Efek Steroid HSP
Efek Steroid HSP
Efek Steroid HSP
Author Manuscript
Pediatrics. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 December 18.
Published in final edited form as:
Pediatrics. 2007 November ; 120(5): 1079–1087. doi:10.1542/peds.2007-0667.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—No consensus exists among general pediatricians or pediatric rheumatologists
regarding whether corticosteroid therapy ameliorates the acute manifestations of Henoch-
Schönlein purpura or mitigates renal injury. Therefore, we sought to synthesize the reported
experimental and observational data regarding corticosteroid use.
METHODS—We performed a meta-analysis based on a comprehensive review of the literature in
the Medline database (1956 to January 2007) and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. On the
basis of reported outcomes among patients with Henoch-Schönlein purpura who were treated at
diagnosis with corticosteroids compared with patients treated with supportive care only, we
calculated odds ratios for the resolution of abdominal pain, the need for surgical intervention
secondary to severe pain or intussusception, the likelihood of Henoch-Schönlein purpura
$watermark-text
Keywords
Henoch-Schönlein purpura; corticosteroids; children; meta-analytic methods; systematic reviews
uremia or ESRD.6 Furthermore, even seemingly benign HSP may have long-lasting effects:
2 studies have reported that 40% and 70% of term pregnancies of women with a history of
childhood-onset HSP were complicated by hypertension, proteinuria, or preeclampsia.7,8
The goals of treating HSP are typically to (1) ameliorate acute symptoms, (2) mitigate short-
term morbidity (such as abdominal complications that require surgery), and (3) prevent
chronic renal insufficiency. Because HSP is characterized by leukocyte infiltration of the
blood vessel walls along with immunoglobulin A deposition (with resulting vascular injury
and necrosis), and because corticosteroids inhibit inflammatory processes, early treatment
with corticosteroids has been postulated to be effective for all 3 therapeutic goals, but much
controversy remains.9-13 Although the literature is replete with retrospective studies that
evaluated corticosteroid use for HSP, currently there are only 3 published prospective,
placebo-controlled studies on the subject, and they vary in their conclusions regarding the
$watermark-text
Through a systematic review and meta-analysis, we sought to compare and contrast the
experimental and observational data regarding corticosteroid use and, where appropriate,
synthesize the data for 5 main clinical questions: (1) Do corticosteroids shorten the duration
of abdominal symptoms in HSP? (2) Do corticosteroids decrease the odds of surgical
intervention for HSP? (3) Do corticosteroids decrease the odds of disease recurrence? (4) Do
corticosteroids decrease the odds of renal disease (transient plus persistent) in HSP? and (5)
Do corticosteroids decrease the odds of developing persistent renal disease in HSP?
METHODS
Data Sources
$watermark-text
The published medical literature was searched by using the Cochrane Controlled Trials
Register (CCTR) and Medline database. Articles written in all languages were included in
the search, and translation was obtained when needed.
CCTR and Medline were searched by using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms
“steroids,” “methylprednisolone,” and “dexamethasone” and the key words “Henoch” and
“corticosteroids.” “Henoch” and “purpura, Schönlein-Henoch” were grouped together and
joined by “or.” “Steroids,” “methylprednisolone,” “dexamethasone,” and “corticosteroids”
were grouped together and joined by “or.” Both groups of terms were joined together by
“and.” The only limit applied to the search was “all children: 0-18 years.”
Given the large number of studies obtained from the literature search (N = 201), we cite in
this report only the studies that were chosen for inclusion. A full list of publications is
available at www.pediatric-generalists.org/weiss.htm.
Study Eligibility
Eligible studies were limited to those that examined the use of corticosteroids for the
treatment of HSP; observational and randomized, controlled trials were included. An article
was excluded if it (1) was a review, (2) examined therapy with a drug other than
corticosteroids, (3) was a case report with fewer than 5 subjects with HSP, (4) focused on
individuals older than 18 years, (5) did not discuss therapy with corticosteroids, (6) included
only patients with nephritis at study onset, (7) did not assess definite outcomes, or (8) did
not discuss HSP.
Study Selection
$watermark-text
The initial literature search of the CCTR and Medline databases yielded 201 articles in 14
languages. Titles were reviewed to screen for eligibility. If the title yielded insufficient data
to determine if a study was eligible, the abstract was obtained and reviewed. Articles
without sufficient information in the abstract or those without an accessible abstract were
examined in full text. Interpreters who were familiar with medical language and study
designs evaluated all articles written in languages other than English.
Two of the authors (Drs Weiss and Feinstein) independently screened each of the potential
titles, abstracts, and articles to determine inclusion. Disagreements were resolved by
discussion and consensus mediated by a third author (Dr Feudtner). Reasons for article
exclusion are presented in Table 1. After all the exclusions were applied, 15 articles
remained for further analysis (Table 2).
$watermark-text
In an attempt to find all relevant articles, the reference lists of included articles were
searched and yielded 2 additional articles for potential inclusion.15,16 However, neither
article was included because the outcomes could not be abstracted. In addition, the authors
of the included articles were contacted to learn of any unpublished trials or studies.
Data Extraction
Two authors (Drs Weiss and Feinstein) independently abstracted data from the remaining
articles. Disagreements were resolved by discussion and consensus mediated by a third
author (Dr Feudtner). Abstracted data from the remaining articles included information
regarding the study population, existence of a control group, study limitations, and
information relating to the resolution of abdominal pain, surgical intervention, recurrence,
and the incidence of renal sequelae.
$watermark-text
Statistical Analyses
Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were obtained by using the “metan” command for Stata 9.2 (Stata
Corp, College Station, TX) for each of 5 clinical outcomes: (1) resolution of abdominal
pain; (2) surgical intervention for severe abdominal pain or intussusception; (3) recurrence;
(4) cumulative renal abnormalities; and (5) persistent renal abnormalities. The odds of
having each outcome in patients who were treated with corticosteroids was compared with
patients treated with routine supportive care for both prospective and retrospective studies.
Results from fixed-effects models are reported. Tests for heterogeneity were performed for
each analysis as a way to evaluate to what extent the results were consistent and suitable for
fixed-effect modeling. If the test for heterogeneity was significant, we did not calculate a
pooled OR. The Egger test for bias was performed and funnel plots were performed for each
of the clinical outcomes to evaluate for publication bias. Each of the funnel plots was
symmetrical, which suggests the absence of publication bias. The Egger test for bias could
only be applied to analyses with 2 or more studies.
RESULTS
Do Corticosteroids Shorten the Duration of Abdominal Symptoms in HSP?
Although there is no consensus regarding the indication for corticosteroid use in HSP,
anecdotally, abdominal pain is the most common reason that corticosteroids are prescribed.
Huber et al11 and Ronkainen et al9 prospectively evaluated the effect of corticosteroids on
abdominal pain duration by using 14-day symptom diaries. Huber et al11 used 2 mg/kg per
day of corticosteroids for 1 week, with weaning over week 2, whereas Ronkainen et al9 used
1 mg/kg per day of corticosteroids for 2 weeks, with weaning over weeks 3 and 4 (Table 2).
Using median values of total abdominal pain duration, Huber et al did not find any
difference between the treatment and control groups (P = .8) (Fig 1A). In contrast,
$watermark-text
Ronkainen et al found a mean reduction of 1.2 days of pain in patients who were treated
with corticosteroids (P = .03) (Fig 1A). Three retrospective studies reported on such effects
within the first 24 hours after corticosteroid administration.17-19 However, after analysis,
there was evidence of heterogeneity among the included studies (P = .015). A likely source
of heterogeneity was the timing of corticosteroid administration in relation to disease onset.
In the study by Reinehr et al18 31 of 57 patients received corticosteroids >21 days after the
onset of HSP, whereas in the other 2 studies the treatment group received corticosteroids
within several days of diagnosis. Analysis excluding the study by Reinehr et al showed a
statistically significant positive corticosteroid effect, and there was no significant
heterogeneity (OR: 5.42; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.60–18.29; P = .476) (Fig 1B).
A study by Chao et al20 looked at a unique group of patients with HSP who had
$watermark-text
Does Early Treatment With Corticosteroids Decrease the Odds of HSP Recurrence?
Recurrences affect up to one third of children with HSP.13,21 Many of these children require
additional hospital admissions and pharmacotherapy. The 2 prospective studies with
recurrence data suggest a protective effect of corticosteroids (OR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.07–1.49),
and there was no significant heterogeneity (P = .70) (Fig 3).11,14 The 5 retrospective
observational studies that examined HSP recurrence exhibited heterogeneity (P < .01), so a
pooled OR is not reported.11,13,14,20-23 The ORs and 95% CIs are reported for each study
(Fig 3). No evidence of publication bias was found (Egger test: P = .55).
In the 3 prospective studies, early corticosteroid treatment significantly reduced the odds of
developing persistent renal disease (OR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.19–0.96) (Fig 5A).8,10,13 There
was no evidence of marked heterogeneity among the studies (P = .341). In addition, no
evidence of publication bias was found (Egger test: P = .99). The retrospective study by
Saulsbury12 did not show a statistically significant difference in renal outcome between the
exposed and unexposed patients (OR: 1.25; 95% CI: 0.29–5.37) (Fig 5B).
Sensitivity Analyses
Does the Dose of Corticosteroid Matter?—We investigated if the corticosteroid dose
affects the likelihood of developing persistent renal disease by using unrestricted and
restricted regression models and the likelihood-ratio test. The doses and duration of
$watermark-text
treatment for each study are listed in Table 2. Two studies were excluded from this analysis
because corticosteroid dose was not reported.20,23 The result of the likelihood-ratio test was
statistically insignificant (P = .07), which suggests but fails to identify a significant dose-
response effect.
of 3.0 for the pooled OR to reach 1.0. A study with 400 patients would need an effect size
greater than an OR of 2.25 for the new pooled OR to reach 1.0; for the new pooled OR to be
statistically significant, the effect size would need to be larger than 3 (Fig 6A). If the
baseline risk of renal involvement in controls is 20%, the OR of a new study with 200
patients would need to be >1.75 to raise the pooled OR to 1.0 and >3.0 to achieve
significance. A new study with 400 patients would need an OR of >1.4 to raise the pooled
OR to 1.0 and >2.25 to achieve statistical significance (Fig 6B).
DISCUSSION
This systematic review and data summary of 15 eligible articles suggests that early treatment
of corticosteroids for children with HSP is associated with statistically significant increased
odds of abdominal pain resolution within 24 hours and reduced odds of persistent renal
disease. In addition, although the analyses lacked sufficient statistical precision, the
likelihood of surgical intervention and of HSP recurrence may also be reduced. Overall,
across all analyses, the pattern of effect is in the direction favoring the use of corticosteroids;
none of the analyses indicated harm.
This review emphasizes the necessity for a more complete understanding of the ways in
which corticosteroids impact the course of HSP, in both the acute and chronic settings.
Corticosteroids were first postulated to benefit children with HSP in the 1950s and are
effective in the treatment of other vasculitides in children and adults.25 Corticosteroids are
the cornerstone of treatment for the majority of juvenile vasculitides including systemic
lupus erythematosus, Wegener granulomatosis, polyarteritis nodosa, and Takayasu arteritis.
By contrast, corticosteroid treatment is controversial for use for Kawasaki disease, another
acute childhood vasculitis with potential morbidity and mortality; 1 recent report found no
effect of corticosteroid,26 whereas others have heralded the beneficial effects of
corticosteroids.27,28 Given this information should corticosteroid be given to children who
present to the hospital with new-onset HSP? A rigorous answer to this question would have
$watermark-text
There are several important potential limitations of the evidence we present. First, the
definition of renal involvement differed among the studies, which means that different
dimensions or degrees of HSP severity were potentially captured. For example, among the 3
prospective studies, the definition of proteinuria ranged from 200 to 400 mg/L, and the
definition of hematuria ranged from 5 to 10 red blood cells per high-powered field. Second,
the dosing regimens and mode of delivery for corticosteroids were not the same in each
study (Table 2). When corticosteroid therapy was stratified by high- versus low-dose
steroids for each of the clinical outcomes, there were no statistical differences between the 2
groups (data not shown). Although various doses of corticosteroids or the method of
$watermark-text
delivery (oral versus intravenous) may affect the size of the risk reduction, these changes in
dose or route are unlikely to reverse the direction of effects. Third, the studies did not
uniformly classify HSP cases as incident or recurrent. Therefore, the potential exists to
inappropriately group severe recurrence with milder recurrence such as rash alone. Like-
wise, given uncertainty about loss to follow-up, particularly in the corticosteroid-treated
group, the protective effect of corticosteroids is likely to be an underestimate.
Two other limitations should be kept in mind when interpreting these data. First, our ability
to draw robust conclusions was hampered by the limited number of prospective studies and
small numbers of patients within the studies, which often resulted in imprecise measures of
treatment effects. Although the effect of corticosteroid on several of the outcomes did
achieve statistically significant evidence of benefit, the failure to demonstrate benefit
$watermark-text
regarding other outcomes and the failure to show a significant dose-response effect may
reflect either the still relatively underpowered nature of the combined existing studies or a
true absence of impact. Second, the effects noted in the retrospective observational studies
probably include some degree of confounding by indication, whereby patients with greater
disease severity were more likely to receive corticosteroids. Given that most of the
retrospective studies nevertheless continued to show a benefit, the results across all studies
are more reassuring.
These caveats not withstanding, our findings suggest that the potential benefit of
corticosteroid administration early in the course of HSP may be more prominent than
previously suggested for both acute (pain, surgical intervention) and chronic (recurrence,
renal disease) complications of disease. If corticosteroid therapy is truly as effective as this
meta-analysis suggests, then broader use of corticosteroid would likely decrease prolonged
hospitalization, the risk of surgery, or chronic renal disease and may, by extension, prove
beneficial even for those seemingly benign cases in female patients who later develop
complications during pregnancy. As demonstrated by the sensitivity analyses, our findings
regarding the potential benefit of corticosteroid to reduce chronic renal disease are robust; to
reverse our findings, not only would the sample size need to be greater than any published
study on HSP to date, but it also would have to show an OR of harm from corticosteroid
administration >2.25, which is unlikely. Better-designed retrospective studies with
standardization of corticosteroid exposure by accounting for the probability that any patient
would receive corticosteroids and larger prospective, randomized, controlled trials are
needed to assess all clinically relevant outcomes. Knowledge from such studies is essential
for guiding our interventions early in the course of HSP and improving patient outcomes for
both children and adults.
Acknowledgments
$watermark-text
Pamela Weiss is funded, in part, by a National Institutes of Health pharmacoepidemiology T32 training grant.
We thank Frank Pessler, Eric Hanson, Alba Hanson, Jan Boswinkel, Keri Cohn, Eva Lynch, Anna Genin, Kaoru
Saijo, and Lorenza Frisoni for translation of abstracts and articles. We also thank David D. Sherry and James
Guevara for critical reading of the manuscript.
Abbreviations
CI confidence interval
References
1. Bowyer S, Roettcher P, Pediatric rheumatology, Pediatric Rheumatology Database Research Group.
clinic populations in the United States: results of a 3 year survey. J Rheumatol. 1996; 23:1968–
1974. [PubMed: 8923377]
2. Rostoker G. Schönlein-Henoch purpura in children and adults: diagnosis, pathophysiology and
management. BioDrugs. 2001; 15:99–138. [PubMed: 11437679]
3. Kobayashi O, Wada H, Okawa K, Takeyama I. Schönlein-Henoch’s syndrome in children. Contrib
Nephrol. 1975; 4:48–71. [PubMed: 1235099]
4. Calviño MC, Llorca J, García-Porrúa C, Fernández-Iglesias JL, Rodriguez-Ledo P, González-Gay
$watermark-text
MA. Henoch-Schönlein purpura in children from northwestern Spain: a 20-year epidemiologic and
clinical study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2001; 80:279–290. [PubMed: 11552081]
5. Levy M, Broyer M, Arsan A, Levy-Bentolila D, Habib R. Anaphylactoid purpura nephritis in
childhood: natural history and immunopathology. Adv Nephrol Necker Hosp. 1976; 6:183–228.
[PubMed: 139081]
6. Ronkainen J, Ala-Houhala M, Huttunen NP, et al. Outcome of Henoch-Schoenlein nephritis with
nephrotic-range proteinuria. Clin Nephrol. 2003; 60:80–84. [PubMed: 12940608]
7. Ronkainen J, Nuutinen M, Koskimies O. The adult kidney 24 years after childhood Henoch-
Schönlein purpura: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2002; 360:666–670. [PubMed: 12241872]
8. Goldstein AR, White RH, Akuse R, Chantler C. Long-term follow-up of childhood Henoch-
Schönlein nephritis. Lancet. 1992; 339:280–282. [PubMed: 1346291]
9. Ronkainen J, Koskimies O, Ala-Houhala M, et al. Early prednisone therapy in Henoch-Schönlein
purpura: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Pediatr. 2006; 149:241–247.
[PubMed: 16887443]
10. Reinehr T, Burk G, Berger T, Doeker B, Andler W. Steroids for prophylaxis of nephropathy in
Schnlein Henoch purpura? Follow-up of 171 patients [in German]. Klin Padiatr. 2000; 212:99–
102. [PubMed: 10916778]
11. Huber AM, King J, McLaine P, Klassen T, Pothos M, A randomized. placebo-controlled trial of
prednisone in early Henoch Schönlein purpura [ISRCTN85109383]. BMC Med. 2004; 2:7.
[PubMed: 15059282]
12. Saulsbury FT. Corticosteroid therapy does not prevent nephritis in Henoch-Schönlein purpura.
Pediatr Nephrol. 1993; 7:69–71. [PubMed: 8280195]
13. Saulsbury FT. Henoch-Schönlein purpura in children: report of 100 patients and review of the
literature. Medicine (Baltimore). 1999; 78:395–409. [PubMed: 10575422]
14. Mollica F, Li Volti S, Garozzo R, Russo G. Effectiveness of early prednisone treatment in
preventing the development of nephropathy in anaphylactoid purpura. Eur J Pediatr. 1992;
151:140–144. [PubMed: 1343079]
15. Buchanec J, Galanda V, Minarik M, Zibolen M. Can the nephropathy in Schonlein-Henoch
$watermark-text
purpura (syndrome) be prevented by early administration of steroids? Clin Nephrol. 1987; 28:156.
[PubMed: 3665209]
16. Temmel AF, Emminger W, Schroth B, Zaunschirm HA, Gadner H. Early prednisone treatment and
nephropathy in anaphylactoid purpura. Eur J Pediatr. 1993; 152:782–783. [PubMed: 8223819]
17. Dawod ST, Akl KF. Henoch-Schöenlein syndrome in Qatar: the effects of steroid therapy and
paucity of renal involvement. Ann Trop Paediatr. 1990; 10:279–284. [PubMed: 1703745]
18. Reinehr T, Burk G, Andler W. Does steroid treatment of abdominal pain prevent renal involvement
in Henoch-Schönlein purpura? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000; 31:323–324. [PubMed:
10997386]
19. Rosenblum ND, Winter HS. Steroid effects on the course of abdominal pain in children with
Henoch-Schonlein purpura. Pediatrics. 1987; 79:1018–1021. [PubMed: 3588124]
20. Chao HC, Kong MS, Lin SJ. Hepatobiliary involvement of Henoch-Schönlein purpura in children.
Acta Paediatr Taiwan. 2000; 41:63–68. [PubMed: 10927941]
$watermark-text
21. Trapani S, Micheli A, Grisolia F, et al. Henoch Schonlein purpura in childhood: epidemiological
and clinical analysis of 150 cases over a 5-year period and review of literature. Semin Arthritis
Rheum. 2005; 35:143–153. [PubMed: 16325655]
22. Buchanec J, Galanda V, Beláková S, Minárik M, Zibolen M. Incidence of renal complications in
Schönlein-Henoch purpura syndrome in dependence of an early administration of steroids. Int
Urol Nephrol. 1988; 20:409–412. [PubMed: 3170111]
23. Gonzalez-Gay MA, Llorca J. Controversies on the use of corticosteroid therapy in children with
Henoch-Schönlein purpura. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2005; 35:135–137. [PubMed: 16325653]
24. Buchanec J, Galanda V, Belakova S, Minarik M, Zibolen M. The effect of prednisone in the
development of nephropathy in Schoenlein-Henoch purpura [in Slovak]. Cesk Pediatr. 1989;
44:145–146. [PubMed: 2731281]
25. Philpott MG, Briggs JN. Treatment of the Schoenlein-Henoch syndrome with adrenocorticotrophic
hormone (A.C.T.H.) and cortisone. Arch Dis Child. 1953; 28:57–60. [PubMed: 13031701]
$watermark-text
26. Newberger J. Surviving the night shift. Emerg Med Serv. 2007; 36(2):77–79. [PubMed: 17340928]
27. Wooditch AC, Aronoff SC. Effect of initial corticosteroid therapy on coronary artery aneurysm
formation in Kawasaki disease: a meta-analysis of 862 children. Pediatrics. 2005; 116:989–995.
[PubMed: 16199713]
28. Inoue Y, Okada Y, Shinohara M, et al. A multicenter prospective randomized trial of
corticosteroids in primary therapy for Kawasaki disease: clinical course and coronary artery
outcome. J Pediatr. 2006; 149:336–341. [PubMed: 16939743]
FIGURE 1.
Corticosteroid (CS) treatment of HSP and resolution of abdominal pain. A, Prospective:
time to resolution of abdominal pain (days) reported in means and medians. B,
Retrospective: ORs (95% CIs) of abdominal pain resolution within 24 hours of
corticosteroid administration. The box size is proportional to the inverse of the magnitude of
the variance.
$watermark-text
$watermark-text
FIGURE 2.
Corticosteroid treatment and odds of surgery. Shown are the ORs (95% CIs) of subsequent
surgical intervention for severe abdominal pain and/or intussusception. A, Prospective; B,
retrospective. The box size in B is proportional to the inverse of the magnitude of the
variance.
$watermark-text
$watermark-text
FIGURE 3.
Corticosteroid treatment of HSP and odds of recurrence. Shown are the ORs (95% CIs) of
HSP recurrence. A, Prospective; B, retrospective. The box sizes are proportional to the
inverse of the magnitude of the variance. No overall OR is displayed in B because of the
heterogeneity of the studies.
$watermark-text
$watermark-text
FIGURE 4.
Corticosteroid treatment and odds of cumulative incidence of renal disease. Shown are the
ORs (95% CIs) of patients with HSP with cumulative (transient or persistent) renal
involvement if treated early with corticosteroids. A, Prospective; B, retrospective. The box
sizes are proportional to the inverse of the magnitudeof the variance. No overall OR is
displayed because of the heterogeneity of the studies.
$watermark-text
$watermark-text
FIGURE 5.
Corticosteroid treatment and odds of persistent renal disease. Shown are the ORs (95% CIs)
of persistent renal involvement after HSP diagnosis. A, Prospective; B, retrospective. An
end point of 1 year was used for the Huber et al11 and Mollica et al14 studies and 6 months
for the Ronkainen et al9 study. The box size in A is proportional to the inverse of the
magnitude of the variance.
$watermark-text
$watermark-text
FIGURE 6.
Sensitivity analysis of effect size of future hypothetical studies for likelihood of persistent
renal involvement. Shown are the new combined pooled OR versus OR of a hypothetical
new study with sample sizes of 200 and 400. The prevalence of persistent renal involvement
in the control group was calculated at either 5% (A) or 20% (B).
$watermark-text
$watermark-text
TABLE 1
Reasons for Exclusion of Articles
$watermark-text
n
Initial set: total 201
a
The references cited (29–207) are available at www.pediatric-generalists.org/Weiss/All-Citations-for-HSP-Systematic-Review.pdf .
$watermark-text
TABLE 2
Summary of Included Articles and Corticosteroid Use
Dose, Duration
mg/kg
per d
Reinehr etal18 (2000) 101 Retrospective a 1wk <3 wk (46%), >3 wk (54%)
2
Reinehr etal10 (2000) 171 Retrospective a 1wk <3 wk(15%), >3wk(85%)
2
Chao et al20(2000) 20 Retrospective Not stated Range: 3–7 d Not stated
Saulsbury13 (1999) 100 Retrospective b Mean: 8.9 d (range: 5–28 d) Mean: 8.5 d (range: 1–40 d)
1.6
Temmel etal16 (1993) 86 Retrospective 2 1 wk, weaning over 1 wk At diagnosis (30%), at onset of
abdominal pain (70%)
Saulsbury12 (1993) 69 Retrospective c Mean: 8 d (range: 5–10 d) Mean: 5 d (range: 1–19 d)
1.7
Dawodand Akl17 (1990) 40 Retrospective 1–2 Mean: 7 d (range: 3–30 d) Not stated
Rosenblum and Winter19 (1987) 43 Retrospective 1–2 Not stated <1 wk(75%), < 12 d (96%)
Shown is a summary of the 15 included articles’ study design, corticosteroid dose, duration of treatment, and timing of treatment in respect to diagnosis.
a
Dose was increased to 3 to 5 mg/kg per day if abdominalpain was present for >24 hours.
b
Mean dose: 1.6 mg/kg per day (range: 1.2–2.0 mg/kg per day).
c
Mean dose: 1.7 mg/kg per day (range: 1.3–2.1 mg/kg per day).
Page 16