ps18 14
ps18 14
Policy Statement
PS18/14***
July 2018
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
2
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 1
1 Overview
Introduction
1.1 The Senior Managers & Certification Regime (SM&CR) aims to strengthen individual
accountability in financial services.
1.2 In July 2017, we consulted on extending the SM&CR to almost all firms regulated only
by the FCA and not the PRA (‘solo‑regulated’ firms) in Consultation Paper (CP) 17/25
– ‘Individual Accountability: Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to all
FCA firms’. A second CP, CP17/40 – ‘Individual Accountability: Transitioning FCA firms
and individuals to the Senior Managers & Certification Regime’, set out how we proposed
to move FCA firms and individuals from the Approved Persons Regime (APR) to
the SM&CR.
1.3 This Policy Statement (PS) summarises the feedback we got to CP17/25 (Part 1) and
CP17/40 (Part 2), and our response to the feedback received.
1.4 We have provided a separate guide to the SM&CR. This sets out the main features of
the regime and gives the details of how the move to the SM&CR will happen. If your
firm is preparing for the SM&CR, we recommend that you read the guide.
1.5 All firms authorised under the Financial Services and Markets Act (FSMA) and regulated
by the FCA will be affected by these changes, as well as European Economic Area
(EEA) and third‑country branches. Insurers are also affected but these firms should
read PS18/15.
1.6 The requirements depend on whether firms are classified as Limited Scope, Core or
Enhanced. Use Figure 1 and Table 1 to identify your firm’s classification.
3
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 1 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
No
No
You are a Core SM&CR firm unless one of the following applies:
You are a firm with You are a firm with You are a
You have Assets total intermediary annual revenue mortgage lender
Under Management regulated business generated by or administrator
You are a regulated consumer (that is not a bank)
You are a CASS of £50 billion revenue of
Significant IFPRU credit lending of with 10,000 or
Large firm or more calculated £35 million or
firm £100 m or more more regulated
as a three year more per annum,
rolling average calculated as a three calculated as a three mortgages
year rolling average year rolling average outstanding
4
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 1
• incoming EEA firms providing cross‑border services only – these firms are out of
scope of the SM&CR
• Payment Services firms that aren’t authorised under FSMA– these firms are out of
scope of the SM&CR
• Insurers and insurance branches (please read PS18/15 for the relevant near-final
rules for these firms)
Context
1.10 This Policy Statement sets out changes to how we will regulate people working in
financial services. The SM&CR replaces the APR for nearly all the firms we regulate.
1.11 The aim of the SM&CR is to reduce harm to consumers and strengthen market
integrity by creating a system that enables firms and regulators to hold people to
account. As part of this, the SM&CR aims to:
• make sure firms and staff clearly understand and can demonstrate who does what
1.12 In March 2016 we applied the SM&CR to banks, building societies, credit unions and
PRA‑designated investment firms ('banking firms'). Subsequent changes to FSMA now
require us to extend the SM&CR to all firms authorised to provide financial services
under FSMA.
1.13 In this PS we summarise changes to our rules to extend the SM&CR to cover all
authorised firms. These rules will apply:
• the Senior Managers Regime (SMR) to FCA solo‑regulated firms. This will focus
regulatory approval on fewer senior individuals in a firm than under the current APR
1 Limited Permission Consumer Credit firms that also act as Appointed Representatives for other business (eg a limited
permission credit broker that is also an AR for insurance business) are, however, within scope of the extended SM&CR as they are
authorised firms.
5
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 1 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
1.14 We received 225 responses to CP17/25 and 47 to CP17/40. We have also considered
relevant responses to CP17/26 and CP17/41, which set out proposals for applying the
SM&CR to insurers.
1.15 The vast majority of these responses supported our proposals. Many respondents
also asked for further clarification on how the rules apply. We also received some
suggestions for changes to the proposed rules. In general, we intend to implement the
consultation proposals, but will make some changes in response to this feedback.
1.16 As a result of the responses received, we have made the following changes to our
CP17/25 proposals:
• removed the Prescribed Responsibility (that only applied to Core firms) to inform the
governing body of their legal and regulatory obligations
• provided an easy process for firms to tell us they wish to voluntarily apply a higher
regime tier
• lengthened the time period from 6 to 12 months for a firm to implement the
Enhanced tier, once they have met relevant criteria
1.17 We intend to implement the proposals set out in CP17/40 largely as proposed, but have
made two changes:
• aligned the REP008 reporting period for Limited Permission Consumer Credit firms
with their annual return
1.18 We have concluded that these amendments do not lead to significant changes to the
costs and benefits and hence do not require an additional cost‑benefit analysis (CBA)
under section 138I(5) of FSMA.
1.19 We have updated our CBA and published it alongside this PS. This is because of the
importance of the SM&CR for the financial services sector, changes in the number of
firms in the different tiers, and the complexity of the CBA. The updated document sets
out the CBA in relation to the near-final rules.2
2 LINK
6
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 1
1.20 We have considered the equality and diversity issues that may arise from the new rules
in this PS.
1.21 Overall, we don’t consider our rules adversely impact any of the groups with protected
characteristics, ie age, disability, sex, marriage or civil partnership, pregnancy and
maternity, race, religion and belief, sexual orientation and gender reassignment.
1.22 A consumer body suggested that we review whether the fit and proper requirements
support the recruitment of diverse candidates into leadership positions in firms. We
have responded to this feedback in Chapter 4.
1.23 The same respondent considered that the SM&CR should be used to address diversity
on boards across the industry. While we agree that diversity is an important issue for
firms and industry to address, we don’t think SM&CR is the best mechanism to deal
with this. There are a number of other initiatives at the UK and EU level, including
diversity obligations on firms under MiFID and CRD, that we believe are better
placed to improve diversity. Our supervision teams will continue to impress on senior
management the importance of diversity in their teams, and we may ask firms directly
about gender diversity policies.3
1.24 The legal instrument accompanying this PS contains near‑final rules. Although they are
near‑final in most respects, they:
• are not near‑final in respect of benchmark activities, our approach to which we will
consult on separately
1.25 Firms affected by these changes will move to the new regime on 9 December 2019.
Note that Handbook references in this PS refer to the rules set out in the
accompanying Instrument.
1.26 Firms should check they have the appropriate people in the correct approved functions
before approved individuals are converted from the APR to the SM&CR. This will help to
make the move to the new regime as effective as possible.
3 www.fca.org.uk/news/speeches/women‑finance‑keeping‑pressure‑progress
7
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 1 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
Part 1:
Feedback to CP17/25:
Extending the Senior Managers &
Certification Regime to all FCA firms
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 2
All UK Limited Scope, Core and Enhanced firms should read this chapter. The feedback for branches is
dealt with in Chapter 7.
2.1 In this chapter, we summarise the feedback we received on our proposed rules and
guidance for applying Senior Management Functions (SMFs) and our response.
Our proposals
2.2 In CP17/25, we proposed applying the following SMFs to Core and Enhanced firms
where they have individuals performing the relevant roles:
• SMF27 – Partner
• SMF9 – Chair
2.4 We also proposed applying the following Prescribed Responsibilities (PRs) that must be
allocated to Senior Managers in Core and Enhanced firms:
Table 2: Prescribed Responsibilities
Handbook PR Ref. Description
All Core and Enhanced Firms
(a) Performance by the firm of its obligations under the SMR, including
implementation and oversight
(b) Performance by the firm of its obligations under the Certification Regime
(b-1) Performance by the firm of its obligations in respect of notifications and training
of the Conduct Rules
(d) Responsibility for the firm’s policies and procedures for countering the risk that
the firm might be used to further financial crime
9
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 2 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
2.5 In CP17/25, we also proposed a PR for ensuring that the governing body is informed
of its legal and regulatory obligations. We have not included this in Table 2 because
we are removing this PR following consultation. Read our response on p. 20 for
more information.
2.6 We proposed that PRs would not apply to Limited Scope firms, and that additional PRs
would apply to Enhanced firms.
Feedback received
Q1: Does the proposed list of Senior Managers in the Core
regime cover the appropriate roles, ie the most senior
decision makers within a firm?
Q2: Are there any other roles that the FCA should consider
specifying as SMFs?
Q3: Are there any proposed Senior Managers that the FCA
should consider excluding from the Core regime?
10
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 2
2.7 Most respondents supported the list of SMFs proposed for the Core tier and agreed
we had taken a proportionate approach to Core firms.
2.9 Some respondents thought that larger or more complex Core firms may have people
doing jobs more suited to the functions defined in the Enhanced tier. They felt that the
proposals concentrate responsibility on a narrow group of executives. They argued
that additional SMFs would help reflect the scale and complexity of these businesses.
Suggestions for additional SMFs in the Core tier included:
• the Enhanced SMF functions equivalent to the CF28 – Systems & Controls function
under APR, ie Chief Finance (SMF2), Chief Risk (SMF4) and Head of Internal
Audit (SMF5)
2.10 One respondent thought the proposals created too much bias towards second line
functions by excluding managers of major business units but including roles such as
the Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO).
• the term ‘required functions’ meant that firms needed to appoint people to fill these
roles where they don’t currently have them, and how two of these roles (SMF16 –
Compliance Oversight and SMF17 – MLRO) apply to specific firm types
• all types of partners fall within the definition of the SMF27 – Partner function
11
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 2 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
Our response
Required functions
The term ‘required function’ is an existing definition under APR that
we proposed carrying over to the SM&CR. It’s intended to categorise
those functions that we require some types of firms to have under
other sections of our Handbook. For example, under the Markets in
Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II, some firms need to have a
Compliance Oversight Function. Some firms don’t currently need to
comply with these requirements and the SMR doesn’t change this.
For example, if a firm doesn’t need to have someone in the Compliance
Oversight or MLRO functions under the APR, they won’t need to under
12
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 2
the SM&CR. Firms should already know whether these functions apply
to them or not.
Group application
The SM&CR applies to legal entities, rather than to groups. This is set
out in FSMA. As such, we don’t have discretion to take a group‑wide
approach to applying the SM&CR.
Instead, we will allow firms to opt into the Enhanced tier if they wish.
We have set out more detail on this in our answer to Q21, in Chapter 6.
This should allow groups to take a consistent approach across different
legal entities if they wish to. The SM&CR is designed to be proportionate,
so firms should only opt up if they are prepared to apply and comply with
the extra requirements of the Enhanced tier. There is no expectation on
firms to opt into the Enhanced tier for the sake of having more SMFs.
Partners
Only partners that meet the definition of the SMF fall under the Senior
Managers Regime. As we set out in CP17/25, we think most partners
will have some involvement in managing a firm, although we recognise
that this won’t be the case in every partnership. It is for firms to decide
whether a Partner performs an SMF, based on our rules and guidance
in SUP 10C.5. The guidance in the Handbook allows firms to consider
other circumstances which may mean a partner does not meet the
SMF definition.
Before they move from the APR to the SM&CR, we encourage firms
to consider whether partners currently approved under CF4 – Partner
Function meet the SMF definition. If they don’t, then Core firms will
need to submit a Form C to cancel that Partner’s approval. Enhanced
firms can simply leave this individual out of their submitted Form K and
the individual’s function will not be converted.
13
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 2 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
Feedback received
Q4: Do you agree with our approach to Senior Management
Functions for Limited Scope Firms? If not, please
explain why.
2.12 Most respondents supported the list of SMFs proposed for the Limited Scope tier.
2.13 However, some considered the criteria for identifying Limited Scope Firms were
unsuitable. They suggested that only using regulatory permissions could create an
uneven playing field for similar firms who would fall in the Core tier. For example, two
firms offering consumer credit could have different permissions, but only one would be
Limited Scope. They felt that the conduct risk posed by consumer credit and insurance
intermediary firms meant the Core tier should apply to them in all cases.
2.14 Other suggestions included expanding the firms under the Limited Scope tier to
include all authorised professional firms (APFs), sole traders with up to 4 employees,
or owner managed businesses.
Our response
We are implementing the SMFs for Limited Scope firms as consulted on.
14
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 2
All sole traders are already in the Limited Scope tier, even if they
have employees.
Appointed Representatives
There are some changes that will interest Appointed Representatives
(ARs) of firms. However, the extension of the SM&CR proposed in
CP17/25 doesn’t affect individuals and Approved Persons working at
ARs. This is because the relevant legislation doesn’t give us the power to
extend the SM&CR to ARs.
As a result, the provisions of the APR and the relevant APR controlled
functions still apply to ARs. Principal firms remain fully responsible for
their ARs and networks meeting our rules. Senior Managers at these
firms must make sure that this happens.
One exception is for Limited Permission Consumer Credit firms that also
act as ARs for other business (eg a limited permission credit broker that
is also an AR for insurance business). These firms fall within scope of the
extended SM&CR as they are authorised firms.
Required functions
Limited Scope Firms may need to have a Compliance Oversight
Function or MLRO under another section of our Handbook. If they
don’t, then firms don’t have to appoint people to these roles for
the SM&CR.
Feedback received
Q22: Do you agree with our proposed Senior Management
Functions for Enhanced firms?
Q23: Do you agree that this will ensure the most senior people
in firms are covered by the Senior Managers Regime,
regardless of organisational structure? If not, please
explain why.
2.16 The majority of respondents supported the list of SMFs proposed for the
Enhanced tier.
2.17 Some respondents suggested that we include extra functions within the Enhanced
tier. These included:
15
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 2 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
2.18 There was a concern that the proposals won’t work at group level if the subsidiaries of
regulated firms don’t have independent Board and Committee frameworks. Another
respondent suggested that the Enhanced tier does not reflect how the investment
management industry operates because these firms will typically be structured by
‘function’ or ‘centre for excellence’ on a group rather than entity basis.
2.19 Some respondents asked us to clarify the difference between functions. For example,
differences between the Head of Internal Audit and the Chair of the Audit Committee,
and the Senior Independent Director and the Chair.
2.20 One respondent suggested that we shouldn’t make chairs of committees SMFs,
as these individuals may already be covered under other SMF roles. We were also
asked how the SM&CR applies to Company Secretaries and whether the SMF7 –
Group Entity Senior Manager Function can act as Chair of the subsidiaries without
separate approval.
2.21 There was a call for greater alignment between the PRA and FCA definitions of the
Chief Operations Function (SMF24). One respondent noted that the PRA currently
allow the SMF24 function to be split across a maximum of 3 people. Another
respondent suggested that the FCA introduce a PR for operational continuity instead
of SMF24 for both FCA and the PRA regimes.
2.22 We were asked to consider applying the PRA Head of Key Business Area Function
(SMF6) to Enhanced Firms as it was suggested this could be more appropriate than
SMF18 – Other Overall Responsibility Function. One respondent suggested that
we should review the potential overlap between the definition of SMF18 and the
Significant Management Function under the Certification Regime. Many respondents
requested clarity on the status of the Head of the Legal Function.
2.23 We were asked whether the SM&CR would force firms to have committees they
haven’t needed to in the past, as a result of making some Chairs of Committees SMFs.
• how the functions of the Chair of the Risk and Audit Committees apply to firms if
they don’t have Non‑Executive Directors
2.25 We received some feedback that updating the Statements of Responsibilities following
significant changes was too burdensome.
16
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 2
Our response
We believe using SMF18 for Enhanced firms is the best way to capture
individuals with Overall Responsibility for a firm’s business area or activity
of the firm if they aren’t performing another SMF. Many different types
of firms come in scope of the FCA’s regime, so we think this function
gives Enhanced firms the flexibility to apply the SMR without having to
specify a series of detailed roles. This allows firms to allocate Overall
Responsibility in way that reflects their business models and governance
structures in the way they consider is most appropriate.
17
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 2 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
Director functions
Our Handbook definitions of the Chairs of Committees under SUP
10C.5A don’t mandate whether these must be held by Executive or
Non‑Executive Directors. There may be other requirements or good
governance practices that dictate whether these Chair roles are held
by a Non‑Executive or Executive Director. The SMR is designed to
accommodate both.
Groups
Under FSMA we need to apply the SM&CR on a legal entity basis. We
recognise that many Enhanced firms will be part of a wider group, so we
have designed the regime to accommodate complex groups and matrix
structures as much as possible, using, for example, the SMF7 – Group
Entity Senior Manager Function.
Committee Chairs
Firms don’t have to set up committees as a result of the SM&CR. It is
only where firms have these committees – whether because they are
required to under other rules or because they choose to – that the Chair
will be a Senior Manager. We have made this clearer in our guidance
in SUP10C.
We have not proposed a PR for operations because this would require all
firms to allocate this responsibility in a specific way. The Chief Operations
Function gives firms more flexibility to meet our requirements in a way
18
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 2
that reflects their business model and governance structure. It does not
require firms to hire someone to fill the Chief Operations role.
In SUP 10C.6B we have set out a number of examples of how the SMF24
– Chief Operations Function could apply. We don’t expect or require firms
to change how they currently allocate responsibility for managing their
internal operations or technology. Instead, the function will clarify how
this responsibility is allocated within the firm. We don’t insist that all these
responsibilities are held by one person and the examples in the guidance
recognise this.
Head of Legal
CP17/25 highlights that the Overall Responsibility requirement currently
includes the legal function (ie there is no specific exemption for this
function). This policy is under review following industry feedback and the
position will be clarified by a further consultation before the rules in this
PS come into force. We will make final rules on this issue before the start
of the SM&CR for solo‑regulated firms.
A Senior Manager will need to have one SoR for every firm where
they perform an SMF. If a Senior Manager performs multiple SMFs in
a single firm, this should all be included in the one SoR. If someone
performs SMFs in different firms across a group, they will need one
SoR for every firm (legal entity) within it.
Feedback received
Q5: Do you agree with our proposed list of Prescribed
Responsibilities? If not, please explain why.
2.27 The majority of respondents agreed with our proposed list of Prescribed
Responsibilities (PRs). Some suggested that we use the same PRs for both Core and
Enhanced firms.
2.28 There were some concerns with our proposals for the PR for informing the
governing body of legal and regulatory obligations. Respondents thought that it was
19
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 2 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
inappropriate to assign this responsibility to one individual. In many firms, this is divided
across different individuals such as the Company Secretary, the General Counsel and
the Compliance Officer.
2.29 Several respondents felt that in small firms the CEO and Compliance Oversight
Function will be given most of the responsibilities. We were asked to clarify whether
PRs should be allocated to the most appropriate Senior Manager that sits on the
Board. Similarly, some respondents asked us to expand on our expectations of
sharing PRs.
2.30 Some respondents suggested that we widen the list of PRs to cover areas such as
culture, complaints handling and risk management.
2.31 There were requests for clarity about whether firms need to assign the PR for the
Certification Regime if firms have no Certified Staff. One respondent asked if the PR
for Conduct Rules extended to Appointed Representatives, or whether it is limited to
‘own staff’ of a firm.
Our response
For example, one of the PRs that must be allocated by Core firms is
responsibility for the firm’s policies and procedures for countering the
risk that the firm might be used to further financial crime. If an SMF3
– Executive Director of a firm is accountable for the firm’s policies and
procedures on financial crime, we would expect the PR to be allocated
to that individual, even if the firm’s compliance function also supports by
providing oversight of these policies and procedures.
When allocating PRs firms will need to think about which Senior Manager
is the most senior person accountable for an issue. For example, if the
person performing the SMF17 – MLRO is not responsible for all aspects
20
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 2
of financial crime, then the PR for financial crime should not be allocated
to this person. It must instead be allocated to the Senior Manager
accountable for all financial crime matters.
We confirm that Core firms are not required to allocate PRs to only those
Senior Managers who sit on the Board.
4 In March 2018 we published a Discussion Paper on transforming culture in financial services. This is part of our drive to promote a
discussion and consensus on the essential features of a healthy culture within financial services. For more information, read DP18/2
– ‘Transforming Culture in Financial Services’.
21
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 2 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
Feedback received
Q6: Do you agree with our proposed Prescribed Responsibility
for AFMs as set out in CP17/18? If not, please explain why.
2.33 Respondents agreed with our proposed PR. Some requested clarity on the allocation
of this PR. They asked if it should be allocated to an Executive or a Non–Executive
Director. They also requested clarity on whether this PR should be allocated to the
SMF9 – Chairman.
2.34 Some respondents felt that introducing the PR would result in Compliance Officers
challenging less in owner‑managed firms, because this PR can only be exercised by
senior executives.
2.36 One suggestion was that we split this PR into two separate PRs to cover the following
two responsibilities:
• AFMs’ value for money assessment and acting in the investors best interest
2.38 Several others queried how much the value for money process is a collective Board
responsibility, or an individual one.
2.39 One respondent asked if the individual holding the SMF14 – Senior Independent
Director Function can hold the PR for an AFM’s value for money assessments,
independent director representation and acting in investors’ best interests.
22
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 2
Our response
Feedback received
Q24: Do you agree with our proposals for Prescribed
Responsibilities in Enhanced firms? If not, please
explain why.
2.40 CP17/25 proposed applying an additional seven PRs for Senior Managers in Enhanced
firms, on top of the Core PRs.
2.41 The majority of respondents supported the list of PRs proposed for Enhanced firms.
2.42 Some respondents suggested that we allow individuals holding the SMF18 – Other
Overall Responsibility to be allocated PRs other than CASS compliance.
2.43 Several respondents didn’t think that firms should allocate the PR for developing and
maintaining the firm’s business model to a single individual. They argued that this
should be a collective responsibility allocated to the Board. They asked us to explain
how we will measure reasonable steps for this PR.
2.44 One suggestion was to create a single set of PRs for both Core and Enhanced Firms.
The same respondent recommended aligning PRs for solo‑regulated firms, insurers
5 PS 18/8 – Asset Management Market Study remedies and changes to the handbook
23
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 2 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
and the PRA list. This would create a common set of PRs across both solo and
dual‑regulated firms.
2.45 There were some questions over the oversight PRs and the PR for managing the firm’s
internal stress‑tests. Respondents asked if they would apply to Enhanced firms that
are exempt from the relevant requirements in the SYSC section of our Handbook.
Our response
24
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 2
25
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 3 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
3 Certification Regime
Our proposals
3.2 The Certification Regime covers people who aren’t Senior Managers, but whose jobs
mean they can have a significant impact on customers, the firm or market integrity.
We won’t approve these individuals, but firms will need to check and confirm (‘certify’)
at least once a year that these people are suitable to do their job. This is a requirement
under FSMA.
Table 3: Certification Functions
Certification Function Overview
Significant Management These individuals perform functions that would have been Significant
Function (current CF29) Influence Functions under the APR.
Proprietary traders These important roles can seriously affect how the firm conducts
(also covered by its business.
current CF29)
CASS Oversight
Function (current CF10a)
Functions subject to This includes, for example, mortgage advisers, retail investment advisers
qualification and pension transfer specialists. The full list is set out in our Training and
requirements Competence Sourcebook.
The client This function has been expanded from the CF30 function under APR to
dealing function apply to any person dealing with clients, including retail and professional
clients and eligible counterparties.
This will cover people who:
• advise on investments (other than a non‑investment insurance contract)
and perform other related functions, such as dealing and arranging
• deal, as principal or agent, and arrange (bring about) deals in investments
• act in the capacity of an investment manager and all functions connected
with this
• act as a bidder’s representative
26
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 3
3.3 We also asked for feedback on whether individuals performing these functions should
appear on a public register.
3.4 This chapter sets out the feedback received to our proposed:
• Certification Functions
Certification Functions
Feedback received
Q7: Do you agree with the functions we have proposed
making Certification Functions? If not, please explain why.
27
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 3 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
3.7 A number of respondents felt that the breadth of individuals in scope of the
Certification Regime was not proportionate. One respondent suggested that the term
‘significant harm function’ should be replaced with ‘significant responsibility function’.
3.8 Others noted that the new definition of the Client Dealing Function could extend the
Certified population to include relevant junior and call centre staff. Some suggested
that the Certified population should only capture current CF30s or other roles such
as mortgage advisers, staff involved in designing products sold to retail investors, and
anyone approving financial promotions.
3.9 There was a concern that certain roles were excluded from the Certification Regime.
Respondents suggested including people handling complaints and corporate finance
activity. They proposed a number of additional Certification Functions. We were asked
to clarify whether a range of roles, including those at Appointed Representatives, were
in scope of the Certification Regime. Commonly suggested functions included:
• Head of HR
• Complaints Handling
• Non‑SMF Partners
3.10 Several respondents commented that the definition of the term ‘Material Risk Taker’
(MRT) differs under UCITS, AIFMD and CRD, and suggested aligning these. Another
said that the MRT definition can cause the MRT populations to vary each year.
3.11 Some respondents wanted us to provide guidance on how firms should decide if
someone is performing the Significant Management Function.
3.13 More information was requested on how a firm should decide whether someone
should be a Senior Manager or certified. Some respondents felt that this is particularly
difficult where they have flat organisational structures. We were also asked whether
contractors and secondees should be certified.
3.14 Another respondent asked that the 4 week period for emergency appointments to
certification functions be extended to 12 weeks. This would then align with Senior
Managers. Another suggested a transitional period for firms to certify staff, noting that
some firms would have a large number of individuals to certify.
• how to apply the Algorithmic Trading Function to firms that use a trading algorithm
provided by another firm
28
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 3
• whether firms are required to certify individuals who perform multiple functions
across a group multiple times
• how Training and Competence rules, which allow trainees to undertake a role under
supervision should be reconciled with the certification requirements
Our response
Certification is intended to ensure that firms assess their staff as fit and
proper on a regular basis. It is for firms to decide the best way of meeting
the requirements. Firms don’t need to adopt the same criteria for fitness
and propriety regardless of a person’s seniority or role. We expect firms
to act in a proportionate manner. This means that, for example, where a
trainee retail investment adviser practises under supervision, they can be
certified as fit and proper for the Client Dealing Function on the condition
that they still meet basic standards and are supervised.
29
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 3 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
If firms use a third party algorithm, there must be someone in the firm
accountable for the decision to use the algorithm, and for how the
algorithm behaves on an ongoing basis. This may be the same person.
Firms must be clear on this and who these people are, whether they
develop their own algorithms or rely on third parties.
Clarifications
The definition of ‘Material Risk Taker’ (MRT) is taken from European
legislation on remuneration. Firms subject to these rules are already
required to identify their Material Risk Takers. This is in line with these
existing requirements and European legislation, and as such we don’t
intend to change this.
30
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 3
Feedback received
Q10: Do you agree with our proposed territorial limitation for
the Certification Regime? If not, please explain why.
3.16 Respondents broadly agreed with the proposal but highlighted the differences in
territorial scope between Senior Managers and Certification Functions. Others were
concerned about the difficulties of applying and monitoring the ’30 day’ rule (where
individuals should be certified if they work more than 30 days a year in the UK).
3.17 Some respondents were concerned that employees of a non‑UK firm to which
a UK firm has delegated a service would be captured. They felt this would be
disproportionate. Others suggested extending the territorial scope of the
Certification Regime.
3.18 Firms asked us to clarify if the Certification Regime applies to staff based abroad,
including individuals involved in client dealing.
Our response
31
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 3 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
CASS Responsibilities
Feedback received
Q11: Do you agree with the approach we have proposed
to allocating CASS responsibilities? If not, please
explain why.
3.19 Most respondents agreed with our approach of allocating the CASS PR.
Some disagreed with our proposal to include the CASS Operational Oversight
Function (current CF10a) under the Certification Regime. In their view, the CASS
Operational Oversight Function should be kept as an approved function. They felt
that to do otherwise could reduce firms’ Boards attention on the importance of
CASS compliance.
3.20 A few respondents disagreed with our example that the CASS PR will often be
allocated to the Senior Manager undertaking the Compliance Oversight role. They feel
this contradicts previous FCA advice that the CASS and Compliance Oversight should
be performed separately.
3.21 One respondent asked us to clarify whether firms can allocate the CASS oversight
function to multiple employees to allow for segregation of duties.
3.22 Some respondents asked how the CASS requirements under the SM&CR worked
with MiFID.
Our response
32
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 3
• it can satisfy itself on reasonable grounds that this person is still able
to discharge his/her CASS oversight responsibilities effectively, and
33
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 4 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
Our proposals
4.1 In CP17/25 we proposed new rules for how firms should assess whether people are fit
and proper to do their job. This includes Senior Managers, Non‑Executive Directors
and individuals under the Certification Regime. The new rules include:
• the evidence we expect firms to gather when making their assessment, including
requirements to:
4.2 This chapter sets out the feedback we received on these topics and our response.
Feedback received
Q12: Do you agree with our proposed approach to rules
and guidance on the fit and proper test? If not, please
explain why.
4.3 Most respondents agreed with our proposals on the fit and proper test. A few asked
us to clarify how firms should conduct the annual assessment. We were also asked for
additional guidance to ensure consistency across the industry.
4.4 Some respondents were concerned about the administrative burden on small HR
functions. A few suggested that the FCA should conduct the annual fitness and
propriety assessments, rather than firms. Some commented that it would be difficult
to conduct fit and proper assessments on Non‑Executive Directors as they only
attend a few Board meetings each year. There were also questions about how fit and
proper assessments apply to sole traders, and whether our rules mean they would
need to self‑certify.
34
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 4
4.5 One respondent suggested that smaller firms should only be required to conduct the
assessment every 3 years, rather than every year.
4.6 Some respondents thought that we should use this opportunity to link and consolidate
various regulatory competence requirements. These could include MIFID II, IDD, Board
competence and guidelines issued by European Supervisory Authorities. Some felt
that we should change the existing rules and guidance on fit and proper assessments
and training and competence to improve standards of individual behaviour. They also
suggested making it compulsory to undertake continuous professional development
of skills and knowledge.
4.7 One respondent was concerned that our fit and proper requirements may not support
the recruitment of diverse candidates in leadership positions. There was also a concern
this could discriminate against those with criminal convictions or older staff members
with experience rather than formal training.
Our response
A key feature of the SM&CR is to reinforce that firms need to take more
responsibility for their staff being fit and proper to do their jobs. This
requirement stems from legislation and followed recommendations
from the Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards (PCBS).
Similarly, FSMA, rather than FCA rules, requires firms to assess fitness
and propriety of their Senior Managers and Certification Staff at least
annually. So we don’t have discretion to change this. It is for firms to
decide how best to carry out their fit and proper assessments, based
on the rules, guidance and evidence requirements set by the FCA. We
haven’t provided prescriptive guidance on how firms should carry out
these assessments as we consider firms best placed to decide how their
internal employee assessments should be carried out.
Firms should already have processes in place to assess the fitness and
propriety of their employees and to monitor and record information
about employees’ performance and suitability. They must also ensure
that employees have the skills, knowledge and expertise necessary for
their responsibilities, as required by the Competent Employees Rule and
corresponding EU rules.
We don’t consider that our expectation for people to be fit and proper
will discriminate against the recruitment of diverse candidates. In our
35
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 4 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
view, the most important considerations that are relevant to fitness and
propriety include:
• financial soundness.
In practice, there will be few cases where sole traders will need to
conduct a fit and proper assessment on themselves. This is because
neither the governing SMFs nor the Certification Regime apply to a
sole trader themselves, as opposed to their employees. If a sole trader
does need to conduct a fit and proper assessment, the guidance in FIT
will still be relevant. They won’t need the assessment to be verified by
someone else. This is identical to the way the current APR operates for
sole traders.
Feedback received
Q13: Do you agree with our proposed requirements on criminal
records checks? If not, please explain why.
4.8 The majority of respondents agreed with our proposals. However, several questioned
whether the proposals were consistent with privacy and data protection laws. Some
said that Limited Scope Firms should not be required to conduct criminal records
checks. On the other hand, several respondents thought that we should extend the
criminal records checks to all Certification Functions. They argued this was appropriate
as these are customer‑facing functions, and firms are limited in the information they
can receive on individuals who are not Senior Managers.
36
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 4
4.9 Several respondents suggested that we shouldn’t ask for criminal records checks
if someone is moving roles within a firm. Some asked for clarity about how often
a criminal records check should be conducted. One respondent asked if a criminal
records check needed to be completed before an employee started with a firm.
4.10 We were also asked to explain when firms should make checks on individuals who have
worked overseas for any length of time, as this this can be a burdensome process.
4.11 Some respondents asked what types of convictions and offences would bar someone
from working in financial services. One suggested that there should also be checks
on whether a director has ever been disqualified or has an undischarged bankruptcy.
Respondents also asked if they need to notify us if an employee provides false
information on a form.
4.12 Some respondents asked whether the Disclosure & Barring Service (DBS) had the
capacity to undertake these criminal records checks.
4.13 One respondent asked how these rules apply to not‑for‑profit firms.
Our response
If a candidate for an SMF has spent considerable time overseas in the last
six years, firms should consider carrying out a criminal records check in
those particular jurisdictions. We provide guidance in the Handbook, but
it is up to the firm to decide if this is appropriate. Candidates themselves
37
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 4 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
are asked to disclose all related matters, whether in the United Kingdom
or overseas, in our forms.
Guidance in FIT makes it clear that conviction for a criminal offence won’t
automatically mean someone can’t be considered fit and proper – this
is a case‑by‑case assessment. If a candidate provides false information
on a form, a firm should consider this when deciding on the individual’s
honesty, integrity and reputation. If someone who is currently employed
by the firm provides false information, this could also be a breach of
the Conduct Rules. Firms need to report breaches of Conduct Rules
resulting in disciplinary action to us annually, using REP008 on GABRIEL.
We have discussed our requirements in this area with the Disclosure and
Barring Service (DBS), as well as the likely increase in requests for criminal
records checks it will receive.
Not‑For‑Profit firms
If a not‑for‑profit firm is in scope of the SM&CR and has someone
performing an SMF, then criminal records checks apply, whether or not
that person is remunerated for their role.
However, SMFs don’t apply to not‑for profit debt advice firms under
our rules.
Regulatory References
Feedback received
Q14: Do you agree with our proposed requirement of
regulatory references? If not, please explain why.
4.14 Most respondents agreed with our proposals for regulatory references, but asked for
clarification on some practical issues. These included:
• how firms should approach reportable matters where the relevant individual has left
the firm
38
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 4
4.15 There were also several requests for guidance on what should be included in regulatory
references. Some firms suggested that additional specific information should be
included in the regulatory reference template.
4.16 Respondents pointed out that employment legislation can make some firms reluctant
to disclose relevant information on candidates. A few firms asked us to explain how
regulatory references interact with legal requirements. These include employment law,
GDPR, laws such as the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act, managing conflicts of interest
and any pre‑existing contracts, such as confidentiality requirements.
4.17 A few respondents noted that providing and getting regulatory references would lead
to increased costs and workloads for firms.
4.18 Some wanted us to create a portal or public register of references, through which
firms lodge confidential references and update them as necessary. One respondent
recommended that we set up a tribunal process to address cases of unfairness around
regulatory references. This could correct simple cases of unfairness or refer more
complex disputes to the courts.
4.19 Many firms expressed concern that Certified Staff may omit previous employers from
their records, rather than receive a poor regulatory reference.
4.20 We were asked for guidance on how the regulatory reference requirements apply to
sole traders.
4.21 One person asked if firms are required to respond to references from third parties,
or respond to speculative regulatory references (such as from recruitment agencies)
before an individual had been put forward for a role.
Our response
• request a reference from all previous employers in the past six years
for Senior Managers, Certification Functions and non‑approved
Non‑Executive Directors (except in Limited Scope firms)
39
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 4 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
Secondly, firms only need to update their new employer if that firm is
regulated under FSMA, and the individual still works there. In practice this
will need to be checked with the firms that were last sent references.
• for ex‑employers, six years from the date the individual left the firm
Also, misconduct that occurred more than six years ago, but which came
to light within six years from the date the individual left the firm, may
require disclosure if that misconduct is serious.
Timing of references
We recognise that there may be situations where a candidate has not
told their current employer that they are leaving. However, a fit and
proper assessment can’t be made until the new firm can confirm that
its due diligence is complete. This includes getting a reference from the
candidate's previous employer. For Senior Managers, firms should ideally
get references before they submit an application for approval. However,
we know that there will be circumstances where this may not be possible.
In these cases, firms can get references no later than one month before
the end of the application process. For Certified Staff, the firm must
receive the references before they issue the certificate.
40
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 4
Role changes
There may be cases where someone changes roles within a group, for
example if they are initially hired into a Certification Function and then
move into an SMF in another entity. In these cases, a firm doesn’t need
to request a regulatory reference from the original entity if the group
maintains centralised records or alternative means of sharing existing
relevant information on the fit and proper assessment of candidates.
Contractual terms
Firms should already be collecting most of the information they have to
include in regulatory references, as part of their statutory obligations to
keep records for regulatory reporting. So we think that updating these
existing processes should involve only minimal costs.
One of the main aims of the SM&CR is for firms and Senior Managers
to take greater responsibility for ensuring their employees are
suitable. Regulatory references are designed to make it easier to share
information between firms. The Fair and Effective Markets Review
(FEMR) found that there was little benefit in creating an FCA portal of
references. So we don’t believe it’s appropriate for us to create a central
portal of references or to manage disputes about their content.
Clarifications
We believe that using a mandatory standard template will increase the
consistency of references across different firms. Our Handbook contains
41
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 4 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
Under SYSC 22, firms must disclose, in the reference, all information
that could be relevant to the hiring firm's assessment of the candidate’s
fitness and propriety. If a firm fails to disclose all information that could
be relevant, then this is likely to be a breach of our rules. In such cases
we will consider what regulatory action should be taken. In certain
circumstances, this may include possible enforcement action.
• inform your FCA case officer (if you have one), call our helpline on
0300 500 0597 or email us at [email protected]
For sole traders, we have added guidance to clarify that a firm doesn’t
need to request a reference for a candidate if they were a sole trader.
We have also added a rule clarifying that that sole traders won’t need to
get references about themselves from previous employers if they will
perform a Senior Management Function as the sole trader.
42
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 5
5 Conduct Rules
Our proposals
5.1 In CP17/25, we proposed replacing the current Statements of Principle and Code
of Practice for Approved Persons (the APER section of the Handbook) with a set of
individual Conduct Rules for all firms. This will ensure a single standard applies across
the market. As the Conduct Rules apply directly to individuals, they will help shape
firms’ culture, standards and policies. They should also promote positive behaviours
that actively support our statutory objectives.
5.2 The Conduct Rules are made up of a general set of rules that we proposed to apply to
most employees in a firm. We also proposed a second tier of rules that only apply to
Senior Managers.
43
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 5 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
5.3 We proposed that these Conduct Rules would apply to a firm’s regulated and
unregulated financial services activities. This includes any related ancillary activities –
activities carried on in connection with a regulated activity.
• all other employees, except ancillary staff (ie people who don’t perform a role
specific to financial services)
• for Senior Managers, the requirement for firms to notify us of breaches within seven
business days of the firm concluding disciplinary action. Disciplinary action in this
context means:
• for all other staff that come under the Conduct Rules, the firm should make a report
every year using REP008 on our electronic reporting system, GABRIEL
5.6 This chapter sets out the feedback we received on the Conduct Rules and
our response.
Feedback received
Q15: Do you agree with our proposal to apply the Conduct
Rules to financial services activities?
5.7 A number of respondents asked us to clarify the scope of activities subject to the
Conduct Rules and on how this relates to the fitness and propriety requirements.
44
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 5
5.8 They also suggested additional roles for the ancillary staff list or that the list should not
be exhaustive. Others argued that certain roles on the ancillary staff list shouldn’t be
excluded, or that all staff should be in scope.
5.9 A number of respondents asked us to clarify the scope of the Conduct Rules where
individuals who are not on the ancillary staff list in practice don’t undertake any
financial services activities. We were also asked whether the Conduct Rules apply
to trustees.
5.10 A number of respondents suggested that the scope of application of the Conduct
Rules should be the same as the banking regime.7 Some also asked us whether
anything prevented a firm from applying the Conduct Rules to all of their employees.
Others asked if the scope of the Conduct Rules would be different for Limited
Scope firms.
• how the Conduct Rules apply where firms carry out a mixture of financial services
and non‑financial services activities
• what the narrower application of the Conduct Rules means compared to that in
place for banking firms
Our response
– affect the ability of a firm to meet the fit and proper threshold
conditions, or
7 Under the banking regime, the Conduct Rules apply to everyone someone does on behalf of a banking firm, whether it’s regulated or
unregulated or linked to financial services.
45
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 5 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
This is the same for all firms, whether they are Limited Scope, Core or
Enhanced.
(b) is subject to (or to the right of) supervision, direction or control by
[a firm] as to the manner in which those services are provided.’
The Conduct Rules also apply to SMFs and Board Directors, whether or
not they come within this definition of ‘employee’.
The Conduct Rules don’t apply to people who only perform an ‘ancillary
role’. We have provided a list of ancillary roles the Conduct Rules don’t
apply to. This is set out in COCON 1.1.2 R (6). These are roles which
would be the same whether or not they are performed at a financial
services firm or a non‑financial services firm.
This means that individuals performing a role on the ancillary roles list
and also undertaking other activities would be in scope of the Conduct
Rules for any part of their role that falls into COCON 1.1.7A (ie the
financial services part of their role), but not a part of their activities that
falls outside COCON 1.1.7A. Equally, individuals at firms who are in no
way involved in financial services activities would not fall within scope of
the Conduct Rules.
Trustees
The Conduct Rules only apply to SMFs, non‑SMF directors and
employees of firms. FSMA defines ‘employees’ as including contractors,
temps and secondees. On this basis, whether a trustee is in scope will
depend on whether they meet the definition of an ‘employee’.
46
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 5
In short, firms can choose to have a single standard for all employees
if they want to, but our rules (including the mandatory training
and reporting obligations) only apply to the population of staff
described above.
Firms may wish to consider whether there are any impacts on contracts
of employment where they intend to apply the Conduct Rules to staff
who are not within scope of our rules.
Clarifications
Some firms offer a mix of financial and non‑financial activities. For them,
whether something is in scope of the Conduct Rules depends on
whether it meets the definition of activities covered by the Conduct
Rules. Generally, this will only be the case where there is a connection
between the financial activity and non‑financial activity.
This approach is narrower than the one we took for banking firms,
as everything that a bank does will be captured by the Conduct Rules.
For solo‑regulated firms and insurers, activity will only be captured if it
meets the definition set out in COCON 1.1.7A.
Feedback received
Q18: Do you agree with our proposal to link notification
requirements for disciplinary action to breaches of the
Conduct Rules?
5.13 A small number suggested that the reporting requirement should only apply to Senior
Managers and Certification Staff.
5.14 We were asked to explain how the FCA would use personal information and whether we
required this information for non‑certified staff.
5.15 Several respondents suggested that notification should be delayed until investigations
have been completed or a breach had been proved. Others felt firms should also notify
breaches of other conduct standards, such as those of a professional body.
5.16 Some respondents suggested a right of appeal to the FCA, to prevent malicious
reporting. They also suggested a central register to support this process.
5.17 We were asked to consider increasing the notification period to one month for Senior
Managers to allow for appeal processes. Respondents also wanted us to confirm
what firms should do when an employee leaves before disciplinary procedures
are completed.
47
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 5 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
Our response
Firms should only report Conduct Rule breaches to us where they result
in one of these courses of action, and once the relevant disciplinary
process has been completed. This means that if an individual leaves the
firm during the disciplinary process and the process can’t be completed,
the firm should not submit a report.
The Conduct Rules apply to all non‑ancillary staff, so the Conduct Rules
reporting requirements apply to these staff too. This is because staff at
all levels of a firm have the potential to cause harm.
5.18 Respondents wanted to know how we would ensure consistent reporting across
the industry.
5.19 Some also wanted further clarity about the notification requirements for Senior
Manager Conduct Rule breaches. They were concerned that firms would be
48
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 5
5.20 Some suggested that annual reporting is too infrequent if a customer‑facing employee
is dismissed for a serious breach of Conduct Rules.
5.21 A few respondents suggested that notification reporting should align with existing
reporting schedules.
• how we will use Conduct Rule breach reports and what effect this will have on
relevant staff
• how firms should update annual Conduct Rule breach notifications where they
become aware of new information that changes a disciplinary outcome
Our response
For this reason, and so that we can compare data across the whole
industry, we intend to keep the proposed reporting period of
1 September to 31 August each year for most firms (with a submission
49
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 5 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
due date of within 2 months of the end of the reporting period). However,
for Limited Permission Consumer Credit firms – the majority of whom
are the very smallest firms we regulate – we have decided to align
the reporting period for this return with their annual reporting cycle.
We considered extending this change to other small firms, but decided
that it is only appropriate for these firms.
50
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 6
6.1 Feedback on Enhanced SMFs and Enhanced Prescribed Responsibilities can be found
in Chapter 2. This chapter provides our response to feedback on our proposed criteria
for identifying Enhanced firms and the rules about firms moving between tiers of
the regime.
Our proposals
6.2 In July, we proposed 6 criteria to identify those firms that we will apply extra
requirements to. We classify these firms as Enhanced. The final criteria are set out in
our legal instrument but we have summarised the changes in Table 5 below.
6.3 We also proposed rules for how firms will move between tiers of the regime when they
begin to meet, or no longer meet, the Enhanced criteria. We also proposed:
6.4 This chapter sets out the feedback we received and our response. Feedback on the
extra SMFs we proposed can be found in Chapter 2.
Enhanced criteria
Feedback received
Q20: Do you agree with our proposed approach of using the
objective criteria set out above to identify firms for the
Enhanced regime? If not, please explain why and propose
alternative approaches.
6.5 Several respondents suggested that the criteria were too focused on quantitative
thresholds and that we should use qualitative thresholds instead, or as well. Some
asset management respondents felt that asset managers should never be in the
Enhanced tier as they are not systemically risky firms.
51
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 6 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
6.6 We received a significant amount of feedback suggesting that the proposed financial
criteria were too sensitive to single year anomalies. This may bring firms into the
scope of the Enhanced tier, disproportionately. Respondents also suggested that the
financial thresholds had been set too low.
6.8 Two respondents suggested removing the CASS Large criteria. They believed that
all CASS Large firms would meet the threshold for inclusion under the IFPRU criteria.
One respondent highlighted that the CASS limit of £425m for Significant IFPRU firms is
significantly less than the £1bn client money limit for CASS Large firms.
• if a firm that does not submit the RMA‑B regulatory return is still subject to the
intermediation threshold
• if a firm with waivers for Significant IFPRU obligations will still be subject to the
Enhanced tier
Our response
52
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 6
The three financial criteria will now all be worked out on a 3-year rolling
average basis, with slight variations necessary due to the underlying
reporting requirements. This means that:
The Enhanced tier isn’t just designed to capture systemically risky firms
from a prudential perspective. It’s also designed to capture firms that are
8 We have also slightly amended the labelling of two of the criteria to ensure clarity. These changes ensure that the labelling in this
Policy Statement aligns with the rules we consulted on and the near-final rules in our instrument. The two changes are to clarify that
the mortgage criterion applies to mortgage lenders and administrators, and to clarify that the consumer credit lending threshold
applies to regulated consumer credit lending.
53
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 6 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
There are a few firms who complete returns other than RMA‑B and
who have intermediation revenue of over £35m. Our intention was that
these firms would be captured by the threshold. We agree that the
rules as proposed did not have this effect. We plan to consult separately
on bringing these firms into the Enhanced tier before the start of
the SM&CR.
Feedback received
Q21: Do you agree with our proposed approach to moving firms
between Core and Enhanced? If not, please explain why.
6.10 Respondents broadly supported our proposed approach to firms moving in and out of
the Enhanced tier.
6.11 Several respondents asked how the proposed approach would apply to groups. They
felt that having the ability to opt‑up to the Enhanced tier would ensure a consistent
approach for groups with entities in different tiers.
6.12 One respondent suggested that Core or Limited Scope entities in a group containing
an Enhanced firm should also be subject to the Enhanced tier. Others asked us
whether firms in this situation would be able to opt‑up into the Enhanced tier.
6.13 Some respondents wanted to extend the transition period for firms moving into the
Enhanced tier to 12 months, rather than 6 months. This would align it with the exit
transition period.
• the approach where firms move categories during the transition period
54
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 6
• if we could ask firms to comply with the Enhanced tier even if they don’t meet
the criteria
Our response
Opting Up
We don’t believe that it would be proportionate to make all firms in a
group with an Enhanced firm automatically apply the Enhanced tier.
However, we agree that it should be easier for firms to opt into the
Enhanced tier if they want to, particularly within groups. As a result,
we have made it easier for firms to opt‑up using a notification process
and a new form (Form O). Firms can make the decision to opt‑up after
considering their specific circumstances.
Once firms have opted into the Enhanced tier they must comply with all
of the relevant rules. If they don’t it will be a breach of our rules – firms
can’t choose to apply some elements of the regime and not others.
This is to ensure consistency and transparency across all firms in the
Enhanced tier.
If firms choose to opt into the Enhanced tier (or from Limited Scope
to the Core), they must be ready to comply with all the rules of the
opted‑into regime 3 months after the date Form O is submitted. More
information on opting up is in SYSC 23 Annex 1.
While we believe that the changes to the financial thresholds will make
this less common, it is possible that a small number of firms will change
regime tier during the transition to the new SM&CR. If a firm believes that
it is likely to change tiers during the transition, they should contact us as
soon as possible so that we can help them.
55
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 6 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
Feedback received
Q25: Do you agree with our proposal to apply the Overall
Responsibility requirement to Enhanced firms? If not,
please explain why.
6.15 We received mainly positive feedback to our proposals. Some respondents were
unclear on the difference between the Overall Responsibility requirement and the
SMF18 – Overall Responsibility Function.
6.16 A few respondents suggested that the Overall Responsibility requirement should apply
to Core firms and that we should make the SMF18 – Overall Responsibility Function
available to these firms.
6.17 One respondent noted that, as part of the re‑structuring of SYSC, we have
deleted SYSC 4.7.9G. This provided guidance on the purpose of the Overall
Responsibility requirement.
6.18 Many respondents asked for guidance on how to apply the rule, as well as for examples
of good practice. Some respondents asked which areas of their ‘unregulated’ business
had to be represented by a Senior Manager. Others wanted guidance on how to
treat business unit heads and how to distinguish between an individual holding the
Significant Management Certification Function and one holding the SMF18.
6.19 We were asked how this requirement should be applied within group structures,
particularly where the parent company has significant management influence in the
subsidiary. Respondents also wanted to know whether the changes will alter how
Overall Responsibility applies to banking firms.
6.20 One respondent asked us to consider redrafting SYSC 4.7.30G. This refers to the
inclusion of activities, transactions, business areas and management functions that
are located or take place outside the UK. They asked us whether this could be limited
to firms only operating, or dealing with customers, in the UK.
Our response
CP 17/25 set out some of the steps a firm may wish to take to comply
with the Overall Responsibility rules. We have not set out best practice
guidance as the way that firms allocate Overall Responsibility will be
56
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 6
different for every firm. The Responsibilities Map should help Enhanced
firms to work out if there are any gaps in Overall Responsibility.
Enhanced firms should also keep in mind that the regime applies
to individual legal entities. Firms must ensure that they identify the
individual who is genuinely accountable in the entity in question. This
is regardless of whether or not they are a director or employee of that
particular entity.
• if their role meets both the definition of SMF7 and SMF18, the
individual should be approved as SMF7
• if their role does not meet the definition of SMF7, then they should be
approved as SMF18
• regulated activities
57
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 6 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
Responsibilities Maps
Feedback received
Q26: Do you agree with our proposal to apply Responsibilities
Maps to Enhanced firms? If not, please explain why.
6.21 Most respondents agreed with our proposals, with a significant number suggesting
that all firms should maintain a Responsibilities Map.
6.22 There was some confusion about the level of detail required in the Responsibilities
Map. Some respondents were unsure whether information in Statements of
Responsibilities should be repeated. A number of firms asked for guidance on how to
create the map and what lessons were learned when banking firms implemented this.
6.23 There were questions about when maps need to be updated and submitted to us,
following changes to the management team.
Some respondents suggested that legal entities managed as a group could submit
a single Responsibilities Map. Some respondents also asked for guidance on how
to represent key senior managers in the parent group.
Our response
58
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 6
Handover Procedures
Feedback received
Q27: Do you agree with our proposal to apply handover
procedures to Enhanced firms? If not, please explain why.
6.24 Most respondents welcomed our proposal to apply handover procedures to Enhanced
firms. In their view, firms had already developed some form of handover procedures.
6.25 While agreeing with our proposals, a few respondents suggested that we extend this to
cover Core firms as well.
6.26 Some expressed concerns – in particular, some felt that we should not prescribe or
dictate handover procedures. Others were concerned that there could be problems
applying our proposals if Senior Managers leave the role suddenly without preparing
handover materials.
9 This is required by FSMA and explained in SUP10C.11, where we provide examples of what is and isn't a significant change.
59
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 6 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
6.27 We were asked about the detail that should be recorded in the handover template, and
asked to explain our expectations and provide good practice guidance on the following:
• reasonable steps
Our response
60
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 7
Our proposals
7.1 In CP17/25, we proposed a set of Senior Management Functions for EEA and non‑EEA
branches, and set out how we proposed to apply the Certification Regime and
Conduct Rules to these firms.
7.2 We also proposed a set of Prescribed Responsibilities for non‑EEA branches, 3 of which
(aa, ff and ee) are specific to non‑EEA branches.
61
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 7 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
Feedback received
7.3 The majority of respondents supported our proposals for branches. They asked how
the regime would apply to EEA branches after the UK leaves the European Union.
7.4 Some challenged the additional administrative burden on Senior Managers in non‑UK
locations who are already subject to local regulations. Others noted that the Branch
Manager may not be involved in the day to day activities of the firm, particularly in
larger branches. One respondent suggested that the SMF16 – Compliance Oversight
Function should apply to EEA branches to ensure head offices appreciate the
regulatory requirements of the UK.
7.5 One respondent noted that the proposals for solo‑regulated non‑EEA branches were
inconsistent with the banking regime, as the SMF7 – Group Entity Function doesn’t
apply to solo‑regulated branches.
7.6 Respondents asked us to confirm that PRs should not be assigned to individuals in EEA
branches but should be assigned to Senior Managers in non‑EEA branches.
62
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 7
7.7 Some respondents wanted the PRs to be consistent across the different categories
of firms.
7.8 Others suggested that PRs for non‑EEA firms should also include responsibility for
culture, training and conflicts of interest.
7.9 The majority of respondents agreed with our proposals on the Certification Regime
and Conduct Rules for EEA branches. However, some questioned whether it was
proportionate to have 2 Senior Managers responsible for a large certified population.
Most welcomed the exclusion of non‑UK staff from the Certification Regime, but
there was some concern that this could lead to gaps in accountability in firms with
global operations.
Our response
Senior Managers in EEA branches will require a SoR. We confirm that PRs
won’t apply to EEA branches.
Territorial Scope
Most respondents agreed with the proposed territorial application
of the regime for branches, so we have maintained this approach in
our near‑final rules. We believe this reflects the different regulatory
requirements that apply to incoming branches. This includes rules on
63
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 7 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
fitness and propriety, and conduct, which apply to staff under their home
state regulations.
64
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 8
Our proposals
8.1 In CP17/25, we proposed introducing a new PR for the Conduct Rules. This means that
all firms, including banking firms, must allocate responsibility for ensuring that they
train staff in the Conduct Rules and comply with the FCA notification requirements.
8.2 The 12-week rule allows someone to cover for a Senior Manager without being
approved, where the absence is temporary or reasonably unforeseen, and the
appointment is for less than 12 consecutive weeks. We proposed to allow any
responsibility that the absent manager holds under the Overall Responsibility
requirement to be reallocated to someone who is not approved, during their absence.
We also suggested a technical change to apply the SMF27 – Partner function to banks.
8.3 This chapter sets out the feedback we received on these topics and our response.
Feedback received
Q33: Do you agree with our proposal to introduce a new
Prescribed Responsibility for the Conduct Rules that will
apply to banking firms?
8.4 The majority of respondents supported our proposal. A small number challenged the
need for the PR and requested clarity on how to allocate it.
8.5 A small number of respondents believed that it might be difficult to allocate this PR to
one person, as training is often administered by HR, Legal and Compliance.
Our response
65
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 8 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
Firms must decide which Senior Manager is the best person to hold this
PR. It should be given to the Senior Manager who is the most senior
person responsible for the Conduct Rules training and notification
requirements. They must also have sufficient authority and an
appropriate level of knowledge and competence to do this properly.
In larger firms, this may be the individual accountable for ensuring that
activities undertaken across different parts of the firm (eg HR, legal and
compliance) enable the firm to comply with our requirements. It doesn’t
mean this person needs to be personally involved in these activities
day‑to‑day.
This PR should normally be held by only one person. Firms will only
be able to share this PR in limited circumstances. They must be able
to show that this is appropriate and justifiable. If a firm decides it is
appropriate to share this PR, they must show why this is justified and
confirm that this does not leave a gap.
Feedback received
Q34: Do you agree with our changes to the 12-week rule? If not,
please explain why.
8.6 Several respondents suggested extending the 12 week period or using waivers where
a firm can’t recruit a replacement within 12 weeks.
8.7 We were asked to clarify how the rule applies to a variety of reasons for an
SMF’s absence.
Our response
66
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 8
8.8 We received 2 responses to this question. Both agreed with our approach.
Our response
67
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 9 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
9.1 When proposing rules, we must publish a cost benefit analysis (CBA) under
Section 138I(2)(a) of FSMA. The CBA must include an analysis and estimate of
the costs arising from, and the benefits brought about by, our proposed rules.
We published a CBA for our proposals in July, alongside CP17/25.
9.2 This chapter sets out our response to the feedback we received on our CBA. We have
separately published an updated CBA alongside this Policy Statement.
Feedback received
9.5 Six respondents agreed with the analysis and conclusions, but asked us to work closely
with firms during implementation because of the number of other ongoing regulatory
initiatives happening at the same time. One suggested that a higher response rate to
our survey would have given greater confidence about our conclusion.
9.6 One respondent suggested that some Core firms may choose to adopt elements
of the Enhanced tier as best practice and we should consider these costs as part of
the CBA.
9.7 Another respondent agreed with the overall CBA, but said our analysis did not consider
the impact for groups with entities already under the SM&CR. They suggested that,
for these firms, the costs may be greater than the benefits. A further respondent
suggested that smaller firms pose a lower risk, so the cost‑benefit of applying the
SM&CR to these firms is less clear, particularly as they are subject to the APR.
9.8 One respondent suggested that, because the merged CBA covers both solo‑regulated
firms and insurers, this made it difficult to work out which parts of the analysis apply to
which firms.
10 www.fca.org.uk/publication/research/cba-extensionsenior-managers-certification-regime.pdf
68
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 9
9.9 One respondent said that the SM&CR would result in less direct supervision of firms
and that we should take this into account. They also asked us to confirm whether our
implementation costs will come from our existing budget.
9.10 One respondent disagreed with our CBA and argued that the changes we proposed
will involve significant one‑off and ongoing costs. They noted that the CBA did not
incorporate the actual costs to banking firms and asked for further information on
our discounting of the reported costs. One respondent suggested that the quoted
costs to maintain the Certification Regime were an underestimate and that significant
work would be needed to oversee and monitor the certified population. Some other
respondents commented more generally that the costs were likely to be understated.
9.11 One industry association said we had given little explanation about why we had left out
some cost categories in the compliance costs estimates in the main part of the CBA.
Another asked why we had not separated the costs associated with the new Conduct
Rules PR for banking firms.
9.12 We were also asked to further explain what ‘average costs’ incurred by firms means.
9.13 Some respondents suggested that unintended consequences from the proposed
changes could cause considerable consumer harm, and we had overlooked the cost of
this. Another respondent suggested that the consumer protection should override any
CBA findings.
9.14 We were asked whether the following factors had been included in the CBA:
• legal fees
• administration costs
9.15 Some respondents suggested that we should quantify both tangible and
intangible benefits.
Our response
We used a survey to help inform decisions about what the right package
of policy proposals was, and to assess the costs and benefits of our final
policy proposal.
69
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 9 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
Some Core firms may choose to adopt elements of the Enhanced tier,
but this is not required under the rules. As a result, we have not included
any additional costs from voluntary compliance with the SM&CR.
The analysis in the original CBA (and final CBA) considers the impact
of the SM&CR on groups with entities which are already subject to
SM&CR. Firms were asked for the incremental costs of the new regime
over and above the existing Approved Persons Regime and some
survey respondents are part of groups already subject to SM&CR. The
compliance cost estimates and the analysis in the CBA are therefore
based on the additional costs of the SM&CR. We have considered
different types of firms by designing 3 categories of firms within the
SM&CR (‘tiers’). The CBA concludes that the SM&CR is likely to be net
beneficial overall.
We discuss the main reasons for leaving out certain cost categories from
the cost estimates included in pages 18 to 20 of the original CBA.
The costs incurred by the FCA for the implementation of the SM&CR will
be recovered separately from industry.
The CBA does not use banking firms’ compliance costs because banks
are different from solo‑regulated firms and insurers. Estimates based on
their costs would therefore not be representative for firms in scope of
the SM&CR. As the SM&CR differs from the Senior Managers Regime for
banks, compliance costs for these two regimes will likely differ.
Average costs
The average compliance costs discussed in the original CBA and in the
CBA accompanying this PS are the averages over all the cost estimates
provided by the survey respondents for each given tier. These averages
70
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 9
have been weighted to ensure they represent the different types of firms
in the overall population. These averages are not typical costs – given the
broad range of firms in scope of the SM&CR it is impossible to say which
type of firm (for example, with a certain number of SMFs or employees)
would typically incur such costs. Some firms will incur higher costs
than the average and others will incur lower costs. We have used these
averages to estimate the total compliance cost for all firms in each of
the tiers.
• legal fees and administrative costs: Where these do not fall into the
cost categories in the survey, respondents will have included those in
the category ‘other costs’
The original CBA discusses the costs and benefits of the SM&CR for
solo‑regulated firms and insurers. The compliance cost for the three
changes for banking firms are discussed in CP17/25 (at paragraph 41
of Annex 1). These were considered to be of minimal significance and
did not require a CBA according to FSMA 138L(3)(b).
71
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
Part 2:
Feedback to CP17/40:
Transitioning FCA firms and individuals to the
Senior Managers & Certification Regime
72
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 10
10 Transitional Arrangements
Our proposals
10.1 This chapter contains our response to feedback we received on the transitional
arrangements we consulted on in CP17/40, including:
• the requirement to check that the firm’s information is correct on the Financial
Services Register after automatic conversion
10.2 For the purposes of the near-final rules that form part of this Policy Statement, we
have assumed firms will have 12 months from the start of the regime to complete their
fitness and propriety assessments and to get the certification paperwork in place.
This is subject to commencement regulations to be made by HM Treasury.
73
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 10 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
Feedback received
10.3 Respondents asked us to communicate the start date for the new regime as soon as
possible. They requested an extended time period between the publication of the final
rules and the start of the SM&CR. Some respondents suggested we should allow the
conversion process to start before Commencement. This would allow firms to identify
and correct errors or omissions which occur during the automatic conversion process.
10.4 Some respondents asked us to clarify what firms should do if, after Commencement of
the new regime, details in the Register about their Senior Managers are incorrect.
10.5 There were some practical suggestions to ease the transition process. These included
asking us to provide dedicated support during transition and improvements we might
make to the forms.
10.6 One person asked us to clarify what fitness and propriety checks firms should do
during transition, and what firms should do about long‑standing employees who
change roles after start of the regime.
10.7 We were also asked to explain how the new regime will affect Appointed
Representatives (ARs).
Our response
74
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 10
Applications under APR will use the existing forms, but applications
using the new SM&CR forms will include the amended F&P questions
consulted on in CP17/40.
Appointed Representatives
As explained in CP17/40, legislation does not provide us with the power
to extend the SM&CR to ARs. The Approved Persons Regime (APR) will
continue to apply to ARs once the extended SM&CR comes into effect.
75
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 11 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
Our proposals
11.1 This chapter contains our response to the feedback we received on the conversion
approach for Core and Limited Scope firms we consulted on in CP17/40, including:
• our approach to new and in‑flight applications by Core and Limited Scope firms
• our approach to Core and Limited Scope firms applying for authorisation
(‘applicant firms’)
11.2 The final mapping of APR to SM&CR controlled functions at Core and Limited Scope
firms is set out below.
Table 7: Function mapping for Core and Limited Scope firms (including branches)11
Current controlled function Corresponding Senior Management Function(s)
CF1 – Director SMF3 – Executive Director
CF2 – Non‑Executive Director12 SMF9 – Chair
CF3 – Chief Executive SMF1 – Chief Executive
SMF19 – Head of Third Country Branch (Third Country
Branches only)
CF4 – Partner SMF27 – Partner
SMF3 – Executive Director (Third Country Branches only)
CF5 – Director of SMF3 – Executive Director
Unincorporated Association
CF6 – Small Friendly Society Function SMF3 – Executive Director
CF8 – Apportionment & Oversight SMF29 – Limited Scope
11 Firms should note that the CF30 – Customer Function will no longer be approved under the SM&CR and is therefore not available for
conversion mapping.
12 Non‑Executive Directors at Core and Limited Scope firms who are not the firm’s Chair will no longer be approved by the FCA.
76
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 11
Feedback received
Q2: Do you have any comments on our proposed mapping of
functions for Core and Limited Scope firms?
11.3 There was much support for the proposed mapping of APR functions to SM&CR
functions for Core and Limited Scope firms.
• that the APR CF29 – Significant Management Function should map to the SMF18 –
Other Overall Responsibility Function
• the APR CF1 – Director function should map to the SMF9 – Chair function without
requiring an additional approval for a governing function
• what firms should do if they want to map roles in a different way from the proposals
• if firms with Partners (CF4s) who don’t meet the definition of a Senior Manager
should cancel their approvals ahead of Commencement of the new regime to avoid
automatic conversion to an SMF role
• whether the SMF16 – Compliance Oversight role will assume responsibility for the
current CF10a – CASS Oversight role
Our response
13 This mapping only applies for EEA Branches. Individuals holding only CF29 at other Core firms won’t be converted to a Senior
Management Function.
77
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 11 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
There will be individuals acting as Executive Chairs within the wide range
of firms in scope of the extended SM&CR. In CP17/25, we explained that
automatic conversion of individuals to the SMF9 – Chair function is not
possible. This is because we currently approve Non‑Executive Chairs
under the CF2 – Non‑Executive Director function and Executive Chairs
are approved under another of the governing functions. As a result, we
don’t hold data on which individuals perform the Chair role.
Clarifications
The mapping table set out above shows the only direct conversions that
will be possible for Core and Limited Scope firms. If firms need to move
an individual into an unmapped role, they must submit either a Form A
(to apply for new approval), or a Form E (to transfer an existing approved
person to a new role that does map). There is information on our website
to help firms work out what they need to do in a variety of scenarios.
All Senior Managers should have a SoR, but Core and Limited Scope
firms are not required to submit these for people converted at
Commencement. This is a ‘one‑off’ exemption that only applies at
Commencement. It will enable us to automatically convert the vast
number of individuals holding controlled functions under the APR to
their relevant Senior Management Function(s). If a SoR is updated after
Commencement, the updated version will need to be submitted to us
using Form J.
78
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 11
Before they move from the APR to the SM&CR, we encourage firms
to consider whether partners currently approved under CF4 – Partner
Function meet the SMF definition. If they don’t, then firms will need to
submit a Form C to cancel that Partner’s approval.
Feedback received
Q3: Do you have any comments on our approach to
conversion for Core and Limited Scope firms?
11.6 The majority of respondents agreed with our approach to conversion for Core and
Limited Scope firms.
11.7 Many respondents requested that we provide support to firms during the conversion
process. Suggestions included:
• a facility for large firms and trade bodies to test automated systems ahead
of Commencement
• dedicated helplines
11.8 Some respondents asked us to clarify the process by which firms move or ‘opt‑up’
between the Core and Enhanced tiers.
79
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 11 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
Our response
Opting up
In Chapter 6 we explained the process for opting up, once the regime has
started, in our response to Q21. We also recognise that some firms will
want to opt‑up from the start of the SM&CR.
New and in‑flight applications for Core and Limited Scope firms
Feedback received
Q4: Do you have any comments on our approach to new and
in‑flight applications by Core and Limited Scope firms?
11.10 The majority of respondents agreed with our approach to new and in‑flight
applications by Core and Limited Scope firms.
• having a 12-month gap between publication of the final rules and Commencement
• providing an online tool to help firms work out which forms to use
11.12 A respondent asked us to clarify whether an in‑flight application using the old Form
A will be converted by:
80
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 11
Our response
Some firms will wish to apply for new individuals to take up SMFs at
the start of the new regime. We will, therefore, make the new SM&CR
forms available before Commencement so that firms can get these
individuals approved as quickly as possible. We are mindful of the need
for clarity around APR and SM&CR forms in the lead up to the start of
the new regime and have considered this in the design of the amended
Connect system.
Clarifications
In CP17/40, we proposed to convert in‑flight applications automatically
and we intend to implement this approach. This covers all applications
submitted but not processed by the start of the new regime.
The 12-week rule period starts again at the start of the new regime.
This means that if an individual is performing an APR controlled function
under the 12-week rule at Commencement, and the function converts
to an SMF, they can continue to cover this role for up to another
12-weeks without approval.
81
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 11 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
communicate the cut‑off dates to firms nearer to the time. After that
date, we can’t guarantee that applications will be processed ahead of
the start of the SM&CR.
Feedback received
Q5: Do you agree with our approach to Core and Limited
Scope applicant firms?
11.14 Respondents supported our approach to Core and Limited Scope applicant firms.
11.15 Some respondents suggested that our proposal to apply the APR until
Commencement is disproportionate. They suggested a 12-week transition period
before Commencement for Limited Scope and Core firms in which we won’t sign‑off
new appointments.
Our response
We will maintain the APR until the start of the SM&CR to avoid a creating
a gap in our rules. This also ensures that all relevant approved individuals
will be appropriately converted.
82
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 12
Our proposals
12.1 This chapter contains our response to the feedback we received on the conversion
approach we consulted on in CP17/40, including:
12.2 The final mapping of APR to SM&CR controlled functions at Enhanced firms is set
out below.
14 Firms should note that the CF30 – Customer Function will no longer be approved under the SM&CR and is therefore not available for
conversion mapping.
83
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 12 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
Feedback received
12.3 Most respondents agreed with our proposed mapping of functions for Enhanced firms.
12.4 Respondents made a number of alternative suggestions regarding how APR functions
should map to SMF roles. These included that:
15 If an Enhanced firm elects not to convert an individual performing a CF10a (CASS Oversight) function to SMF18 (Other Overall
Responsibility) function, then this individual will be expected to be certified under the Certification Regime. The CASS Prescribed
Responsibility should then be allocated to the Senior Manager to whom to the individual reports.
84
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 12
12.5 We received a number of responses on the breadth of the SMF24 – Chief Operations
function. These included the thought that there should be a separate SMF for IT and
that the responsibilities for risk in the SMF24 role are too large for one person.
12.6 It was suggested that the Enhanced definition of Executive Directors should also cover
Group Executive Directors, as long as they hold a SMF function in at least one entity
within the Group.
12.7 One respondent suggested Form K should contain a section to present a case where
a conversion could be allowed against unmapped functions.
• why the CF10 – Compliance Oversight function maps to the SMF24 – Chief
Operations function
Our response
There will be individuals acting as Executive Chairs within the wide range
of firms in scope of the extended SM&CR. A person currently performing
the Chair role as an Executive Chair under a governing function will
need to apply for the SMF9 function using a short Form A, in addition
to their existing function being converted. This application should
be accompanied by a SoR for the individual. Their current governing
function should be included on the firm’s Form K.
85
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 12 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
Clarifications
The SM&CR applies on a legal entity basis. This means that we can’t
apply elements of the regime at group level. If a regulated firm has an
unregulated subsidiary, then the subsidiary won’t be subject to the
SM&CR. Whether staff at the subsidiary are subject to the SM&CR will
depend on their relationship with the parent entity. It will also depend
on whether they meet the test in FSMA 63E(9) to be considered an
‘employee’ of the parent (discussed earlier, in Chapter 5). The application
of the Conduct Rules to ‘employees’ of the parent depends on whether
their role involves financial services activities.
Feedback received
Q7: Do you have any comments on our approach to
conversion for Enhanced firms?
86
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 12
12.9 The majority of respondents agreed with the proposed approach to conversion for
Enhanced firms.
12.10 Several respondents asked us to make the forms available as soon as possible and
allow sufficient time ahead of Commencement for completion.
12.11 We were asked for clarification on whether regulatory references for the
previous 6 years need to be obtained for existing Senior Managers and Certified Staff
from Commencement
Our response
Clarifications
Firms don’t need to get regulatory references for existing
employees, including any Senior Managers and Certified Staff,
at Commencement.
Feedback received
Q8: Do you agree with our approach to new and in-flight
applications by Enhanced firms?
12.12 The majority of respondents agreed with our proposals for new and in‑flight
applications by Enhanced firms.
12.13 There were concerns that our requirement to list all relevant applications on Form
K could delay when firms are able to submit it. This could be an issue for firms with
high staff turnover or restructuring where they might not submit the form until
the deadline.
12.14 A respondent asked us to clarify whether the ‘12-week rule’ applies in the case of
in‑flight applications.
Our response
Form K
In designing our approach to Form K submissions we took into account
lessons learned from the implementation of the banking regime. To give
firms as much time as possible to complete their Form K, we have set a
deadline of one week before the start of the new regime to submit this
form. This may mean that some firms leave it until quite late and we have
factored this into our planning.
87
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 12 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
12-week rule
If an individual performing a role under the 12-week rule before
Commencement is still performing that role at the start of the new
regime, the 12-week period resets. This means that the individual can
use the rule for a role that would otherwise be a Senior Management
Function for another 12 weeks. If they are in that role for longer
than 12 weeks they will need to be approved by the FCA.
88
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 13
13 Forms
Our proposals
13.1 This chapter contains our response to the feedback we received on the changes to
forms we consulted on in CP17/40.
13.2 The main changes being made to our regulatory forms are set out below. To reduce
the different number of forms, we have combined overlapping versions and brought
APR applications for Appointed Representatives into these new SM&CR versions.
Form E – Internal transfer of a person All An application for an individual to change the
performing a controlled function for approved function being performed.
solo‑regulated firms
Form I – Application for the All An application for changes to the conditions
Variation of a Conditional Approval associated with a conditional approval to
for the performance of a Senior perform a Senior Management Function.
Management Function
Form J – Notification of Significant All A notification submitted to inform the FCA
Changes in Responsibilities of a Senior of significant changes to a Senior Manager’s
Management Function Manager Statement of Responsibilities.
89
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 13 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
13.3 There are also some changes that we and the PRA are making to the Fitness and
Propriety questions repeated in several solo and dual‑regulated forms. The table below
summarises these.
90
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 13
Changes to forms
Feedback received
Q10: Do you have any comments on our proposed changes
to forms?
13.6 Respondents commented on our proposed SoRs form. Some asked whether Core
and Limited Scope firms needed to maintain these. We were also asked to make an
editable document available for Core and Limited Scope firms. This would make it
easier for them to create and update the SoRs of their Senior Managers.
13.7 Two respondents asked us to restructure the form to make it specific to particular
sectors. Another asked us to provide a template and guidance notes for SoRs.
13.8 We were given feedback on user experience with Connect. These included the ability
to print one document rather than printing in sections and changes to the permissions
of users.
13.9 We received some ideas on ways to improve the forms. Suggestions included:
• updating the forms to refer to the GDPR and Data Protection Act 2018 rather than
the Data Protection Act 1998
• addressing the difference between the Long Form A which asks for a 5 year
employment history and the regulatory references requirements in our Handbook,
which ask for a 6 year employment history
Clarifications
13.10 Respondents asked us to clarify:
91
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 13 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
Our response
ARs should therefore use the same forms as firms that are subject to the
SM&CR. There are some sections of forms that are specific to ARs and
these are clearly signposted. We think that incorporating these sections
into the new forms is a better solution than having a separate form
specifically for ARs.
To make it clear that ARs must adhere to the APR, we have amended the
declarations on forms to refer explicitly to the Statements of Principle
and Code of Practice for Approved Persons (APER). We confirm that
Question 5.05.2 is not relevant for ARs.
Form A
We acknowledge that our requirements regarding employment
history are not identical between Form A and the regulatory reference
requirements. When firms apply for Senior Managers to be authorised,
we ask for information on their employment history for the last 5 years.
92
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 13
Specific detail on the use of forms is set out in our Handbook in SUP 10C
Annex 2G.
Statements of Responsibilities
Core and Limited Scope firms don’t have to submit their Senior
Managers’ SoRs. They do have to create and maintain them for each
individual Senior Manager at the firm from Commencement of the
SM&CR. Firms told us that it would be easier to do this if we created a
template for them to download and edit. We will consider the best way to
help firms understand the requirements and will provide extra material
in due course. We don’t think that it is practical to restructure the SoRs
form to make it specific to particular sectors. Firms have different
business models and structures and need the flexibility to represent
these properly.
The reference to the Data Protection Act has been updated in separate
Handbook amendments, to reflect the recent legislative changes.
We have also made consequential changes to bring the declarations
sections of our forms into line with the GDPR.
Clarifications
Firms should use our Connect system to submit forms. In the event
that FCA systems are unavailable for a prolonged period there may
be circumstances in which firms can submit using paper versions of
the forms.
Forms will be available three months before the start of the regime.
93
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 13 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
Feedback received
Q11: Do you have any feedback on our proposed amendments
to the Fitness & Propriety questions?
13.12 Several respondents asked us to confirm that the rules on criminal records checks
comply with current privacy law. Others had specific queries about the Disclosure
and Barring Service (DBS), for example to confirm that firms will have the authority to
register with the DBS. Another suggested that individuals should be able to access the
DBS checking service and obtain certificates to submit to employers.
13.13 Some respondents queried the proposed 10 year time period for civil procedures
disclosures. A few suggested a 5 year period was more appropriate and consistent with
wider practice. A respondent noted candidates might not be able to answer questions
about court judgements involving large firms at which they were an employee.
13.15 We were asked to confirm that declarations by candidates are sufficient evidence for
firms to meet the employment requirements.
13.16 One respondent was concerned about how professional bodies which issue
Statements of Professional Standing might engage in the SM&CR process, as they
believe that it is difficult for trade bodies to discipline members.
13.17 We were also asked whether we will make any changes to the questions in Form
A to reflect the Ministry of Justice consultation on aspects of Default County Court
Judgements (CCJs).
Our response
Firms will need to decide how they should obtain the criminal records
checks they need. This may be through an umbrella organisation or by
registering directly with the DB organisation. Our rules require the firm to
obtain a criminal records check, rather than the candidate. A candidate’s
declaration in relation to criminal records checks would not be sufficient.
The new form introduces a time limit to some of the questions about
civil proceedings. Previously, there was no time limit on this question.
94
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 13
Professional bodies
Professional bodies and trade bodies have an important role to play in
strengthening professionalism amongst their membership.
Feedback received
Q12: Do you have any comments on our proposal to extend the
use of REP008 to all SM&CR firms?
16 www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/glossary/?filter‑title=ACCREDITED+BODIES
17 www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/TC/App/6/1.html
95
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 13 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
13.18 The majority of respondents supported our proposed extension of REP008 to all
SM&CR firms. Respondents generally supported our proposal to require a nil return
and extend the late returns fee for late or non‑submission.
13.19 Some suggested that REP008 and the nil returns requirement should not apply to
different types of Limited Scope firms.
13.20 One suggested that for groups where employees have roles at multiple subsidiaries,
it would be difficult to identify which legal entity should submit the report. In these
cases a group return would be more suitable.
13.21 Several respondents requested we send reminders to firms ahead of the REP008 due
submission date. Another respondent asked us to allow firms to set a timetable that
aligns with other relevant regulatory reporting dates.
13.22 There were some questions about our proposal on nil returns. They included:
13.23 We were also asked for more guidance on the reporting of Conduct Rule breaches.
Our response
Group submissions
The SM&CR applies on a legal entity basis and our Conduct Rule
reporting requirements are consistent with this. If an individual works
across more than one entity within a group, breaches should be
reported under the firm in which the individual meets the definition of an
employee, and was undertaking the activity related to the breach.
96
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 13
As with all of our regulatory reporting, firms will receive 3 email reminders
from our GABRIEL reporting system ahead of the REP008 due date.
REP008 will apply to sole traders because the Conduct Rules will apply
to employees of a sole trader, where they have staff. We won’t be
able to distinguish between sole traders with employees, and those
without. The circumstances of these firms may change over time.
Where a sole trader has no employees, it will be quick and simple for
them to submit a nil return using GABRIEL.
97
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 14 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
14 Consequentials
Our proposals
14.1 This chapter contains our response to the feedback we received on the consequential
amendments proposed in CP17/40.
• a series of consequential amendments to reflect the retention of the APR for ARs
Consequential amendments
Feedback received
Q14: Do you have any comments on our proposed
consequential amendments?
14.4 Some respondents suggested subjecting firms to both the APR and SM&CR might
confuse and burden firms. One person asked us to explain why we plan to retain the
APR for ARs. Some others asked us to clarify how principal firms subject to the SM&CR
should oversee ARs subject to the APR.
14.5 There were requests to re‑structure our Handbook into different sections covering
each type of firm or business eg asset managers, intermediaries, credit firms.
Another person asked us to establish separate rulebooks for Limited Scope, Core and
Enhanced firms. One other suggested that an SMF’s SoR form should only reference
the list in SYSC 25 Annex 1 if the activities are relevant to their industry sector.
We were also asked to confirm that references to ‘shared services’ relate to banks and
not asset managers.
98
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 14
14.6 One respondent expressed concern that we had classified the proposed changes
to the remit of SMF24 – Chief Operations function as ‘consequential amendments’.
Two further respondents were concerned that the categorisation of SMF24 is not
appropriate for all firms. Another asked us to confirm that only one individual holds the
SMF24 function.
Our response
Structure of Handbook
We recognise that there are different sections in our Handbook that
firms need to navigate to understand the SM&CR. However, most
elements of the SM&CR are applicable to all firms. For example, the
Certification Regime, the Conduct Rules and Fit & Proper requirements
are the same for almost every firm. This means that creating
sourcebooks for each tier of the regime would lead to a lot of duplication
in our Handbook. SYSC 23 summarises the whole of the SM&CR
and explains where the relevant Handbook material can be found for
each element.
The main differences are in how the Senior Managers Regime applies
to firms. In particular, the SMFs and PRs that apply, and the rules around
Overall Responsibility, Responsibilities Maps and handover procedures.
We have tried to mark these clearly in the Handbook, for example using
tables showing how the requirements apply to different firms. We also
flagged in our Mission that we would review our Handbook after the work
on the outcome on EU withdrawal is clear. Until then, we don’t intend to
do further work on changing the structure of our Handbook.
SYSC 25 Annex 1
We confirm that there is no requirement for firms to refer to the activities
and business areas in SYSC 25 Annex 1. This is made clear in SYSC 25.7.2
and in 8.27 of CP17/25 – ‘Firms may find it useful to refer to Annex 1
of SYSC 25 as a starting prompt to think about their own business is
organised, but this is not mandatory or exhaustive’. There is similar
guidance on Form A that makes it clear that this Annex is not mandatory
or exhaustive.
99
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 14 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
100
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chapter 15
Our proposals
15.1 This chapter contains our response to the feedback we received on our proposed
changes affecting banking firms.
Feedback received
Q15: Do you agree with our proposal to implement the new
Conduct Rules Prescribed Responsibility for firms subject
to the Banking Regime ahead of the Commencement of
the extended SM&CR?
15.2 The majority of respondents agreed with the timing approach for implementing the
new Conduct Rules PR.
• Commencement for banks should be the same as for the wider regime, with banks
implementing the change ahead of time on a voluntary basis
Our response
Banking firms are already required to train staff on the Conduct Rules. We
think that allocation of the new PR is an incremental change for these
firms. We will implement the new PR on 1 November 2018 and intend to
make the relevant updated forms available for submission from the first
half of September. Firms must submit the relevant documentation by
1 November.
101
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Chapter 15 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
Feedback received
Q16: Do you have any comments on our proposal to apply the
late returns fee to late or non‑submitters of REP008?
Our response
102
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Annex 1
Annex 1
List of non‑confidential respondents
We have included respondents who only provided feedback on the Register but this
feedback will be fed into a separate consultation in due course.
CP17/25
Ablestoke Wealth Management
Aegon UK
Age Partnership
Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) & Managed Funds
Association (MFA)
AJ Bell
Alan Duff
Alan Kendrick
Alastair Lyon
Alex De Silva & Co
Alva Capital
Amati Global Investors
Anders Bayley Scott
Anderson Strathern
Andrew Formica
Ashlea Financial Planning
Ashwood Tax & Law
Aspley Compliance
Association of British Credit Unions (ABCUL)
Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) & UK Finance
Association of Foreign Banks (AFB)
Association of Investment Companies (AIC)
Association of Mortgage Intermediaries (AMI)
Association of Member‑Directed Pension Schemes (AMPS)
Association of Professional Compliance Consultants (APCC)
Association of Short Term Lenders (ASTL)
AXA UK
Banking Standards Board (BSB)
British Insurance Brokers Association (BIBA)
BNY Mellon
Board Strategy
Bovill
BPH Wealth Management
British Retail Consortium (BRC)
Brenda Santimano
Brewin Dolphin
103
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Annex 1 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
104
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Annex 1
Hargreaves Lansdown
Hartley Wadsworth and Partners
Hartsfield Financial Services
Henson Crisp
HomeServe Membership
HSBC
Ian Line
Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales (ICAEW)
ICE Futures Europe
IDS Financial Services
IFS Wealth & Pensions
Independent Wealth Management Consultants
Invesco Perpetual
Investment Association (IA)
Investor in Customers
Irish League of Credit Unions (ILCU)
Janus Henderson Investors
JM Finn & Co
Just Financial Group
Kevin A Render
Kevin Titmus
Killik & Co
Kingsley Napley
KR Group
Lark Group & Aston Scott
Latham & Watkins
LEBC Group
LGT Vestra
Little Venice Partners
Liverpool John Moores University
Loans 2 Go
London and International Insurance Brokers' Association (LIIBA)
Margaret Abrahams
Mark Henderson
Matrix Solutions
Matthew Lambe
McInroy & Wood
Medics Financial Services
Medius Consulting
Mortgage Wyse
Mr R.J. Martin
My Jar
N M Rothschild & Sons
National Franchised Dealers Association (NFDA)
National Pawnbrokers Association (NPA)
Neil Rowland
Nick Muir
Otus
Paul Wallis Financial Solutions
Peter Dart
Phillips 66
PI Financial
Personal Investment Management and Financial Advice Association (PIMFA)
105
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Annex 1 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
106
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Annex 1
USSIM
Virgin Money
Vouched For
Wealth Harbour Services
Wescot Credit Services
Whitechurch Securities
Willis Towers Watson
Worksmart
Zedra Trust Company (UK)
Zurich
CP17/40
Association of Professional Compliance Consultants (APCC)
Aviva
Connells
Create Solutions
European Venues & Intermediaries Association (EVIA)
The Investment Association (IA)
Money Advice Trust
RKH Specialty Limited
Rosediem
107
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Annex 2 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
Annex 2
Abbreviations in this document
108
Financial Conduct Authority PS18/14
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Annex 2
Disclaimer
We have developed the policy in this Consultation Paper in the context of the existing UK and EU
regulatory framework. The Government has made clear that it will continue to implement and apply
EU law until the UK has left the EU. We will keep the proposals under review to assess whether any
amendments may be required in the event of changes in the UK regulatory framework in the future.
We make all responses to formal consultation available for public inspection unless the respondent
requests otherwise. We will not regard a standard confidentiality statement in an email message as a
request for non‑disclosure.
Despite this, we may be asked to disclose a confidential response under the Freedom of Information
Act 2000. We may consult you if we receive such a request. Any decision we make not to disclose the
response is reviewable by the Information Commissioner and the Information Rights Tribunal.
You can download this Consultation Paper from our website: www.fca.org.uk.
All our publications are available to download from www.fca.org.uk. If you would like to receive this
paper in an alternative format, please call 020 706 0790 or email: [email protected] or
write to: Editorial and Digital team, Financial Conduct Authority, 12 Endeavour Square, London E20 1JN
109
PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Appendix 1 Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
Appendix 1
Near-Final Rules
110
FCA 2018/XX
Powers exercised
A. The Financial Conduct Authority makes this instrument in the exercise of the
following powers and related provisions in the Financial Services and Markets Act
2000 (“the Act”):
B. The rule-making powers listed above are specified for the purpose of section 138G(2)
(Rule-making instruments) of the Act.
Commencement
C. This instrument comes into force on [ ] 20[ ] [main commencement date for solo-
regulated firms] except as follows :
E. The modules of the FCA’s Handbook of rules and guidance listed in column (1)
below are amended in accordance with the Annexes to this instrument listed in
column (2) below:
(1) (2)
Glossary of definitions Annex A
Senior Management Arrangements, Systems and Controls Annex B
sourcebook (SYSC)
Code of Conduct (COCON) Annex C
Threshold Conditions (COND) Annex D
Statements of Principle and Code of Practice for Approved Persons Annex E
(APER)
Fit and Proper test for Employees and Senior Personnel (FIT) Annex F
Prudential sourcebook for Investment Firms (IFPRU) Annex G
Conduct of Business Sourcebook (COBS) Annex H
Client Assets (CASS) Annex I
Supervision manual (SUP) Annex J
Dispute Resolution: Complaints (DISP) Annex K
Credit Unions sourcebook (CREDS) Annex L
F. In each case in which one of the Annexes listed in column (2) of the table in
paragraph E of this instrument says that the module of the FCA’s Handbook of rules
and guidance to which that Annex relates is amended by inserting a new form into
that module as set out in Annex Q of this instrument, that module is amended
accordingly.
G. The material outside the Handbook listed in column (1) below is amended in
accordance with the Annexes to this instrument listed in column (2) below:
Page 2 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
(1) (2)
The Energy Market Participants guide (EMPS) Annex M
The Oil Market Participants guide (OMPS) Annex N
Service companies guide (SERV) Annex O
General guidance on Benchmark Administration, Contribution and Annex P
Use (BENCH)
H. The amendments made by this instrument are to the Handbook and the material listed
in paragraph G of this instrument as amended by the Individual Accountability (Dual-
Regulated Firms) Instrument 2018.
Citation
I. This instrument may be cited as the Individual Accountability (FCA-Authorised
Firms) Instrument 2018.
Page 3 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
Annex A
In this Annex, underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text,
unless otherwise stated.
Part 1: Comes into force [ ] 20[ ] [main commencement date for solo-regulated firms]
Insert the following new definitions in the appropriate alphabetical position. The text is not
underlined.
APER employer (in APER and in relation to an approved person whose approval is
given under SUP 10A (FCA Approved Persons in Appointed
Representatives):
chair of the audit FCA controlled function SMF11 in the table of FCA-designated
committee function senior management functions, described more fully in SUP
10C.5A.9R.
chair of the governing FCA controlled function SMF9 in the table of FCA-designated
body function senior management functions, described more fully in SUP
10C.5A.7R.
chair of the risk FCA controlled function SMF10 in the table of FCA-designated
committee function senior management functions, described more fully in SUP
10C.5A.8R.
chief finance officer FCA controlled function SMF2 in the table of FCA-designated
function senior management functions, described more fully in SUP
10C.6A.3R.
Page 4 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
chief risk officer FCA controlled function SMF4 in the table of FCA-designated
function senior management functions, described more fully in SUP
10C.6A.4R.
core SMCR firm a firm identified as a core SMCR firm in the decision tree in SYSC
23 Annex 1 (Definition of SMCR firm and different types of SMCR
firms).
EEA core SMCR firm a core SMCR firm that is an incoming EEA firm or incoming Treaty
firm.
enhanced scope SMCR a firm identified as an enhanced scope SMCR firm in the decision
firm tree in SYSC 23 Annex 1 (Definition of SMCR firm and different
types of SMCR firms).
group entity senior FCA controlled function SMF7 in the table of FCA-designated
manager function senior management functions, described more fully in SUP
10C.5B.1R.
head of internal audit FCA controlled function SMF5 in the table of FCA-designated
function senior management functions, described more fully in SUP
10C.6A.6R.
head of third country FCA controlled function SMF19 in the table of FCA-designated
branch function senior management functions, described more fully in SUP
10C.5.24R.
limited scope function FCA controlled function SMF29 in the table of FCA-designated
senior management functions, described more fully in SUP
10C.6.5R.
limited scope SMCR a firm identified as a limited scope SMCR firm in the decision tree
firm in SYSC 23 Annex 1 (Definition of SMCR firm and different types
of SMCR firms).
non-SMF board (in relation to an SMCR firm) a board director of the firm who
director subject to meets the following conditions:
competence
requirements
Page 5 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
accountable functions (in relation to an approved person) the functions described in APER
1.1A.2R, which are in summary:
certification employee …
(2) …
Page 6 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
chief executive (1) (for an SMCR firm) FCA controlled function SMF1 in the
function table of FCA-designated senior management functions,
described more fully in SUP 10C.5.21R;
compliance oversight (1) (for SMCR firms) FCA controlled function SMF16 in the
function table of FCA-designated senior management functions,
described more fully in SUP 10C.6.1R; and .
(2) (for other firms) FCA controlled function CF10 in the table
of FCA controlled functions, described more fully in SUP
10A.7.8R.
Page 7 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
director (1) …
employee …
Page 8 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
FCA controlled a controlled function which is specified by the FCA under section
function 59 of the Act (Approval for particular arrangements) in:
FCA required any of the FCA controlled functions labelled as FCA required
functions functions in :
money laundering (1) (for SMCR firms) FCA controlled function SMF17 in the
reporting function table of FCA-designated senior management functions,
described more fully in SUP 10C.6.2R; and .
partner function (1) (for an SMCR firm) FCA controlled function SMF27 in the
table of FCA-designated senior management functions,
described more fully in SUP 10C.5.14R to SUP 10C.5.17R
SUP 10C.5.19R;
Page 9 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
staff being assessed (in FIT and in relation to an SMCR firm) those persons set out in
under FIT FIT 1.1.1G(4) to (7) (8).
Page 10 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
Delete the following definitions. The text is not shown struck through.
apportionment and FCA controlled function CF8 in the table of FCA controlled
oversight function functions, described more fully in SUP 10A.7.1R.
CASS operational FCA controlled function CF10a in the table of FCA controlled
oversight function functions, described more fully in SUP 10A.7.9R.
small friendly society FCA controlled function CF6 in the table of FCA controlled
function functions, described more fully in SUP 10A.6.31R to SUP
10A.6.32R.
systems and controls FCA controlled function CF28 in the table of FCA controlled
function functions, described more fully in SUP 10A.8.1R and SUP
10A.8.1AR.
Part 2: Comes into force [ ] 20[ ] [one year after main commencement date for solo-
regulated firms]
certification employee …
Page 11 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
Annex B
In this Annex, underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text,
unless otherwise stated.
Part 1: Comes into force [ ] 20[ ] [about three months before main commencement date for
solo-regulated firms]
7.1.3 G SYSC TP 7:
Page 12 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
7.1.4 G (1) The main time period for which SYSC TP 7 operates is 2018 to 2019
20[ ] [year after the main commencement date for solo-regulated
firms].
Note (1): Column (2) (Insurers) applies to a firm in the insurance sector (to the
extent that SYSC TP 7 applies to such firms).
Note (2): Column (3) (Others) applies to a core SMCR firm, an enhanced scope
SMCR firm and a limited scope SMCR firm.
Page 13 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
7.4.2 R SYSC 22.2.1R (Obligation to obtain a regulatory reference) does not apply to
an application for approval as an approved person that:
7.6.2 G …
7.7.1 R If a firm is treated as a core SMCR firm, an enhanced scope SMCR firm or a
limited scope SMCR firm before the general commencement date for the
purposes of SUP TP 12 (Bank of England and Financial Services Act 2016:
Approved persons in solo-regulated firms) it retains that status after the
general commencement date unless and until it changes under SYSC 23
Annex 1 (Definition of SMCR firm and different types of SMCR firms).
7.7.2 G For example if before the general commencement date a firm has opted up
to be an enhanced scope SMCR firm it remains an enhanced scope SMCR
firm after the general commencement date. It may then elect to cease being
an enhanced scope SMCR firm using a Form O under the procedure in SYSC
23 Annex 1 unless it also meets one of the other qualifications for being an
enhanced scope SMCR firm.
7.7.3 G (1) SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.15R deals with cases in which the period in
relation to which the financial calculations are made to test whether a
firm meets one of the financial qualification conditions for being an
enhanced scope SMCR firm is adjusted because the relevant
reporting requirements did not apply for the whole period. SYSC 23
Annex 1 7.16G gives examples of why this may happen.
(2) Another reason why SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.15R may apply is that the
relevant reporting requirements have not existed for the whole of the
period. A particular example of this is consumer credit reporting
requirements. At the time the financial qualification conditions for
being an enhanced scope SMCR firm first came into force in 20[ ]
[the year in which the main commencement date for solo-regulated
firms falls], the relevant reporting requirements had not existed for a
full three years.
Page 14 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
Part 2: Comes into force [ ] 20[ ] [main commencement date for solo-regulated firms]
1.1A Application
1.1A.1A G The application of this sourcebook to specific firms that are not PRA-
authorised persons is summarised at a high level in the following table. The
detailed application is cut back in SYSC 1 Annex 1 and in the text of each
chapter.
Full-scope UK Chapters 4 to 10, 12, 18, 19B, 19F.2, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
AIFM 27, 28
BIPRU firm Chapters 4 to 10, 12, 18, 19C, 19F.2, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25,
(including a 26, 27, 28
third-country
BIPRU firm)
IFPRU Chapters 4 to 10, 12, 18, 19A, 19F.2, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25,
investment 26, 27, 28
firm (including
an overseas
firm that would
have been an
IFPRU
investment
firm if it had
been a UK
domestic firm)
Page 15 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
(1) SYSC 4.3 and 4.4 do does not apply as long as he does they do not
employ any person who is required to be approved under section 59
of the Act (Approval for particular arrangements);
(2) …
… … … … …
Page 16 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
Page 17 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
As specified in SYSC
4.4.1AR.
… … … … …
Application
(-1) The application of this section is further limited by the rest of this
rule.
Page 18 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
(3) a credit firm which holds only a limited permission (other than a not-
for-profit debt advice body) with respect to the relevant credit
activity (as defined in paragraph 2G of Schedule 6 to the Act) for
which it has limited permission; [deleted]
(5) This section only applies to a sole trader, but only if they:
Question Answer
Page 19 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
… … …
… … …
… … …
Page 20 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
… … …
6.2.2 G …
(2) For a firm that is not an SMCR firm, the internal audit function is not
a controlled function itself, but is part of the systems and controls
function (CF28). [deleted]
Page 21 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
(3) For an SMCR firm that is a PRA-authorised person, the internal audit
function is a PRA controlled function (SMF5). For an enhanced
scope SMCR firm it is an FCA controlled function (SMF5).
7 Risk control
7.1.8 G …
(3) For a firm that is not an SMCR firm, the risk management function is
not a controlled function itself, but is part of the systems and
controls function (CF28). [deleted]
(4) For an SMCR firm that is a PRA authorised person, the risk
management function is a PRA controlled function (SMF4). For an
enhanced scope SMCR firm it is an FCA controlled function.
21.1.2 G …
(2) Firms will need to seek the appropriate regulator's FCA’s or PRA’s
(as appropriate) approval for a Chief Risk Officer to perform:
(b) (for any other firm an enhanced scope SMCR firm) the
systems and controls function (see SUP 10A (FCA approved
persons)) chief risk officer function.
22 Regulatory references
22.1 Application
General application
Page 22 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
22.1.1 R This chapter applies to all SMCR firms (subject to SYSC 22.1.5R).
22.1.1A G (1) Despite SYSC 22.1.1R, this chapter distinguishes between SMCR
firms and other firms to which this chapter applies. The reason for
this is SYSC 22.8.4R, which imposes some requirements on SMCR
firms in relation to appointed representatives but fewer than it
applies to SMCR firms themselves.
(1) an overseas firm that does not have an establishment in the United
Kingdom; or
Page 23 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
(C) … … …
22.2.7 R …
Sole traders
22.2.9 G An example of SYSC 22.2.8R is this. Say that P works at a firm (B) and
leaves to become a firm and a sole trader. P appoints themselves to perform
the compliance oversight function. P does not need to get a regulatory
reference from B about themselves.
22.2.10 G (1) If a firm is appointing someone who was a sole trader to a position
that would normally require a regulatory reference under SYSC
22.2.1R, it does not have to request a reference from the sole trader
themselves. That is because SYSC 22.2.1R only requires a firm to
request a reference from a previous employer and a sole trader is not
their own employer.
(2) An example of (1) is this. Say that P was a firm and a sole trader and
performed the compliance oversight function themselves. P goes to
work for another firm (A). A does not need to request a regulatory
reference from P about P.
22.5 Giving references: additional rules and guidance for all firms
Page 24 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
22.5.19 G A firm giving a reference need not include information from a criminal
records check it has carried out under Part V of the Police Act 1997
(Certificates of Criminal Records, &c). The recruiting firm should carry out
a criminal records check itself if necessary. The main FCA Handbook
requirements on a recruiting firm to carry out a criminal records check are:
(1) SUP 10C.10.16R requires (an SMCR firm to should carry out such a
check when appointing an SMF manager); and
Appointed representatives
22 Annex Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure
1R requirements
Page 25 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
[Editor’s note: The underlining in the heading of each question in the remaining portion of Part
One of SYSC 22 Annex 1R is in the existing Handbook text and does not indicate new text.]
Question B:
Has the individual performed one or more of the following roles in relation to our firm:
(1) notified non-executive director;
(2) credit union non-executive director; or
(3) key function holder (other than a controlled function); or
(4) board director.
…
22 Annex Factors to take into account when asking for and giving regulatory
2 references
Page 26 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
23.1 Purpose
(1) explain what the senior managers and certification regime is and
where to find the main Handbook provisions;
(4) require certain firms to carry out criminal record checks before
appointing certain board directors.
23.2.1 R …
23.2.2 G Broadly speaking, firms covered by the senior managers and certification
regime that are dual-regulated by the FCA and the PRA are divided into two
categories:
(1) Banks and deposit-takers. They are called SMCR banking firms.
(2) Insurers.
23.2.3 G Broadly speaking, firms covered by the senior managers and certification
regime that are regulated by the FCA are divided into three categories:
(1) Firms regulated by the FCA that do not fall into (2) or (3). They are
called core SMCR firms. A large number of firms will be in this
category.
(2) Certain large firms. These are called enhanced scope SMCR firms.
Relatively few firms fall into this category.
(3) Firms whose business is limited to certain types. These are called
limited scope SMCR firms. A large number of firms will be in this
category. The main examples are:
Page 27 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
23.3.2 G The table in SYSC 23.3.3G gives more details about each of those three
elements. The first two columns of the table apply to all firms. The third
column only covers firms that are not regulated by the PRA.
Page 28 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
Page 29 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
The senior managers regime: Parts that only apply to a limited range of
firms
Page 30 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
A firm should ensure that a person SYSC 25.9 Does not apply to
becoming an SMF manager has all (Handover a limited scope
the information and material that procedures and SMCR firm or a
they could reasonably expect to have material) core SMCR firm.
to perform their responsibilities Applies to an
enhanced scope
SMCR firm.
Page 31 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
regime and
explains which
employees are
covered.
23.3.4 G …
Page 32 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
23.4.2 R A firm must (as part of its assessment of the fitness and propriety of any of
its non-SMF board directors subject to competence requirements (P)) obtain
the fullest information that it is lawfully able to obtain about P under Part V
of the Police Act 1997 (Certificates of Criminal Records, &c) and related
subordinated legislation of the UK or any part of the UK before P’s
appointment as a board director.
23.4.3 G The guidance in SUP 10C.10.17G, SUP 10C.10.18G and SUP 10C.10.21G
about criminal record checks for candidates to be an SMF manager applies
to criminal record checks under this section.
1.1 R …
Delete the flow diagram in SYSC 23 Annex 1 1.2R and replace it with the following. The
deleted text is not shown.
Yes
Are you an exempt firm (see You are not an SMCR firm
Part 2 of this Annex)? Yes
No
Page 33 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
No
No
No
Have you
elected to be
an enhanced Yes You are an SMCR firm and an
scope SMCR enhanced scope SMCR firm
firm?
Page 34 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
No
No
No
Note: The categorisation in this flow diagram is subject to SYSC 23 Annex 1 2.1R. This note forms part of the
flow diagram.
…
2.1 R If a firm is subject to a requirement that it must comply with the rules in
the FCA Handbook applicable to one of the categories of SMCR firm set
Page 35 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
2.2 G (1) The FCA may, on a case-by-case basis, require a limited scope
SMCR firm or a core SMCR firm to comply with the requirements
that apply to an enhanced scope SMCR firm if the FCA considers it
appropriate to do so to advance one or more of its operational
objectives under the Act.
(3) One effect of SYSC 23 Annex 1 2.1R is that if a firm is moved from
the limited scope SMCR firm or core SMCR firm category to the
enhanced scope SMCR firm category, the FCA-designated senior
management functions that will apply to it are the ones for
enhanced scope SMCR firms.
2.4 G (1) Where a firm becomes or stops being an enhanced scope SMCR
firm under the procedure described in SYSC 23 Annex 1 2.1R, the
material in Parts 9 and 10 of this Annex about when the change of
status becomes effective will not apply. Instead the timing will be
dealt with in the variation of permission.
(2) If the variation does not specify the timing of the change, the
change is likely to take effect when the variation does.
Page 36 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
(2) The notification takes effect in accordance with the applicable Part
of this Annex. The notice may not specify when it is to take effect.
(4) A firm must use the version of the form made available for this
purpose on the electronic system referred to in SUP 10C.15.11R,
which is based on the version found in SYSC 23 Annex 2R (Form
O).
(6) A firm may, by notice to the FCA, withdraw a notice in (1) at any
time before the firm becomes or, as the case may be, ceases to be,
an enhanced scope SMCR firm or, as the case may be, a core SMCR
firm.
2.6 R (1) The following may also give a notice described in SYSC 23 Annex
1 2.5R(1)(a) or SYSC 23 Annex 1 2.5R(1)(c):
(2) This Annex restricts who can elect to opt up to a higher category of
SMCR firm. In a case covered by this paragraph, this restriction
Page 37 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
(3) (2) also applies to the requirements about how to notify the FCA.
2.10 G (1) A firm may elect to opt up to a higher category of SMCR firm (see
SYSC 23 Annex 1 2.5R(1)(a) and (c)) and then later meet one of the
other qualification conditions for that higher category.
2.11 G Table: Examples involving a firm that opts up a category (this table
belongs to SYSC 23 Annex 1 2.10G)
(1) A firm elects to opt up to a higher The firm remains in the higher
category. It later meets one of the category because its election remains
other qualification conditions for that in force.
higher category. It ceases to meet that
second qualification condition some
time later.
(2) A firm elects to opt up to a higher The firm remains within that higher
category. It later meets one of the category despite cancelling its
other qualification conditions for that election because it still meets that
higher category. It later cancels its second qualification condition.
election.
(3) A firm elects to opt up to a higher The firm remains within that higher
category. It later cancels its election. category despite the cancellation
During the one year period in Part notice.
Five or Part Ten of this Annex
following its cancellation notice it
meets one of the other qualification
conditions for that higher category.
Page 38 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
3.3 R …
3.4 R A UCITS qualifier is an exempt firm (see section 266 of the Act
(Disapplication of rules)).
Insert the following new Parts in SYSC 23 Annex 1 where indicated. The text is not
underlined.
4.2 R …
5.1 R (1) This Part sets out the requirements for being a limited scope SMCR
firm referred to in the flow diagram in Part One of this Annex.
(2) Where this Part says that a firm is a limited scope SMCR firm, that
means that the firm meets those requirements.
(3) This Part also sets out a procedure for a firm that would otherwise
have been a limited scope SMCR firm to elect to be a core SMCR
firm and to reverse that election.
5.2 G A firm that would otherwise have been a limited scope SMCR firm may
elect to be an enhanced scope SMCR firm and may reverse that election.
Parts Eight and Ten of this Annex deal with this.
5.3 R A firm listed in the table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 5.4R is a limited scope
SMCR firm if:
Page 39 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
5.4 R Table: List of limited scope SMCR firms referred to in SYSC 23 Annex 1
5.3R
(b) it either:
5.5 G It will be a matter of fact in each case whether, having regard to all the
circumstances, including in particular where the balance of the business
lies, a firm’s principal purpose is to carry on activities other than
regulated activities. If a firm wishes to rely on SYSC 23 Annex 1 5.3R, it
should be in a position to demonstrate that its principal purpose is to carry
on activities other than regulated activities.
Page 40 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
5.9 R An authorised professional firm whose only regulated activities are non-
mainstream regulated activities is a limited scope SMCR firm.
5.10 R A firm is a limited scope SMCR firm if it meets the following conditions:
5.11 R (1) A limited scope SMCR firm may notify the FCA in accordance with
this Part that it intends to become a core SMCR firm.
(2) A firm that gives notice under (1) must comply with the
requirements for core SMCR firms (and becomes a core SMCR
firm) from three months after the FCA receives the notice in (1).
5.12 R (1) This rule deals with a firm that has elected to become a core SMCR
firm under SYSC 23 Annex 1 5.11R.
(2) The firm may notify the FCA that it intends to cancel its election to
be a core SMCR firm under SYSC 23 Annex 1 5.11R.
(3) The notification takes effect one year after the FCA receives the
notice.
6.1 R This Part sets out which firms are excluded from the enhanced regime for
the purposes of the flow diagram in Part One of this Annex.
6.3 R A firm is excluded from the enhanced regime if its permission only covers
being the full-scope UK AIFM of:
Page 41 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
(1) The average amount of Assets under management are SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.7R(2)
the firm’s assets under calculated in accordance with and SYSC 23 Annex 1
management (calculated as a the method that must be used 7.10R apply to this
three-year rolling average) is to calculate the amount to be calculation.
£50 billion or more recorded in data element 1A
(Total funds under
management) in data item
FSA038 (Volumes and Type
of Business)
Page 42 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
(3) The average amount of Total intermediary regulated SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.7R(3)
the firm’s total intermediary business revenue is calculated applies to this calculation.
regulated business revenue in accordance with the method
(calculated as a three-year that must be used to calculate
rolling average) is £35 the amount to be recorded in
million per annum or more data element 4E (Total
regulated business revenue) in
Section B (Profit and Loss
account) of the RMAR
(4) The average amount of Annual revenue generated by SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.7R(3)
the firm’s annual revenue regulated consumer credit applies to this calculation.
generated by regulated lending is calculated as
consumer credit lending follows:
(calculated as a three-year
rolling average) is £100
million or more
Note 1: Where Parts 7 to 10 of SYSC 23 Annex 1 refer to a calculation period they refer to
the annual period in column (1) for the calculations in Part Two of this table.
Note 2: Where Parts 7 to 10 of SYSC 23 Annex 1 refer to an averaging period they refer to
the three year period in column (1).
Note 3: Where Parts 7 to 10 of SYSC 23 Annex 1 refer to a reporting period they refer to
the period for which reports in column (2) are prepared.
7.3 G (1) Column (2) of the table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.2R refers to the FCA
Handbook versions of the relevant data items.
Page 43 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
7.6 R (1) The calculation periods, averaging periods and dates in column (1)
of the table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.2R are defined so as to be
consistent with the financial reporting periods used for the
corresponding data item in column (2) of that table. The rest of this
rule gives examples of this principle.
(a) the calculation periods in column (1) are also based on the
firm’s accounting period; and
(4) Where row (2) of column (1) of the table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.2R
refers to a firm’s current financial figures it refers to the figures for
its most recent reporting period in column (2).
(5) A firm’s most recent reporting period is the one for the data item
whose required submission date has passed most recently.
7.7 R (1) This rule deals with the establishment of a firm’s averaging periods.
(2) When the table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.2R specifies that this
paragraph (2) applies:
Page 44 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
(3) When the table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.2R specifies that this
paragraph (3) applies:
(a) each averaging period ends on the last day of a year; and
(4) The term ‘year’ in (3) has the meaning in SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.6R.
7.8 G (1) SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.7R(2) provides for a firm’s status to be tested
every six months if the relevant data item is reported in six-month
intervals and to be tested yearly if the relevant data item is reported
yearly.
7.9 R (1) This rule applies to calculations in Part Two of the table in SYSC 23
Annex 1 7.2R.
(2) If:
(a) the firm reports the relevant data items more than once a
year; and
the calculations in the table are only based on the data item that
covers the full year.
(3) The term year in (2) has the meaning in SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.6R.
7.10 R When the table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.2R specifies that this rule applies,
the calculation of the average involves calculating the relevant amount for
each reporting period relating to the averaging period, summing those
amounts and dividing the result by the applicable number of reporting
periods.
Page 45 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
(2) Where this rule applies, the firm must adjust the minimum
qualification amount in column (1) proportionately.
7.12 G The main example of when SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.11R may apply is where a
firm changes its accounting reference date.
7.13 G (1) The financial reporting period may be shorter than the
corresponding calculation period.
(3) If SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.9R applies this does not matter as the
calculation is based on the figures for the full year.
(4) If SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.9R does not apply, in the example in (2):
(b) each year within the three year average is based on two six-
month periods.
7.16 G Reasons why SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.15R may apply to a firm include the
following:
(2) the firm’s Part 4A permission has only recently been varied to
include the relevant regulated activities; or
Page 46 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
(3) the firm has only recently become subject to the relevant reporting
requirements.
7.17 G (1) This paragraph gives an example of how SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.15R
works.
(2) The firm will not meet the qualification condition before the end of
the accounting year in which the firm is authorised, however large
its business is in the period from February to June. This is because
the calculations are based on calculation periods of a year and the
firm will not have data for the year.
(4) After the end of the second accounting year, the averaging period is
two years.
(5) After the end of the third accounting year there is no further need
for SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.15R.
Part Eight: Other qualification conditions for being an enhanced scope SMCR
firm
(3) the firm notifies the FCA in accordance with this Part that it intends
to become an enhanced scope SMCR firm.
Page 47 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
8.2 R (1) This rule deals with a notification under SYSC 23 Annex 1 8.1R(3).
(c) an enhanced scope SMCR firm that is within the one year
period in Part Ten of this Annex (When a firm stops being an
enhanced scope SMCR firm).
8.3 G If a firm is subject to a requirement that it must comply with the rules in
the FCA Handbook applicable to one of the categories of firm in SYSC 23
Annex 1 8.1R(1) or SYSC 23 Annex 1 8.1R(2) it is to be treated as falling
into that category of firm for the purpose of this Annex as well.
General rule
9.1 R (1) A firm must comply with the requirements for enhanced scope
SMCR firms (and becomes an enhanced scope SMCR firm) from
the date specified in this rule.
(2) If a firm:
the date is twelve months after it first meets the first qualification
condition that it met.
(3) Where the first qualification condition it meets is the one in SYSC
23 Annex 1 8.1R(3), the date is three months after the FCA receives
the notice in SYSC 23 Annex 1 8.1R(3).
(b) the result of applying (3) would be that the firm would
become an enhanced scope SMCR firm sooner.
Page 48 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
9.2 R (1) A firm meets one of the qualification conditions in Part 7 of this
Annex (financial qualification conditions) on the due date for
submission of the relevant data item (see (2) and (3) for the
meaning of relevant data item).
(2) Except where (3) applies, the relevant data item is the data item for
the final financial reporting period applicable to the averaging
period for which the firm first meets that qualification condition.
(3) Where the qualification condition is the one in row (2) of the table
in SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.2R, the relevant data item is the one for the
reporting period for which the firm first meets that qualification
condition.
9.3 R A firm meets one of the qualification conditions in Part 8 of this annex
(other qualification conditions) on the date when:
9.4 G SYSC 23 Annex 1 9.1R and SYSC 23 Annex 1 9.3R mean that a firm
becomes an enhanced scope SMCR firm under Part 8 of this Annex on the
date in column (2) of the table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 9.5G.
The firm is a significant IFPRU firm It becomes an enhanced scope SMCR firm one year
and three months after the date in IFPRU 1.2.3R
(the three-month period in IFPRU 1.2.6R(2) plus
the one year in this Part).
The firm is a CASS large firm If the firm notifies the FCA in accordance with
CASS 1A.2.9R(1) or CASS 1A.2.9R(2), it becomes
This includes a firm that has elected to
an enhanced scope SMCR firm one year following
be treated as a CASS large firm
the 1 February following the notification under
CASS.
If the firm notifies the FCA in accordance with
CASS 1A.2.9R(3), it becomes an enhanced scope
SMCR firm one year after the day it begins to hold
client money or safe custody assets.
Page 49 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
The firm opts to be an enhanced scope It becomes an enhanced scope SMCR firm three
SMCR firm by notifying the FCA using months after the FCA receives the notice
Form O
9.6 G (1) The purpose of the one year or three-month period between meeting
the conditions for being an enhanced scope SMCR firm and the firm
becoming subject to the requirements for such firms is to allow it to
make preparations to comply with the new requirements.
9.7 G (1) A firm retains its old status during the one year or three-month
period described in this Part.
(2) For example, a core SMCR firm that meets one of the qualification
conditions for being an enhanced scope SMCR firm in SYSC 23
Annex 1 8.1R(1) or SYSC 23 Annex 1 8.1R(2) will remain as a core
SMCR firm for one year after it meets the qualification condition.
Part Ten: When a firm stops being an enhanced scope SMCR firm
General rule
10.2 R A firm ceases to meet one of the qualification conditions in Part 7 of this
Annex (financial qualification conditions) on whichever of the following
is applicable:
Page 50 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
(1) the due date for submission of the data item for the final financial
reporting period applicable to the averaging period for which the
firm first ceases to meet that qualification condition; or
(2) (where the qualification condition is the one in row (2) of the table
in SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.2R) the due date for submission of the data
item for the reporting period for which the firm first ceases to meet
that qualification condition; or
10.4 R (1) This rule deals with a firm that has elected to become an enhanced
scope SMCR firm under SYSC 23 Annex 1 8.1R(3).
(2) A firm may notify the FCA that it intends to cancel its election to be
an enhanced scope SMCR firm under SYSC 23 Annex 1 8.1R(3).
(3) The firm ceases to meet the qualification condition under SYSC 23
Annex 1 8.1R(3) on the date the FCA receives the notice.
10.5 G If the firm ceases to meet the relevant qualification condition while the
one-year period in Part 9 of this Annex is still running, the one-year
period in this Part does not apply. Instead, the firm will simply not
become an enhanced scope SMCR firm in the first place.
10.6 R If:
(1) the one-year period in SYSC 23 Annex 1 10.1R is still running; and
(2) the firm again meets a qualification condition in Part Seven or Eight
of this Annex;
then:
Page 51 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
(4) the one-year or three-month period in Part 9 of this Annex does not
apply.
Insert the following annex in the appropriate position. The text (which consists of a form) is
included in Part Two of Annex Q of this instrument.
23 Annex Form O: Changing firm status under the Senior Managers and
2R Certification Regime
24.1 Application
24.1.1 R This chapter applies to an SMCR firm, except to the extent that this chapter
applies a narrower scope to a particular provision. However, this chapter
does not apply to:
Page 52 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
Page 53 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
(17) … … …
Page 54 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
8.5.22R (Allocation of
responsibility for
compliance to an
approved person).
24.3.1 G The FCA expects that a person who has responsibility for an FCA-
prescribed senior management responsibility :
(1) will generally (in the case of the FCA-prescribed senior management
responsibilities in SYSC 24.3.3G SYSC 24.3.3G(1)) be the most
senior employee or officer responsible for managing that area (or the
most senior below the chief executive); and
Executive or non-executive
24.3.3 G (1) The Subject to (2), the FCA expects that normally a firm will allocate
the other FCA-prescribed senior management responsibilities to an
SMF manager who performs executive functions for the firm.
(2) The relevant rules in COLL deal with the persons to whom a firm
should allocate FCA-prescribed senior management responsibility
(za) (COLL value for money assessment and independent director
requirements).
Page 55 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
24.3.4 G The FCA accepts that it may not be practical for a small non-complex firm
to comply with the parts of SYSC 24.3.1G(1), SYSC 24.3.2G and SYSC
24.3.3G SYSC 24.3.3G(1) that would otherwise apply to it.
24.3.10 G …
1.3 G …
Page 56 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
Insert the following new Parts in SYSC 24 Annex 1 where indicated. The text is not
underlined.
… … … … … …
4.1 R (1) The table in SYSC 24 Annex 1 4.2R sets out which FCA-prescribed
senior management responsibilities apply to which type of core
SMCR firm and enhanced scope SMCR firm.
(2) SMCR firms in (1) are divided into the following categories for the
purposes of in (1):
Page 57 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
COCON (b-1) ✓ ✓ ✓
CASS (z) ✓ ✓ ✓
Note: The categories of firm in the column headings of this table are to be interpreted in
accordance with the classification of firms in SYSC 24 Annex 1 4.1R. Therefore:
(1) UK core firm (column three) refers to SYSC 24 Annex 1 4.1R(2)(a);
Page 58 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
(2) Third country core firm (column four) refers to SYSC 24 Annex 1 4.1R(2)(b); and
(3) Enhanced scope firm (column five) refers to SYSC 24 Annex 1 4.1R(2)(c).
except to the extent that this chapter applies a narrower scope to a particular
provision.
25.3.1 R An enhanced scope SMCR firm may prepare its management responsibilities
map so that (subject to SYSC 25.3.4R) it only includes its management and
governance arrangements to the extent that they cover, support or otherwise
relate to its SMCR financial activities.
Page 59 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
(2) Take for example human resources. If the firm’s human resources
function covers the firm’s entire workforce without separating the
parts that deal with the firm’s financial services and its other
business, the management responsibilities map should cover the
entire human resources function.
(3) On the other hand, the firm may separate the part of its human
resources function that deals with those working in its financial
services business from the part that deals with the other part of its
business. In that case the management responsibilities map may
leave out (subject to SYSC 25.3.4R) the part of the human resources
function that covers its non-financial services business.
25.3.4 R If a firm uses the exclusion in SYSC 25.3.1R it must include sufficient
information about the excluded management and governance arrangements
to show how the included management and governance arrangements fit in
with the firm’s management and governance arrangements as a whole.
25.4.11 G The executive director function, the other local responsibility function, the
group entity senior manager function, the partner function and the other
overall responsibility function are defined generally and generically and can
be performed by several people. Therefore, there is no need to explain why
several people perform one of the functions.
Application
25.9.3 R [This has been left blank deliberately] This section does not apply to a full-
scope UK AIFM in relation to its managing an AIF.
26.1 Application
Page 60 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
except to the extent that this chapter applies a narrower scope to a particular
provision.
Territorial scope
… …
26.2 Purpose
26.2.1 G The purpose of this chapter is to ensure, together (in the case of a PRA-
authorised person) with the equivalent PRA requirements and the
requirements about FCA-prescribed senior management responsibilities in
SYSC 24 (Senior managers and certification regime: Allocation of prescribed
responsibilities), that:
Page 61 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
26.4 Exclusions
26.4.1 R …
26.4.2 R SYSC 26.3 (Main rules) does not require a firm PRA-authorised person to
ensure that SMF managers have local or overall responsibility for any
activity, business area or management function that is:
26.4.8 G …
26.4.9 R SYSC 26.3 (Main rules) only requires an enhanced scope SMCR firm to
allocate responsibility for activities, business areas and management
functions to the extent that they support, form part of or otherwise relate to
its SMCR financial activities.
Page 62 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
26.4.11 R A full-scope UK AIFM may treat managing an AIF as not being part of its
SMCR financial activities for the purposes of this chapter.
26.10.2 G …
26.10.3 G (1) This chapter does not cover responsibility for an aspect of a firm’s
PRA-authorised person’s affairs managed by an individual approved
to perform the Group Entity Senior Manager or the Group Entity
Senior Insurance Manager PRA-designated senior management
function (see SYSC 26.4.2R (Exclusions where other requirements
apply).
Fitness to act
27.2.8 G …
(3) In deciding how much reliance to put on the contractor, the firm
should take into account:
Page 63 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
27.6.6 R …
(3) Therefore the certification regime does not apply to a sole trader
with no employees.
27.6.8 R This chapter does not apply to a firm that meets the following conditions:.
Page 64 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
(3) …
(5) A firm that would fall within In relation to a firm in column (1), the
SYSC 19A.1 if it applied to an definition of Remuneration Code staff
incoming EEA firm is extended so that it includes
employees of this kind of firm in the
For these purposes sub-
same way as it includes employees of
paragraphs (i) and (ii) in SYSC
an overseas firm in row (4) of this
19A.1.1R(1)(d) (application of
table.
the Remuneration Code) do not
apply.
(9) A firm that would fall within In relation to a firm in column (1), the
SYSC 19C.1 if it applied to an definition of BIPRU Remuneration
Code staff is extended so that it
Page 65 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
TP 6 Transitional Provision 6
5 …
Page 66 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
administering a specified
benchmark.
… … … … … …
Page 67 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
Annex C
In this Annex, underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text.
Part 1: Comes into force [ ] 20[ ] [main commencement date for solo-regulated firms]
1.1 Application
(6) … …
(B) …
Page 68 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
(2) …
(a) …
(i) …
(8) For a senior conduct rules staff member who is responsible for the
compliance function, failing to ensure that:
Part 2: Comes into force [ ] 20[ ] [one year after main commencement date for solo-
regulated firms]
Page 69 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
1.1 Application
Page 70 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
Annex D
2.5 Suitability
2.5.3 G (1) The emphasis of the threshold conditions set out in paragraphs 2E
and 3D of Schedule 6 of the Act is on the suitability of the firm itself.
The suitability of each person who performs a controlled function
will be assessed by the FCA and/or the PRA, as appropriate, under
the approved persons regime (in relation to an FCA-approved
person, see SUP 10A (FCA Approved Persons in Appointed
Representatives), SUP 10C (FCA senior managers regime for
approved persons in SMCR firms) and FIT). In certain
circumstances, however, the FCA may consider that the firm is not
suitable because of doubts over the individual or collective
suitability of persons connected with the firm.
Page 71 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
Annex E
Amendments to the Statements of Principle and Code of Practice for Approved Persons
(APER)
In this Annex, underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text,
unless otherwise stated.
1.1A Application
Who?
1.1A.1A G (1) APER does not apply to FCA-approved persons of SMCR firms.
COCON applies instead.
What?
(5) APER does not apply to conduct unless it is within the scope of
section 64A(4) of the Act (Rules of conduct).
Coverage of APER
1.1A.6 G APER 1.1A.7G gives examples of the effect of APER 1.1A.1R and APER
1.1A.2R. The first column says whether the example involves an FCA-
approved person in relation to one or two firms. The second column
explains what functions APER covers in the scenario set out in the first
column. [deleted]
Page 72 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
(1) Yes, in Applies to the FCA controlled function. Also applies to any
relation to firm A other function performed for firm A in relation to the
carrying on by firm A of a regulated activity even if it is
not a controlled function.
(2) Yes, in In relation to firm A, the answer is the same as for scenario
relation to firm (1). However, APER does not apply to any function that the
A. No, in relation approved person carries on in relation to firm B even if that
to firm B, function relates to regulated activities carried out by firm
B. However, if the function that they perform in relation to
firm B is a controlled function the approved person and
firm B may be subject to legal sanctions (see SUP
10A.13.1G to SUP 10A.13.2G).
1.1A.8 G (1) A person may be an approved person in relation to more than one
firm. When that is the case, APER applies in relation to all those
firms.
(2) APER does not apply if the firm is an SMCR firm, except for
approved persons of an appointed representative of an SMCR firm.
1.1A.9 G (1) APER 1.1A refers to an approved person’s firm. This means their
authorised approved person employer. APER 1.1A also refers to an
approved person of a firm.
(3) Section 59(1) of the Act describes the first. It covers a person who
performs a controlled function under an arrangement entered into by
an authorised person (“A”). In this case, the authorised approved
person employer is A.
Page 73 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
(4) Section 59(2) of the Act describes the second. It covers a person who
performs a controlled function under an arrangement entered into by
a contractor ("B") of an authorised person (“A”). In this case, the
authorised approved person employer is A (and not B). [deleted]
Replace the defined term “firm” wherever it appears in APER 2, APER 3 and APER 4 with
the defined term “APER employer”. This change is not made in those provisions of APER
amended in the following portion of this annex.
3.1 Introduction
3.1.9 G (1) UK domestic firms An APER employer that has its registered office
(or, if it has no registered office, its head office) in the United
Kingdom with a premium listing of equity shares are is subject to the
UK Corporate Governance Code, whose internal control provisions
are amplified in the publication entitled ‘Guidance on Risk
Management, Internal Control and Related Financial and Business
Reporting (September 2014)’ issued by the Financial Reporting
Page 74 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
4.5.2 G In the opinion of the FCA, conduct of the type described in APER 4.5.3G,
APER 4.5.4G, APER 4.5.6G or APER 4.5.8G does not comply with
Statement of Principle 5.
4.5.6 G In the case of an approved person who is responsible under SYSC 4.4.5R(1)
for dealing with the appointment of responsibilities under SYSC 4.4.3R,
failing to take reasonable care to maintain a clear and appropriate
apportionment of significant responsibilities among the firm’s directors and
senior managers falls within APER 4.5.2G. [deleted]
4.5.7 G Behaviour of the type referred to in APER 4.5.6G includes, but is not limited
to:
Page 75 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
(2) failing to act where that review shows that those significant
responsibilities have not been clearly apportioned. [deleted]
4.7.9 G In the case of the money laundering reporting officer, failing to discharge
the responsibilities imposed on them by the firm in accordance with SYSC
6.3.9R falls within APER 4.7.2G. [deleted]
(1) [deleted]
(3) article 22(3) of the MiFID Org Regulation (as applied in accordance
with SYSC 1 Annex 1 2.8AR, SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.2-AR, SYSC 1
Annex 1 3.2-BR, SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.2CR and SYSC 1 Annex 1
3.3R); or
4.7.11A G Where the approved person is a proprietary trader under SUP 10A.9.10R,
failing to maintain and comply with appropriate systems and controls in
relation to that activity falls within APER 4.7.2G. [deleted]
Page 76 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
Page 77 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
Annex F
Amendments to the Fit and Proper test for Employees and Senior Personnel sourcebook
(FIT)
In this Annex, underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text.
1 General
1.1.2 G The purpose of FIT is to set out and describe the criteria that:
(c) assessing the fitness and propriety of a person whom the firm
is proposing to certify to perform an FCA certification
function; and
1.1.3 G The table in FIT 1.1.4G summarises the situations to which FIT applies.
[deleted]
Page 78 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
Page 79 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
1.2 Introduction
1.2.-1 G Under section 60A(1) of the Act, before an SMCR a firm may make an
application for the FCA’s approval of a controlled function the firm must be
satisfied that the person for whom the application is made is a fit and proper
person to perform that function.
1.2.1B G Under sections 60A and 63F of the Act, in assessing whether a person is a fit
and proper person to perform an FCA designated senior management
function or an FCA certification function, an SMCR a firm must have
particular regard to whether that person:
1.3.2A G An SMCR A firm assessing the fitness and propriety of staff being assessed
under FIT should consider:
Page 80 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
1.3.3 G The criteria listed in FIT 2.1 to FIT 2.3 are guidance and will be applied in
general terms when the FCA is determining a person’s fitness and propriety.
It would be impossible to produce a definitive list of all the matters which
would be relevant to a particular determination. An SMCR A firm assessing
the fitness and propriety of staff being assessed under FIT should be guided
by substantially the same criteria in FIT 2.1 to FIT 2.3 (to the extent
applicable to the firm), recognising that this is not intended to be a definitive
list of matters to be considered.
1.3.4 G If a matter comes to the FCA’s attention which suggests that the person
might not be fit and proper, the FCA will take into account how relevant and
how important it is. In the same way, if a matter comes to the attention of an
SMCR a firm which suggests that any staff being assessed under FIT might
not be fit and proper, the firm should take into account how relevant and
how important that matter is.
1.3.4B G An SMCR A firm assessing the continuing fitness and propriety of staff
being assessed under FIT should assess the role that the individual is
actually performing at the time the assessment is done. For this purpose, the
assessor(s) should be provided with an up-to-date job description for that
individual in advance of the assessment.
2.1.1A G An SMCR A firm determining the honesty, integrity and reputation of staff
being assessed under FIT, should consider all relevant matters, including
those set out in FIT 2.1.3G, which may have arisen either in the United
Kingdom or elsewhere. Firms should inform themselves of relevant matters,
including checking for convictions for criminal offences (where possible)
and contacting previous employers who have employed that candidate or
person. If any staff being assessed under FIT has a conviction for a criminal
offence, the firm should consider the seriousness of and circumstances
surrounding the offence, the explanation offered by that person, the
Page 81 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
relevance of the offence to the proposed role, the passage of time since the
offence was committed and evidence of the individual’s rehabilitation.
2.1.2A G In considering the reputation of staff being assessed under FIT 2.1.1AG an
SMCR a firm should have regard to whether that person’s reputation might
have an adverse impact upon the firm for which the function is to be
performed and the person’s responsibilities.
2.1.3 G The matters referred to in FIT 2.1.1G to which the FCA will have regard,
and to which an SMCR a firm should also have regard, include, but are not
limited to:
2.2.2A G The FCA would expect an SMCR a firm determining the competence and
capability of staff being assessed under FIT to consider convictions,
dismissals and suspensions from employment for drug or alcohol abuses or
other abusive acts only in relation to a person’s continuing ability to perform
the particular FCA designated senior management function or an FCA
certification function for which the person is, or is to be, employed.
2.3.1 G In determining a person’s financial soundness, the FCA will have regard,
and an SMCR a firm should also have regard, to any factors including, but
not limited to:
2.3.2 G The FCA will not normally require a candidate to supply a statement of
assets or liabilities. The fact that a person may be of limited financial means
will not, in itself, affect their suitability to perform a controlled function.
Page 82 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
The FCA would expect an SMCR a firm to take a similar view in assessing
whether staff being assessed under FIT, are fit and proper.
Page 83 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
Annex G
In this Annex, underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text.
4 Credit risk
Corporate governance
4.3.8 G …
Page 84 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
Annex H
In this Annex, underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text
19.5.8 G (1) A firm should consider allocating responsibility for the management
of the relationship between the firm and its IGC to a person at the
firm holding an FCA significant-influence function or a designated
senior management function.
Page 85 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
Annex I
In this Annex, underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text.
1A.3.1 R …
(2) A CASS small firm that is not an SMCR firm must make the
allocation in (1) to a director or senior manager who is approved to
perform a significant influence function for that firm. [deleted]
1A.3.1-A G The material in CASS 1A.3.1BG about how CASS 1A.3 fits into the FCA
senior managers and certification regime for SMCR firms also applies to a
CASS small firm that is an SMCR firm and the function in CASS 1A.3.1R.
However :
(2) the person performing that function will not necessarily be subject to
the employee certification regime described in SYSC 27 (Senior
managers and certification regime: Certification regime).
The approved persons senior managers regime and the certification regime
1A.3.1B G (1) (a) CASS 1A.3.1AR describes the FCA controlled function
known as the CASS operational oversight function (CF10a).
The table of FCA controlled functions in SUP 10A.4.4R
together with SUP 10A.7.9R specify the CASS operational
oversight function as an FCA required function for a firm to
which CASS 1A.3.1AR applies. This paragraph CASS
1A.3.1BG describes how CASS 1A.3.1AR applies to SMCR
firms.
Page 86 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
1A.3.1C R If, at the time a firm that is not an SMCR firm becomes a CASS medium firm
or a CASS large firm in accordance with CASS 1A.2.12R(1) or CASS
1A.2.12 R(2), the firm is not able to comply with CASS 1A.3.1AR because it
has no director or senior manager who is an approved person in respect of
the CASS operational oversight function, the firm must:
(1) take the necessary steps to ensure that it complies with CASS
1A.3.1AR as soon as practicable, which must at least include
submitting an application for a candidate in respect of the CASS
operational oversight function within 30 business days of the firm
becoming a CASS medium firm or a CASS large firm; and
(2) until such time as it is able to comply with CASS 1A.3.1AR, allocate
to a director or senior manager performing a senior management
function responsibility for:
1A.3.1D G (1) CASS 1A.3.1CR provides a grace period for a firm that is not an
SMCR firm to apply for someone to be approved to perform the
CASS operational oversight function.
Page 87 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
1A.3.3 R (1) Subject to (2), a firm must make and retain an appropriate record of
the person to whom responsibility is allocated in accordance with
CASS 1A.3.1R, or CASS 1A.3.1AR or CASS 1A.3.1CR(2).
CASS small debt management firm other than a not-for-profit debt advice body
11.3.1 R …
(2) A firm that is not an SMCR firm must make the allocation in (1) to a
director or senior manager approved to perform a significant
influence function in relation to that firm. [deleted]
CASS small debt management firm that is a not-for-profit debt advice body
11.3.2 R …
11.3.2A G (1) CASS 11.3.3G(5) to (11) do not apply to a CASS small debt
management firm that is a not-for-profit debt advice body. This is
because neither SYSC 24 (Senior managers and certification regime:
Allocation of prescribed responsibilities) nor SYSC 26 (Senior
managers and certification regime: Overall and local responsibility)
apply to it.
Page 88 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
CASS large debt management firms firm: the CASS operational oversight
function (CF10a)
11.3.3 G (1) CASS 11.3.4R describes the FCA controlled function known as the
CASS operational and oversight function (CF10a) in relation to
CASS large debt management firms, including not-for-profit debt
advice bodies. [deleted]
(3) In the case of a firm that is not an SMCR firm, the director or senior
manager in (2) should be an approved person under the approved
persons regime provided for in SUP 10A (FCA Approved Persons).
(4) However, the CASS operational oversight function does not apply to
an SMCR firm. [deleted]
11.3.5 R If, at the time a CASS debt management firm that is not an SMCR firm
becomes a CASS large debt management firm in accordance with CASS
11.2.8R, the firm is not able to comply with CASS 11.3.4R because it has no
director or senior manager who is an approved person in respect of the
CASS operational oversight function, the firm must:
(1) take the necessary steps to ensure that it complies with CASS
11.3.4R as soon as practicable, which must at least include
submitting an application for a candidate in respect of the CASS
operational oversight function within 30 business days of the firm
becoming a CASS large debt management firm; and
(2) until such time as it is able to comply with CASS 11.3.4R, allocate to
a director or senior manager performing a significant-influence
function responsibility for:
Page 89 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
11.3.5A G (1) CASS 11.3.5R provides a grace period for a firm that is not an SMCR
firm to apply for someone to be approved to perform the CASS
operational oversight function.
Page 90 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
Annex J
In this Annex, underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text,
unless otherwise stated.
Part 1: Comes into force [ ] 20[ ] [about six months before main commencement date for
solo-regulated firms]
After SUP TP 11 (Bank of England and Financial Services Act 2016: Approved persons in
insurers) insert a new SUP TP 12. The text is not underlined.
TP 12 Bank of England and Financial Services Act 2016: Approved persons in solo-
regulated firms
12.1.2 G (1) SUP TP 12 has transitional provisions relating to the changes to the
approved persons regime made by Part 2 of the Bank of England and
Financial Services Act 2016 and the Individual Accountability
(FCA-Authorised Firms) Instrument 2018.
12.1.3 G (1) The main time period for which SUP TP 12 operates is [the year in
which the main commencement date for solo-regulated firms falls].
(2) There are transitional provisions that can apply beyond that period.
They are based on events occurring during that period.
12.1.5 G SUP TP 12.22 has a glossary of terms used in SUP TP 12 which have
meanings that only apply in SUP TP 12. These terms appear in bold type in
SUP TP 12.
Page 91 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
12.2.1 R If the conditions set out in SUP TP 12.2.2R are met, a pre-implementation
approval in relation to a particular approved person (AP) and a particular
solo-regulated SMCR firm (F) has effect on and after the commencement
date as if it had been given in relation to the FCA-designated senior
management function or FCA-designated senior management functions
specified in SUP TP 12.2.2R(2) and (3).
(4) (where SUP TP 12.2.10R applies this condition) F has notified the
FCA:
Page 92 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
12.2.4 R (1) Part One of the table in SUP TP 12.2.5R applies to a core SMCR
firm and a limited scope SMCR firm.
Part One (core SMCR firms and limited scope SMCR firms)
Executive functions
Oversight functions
Page 93 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
Required functions
(1) (2)
Pre-Implementation Controlled New FCA-designated senior
Function management function
Executive functions
Page 94 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
Oversight functions
Required functions
Page 95 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
(2) The conversion from the chief executive function to the executive director
function only applies to a non-directive friendly society.
then, for that approved person and that firm, the other overall responsibility
function or the other local responsibility function (whichever is applicable)
does not apply.
12.2.9 R (1) A notification to the FCA is not to be taken into account for the
purposes of SUP TP 12.2.2R(4) so far as it concerns a particular
Page 96 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
(2) A notification to the FCA is not to be taken into account for the
purposes of SUP TP 12.2.2R(4) if the firm does not include a
management responsibilities map with the notification when
required to do so by SUP TP 12.12.
(2) do not apply to a core SMCR firm or a limited scope SMCR firm
except in relation to a pre-implementation approval for which
there is a notification obligation under SUP TP 12.5 or SUP TP 12.6.
12.2.11 G SUP TP 12.2.2R(4)(a) (together with SUP TP 12.5 and SUP TP 12.6) means
that if a firm is required to submit a Form K:
(2) This rule applies whether or not the FCA has given a warning notice
or a decision notice under:
Page 97 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
continues to have effect on and after that day in respect of the converted
approval.
12.4.4 G (1) A firm does not have to submit a Form C for an approved person
who had a pre-implementation approval to perform the customer
function but ceases to perform that function because the customer
function is (except in relation to appointed representatives) abolished
after the commencement date.
(2) A firm should however notify the FCA by Form C that a pre-
implementation approval has not been converted into approval for
an FCA-designated senior management function under SUP TP 12.2
because the approved person resigned or otherwise stopped
performing the FCA controlled function before the commencement
date.
Page 98 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
(2) A firm must make the notification in (1) between the first
notification date and the final notification date.
12.5.2 G SUP TP 12.10 explains how the firm should make the notification.
12.5.3 G (1) This paragraph (SUP TP 12.5.3G) gives examples of things that a
firm should not include in a notification under SUP TP 12.5.1R.
(b) the firm considers that the approved person will not be
performing that FCA-designated senior management function
on the commencement date.
(4) Therefore, a firm should not include an approved person who plans
to resign before the commencement date if it is intended that they
will have left the firm before then.
Page 99 of 211
FCA 2018/XX
12.6.1 R (1) This rule applies if, before the commencement date:
(b) the firm giving the notice discovers that any part of that
information is inaccurate.
12.6.2 G SUP TP 12.10 explains how the firm should make the revised notification.
12.6.3 G (1) This paragraph SUP TP 12.6.3G gives examples of when a firm
should revise its SUP TP 12.5 notice under SUP TP 12.6.
(3) If, after the notice to the FCA, the FCA grants an approval under
section 59 of the Act (Approval for particular arrangements) to
someone who did not have any such approval for the firm at the time
of the notice, the firm should revise its notice by including that new
approved person and that new pre-implementation approval.
(4) If, after a firm has given the notice to the FCA, the FCA grants a new
approval under section 59 of the Act to someone who already was an
approved person for the firm when the firm gave the notice to the
FCA, the firm should revise its notice by including that new pre-
implementation approval.
(b) the approved person tells the firm they are going to leave the
firm before the commencement date; or
(6) There is no need to include information about the matters set out in
SUP TP 12.5.3G.
12.6.4 G If a firm gives a notification to the FCA under SUP TP 12.5 about an
approved person and that approved person later leaves the firm or gives up
performing some of their pre-implementation controlled functions before
the commencement date, the firm should notify the FCA using Form C or
Form E under SUP 10A as well as a Form K under SUP TP 12.10.
12.7.3 R SUP TP 12.7.1R is subject to any amendment the firm may make to the
application after the first notification date and before the commencement
date to specify that on the commencement date:
12.7.5 G (1) SUP TP 12.7.3R is not the only way a firm may change the effect of
SUP TP 12.7.
(2) After the commencement date a firm is free to amend its application
in accordance with the Act and the FCA Handbook.
12.8.1 R A firm must, between the first notification date and the final notification
date, notify the FCA of every pre-implementation application if:
(3) the firm would be required to notify the FCA under SUP TP 12.5 if
that application had been granted and the approval was in effect
immediately before the date of the notification in SUP TP 12.8.1R.
(2) the resulting approval was in effect immediately before the date of
the notification in SUP TP 12.8.1R.
(1) In general only an enhanced scope SMCR firm needs to make the
notification.
(2) A core SMCR firm and a limited scope firm should not make a
notification except in relation to an application to perform the non-
executive director pre-implementation controlled function.
(b) the firm considers that the approved person concerned will be
performing that FCA-designated senior management function
on the commencement date if the pre-implementation
application is approved before then.
(4) A firm should not notify the FCA about a particular pre-
implementation application if the firm considers that, if the
application were approved before the commencement date, the
approved person will not be performing on the commencement date
any of the FCA-designated senior management functions into which
the applicable pre-implementation approval would be potentially
convertible. This might be because the firm intends that the
candidate will only be in post for a short time.
12.8.4 R (1) This rule applies if, before the commencement date:
(b) the firm would be required to notify the FCA under SUP TP
12.6 if that application had been granted and the approval
was in effect immediately before the date of the notification
under SUP TP 12.8.4R.
(2) This rule also applies if, before the commencement date:
(3) Where circumstances described in (1) or (2) occur before the final
notification date, the firm must submit a revision of the notice
referred to in (1) or (2) to the FCA before the final notification date.
(4) Where circumstances described in (1) or (2) occur between the final
notification date and the commencement date, the firm must
submit a revision of the notice referred to in (1) or (2) to the FCA
before the commencement date.
12.8.5 G SUP TP 12.10 explains how the firm should make the notification.
12.10.1 R A firm must only make a single notification under SUP TP 12.5 and SUP TP
12.8.1R and must do so on the same notification form.
12.10.2 R A firm must make a notification under SUP TP 12.5, SUP TP 12.6 or SUP
TP 12.8 by completing Form K (SUP TP 12.23.1R).
12.10.3 R A firm must make a notification or submit a document to the FCA under
SUP TP 12 in accordance with SUP 10C.15.11R(1) and (3) (Method of
submission: electronic submission).
12.10.5 G If a firm discovers after the commencement date that any information it has
given under SUP TP 12 is inaccurate it should notify the FCA as described
in SUP 15.6 (Inaccurate, false or misleading information). If SUP TP
12.17.4R applies, the firm should notify the FCA under that rule instead.
12.11.2 R A firm must have prepared the statement in SUP TP 12.11.1R by the
commencement date (unless it must prepare it earlier under SUP TP
12.11.4R).
12.11.3 G A firm should not send that statement to the FCA unless it is required to do
so by SUP TP 12.11.4R or SUP TP 12.11.5R.
12.11.4 R A notification to the FCA under SUP TP 12.5, SUP TP 12.6 or SUP TP 12.8
by an enhanced scope SMCR firm about an approved person or candidate
must be accompanied by a statement of responsibilities about that person.
12.11.5 R A core SMCR firm and a limited scope firm must, within five business
days after the commencement date, give the FCA a statement of
responsibilities for each candidate who is the subject of a pre-
implementation application by the firm that has been converted into an
application for approval for the performance of an FCA-designated senior
management function under SUP TP 12.7.
12.11.6 G A statement of responsibilities should comply with all the rules and
directions in the FCA Handbook that will apply to statements of
responsibilities prepared by the firm (see SUP TP 12.16).
12.12.1 R SUP TP 12.12 applies to an enhanced scope SMCR firm that will be
required under SYSC 25 (Senior managers and certification regime:
Management responsibilities maps and handover procedures and material) to
have a management responsibilities map when that chapter comes into force
on the commencement date.
12.12.3 G A management responsibilities map should comply with all the rules and
directions in the FCA Handbook that will apply to a management
responsibilities map prepared by the firm (see SUP TP 12.16).
12.13.3 G A firm should not assume that the FCA has reviewed a statement of
responsibilities or a management responsibilities map submitted to it for
completeness, quality or accuracy. It is the firm’s responsibility to ensure
that they have been prepared in accordance with the FCA’s rules and the
Act.
12.14.1 R SUP 10C.10.16R (Criminal record checks) does not apply to any pre-
implementation application continued in effect by SUP TP 12.7.1R after
the commencement date.
12.14.2 G SUP 10C.10.16R (Criminal record checks) applies to any application for
approval made under SUP TP 12.15.
12.15 Applications of approved persons to take effect from the commencement date
12.15.1 D (1) A firm may, before the commencement date, apply under section 60
of the Act (Applications for approval) for the FCA’s approval under
section 59 of the Act (Approval for particular arrangements) for the
performance of an FCA-designated senior management function
which comes into effect (as respects the firm) on the
commencement date.
(2) Any application may only be made after the first notification date.
(3) Any such application is made on the basis that it is treated as being
made on the commencement date.
(4) The application must be made using the version of Form A or Form
E applicable from the commencement date and in accordance with
the other requirements to be in effect on that date.
12.15.2 G The rest of SUP TP 12 will not apply to an application under SUP TP 12.15.
In particular, it is not a pre-implementation application and the application
should not be included in the firm’s Form K.
12.15.4 G A firm does not have to make an application under SUP TP 12.15. It can
make an application for an existing controlled function before the
commencement date under the rules and directions in force at the time of
the application. SUP TP 12 will apply to such applications.
12.16.1 R (1) The rules of the FCA Handbook apply to a converted approval, as
they do to approvals granted after the commencement date.
(2) (2) applies even if the firm is not required to submit the statement of
responsibilities to the FCA under SUP TP 12.12.
12.16.4 R (1) If, since the commencement date, there has been any significant
change in the aspects of a firm’s affairs which a transitioned SMF
manager is responsible for managing in performing their converted
designated senior management function, the firm must provide the
FCA with a revised statement of responsibilities.
12.16.6 G The table in SUP TP 12.16.7G gives examples of how SUP 10C and other
parts of the FCA Handbook apply to converted approvals.
Varying an approval
(2) If:
(a) after the commencement date a
transitioned SMF manager is
approved by the FCA to perform
another FCA-designated senior
management function; and
(b) later there is a significant change in
the transitioned SMF manager’s
responsibilities;
SUP Notification of
10C.14.5R ceasing to
perform the
function
Form D
General
12.17.1 R (1) If before the commencement date a firm is required to notify the
FCA using Form C or Form D or under SUP 10A.14.10R, that
obligation continues to apply after the commencement date if the
firm has not complied with that obligation before then.
(2) (1) applies whether the deadline for reporting expires before or after
the commencement date.
(3) (1) does not apply to the customer function (unless the customer
function continues to apply after the commencement date under
SUP TP 12.4.2R) if the deadline for reporting expires after the
commencement date.
12.17.2 R (1) This rule applies to a core SMCR firm and a limited scope firm (F)
in relation to a particular approved person (AP) if:
(2) If F is not already required to notify the FCA of that fact, it must
notify the FCA of that fact using Form C in accordance with SUP
10A before:
(b) (if the situation in (1) first arises after the final notification
date) the commencement date.
12.17.3 G (1) The most likely reason for the situation SUP TP 12.17.2R to arise is
that, before the commencement date, AP resigns or gives up their
controlled function or plans to do so.
(2) In most cases F will already be required to notify the FCA. If so,
SUP TP 12.17.2R will not apply.
(b) their job does not come within the definition of the FCA-
designated senior management function in SUP TP 12.17.2R
even though their job comes within the pre-implementation
controlled function.
12.17.4 G SUP TP 12.17.2R does not apply to an enhanced scope SMCR firm. The
FCA will rely on its Form K instead.
12.17.5 R A firm must, in the month beginning five business days after the
commencement date, check whether the Financial Services Register:
(a) the Financial Services Register does not correctly do all the
things in SUP TP 12.17.5R; and
(b) the firm is not already required to notify the FCA of the facts
giving rise to (1)(a) or to apply for the necessary approvals
under section 59 of the Act (Approval for particular
arrangements)
the firm must (by the end of the one month period in SUP TP
12.17.5R) notify the FCA of that fact using the applicable form in
SUP 10C.
(2) The applicable form in (1) is, in relation to a particular person (AP)
and firm, whichever one or more of the following forms in SUP 10C
applies:
(a) Form A (short form) where AP is not, but should be, included
in the Financial Services Register or where the Financial
Services Register omits some of AP’s FCA-designated senior
management functions for which the firm has approval; or
(b) Form C where AP is, but should not be, included in the
Financial Services Register or where the Financial Services
Register shows an approval for AP to perform an FCA-
designated senior management function that the firm does not
have; or
(1) the FCA will update the Financial Services Register based on the
information it has; but
(2) the FCA may not have sufficient information to tell whether all the
conversion conditions in SUP TP 12.2.2R have been met.
12.17.8 G (1) In practice it is unlikely that SUP TP 12.17.6R will normally apply
because the firm will already be required to notify the FCA of the
matter or apply for approval. For example:
(2) SUP TP 12.17.6R may apply for example if the firm has made all the
notifications (if any) required by SUP TP 12 and other parts of the
FCA Handbook but:
(a) the Financial Services Register does not include one of the
firm’s approved persons even though their pre-
implementation controlled function was converted under
SUP TP 12; or
12.18.1 G (1) SUP 10C.3.13R (The 12-week rule) allows a firm to appoint
someone (P) to perform a function which would normally be an
FCA-designated senior management function without needing to
apply for the FCA’s approval under section 59 of the Act (Approval
for particular arrangements) where P is filling in for someone who is
absent unexpectedly or temporarily. There is a maximum period for
which P’s appointment can last.
(2) When calculating the maximum time period in (1), the firm need not
take into account any time spent by P before the commencement
date performing what will become the FCA-designated senior
management function in (1).
12.18.2 G (1) SUP 10C.3.13R only applies where P (as referred to in SUP TP
12.18.1G) is providing cover for an SMF manager whose absence is
temporary or reasonably unforeseen.
(2) SUP 10C.3.13R may still apply if the absence referred to in (1)
began before the commencement date.
12.18.3 G SUP TP 12.18.1G and SUP TP 12.18.2G may apply even if:
(b) for an approval by the FCA for the performance of the same
pre-implementation controlled function.
12.20.1 R The changes to the FCA Handbook made by the Individual Accountability
(FCA-Authorised Firms) Instrument 2018 do not affect:
12.21.1 R The first notification period under SUP 15.11.13R (Timing and form of
notifications: conduct rules staff other than SMF managers):
(a) (in the case of a firm falling within SYSC 23 Annex 1 5.7R
(credit firms with limited permission)) the first financial
reporting period referred to in SUP 15.11.13R(3)(a)(i) ending
after the commencement date; or
12.21.2 G SUP TP 12.21.1R(2)(a) applies however short the resulting reporting period
may be.
12.22.1 R The terms in the first column of the table in SUP TP 12.22.2R, where they
appear in bold in SUP TP 12, have the meanings in the corresponding entry
in column 2 for the purposes of SUP TP 12.
core SMCR firm, have the meaning set out in the amendments to the Glossary
enhanced scope to be made by the Individual Accountability (FCA-
SMCR firm, Authorised Firms) Instrument 2018).
limited scope This is subject to SUP TP 12.22.3R.
SMCR firm, non-
UK SMCR firm
first notification date [ ] 20[ ] [about three months before main commencement
date for solo-regulated firms]
Form O start date [ ] 20[ ] [about six months before main commencement
date for solo-regulated firms]
12.22.3 R (1) Between the first notification date and the commencement date,
the question of:
(3) (1) does not apply to a firm that is already an SMCR firm before the
commencement date. Such an SMCR firm cannot be a solo-
regulated SMCR firm for the purposes of SUP TP 12.
12.22.4 G (1) The effect of SUP TP 12.22.3R is that if a PRA-regulated SMCR firm
changes its permission in a way that would turn it into a solo-
(2) SUP TP 12.15 will however apply and the firm can use this to apply
for the approvals it needs because of its change of category.
12.22.5 G If a firm changes from being an enhanced scope SMCR firm to a core
SMCR firm or a limited scope SMCR firm after it has sent the FCA its
Form K, it should notify the FCA as described in SUP 15.6 (Inaccurate, false
or misleading information).
12.22.5 R (1) This rule modifies the rules for making an election to become a core
SMCR firm or an enhanced scope SMCR firm in accordance with
the procedure set out in SYSC 23 Annex 1(as set out in the Individual
Accountability (FCA-Authorised Firms) Instrument 2018) for the
purposes of SUP TP 12.22.3R.
(2) A firm may make such an election on or after the Form O start
date.
(4) The election takes effect for the purposes of SUP TP 12.22.3R on the
first notification date or, if it is made after that date, immediately.
(5) If the election is made on or after the first notification date the firm
must at the same time make the following notifications and
applications (based on the type of SMCR firm it has elected to
become):
12.23 Forms
12.23.1 R Form K
[Insert here the form titled “Conversion Notification Form – FCA Solo Regulated
Firms (Form K)”. The text of this form is contained in Part One of Annex Q of
this instrument]
12.23.2 R Form O
[Insert here the form titled “Notification of change to firm classification under the
Senior Managers & Certification Regime (Pre-Commencement version) (Form
O)”. The text of this form is contained in Part One of Annex Q of this instrument]
Part 2: Comes into force [ ] 20[ ] [main commencement date for solo-regulated firms]
(b) notify the FCA or PRA of any approved person who has
ceased to perform a controlled function specified by that
regulator, Form C (Notice of ceasing to perform
controlled functions (including senior management
functions)); see:
(4) the other elements of the regime for SMCR firms described in
SYSC 23.4 (Overview of the senior managers and certification
regime) apply (which differ depending on the type of SMCR
firm).
All …
… …
Approved persons
10A.1 Application
10A.1.1 R This chapter applies to every : (1) firm that is not an SMCR firm that
has an appointed representative.
; and
(2) SMCR firm, but only to the extent required by SUP 10A.1.16BR
(Appointed representatives).
10A.1.5 R (1) This chapter does not apply in relation to an overseas firm
overseas appointed representative in relation to regulated
activities which are carried on in the United Kingdom other than
from an establishment maintained by it or its that appointed
representative in the United Kingdom.
10A.1.6 R - (1) Only the following FCA controlled governing functions (as
modified by this rule) apply in relation to an overseas firm
overseas appointed representative which maintains an
establishment in the United Kingdom from which regulated
activities are carried on:
(1) the The director function where only applies to the extent that
the person performing that function:
Incoming EEA firms, and incoming Treaty firms and UCITS qualifiers
10A.1.7 R This chapter does not apply in relation to the appointed representative
of:
10A.1.8 G SUP 10A.1.7R reflects the provisions of section 59(8) of the Act and, in
relation to an incoming Treaty firm and a UCITS qualifier, the Treaty
and the UCITS Directive. It preserves the principle of Home State
prudential regulation. In relation to an incoming EEA firm exercising an
EEA right, or an incoming Treaty firm exercising a Treaty right, the
effect is to reserve to the Home State regulator the assessment of the
fitness and propriety of a person performing a function in the exercise
10A.1.10 G An incoming EEA firm will have to consider, for example, the position
of a branch manager based in the United Kingdom who may also be
performing a function in relation to the carrying on of a regulated
activity not covered by the EEA right of the firm. In so far as the
function is within the description of an FCA controlled function, the
firm will need to seek approval for that person to perform that FCA
controlled function. [deleted]
10A.1.11 R Only the following FCA controlled functions apply to an incoming EEA
firm with respect to its passported activities carried on from a branch in
the United Kingdom:
(c) [deleted]
(3) the customer function other than where this relates to the
function in SUP 10A.10.7R(4) and (7). [deleted]
Incoming EEA firms etc with top-up permission activities from a UK branch
(1) the FCA required functions, other than the apportionment and
oversight function and the compliance oversight function;
(c) [deleted]
10A.1.14 R A person does not perform the significant management function for a
firm under SUP 10A.1.11R or SUP 10A.1.13R if that person would not
have been treated as performing any FCA controlled function for that
firm if that firm had been a UK firm. [deleted]
10.1.15A R The FCA governing functions do not apply to a tied agent of an EEA
MiFID investment firm.
10A.1.16A R This The customer function is the only controlled function in this
chapter that applies to an appointed representative that is an SMCR
firm and has a limited permission to carry on a regulated activity
prescribed for the purposes of section 39(1E)(a) of the Act as follows: .
10A.1.16C G (1) References in this chapter to a firm include an SMCR firm, but
only to the extent required by SUP 10A.1.16BR Certain
additional controlled functions apply to a firm in SUP
10A.1.16AR under SUP 10C (FCA senior managers regime for
approved persons in SMCR firms).
10A.1.16D G …
(2) Generally, the FCA does not think that a person performing a
function in SUP 10A.1.16BR this chapter will have sufficient
responsibility for managing the affairs of the appointed
representative’s principal (as opposed to managing the affairs
of the appointed representative itself) to perform a senior
management function.
(3) Therefore:
(a) the FCA has not designated any of the functions in SUP
10A.1.16BR this chapter as a senior management
function; and
Members of a profession
10A.1.17 R (1) This chapter, except in respect of the FCA required functions,
does not apply to an authorised professional firm in respect of
its non-mainstream regulated activities, subject to (2).
10A.1.19 G It will be a matter of fact in each case whether, having regard to all the
circumstances, including in particular where the balance of the business
lies, a firm’s principal purpose is to carry on activities other than
regulated activities. If a firm wishes to rely on SUP 10A.1.18R, it
should be in a position to demonstrate that its principal purpose is to
carry on activities other than regulated activities. [deleted]
10A.1.21 G For a firm that is exempt from MiFID under article 2(1)(j) and whose
only permission is bidding in emissions auctions, the only FCA
controlled functions that apply to it are:
Benchmark activities
10A.1.21A G (1) For a firm which only has a permission for administering a
benchmark, the following FCA controlled functions do not
apply:
(b) the FCA controlled function in (d) above does not apply
in relation to benchmark activities (see SUP 10A.8.2R).
10A.1.24 G In accordance with section 59(7C) of the Act this chapter does not
apply to an internally managed AIF which is a body corporate and not
a collective investment scheme. [deleted]
10A.1.25 R (1) Subject to (2) and (3), this chapter, except in respect of the
apportionment and oversight function, does not apply to a firm
that has limited permission in relation to the carrying on of the
relevant credit activity (as defined in paragraph 2G of Schedule
6 to the Act) for which it has limited permission.
Obligations on firms
10A.2 Purpose
10.3.4 G If, however, a firm is a member of a group, and the arrangements for
the performance of an FCA controlled function of the firm are made by,
for instance, the holding company, the person performing the function
will only require approval if there is an arrangement (under section
59(1)) or a contract (under section 59(2)) between the firm and holding
company permitting this. This need not be a written contract but could
arise, for example, by conduct, custom and practice. [deleted]
4 Partner function
10A.5.6 R If:
Introduction
10A.6.1 G Every firm appointed representative will have one or more persons
responsible for directing its affairs. These persons will be performing
the FCA governing functions and will be required to be FCA-approved
persons unless the application provisions in SUP 10A.1, or the
particular description of an FCA controlled function, provide otherwise.
For example, each director of a company incorporated under the
Companies Acts will perform an FCA governing function.
(1) (where apportioned under SYSC 4.3.1R and SYSC 4.4.3R (or,
for a full-scope UK AIFM apportioned under article 60(1) of the
AIFMD level 2 regulation))
10A.6.4 G (1) The effect of SUP 10A.6.3R is that a person who is approved to
perform an FCA governing function will not have to be
specifically FCA-approved to perform the systems and controls
function or the significant management function or the part of
the customer function specified in SUP 10A.10.7R(7).
However, a person who is approved to perform an FCA
10A.6.5 G See MIPRU 2.2 for how the FCA’s approved persons regime is
adjusted for a firm carrying on insurance distribution activity. [deleted]
(3) (1) does not apply to the function falling into SUP 10A.6.13R
(non-executive director of the parent undertaking or holding
company).
10A.6.9 G Examples of where SUP 10A.6.8R might apply include (but are not
limited to):
10A.6.14 G Examples of where SUP 10A.6.13R might apply include (but are not
limited to):
(2) The basic position is set out in SUP 10A.3.4G. As is the case
with all controlled functions, The guidance in SUP 10C.5B.3G
to SUP 10C.5B.5G about when the group entity senior manager
function applies to an SMCR firm is also relevant to when those
who have a position with an appointed representative’s parent
undertaking or holding company may be performing a
controlled function under SUP 10A.6.8R and or SUP
10A.6.13R. are subject to the overriding provisions in SUP
10A.6.17 R The chief executive function is the function of acting in the capacity of a
chief executive of a firm an appointed representative.
10A.6.18 G This function is having the responsibility, alone or jointly with one or
more others, under the immediate authority of the governing body:
(1) for the conduct of the whole of the business (or relevant
activities); or
10A.6.19 G For a branch branch in the United Kingdom of an overseas firm a non-
UK appointed representative, the FCA would not normally expect the
overseas chief executive of the firm appointed representative as a whole
to be FCA-approved for this function where there is a senior manager
under him them with specific responsibility for those activities of the
branch branch which are subject to the UK regulatory system. In some
circumstances, the person within the firm appointed representative
responsible for UK operations may, if the function is likely to enable
him them to exercise significant influence over the branch branch, also
perform the chief executive function (see SUP 10A.7.4G).
10A.6.34 G In practice, the FCA expects that most non-directive friendly societies
will be PRA-authorised persons. Where that is the case, this chapter
does not apply and so the small friendly society function will not apply.
[deleted]
(2) [deleted]
10A.7.3 G The fact that there is a person performing the apportionment and
oversight function, and who has responsibility for activities subject to
regulation by the FCA, may have a bearing on whether a manager who
is based overseas will be performing an FCA controlled function. It is a
factor to take into account when assessing the likely influence of the
overseas manager.
10A.7.6 G Where the person performing the apportionment and oversight function
is also responsible for the firm’s insurance distribution activity, the
words “(insurance distribution)” will be inserted after this FCA
controlled function (see MIPRU 2.2.5G).
10A.7.7 G [deleted]
(a) [deleted]
10A.7.9 R In relation to a CASS medium firm and a CASS large firm (other than a
CASS large debt management firm), the CASS operational oversight
function is the function of acting in the capacity of a person to whom is
allocated the function set out in CASS 1A.3.1AR.
10A.7.10 R The money laundering reporting function is the function of acting in the
capacity of the money laundering reporting officer of a firm.
10A.8.1 R The systems and controls function is the function of acting in the
capacity of an employee of the firm with responsibility for reporting to
the governing body of a firm, or the audit committee (or its equivalent)
in relation to:
(2) setting and controlling its risk exposure (see SYSC 7.1.6R,
article 23(2) of the MiFID Org Regulation and article 23(2) of
the MiFID Org Regulation (as applied in accordance with SYSC
1 Annex 1 2.8AR, SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.2-AR, SYSC 1 Annex 1
3.2-BR, SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.2CR and SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.3R));
and
10A.8.2 R The systems and controls function does not apply in relation to:
10A.8.3 G [deleted]
10A.8.4 G Where an employee performs the systems and controls function the
FCA would expect the firm to ensure that the employee had sufficient
expertise and authority to perform that function effectively. A director
or senior manager would meet this expectation.
Application
10A.9.2 G The FCA anticipates that there will be only a few firms needing to seek
approval for an individual to perform the significant management
function set out in SUP 10A.9.1R(1). In most firms, those approved for
the FCA governing functions, FCA required functions and, where
appropriate, the systems and controls function, are likely to exercise all
the significant influence at senior management level.
10A.9.3 G A proprietary trader undertakes activities with the firm’s money and
has the ability to commit the firm. By virtue of this role, all proprietary
traders have potential to be able to exercise significant influence on the
firm for the purposes of the definition of significant-influence function.
Therefore, it is the FCA’s expectation that all firms will assess all their
proprietary traders to ascertain the ones for whom approval is required.
10A.9.4 G The scale, nature and complexity of the firm’s business may be such
that a firm apportions, under SUP 10A.9.1R(1), a significant
responsibility to an individual who is not approved to perform the FCA
governing functions, FCA required functions or, where appropriate, the
systems and controls function. If so, the firm should consider whether
the functions of that individual fall within the significant management
function. For the purposes of the description of the significant
(1) the size and significance of the firm’s business in the United
Kingdom; for example, a firm carrying on designated
investment business may have a large number of approved
persons (for example, in excess of 100 individuals);
10A.9.5 G When considering whether a business unit is significant, the firm should
take into account all relevant factors in the light of the firm’s current
circumstances and its plans for the future, including:
(6) any other factor which makes the unit significant to the conduct
of the firm’s affairs so far as relating to the regulated activity.
10A.9.6 G The question may arise whether a manager who is based overseas will
be performing the significant management function under SUP
10A.9.9R and should, therefore, be an FCA-approved person. This is
especially true where the firm operates matrix management. The fact
there is a person performing the apportionment and oversight function,
and who has responsibility for activities subject to regulation by the
FCA, may have a bearing on this. It is a factor to take into account
when assessing the likely influence of the overseas manager.
(2) [deleted]
10A.9.11 R The significant management function does not include any of the
activities described in any other FCA controlled function if that other
controlled function applies to the firm.
Introduction
10A.10.6 G …
10A.10.6B G Section 59(2) of the Act covers a controlled function performed under
an arrangement entered into by a contractor of a firm in relation to the
carrying on by the firm of a regulated activity. Section 59(2) is reflected
in SUP 10A.3.1R(2) (Provisions related to the Act).
Forms
10A.12.1 G The forms listed in SUP 10A.12.2G are referred to in SUP 10A.12
(Procedures relating to FCA-approved persons) to SUP 10A.17 (Further
questions) SUP 10A.16 (How to apply for approval and give
notifications).
Note (1): The form in the SUP annex shown is to be used by a firm whose
Part 4A permission covers only credit-related regulated activities, and by
other firms only in the event of a failure of the information technology systems
used by the FCA. See the relevant “Handbook requirement”.
10A.13.4A G When a MiFID investment firm (except a credit institution) notifies the
FCA of a change using Form A or Form E, they must also submit the
MiFID Article 4 APER Information Form. The details can be found in
SUP 10A.14.4BD. [deleted]
(b) (where the FCA candidate works for the firm’s parent
undertaking or holding company) by the firm’s parent
undertaking or holding company the appointed
representative.
(2) Usually this will be the firm that is employing the FCA
candidate to perform the FCA controlled function. Where a firm
has outsourced the performance of an FCA controlled function,
the details of the outsourcing determine where responsibility
lies and whom the FCA anticipates will submit FCA-approved
persons application forms. SUP 10A.13.6G describes some
common situations. The firm which is outsourcing is referred to
as “A” and the person to whom the performance of the FCA
controlled function has been outsourced, or which makes the
arrangement for the FCA controlled function to be performed, is
referred to as “B”. In each situation, A must take reasonable
care to ensure that, in accordance with section 59(2) of the Act,
no person performs an FCA controlled function under an
arrangement entered into by its contractor in relation to the
10A.14.4 D (1) A firm must use Form E where an approved person is both
ceasing to perform one or more controlled functions and needs
to be approved in relation to one or more FCA controlled
functions within in relation to the same firm or in relation to a
firm in the same group.
(ii) …
in relation to any:
(iii) …
(3) SUP 10A.14.4BD explains how this requirement fits in with the
requirement to submit a Form A or Form E. [deleted]
10A.14.4B D Where:
(2) that change also requires the firm to apply for approval for that
member or person to perform an FCA-designated senior
management function;
the firm must submit to the FCA the completed form found in SUP 10A
Annex 10D (MiFID Article 4 SMR Information Form) at the same time
as submitting the Form A and/or or Form E about the candidate.
[deleted]
about a candidate can complete the Annex III template outlined in SUP
10A.14.4AG(1) by cross-referring to any information required by the
template that has been included in the relevant Form A or Form E . The
template should be annexed to the relevant Form A or Form E.
[deleted]
10A.14.8 R …
(2) If:
(2) This means that a MiFID investment firm required to notify the
FCA under (1) may also need to submit the Annex III
information along with the Form C or Form E. [deleted]
10A.14.10 R (1) A firm must notify the FCA as soon as practicable after it
becomes aware, or has information which reasonably suggests,
that it will submit a qualified Form C in respect of an FCA-
approved person.
10A.14.13 G A firm can submit Form C or Form E and the MiFID Article 4 APER
Information Form to the FCA in advance of the cessation date. When a
person ceases the arrangement under which they perform an FCA
controlled function, they will automatically cease to be an FCA-
approved person in relation to that FCA controlled function. A person
can only be an FCA-approved person in relation to a specific FCA
controlled function. Therefore, a person is not an FCA-approved person
during any period between ceasing to perform one FCA controlled
function (when they are performing no other FCA controlled function)
and being approved in respect of another FCA controlled function.
10A.14.21 G (1) If, in relation to a firm which has completed the relevant Form
A (SUP 10A Annex 4D) (SUP 10C Annex 3D), any of the
details relating to arrangements and FCA controlled functions
are to change, the firm must notify the FCA on Form D (SUP
10C Annex 6R).
References
(2) This applies even if A is a firm to which SUP 10C (FCA senior
managers regime for approved persons in SMCR firms)) applies
rather than this chapter. [deleted]
10A.15.4 G The obligations to supply information to the FCA under either SUP
10A.14.8R or SUP 10A.14.10R apply notwithstanding any agreement
(for example a ‘COT 3’ Agreement settled by the Advisory,
Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS)) or any other
arrangements entered into by a firm or its appointed representative and
an employee upon termination of the employee’s employment. A firm
should not (and should ensure that its appointed representatives do not)
enter into any such arrangements or agreements that could conflict with
its obligations under this section.
10A.16.3 G If the information technology systems used by the FCA fail and online
submission is unavailable for 24 hours or more, the FCA and PRA will
endeavour to publish a notice on their websites confirming that online
submission is unavailable and that the alternative methods of
submission set out in SUP 10A.16.1D(4) and SUP 15.7.4R to SUP
15.7.9G (Form and method of notification) should be used. [deleted]
10A.17.1 G A list of frequently asked questions and answers is at SUP 10A Annex
1.
10A.17.2 G If the firm or its advisers have further questions, they should contact the
FCA’s Contact Centre (see SUP 10A.12.6G).
Delete the following Annexes. The deleted text of each Annex is not shown.
10A Annex Approved persons regime: summary of forms and their use for
2G applications for approval to perform an FCA-controlled function
[deleted]
10C FCA senior managers regime for approved persons in SMCR firms
10C.1 Application
Appointed representatives
10C.1.7 R This chapter does not deal with an approved person who is approved
under SUP 10A.1.16BR (Appointed representatives) SUP 10A (FCA
Approved Persons in Appointed Representatives).
(5) Both this chapter and SUP 10A deal with an appointed
representative that has a limited permission to carry on a
regulated activity prescribed for the purposes of section
39(1E)(a) of the Act.
10C.3.4 G The FCA has (in SUP 10A (FCA Approved Persons in Appointed
Representatives)) specified controlled functions for SMCR firms that
are not designated senior management functions. (See SUP 10C.1.7R to
SUP 10C.1.8G (Appointed representatives)).
SMF 13 …
SMF 15 …
SMF 27 …
FCA required … …
functions
SMF 23b …
10C.4A.1 G …
Sole traders
10C.4A.2 G (1) An individual sole trader themselves will not need approval to
perform any of the governing functions. Therefore the
governing functions do not apply to a sole trader with no
employees.
(4) This might happen, for example, if the sole trader’s business is
so large that the sole trader sets up a governing body to run it.
10C.5.9 R …
10.5.10 G …
(3) The individual in (2) may, for example, have the title of chief
executive or similar. The individual would (subject to SUP
10C.5.11G) have to be an FCA-approved person under SUP
10C.5.9R.
10C.5.11 G (1) In practice, the FCA expects that most non-directive friendly
societies will be PRA-authorised persons.
(2) Where that is the case, the executive director function will often
not apply (see SUP 10C.4A.1G).
...
10C.5.18 G …
(4) Any regulated activities which such a partner carries on are not
within the description of the partner function.
10C.5.21 R (1) The chief executive function is the function of acting in the
capacity of a chief executive of a firm.
10C.5.22 G This function is having the responsibility, alone or jointly with one or
more others, under the immediate authority of the governing body for
the conduct of the whole of the business (or relevant activities) of the
firm.
10C.5A.6 R …
10C.5A.7 R The chair of the governing body function is the function of having
responsibility for chairing, and overseeing the performance of the role
of, the governing body of the firm.
10C.5A.8 R The chair of the risk committee function is the function of having
responsibility for chairing, and overseeing the performance of, any
committee responsible for the oversight of the risk management
systems, policies and procedures of the firm, including where
applicable to the firm, a committee established in accordance with the
risk control requirements for SMCR firms.
10C.5A.9 R The chair of the audit committee function is the function of having
responsibility for chairing, and overseeing the performance of, any
committee responsible for the oversight of the internal audit system of
the firm including where applicable to the firm, a committee established
in accordance with the internal audit requirements for SMCR firms.
10C.5B.1 R (1) The group entity senior manager function is the function of
having a significant influence on the management or conduct of
one or more aspects of the affairs of a firm in relation to its
regulated activities.
(2) This controlled function does not include having such influence
in the course of performance of another designated senior
management function for that firm.
10C.5B.2 G (1) This provision explains the basis on which the group entity
senior manager function is included as a controlled function.
(2) The basic position is set out in SUP 10C.3.9G. As is the case
with all controlled functions in this chapter, the definition of the
group entity senior manager function is subject to the
overriding provisions in SUP 10C.3.6R, which sets out the
requirements of section 59(1) and (2) of the Act.
(3) This means that unless the firm has an arrangement permitting
the performance of these roles by the persons concerned, these
persons will not be performing the group entity senior manager
function.
(4) Therefore, the FCA accepts that there will be cases in which a
person performing the role described in SUP 10C.5B.1R will
not require approval.
10C.5B.4 G Whether someone performs the group entity senior manager function
should be assessed on a case-by-case basis. The factors to be taken into
account include:
(2) the split of key responsibilities between the group and firm
boards and senior management; and
the FCA would not routinely expect the firm to have persons
performing the group entity senior manager function in place.
(2) So for example if the individual has responsibility for the firm’s
finances they may be performing the chief finance officer
function. If that is the case the individual will not be performing
10C.5B.8 G (1) The parent of a subsidiary firm cannot itself perform the group
entity senior manager function.
(2) A shareholder in the parent will also not perform this function
unless the shareholder is also a director, officer or employee of
the parent and is exerting significant influence over the firm
through that role.
10C.6.4 R …
10C.6.5 R The limited scope function is the function of acting in the capacity of a
person responsible for the apportionment function and/or the oversight
function set out in SYSC 4.4.5R.
10C.6.6 G The fact that there is a person performing the limited scope function,
and who has responsibility for activities subject to regulation by the
FCA, may have a bearing on whether a manager who is based overseas
will be performing an FCA controlled function. It is a factor to take into
account when assessing the likely influence of the overseas manager.
10C.6A Systems and controls functions: Finance, risk and internal audit
Introduction
Seniority
10C.6A.2 G The FCA expects a firm to ensure that a person performing a function in
this section for a firm has sufficient expertise and authority to perform
that function effectively. A director or senior manager would meet this
expectation.
10C.6A.4 R The chief risk officer function is the function of having responsibility
for overall management of the risk controls of a firm, including:
(1) the setting and managing of the firm’s risk exposures; and
10A.6A.5 G (1) Risk controls systems include ones designed to deal with the
kinds of matters in the risk control requirements for SMCR
firms.
10A.6A.7 G (1) Internal audit covers the kinds of matters in the internal audit
requirements for SMCR firms.
Seniority
10C.6B.1 G The FCA expects a firm to ensure that a person performing a function in
this section for a firm has sufficient expertise and authority to perform
that function effectively. A director or senior manager would meet this
expectation.
10C.6B.2 R (1) The chief operations function is the function of having overall
responsibility for managing all or substantially all the internal
operations or technology of the firm or of a part of the firm.
(c) any part of the firm responsible for advising other parts
of the firm.
(4) The chief operations function does not include the function of
acting in the capacity of a chief executive of a firm.
(5) A person (P) does not perform the chief operations function by
managing the internal operations or technology of a part of a
firm that carries out other functions (such as a part of the firm
that carries on regulated activities with clients) as part of P’s
function of managing that part of the firm.
(2) Those services include but may not be necessarily limited to the
mechanisms and networks that support the operations of a firm,
including data entry, data storage, data processing and reporting
services, but also monitoring, business and decision support
services.
10C.6B.4 G The chief operations function may include but not necessarily be
limited to areas such as:
(2) cybersecurity;
10C.6B.5 G If:
(1) a firm does not have anyone who performs the chief operations
function; but
10C.6B.7 G The table in SUP 10C.6B.8G gives examples of how the chief
operations function applies.
Example Comments
(1) Firm A has the following The COO is the only person
three individuals. performing the chief operations
function.
- Chief Operating Officer
(COO);
- Chief Information &
Technology Officer (CITO);
- Head of Human Resources
(Head of HR).
The Head of HR and the
CITO report to the COO.
(2) Firm A has the following Both individuals perform the chief
two individuals: operations function.
- Chief Operating Officer
(COO);
- Chief Information and
Technology Officer (CITO).
The COO and CITO are
equally senior. Both have
separate reporting lines to
the Board and the CEO.
Overall responsibility for
information technology is
shared between the COO and
CITO.
The COO has overall
responsibility for all other
internal operations.
(7) Firm A has two business SUP 10C.6B.2R(5) means that neither
lines (broking and advice). B B nor C performs the chief operations
is chief executive of the function.
broking division and C is
chief executive of the
advisory division. Each chief
executive is responsible for
the internal operations and
IT of their division. Both B
and C report to the Board.
Application
10C.7.1-1 G The effect of SUP 10C.7.1-2R is that this section only applies to one of
the following types of UK SMCR firm:
Definition
(1) is performing:
Example Comments
… …
… …
10C.8 The other local responsibility function (SMF22) and EEA branch senior
manager functions (SMF21)
10C.8.3 G Table: Examples of how the other local responsibility function applies
Example Comments
(4) A branch does not have a P needs approval to perform the other
Head of Internal Audit. ‘P’ is local responsibility function.
allocated local responsibility However, if P has already been
for internal audit in relation approved to perform another FCA-
to that branch. designated senior management
function or (if the firm is a PRA-
authorised person) PRA-designated
senior management function, then P
will not be performing the other local
responsibility function.
Application
10C.10.9 D …
(i) …
10C.10.16 R (1) This rule applies to an application by a firm for the FCA’s
approval under section 59 of the Act (Approval for particular
arrangements) for the performance of an FCA-designated senior
management function.
(3) This rule does not apply to a firm that is a sole trader if the
candidate is the sole trader themselves.
10C.11.2 G (1) …
10C.11.6 G (1) …
(3) …
10C.11.7 D (1)
10C.11.14 G …
(4) The FCA and the PRA have coordinated their arrangements so
that a firm PRA-authorised person can prepare a single
document that will meet the requirements of both regulators
about statements of responsibilities.
10C.11.18 G The table in SUP 10C.11.19G gives examples of how the requirements
in this section for submitting statements of responsibilities (combined,
in the case of a PRA-authorised person, with the corresponding PRA
requirements) work in different cases.
Example Comments
Example Comments
The arrangements in SUP 10C.9 for FCA
functions to be absorbed into PRA ones do
not apply and so there are separate
applications to the FCA and PRA.
The firm is a PRA-authorised person.
Example Comments
(c) only contain material about the matters that this chapter,
the corresponding PRA requirements (in the case of a
PRA-authorised person), and the Act say should be
included in it.
10C.11.26 G …
Purpose
10C.12.1 G …
10C.12.2 G …
(3) The FCA has (in SUP 10A (FCA Approved Persons in
Appointed Representatives)) specified controlled functions for
SMCR firms that are not designated senior management
functions. See SUP 10C.1.7R to SUP 10C.1.8G (Appointed
representatives) for more about this.
10C.13.4 G (1) There are requirements about whether If the firm applying for a
change described in SUP 10C.13.3G is a PRA-authorised
person, there are requirements about whether it should apply to
the FCA or the PRA. Paragraphs (2) to (3) summarise these
requirements.
10C.14.1 G …
10C.14.22 R …
10C.15 Forms and other documents and how to submit them to the FCA
10C.15.7 D (1) A firm other than a credit union firm in (2) must submit a
document in column 1 of the table in SUP 10C.15.10R, in
accordance with the corresponding requirement in column two
of that table.
(2) A:
(3) …
10C.15.8 R …
References
1.3 G …
(3) Another reason would be if the rules defining the FCA controlled
function refer to a rule elsewhere in the Handbook and the latter only
applies to certain types of firm. For example, SYSC 1 Annex 1
(Detailed application of SYSC) and SYSC 4.4 (Apportionment of
responsibilities) cut back the application of the limited scope
function.
(4) The exclusions in Part Two of this Annex and in SUP 10C.1 are also
relevant.
(2) × means that the FCA controlled function does not apply;
2.1 R (1) [This part has been left blank deliberately] This chapter, except in
respect of the FCA required functions, does not apply to an
authorised professional firm that is an FCA-authorised person in
respect of its non-mainstream regulated activities, subject to (2).
Insert the following new Parts in SUP 10C Annex 1 where indicated. The text is not underlined.
4.4 R …
5.1 R (1) The table in SUP 10C Annex 1 5.2R sets out which FCA controlled
function applies to which type of core SMCR firm.
(2) Firms in (1) are divided into the following categories for the purposes
of this rule:
Governing functions
Required functions
Note: The categories of firm in the column headings of this table are to be interpreted in
accordance with the classification of firms at SUP 10C Annex 1 5.1R. Therefore:
(a) column three (UK firm) refers to SUP 10C Annex 1 5.1R(2)(a);
(b) column four (EEA firm) refers to SUP 10C Annex 1 5.1R(2)(b);
(c) column five (Other overseas firm) refers to SUP 10C Annex 1 5.1R(2)(c); and
(d) column six (Emission auction bidders) refers to SUP 10C Annex 1 5.1R(2)(d).
6.1 R The table in SUP 10C Annex 1 6.2R sets out which FCA controlled functions
apply to an enhanced scope SMCR firm.
Governing functions
Required functions
7.1 R Limited scope SMCR firms are divided into the following categories for the
purposes of SUP 10C Annex 1:
(1) a firm falling within the table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 5.4R that does not
come within (2) to (4);
(2) a firm falling within row (5) of the table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 5.4R
(distribution of non-investment insurance contracts);
(3) a firm falling within SYSC 23 Annex 1 5.7R (credit firms with limited
permission) except for one falling within (4);
(5) a sole trader who does not come within (1) to (4);
(6) an authorised professional firm that does not come within (1) to (4);
7.2 R A firm in SUP 10C Annex 1 7.1R(7) does not fall into any other paragraph of
SUP 10C Annex 1 7.1R.
7.3 R (1) The table in SUP 10C Annex 1 7.4R sets out which FCA controlled
functions apply to a limited scope SMCR firm covered by SUP 10C
Annex 1 7.1R(1), (2), (3) or (4).
(3) Part One of that table applies to other limited scope SMCR firms in
(1).
7.4 R Table: Controlled functions applying to limited scope SMCR firms except
sole traders and authorised professional firms
Governing functions
Required functions
Required functions
Note (1): The categories of firm in the column headings of this table are to be interpreted in
accordance with the classification of firms at SUP 10C Annex 1 7.1R. Therefore:
(1) column three (General) refers to SUP 10C Annex 1 7.1R(1);
(2) column four (Insurance distribution and credit firms) refers to SUP 10C Annex 1 7.1R(2)
and SUP 10C Annex 1 7.1R(3); and
(3) column five (Consumer credit appointed representatives) refers to SUP 10C Annex 1
7.1R(4).
Note (2): SUP 10C Annex 1 7.3R sets out which part of the table applies to which firm.
Note (3): Not applicable to these firms because SUP 10C Annex 1 7.2R means that the table
does not apply to firms in this category.
7.5 R (1) This rule applies to a firm in SUP 10C Annex 1 7.1R(4) (an
appointed representative that has a limited permission).
7.6 G The customer function also applies to a firm in SUP 10C Annex 1 7.1R(4)
under SUP 10A (FCA Approved Persons in Appointed Representatives).
Such a firm will need to read SUP 10A as well as this annex to find the
complete list of controlled functions that apply to them.
7.7 R (1) The table in SUP 10C Annex 1 7.8R sets out which FCA controlled
functions apply to a limited scope SMCR firm that is covered by SUP
10C Annex 1 7.1R(5) or (6) (a sole trader or an authorised
professional firm).
(2) Firms in (1) are divided into the following categories for the purposes
of this rule:
7.8 R Table: Controlled functions applying to limited scope SMCR firms that are
sole traders or authorised professional firms
Governing functions
Required functions
Note: The categories of firm in the column headings of this table are to be interpreted in
accordance with the classification of firms at SUP 10C Annex 1 7.2R. Therefore:
(a) column three (UK firm) refers to SUP 10C Annex 1 7.7R(2)(a);
(b) column four (EEA firm) refers to SUP 10C Annex 1 7.7R(2)(b); and
(c) column five (Other overseas firm) refers to SUP 10C Annex 1 7.7R(2)(c).
7.9 R None of the FCA controlled functions apply to a limited scope SMCR firm in
the table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.10R.
7.10 R Table: Limited scope SMCR firms to which no controlled functions apply
Function Comments
An EEA SMCR firm falling within SYSC 23 This applies whether or not it is an appointed
Annex 1 5.7R (credit firm with limited representative
permission)
7.11 G As explained in SUP 10C Annex 1 1.3G, the full range of FCA controlled
functions that are applied to a class of firm by this Annex may not apply to
every firm in that class. For example, in the case of a limited scope SMCR
firm that is a sole trader:
(2) The money laundering reporting function does not apply to a sole
trader with no employees (see SYSC 6.3.9R).
10C Summary of forms and their use in the senior managers regime
Annex
2G
(10) Person remaining with the same firm E Submitted by firm to the FCA
PRA-authorised person but giving up a PRA before changes take place.
controlled function and taking up an FCA-
designated senior management function.
(11) Person remaining with the same firm E Submitted by firm to the PRA
PRA-authorised person but giving up an before changes take place (see
FCA-designated senior management the PRA’s requirements).
function and taking up a PRA-designated
senior management function.
(12) Person remaining with the same firm E Submitted by firm to the FCA in
PRA-authorised person in the circumstances advance of giving up the PRA
described in example 9 in the table in SUP controlled function.
10C.7.3G (ceasing to perform a PRA
controlled function triggering need for FCA
approval to perform the other overall
responsibility function).
(14) Person remaining with the same firm E Submitted by firm to the FCA in
PRA-authorised person in the circumstances advance of giving up the PRA
described in example 8 in the table in SUP controlled function.
10C.9.9G (giving up a PRA controlled
function triggering need for FCA approval).
Insert the following annexes in the appropriate position. The text (which consists of forms) is
included in Part Two of Annex Q of this instrument.
Long Form A – Solo regulated firms (including EEA and third country)
Short Form A – Solo regulated firms (including EEA and third country)
(The first form is to be inserted under the heading “Long Form A” and the second form is to
be inserted under the heading “Short Form A”)
12 Appointed representatives
Obligations of firms under the approved persons and senior managers regime
12.6.8 G (1) Some of the controlled functions, as set out in SUP 10A.4.1R SUP
10A, apply to an appointed representative of a firm, other than an
introducer appointed representative, just as they apply to a firm (see
SUP 10A.1.15R). These are the governing functions and the
customer function. In the case of an appointed representative that
also has a limited permission, an FCA required designated senior
management function may apply to it and SUP 10C may apply in
addition to SUP 10A. As explained in SUP 10A.1.16R and SUP
10A.3.2G respectively:
(a) the effect of SUP 10A.1.15R is that the directors (or their
equivalent) and senior managers (or their equivalent) of an
appointed representative, other than an introducer appointed
representative, must also be approved under section 59 of the
Act for the performance of certain controlled functions;
(c) sections 59(1) and 59(2) of the Act (Approval for particular
arrangements) provide that approval is necessary in respect of
a controlled function which is performed under an
arrangement entered into by a firm, or its contractors
(typically an appointed representative), in relation to a
regulated activity.
(3) The approved persons regime does not apply in relation to CBTL
business carried on by CBTL firms. [deleted]
(4) The approved persons regime for SMCR firms is in SUP 10C (FCA
senior managers regime for approved persons in SMCR firms),
rather than SUP 10A. However, SUP 10A still applies to approved
persons of appointed representatives of SMCR firms (see SUP
10A.1.16BR to SUP 10A.1.16DG and SUP 10C.1.8G for more about
this). [deleted]
… … …
… … …
SUP … …
… …
… … …
Timing and form of notifications: conduct rules staff other than SMF managers
15.11.13 R …
(a) cover:
(ii) (for any other firm) the 12 month period ending on the
last day of August; and
..
authorised or
registered under the
benchmark regulation,
or ceases to be
authorised for
administering a
specified benchmark.
Annex K
In this Annex, underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text.
1.3.7 R …
Annex L
In this Annex, underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text.
8 Supervision
8.3.4 G (1) The regime for approved persons differs between applies to SMCR
firms and other types of firm.
(3) SUP 10C deals with the approved persons requirements for credit
unions and other SMCR firms.
8.3.8 G …
Annex M
In this Annex, underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text.
High Level … …
Standards
Code of This does not apply applies.
Conduct
(COCON)
… …
… …
… … …
Regulatory … …
processes
Supervision This applies, with the following
manual (SUP) qualifications:
…
(b) in SUP 10 (Approved persons), if an
oil market participant’s principal purpose
is to carry on activities other than
regulated activities, then the scope of the
significant influence functions is
restricted to the required functions: see
SUP 10A.1.18R - SUP 10A.1.19G
…
… …
… … …
Annex N
In this Annex, underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text.
High Level … …
Standards
Code of This does not apply applies.
Conduct
(COCON)
… …
… …
… … …
Regulatory … …
processes
Supervision This applies, with the following
manual (SUP) qualifications:
…
… …
… … …
Annex O
In this Annex, underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text.
High Level … …
Standards
Code of This does not apply applies.
Conduct
(COCON)
… …
… …
… … …
Regulatory … …
processes
Supervision This applies, with the following
manual (SUP) qualifications:
…
(c) in SUP 10 (Approved persons), if a
service company’s principal purpose is to
… …
… … …
Annex P
In this Annex, underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text.
1.1.3 G …
(4)
High Level …
Standards
Senior The detailed application of this is set out in
Management SYSC 1 Annex 1. However, in general, only
Arrangements, the following parts of SYSC will be relevant
Systems and to a firm which only has permission to carry
Annex Q
Handbook forms
All the text in this Annex is new and so it is not underlined. The forms are to be inserted in
the place specified in paragraph F of the cover sheet of this instrument.
Part 1: Comes into force [ ] 20[ ] [about six months before main commencement date for
solo-regulated firms]
[Commencement Date]
Name of firm
Title
First name
Surname
Job title
Business address
Postcode
Phone number
Email address
This section should only be completed by enhanced scope SMCR firms (for CF2 to SMF9 conversion for
core SMCR firms, see 2.02).
2.01 The table below provides a breakdown of possible applicable senior management functions for enhanced
SMCR firms only. Please tick all of the senior management functions which have been allocated in this
conversion notification. Only those senior management functions potentially applicable to enhanced SMCR firms
are listed.
Core SMCR firms should use the table in 2.02 if applying for conversion where auto-conversion has not
occurred.
SMF27 Partner
2.02 Individuals at core SMCR firms will be automatically converted to new mapped senior management
functions, where applicable. The only exception is in the case of a firm’s Chair (see below).
Under the Approved Persons Regime (APR), we do not specifically approve the firm’s Chair (individuals are
approved under a CF2 – Non-Executive Director function). It is not possible to automatically convert such
individuals to the new senior management function. As such, firms should use this form to notify us that a CF2
will be performing the Chair role under the SMCR. Failure to do so will mean that the individual will not be
approved to perform the SMF9 role at Commencement.
Core SMCR firms should only use this form where an existing CF2 (Non-Executive Director) under APR
will be performing the SMF9 (Chair of the Governing Body) role at the firm.
Note that individuals may only be mapped from their existing APR controlled function to an appropriate
senior management function (SMF) as set out in Annex [X].
SMF27 Partner
SMF27 Partner
2.06 If you have submitted any applications for approval of individuals to significant influence function CF2 under
the approved persons regime that are currently subject to determination by the FCA, who will remain at the firm in
the capacity of a non-executive director following commencement date, and such individuals are not listed above
in Section 2.02, please list them below.
3.00 If you need to update or correct a previous conversion notification, please provide details of these
amendments below.
4.00 If submitting this form as an enhanced scope SMCR firm, please attach a statement of
responsibilities for each individual identified in this form as being converted to perform one or more
senior management functions. Please also attach the firm’s management responsibilities map.
A core SMCR firm which is completing this form to convert a CF2 to the Chair senior management
function does not need to attach the statement of responsibilities for the Chair.
Declaration
In this declaration, the firm making the notification in relation to each individual is referred to as the “applicant”.
The applicant must ensure that it has the authority of each individual in relation to whom it is making a notification
for conversion to a senior management function to cause the information contained in this form relating to such
individual to be submitted, and that it has made each such individual aware of their prospective regulatory
responsibilities as set out in the FCA’s Code of Conduct (COCON).
It is a criminal offence, knowingly or recklessly, to give the FCA information that is materially false, misleading or
deceptive (see sections 398 and 400 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 – ‘FSMA’).
The applicant must notify the FCA immediately if there is a change to the information in this form and/or if
inaccurate information has been provided.
In addition to other regulatory responsibilities, firms and approved persons have a responsibility to disclose to the
FCA matters of which it would reasonably expect to be notified. Failure to notify the FCA of such information may
lead to the FCA taking disciplinary or other action against the firm and/or individuals.
For the purposes of complying with data protection legislation, please read the FCA’s privacy notice at
https://www.fca.org.uk/data-protection. This notice will tell you what to expect when the FCA collects personal
information, including how and why we use your personal information and who to contact if you have any queries
or wish to exercise your rights.
• they have confirmed that the information supplied is accurate and complete to the best of their knowledge, and
that each statement of responsibility submitted with this form accurately reflects the aspects of the affairs of the
applicant which it is intended that the relevant individual will be responsible for managing in performing their
proposed senior management functions.
Position
Signature
Date
Terms defined in the FCA Handbook are italicised and should be construed accordingly.
This form can only be used by solo-regulated SMCR firms. It is not relevant to dual regulated SMCR
firms, appointed representatives or SMCR firms that are defined as an enhanced scope SMCR firm
because they meet the qualification criteria in SYSC 23 Annex 1.
Limited scope SMCR firms and core SMCR firms can use this form to notify the FCA that they agree
to be subject to the rules for enhanced scope SMCR firms, set out in SYSC 23 Annex 1. Limited
scope SMCR firms can use this form to notify the FCA that they agree to be subject to the rules for
core SMCR firms, set out in SYSC 23 Annex 1.
The pre-Commencement version of Form O can be submitted up to six months before the regime
takes effect. If it is submitted three months or less before the regime takes effect, firms will need to
submit the supporting documentation listed in Section 2 at the same time.
The opt-up will take effect at Commencement. To withdraw a notification, firms must write to us before
the opt-up takes effect. Once the opt-up has taken effect, firms can use Form O to revert to the SMCR
classification defined in SYSC 23 Annex 1. This will be effective one year from the date of notification.
Firms opting-up should ensure they understand and are in a position to comply with the relevant rules,
set out in the FCA’s Senior management arrangements, Systems and Controls (SYSC), Supervision
(SUP), Code of Conduct (COCON) sourcebooks. The decision should be made at the appropriate
levels and approved at governing body level. As a result of opting-up, firms will be subject to rules
relating to additional Senior Management Functions and Prescribed Responsibilities. Firms opting-up
to enhanced scope SMCR firm classification will also be subject to requirements on Responsibilities
Maps, Handover Procedures and Overall Responsibilities.
[Commencement Date]
Name of firm
Form O – Notification of change to firm classification under the Senior Managers & Certification Regime Page 1
Financial Conduct Authority
12 Endeavour Square
Stratford
London E20 1JN
United Kingdom
Telephone +44 (0) 300 500 0597
E-mail [email protected]
Website http://www.fca.org.uk
Registered as a Limited Company in England and Wales No 1920623. Registered Office
as above
Form O – Notification of change to firm classification under the Senior Managers & Certification Regime Page 2
Contact Details Section 1
Title
First name
Surname
Job title
Business address
Postcode
Phone number
Email address
Form O – Notification of change to firm classification under the Senior Managers & Certification Regime Page 3
Notification that the firm is opting-up Section 2
If this notification is being made more than three months before the Regime commences, please proceed to
Section 3.
Core SMCR firm agreeing to be subject to the rules for enhanced scope
SMCR firms
Limited scope SMCR firm agreeing to be subject to the rules for core
SMCR firms
Limited scope SMCR firm agreeing to be subject to the rules for enhanced
scope SMCR firms
Please tick to confirm that you are submitting the supporting documents listed in the table below with this
notification. These documents must be submitted up to three months and at least one week before
Commencement.
*
Form K – Conversion notification
Form O – Notification of change to firm classification under the Senior Managers & Certification Regime Page 4
Declarations and signatures Section 3
In this declaration, the authorised firm making the notification is referred to as the “firm”.
• they have the authority of the firm’s governing body to make this notification;
• the firm’s governing body understands their regulatory responsibilities following the opt-up, as set out in the
FCA’s Senior management arrangements, Systems and Controls (SYSC), Supervision (SUP), Code of
Conduct (COCON) sourcebooks;
• the firm’s governing body understands that, once the opt-up takes effect, the notifying firm will not be able to
revert to its previous SMCR classification (as defined in SYSC 23 Annex 1) for at least one year.
It is a criminal offence, knowingly or recklessly, to give the FCA information that is materially false, misleading or
deceptive (see sections 398 and 400 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000). The notifying firm must
notify the FCA immediately if there is a change to the information in this form and/or if inaccurate information has
been provided.
For the purposes of complying with data protection legislation, please read the FCA’s privacy notice at
https://www.fca.org.uk/data-protection. This notice will tell you what to expect when the FCA collects personal
information, including how and why we use your personal information and who to contact if you have any queries
or wish to exercise your rights.
Position
Signature
Date
Form O – Notification of change to firm classification under the Senior Managers & Certification Regime Page 5
FCA 2018/XX
Part 2: Comes into force [ ] 20[ ] [main commencement date for solo-regulated firms]
Application number
(for FCA use only)
The FCA has produced notes which will assist both the applicant firm and the candidate in answering the
questions in this form. Please read the notes, which are available on the FCA’s website at:
https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/SUP/10C/Annex3D.html
Both the applicant and the candidate will be treated by the FCA as having taken these notes into
consideration when completing this form.
[Commencement Date]
Name of candidate
(to be completed by applicant firm)
Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 1
Personal identification details Section 1
1.02 Title
(e.g. Mr, Mrs, Ms)
1.03 Surname
1.10 a Nationality
b Passport number
(if National Insurance number not
available)
Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 2
1.14 a Private address
b
Postcode
(If address has changed in the last three years, please provide addresses for the previous
three years.)
b
Postcode
b
Postcode
Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 3
Firm identification details Section 2
B Position
C Phone number
D E-mail
Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 4
Arrangement and Senior Management Functions Section 3A
Complete this section if the application is for a senior management function. If you are submitting an
application for a controlled function at an appointed representative, then please complete Section 3B.
Name of group
d Partner
f Other
Give details
3A.02 For applications from a single firm, please tick the boxes that correspond to the senior
management functions to be performed. If the senior management functions are to be performed
for more than one firm, please leave the boxes below blank and go to question 3A.04
Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 5
Tick (if applicable)
SMF27 Partner
Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 6
Insurance Distribution
Will the candidate be responsible for insurance distribution at the firm? YES NO
(Note: Yes can only be selected if the individual is applying for a governing function (other than a non-executive director
function))
Will the candidate be responsible for Mortgage Credit Directive Intermediation at the firm? YES NO
(Note: Yes can only be selected if the individual is applying for a governing function (other than a non-executive director
function))
Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 7
3A.04 Complete this section only if the application is on behalf of more than one
firm.
List all firms within the group (including the firm entered in 2.01) for which the
candidate requires approval and the requested senior management function for
that firm. †
Firm Senior Responsible Responsible for
Reference Name of Management for insurance MCD credit Effective
Number firm Function Job title distribution? intermediation? date
a
Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 8
Arrangements and controlled functions – Appointed Representatives
Section 3B
Complete this section if the application is for a controlled function at an appointed representative (AR). If you are
submitting an application for a senior management function, then please complete Section 3A.
For limited permission consumer credit firms that are also appointed representatives, only the customer function is
relevant in this section. For these firms, relevant senior management functions apply instead of the governing functions
(ie CF1 (AR), CF3 (AR), CF4 (AR) and CF5 (AR)). We do not expect this to apply to many firms.
c Other
Give details
3B.02 For applications from a single firm, please tick the boxes that correspond to the controlled functions to be
performed. If the controlled functions are to be performed for more than one firm, please go to question
3B.05.
a Significant influence CF 1 (AR) Director function
functions
CF 3 (AR) Chief executive function
CF 4 (AR) Partner function
CF 5 (AR) Director of an unincorporated association function
Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 9
3B.05 Complete this section only if the application is on behalf of more than one firm.
List all firms within the group (including the firm entered in 2.01) for which the candidate requires approval and
the requested controlled function for that firm. †
Firm
Reference Controlled
Number Name of firm function Job title Effective date
a
Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 10
Employment history in the past 5 years Section 4
N.B.: ALL gaps must be accounted for
4.01 Employment details (1)
a Period (dd/mm/yyyy) From To
If c or d is ticked,
please give details
c Name of employer
d Nature of business
i Position held
j Responsibilities
Specify
Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 11
4.02 Employment details (2)
a Period (dd/mm/yyyy) From To
If c or d is ticked,
please give details
c Name of employer
d Nature of business
i Position held
j Responsibilities
Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 12
Fitness and propriety Section 5
When answering the questions in this section the candidate should include matters whether in the UK or overseas. By
virtue of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (Exceptions) Order 1975, if the candidate is subject to the law of
England and Wales, candidate must disclose spent convictions and cautions (other than a protected conviction or
caution). By virtue of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (Exclusions and Exceptions) (Scotland) Order 2013 and the
Rehabilitation of Offenders (Exceptions) Order (Northern Ireland) 1979, if the candidate is subject to the law of Scotland or
Northern Ireland, the candidate must disclose spent convictions (other than a protected conviction).
For the avoidance of doubt, references to the legislation above are references to the legislation as amended.
If any question has been answered ‘yes’ in Section 5, further details should be provided in Section 6
If there is any other information the candidate or the firm considers to be relevant to the application, it must be included in
Section 6
5.01.1a Has the candidate ever been convicted of any criminal offence
(whether spent or not and whether or not in the United Kingdom):
i. involving fraud, theft, false accounting, offences against
the administration of public justice (such as perjury,
perverting the course of justice and intimidation of
witnesses or jurors), serious tax offences or other
YES NO
dishonesty or
ii. relating to companies, building societies, industrial and
provident societies, credit unions, friendly societies,
insurance, banking or other financial services,
insolvency, consumer credit or consumer protection,
money laundering, market manipulations or insider
dealing?
c Has the candidate ever been given a caution in relation to any criminal
offence? YES NO
5.01.2 Has the candidate any convictions for any offences other than those in
5.01.1 above (excluding traffic offences that did not result in a ban
from driving or did not involve driving without insurance)? YES NO
5.01.3
Is the candidate the subject of any ongoing criminal investigation?
Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 13
5.01.5 Has any firm at which the candidate holds or has held a position of
influence ever:
(Please check the guidance notes for the meaning of ‘position of
influence’ in the context of the questions in this part of the form.)
c Been the subject of any criminal proceeding which has not resulted in
a conviction? YES NO
Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 14
5.02 Civil Proceedings
5.02.1 Has the candidate, ever been the subject of a judgement debt or
award against the candidate? (whether satisfied or not?) YES NO
5.02.2 Has the candidate ever been party to any civil proceedings which
resulted in any order against the candidate (other than a judgement
debt or award referred to in 5.02.1 above)? (the candidate should YES NO
include, for example, injunctions and employment tribunal
proceedings.)
YES NO
5.02.4 Does the candidate have any current judgement debts (including
CCJs) made under a court order still outstanding, whether in full or in YES NO
part?
5.02.5 Has the candidate ever failed to satisfy any such judgment debts
(including CCJs) made under a court order still outstanding, whether in YES NO
full or part, within one year of the order being made?
Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 15
5.02.6 Has the candidate ever:
5.02.7 Does the candidate, or any undertaking under their management, have
any outstanding financial obligations arising from regulated activities,
which have been carried out in the past (whether or not in the UK or YES NO
overseas)?
5.02.8 Has the candidate ever been adjudged by a court or tribunal (whether
criminal, civil or administrative) for any fraud, misfeasance, negligence,
wrongful trading or other misconduct? Or been found by a judge or YES NO
tribunal to have lied on oath and/or that their evidence was to be
disbelieved?
5.02.10 During the period over which the candidate has held a position of
influence and/or in the 10 years after this, has any firm at which the YES NO
candidate holds or has held a position of influence ever been:
Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 16
5.02.11 Is any firm at which the candidate currently holds or has held, within
the last 12 months from the date of the submission of this form, a
position of influence currently:
Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 17
5.03 Business and Employment Matters
5.03.2 Has the candidate ever been refused entry to, or been dismissed,
suspended or requested to resign from, any professional, vocation,
office or employment, or from any fiduciary office or position of trust YES NO
whether or not remunerated?
5.03.3 Does the candidate have any material written complaints made against
the candidate by the candidate’s clients or former clients in the last five
years which the candidate has accepted, or which are awaiting YES NO
determination, or have been upheld – by an ombudsman or complaints
scheme?
Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 18
5.04 Regulatory Matters
i Been the subject of any civil action related to any regulated activity
which has resulted in a finding by a court? YES NO
Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 19
5.04.2 In relation to activities regulated by the FCA or any other regulatory
body, has the candidate or any firm at which the candidate holds or
has held a position of influence at any time during and within one year
of the candidate’s association with the firm ever:
Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 20
5.05 Other Matters
5.05.1 Is the candidate, in the role to which the application relates, aware of
any business interests, employment obligations, or any other
circumstance which may conflict with the performance of the senior YES NO
management functions for which approval is now being sought?
5.05.2 Is the candidate or the firm aware of any other information relevant to
this notification that the FCA might reasonably expect from the
candidate? YES NO
5.05.3 Has the firm undertaken a criminal records check in accordance with
the requirements of the FCA?
Date (dd/mm/yy):
Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 21
Supplementary information for Senior Management Functions Section 6
If there is any additional information indicated in previous sections or any other information the
6.02 candidate or the firm considers being relevant to this application it must be included here. (Please
also provide full details of any issues that could affect the Fitness and Propriety of the individual that arose
when leaving an employer listed in Section 4 or if any question has been answered ‘yes’ in Section 5)
Question Information
6.03 Firms must also provide the following supporting documents required with this form
(please tick)
Statement of responsibilities
Role(s) description
Organisational chart
A copy of the firm’s management responsibilities map (SYSC 25 and SUP 10C.9)
Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 22
Declarations and signatures Section 7
Declaration of Candidate
It is a criminal offence, knowingly or recklessly, to give the FCA information that is materially false, misleading or
deceptive (see sections 398 and 400 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 – ‘FSMA’). Even if you believe or
know that information has been provided to the FCA before (whether as part of another application or otherwise) or is in
the public domain, you must nonetheless disclose it clearly and fully in this form and as part of this application – you
should not assume that the FCA will itself identify such information during the assessment of this application.
There will be a delay in processing the application if information is inaccurate or incomplete, and it may call into question
the suitability of the candidate and/or lead to the FCA exercising their powers (including but not limited to taking
disciplinary/ Enforcement action). You must notify the FCA immediately if there is a change to the information in this form
and/or if inaccurate information has been provided (insofar as the FCA is reasonably likely to consider the information
material).
The candidate confirms that the information provided in this application is accurate and complete to the best of his/her
knowledge and that he or she has read the notes to this form. The candidate will notify the FCA immediately if there is a
material change to the information provided.
The candidate confirms that the attached statement of responsibilities accurately reflects the aspects of the affairs of the
firm which it is intended that the candidate will be responsible for managing. The candidate confirms that they have
accepted all the responsibilities set out in this statement of responsibilities.
The candidate agrees that the FCA may use the address specified for the candidate in this form as the proper address
for service in the United Kingdom (as defined in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Service of Notice)
Regulations (SI 2001/1420)) to serve any notices on the candidate.
The candidate confirms that he or she understands the regulatory responsibilities of the proposed role as set out in the
rules of conduct in the FCA’s COCON or APER.
The candidate is aware that, while advice may be sought from a third party (e.g. legal advice), responsibility for the
accuracy of information, as well as the disclosure of relevant information, on the form is ultimately the responsibility of
those who sign the application.
In addition to other regulatory responsibilities, firms, and approved persons have a responsibility to disclose to the FCA
matters of which it would reasonably expect to be notified. Failure to notify the FCA of such information may lead to the
FCA taking disciplinary or other action against the Applicant and/or the candidate.
For the purposes of complying with data protection legislation, please read the FCA’s privacy notice at
https://www.fca.org.uk/data-protection. This notice will tell you what to expect when the FCA collects personal
information, including how and why we use your personal information and who to contact if you have any queries or wish
to exercise your rights.
Tick here to confirm you have read and understood this declaration:
7.02 Signature
Date
Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 23
Declaration of Firm
It is a criminal offence, knowingly or recklessly, to give the FCA information that is materially false, misleading or
deceptive (see sections 398 and 400 of the Financial Services and Markets Act – ‘FSMA’). Even if you believe or know
that information has been provided to the FCA before (whether as part of another application or otherwise) or is in the
public domain, you must nonetheless disclose it clearly and fully in this form and as part of this application – you should
not assume that the FCA will itself identify such information during the assessment of this application.
There will be a delay in processing the application if information is inaccurate or incomplete, and it may call into question
the suitability of the candidate and/or lead to the FCA exercising their powers under FSMA (including but not limited to
taking disciplinary/ Enforcement action). You must notify the FCA immediately if there is a change to the information in
this form and/or if inaccurate information has been provided (insofar as the FCA is reasonably likely to consider the
information material).
In addition to other regulatory responsibilities, firms, and approved persons have a responsibility to disclose to the FCA,
matters of which it would reasonably expect to be notified. Failure to notify the FCA of such information may lead to the
FCA taking disciplinary or other action against the Applicant and/or the candidate.
The Applicant confirms that the information provided in this application is accurate and complete to the best of its
knowledge and that it has read the notes to this form. The Applicant will notify the FCA immediately if there is a material
change to the information provided.
For the purposes of complying with data protection legislation, please read the FCA’s privacy notice at
https://www.fca.org.uk/data-protection. This notice will tell you what to expect when the FCA collects personal
information, including how and why we use your personal information and who to contact if you have any queries or wish
to exercise your rights.
Where applicable, the Applicant confirms that it has requested the fullest information that it is lawfully able to obtain
about the candidate under Part V of the Police Act 1997 and any related subordinate legislation of the UK or any part of
the UK, and (where available) has given due consideration to that information in determining that candidate to be fit and
proper.
In making this application the Applicant believes on the basis of due and diligent enquiry and, where applicable, by
reference to the criteria in FIT in the FCA Handbook that the candidate is a fit and proper person to perform the
controlled function(s) listed in section 3. The Applicant also believes, on the basis of due and diligent enquiry, that the
candidate is competent to fulfil the duties required in the performance of such function(s). Note: For EEA firms, this
would only apply to those firms undertaking any Non MiFID business.
The Applicant confirms that it has complied with its obligations under Equality and Diversity legislation when selecting the
candidate to perform the function(s) applied for.
The Applicant confirms that it has made the candidate aware of their regulatory responsibilities as set out in the rules of
conduct in the FCA’s COCON or APER.
The Applicant confirms that the statement of responsibilities submitted with this form accurately reflects the aspects of
the affairs of the firm which it is intended that the candidate will be responsible for managing.
The Applicant is aware that, while advice may be sought from a third party (e.g. legal advice), responsibility for the
accuracy of information, as well as the disclosure of relevant information, on the form is ultimately the responsibility of
those who sign the application.
I confirm that I have authority to make this application and provide the declarations given by the Applicant, and sign this
form, on behalf of the firm identified in Section 2.01 and/or each firm identified in Section 3.04. I also confirm that a copy
of this form, as submitted to the FCA, will be sent to each of those firms at the same time as submitting the form to the
FCA.
7.06 Signature
Date
Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 24
Application number
(for FCA use only)
The FCA has produced notes which will assist both the applicant firm and the candidate in answering the
questions in this form. Please read these notes, which are available on the FCA website at:
https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/SUP/10C/Annex3D.html
Both the applicant firm and the candidate will be treated by the FCA as having taken these notes into
consideration when completing this form.
[Commencement Date]
Name of candidate
(to be completed by applicant firm)
Short Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 1
Personal identification details Section 1
1.02 Title
(e.g. Mr, Mrs, Ms)
1.03 Surname
1.10 a Nationality
b Passport number
(if National Insurance number not
available)
Short Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 2
1.14 a Private address
b
Postcode
(If address has changed in the last three years, please provide addresses for the previous three
years.)
b
Postcode
b
Postcode
Short Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 3
Firm identification details Section 2
b Position
c Phone number
d E-mail
Short Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 4
Arrangement and Senior Management Functions Section 3A
Complete this section if the application is for a senior management function. If you are submitting an
application for a controlled function at an appointed representative, then please complete Section 3B.
3A.01 Nature of the a Employee
arrangement
between the
candidate and the b Group employee
applicant firm
Name of group
d Partner
e Other
Give details
Proposed date of
appointment
Length of
appointment (if
applicable)
3A.02 For applications from a single firm, please tick the boxes that correspond to the senior
management functions to be performed. If the senior management functions are to be performed
for more than one firm, please go to question 3A.04
Short Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 5
Tick (if applicable)
SMF27 Partner
Short Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 6
Insurance distribution
Will the candidate be responsible for Insurance distribution at the firm? YES NO
(Note: Yes can only be selected if the individual is applying for a governing function (other than a non-executive director
function))
Will the candidate be responsible for Mortgage Credit Directive Intermediation at the firm? YES NO
(Note: Yes can only be selected if the individual is applying for a governing function (other than a non-executive director
function))
Short Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 7
3A.04 Complete this section only if the application is on behalf of more than one
firm.
List all firms within the group (including the applicant firm entered in 2.01) for
which the candidate requires approval and the requested senior management
function for that firm. †
Responsible Responsible
Firm Senior for insurance for MCD credit
Reference Management distribution intermediation Effective
Number Name of firm Function Job title ? date
a
Short Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 8
Arrangements and controlled functions – Appointed Representatives
Section 3B
Complete this section if the application is for a controlled function at an appointed representative (AR). If you are
submitting an application for a senior management function, then please complete Section 3A.
For limited permission consumer credit firms that are also appointed representatives, only the customer function is
relevant in this section. For these firms, relevant senior management functions apply instead of the governing functions
(ie CF1 (AR), CF3 (AR), CF4 (AR) and CF5 (AR)). We do not expect this to apply to many firms.
c Other
Give details
3B.02 For applications from a single firm, please tick the boxes that correspond to the controlled functions to be
performed. If the controlled functions are to be performed for more than one firm, please go to question
3B.05.
a Significant influence CF 1 (AR) Director function
functions
Short Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 9
I have supplied further information
related to this page in Section 6 YES NO
Short Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 10
3B.05 Complete this section only if the application is on behalf of more than one firm.
List all firms within the group (including the firm entered in 2.01) for which the candidate requires approval and
the requested controlled function for that firm.
Firm
Reference Controlled
Number Name of firm function Job title Effective date
a
Short Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 11
Employment History Section 4
If there has been a change to the detail in this section since your last approval, you must submit a Long Form A
as opposed to a Short Form A informing the FCA of the revised detail.
Short Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 12
Fitness and Propriety Section 5
If there has been a change to the detail in this section since your last approval, you must submit a Long Form A
as opposed to a Short Form A informing the FCA of the revised detail.
5.1 Has the firm undertaken a criminal records check in accordance with
the requirements of the FCA?
Date (dd/mm/yy):
Please note that a firm is required to use reasonable steps to obtain an YES NO
appropriate reference from any current or previous employer of the
candidate during the last 6 years (see SYSC 22) “Employer” has an
extended meaning for these purposes.
Short Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 13
Supplementary Information Section 6
Question Information
6.03 For applications for senior management functions, firms must also provide the following supporting
documents with this form (please tick):
Statement of responsibilities
Role(s) description
Organisational chart
6.04 In addition for applications for senior management functions, enhanced scope SMCR firms must also
provide (please tick);-
A copy of the firm’s management responsibilities map (as referred to in SYSC 25.1)
A summary of any handover material (as referred to in SYSC 25.9 and SUP 10C.10)
Short Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 14
Declarations and signatures Section 7
Declaration of Candidate
It is a criminal offence, knowingly or recklessly, to give the FCA information that is materially false, misleading or
deceptive (see sections 398 and 400 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 – ‘FSMA’). Even if you believe or
know that information has been provided to the FCA before (whether as part of another application or otherwise) or is in
the public domain, you must nonetheless disclose it clearly and fully in this form and as part of this application – you
should not assume that the FCA will itself identify such information during the assessment of this application.
There will be a delay in processing the application if information is inaccurate or incomplete, and it may call into question
the suitability of the candidate and/or lead to the FCA exercising their powers (including but not limited to taking
disciplinary/Enforcement action). You must notify the FCA immediately if there is a change to the information in this form
and/or if inaccurate information has been provided (insofar as the FCA is reasonably likely to consider the information
material).
The candidate confirms that the information provided in this application is accurate and complete to the best of their
knowledge and that they have read the notes to this form. The candidate will notify the FCA immediately if there is a
material change to the information provided.
The candidate confirms that the attached statement of responsibilities accurately reflects the aspects of the affairs of the
firm which it is intended that the candidate will be responsible for managing. The candidate confirms that they have
accepted all the responsibilities set out in this statement of responsibilities.
The candidate agrees that the FCA may use the address specified for the candidate in this form as the proper address
for service in the United Kingdom (as defined in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Service of Notices)
Regulations (SI 2001/1420)) to serve any notices on the candidate.
For the purposes of complying with the Data Protection Act 1998, the personal information provided in this form will be
used by the FCA to discharge their statutory functions under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and other
relevant legislation, and will not be disclosed for any other purpose without the permission of the candidate.
The candidate confirms that they understand the regulatory responsibilities of the proposed role as set out in the rules of
conduct in the FCA’s COCON or APER.
The candidate is aware that, while advice may be sought from a third party (e.g. legal advice), responsibility for the
accuracy of information, as well as the disclosure of relevant information, on the form is ultimately the responsibility of
those who sign the application.
In addition to other regulatory responsibilities, firms, and candidates/approved persons have a responsibility to disclose
to the FCA matters of which it would reasonably expect to be notified. Failure to notify the FCA of such information may
lead to the FCA taking disciplinary or other action against the Applicant and/or the candidate.
For the purposes of complying with data protection legislation, please read the FCA’s privacy notice at
https://www.fca.org.uk/data-protection. This notice will tell you what to expect when the FCA collects personal
information, including how and why we use your personal information and who to contact if you have any queries or wish
to exercise your rights.
Tick here to confirm you have read and understood this declaration:
7.02 Signature
Date
Short Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 15
Declaration of Firm
It is a criminal offence, knowingly or recklessly, to give the FCA information that is materially false, misleading or
deceptive (see sections 398 and 400 of the Financial Services and Markets Act – ‘FSMA’). Even if you believe or know
that information has been provided to the FCA before (whether as part of another application or otherwise) or is in the
public domain, you must nonetheless disclose it clearly and fully in this form and as part of this application – you should
not assume that the FCA will itself identify such information during the assessment of this application. If there is any
doubt about the relevance of information, it should be included.
There will be a delay in processing the application if information is inaccurate or incomplete, and it may call into question
the suitability of the candidate and/or lead to the FCA exercising their powers under FSMA (including but not limited to
taking disciplinary/Enforcement action). You must notify the FCA immediately if there is a change to the information in
this form and/or if inaccurate information has been provided (insofar as the FCA is reasonably likely to consider the
information material).
In addition to other regulatory responsibilities, firms, and candidates/approved persons have a responsibility to disclose
to the FCA matters of which it would reasonably expect to be notified. Failure to notify the FCA of such information may
lead to the FCA taking disciplinary or other action against the Applicant and/or the candidate.
The Applicant confirms that the information provided in this application is accurate and complete to the best of its
knowledge and that it has read the notes to this form. The Applicant will notify the FCA immediately if there is a material
change to the information provided. The Applicant is aware that, while advice may be sought from a third party (e.g. legal
advice), responsibility for the accuracy of information, as well as the disclosure of relevant information, on the form is
ultimately the responsibility of those who sign the application.
Where applicable, the Applicant confirms that it has requested the fullest information that it is lawfully able to obtain
about the candidate under Part V of the Police Act 1997 and any related subordinate legislation of the UK or any part of
the UK, and (where available) has given due consideration to that information in determining that candidate to be fit and
proper.
In making this application the Applicant believes on the basis of due and diligent enquiry and, where applicable, by
reference to the criteria in FIT in the FCA handbook that the candidate is a fit and proper person to perform the controlled
function(s) listed in Section 3.
The Applicant also believes, on the basis of due and diligent enquiry, that the candidate is competent to fulfil the duties
required in the performance of such function(s). Note: For EEA firms, this would only apply to those firms undertaking
any non MiFID business.
The Applicant confirms that it has complied with its obligations under equality and diversity legislation when selecting the
candidate to perform the function(s) applied for.
The Applicant confirms that it has made the candidate aware of their regulatory responsibilities as set out in the rules of
conduct in the FCA’s COCON or APER.
The Applicant confirms that the statement of responsibilities submitted with this form accurately reflects the aspects of
the affairs of the firm which it is intended that the candidate will be responsible for managing.
For the purposes of complying with data protection legislation, please read the FCA’s privacy notice at
https://www.fca.org.uk/data-protection. This notice will tell you what to expect when the FCA collects personal
information, including how and why we use your personal information and who to contact if you have any queries or wish
to exercise your rights.
I confirm that I have authority to make this application and provide the declarations given by the Applicant, and sign this
form, on behalf of the firm identified in Section 2.01 and/or each firm identified in Section 3.04. I also confirm that a copy
of this form, as submitted to the FCA, will be sent to each of those firms at the same time as submitting the form to the
FCA.
7.06 Signature
Date
Short Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 16
Application number
(for FCA use only)
The FCA has produced notes which will assist both the applicant firm and the candidate in answering the
questions in this form. Please read these notes, which are available on the FCA website at
https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/SUP/10C/Annex7D.html
Both the applicant firm and the candidate will be treated by the FCA as having taken these notes into
consideration when completing this form.
Form E -
Internal transfer of a person performing a
controlled function for solo-regulated firms
(including EEA and third country)
Name of candidate
(to be completed by applicant firm)
Name of firm
(as entered in 2.01)
Form E - Internal transfer of a person performing a controlled function for solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third
country) Page 1 of 14
Personal identification details Section 1
1.02 Title
(e.g. Mr, Mrs, Ms)
1.03 Surname
B Position
C Phone number
D E-mail
Form E - Internal transfer of a person performing a controlled function for solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third
country) Page 2 of 14
Senior management functions to cease Section 3
3.01 List all senior management functions which the approved person is ceasing to perform. The effective date is
the date the person will cease to perform the functions.
Senior Management
FRN Name of firm Function Effective date
a
Form E - Internal transfer of a person performing a controlled function for solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third
country) Page 3 of 14
Senior management functions Section 4A
Complete this section if the application is for a senior management function. If you are submitting an application for a
controlled function at an appointed representative, then please complete Section 4B.
4A.01 Nature of the
arrangement a Employee
between the
candidate and the
b Group employee
applicant.
Name of group
d Partner
e Other
Give details
Form E - Internal transfer of a person performing a controlled function for solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third
country) Page 4 of 14
4A.02 For applications from a single firm, please tick the boxes that correspond to the senior management functions
to be performed.
If the senior management functions are to be performed for more than one firm, please go to question 4.04
SMF27 Partner
Form E - Internal transfer of a person performing a controlled function for solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third
country) Page 5 of 14
4A.03 Job title
Will the candidate be responsible for Mortgage Credit Directive Intermediation at the firm? YES NO
(Note: Yes can only be selected if the individual is applying for a governing function (other than a non-executive
director function))
4A.06 Has the firm undertaken a criminal records check in accordance with the requirements of the FCA?
Please note that a firm is required under FCA rules, to obtain the fullest information that it is lawfully able to obtain
about the candidate under Part V of the Police Act 1997 (Certificates of Criminal records, etc) and related
subordinated legislation of the UK or any part of the UK before making the application (SUP 10C.10).
If yes, please enter date the criminal records check was undertaken
Date (dd/mm/yy):
Note: if date is more than 3 months prior to current date or 3 months prior to date of application submission
or the check has not been undertaken, please provide details why in section 5.
Form E - Internal transfer of a person performing a controlled function for solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third
country) Page 6 of 14
4A.04 List all firms within the group (including the firm entered in 2.01) for which the applicant requires
approval and the requested senior management function for that firm.
Firm
Reference Senior Management Job title Effective
Number Name of firm Function (mandatory) date
A
4A.05
Has / Have a reference or references been obtained from current or
previous employer(s) in accordance with the requirements of the FCA.
If No, please provide details why the reference or references has/have
not been obtained. YES NO
Form E - Internal transfer of a person performing a controlled function for solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third
country) Page 7 of 14
Controlled functions – Appointed Representatives Section 4B
Complete this section if the application is for a controlled function at an appointed representative (AR). If you are
submitting an application for a senior management function then please complete Section 4A.
For limited permission consumer credit firms that are also appointed representatives, only the customer function is
relevant in this section. For these firms, relevant senior management functions apply instead of the governing functions
(ie CF1 (AR), CF3 (AR), CF4 (AR) and CF5 (AR)). We do not expect this to apply to many firms.
c Other
Give details
4B.02 For applications from a single firm, please tick the boxes that correspond to the controlled functions to be
performed. If the controlled functions are to be performed for more than one firm, please go to question
3B.05.
a Significant influence CF 1 (AR) Director function
functions
CF 3 (AR) Chief executive function
CF 4 (AR) Partner function
CF 5 (AR) Director of an unincorporated association function
Form E - Internal transfer of a person performing a controlled function for solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third
country) Page 8 of 14
4B.05 Complete this section only if the application is on behalf of more than one firm.
List all firms within the group (including the firm entered in 2.01) for which the candidate requires approval and
the requested controlled function for that firm.
Firm
Reference Controlled Job title
Number Name of firm function Effective date
a
Form E - Internal transfer of a person performing a controlled function for solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third
country) Page 9 of 14
Supplementary information for Senior Management Functions
Section 5
5.02 If there is any additional information indicated in previous sections or any other information the
candidate or the firm considers being relevant to this application it must be included here.
Question Information
5.03 Firms must also provide the following supporting documents required with this form (please tick)
Statement of responsibilities
Role(s) description
Organisational chart
Form E - Internal transfer of a person performing a controlled function for solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third
country) Page 10 of 14
A description or copy of the candidate’s Induction programme
A description or copy of the candidate's Learning and Development plan (including the name
of the individual responsible for monitoring the candidate's progress against the development
points and the time frame for completion)
A description or documentation setting out how the competency was assessed (demonstrating
competence and suitability mapped to the specific role and responsibilities of the role).
A copy of the firm’s management responsibilities map (SYSC 25, where applicable.
A summary of any handover material (SYSC 25.9 and SUP 10C.10) This requirement does not
apply to all firms.
Form E - Internal transfer of a person performing a controlled function for solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third
country) Page 11 of 14
Declarations and signatures Section 6
Declaration of Candidate
Knowingly or recklessly giving the FCA information which is false or misleading in a material particular may be a criminal
offence (section 398 and 400 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 – ‘FSMA’). It should not be assumed that
information is known to the FCA merely because it is in the public domain or has previously been disclosed to the FCA or
another regulatory body. If there is any doubt about the relevance of information, it should be included.
In addition to other regulatory responsibilities, firms, senior managers and other approved persons have a responsibility
to disclose to the FCA matters of which it would reasonably expect to be notified. Failure to notify the FCA of such
information may lead to the FCA taking disciplinary or other action against the firm and/or individuals.
The candidate confirms that the attached statement of responsibilities accurately reflects the aspects of the affairs of the
firm which it is intended that the candidate will be responsible for managing. The candidate confirms that they have
accepted all the responsibilities set out in the statement of responsibilities.
For the purposes of complying with data protection legislation, please read the FCA’s privacy notice at
https://www.fca.org.uk/data-protection. This notice will tell you what to expect when the FCA collects personal
information, including how and why we use your personal information and who to contact if you have any queries or wish
to exercise your rights.
In signing the form below:
a) I authorise the FCA to make such enquiries and seek such further information as it thinks appropriate in the
course of verifying the information given in this form. Candidates may be required to apply for a criminal
records search to be made as to whether any criminal records are held in relation to them and to obtain a
certificate (where such certificate can be obtained) and to disclose the result of that search to the firm
submitting this application.
b) I confirm that the information in this form is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief
and that I have read the notes to this form.
c) I confirm that I understand the regulatory responsibilities of my proposed role as set out in the rules of
conduct in the FCA’s COCON or APER.
d) I confirm that the statement of responsibilities submitted with this form accurately reflects the aspects of the
affairs of the firm which it is intended that I will be responsible for managing. I confirm that I have accepted all
the responsibilities set out in this statement of responsibilities.
Tick here to confirm you have read and understood this declaration:
6.01 Candidate's full name
6.02 Signature
Date
Form E - Internal transfer of a person performing a controlled function for solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third
country) Page 12 of 14
Declaration of Firm
Knowingly or recklessly giving the FCA information which is false or misleading in a material particular may be a criminal
offence (sections 398 and 400 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 – ‘FSMA’). SUP 15.6 of the FCA
Handbook require a firm to take reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy and completeness of information given to the
FCA and to notify the FCA immediately if materially inaccurate information has been provided.
In addition to other regulatory responsibilities, firms, senior managers and other approved persons have a responsibility
to disclose to the FCA matters of which it would reasonably expect to be notified. Failure to notify the FCA of such
information may lead to the FCA taking disciplinary or other action against the firm and/or individuals.
It should not be assumed that information is known to the FCA merely because it is in the public domain or has
previously been disclosed to the FCA or another regulatory body. If there is any doubt about the relevance of
information, it should be included.
In making this application the firm believes on the basis of due and diligent enquiry and by reference to the criteria in FIT
in the FCA Handbook that the candidate is a fit and proper person to perform the senior management functions(s) listed
in Section 3. The firm also believes, on the basis of due and diligent enquiry, that the candidate is competent to fulfil the
duties required in the performance of such function(s).
IF UNDERTAKING ANY NON MiFID BUSINESS FOR WHICH THE FIRM HAS NOT PREVIOUSLY APPLIED FOR
AUTHORISATION, PLEASE ALSO COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING
The firm also believes, on the basis of due and diligent enquiry, that the candidate is competent to fulfil the
duties required of such function(s). YES NO
If the firm confirms that it has had sight of a criminal records certificate prepared within the past 3 months in relation to
the candidate and has given due consideration to the information contained in that certificate in determining that
candidate to be fit and proper. Alternatively, where a certificate is not obtained the firm has provided an explanation in
Section 5.
For the purposes of complying with data protection legislation, please read the FCA’s privacy notice at
https://www.fca.org.uk/data-protection. This notice will tell you what to expect when the FCA collects personal
information, including how and why we use your personal information and who to contact if you have any queries or wish
to exercise your rights.
6.06 Signature
Form E - Internal transfer of a person performing a controlled function for solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third
country) Page 13 of 14
Date
Form E - Internal transfer of a person performing a controlled function for solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third
country) Page 14 of 14
Application number or IRN
(for FCA use only)
For candidates for approval, this form must be submitted as an attachment to a Form A application or
a Form E application.
For significant changes to an existing statement of responsibilities, this form must be submitted as an
attachment to a Form J notification or a Form I application or variation.
FCA Handbook Reference: SUP 10C Annex 10D.
[Commencement Date]
Name of individual
(to be completed by firm)
Name of firm
(as entered in 2.01)
1.02 Title
(e.g. Mr, Mrs, Ms)
1.03 Surname
b Position
c Telephone
e E-mail
A statement of responsibilities should be drafted to clearly show the responsibilities that the candidate or senior
manager is to perform as part of their senior management function and how they fit in with the firm’s overall
governance and management arrangements. If the firm is an enhanced scope SM&CR firm, the statement of
responsibilities should also be consistent with the firm’s management responsibilities map.
A statement of responsibilities should be drafted in such a way as to be practical and useable by regulators. The
FCA considers that this would be achieved by succinct, clear descriptions of each responsibility which avoid
unnecessary detail. Firms have the opportunity to provide details of each responsibility allocated to an individual
using the free text boxes in this form, however, FCA would not usually expect the description of each
responsibility to exceed 300 words.
A statement of responsibilities must be a self-contained document. There should be one statement per senior
manager per firm. Where an individual performs a senior management function on behalf of more than one firm
within a group, one statement of responsibilities is required for each firm. Any supplementary information may be
provided in Section 4 (or if submitting electronically, in a single attachment). A statement of responsibilities must
not cross refer to other documents, attachments or links.
If the FCA considers that the statement of responsibilities is not sufficiently clear to be practical and usable, it
could be challenged as part of a candidate’s application for approval, or in ongoing supervision.
Details of the individual’s responsibilities should be set out in Sections 3.2 to 3.4, as appropriate:
• Section 3.2 covers prescribed responsibilities required by regulators to be allocated to one or more
senior managers. This section is not applicable to limited scope SMCR firms or EEA core SMCR
branches.
• Section 3.3 covers having overall responsibility for each of the business areas, activities, and
management functions of the firm. This section applies to enhanced scope SMCR firms only.
• Section 3.4 covers anything else, not otherwise included, for which a candidate or senior manager is to
be responsible as part of their FCA senior management function(s) role. This section applies to all
firms.
Please note that where this is a revised statement of responsibilities, i.e. since the granting of the application,
there has been a significant change in the aspects of the firm’s affairs which the individual is responsible for
managing in performing the function (for example, a change in allocation of responsibilities within the firm, or the
senior manager is applying for a new or additional senior management function), then this statement of
responsibilities supersedes any previous versions.
3.1.2 List all senior management functions which the candidate or senior manager is to perform and the effective
date the candidate or senior manager commenced or will commence the performance of the functions.
Core firms
Enhanced
Effective
Limited EEA Third SMCR
UK core Date
scope core country firms
SMCR
SMCR SMCR branches
firms
firms firms
SMF16 Compliance
Oversight
SMF27 Partner
This statement of responsibilities is considered to automatically include the existing legal and regulatory
obligations where they exist for these roles and functions. For example, certain specific responsibilities of a
If the responsibilities that the candidate or senior manager is to carry out as described in the statement of
responsibilities go beyond those set out in this section, those additional responsibilities should not reduce or alter
the scope of the prescribed requirements set out in this section (SUP 10C.11)
3.2.1 Please indicate below which of the responsibilities listed are/will be allocated to the candidate or senior
manager if any, and whether or not they are shared. Different prescribed responsibilities apply to different
types of firm as indicated in the table below.
If the individual has not been allocated a prescribed responsibility, please go to Section 3.3.
b Responsibility for the firm’s performance of its obligations under the employee certification regime Yes / No Yes / No
b-1 Responsibility for the firm’s obligations in relation to individual conduct rules for: Yes / No Yes / No
(a) training; and
(b) reporting
d Overall responsibility for the firm’s policies and procedures for countering the risk that the firm might be Yes / No Yes / No
used to further financial crime
z Responsibility for the firm’s compliance with CASS Yes / No Yes / No
za Responsibility for an AFM’s value for money assessments, independent director representation and Yes / No Yes / No
acting in investors’ best interests
Ref Prescribed Responsibility (These should be applied by enhanced scope SMCR firms only, in Does this Is this prescribed
addition to the prescribed responsibilities for core SMCR firms) prescribed responsibility
responsibility shared?
apply?
c Compliance with the rules relating to the firm’s management responsibilities map Yes / No Yes / No
t Responsibility for the development and maintenance of the firm’s business model by the governing Yes / No Yes / No
body.
s Responsibility for: Yes / No Yes / No
(a) managing the firm’s internal stress tests; and
(b) ensuring the accuracy and timeliness of information provided to the FCA and other
regulatory bodies for the purposes of stress testing.
Ref Prescribed Responsibility (Applicable to non-EEA branches) Does this Is this prescribed
prescribed responsibility
responsibility shared?
apply?
a Responsibility for the firm’s performance of its obligations under the senior managers regime Yes / No Yes / No
b Responsibility for the firm’s performance of its obligations under the employee certification regime Yes / No Yes / No
b-1 Responsibility for the firm’s obligations in relation to individual conduct rules for: Yes / No Yes / No
(a) training; and
(b) reporting
d Responsibility for the firm’s policies and procedures for countering the risk that the firm might be used Yes / No Yes / No
3.2.2 If necessary, please provide additional information about each prescribed responsibility, including:
• A breakdown of the different components and tasks which the responsibility encompasses; and
• If applicable, details of any sharing arrangements including, if known, the name(s), IRN(s) and/or job title(s) of the individual(s) with whom the candidate or senior manager
is or will be sharing this prescribed responsibility. The responsibility should be recorded in the same way in the statements of responsibilities for each individual.
Additional information must be relevant, succinct and not dilute or undermine the prescribed responsibility.
By overall responsibility we mean the ultimate responsibility (under the governing body) for managing or
supervising that function, and primary and direct responsibility for briefing and reporting to the governing body
about that function and putting matters for decision about that function to the governing body of the firm.
(SYSC24)
If the individual has overall responsibility for any or part of the business areas, activities, or management
functions of a firm, please provide details of each in the table below.
Where responsibilities are shared (for example, a responsibility may be shared as part of a job share or where
departing and incoming senior managers work together temporarily as part of a handover), please provide details
of any sharing arrangements including, if known, the name(s), IRN(s) and/or job title(s) of the individual(s) you
are sharing this responsibility with. The responsibility should be recorded in the same way in the statement of
responsibilities for each individual.
If the individual does not have overall responsibility for a business area, activity or management function of the
firm, please go to Section 3.4 below.
A firm may wish to refer to SYSC 25 Annex 1G (replicated in Annex A of this statement of responsibilities) to help
it make sure it has not failed to allocate overall responsibility for a particular activity of the firm. Please note that
the FCA does not require firms to organise themselves by the functions in SYSC 4 Annex 1G, and that the Annex
is not comprehensive. It is important that a firm does not fail to allocate overall responsibility for business areas,
activities and management functions, in line with SYSC 4.
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Please provide a title for this other Please provide further details of this other responsibility Is this other responsibility
responsibility shared?
If ‘Yes’ please provide ,the
name(s), IRN(s) and/or job title(s)
of the individual(s) you are
sharing this responsibility with
(where known)
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
4.1 Is there any other information the individual or the firm considers to be
YES NO
relevant?
If yes, please provide details below or on a separate sheet of paper and clearly identify the section and question
to which the additional information relates.
Question Information
(3) Investment management This has the same meaning as managing investments with
the following adjustments:
(5) Mortgage advice This has the same meaning as advising on regulated
mortgage contracts but is expanded to cover land anywhere
in the world and to cover security of any kind over land.
(6) Corporate investments This means acquiring, holding, managing and disposing a
firm’s investments made for its own account.
(7) Wholesale sales This means the selling of any investment to a person other
than a retail customer.
It does not include the activities in (1).
(8) Retail sales This means the selling of any investment to a retail
customer.
It includes savings accounts. It does not include the
activities in (1).
(9) Trading for clients This means dealing in investments as agent and execution
of orders on behalf of clients but the list of products includes
money market instruments and foreign exchange.
(10) Market making This has the same meaning as it does in MIFID (see the
definition of market maker in article 4.1(8)).
(13) Retail lending decisions Deciding whether, and on what terms, to lend to retail
customers.
Lending includes granting credit, leasing and hire (including
finance leasing).
(14) Wholesale lending decisions Deciding whether, and on what terms, to lend to persons
who are not retail customers.
Lending includes granting credit, leasing and hire (including
finance leasing).
(15) Design and manufacturing of Wholesale customers mean persons who are not retail
products intended for wholesale customers
customers
(18) Customer service This means dealing with clients after the point of sale,
including queries and fulfilment of client requests
(19) Customer complaints This includes the firm’s compliance with DISP.
handling
It also includes:
(20) Collection and recovering “Customer” means any person falling into any of the
amounts owed to a firm by its definitions of client in the Glossary so far as they apply to
customers the FCA’s Handbook. The definition is extended to cover all
services provided by the firm and not just those that are
Dealing with customers in arrears provided in the course of carrying on a regulated activity or
an ancillary service.
(21) Middle office This means risk management and controls in relation to,
and accounting for, transactions in securities or derivatives
(23) Business continuity planning This means the functions described in SYSC 4.1.6R and
SYSC 4.1.7R
(24) Human resources This includes recruitment, training and competence and
performance monitoring
(25) Incentive schemes for the This is not limited to schemes based on sales.
firm’s staff
Note (1): The purpose of this Annex is explained in SYSC 25.7 (Guidance about SYSC 25 Annex
1 G) and SYSC 26.11.2G.
Note (2): A firm does not have to use the split of activities in this Annex for the purposes in Note
(1). If a firm does decide to use it, it may adapt it to suit its management arrangements better.
For example, a firm may find the split of activities into retail and wholesale activities unsuitable. If
so, the firm might:
(a) treat retail and wholesale activities together; or
(b) use its own definition of retail and wholesale activities.
Terms defined in the FCA Handbook are italicised and should be construed accordingly.
This form can only be used by solo-regulated SMCR firms. It is not relevant to dual regulated SMCR
firms, appointed representatives or SMCR firms that are defined as an enhanced scope SMCR firm
because they meet the qualification criteria in SYSC 23 Annex 1.
Limited scope SMCR firms and core SMCR firms can use this form to notify the FCA that they agree
to be subject to the rules for enhanced scope SMCR firms, set out in SYSC 23 Annex 1. Limited
scope SMCR firms can also use this form to notify the FCA that they agree to be subject to the rules
for core SMCR firms, set out in SYSC 23 Annex 1.
The opt-up will take effect three months from the date of this notification. If a firm submits this form to
opt-up, that firm will be subject to the rules of the new SMCR classification three calendar months
from the date they submit the notification.
To withdraw a notification, firms must write to us before the opt-up takes effect. Once the opt-up has
taken effect, firms can use this form to revert to the SMCR classification defined in SYSC 23 Annex 1.
This will be effective one year from the date of notification. Firms that are enhanced scope SMCR
firms or core SMCR firms because they meet the qualification criteria in SYSC 23 Annex 1 cannot
opt-down.
Firms opting-up should ensure that they understand and are in a position to comply with the relevant
rules, set out in the FCA’s Senior management arrangements, Systems and Controls (SYSC),
Supervision (SUP), Code of Conduct (COCON) sourcebooks. The decision should be made at the
appropriate levels and approved at governing body level. As a result of opting-up, firms will be subject
to rules relating to additional Senior Management Functions and Prescribed Responsibilities. Firms
opting-up to enhanced scope SMCR firm classification will also be subject to requirements on
Responsibilities Maps, Handover Procedures and Overall Responsibilities.
[Commencement Date]
Name of firm
Form O – Notification of change to firm classification under the Senior Managers & Certification Regime Page 1
Financial Conduct Authority
12 Endeavour Square
Stratford
London E20 1JN
United Kingdom
Telephone +44 (0) 300 500 0597
E-mail [email protected]
Website http://www.fca.org.uk
Registered as a Limited Company in England and Wales No 1920623. Registered Office
as above
Form O – Notification of change to firm classification under the Senior Managers & Certification Regime Page 2
Contact Details Section 1
Title
First name
Surname
Job title
Business address
Postcode
Phone number
Email address
Form O – Notification of change to firm classification under the Senior Managers & Certification Regime Page 3
Notification Section 2
The opt-up will take effect three months from the date of this notification. Firms will not be able to revert to their
previous SMCR classification (as defined in SYSC 23 Annex 1) for at least one year.
If you are revoking a previous opt-up, this will take effect one year from the date of this notification.
Core SMCR firm agreeing to be subject to the rules for enhanced scope
SMCR firms
Limited scope SMCR firm agreeing to be subject to the rules for core
SMCR firms
Limited scope SMCR firm agreeing to be subject to the rules for enhanced
scope SMCR firms
Firm has previously opted-up and intends to revert to core SMCR firm
classification, defined in SYSC 23 Annex 1, one year from the date of this
notification
Firm has previously opted-up and intends to revert to limited scope SMCR
firm classification, defined in SYSC 23 Annex 1, one year from the date of
this notification
Please tick to confirm that you are submitting the supporting documents listed in the table below with this
notification. These documents must be submitted at the same time as this notification.
If you are revoking a previous opt-up, you are not required to submit any supporting documents.
Form O – Notification of change to firm classification under the Senior Managers & Certification Regime Page 4
Declarations and signatures Section 3
In this declaration, the authorised firm making the notification is referred to as the “firm”.
• they have the authority of the firm’s governing body to make this notification;
• the firm’s governing body understands their regulatory responsibilities following the opt-up, as set out in the
FCA’s Senior management arrangements, Systems and Controls (SYSC), Supervision (SUP), Code of
Conduct (COCON) sourcebooks;
• the firm’s governing body understands that, once the opt-up takes effect, the notifying firm will not be able to
revert to its previous SMCR classification (as defined in SYSC 23 Annex 1) for at least one year.
It is a criminal offence, knowingly or recklessly, to give the FCA information that is materially false, misleading or
deceptive (see sections 398 and 400 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000). The notifying firm must
notify the FCA immediately if there is a change to the information in this form and/or if inaccurate information has
been provided.
For the purposes of complying with data protection legislation, please read the FCA’s privacy notice at
https://www.fca.org.uk/data-protection. This notice will tell you what to expect when the FCA collects personal
information, including how and why we use your personal information and who to contact if you have any queries
or wish to exercise your rights.
Position
Signature
Date
Form O – Notification of change to firm classification under the Senior Managers & Certification Regime Page 5
Pub ref: 005629