PROBES-75 Guidelines For Developing Greenbelts PDF
PROBES-75 Guidelines For Developing Greenbelts PDF
PROBES-75 Guidelines For Developing Greenbelts PDF
PAOBES/75/1999-2000
FOREWORD
Green vegetal cover is not only pleasing to the eyes but also beneficial in many ways
such as conservation of bio-diversity. retention of soil moisrure. recharge of groundwater
and moderation of micro-climate. Yet another important role of vegetal cover. which is
not well recogm sed . relates to comamment of pollution Bes1des actmg as a carbon smk.
certain spec1es of plants can even absorb the pollutantS while others can thrive in polluted
Ra.ISlng of green belts with right t}-pc!S of species can serve as a useful buffer to
contam the menace of pollution from dil'terent sources. With this in view. a study was
commissioned by the Central Polluuon Control Board (CPCB) tor enlisti ng the plant
spec1es SUited to various bio-climauc conditions The Study was also intended to evolve a
theoretical model for design and development of green belt for opumum artenuauon of a1r
polluoon Apart from morphologtcal features affecting the plant response to pollutants. the
other important considerations in optimisation of green belL development tnclude distance
from the source of pollution and dispersion of pollutants under different atmospheric
Stabiliry conditions. An exercise was also made to Identify the spe cies which are sunable tor
revegetauon of mine spoil s , degraded habitats and stabilisation of tly ash dumps.
Based on the inputs provided by CPCB and information contained in this report. a
scheme for raising green belt fo r poiJuuon abatement and envtronmemal improvement has
been launched 10 Tamil �adu.
We hope. the gmdelines and mfom1auon comruned in thts report wt ll be useful to all
concerned "wtth environmental cleaning through greening�
�
(Dilip Biswas)
'Pauvesh Bhawan, C B 0 cum Olllce Complex East Aqun Nagar Delhol tO OJ:>
Grams "CLEENVIRON Fax (01112204Q48 Telex 031·66440 PCON IN P maol· cpcll�dlpha not 1n
CONTENTS
Page No.
Executive Summary 1
1 lntroductron 2
2 Plant -Pollutant Interactions 4
3 Theoretrcal Model for Development of Green Belt 19
4 Agro-chmatrc Zones of lnd1a 34
5 Chorce of Plants for Green Belts 39
6 Stabrlizatron of Fly- ash usrng plants 44
Chapter 1 : Introduction
Green belts are recommended for conta1nment of air pollut1on 1n the human environment,
especially 1n Industrial and urban env1rons. Improvement of aesthetics is a bonus derived
through the presence of greenery in these areas
Advantages notwithstanding, green plants are not a panacea for the environmental ills. As
liv1ng orgamsms, plants have their limits to tolerate toxicity of air pollutants and to function as
pollution ameliorants. Nature and levels of sensit1vit1es of plant species towards
A vast country encompasses a variety of agro-cllmates suitable for different types of plant
species. Zones and subzones of India are described, along with their soil types (as
Appendix A) to assist in selecting plant spec1es for cultivation. suitable to agro-climates.
Plant spec1es suitable for removal of part1culate matter and gaseous pollutants differ tn their
morphological characteristrcs Srzes and shapes of crowns penod1c phenomena hke leaf
shedding, also contribute to plant efftc1ency for pollution abatement. D1scuss1on on these
points IS followed by descnpt1on of a large number of plant spec1es (1n AppendiX B)
stressing characters useful for sorption of pollutants. Combining information in chapters 4
and 5, zonew1se lists of plants recommended for green belts are presented (in Appendix C)
Coal is likely to be used on an 1ncreas1ng scale for power generation, and Will lead to
aggravation of pollution problem due to fly-ash Stabiltsat1on of ash w1th plants provides
avtable solution. Strateg1es for achieving the same are discussed in this chapter.
CHAPTER-1
INTRODUCTION
Most of the human activities generate poilution of one or other types and o1 different
magnitudes, to whtch all the organ sms are exposed. More often than not exposures to
some pollution types are considered unavoidable. Resistance of organisms help them
overcome the hazards caused by such exposures At the same time, organisms. espectally
animals tend to avoid, or move away, from pollution. By avoidance or by tolerance
orgamsms struggle and suNtve tn polluted envtronments.
Such suNival however, is hardly desirable and has limitattons, in terms of health and vitality
of organtsms. Hence, tt is imperative that pollution is controlled at the source itself.
Numerous mechanical devices are available for controlling pollution at the process level
itself. Some trace amount however. 1s still likely to get released. Th1s tS especially true of air
Green belts are thought to be effective in such scenanos. where green plants form a surface
capable of sorbtng arr pollutants and formtng s1nks for pollutants Leaves wrth their vast area
1n a tree crown, sorbs pollutants on their surface, thus effectNely reduce the1r concentrations
1n the ambient a1r. Often, the sorbed pollutants are Incorporated in metabolic stream and
thus ttle a1r IS punfted. Plants grown 1n such a way as to funct1on as pollutant sinks are
collectively referred to as green belts •
An important aspect of a green belt. some times overlooked, IS that the plants constituting
green belts are ltvtng organ1sms. wtth limits to their tolerance towards air pollutants As a
result cross1ng the threshold limits in terms of pollutton load, would lead to injury to plants
causing death of tissues and reducing the1r absorption potential. Sink eff1ciency of unhealthy
and dead t1ssues and leaves ts known to be extremely low, thus defeating the very purpose
of a green belt. In short, a green belt ts effecttve as pollution sink only within the tolerance
limits of constituent plants.
Spectes of plants are stud1ed for the1r relatNe sens1t1v1ties towards different atr polluta11ts.
Thus, we recogntse spec1es sens�tNe to SOz. species sensitive to 03, or sens1tive to HF,
etc. In terms of tolerances however, 1t is diff1cu!t to 1dent1fy species that are seiectNely
tolerant to pollutant spec1es. Statements like HF-sensttive gladiolus is tolerant to SOz is
obviously not accurate Moreover, an industnal or urban scene invariably cons1sts of
several pollutants rather than a s1ngle pollutant. Pollut1on sinks hence, a1m at cultrvating
plants that are tolerant to atr pollutants in general, rather than tolerant to S02, to HF. or to
0;,, etc Scattering of a few known sens1tive plants. (including selectively sensitive spec1es)
w1th1n a green belt however. do carry out an important function of indicating the presence of
pollutants whtch the tolerants would not tndicate.
Two types of approaches are recogn1sed while designing green belts - i) Source oriented
2
approach and ii) receptor- oriented approach. Both these approaches have their own
advantages and limitations. It is generally felt that the first approach is advantageous
where a single industry is situated and the pollutants emitted by the same are sought to be
contained. The latter approach is desirable in urban- industrial complexes with multiple
sources of pollution in an industrial - urban mix. A very large proportion of polluted areas in
this country, where human settlements are intricately mixed with industries, form examples
deserv1ng the second approach for green belt desigmng
Whereas, rt 1s easy to state that tolerant plant spec1es should form green belts, it 1s very
difficult to state confidently about several other aspects about the belts. e.g ij which
bio-geographic regions of the country are suitable for what plant spec1es ii) what extent soil
quality contributes to the sources (or otherwise) of growth of plants 1n the belts. 1ii) what
should be the d1stance. Width and he1ght of the belt w1th reference to pollution source, iv)
what 1s the ideal density of plant crowns, and v) what are the limits of pollution dosages
upto wh1ch green belts would function optimally. Attempts are made in the following
chapters, to seek answers to these questions, on the basis of our present knowledge in this
Apart from functioning as pollutant s1nks, green belts would provide other benefits l1ke
aesthetic Improvement and prov1ding poss1ble habitats for birds and animals. thus re
creating hospitable nature 1n an otherw1se drab urban- Industrial scene. One of the worst
examples of the latter type of scene IS prov1ded by depos1ts of coal-ash from thermal power
plants. The problem 1s on the nse in the country, where coal is a fuel long-lasting surety of
availability. Covering of ash using plants - another type of green belt is recommended to
overcome the hazards posed by ash. The last chapter in this report IS devoted to the
problem of ash stabilization and making ash-dumps environmentally acceptable.
