Groundwater Recharge in The Aeul Aquifer, Cmtral Buenos Aires Province, Argentina

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Phys. Chem. Earth (B), Vol. 24, No. 4, pp.

349-352, 1999
0 1999 Elscvier Science Ltd
All rights reserved
1464-1909/99/$ - see front matter
PII: S1464-1909(99)00012-X

Groundwater Recharge in the Aeul Aquifer, Cmtral Buenos Aires


Province, Argentina

M. Vami, E. Usunoff, P. Weinzettel and R. Rivas

Instituto de Hidrologia de Llanuras, CC 178,730O Azul, Argentina

Received 24 April 1998; accepted 23 October 1998

8 1999 Elsevier nce Ltd. All rights reserved.

1.1Lu&onalulcllimucdata

349
350 M. Varni et al.: Groundwater Recharge in the Am1 Aquifer

dt!ptllinthcplain6.Thcriveri6fedbygrcnlndwatcrmo6t evapotraacpiration by the Tlmmwaite aquauon


dth?ymr@xccptwllcnhmvyrain6occur),aswdlastbc (Tlto~tc, 1948),anditsnseinaadl-watcrkdget
many malldepth dcpres6ion6scrrttered lhroughout the (Thomthwaitc and Math, 1957). Table 1 dbplaya the
plain (Sah et al., 1987). The aquifkr hydmulic parameters lWultsobtabdinaulicr~whichrbowammal
wercobtabdfi0mpumpingtcstsatChilhraodAzui graudwaterrtchargetobeof13.5%~dmmn
dties (Fig. 1), that gave a mean hyhuiic cohctivity aonualrainfall)inselaecat(1987),16.4%inN~ud
valueofsmkhy. Auge (1992). and 10.3% in KNSC(1992).

2 MetlMtdology 2.2 Chloride ion mass balance

IllStGidy~dtiO~~tbCwuface~
2.1 conventionelapp~bc8 andsubjccttOthelKul~Ofcbbrideraurxsintbc
unsatutotedzone,andtaking~careofthcdry
Thetitle&rstothcme&odologicaltoolsofanmonuse fau-out,thcfblllowing- ay8tiOncaabctitatcd
in the fMy m maiQly due to tkir lowdata @iksmandKhunnalrarem. 1%9;AllisonandHug&
fe@ancnt. That is the cstimauonofthepotential 1978; Cook et al.. 1989; Edmuds and &ye, 1994):
P-CIP=R-CiR (1)
wherePispndpitatio~CcPistb8cbbrideascntmh
intkSMIplC(iWl~tlKl~--aod
t&ltofthCdfyfallUit),AiStllCrscbuge,aDdCPiStbC
chlorideconceotrarionofthemchafgc(~inthe
upperdcdmWoftberqulber).~wclealrcady
publisbedbyvanlietal.(1996),whichwaeupdatedfor
Vdbb aahdal. Nagyam Knm thispapcrtakingatotalnaxdingpuiodoftlueycafsat
(1917) AuvW92) (1992) AzuI City. Table 2 abows the mlcvant data, The mean
* . 894 89a dlloridacontultofthe~w8ss2.4ppm.It-
Acant- 752 732 FE
Brribw 16 quite cvi&at that the ra&afge obtdnal is anuibably
14’ f’7 smaUcrtbanthosedtcdabovc.
1% n
M. Vami et al.: Groundwater Recharge in the Azul Aquifer 351

Jm%.May% on.6 4.0 6S.0 1.4


3.2 63.4 6.0

2.3 Qadrntarilowdan&bn
352 M. Vami et al.: Groundwater Recharge in the Azul Aquifer

04 . . . . . . . . .
EFYAYJJAIONO

(hm Ruii l!n4)

4 collclu#ioM

ByrevicWitlgthclK!sultsoftheapplicatiotlof several
ldddOgiieofbgmuodwaterrachargeestimationsOIltllC
tlat-landbaSinatccntralBueoosAiresprovince,tbc
fblbWingamcluSiOnSafcmadc:
Twoditbllt gltmeaw flow models yifMlxl
slmilarre8ult8jwhichhasicsllydeflnetworecharge
areas(6and2Koftheamu8lraidll).Tho8eam8
matchacctorsofdiffuentsoiItypcs,uses,and
gfzomoQhologic%l fkahues.
A3-ycarchloridcmassbalaneataplacclocatedhalf
waybctwccatbcanzasabovcmentionedgivesa
mchargc of6.4% ofthe annual raidI.
TbCcOlMKdyUSCddhOdtOdIllatCthClOd
aquikrrdargc,whichamsistsincalculatingthe
potellu evspotranspiraton by means the
Thomthwaitc equation (1948) and its follow-up in tbc
soil-water budget of Thomthwaitc and Mather (1957),
msults in Cva~imtiOll fates which als lower
than in mality, the&y -g the aquifer
dUfgC.TIliS~l&tOlllMdhgwater-rcsourcts
msmgcmmt~Withauthecon&cluurcesthat
theymaYconveY.

You might also like