Test Bank For The Legal Environment of Business Text and Cases 9th Edition Cross, Miller
Test Bank For The Legal Environment of Business Text and Cases 9th Edition Cross, Miller
Test Bank For The Legal Environment of Business Text and Cases 9th Edition Cross, Miller
TRUE/FALSE QUESTIONS
1. Laws would be meaningless without the courts to interpret and apply them.
1
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
2TEST BANK—UNIT ONE: THE FOUNDATIONS
3. Under the authority ofa long arm statute, a court can exercise personal jurisdic-
tion over certain out-of-state defendants.
4. A court can exercise jurisdiction over property that is located within its
boundaries.
5. Because corporations are not considered legal persons, courts use different
principles to determine whether it is fair to exercise jurisdiction over a
corporation.
9. U.S. district courts have concurrent jurisdiction with state courts in matters
involving federal questions.
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
FULL FILE AT HTTPS://TESTBANKSCAFE.EU/
10. Procedural law does not have a significant impact on a person’s ability to
pursue a legal claim.
11. The litigation process has three phases: filing, answering, and appealing.
13. The use of additional evidence distinguishes the motion for summary judgment
from the motion for judgment on the pleadings.
14. Interrogatories are written questions for which written answers are prepared by
a judge.
15. Any written material, including information stored electronically, can be the
object of a discovery request.
16. An expert witness is a person who is directly involved in the events concerning
a lawsuit.
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
4TEST BANK—UNIT ONE: THE FOUNDATIONS
17. After both sides have rested their cases, only the plaintiff’s attorney makes a
closing argument.
18. Either party may appeal a jury’s verdict but only the defendant may appeal a
judge’s ruling.
MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS
a. judicial review.
b. jurisdiction.
c. venue.
d. early neutral case evaluation.
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
FULL FILE AT HTTPS://TESTBANKSCAFE.EU/
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
6TEST BANK—UNIT ONE: THE FOUNDATIONS
4. Lewis wants to file a suit against Mikayla. Before any court can hear the case
5. Marcus files a suit against Naomi in an Ohio state court. Naomi’s only connec-
tion to Ohio is an ad on the Web originating in Pennsylvania. For Ohio to
exercise jurisdiction, the issue is whether Naomi, through her ad, has
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
FULL FILE AT HTTPS://TESTBANKSCAFE.EU/
6. Arnold loses his suit against Buffy in a Coloradostate trial court. Arnold appeals
to a state intermediate court of appeals and loses again. Arnold would appeal
next to
7. The Montana Supreme Court rules against Natural Grocery Mart in a case
against One Stop 2 Shop Stores, Inc. Natural Grocery files an appeal with the
United States Supreme Court. The Court does not hear the case. This
8. The Iowa Supreme Court rules against Jennifer in a case against Kut-Rate
Stores, Inc. Jennifer wants to appeal her case to the United States Supreme
Court. She must ask the Court to issue a writ of
a. appeal.
b. certiorari.
c. jurisdiction.
d. summons.
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
8TEST BANK—UNIT ONE: THE FOUNDATIONS
10. Ballpark Sportsfield, Inc., files a suit against Concessions & Tailgate Services.
The document that informs Concessions & Tailgate that it must file an answer
within a specified time period is
a. the answer.
b. the complaint.
c. the writ of certiorari.
d. the summons.
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
FULL FILE AT HTTPS://TESTBANKSCAFE.EU/
12. Lyn files a suit against Karl. Karl denies Lyn’s charges and sets forth his own
claim that Lyn breached their contract and owes Karl money for the breach.
Karl’s claim is
a. counterclaim.
b. motion for judgment on the pleadings.
c. motion for summary judgment.
d. motion to dismiss.
13. Renewable Resources, Inc., files a suit against Sunrich Utility Company and
seeks to examine certain documents in Sunrich’s possession. A legitimate
reason for this examination is that the documents contain
14. To prepare for a trial between SmartPhones, Inc., and TechApps Company,
TechApps’ attorney places SmartPhones’ chief executive officer (CEO) under
oath. A court official makes a record of the attorney’s questions and the CEO’s
answers. This is
a. a cross-examination.
b. a deposition.
c. voir dire.
d. an interrogatory.
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
10TEST BANK—UNIT ONE: THE FOUNDATIONS
15. During the trial phase of Sof’ Drink Soda Corporation’s suit against TimeOut
Convenience Stores, Inc., their attorneys engage in voir dire. This is
16. Jenna files a civil suit against Keshia. To succeed, Jenna must prove her case
17. In Hazel’s suit against Ingrid, the court issues a judgment in Ingrid’s favor. If the
case is appealed to an appropriate court of appeals, the appellate court will
hear
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
FULL FILE AT HTTPS://TESTBANKSCAFE.EU/
18. Refer to Fact Pattern 2–1. After its review of Martinv. Nichelle, the appellate
court upholds the lower court’s verdict. The appellate court has
19. Refer to Fact Pattern 2–1. After a final determination in the case of Martinv.
Nichelle, any judgment will be satisfied
20. Refer to Fact Pattern 2–1. After the state’s highest court’s review of Martinv.
Nichelle, a party can appeal the decision to the United States Supreme Court if
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
12TEST BANK—UNIT ONE: THE FOUNDATIONS
ESSAY QUESTIONS
2. Tech Performance, Inc., completes programming and other tech services for
Uno IT Products Corporation. When Uno’s computer system crashes, it loses
$500,000 worth of business and pays $100,000 to have the system
reprogrammed. Uno IT announces to the media that the crash was due to Tech
Performance’sincompetence and files a complaint in a federal court against the
firm. What are Tech Performance’soptions in response?
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
FULL FILE AT HTTPS://TESTBANKSCAFE.EU/
out in Uno IT’s complaint or denies them and sets out any defenses that Tech
Performancemay have. (If Tech Performanceadmits to the allegations, a
judgment will be entered in favor of Uno IT. If Tech Performancedenies the
allegations, the matter will proceed.) In the answer, Tech Performancemay
assert an affirmative defense—that is, admit the truth of the complaint but raise
new facts to show that the firm should not be held liable for the damage
sustained by Uno IT . (The sorts of facts these might be and the legal effect
they might have are details explained in later chapters in this text.) Tech
Performancecould also deny Uno IT’s allegations and assert a counterclaim
alleging that the crash occurred as a result of something Uno IT did and that
Uno IT owes Tech Performancedamages for the harm done to its reputation.
Uno IT would have to submit an answer to the counterclaim.
Instead of filing an answer, Tech Performancemight file a motion to
dismiss. This motion might contend that Uno IT failed to state a claim for which
relief can be granted—in other words, even if the facts presented in the
complaint are true, their legal consequences are such that there is no reason to
go ahead with the suit. Other grounds for this motion include improper service
of process and the court’s lack of jurisdiction or venue. (If the motion is denied,
Tech Performance will be given time to file an answer. If the motion is granted,
Uno IT will be given time to file an amended complaint.)
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.