Evaluation of Sensitivity and Specificity of ELISA Against Widal Test For Typhoid Diagnosis in Endemic Population of Kathmandu
Evaluation of Sensitivity and Specificity of ELISA Against Widal Test For Typhoid Diagnosis in Endemic Population of Kathmandu
Evaluation of Sensitivity and Specificity of ELISA Against Widal Test For Typhoid Diagnosis in Endemic Population of Kathmandu
Abstract
Background: Widal test, which has poor predictive outcomes in predominant typhoid population, is not standard
enough to predict accurate diagnosis. This study aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Widal test to ELISA
using blood culture as gold standard.
Methods: The blood samples were collected in Capital Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal from febrile patients having ≥48 h
fever in 3 years study period for blood culture, Widal test and IgG-IgM ELISA.
Results: Amongst 1371 febrile cases, 237 were Salmonella typhi positive to blood culture and 71.4 % typhoid fever
patient were of 46–60 years old with male to female ratio of 2:1. Blood culture confirmed patients had ≥1:40 anti-TH
and anti-TO titre in 45.56 % (n = 108) and 43.88 % (n = 104) patients respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of IgG
(0.96 and 0.95) and IgM (0.95 and 0.94) at 95 % confidence level were significant compared to Widal anti-TH (0.72 and
0.58) and TO (0.80 and 0.51) test (p value, 0.038) at titre level ≥1:200. Further the PPV of Widal TH and TO (0.38 and
0.23) was low compared to IgG and IgM ELISA (0.78 and 0.77) (p value, 0.045).
Conclusion: Widal test is not sensitive enough for an endemic setting like Nepal and thus should be either replaced
with more accurate test like ELISA or follow an alternative diagnostic methodology.
Keywords: Typhoid Fever, Salmonella typhi, Widal test, ELISA, Sensitivity, Specificity, Nepal
© 2015 Adhikari et al. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to
the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver
(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Adhikari et al. BMC Infectious Diseases (2015) 15:523 Page 2 of 7
is still the gold standard in the febrile cases of typhoid. Rou- standard (Blood Culture). The control populations with
tine Widal test is alternatively adopted second most negative blood culture reports were also included in the
popular choice for diagnosis as blood culture remains con- study, so as to make self evaluation of reference standard.
troversial due to its biased diagnosis [11]. Enzyme-linked The sample population inclusive of blood culture positive
immunosorbent assay (ELISA) based diagnosis has also was grouped into five different groups (Fig. 1).
been studied previously with good diagnostic accuracy [12–
15]. This study aims to compare diagnostic accuracy of Blood collection and bacterial culture for pathogen
Widal test and ELISA in febrile patients taking blood cul- isolation
ture as gold standard tool for the diagnosis of typhoid fever. Blood were collected in BACTEC Peds Plus™/F culture
vials and immediately (within 10 min) transferred to la-
Material and methods boratory to be loaded in Bactec 9240 (Becton Dickinson,
Patients, inclusion/exclusion criteria and data analysis USA) culture instrument for growth. Blood isolates which
Patients attending Capital Hospital, a centrally located were found culture positive were reconfirmed for Salmon-
hospital at Kathmandu, during the months January 2011 ella by slide agglutination, using monospecific anti sera
to December 2013 with complaint of fever over 72 h with- (Sifin, Germany) as described by the Kauffmann-White
out obvious focus of infection and clinical suspicion of scheme [16–18].
