Meet Your Strawman and Whatever You Want To Know Editabil

MEET YOUR STRAWMAN
AND WHATEVER YOU

WANT TO KNOW
Happy is the man that findeth wisdom, and the
man that getteth understanding. - Pro. 3:13
WE THE PEOPLE
“Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their

Just powers from the consent of the governed”
L e t’s have a Utile
1. Who meets there?

2. W hat do they do there?
3. Do they heip you in any way?
Ifyour answers were:

1. “Members o f the govemmenf ’
2. “They represent all the people living in the country.”
3. “Yes, they create laws to protect me and my family.”
Then let me congratulate

yo u r answers .w
g
ron
Didn 't do too w ell on that quiz? OK, le t’s have another go:
4. W hen was slavery abolished?

5. Was slavery legal?
6. Are you in debt to a financial institution?
And Whatever You Want To Know 1

Here are the answers:
1. The serving officers of a commercial Corporation.
2. They think up ways to take money and goods from you.
3. No, absolutely not, they help themselves and not you.
4. Slavery has NEVER been abolished and you yourself are

considered to be a slave right now.
5. Yes, slavery is “legal” although it is not “lawful” (you need to
discover the difference).
6. No. You are NOT in debt to any financial institution.
Does thisseem a little strânge to you? does, then read on
THOSE IN POWER HAVE A BIG SECRET
• Paying tax is OPŢIONAL !!

• Registering a vehicle is OPŢIONAL !!
® Paying a fine is OPŢIONAL !!
• Attending a court is OPŢIONAL !!
YOU CAN IF YOU WANT TO, BUT YOU DON’T HAVE

TO.
Surprised? Well - try this on for sizet
Every Mortgage and Loan is FULLY REPAID from day one -

you can pay it again if you want to, but you don’t have to !!
If nobody has told that you have a Strawman, then this could be
a very interesting experience for you.
Your Strawman was created when you were very young, far
too young to know anything about it. But then, it was meant to be
a secret as its purpose is to swindle you, and it has been used very
effectively to do just that ever since it was created.
2 Meet Your Strawman

Perhaps it is about time that you leamed about your Strawman
and how you can stop it being used against you. Knowing about it
is the most important first step. You need to go on a joumey of
discovery, and I ’m afraid that what you are about to discover is not
very pleasant. However, if you decide to act on what you learn, it
could change your life for the better.
If you think that you are in debt, then you can get out of it if you
are willing to stand up for your rights and refuse to be swindled any
longer.
Interested? If so, then let’s start at the beginning and fmd out
where your Strawman carne from — and why you should care
about it.
It all started whcn your parents had a happy event and you
entered the world. You don’t know exactly when that was,
bccausc you wcrc not aware of the days of the week, the months
of the year, or even what year it was. Even after some months had
gone by, you still were not aware of these things, but by that time,
your Strawman had already been created, and it was being used to
nmkc some very unscrupulous people rich.
None of this was your fault. It happened because your parents
wcrc fooled into thinking that they needed to register your birth and
get a birth certificate for you. So, they APPLIED for a birth
certificate, not understanding what would happen when they did.
Well then, what did happen? According to the Local
Authority:
1. They lost ownershîp of their baby (you).
2. They alJowed a Strawman to be created.
This is not something which they can be blamed for, as nobody
lold them it would, or even could, happen. Nor did anybody teii
your parents what a Strawman is or how it can be used against
their baby. In actual fact, the “registration” is a contract which is,
in reality, nuli and void because there was no full disclosure by the
Local Authority, nor was there Tntent to contract’ on the part of
your parents.

The registering of a baby’s birth passes “ownership” of the baby
to the Local Authority and that, and that alone, allows the Local
Authority to take the child away from the parents if they ever want
to do that. This applies until the child reaches the “age of maturity”
set by the current legal statutes. Doing that is not “lawful” but
after the birth has been registered, it is “legal” and there is a world
of difference between those two terms, a difference which it is
very important that you come to clearly understand.
So, W hat is a Strawman?
A Strawman is a fictitious legal entity, created with the hope
that as the child grows up, he will be fooled into believing that he is
actually the Strawman (which he most defmitely is not) and pay all
sorts of imaginary costs and liabilities which get attached to the
Strawman by con artists.
How is a Strawman Created?
Well the mechanism involves that unnecessary birth certificate
which the parents imagine is about, and belongs to, their baby
(neither of which is actually true). If the baby has been named
‘James’ and the family name is ‘Martin’, then you would expect
the birth certificate to have the name ‘James Martin’ printed on it.
If that is what is printed on it, then all is well and it is a genuine birth
certificate and nothing more. However, if any other name is there,
then the document is not a birth certificate but instead is the
creation of a Strawman masquerading as James Martin. The
alternative entries might be any of the following examples: “JAMES
MARTIN”, “Mr. James Martin”, “Martin, Mr. James” or anything
else which is not exactly “James Martin” and nothing else.
Why Create a Strawman?
The answer is “in order to charge the Strawman imaginary costs
and penalties and fool the human James Martin into paying those
amounts”. These imaginary charges include ‘Income Tax’, ‘Council
Tax’, ‘Inheritance Tax’, ‘Capital-Gains Tax’, ‘RoadTax’, ‘Import
Tax’, ‘Value-Added Tax’, ‘Fuel Levy’, ‘Loan Interest’, ‘Bank
Charges ’ and anything else that full-time professionals can think up

and are confident that you will not notice that you never agreed to
pay, and don't need to pay.
uLegaIese"
“Legalese” is a secret language invented to trick you. It uses
English words but attaches secret meanings to those words with
the sole intention of stopping you from believing that what they are
saying to you has nothing to do with the normal meaning in the
English language. Their purpose is to cheat you and rob you.
For example, they will ask to you ‘6Bo you understand?”
In English, that means “Do you comprehend what I am saying
to you?” And the automatic response would be “Yes”, meaning “I
do comprehend what you are saying to me”. But these sneaky,
underhand people have changed the meaning in Legalese to mean
“Do you stand under me?” meaning “Do you grant me authority
over you so that you have to obey whatever I teii you to do?”
What makes it even worse, is the fact that they will never teii
you that they have switched from English to Legalese, and if that is
not dishonest, underhand and unscrupulous, then I doift know what
is! If you answer the question believing that English is being
spoken, then they pretend that you are contracting with them to
become subordinate to them. Whether or not that is actually true
is debatable because that is effectively a verbal contract between
you and them, and for any contract to be valid, there has to be full
and open disclosure of all of the terms of the contract, and then,
unreserved acceptance by both parties, and in these cases, that has
most definitely, not occurred.
But what is the point in all this? Well, this manoeuvre is
intended to trick you into agreeing to represent your Strawman.
Why? Aaah, now, that’s a good question, but to answer it talces a
bit of explaining, and you need to understand the overall situation:
All humans are born equal, with complete freedom of choice
and action. If you live in the same place as a lot of other people,
then there are a few restrictions which have grown up, by common
consent, over time. These restrictions are for your protection and

the protection of the other people living near you. These restric-
tions are called “the Law” (or more accurately: “Common Law”)
and they are few in number and very easy to understand. They
are:
lo You m m t not înjure or kill anyone.
2. You must not steal or damage things owned by some-
body e!se0
3. You must be honest in your dealings and not swindle
anyoneo
These restrictions have resulted from hundreds of years of

disputes which have been dealt with through using common sense
and the opinions of ordinary people. They are the only limitations
on you, and if you don't want to abide by them, then you need to go
to some isolated place, and stay away from other people.
Many people think that there are hundreds of other laws which
they have to lceep (and new ones every other day), but that is not
so. Those other things are called “statutes” and keeping them is
opţional for you, the human, BUT they are NOT opţional for your
fictitious Strawman, and that is why the people who benefit from
those things want to persuade you to represent your Strawman and
so become subject to all of their invented restrictions and charges.
If you knew that they were opţional, would you agree to:
1. Give most of your earnings away in taxes and similar
charges?
2o Pay to own a vehicle?
3. Pay to own a television set?
4. Pay to drive on roads which were built with your money?
5. Be forced to join the armed Services if you are told to?
6. Send an army which is supposed to represent you, into
another coimtry to raiirder innocent people there?
Were you ever told that these things are opţional? If you agree
to represent your Strawman, then these things become binding on
you. These are some of the “statutes” which ‘politicians’ lceep
inventing in order to make you poor, make them and their friends

rich, and keep you in a position where you have to do everything
they say, no matter how much that harms you and does away with
your natural freedom and rights.
But, says somebody, we elect a govemment to represent us and
so we have to do what they say; after all, they have our best
interests at heart; don't they?
Well, that is a nice thought, but is it actually true? No it isn't.
You think that you elect politicians to represent you in your
government, but that is not what you actually do.
That is part of a very carefully fostered illusion intended to
keep you in your place and giving most of your eamings away (typi-
cally, 80% of all you earn). Part of the secret is that what is
supposed to be your ’governmenf is actually a privately owned,
for-profit company and all that you do when voting, is to help choose
the serving officers inside that company. It will never make the
slightest difference to what happens in the future as the company
policy and actions are controlled by the owners of the company and
they are not influenced in any way whatsoever by what you want.
Think this is far fetched? Then check it out via Dun & Bradstreet
or any of the other place which records the setting up and
perfoimance of the 160,000,000 commercial companies world-wide.
When you do that, you will discover, for example, that the United
States is a commercial for-profit company.
The United States Corporation is a private company.
The non-federal Federal Reserve Bank is a private company
set up in the year 1913, as is every Court and every Police Force
and even Congress is a company and not a person.
Just in case you are not aware of it, the purpose of any
commercial ‘for-profit’ company or Corporation is to make money
for its owners (and shareholders if there are any). The people who
you think of as T he Government’ don’t do anything that eams money
- they instead take money from you, and their main job is to make

sure that you don't realize that they are in the same position as IBM
which takes away millions of your money every year.
So, why all the pretence of there being a genuine govemment
which you elect and who serves you? They don’t want you to
understand that they are just running a company which produces
nothing of any worth - something like a betting shop, where almost
every customer loses money - and wake up to the fact that, unlike
what you have been told all your life, this is all opţional and you
don’t need to play their rip-off game any longer, unless you want to.
They want you to be so burdened down with paying them money
and working so hard and so long that you don’t have the time, money
or energy to stop and think about what is happening to you and your
family.
They are desperate to stop you from just walking away from
their scam, so they malce every effort to connect you with the
fiction which is your Strawman because fictitious entities like
commercial companies can’t have any dealing with a real man or a
real woman - they can only deal with another fiction like your
Strawman, and it is essential that they fool you into believing that
you have to act on behalf of your Strawman - which you don’t.
They have a number of well-proven methods of distracting you
and keeping you from finding out. They want you to see a great
deal of entertainment, not because there is anything wrong with
entertainment, but while you are being entertained you will not be
aslcing awkward questions. Also, they are very careful that most
entertainment reinforces their make-believe world and malces it
appear to be “the real world” where everyone is under 4The
Government’, Police Officers uphold the law, taxes are essential in
order to keep things going, and things which are said to be bad for
you, are taxed heavily (not to make money) but supposedly, to
encourage you to avoid those things. You will notice that they keep
saying that their invented “statutes” are “the law” which they most
certainly are not, but if they say it often enough, people start
believing it and never think to question what they say.
They also have another very effective technique, and that is

FEAR. They want you to be afraid. Afraid of imaginary terror-
ists. Afraid of disasters. Afraid of new diseases. Afraid of foreign
countries. Afraid of “the economy” doing badly and inflation rising.
If you doubt this, then take a look at the news and count the number
of positive, uplifting news items, and the number of negative or
depressing news items. It doesnTt take much in the way of
research to see the very heavy negative bias in the news. The
reason behind this is to make you feel that you need a Govern
ment and an Army to protect you from these supposed dangers. It
is easy to keep the news items biased that way, because all of the
major news agencies and media outlets in the world are owned by
only five or six privately owned commercial companies.
So to supposedly connect you to the Strawman which they
created for you when your birth was registered, they use the
Legalese technique o f conning you with the Name of the
Strawman. If you are ill-advised enough to go to a Court (which is
a Corporate place of Business) as “the accused”, you will be asked
to confirm your name, quoting the full name shown on your birth
certificate, which is the LEGAL PERSONALITY. Titles such as
Mr., Dr., Rev., Gov., Sec., or whatever are not asked for as they
are not required. The “A ccused” is actually the LEGAL
PERSONALITY which is the name on the birth certificate, so when
they ask for the person’s NAME, they are talking to the LEGAL
PERSONALITY (the Strawman) and not to the human. This is
because a human cannot exist in the legal world - only pieces of
paper can, and that is something which they are very careful not to
teii you.
This is a really Key issue. Natural Law and Common Law are
the only laws which apply to humans and they deal only with harm-
ing other people or causing them loss, and outside of those
restrictions, a human has free and unlimited entitlement to do
anything he chooses which complies with these principles. As
opposed to this, Acts of Congress, “Statutes” and Statutory
Instrument “Contracts” do not apply to the human but only to the
piece of paper which is the LEGAL PERSONALITY which has
no reality. As the legal fiction—the LEGAL PERSONALITY—
was created by the company called “THE UNITED STATES

CORPORATION”, that company gets to say what the rights and
duties for that piece of paper are.
When a person is bom in America, the mother and father submit
a Birth Certificate Registration Form, which is a piece of paper.
There is no requirement under common law to do this. When any
limited company or Corporation is set up, there is always a
Certificate of Registration in order to create its LEGAL PERSON-
ALITY, and that is a piece of paper. Please note that an American
Birth Certificate States quite clearly that it is not evidence of
identity, meaning that, it has nothing to do with any human. Marked
on it is “U.S. Copyright” showing clearly that it does not belong to
an individual and was created by the State. This act of Registering
a child, makes that child a “ward of the court” and the child can be
taken away from the parents at any time.
The Legalese definitions of words which sound commonplace,
can be found in Black's Law Dictionary and the current edition is
the eighth.
Interestingly, in Legalese, you the human are defined as a
“monster” which shows exactly what the people who use Legalese
think of you - charming people aren't they?
Another trick they try to play on you is to imply that a
Summons is something which you MUST obey while in fact, it is
only an Invitation to attend their place of business. They are NOT
inviting you the man or woman, but instead, they are inviting the
LEGAL PERSONALITY to their place of business, and please
note that there is a CHOICE, as it is only an invitation.
The LEGAL PERSONALITY is just a piece of paper, a BIRTH
CERTIFICATE created by the commercial company called “The
United States Corporation”, and it is not the human. You can’t be
forced into a contract, so they have to deceive you into entering
into one without understanding what you are doing. They are using
deception as every Judge’s Court is a trading name of the commer
cial company called “The Department of Justice” which does not
have a Parent Company listed, meaning that it is a Parent
Company itself. Legal people, on being shown this company

registration, respond by realizing that if this information is genuine
(which it is) then the US has been lawless for more than 100 years
because the whole Justice System is being dealt with by a commer-
cial company.
Going to court in connection with any civil action is a very bad
idea as the only function of a court is to judge between two parties
who disagree and then penalize the loser. The court doesn’t care
who wins or loses, and the objective of the court is to make a profit
for its owners as it is a commercial enterprise and its purpose is to
acquire money from anybody who is foolish enough to attend. If
you look at the Summons (which is really an invitation to go to
court), you will see that it is not in your name, but in the name of the
Strawman which they are hoping to fool you into representing.
DEALING WITH DEBT

Because of the very high percentage of the money eamed being
taken away from the average person, it is not unusual for people to
end up with what loolcs like “debt”. Most people spend their time
worrying over the statement of what they are told they owe, and do
endless calculations to see if they agree with the numbers which
they have been sent. Again, this is the sort of misdirection which
magicians use to fool audiences, distracting their attention away
from where the action is really taking place. Here, the question is
really not “How much is owed?” But instead is “Is anything
actually owed?”
You need to remember that any financial institution is a legal
fiction and does not actually exist. As a result of this, it can only
deal with other legal fictions (essentially, other pieces of paper) and
it can’t have any dealings with a man or a woman as they are not
legal fictions. It is also important to understand what passes for
money nowadays. Lefs say our trusty friend James Martin goes
looking for a loan and he fills out an application form with the Swindle
Bank, Inc. for $10,000. Interestingly, the form which he is asked to
sign, says that he has already received the $10,000 although the
loan has not yet been approved.

