Understanding The Contemporary Caribbean
Understanding The Contemporary Caribbean
Understanding the
Contemporary Caribbean
SECOND EDITION
edited by
Richard S. Hillman
and Thomas J. D’Agostino
Copyright © 2009
ISBN: 978-1-58826-663-7 pb
Contents
List of Illustrations ix
Preface xiii
v
Hillman_FM.qxd 6/25/09 11:54 AM Page vi
vi Contents
6 International Relations
Jacqueline Anne Braveboy-Wagner 161
The External Effects of Caribbean Culture and Identity 162
The Geopolitical Framing of Security 167
Economic Relations 176
Challenges for the Future 184
Contents vii
viii Contents
1
Introduction
Richard S. Hillman
1
Hillman_1.qxd 6/24/09 4:34 PM Page 2
2 Richard S. Hillman
A beach along
undeveloped shoreline,
Runaway Bay, Jamaica.
United Nations
Hillman_1.qxd 6/24/09 4:34 PM Page 3
Introduction 3
UNITED
STATES
T
H
Miami
a
•
rid
Gulf of Mexico
lo
A
F ★ H
of Nassau A
its M Atlantic Ocean
6/24/09
Stra ANDROS A
ISLAND S
Havana
★
G Guantánamo ssa
Pa DOMINICAN
LEEW
RE • • rd AR
CAYMAN Santiago wa REPUBLIC VIRGIN D
MEXICO A
age
indGonaîves •
ISLANDS T de Cuba W Santo Ponce ISLANDS ANGUILLA
E Port-au-Prince San Juan
IS
R Domingo ST. MAARTEN/ST. MARTIN
a Pass
Montego Bay ★ ★ ★
• • ST. EUSTATIUS
Mon
LA
★
• • SABA BARBUDA
• Belize City San Pedro de Macoris PUERTO
JAMAICA Kingston A N HAITI ST. KITTS ★ ANTIGUA
★ Belmopan RICO
ND
T I L L
S
LES
★ HONDURAS ★ MARTINIQUE
Fort-de-France
Guatemala Tegucigalpa
Caribbean Sea Castries ★ ST. LUCIA
★
NDS
TIL
★ BARBADOS
San Salvador NETHERLANDS ST. VINCENT & THE ★
★
AN
EL SALVADOR ANTILLES GRENADINES Bridgetown
ND
CURAÇAO
ER
★ Managua ★ GRENADA
WI
★ BONAIRE
• Bluefields St. George's
SS
Willemstad
ISLA DE MARGARITA
LE
Port-of-Spain TRINIDAD
★ AND TOBAGO
COSTA ★
RICA Limón
Cartagena •
Choroní
• Caracas •
★ • Panama Canal Barlovento
San José
Colón •
★
Panama
PANAMA
Gulf of VENEZUELA
N Panama Georgetown
★
Paramaribo
GUYANA ★
W E
Pa c i f i c COLOMBIA
★
Cayenne
Bogotá
★ SURINAME FRENCH
S
Ocean GUIANA
Tampa
St. Petersburg ••
UNITED N
STATES
T
6/24/09
•
Freeport W E
H
Gulf
E
Miami NEW
•
B
PROVIDENCE S
a
of
id
H
★ A
or
Mexico Fl Nassau M
4:34 PM
of ANDROS
A
s S Atlantic Ocean
S trait
Havana Matanzas
★
•
Page 5
Santa Clara
• • TURKS &
Pinar
Cienfuegos
• Sancti Spiritus W CAICOS ISLANDS
del Rio • CUBA E S
• T ★
Cockburn Town
Camagüey
Holguín • I N D
e I E S
Manzanillo Guantánamo g Cap-Haïtien
G R • Pa
ssa
Monte Cristi
EA • • rd
Santiago
e
ind Gonaîves • •
•
George R W HAITI DOMINICAN • Macoris BRITISH VIRGIN
Town ISLANDS
Port-au-Prince San Juan
a Pas
DOMINICAN
BRITISH VIRGIN
REPUBLIC
Mayagüez ISLANDS ANGUILLA N
ge
Santo
ge
San Juan Road Town ST. MAARTEN / ST. MARTIN
a
Domingo ★ The
★ • ★
Passa
★ Valley ST. BARTHÉLEMY
6/24/09
• W E
Pass
San Pedro Ponce Charlotte ST. EUSTATIUS
a
de Macoris
• • Amalie
SABA BARBUDA
ada
PUERTO Basseterre
Mon
U.S. VIRGIN ★ ANTIGUA S
RICO ST. KITTS St. John's
ISLANDS ★ MONTSERRAT
Aneg
NEVIS age s
4:34 PM
•San Fernando
VENEZUELA
Introduction 7
Similarly, when asked who would be a better president of the United States
for developing countries, Barack Obama or John McCain, former Jamaican
prime minister Edward Seaga replied that “there is not much commitment to
this region anymore from Washington by either party. The Cold War is over”
(Sunday Gleaner, October 26, 2008). However, Richard Crawford, lecturer in
political science at the University of the West Indies, stated that if Barack
Obama were elected, “We would be seeing the end of an era of hostile military-
type politics from the United States” (Sunday Gleaner, October 26, 2008).
