Affidavit of Foreign Status

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 6
At a glance
Powered by AI
The key takeaways are that the affiant claims to be a sovereign citizen of Massachusetts and a nonresident alien with respect to the United States. He also claims to have no liability for federal income taxes.

The purpose of the affidavit is for the affiant to publicly declare his 'foreign status' and clarify his status with respect to both the individual US states and the United States federal government.

According to the affidavit, the affiant claims to be an 'American Inhabitant' and 'NONRESIDENT ALIEN' with respect to the United States. He also claims to be a foreigner with respect to other US states besides Massachusetts.

Affidavit of Foreign Status

Reader's Notes:

Certified Mail Number: __________________________________________

Date: __________________________________________

John Q. Doe
c/o general delivery
Marin county
San Rafael [ZIP code exempt]
CALIFORNIA, USA

FOREIGN STATUS AFFIDAVIT

CALIFORNIA STATE/REPUBLIC )
) Subscribed, Sworn and Sealed
MARIN COUNTY )

PREAMBLE

The following Affidavit of Foreign Status is a public notice to all


interested parties concerning the Affiant's "birthrights" and his "status" as
an "AMERICAN INHABITANT", as that status would apply with respect to the
American States (the 50 independent States of the Union) and also with respect
to the "United States", as follows:

1. The Affiant, John Q. Doe, was natural born a free Sovereign in


Massachusetts, which is one of the sovereign States of the Union of several
States joined together to comprise the confederation known as the United States
of America. He is, therefore, a "nonresident alien" individual with respect
to the "United States", which entity obtains its exclusive legislative authority
and jurisdiction from Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 and Article 4, Section 3,
Clause 2 of the Constitution for the United States of America. The Affiant's
parents were Sovereigns also, born in sovereign States of the Union. As the
progeny of Sovereign people, the Affiant was born "... one of the sovereign
people .... A constituent member of the sovereignty synonymous with the
people." Scott v. Sanford, 19 How. 404. The Affiant is alien to so-called
14th Amendment "United States" citizenship, and also nonresident to so-called
14th Amendment State residency, and therefore he is a "nonresident alien" with
respect to both. As a Sovereign whose Citizenship originated in Massachusetts
by birth, and who has remained intact in California since the year 1952, the
Affiant is also a foreigner (alien) with respect to the other 49 States of the
Union and with respect to the "United States". As a consequence of his birth,
the Affiant is an "American Inhabitant". And further,

2. The Affiant, to the best of his informed knowledge, has not entered
into any valid agreements of "voluntary servitude". And further,

3. The Affiant is a "NONRESIDENT ALIEN" with respect to the "United


States", as that term is defined and used within the Internal Revenue Code
(Title 26, United State Code) and/or Title 27 and the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder as follows:

The Internal Revenue Code (Title 26, United State Code) and associated
federal regulations, clearly and thoroughly make provision for Americans born
and living within one of the 50 Sovereign States of America, to wit:

Section 1.871-4 Proof of residence of aliens.

(a) Rules of evidence. The following rules of evidence shall govern in


determining whether or not an alien within the United States has
acquired residence therein for purposes of the income tax.

(b) Nonresidence presumed. An alien by reason of his alienage, is


presumed to be a nonresident alien.

[26 CFR 1.871-4]

And further,

4. The Affiant was not born or naturalized in the "United States",


consequently he is not a "citizen of the "United States" nor a "United States
citizen", as those terms are defined and used within the Internal Revenue Code
(26 U.S.C.) and/or Title 27 and the rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder; and, therefore, he is not subject to the limited, exclusive
territorial or political jurisdiction and authority of the "United States" as
defined.

The "United States" is definitive and specific when it defines one of its
citizens, as follows:

Section 1.1-1

(c) Who is a citizen. Every person born or naturalized in the United


States and subject to its jurisdiction is a citizen.

[26 CFR 1.1-1(c)]


And further,

5. The Affiant is not a "citizen of the United States" nor a "United


States citizen living abroad", as those phrases are defined and used in the
Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.) and/or Title 27 and the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder. And further,
6. The Affiant is not a "resident alien residing within the
geographical boundaries of the United States", as that phrase is defined and
used in the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.) and/or Title 27 and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder. And further,

7. The Affiant is not a "United States person", a "domestic


corporation", "estate", "trust", "fiduciary" or "partnership" as those terms
are defined and used within the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.) and/or Title
27 and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. And further,

8. The Affiant is not an "officer", "employee" or "elected official"


of the "United States", of a "State" or of any political subdivision thereof,
nor of the District of Columbia, nor of any agency or instrumentality of one or
more of the foregoing, nor an "officer" of a "United States corporation", as
those terms are defined and used within the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.)
and/or Title 27 and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. And
further,

9. The Affiant receives no "income" or "wages with respect to


employment" from any sources within the territorial jurisdiction of the "United
States" and does not have an "office or other fixed place of business" within
the "United States" from which the Affiant derives any "income" or "wages" as
such, as those terms and phrases are used and defined within the Internal
Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.) and/or Title 27 and the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder. And further,

10. The Affiant has never engaged in the conduct of a "trade or


business" within the "United States", nor does the Affiant receive any income
or other remuneration effectively connected with the conduct of a "trade or
business" within the "United States", as those terms are defined and used within
the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.) and/or Title 27 and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder. And further,