typhoid fever (high fever, malaise, headache, constipation
or diarrhoea) were prospectively enrolled in this study. Quantitative Widal test
Patients were divided into five age groups i.e. 1–15 The Widal tube agglutination test was performed using
(children), 16–30 (young), 31–45 (young adults), 46–60 Wellcolex®(Remel, UK) in the group A (n = 1371) as well
(adults) and >60 years (olds). Pregnant women were ex- as for group B, C D and E according to the manufactur-
cluded from the study. The ELISA and Widal tests were er's instructions parallel to the blood culture procedure
performed by a single specialized clinical researcher who of individual groups. Briefly, serum remained after keep-
was blind to the patient's diagnosis in reference to stand- ing for blood culture was diluted in 0.86 % saline solu-
ard throughout the study period. The patients with febrile tion starting with 1:100. Salmonella ‘O’ and ‘H’ antigens
cases were screened when found positive to reference from the standard preparation were added and the tubes
Fig. 1 Consort chart for patients in study. Group A: Febrile patients with suspected typhoid fever (n = 1371), Group B: Blood culture positive
patients (n = 237), Group C: Post treated patients from group A (>Day 30) (n = 237), Group D: Endemic healthy population (n = 237), Group E:
Other diseased patients (infection from; Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Staphylococcus aureus, Cryptococcus neoformans, Vibrio cholera, HIV-1, Neisseria
meningitidis, Listeria monocytogenes, Haemophilus influenza, Streptococcus pneumonia and Rabies virus): Negative to Salmonella tests (n = 237)
Adhikari et al. BMC Infectious Diseases (2015) 15:523 Page 3 of 7
Table 2 Culture report of S.typhi positive cases and co-infection Table 4 Number of anti TH and anti TO levels in blood isloates
with other pathogens among inpatient and outpatient of capital Titration Record Total Patients Culture positive Culture negative
hospital (n = 1371) patients (n = 237) patients (n = 1134)
Inpatients Outpatients Anti TH
Salmonella typhi 115 (95.83 %) 122 (100 %) Aggutinition 311 (22.68 %) 108 (45.57 %) 203 (17.92 %)
Actinobacteria 3 (2.5 %)* 0 (0 %) ≥1:640 78 (25.08 %) 36 (33.33 %) 42 (20.69 %)
*
Klebsiella pneumonia 2 (1.67 %) 0 (0 %) 1:320 156 (50.16 %) 55 (50.93 %) 101 (49.75 %)
Co-infection with S.typhi
*
1:160 176 (56.59 %) 89 (82.41 %) 87 (42.86 %)
1:80 201 (64.63 %) 98 (90.74 %) 103 (50.74 %)
headache (97.47 %; p value, <0.034), loss of appetite 1:40 311 (100 %) 108 (100 %) 203 (100 %)
(90.3 %; p value, 0.028) and chill (74.26 %; p value, No 1060 (77.32 %) 129 (54.43) 931 (82.14 %)
0.034). Abdominal discomfort, myalgia, vomiting, consti- Agglutination
pation, rigor, diarrhea, and dysuria were other symptoms Anti TO
observed in less than half of culture confirmed typhoid pa- Aggutinition 298 (21.74 %) 104 (43.88 %) 194 (17.11 %)
tient. Hence, fever, headache and loss of appetite were sig- ≥1:640 71 (23.83 %) 29 (27.88 %) 42 (21.65 %)
nificant symptoms for the fever ailment (Table 3).
1:320 147 (49.33 %) 45 (43.27 %) 102 (52.58 %)
Qualitative slide agglutination Widal test 1:160 164 (55.03 %) 84 (80.77 %) 80 (41.24 %)
Widal test used as the primary screening assay by typ- 1:80 198 (66.44 %) 91 (87.5 %) 107 (55.15 %)
ing O and H antigen of Salmonella showed overall 1:40 298 (100 %) 104 (100 %) 194 (100 %)
positivity rate of 21.74 % and 22.68 % respectively at No 1073 (78.26 %) 133 (56.12 %) 940 (82.89 %)
the titre ≥1:40. (Table 4). Among culture confirmed pa- Agglutination
tients, group A (n = 237), the number of TH (n = 108)
and TO (n = 104) positive at titre ≥1:40 was signifi-
cantly lower (p value, 0.04) than from the culture nega- after ≥3 days of reported fever case, which were un-
tive patients (n = 1134) group. Though blood culture detectable in initial 3 days of feverish condition. Pa-
showed negative to typhoid test, Widal test was found tients of group C (n = 237), who were enrolled in
positive to TH antigen (n = 203, 17.92 %) and TO anti- medication and recovered, showed significant level of
gen (n = 194, 17.11 %) test at same titre (Table 4). serum IgG (p value, 0.046) but not IgM, when com-
pared to previous data from same patients before medica-
Assessment of ELISA for the diagnosis of typhoid fever tion. For the endemic healthy group D (n = 237), the titre
The OD value for IgM in the culture confirmed group B for IgG was 400 but with no significant IgM titre value. In
(n = 237) was significantly higher (p value, 0.041) than that case of other disease patients of group E (without
of control groups C, D and E. There was no significant dif- Salmonella but other infections), the ELISA results
ference between the control groups D and E (p value, were negative for both Salmonella anti IgM and IgG
0.039). Titre value of 3200 for IgM and 200 for IgG, (Fig. 2). Serology based typhoid diagnostic tests using
was observed for group B patients (193 of 237) only sera from the culture confirmed typhoid patients and
the control subjects showed that both IgG and IgM case definition for suspected and probable cases of ty-
based ELISA tests were superior to the Widal TH and phoid fever (Table 6).
