIC values were taken as the lowest ascorbic acid (5e250 mg/mL) was used as the positive control
concentration that inhibited the visual growth of the tested [21]. All the tests were performed in triplicate. The percentage
organisms [14,16]. of scavenging activity was measured using the formula
mentioned in the “Radical Scavenging Activity” section.
2.6. Assessment of antioxidant activity
2.6.2. Reducing power property
2.6.1. Radical scavenging activity The reducing power of extracts was determined according to
The antioxidant activity was assessed through various in vitro the method suggested by Yen and Chen [22]. Different con-
assays. The free radical scavenging activities of the three ex- centrations of each extract (25e500 mg/mL) were mixed with
tracts of A. squamosa leaves and L-ascorbic acid (vitamin C) phosphate buffer (2.5 mL, 0.2M, pH 6.6) and potassium ferric
were measured in terms of hydrogen donating or radical cyanide [K3Fe(CN)6] (2.5 mL, 1%). The mixture was incubated
scavenging ability using the stable 1,1-diphenyl-2- at 50 C for 20 minutes. A portion (2.5 mL) of trichloroacetic
picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radicals. Nitric acid generated from acid (10%) was added to the mixture to stop the reaction, and
sodium nitroprusside was measured by the Griess reaction. the mixture was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes. The
The antioxidant activity was further confirmed by hydrogen upper layer of solution (2.5 mL) was mixed with distilled water
peroxide (H2O2) scavenging and reducing power properties of (2.5 mL) and ferric chloride (0.5 mL, 0.1%), and the absorbance
A. squamosa leaves extracts. was measured at 700 nm. A similar procedure was repeated
The percentage scavenging of free radical activity was with respective solvent instead of the extract, which served as
calculated using the following formula: the control. Ascorbic acid was used as the standard. All tests
were performed in triplicate. Increased absorbance of the re-
% inhibition ¼ [(Control e Test)/Control] 100 (1) action mixture indicates the increased reducing power [23].
798 j o u r n a l o f f o o d a n d d r u g a n a l y s i s 2 3 ( 2 0 1 5 ) 7 9 5 e8 0 2
2.7. Statistical analysis whereas against F. solani, the aqueous extract exhibited in-
termediate effect (Fig. 2C) with percentage inhibition of 33.33%
The experimental results pertaining to the antifungal activity at 1 mg/mL and 64.58% at 2 mg/mL. Further, the methanolic
were expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean and aqueous extracts showed maximum inhibitory activity
(SEM), and for antioxidant activity, the average values from against M. canis with percentage inhibition of 66.18% and
three parallel measurements were depicted in Figs. 3 and 4. 52.94% at 1 mg/mL and 72.06% and 67.65% at 2 mg/mL of the
Linear regression analysis was used to calculate the IC50 methanol and aqueous extracts, respectively, when compared
values. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of vari- with the chloroform extract (Fig. 2D) with percentage inhibi-
ance (ANOVA) followed by the Dunnett post hoc test using tion of 22.06% at 1 mg/mL and 41.18% at 2 mg/mL. All the three
GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). extracts exhibited similar effect against A. niger with per-
centage inhibitions of 31.08%, 25.86%, and 22.41% at 1 mg/mL
and 81.03%, 77.59%, and 84.84% at 2 mg/mL of methanol,
3. Results chloroform, and aqueous extracts, respectively, as shown in
the Fig. 2E.
3.1. Phytochemical analysis
3.2.2. Broth microdilution method
The phytochemical qualitative analysis revealed the presence The MICs of methanol, chloroform, and aqueous extracts of A.
of glycosides, flavonoids, phenols, tannins, saponins, alka- squamosa leaves were estimated and presented in Table 2. The
loids, carbohydrates, and steroids in different extracts as re- organic extracts exhibited significantly higher antifungal ac-
ported in Table 1. tivity than the aqueous extract of A. squamosa leaves. The
chloroform extract showed maximum potency among the
3.2. Antifungal assessment three extracts tested against A. alternata and F. solani. The
methanol extract exhibited the highest activity against M.
3.2.1. Agar well diffusion method canis and A. niger; however, against C. albicans both methanol
The results of this study revealed that the leaves of A. squa- and chloroform extracts showed the same potency. The
mosa possess potential antifungal activity against all five aqueous extract showed relatively less activity when
pathogenic fungal strains studied. The antifungal activity was compared with the methanol and chloroform extracts against
determined using the agar well diffusion method by all tested fungal strains.
measuring the diameter of zone of inhibition and by calcu-
lating the percentage inhibition. The antifungal activity of the
tested extracts showed different selectivity for each micro- 3.3. Antioxidant assessment
organism studied. Our analysis indicated that both chloro-
form and methanol extracts showed almost similar effect 3.3.1. Radical scavenging activity
against A. alternata, C. albicans, and F. solani (Fig. 2Ae2C, The results pertaining to the DPPH free radical scavenging
respectively) with percentage inhibition of 79.10%, 27.69%, activity of the three different extracts of A. squamosa leaves,
and 91.67% at 1 mg/mL and 83.58%, 64.62%, and 108.33% at along with the standard reference, vitamin C, are shown in
2 mg/mL of the chloroform extract, respectively, and 34.33%, Fig. 3A. The potent free radical scavenging activity was
43.08%, and 60.42% at 1 mg/mL and 74.63%, 70.77%, and 97.92% exhibited by the chloroform extract (IC50 308.3 mg/mL),
at 2 mg/mL of the methanol extract, respectively. However, whereas the methanol extract (IC50 342.5 mg/mL) showed
the aqueous extract of A. squamosa showed relatively less comparable scavenging activity and the aqueous extract (IC50
activity against A. alternata and C. albicans (Fig. 2A and 2B, 439.6 mg/mL) exhibited relatively less free radical scavenging
respectively), with percentage inhibition of 20.90% and 9.23% activity. Ascorbic acid showed the highest DPPH radical
at 1 mg/mL and 43.28% and 33.85% at 2 mg/mL, respectively, scavenging activity (IC50 35.26 mg/mL).
Fig. 3B shows hydrogen peroxide scavenging activity of the
methanol, chloroform, and aqueous extracts of A. squamosa
Table 1 e Preliminary phytochemical analysis of the leaves. All extracts caused a strong dose-dependent inhibition
methanol, chloroform, and aqueous extracts of Annona of hydrogen peroxide. The aqueous and chloroform extracts
squamosa Linn. leaves. showed good H2O2 scavenging ability compared with the
Extract Methanol Chloroform Aqueous methanol extract. The IC50 values of the chloroform, aqueous,
extract extract extract and methanol extracts were 242.7 mg/mL, 342.2 mg/mL, and
Alkaloids þ e e 453.7 mg/mL, respectively; however, ascorbic acid showed
Glycosides þ þ þ maximum activity with IC50 of 32.73 mg/mL.
Flavonoids þ þ þ Results related to the NO radical scavenging activity of all
Tannins þ þ e the extracts and positive control showed significant NO
Carbohydrates þ e þ radical scavenging activity in a concentration-dependent
Phenols þ þ þ
manner (Fig. 3C). In this assay, the methanol extract caused
Saponins þ e þ
a potential inhibition when compared with the chloroform
Amino acids e e þ
Steroids e þ e and aqueous extracts of A. squamosa leaves with IC50 values of
185.2 mg/mL, 345.8 mg/mL, and 366.3 mg/mL, respectively. The
þ ¼ present; e ¼ absent.
IC50 value of ascorbic acid was 58.7 mg/mL.
j o u r n a l o f f o o d a n d d r u g a n a l y s i s 2 3 ( 2 0 1 5 ) 7 9 5 e8 0 2 799
Fig. 2 e (A) Antifungal activity of Annona squamosa Linn. against Alternaria alternata. (B) Antifungal activity of A. squamosa
against Candida albicans. (C) Antifungal activity of A. squamosa against Fusarium solani. (D) Antifungal activity of A. squamosa
against Microsporum canis. (E) Antifungal activity of A. squamosa against Aspergillus niger. The values are expressed as
mean ± standard error of the mean. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.01 versus vehicle control (blank), calculated using one-
way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett post hoc analysis (n ¼ 3). AEAS ¼ aqueous extract; CEAS ¼ chloroform extract;
KTZ ¼ ketoconazole; MEAS ¼ methanol extract.