11. The Affiant receives no "income", "wages", "self-employment income"


or "other remuneration" from sources within the "United States", as those terms
are defined and used in the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.) and/or Title 27
and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. All remuneration paid to
the Affiant is for services rendered outside (without) the exclusive
territorial, political and legislative jurisdiction and authority of the "United
States". And further,

12. The Affiant has never had an "office" or "place of business" within
the "United States", as those terms are defined and used in the Internal Revenue
Code (26 U.S.C.) and/or Title 27 and the rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder. And further,

13. The Affiant has never been a "United States employer", nor
"employer", nor "employee" which also includes but is not limited to an
"employee" and/or "employer" for a "United States" "household", and/or
"agricultural" activity, as those terms are defined and used in the Internal
Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.) and/or Title 27 and the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder. And further,
14. The Affiant has never been involved in any "commerce" within the
territorial jurisdiction of the "United States" which also includes but is not
limited to "alcohol", "tobacco" and "firearms" and Title 26, Subtitle D and E
excises and privileged occupations, as those terms are defined and used in the
Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.) and/or Title 27 and the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder. And further,

15. The Affiant has never been a "United States" "withholding agent" as
those terms are defined and used in the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.) and/or
Title 27 and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. And further,

16. The Affiant had no liability for any type, kind or class of Federal
Income Tax in past years, and was and is entitled to a full and complete refund
of any amounts withheld, because any liability asserted and amounts withheld
were premised upon a mutual mistake of fact regarding the Affiant's status. The
Affiant has never knowingly, intentionally, and voluntarily changed his
Citizenship status nor has he ever knowingly, intentionally, and voluntarily
elected to be treated as a "resident" of the "United States". And further,

17. The Affiant, to the best of his current knowledge, owes no "tax" of
any type, class or kind to the "United States" as those terms are defined and
used in the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.) and/or Title 27 and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder. And further,

18. The Affiant anticipates no liability for any type, class or kind of
federal income tax in the current year, because the Affiant does not intend to
reside in the "United States", he does not intend to be treated as either a
"resident" or a "citizen" of the "United States", he is not and does not intend
to be involved in the conduct of any "trade or business" within the "United
States" or receive any "income" or "wages" from sources within the "United
States", as those terms are defined and used in the Internal Revenue Code (26
U.S.C.) and/or Title 27 and the rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder. And further,

19. The Affiant, by means of knowingly intelligent acts done with


sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and consequences (Brady v.
U.S., 397 U.S. 742, 748 (1970)) never agreed or consented to be given a federal
Social Security Number (SSN), same said as to a federal Employee Identification
Number (EIN) and, therefore, waives and releases from liability the "United
States" and any State of the Union of 50 States, for any present or future
benefits that the Affiant may be entitled to claim under the Old-Age Survivors
and the Disability Insurance Act, and/or the Federal Unemployment Tax
Act. Additionally, your Affiant makes no claim to any present or future
benefits under any of the foregoing; and

20. Therefore, I, John Q. Doe, am a natural born free inhabitant and,


as such, a Sovereign Citizen/Principal inhabiting the California
Republic. Therefore, I am not "within the United States" but lawfully I am
"without the United States" (per Title 28, U.S.C., Section 1746, Subsection 1),
and therefore I have no standing capacity to sign any tax form which displays
the perjury clause pursuant to Title 28, Section 1746, Subsection 2. And
further,
PLEASE NOTE WELL: At no time will the Affiant construe any of the
foregoing terms defined within the Internal Revenue Code, Title 26, United State
Code, or within any of the other United State Code, in a metaphorical
sense. When terms are not words of art and are explicitly defined within the
Code and/or within a Statute, the Affiant relies at all times upon the clear
language of the terms as they are defined therein, NO MORE and NO LESS:

... When aid to construction of the meaning of words, as used in the


statute, is available, there certainly can be no "rule of law" which
forbids its use, however clear the words may appear on "superficial
examination" ....

[United States v. American Trucking Association]


[310 U.S. 534, 543,544 (1939)]

This unsworn certification is being executed WITHOUT the "United States",


pursuant to Section 1746(1) of Title 28, United State Code, Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure:

I affirm under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of
America, that I executed the foregoing for the purposes and considerations
herein expressed, in the capacity stated, and that the statements contained
herein are true and correct, to the best of my knowledge.

Executed Anno Domini, on this the ___________ day in the month of

___________________________, 199___.

Subscribed, sealed and affirmed to this ________________ day of

___________________________, 199___.

_________________________________________________________________
John Q. Doe, Citizen/Principal, by special Appearance, in Propria Persona,
proceeding Sui Juris, with Assistance, Special, with explicit reservation of
all of my unalienable rights and without prejudice to any of my unalienable
rights.

John Q. Doe
c/o general delivery
San Rafael [ZIP code exempt]
CALIFORNIA, USA

California All-Purpose Acknowledgement


CALIFORNIA STATE/REPUBLIC )
)
COUNTY OF MARIN )

On the ______ day of ____________, 199___ Anno Domini, before me


personally appeared John Q. Doe, personally known to me (or proved to me on the
basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the Person whose name is subscribed to
the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in His
authorized capacity, and that by His signature on this instrument the Person,
or the entity upon behalf of which the Person acted, executed the
instrument. Purpose of Notary Public is for identification only, and not for
entrance into any foreign jurisdiction.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

_____________________________________
Notary Public

You might also like