TO tests. When sensitivity, specificity, positive predict-
ive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of Discussion
ELISA was compared among group A (n = 1371) pa- Typhoid is a major public health problem in third world
tients against Widal test, ELISA (IgG/IgM) had higher countries [1,2]. In Nepal, typhoid fever is endemic and
PPV at ≥1:400 (Table 5). The IgM/IgG titre ≥1:200 had the major factors for high prevalence rate include, but
a high sensitivity (95.50 %/96.85 %) and specificity are not limited to, illiteracy, poverty, poor sanitation and
(94.69 %/94.95 %). The diagnostic sensitivity of Widal inadequate facilities for safe drinking water supply. The
TO test at titre ≥1/400 was 84.09 % and specificity was Widal test based on TO and TH titre values were ob-
52.65 %. There was a significant difference between served higher in healthy subjects relating to the endemic
Table 5 Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV and NPV for typhoid fever of ELISA and Widal test in different cut off titers
Test Titer Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV
95 % CI 95 % CI 95 % CI 95 % CI
IgM ≥1:200 95.50 % 94.69 % 77.66 % 99.09 %
91.87 % to 97.82 % 93.23 % to 95.92 % 72.24 % to 82.46 % 98.33 % to 99.56 %
≥1:400 81.23 % 98.29 % 91.77 % 95.70 %
75.95 % to 85.78 % 97.34 % to 98.97 % 87.45 % to 94.98 % 94.36 % to 96.80 %
≥1:800 61.97 % 96.48 % 78.38 % 92.50 %
55.41 % to 68.21 % 95.24 % to 97.48 % 71.74 % to 84.08 % 90.85 % to 93.93 %
≥1:1600 51.89 % 93.79 % 60.44 % 91.42 %
44.94 % to 58.78 % 92.24 % to 95.11 % 52.94 % to 67.60 % 89.68 % to 92.95 %
≥1:3200 47.44 % 92.73 % 54.84 % 90.46 %
40.61 % to 54.34 % 91.08 % to 94.16 % 47.39 % to 62.13 % 88.65 % to 92.08 %
IgG ≥1:200 96.85 % 94.95 % 78.75 % 99.36 %
93.61 % to 98.72 % 93.52 % to 96.14 % 73.42 % to 83.45 % 98.69 % to 99.74 %
≥1:400 85.95 % 98.76 % 93.69 % **
97.04 %
80.92 % to 90.07 % 97.93 % to 99.32 % 89.65 % to 96.51 % 95.89 % to 97.94 %
≥1:800 62.61 % 97.09 % 81.87 % 92.51 %
56.12 % to 68.77 % 95.93 % to 97.99 % 75.49 % to 87.18 % 90.87 % to 93.95 %
≥1:1600 51.89 % 94.48 % 63.22 % 91.48 %
44.94 % to 58.78 % 93.00 % to 95.72 % 55.59 % to 70.39 % 89.75 % to 93.00 %
≥1:3200 47.44 % 92.73 % 54.84 % 90.46 %
40.61 % to 54.34 % 91.08 % to 94.16 % 47.39 % to 62.13 % 88.65 % to 92.08 %
TO ≥1:100 90.32 % 52.41 % 44.22 % 92.12 %
87.25 % to 92.47 % 49.10 % to 53.91 % 41.18 % to 50.73 % 88.71 % to 94.83 %
≥1:200 80.95 % 51.77 % 23.29 % 93.76 %
74.98 % to 86.03 % 48.85 % to 54.68 % 20.27 % to 26.53 % 91.60 % to 95.50 %
≥1:400 84.09 % 52.65 % 25.34 % 94.54 %
78.58 % to 88.66 % 49.72 % to 55.57 % 22.22 % to 28.66 % 92.49 % to 96.17 %
TH ≥1:100 80.32 % 53.22 % 48.40 % 90.87 %
75.28 % to 85.91 % 46.42 % to 55.36 % 42.83 % to 50.27 % 87.14 % to 92.84 %
≥1:200 72.23 % 58.33 % 38.13 % 89.37 %
68.24 % to 79.72 % 52.93 % to 64.22 % 31.23 % to 43.10 % 83.11 % to 94.07 %
≥1:400 62.47 % 55.23 % 39.48 % 90.62 %
59.23 % to 66.82 % 47.21 % to 59.99 % 31.34 % to 45.83 % 86.92 % to 95.27 %
**
Highest PPV value
Adhikari et al. BMC Infectious Diseases (2015) 15:523 Page 6 of 7
Table 6 Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for typhoid fever of WHO case definition
Suspected case of Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV
Typhoid fever
95 % CI 95 % CI 95 % CI 95 % CI
Isolation in Blood culture of;
S. typhi 76.81 % 99.22 % 97.07 % 92.71 %
71.99 % to 81.16 % 98.47 % to 99.66 % 94.31 % to 98.73 % 91.01 % to 94.18 %
Probable case of Typhoid fever
TH(1:160) 45.22 % 82.32 % 34.23 % 87.83 %
41.27 % to 49.17 % 79.91 % to 87.82 % 29.46 % to 38.96 % 81.59 % to 91.31 %
TO(1:80) 43.45 % 82.31 % 34.11 % 87.14 %
39.29 % to 48.97 % 78.96 % to 84.78 % 31.41 % to 38.85 % 83.72 % to 92.91 %
6. Karki S, Shakya P, Cheng AC, Dumre SP, Leder K. Trends of etiology and
drug resistance in enteric fever in the last two decades in Nepal: a
systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57(10):e167–176.