Fig. 3 e (A) 1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging activity of Annona squamosa Linn. leaves. (B) H2O2 scavenging
activity of A. squamosa leaves. (C) Nitric oxide radical scavenging activity of A. squamosa leaves. AEAS ¼ aqueous extract;
CEAS ¼ chloroform extract; MEAS ¼ methanol extract.
j o u r n a l o f f o o d a n d d r u g a n a l y s i s 2 3 ( 2 0 1 5 ) 7 9 5 e8 0 2 801
references [19] Ahmad B, Khan MR, Shah NA, Khan RA. In vitro antioxidant
potential of Dicliptera roxburghiana. BMC Complement Altern
Med 2013;13:140.
[20] Govindarajan R, Rastogi S, Vijayakumar M, Shirwaikar A,
[1] Mazid M, Khan TA, Mohammad F. Medicinal plants of rural
Rawat AK, Mehrotra S, Pushpangadan P. Studies on the
India: a review of use by Indian folks. Indo Glob J Pharm Sci
antioxidant activities of Desmodium gangeticum. Biol Pharm
2012;2:286e304.
Bull 2003;26:1424e7.
[2] Bussmann RW, Glenn A, Meyer K, Kuhlman A,
[21] Mandal S, Rajani GP, Sharma RK, Gupta N. In vitro antioxidant
Townesmith A. Herbal mixtures in traditional medicine in
and anti-inflammatory potential of Polyalthia longifolia in rats.
Northern Peru. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 2010;6:10.
Indian J Pharmacol 2012;44:277e8.
[3] Duraipandiyan V, Ignacimuthu S. Antifungal activity of
[22] Yen GC, Chen HY. Antioxidant activity of various tea extracts
traditional medicinal plants from Tamil Nadu, India. Asian
in relation to their antimutagenicity. J Agric Food Chem
Pac J Trop Biomed 2011;1:S204e15.
1995;43:27e32.
[4] Raj DS, Vennila JJ, Aiyavu C, Panneerselvam K. The
[23] Ebrahimzadeh MA, Nabavi SM, Nabavi SF, Bahramian F,
hepatoprotective effect of alcoholic extract of Annona
Bekhradnia AR. Antioxidant and free radical scavenging
squamosa leaves on experimentally induced liver injury in
activity of H. officinalis L. var. angustifolius, V. odorata, B.
Swiss albino mice. Int J Integr Biol 2009;5:182e6.
hyrcana and C. speciosum. Pak J Pharm Sci 2010;23:29e34.
[5] Kaleem M, Medha P, Ahmed QU, Asif M, Bano B. Beneficial
[24] Mau J, Chen CP, Hsieh PC. Antimicrobial effect of extracts
effects of Annona squamosa extract in streptozotocin-induced
from Chinese chive, cinnamon, and Corni fructus. J Agric Food
diabetic rats. Singapore Med J 2008;49:800e4.
Chem 2001;49:183e8.
[6] Pandey VK, Giri IC, Prakashdeep, Singh S, Srivastava A.
[25] Krishnamoorthy K, Subramaniam P, Senguttuvan J. In vitro
Pharmacognostical and physiochemical study on the
antifungal activity of various extracts of leaf and stem parts
leaves of Annona squamosa Linn. Int J Res Pharm Sci
of Solena amplexicaulis (Lam.) Gandhi. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci
2014;4:8e12.
2013;5:745e7.
[7] Starr Environmental. Plants of Hawaii. Available from: http://
[26] David E, Elumalai EK, Sivakumar C, Therasa SV,
www.starrenvironmental.com/images/species/?
Thirumalai T. Evaluation of antifungal activity and
q¼annonaþsquamosa&o¼plants. Last accessed: July 16,
phytochemical screening of Solanum surattense seeds. J
2015.
Pharm Res 2010;3:684e7.
[8] Wikimedia Commons. Annona squamosa. 2009. Available
[27] Lacaille-Dubois MA, Wagner H. A review of the biological and
from: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Annona_
pharmacological activities of saponins. Phytomedicine
squamosa01.JPG. Last accessed: July 16, 2015.
1996;2:363e86.
[9] Flickr. Image by jayjayc. 2009. Available from: http://www.
[28] Omulokoli E, Khan B, Chhabra S. Antiplasmodial activity of
flickr.com/photos/jayjayc/292041435. Last accessed: July 16,
four Kenyan medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol
2015.
1997;56:133e7.
[10] King Saud University. KSU faculty websites: image by
[29] Cushnie TP, Lamb AJ. Antimicrobial activity of flavonoids. Int
Abdullah Alebidi. 2009. Available from: http://faculty.ksu.
J Antimicrob Agents 2005;26:343e56.
edu.sa/10439/Pictures%20Library/Forms/DispForm.aspx?
[30] Yermilov V, Rubio J, Becchi M, Friesen MD, Pignatelli B,
ID¼113. Last accessed: July 16, 2015.
Ohshima H. Formation of 8-nitroguanine by the reaction of
[11] Celeghini RMS, Vilegas JHY, Lanças FM. Extraction and
guanine with peroxynitrite in vitro. Carcinogenesis
quantitative HPLC analysis of coumarin in hydroalcoholic
1995;16:2045e50.
extracts of Mikania glomerata Spreng. (“guaco”) leaves. J Braz
[31] Dehpour AA, Ebrahimzadeh MA, Nabavi SF, Nabavi SM.
Chem Soc 2001;12:706e9.
Antioxidant activity of methanol extract of Ferula asafoetida
[12] Trease G, Evans SM. Pharmacognosy. 15th ed. London: Bailer
and its essential oil composition. Grasas Aceites
Tindal; 2002. p. 23e67.
2009;60:405e12.
[13] Harborne JB. Phytochemical methods: a guide to modern
[32] Wang KJ, Zhang YJ, Yang CR. Antioxidant phenolic
techniques of plant analysis. 2nd ed. London: Chapman and
compounds from rhizomes of Polygonum paleaceum. J
Hall; 1984. p. 4e16.
Ethnopharmacol 2005;96:483e7.
[14] Srinivasan S, Sarada DV. Antifungal activity of phenyl
[33] Moncada A, Palmer RM, Higgs EA. Nitric oxide: physiology,
derivative of pyranocoumarin from Psoralea corylifolia L.
pathophysiology, and pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev
seeds by inhibition of acetylation activity of trichothecene 3-
1991;43:109e42.
o-acetyltransferase (Tri101). J Biomed Biotechnol
[34] Shirwaikar A, Prabhu KS, Punitha ISR. In vitro antioxidant
2012;2012:310850.
studies of Sphacranthus indicus (L). Indian J Exp Biol
[15] Lee CJ, Chen LW, Chen LG, Chang TL, Huang CW, Huang MC,
2006;44:993e6.
Wanga CC. Correlations of the components of tea tree oil
[35] Gulcin I, Oktay M, Kirecci E, Kufrevioglu I. Screening of
with its antibacterial effects and skin irritation. J Food Drug
antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of anise (Pimpella
Anal 2013;21:169e76.
anisum L.) seed extracts. Food Chem 2003;83:371e82.
[16] Senguttuvan J, Paulsamy S, Krishnamoorthy K. In vitro
[36] Chou ST, Chao WW, Chung YC. Antioxidative activity and
antifungal activity of leaf and root extracts of the medicinal
safety of 50% ethanolic red bean extract (Phaseolus radiatus L.
plant, Hypochaeris radicata L. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci
var. aurea). J Food Sci 2003;68:21e5.
2013;5:758e61.
[37] Shahidi F, Wanasundara PK. Phenolic antioxidants. Crit Rev
[17] Koleva II , van Beek TA, Linssen JP, de Groot A, Evstatieva LN.
Food Sci Nutr 1992;32:67e103.
Screening of plant extracts for antioxidant activity: a
[38] Do QD, Angkawijaya AE, Tran-Nguyen PL, Huynh LH,
comparative study on three testing methods. Phytochem
Soetaredjo FE, Ismadji S, Ju Y. Effect of extraction solvent on
Anal 2002;13:8e17.
total phenol content, total flavonoid content, and
[18] Nandhakumar E, Indumathi P. In vitro antioxidant activities
antioxidant activity of Limnophila aromatica. J Food Drug Anal
of methanol and aqueous extract of Annona squamosa (L.)
2014;22:296e302.
fruit pulp. J Acupunct Meridian Stud 2013;6:142e8.