Assesment of Textile Dyeing Units and ZLD at Tirupur - CPCB PDF

“REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF POLLUTION FROM TEXTILE DYEING UNITS
IN TIRUPUR, TAMIL NADU AND MEASURES TAKEN TO ACHIEVE ZERO

LIQUID DISCHARGE”
2014-15
CENTRAL POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

ZONAL OFFICE (SOUTH), BENGALURU
Contributors
Technical Adviser : Dr. A. B. Akolkar

Member Secretary
Principal Coordinator : Sh. S. Suresh

Zonal Officer
Project Coordinator : Smt. H D Varalaxmi

Scientist D
Monitoring Team : Smt. H.D. Varalaxmi

Scientist D
&
Project Trainees
Report Preparation : Smt. H.D. Varalaxmi

Scientist D
Laboratory Facilities : South Zonal Office, Bengaluru

Contents
Chapter Details Page
Ch. 1 Introduction 1-3
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Objectives and scope of study 2
1.3 Phases of Work 2
1.4 Methodology 3
1.5 Questionnaire Design 3
1.6 Questionnaire Survey 3
1.7 In Depth Study 3
Ch. 2 Textile Dying units at Tirupur – An Overview 4-11
2.1 Textile Dying Units in Tirupur 4
2.2 Textile Dying Process 4
2.2.1 Production of Yarn and Fabric 5
2.2.2 Treatments to fibers, yarns and fabric: 5
2.2.3 Dyeing process 6
2.2.4 Dyes 7
2.2.5 Bleaching 7
2.3 Water Consumption 7
2.4 Sources of Wastewater 8
2.4.1 Wastewater generation and Nature 8
2.5 Pollution Potential in Textile dying units 9
2.6 Treatment system Installed to achieve Zero Liquid Discharge 9
Ch. 3. Questionnaire Survey and In-Depth Study 12-61
3.1 Preliminary data obtained through Questionnaire 12
3.2 Study carried out at Tirupur 12
3.3 General Observations made during field study of CETPs and 12
IETPs at Tirupur industrial Area
3.4 Details of CETPs and IETPs studied 13
3.4.1 M/s Andipalayam Common Effluent Treatment Plant (P) Limited 13
3.4.2 M/s Rayapuram Common Effluent Treatment Plant (P) Limited 17
3.4.3 M/s Veerapondi Common Effluent Treatment Plant (P) Limited 20
3.4.4 M/s Mangalam Common Effluent Treatment Plant (P) Limited 23
3.4.5 M/s Arulupuram Common Effluent Treatment Plant (P) Limited 25
3.4.6 M/s PARK Common Effluent Treatment Plant (P) Limited 28
3.4.7 M/s Chinnakkarai Common Effluent Treatment (P) Ltd., 30
3.4.8 M/s Tiruppur Murgampalyam Common Effluent Treatment (P) 33
Ltd.,
3.4.9 M/s Kallikadu Common Effluent Treatment Plant (P) Ltd., 37
3.5 Individual Effluent Treatment Plants studied 40
3.5.1 M/s Jayavishnu Textile Dyeing Unit 40
3.5.2. M/s Royal Classic Mills Pvt Ltd 44
3.5.3 M/s Victus Dyeing (P) Ltd 46
3.5.4 M/s Mercury Process (P) Ltd., 49
3.5.5 M/s Poppy Arts Dyeing (P) LTd., 51
3.5.6 M/s Maruthy dyeing (P) Ltd., 54
3.6 Assessment of Surface and Ground water monitoring along the 56
River Noyyal at Tiruppur
3.6.1 Surface water monitoring 56
3.6.2 Ground monitoring 59
Ch. 4. Results and Discussion 62-67
4.0 Results and Discussion 62
4.1 Water recovery and reuse 62
4.2 RO reject management 63
4.3 Salt recovered in terms of pure salt, brine solution and impure salt 64
4.4 ETP Sludge Management 65
4.5 Conclusion and Recommendations/suggestions 66
4.5.1 Conclusions 66
4.5.2 Recommendations/Suggestions 67
Annexure -1 68-78
Annexure - 2 79-83
Report on Assessment of Pollution from Textile Dyeing Units in Tirupur, Tamil Nadu and Measures Taken to
Achieve Zero Liquid Discharge
Chapter 1.0
Introduction
1.1 Background
Tirupur has 760 textile dyeing units established out of which 430 units are in
operation. The untreated effluent was discharged into the Noyyal River till 1997. After the
issuance of directions by Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board (TNPCB) in 1997, these units
have installed Common Effluent Treatment Plants (CETPs) consisting of physical, chemical
and biological treatment units. Some of the units have installed individual ETPs (IETPs). The
treated effluent was finally discharged into the river. The dyeing units use sodium chloride
/Sodium sulphate salt in the dyeing process for efficient fixing of dyes on the fabric
efficiently. This contributes high total dissolved solids (TDS) and chlorides in the effluent.
CETPs and IETPs failed to meet discharge standards of TDS and chlorides and thereby
significantly affected the river water quality. TDS level in the river water was in the range of
900 - 6600 mg/L and chloride was in the range of 230 - 2700 mg/l.
Orathupalayam dam is located across Noyyal river at 32 kms downstream of Tirupur.

The pollutants carried by the river was accumulated in the dam. TDS in the dam water was
in the range of 4250 - 7900 mg/L and chloride was in the range of 1600 - 2700 mg/L. The
dam sediments contain heavy metals of chromium, copper, zinc and lead. In 2006, the High
Court has directed the dyeing units to install zero liquid discharge (ZLD) plants and to stop
discharging of effluent into the river. Accordingly, the industries have installed and
commissioned the ZLD plants consisting of RO plant and reject management system in 2010.
The effluent after secondary treatment from the CETP is further treated in RO plant.
The RO permeate is reused by the member units. The RO reject is concentrated in Multiple
Effect Evaporator (MEE)/ Mechanical Vacuum Re-compressor (MVR). The concentrate is
crystallized and centrifuged to recover salt. The salt recovered is reused. The liquid separated
from the centrifuge is sent to solar evaporation pan. The salt collected in the solar pans is
bagged and stored in secure land fill facility. Thus, the discharge into the river is now
stopped. However, the damage caused to the groundwater and soil contamination in the river
basin is yet to be restored.
CPCB Zonal Office Bengaluru Page 1

To assess the measures taken by the Textile Dyeing units in Tirupur, the detailed
studies in selected industries was taken to carry out performance evaluation of various
pollution control system provided by the industries. The study also focuses on status of
surface & ground water quality in the surrounding area.
1.2 Objectives and Scope of the Study:
The broad objective is to assess the pollution control measures taken by the Textile
Dyeing units to achieve zero liquid discharge. The other specific study objectives are:
 Conducting baseline survey on type of process practised, water consumption,

management of process solutions, treatment technologies provided, and
management of hazardous wastes generated.
 Identification of major area of concern in the context of environmental
management.
 Performance evaluation of treatment system by collecting samples.
 Assessment of status of surface and ground water quality in the surrounding area.
 Evaluation of compliance to the existing environmental regulations and norms.
 Providing valuable inputs for formulation of environmental management
guideline.
1.3 Phases of Work
The project is planned to carry out in two phases in 18 months. The details of the study
for Phase I and Phase II are as follow:
Phase I: Questionnaire survey in textile dyeing units and CETPs in Tirupur and
followed by in-depth monitoring in 6 Common Effluent Treatment Plant
and 3 Individual Effluent Treatment Plants.
Phase II: In-depth monitoring of 3 CETP’s and 3 IETPS to cover different

combination of ZLD system and assessment of Ground water & surface
water quality along the Noyyal river and in the surrounding area.

1.4 Methodology
The list of CETPs and IETPs located in Tirupur were obtained through Tamil Nadu
State Pollution Control Board. Separate questionnaire format were sent to CETPs and IETPs
to obtain preliminary information. Based on the preliminary information provided and in
consultation with TNPCB officers, 9 CETP’ s and 6 IETPs were selected for field visit in
Tirupur for detailed monitoring of pollution control measures taken by the units and also
monitored surface water quality in Noyyal river and ground water quality in the surrounding
area.
The phases of work involved are as follows:
1.5 Questionnaire Design
A comprehensive questionnaire is designed to collect information from CETPs and

IETPs. The designed questionnaire to obtain first-hand information is enclosed at Annexure
- 1.
1.6 Questionnaire Survey
The Questionnaire were sent to CETPs and IETPs to obtain preliminary information
about the units. The information received from the units were compiled with respect to type
of salt used in dying process, chemical used ,water consumption, wastewater generation and
type of treatment system to achieve ZLD for selection of representative units for in-depth
study.
1.7 In Depth Study
After obtaining the information through questionnaire, based on the type of salts used,
type of ZLD system and recovery and recycle of salts generated through ZLD system,
CETPs and IETPs were selected for in-depth monitoring. In-depth monitoring were carried
out in presence of TNPCB officers and industry representatives.

Chapter 2.0
Textile Dying units at Tirupur – An Overview
2.1 Textile Dying Units in Tirupur
The textile plants are classified as one of the most polluting industrial sectors due to
enormous quantity of wastewater generation and it’s characteristic. Tirupur has 760 textile
dyeing units established out of which 430 units are in operation. Partially treated and
untreated effluent from dyeing units was discharged into the Noyyal River till 2006, which
resulted in significant increase in TDS and chloride level in the Noyyal River and
Orathupalayam dam located across the river. In 2006, the High Court has directed the dyeing
units to install zero liquid discharge (ZLD) plant and to stop discharging of effluent into the
river. Since majority of the units were small scale in nature, a few units clustered together to
installed common effluent treatment plants consisting of physico - chemical, biological
treatment, RO plant and reject management system to achieve ZLD. Presently, 20 CETPS
and 66 IETPS are catering for treatment of effluent from textile dyeing & bleaching units
present in Tirupur.
2.2 Textile Dying Process
The textile industry involves the spinning of a wide range of natural and synthetic
fibers into yarn and the production of fabric from yarn. Spun yarns and fabrics may receive
various treatments to improve their appearance. The raw materials used in textile works
include natural and synthetic fibers. The raw materials used are;
Natural Fibers: Semi-Synthetic: Synthetic Fibers:
 Cotton Rayon Derivatives of oil

 Jute
 Flax
 Wool
 Silk

2.2.1 Production of Yarn and Fabric:
Picking, Carding and Combing of fibers are carried out to remove vegetable or other
impure matter before the fibers are spun into yarn.
Carding and spinning:
Carding is the tearing of fibers using a series of machines with fine-pointed wire belts
wound around large drums. The loose rope produced by carding is called card silver.
Spinning is the drawing and twisting of card silver to make yarn. After spinning, the yarn
may be sent for dyeing before it is used to weave or knit a fabric.
Weaving:
Weaving uses traditional flying shuttle looms to form the fabric from the yarn, but
sometimes special features like water jet systems or air pulsing to increase the output of
woven fabric.
Knitting:
Knitted fabrics are made by the intermeshing of one or more yarns to form loops and in
order to form the loops, the yarn must be bent in a number of directions. Knitting may be
used to form garment sized pieces or whole garments. Residual oils present in wool fibers or
fabrics and sizing agents (usually applied to cotton yarns) improve workability during
knitting or weaving.
2.2.2 Treatments to fibers, yarns and fabric:
Mechanical and chemical processes may be applied to improve the workability or finish
of fibers, yarn and fabric. Treatments which involve chemical addition usually involve bath
immersion or padding (roller coating). Many of the chemicals used are potential
contaminants. Fabrics may be treated with compounds to prevent fungal or mould growth.
Bleaching:
Bleaching is accomplished by oxidation or reduction. Cotton and other cellulosic

fibres are treated with alkaline hydrogen peroxide. Sodium hypochlorite was used in the past
but is now generally only used to bleach linen. Wool and other animal fibres are subjected to

acidic reducing agents. Synthetic fibres can be treated by either oxidation or reduction,
depending upon their chemical composition. The treatment can be under taken by immersion
under pressure and high temperature followed by rinsing and drying.
Drying:
Excess water is removed mechanically by centrifuge squeezing and vaccum suction

rolls. Remaining moisture is removed by passing the fabric or yarn through heated dryers
under controlled temperature, humidity, drying time, dimensional stability.
Mercerisation:
This process is applied to cotton and cotton blends to increase lustre and to improve
strength and affinity for dyes. The treatment produces a swelling of the fibre, it can be
applied at yarn or fabric stage and involves immersion of the material in a sodium hydroxide
solution followed by cold spraying and then neutralisation with acid or by liquid ammonia
treatment.
Sizing and desizing:
Sizing chemicals are applied to wrap yarns(especially cottons) to enable them to

withstand the stresses of weaving. Sizing chemicals include polyvinyl acetate(PVA).
Polyacrylic acid and carboxymethyl cellulose. These chemicals are removed by desizing,
often achieved by applying solutions of enzymes such as malt diastase.
2.2.3 Dyeing process
Dyeing is the process of adding colour to textile products like fibers, yarns, and fabrics.
Dyeing is normally done in a special solution containing dyes and particular chemical
material. After dyeing, dye molecules have uncut chemical bond with fiber molecules.
The temperature and time controlling are two key factors in dyeing. There are mainly two
classes of dye, natural and man-made. The primary source of dye, historically, has generally
been nature, with the dyes being extracted from animals or plants. Artificial dyes have been
produced to achieve a broader range of colors and to render the dyes more stable to resist
washing and general use. Different classes of dyes are used for different types of fiber and at
different stages of the textile production process, from loose fibers through yarn and cloth to
completed garments.

Acrylic fibers are dyed with basic dyes, while nylon and protein fibers such
as wool and silk are dyed with acid dyes and polyester yarn is dyed with disperse
dyes. Cotton is dyed with a range of dye types, including vat dyes, and modern synthetic
reactive and direct dyes.
2.2.4 Dyes
Dyes are colourless soluble in a carrier, mostly water or an organic solvent.
Classification of dyes according to method of application is shown below, together with types
of textile fibre that can be commercially dyed by each method:
 Basic--Cationic dyes (wool,wool blends, silks, acrylic)
 Acid--anionic dyes (wool, silk and nylon)
 Direct--anionic dyes (cotton, linen, viscose)
 Chrome--anionic dyes that must be applied with sodium dichromate(wool)
 Azoic--Insoluble pigments formed within (cotton,linen) the fibre initially by a
soluble coupling compound and then a diazotized base
 Vat and sulphur--Insoluble in water and converted into soluble colourless
compound by use of sodium hydrosulphite. Ex: cotton, viscose, linen, silk.
 Disperse--non ionic dyes such as polyester, triacetate, secondary acetate
 Metal complex--anionic dye containing chromium ex: wool,nylon.
2.2.5 Bleaching
Bleaching is one of the stages in the manufacture of textiles. All raw textile materials,
when they are in natural form will have its natural color, odor and impurities that are not
suitable for clothing materials. Not only the natural impurities will remain on the material
but also the add-ons that were made during its cultivation, growth and manufacture in the
form of pesticides, fungicides, worm killers, sizes, lubricants, etc. The removal of these
natural coloring matters and add-ons during the previous state of manufacturing is called
scouring and bleaching.
2..3 Water Consumption
In most of the textile dyeing units the water consumption is around 140-200 l/d for
producing 1 kg of fabric material.