7. Charles RC, Sultana T, Alam MM, Yu Y, Wu-Freeman Y, Bufano MK, et al.
Identification of immunogenic Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi antigens
expressed in chronic biliary carriers of S. Typhi in Kathmandu, Nepal. PLoS
Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(8):e2335.
8. Parry CM, Wijedoru L, Arjyal A, Baker S. The utility of diagnostic tests for
enteric fever in endemic locations. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther.
2011;9(6):711–25.
9. Fadeel MA, House BL, Wasfy MM, Klena JD, Habashy EE, Said MM, et al.
Evaluation of a newly developed ELISA against Widal, TUBEX-TF and
Typhidot for typhoid fever surveillance. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2011;5(3):169–75.
10. Malla T, Malla KK, Thapalial A, Shaw C. Enteric fever: a retrospective 6-year
analysis of 82 paediatric cases in a teaching hospital. Kathmandu Univ Med
J (KUMJ). 2007;5(2):181–7.
11. Pokhrel BM, Karmacharya R, Mishra SK, Koirala J. Distribution of antibody
titer against Salmonella enterica among healthy individuals in nepal. Ann
Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2009;8:1.
12. Zaka-ur-Rab Z, Abqari S, Shahab T, Islam N, Shukla I. Evaluation of salivary
anti-Salmonella typhi lipopolysaccharide IgA ELISA for serodiagnosis of
typhoid fever in children. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97(3):236–8.
13. Fadeel MA, House BL, Wasfy MM, Klena JD, Habashy EE, Said MM, Maksoud
MA, Rahman BA, Pimentel G: Evaluation of a newly developed ELISA against
Widal, TUBEX-TF and Typhidot for typhoid fever surveillance. In.: DTIC
Document; 2011
14. Parry CM, Wijedoru L, Arjyal A, Baker S. The utility of diagnostic tests for
enteric fever in endemic locations. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther.
2011;9(6):711–25.
15. Quang NN, Tapchaisri P, Chongsa-nguan M, Van Vien C, Tra DT, Sakolvaree
Y, et al. Diagnosis of enteric fever caused by Salmonella spp. in Vietnam by
a monoclonal antibody-based dot-blot ELISA. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol.
2011;15(4):205–12.
16. Brenner FW, Villar RG, Angulo FJ, Tauxe R, Swaminathan B. Salmonella
nomenclature. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(7):2465–7.
17. Euzeby JP JP. Revised Salmonella nomenclature: designation of Salmonella
enterica (ex Kauffmann and Edwards 1952, Le Minor and Popoff 1987 sp.
nov., nom. rev. as the neotype species of the genus Salmonella Lignieres
1900 (approved lists 1980), rejection of the name Salmonella choleraesuis
(Smith 1894) Weldin 1927 (approved lists 1980), and conservation of the
name Salmonella typhi (Schroeter 1886) Warren and Scott 1930 (approved
lists 1980). Request for an opinion. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1999;49(Pt 2):927–30.
18. Popoff MY, Bockemuhl J, Brenner FW. Supplement 1998 (no. 42) to the
Kauffmann-White scheme. Res Microbiol 2000. 1998;151(1):63–5.
19. Florkowski CM. Sensitivity, specificity, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC)
curves and likelihood ratios: communicating the performance of diagnostic
tests. Clin Biochem Rev. 2008;29 Suppl 1:S83–87.
20. Stojanovic M, Andjelkovic Apostolovic M, Stojanovic D, Milosevic Z,
Ignjatovic A, Lakusic VM, et al. Understanding sensitivity, specificity and
predictive values. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2014;71(11):1062–5.
21. Parikh R, Mathai A, Parikh S, Chandra Sekhar G, Thomas R. Understanding
and using sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Indian J Ophthalmol.
2008;56(1):45–50.
22. Liang L, Juarez S, Nga TV, Dunstan S, Nakajima-Sasaki R, Davies DH, et al.
Immune profiling with a Salmonella Typhi antigen microarray identifies new
diagnostic biomarkers of human typhoid. Sci Rep. 2013;3:1043.
23. Chew SK, Cruz MS, Lim YS, Monteiro EH. Diagnostic value of the Widal test
for typhoid fever in Singapore. J Trop Med Hyg. 1992;95(4):288–91.
24. Olopoenia LA, King AL. Widal agglutination test - 100 years later: still Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central
plagued by controversy. Postgrad Med J. 2000;76(892):80–4. and take full advantage of: