Segmental

g Concrete
Box--Girder Bridges
Box g
ดร.. สุุนิติ สุภุ าพ
ดร
Dr. Suniti Suparp
[email protected]

1
Outlines
• Bridge Characteristics
• Advantages and disadvantages
• Analysis of Segmental Bridge
• D i off SSegmental
Design t l BBridge
id

2
Segmental Concrete Box
Box--Girder Bridge

External Prestressing System

4
Structural Element of Segmental Box-
Box-Girder Bridge
1 2 3 4

1 3

2 4

รูปทีี่ 3 Deviator Segment

5
Type of Segmental Concrete Box-
Box-Girder Bridge

6
Construction Method of Segmental Concrete Bridge

7
Segmental Concrete Box
Box--Girder Bridge
• safety (e.g. in case of fire)
• extra cost (more prestressing required, single spans, truss)
Disadvantages • high construction loading (overslung truss)
• new construction method – technology (e.g. geometry control of
segments, design))
• short construction time (segments are prefabricated while the
substructure is being built)
• no interruption of traffic
• precast ‘mass’ production (cost efficient, good controlled quality
shapes)
Advantages • weather independent construction (dry ( joints))
• small light segments
• hollow
h ll boxb sectionti
• reduced dead load
• cost (reduced reinforcement)
• Recycling
8
External Prestressing
• additional mild reinforcement required (p)
• additional cost for ducts, anchorage, etc.
Disadvantages
• only straight tendon layout
• diffusion of post-tensioning forces
• replacement of tendons possible
• inspection of tendons possible
• easier Installation of longitudinal tendons
Advantages • good corrosion protection of p.t. cables
• less dead load (thin webs)
• less friction (no wobble losses)
• prestress forces can be modified after construction (spare
( ducts))

9
Structural Action
• Simple beam action in the longitudinal direction causing longitudinal flexural stresses
and shear stresses across the section.
• Shear lag effect in bending.

10
Structural Action
• Torsion of the cross
section due to eccentricity
of loading. (St. Venant’s
shear stress and warping
shear stresses in the
longitudinal direction)
• Distortion of the section
due to eccentric loading.
(Transverse bending stress,
shear stress across the
section,
ti longitudinal
l it di l
warping stress
(di t ti l) andd
(distortional),
corresponding
(distortional) warping shear
stresses
11
Overall Structural Action of Box Girder

12
Behavior of Segmental Box Girder
Precast segmental box girder bridges with external prestressing - design and
construction - Prof. Dr.-Ing. G. Rombach, Technical University, Hamburg-Harburg, Germany

13
Behavior of Segmental Box Girder (Dry Joint)
• Whole structure is under compression
at the beginning. (due to PT)
• The structure fails due to crushing of
the concrete in the top
• A ductile behavior of the segmental
bridge can be seen!!!
g
• The segments around mid-spanp are
open.
• T. Takebayashi, et.al : A full-scale
destructive test of a precast
segmental box girder bridge with dry
joints an external tendons

14
Behavior of Segmental Box Girder
Critical sections
1 • mid-span greatest bending moment
2 • first joint after support greatest shear force but prestress force not
uniformly distributed in cross-section
3 • diaphragms high concentrated loads due to anchorage
of tendons
4 • deviators g concentrated loads due to tendons.
high
3 3
1

2 2
4 4 4

15
Design Codes
- AASHTO (Segment) American Association of State Highway and Transportation
Offi i l Guide
Officials, G id Specifications
S ifi ti for f Design
D i andd Construction
C t ti off
Segmental Concrete Bridges, 1999 (INTERIM 2003)
- AASHTO (STD) American Association of State Highway and Transportation
Officials, Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 2002
- AASHTO (LRFD) American Association of State Highway and Transportation
Officials,
ff l LRFD Bridged Design Specifications,
f Interim 2005
- BS5400 British Standards Institution, British Standard 5400 (Steel,
concrete and composite bridges)
- CEB-FIP Euro-International Committee for Concrete and International
Federation for Prestressing, CEB-FIB Model Code 1990 (Design
Code), 1990
16
Loads – additional considerations
considerations--A5.14.
14.2
• According to AASHTO (Segment), all loadings shall be in accordance with AASHO
(STD) including temperature gradient
gradient, erection loads,
loads and creep and shrinkage
(ACI, CEB-FIP)
• LRFD
LRFD-2005
2005 includes some of loadings as specified above.
above
• For segmentally constructed bridges, the LC shall also be investigated at the
service limit state ;
LRFD2005

AASHTO(Segmemt)

• Additional three types of loading are listed below;

allows
ll ffor possible
bl variations in cross section
weight due to construction irregularities

preliminary load from past experience

18