Auger Foundation

Download as xls, pdf, or txt
Download as xls, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 9
At a glance
Powered by AI
The document discusses the design of an auger foundation for a transmission line tower, including soil properties, design loads, and computations for uplift resistance and depth of rotation.

The design criteria include material properties, soil properties from site investigation, loads on the foundation, and other parameters like water table depth. Concrete grade, steel grade, soil densities and shear strengths are some of the key parameters considered.

Uplift resistance is computed using three different methods - considering the weight and volumes of concrete and soil, using formulas from IEEE standards considering truncated cone and cylindrical shear models, and considering skin resistance in different soil layers.

DESIGN OF AUGER FOUNDATION FOR TRANSMISSION LINE TOWER TYPE - tt

Tower Location No. 48, 48b . 50. 52.


Critical Borehole - 48

1) Pile design and construction practice By M.J. Tomlinson


2) Soil Investigation Report B
3) IEEE-691-2001
4) SES-P-119.18
DESIGN CRITERIA

E
A. MATERIAL PROPERTIES AND DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

CONCRETE
Concrete Compressive Strength @ 28 days, f'c [MPa] 28 As per PTS Cl: 2.02 A
Unit Wt. of Concrete [kN/M3] , gc 24

D1
Minimum Conc. Cover at Top, Bott. & Sides of Pier [mm] 75 As per PTS Cl: 2.02 (C)
Top of Concrete above Finish Grade [m], E 0.60 m
Effective Unit Wt. of Concrete [kN/m3], (γc)   24
̅̅
STEEL Minimum Bar Size for Long. Reinf. [mm] 20
Yield Strength of Steel, fy [MPa] 420
Minimum Bar Size for Ties [mm] 10
SOIL PROPERTIES (AS PER SOIL REPORT) - REFER ANNEXURE-1 0.75
UCS Unit Wt. Skin Friction Frustum
Layer # Depth f C CA Average KS Ka Kp
quc gs Angle Angle

Concrete
m Degree KN/m2 RQD (%) MN/m2 KN/m3
(d = 3/4 f) Deg q

Below GWL 30.00 16.00 22.00 0.33 3.00


30.00 1.00
Above GWL 31.00 17.00 23.00 0.32 3.12
1 3.00 34.00 0 0 0 0.00 16.79 25.5° 29° 1 0.32 3.12
2 6.00 32.00 0 0 0 0.00 18.07 24° 27° 1 0.32 3.12
3 10.00 30.00 0.014 0 0 0.00 18.36 22.5° 25° 1 0.33 3.00
4 15.00 30.00 0.014 0 0 0.00 1.36 22.5° 25° 1 0.33 3.00

ADDITIONAL PARAMETERS
Surcharge Pressure at G.L. = 0.3 x 24 = 7.2 kN/m2 {Due to Structure Pad with Thickness = 300 mm
Water Table below Gr. Lev. "Dw"= 0.15 m {Ground Water Level considered 1 m higher than as given in Soil Report.

B. LOADS ON PIER FOUNDATION (Applied at Top of Concrete Level) - REFER ANNEXURE


Tower Type tt From super str. Factored ( 2.00 )
[Total F.O.S considered= 2]
Maximum Compressive Load 627.84 kN. 1255.68 kN.
Maximum Uplift Load 343.35 kN. 686.70 kN.
Resultant Lateral Load (Shear), Fh 142.25 kN. 284.49 kN.
Maximum External Moment 0.0 kN-M. 0.0 kN.-M.
C. OTHER DATA
Assumed Dia of Drilled Pier "b" = 1.00 m D1 = 10.000 m
Depth of Top Soil whose strength to be ignored, E1 = 1.00 m D2 = 0.00 m {E1 as per PTS Cl 1.16-D-4 pg 23/53

Density of Soil, gs = 17.00 KN/m³ D3 = 0.00 m B


Density of Soil below GWL,(γs)   = 16.00 KN/m³ B = 1.00 m
E = 0.75 m
E

Width of soil frustum cone failure in ground, B2 = B+2 tanq (D1+D2-E1)