3
CHAPTER-2
A large amount of information has been generated about the nature of plant-pollution
interactions: very little authentic informatron tn Indian context has been generated about the
role of plants in absorption of air pollutants. Most of the information available is from
tiForest Vegetation as a Sink for Gaseous Contaminants" (Sm1th, 1981}. As per the
drscussion therein. even sensitive plants like alfalfa have been used for estimation of srnk
efficrency of plants.
Another point to ponder is about the areas where green belts should be set up. Obviously
s1nce a green belt is expected to neutralize pollutants, their location should aim at screening
off the source of pollutants from society. Areas around industrial establishments, residential
areas and roadsides. should be the ones targetted for green belts.
The philosophy IS that when primary pollutants are taken care of, formation of secondary
pollutants will not reach menacing proportions. Primary pollutants of concern are - SOz
HF NO. CO, COz, NH3, HzS. Cl SPM and organics. Industrial and man- made sources
of these pollutants are given 1n Table-2.1. Common secondary pollutants are also included
in the same Table.
Since the project aims at mit1gation of air pollutants with plants, discussion here is confined
to air pollutant interactions w1th plants Other forms of life are 110t considered. Mode of
absorption of a pollutant by plants and fate of the pollutant inside plant body are given. Rate
at wh1ch a pollutant is absorbed, total amount that can be absorbed and form of the
pollutant in which it ends insrde the plant, determine the success of the scaveng1ng
process. It is known that when pollutant is absorbed at a rate higher than the rate of 1ts
•
assimilation, accumulation takes place, resultrng in plant injury and ineffectiveness of the
green belt.
S02 : Though several ox1des of sulphur may be the result of industrial processes. SOz IS
cons1dered to be the most important one. Background level of SOz in the atmosphere IS
0.001 ug L.1 or less (Kellogg et. al.. 1972). About 109 million metric tons (mmt) of SOz are
estimated to be added to the earth's atmosphere every year (Helbwachs, 1983).
IJpadhyay, 1981).
S02 enters plants mainly through the stomatal apertures. Cutrcle and wax on leaf
L1
epidermis and suberin on stem being imperv1ous, more than 95% of the pollutant enters a
plant through the routes of gaseous exchange Hence stomata. theJr structure, posit1on
and functions are important 1n the entry of gas in a leaf Once inside the leaf, rt passes into
the Intercellular spaces of mesophyll and gets absorbed on the wet cell-walls to finally
drffuse gradually 1nto the cell sap (Knabe, 1976). Whereas absorption of SOz by mesophyll
tissue of a leaf IS proportional to the stomatal conductance (W1nner and Mooney, 1980),
diffusion of S02 into cell sap is a function of its water solubility, wh1ch ts fairly high
(Table-2.4).
Chemical reactions leading to leaf injury or absorption of S from S02 into the metabolic
stream have been described variously A widely accepted view is that S02 inside leaf gets
oxidised to S03. which in turn combines with water to form sulphuric ac1d.
The adverse effect of SOz on chlorophyll pigments leading to reduced productivity may be
considered under two cellular pH conditions At pH 3 5 the free H ions generated in
2.2 to
2
the cell from the splitting of H2S03 into sol and H". dtsplace the Mg ' from chlorophyll
molecule to degrade the latter into phaeophytin molecule, a non-photo- synthetic brown
pigment (Rao and Le Blanc. 1 966) At pH above 3.5, SOz affects the thylacotd membrane
of chloroplast by causing oxidation of carotenoids through generation of 02· from HSo3·
(Pieser and Yang. 1978) The unprotected chlorophyll molecule then IS oxtd1sed and lost
Free Oz. also tncreases level of H,02 1n the presence of SOD (superoxide dismutase),
leading to ox1dat1on of chlorophyll molecules. S02 IS also considered to reduce
chlorophyllide synthesis, through 1ts effects on ascorbic acid (Keller and Schwager. 1977).
Initial v1sual symptom of foliar 1njury caused by S02 is the formation of marginal and
interveinal chlorotic, bronzed or necrotic areas. start1ng with dark green or dull colouration,
w1th water-soaked appearance. NecrotiC areas e>eend and are v1s·ble on both epidermal
surfaces Older leaves having just attained full expansion are the most susceptible ones.
NOx : Three types of ox1des of nitrogen are collectively referred as NOx. These are N20
1N1trous oxide). NO (N1tnc oxide) and N02 (N1trogen dioxide). H1gh temperature reactions
in the presence of a1r lead to oxidation of atmosphere nttrogen. g1ving rise to oxides of
nitrogen Whereas background level of N02 1s only 1 .9 �tg m·3 that of NzO may be as high
as 450 �tg m-3 (Urone. 1976).
On absorption in leaves across stomatal apertures, NOx react on cell walls to form HNOz
and HN03, the former being more toxic pH drop and reaction of acids with unsaturated
compounds causing 1somerizat1on and free radical formation. lead to toxicity. Nitrosamines
5
are formed, cellular pH is lowered and acetate metabolism inhibited, lead1ng to growth
suppress1on (Mudd, 1 973 Taylor et al 1975: Zeevart 1976).
InJury symptoms are visible as d1scoloured spots of gray-green or light brown colour
Bleached or necrotic spots 1n interveinal areas of leaves IS a later development, appeanng
as stripes 1n advanced stages.
NO.. are not considered to be of major concern as phyto- tox1cants since several stud1es
suggest that levels suffic1ent to InJure vegetat1on would be far above known or monitored
amb1ent levels. Importance of NO,. 1n the atmosphere however, lies 1n the fact that they are
the raw matenal for format1on of Important secondary pollutants like OJ Smog and PAN.
Fluonde enters leaf through stomata. and from the intercellular spaces of mesophyll,
diffuses into vascular t1ssues. It moves along transpiration stream towards leaf t1ps and
marg1ns where accumulation takes place Due to absence of v1sible InJury. such
accumu1at1on goes unnoticed for long n some sensitive plants. injured t1ssues in t1ps and
marg ns have shown values of 50-200 ppm HF concentrations. In tolerant spec1es vis1ble
inJury was not noticeable even at 500 ppm concentration level.
Chlorosis of leaf tip is the f1rst visible 1njury. Wrth increasing accumulat1on. the InJury may
extend along margins and 1nwards along veins. Injured brown or dead areas of leaves
become necrotiC. lead1ng to premature leaf fall (Weinste1n, 1 977)
CO and CO� : Incomplete combustion of fuels 1nclud1ng fossil fuels. leads to formation of
CO. Automobtles are the commonest source of CO 011 refineries metallurgical
operatrons etc are other sources of significance. Annual global tnput of this tox1c gas IS
est1mated to be 6 billion tons (Se11er. 1974).
CO is not a phytotoxic gas Green plants function as natural sinks for CO (or its read=ly
converted form, COz). Sou and oceans are also vast s1nks for the gas S nee CO gets
gradufly oxid;zed to COz. whtch is absorbed and utt' zed by plants on 1arge scale, and since
increase 1n COz concentration from 1ts normal 300 ppm to htgher levels are still non-toxic to
plants CO or COz are not treated as senous phyto-toxtcants
NH3 : Oecornpos t1on of organ1c matter of different orig1ns including excreta fertilizer
breakdown, coal combust1on and releases from tndustnes lead to pollution by ammonia.
Though localized, amb1ent concentrations of 20 pphm have been recorded (Cholak. 1 952).
6
Blackening and bleaching of leaves, spotting, brown lesions between ve1ns and colour
change of fruits, are symptoms of injury by ammonia.
Exposure of sensitive plants like radish and alfalfa to 10 pphm of Cl2 for 2 hours, showed
foliar Injury, while plants like tobacco Zinnia corn and sunflower were injured when
exposed to the same concentration for 4 hours (Brennan, et. al., 1 965). Chlorosis, stipple,
necrosis and reddening were the types of injuries observed on foliage of plants exposed.
Hydrocarbons (HC) : Organic compounds containing carbon and hydrogen are emitted
H2S : Pattern of 1njury caused by th1s pollutant IS different from that by others. Necrosis and
death of young tissues 1s reported rather than that of old t1ssues. Tips of leaves are also
inJured. Injury at chronic levels of the pollutant is unknown. toxic levels are found to be
much above the known ambient concentratrons of the gas. The most sensitive plant
species have been reported to be injured at 86 ppm (12 x 104 ug m 1 after 5 hours
exposure (US EPA, 19 76).
SPM :Suspended particulate matter 1s released during metal refining, by foundries, cement
factories and as fly ash from thermal power plants. m1ne tatlings. etc and autoexhausts.
Heav1er part1cles. above 1 u d1ameter s1ze tend to settle while finer and lighter part1cles
remain airborne for days together and travel for hundreds of kilometers over w1nd currents.
Chem1cal dusts are more lnJunous and under humid condrt1ons. the1r phytotoXICity
increases further (Chaphekar. 1972).
Finer part1cles clog stomatal apertures and prevent gaseous exchange by leaves. Phys1cal
weight on foliage and a film of dust causing rise in leaf surface temperature are other
hazardous situations for plants. Dust part1cles deposited on st1gmatic surfaces of flowers
reduce effective pollination and hence fru1t yields.
Dust is captured by leaves of plants, leaf epidermal outgrowths like ha1rs and scales, hairy
ax1ls of stems and leaf bases. etc. (Das, 1981)
Mixtures of pollutants : In India as 1n several other places many industnes are located
in the same region and the air is a m1x of several po1lutant gases A large number of
studies Indicate synerg1st1c nature of pollutant m1xture effects on plants It 1s practically
7
impossible to assess the pollutant removaJ efficiency of plants under the numerous possible
-comb1nat1ons of mixing proportions of different pollutants detected. Bear1ng 1n m1nd
however the synergistic nature of the reactions •t is again emphasized that the
concentrations of amb1ent pollutants have to be well below the threshold limits of tolerance
(e.g. as crted 1n Table 2 5). for plants to tunct1on effectively for removal of pollutants.
The sensit1ve plants indicate injury symptoms due to a1r pollution. that are specific to the
type of pollutant. Ranges of dosage of the pollutants to wh1ch sens1t1ve plants respond, are
given in Table-2.5.
A large amount of research has been carried out in India, during the last two decades.
Compilation of this work has been presented in a comprehensive Table 2.6.
Within their limits of tolerance, plants absorb pollutants and to that extent remove the same
from ambient air The plant uptake of air pollutants as investigated by Hrll (1971) and
Bennett and Hill (1973, 1975), appeared to follow the follow1ng order
The rate of pollutant removal is found to 1ncrease linearly as the concentration of the
pollutant increased over the ranges of concentration that are encountered in ambient air
and which are low enough not to cause stomatal closure Pollutants are absorbed most
efficiently by plant foliage near the canopy surface where diffus1on process is h1gh due to
favourable light conditions An example of the magnitude of absorption of pollutants by
seedlings of plants 1s given 1n Table-2.7.
Sm1th {1981) has g1ven est1mated abbsorption of gaseous pollutants by dry soil and
vegetative surfaces to emphasize relative differences in their efficiencies to remove
pollutants (Table 2.8) He also assessed pollutants removal efficiency of a 'Model Forest
Hectare' developed by US EPA in which composition of plant species is as follows:
Maple 69 36.8 2 54 X 10
Oak 69 36.1 250x 103
Poplar 69 52 5 3.63 X 103
Linden 69 23.0 1.56x 103
Birch 69 27 2 1.88 X 103
Pines 700 42 2.90 X 103
Th1s hectare. cons1sting of 5-year old plants, 1s est1mated to remove gaseous pollutants
annually in quantities as :
03- 9.6 x 104, S02- 748, CO - 2.2, NOx- 0.38 and PAN - 0.17 (all values 1n tonnes).
8
Fig. 2.1 Summary diagramatic representation of the effects of sulphur dioxide on plants
Sulph f dioxide
I I
High level Low level Acid rain
A T
ppllutants. diseases of soil
I I
Yteld No Yteld Yteld Yteld
reduction effect increases increases reduction
Visible
9
Table 2.2 Quantities of SOz liberated during different types of industrial activities
F1rewood 20
Coal 6 to 15.0
011 6 to 7 6
LPG 0.0002 to 0 008
Natural Gas 02
Petrol 5. 4
D1esel 5 to 6
co 0.02
NO 0.05
COz 0.88
PAN
03 026
NOz Decomposes
Clz 230
SOz 39 40
HF 446
1. Sulphur dioxide 0.70 ppm (1820 ��g m·) for 1 hr.; lnterve1nal necrotic
0. 1 8 ppm (468 ug m 1 for 8 hr., blotches
0 008-0.017 ppm (21!44 �,g m ) Red brown dieback o r
for growrng season (Ltnzon 1978) banding in p1nes.
7. Hydrogen sulphide 1 oo ppm (14 x 1 o'' 1,g rn 3) for 5 hr.; lntervelnal necrotic
(U.S. Environ. Protection Agency blotches
1 976) Distal necrosis in p1nes.
9. Ozone 0 20 - 0.30 ppm (392 - 588 11g rn :�) Upper surface flecks
for 2-4 h r , Some con1fers 0 08 ppm Distal necrosis and
(157 u9 rn 1) for 1 2- 1 3 hr stunted needles rn
(National Academy of Scrences 1977b) pines.
11
Table 2.6 Compilation of research in India indicating sensitive and tolerant species,
with reference to industrial pollutants
(Contd.....)
12
Table 2.6 (Contd.....)
(Contd.....)
13
Table 2.6 ·contd.....)
(Contd.... )
.
14
Table 2.6 (Contd..... )
(Contd.... )
.
15
Table 2.6 (Contd..... )
Cassia siamea
Delonix regia
Shorea robusta
Acacia arabica 802,
fly-ash
Acacia catechu
Zizyphus sp.
(Contd.....)
16
Table 2.6 (Contd .
. .. .}
l 7
Table 2.7 Absorption of S02 by seedlings fumigated at 1.0 ppm for 1 hour in a
controlled chamber (27 ± 1°C, 51 ± 7 R.H., 1 300 fc)
Table 2.8 Guesstimated gaseous pollutant flux rates for dry soil and vegetative
surfaces
18
CHAPTER-3
Introduction
The a1r pollutton emrtted by Industries settles on the ground and vegetation of surrounding
area The plants Interact wrth both gaseous and particulate pollutants and to great extent
absorb them and thus, remove them from the atmosphere. This pollution removal property
of the plants has been known for a long time. For several years tree planting has been
promoted by USSR scientists and city planners for the purpose of reducing ground level air
pollution Many sc1ent1sts have also suggested the use of green belt. wh1ch 1s rows of trees
for reducing the pollution originating from industnal operations. (Kalyushnyi et al . 1952.
Flemm1ng 1 967· Hanson and Throne 1970; Warren 1 973, Ganguly 1976)
Mechanism of Deposition
Interaction of pollution w1th vegetation has always been expressed by a common parameter
known as the deposition velocity of the pollutants. The concept of deposition velocity has
also been widely used in agnculture to calculate the dose of fertilizer and pesticides for crop
growth and its protection. The deposition velocity is defined as follows ·
,
It has dimension of Ms_ (see McMahan & Dentson 1 979 for values of Vd for commonly
released pollutants).
