Scribd
Upload
67 views3 pages

Lab Rubrics For Ananlytical and Intrumentation

This document provides a rubric for evaluating student lab reports with criteria in several areas: 1. Organization - Assesses whether the report is well-planned and organized. 2. Clarity - Evaluates the use of background information from literature and clarity of writing. 3. Introduction - Judges the appropriateness of the introduction's length, details, and grammar. 4. Methods - Rates the clarity and level of detail provided in the experimental procedures. 5. Graphs/Tables - Assesses the structure, labels, and captions used for any illustrations. 6. Results and Discussion - Examines the linkage between results and literature and efforts to illustrate findings.

Uploaded by

Rathish Ragoo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
67 views3 pages

Lab Rubrics For Ananlytical and Intrumentation

This document provides a rubric for evaluating student lab reports with criteria in several areas: 1. Organization - Assesses whether the report is well-planned and organized. 2. Clarity - Evaluates the use of background information from literature and clarity of writing. 3. Introduction - Judges the appropriateness of the introduction's length, details, and grammar. 4. Methods - Rates the clarity and level of detail provided in the experimental procedures. 5. Graphs/Tables - Assesses the structure, labels, and captions used for any illustrations. 6. Results and Discussion - Examines the linkage between results and literature and efforts to illustrate findings.

Uploaded by

Rathish Ragoo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

EKB3171

LAB RUBRICS FOR ANANLYTICAL AND INTRUMENTATION

Student Name : ………………………………………………………………. Student ID : ……………………………………………………………….

Subject Code and Subject Name : ………………………………………………………………. Lecturer : ……………………………………………………………….

Criteria Description

Organisation plan; well organised; Organised in simple way Weak plan; confusing;

5 1 Score =

Clarity Very good use of additional information from Some additional information for background Little use of additional information
literature (or textbooks) for background from literature; repeating the
practical manuals

5 1 Score =

Introduction Very appropriate length and details; easy to follow; Appropriate length and details; able to follow; Not appropriate length and details;
good grammar, punctuation and no spelling errors some mistake in grammar, punctuation and difficult to follow
spelling

5 4 3 2 1 Score =

Methods In detailed procedure with clarity and easy to Show sufficient steps to follow Not clear to follow
follow
EKB3171

10 1 Score =

graphs/ Tables Very well structured; easy to read; very precise and Able to illustrate the main points; appropriate No understanding on the construct
appropriate label and caption label and caption of graphs/ tables; poor label and
inappropriate caption

5 4 3 2 1 Score =

Results and Show very good link of reults to literature; extra Moderate linkage of results to literature; some Not sufficient literature; not
Discussion examples are included for illustration further discussion motivated; no extra effort to
illustrate

10 3 2 1 Score =

Conclusion Able to suggest future development or give Some discussion for relevancy to pharmacy; No context; not motivated; no extra
examples of the practical relevancy to EXPERIMENT average effort & motivation effort shown

5 4 3 2 1 Score =

References Extra literature used; Flawless citation according to Appropriate citation; follow APIreferencing; Not appropriate citation; not follow
the Api format; appropriate literature some extra literature API referencing; no extra literature

5 4 3 2 1 Score =

Total score (maximum 50)

Comments from lecturer:


EKB3171

You might also like