The next day, the loan is approved and James is handed a check
which he is asked to sign and deposit to his account with the bank.
We won't follow up on that very interesting procedure at this time,
but please remember that he has now provided two signatures for
$10,000 in the Strawman name, and all he has received is a ‘ 1’ and
four zeros in the accounts of the Swindle Bank.
All goes well for several months until James loses his job and
does not manage to get another one. This is financial trouble which
he does not know how to deal with. Time goes by and James has
not had sufficient money to make payments against his loan from
the Swindle Bank Inc. He starts getting letters from the bank
saying that he must pay the arrears immediately and keep up with
the payments in future. There is not the slightest chance of that
happening as James just does not have the money and he does not
know what to do.
Fortunately, Peter, the next door neighbor of James, happens to
be an independent financial advisor with years of experience, and
James has the idea of asking him for help. Peter is willing to help
and so he sits down and goes through all of the paperwork.
Thenhetells James: “You must not ignore this situation. Write
back immediately and say that you agree to pay any financial
obligation which you might lawfully owe, ON THE CONDITION
that they pro vide:
1. Validation of the debt—that is, the actual accounting.
2. Verification of their claim against you; that is, a signed
Imvoice.
3. A copy of the Contract binding both parties (you and
them), in a letter by ‘certified m ail’ so that there is an
independent “witness to it having been delivered.”
Every letter you write should be marked clearly
Prejudice ” which means that you reserve all your lawful rights
and you accept no contract unless it is shown to be lawful by meet-
ing the four essential conditions to a lawful binding contract—
namely:

1. Full Disclosure (you were not told that you were actu-
ally creating the credit with your wet ink signature);
2. Equal Consideration (they brought nothing of value to
the table and so had nothing to lose);
3. Lawful Terms and Conditions (your’s were based on
fraud);
4. The wet ink signatures of both parties — (corporations

can't sign because they have no Right or Mind to contract
since they are soul-Iess legal fictions; and furthermore, no
third party can sign a contract on their behalf).
Peter then tells James that agreeing to pay provided that
evidence of a lawful debt can be produced, stops him being taken
to court because courts only adjudicate between parties who are in
dispute, and as James has agreed to pay there is no dispute, so the
court would not accept any application for a hearing. If the Swindle
Bank were foolish enough to try, James has only to send the court
a copy of his letter agreeing to pay, and the case would be thrown
out (dismissed) immediately (and the Bank might well be penalized
for wasting the court’s time).
The bank is now in trouble as it has been running a con game on
James and so can't produce the documents, for which James has
asked. The request by James was reasonable in every respect.
However, a loan agreement is a contract and so there has to be full
disclosure of all the details (which there wasn’t), both sides have to
put up something of equal worth (which didn’t happen), and the
contract has to be signed in wet ink by both parties (which the bank
can’t do). So the bank has a real problem.
The bank will probably send a Statement of what it wants James
to believe is the outstanding amount. James should retum this with
a poliţe note saying that a ‘Statement’ is not an ‘Invoice’, so would
they please provide a signed ‘Invoice’ as requested. They will also
probably send a photocopy of his Loan Application form, at which
point James should write back and point out politely that it does not
constitute a contract as it is only signed by one of the parties (him-

seif) and he has asked for a copy of the Contract signed by both
parties.
The bank is likely to go silent at this point and stop correspond-
ing with James. James should then write again, requesting that the
necessary documents be sent to him within the next fourteen (or
perhaps 28) days, and if that does not happen, then he will consider
the debt to be fully discharged.
The bank will either remain silent or write back to say that the
debt is fully discharged. If the bank tries phoning, then just teii
them politely that you only wish to deal with this matter in writing,
and hang up. If the bank remains silent for the stated period of
time, then James should write back stating that due to the bank’s
failure to provide the necessary evidence of a lawful debt within
the reasonable period of time provided, that James now considers
that the debt is fully discharged, and ask the bank to confirm that in
writing. The bank will normally write back confirming that the debt
is fully discharged and that there is nothing owing and if it does not
do that, it will just stop asking for any further payments.
The reasons for how and why this takes place, takes a good
deal of explaining and many people fînd it difficult to understand.
So it is covered in detail on the following pages here. Many people
think that this process sounds like you ripping off the bank, but this
is definitely not the case.
WHAT IS MONEY?
Originally, in England, the unit of money was called “one pound
sterling”. That was because it was literally, sterling silver weighing
one pound. As it was quite difficult to carry several pounds weight
of currency around with you, it was arranged that the actual silver
could be held in a bank and a promissory note which was essen-
tially, a receipt for the deposit of each pound of silver on deposit,
was issued. It was much easier to carry these “bank notes” around
and to do business with them. If you wanted to, you could always
take these notes to a bank and ask for them to be cashed, and the

bank would hand you the equivalent weight of sterling silver in
exchange for the notes.
Today, the eurrency in America is “bank notes” which are
certainly easier to carry around than metal coins, but there is one
very important difference. These notes are issued by the private
company called “The Federal Reserve Bank” (which is as good a
name for a company as any other name). However, if you were to
take one of their bank notes to a branch of that company and ask
for it to be cashed, all that they would do is give you another note
with the same numbers of credit printed on it, or altematively, other
notes with smaller numbers printed on them. This is because,
unlike the original bank notes, there is nothing of any physical
value backing up the bank notes of today - they are only materially
worth the physical paper on which they are printed.
It actually gets worse than that. What happens most commonly
nowadays is that they do not even bother printing those pieces of
paper. Now, they just tap some numbers into a computer record,
or if they are old-fashioned enough, they write the numbers into a
ledger by hand. What do those numbers represent? Nothing at all
- they have no actual value, in other words, just as much value as if
you typed them into your own computer - quite meaningless - and
yet, a bank or other financial institution will merrily “lend” you those
numbers in return for years of your work, plus interest charges —
now isnrt that really generous of them?
Actually, this is not at all funny, because if you don’t keep
paying them money earned by your very real work, they will
attempt to take your house and possessions away from you. This
won’t happen if you understand that what they lent you was
actually valueless. Take the case of Jerome Daly of Minnesota in
America. In court, Jerome challenged the right of the bank to fore-
close on his home which had been purchased with a loan from the
bank. Jerome argued that any mortgage contract required that
both parties (that is, himself and the bank) put up a legitimate form
of property for the exchange. In legal language, that is called a
legitimate “consideration” put forward by both parties to the
contract.

Jerome explained that the “money” was in fact not the property
of the bank as it had been created out of nothing as soon as the loan
agreement was signed. That is, the money does not come out of
the bank’s existing assets as the bank is simply inventing it, and in
reality the bank is putting up nothing of its own, except for a
fictional liability on paper. As the court case progressed, the
President of the bank, Mr. Morgan, took the stand and admitted
that the bank, in combination with the (privately owned commercial
company called) “The Federal Reserve Bank”, created the entire
amount of the loan in “credit” in its own books by means of a book-
keeping entry, the money and credit coming into existence when
they created it. Further, Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States
Law or Statute exists which gives him the right to do this. A lawful
consideration must exist and must be tendered to support the loan
agreement. The jury found that there had been no lawful consider
ation put forward by the bank, so the court rejected the bank's
application for foreclosure and Jerome Daly kept his home debt
free.
That is exactly the situation with all American mortgages. When
someone makes an application for a mortgage or any other loan,
the applicant’s signature is required on the application form
before the loan is approved. The “signature” on that signed
application makes it a valuable piece of paper which the bank can
deposit in its accounts as a credit to the bank for the amount of the
loan. The bank could just keep that application form and stay
ahead by $100,000 or whatever, but they want more, much more.
They want the borrower to pay them that same amount again,
funding it by years of labor, and not only the amount of the
supposed “loan” but significant extra amount in interest as well.
Why do you think that they are so keen to lend you “money” - they
are even willing to lend to people with very poor credit, as there is
no way that the bank can lose out on the deal, no matter what
happens.
This is why, if a company starts demanding payment of large
sums o f money, you start by asking them to provide the
“accounting” for the deal. In other words, you are asking them to
show in writing that they provided something of genuine worth as

their side of the loan contract. As they invented the money as
numbers in their books, with no real worth attached to those
numbers, they are in deep trouble as they can’t comply with your
demand to see their accounting for the deal. Did you ever wonder
how the average bank manages to make hundreds of millions of
dollars profit every year?
Well, you are looking right at where a large chunk of it
eornes front*
THE BOGKKEEPING
This next part of the information may be a little difficult to
understand. When any business is being run, the accounts are
recorded as money “coming in” and money “going out”. For a
bank, the money coming in is called a 4‘Credit” and money going out
is called a “Debit”. The objective is to have these two amounts
always match each other (balance) for any customer. Not
everything done in banking is immediately obvious to the average
person, so it may be a little difficult to understand how everything
works in this area.
If you have an account with a bank and you deposit $200 to
open the account, the bank enters that in its books as a Credit. The
Credit on your account is $200 and the Debit is $0, so the balance
has a positive, or Credit, value of $200.
If you were to withdraw $300, then the bank would record this
as a Debit of $300. When the Credit balance on your account is
$200, the balance on your account would be $ 100 in Debit, that is,
overdrawn by $100.
If you were to deposit a further $100 and then close your
account, the bank would not have any problem, other than the fact
that they would lilce to keep you on as a customer.
As far as the accounting goes, your account is balanced and the
bank is satisfied with the state of affairs, $300 has come in and
$300 has gone out, the books balance - case closed.
Now, if you were to apply for a loan (mortgage or otherwise)

for $100,000 from the bank, they would give you an application
form which is set out in such a way that you have to fiii in the
Strawman’s name rather than your own - separate boxes with one
of them containing “Mr.” and they may even require you to fiii the
form in using block capital letters.
You may think that the capital letters are so that they can read
you writing or perhaps, to make it easier for it to be entered into a
computer, but the name in those capital letters belongs to the Straw-
man and not to you. You have actually just made an application on
behalf of the Strawman and not on behalf of yourself!
You might wonder why they would want you to do this. After
all, what could they ever get from the Strawman? Well, you might
be surprised. When the Strawman was incorporated they assigned
a large monetary value to it, possibly $100,000,000 and they have
been trading on the stock market on behalf of the Strawman ever
since, and you know how many years that has been. So, very
surprisingly, in their opinion, the little fellow is really very rich, and
you have just authorized them to take the amount of your loan
application from the Strawman’s account. So before the bank
passes you any money, it has already gotten its money from the
Strawman account and entered it in its books as a $ 100,000 Credit
to your loan account. They then place $100,000 into your loan
account as a Debit. Interestingly, that loan account is now
balanced and could easily be closed off as a completed deal.
This is where the sneaky part comes in. To get the money out
of your account, you have to write and sign a check for $100,000
on that account. What does the bank do with checks which you
sign? It assigns them to the account as an asset of the bank, and
suddenly, the bank is ahead by $ 100,000 because the check is in the
name of the Strawman who can supply the bank with almost any
amount of money. But it doesn't end there, as the bank is confident
that you know so little about what is going on that you will pay them
anything up to $100,000 over the years, against what you believe
you owe them! If that happens, then they have made yet another
$100,000 for the bank. To make things even better for them, they
want you to pay them interest on the money which you (don't

actually) owe them. Overall, they make a great deal of money
when you borrow from them, so perhaps you can see now why
banks make hundreds of millions in profit each year.
If the loan were used to buy a property, then the bank probably
insisted that you assign the title deeds to them as collateral for the
loan, as soon as the property deal closed (was completed). If you
then fail to keep paying them, they are likely to attempt to foreclose
on the “loan” and sell your property quickly for an even greater
profit. And to add insult to injury, if the property sale did not exceed
the amount of the “loan” plus the charges for selling it, then they
are likely to claim that you owe them the difference!
Perhaps you can now see why Jerome Daly told them to go
take a running jump at themselves, and why your request for “the
accounting” for any loan made to you, puts the bank in an
impossible situation. If the bank then just writes and tells you that
the “debf ’ is fully discharged, they still have made a massive profit
on the operaţi on, and they also hope that the vast majority of their
customers will not catch on to the fact that they are paying far too
much for their property, or even that there is a Strawman involved.
Please don’t feel that you are ripping off the banks if you don't
pay them what they are asking you to pay - they have already
recovered everything paid out before you start paying them for the
second or third time.
When it is a Mortgage the entire process is very much the same.
The “Debt-Free Sovereign” web site:
http://www.freewebs.com/debtireesovereign gives a very
clear description of this process in Canada, and the process is much
the same everywhere else. They describe a typical property sale
and mortgage this way:
The buyer goes to Magic Bank in response to the bank’s claim
that it is in the business of lending money in accordance with its
corporate charter. The buyer went to the bank believing that Magic
Bank had the asset (money) to lend. Magic Bank never tells its
customers the truth that it does not have any money to lend, nor

that Magic Bank is not permitted to use their depositors' money to
lend to its borrowers.
Notwithstanding the fact that Magic Bank does not have any
money to lend, Magic Bank makes the buyer/borrower sign a
mortgage loan application form which is essentially a promissory
note saying that the buyer/borrower promises to pay Magic Bank
for the money (what money?) which he is supposed to receive
from Magic Bank even before any value or consideration is
received by the buyer/borrow er from M agic Bank. This
promissory note is a valuable consideration, a receivable, and
therefore an asset transferred from the buyer to the bank which
Magic Bank enters into its own asset account as a cash deposit.
After making sure that the buyer has the ability to pay the
required monthly payments (the buyer has credit), Magic Bank
agrees to lend the buyer the money (cash) to pay the seller. Magic
B ank has no money to lend but it gave the buyer a promise to lend
money by way of a commitment letter, loan approval letter, loan
authorization, or loan confirmation letter, etc., signed by a bank
official or loan/mortgage officer employed by Magic Bank.
Magic Bank’s acceptance of the buyer’s promissory note makes
the bank liable to the buyer/borrower for the full face value of the
promissory note which is the agreed purchase price of the property,
less any cash deposit or down payment money paid by the buyer
directly to the seller. It is important to note at this point that all real
estate transactions require that the property being sold must be
conveyed, by the seller to the buyer, free of all liens and encum-
brances which means that all liens such as existing mortgages, judg-
ments, etc. must be paid before the property can be mortgaged by
the buyer as collateral to the mortgage loan which is yet to be
received by the buyer pursuant to the promise made by Magic Bank.
How can the seller pay off his mortgage and obtain clear title if he
has not yet received any money from the buyer? And how can the
buyer mortgage a property that does not yet belong to him?
This dilemma is solved using Magic Bank’s magic bag of tricks.
Magic Bank, in concert with the bank’s lawyers, or notaries, causes
all the liens and encumbrances to magically disappear by writing a

Magic Bank check, backed by the buyer’s promissory note and
agreement of purchase and sale, deposited into the lawyer’s trust
account, to pay the seller for the property at closing. In essence,
using the buyer’s promissory note as the cash to enable the agree
ment of purchase and sale.
So the buyer’s promissory note made the conveyance possible.
Magic Bank caused the property to be conveyed from the seller to
the buyer with title free and clear of all encumbrances and liens.
The property now belongs to the buyer which makes it possible for
the buyer to mortgage his property to Magic Bank. The buyer
actually paid for the property using his own promissory note.
At this point, the seller has not yet received any money or cash
so Magic Bank and its magicians must perform more magic in
order to satisfy the seller’s requirement that he get paid, or the
whole deal is nuli and void. The seller does not even know that the
property has been magically conveyed to the buyer ’s name in order
for the seller to receive any money.
The ensuing magic trick is accomplished this way. The buyer is
made to sign another promissory note. The mortgage contract is
attached to the promissory note which makes the buyer liable to
pay Magic Bank for the money or the loan which the buyer has not
yet or may never receive for up to twenty five years or more
depending on the term of the mortgage contract. This note is linked
to the collateral through the mortgage contract and as such, it is
valuable to Magic Bank.
Magic Bank then goes to the Federal Reserve Bank or to
another bank to pledge the deal that they have just gotten from the
buyer for credit. The Federal Reserve Bank then gives Magic
Bank the “credit”. Remember, it is not Magic Bank’s credit, it is
the buyer’s credit who promised to pay Magic Bank if and when
the money is received by the buyer from Magic Bank, payable for
up to 25 years or more.
Note: What happened above is basically a “swap” transaction
all banks do to ‘monetize’ security. In this case, the second
promissory note that is linked to the mortgage contract and signed

by the buyer is a mortgage-backed security.
Magic Bank will then agree to pay the Federal Reserve Bank a
certain percentage of interest over “prime”. Thus the buyer’s loan
package goes to the Federal Reserve Bank which credits Magic
Bank with the full amount of credit which is the total amount of the
money Magic Bank is entitled to receive after 25 years which is the
amount of the principal plus all the interest payments the buyer has
promised to pay to Magic Bank for 25 years or more which is
usually three times the amount of the money promised by Magic
Bank to the buyer. By magic, Magic Bank just enriched itself and
got paid in advance, without using or risking its own money.
Magic Bank's magician, the lawyer who holds the check that is
backed by the buyer's original promissory note, then writes a check
to the seller as payment for the property.
In effect, the buyer paid the seller with his own money by virtue
of the fact that it was the buyer's own money (the promissory note)
that made the purchase and sale possible.
Magic Bank just made a cool 300% profit without using or
risking any capital of its own.
Neither was there any depositor’s money deducted from Magic
Bank’s asset account in this transaction.
What really happened was pure deception and if we the people
tried to do this, we would end up in prison being found guilty of
fraud and criminal conversion not to mention that the property would
have been seized by the court.
This is only a crime if we, the people, do it to each other, as it
would be an indictable crime if we issued a check with no funds.
There would not be any deal, no purchase and sale agreement
because there is no valuable consideration. In order to de-criminalize
the transaction, we need Magic Bank and their cohorts to make
the deal happen. It is really a conspiracy of sorts but these
“persons”, the banks, the lawyers, the land title offices or even the
courts do not consider the transaction as fraudulent transactions
because these transactions happen all the time.

