Grid Connection of Power Generating Facilities: Febeg Position Elia WG Belgian Grid' (16.09.2011)

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 15

GRID CONNECTION OF POWER

GENERATING FACILITIES

FEBEG POSITION
Elia WG ‘Belgian Grid’
(16.09.2011)

16.09.2011
FEBEG

16.09.2011 2
CONTENT

• Current developments
• General principles
• Integrating new power plants in the grid
• Grid connection procedure
• Firm capacity for injection
• Congestion management
• Derogations
• Conclusions

16.09.2011
CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS

• Proposals Elia (WG Belgian Grid) for new capacity


reservation procedure

• Proposals Elia (WG Belgian Grid) for new connection


procedure

• Proposals in Policy Platforms VREG and CWaPE (REDI)


regarding flexible access (= conditional connection)

16.09.2011
GENERAL PRINCIPLES (1)

• Need for transparent and efficient procedures for non-


discriminatory connection of new power plants to the grid
(art. 23,1 of EU Electricity market directive)

• All new generation capacity should be timely connected to


the grid (art. 23,2):
– connection cannot be refused on the grounds of possible future limitations to
available network capacities current situation in BE is not compliant
– connection cannot be refused on the ground that it will lead to additional costs
linked with necessary capacity increase of system elements

• Power generators need firm commitment and predictable


conditions at the moment of their investment decision

16.09.2011
GENERAL PRINCIPLES (2)

• Grid operators should employ all reasonable means to


timely connect all new generation capacity:
– at a reasonable cost
– at the most appropriate connection point (location, voltage, …)
– without imposing disproportionate or discriminatory technical or
operational constraints to power generators
• Grid operators should proactively invest with a long term
vision in order to reach this objective1
– ensure the long-term ability of the system to meet demands for
transmission of electricity in a secure, reliable and efficient way
– contribute to security of supply through adequate transmission capacity
and system reliability
• Solidarity and coordination between TSO and DSOs
regarding grid investments and choice of most appropriate
connection point for power plants
1 Art. 12 of EU Electricity Market Directive

16.09.2011
INTEGRATING NEW POWER PLANTS IN THE GRID

Power generation development


Investment decision Firm grid capacity available

Strategy Development Specs, Licensing, Engineering


Build First Firing
Project planning Phase RFI, RFP, …

Commitment
Request Request
for firm capacity
Connection Procedure
Connection Agreement
Consultation
Realization (Congestion
Orienting study Detailed study Engineering
Connection Management)

Grid development

Investment Engineering Grid Grid


TYND …
planning Permitting reinforcements reinforcements

16.09.2011
CONNECTION PROCURE
Capacity reservation

• TSO should treat all applications for grid connection on a


transparent and non-discriminatory manner

• At the moment of its investment decision (financial closing)


the applicant needs firm commitment that grid capacity will
be firmly available at the commissioning date

• Objective is to avoid grid capacity hoarding for non realistic


projects and reduce interdependencies and administrative
overhead for Elia and applicant:
– frequent in between checks based on permitting status or confirmations of
requests should be avoided
– ad hoc intervention of Minister in individual procedures is not appropriate

16.09.2011
CONNECTION PROCEDURE
Principles

• Connection procedure should be transparent and efficient


and based on non-discriminatory criteria:
– objective criteria to assess request for connection
– informative orienting study
– formal request for detailed study (leading to connection options, including
conditions, timing and costs)
– formal & mutual acceptance of one option
– signing of the connection agreement
– start realization according to planning and payment scheme

• Signing of the connection agreement:


– firmly allocates the capacity to the applicant
– fixes all terms and conditions between applicant and grid operator,
including arrangements if grid operator is unable to timely realize grid
connection (reinforcement) or if power plant project is delayed or definitely
stopped

16.09.2011
CONNECTION PROCEDURE
Agreement
General
terms and conditions

Specific In case of timely


Payment
terms and conditions realization of connection

Possible compensation
In case of
depending on
withdrawal connection request
phase of realization

In case of untimely
Compensation
realization of connection

In case of untimely
Congestion management
realization grid reinforcements

… …

16.09.2011
FIRM CAPACITY FOR INJECTION

• Flexible connection is unacceptable


– lack of incentives for grid investments
– discourages investments in generation capacity
– discriminatory competition distortion
– additional uncertainty and missed revenues for power generator

• NMA1: ‘flexible connections are discriminatory because they


make a distinction between existing and new connections’

• If grid infrastructure is not sufficient to guarantee firm


connection capacity: market based congestion management
as temporary solution pending urgent grid investments
1 NMA decision of the 20th of May, 2009 (102690/87)

16.09.2011
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT (1)

• Objective criteria to measure/predict actual/future congestion


proactive investment program
• Structural congestion is unacceptable
• Occasional congestion:
– should also be prevented by timely investments
– market based congestion management can offer temporary solution

• Market based congestion management system with fair


compensation ensures:
– grid operators can assess whether they compensate grid users to ramp
up/down or invest in grid reinforcements
– a correct price which reflects scarcity or oversupply of flexibility
– a fair compensation incentivizes market operators to invest in flexible
generation capacity or flexible demand

16.09.2011
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT (2)

• System redispatch with up- and downward regulation can


be implemented according to the Dutch Model:
– clear identification of congested zones on TSO and DSO grid
– voluntary and, if necessary, mandatory bidding
– applicable on all grid users (both generators and end users), including
already connected parties no discrimination
– biddings for different categories of units to prioritize renewables and
cogeneration
– fair and market based compensation
– net cost of congestion management system is socialized in grid fee

16.09.2011
DEROGATIONS

• Derogations of these principles should be avoided:


– except for system security reasons
– existing derogations such as mutually agreed upon grid access
constraints for specific conections during a limited number of hours for the
maintenance of grid components, should not be considered as a
precedent

16.09.2011
CONCLUSIONS

• Grid operators should employ all necessary means to


timely connect all new generation capacity

• Complexity and uncertainty in the connection procedure


and agreement should be reduced

• Grid capacity for injection needs to be firm

• Structural congestion must be avoided by timely


investments

• Occasional congestion should also be prevented by grid


reinforcements or managed with a market based
congestion management system with fair compensation

16.09.2011

You might also like