Scribd
Upload
78 views3 pages

Seleksi Model: K-Way and Higher-Order Effects

1) The document analyzes a selection model using K-way effects and backward elimination to determine the effects of gender (JK), eligibility (Kep), and placement (Dep) on student admission. 2) Higher-order interactions between the three effects were not significant, but some two-way interactions and main effects were significant. 3) After backward elimination, the remaining significant effects were the two-way interactions of gender with eligibility and placement, as well as the main effects of eligibility and placement.

Uploaded by

Ryka Roest
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
78 views3 pages

Seleksi Model: K-Way and Higher-Order Effects

1) The document analyzes a selection model using K-way effects and backward elimination to determine the effects of gender (JK), eligibility (Kep), and placement (Dep) on student admission. 2) Higher-order interactions between the three effects were not significant, but some two-way interactions and main effects were significant. 3) After backward elimination, the remaining significant effects were the two-way interactions of gender with eligibility and placement, as well as the main effects of eligibility and placement.

Uploaded by

Ryka Roest
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

SELEKSI MODEL

K-Way and Higher-Order Effects

Likelihood Ratio Pearson

K df Chi-Square Sig. Chi-Square Sig. Number of Iterations

K-way and Higher 1 15 373,110 ,000 442,528 ,000 0


a
Order Effects 2 10 184,187 ,000 185,058 ,000 2

3 3 ,751 ,861 ,742 ,863 6


b
K-way Effects 1 5 188,923 ,000 257,470 ,000 0

2 7 183,436 ,000 184,317 ,000 0

3 3 ,751 ,861 ,742 ,863 0

a. Tests that k-way and higher order effects are zero.

b. Tests that k-way effects are zero.

Partial Associations

Partial Chi-
Effect df Square Sig. Number of Iterations

JK*Kep 1 ,370 ,543 2


JK*Dep 3 96,053 ,000 2
Kep*Dep 3 75,786 ,000 2
JK 1 ,200 ,655 2
Kep 1 82,283 ,000 2
Dep 3 106,440 ,000 2
BACKWARD ELIMINATION STATISTICS

Step Summary
Number of
Stepa Effects Chi-Squarec df Sig. Iterations
0 Generating Classb JK*Kep*Dep ,000 0 .
Deleted Effect 1 JK*Kep*Dep ,751 3 ,861 6
1 Generating Classb JK*Kep, JK*Dep,
,751 3 ,861
Kep*Dep
Deleted Effect 1 JK*Kep ,370 1 ,543 2
2 JK*Dep 96,053 3 ,000 2
3 Kep*Dep 75,786 3 ,000 2
2 Generating Classb JK*Dep, Kep*Dep 1,122 4 ,891
Deleted Effect 1 JK*Dep 101,666 3 ,000 2
2 Kep*Dep 81,399 3 ,000 2
3 Generating Classb JK*Dep, Kep*Dep 1,122 4 ,891
a. At each step, the effect with the largest significance level for the Likelihood Ratio Change is
deleted, provided the significance level is larger than ,050.
b. Statistics are displayed for the best model at each step after step 0.
c. For 'Deleted Effect', this is the change in the Chi-Square after the effect is deleted from the
model.

Goodness-of-Fit Tests

Chi-Square df Sig.

Likelihood Ratio 1,122 4 ,891

Pearson 1,094 4 ,895


ESTIMASI PARAMETER

Parameter Estimates

95% Confidence Interval

Effect Parameter Estimate Std. Error Z Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound
JK*Kep*Dep 1 ,080 ,106 ,757 ,449 -,128 ,288
2
-,006 ,098 -,062 ,950 -,198 ,186
3
-,006 ,105 -,061 ,951 -,212 ,199

JK*Kep 1 ,029 ,061 ,478 ,633 -,091 ,150


JK*Dep 1 -,476 ,106 -4,485 ,000 -,684 -,268
2
,775 ,098 7,923 ,000 ,583 ,967
3 -,285 ,105 -2,722 ,006 -,491 -,080
Kep*Dep 1 ,079 ,106 ,746 ,456 -,129 ,287
2 -,398 ,098 -4,063 ,000 -,589 -,206
3
,701 ,105 6,687 ,000 ,495 ,906
JK 1 ,014 ,061 ,232 ,816 -,106 ,135
Kep 1 ,382 ,061 6,229 ,000 ,262 ,503
Dep 1 -,042 ,106 -,395 ,693 -,250 ,166
2
,264 ,098 2,702 ,007 ,073 ,456
3
,303 ,105 2,887 ,004 ,097 ,508

Cell Counts and Residuals


De Observed Expected
JK Kep p Count % Count % Residuals Std. Residuals
Laki-Laki Ditolak 1 23,000 4,6% 21,000 4,2% 2,000 ,436
2 63,000 12,6% 62,500 12,5% ,500 ,063
3 68,000 13,6% 67,500 13,5% ,500 ,061
4 12,000 2,4% 12,500 2,5% -,500 -,141
Diterima 1 7,000 1,4% 9,000 1,8% -2,000 -,667
2 62,000 12,4% 62,500 12,5% -,500 -,063
3 7,000 1,4% 7,500 1,5% -,500 -,183
4 13,000 2,6% 12,500 2,5% ,500 ,141
Perempuan Ditolak 1 47,000 9,4% 49,000 9,8% -2,000 -,286
2 12,000 2,4% 12,500 2,5% -,500 -,141
3 112,000 22,4% 112,500 22,5% -,500 -,047
4 13,000 2,6% 12,500 2,5% ,500 ,141
Diterima 1 23,000 4,6% 21,000 4,2% 2,000 ,436
2 13,000 2,6% 12,500 2,5% ,500 ,141
3 13,000 2,6% 12,500 2,5% ,500 ,141
4 12,000 2,4% 12,500 2,5% -,500 -,141

You might also like