Such a contract is “void ab-initio” or “void from the beginning”
which means that the contract never took place in the first place.
Moreover, the good faith and fair dealing requirement through full
disclosure is non-existent which further voids the contract.
Magic Bank failed to disclose to the buyer that it will not be
giving the buyer any valuable consideration and taking interest back
as additional benefit to unjustly enrich the Corporation. Magic Bank
also failed to disclose how much profit they are going to make on
the deal.
Magic Bank led the buyer to believe that the money going to the
seller would be coming from its own asset account. They lied
because they knew, or ought to have known, that their own book or
ledger would show that Magic Bank does not have any money to
lend and that their records will show that no such loan transaction
ever took place. Their own book will show that there would be no
debits from Magic Bank’s asset account at all and all that would
show up are the two entries made when the buyer gave Magic
Bank the first collateral or the promissory note which enabled Magic
Bank to cut a check which made it possible to convey the property
from seller to the buyer free and clear of all liens or encumbrances
as required by the agreement of purchase and sale entered into in
writing between the buyer and the seller. What really happened
was not magic; in reality, the buyer’s promissory note was used by
Magic Bank and its magicians - the lawyers and land title clerks -
to convey free title to the buyer from the seller. So why do we
need the mortgage contract at all?
The other entry that would show up when we audit Magic Bank’s
accounts, is the other pledge of collateral including the buyer’s prom
issory note which was converted (unlawfully and without disclo
sure or permission from the buyer) into a mortgage-backed secu-
rity which was “swapped” or deposited by Magic Bank to the Fed
eral Reserve Bank for which another deposit was entered into
Magic Bank’s transaction account.
From the above, we can list all the criminal acts perpetrated by
Magic Bank:

1. The mortgage contract was “void ab-initio” because
Magic Bank lied and never intended to lend a single cent of
their own asset or depositor’s money to the buyer.
2. A valid contract must have lawful or valuable consider-
ation. The contract failed for anticipated breach. Magic
Bank never planned to give the buyer/borrower any valu
able consideration.
3. Magic Bank breached all its fiduciary duties to the buyer
and is therefore guilty of criminal breach of trust by failing in
its good faith requirement.
4. Magic Bank concealed the fact from the buyer that it
would be using the buyer’s promissory notes; first to clear
all the liens and encumbrances in order to convey clear title
to the buyer and then use the second promissory note to
obtain more money from the Federal Reserve Bank or other
institutions that buy and sell mortgage-backed security.
Magic Bank received up to three times the amount of money
required to purchase the property and kept the proceeds to
its elf without teliing the buyer.
5. Magic Bank violated its corporate charter by Iending
“credit” or “nothing at all” to the buyer and then charging
interests on this make-believe loan. Banks are only licensed
to lend their own money, not other people's money. Magic
Bank used the buyer’s promissory note to clear the title
which essentially purchased the property from the seller.
The transaction is “an ultra vires” transaction because Magic
Bank has engaged in a contract “outside of it's lawful man
date”. An ultra vires contract is void or voidable because it
is non-existent in law.
6. Everyone involved in this undertaking with Magic Bank,
starting with the loan or mortgage officer, the lawyers, the
land title office and even the central bank are equally guilty
by association by aiding and abetting Magic Bank in its com-
mission of its crimes against the buyer and the people who
would eventually have to absorb all of the loss through

increased taxes9 etCo
In the final analysis, Magic Bank and the others who profited
from the ultra vires transaction are all guilty of unjust enrichment
and fraud for deceiving the buyer and the people, and for acting in
concert in this joint endeavour to deceive the buyer.
DEALING WITH THE POLICE

Years ago, a policeman was your friend and defender. Things
have changed now that Police Forces have become commercial
organizations, dedicated to producing a profit by taking money from
y°u in the form of Speeding Fines, Parking Fines and any number
of other charges. It was stated on naţional TV recently that in the
last thirteen years, three thousand additional offences have been
invented.
As each individual Police Force is a commercial company, in a

way lilce a McDonald’s Restaurant in strategy, it has no authority to
enforce anything, any more than a McDonald’s has. The men and
women who work under the banner of their local Police Force have
two separate roles. When they talce up their occupation, they take
an oath of office, pledging to uphold the law.
That oath, and nothing else, gives them the authority to act to
enforce Common Law - that is, the few things which are listed
near the start of the “Legalese” section above. It does not
authorize them to do anything connected with so-called “govern-
menf ’ statutes, so they have been trained to use Legalese to entrap
uninformed members of the public. To be fair, it is highly likely that
members of the police force are not aware of what they are doing
and do not understand the difference between “legal” statutes (which
are opţional) and the “lawful” Common Law requirements which
apply to everyone and are not opţional.
Please don t get me wrong. Most policemen and policewomen

do a great job and assist members of the public, often above and
beyond the requirements of their job - opposing bullying, intimida-
tion, fraud, etc. and comforting in cases of bereavement or injury.

Admittedly, the commercial companies who control the Police Forces
are working hard to end this sort of positive behavior, using ridicu-
lous “Health and Safety” regulations as an excuse, even to the
extent that police offîcers are instracted to stand by and watch
somebody drown and not attempt to save them. This is not the
choice of the officer but the instructions of the owners of the
company.
Because these thousands of invented offences don’t apply to
anybody unless they agree to be bound by them, it becomes
essential for a police officer to (possibly inadvertently) persuade a
member o f the public to agree to subject him self to these
unnecessary restrictions and agree to pay invented cash penalties
to the local commercial company called the “Police Force”. The
normal first attempt to establish this spurious dominance of the
police officer is by him asking for your name. This is not an
innocent question and it is essential that you are careful in what you
say as there are Legalese booby traps all over the place.
One suitable reply is “The law does r
that I n f o r m a t i o n ”which is entirely correct and av
number one, and no matter how often the question is asked, the
answer is always the same. It is important not to argue with a
police officer as that is another Legalese booby trap which makes
you subject to the thousands of hateful regulations designed to part
you from your money. So, only answer questions, ideally, with a
non-aggressive question, and don't volunteer any information.
If the police officer says “You were exceeding the speed
you could say “Was I?” As you don't argue, nor do you say that
the Common Law does not require anyone to keep to speed limits,
obey road signs, park only where directed, etc. even though that is
perfectly true. Maxim: “Arguments are for fools”.
As mentioned before, if the police officer aslcs Do you
understand?” Your response should be “No! — I do NOT stand.
under vou in this matter”, As before, the question is a Legalese
trap and has nothing whatsoever to do with understanding anything
which has been said.

Under Common Law, an offense has only been committed if
there is a victim (somebody who has been injured or killed, had
possessions damaged or stolen, or who has been defrauded). So, if
the police officer keeps pushing you to agree to pay his company
money, when you don't need to, then a good question to ask might
be “W h o i s the victim?”A n alternative is to
charge or am Ifree to go?” If you stick to these things, then the
police officer has nothing to work on as you have not agreed to be
bound by statutes; you have not provided a name and address for
him to write on an Invoice (or “Fixed Penalty Notice” as they like
to caii it) and you have not entered into a “controversy” by arguing
with him, or into “dishonor” by refusing him point blank.
There is one other thing, and that is, without being aggressive or
offensive in any way, you must not DO anything which he tells you
to do because if you do, then those charming Legalese people can
see that you agree to “stand under” him and become subject to his
“legal” (but not “lawful”) authority, and so become liable to those
thousands of cunning plâns called “statutes”, carefully crafted in
order to rob you in a perfectly “legal” but not “lawful” way.
One thing which any police officer needs to become aware of is
the tact that they do not have any security provided by the Police
Force which employs them. In any situation which does not
involve Common Law, the police officer is on his own, acting as an
individual contractor and as such is wide open to action against him
either under Common Law it he is acting unlawfully or by civil
court action if his actions warrant it. If there is failure to establish
“Joinder” (which is where a human voluntarily agrees to
represent the Strawman and so become subject to statutes), then
the piesumed authority of a police officer does not exist in any
respect and he is acting solely as an individual whose only
authority is to enforce Common Law and nothing else.
REGISTRATION
Most people believe that when they buy a new car that they
have to register it with the commercial company known as the

“Department of Motor Vehicles”. What very few people are aware
of is the fact that the act of applying for registration confirms the
transfers the physical ownership of the vehicle from you the
purchaser who paid the money, to the State. That is, you have
given the vehicle away to a commercial company who has done
nothing at all for you and which does not have your best interests at
heart. Since it is unlawful to swindle anyone, I would be most
interested to hear any reason why this registration should not be
deemed to be unlawful, blatant, and an obvious fraud, for there has
not been full disclosure of the silent and adhesive contract terms.
The change of ownership is shown by the fact that you, the
previous owner, are now sent a document stating that your Straw-
man is now the “Registered Owner” of the vehicle which you have
just bought. You are left to pay for maintaining the vehicle which
you do not own, and which the actual owner will, seize and sell the
vehicle (which cost him nothing) if you, as agent for the
“Registered Owner” do not keep on paying for the use of the
vehicle.
Seizing the vehicle would not be lawful if the vehicle did
not belong to the company doing the seizing.
The vehicle will be seized if the “Registration Tax” is not paid.
That “tax” was originally introduced as a fund contributed to by the
vehicle drivers, in order to build new roads, and to maintain roads
that exist. That was a reasonable idea which means that all the
roads in the country belong to the people who paid the money for
them to be built and repaired.
Local Authorities say that they can’t maintain roads properly as
they do not have sufficient funds to do the work. The charge is
more for vehicles of larger size on the excuse that they bum more
fuel and so contribute more to global warming. The real purpose
for the increase is to take more money from people who have no
idea what is going on. There is even a proposal now, that motorists
be charged for every mile that they drive along the roads which
they paid for and own.
That, of course, is not the only stream of income from vehicles.

A major source of income is from the massive “tax” on fuel for
vehicles, and it has been stated that an incredible 65% of the selling
plice is the proportion which is not needed for the location, extrac-
tion, processing and delivery of the actual fuel. In passing it can be
noted that vehicles can be run on water, compressed air, energy
direct from the environment, permanent magnets, and even on
gravity. It will, without doubt, be a shock to you that many of the
inventors who have done this suddenly disappeared as soon as they
started testing their prototypes. Farfetched? I know of five people
who have been told to “cease and desist - or else”. When you
understand the billions and billions in profit that are made through
selling oii products, actions like that become very understandable,
especially since the people who do these things own the police forces
and the courts, and know that there will be no comeback no matter
what they do.
So, what about the Driver ’s License? Under Common Law,

humans have the right to travel freely and that includes using a
vehicle when travelling. The Legalese people want to persuade
you that you are no longer a “Traveller” under Common Law, but
instead, you are a “Driver” subject to their statutes, and they
demand that a Driver ’ must have a driver’s licence, registration
tax, car insurance, and anything else that they can thinlc up. If you
wish to live in freedom and somebody asks to see your licence,
then the question is “Why would I want one of those?”
A driver’s licence is only needed for the driver of a vehicle
which is being used in commerce. It can be argued that
transporting a Strawman is a commercial undertaking, so it would
be advisable to not have anything related to a Strawman with you
on the road. It is also important to not give your name, address or
(supposed) date of birth or to show any form of ID as that places
you in a position of voluntarily submission by:
(a) Obeying the command of another human being (who is
of equal standing to you);
(b) Associating yourself with, and consequently represent-

ing, a Strawman who is automatically subject to all statutes,
being itself, a legai fiction joined to that fîctional world.

So, if you are not carrying a passenger who is paying for the
joumey and you are not stopping off on the journey to sell things
and you are not transporting a Strawman, then you are not a “Driver”
with a “Passenger”, but are instead a “Traveller”, with a “Guest”.
Travellers do not need a driver’s licence.
POŞTAL DEMANDS
Each person generally gets a number of demands for amounts
to be paid (Bills). If you get a demand for payment, you will notice
that it is not addressed to you, the human, but to the fictional Straw
man which has a name which sounds like your name but is not the
same. The name will be printed on the demand in all capital letters,
or in rare cases preceded by "Mr.", "Mrs." or "Miss.", and any one
of those names refers to the Strawman who sounds like you and
which has a creation date which matches what you have been told
was your birthday. You can pay this demand if you want to, but it is
entirely opţional. Remember that it is not YOU who is being billed.
Also worth remembering is that you, the human, are bound by
Common Law and not legal statutes, and Common Law does not
require you to pay any form of tax.
The company invoicing the Strawman is hoping that you don't
catch on to the fact that it is not you who is being billed, and so
make the payment as a mistake on your part.
If you don't want to pay this unnecessary charge on behalf of
the Strawman, then you can mark the envelope “NO CONTRACT
— Return to Sender” and mail it back to the sender. Any
subsequent letters can be treated in exactly the same way. As in all
cases, do not have any telephone conversations about it, as verbal
Communications bristle with Legalese verbal traps. At most, say
that you wish to deal with any such matters by mail and terminate
the caii. It does not matter if an employee tums up at your home
and hands you a letter or puts it through your mail box. The letter
is NOT for you or even addressed to you - it is addressed to the
Strawman, so it can be mailed back the same as any other letter.

Recently, Tony Rooke in the UK took a different approach. He
refused to pay for a TV licence and went to court over it. There,
he stated that he would not pay a TV licence fee because the BBC
( British Broadcasting Corporation”) intentionally misrepresented
facts about the 9/11 attacks. As is widely known, the BBC
reported the collapse of World Trade Centre Building 7 - the 47-
story Salomon Brothers’ building which was never hit by an
airplane but which collapsed at free-fall speed later that day - more
than twenty minutes before the collapse occurred.
Rooke stated that the BBC had to have had prior knowledge of
that terror attack and so were complicit in the attack. He then
showed a recording of the BBC video news broadcast along with
considerable additional evidence. The judge agreed that Rooke
had a reasonable case to protest and he was found ‘not guilty’ by
the couit and was not fîned for failure to pay the licensing fee.
If it is still available, the BBC news report of the collapse, show-
ing the building standing behind the reporter, is at
http://tinvurl.com/loulgca
If you wish, you can talce a more forceful, direct stance as
demonstrated here by a letter issued by Christopher Lees when
dealing with a Fixed Penalty Notice charge:
Bear Sirs,
Please read the following notice thoroughly and carefully

before responding. It is a notice. It informs you. It means
what it says.
The reason why you need to read it carefully is simple. I

am offering condiţional agreement. This removes contro-
versy, and means that you no longer have any ultimate
recourse to a court of law in this matter, because there is no
controversy upon which it could adjudicate. You always have
the option of dragging these conditions into a court of law
only to be told that they are, indeed, lawful. That is, of course,

always your prerogative should you decide to waste your tinte.
For this reason it is important that you consider and
respond to the offer in substance. The “nearest official form”
wil! not suffice, and consequently is likely to be ignored by
myself without anydishonor on my part.
On the other hand there is a time-Iimit on the agreement
being offered. It is reasonable, and if it runs out then you
and aii associated parties are in default, removing any and all
lawful excuse on your part for proceeding in this matter.
For these reasons it is recommended that you carefully
consider this notice and respond in substance, which means
actually addressing the points raised herein.
You have apparently made allegations of criminal conduct
against me.
You have apparently made demands upon me.
I do not understand those apparent demands and there-
fore cannot lawfully fulfil them. I seek clarification of your
document so that I may act according to the law and maintain
my entire body of inalienable Natural Rights.
Failure to accept this offer to clarify, and to do so com-
pletely and in good faith within 7 (seven) days will be deemed
by all parties to mean that you and your principal or other
parties abandon all demands upon me.
I conditionally accept your offer to agree that I am a legal
fiction “person” Mr. Christopher Mark Lees and that I owe
£70 for Services rendered by your company, upon proof of
claim of all of the following:
1. Upon proof of claim that I am a person, and not a
tam an being.
2. Upon proof of claim that you know what a “person”
actually is in legal terms.
3. Upon proof of claim that you know the difference

between a “human being” and a “person” legally speaking.
4. Upon proof of claim that you know the difference
between the terms “legal” and “lawful”.
5. Upon proof of claim that I am legal fiction “person”

Mr. Christopher Mark Lees, being the entity to which your
paperwork was addressed, and not Christopher of the Lees
famiîy, as commonly called.
6. Upon proof of claim that the charge was the result of a

lawful investigation unmarred by prejudice.
7. Upon proof of claim that I am a member of the society
whose statutes and subsisting regulations you are enforc-
ing.
8. Upon proof of claim that I showed you some sort of

identifîcation.
9. Upon proof of claim that there is a nameable society

that I belong to and that the laws covered within any alleged
transgressions state that they apply to me within that named
society.
Sincerely and without ill will, vexation or frivolity,
By ; ***__________________________ *** (Agent)

Christopher of the Lees family
WITHOUT PREJUDICE, i.e. all Natural Inalienahle

Rights Reserved
Please address all future correspondence in the matter

to a direct Human Seif, namely Christopher of the Lees
family, as commonly called.
Encl: Original paperwork as received.

CONSENT
AII men are born equal and so nobody has the right to
command you, make demands of you or force you to do anything.
The most that anyone can do is to make you an offer to perforai.
Even though they may say that it is an “Order”, or a “Demand”,
or a “Summons”, it is in reality an offer which you are free to
acceptor not as you so choose. This is why they keep using
“Applications”, “Registrations” and “Submissions” as those things
give them power over you through your unwitting consent. They
are hoping that you will break the law by the way that you deal with
their offer. If you just ignore the offer, you are stepping into what
is called “dishonor”. The only effective way of dealing with the
offer is “condiţional acceptance” as already mentioned. If you
accept their offer without imposing any conditions, then you are
accepting that they have the power to order you around, and that
places you under their authority, because you have just chosen to
accept their offer (even though you may not understand that you
are accepting their offer for them to have authority over you).
They also want to get you arguing with them since that also
places you in “dishonor”, and if there is a court case involved, the
judge just looks to see who is in dishonor. Remember, in civil cases
the court is a commercial operation where the judge doesn't care
who is right or wrong, just who will pay the court. So, we accept
all offers but with our conditions attached to each offer, and that
prevents them taking us to court - remember, courts only deal with
disputes and if you conditionally accept each offer there won't be
any dispute and so there can't be any court involvement. Some
offers are “Notices” and a notice has to be clear, unequivocal, and
concise. You can discharge a Notice by seeking clarification, that
is by writing back, aslcing the meaning of a word, stating that you
don't understand the word. They were hoping that you would just
ignore the Notice and so go into dishonor and become liable.

A Parking Ticket is a “Notice”, and please be aware that a
Parking Ticket is not a bill, but instead it is a Notice telling you that
theie is something to which you should pay attention. So you write
back saying that you have noticed their Notice and as they appear
to think that you owe them money, you are happy to pay, but first
you need some verification before payment is made.
“First, there is a need to verify the debt, so please send me a bill
with a human signature on it. Also, I need to see the lawful, two-
party contract supporting that bill”. As they can’t supply either of
those things, it kills the claim stone dead, so just keep insisting that
they either supply those things or else stop bothering you.
An interesting alternative is that if they send you a final notice
marked “Remittance”, then that piece of paper actually has the
value of the money amount written on it. The really silly thing is
that you have the option to write “Accepted for value” on that
piece of paper, sign it with your name and the date, and mail it back
to them, and technically, that concludes the matter by paying the
amount demanded. Who was it that said “it's a mad, mad, mad,
mad world”? Actually, the payment comes out of the vast amount
of money which your Strawman has accumulated over the years,
and your signing the document as “Accepted for value”, authorizes
them to take the payment from your Strawman account and that
suits them as well as yourself. Writing “Accepted for Value” means
that you are authorizing them to take the amount they specify out of
the Strawman account which has such a large amount in it that the
balance will hardly be affected at all.
SOCIETY
We come now to the very difficult subject of American society.
I certainly don’t know all the answers in this area. A society is a
group of people who willingly join together and abide by a set of
rules decided on by members of that society. Loosely speaking, the
system which has been set up by the commercial companies who
have control of the United States, is a society. It is a society which
has good features and bad features as well.

Common sense says that there is an advantage for any large
number of people to organize themselves together and have skilled
specialists provide paid Services for the other members of that
society.
For example, having a communal collection to enable roads, water
supplies, sewerage and the like, certainly makes sense. A National
Health Service also looks like a good idea as does having social
welfare benefits for those who are unfortunate enough to become
ill or who are unable to find work. However, such things have been
subverted by those in charge, and manoeuvred into a state wheie
these things serve their ends rather than the needs of the general
population.
While a country-wide medical service sounds like a good thing,
it has been reported that the price of some of the medicines sup-
plied to the National Health Service now cost literally ten times
what they did two years ago. This looks very much as if the
people in control of that service are using it to make massive profits
on pharmaceuticals, and probably many other Services such as
parlcing fees where millions per year are made from people who
have no option but to park in the hospital grounds. So, what looks
like a sensible arrangement, appears to have been converted to
something different. Perhaps this is an unduly cynical view, but it is
certainly in line with many of the other scams which are being run.
Income Tax was introduced as a temporary measure in
connection with a war (and who organizes wars?). It has never
been removed and yet the country did not seem to have any majoi
problems when there was no Income Tax. The employees of the
commercial company which runs the country - those people who
take the title of Member of Congress or some similar meaningless
title, spend a lot of time thinking up "new legislation" which if it can
be introduced without too many people noticing it, will become a
"statute". I suggest that the main intention of all legislation is to
provide a smoke-screen to hide additional charges which members
of the public are required to pay. An argument can be that "you
elected" those politicians, so you must abide by whatever they
dictate. This carefully avoids mentioning the fact that those

politicians have nothing to do with the public, other than giving the
appearance that the public has some say in what happens, while
the reality is that everything that happens is dictated by the (non-
elected) owners of the companies in charge.
The payment of benefîts to those in need looks like a very good
and necessary thing, but the people in charge see it as an admission
that the adult is not capable of taking care of himself and so they
literally think of these ordinary people as "cattle" (their word, not
mine). What they ignore is the fact that their many, many direct
and indirect taxes and charges, along with the low level of pay
which they reckon that people can be made to work for, are the
things which have many ordinary, hard-working people in the very
P°or financial positions which they despise. They are willing to
cheat, steal and lie while the ordinary person is not comfortable
doing those things. So, what should be a good and helpful system,
has been changed into an oppressive thing which is used to force
people into dependency.
While a certain level of public contribution for what are thought

of as being essential Services, is understandable and a desirable
thing, that the system has been twisted into a mechanism to enslave
and defraud ordinary people. It has long since reached a
ridiculous level with the average person being expected to pay
Income Tax, Council Tax, Inheritance Tax, National Insurance,
Capital Gains Tax, Sales tax on house purchases, Value Added Tax,
Parking charges, Airport charges, Fuel Tax, Road Tax, Import Duty,
Tax on alcohol, Tax on tobacco, payments for a driving licence,
passport... the list goes on and on and on with additional items are
added all the time.
People who have been caught for many years in this system will
have already paid in so much that they will not want to leave the
system and lose the benefîts for which they have been paying so
long. Others may well consider starting to refiise to pay some of
the things demanded of the Strawman. This is a personal choice
and one which should be thought about carefully before any action
is taken.
Please note that this document does not provide you with legal

advice, but instead, presents facts for information purposes only. If
you want legal advice, then consult a lawyer.
THE ÂRMEB SERVICES

The commercial company which has chosen the name “The
United States, Inc.”, has a large number of people employed in
what it calls the “United States Armed Services”. Most countries
have a similar arrangement. If you were asked “what is the
purpose of these armed and trained people?” How would you
reply?
It may surprise you to know that the people who employ them
hire them to protect themselves (the employers) from their
enemies.
Not too startling an idea you say. Yes, as you say, not too
startling a revelation, but what may surprise you to discover is that
the enemy is quite openly stated to be YOU! So, not only do they
describe you as a “monster” but also as their “enemy”.
Because they are so heavily outnumbered, they are actually
frightened of you and feel that they need armed bodyguards and
heavy locked doors to keep them safe from the anger of ordinary
people, if they every find out how they are being manipulated and
robbed. In passing, they consider anybody who asks permission to
do something which they are already entitled to do under Common
Law, to be a “Child of the State” and so, of no consequence.
Let’s check out a possible scenario. You take some young people
to a McDonald’s restaurant and order several meals. When the
food has been prepared, the manager says, “I will make a deal with
you: you can have your meals for free if you just take this loaded
revolver and go over to that corner table and shoot that man dead.
There will be no comeback as I am authorizing you to do it”. Having
blinked a few times, you ask why you should shoot him dead when
he has never done anything to you. The manager then says, “He
has never done anything to me neither, but he has a lot of money in
his wallet and I want to steal it, so just go and shoot him dead, it's
38 Meet YourStrawman
OK, because I am telling you to do it for me”.
Sound a bit mad? Well, it should do so as murder is a criminal
offense under Common Law, and somebody telling you to do it, and
that it is OK because they say so, is quite ridiculous. Nobody has
the authority to teii you to murder somebody - remember, all of us
were born with exactly the same privileges and rights, and nobody
has authority over anyone else, and most definitely not to be able to
authorize murder.
The owners of the commercial company which amusingly we

think of as “the govemmenf5stand in the same position as the man
ager of McDonald’s, and have the same lack of authority to breach
Common Law by sending their armed employees into another country
to kill the people there — people who have done them no harm
whom they want to rob.
AH recessions and wars are deliberately instigated by the

people who gain fînancially from them.
Did you ever wonder why vast sums of “public” money are
spent every year on arms? Who owns the companies that make
the profits from selling these arms? Who gets the profits from
rebuilding the places damaged or destroyed by your veiy own army?
Who malces a profit from “lending” vast sums of imaginary money
to a country which has been devastated by their unprovoked
actions, creating an imaginary debt which can never be repaid?
Since World War Two, more than four million people have died
as a result of commercial companies interfering in other countries,
and every one of those deaths was a criminal offense under
Common Law. These companies believe that they and their
employees are above the law and so they do whatever they want.
From time to time, these companies demand that people be
conscripted into their armed forces, without their consent. Do you
ever remember being asked if you would consent to such press-
gang operations? If you were asked - did you say "Yes"? And if
you did, does it make it lawful to force the people who said "No"?
Do you ever get the impression that things are done which breach

both your personal rights and the demands of Common Law?
Not only does invading other countries and murdering the people
there destroy them, but it also has a major negative impact on the
people who joined the armed forces, not being aware that their
(commercial) employers are the real terrorists of this world. Do
you feel that this is a little far-fetched? Well, it was reported on
naţional TV news on 6th September 2010 that ex-Army Chief
General Richard Dannatt claimed that “veşted interests” rather than
“naţional security” decided military spending on the wars in
Afghanistan and Iraq. AII major wars are carried out for commer
cial reasons, although that fact will never be admitted publicly.
Michael Rivero has put together a concise statement on the
situation in America, (which impacts upon the whole world). His
statement is at this web location http://tim vurl.£Mn/l?4ah2ţţ here
he says:
I know that many people have a great deal of difficulty with
understanding just how many wars are started for no other
purpose than to force private central banks onto nations, so let me
share a few examples, in order that you can understand why the
US Government is engaged in so many wars against so many
foreign nations. There is ample precedent tor this.
The United States fought the war of the American Revolution
primarily over the Currency Act of King George III, which forced
the colonists to conduct their business only with printed bank notes
borrowed from the Bank of England at interest. After the Revolu
tion, the new U nited States adopted a radically different
economic system in which the government issued its own value-
based money, so that private banks like the Bank of England were
not siphoning off the wealth of the people through interest-bearing
bank notes.
“The refusal o f King George III to allow the colonies to
operate an honest money system, which freed the ordinary man
from the clutches o f the money manipulators, was probably the
prime cause o f the revolution”. —Benjamin Franklin, Founding
F ather.