2.4 Sources of Wastewater
Textile industry being a wet fabric processing industry includes, de-sizing, scouring,
bleaching, mercerizing, dying, printing and finishing stages. During each stage different type
of chemicals are used such as strong acids, strong alkalis, inorganic chlorinated compounds,
hypochlorite of sodium, organic compound such as dyestuff, bleaching agent, finishing
chemicals, starch, thickening agent, surface active chemicals, wetting and dispersing agents
and salts of metals. Various dyes are used during dying stage for coloring purpose; multicolor
are used to improve beauty of products. The main products of textile industries in Tirpur are
raw cotton based like pullout, towels, napkins and power looms. The processing steps
involved and pollutants generated are shown in below schematic figure
Figure 1: Cotton fabric production and associated water pollutants
2.4.1 Wastewater generation and Nature

Table 2: Wastewater generation processes and their nature
Process Nature
Sizing High in BOD, COD
De-sizing High in BOD, COD, Dissolved Solids

Bleaching High alkalinity, Suspended Solids

Mercerizing High PH, Dissolved Solids
Dyeing Strong Color, High BOD, Dissolved Solids
Printing Color, High BOD, Suspended Solids
2.5 Pollution Potential in Textile dying units

The textile industry consumes a substantial amount of water in its manufacturing
processes used mainly in the dyeing and finishing operations. Considering the volume
generated as well as the effluent composition, textile plants is classified as one of the most
polluting industrial sectors. Textile wastewaters are characterized by extreme fluctuations in
parameters such as chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD),
pH, color and salinity. The composition of the wastewater depends on the different organic-
based compounds, chemicals and dyes used in the dry and wet-processing. During dyeing
process it has been estimated that the losses of un-fixed dyes to the environment can reach
10–50%. One of the most difficult tasks confronted by the wastewater treatment plants of
textile industries is the removal of the color, mainly because dyes and pigments are designed
to resist biodegradation, such that they remain in the environment for a long period of time.
In addition, tremendous quantity of unused salts such as sodium sulphate and sodium
chloride reaches the effluent stream increasing the TDS level. Presence of sulphur, naphthol,
vat dyes, chromium compounds and heavy metals and certain auxiliary chemicals all
collectively make the effluent highly toxic. Other harmful chemicals present in the effluent
may be formaldehyde based dye fixing agents, hydro carbon based softeners and
nonbiodegradable dyeing chemicals. The mill effluent is often of a high temperature and pH.
The colloidal matter present along with colors and oily scum increases the turbidity and
imparts foul odour to the effluent.
2.6 Treatment system Installed to achieve Zero Liquid Discharge
The Textile dyeing units in Tirupur have physico - chemical, biological treatment
followed by Reverse Osmosis for water recovery; and Multiple Vapor Re-compressor and
Multiple Effect Evaporator for salt or brine recovery through CETPs or IETPs to achieve
Zero Liquid Discharge. The concept of Common Effluent Treatment Plant was originated to

treat the wastewater generated by cluster of small scale industries since such units are not in a
position to have individual treatment facilities due to space constraints, high
capital/maintenance cost, etc. Since most of the textile dyeing units are small scale, CETPs
are ideal option for effluent treatment. Thus, most of the textile dyeing clusters in India has
established and commissioned several CETPs. The overall treatment process technology
implemented in CETPs and IETPs to treat textile industry effluent is same while the scale
varies.
The raw effluents generated by various sections of textile process are collected in a
storage tank inside the factory premises of the individual member unit. The effluent is
collected by gravity through HDPE pipes to a collection well from where it is pumped to the
respective CETPs. At the CETPs, the effluent is first passed through screen chamber to
remove floating material and stored in equalization tank for homogenization of effluent
received from different units before subjecting to the main treatment processes such as
physico - chemical treatment and biological treatment. In biological treatment, the physico
chemically treated effluent is fed into aeration tank of different aeration techniques to
convert bio- degradable organic components into bio-mass. The effluent with biomass being
taken to clarifier where the bio-mass settle by gravity and clear supernatant overflows into a
sump. The excess sludge is removed into a sludge thickener. The clear supernatant water
from clarifier is subjected to quartz filtration for removal of suspended solids; resin filtration
for color removal; softening to reduce calcium and magnesium hardness; and chlorination to
prevent growth of microorganisms as well as for colour removal.
A few CETPs have installed Oxidation -Reduction reactor. The reactor has HDPE pipes
of suitable diameter and length arranged in parallel arrays and interconnected, where
acidification, injection of activator chemicals into reactor and pH correction of effluent takes
place. The O-R treated effluent is taken to flash mixer for addition of coagulating agent and
then sent to flocculator and tube settler for settling of micro suspensions to yield a treated
effluent free of the fragmented dyestuff and original COD causing dyestuff. After settlement,
the effluent is passed through dual media filters for retention of fine solids and ultrafiltration
for removal of micron sized suspensions and colloids and then treated through activated
carbon filters before feeding into the RO system. The RO permeate recovered is distributed
to member units through dedicated pipeline from CETPs.

The RO rejects is further treated through combination of Mechanical Vapour

Recompression (MVR) Evaporators, Multi Effect Evaporator (falling film/forced circulation)
crystallizers and centrifuges for recovery and reuse of salt (brine solution). The concentrated
effluent is fed into a crystallizer to enhance the formation of salt crystals and the condensate
is collected and reused along with RO permeate. The concentrates with crystals from
crystallizer are taken into a centrifuge for salt separation. The separated salts and salt solution
(MEE concentrate) are reused by the member units and a portion of the mother liquor is taken
to solar evaporation pond to recover mixed salt. The biological and chemical sludge is
dewatered in filter press and disposed in secured landfill or through authorized agencies.

Chapter 3.0
Questionnaire Survey and In-Depth Study
3.1 Preliminary data obtained through Questionnaire

This office has prepared questionnaire to obtain preliminary information about the
CETPs and IETPs. 5 CETPs out of 20 CEPTs, and 2 IETPs out of 66 IETPs have provided
the information. Detailed field investigations were conducted in 6 CETPs & 3 IETPs in 1st
phase and 3 CETPs & 3 IETPs after obtaining preliminary data from the CETPs and IETPs.
The Compiled information of CETPs and IETPs which are submitted the filled questionnaires
are given in Annexure 2.
3.2 Study carried out at Tirupur
Tirupur, the “knitwear capital" of India, is a city corporation located at 11.1075°N

77.3398°E, 47 km east of Coimbatore in the Indian state of Tamil Nadu. The town is
renowned as India’s leading cotton knitwear center, accounting for over 90 % of the
country’s exports in this sector. The textile industry provides employment to over six lakh
people and has an annual turnover of 220 billion Rupees. There are nearly about 3000 sewing
units and 1326 knitting units, and other ancillary units. Some of the world’s largest retailers
including C & A, Switcher SA, Walmart, Primark, Lauren diesel, Tommy Hilfiger, Fila,
Reebok import textiles and clothing from Tirpur.
Tirupur has 760 textile dyeing units established out of which 430 units are in operation.
Presently, 20 CETPs and 66 IETPs are catering for treatment of effluent from textile dyeing
units present in Tirupur.
3.3 General Observations made during field study of CETPs and IETPs
at Tirupur industrial Area:
i. Around 17 CETP’s are operating at 30-40% of installed capacity and 3 CETP’s are
operating at 70% of installed capacity as per the directions of TNPCB.

ii. All CETPs/IETPs are having treatment facilities comprising of Physico chemical
followed by biological and advanced treatment viz Nano/RO followed by
MVRE/MEE and salt recovery system.
iii. All CETPs and IETPs are having online flow measurement system to quantify the
effluent received from the individual unit, quantity of effluent treated and quantity of
treated effluent sent to their member units for reuse in their process and same is
connected to TNPCB network system.
iv. The CETPs/IETPs are unable to recover 100% salt from the RO reject, still 5-31% of
RO reject is disposed in solar evaporation ponds.
v. Some of the CETP’s are sending partially concentrated brine to their member units
through tanker and some of CETP’s are recovering the pure salt after concentrations.
vi. Pure salt recovered from the RO reject is being utilised in the process and impure salt
recovered is stored under shed.
vii. All CETPs and IETPs are storing huge quantity of chemical sludge generated from
ETPs.
viii. Utilisation of chemical sludge in cement industry as auxiliary raw material is to be
speeded up by TNPCB, based on the trail run.
ix. All CETPs and IETPs are looking for scientific disposal options for impure salt and
exploration of utilisation of impure salt in other industrial sector as auxiliary raw
material.
3.4 Details of CETPs and IETPs studied
3.4.1 M/s Andipalayam Common Effluent Treatment Plant (P) Limited
General Information:
Address of the CETP : M/s Andipalayam Common Effluent

Treatment Plant P)Limited., Mangalam
Road, Anaipalayam, Tamil Nadu
Installed capacity in MLD/KLD : 4.5 MLd or 4500 KLd
Operating capacity in MLD : 1.35 MLD or 1350 KLD
Number of member units : 20
Sequences of treatment system exist : Receiving tank, equalization and
to achieve ZLD neutralization tank, Aeration tank,
secondary clarifier, oxidation reduction
process, OR sump, flash mixer, tube

settler, dual media filter, ultra filtration,

Activated carbon filter, Reverse osmosis
followed by nano-filteration, MVR,
MEE and solar evaporation pond
Quantity of treated effluent recycled : 1080 KLD
to member units
Type and Quantity of salt recovered : Sodium chloride 108 kld as liquid brine
per day
Quantity of salt recycled into : Sodium chloride 108 kld as liquid brine
member units
Quantity of concentrated effluent : 2 kld
sent to solar evaporation pond
Quantity of impure salt generated per : Approx. 1.7 tons/day
day
Quantity of impure salt accumulated : 2000 tons
in storage shed
Specific Observation of the units :
(i) M/s Andipalayam Common Effluent Treatment Plant (P) Limited, has 20 member
units, out of which 8 member units are actively operating.
(ii) The CETP was operating at 30 % of installed capacity since 2012.
(iii) The effluent being received through pipeline. All member units are using sodium
chloride salt in the process.
(iv) The trade effluents are received in receiving tank through closed conduit by gravity.
The pH of the raw effluent is around 9.2 and hence HCl is added in neutralization tank
to neutralize the effluent. Neutralized effluent is being sent to aeration tank of 3MLD
capacity provided with diffused aeration system and maintained 3000 mg/l of MLSS.
Overflow of aeration tank is taken to secondary clarifier where 85 % of COD and 60%
of TSS are reduced through separating bio mass. Supernatant of secondary clarifier is
being treated in Oxidation Reduction Reactor (ORR) of 8.5 lakh liter capacity where
chlorine gas is feed at the rate of 50 ppm with residential time of 1 hr to disinfect and to
remove colour.
(v) Treated effluent from ORR is stored in OR sump and sodium metabisulphate is added
to remove residual chlorine. Lime (400-500 ppm) and poly aluminum chloride (0.2
ppm) are added in the flash mixer and effluent is passed to tube settlers. Sludge from
primary and secondary clarifier and tube settlers are dewatered in filter press.

(vi) HCl dose is provided to the effluent at the outlet of the tube settler. Treated effluent is
collected and feed to Dual Media Filter (DMF) followed by ultra-filter of capacity 225
m3/hr with 2 skids followed by activated carbon filter. The unit has 2 stage RO systems
with each having 2 skids, with each skid of capacity 112.5 m3/hr. Pretreated effluent is
being treated through RO. The RO permeate being sent to the member units along with
condensate water. RO reject is being treated through nano filter. Nano filter permeate
known as brine is supplied to member units after lime treatment at the dose of 300 ppm.
Reject from nano filter is passed to MVR followed by MEE. The unit has 2 stages MEE
with falling film type and forced circulation type. After concentration through MVR
followed by MEE with falling film, the concentrated brine of 108 kld being sent to
their member units and remaining is further concentrated through MEE with forced
circulation, the final concentrated effluent in the tune of 2 kld being sent to solar
evaporation to recover impure salt through natural evaporation. It is informed that the
steam fed in the tune of 664 kg/hr to the MEE.
Collection Tank Chemical sludge dewatered in filter press
Solar Evaporation Pond Mixed salt from Solar evaporation pond

(vii) It is informed that around 2000 tons of mixed salt is being generated since inception
of ZLD and same being stored in the CETP premises.
(vii) It is informed that around 3000 tons of ETP sludge was sent to M/s Ultratech Cement,
Ariyalur (at the cost of Rs. 1300/ton) for co processing.
(ix) It is informed that co -member units are charged an average of Rs. 180 /kl. CETP
operation maintenance cost is worked about Rs. 150/kl.
(x) During inspection samples being collected at various points of CETP to verify the
efficiency of ZLD system, the analysis results are depicted below:
Location of samples Equaliza Secondary RO RO RO Nano brine Nano
collected tion treated feed permeate reject reject
Parameters Tank (Tube
Settler out
let)
pH 9.3 6.7 6.8 6.8 6.6 7.5 7.1
TSS (mg/L) 860 1604 - _ - ___ 32 20516 68
TDS (mg/L) 8374 9210 9454 400 42244 20406 44234
BOD (mg/L) 307 10 ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

COD (mg/L) 535 299 ___ ___ ___ ___ ___
Chloride (mg/L) 3589 4977 4475 96 22828 12730 12395
Sulphate (mg/L) 536 675 ___ ___ ___ ___ ___
Location of samples MVR MVR MEE MEE condensate

collected Concentrate condensate Concentrate
Parameters
pH 7.5 7.0 7.4 7.2
TSS (mg/L) 2950 ---- 106130 -----
TDS (mg/L) 56242 426 171580 172
Chloride (mg/L) 31966 191 60088 12

MLSS concentration in Aeration Tank (mg/L) 2945
(xi) From the analysis results RO efficiency is worked about 77.6 %, based on flow meter
reading taken during the inspection RO efficiency was found 78%. As per analysis
results the solid concentration is increased from 4.4 to 5.9% through MVR and further
it was increased upto 27.7% through MEE. As per the analysis results the MEE final
concentrate which is being sent to solar evaporation is worked about 15 kld. Based on

flow reading taken at different points of MVR and MEE during the inspection also
confirms the same, the quantity of concentrated effluent sent to solar evaporation
pond worked about 16 kld. However CETP claims that only 2 kld of effluent being sent
to solar evaporation and the same is not matching with field observation and the
quantity of concentrate sent to solar evaporation was found in higher side.
3.4.2 M/s Rayapuram Common Effluent Treatment Plant (P) Limited
Address of the CETP : Rayapuram Common Effluent Treatment

Plant (P)Limited S.F.No.642,
Anaipalayam
Sirupooluvapatti (PO)
Tirupur-641 687
Installed capacity in MLD/KLD : 5.5 MLD or 5500 KLd
Sequences of treatment system exist : Receiving tank, homogenization tank,
to achieve ZLD Biological oxidation tank, clarifier,
quartz filter, resin filter, BDTRF,
softener filter, Reverse osmosis followed
by MVR, crystallizer, centrifuge and
solar evaporation pond.
Quantity of treated effluent recycled : 1215 kld
to member units
Type and Quantity of salt recovered : Sodium sulphate 13 tons/day as liquid
per day brine
Quantity of salt recycled into : Sodium sulphate 13 tons/day as liquid
member units brine
Quantity of concentrated effluent : 8.2 kld
Quantity of impure salt generated per : 1.85 tons/day
day
in storage shed
Specific Observations:
(i) M/s Rayapuram Common Effluent Treatment Plant (P) Limited, has 25 member units
out of which 12 member units are active.
(ii) The CETP was operating in the range of 20-30% of installed capacity since March
2012.