Sedtmentatton usually results tn the deposrt1on of the particles on the upper surfaces of the
plant and IS most Important for large parttcles Sedtmentation velocrty varies with particle
density shape etc. Impaction occurs when atr flows past an obstacle and the air stream
d,v1des The efficiency of collection v1a 1mpact1on increases with decreasing d1ameter of the
19
collection obstacle and Increasing diameter of the particle. It has been suggested that
tmpaction is the principal means of deposition tf particle size is of the order of tens of
m1crometers (um) or greater obstacle stze is of the order of centimeters or less, approach
velocity IS of the order of meters per second or more and the collecting surface rs wet,
st1cky. haJry, or otherw1se retentive For parttcles of d1mens1on 1 -5 1,m, impact1on is not
effic1ent and interception by fine hairs on vegetation is possibly the most efficient retentive
mechanism. The efficiency of washout of particles by rain IS high for particles approximately
of 20-30 1,m size. The capturing efficiency of rain drops falls off very sharply for particles of
5 um or less.
The hypothesis that trees are important particulate sinks 1s supported by evidence obtained
from stud1es dealing with diverse particulates Including radioactive. trace element, pollen
spore, salt. prec1p1tat1on dust and other unspec1f1ed particles. So far as gaseous pollutants
are concerned, substantial evidence is available to support the fact that plants in general
and trees in particular funct1on as sinks for gaseous pollutants. The gaseous pollutants are
transferred from the atmosphere to vegetation by the combined forces of diffus1on and
flowtng air movement Once 1n contact w1th the plants. gases may be bound or d1ssolved
The interaction of these vanous s1zed particles and gaseous pollutants with exceedingly
diverse vegetative surfaces under conditions of extremely variable microclimate and
pollutant source characteristiCS suggests an enormously complex relationship. These
studies have expressed uptake of pollutton by plants in terms of deposition velocity. Thts
concept though su1table for esttmation of loss of pollutant over a vegetation surface, is hard
to apply for a case when pollut1on travels horizontally through a canopy (e.g. through green
belt). The mathematical models so far available 1n literature for green belt are applicable
only for ground level air pollution source. The only theoretical model available for estimation
of depletion of pollutants by green belt is developed by Kapoor and Gupta (1 984). This
model expresses pollution attenuation factor At of green belt in terms of different
dimensions and characteristics of green belt under various meteorological conditions. The
model IS described tn next sect1on.
Mathematical model for the estimation of pollution attenuation by a green belt exits only for
a ground level pollution source. Such ground level releases can occur by break in storage
vessels and under various conditions such as follows :
20
(ii) Elevated releases reaching ground level due to
- stack downwash due to low dtscharge velocity
- effect of obstacles upstream
- short stack near a long flat building
- downwash tn the wake of a clift
- fumtgation condittons due to breaking up of ground based temperature inversion.
The green belt model introduces the concept of a potlutton attenuation coefficient for
estimating the removal of pollutant whtle passrng through the green belt. The formulatton of
potlutton attenuatron coefficient makes use of parameters such as leaf area density of the
tree plantation, deposition velocity of the pollutant on leaf surface and wind speed tn the
green belt The model giVes the dependence of the pollution attenuatron factor Ar of a green
belt on various physical parameters of the green belt such as its height, width, distance
from the pollution source and on atmospheric stability conditions and hence the model can
be used to optimise the design of the green belt 1n obtaining the desired degree of
attenuation of the pollution around an rndustry.
The detatls of the model, rts application aspects includi n g tts llmrtat1ons are given in following
sections
ax = a c e · x --- ---
- ----- -----
---- --- {1)
1
Where Vd = dry deposition velocity of pollutant for vegetative canopy, ms·
Uc = average wind speed through the green belt. ms· 1
21
2 3
Pt = average foliage surface area density of a single tree, of green belt m m-
K = Pc I Pt
2 3
Pc = ayerage foliage surface area density of the green belt, m m-
The constant K depends on the spacing of the trees 1n the green belt and is introduced to
consider the overall foliage surface area density. For an ideal green belt, the value of K will
be unrty when such a green belt has the same foliage surface area density as that of a
single tree.
The above formulation of as given in equation (2) has been tested by Kapoor and Gupta
(1984) using experimental data and is discussed here. For th1s testing, it is necessary to
demonstrate that the value of as obtained by using equation (2) compares reasonably
well with the value estimated using equation (1) for the same set of f1eld measurements.
The study conducted by Raynor et al., (1 974) regarding the measurements of variation of
mass flux of pollens (hav1ng s1ze 20 um) with distance provides such a comparison. The
average value of obtained from the experiments conducted by Raynor et al using equation
1
(1} is 0.0187 + 0.0047 m· and for the same set of experiments, the value of calculated by
A schematic diagram of the green belt around a pollution source I.e. an industry is g1ven in
Fig. 3. 1 .
The pollution attenuation factor Af g1ves the effectiveness of a green belt in attenuating
pollution. The attenuat1on factor Af has been defined as the rat1o of mass flux of pollutant
reaching a given d1stance in the absence of green belt to the mass flux of pollutant reaching
the same distance 1n the presence of the green belt. Mathematically,
OwB
Af = ----------------
-
---
--
(3)
-------
08
Where, QwB = Mass flux of pollutant reaching at distance in the absence of a
green belt
QB = Mass flux of pollutant reaching at the same distance in the
presence of the green belt
The value of pollut1on attenuation factor. Af is calculated in the following five stages.
-
STAGE-1
The depletion of pollutant, because of the dry deposition over the travel distance upto the
inner edge (X1) of the green belt and above it (�) is obtained using the source depletion
model (Chamberlain, 1 970). The mass flux OA reaching the location A (as per figure 3. 1 )
can be evaluated by
22
ENVIS Centre, CPCB (www.cpcbenvis.nic.in)
Fig. 3.1 Diagram of a Green Belt Around a Ground Level Pollution Source Illustrating
the Parameters of Pollution Attenuation Model
23
---------------------------------------
OA OoFD (4)
Where Qo IS the mass flux at the source. and, the FD is the deposition correct1on factor
which IS g·ven by
Value of FD can be obta1ned e1ther from equation (5 ) or from table no. 3 1 (reproduced from
Hukkoo et al 1 988), wh1ch g1ves the value of FDo for the rat1o of Vd/U = 0 01 at vanous
distances under different atmospheric stability condittons). The value of FD for any rat1o of
The value of QA can thus be obta.ned ..t11th the help of equat1ons (4) and (6).
STAGE-2 :
The matenal QA is divided 1nto two parts namely Qc which passes through the green belt
and OAA wh1ch passes over it (see figure-3. 1) The proport1on 1n wh1ch QA is divided into
these two parts depends upon the he1ght of trees d1stance X1 and atmospheric conditions
The calculation of Qc involves the effective height he of the inc1dent air steam. If the he1ght
of the green belt is h, then he is g1ven by
Where U(z) is the wind speed at height Z prof1le outside the green belt and Uc is average
wind speed through green belt The methodology for calculation of h.., 1s g1ven by Kapoor
and Gupta (1 984) and values of he for different he1ghts of trees under different atmosphenc
stability conditions reproduced from that work 1s g1ven here 1n Table 3 2. The quantity Qc is
then evaluated as follows
Oc = OA xu dy dz ----------------------· (8)
X (X. o, o) the centre line ground level concentration at down w1nd travel distance X
24
Where, y and z are dtsperston coeff1c1ents and are 1n fact the standard deviations of
concentration ciistnbut1on 1n crosswind and verttcal directions respectively at down wind
distance X. This is a standard atmosphenc dispersion equation. More information on this
and other atmospheric disperston models can be obtained from Sutton, 1 953; IAEA
publications 1 980; 1 986. Equatton (8) after substitution and carrying out the integration
over y and z, can be wntten as,
Oc = OA -------------- {1 0)
Where
--- ---
{11)
The value of the mass flux which passes over the green belt. QAA can thus be obtatned
us1ng the following relation
QAA =
QA - QC -------------------------------------
{1 2)
Stage-3
The material Qc 1s depleted tn the green belt according to the relation gNen in equat1on (1}.
Value of for the pollutant and applicable to the green belt can be obta�ned using equatton
(2)
Thus.
Osc =
Qc exp ( - �) -----------------------
{1 3)
Where � is the width of the green belt. The amount of material OAA wh1ch passes over
the green belt w11l also get depleted to mass flux OsA by loss of material at the top surface
of the green belt. The value of OBA IS evaluated for travel distance � from (4) and {6) by
replac1ng Qo by QAA
25
Stage-4 :
T he total mass flux QB reaching at the outer edge of the green belt (location B) is thus
g1ven by
QB = QBC + QBA ------------------ {14)
--
Stage-S :
In the absence of a green belt, the mass flux QWB reaching the distance x, T N is
evaluated us1ng equat1ons (4) and (6). The attenuation factor Af of the green bett at
locat1on B 1s then obta1ned us1ng equat1on (3).
Comb1n1ng all the five above stages and after do1ng the necessary mathematical
FD (Xt+�) = depos1t1on correction factor for travel over distance (X1 +X:?)
FD (Xt) = depos t1on correct.on factor for travel over distance Xt
FD(X:? = deposition correct1on factor for travel over distance N
In prev1ous section, a model for the development of g een belt around pollution sources for
reduc1ng pollutton levels has been desc 1bed which can be used for the optimization of the
physical dimens1ons of the green belt This optim1zat1on, methodology 1s further described
below.
It may be re1terated that the model incorporates follow1ng parameters for the computation of
pollution attenuation factor, Af : (i) physical charactenst1cs of the green belt e g distance
from the source. width, hetght and leaf surface area dens1ty; (u) aerodynam1c properties
eg w1nd speed through greer'\ belt and effect1ve he1ght of the incident aJr stream. (1ii)
deposition velocity of the pollutant. and (iv) atmospheric stability conditions The est1mated
value of attenuation factor. Af for different com binations of green belt parameters i e.
Xt X:? h. ,U under d1fferent atmospheroc stability cond1t1ons can be used to opt1m1se the
des1gn of the green belt. Tfle parameters x�.X2 and are cntical for opt1m1satton The
cho1ce of rema1mng paraweters (h and U) 1s restncted and dec1ded mostly by the local
·• conditions For examp'e rt 1s preferable to have taller trees w1th h1gh foliage densrty, but
� trees of he1ght greater than 20 meters are not common at most sites.
26
In optimising the phys1cal dimensions of green belt for a ground level source as described
above, factors like; the vanat1on in the density of tree plantat1on and interfacial mass
exchange through upper boundary of green belt were not considered. Since, these factors
also play important role 1n effectiveness of green belt, these are d1scussed 1n next sect1on.
The effect of density of tree plantation on attenuation factor has been dealt 1n details by
Gupta and Kapoor (1 992) It has been found out that the value of attenuation factor
increases w1th increase in the density of tree plantation ('K' of equation (2)] upto an
opt1mum value of K but decreases therea-fter for Xz = 4 Km However thts concept IS true
only when interfactal mass exchange of pollutants through upper boundary of the green belt
is not considered
1
500 2. 1 7 X 10 0.9 1 .87 X 101 0.9 -
1
1 000 6 64 X 10 07 3. 1 0 X 1 01 0.8
2000 2.1 3 X 102 0.6 3 84 X 101 0.7
3000 5 87 X 102 0.5 4.67 X 101 07
3
4000 1 46 X 1 0 0.4 5 67 X 101 0.7
5000 3.76 X 1 0:? 04 . 6.88 X 101 0.7
27
Effect of other parameters
As an 1llustrat1ve example for optimisation. values of Af are calculated for a few selected
values of parameters and the results are discussed here The calculations are performed
1
for removal of particulate matenal by a green belt for 0.02m· and tree he1ght varying from
=
1 0-30m Amongst the other parameters. value of Vdx, and Vd><2 are assumed to be equal
1
and ass1gned a value of 0 0156 ms· (wh1ch is the grav1tat1onal settling rate for 20 um
part1cle s1ze) S1m1larly Ux, and U><2 are assumed to be the same as U(1 0). The values of
U(1 0) & UC used 1n these calcu at1ons under different atmosphenc stability condt1ons are
g1ven be,ow
Stab1llty condition A B c 0 E F
Uto 2 2 4 55 3 2
uc 0.5 05 0 75 1.0 0.6 0.5
Unstable condition, A
The variation of Af With x, for a f1xed value of � = 500 m and w1th X? for a f1xed value of X1
-: 50 m for stab1hty cond1tlon A are g1ven rn figures 3 2 and 3 3 respectively It can be seen
from f1gure 3 2 that the value of Af 1s close to un1ty even for taller trees 1f x, - 300m or
more. Reduc1ng the value of X1 1s of advantage only rn the case of tall trees and a value of
Af = 6 1s obtained for 30m tall tree 1f X· 1s kept at 50 m.
Figure 3.2 shows that the value of Af remains constant beyond a certa1n value of �
depending on the he1ght of trees Th1s suggests that increasing the value of X? more than
300m does not serve any useful purpose for stab1hty cond1tion A for h = 1 0 to 30 m.
Stable condition, F
F1gures 3 4 and 3.5 which are s-m1lar to f1gure 3.1 and 3.2 present the variation of Af 1n
4
stab1hty cond1tion F The value of Af. as h1gh as 1 0 , is atta1nable 1n this stability condition
(see fig - 3. 4) for trees of he1ght 1 5m or more for � = 500m and x, 50m. Th1s f1gure also
-
shows that 1f the tree he1ght 1s more than 25m the value of Af 1s of the same order even if
x, 1s 1ncreased to 1 OOm F1gure 3. 5 shows that the value of Af 1ncreases With X? upto a
certain d1stance and thereafter the 1ncrease 1n Af 1s not sign1hcant. Th1s feature of more or
less constant value of Af beyond a certaJn d1stance helps 1n est1mat ng the opt1mum width
of the green belt. For the cond1t1ons cons1dered 1n th's example, th.s d1stance is 500, 700
and 1 700m for tree he ghts 1 0. 1 5 and 30 m repectively.
28
10
6
�
0::
0
1- I.
u
<
u.
z
Q
1-
<
:::>
z
UJ 2
1-
1-
<
h = 30
� 6
0::
0
1- h :25
u
<
u. I.
z h = 20
g
�
:::>
3
z h = 15
UJ
I
I-
< h = 10
2
1 ��-�-.-�-�-r-r-���
0 200 1.00 600 800 1000
x 2 (m)
Fig. 3.3 Attenuation Factor as a Function of Width of GrC'en Belt and the Tree Height,
for X,=SOm, ).. = 0.02m"1 and for Atmospheric Stability Condition A
29
105
' '
STABILITY CONDITION F
�
10
a:
0
u 103
....
<
u.
z
0
� 2
< 10
::::>
z
UJ
....
....
<
101
°��--��-T--r-�-�-.�
10
h = 20.25 . 30
a:
0
....
u
<
u.
z
Q
....
<
::::>
z
UJ h : 10
....
....
<
x2 lml
Fig. 3.5 For Atmospheric Stability Condition F
30
Variation in other Atmospheric stability conditions
The above discuss1on pertains to only two extreme atmospheric stability conditions The
values of Af for intermediate stability conditions lie mostly in between the two extreme
values (Table-34) . It can be seen from th1s Table that, for 1 5m high trees, advantage
gained by increasing the width of green belt from 500 to 1 ooom is not significant in all the
stability cond1t1ons except for F where Af of more than 1 04 is obta1ned for x, = 50m.
However, 1f the tree he1ght 1s Increased to 30m an attenuation factor of greater than 1 04 is
possible 1n stability category E also for a green belt Width of 1 aoam, whereas, in stab1hty
category D. the attenuation factor obtained is 600. This suggests that a green belt
consisting of tall trees around an ndustry could provide Significant attenuation factors for
about 50% of the time 1n a year for the case considered here.
The green belt model developed here IS applied to 1:\vo different cases for study1ng the
usefulness of green belt 1n reducing the 1mpact of pollution Out of the two applications, one
is a source oriented approach and the other is receptor oriented approach. In the source
onented approach. green belt of su1table dimens1on 1s planted around a source emitting
pollut1on and studtes are made to know the usefu ness of green belt ·n reducing the effects
of pollution for ground level releases. In the second case i.e . . 1n the receptor onented
approach green belt of suitable dimension ts planted around an ObJeCt wh1ch 1s getttng
deteriorated or likely to get detenorated as a result of pollution in and around it and studies
made to protect 1t aga1nst pollution. These two examples are dealt within a ltttle more detail
1n the follow1ng paragraphs
A nuclear power reactor surrounded by a su tably designed green belt prov1des an example
of the source onented approach.
Gupta and Kapoor (1 985) analysed the consequences of a hypothetical reactor accident. in
which a large cold, ground level release of rad1oact1ve nuclides takes place in the
presence of a suitably des1gned green beit around a nuclear power plant. The release of
54
radionuclides from a 1OOOMWe light water reactor was considered These radionuchdes
fall ,nto two ma1n categones part1culates and noble gases The deposition velocity on
31
vegetation for particulates was taken as 0.01 ms·1 and zero for noble gases (being inert in
nature) . The calculations considered the build1ng wake effect (effect of stagnation of
pollutants and subsequent dilution owing to alignment of surrounding structures which give
rise to eddy currents) and radio - active decay as well as deposition of radionuclides in the
green belt.
The radiological consequences were calculated in terms of early and continued mortalities.
The radiatJon dose to four important body organs (viz. thyroid, lung, gastrointestinal tract.
and bone marrow) of persons staying up to 1 00 kms from the reactor were calculated under
different atmospheric stability categones. For calculation of early and continued mortality by
the effect of radiation dose the dose - mortality cntena of WASH 1400 (1 975) were
adopted.
The reactor accident consequences were calculated without a green belt and compared
with the corresponding consequences when the reactor is surrounded by a 1 5m high
green belt of 1 500m width. The inner boundary of the green belt was taken as 50 m away
from the reactor. Besides the decrease in mortality probability, the impact of green belt on
(0 The early and cont1nued mortalities are practically eliminated beyond a distance of
3km
(ii) The relocation of populat1on to protect it from long term external exposure from
ground contamination may not be reqUired
(iii) The supply of food from uncontaminated areas may be needed for populations living
between 2 to 20 km only in the affected sector.
Since the siting requirements in many countries require exclusion distance ranging from 0.5
to 3 km from the reactor, it should be possible to develop a green belt around nuclear
power plants that will substantially reduce the consequences of the accidents. The green
belt would thus serve as another barner between the nuclear power plant and the public
and would strengthen the defense-in -depth philosophy adopted in the design of nuclear
power plants. The assured availability of a su1tably des1gned green belt throughout the year
could also help in reducing the magnitude of emergency preparedness in the public domain
Mathematically both source and receptor oriented approach are the same, the only
difference between the two is the manner in which the green belt is planted. I n the source
oriented approach, the green belt 1s planted around the pollution source, whereas in the
receptor oriented approach the receptor IS protected aga1nst pollution by planting a green
belt around t
i . The case of protecting the T8J Mahal aga1nst a1r pollution by a green belt is
presented here as an example of receptor oriented approach.
The value of the pollution attenuation factor. Af IS computed for different atmospheric
32
stability conditions, different heights, widths of the green belt and also for varying distances
of green belt from the receptor. The results of the studies suggest that the green belt is
more effective in attenuating pollution in stable atmospheric stability conditions and for
smaller distance between source and green belt (X,). Increasing the height of trees is of
advantage in attenuating the pollution only for a smaller value of x,. Also, it is obseNed that
increasing the width of green belt beyond 200m does not significantly increase the value of
Af, for the range of x, considered in the study. In general, the study indicates that, the value
of Af in the case of Taj Mahal is much smaller than that obtained by a source oriented
approach. Significant values of Af occur only for nearby ground level pollution sources and
that also in stable atmospheric conditions.
Nomenclature
33
CHAPTER - 4
According to this scheme, there are 1 5 agro-climattc regions (Fig.4 1 ) . Each of these
Under National Agncultural Research Project (NARP), a 120 sub-zone map has been
prepared, based pnmarily on rainfall, existing cropping pattern and administrative units.
More recently, us1ng parameters such as physiography, so1ls. bioclimates and length of
grow1ng period, an agro-ecological map of the country (Fig. 4.4.) has been prepared. This
scheme recognizes 6 reg1ons, wh1ch are further d1v1ded into 20 sub-regions.
During the present work, the scheme suggested by the Planning Commission has been
adopted Appendix A g1ves the 1 5 agro-climatic zones and their 68 sub-zones, for which
details such as annual ra1nfall. climate, soil types and revenue districts covered by them,
are given.
It IS expected that user of th1s report refers to Appendix A, for ident1fy1ng and locating one's
area of concern, before proceed1ng further to the list of plants to be chosen for plantation
programme.
34
r·
/ ...... .,.../'
(,
(
1 5°0e
•
lAI(SHAO'MTP
SLANOS 0
'
LEGEND
t WESTERN HI�·�ALAYAN 9 'I'.ESTERN PLATEAU - H.LLS
2 EASTERN liiMALAYAN 10 SOUl HERN PLAREAU HILLS
3. LOWER GANGLIIC PLAlrJS 11. E A S T COSf PLAINS - HILLS
� M:ODLE GA:-.:GETIC >='LA '!S i2. 'NEST COST PLAINS - HILLS
5. UPPE� GANGETIC ?LAL"lS l3 Gu..ARAT PL AL'-45 - H·lL S
6 TRANS IYAilGETIC PL,\INS lf, WESTERN DRY REGION
., EASTERN PLATEAU HILL� 15 1nE ISLANDS REGIO'l
R CEWi<' PLATEt.U HL...S
35
ENVIS Centre, CPCB (www.cpcbenvis.nic.in)
lSIANDS
•
LAKSHADWE:EP • 0
4.
•
•
•
0
ANOAt�AII
AND
ll�COBAR
ISlANDS
-�
0
200 -���
L E G E N D <c.
� 20 - !C � =; 200 - 300
36
ENVIS Centre, CPCB (www.cpcbenvis.nic.in)
r "
.. ' ,:.
A�DI.'·W:
AKSf.lt.Jl'l E.f At (1
I:.LA'JDS NICOBAR
ISLANOS v
..
�,
SO!LS TYPES LEGEND
c. ] ALLUVIAL SOILS JlJillffioESERT SO c;
37
ENVIS Centre, CPCB (www.cpcbenvis.nic.in)
/
,J
/ \.. -
( 2
"')
l
\ 7 17
r· -..J I
("•.../
�
(�y I I'·
t. J
\ i
.j
38
CHAPTER - S
Dtscusston tn earher chapters indicate the nature of plant-air pollutant 1n•eract ons and
sensitiVIty tndtcated by plants. It also bnngs out the hmttations under which plants are to
funct1on as scavengers of aJr pollutants. Other limitations for growing plants are the climattc
condttions and sotl characters. Of these. the latter get modtfied when plants are culfvated
and grown under care, e g A standard horticultural practtce 1nvolves planting of saplings tn
ptts of substantial dtmensions. i.e. 1 m x 1 m x 1 m for btg trees and almost half of these
dtmenstons for smaller trees and shrubs The ptts are then ftlled with earth, sand silt and
manure tn pre-determined proportions Sapl·ngs planted in such prts are watered liberally.
The grow1ng plants are then cared for the f1rst three years, or for at least two years under
favourable condittons of climate and drainage Nutnents 1n p ts are supplemented and the
Whtle maktng chotce of plant spectes for cu ttvatton tn green belts, wetghtage has to be
gNen to the natural factor of bto-cltmate It IS also presumed that the selected plants w·-- be
grown as per normal horticultural (or forestry) practtce given above and authonttes
responstble for plantation. wtll also make adequa:e provtstons for wa�enn.; and protect.on
of the saplings.
For effecttve removal of pollutants. it ts necessary that ( 1 ) plants grow under condttions of
adequate nvtnttonal supply (for health and v1gour of growth) , (2) ab�enr�? of water stress
(to matntain openness of stomatal apertures and form of epidermal structures). and (3) are
well-exposed to atmospheric condtttons of light and breeze (i e. away from engtneenng
structures htnder.ng free flow of atr to matntain free tnteractton with gases.
Characters of plants tncludtng shapes of crowns (Fig.5-1) considered necessary for effecttng
absorptton of pollutant ��ses wd remo·.a of dust parttcles are as k.Jmvs
i) Tolerance tmvards po'lu�ants in quest,on. at concentrations, that are not too high to
be Instantaneously lethal).
39
d. Large number of stomatal apertures,
e. Stomata well-exposed On level w1th the general epidermal surface).
Note : All tolerant plants are not necessanly good for green belts. e.g Xerophytes with
sunken stomata can wrthstand pollution by avoidance but are poor absorbers of pollutants
Models for Attenuation Coefficients grven in chapter Three provide gu1delines for
posrtion1ng of plants with reference to particulate emiss1on source at ground level. Width of
the belt as presented by the model, may prove diffrcult for many 1ndustnes to attain, for one
or more reasons Hence. 1t becomes necessary to dec1de to have green belts in places
avatlable around the 1ndustry (source- onented plantatron) as well as around habitats
(receptor- onented plantation) Lists of plants g1ven rn Appendrx-C should be seen from
th1s angle for selection of spec1es combtnattons, 1n conformity with biochmatrc attributes of
respect1ve reg1ons.
Automobiles may be constdered as ground level, mob1le sources of pollutton of both types -
gaseous as well as part1culate Components of green belts on roadsides hence should
be both absorbers of gases as wen as of dust panicles. includrng even lead part1Cu1ates
Sorption of the latter type has been est1mated by Joshi {1990) who found high leve s of
lead sorption on ornamentals cultivated 1n traff1c 1slands. Choice of plants for roadside
(and traff1c island) plantations may be for conta1nment of pollut1on and for formatton of a
screen between traff1c and roads de res1dences. This choice of plants should include
shrubs of height 1 to 1 5 m and tree of 3 to 5 m height The 1nterm1x1ng of trees and
shrubs should be such that the foliage area dens1ty 1n vertical is almost un1form. A green
belt of such a des1gn and hav1ng a w1dth of 30 to 50 m will g1ve a pollution attenuation factor
of 2 to 1 00 for unsurtable to plants atmosphenc conditions Thus med1um- srzed and small
40
trees alternating with shrubs, aimed at sorption of particulates and gases, will be suitable
here Since safety of traffic is a maJor consideration, shrubs 1n traffic islands and along
road-dividers will have to be short enough to be below the eye-level of motorists. An ideal
des1gn for roadside green belt is presented in Fig.5.2. Still, it is necessary to emphasize
that each traffic island has its own character and needs to be studied separately for
design1ng 1ts green belt
A comprehensive list of plants recommended for green belts in the country is presented in
Appendix-B. The list consists of latin and common names of plants natural order to which
they belong and a number of relevant characteristic features. viz. tolerance or otherwise
towards air pollutJon habit. growth rate. flowering phenology, crown shape and approximate
surface area, etc.
The list is not complete in itself. Several more spec1es could be added to it. Criteria for
inclusion of species 1n this list include availability, knowledge about their horticultural
The shapes given here are for convenience only Many crown shapes range between
those identrfied following, viz Oblong-Round, Round-Spreading, Conical-Oblong, etc.
Some shapes also change with age or emiron mental stresses.
41
Fig.5.1 TREE CANOPY SHAPES
,
,
,
/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SPREADING CONICAL
lht.' shapes g1ven here ore 'or cor""entence only Many crown shapes range between those
v;z. Oolong-Rouro. Ro:nd - Sj)reading Contea -Oblong. etc. Some snapes also
iden!i!ieo fo!lo·.,ing
change w"h age or e:n··on "'lenla s;resses
42
ENVIS Centre, CPCB (www.cpcbenvis.nic.in)
�
w
_S HO�
PATHWAY
Introduction
Of all the sources of non-muscular energy. coal 1s the most abundant one (Tandon. 1 989).
Total stocks of coal .n India are 1 . 70 460.54 m on tons of whrch 49.376 28 million tons are
proven ones. Compared to oil and natura gas reserves (16,000 mt potential}. coal stocKs
are more long-last1ng and hence more reliable for exploitation. Hydropower 1s clean but
creates other envrronmental problems Ihrough construction of large impoundments
Moreover. most of the hydropower potent1a 1n ndra has already been harnessed, leav1ng
very little scope for further expansion to meet 1ncreas1ng demands of t1mes. Nuclear power
potential is vast. Presently meet1ng only a fract1on of countries energy needs Energy from
Of all the fossil fuels. coal 1s the dirt1est one All the way - from coal mine to ash dumps. this
fuel poses environmental hazards 1n one or another form Ac1dic drainage from coal rrunes
and p1t-head dumps are reported repeatedly by several workers (Bradshaw and Chadwick,
1 980) Fug1tive dust escap1ng along coal transporat1on channels, from p1t-heads to power
plants and at the t1me of load1ng - unloading operations has also been observed (Rao.
1 97 1 ) Once at power plants, every stage of coal utilization creates a different
environmental hazard
Coal arriving 1n power plant prem1ses 1s t1pped from railway wagons or from conveyors. The
t1pp1ng and storage areas are the ones where fung1t1ve coal-dust escapes 1n the
immded1ate neighbourhood, especially when these operations take place in the open.
under dryweather cond1t1ons
Crush1ng of coal and conveyance of nne coal to furances 1s the next stage of fungitive dust
em1ss1on. Combust1on of coal for energy production then takes place, where generation of
ash and pollutant gases takes place. A substantial amount of energy also escapes at the
same t1me. Under the present technoiog•ca scenar o a large proport1on of all the three are
captured and sought to be nullif1ed. detoxr" ed or ameliorated, from environmental point of
vtew. Considering the magn1tude of energy production however. even small proportion of
the pollutant output proves to be a maJor environmental hazard. e.g. A 500 MW TPP usrng
lnd1an coal (0.5% S. 40% mineral matter) generates 3537 tons of ash. 76 tons of S02,
every day of 1ts full capac1ty working Pollut1on abatement measures of good capac1t1es
(99 8% in respect of dust capture) st1ll permt around 884 g S02 and 66 g dust to emit from
the high stack. every second Ash captured before em1ss1on from stacks is deposrted in
pns valleys or even on flat grounds. It finds ·ts way 1n a1r by wtnd eros on and in water
bodres by surface run off. Where deposited, the :and by 1tself is unft for any primary
production process.
44
Covering of ash dumps
The large proportion of ash (40-47�o 1n Indian coals) 1s conveyed to deposition areas 1n
pipelines in the form of slurry Rece1v1ng grounds are valleys. flat-lands or pits dug for the
purpose. On decantation. or after infiltration of water 1nto the ground, the ash stands
exposed to elements - winds and rains. Ash gets blown on winds to get deposited
downwind on croplands or on other types of vegetation, smother plants and affects yields
(Rao. 1 97 1 ; Bradshaw and Chadwick, 1 980) Ash earned by run - off water forms
sed1ments in nearby waterways causing turbidity problems for aquatic organisms. reduces
water quality for drinking or even for irngatton Cases of accumulation of toxic heavy
metals in sediments of nvers are also reported (Evans and Ge1sey. 1 979) Stabilization of
ash deposits. hence. is always an urgent necessity.
Examples of successful stabilization of ash dumps and covering the same with plants can
be c1ted (Bradshaw and Chadwick, 1 980}. Use of stabilized grounds formed by ash
deposits for agncuttural production has also been done.
Fly ash is deficrent in plant nutrients like n1trogen and sometimes phosphorus and other
minerals and contains toxic metals hke copper. cadmrum. cobalt chromrum manganese.
molybdenum mckel lead, z1nc and boron (Tables 6 1 and 6.2). Amendment of ash with
nutnents and agents to arrest toxicants are essent1al for covering it with plants Some
suitable and rnexpens1ve SOil additi\<es are given 1n Table 6.3 along w1th the1r properties.
Nutnent contents of some commonly used orgamc manures are given in Table 6. 4.
Mixing of farmyard manure (FYM) in 1 :4 proportion should serve well as was found with
zinc mrne tailings {Chaphekar, et al . 1 986). For growing grasses this mrx need be 1n the
top soli (upto 1 5 em) only, while for tree saplings. pits of suitable dimensions (60x60x60 or
90x90x90 em) are reqUired wtth stm1lar m1xtures Watering reg1mes depend upon local
climatiC conditions, though 1n 1nmal stages regular watering - da1ly for grass and 2-3 times a
week for trees 1s a must
45
Nothing compares favourably with the capacity of carpet form1ng grasses 1n holding soil rn
its place, e.g. Cynodon dactylon has conservation value index (CVI) of 94°·
o (Ambasht,
1 970). Cultivation of grasses with spreading habrt stabilzes the ash surface effectively.
Grasses with hrgh turnover rate of shoots contribute subtantially to the organic enrichment
of the otherwise nutrient-poor silty ash. Weathered ash is reported to be substantially less
tox1c than the freshly deposited ash (Bradshaw & Chedwick, 1 980). Cultivation of
herbaceous legumes enriches the substratum with nitrogen. The stabilized ash then forms
suitable ground for other planned ut11ties like woodland, fuel or fru1t-yield1ng trees. etc.
Tables 6.5 (Jha & S1ngh, 1 994) and 6.6 give lists of plants considered suitable for growing
on ash dumps for their stabilization. The plants listed are grasses, legumes and MPTs
(multi-purpose trees) forming a comprehensive agroforestry system. Possibilities for
development of different amenities are numerous, including parks for recreational or
educational purposes. Testrng of edible parts of plants for toxic heavy metal cotents would
help decision-mak1ng for deriving agricultural yield from stabilized ash dumps. Experience
derived after practicing stabilization efforts along suggested lines would prove valuable as
gu1delines for further efforts.
There are several variables II"' the env1ronment and the types 1n nputs lead1ng to pollut1on
stress. MaJor vanation 1s 1n the set of biogeographical conditions - especrally climate and
topography as a result of wh1cn correspondrng modrf1cat1ons 1n planting strateg1es become
necessary. A large variety of local (climat1cally adapted) plant species need to be tried in
different regions of the country. In case of failure of any of the specres to respond as
expected. a thorough investiigation (even post- mortern) into the causes of failures. is called
for. Such invest1gatrons provide gurdeltnes for correct1ve measures and modifications in
plans.
S1 51.94 Co 21
Na 0 49 Ni 86
K 0.60 Cu 68
Mg 0.29 Mo 50
Ca 1 .38 Zn 72
Fe 6.13 Cd 5
AI 23.94 As 36
p 0.22
Coal Ry Ash
Na 300 1 300
K 2075 1 8275
La 47 6 238
Ce 30 2 145
Hg 1 1 .0 48
Pb 1 8 8.1
Th 5.3 25
Cr 62 8 404
Hf 7.1 32 6
(a) While seed1ng. (b) for eros1on control, (c) around already established plants.
47
Table 6.4 Nutrient contents of some types of organic manures
N P K
Acacra catechu
Acacta ntlotica
Acatca tortihs
Alb1Z1a lebbecl<
AlbiZia procera
Azadtrachta rndtca
Casuanna equtsetitolla
Oa!bergia sissoo
Oendrocalamus strictus
D1chrostachys ctnerea
Gmehna arborea
Holarrhena antidysenterica
Holoptelia rntegrrfolia
Leucaena leucocephala
Madhuca 1ndrca
Melra azaderach
Phyllanthus emblica
Pongamia ptnnata
Prosoprs ctnerana
Sesbania aegyptraca
Shorea robusta
Syzygium cumtnr
Tamarindus 1nd1ca
Tectona grandts
.,...erminalia arjuna
Terminaha bellerica
Zrzyphus mauntrana
Grasses
Bothriochloa intermedia
Bothriochloa pertus
Brachiaria mutica
Cenchrus setigerus
Chloris gayana
Chryosopogon fulvus
Cynodon dactylon
Echtnochloa colona
Eragrostis cynosuroides
Heteropogon contortus
Paspalidium geminatum
Sacharum bengalense
Sehtma nervosum
Herbaceouss Legumes
Cajanus cajan
Crotalana juncea
Crotalaria burhia
Oesmodtum triflorum
Medicago sativa
Phaseolus mungo
Stylosanthes hamata
Trees
Acacia albida
Acacia aunculiformis
Acacta catechu
Acacia holosericea
Acacia nilottca
Acacia senegal
Albizia amara
Albizra lebbeck
v
Azadirachta rndtca \
Oalberg1a SISSOO
Eucalyptus hybrid \
\.
.
Erythrina vanegata ..
Gliricidia sepium
Grewia tenax
Hardwickia binata
Leucaena latisiliqua
Pithecellobium dulce
Ztzyphus nummulana
50
II. Eastern Himalayan Region
2 NE. Hills 3528 Per humid Red sandy Karbi Anglong, North
to humid Laterite Cachar Hills (Assam)
Oibang valley, East
Kameng. East Siang,
Lohit. Lower Subansiri
(Contd.....)
51
s Sub Zone Raintal Climate SoliS Districts
No. (mm)
52
Ill. Lower Gangetic Plains (West Bengal)
1. Barind Plains 1 587 Moist sub Red and Mallah West Dinajpur
humid and yellow
sry sub humid allwvial
3. Alluvial Coastal 1 607 Dry sub Red and Calcutta, Twenty Four
53
IV. Middle Gangetic Plains
2. North East Alluvtal 1470 Dry Sub Alluvial tataJ Aurangabad, Beg usarai
humid to Moist Bhagalpur, Bhojpur,
sub humid Darbhanga, Gaya,
SL!
v. Upper Gangetic Plainns (Uttar Pradesh}
1. Central Plains 979 Dry sub humid Alluvial Allahabad Bara bank!
to sem1 arid Fatehpur HardOJ, Khefi
Lucknow, P11ibhit, Rae
Bareli, Sitapur,
Sultanpur, Unnao,
Partapgarh
55
VI. Trans Gangetic Plains
56
VII. