Heirs of Reinoso
Heirs of Reinoso
Heirs of Reinoso
116121
SR., represented by Ruben Reinoso Jr.,
Petitioners,
Present:
CARPIO,* J.
- versus -
VELASCO, JR., Chairperson,
PERALTA,
ABAD, and
MENDOZA, JJ.
COURT OF APPEALS, PONCIANO TAPALES,
JOSE GUBALLA, and FILWRITERS
GUARANTY ASSURANCE
CORPORATION,* *
Respondent.
Promulgated:
x -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x
MENDOZA, J.:
Facts:
Reinoso, the jeepney passenger, died as a result of the collision of a jeepney and a truck
on June 14, 1979 at around 7:00 o’clock in the evening along E. Rodriguez Avenue, Quezon City.
It was established that the primary cause of the injury or damage was the negligence of the
truck driver who was driving it at a very fast pace. Based on the sketch and spot report of the
police authorities and the narration of the jeepney driver and his passengers, the collision was
brought about because the truck driver suddenly swerved to, and encroached on, the left side
portion of the road in an attempt to avoid a wooden barricade, hitting the passenger jeepney as
a consequence.
The "gravel & sand" truck was running in high speed on the good portion of E. Rodriguez
Avenue (lane 1 & 2) before the wooden barricade and (having in mind that it had just delivered
its load at the Corinthian Gardens) so that when suddenly confronted with the wooden obstacle
before it had to avoid the same in a manner of a reflex reaction or knee-jerk response by
forthwith swerving to his left into the right lanes (lanes 3 & 4). At the time of the bumping, the
jeepney was running on its right lane No. 4 and even during the moments before said bumping,
moving at moderate speed.
The passenger jeepney was owned by Ponciano Tapales and driven by Alejandro Santos,
while the truck was owned by Jose Guballa and driven by Mariano Geronimo.
On November 7, 1979, the heirs of Reinoso (petitioners) filed a complaint for damages against
Tapales and Guballa. In turn, Guballa filed a third party complaint against Filwriters Guaranty
Assurance Corporation (FGAC) under Policy Number OV-09527. On March 22, 1988, the RTC
rendered a decision in favor of the petitioners and against Guballa. On appeal, the CA, in its
Decision set aside and reversed the RTC decision and dismissed the complaint on the ground of
non-payment of docket fees.
Issue: WON Guballa was successful in proving due diligence of a good father of the family in
hiring and supervising his employees
Held: Yes. Guballa was not successful in rebutting the presumption of negligence.