(iii) The CETP receives effluent through the underground pipeline by gravity. The CETP is
operated for 7 days a week, while dyeing units are operating 5 days a week.
(iv) It is informed that the total production capacity of 10 member units is 5469 kg/day and
their member units are consuming 25503 kg/day of sodium sulphate salt in dying
process.
(v) The trade effluents are received in receiving tank of capacity 138 m3 through closed
conduit and taken to homogenization tank for uniform mixing followed by biological
oxidation tank and primary clarifier. Sludge from primary clarifier is dewatered through
thickener and filter press. The supernatant of the clarifier is pretreated in quartz filter
for further reduction of suspended solids followed by resin filter for removal of colour
and further treated through softener for reduction of hardness and to removal of color
before treating it through Reverse Osmosis. HCl and NaOH is used as softener filter
back washing and NaCl and H2SO4 for resin regeneration. Resin regeneration water is
treated through soda ash treatment and supernatant is passed to crystallizer.
(vi) The unit has four stages RO with 3 skids in each RO with the capacity of 85 m3/hr each.
It is informed that RO permeate and condensate is being sent to member units through
pipeline.
(vii) It is informed that around 60-70 % of RO reject having 130 GPL is sent to member units
as a brine for reuse in dyeing in place of salt. The remaining 30 – 40% of the RO reject
is concentrated through MVR. The unit has two MVR of capacity 250 KL/hr out of
which one is stand-by. Condensate of MVR is sent to member units for use in the
process, while concentrate is being further concentrated through MEE with 3 effect of
falling film and 2 effect of forced circulation.
(viii) It is informed that around 13 tons/day pure salt in the form of liquid brine from the
MVR is sent to member unit for reuse. The reported steam consumption at MVR is 300
kg/hr and steam consumption at MEE is 1.5 ton/hr .
(ix) After recovering the salt, MEE concentrate containing mixed salt is sent to solar
evaporation pond of an area 2400 m2. 960 tons of mixed salt collected from solar
evaporation pond, 86 tons of chemical sludge and 161 tons of biological sludge are
stored in the CETP premises.

Aeration Tank Storage of mixed salts

(x) The unit has proposed to dispose biological sludge and mixed salt to M/s Tamil Nadu
Waste Management Limited, Gummidipoondi (TSDF); and chemical sludge for co-
processing at M/s Dalmia Cement Bharat Limited, Ariyalur.
(xi) Member units are charged an average of Rs. 350-400/kl. Expenditure towards
manpower is RS. 30 lakh/ month and 20-25 lakh/month for chemicals. Fixed
expenditure towards electricity and fuel is Rs. 5-6 lakh/month while variable cost is Rs.
25 lakh/month.
(xii) During inspection samples being collected at various points of CETP to verify the
Location of samples Raw Effluent After RO RO reject

collected Softener permeate
Parameters
pH 10.12 8.13 5.82 8.13
TSS (mg/L) 7 5 6.50 2.31
TDS (mg/L) 9854 11000 210 36808
BOD (mg/L) 394 45 - -

COD (mg/L) 620 151 - -
Chloride (mg/L) 2644 2452 65.37 8652.6
Sulphate (mg/l) 2712 3134 24 -
Location of samples MVR MVR MEE MEE Aeration

collected Condensate Concentrate Condensate Concentrate tank
Parameters
pH 6.28 9.89 6.58 8.6 -

TSS (mg/L) BDL 63.51 BDL - -

TDS (mg/L) 44 95944 66 180336 -
Chloride (mg/L) 5.768 23554 24516 67298 -
Sulphate (mg/l) 9.88 - 1.46 - -
MLSS (mg/l) - - - - 1410
(xiii) From the analysis results RO efficiency is worked about 70.11 % . As per analysis
results the solid concentration is increased from 3.68 to 9.59% through MVR and
further it was increased upto 18.03% through MEE. As per the analysis results the MEE
final concentrate which is being sent to solar evaporation is worked about 35.95kld.
3.4.3 M/s Veerapondi Common Effluent Treatment Plant (P) Limited

Address of the CETP : M/s Veerapandi Common Effluent

Treatment Plant (P)Limited., SF No.
548/1, Karuppagoundampalayam,
Cottom Market Post, Tirupur, Tamil
Nadu.
Installed capacity in MLD/KLD : 12 MLD or 12000 KLd
Sequences of treatment system exist : Receiving tank, equalization and
to achieve ZLD neutralization tank, Aeration tank, tube
settler, oxidation reduction process, OR
sump, flash mixer, Secondary clarifier,
dual media filter, ultra filtration,
Activated carbon filter, Reverse osmosis
followed by MVR, MEE and solar
evaporation pond.
to member units
Type and Quantity of salt recovered : Sodium sulphate – 5-6 tons/day
per day
Quantity of salt recycled into : Sodium sulphate – 5-6 tons/day
member units
Quantity of concentrated effluent : 5- 7 kld
Quantity of impure salt generated per : 1 – 1.5 tons/day
day
in storage shed

(i) M/s Veerapandi Common Effluent Treatment Plant (P) Limited has 72 member units,
out of which 60 member units are actively operating.
(ii) The CETP was operating at 20% of installed capacity since 2011.
(iii) The unit receives effluent through pipeline. Informed that all the member units are
using sodium sulphate salt in the process. 50% of the member units are exporters and
remaining 50% are domestic suppliers.
Sulphuric acid is added in equalization cum neutralization tank to neutralize the
effluent. Neutralized effluent is being treated through aeration tank of capacity 8 MLD
capacity provided with diffused aeration system and retention time of 16 hr is
maintained. Overflow of aeration tank is passed to tube settler where 80 % of COD is
reduced. Supernatant is passed to Oxidation Reduction Reactor (ORR) where chlorine
gas is feed at the rate of 0.1 ppm.
(v) Treated effluent from ORR is collected in OR sump and sodium metabisulphate is
added to remove residual chlorine. Lime is added in the flash mixer followed by
secondary clarifier. Sludge from secondary clarifier and tube settlers are dewatered in
filter press. Clarified effluent is collected and feed to DMF filter followed by Ultra-
Filteration (UF) and activated carbon filter. The unit has 3 stage RO systems with each
having 3 skids of capacity 200 m3/hr with retention time of 20 hrs. Pretreated effluent is
passed through RO and RO permeate is supplied to the member units along with
condensate water. RO reject is passed to MVR followed by MEE. The unit has two
MEE, one with 3 effects (120 kld) falling film and another with 2 effects (100kld)
forced circulation. After concentration through MVR followed by MEE falling film
evaporator, the concentrated effluent temperature being reduced to 10-12o C through
chiller and taken to crystallizer followed by centrifuge to recover salt. Further the
mother liquor from centrifuge being concentrated through 2 effect forced circulation
type MEE and finally sent to solar evaporation for recovering mixed salt through
natural evaporation.

(vi) It is informed that Steam consumption at MVR is 1000 kg/hr; MEE (falling film) is
1000 kg/hr and in MEE (forced circulation) is 620 kg/hr.
(vii) It is informed that the CETP charges 4 paise per liter of permeate while the fresh water
charges is 7 paise per liter and Rs 5/- per kg of CETP salt whereas outside price for salt
is Rs. 14 per kg.
(viii) It is informed that around 5-6 tons/day of sodium sulphate is recovered and given back
to the member units for reuse. 1-1.5 tons/day mixed salt recovered from solar
evaporation pond and 215 tons of mixed salt is stored in the unit’s premises. 15- 20 tons
of ETP sludge is generated every month. ETP sludge is sent to M/s Ultratech Cement,
Ariyalur for co-processing. It is informed that Rs. 2400/- per ton (Rs. 600- for
processing, Rs. 1800/- for transportation) is paid to M/s Ultratech Cement towards
transportation and co-process of ETP sludge in Cement Mill .
ORR system RO system
Multiple Effect Evaporator

(ix) During inspection samples were collected at various points of CETP to verify the
Location of samples Raw Effluent Equalization Secondary RO Permeate RO Reject

collected tank Clarifier
Parameters
pH 9.1 6.6 10.9 5.3 6.92
EC (µs/cm) 14540 11360 14770 298 68800
TSS (mg/L) 170 80 49 10 161
TDS (mg/L) 12902 8487 10753 214 66735
BOD (mg/L) 446 316 3 ___ 9.4
COD (mg/L) 667 635 95 0 527.8
Chloride (mg/L) 1061 1254 1229 64 6581
Sulphate (mg/L) 4998 3786 3945 8 ___
Location of samples MVR MEE 1 MEE 2
collected concentrate Concentrate Concentrate
Parameters
pH 9.12 8.81 8.79
TSS (mg/L) 317 ___ ___
TDS (mg/L) 108995 ___ ___
Chloride (mg/L) 10389 ___ ___
Total Solids (mg/L) ___ 434708 483162
(x) From the analysis results the RO efficiency is worked about 83.9 %. As per analysis
results the solid concentration is increased from 6.68 to 10.9% through MVR and
further it was increased upto 43.4% through MEE falling film to recover pure salt in
the tune of 5-6 ton/day. As per the analysis results the MEE final concentrate which is
being sent to solar evaporation is worked about 40 kld. Based on flow reading taken at
different points of MVR and MEE during the inspection also confirms the same, the
quantity of concentrated effluent sent to solar evaporation pond worked about 16 kld
and found not matching each other .
3.4.4 M/s Mangalam Common Effluent Treatment Plant (P) Limited
General Information :
Address of the CETP : M/s Mangalam Common Effluent

Treatment Plant, P)Limited., Mangalam
Road, Tirupur, Tamil Nadu


to achieve ZLD Aeration tank, secondary clarifier, ozone
contact tank, Pressure sand filter,
softening filter, Activated carbon filter,
cartridge filter, Reverse osmosis
followed by MVR.
to member units
Type and Quantity of salt recovered : -
per day
Quantity of salt recycled into : -
member units
Quantity of concentrated effluent : -
Quantity of impure salt generated per : -
day
Quantity of impure salt accumulated : 30 Ton
in storage shed
(i) M/s Mangalam Common Effluent Treatment Plant (P) Limited has 14 member units,
out of which 7 member units are actively operating.
(ii) The CETP was operating at 15% of installed capacity since May 2013 on trail basis.
(iii) The unit receives effluent through pipeline. All the member units are using sodium
sulphate salt in the process.
After homogenization, aeration and clarification, effluent is passed to ozone contact
tank for color removal. Liquid oxygen dosing is provided to the effluent at ozone
contact tank. It is informed that 1800 m3 of liquid oxygen is consumed in 2 days.
Treated effluent is passed through pressure sand filter, softening filter activated carbon
filter and cartridge filter prior to RO. ETP sludge is dewatered at filter press.
(v) The unit has 4 stage RO systems with each having 3 skids. Only 2 RO was in
operational. RO permeate and MVR condensate is supplied to the member units. RO

reject is passed to MVR. MVR reject, known as brine is supplied to member units for
reuse. The operation cost of CETP is Rs.450 per KLD
(vi) During inspection the CETP was found partial operation, RO and MVR found under
repair, Hence the samples were not collected.
(vii) ZLD system was found inadequate the RO reject was found stored in the storage lagoon
which also indicates the inadequacy of ZLD system.
3.4.5 M/s Arulupuram Common Effluent Treatment Plant (P) Limited
Address of the CETP : M/s Arulupuram Common Effluent

Treament Company Pvt., Ltd,
Thalunjikattu thottam, Veerapandi (Via),
Tirupur
to achieve ZLD neutralization tank, biological oxidation
tank, secondary clarifier,
hypochlorination tank, quartz filter,
resign filter, softening filter, pressure
filter, cartridge filter, Reverse osmosis
followed by MVR, MEE with 5 effect of
falling film and 3 effect of forced
circulation system and solar evaporation
pond.
Quantity of treated effluent recycled : 3272.5 kld (85%)
to member units
Type and Quantity of salt recovered : 12.5 tons/day in terms of pure salt and
per day brine solution
Quantity of salt recycled into : 100% recycled
member units
day
Quantity of impure salt accumulated : Around 1300 tons (30 tons sent to TSDF
in storage shed for disposal)

(i) M/s Arulupuram Common Effluent Treatment Plant (P) Limited has 14 member units
which are actively operating.
(iii) Each member unit has four flow meters connected online to CETP such as flow meter
for fresh water, effluent generation, brine received by the unit and brine utilized by the
unit. The CETP is operating 5 days a week. The CETP is having three pipelines; one
for receiving effluent from member units, second line for sending permeates water and
3rd line for sending brine solution to the member units..
(iv) It is informed that all member units are using sodium sulphate salt in the process and
brine solution is reused in their process. In addition, excess pure salt is stored in the
CETP.
After homogenization and neutralization by adding 200 ppm H2SO4, effluent is treated
in biological oxidation tank. Biologically treated effluent is clarified in secondary
clarifier. Chlorine dose of 100 ppm is provided in hypochlorination tank to remove
color followed by dosing sodium meta bisulphate (50ppm) to remove excess chlorine.
Treated effluent is then passes through Quartz filter to remove SS and turbidity
followed by resin filter to remove color and COD followed by softner filter to remove
hardness and then treated through pressure filter and microcartridge filter before
treating through RO. The resins are treated with HCl and H2SO4 .
(v) The unit has 4 stage RO, the CETP claims that they are recovering 80-85% of RO
permeate. As per observation of team the RO efficiency was found 84%. RO permeate
is distributed to the member units proportionally to the effluent received. RO reject is
being concentrated in MVR to increase solid concentration from 3.5 % to 11 %. After
achieving 11% solid concentration part of concentrated(11%) is being taken as brine
solution preparation and remaining 89% being further concentrated through 5 effect
falling film evaporator to achieve 30 % solid concentration. Part of MVR concentrate
(11%) is being mixed with part of MEE concentrate to and sent to member units as
brine solution after adding sulphuric acid for maintaining pH and chlorine gas to
remove color and sodium meta bisulphate. The temperature of remaining concentrated
effluent being reduced through chiller and taken to crystallizer to recover sodium
sulphate pure salt. The mother liquor from crystallizer being further concentrated

through 3 effect forced circulation evaporator to achieve solid concentration of 40%.

The concentrated effluent from forced circulation evaporator being sent to solar
evaporation pond of 5000 m2.
(vi) It is informed that 300 kg/day of biological sludge generated is stored in the unit’s
premises. Around 300- 400 tons of chemical sludge was sent to M/s Ultratech Cements
at the price of Rs. 2000/ton for co-processing. Around 5000 tons of chemical sludge
is stored in the CETP which is proposed to send to M/s Ultratech Cements.
RO system MEE cum crystallizer to recover pure salt

(vii) It is informed that mixed salt of 3 tons/day is being generated from solar evaporation
pond. Around 1300 tons of mixed salt is stored in the CETP premises.
(viii) The CETP is charging member units at the rate of Rs. 220/- kl of the effluent received.
(ix) During inspection samples being collected at various points of CETP to verify the
Location of samples Raw Aeration Secondar RO feed RO RO reject

collected Effluent tank y Permeate
Parameters Clarifier
out let
pH 9.1 7.3 7.6 7.6 6.92 7.8
EC (µs/cm) 9900 9800 10270 271 -
TSS (mg/L) - - - - -
TDS (mg/L) 4200 4200 4300 100 11800
BOD (mg/L) 190 11 2 BDL -
COD (mg/L) 915 295 256 16 -
Chloride (mg/L) 742 670 550 21 -
Sulphate (mg/L) 2913 3194 2903 41 -
MLSS (mg/l) - 620 - - - -
Location of samples MVR MVR MEE MEE

collected

Parameters condensate concentrate Condensate concentrate

pH 6.7 9.0 7.9 8.9
EC (µs/cm) 508 - 577 -
TSS (mg/L) - ___ - -
TDS (mg/L) 200 ___ 200 -
Sulphate (mg/L) 195 210 -
Chloride (mg/L) - ___ - -
Total Solids (mg/L) ___ 130290 - 781780
(x) From the analysis results the RO efficiency is worked about 64 % only. As per analysis
results the solid concentration is increased from 1.18 %to 13.0% through MVR and
further it was increased upto 78.18 through MEE falling film to recover pure salt in the
tune of 10-12 ton/day. As per the analysis results the MEE final concentrate which is
being sent to solar evaporation is worked about 8-9 kld. Based on flow reading taken
at different points of MVR and MEE during the inspection also confirms the same.
3.4.6 M/s PARK Common Effluent Treatment Plant (P) Limited
Address of the CETP : M/s PARK CETP (P) Ltd., Anburam

Knit Process, Pitchampalayam, Tirupur
Sequences of treatment system exist : Equalization tank, homogenization tank,
to achieve ZLD Aeration tank, secondary clarifier,
multigrade filter, micro grade filter,
nanofilter, Reverse osmosis followed by
MVR and MEE
Quantity of treated effluent recycled : 1120 kld (80%)
to member units
Type and Quantity of salt recovered : 7.73 tons/day in terms of brine solution
per day
member units
Quantity of concentrated effluent : 3.4 kld
day
Quantity of impure salt accumulated : Around 74 tons
in storage shed

(i) M/s Park Common Effluent Treatment Plant (P) Limited has 3 member units, which are
actively operating.
(ii) The CETP was operating at 70% of installed capacity.
(iii) The unit receives effluent through pipeline. All member units are using sodium chloride
salt in the process. The CETP is operated for 6 days a week.
(iv) The trade effluents are received in equalization tank through closed conduit by gravity.
After neutralization the effluent is provide with biological treatment and clarification.
The secondary treated effluent being treated through microfiltration followed by Nano
filteration. Nano filterate of 90% being treated through 2 stage RO to recover permeate
of 85% the RO reject being concentrated through 5 effect falling film evaporator to
achieve 180gpl, after achieving required concentration, the concentrate being sent to
their member units as brine solution.
(v) The reject from the nano filtration is being treated through 3 stage RO system followed
by 5 effect falling film evaporator and 1 effect forced circulation system. The
concentrated effluent being finally sent to solar evaporation pond of 2600m2 for
recovering slat through natural evaporation. During inspection this system was found
not in operation.
(vi) The 5 effect falling film evaporator is being used for both the stream. It is informed that
3 – 4 days in a week used for treating the brine solution stream and 1-2 days in a week
used for treating the Nano reject.
(vii) The biological sludge and softening sludge from the ETP is dewatered in filter press
and disposed in secured landfill site. The unit is charging member units Rs. 150/- kl for
permeate and Rs. 150/- kl of brine solution.
(viii) During inspection the CETP was found under up gradation, microfiltration, RO-I, RO-
II and MEE was found in operation.
Location of samples Raw Aeration Secondary Nano Nano Nano RO- I

collected Effluen tank Clarifier feed Permeate reject & II
Parameters t out let feed
pH 8.6 7.4 7.7 5.7 5.8 5.7 6.2
EC (µs/cm) 12620 ----- 13200 13500 14130 14640 12790

TSS (mg/L) --- ----- - - -- -

TDS (mg/L) 6200 ----- 6400 6400 6600 6900 6400
BOD (mg/L) 199.65 ---- 30.85 - - - -
COD (mg/L) 946.72 ----- 411.28 -- - - -
Chloride (mg/L) 4187 ------ 4523 - - - -
Sulphate (mg/L) 335 1542 - - - 1055
MLSS (mg/l) 1700 - - - -
Location of samples RO I &II RO I & II MEE MEE MEE

collected permeate reject feed condensa concentrate
Parameters te
pH 5.3 5.7 6.1 8.4 7.8
EC (µs/cm) 65 - - 1144 -
TSS (mg/L) -- - - - -
TDS (mg/L) 40 - 19400 600 -
Sulphate (mg/L) 6.3 6479 5414 66 -
Chloride (mg/L) - - - - -
Total Solids (mg/L) - 59760 - 201640
(x) From the analysis results the RO efficiency is worked about 90 %. As per analysis
results the solid concentration is increased from 5.97 % to 20.16 % through MEE. After
achieving 200 gpl the brine solution was being sent to their member units. Due to non-
operation of other part of treatment system(viz Nano reject management) the
efficiency of ZLD system was not verified.
3.4.7 M/s Chinnakkarai Common Effluent Treatment Plant (P) Limited
Address of the CETP : M/s Chinnakkarai Common Effluent

Treament Company Pvt., Ltd, Veerpandi
village, Tirupur
Operating capacity in MLD : 1.5 – 2.0 MLD or 1500 - 2000 KLD
to achieve ZLD biological oxidation tank, secondary
clarifier, hypochlorination tank, quartz
filter, resign filter, softening filter,
pressure filter, cartridge filter, Reverse
osmosis followed by MVR, MEE with 4
effect of forced circulation system and
to member units

Type and Quantity of salt recovered : 3-4 tons/day in terms of pure salt and
per day brine solution
member units
Quantity of concentrated effluent : 3.0 -3.5 kld
day
in storage shed
(i) M/s Chinnakkarai Common Effluent Treatment Plant (P) Limited has 23 member units
unit. The CETP is having three pipelines; one for receiving effluent from member units,
second line for sending permeates water and 3rd line for sending brine solution to the
member units..
CETP.
permeate. As per observation of team ( based on flow reading) the RO efficiency was
found 85.3%. RO permeate is distributed to the member units proportionally to the
effluent received. RO reject is being concentrated in MVR to increase solid

concentration from 3.5 % to 11 %. After achieving 11% solid concentration, around 70-
75 % of MVR concentrated is being taken as brine solution preparation ( after adding
sulphuric acid for maintaining pH and chlorine gas to remove color and sodium meta
bisulphate into MVR concentrate and the same being sent to their member units to
utilize in the dying process) and remaining 25-30 % being further concentrated through
4 effect falling film evaporator to achieve 45 % solid concentration. The temperature
of remaining concentrated effluent being reduced through chiller and taken to
crystallizer to recover sodium sulphate pure salt. The mother liquor from crystallizer
being sent to solar evaporation pond of 3296 m2.
(vi) It is informed that 2.1 t/m of biological sludge and 6.5 t/m of chemical sludge is being
generated and the same being stored in the unit’s premises. Around 403 tons of
chemical sludge was sent to M/s Ultratech Cements.
(vii) It is informed that mixed salt of 2-3 tons/day is being generated from solar evaporation
The cost saved due to utilize of RO permeate, brine solution and slat is Rs. 160.60/kl,
the net cost for treatment of effluent is only Rs. 172.5/kl( Rs. 334 – 160.60))
Biological oxidation tank Storage of recovered pure salt ( sodium sulphate)
Accumulated mother liquor in solar evaporation pond

out let
pH 9.2 103 8.2 7.8 4.9 8.1
EC (µs/cm) 12090 - 13220 13400 145 -
TSS (mg/L) 88 - 12 BDL 08 22
TDS (mg/L) 10270 - 9486 9760 104 -
BOD (mg/L) 392 - 6.5 - - -
COD (mg/L) 918 - 203 204 BDL -
Chloride (mg/L) 71851 - 1806 - - -
Sulphate (mg/L) 3185 - 3075 - - -
Total Hardnes (mg/l) - - 144 27 1.9 67.3
Total solids (mg/l) 43603
MLSS (mg/l) - 3775 - - - -

collected condensate concentrate Condensate concentrate
Parameters
pH 8.1 9.6 7.7 9.3
EC (µs/cm) 1175 - 996 -
TSS (mg/L) - ___ - -
TDS (mg/L) 698 ___ 550 -
Sulphate (mg/L) 195 - -
Total Solids (mg/L) ___ 117684 - 229557
Fixed solids (mg/l) - - - 224623
Volatile solids - - - 4935
(mg/l)
(x) From the analysis results the RO efficiency is worked about 77.6% only. As per
analysis results the solid concentration is increased from 4.36 to11.70% through MVR
and further it was increased upto 22.3 through MEE to recover pure salt in the tune of
3-4 ton/day. As per the analysis results the MEE final concentrate which is being sent
to solar evaporation is worked about 40 kld.
3.4.8 M/s Tiruppur Murgampalyam Common Effluent Treatment Plant (P) Limited
Address of the CETP : M/s Tiruppur Murugampalayam

Common Effluent Treatment Company

Pvt., Ltd, Veerpandi village, Tirupur

to achieve ZLD biological oxidation tank, secondary
clarifier, hypochlorination tank, quartz
filter, resign filter, softening filter,
pressure filter, cartridge filter, Reverse
osmosis followed by MVR, MEE with 3
effect of forced circulation system and
to member units
Type and Quantity of salt recovered : Brine solution
per day
member units
Quantity of concentrated effluent : 10-15 kld
day
Quantity of impure salt accumulated : -
in storage shed
(i) M/s Tiruppur Murugampalayam Common Effluent Treatment Plant (P) Limited has 39
member units which are actively operating.
(ii) The CETP was operating at <30% of installed capacity since 2010.
member units..
CETP.


concentration from 3.5 % to 10 %. After achieving 10% solid concentration, around 60
% of MVR concentrated is being taken as brine solution preparation ( after adding
utilize in the dying process) and remaining 40 % being further concentrated through 3
effect forced circulation evaporator to achieve 30 % solid concentration.The
concentrated effluent being sent to solar evaporation pond of 5094 m2.
(vi) It is informed that 0.48 t/m of biological sludge and 3.76 t/m of chemical sludge is
being generated and the same being stored in the unit’s premises.
(vii) It is informed that mixed salt of 0.74 tons/day is being generated from solar evaporation
Chlorination system MVRE system for concenteration

MEE with 3 effect forced circulation system Solar ponds for natural evaporation of
concenterated effluent
The cost saved due to utilize of RO permeate, brine solution and slat is Rs 150.4/kl, the
net cost for treatment of effluent is only Rs. 53.6/kl( Rs. 204 – 150.4)

out let
pH 9.4 - 8.4 7.8 6.1 8.5
EC (µs/cm) 11040 - 11550 11950 277 -
TSS (mg/L) - - - 22 BDL 22
TDS (mg/L) 7900 - 8476 8498 162 -
BOD (mg/L) 467 - 6.5 - - -
COD (mg/L) 1026 - 205 176 BDL -
Chloride (mg/L) 346 - 1554 - - -
Sulphate (mg/L) 1482 - 2079 - - -
Total Hardnes (mg/l) - - 250 48 - 154
Total solids (mg/l) - - 39380
Fixed Solids (mg/L) - - - - - 38200
volatile solids (mg/l) 11800
MLSS (mg/l) - 3483 - - - -

collected condensate concentrate Condensate concentrate
Parameters
pH 8.0 9.9 6.2 9.9
EC (µs/cm) 211 - 749 -
TSS (mg/L) - ___ - -

TDS (mg/L) 94 ___ 438 -

Sulphate (mg/L) - - -
Total Solids (mg/L) ___ 94092 - 308521
Fixed solids (mg/l) - 91804 - 303127
Volatile solids (mg/l) - 2288 - 5395
analysis results the solid concentration is increased from 3.9 to 9.4% through MVR and
further it was increased upto 30.85 % through MEE and sent to solar evaporation
pond.. As per the analysis results the MEE final concentrate which is being sent to solar
evaporation is worked about 20-25 kld.
3.4.9 M/s Kallikadu Common Effluent Treatment Plant (P) Limited
Address of the CETP : M/s Kallikadu Common Effluent

Treatment Company Pvt., Ltd, Kallikadu
thottam, Karuvampalyam, Tirupur
to achieve ZLD biological treatment, secondary clarifier,
ORP, pressure filter, Activated Carbon
filter, Reverse osmosis followed by
MVR and solar evaporation pond.
to member units
Type and Quantity of salt recovered : Brine solution
per day
member units
Quantity of concentrated effluent : -
day
in storage shed
(i) M/s Kallikadu Common Effluent Treatment Plant (P) Limited has 12 member units

(ii) The CETP was operating at <30% of installed capacity since 2008.
member units..
(iv) It is informed that all member units are using sodium chloride salt in the process and
brine solution is reused in their process.
After homogenization and neutralization by adding H2SO4, effluent is treated in
biological treatment. Biologically treated effluent is clarified in secondary clarifier.
Chlorine gas dose is provided to remove color followed by dosing sodium meta
bisulphate (50ppm) to remove excess chlorine. Treated effluent is then passes through
pressure filter and Activated carbon filtre before treating through RO.
concentration from 3.5 % to 10 %. After achieving 10% solid concentration, around 28
kld of MVR concentrated is being taken as brine solution preparation ( after adding
utilize in the dying process) and remaining is sent to solar evaporation ponds..
Chlorine gas dosing system to remove colour Brine preparation tank

Storage of excess MVR concentrate
(vii) It is informed that 5-6 t/a of biological sludge and 150 t/a of chemical sludge is being
generated and the same being stored in the unit’s premises. The chemical sludge stored
was sent to cement plant for co-processing.
The cost saved due to utilize of RO permeate, brine solution is Rs 70/kl, the net cost for
treatment of effluent is only Rs. 180/kl( Rs. 250-70).

out let
pH 8.5 - 7.2 6.9 6.1 7.8
EC (µs/cm) 18060 - 19090 19110 766 63700
TSS (mg/L) 42 - BDL BDL - -
TDS (mg/L) 12444 - 12642 12602 352 -
BOD (mg/L) 201 - BDL 2.1 - -
COD (mg/L) 335 - 76 16 1.3 -
Chloride (mg/L) - - 6652 6061 - -
Sulphate (mg/L) - - 1187 1343 - -
Total Hardnes (mg/l) 907 - 869 50.2 - -
Total solids (mg/l) - - 48923
Fixed Solids (mg/L) - - - - - 48068
volatile solids (mg/l) 855
MLSS (mg/l) - 6300 - - - -

Location of samples MVR feed MVR MVR

collected concentrate Condensate
Parameters
pH 7.0 8.6 8.6
EC (µs/cm) 58600 119800 43
TSS (mg/L) - ___ -
TDS (mg/L) - ___ 32
Sulphate (mg/L) - -
Chloride (mg/L) - ___ -
Total Solids (mg/L) 43868 105932 -
Fixed solids (mg/l) 43040 104820 -
Volatile solids (mg/l) 828 1112 -
(x) From the analysis results the RO efficiency is worked about 75% only. As per analysis
results the solid concentration is increased from 4.8 to 10.59% through MVR and the
same being sent to their member units as brine solution and balance around 70 kld sent
to solar evaporation ponds..
3.5 Individual Effluent Treatment Plants studied:
3.5.1 M/s Jayavishnu Textile Dyeing Unit

Address of the CETP : M/s Jayavishnu Textile dyeing Unit

Production capacity (consented) : 20 ton/day
Operating at : 12 ton/day
Installed capacity in MLD/KLD : 2 MLD
Operating capacity in MLD : 0.65 MLD
Sequences of treatment system exist : Receiving tank, neutralization and
to achieve ZLD homogenization tank, dissolved air
flotation, anaerobic digester, plate settler,
aeration tank, secondary clarifier,
chemical dosing tank, tertiary clarifier,
multigrade filter, ultra filter, reverse
osmosis followed by MEE, crystallizer,
centrifuge and solar evaporation pond.
Quantity of treated effluent recycled : 0.63 MLD

in the process
Type and Quantity of salt recovered : Sodium sulphate – 1.7 tons/day
per day
Quantity of salt recycled in the : Sodium sulphate – 1.7 tons/day
process


Quantity of impure salt generated per : 200 kg/day
day
in storage shed
(i) M/s Jaiavishnu Textile Process (P) Ltd is a textile unit with installed capacity of 20
tons/day. During inspection the unit was operating at 12 tons/day.
(ii) The unit is involved in dyeing of cotton material. It is informed that, the unit was
member of Arulupuram CETP till 2013. After that it established its own ETP in
August, 2013.
(iii) The unit is consuming 7.5 MLD of water out of which 6.9 MLD is RO permeate and
0.6 MLD is fresh water. The water is being used for dyeing, rinsing and washing. It is
informed that reactive dyes and sodium sulphate salt is used in the process.
(iv) The effluent from the process is being collected in receiving tank and passed through
screening bar to neutralization tank and homogenization tank. Sulphuric acid dose is
given in the neutralization tank to neutralize the pH of the effluent. In dissolved air
flotation (DAF), dissolved air is mixed and floating material is scoped and effluent is
passed to anaerobic tank and provided retention time of 2 days. Anaerobically treated
effluent is taken to aeration tank, which has 4 chambers with baffle and diffused
aerators.
(v) The effluent from aeration tank is being taken to secondary clarifier. Poly aliminium
chloride (300 ppm), poly cation (200 ppm) and poly electrolyte (2 ppm) are added to
the supernatant of the secondary clarifier and taken to tertiary clarifier for separation
of sludge. The effluent from tertiary clarifier being treated through multi-grade filter
(sand and carbon filter) and ultra-filter prior to RO.
(vi) The unit has three stages RO and five effect multiple effect evaporator comprises of 3
effects are falling film type and 2 effects are forced circulation type. Permeate from
RO and condensate from MEE is used in the process. The RO reject being
concentrated through 3 effect falling film evaporator, the temperature of concentrated
effluent being reduced to 10-12oC and recovered pure salt through
crystallizer/centrifuge, the mother liquor being further concentrated through 2 effect

forced circulation evaporator, the concentrated effluent being sent to solar

evaporation.
(vii) The unit has constructed the solar evaporation ponds on the terrace of the building.
The solar evaporation ponds spread over an area of 1000 m2.
(viii) It is informed that Steam consumption at MEE is 1600 kg/hr. RO is operated 10-11
hr/day and MEE is operated 3 days a week.
(ix) It is informed that 3 tons of salt is generated per day. If unit involves in dark color
dying process the entire recovered salt being utilized, if light color dyeing process
requires less salt which results in accumulation of recovered salt. During inspection
around 10 tons of recovered pure salt is stored in the unit premises since 2 months.
(x) The impure salt from solar evaporation pond being stored under shed.
Homoginization tank Primary clarifier
Ultra filtration skid Biological Sludge

Solar evaporation ponds constructed on terrace of the building

(xi) During inspection CETP was in partial operation, samples being collected at various
points of CETP to verify the efficiency of ZLD system, the analysis results are
depicted below:
Location of samples Raw Effluent Tertiary RO RO Reject MEE Feed MEE

collected Clarifier Permeate Concentrate
Parameters
pH 8.6 8.5 6.6 8.3 8.63 9.63
EC (µs/cm) 4 5 122.2 37900 37.5 127.6
TSS (mg/L) 138 19 2 87 - -
TDS (mg/L) 2526 3478 165 34780 - -
BOD (mg/L) 152 02 - 28 - -
COD (mg/L) 691 79 BDL 556 - -
Chloride (mg/L) 116 241 5 3028 - -
Sulphate (mg/L) 1113 2345 4 17712 - -
Total Solids - - - - 82638 386156
(mg/L)
(xii) From the analysis results the RO efficiency is worked about 89.9% only. As per
analysis results the solid concentration is increased from 3.79 to 38.61% through MEE
falling film, after recovering pure salt, the mother liquor being further concentrated
through MEE forced circulation . However during monitoring MEE forced circulation
was not in operation. As per the analysis results the MEE final concentrate which is
being sent to solar evaporation is worked about 4-5 kld.

3.5.2. M/s Royal Classic Mills Pvt Ltd
Address of the CETP : M/s Royal classic Mills Pvt., Ltd.,

Karaipudur village, Arulpuram PO,
Tirupur.
Production capacity (consented) : Dying of cotton fabrics and yarn – 38.52
ton/day
Bleaching of fabrics & yarn – 26.32
tons/day
Operating at : 65-70 % of installed capacity
Installed capacity in MLD/KLD : 3.0 MLD or 3000 KLD
Operating capacity in MLD : 1.5 -2.0 MLD or 1500 – 2000 KLD
Sequences of treatment system exist : Receiving tank, Primary clarifier, biological
to achieve ZLD aeration tank, biological settling, tertiary
clarifier, ultra filter, reverse osmosis, nano
filtration followed by MEE and solar
evaporation pond.
Quantity of treated effluent recycled : 80 - 85 % of Treated effluent recovered
in the process through RO being recycled in process
Type and Quantity of salt recovered : Sodium chloride as brine solution
per day
Quantity of salt recycled in the : 5000 litres (90 %) of brine solution being
process utilised in the process in
day
in storage shed
(i) M/s Royal Classic Mills (P) Ltd is a textile unit with installed capacity of 38.52 t/day of
Dyeing of hosiery fabrics & yarn and 26.32 t/day of bleaching of hosiery fabric & yarn.
During monitoring the unit was in operation at 60 % of installed capacity.
(ii) The unit was consuming 3.25 MLD of water out of which 2.9 MLD is RO permeate
and 0.325 MLD is fresh water. The water is being used for bleaching, dyeing, rinsing
and washing. It is informed that reactive dyes are used for cotton fabrics/yarn and
dispersive dyes are used synthetic fabrics/yarn. The unit is using sodium chloride
salt in dyeing process in which 75 % of salt requirement is meeting through

recovered brine solution from nano filtration and 25 % of fresh salt being used during
dyeing process.
(iii) It is informed that the unit maintains 1: 5 material to liquor ratio in each bath and
each batch requires 10 baths. 110 kg of chemicals and 40 kg of sodium chloride salt
is used in process per ton of fabric. Total 50 m3 of water is used per ton of fabric,
out of which 45 m3 is RO permeate and 5 m3 is fresh water is used per ton of fabric .
(iii) The unit has ETP of capacity 3000 m3 but operating at 2000 m3. The unit is involved
in dyeing and bleaching of yarn and fabric. The unit has established its own ETP.
(iv) The effluent having TDS around 6000 mg/l and temperature 56-60o C is received in
the receiving tank and taken to primary clarifier. Feric chloride (300 ppm) and lime
(200ppm) is added in primary clarifier. Effluent is then treated through biological
treatment system followed by tertiary clarifier. Cationic coagulant (200ppm) and
anionic coagulant ( ppm) are added before in tertiary clarifier. Supernatant is feed to
ultra-filtration and then to RO .
(v) The unit has four stage RO of capacity 3000 kld . Permeate is used in the process and
reject is passed through nano filter and brine having TDS of 60000 mg/l is recovered
and reused in the process as a brine solution. Reject from nano filter is concentrated
through feed to MEE.
(vi) The unit has 5 effects of falling film evaporator (feed rate 2 ton/hr) and 3 effects of
forced circulation evaporator (feed rate 1. 2 ton/hr). The final concentrated effluent of
15 m3/day being sent to solar evaporation ponds of 9748 m2.
Effluent Receiving tank Aeration tank

(vii) The sludge generated from chemical treatment and biological treatment system of
around 10 m3/day of sludge being de-watered in monobelt filter press and the sludge

generated is stored in secured land fill. During inspection it was observed that around
2026 tons of sludge is stored in the SLF.
(viii) The reported operational cost of ETP is Rs. 350/ m3.
(ix) The house keeping in the ETP area was found very poor, all solar evaporation ponds
are found totally filled.
(x) During inspection samples being collected at various points of ETP to verify the
Location of samples Raw Aeratio Tertiary RO feed RO RO
collected Effluent n tank Clarifier Permeate reject
Parameters out let
pH 10.07 7.75 7.01 6.65 5.72 7.14
EC (µs/cm) 8310 - 8710 8890 246 -
TSS (mg/L) - - - - - -
TDS (mg/L) 3300 - 3800 3800 100 -
BOD (mg/L) 363 - BDL - BDL -
COD (mg/L) 776 - 31.2 176 9.41 -
Sulphate (mg/L) 104 - 128 159 9.27 317
Total solids (mg/l) - - - 7100
MLSS (mg/l) - 8320 - - - -
Location of samples ME – I MEE -I MEE - I MEE -II MEE -II MEE - II

collected feed Condensate concentrate Feed Condensate concentrate
Parameters
pH 6.46 7.12 7.54 6.02 8.3 7.2
EC (µs/cm) - 211 - - - -
TSS (mg/L) - ___ - - - -
TDS (mg/L) 16500 100 - - 100 -
Sulphate (mg/L) 1175 34 5936 2888 31.7 7192
Total Solids (mg/L) ___ - 260740 121830 - 298770
analysis results the solid concentration is increased from 0.71 to 26% through MEE
falling film Evaporator. After recovering pure salt the mother liquor is further
concentrated from 12.18 – 29.8% of solid concentration through MEE forced
circulation system and sent to solar evaporation pond. As per the analysis results the
MEE final concentrate which is being sent to solar evaporation is worked about 3.85
kld.
3.5.3 M/s Victus Dyeing (P) Ltd

Address of the CETP : M/s VICTUS DYEING

Karaipudur village, Palladam Tq,
Tirupur.
Production capacity (consented) : Dyeing bleaching & washing of knitted
fabrics --- 31 tons/day
Operating at : 17 tons/day
Installed capacity in MLD/KLD : 1.6 MLD or 1600 KLD
Sequences of treatment system exist : Receiving tank, Primary clarifier,
to achieve ZLD aeration tank, secondary clarifier, tertiary
clarifier, reverse osmosis, followed by
MEE and solar evaporation pond.
Quantity of treated effluent recycled : 85 - 89 % of Treated effluent recovered
Type and Quantity of salt recovered : Sodium sulphate 6tons/day as pure salt
per day
Quantity of salt recycled in the : 100%
process
day
in storage shed
(i) M/s Victus Dyeing (P) Ltd is a textile unit with installed capacity of 927 tons/month
or 31 tons/day and operating capacity at 350-500 tons/moth.
(ii) The unit is involved in bleaching, dyeing and washing of yarn & fabric. Sodium
sulphate salt is used in the process.
(iii) The unit has established its own ETP of capacity 1600 kld and operating at 1150
KLD.
(iv) The effluent of pH 9-10 is received in the receiving tank and treated through to
primary clarifier. Sulphuric acid dosing is provided in the out let of receiving tank
itself to neutralize the effluent. The clarified effluent from primary clarifier is being
treated through biological treatment system followed by secondary clarifier. The
clarified effluent being taken to holding where Cationic coagulant (200ppm) and
anionic coagulant ( 300ppm) are added before tertiary clarifier. The supernatant from
tertiary clarifier is being treated through pressure sand filters followed by cartridge
filter before feeding to RO .

(vi) The unit has three stage RO system, the RO permeate being used in the process, the
RO reject is being concentrated through 5 effect falling film evaporator, the
temperature of concentrated effluent being reduced to 10- 12oC to facilitate the
crystal formation of sodium salt. After recovering the salt the mother liquor being
further concentrated through forced circulation evaporator the final concentrated
effluent being sent to solar evaporation ponds of area 1600 m2.
(vii) It is informed that the operating cost of treatment system is around Rs170-184/m3.
(viii) The reported steam consumption in MEE is 2.24 ton/hr .
Biological sludge Accumulated salt in solar evaporation

(ix) The house keeping in the ETP area was found very poor. The chemical dosage practiced
also found unscientific way, without any dosage regulation chemicals are added in
unskilled manner.
(x) The operation of RO system and MEE also found not satisfactory.
(xi) Solar evaporation ponds are filled totally with concentrated effluent which also
indicates the poor operation and maintenance of ETP.
(xii) During inspection samples being collected at various points of ETP to verify the
Location of samples Raw Aeratio Secondar RO feed RO RO

collected Effluent n tank y Permeate reject
out let
pH 9.6 7.7 7.9 6.8 6.9 7.7
EC (µs/cm) 7450 - 9900 9970 - 13800
TSS (mg/L) - - - - - -
TDS (mg/L) 3200 - 4300 5300 11 -
BOD (mg/L) 260 - 9 - BDL -
COD (mg/L) 916 - 233 - 8.1 -

Sulphate (mg/L) 2180 - 128 340 - -

Chloride (mg/l) 139 - 191 - 2417
Total solids (mg/l) - - - - 11790
MLSS (mg/l) - 4510 - - - -
Location of samples MEE -I MEE - I MEE -II MEE - II

collected Condensate concentrate Condensate concentrate
Parameters
pH 8.6 8.4 8.6 7.5
EC (µs/cm) 126 - 156 -
TSS (mg/L) - - - -
TDS (mg/L) 100 - 100 -
Sulphate (mg/L) 20 - 43.9 -
Total Solids (mg/L) - 271870 - 459890
(x) From the analysis results the RO efficiency is worked about 55% only. As per analysis
results the solid concentration is increased from 1.17 to 27% through MEE falling film
Evaporator. After recovering pure salt the mother liquor is further concentrated to
45.98% solid concentration through MEE forced circulation system and sent to solar
evaporation pond. As per the analysis results the MEE final concentrate which is being
sent to solar evaporation is worked about 10 kld.
3.5.4 M/s Mercury Process (P) Ltd
Address of the IETP : M/s Mercury Process

Veerapandi Village, Tiruppur Tq,
Tirupur.
Production capacity (consented) : Dyeing of fabrics --- 12 tons/day
Operating at : 12 tons/day
Installed capacity of IETP in : 0.90 MLD or 900 KLD
MLD/KLD
Sequences of treatment system exist : Collection tank, chemical dosage tanks,
to achieve ZLD Primary clarifier, aeration tank,
secondary clarifier, chemical dose cum
tertiary clarifier, reverse osmosis,
followed by MEE and solar evaporation
pond.
Quantity of treated effluent recycled : 89 % of Treated effluent recovered
Type and Quantity of salt recovered : Sodium sulphate 2 tons/day as pure salt
per day


process
Quantity of concentrated effluent : 5 -7 kld
Quantity of impure salt generated per : 1000kig/3 month
day
in storage shed
(i) M/s Mercury Process is a textile unit with installed capacity of 12 t/d and operating
at 90% of installed capacity.
(ii) The unit is involved in dyeing and washing of yarn & fabric. Sodium sulphate salt is
used in the process.
(iii) The unit has established its own ETP of capacity 900 kld and operating at 800 KLD.
clarified effluent being taken to chemical dose cum clarifier to remove colour Poly
Aluminum Chloride is added in chemical dosage tank. The supernatant from tertiary
clarifier is being treated through pressure sand filters followed by cartridge filter
before feeding to RO .
RO system Pure salt recovered for reuse in the process

(vi) The unit has two stage RO system, the RO permeate being used in the process, the RO
reject is being concentrated through 2 effect falling film & 2 effect of forced
circulation evaporator, the temperature of concentrated effluent being reduced to 10-

12oC to facilitate the crystal formation of sodium salt. After recovering the salt the
mother liquor being sent to solar evaporation ponds.
(vii) It is informed that the operating cost of treatment system is around Rs200/m3.
(viii) The reported steam consumption in MEE is 2 ton/hr .
(xi) Solar evaporation ponds are filled totally with concentrated effluent which also
(xii) During inspection samples being collected at various points of ETP to verify the
Location of samples Raw Aeratio Tertiary RO RO MEE MEE

collected Effluent n tank Clarifier Permeate reject Condens Concent
Parameters out let ate rate
pH 9.2 7.0 7.7 6.6 7.8 8.6 8.5
EC (µs/cm) 7710 - 11830 335 - 75 -
TSS (mg/L) 20 - 12 BDL 36 - -
TDS (mg/L) 5576 - 9490 216 - 60 -
BOD (mg/L) 109 - 3.4 - - - -
COD (mg/L) 320 - 78 BDL - - -
Sulphate (mg/L) 2675 - 4295 - - - -
Chloride (mg/l) 693 - 1600 - - - -
Total Hardness - - 304 81 1471 - -
(mg/l)
Total solids (mg/l) - - - 63245 - 259257
MLSS (mg/l) - 4476 - - - - -
(x) From the analysis results the RO efficiency is worked about 84.9%. As per analysis
results the solid concentration is increased from 6.32 to 25.92% through MEE falling
film followed by forced circulation Evaporator. After recovering pure salt the mother
liquor is being sent to solar evaporation pond. As per the analysis results the MEE final
concentrate which is being sent to solar evaporation is worked about 15 kld.
3.5.5 M/s Poppy Arts Dyeing (P) Ltd
Address of the IETP : M/s Poppy Arts Dyeung (P) Ltd.,

Chinnakarai village, Arulpuram,
Tipruppur
Production capacity (consented) : Dyeing of fabrics --- 225 tons/month
Operating at : 225t/m or 7.5 tons/day
MLD/KLD


Sequences of treatment system exist : Collection tank, equalization tank,
to achieve ZLD chemical dosage tanks, Primary clarifier,
aeration tank, secondary clarifier,
chemical dose cum tertiary clarifier,
reverse osmosis, followed by MEE and
Type and Quantity of salt recovered : Sodium sulphate 1.3 tons/day as pure salt
per day
process
Quantity of impure salt generated per : 300 kg/ month
day
(i) M/s Poppy Arts Dyeing Process is a textile unit with installed capacity of 7.5 t/d and
operating at full capacity.
(ii) The unit is involved in dyeing and washing of yarn & fabric. Sodium sulphate salt is
(iii) The unit has established its own ETP of capacity 500 kld and operating at full
capacity.
clarified effluent being taken to chemical dose cum clarifier to remove colour Poly
Aluminum Chloride is added in chemical dosage tank. The supernatant from tertiary
clarifier is being treated through pressure sand filters followed by cartridge filter
before feeding to RO .
(v) The unit has three stage RO system, the RO permeate being used in the process, the
RO reject is being concentrated through 3 effect falling film & 1 effect of forced
circulation evaporator, the temperature of concentrated effluent being reduced to 10-
12oC to facilitate the crystal formation of sodium salt. After recovering the salt the
mother liquor being sent to solar evaporation ponds.

(vi) It is informed that the operating cost of treatment system is around Rs. 150/m3.
(vii) The reported steam consumption in MEE is 0.75ton/hr .
Raw effluent Collection tank Filtre press for sludge dewatering
Secured land fills site Solar evaporation ponds

(viii) The house keeping in the ETP area was found very poor. The chemical dosage
practiced also found unscientific way, without any dosage regulation chemicals are
added in unskilled manner.
(ix) The operation of RO system and MEE also found not satisfactory.
(x) Solar evaporation ponds are filled totally with concentrated effluent which also
(xi) During inspection samples being collected at various points of ETP to verify the
Location of samples Raw Aeratio Tertiary RO RO MEE MEE

collected Effluent n tank Clarifier Permeate reject Condens Concent
Parameters out let ate rate
pH 8.1 7.0 8.1 5.1 8.2 7.5 9.5
EC (µs/cm) 5800 - 6480 83 - 105 -
TSS (mg/L) 92 - BDL BDL 44 - -
TDS (mg/L) 4608 - 5664 42 - 84 -
BOD (mg/L) 366 - 3.0 - - - -

COD (mg/L) 843 - 74 13 - - -

Total Hardness - - 169 15 1010 - -
(mg/l)
Total solids (mg/l) - - - 41385 - 243004
Fixed solids (mg/l) - - - - 40291 236580
Volatile solids (mg/l) - - - - 1095 - 6424
MLSS (mg/l) - 752 - - - - -
(xii) From the analysis results the RO efficiency is worked about 86.3%. As per analysis
results the solid concentration is increased from 4.13 to 24.3% through MEE falling
film followed by forced circulation Evaporator. After recovering pure salt the mother
liquor is being sent to solar evaporation pond. As per the analysis results the MEE final
concentrate which is being sent to solar evaporation is worked about 9 kld.
3.5.6 M/s Maruthy Dyeing (P) Ltd.,
Address of the IETP : M/s Maruthy Dyeing (P) Ltd.,

Periyandipalyampieivu, Kulle Gounden
Pudur, Kozhi Pannai Bus Stop,
Mangalam Road, Tiruppur.
Production capacity (consented) : Dyeing of fabrics --- 1.3 tons/day
Operating at : 1.3 tons/day
MLD/KLD
Sequences of treatment system exist : Collection tank, equalization tank, Flash
to achieve ZLD mixer, Primary clarifier, aeration tank,
secondary clarifier, treated water sump,
dual media filter, Activated carbon filter ,
reverse osmosis, followed by solar
evaporation pond.
Type and Quantity of salt recovered : Sodium chloride as a brine solution
per day
process

(i) M/s Maruthy Dyeing (P) Ltd., is a textile unit with installed capacity of 1.3 t/d and
operating at full capacity.
(ii) The unit is involved in dyeing and washing of yarn & fabric. Sodium chloride salt is
(iii) The unit has established its own ETP of capacity 100 kld and operating at full
capacity.
(iv) The effluent is received in the receiving tank and taken to equalization tank, in
chemical dosage tank, lime (500 ppm), Ferrous sulphate (350 ppm), poly electrolyte
(0.3 ppm) and HCl (200 ppm) are added and treated through primary clarifier. The
clarified effluent from primary clarifier is being treated through biological treatment
system followed by secondary clarifier. The clarified effluent being taken to chemical
dose cum clarifier to remove colour Poly Aluminum Chloride is added in chemical
dosage tank. The supernatant from tertiary clarifier is being treated through pressure
sand filters followed by cartridge filter before feeding to RO .
(v) It is informed that the operating cost of treatment system is around Rs. 80/m3.
Poor house keeping in Effluent collection system and in RO system
Solar Evaporation ponds with concentrated effluent

(vi) The unit has four stage RO system, the RO permeate being used in the process, the RO
reject is being treated through nano filtration, nano product is being used as brain and
reject is being sent to solar evaporation ponds.
(vii) The house keeping in the ETP area was found very poor. The chemical dosage practiced
also found unscientific way, without any dosage regulation chemicals are added in
unskilled manner.
(viii) The operation of RO system and MEE also found not satisfactory.
(ix) Solar evaporation ponds are filled totally with concentrated effluent which also
(x) During inspection samples being collected at various points of ETP to verify the
Location of samples Raw Aeratio Tertiary RO RO Nano Nano

collected Effluent n tank Clarifier Permeat reject product reject
Parameters out let/RO e
feed
pH 10.0 7.0 8.7 6.2 7.3 7.2 9.0
EC (µs/cm) 7620 - 6220 175 13800 20600 22500
TSS (mg/L) 64 - 18 - - - -
TDS (mg/L) 4182 - 3716 78 - 14216 -
BOD (mg/L) 302 - 1.2 - - - -
COD (mg/L) 558 - 12.0 3.0 - - -
Chloride (mg/l) - 1505 20.7 -
Sulphate (mg/l) = 363 0.5 -
Total Hardness 135 - 104 BDL - - -
(mg/l)
Total solids (mg/l) - - - 9988 - 16393
Fixed solids (mg/l) - - - - 9396 15439
Volatile solids (mg/l) - - - - 592 - 954
MLSS (mg/l) - 3000 - - - - -
(xi) From the analysis results the RO efficiency is worked about 62.79%. As per analysis
results the solid concentration is increased from 0.9 % to 1.6% through Nano and the.
same being sent to solar evaporation pond. As per the analysis results the nano reject
sent to solar evaporation is worked about 13 kld.
3.6 Assessment of Surface and Ground water monitoring along the River Noyyal at
Tiruppur
3.6.1 Surface water monitoring:

The Noyyal river rises from the Vellingiri Hills in the Wester Ghats in Tamilnadu and
drains into Kaveri. The river’s basin is 180 km long and 25 km wide and covers a total area
of 3500 km2. The Noyyal river passing through Coimbatore district, Tiruppur district and
Karur District. Two major dams were constructed in Noyyal river, one is Orathupalyam Dam
near Chennimalai, Tiruppur district and other is Aathupalayam Dam near Vallakoil in Karur
district. The river has 23 Check dams, most of them are located in between Kooduthurai and
Tiruppur. The river was flows with natural antibiotic minerals. The entire Orathuppalayam
Dam has become a tank of holding effluent due to discharge of effluent from CETPs &
IETPs located in Tiruppur and releases water after every rainfall, which results in polluting
the down river villages in the Tiruppur and Karur Districts.
However, 2004 onwards, local volunteers made efforts to conserve the water
resources of Noyyal river. After several petitions from 2003 to 2011, dyeing bleaching units
(CETP & IETPs) were ordered to close until installation of Zero Liquid Discharge system.
The below diagram represents the stretches of Noyyal river passing through Tiruppur and
location of CETPs exist along the Noyyal river. It is observed that all CETPs & IETPs are
located in between Point A & F.

As a part of the study, surface water sampling was done in Noyyal river to assess the
quality of river. The location was selected in consultation with officials of Tamilnadu
Pollution Control Board. The analysis results are depicted below;
Location of samples collected U/S of Noyyal river at D/S of Noyyal river

Agrahara Pudur (A) at Anaipalyam bridge
Parameters (F)
pH 7.5 7.6
EC (µs/cm) 6170 5120
TSS (mg/L) 08 40
TDS (mg/L) 4304 3070
Colour (apparent) clear Light yellow
BOD (mg/L) 3.3 13.3
COD (mg/L) 21.7 93.9
Total Hardness (mg/l) 1679 666
Calcium (mg/l) 329 182
Magnesium (mg/l) 209 52
Alkalinity as CaCO3 (mg/l) 312 666
Chloride (mg/l) 1611 1074
Sulphate (mg/l) 576 400
Sodium (mg/l) 635 874
Potassium (mg/l) 32 46
Nitrate as N (mg/l) 0.43 0.23
Nitrite as N (mg/l) 0.56 10.5
Flouride (mg/l) 0.93 0.89
From the analysis results, it is observed that TDS, total Hardness, calcium,
magnesium, chloride and sulphate concentration at upper stream (u/s) of Noyyal river was
found higher than the downstream (d/s) stream of river, this may be due to accumulation of
old sediment or due to discharge of industrial effluent. Though, the concentration of above
mentioned parameter found lesser than the u/s, the river water quality is found poorer than the
domestic effluent w.r.t TDS, Chloride and Sulphate.
Sample collected at U/S of Noyyal river at Agrahar Pudur

Sample collected at D/S of Noyyal river at Anaipalyam bridge
3.6.2 Ground water monitoring:
As a part of the study, ground water sampling was done along the Noyyal river to
assess the quality of ground water. The location was selected in consultation with officials of
Tamilnadu Pollution Control Board, during monitoring 10 ground water samples viz., 1. Bore
well (Sh. Murugasamy) at Kashipalayam, 2. Bore well (M/s Texwell industries) at kasha
palyam, 3. Open well at Uthukulli/Kageyam road, 4. Open well near Anaipalyam road bridge,
5,Open well at Vaykkal thottam, 6. Bore well near M/s PRK sizing mill, Vayakkadu thottam,
7. Open well at Mangalam, 8. Open well at Korikkadu near mangalam road bridge, 9. Open
well at Perumal thottam, Kavalipalayam, Pudur and 10. Open well at Brindavan residential
area. The analysis results are depicted below;
Location of Bore Bore Open Open Open Bore Open Open Open Open
samples collected well - 1 well - well -3 well - 4 well -5 well - 6 well - 7 well -8 well - 9 well -
2 10
Parameters
pH 7.8 7.3 7.5 7.6 6.9 7.1 6.6. 6.7 6.8 7.6
EC (µs/cm) 1230 4590 4220 7750 10040 6630 12110 13280 12050 2760
TDS (mg/L) 782 2836 2548 4828 7246 3750 9138 9708 8226 1704
Colour clear clear clear clear clear clear clear clear clear clear
(apparent)
Total Hardness 417 733 589 802 3435 1805 4883 3976 4092 753
(mg/l)
Calcium (mg/l) 120 201 170 205 658 371 990 766 797 259
Magnesium 28.6 56.3 39.9 70.3 439 213 586 502 511 26
(mg/l)
Alkalinity as 256 508 580 442 324 388 256 340 292 436
CaCO3 (mg/l)

Chloride (mg/l) 168 838 860 1782 2897 1725 3637 3972 3775 444
Sulphate (mg/l) 29.1 608.4 300.6 78.2 970 497 1173 1237 590 120
Sodium (mg/l) 58 772 743 1436 1905 1695 1980 3370 2755 509
Potassium (mg/l) 43 16 21 18.5 58 43 75 200 105 127
Nitrate as N 10.1 6.05 4.8 7.0 3.26 5.52 15.1 6.4 31.04 26.7
(mg/l)
Nitrite as N 0.5 0.2 0.03 0.47 0.26 0.47 0.63 0.26 0.18 0.6
(mg/l)
Fluoride (mg/l) 0.77 1.51 1.3 1.12 1.19 1.38 0.89 1.20 1.45 1.36
From the analysis results, it is observed that except bore well no. 1 and open well no
10, the TDS, Chloride, Sulphate and Sodium concentration found very high which reveals
that contamination of ground water due to discharge of untreated/partially treated effluent
into land/drain in the past. These ground water is not meeting the irrigation water quality
(w.r.t TDS, Chloride, sulphate and sodium) criteria also.

Open wells and Bore wells in which ground water samples taken during monitroing

Chapter 4.0
Results and Discussion
4.0 Results and Discussion
The Textile dyeing units who are having their individual ETP and member units of
CETPs in Tirupur have implemented ZLD by installing Treatment facilities comprises of
Physico-Chemical followed by Biological treatment followed by combination of Nano
filtration, Reverse Osmosis process to recover permeate and brine solution which can be
recycled in the process. For RO reject management the IETPs and CETPs installed
combination of Mechanical Vapour Recompressor (MVR), MEE (Multiple Effect falling film
/forced circulation Evaporator) and crystallizer to recover pure salt upto maximum extent.
The CETPs and IETPs claims that no effluent being discharge into drain/surface water. Based
on the study carried out in IETPs and CETPs of Tirupur by the CPCB team, following
results and discussion are arrived.
4.1 Water recovery and reuse
CETPs and IETPs are recovering the water from treated effluent through RO system
and the same being used in their process which results reduction of fresh water consumption
in dyeing process. The details of RO permeate recovery is as below;
In CETPs :
Name of the CETP CETP -1 CETP -2 CETP -3 CETP - CETP - CETP - CETP - CETP -
Details of recovery 5 6 7 8 9
system
Operating Capacity 1350 1300 2500 3850 1400 1500 2200 900
in kld
Stages of RO system 4 stages 4 stages 3 stages 4 stages 3 stages 3 stage 4stages 4 stages
Efficiency as per 77.6% 70.11% 83.9 % 64 % 90% 77.6% 78.4% 75%
monitoring
RO permeate 1047.6 911.43 2097.5 2464 1260 1164 1724.8 675
recovered in kld
In IETPs :
Name of the IETP IETP -1 IETP -2 IETP -3 IETP -4 IETP -5 IETP -6
Details of recovery system
Operating Capacity in kld 650 1500 1150 800 500 100
Stages of RO system 3 stages 4 stages 3 stages 2 stages 3 stages 4 stage

Efficiency as per 89.9 % 46.4 % 55 % 84.9 % 86.3% 62.79%

monitoring
RO permeate recovered in 584.35 696 632.5 679.2 431.5 62.79
kld
From the above tables it is observed that all CETPs and IETPs monitored have installed
RO with 3 or 4 stages and achieving minimum of 64 % & maximum of 90 % efficiency in
CETPs and minimum of 46.4% & maximum of 89.9% efficiency in IETPs. The efficiency of
RO depends on the good practises adopted before feeding to RO system. It is also observed
that all CETPs and IETPs are using these RO permeate in their process and reduced
proportionate quantity of fresh water consumption in their process.
4.2 RO reject management
The RO reject from RO system is further concentrated through combination of MVR/

MEE (falling film, forced circulation evaporator)/ crystallisation/centrifuge and recovering
either in the form of pure salt or in the form of brine solution which is being used in the
dyeing process of their own unit or in their member units. The details of reject management
system installed in different CETPs/IETP are as follows;
In CETPs :
Name of the CETP CETP -1 CETP -2 CETP -3 CETP - CETP - CETP - CETP - CETP -
Details of reject 5 6 7 8 9
management system
Solid Concn in RO 4.4% 3.68% 6.68% 1.18% 5.97% 4.36% 3.9% 4.8%
reject
Nano filtration yes no no no yes no no no
Solid concentration 5.9% 9.51% 10.9% 13.0% no 11.70% 9.4% 10.59%
achieved through
MVR
MEE falling/forced 4 effect 5 effects 5 effects 8 effects 5 effects 4 effects 3effects Not
circulation with exist
number of effects 27.7% 18.03% 43.4 & 78.18% 20.16% 22.5% 30.85
and solid 48.3%
concentration
achieved
In IETPs :

Details of reject
management system
Solid Concn in RO reject 3.79% 0.71% 1.17% 6.32% 4.13 0.9
Nano filtration no no no no no yes

Solid concentration - - - - - -
achieved through MVR
MEE falling/forced 5 effect 8 effects 5 effects 4 effects 5 effects Not exist
circulation with number of
effects and solid 38.61% 26% & 27 & 25.92 24.3
concentration achieved 29.8% 45.98%
From the above table it reveals that CETPs installed MVR system are found
achieving solid concentration in the range of 5.9 to 11.70 % and further concentrated through
Multi Effect Evaporator and achieving solid concentration in the range of 18.03 – 48..3 %.
However one CETP found achieving solid concentration of 78.18 % through 8 effect MEE.
All IETPs are found achieving solid concentration in the range of 24..3 to 45.98 % through
only MEEs .
After concentration through different technologies CETPs/IETPS found recovering

either pure salt or in terms of brine solution and using the same in their own unit or in their
member units. The condensate generated during concentration is being mixed with RO
permeate and used in the process. However still 5- 31 % of concentrated effluent having
30-35% TDS concentration being sent to solar evaporation ponds. No CETPs or IETPs are
practising 100% salt recovery through advanced concentration techniques. This process is
energy intensive but necessary to meet the zero liquid discharge requirements.
4.3 Salt recovered in terms of Pure salt, brine solution and impure salt
During study, samples were taken at different points of treatment facilities to verify
the efficiency of ZLD system installed to achieve zero discharge. Below table shows the
efficiency of ZLD system installed in different CETPs and IETPs;
In CETPs :
Name of the CETP CETP -1 CETP -2 CETP -3 CETP -5 CETP -6 CETP -7 CETP -8 CETP -9
Details of
acheivability
Salt( based on TDS) 11.3 t/d 12.8 t/d 21.2 t/d 16.17t/d 8.68 t/d 15.41t/d 17.3t/d 11.9t/d
entered into CETPs
Pure salt recovered in - - 6 t/d 12.5t/d - 4 t/d no no
terms of Sodium sulphate
or sodium chloride
Quantity of salt 8.64t/d 8.58 t/d - 7.73t/d 10.64t/d 2.96 t/d

recovered in terms of
brine solution.
Quantity of concentrated 16 kld 35.9 kld 40 kld 9kld 4kld 40 kld 25kld 70kld
effluent sent to solar (5.3%) (9.2%) (9.9%) (0.65%) (2.85%) (11.9%) (5.26%) (31.1%)
evaporation
Impure salt recovered 1.7 t/d 1.857 t/d 1.5 t/d 3.2t/d 0.102t/d - - -
from solar pond
Efficiency w.r.t salt 91.5% 81.53% 35.3% 97.5% 90.2% 25.9% 61.5% 24.8%
recovery
In IETPs :
Details of achievability
Salt( based on TDS) 1.64 t/d 4.94 t/d 3.68 t/d 4.46t/d 2.3 t/d 0.418t/d
entered into CETPt
Pure salt recovered in 1.23t/d - 3.0 t/d 2t/d 1.3t/d -
terms of Sodium sulphate
or sodium chloride
Quantity of salt recovered - 1.3t/d - - - 0.26t/d
in terms of brine solution.
Quantity of concentrated 4.5 kld 3.85kld 10kld 15kld 9kld 13 kld
effluent sent to solar pond (6.85%) (0.45%) (1.9%) (12.4%) (13.13%) (34.9%)
Efficiency w.r.t salt 87.19% 36.73% 95.1% 45.08% 56.66% 62.22%
recovery
From the above table it is observed that all CETPs and IETPs are still sending 5- 31%
of concentrated effluent into solar ponds for natural evaporation. Only 3 CETPs found
achieving >90% efficiency w.r.t salt recovery and 2 IETPS found achieving >85% efficiency
w.r.t salt recovery.
4.4 ETP Sludge management

Main sources of sludge generation is chemical treatment system and biological
treatment system, It was observed that no CETPs/ IETPs are found not maintain any records
about sludge generation. However the sludge being stored separately and the chemical sludge
having lime content are being sent to cement industries for co-processing. The
CETPs/IETPs handling combined sludge from chemical and biological system are facing
problem of disposal of sludge.

4.5 Conclusions and Recommendations/suggestions:
4.5.1 Conclusions
 In Tirupur there are 20 CETPs and 39 IETPs are exist, during study period 17 CETPs
and 37 IETPS were found in operation at restricted capacity based on the treatment
facility available to achieve ZLD.
 All CETPs/IETPs are achieving prescribed standards of TNPCB w.r.t pH, BOD,
COD, TSS through physico- chemical followed by biological treatment.
 As per the study, RO efficiency was found wide variation, only one CETP was found
achieving 90 % efficiency. The CETP/IETPs who have taken measures to reduce
hardness and microbial fouling before feeding to RO system found achieving
efficiency in the range of 75- 85%.
 Through MVR technology, the solid concentration in RO reject was found increased
maximum of 11-12 % only.
 All CETPs/IETPs found installed MEE with minimum of 3 effects and maximum of
5-8 effects and achieving solid concentration in the range of 18-48%. The
CETP/IETPs who have taken measures to reduce hardness < 50 mg/l before feeding
to MVR/MEE found achieving good solid concentration and recovering pure salt in
the range of 85-95%.
 Some of the CETP’s are sending partially concentrated brine to their member units
through tanker and some of CETP’s are recovering the pure salt after concentrations.
 Pure salt recovered from the RO reject is being utilised in the process and impure salt
recovered is stored under shed
 NO CETPs/IETPS found achieving 100 % ZLD system, still concentrated effluent in
the range of 5-31% of concentrated effluent having 30-35% TDS concentration
being sent to solar ponds for natural evaporation.
 All CETPs/IETPs are found installed online flow measuring system and the same
being connected to TNPCB CARE AIR centre.
 No CETPs/IETPs found not maintaining the records of biological/ chemical sludge
generated.
 Most of the CETPs/IETPs are not taken any steps to identify the proper storage place
to store impure salt generated from solar ponds.

 All CETPs and IETPs are storing huge quantity of chemical sludge generated from
ETPs.
 As per monitoring of CPCB, Noyyal river water quality is found poor due to
accumulation of old sediment or due to discharge of industrial effluent.
 The TDS, Chloride, Sulphate and Sodium concentration found very high in the
ground water samples taken along the Noyyal River. This ground water is not meeting
the irrigation water quality (w.r.t TDS, Chloride, Sulphate and Sodium) criteria also.
4.5.2 Recommendations/Suggestions
Tamil Nadu State Pollution Control Board may be asked to implement the following
recommendations/suggestions to control the pollution load from CETPs/IETPs to stop further
pollution of Noyyal River & ground water in Tirupur.
 To monitor drains joining to the Noyyal River to trace any illegal discharge of
effluent from any industries.
 To take steps for ground water remedial measures through recognised
institutions/organisation to reclaim the ground water quality along the Noyyal river as
well as in Tirupur.
 To ask CETPs/ IETPS to take measures to improve efficiency of RO, MEE to achieve
100 % ZLD.
 To ask CETPs/IETPs to maintain proper records of Sludge generated and disposed.
 To ask CETPs/IETPs to store impure salt in the designated place by covering
properly.
 To take up study to explore utilisation of impure salt in other industrial sector as
auxiliary raw material.

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR COMMON

EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANTS SOUTH
OF TEXTILE DYING UNITS ZONAL
LOCATED IN TIRUPUR OFFICE,
Bengaluru
Annexure -1
1. Name/ address of CETP/ company: ---------------
2. Contact person (Name, Designation, and Contact No.): -----------------
3. Status of the CETP: Operational or Closed
4. Consent status : Valid up to
: Applied (Date of Application)
5. Industrial area (s) connected to the CETP: -------------------
6. Details member units of CETP
Name of Production Total Water consumption Effluent Type of Salt

member units capacity per tone of generation consumption
production(m3/ton) per ton of per ton of
Fresh water RO production production
consumption permeate
(m3/ton) consumption
(m3/ton)
7. Treatment capacity ----- MLD / Design flow of CETP: (-------m3/hr)
8. Wastewater treated: ------------ MLD/ Average flow reaching CETP (------ m3/hr)
9. Wastewater bypassed: --------------------- MLD
10. Method of collection of effluent (pipeline/tanker):

 If collection is by tankers, average No. of tankers/day:---------------
 Capacity of tankers, m3:-------------------
11. Details of instrumentation/meters:(type, location and operational status)

Flow/ Volume and quality of untapped Wastewater:
Industrial Drain carrying untapped Quality of untapped Wastewater Approx.

area flow in drain Flow/Volume
12. Treatment Scheme:
a) Conventional system (physico-chemical and biological treatment)

b) Conventional with tertiary system (pressure filtration, activated carbon, additional
physico-chemical treatment)
c) Additional treatment (Multi-effective evaporator, RO, advanced oxidation
process)
Unit sizes of main treatment units and operational conditions:
Treatment unit Collected information

Receiving tank Hourly influent flow rate, m3/h:
Volume of tank, m3:
Equalization tank Hourly influent flow rate, m3/h:
Volume of tank, m3:
Flocculation tank Hourly influent flow rate, m3/h:
Volume, m3:
Tube settler* Hourly influent flow rate--------- m3/h
Total number of operation hours:
Surface area, m2:
Media depth, m:
Effective surface area, m2 / m3 media:
Primary settling tank* Hourly influent flow rate, m3/h:
Surface area, m2: or diameter, m:
Up flow Anaerobic Hourly influent flow rate, m3/h:
Sludge Blanket Volume of tank, m3:
Reactor Sludge wasting rate, m3/day:
Aeration tank Hourly influent flow rate, m3/h:

Volume of tank, m3:
No. of aerators:
Capacity of each aerator, HP:
Secondary settling Hourly influent flow rate, m3/h:
tank Surface area, m2: or diameter, m:
Colour removing Hourly influent flow rate, m3/h:
treatment Chemical dosage given in PPM:
Residential time in minutes:
Volume of tanks in m3
Dual media filters Total units: and diameter of each unit, m:
3
Hourly influent flow rate, m /h:
Operation hours/day: -

No of units used:
Activated carbon Total units: and diameter of each unit, m:
columns Hourly influent flow rate, m3/h:
Operation hours/day:
No of units used:
Sludge thickener Daily & Hourly primary sludge flow rates, m3/h:
Operation hours:
Rotary vacuum filter Daily & Hourly thickened sludge flow rates, m3/h:
(Thickened sludge pump cap.: -------m3/hr)
Dia, m: , Cloth width, m: , RPM:
2
Design loading, kg/m /h:
Sludge Drying Beds  Capacity of Sludge Drying Bed – Kg/Tonnes
 Minimum Retention Period
 Size of Sludge Drying Bed –Length, Breadth, Width
(*A CETP either has Primary settling tank or Tube Settlers for removal of suspended/
dissolved solids)
 Aeration Tank: MLSS:--------mg/l

MLVSS: ------mg/l
DO: ----------mg/l
 Chemical dozing:
Sodium sulphate ------ ppm,
Alum ---------ppm,
Poly-electrolyte ------ppm
 Method of regulating and measuring primary sludge withdrawal flow rate:

 Method of regulating / measuring thickened sludge withdrawal flow rate:
 Results of analysis of samples after different stages of treatment:
General parameters: All values in mg/L except pH

Sample point pH BOD COD TSS TDS
Raw effluent or Before equalization
After equalization
After Up flow Anaerobic Sludge
Blanket Reactor
(VSS also)
After Tube settler /PST
Aeration tank mixed liquor (TSS &
VSS only)
After SST
After dual media filters
After activated carbon columns
Tube settler /PST sludge ( underflow
and TSS only)
Thickener sludge (underflow and TSS
only)

SST return / excess sludge (TSS only)

Discharge Standards(limits)
Design parameters & monitoring
Parameter Inlet quality Outlet quality Limits(standards)

PH
BOD
COD
TDS
Chlorides
Sulphates
SS
Metals and special parameters: All values in mg/L except %Na and SAR
Sample point Cd Cr Cu Fe Ni Pb Zn
Before equalization
PST sludge (underflow)
Thickener sludge
(underflow)
After activated carbon
columns
13. Method of Waste water collection: Tankers / Industrial sewers / Drains
1. Primary Sludge Management System:
Primary Sludge generation rate (m3/ day or tons/ day):

Number and capacity of sludge drying beds:
Quantity of sludge stored:
Primary Sludge Disposal* (Secured Land Fill or TSDF):
(*Co-incineration if any)
2. Excess Biological Sludge Management System:
Excess Biological Sludge generation rate:

Excess Biological Sludge Disposal:
3. Details of any other methods for sludge thickening (filter press/rotary

filters etc.)
4. Zero Liquid Discharge: Yes or No (If yes, then provide details of technology, water/
salt reuse)
Capacity of RO Feed rate of RO RO permeate RO reject Solid
in KLD in m3/hr Recovery in generated in concentration of
m3/hr m3/hr RO reject in

mg/l
5. Reject Management System:
Solar Evaporation Ponds/ Mechanical Effect Evaporator*/ Mechanical Vapor

Recompression*
Type of Feed rate in Solid Steam feed Quantity Quantity of salt generate Quantity of
evaporator m3/hr concentrat rate in of mother
with no. of ion of ton/hr condensa liquor sent
effects MEE feed te to solar
in mg/l generate Pure salt Impure salt evaporation
in m3/hr in in tonnes pond in
tons/day per day m3/day
Residue Disposal (Secured Land Fill facility/ TSDF)
*Fuel used for making steam: Wood/ Rice Husk/Coal
*Air Pollution Control Device used
6. Conveyance system for disposal of treated wastewater: Drains/ Pipeline
7. Method of Treated wastewater recycle/disposal: Reuse in member units /River/ Land/

Marine
8. Recovery: infrastructure for supply of recovered water

Salts recovered:
9. Hazardous Substances Handling :
Name of Chemicals Storage Capacity Threshold Capacity
Any Treatment Storage and disposal facility for hazardous waste (TSD) (Yes or No):
10. Operational Cost:
11. Other observations:
Inspected by (Name & Designation):

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR
INDIVIDUAL EFFLUENT SOUTH ZONAL
TREATMENT PLANTS OF TEXTILE OFFICE,
DYING UNITS LOCATED IN Bengaluru
TIRUPUR
1. Name/ address of IETP/ company: ---------------
2. Contact person (Name, Designation, and Contact No.): -----------------
3. Installed Capacity of Unit --------------------

4. Present operating Capacity of the unit ------------
5. Status of the IETP: Operational or Closed
6. Consent status : Valid up to
: Applied (Date of Application)
7. Details of raw material used -------------

8. Details of chemical used per ton of fabric --------------------------------
Sl. No. Name of the chemicals, Composition of Quantity of

bleaching agents and chemical chemicals used per
dyestuff ton of fabrics
1
2
3
9. Details of salts used per ton of fabric --------------------------------
Sl. No. Name of the salt Quantity of salt used per Quantity of Brain
ton of fabrics solution used per
Fresh salt Recovered ton of fabric
consumption salt
consumption
1
2
3
10. Total Water consumption per tonne of production in m3/ton ------------

a. Fresh water Consumption in m3/ton -----------------------------------
b. RO permeate/ MEE condensate consumption in m3/ton -----------------------

11. Treatment capacity ----- MLD / Design flow of IETP: (-------m3/hr)
12. Wastewater treated: ------------ MLD/ Average flow reaching IETP (------ m3/hr)
13. Wastewater bypassed: --------------------- MLD
14. Method of collection of effluent (pipeline/tanker):

 If collection is by tankers, average No. of tankers/day:---------------
 Capacity of tankers, m3:-------------------
15. Details of instrumentation/meters:(type, location and operational status)
Flow/ Volume and quality of untapped Wastewater:
16. Treatment Scheme:
d) Conventional system (physico-chemical and biological treatment)

e) Conventional with tertiary system (pressure filtration, activated carbon, additional
physico-chemical treatment)
f) Additional treatment (Multi-effective evaporator, RO, advanced oxidation
process)
Unit sizes of main treatment units and operational conditions:
Treatment unit Collected information

Receiving tank Hourly influent flow rate, m3/h:
Volume of tank, m3:
Equalization tank Hourly influent flow rate, m3/h:
Volume of tank, m3:
Flocculation tank Hourly influent flow rate, m3/h:
Volume, m3:
Tube settler* Hourly influent flow rate--------- m3/h
Total number of operation hours:
Surface area, m2:
Media depth, m:
Effective surface area, m2 / m3 media:
Primary settling tank* Hourly influent flow rate, m3/h:
Up flow Anaerobic Hourly influent flow rate, m3/h:
Sludge Blanket Volume of tank, m3:
Reactor Sludge wasting rate, m3/day:
Aeration tank Hourly influent flow rate, m3/h:

Volume of tank, m3:
No. of aerators:
Capacity of each aerator, HP:
Secondary settling Hourly influent flow rate, m3/h:

tank Surface area, m2: or diameter, m:

3
Colour removing Hourly influent flow rate, m /h:
treatment Chemical dosage given in PPM:
Residential time in minutes:
Volume of tanks in m3
Dual media filters Total units: and diameter of each unit, m:
Hourly influent flow rate, m3/h:
Operation hours/day: -
No of units used:
Activated carbon Total units: and diameter of each unit, m:
3
columns Hourly influent flow rate, m /h:
No of units used:
Sludge thickener Daily & Hourly primary sludge flow rates, m3/h:
Operation hours:
Rotary vacuum filter Daily & Hourly thickened sludge flow rates, m3/h:
(Thickened sludge pump cap.: -------m3/hr)
Dia, m: , Cloth width, m: , RPM:
2
Design loading, kg/m /h:
Sludge Drying Beds  Capacity of Sludge Drying Bed – Kg/Tonnes
 Minimum Retention Period
 Size of Sludge Drying Bed –Length, Breadth, Width
(*A IETP either has Primary settling tank or Tube Settlers for removal of suspended/
dissolved solids)
 Aeration Tank: MLSS:--------mg/l

MLVSS: ------mg/l
DO: ----------mg/l
 Chemical dozing:
Sodium sulphate ------ ppm,
Alum ---------ppm,
Poly-electrolyte ------ppm
 Method of regulating and measuring primary sludge withdrawal flow rate:
 Method of regulating / measuring thickened sludge withdrawal flow rate:
 Results of analysis of samples after different stages of treatment:
General parameters: All values in mg/L except pH

Sample point pH BOD COD TSS TDS
Raw effluent or Before equalization
After equalization
After Up flow Anaerobic Sludge
Blanket Reactor
(VSS also)

After Tube settler /PST

Aeration tank mixed liquor (TSS &
VSS only)
After SST
After dual media filters
After activated carbon columns
Tube settler /PST sludge ( underflow
and TSS only)
Thickener sludge (underflow and TSS
only)
SST return / excess sludge (TSS only)
Discharge Standards(limits)
Design parameters & monitoring
Parameter Inlet quality Outlet quality Limits(standards)

PH
BOD
COD
TDS
Chlorides
Sulphates
SS
Metals and special parameters: All values in mg/L except %Na and SAR
Sample point Cd Cr Cu Fe Ni Pb Zn
Before equalization
PST sludge (underflow)
Thickener sludge
(underflow)
After activated carbon
columns
17. Method of Waste water collection: Tankers / Industrial sewers / Drains
18. Primary Sludge Management System:
Primary Sludge generation rate (m3/ day or tons/ day):
Primary Sludge Disposal* (Secured Land Fill or TSDF):

(*Co-incineration if any)
19. Excess Biological Sludge Management System:

Excess Biological Sludge generation rate:
Excess Biological Sludge Disposal:
20. Details of any other methods for sludge thickening (filter press/rotary
filters etc.)
21. Zero Liquid Discharge: Yes or No (If yes, then provide details of technology, water/
salt reuse)
Capacity of RO Feed rate of RO RO permeate RO reject Solid
in KLD in m3/hr Recovery in generated in concentration of
m3/hr m3/hr RO reject in
mg/l
22. Reject Management System:
Solar Evaporation Ponds/ Mechanical Effect Evaporator*/ Mechanical Vapor

Recompression*
Type of Feed rate in

Solid Steam feed Quantity Quantity of salt generate Quantity
3
evapora m /hr concentrat rate in of of mother
tor ion of ton/hr condensa liquor sent
with no. MEE feed te to solar
of in mg/l generate Pure salt Impure evaporatio
effects in m3/hr in salt in n pond in
tons/day tonnes m3/day
per day
Residue Disposal (Secured Land Fill facility/ TSDF)
*Fuel used for making steam: Wood/ Rice Husk/Coal
*Air Pollution Control Device used
23. Conveyance system for disposal of treated wastewater: Drains/ Pipeline
24. Method of Treated wastewater recycle/disposal: Reuse in member units /River/ Land/
Marine
25. Recovery: infrastructure for supply of recovered water

Salts recovered:
26. Hazardous Substances Handling :
Name of Chemicals Storage Capacity Threshold Capacity
Any Treatment Storage and disposal facility for hazardous waste (TSD) (Yes or No):
27. Operational Cost:
28. Other observations:
Inspected by (Name & Designation):

Report on Assessment of Pollution from Textile Dyeing Units in Tirupur, Tamil Nadu and Measures Taken to Achieve Zero Liquid Discharge
Annexure 2
Water consumption and salt consumption in CETPS
sl.no Name of CETP No. of Total production Total water consumption Wastewater Type of salt Salt
mem capacity by per ton of production generated used consumption
ber member units Cu.m/T (Cu.m/T) (kg)
units
Fresh water Recovered

consumptio water
n
1 M/s Arulpuram Sodium
CETP 14 8253 kg/day 277 5228 5500 sulphate 33,810
2 M/s Tirupur
Murugampalayam
Sodium
CETP
67 72,604 kg/day 559 10,460 48,399 sulphate 70,309
3 M/s Kasipalayam Sodium
CETP 12 117.63T/d 42 483 525.4 sulphate 4000
4 M/s Rayapuram Sodium
CETP 10 5469kg/d 189 3465 3645 Sulphate 25,503

Water and Salt recovery in CETPs

sl.no Name of CETP Total Total Method of Total Salt recovered and used
wastewater Treatment collection quantity of
Treated capacity permeate
(MLD) (MLD) recovered
cu.m Pure salt(T/d) Brine

1 M/s Arulpuram
CETP 2.75 5.5 PIPELINE 5228 - 17.5
2 M/s Tirupur
Murugampalayam
CETP
1.65 11 PIPELINE 10,460 - 5.76
3 M/s Kasipalayam
CETP 1.32 4.4 PIPELINE 483m3/T 1.3 -
4 M/s Rayapuram
CETP 1.3 5.5 PIPELINE 3465 - 13

Sludge and mixed salt generation in CETPS

sl.n Name of CETP Biological sludge Chemical sludge mixed salt Operation Cost
o
Total Mode Rate Total Mode Rate Total Mode of Rate Total Mode Operation
quantit of quantit of quantit disposal quantit of cost(rs/KLD
y disposa y disposal y y disposa )
l l
1 M/s Arulpuram NA NA 350kg/d 450T TSDF 400Kg/ 450T M/s. 3.2T/d 1100T TSDF 260
CETP d Ultratec
h cement
2 M/s Tirupur NA NA 110KL 1500kg TSDF NA NA NA 1.26T/ TSDF 280
Murugampalaya D D
m CETP
3 M/s Kasipalayam NA NA 0.12T/d Stored NA NA NA TSDF 280
CETP in Unit
premise
s
4 M/s Rayapuram NA NA 164 161 TSDF 400kg/d 89T M/s. 1.85T/d 960T TSDF 303
CETP Dalmia
cement

Water consumption and salt consumption and recovery in IETPS
sl.no Name of Total water consumption Type of Salt Total Total Method Total Salt recovered
CETP per ton of production salt consumption wastewater Treatment of quantity and used
Cu.m/T used (kg) Treated capacity collection of
(MLD) (MLD) permeate
recovered
Fresh water Recovered cu.m Pure Brine

consumption water salt(T/d)
1 M/s Scotts 35 150 Sodium 0.36 0.7 0.7 PIPELINE 150m3/T 0.7
garments sulphate
Ltd.(Dyeing
unit)II
2 M/s Royal 5 45 Sodium 0.01 3 4 PIPELINE 45m3/T
Classic Chloride
Mills IETP

Sludge and mixed salt generation in IETPS

sl.n Name of Primary sludge Biological sludge Chemical sludge mixed salt Operation
o CETP Cost
Generati Total Mode Rate Total Mode Rat Total Mode Rate Total Mode Operation
o rate(kg) quantit of quantit of e quantit of quantit of cost(rs/KLD
y disposa y disposa y disposa y disposa )
l l l l
1 M/s Scotts 0.20T/day 125T Secure 0.07T/ -- Secure NA NA NA 0.1T/ Secure

garments Landfill d landfill d land
Ltd.(Dyein
g unit)II
2 M/s Royal 10m3/d 2026 T Secure NA NA NA NA NA NA 350
Classic Landfill
Mills IETP

Assesment of Textile Dyeing Units and ZLD at Tirupur - CPCB PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Assesment of Textile Dyeing Units and ZLD at Tirupur - CPCB PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Assesment of Textile Dyeing Units and ZLD at Tirupur - CPCB PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

“REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF POLLUTION FROM TEXTILE DYEING UNITS

IN TIRUPUR, TAMIL NADU AND MEASURES TAKEN TO ACHIEVE ZERO

CENTRAL POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

Technical Adviser : Dr. A. B. Akolkar

Principal Coordinator : Sh. S. Suresh

Project Coordinator : Smt. H D Varalaxmi

Monitoring Team : Smt. H.D. Varalaxmi

Report Preparation : Smt. H.D. Varalaxmi

Laboratory Facilities : South Zonal Office, Bengaluru

Orathupalayam dam is located across Noyyal river at 32 kms downstream of Tirupur.

CPCB Zonal Office Bengaluru Page 1

1.2 Objectives and Scope of the Study:

 Conducting baseline survey on type of process practised, water consumption,

1.3 Phases of Work

Phase II: In-depth monitoring of 3 CETP’s and 3 IETPS to cover different

CPCB Zonal Office Bengaluru Page 2

1.5 Questionnaire Design

A comprehensive questionnaire is designed to collect information from CETPs and

1.6 Questionnaire Survey

1.7 In Depth Study

CPCB Zonal Office Bengaluru Page 3

2.1 Textile Dying Units in Tirupur

2.2 Textile Dying Process

Natural Fibers: Semi-Synthetic: Synthetic Fibers:

 Cotton Rayon Derivatives of oil

CPCB Zonal Office Bengaluru Page 4

2.2.1 Production of Yarn and Fabric:

Carding and spinning:

2.2.2 Treatments to fibers, yarns and fabric:

Bleaching is accomplished by oxidation or reduction. Cotton and other cellulosic

CPCB Zonal Office Bengaluru Page 5

Excess water is removed mechanically by centrifuge squeezing and vaccum suction

Sizing and desizing:

Sizing chemicals are applied to wrap yarns(especially cottons) to enable them to

2.2.3 Dyeing process

CPCB Zonal Office Bengaluru Page 6

2..3 Water Consumption

CPCB Zonal Office Bengaluru Page 7

2.4 Sources of Wastewater

Figure 1: Cotton fabric production and associated water pollutants

2.4.1 Wastewater generation and Nature

CPCB Zonal Office Bengaluru Page 8

Bleaching High alkalinity, Suspended Solids

2.5 Pollution Potential in Textile dying units

2.6 Treatment system Installed to achieve Zero Liquid Discharge

CPCB Zonal Office Bengaluru Page 9

CPCB Zonal Office Bengaluru Page 10

The RO rejects is further treated through combination of Mechanical Vapour

CPCB Zonal Office Bengaluru Page 11

3.1 Preliminary data obtained through Questionnaire

3.2 Study carried out at Tirupur

Tirupur, the “knitwear capital" of India, is a city corporation located at 11.1075°N

CPCB Zonal Office Bengaluru Page 12

3.4 Details of CETPs and IETPs studied

3.4.1 M/s Andipalayam Common Effluent Treatment Plant (P) Limited

Address of the CETP : M/s Andipalayam Common Effluent

CPCB Zonal Office Bengaluru Page 13

settler, dual media filter, ultra filtration,

Specific Observation of the units :

BOD (mg/L) 307 10 _ _ _ _ ___

Sulphate (mg/L) 536 675 _ _ _ _ ___