But bankers are nothing if not dedicated to their schemes to
acquire your wealth, and they know how easy it is to corrupt the
leaders of a nation. Just one year after Mayer Amschel Rothschild
had uttered his infamous statement: “Let me issue and control a
nation ’s money and I care not who makes the laws ”, the bank
ers succeeded in setting up a new Private Central Bank called the
First Bank of the United States, largely through the efforts of the
Rothschild's chief US supporter, Alexander Hamilton.
Founded in 1791, by the end of its twenty year charter the First
Bank of the United States had almost ruined the nation's economy,
while enriching the bankers. Congress refused to renew the
charter signaling their intention to go back to a state-issued value-
based currency, on which the people paid no interest at all to any
banker. This resulted in a threat from Nathan Mayer Rothschild
against the US Government: "Either the renewal
o f the charter si granted, or the United States will fin
involved in a most disastrous war". Congress still refused to
renew the charter for the First Bank of the United States, where-
upon Nathan Mayer Rothschild railed, “Teach those impudent
Americans a lesson! Bring them back to Colonial statusl”
Financed by the Rothschild-controlled Bank o f England,
Britain then launched the war of 1812 to re-colonize the United
States and force it back into slavery to the Bank of England, or to
plunge it into so much debt that the people would be forced to
accept a new private central bank. The plan worked. Even though
the War of 1812 appeared to be won by the United States,
Congress was forced to grant a new charter for yet another
private bank issuing the public currency as loans at interest, and
that was the Second Bank of the United States. Once again,
private bankers were in control of the nation’s money supply and
cared not who made the laws or how many British and American
soldiers had to die for it.
Once again the nation was plunged into debt, unemployment,

and poverty through the plundering of the private central bank, and
in 1832 Andrew Jackson successfully campaigned for his second
term as President under the slogan, “Jackson And No Bank! ” True

to his word, Jackson succeeded in blocking the renewal of the
charter for the Second Bank of the United States.
“Gentlemeni I too have heen a close observer o f the doings
o f the Bank o f the United States. I have had men watching you
for a long time, and am convinced thatyou have used the funds
o f the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When
you won, you divided the profits amongst yourselvesy and when
you lost, you charged it to the bank. You teii me that if I take
the deposits from the bank and annul its charter I shall ruin
ten thousand families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is
Your sin! I f I letyou go on, you will ruin fifty thousand fami-
UeSy and that would be My sin! You are a den o f vipers and
thieves. I have determined to routyou o ut, and by the Eternai,
Gody (bringing his fist down on the table) I will routyou out!"
— Andrew Jackson, shortly before ending the charter of the
Second Bank of the United States. [From the original minutes of
the Philadelphia committee of citizens sent to meet with President
Jackson (February 1834), according to Andrew Jackson and the
Bank o f the United States (1928) by Stan V. Henkel].
Shortly after President Jackson (the only American President to
actually pay off the National Debt) ended the Second Bank of the
United States, there was an attempted assassination which failed
when both pistols used by the assassin, Richard Lawrence, failed
to fire. Lawrence later said that “with Jackson dead, money
would be mare plentyfuV\
Of course, the present day American public school systcm is as
subservient to the bankers’ wishes to keep certain items of history
from you, just as the corporate media is subservient to Monsanto's
wishes to keep the dangers of Genetically Modilied foodsluffs from
you, and the Global Warming culfs wishes to eoneeal from you the
fact that the Earth has actually becii eooling for the List 16 years.
Thus is shouldcomeas little surprisc, (hat mucii of the real reasons
for the events of the Civil War are not well known (o the average
American.
42 Meet Your Strawnum

When the Confederacy constitutionally seceded from the United
States, the bankers once again saw the opportunity for a rich
harvest of debt, and offered to fund Lincoln's efforts to bring the
south back into the union by force, but at 30% interest. Lincoln
remarked that he would not free the black man by enslaving the
white man to the bankers, so using his authority as President, he
issued a new govemment currency, the “greenback”.
This was a direct threat to the wealth and power of the central
bankers of the United States, who responded quickly.
"If this mischievous financial policy, which has its origin in
North America, becomes entrenched, then that Government will
issue ifs own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be
without debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on
its commerce. It will become prosperous to a degree which is
without precedent in the history o f the world. The brains, and
wealth o f all countries will migrate to North America, That
country must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on
the globe".
— The London Times responding to Lincoln’s decision to issue
govemment greenbacks to finance the Civil War, rather than agree
to private banker’s loans at 30% interest.
In 1872 New York bankers sent a letter to every bank in the
United States, urging them to fund any newspapers which opposed
govemment-issued money (Lincoln's greenbacks):
“Dear Sir: It is advisable to do all in your power to sustain
such prominent daily and weekly newspapers... as will oppose
the issuing o f greenback paper money, and that you also with-
hold patronage or favors from all applicants who are not will-
ing to oppose the Government issue o f money. Let the Govern
ment issue the coin and the banks issue the paper money o f the
country. To restore to circulation the Government issue o f money,
will be to provide the people with money, and will therefore
seriously affect your individual profit as bankers and lenders".
— “Triumphant plutocracy”; the story of American public life
from 1870 to 1920, by Lynn Wheeler.

tfIt will noî do to allow ihe greenback , as it is called, to
circulate as money any length o f tirne, as we cannot control
that”. — ibid.
“Slavery is likely to be abolished by the war, power, and
chattel slavery destroyed. This, I and my European friends
are in favor o f for slavery is but the owning o f labor and
carries with it the care for the laborer, while the European plan ,
led on by England, is for capital to control labor by controlling
the wages. THIS CAN BE BONE BY CONTROLLING THE
MONEY”! — ibid.
Goaded by the private bankers, much of Europe supported the
Confederacy against the Union, with the expectation that victory
over Lincoln would mean the end of the Greenback. France and
Britain considered an outright attack on the United States to aid the
confederacy, but were held at bay by Russia, which had just ended
the serfdom system and had a state central bank similar to the
system the United States had been founded on. Left free of Euro
pean intervention, the U nion won the war, and Lincoln
announced his intention to go on issuing greenbacks. Following
Lincoln's assassination, the greenbacks were pulled from
circulation and the American people forced to go back to an economy
based on bank notes borrowed at interest from the private bankers.
Finally, in 1913, the Private Central Bankers of Europe, in
particular the Rothschilds of Great Britain and the Warburgs of
Germany, met with their American financial collaborators on Jekyll
Island, Georgia to form a new banking cartel with the express
purpose of forming the Third Bank of the United States, with the
aim of placing complete control of the United States money supply
once again under the control of private bankers. Owing to hostility
over the previous banks, the name was changed to “The Federal
Reserve” system in order to grant the new bank a quasi-govem-
mental image, but in fact it is a privately owned bank, no more
“Federal” than Federal Express. Indeed, in 2012, the Federal
Reserve successfully rebuffed a Freedom of Information Lawsuit
by Bloomberg News on the grounds that as a private banking
Corporation and not actually a part of the govemment, the Freedom

of Information Act did not apply to the operations of the Federal
Reserve. The year 1913 proved to be a transformative year for the
nation’s economy, first with the passage of the 16th “income tax”
Amendment and the false claim that it had been ratified.
“I think that if you were to go back and try top find and
review the ratijication of the 16th Amendment, which was the
internai revenue, the income tax, I think that if you went back
and examined that carefully, you would find that a sufficient
number o f States never ratified that Amendment". — U.S. Dis
trict Court Judge James C. Fox (Sullivan v United States, 2003).
Later in 1913, apparently unwilling to risk another questionable
amendment, Congress passed the Federal Reserve Act over the
Christmas holiday, while members of Congress who were opposed
to the measure were at home. This was a very underhanded deal,
as the Constitution which explicitly grants Congress the authority
to issue the public currency, does not authorize it to delegate that
authority to another party, and so it should have required a new
Amendment to allow Congress to transfer that authority to a
private bank. But Congress passed it, and President Woodrow
Wilson signed it (as he had promised the bankers that he would, in
exchange for generous campaign contributions). Wilson later
regretted that decision, stating in 1919:
“I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my
country. A great industrial nation is now controlled by its
system o f credit We are no longer a government by free
opinion, no longer a government by conviction and vote o f the
majority, but a government by the opinion and duress o f a small
group o f dominant men”.
The very next year, World War I started, and it is important to
remember that prior to the creation of the Federal Reserve, there
was no such thing as a world war. No profits — No wars.
The First World War started between Austria-Hungary and
Serbia, but quickly shifted to focus to Germany, whose industrial
capacity was seen as an economic threat to Great Britain, who
saw the decline of the British Pound as a result of too much

emphasis on fmancial activity to the neglect of agriculture, indus
trial development, and infrastructure (not unlike the present day
United States).
Although pre-war Germany had a private central bank, that bank
was heavily restricted, and inflation kept to reasonable levels. Un-
der govemment control, investment was guaranteed to internai
economic development, and Germany was seen as a major power.
So, in the media of the day, Germany was portrayed as the prime
instigator of World War One, and subsequently, not just defeated,
but had its industrial base flattened.
Following the Treaty of Versailles (June, 1919) Germany was
ordered to pay the war costs of all of the participating nations, even
though Germany had not actually started the war. This amounted
to three times the value of all of Germany itself. Germany’s private
central bank, to which Germany had gone deeply into debt to pay
the costs of the war, broke free of government control, and mas-
sive inflation followed (mostly triggered by currency speculators)
permanently trapping the German people in endless debt.
When the Weimar Republic economically collapsed, it opened
the door for the National Socialists to take power. Their first
fînancial move was to issue their own state currency which was
not borrowed from private central banks. Freed from having to pay
interest on the money in circulation, Germany blossomed and quickly
began to rebuild its industry. The media called it “The German
Miracle”. TIME magazine lionized Hitler for the amazing improve-
ment in life for the German people, and the explosion of German
industry, and even named him TIME Magazine’s “Man Of The
Year”, in 1938.
Once again, Germany’s industrial output became a threat
to Great Britain, resulting in these comments:
“Should Germany merchandise (do business) again in the
next 50 years, we have led this war (WWI) in vain9\ —
Winston Churchill in The Times (1919)
“We will force this war upon Hitler; if he wants it or not ”
— Winston Churchill (1936 broadcast)

“Germany hecomes too powerfuL We have to crush it.”
— Winston Churchill (November 1936 speaking to US - General
Robert E. Wood).
“This war is an English war and its goal is the destruction
o f Germany”. — Winston Churchill (- Autumn 1939 broadcast).
Germany’s state-issued value-based currency was also a
direct threat to the wealth and power of the private central banks,
and as early as 1933 they started to organize a global boycott against
Germany to strangle this upstart ruler who thought he could break
free of private central banks!
As had been the case in World War I, Great Britain and other
nations threatened by Germany’s economic power looked for an
excuse to go to war, and as public anger in Germany grew over the
boycott, Hitler foolishly gave them that excuse. Years later, in a
spirit of candor, the real reasons for that war were made clear:
“The war wasn rt only about abolishing fascism, but to con-
quer sales markets. We could have, if we had intended to,
prevented this war from breaking out without fîring one shot,
but we didn ft want to ”. — Winston Churchill to Truman (Fultun,
USA March 1946).
“Germany9s unforgivable crime before WWII was its at~
tempt to loosen its economy out o f the world trade System and
to build up an independent exchange system from which world-
finance couldn’t profit any more. ... We butchered the wrong
p ig ”. — Winston Churchill (The Second World War - Bern, 1960).
As a side note, we need to step baclc before WWII and recall
Marine Major General Smedley Butler. In 1933, Wall Street
bankers and financiers had bankrolled the successful coups by both
Hitler and Mussolini. Brown Brothers Harriman in New York was
financing Hitler right up to the day war was declared with
Germany. And they decided that a fascist dictatorship in the United
States, based on the one in Italy, would be far better for their
business interests than Roosevelt’s “New Deal” which threatened
massive wealth re-distribution to recapitalize the working and middle

class of America. So the Wall Street tycoons recruited General
Butler to lead the overthrow of the US Government and install a
“Secretary of General Affairs55who would be answerable to Wall
Street and not to the people, and would crush social unrest and shut
down all labor unions.
General Butler pretended to go along with the scheme but then
exposed the plot to Congress. Congress, then as now in the pocket
of the Wall Street banlters, refused to act. When Roosevelt learned
of the planned coup, he demanded the arrest of the plotters, but the
plotters simply reminded Roosevelt that if any one of them were
sent to prison, their friends on Wall Street would deliberately
collapse the still-fragile economy and blame Roosevelt for it.
Roosevelt was thus unable to act until the start of WWII, at which
time he prosecuted many of the plotters under the “Trading With
The Enemy Act55.
The Congressional minutes into the coup were finally released
in 1967 and became the inspiration for the movie, “Seven Davs in
Mav55but with the true financial villains erased from the script.
“I spent 33 years and four months in active military service
as a memher of our country rs most agile military force — the
Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from
second lieutenant to Major General. During that period I spent
more o f my time being a high-class mus ele man fo r Big
Business, for Wall Street, and for the bankers. In short, I was
a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism. I suspected that I was
just a part o f a racket at the time. Now I am sure o f it. Like all
members o f the military profession I never had an original
thought until I left the service. My mental faculties remained
in suspended animation, while I obeyed the orders o f the higher-
ups. This is typical with everyone in the military service. Thus
I helped make Mexico, and especially Tâmpico, safe for Ameri
can oii interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a
decent place fo r the N ational City Bank boys to collect
revenues in. I helped in the raping o f half a dozen Central
American republics for the benefit of Wall Street. The record of
racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua fo r the

internaţional banking house o f Brown Brothers in 1909-12. /
brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar
interests in 1916. In China in 1927 I helped see to it that
Standard Oii went on its way unmolested. During those years,
I had, as the boys in the back room would say, a swell racket. I
was rewarded with honors, medals and promotion. Looking
back on it, I feel I might have given A l Capone a few hints.
The best he could do was to operate his racket in three city
districts. I operated on three continentsff. — General Smedley
Butler, former US Marine Corps Commandant, 1935.
As President, John F. Kennedy understood the predatory na-
ture of private central banking, he understood why Andrew
Jackson fought so hard to end the Second Bank of the United States.
So Kennedy wrote and signed Executive Order 11110 which
ordered the US Treasury to issue a new public currency, the United
States Note.
Kennedy’s United States Notes were not borrowed from the
Federal Reserve but created by the US Government and backed
by the silver stockpiles held by the US Government. It represented
a return to the system of economics on which the United States
had been founded, and this was perfectly legal for Kennedy to do.
All told, some four and a half billion dollars went into public circula-
tion, eroding interest payments to the Federal Reserve and loosen-
ing their control over the nation. Five months later John F. Kennedy
was assassinated in Dallas Texas, and the United States Notes,
pulled from circulation and destroyed (except for samples held by
collectors). John J. McCloy, President of the Chase Manhattan
Bank, and President of the World Bank, was named as part of the
Warren Commission, presumably to make certain that the banking
dimensions behind the assassination were concealed from the
public.
As we enter the twelfth year of what future history will most
certainly describe as World War III, we need to examine the
financial dimensions behind the wars.
Towards the end of World War II, when it became obvious that
the allies were going to win and dictate the post war environment,

the major world economic powers met at Bretton Woods, a luxury
resort in New Hampshire, in July 1944, and hammered out the
Bretton Woods agreement for internaţional finance. The British
Pound lost its position as the global trade and reserve currency and
its place was taken by the US dollar (part of the price demanded by
Roosevelt in exchange for the US entry into the war). Without the
economic advantages of being the world’s central currency, Britain
was forced to nationalize the Bank of England in 1946. The Bretton
Woods agreement was ratified in 1945, and in addition to making
the US dollar the global reserve and trade currency, obliged the
signatory nations to tie their currencies to the dollar. The nations
which ratified Bretton Woods did so on two conditions. The first
was that the Federal Reserve would refrain from over-printing the
dollar as a means to loot real products and produce from other
nations in exchange for ink and paper; basically an imperial tax.
That assurance was backed up by the second, which was that the
US dollar would always be convertible to gold at $35 per ounce.
Of course, the Federal Reserve, being a private bank and not
answerable to the US Government, did start overprinting paper
dollars, and much of the perceived prosperity of the 1950s and 1960s
was the result of foreign nations’ obligations to accept the paper
notes as being worth gold at the rate of $35 an ounce.
Then in 1970, France looked at the huge pile of paper notes
sitting in their vaults, for which real French products lilce wine and
cheese had been traded, and notified the United States government
that they would exercise their option under Bretton Woods to
retum the paper notes for gold at the $35 per ounce exchange rate.
Of course, the United States had nowhere near the gold to redeem
the paper notes, so on August 15th, 1971, Richard Nixon
“temporarily” suspended the gold convertibility of the US Federal
Reserve Notes.
This “Nixon Shock” effectively ended Bretton Woods and many
global currencies started to disengage from the US dollar. Worse
still, since the United States had collateralized their loans with the
nation’s gold reserves, it quickly became apparent that the US
Government did not in fact have enough gold to cover its outstand-

ing debts. Foreign nations began to get nervous about their loans to
the US and understandably were reluctant to lend any additional
money to the United States without some form of collateral. So
Richard Nixon started the environmental movement, with the EPA
and its various programs such as “wildemess zones”, “Road-less
areas”, “Heritage rivers”, “Wetlands”, all of which took vast areas
of public lands and made them off limits to the American people
who were technically the owners of those lands. But Nixon had
little concern for the environment, for the real purpose of this land
grab under the guise of the environment was to pledge those pris-
tine lands and their vast mineral resources as collateral on the
naţional debt. The plethora of different programs was simply to
conceal the true scale of how much American land was being
pledged to foreign lenders as collateral on the govemment’s debts;
eventually almost 25% of the nation itself.
With open lands for collateral already in short supply, the US
Government embarked on a new program to shore up sagging in
ternaţional demand for the dollar. The United States approached
the world's oii producing nations, mostly in the Middle East, and
offered them a deal. In exchange for only selling their oii for
dollars, the United States would guarantee the military safety of
those oil-rich nations. The oii rich nations would agree to spend
and invest their US paper dollars inside the United States, in
particular in US Treasury Bonds, redeemable through future gen-
erations o f US taxpayers. The concept was labelled the
“petrodollar”. In effect, the US, no longer able to back the dollar
with gold, was now backing it with oii. Other peoples’ oii, and the
necessity to control those oii nations in order to prop up the dollar
has shaped America’s foreign policy in the region ever since.
But as America’s manufacturing and agriculture has declined,
the oii producing nations faced a dilemma. Those piles of US
Federal Reserve notes were not able to purchase much from the
United States because the United States had little (other than real
estate) which anyone wanted to buy.
Europe’s cars and aircraft were superior and less costly, while
experiments with GMO food crops led to nations refusing to buy

US food exports. Israel’s constant belligerence against its
neighbors caused them to wonder if the US could actually keep up
their end of the petrodollar arrangement. Oil-producing nations
started to talk of selling their oii for whatever currency the
purchasers chose to use. Iraq, already hostile to the United States,
following Desert Storm, demanded the right to sell their oii for
Euros, in 2000, and the United Nations agreed to allow it in 2002
under the Oii for Food program instituted following Desert Storm.
One year later the United States re-invaded Iraq, lynched Saddam
Hussein, and placed Iraq’s oii back on the world marlcet only for
US dollars.
Following 9-11, the US policy shift away from being an imparţial
broker of peace in the Middle East to one of unquestioned support
for Israel’s aggressions, only further eroded confîdence in the
Petrodollar deal and even more oil-producing nations started openly
talking of oii trade for other global currencies.
Over in Libya, Muammar Gaddafi had instituted a state-owned
central bank and a value-based trade currency, the Gold Dinar.
Gaddafi announced that Libya’s oii was for sale, but only for the
gold Dinar. Other African nations, seeing the rise of the Gold Dinar
and the Euro, even as the US dollar continued its inflation-driven
decline, flocked to the new Libyan currency for trade. This move
had the potenţial to seriously undermine the global hegemony of the
dollar. French President Nicolas Sarkozy reportedly went so far as
to caii Libya a “threat” to the Financial security of the world.
So, the United States invaded Libya, brutally murdered Gaddafi
(the object lesson of Saddam’s lynching not being enough of a
message, apparently), imposed a private central bank, and retumed
Libya’s oii output to dollars only. The gold that was to have been
made into the Gold Dinars is, as of last report, unaccounted for.
According to General Wesley Clark, the maşter plan for the
“dollarification” of the world’s oii nations included seven targets,
Iraq; Syria; Lebanon; Libya; Somalia; Sudan; and Iran (Venezuela
—which dared to sell their oii to China for the Yuan—is a late 8th
addition). What is notable about the original seven nations
originally targeted by the US is that none of them are members of

the Bank for International Settlements, the private central bankers
private central bank, located in Switzerland. This meant that these
nations were deciding for themselves how to run their nations'
economies, rather than submit to the private internaţional banks.
Now the banker’s gun sights are on Iran, which dares to have
a govemment controlled central bank and sell their oii for whatever
currency they choose. The war agenda is, as always, to force
Iran’s oii to be sold only for dollars and to force them to accept a
privately owned central bank.
The German government just recently asked for the retum of
some of their gold bullion from the Bank of France and the New
York Federal Reserve. France has said it will take 5 years to return
Germany's gold. The United States has said they will need 8 years
to retum Germany's gold. This suggests strongly that the Bank of
France and the NY Federal Reserve have used the deposited gold
for other purposes, and they are scrambling to fmd new gold to
cover the shortfall and prevent a gold mn. So France suddenly
invades Mali, ostensibly to combat Al Qaeda, with the US joining
in.
Mali just happens to be one of the world's largest gold
producers with gold accounting for 80% of Mali exports. War for
the bankers does not get more obvious than that!
Americans have been raised by a public school system and media
that constantly assures them that the reasons for all these wars and
assassinations are many and varied. The US claims to bring
democracy to the conquered lands (they haven’t). The usual result
of a US overthrow is the imposition of a dictatorship— such as the
1953 CIA overthrow of Iran’s democratically elected govemment
of Mohammad Mosaddegh and the imposition of the Shah—or the
1973 CIA overthrow of Chile's democratically elected government
of President Salvador Allende, and the imposition of Agusto
Pinochet)—or to save a people from a cmel oppressor, revenge for
9-11; or that tired wom-out catch all excuse for invasion: “weapons
of mass destruction”. Assassinations are always passed off as
“crazed lone nuts” to obscure the real agenda.

The real agenda is simple. It is enslavement of the people by the
creation of a false sense of obligation. That obligation is false
because the private Central Banking system, by design, always
creates more debt than money with which to repay that debt.
Private Central Banking is not Science, it is a Religion; a set of
arbitrary rules created to beneflt the Priesthood, meaning the
owners of the Private Central Bank.
The fraud persists, with often lethal results, because the people
are tricked into believing that this is the way life is supposed to be
and no alternative exists or should be dreamed of. The same was
true of two earlier systems of enslavement, Rule by Divine Right
and Slavery, both of which are systems designed to trick people
into obedience, and both of which are now recognized by modem
civilization as illegitimate. Now we are entering a time in human
history where we will recognize that “rule by debt”, or mie by
private Central Bankers issuing the public currency as a loan at
interest, is equally illegitimate.
It only works as long as people allow themselves to believe that
this is the way life is supposed to be.
But understand this above all else, private Central Banks do not
exist to serve the people, the community, or the nation. Private
Central Banks exist to serve their owners, to make them rich
beyond the dreams of Midas and all for the cost of paper, ink, and
the right bribe to the right official.
Behind all these wars, all these assassinations, the hundred
million horrible deaths from all the wars lies a single policy of
dictatorship. The private central bankers allow rulers to mie only
on the condition that the people of a nation remain enslaved to the
private central banks. Failing that, any ruler will be killed, and their
nation invaded by those other nations which are already enslaved
to private central banks.
The so-called “clash of civilizations” we read about on the
corporate media is really a war between banking systems, with the
private central bankers forcing themselves on to the rest of the
world, no matter how many millions must die for it. Indeed the

constant hatemongering against Muslims lies in a simple fact. Like
the ancient Christians (prior to the Knights Templar’s private bank-
ing system) Muslims forbid usury (the lending of money at inter-
est), and that is the reason why the American govemment and media
insist that Muslims must be converted or killed. They refuse to
submit to currencies issued at interest. They refuse to be debt
slaves. So offto warAmerican children must go, to spill their blood
for the gold of the money-junkies. We barely survived the last two
world wars. In the nuclear/bio-weapon age, are the private central
bankers willing to risk incinerating the whole planet just to feed
their greed? Apparently so.
Flag waving and propaganda aside, all modem wars are wars
by and for the private bankers, fought and bled for by third parties
unaware of the true reason why they are expected to be crippled
and killed. The process is quite simple. As soon as the Private
Central Bank issues its currency as a loan at interest, the public is
forced deeper and deeper into debt. When the people are reluctant
to borrow any more, that is when the Keynesian economists
demand the govemment borrow more to keep the pyramid scheme
working. When both the people and govemment refuse to borrow
any more, that is when the wars start, to plunge everyone even
deeper into debt to pay for the war, then after the war to borrow
more to rebuild. When the war is over, the people have about the
same as they did before the war, except the graveyards are far
larger and everyone is in debt to the private bankers for the next
century. This is why Brown Brothers Harriman in New York funded
the rise of Adolf Hitler.
As long as Private Central Banks are allowed to exist,
inevitably — as night follows day — there will be poverty,
hopelessness, and millions of deaths in endless World Wars, until
the Earth itself is sacrifîced to Mammon in flames. The path to
tme peace on Earth lies in the abolishment of all private central
banking everywhere, and a return to the state-issued value-based
currencies that allow nations and people to become prosperous.

SUMMARY
Before you were bom, the bankers operated a scana intended to
rob all members of the general public. They removed all forms of
money and replaced it with worthless notes which read “I promise
to pay the bearer”... (with another worthless bank note). They
then managed to do away with the government and replace it with
a group of commercial companies which they own. They
cunningly named these companies so that they look like a govem-
ment. They took over the printing of the worthless bank notes with
their private company called “The Bank of England” which is meant
to sound like a government organization (although it most definitely
isn’t).
The next step in their cunning plan, was to get their company
which sounds like the government, to asie their other company “The
[non-federal] Federal Reserve” to prinţ them lots of (worthless)
money and to charge interest on that money, over and above the
face “value” of the currency. This excess interest amount is called
the “National Debt” in order to fool ordinary people into
believing that their country somehow owes somebody large amounts
of money. Firstly, there is actually nothing owed at all. Secondly,
there is no money. Thirdly, the country does not owe anything, and
in the unlikely event that there were a genuine debt, then it has
nothing to do with ordinary people as it is just a naţional debt
incurred by one commercial company to another commercial
company (owned by the same people). This supposed debt has
been boosted over the years to a ridiculous level which could never,
ever be paid off, and you will no doubt be glad to leam that all
income tax is now paid to the owners of these commercial
companies. Isn't it great to be paying vast sums of money to a
commercial company which has never done anything for you and
which holds you in utter contempt because you haven't discovered
their scam and continue to pay lots of ridiculous taxes, fees and
charges, none of which you need to pay at all. Combined, these
charges amount to more than 80% of a person's eamed income -
do you enjoy living on one fifth of what you actually eam?

To strengthen their scam, they have invented a language of lies
called “legal terminology” where they have changed the meanings
of ordinary English words in order to abuse and rob ordinary
members of the public. They have set up a company called “The
Law Society” to train up unscrupulous people in their methods of
deception and lies. Their commercial company which pretends to
be the government, keeps inventing new “statutes” which they pre-
tend are laws (which they most definitely are not) and they keep
telling everybody that they “must obey these laws”, and they have
subverted policeman and policewomen and convinced them that
they have to enforce these statutes. The primary aim of these
statutes is to take cash, goods and property from members of the
public who have not yet discovered that it is a scam being run against
them. Many police officers are probably themselves ignorant of
the fact that statutes are purely opţional and no human is actually
bound by them.
Just to clarify the situation, breaches of The Law are dealt with
in a genuine court with a jury. All other matters, such as taxation,
bank loans, parking restrictions, speed limits, and the like, are dealt
with in a fake “court” which is a commercial company and part of
a violent protection racket style scam which is wholly unlawful, but
enforced by violence, threats and intimidation using bailiffs and police
to protect the bailiffs from being attacked. There has never been
any law which demands that you pay any form of tax, licence or
other charge.
What you decide to do is entirely up to yourself. You can
continue to give away most of your income to fund people who
want to harm you, or you can decide to step outside this corrupt
system, and stop paying these people. All humans are born equal,
so nobody has the right to order you around, unless you agree to
give them that right, and the choice is yours.

AN OVERVIEW OF A POLITICAL CON JOB
If this has all been a lot of new information for you, then it might
be useful to have a “thum bnail” sketch of the outrageous
confîdence trick which is being played on you. So, here it is for
your local area, and the same situation is found in almost every
other area as well.
It all started before most people were bom. It started with two
brothers deciding to run a scam which would make them the
richest people in the world and rig things so that everybody else
worked for them without being aware of that fact. Even though
they are literally brothers, in order to distinguish between them we
will caii them Mr. Government and Mr. Banker because that is
what they needed to become in order to run this scam.
Mr. Government set up a very clever system of interlocking
commercial companies, choosing names for them which made them
look like official government bodies, while in reality, they are just
ordinary companies like any high-street shop. In order to strengthen
the illusion, Mr. Government hires people to work for him and gives
them names like “Congressman” or “Member of Parliament” or
some other meaningless working title. He employs most of them to
sit around and argue with each other, and from time to time, he
swaps them around by asking members of the public to vote for
who will be his employees for the next few years.
This is actually very clever, because it makes members of the
public believe that their voting makes a difference, while Mr.
Government knows that it doesn’t as he sets company policy, and
he makes all of the decisions, and he really coukhTt care less who
happen to be his employees at any given moment in time.
Meanwhile, his brother Mr. Banker has set up two commercial
companies of his own.
One he calls “The Federal Reserve” or the “Bank of England”

or some other suitable name for his particular location (and yes,
there are actually more than two brothers in this family). The other
company, he calls “The Mint”. He owns both and so decides
exactly what each will do.
The action starts and Mr. Government needs money with which
to pay his employees, so he asks his brother Mr. Banker to
provide some. This is where the fun part starts. Our trusty Mr.
Banker “invents” the money and pretends that he has plenty
although he actually has none. He “lends” a large amount, say,
$1,000,000 to his brother Mr. Government. This costs him
nothing as it doesn’t even exist, and it is just the fîrst step in the
scam.
His brother Mr. Government now says that he has a “National
Debt” of $1,200,000 which will increase by 20% (one fifth) every
year if it is not paid off completely. His cunning plan of calling it a
“National Debt” makes people think that “their country” owes some-
body something. The reality is that nobody owes anybody any-
thing. Good, isn’t it? Very clever ! Without using anything of any
value, the brothers have persuaded people that (a) they have a
government (which they don’t), and (b) that their country has bor-
rowed money for essential Services so their country is in debt to
some lcindly lender (which it isn’t). Very slick — these brothers
aren’t stupid !
Next, Mr. Government “pays” members of his staff with pieces
of paper called “checks” and he sends them to his brother Mr.
Banker, to get those pieces of paper exchanged for “money”. But,
Mr. Banker does not have any money, so instead, he gets his
company “The M int” to prinţ other pieces of paper called
“currency” and he passes these out in exchange for his brother’s
checks, swapping pieces of paper for other pieces of paper.
What is the value of these pieces of paper? The cost of
the prietieg, paper9 ink,
At this point, what have the brothers gained? Well, they have
got a large number of people working for them, doing whatever
they say, and it is costing them nothing.

But, that is just the first step. Now, Mr. Government takes back
80% of what he “paid” to his employees, in the form of taxation.
After all, the country is in debt and so Mr. Government has to take
money from everybody in order to repay the country’s debt - hasn’t
he? Why does everybody have to pay? Because his employees
say so. They invent “statutes” and all kinds of charges designed to
move money from ordinary people into the pockets of Mr. Govern
ment, who promptly pays most of it to his brother Mr. Banker as
the repayment of borrowing (nothing) and interest on the amount
borrowed.
Where does the tax money paid by ordinary people come from?
It is paid to them to compensate them for the time and effort which
they put in when working. This is real money, backed by the goods
and Services provided by the people who do the work.
This is something of real value, and yet 80% of those valuable
assets are taken back from them by Mr. Government. Why do
people let this happen? Because they think that they have no choice
and will be put in prison if they don’t. What they do not understand
is that paying tax is opţional and they don’t have to if they don’t
want to. Mr. Banker is doing veiy well out of this. His brother is
paying him lots of real money in exchange for the fake money which
he invented. So, he decides to expand his business and do exactly
the same thing to as many people as he can.
He offers to lend people money (which he will ‘invent’ and
conjure up out of nothing) in order to allow them to buy whatever
they want. We will skip the Strawman here and just focus on the
actual transaction offered by Mr. Banker.
A house purchaser comes to Mr. Banker, looking for a loan of
$100,000. This is a deal on which Mr. Banker can’t lose no matter
what happens, so he will approve the deal unless he has some very,
very good reason for not doing so. After all, it’s not going to cost
him anything and he will be paid with real money gained through
real work done by real people. The deal is for 17% interest per
year for 25 years. If the deal runs for the full 25 years, then the
borrower may well pay back as much as $433,557 according to a
professional mortgage calculator result. That is, you pay back four

times what you borrowed, even though what you were given was
fake money and what you pay back is real labor-backed money.
But, as Mr Government takes 80% of what you earn before you
get to pay the mortgage, you need to earn $2,167,785 in that 25
year period as Mr Government will take $ 1,734,228 of it away from
you in direct and hidden taxes. And to add insult to injury, Mr
Government will take a large chunk of that $ 1,734,228 and give it to
his brother Mr Banker in supposed payment of the (fake) “National
Debt”. So, the house purchaser pays several times the borrowed
amount, using his real money.
It gets worse. Mr Banker and Mr Government make sure that
not enough currency is issued for people to be physically capable
of paying the interest on their loans as there just isn’t enough cur
rency in the entire economy for that to be possible. This is another
cunning ploy. The people who earn most will not have a problem,
but most of the people will have great diffîculty and will have very
little left after paying their mortgage. The slightest financial
problem, such as losing a job, can put the average person in a
position where he can’t pay the amount demanded. When that
happens, and it HAS to happen in a substanţial number of cases,
then Mr Banker tries to take the property, using some of his brother’s
“statutes” (which are NOT law) to justify his theft. He may even
manage to send in bailiffs ahead of seizing the property, and seize
many of the house purchaser’s personal possessions as well.
What the house purchaser needs to remember is that the
original “loan” was fake and that Mr. Banker never put up
anything of value, the purchaser was never told the real amount
which he would have to repay, a genuine contract was never drawn
up, and in reality, it is not the human borrower which is being asked
for the repayment.
Want to know what Mr Banker thinks of any borrower?

For evil to triumph, all that is necessary
is for good meu to do nothing.
— For Example —
Why did the United States attack Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan and
Yemen? Why areUSoperativeshelpingtode-stabilize Syria? And
why is the United States govemment so intent in taking down Iran,
in spiţe of the fact that Iran has not attacked any country since
1798?
And, what’s next? Wliat are we headed for? When you look at
the current trajectory that we are on, it doesn’t make any sense at
all if you evaluate it on what we are taught in school. And it doesn’t
make any sense if you base your world view on the propaganda
that the mainstream media tries to pass off as news. But it makes
perfect sense once you know the real motives of the powers that
be. In order to understand those motives, we first have to take a
look at history:
In 1945, Britain, with agreement, established the dollar as the
w orld’s Reserve Currency, which meant that internaţional
commodities were priced in dollars. The agreement, which gave
the United States a distinct Financial advantage was made under
the condition that those dollars would remain redeemable for gold
at a consistent rate of $35 per ounce.
The United States promised not to prinţ very much money but
this was on the honor system because the Federal reserve refused
to allow any audit or supervision of its printing presses.
In the years leading up to 1970, expenditures in the Vietnam
War made it clear to many countries that the US was printing far
more money than it had in gold, and in response, they began to ask
for their gold back. This, of course, set off a rapid decline in the
value of the dollar. The situation climaxed in 1971, when France
attempted to withdraw it’s gold and Nixon refused. On 15th of
August, Nixon made the following announcement:

“I have directed the Secretary o f the Treasury to take the
action necessary to defend the dollar against the speculators.
I directed Secretary Connolly to suspend temporarilyy the
convertibility o f the dollar into gold or other reserve assets
except in amounts and in conditions determined to be in the
interests o f monetary stability and in the best interests o f the
Unites States
This was obviously not a temporary suspension as he claimed,
but rather a permanent default, and for the rest of the world who
had entrusted the United States with their gold, it was outright theft.
In 1973, President Nixon asked King Faisal of Saudi Arabia to
accept only US dollars in payment for oii, and to invest any excess
profits in US Treasury Bonds, Notes and Bills. In return, Nixon
offered military protection for Saudi oii fields. The same offer was
extended to each of the key oil-producing countries, and by 1975,
every member of OPEC had agreed to only sell their oii in US
dollars.
The act of moving the dollar off gold and tying it to foreign oii,
instantly forced every oil-importing country in the world to maintain
a con stant supply of Federal Reserve paper, and in order to get that
0
paper, they would have to send real physical goods to America.

This, was the birth of the Petro Dollar. Paper went out, everything
America needed came in, and the United States got very, very rich
as a result. It was the largest Financial con in recorded history.
The Arms Race of the Cold War was a game of poker. Miliary
Expenditures were the chips, and the US had an endless supply of
chips. With the Petro Dollar under its belt, it was able to raise the
stakes higher and higher, outspending every other country on the
planet, until eventually, US military expenditure surpassed that of
all of the other nations in the world combined - the Soviet Union
never had a chance.
The collapse of the communist bloc in 1991, removed the last
counterbalance to American military might. The United States was
now an undisputed Super-power with no rival. Many hoped that
this would mark the start of a new era of stability and peace.
Unfortunately, there were those in high places who had other ideas.

Within that same year, the US invaded Iraq in the first Gulf War,
and after crushing the Iraqi military, and destroying their
infrastructure, including hospitals and water-purification plants,
crippling sanctions were im posed which prevented Iraq ’s
infrastructure from being rebuilt.
Theses sanctions which were initiated by Bush Senior, and
sustained throughout the entire Clinton administration, lasted for
over a decade and were estimated to have killed more than five
hundred thousand children. The Clinton administration was fully
aware of these figures.
A TV in te rv ie w e r speaking to M adeleine A lb rig h t,
Secretary of State for Clinton, asked: “We have heard that
half a million children have died, I mean> that’s more children
that died than in Hiroshima, and is the price worth it?99
To which Madeleine Albright replied: “I think that this is
a very hard choice. We think that the price is worth it99
Miss Albright, what exactly was worth killing 500,000 children
for? In November of 2000, Iraq began selling its oii exclusively in
Euros. This was a direct attack on the dollar and on US fînancial
dominance, and it wasn’t going to be tolerated. In response, the
U S govemment with the assistance of the mainstream media, began
to build up a mass propaganda campaign claiming that Iraq had
weapons of mass destruction and was planning to use them.
In 2003, the US invaded and once they had control of the
country, oii sales were immediately switched back to dollars. This
is particularly noticeable as switching back to the dollar meant a
15% to 20% loss in revenue due to the Euro’s higher value. It
doesn’t make any sense at all unless you take the Petro Dollar into
account.
On 2nd March 2007, US General Wesley Clark said: “So Icame
back to see him a few weeks later and by that time we were
bombing in Afghanistan. I said: A re we still going to war with
Iraq?9And he said 6Oh it9s worse than that9e He said as he
reached over on his desk and picked up a piece o f paper and

he said 7 just got this down from upstairs today (meaning from
the Secretary of Defense’s Office), this is a memo which
describes how we are going to take out seven countries in Jive
years, starting o ff with Iraq and Syria, Lehanon, Libya,
Somalia, Sudan and finishing off Iran”.
Let’s take a look at the events of the past decade and see if you
see a pattem. In Libya, Gadaffi was in a process of organizing a
block of African countries to create a gold-based currency called
the “Dinar” which they intended to use to replace the dollar in that
region. US and NATO forces helped to destabilize and topple the
govemment in 2011 and after taking control of the region, US armed
rebels executed Gadaffi in cold blood and immediately set up the
Libyan Central Bank. Iran has been actively campaigning to puii
oii sales off the dollar for some time now, and it has recently secured
agreements to trade its oii in exchange for gold. In response, the
US government with mainstream media assistance has been
attempting to build internaţional support for military strilces, on the
pretext of preventing Iran from building a nuclear weapon. In the
mean time they established sanctions which they admit are aimed
at causing a collapse of the Iranian economy.
Syria is Iran’s closest ally and they are bound by mutual
defence agreements. The country is currently in the process of
being destabilized with covert assistance from NATO and although
Russia and China have warned the United States not to get
involved, the White House has made statements in the past month
indicating that they are considering military intervention. It should
be clear that military intervention in Syria and Iran isn’t just being
considered - it is a foregone conclusion. Just as it was in Iraq and
Libya, the US is actively working to create the context which gives
them the diplomatic cover to do what they have already planned.
The motive for these invasions and covert actions becomes clear
when we look at them in their full context and ‘connect the dots\
Those who control the United States understand that if even a
few countries begin to sell their oii in another currency, it will set off
a chain reaction and the dollar will collapse. They understand that
there is absolutely nothing else holding up the value of the dollar at

this point, and so does the rest of the world. But instead of
accepting the fact that the dollar is nearing the end of if s life-span,
the “powers that be” have made a calculated gambit. They have
decided to use the brute force of the US military to crush each and
every resistant State in Africa and the Middle East.
That in itself would be bad enough, but what you need to under-
stand is that this is not going to end with Iran.
China and Russia stated publicly and in no uncertain terms that
they will not tolerate an attack on Iran or Syria.
Iran is one of their key allies, one of the last independent oil-
producers in the region, and they understand that if Iran falls, then
they will have no way to escape the dollar without going to war.
And yet, the United States is pushing forward in spiţe of the
wamings. What we are witnessing here is a trajectory which leads
straight to the unthinkable. It is a trajectory which was mapped out
years ago in full awareness of the human consequences.
But who was it that put us on this course? What kind of
psychopath is willing to intentionally set off a global conflict which
will lead to millions of deaths, just to protect the value of a fîat
paper currency? It obviously isn’t the President. The decision to
invade Syria, Libya and Iran was made long before Obama had
risen to the naţional spotlight, and yet, he is carrying out his duties
just like the puppets who preceded him. So who is it that pulls the
strings?
Often, the best answers to questions like this are found by
asking another question “Cui Bono?” - “Who Benefits?”
Obviously, those who have the power to prinţ the dollar out of
thin air have the most to lose if the dollar were to fall, and since
1913, that power has been held by the Federal Reserve. The
Federal Reserve is a private entity owned by a conglomerate of the
most powerful banks in the world and the men who control those
banks are the ones who puii those strings. To them, this is just a
game. Your life, and the lives of those you Iove are just pawns on
their chessboard. And like a spoiled four-year-old who tips over

the board to the floor when he starts to lose, the powers that be are
willing to start World War Three to keep control of the global
fmancial system.
Remember that, when these wars accelerate and extend.
Remember that, when your son, or your neighbor’s son comes back
in a flag-draped coffin. Remember that, when they point the finger
at the new “bogeymen” because the madmen who are running this
show, will take this as far as you allow them to take it.
So, how much time do we have left? I f s a question which I
hear constantly. But it is the wrong question. Asking how much
time we have left is a passive posture. It is the attitude of a
prisoner who is waiting to be taken out to a ditch and shot in the
back of the head.
What are our chances? Can we change course? Also, the
wrong question. The odds don’t matter any more. If you under-
stand what we are facing, then you have a moral responsibility to
do everything in your power to alter the course we are on, regard-
less of the odds. It is only when you stop basing your involvement
on the chances of your success, that success actually becomes
possible. To strip the ill-begotten power from the financial elites
and bring these criminal cartels to justice, will require nothing less
than a revolution. The government is not going to save us. The
govemment is completely infiltrated and corrupt to the core. Loolc-
ing to them for a solution at this point is utterly naive.
There are three stages of revolution and they are sequential.
Stage One is already underway.
Stage One is the ideological resistance. In this stage we have
to actively work to wake up as many people as possible about what
is happening and the direction we are headed. AII revolutions origi-
nate from a shift in the mind-set of the population and no other
meaningful resistance is possible without it. Success in this stage
of the game can be measuredby the contagion of ideas. When an
idea reaches criticai mass, it begins to spread on its own and seeps
into all levels of society. In order to achieve that contagion, we
need more people in this fight. We need more people speaking up,

making videos, writing articles, getting this information onto the na
ţional and internaţional stage, and we especially need to reach the
military and the police.
Stage Two is civil disobedience, also known as Non-violent
Resistance. In this Stage, you put your money where your mouth
is, or more accurately, you withhold your money and your
obedience fforn the govemment and you do everything in your power
to bring the gears of the State to a halt. Practiced in mass, this
method alone is often enough to bring a regime to its knees.
However, if it fails at this stage, Stage Three is inevitable.
Stage Three is direct physical resistance. Direct physical
resistance is the last resort and it should be avoided and delayed as
long as possible and only invoked when all other options have been
thoroughly exhausted. There are those who “talk tough” and claim
that they will resist when the time comes, but what they fail to
realize is that if you are inactive during the fîrst two Stages, and
save your efforts for the last resistance, you will fail.
When the Nazis in Germany were moving from door to door,
dragging people out of their homes, that was the time to fight baclc
physically, but due to the lack of ideological resistance and civil
disobedience leading up to that moment, even an armed uprising
would have likely failed at that point. An armed uprising can only
succeed if the people have established an attitude of active resis
tance. And active resistance is only possible after their minds have
broken free from the mainstream propaganda. If you want to fight
back, then its now or never - you’re not going to get another chance,
and the stakes are far higher than they were in Nazi Germany.

CLOSING GOOD NEWS
One of the major attacks mounted against you is to con you out
of your money. Much of this is “government tax” on fuels which
are burnt to provide energy - energy for transport, energy for
heating, cooling, lighting, cooking, washing, drying, Communications,
entertainment, ... A major effort has been put into attempting to
prevent you from finding out the simple fact that we are all
surrounded by limitless energy and more importantly, preventing us
from finding out how to tap into and use that energy. Tight control
has been kept on educaţional establishments, publishing and
m ainstream news Services. Patents have been suppressed,
inventors harassed, intimidated and forced into silence by any
available means.
The reality is that energy can be pulled from the air, using an
aerial, and Hermann Plauson produced systems which provides
more than 100 kilowatts of electrical energy and which needs no
input whatsoever. There is nothing magical about this, as the
energy comes from the ionosphere which the Sun continuously
charges, so sorry folks, no magic, just practicai engineering.
Energy can be pulled from the ground, as the Earth is a vast
reservoir of energy. Energy can be taken from gravity by various
methods, including just nudging weights sideways as they fail,
powering a large wheel which tunis a generator.
Energy can be drawn from changes in inerţia, as just spinning a
flywheel which drives a generator, allows that generator to power
both the flywheel and other items of household equipment.
Ordinary, unmodified “petrol” generators can provide kilowatts
of electrical power by splitting water into its component gasses and
using those gasses to power the generator. Here, the generator
both splits the water and powers the additional equipment.
It is possible to build a simple motor/generator which produces
far more electrical power than is needed to make it run. Robert

Adams of New Zealand demonstrated this with quite small models
which had a minimum of eight times more output power than input
power, while more advanced models have outputs hundreds of times
greater than the input power.
We are told (either tongue in cheek or based on complete
ignorance) that permanent magnets can’t do any useful “work”.
Dietmar Hohl has shown that anybody can build a simple rotor
drum which is made to spin using just permanent magnets.
We are told that no electronics-driven transformer can output
more than is used to drive it. Thane Heins has demonstrated that
this is just not true, while by adding a permanent magnet to the
transformer, Lawrence Tseung has shown that with just a simple
iron frame, much more power can be drawn from the output than is
needed to operate the frame.
The supposed limits taught by “educaţional” establishments are
based on electric transfer methods in transformers running at low
speeds, such as 50 or 60 cycles per second. However, if the
transfer is made to be magnetic rather than electrical, and the cycle
frequency exceeds 20,000 cycles per second and especially if the
voltage is raised to a much higher level, then the output power from
a simple, motionless device can be kilowatts more than the input
power.
There are many, many ways to provide electrical power where
no fuel is bumt, and where you do not have to pay for whatever
energy you happen to draw from the system. There is no need for
you to do any of this, but it is important that you understand that it
can be done, and there is actually no need for you to be charged for
every watt of electrical energy you choose to use.
Please download and read the eBook below. It is free and above
all else, please understand fully that this technology has been
suppressed for personal gain for more than a hundred years.
[ free eBook ]
http://www.free-energy-info.tuks.nl/PJKBook.htmI

FACTS YOU MAY NOT KNOW
And Whatever You Want To Know

1. The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA was incorpo-
rated in London in 1783. The United States of America is a
territory of Great Britain. The Colonists did not win the Revo-
lutionary War. The British troops did not leave until 1796.
Republican v. Sweers, 1 Dallas43;Treaty ofCommerce,
8 Stat. 116; The Society for Propagating the Gospel & c. v.
New Haven, 8 Wheat 464, Treaty of Paris (Peace), 8 Stat.
80, IRS Publication 6209, Articles of Association, October
20,1774.
2. King George III of England financed both sides of the

Revolutionary War.
Treatv oj_ Verşailleş,July 15, 1782; of
(Peace), 8 Stat. 80.
3. The IRS is not a U.S. Government agency. It is a Debt

Collection Agency of the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
Diversified Metal Products v. IRS, et. al., CV-93-405E-
EJE,U.S.D.C.D.L, Public Law 94-564, Senate Report 94-
1148 pg.5967, Bankruptcy Reorganization Plan No. 26, Pub
lic Law 102-391.
4. The IMF is an agency of the United Nations (UN). —

Black’s Law, 6th Ed. pg. 816.
5. The U.S. has not had a Treasury since 1921. — 41 Stat.

Ch. 214 pg. 654.
6. New York City is defined in the Code of Federal Regu-

lations (CFR) as the United Nations.
Rudolph Giuliani stated on C-Span that “New York City
is the capitol of the World” and he is correct. 20 CFR Ch.
111, subpartB422.103(b)(2).

7. No judicial courts, nor judges, have existed in America
since 1789. Executive Administrators, not Judges, enforce
Statutes and Codes.
FRC v. GE, 281 US 464, Keller v. PE, 261 US 428, 1
Stat. 138-178. See also the llth Amendment. This was the
abolishment of all inferior courts to hear cases of law or
equity (this means that all courts below the “one supreme
courts”, not the U.S. Supreme Court.
8. You cannot use the U.S. Constitution to defend your-

self because you are not a party to it. (use instead the Bill of
Rights).
Padelford Fay & Co. v. The Mayor and Alderman of the

City of Savannah, 14Georgia438, 520.
9. You own no property. Slaves cannot own property. Read

the Deed to the property that you think you own. You are
listed as a Tenant. — Senate Document 43, 73rd Congress, Ist.
Session.
10. We are slaves and own nothing, not even who we

think are our children.
Tillman v. Roberts, 108 So. 62; Van Koten v. Koten, 154
N.E. 146; Senate Document 43 and 73rd Congress Ist, Ses
sion’ Wynehammer v. People, 13 N.R. REP 378,481.
11. Great Britain is owned by the Vatican. — Treaty of

Verona, 1213.
12. The Pope can abolish any law in the United States. —
Elements ofEcclesiastical Law, Voi. 1, 53-54.
13. We are Human Capital. — See Executive Order 13037.
14. We are enemies of the State.

Trading with the Enemy Act or 1917 and 1933, October
6, 1917, under the Adr, Section 2, subdivision (c) Ch. 106 -
Enemy deflned “other than citizens of the United States...”
M arch9,1933, Ch 106, Section 5, subdivision (b) of the Act
of Oct. 6,1917 (40 Stat. L. 411) amended as follows: “ ...any
person within the United States.” See H.R. 1491 Public law
No. 1.
15. Your name when spelled in all capital letters is a

Corporation: A Cestui Que Vie Trust. — Cannon Law.
16. “The People” do not include you and me since our

names are all Capital Letter Acţionai legal names. — Barron
v. Mayor of City coundil of Baltimore, 32 U.S. 243.
17. A 1040 Form is for tribute paid to Great Britain (and

the Vatican). — IRS Publication 6209 IMF decoding manual.
18. Everything in the “United States” is for sale: roads,

bridges, schools, hospitals, water plants, prisons, airports,
etc. (Who bought Klamath Lake in California?) — See Ex
ecutive O rder12803.
19. It is not the duty of the police to protect you. Their

job is to protect the Corporation and arrest Code breakers.
Sapp. v. Tallahassee, 348 S0.2d 363; Reiff v. City of Phila
delphia, 477 F. Supp. 1262; Lynch v. N.C. Dept. ol Justice,
376 S.E.2d 247.
20. The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA and all the other alphabet
gangs were never a part of the United States Government,
even though the “U.S. Government” held shares of stock in
the various agencies.
U.S. v. Strâng, 254 U.S. 491; Lewis v. U.S., 6880 F.2d 1239.

LINKS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
Rule By Secrecy - The Hidden History by Jim Marrs. This
is a most remarkable and detailed account, naming names,
stating events and revealing motives for most of history - a
really spectacular work !!
pdf format:
ePub format: ://www. vourStrawman.com/Marrs.epul
html format: http://www.vourStrawman.com/Marrs.htm
http://vimeo.eom/71587843# OUTLAWS-in-JUSTICE: USA

Common Law officials, Anthony Williams, Hep Guinn, and
others advancing a naţional organization to reestablish
Common Law and Constituţional Law as the primary "law of
the land" and "due process." A dditional com m ents:
http://vimeo.eom/71700258
http://www.vourStrawman.com/Emerv.pdf Seven Financial

Conspiracies which have Enslaved the American People -
the facts presented in a straightforward way
h t t p : / / w w w . y o u t u b e .com/watch ?v= oCIh m0-H-

OQ&feature=voutu.be The ‘Fix The World’ documentary
which is an outline of current action being taken.
Alternative link: h ttps://vimeo.com/68447896
http://www.vourStrawman.com/Bowie.pdf The latest 2013

attack on world population with attempts to kill people such
as yourself on a long-term basis.
http://w'wwj .com/watch?v=lPTznFPh 1MO The Fall of

the Vatican, the Queen and the System - video details.
http://www.vourStraw'man.com/EirePesist.pdf How Ireland

has responded to bank foreclosures, opposing house

repossessions, and some relevant responses:
http://www.enewQridehrontele.eem/2p-12451
http://www.youtube.com/iiser/ThriveMovement A clear and

comprehensive explanation of the present situation and what
YOU can do about it
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AXAnba23qV4 A 2013
video demonstrating that mortgages are fake and fraudulent
and that the regulators have not the slightest intention of
doing anything about it.
http://www.truth-now.net/casel.htm Australian Fakes: a

video demonstrating that Australia has no lawful Courts,
Police, Customs, Parliameet, etc.
http://www.youtube.com/watch7v~Y7qXbv6U4YM Clear
insights into the present situation, including why you
personally are readieg this
fattp ://www.docmiientary wirexom/j otin-harris-its-an-llMşloil

video lecture by John Harris
http://www.getoutofdebtfree.org sample letters for dealing

with 9debtf issues
http://www.yourStrawman.com/VeronicaChapman.pdt very
important Information for those in the UK
http://w w w .thebcgroup.org.uk video British Constitution

Group9§ seven video lecteres
http://www.tpuc.co.uk John Harris9 website 9The People9s

United Community9
http://www.raymoedstdalr.com Raymond St Clair’s website

with videos

http://www.fmotI.com The Freem an On The Land web site
with a large am ount o f specific Information
h t t p : / / v i d e o . g o o g l e . c o m /
videoplay?docid=6399325693468031456 'Think Free'
Part 1 - a top video presentation by Robert-Arthur Menard
of Canada
h t t p : / / v i d e o . g o o g l e . c o m /
videoplav?docid=6399325693468031456fldodd=7L575457(m70673&39
Think Free* Part 2
http://thecrowhouse.com/Documents/marv-book.pdf Mary
C roft's eBook "How I Clobbered Every Bureaucratic
Cash-Confiscatory Agency Known To Man"
h t t p : / / e d u c a t e - y o u r s e l f . o r g / c n /
StrawmaniHusion02aprl0.shtml The ‘Educate-yourself.org’
web site with video presentations
http://panacea-bocaf.org/honordishonor.htm The Australian

web site with links
h t t p : / / v i d e o . g o o g l e . c o m . a u /
videoplav?docid=3296715122664269567# 'Hijacking Hu-
manity' - a great video presentation by Paul Verge of Canada
http://www.voutube.com/watch?v=YHZTjTmrgjl
Mary Croft interview Part 1
http://www.voutube.com/watch?v=alqgpuAwpzM&NR=4
“ ~ ^ 7 - I T - T .? * y 9 J v ^ A R K f V 7 « r-i* . » R « V
Part 2
h t t p : / / w w w v o 11 t 11 b e
JM ^ aSUU e o m / u u m -u u .u w .- w w - w .-
*
uuu n n ,u ^ t u w u u u m n n u x i r t n m u ^ u u . .
watch?v=8hqnaHNw fo&feature= related Part 3

h t t p : / / w w w . v o u t u b e c o m / .
watch? v=P9zx VMN mJsE & featu r e-related Part 4

h t t p : / / w w w . v o u t u b e c o m / .
watch?v==iWnv66ERXiw&featiire:==related Part 5
h t t p : / / w w w v o II t 11 b e
— < a n n -r r r n , « c o m / .
, r r - r n i . , n - n n . „ « „ „ n n u i u u U J u u ------------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------- -------------- *
watch ?•v-BUP5fOMWnKo&featu re=related Part 6

http://www.zshare.net/audio/548937360de2eel2 A 143 Mb
downioad file of an audio interview
/details/Miehael Badn Michael

Badnarik explains the American Constitution
h t tp://w eb.archive.org/web/2e0604ft7062015iliMBJi/
www.worldnewsstand.net/law/PLAY.B A LL.htm. “The
Commerce Game Exposed” - the present situation explained
with emptiasis ou America
h t t p : / / f a m g u a r d i a n . o r g / T a x F r e e d o m / I n s t r ue t io ns.
3.17QuitSocialSecuritv.htm “Tax Freedom” - dealing with US
taxes
h t t p : / / v i d e o . g o o g l e . c o m / v i d e o p l a y 7 d o...c..i .d.=..-
2550156453790090544# “Money As Debt” - a video on how
(American) banks create money out of nothing
h t t p : / / v i d e o . g o o g l e . c o m / v i d e o p l a y 7 d o.c. i..d fir

515319560256183936# “The Money M asters” - a VERY
long factual video explaining how we got where we are today
ht t p: / / web. ar chi ve. or g/ web/ 20 0 60206Q8 514.3/

www.worldnewsstand.net/law7REDEMPT10N3.htm “The
Application of Commercial Law”
\
http://wwwJVee“eiiergv-devlcesA^om/Chapterl5,»pd| The
Historical Background of the Lies - how things developed in
Englaed aed America
http://www,xtraecirmaL€ciiii/wateh/îl3.1691.1 This is a video

which expresses the opinion of just one person. However,
I am unable to fault anythieg said, other than to remark that
I9 personally, have not one shred of evidence of collusion on
the part of some judges, even though I suspect it to be true.

h ttp ://w w w .iaw fuIrebeH ion.org This is an im portant website
with a good deal o f relevant inform ation
http://w w w .youtube.com /w atch ?v=ElrX rE8 Amic Video

explaining how we and our children are being progressively
poisoned.
http://www.buiMfreedom.com/tl/comliens.shtml A website
explaining a very powerful tool in defending yourself against
unlawful attack: the ‘lien’ .
htţp://www.yoMrStrawman.com/CommercialLiens.pdf A pdf
copy of that information:
h t t p : / / w w w . v o u t u b e . c o m /
watch?v=sB4o3afM llw&feature=re]ated Video lecture by
Robert M Nenard of Canada who is very knowledgeable.
h t t.p : / / w ..w w . y o u t u b e . c o m /
watch?v=n5evEOpcSKO&feature=related Part 2
h t t p : / / w w w . v o u t u b e , c o r n /
watch?v-8oYhIasKrfy&feature=related Part 3
h 11 p : / / w w w . y o u t u b e . c o m / w a t c h ? v = C 2 j 2 r M j -
OPs&featu re~related Part 4
watch?v-0gGaFo7u50g&feature=related Part 5
watch'/v-kAVmGRQLrpEifcfeature^related Part 6
watch?v=LsRUKutNqP8&feature=related Part 7
h t t p : / / w w w . y o u t u b e . c o m /
watch?v=R.HXhntd4Wpg&feature=related Part 8
littp://www.voutube.com/watch?v =ALvNSsh-
iWo&feature=reSated Part 9
httpi//ruiinymede 1215.wordpress.com Website explaining

the details of the physical strategies used against you by the
courts.

http://www.yourStrawman.cona/IndividuaIism.pdf A150-page
document explaining your present position and what you can
do aboiit it.
-httn ://www.voutube
—— *
voutu.be& fb source=m es An Irish house repossession
stopped by the Constitution.
http://www.voutube.com/watch?v= ae7h8FioX0 A 12-year

old girl explains how banks rob ordinary people.
http://www*yourStrawman.comfl)aCosta.pdf A letter laying

out very clearly, the corruption of the legal system in Canada
at the present time.
http://www.m5d.com/40-outrageous-facts-most-people-dont-
know.html A clear statement of the present situation with
supporting references.
http://www.pacalliaiice.iis/perspectlves/partl The real situ

ation explained in detail, especially for the people of America.
http://wakeup-world.com/2013/Q2/18/all-corporations-banks-
and-governments-lawfully-foreclosed-by-oppt/ 2013
See the web page;
NatîonalLibertyAlliance* org
If you have any questions or comments feel free to email:
David Robinson
drobin 88@c omeas t.net
Administrator
Unified Mâine Common Law Grand Jury
fo r the Mâine Republic Free State
Thanks for standing up to save our Republic.

( • v- >
Lefs have a little quiz:
1. W ho m eets there?
2. W hat do they do there?
3. Do they help you in any way?
4. W hen was slavery abolished?

5. Was slavery legal?
www.NationalLibertvAlliance.orq
Books: http://tinvurl.com /ctj3zsx
ii
Give me Liberty or give me death. ” - Patrick Henry
ISBN 9781492877677
90000 >
9 781492 877677

Meet Your Strawman and Whatever You Want To Know Editabil

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Meet Your Strawman and Whatever You Want To Know Editabil

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Meet Your Strawman and Whatever You Want To Know Editabil

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Who meets where according to the document?

Who meets where according to the document?

What do they do there according to the document?

What do they do there according to the document?

MEET YOUR STRAWMAN

AND WHATEVER YOU

“Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their

1. Who meets there?

Ifyour answers were:

Then let me congratulate

4. W hen was slavery abolished?

And Whatever You Want To Know 1

4. Slavery has NEVER been abolished and you yourself are

Does thisseem a little strânge to you? does, then read on

THOSE IN POWER HAVE A BIG SECRET

• Paying tax is OPŢIONAL !!

YOU CAN IF YOU WANT TO, BUT YOU DON’T HAVE

Every Mortgage and Loan is FULLY REPAID from day one -

2 Meet Your Strawman

And Whatever You Want To Know 3

4 Meet Your Strawman

And Whatever You Want To Know 5

These restrictions have resulted from hundreds of years of

6 Meet Your Strawman

And Whatever You Want To Know 1

8 Meet Your Strawman

And Whatever You Want To Know 9

10 Meet Your Strawman

DEALING WITH DEBT

And Whatever You Want To Know 11

12 Meet Your Strawman

4. The wet ink signatures of both parties — (corporations

And Whatever You Want To Know 13

14 Meet Your Strawman

And Whatever You Want To Know 15

16 Meet Your Strawman

And Whatever You Want To Know 17

18 Meet Your Strawman

And Whatever You Want To Know 19

20 Meet Your Strawman

And Whatever You Want To Know 21

22 Meet Your Strawman

And Whatever You Want To Know 23

24 Meet Your Strawman

DEALING WITH THE POLICE

As each individual Police Force is a commercial company, in a

Please don t get me wrong. Most policemen and policewomen

And Whatever You Want To Know 25

26 Meet Your Strawman

And Whatever You Want To Know 27

28 Meet Your Strawman

So, what about the Driver ’s License? Under Common Law,

(b) Associating yourself with, and consequently represent-

And Whatever You Want To Know 29

30 Meet Your Strawman

Please read the following notice thoroughly and carefully

The reason why you need to read it carefully is simple. I

And Whatever You Want To Know 31

32 Meet Your Strawman

By ; __________________________ (Agent)