Salient Features of Copyright Amendment ACT, 2012 (30-43)
Salient Features of Copyright Amendment ACT, 2012 (30-43)
Salient Features of Copyright Amendment ACT, 2012 (30-43)
The C opyright Act, 1957 has been am ended six times, since its
inception, in the years 1983,1984,1992,1994,1999 and 2012. The recent
amendm ent to the Copyright Act, 1957 was introduced by way of the
Copyright (Amendment) Bill, 2010. The Bill was referred to the Standing
Committee on H um an Resource Development after its introduction in
Rajya Sabha in 2010. The Bill as revised by the Standing Committee was
passed by both the Houses in 2012. The Bill received the Presidential
assent on June 7, 2012 and came into force on June 21, 2012.^
Brief History
To address the revolutionary challenges posed by ICT (Information
Communications Technology) and digitalisation, the Copyright Act
was amended in 1994 and to make the Indian copyright law compatible
with TRIPS regime, the Act was again am ended in 1999. Meanwhile,
another significant development took place in the global copyright
scenario: the 'internet treaties' w ere adopted by WIPO. The then
existing treaties on copyright such as Beme Convention, 1883 date
back more than a quarter of a century. Hence, to adequately address
the challenges of the new digital technologies, new standards and
clarifications were indeed needed in the global copyright law. The WCT
(WIPO C opyright Treaty) and W PPT (WIPO Perform ances and
Phonograms Treaty) were concluded updating and im proving the
protection of the already existing copyright and related rights treaties.
The new treaties thus became milestones in the w orld copyright law
history by m odernizing the international system of copyright and
related rights in the digital age.
India has not yet ratified the Internet Treaties - WCT and WPPT -,
albeit the 2012 am endm ent Act tries to harm onise the Indian copyright
1 Vide S.O. 1393(E), dated June 20, 2012, published in the Gazette o f India.
Salient Features o f Copyright Amendment Act, 2012 31
law with the internet treaties. In fact, the amendm ents go much beyond
the in te rn e t tre a tie s a d d ressin g th e challenges r d e v a n t to the
dissemination of protected material over the Internet as evidenced
from various am ended provisions.
Major Amendments
Commercial rental
Though the international copyright treaties do not themselves grant
rights, they require the m em ber countries, to grant certain rights
specified on a non-discrim inatory basis. Each national law creates
rights for authors and creators. In India, section 14 of the Copyright
Act talks about the economic right of authors. By following the m andate
of article 11 of TRIPS Agreement, article 7 of WCT and article 9 of
WPPT w hich pro v id e for commercial rental rights for co m puter
programmes and cinematograph films, in India, the 1994 Copyright
Am endm ent Act introduced in section 14 the right of hire. However,
keeping in view the possibility of interpreting the term 'hire' to include
non-com m ercial h ire and len d in g by libraries and ,e d u catio n al
institutions, the term 'hire' in section 14(b) for computer program was
replaced w ith the term 'commercial rental' by virtue of am endm ent in
the year 2012 .^
The 20J.2 am endm ent has incorporated the definition of the term
'commercial rental' under section 2 (fa) as follows, by stating w hat does
not constitute commercial rental;
'Commercial rental' does not include the rental, lease or lending
of a lawfully acquired copy of a com puter programme, sound
recording, visual recording or cinem atograph film for non
profit purposes by a non-profit library or non-profit educational
institution;
2 Zakir Thomas, “Overview of Changes to the Indian Copyright Law” 17(4) JIPR 326 (2012).
32 Broadcasting Reproduction Right in India
3 S. 14(c)(1).
4 The words “on any medium produced through a process from which a moving image may
be produced by any means” have been omitted by the Amendment Act, 2012.
5 S. 14(d)(i)(B).
6 S. 14 (e)(i).
Salient Features o f Copyright Amendment Act, 2012 33
Assignment
U n d er section 18 of the C o p y rig h t A ct w hich p ro v id es for
assignment of copyright, three provisos have been inserted by virtue
of 2012 A m endm ent to safeguard the author from new m odes of
exploitation which may arise in the future by way of technological
advancem ents and w hich w ere not contem plated at the tim e of
assignment. The provisos read thus:
Provided further that no such assignment shall be applied to
Salient Features o f Copyright Amendment Act, 2012 35
payable. Further three sub-sections, i. e., 19 (8), 19 (9) and 19 (10) have
been inserted. Section 19(8) provides that the assignment of copyright
in any work contrary to the terms and conditions of the rights already
assigned to a copyright society in which the author of the work is a
m ember shall be void. Section 19(9) and section 19(10) provide that no
assignment of copyright in any work to make a cinematograph film or
sound recording (which does not form part of a cinematograph film)
shall affect the right of the author to claim an equal share of the royalties
a n d c o n sid e ra tio n p a y ab le fo r an y u tiliz a tio n of su ch w ork,
respectively.
Relinquishment
Amendments are m ade in the m anner by which the author can
relinquish his copyright. U nder section 21, after the amendment, the
author of a work can even relinquish all or any of the rights in the
copyright in the work by way of a simple public notice. Prior to the
amendment, the author could relinquish his copyright only by giving
notice to the Registrar of Copyrights.
Licenses
Section 30, prior to the recent A m endm ent required licenses to be
in writing and signed. 2012 Am endm ent has simplified the procedure
by requiring copyright licenses to be only in writing.
Further, by am ending section 31 compulsory licensing has been
made a applicable to foreign works as well. N ow compulsory licenses
apply to all works, w hether Indian or not w ith an object of making
foreign works capable of being licensed compulsorily in case it is
published elsewhere b u t w ithheld in India. The A m endm ent also
widened the scope of section 31A to provide for compulsory license in
the case of published work. Before A m endm ent the section applied
only to unpublished work. The am endm ent enables the Copyright
Board to grant compulsory licenses to more than one person provided
the Board is of the opinion that the person is qualified to do so.
The Amendment has introduced the statutory licenses. Section 31C
has been inserted by virtue of the 2012 am endm ent to provide for
statutory licenses for cover versions. In the pre-amendm ent regime,
the right to make cover versions was treated as a part of fair dealing
under section 52(l)(j). However, time period after which a cover version
can be m ade has increased from two years to five years Under section
31A, any person desirous of m aking a cover version, being a sound
Salient Features o f Copyright Amendment Act, 2012 37
9 S. 31D (4).
10 S. 3 ID (6).
38 Broadcasting Reproduction Right in India
make personal copies of songs and films, to make copies for research,
to use film clips in classrooms, etc. Fair dealing exception under section
52(l)(a) has been extended to the reporting of current events, including
the reporting of a lecture delivered in public. Earlier, fair dealing
exception was limited for (i) private use, including research, and (ii)
criticism or review, w hether of that work or of any other work. Further,
it has been clarified that the storing of any work in any electronic
m edium for the purposes m entioned in this clause, including the
incidental storage of any com puter program m e which is not itself an
infringing copy, does not constitute infringement.
12 S. 52(l)(b).
13 S.52(l)(c).
14 S. 52(l)(n).
40 Broadcasting Reproduction Right in India
Copyright society
Chapter VII of the copyright Act providing for copyright societies
has been substituted in the year 1994. Various amendm ents have been
carried out in section 33, 34 and 35 of the Act dealing with registration
and functioning of copyright societies. The newly inserted proviso to
section 33 states that tiie business of issuing or granting licenses in
respect of literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works incorporated
in a cinematograph film or sound recordings shall be carried out only
th ro u g h a registered copyright society.'^ The existing copyright
societies will be deemed to be treated as copyright society under the
new am endm ent b u t they need to reregister w ithin a period of one
year from the date of commencement of the Copyright (Amendment)
Act, 2012.'® The period of registration will be for a initial term of five
years which can be renewed.'^ The central government can suspend
the registration of a copyright society inter alia in the interest of authors
and owners of copyright.^°
C opy rig h t Societies are req u ired to have governing bodies
consisting of equal num ber of authors and owners of work for the
purpose of administration of the society. All members of the Copyright
Society shall enjoy equal m embership rights and there shall be no
discrim ination betw een authors and ow ners in the distribution of
royalties.^' Amendment in this regard has been made to protect the
interest of the authors.
15 S. 52(l)(w).
16 S. 52(l)(zc).
17 S. 33 (1) Proviso 2.
18 S. 33 (3A) Proviso 2.
19 S. 3(3A).
20 S. 33(5).
21 S. 35.
Salient Features o f Copyright Amendment Act, 2012 41
Section 33A has been inserted by the 2012 am endm ent providing
for tariff scheme by copyright societies. Every copyright society has to
publish its tariff scheme and any person w ho is aggrieved by such
scheme has the right to appeal to the Copyright Board. The Copyright
Board after holding an enquiry, has the power to make orders to remove
any unreasonable element, anom aly or inconsistency in the tariff
scheme.^ However, the aggrieved person has to pay all his dues to the
copyright society before making an appeal to the Copyright Board.
Further, the C opyright Board may after hearing the parties fix an
interim tariff and direct the aggrieved parties to make the paym ent
accordingly pending disposal of the appeal.
Rights of performers
The am endm ent Act m odified the definition of 'p erfo rm er' in
section 2 (qq) by inserting a proviso;
22 S. 33 (2).
42 Broadcasting Reproduction Right in India
23 S .3 8 A (I)(b ).
Salient Features o f Copyright Amendment Act, 2012 43
24 S.38A (2).