= 1+ 2 x TAN(30)x(10+0-1) = 11.39 m
E1

Width of soil frustum cone failure at GWL, B2w = B+2 tanq (D1+D2-Dw) = 12.37 m
Soil Depth, D = D1+D2+D3 = 10.00 m
COMPUTATION OF UPLIFT RESISTANCE
D1

V1 = 0.589 m3
Vw = 7.736 m3 V2 = 0.118 m3
Volume of concrete below GWL V3 = 0.000 m3
V4 = 0.000 m3 B2
Total Volume of Concrete above GWL, Vc = V1+V2+V3+V4 = 0.707 m3 8.44
Total Volume of Soil below GWL, Vsw = p/12x(D 1
+D 2
-Dw)x[B2+B2w2+(BxB2w)]-(Vw) = 421.33 m3
Total Volume of Soil, Vs = p/12x(D1+D2-E1)x[B2+B22+(BxB2)]-(V2+V3) -{Vsw}
= 3.142/12x(10+0-1)x(1^2+11.39^2+(1x11.39))-(0.118+0)- 421.33 = -86.58 m3
Weight of Concrete below GWL, Ww = 14x7.736 = 108.30
Weight of Concrete, Wc = {24x0.707}+{14x7.736} = 125.27 KN
Weight of Soil, Ws = (-86.58x17) + (421.33x16) = 5269.42 KN
Total Weight = Wc + Ws = 5394.692 > 686.7………..Hence Safe.
COMPUTATION OF UPLIFT RESISTANCE BY IEEE STANDARDS FORMULAII (Truncated Cone Model)

Weight of Concrete stragiht shaft = Eq 75 as per IEEE Std 691-2001 .

= 125.27 KN

Weight of soil cone, Qsw = Eq 76 as per IEEE Std 691-2001 .

= 5440.73 KN 1m of soil ignored as per PTS Clause 3 pg 55/85.

Total weight, Qu= = 5566.01 KN Eq 74 as per IEEE Std 691-2001 .

= 5566.01 >686.7 ………Hence Safe

COMPUTATION OF UPLIFT RESISTANCE BY IEEE STANDARDS FORMULAII (Cylindrical Shear Model)

Drained Condition - Non Cohesive soil/Granular soil

Ultimate Uplift Capacity = Eq 82 as per IEEE Std 691-2001 .

Skin Resistance of straight shaft = Eq 83 as per IEEE Std 691-2001 .

=> (Qsu)   = K σv .tan 〖 δ . Ap 〗

Undrained Condition - Cohesive Soil

Ultimate Uplift Capacity = Eq 79 as per IEEE Std 691-2001 .

Skin Resistance of straight shaft = Eq 80 as per IEEE Std 691-2001 .

under undrained condition


Where,
a = adhesion factor. As per Graph recommended by Soil Invetigation agency
(Ref: Fig 16-14 : Book "Foundation Design by J E Bowles"
su = undrained shear strength of soil. Su = C

Rock Layer

Skin Resistance of shaft in Rock (kN) = fs= αβq  uc (π. B. Rock Layer depth . 1000) Eq 4.25 page 145: Book by Tomlinson .

a = Reduction factor related to Unconfined Compression Strength "quc". Fig 4.38 page 144: Book by Tomlinson .

j = Mass factor "j". As per Table on page 145: Book by Tomlinson .

b = Correction factor related to Mass factor "j". Fig 4.39 page 145: Book by Tomlinson .

Layerwise Calculation for Uplift Resistance is as follows: 1m of soil ignored as per PTS Clause 3 pg 55/85.

D-(E1) RQD UCS (quc) Reduction Su Adhesion (Qsu+(Qsu)    ) or  fs


Mass Factor
Layer Factor
"j" "b" Factor (γs)   D σv=(γs)   D
(m) (%) (MN/m2) "a" (kPa) "a" (kN)
0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
1 0.15 2.70 1.35 0.27
2 4.85 77.60 41.50 268.41
3 3.00 48.00 104.30 397.16
4 1.00 16.00 136.30 173.00
5
Skin Resistance of shaft in Rock , "fs"= 0.00 KN Total Skin Resistance = SQsu = 838.84

Weight of Concrete stragiht shaft, W = Eq 75 as per IEEE Std 691-2001 .

= 125.27 KN

Ultimate Uplift Capacity = Eq 79 or 82 as per IEEE Std 691-2001 .

= 838.84+125.272
= 964.11 KN

=> 964.1 > 686.7 ………Hence Safe


Penetration into Rocky Strata : Keeping 1m for site uncertainity and remaining for Rock strata embedment.
Reduction in Rock Socket bond strength: a- Rock strength ignored upto 500mm depth.
UCS - Reduced by 30%.
COMPUTATION OF LATERAL CAPACITY
According to Broms Equation, Eq 6.2, pg228 by Tomlinson
Lateral resistance, Fh = 0.5 x b x (D - E1 )3 x Kp x gs / (E + D) {If No Water Table

= 0.5 x b x [(Kp x gs (Dw- E1 )3)+(Kpw x gsw (D - Dw )3)] / (E + D) {With Water Table

= 0.5 x 1 x ( 10 - 1 )³ x 3.12 x 17 / (0.75 + 10 )


= 2132.08 > 284.49 KN………..Hence Safe. Check Ignored. Please refer to Brinch & Hanson
approach given in subsequent page.

CHECK FOR OVERTURNING RESISTANCE

Overturning Moment, Mo = Fh x ( E + D)
= 284.49 x ( 0.75 + 10 ) = 3058.27 KN-m

Resistant Moment, Mr = 0.5 x b x ( D - 0.3 )3 x Kp x gs {If No Water Table

= 0.5 x b x [(( Dw-E1- 0.3 )3 x Kp x gs)+(( D-Dw- 0.3 )3 x Kpw x gsw)] {With Water Table

= 0.5 x 1 x (10 - 0.3)³ x 3.12 x 17 = 20863.28 KN-m


= 20863.28 > 3058.27 KN………..Hence Safe. Check Ignored. Please refer to Brinch & Hanson
approach given in subsequent page.

COMPUTATION OF ULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY


{As per Vesic: IEEE Std 691-2001, page 123}
End Bearing Resistance = At x so' x Ns = ( p / 4 x B2) x (gs x D ) x Ns Ns = As per Soil
Report
= (3.1416 / 4 x 1² ) x (16 x 10 ) x ( ) gs = 16.00
= 0.00 KN

Factor of Safety = 3.00


So,
Ultimate End Bearing, Qb = 0/3
= 0.00 KN
Ultimate Skin Friction, Qs = As per IEEE-Cylindrical Shear Model

= 964.11 KN

Compression Resistance, Qc = Qb + Qs - W
= 0 + 964.11 - 125.272

= 838.838 < 1255.68 KN………..Hence Unsafe.


Compression resistance has been satisfied by Skin Friction only.
POINT OF ZERO SHEAR DEPTH

Maximum Compressive Force = 1255.68 kN.


Maximum Uplift Force = 686.70 kN.
Resultant Lateral Load (Shear), Q = 284.49 kN.
Additional Moment, M = 0.00 kN-m.

Zero Shear Depth Ym = 2.054 m When Resisting Shear >= Applied Lateral Load "Q"
below E1 = (0+1.35+283.14)
= 284.49 < 284.49
Since the Resisting shear is greater than the lateral Force, Hence OK

Zero Shear Depth from Zd = Ym + E1


Ground Level = 3.054 m Consider Layer Number = 2
Ym x 1/3 = `1 m

SOIL PRESSURE AT ZERO SHEAR DEPTH (According to Brinch & Hanson Method)

Soil Pressure = eD = qKqD + cKcD

Depth Layer Soil Pressure AREA OF RESISTING


Pier Dia Pressure On Pier
from GL Depth D/B g f c Kq Kc EARTH SHEAR
B (m) (kN)
D (m) (m) Kpa KN/m LAYER
1 1.000 1.00 1.00 18.00 31.00 0.00 6.47 17.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1 1.150 0.15 1.15 18.00 31.00 0.00 6.65 19.13 17.95 17.95 1.35 1.35
1 3.054 1.90 3.05 16.00 31.00 0.00 8.59 31.14 279.48 279.48 283.14 284.49

#VALUE!
S= 284.49
Since the Resisting shear is greater than the lateral Force, Hence OK
DESIGN BENDING MOMENT

Design bending moment, Mmax = Mo - Mr As per SES-P-119.18, Step # 6.

Overturning bending moment, Mo = M + Q x (E+Zd) As per SES-P-119.18

about point of Zero Shear = 0+284.49x(0.75+1+2.054)


due to lateral force. = 1082.18 kN-m.

∑_(i=1)^n▒[Z_i (Lever arm of Earth Layer) x A_i (Area of Earth Layer)] 
Resisting bending moment, Mr = = As per SES-P-119.18

about point of Zero Shear


due to Earth = 183.17 kN-m.

"Mmax"
Depth Layer Soil Pressure Area of "Mr" about
Pier Dia Pressure On Pier Lever Arm
B (m)
from GL Depth Earth
(m)
about Point Point of
D (m) (m) Kpa KN/m Layer of Zero Shear Zero
Shear
1 1.000 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1 1.150 0.15 17.95 17.95 1.35 1.954 2.63
1 3.054 1.90 279.48 279.48 283.14 0.638 180.54
899.01

S= 183.17

Design bending moment, Mmax = Mo - Mr As per SES-P-119.18

= 1082.18-183.17
= 899.01 kN-m.

Soil Pressure Diagram


0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
0

23

6 5

10 8

12
1 2 4 6 7 3 5
SOIL LAYER # 2 3

Rotation/Max
Point of Zero
Shear Depth

Point of

Shear
SF = 0 SF = Max
Depth of layer from GL, "D" = 1.00 1.15 6.00 9.00 10.00 3.054 6.758
LAYER # GL/E1 1 2 3 4 5 Zd X1
Depth of Layer = 1.00 0.15 2.95 2.24 1.00 #VALUE! 1.904 0.758
B= 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
D/B = 1.00 1.15 6.00 9.00 10.00 #VALUE! 3.05 6.76
g= 18.00 18.00 16.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 16.00
Soil overburden = q = 0.00 2.70 47.14 35.88 0.00 #VALUE! 30.46 12.12
C= 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Φ= 31.00 31.00 31.00 30.00 30.00 31.00 30.00
Φ in Radians = 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.52 0.52 #VALUE! 0.54 0.52
tanΦ = 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.58 0.58 #VALUE! 0.60 0.58
cosΦ = 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.87 0.87 #VALUE! 0.86 0.87
sinΦ = 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.50 0.50 #VALUE! 0.52 0.50
cot Φ 1.66 1.66 1.66 1.73 1.73 #VALUE! 1.66 1.73
A= 1.27 1.27 1.27 1.21 1.21 #VALUE! 1.27 1.21
B= -0.62 -0.62 -0.62 -0.60 -0.60 #VALUE! -0.62 -0.60
eA = 3.56 3.56 3.56 3.35 3.35 #VALUE! 3.56 3.35
eB = 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.55 0.55 #VALUE! 0.54 0.55
[45 + Φ/2] = 60.50 60.50 60.50 60.00 60.00 #VALUE! 60.50 60.00
in Radians 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.05 1.05 #VALUE! 1.06 1.05
[45 - Φ/2] = 29.50 29.50 29.50 30.00 30.00 #VALUE! 29.50 30.00
in Radians 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.52 0.52 #VALUE! 0.51 0.52
tan [45 + Φ/2] = 1.77 1.77 1.77 1.73 1.73 #VALUE! 1.77 1.73
tan [45 - Φ/2] = 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.58 0.58 #VALUE! 0.57 0.58
sin (45 + Φ/2) = 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 #VALUE! 0.87 0.87
K°q =[eA.cosΦtan(45+Φ/2)]-[e B.cosΦtan(45-Φ/2)] 5.13 5.13 5.13 4.75 4.75 #VALUE! 5.13 4.75
K°c =[eA.cosΦtan(45+Φ/2)-1]cotΦ 7.30 7.30 7.30 6.97 6.97 #VALUE! 7.30 6.97
dci = 1.58 + tan4Φ 2.11 2.11 2.11 2.03 2.03 #VALUE! 2.11 2.03
Nc = [epi tanΦ tan2(45+Φ/2)-1]cotΦ 32.67 32.67 32.67 30.14 30.14 #VALUE! 32.67 30.14
pi tan Φ = 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.81 1.81 #VALUE! 1.89 1.81
epi tan Φ = 6.60 6.60 6.60 6.13 6.13 #VALUE! 6.60 6.13
Ko = 1 - sinΦ 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.50 0.50 #VALUE! 0.48 0.50
Kci = Nc dci 69.04 69.04 69.04 61.32 61.32 #VALUE! 69.04 61.32
Kqi = Nc dc Ko tanΦ 20.12 20.12 20.12 17.70 17.70 #VALUE! 20.12 17.70
aq = [K°q/Kqi-K°q] [KosinΦ/sin(45+Φ/2)] 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.11 #VALUE! 0.10 0.11
K°q / (Kqi - K˚q) = 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.37 0.37 #VALUE! 0.34 0.37
Ko sinΦ/sin45+Φ/2 = 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 #VALUE! 0.29 0.29
aci = K°c/(Kci-K°c)[2sin(45+Φ/2)] 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.22 #VALUE! 0.21 0.22
K°c / (Kci - K°c) = 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.13 #VALUE! 0.12 0.13
KcD = [K°c+Kci(ac)(D/B)] / [1+ac(D/B)] 17.85 19.13 41.43 43.20 44.45 #VALUE! 31.14 39.60
KqD = [K°q+Kqi(aq)(D/B)] / [1+(aq)(D/B)] 6.47 6.65 10.68 11.07 11.41 #VALUE! 8.59 10.16
eD = qKqD + cKcD 0.00 17.95 503.63 397.31 0.00 #VALUE! 261.53 123.11
Soil Pressure at bottom of each layer 0.00 17.95 783.11 1303.53 1303.53 #VALUE! 279.48 906.22

When f = 0,
=> Kq =0 & Kc is taken from Graph for respective value of D/B
Computation of Depth of Rotation Center (Noted as "X1")

S1 = Total Shear between Point of Zero Shear & Rotation Centre


S2 = Total Shear below Rotation Centre

Point of Rotation lies between Layers as shown in Table below.


Let the depth of Rotation Point be at ( x1 )

Equating the shears as above:

S1 = S2

1.35+283.14+1565.24 = 2477.57

1849.73 = 4421.02

Difference = S1 - S2 = 1849.73-4421.02
= -2571.29

Hence, X1 = Point of Rotation below GL = 6.758 m

Net Moment about Point of Rotation / Max Shear

Ms1 = Moment of area of shear (above point of rotation) about Point of Zero Shear
Ms2 = Moment of area of shear (Below point of rotation) about Point of Zero Shear

Depth Layer Pressure Pressure AREA OF


Pier Dia Pressure Pressure MOMENT MS1 about MS2 about
Layer # from GL Depth On Pier Above EARTH
B (m) (Kpa) Below X1 ARM X1 X1
D (m) (m) KN/m X1 LAY. (kN)
1 1 GL/E1 1.000 1.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 1 1 1.150 0.150 17.95 17.95 17.95 1.35 0.00
3 1 Zd 3.054 1.904 279.48 279.48 279.48 283.14 0.000 0.00
4 1 2 6.000 2.946 783.11 783.11 783.11 1565.24 1.706 2669.93
5 1 X1 6.758 0.758 906.22 906.22 906.22 639.92 3.334 2133.55
6 1 3 9.000 2.242 1303.53 1303.53 1303.53 2477.57 4.825 11953.99
7 1 4 10.000 1.000 1303.53 1303.53 1303.53 1303.53 0.00

4803.48 11953.99
Net Moment = Ms2 - Ms1 = 11953.99-4803.48
= 7150.51 kN-m
> 1082.18 kN-m Safe
Since Resisting Moment is greater than Max Overturning Moment, Hence it is Safe

-1500 -1000 -500 0 500 1000 1500


0

3 2

6 3

2 4
7

3 9

10

11

You might also like