The global crisis, of course, has posed many serious challenges to the re-
gion as a whole, as well as individual countries. The Caribbean comprises min-
istates endowed with widely dispersed and, in some cases, sparse resources.
Thus, economic development has been problematic. Political evolution has also
been complicated. In countries that have experienced long periods of colonial-
ism, with the attendant institutions of the plantation and slavery, it is difficult
to overcome deeply ingrained authoritarian legacies in order to promote the
consolidation of democracy. This does not mean, however, that historical lega-
cies will determine the future. Moreover, disparate developments such as the
Cuban revolution, the transition toward democracy in the Dominican Repub-
lic, and the invasion of Grenada further complicate the absence of a singular
paradigm or model that would fit the entire region. Thus, generalizations about
Caribbean political and economic development must of necessity be multifac-
eted and intricate if they are to be meaningful.
Yet the different countries of the Caribbean have much in common. Among
the most problematic common features are financial weakness and lack of in-
vestment capital. The latter is exacerbated by the global crisis in credit markets.
Most production in the Caribbean has involved food processing, the mak-
ing of clothing, and the manufacturing of sugar and rum. Efforts to expand
these activities to earn additional income and provide new jobs through pro-
grams of import substitution and industrialization by invitation have been rel-
atively unsuccessful.2 Also, West Indian governments have sought to protect
local industries by imposing tariffs on the importation of foreign goods, but
that drove up the prices of domestically manufactured products, which were
often inferior in quality to imported goods.
Among the incentives used to attract investment capital are low-cost labor,
factories constructed by governments, reduction in taxes or complete tax abate-
ments for a number of years (free trade zones), government-sponsored training
programs, political stability, and proximity to the large North American market.
Companies assembling goods for export to the United States benefit from
special US tariffs that either reduce or waive import duties for these products.
When duties are imposed, they usually are assessed only on the value added to
the products by the Caribbean operations. US firms, seeking to escape high-cost
unionized labor, have established assembly maquiladoras (factories) in the Do-
minican Republic, Haiti, Jamaica, and Barbados. Predominantly female workers
Hillman_1.qxd 6/24/09 4:34 PM Page 8
8 Richard S. Hillman
typically earn between US$50 and $100 per week in as many as 1,000 maqui-
ladoras throughout the Caribbean employing more than 25,000 workers. A sig-
nificant portion of the moderately priced clothing sold in the United States is
now made in these factories.
Neoliberal economic philosophy purports that it is more beneficial for
producers to export their products. Accordingly, the World Bank and the Inter-
national Monetary Fund (IMF) have required local governments seeking loans
to devalue their currencies to reduce the costs of their products overseas, to
lower their import tariffs to increase local competition and efficiency, and to re-
duce domestic spending so that larger financial reserves will be available to
pay off the loans. The main problem with this philosophy is that it creates aus-
terity in the home country. Currency devaluation raises local prices; competi-
tion from imported goods can drive local firms out of business, exacerbating
already high levels of unemployment; and decreased government spending re-
duces the amount of money circulating within the island’s economy, causing
political pressures. Recently, the World Bank and the IMF have begun to re-
think their overall approach and ease requirements for development loans.
One of the more successful economic mechanisms used by Caribbean na-
tions to fortify their economies has been offshore banking.3 Some nations pro-
vide advantages such as reduction or elimination of taxes on income, profits,
dividends, and capital gains in secret accounts.4 Moreover, legal fees and li-
censes are charged by the banks, adding valuable foreign currency to the re-
gion’s economy. Recently, the Netherlands Antilles, especially Curaçao, and
then the Bahamas, the Cayman Islands, Antigua, the Turks and Caicos Islands,
Montserrat, and St. Vincent became the leading centers in the Caribbean for
offshore banking. In the Bahamas and the Cayman Islands, offshore banking is
the second leading industry behind tourism, providing 15–20 percent of each
country’s gross national product.
In sum, although the Caribbean continues to struggle with political and
economic challenges, the global scope of the region’s impact is inconsistent
with its image and size: the Caribbean contains approximately 41 million peo-
ple—a small percentage of the Western Hemisphere and only a tiny fraction of
the world’s population. But their impact has been disproportionate to their
numbers, and there are many enclaves of Caribbean peoples living in other
areas of the world. London, Toronto, Miami, and New York, for example, have
a large West Indian presence.
The world continues to become more interdependent, and the Caribbean
must be integrated into this emerging global society. Therefore, it is very im-
portant to increase our understanding of the contemporary Caribbean. Unfor-
tunately, segregated analyses of the region according to superficial criteria
have caused confusion. It has been convenient to refer to linguistic divisions,
geographic distributions, and chronological dates of independence, for example.
These approaches have reaffirmed obvious differences while obscuring common
factors that could help to produce salutary solutions to pervasive problems.
Hillman_1.qxd 6/24/09 4:34 PM Page 9
Introduction 9
Our earlier research has shown that the Hispanic countries within the Carib-
bean have been considered an integral part of Latin America, and the English-
speaking countries have been excluded based on the assumption that different
cultural heritages require a fundamentally different analytical framework.
Thus, scholars of Latin America focus on the Latin Caribbean “often to the al-
most total exclusion of other areas,” whereas scholars of the Commonwealth
Caribbean “have usually neglected the Latin Caribbean” (Millet and Will
1979:xxi). We have shown that the Caribbean region provides a microcosm of
a fragmented third world in which divisions “tenaciously obscure similarities
and impede the evolution of common interests and aspirations” and that the ab-
sence of a “single, holistic community” has resulted (Hillman and D’Agostino
1992:1–17).
Some authors have argued that there is a “clear dividing line” separating
the English-speaking Caribbean countries from their Hispanic, French, and
Dutch neighbors (Serbin 1989:146). Some conclude that conflicts in relations
between Caribbean countries are due to “misconceptions, misunderstanding,
and lack of communication . . . deriving from historical, cultural, racial, and
linguistic differences” (Bryan 1988:41). Others have attributed the absence of
a single community to the divisiveness of separate Caribbean societies “often
fatally hostile to each other” (Moya Pons 1974:33).
Our approach reveals that beneath obvious differences lie similarities in
common historical themes, geopolitical and sociocultural contexts, economic
experiences, and accommodation patterns that reflect the pressures of congru-
ent sociopolitical environments. Moreover, we believe that there has been sig-
nificant convergence of mutual economic and political interests to warrant the
promotion of improved relations between the diverse Caribbean states. Nicolás
Guillén summarizes this idea succinctly when he characterizes the Caribbean
archipelago as one “communal yard” due to its common heritage of slavery,
imperial domination, and struggle (Guillén 1976:26). And Pére Labat observed
in the eighteenth century that the Caribbean peoples are “all together, in the same
boat, sailing the same uncertain sea” (Knight 1990:307). We believe that aca-
demic and political navigation in this sea can be enhanced through understand-
ing and appreciating the forces that have shaped the contemporary Caribbean.
Therefore, there is a need for an interdisciplinary introduction to the Carib-
bean region. Academic, business, and policy interests require understanding
this complex and significant area, especially in the twenty-first century. But the
growing numbers of people who wish to learn about the Caribbean are not able
to use narrowly focused studies. Comprehending existing theoretical analyses
of the region’s socioeconomic and political conditions presupposes expertise
and experience.
Further, there is much misunderstanding about Caribbean attitudes, values,
and beliefs regarding the conduct of politics, business, and life. Sensationalized
media coverage of political instability, external debt, immigration, and narcotics
trafficking has overshadowed valiant Caribbean efforts to define uniquely
Hillman_1.qxd 6/24/09 4:34 PM Page 10
10 Richard S. Hillman
Introduction 11
12 Richard S. Hillman
ancestries to the Spanish, English, Irish, Scots, French, German, and Dutch—
came as conquerors. Indigenous to the region by virtue of early migrations
from Asia were North American tribes of Taínos, Arawaks, Caribs, Ciboney,
and Guanahuatebey. After the abolition of slavery, indentured servants (from
China, India, and Java) were brought to the Caribbean. Later, small waves of
immigrants arrived from Spain, Portugal, France, England, Germany, China,
the Jewish diaspora (Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews), Italy, the Middle East
(Syrians and Lebanese), Latin America, and North America (the United States
and Canada).
Each group brought particular traits to the Caribbean. The Africans brought
popular tales and legends, folklore, music, arts, and religious beliefs, as well
as qualities of perseverance and leadership (Herring 1967:109–113). The Eu-
ropeans brought their religions and culture, military technology, political and
social institutions, scientific discovery, and diseases unknown in the region.
The indigenous contributions are debated due to scant archaeological evidence
(Knight 1990:4–22). However, the Arawaks are reputed to have lived in a pacific
communal society, whereas the Caribs migrated and were more belligerent.
The aesthetic achievements and social structures of the indigenous peoples
were almost completely destroyed by conquest, despite the lasting imprint of
linguistic adaptations—such as words like bohío (shack or hut), guagua (bus),
cacique (Indian chief or political leader), and guajiro (peasant).
Far more interesting and significant than the individual contributions of
the various groups constituting the contemporary Caribbean is the process
whereby their sociopolitical traits have been amalgamated and Eurocentric
dominance has been mitigated. The region has truly been a crucible of various
cultures. This blending, not only of institutions but also of ethnicity, has pro-
duced the uniquely Caribbean Creoles.6 Thus, racial variation can be under-
stood in the context of a fluid continuum. As Gordon Lewis observed, “Columbus
and his followers came to the New World with a baggage of religious intoler-
ance rather than racial phobia” (Lewis 1987:10).
The most popular religious expressions resulted from a syncretizing process
that brought together the elaborate African belief systems with those of the Eu-
ropean religious traditions. Thus, elitist practice of Catholicism or mainstream
Protestantism is nominal compared to the dynamic integration into daily life
of Vodou, spiritualism, Obeah, Santería, or other fusions of European and Afri-
can or indigenous religions. Because the Caribbean was “a society founded on
the gross exploitation, in the name of Christianity, of both Antillean Indian and
African black” people (Lewis 1987:89), these combinations were crucial to a
vast majority of non-Europeans attempting to preserve their beliefs and them-
selves. Although many perceived that “Catholic proselytization was a lost cause
. . . the Catholic religion saw [its role] as a war against paganism and supersti-
tion” (Lewis 1987:195). Lately, evangelical religions have been making inroads
in the Caribbean. As one observer asks, “Who with the slightest missionary
Hillman_1.qxd 6/24/09 4:34 PM Page 13
Introduction 13
spirit could resist a region of poor countries whose populations are always look-
ing for new religions?” (Kurlansky 1992:72).
Occasionally, when it had been impossible to integrate their cultures into
the dominant society, certain groups rejected that society and alienated them-
selves. The first of these groups were the maroons. The name “maroon” is de-
rived from cimarrón, which literally refers to a domesticated animal that
reverts to a wild state. The name was applied to runaway slaves who escaped
from plantations and formed their own enclave societies in the rugged terrain
of the Jamaican hinterland. Later on, the Rastafarians rejected Anglo values,
creating an Africanist belief system loosely based on allegiance to Haile Se-
lassie, the former emperor of Ethiopia.
Understanding the forces that tie Caribbean societies together, as well as
those that have challenged and transformed their institutions, requires exploration
of the impact of the plantation system, slavery, and the processes through which
independence (or pseudo-independence) was gained. Moreover, religion, gov-
ernment, society, and current challenges derive in large part from these origins.
Simply stated, the relationships between masters and slaves, the rebellions, the
heroic struggles, and the tortuous evolution from colonies to independent states
reveal inescapable realities that cannot be ignored in our study of the contem-
porary Caribbean. The resultant attitudes, values, and beliefs inform our under-
standing of this complex region.
Caribbean attitudes toward the United States are ambivalent, ranging from
disdain to infatuation. A version of dependency theory in which problems en-
demic to the region are attributed to Europe and the United States has become
popular in some academic circles. Virulent anti-US sentiment developed early in
Cuban history, was cultivated by independence leaders, and given ideological ex-
pression through fidelismo and Castro’s revolution. It was given expression by
US as well as Cuban manipulation of the Elián González dispute, in which the
question of a father’s legal custody over his son became an international incident.
On the one hand, Michael Manley, Maurice Bishop, and other West Indian
leaders have flirted with alternative ideologies such as democratic socialism
and Marxism as an antidote to dependence on the United States. On the other
hand, some Puerto Rican politicians have championed statehood for the island,
whereas others fiercely resist it. Some leaders have consistently supported US
international initiatives and have always voted accordingly in world forums
such as the United Nations. Also, there has been much envy and idolatry of US
culture and economic superiority, which has led to massive immigration—both
legal and illegal—into the United States. It has also led to “brain drain,”
whereby Caribbean professionals and the intelligentsia abandon their own
countries for US residency and citizenship. This loss of human resources has
been extremely problematic for Caribbean societies.
Also, there has been substantial movement within the Caribbean: Domini-
cans to Miami and St. Martin; Haitians and Cubans to Puerto Rico, Venezuela,
Hillman_1.qxd 6/24/09 4:34 PM Page 14
14 Richard S. Hillman
Poster of Elián
González, Havana,
Cuba. The poster reads,
“Return our Child.”
Cynthia Sutton
Introduction 15
16
Introduction 17
and groups living in the same small area. They also touch on the impact of Eu-
rocentricity and the contribution of the different ethnic groups, as well as the
creolization pattern. The contribution of women is the focus of “Women and
Development” (Chapter 9), by A. Lynn Bolles. In “Religion in the Caribbean”
(Chapter 10), Leslie Desmangles, Stephen Glazier, and Joseph Murphy show
how imposed European religions have been embellished by syncretic belief
systems such as Rastafarianism, Obeah, Vodou, and Santería.
“Literature and Popular Culture” (Chapter 11), by Kevin Meehan and
Paul Miller, discusses the most notable writers and the politicized nature of
their work. It also mentions the widespread impact of folklore and music—like
reggae, salsa, merengue, rumba, son, cumbia, tambores, and calypso. In “The
Caribbean Diaspora” (Chapter 12), Dennis Conway shows the geographical
diversity and impact of the various groups who leave the region and contribute
to brain drain, the safety-valve effect, capital flight, and financial remissions.
Finally, in “Trends and Prospects” (Chapter 13), Richard Hillman and Andrés
Serbin analyze where the region has been as well as the direction in which it
appears to be headed.
■ Notes
1. The terms Caribbean and West Indies are used interchangeably throughout this
book.
2. The phrase import substitution refers to a policy of trying to produce goods lo-
cally that were formerly imported. Industrialization by invitation is a strategy aimed at
attracting foreign capital for investment in local industry.
3. Offshore banking includes financial operations conducted by foreign banks that
have branches in countries like those in the Caribbean.
Hillman_1.qxd 6/24/09 4:34 PM Page 18
18 Richard S. Hillman
4. This has caused speculation that such operations have become money-laundering
facilities for illegal activities such as drug trafficking.
5. Among my travels, I visited Cuba as a professor on the faculty of the Univer-
sity of Pittsburgh Semester at Sea Program and presented a copy of my book, Richard
S. Hillman, ed., Understanding Contemporary Latin America (Boulder: Lynne Rienner
Publishers, 2001), to Fidel Castro during his four-and-a-half hour meeting with Semes-
ter at Sea students and faculty in Havana, January 25, 2002.
6. Creole is a term used in the Caribbean in reference to the unique admixtures of
peoples and cultures.
7. Mireya Navarro, “At Last on Hispaniola: Hands Across the Border,” New York
Times, July 11, 1999, p. 3.
■ Bibliography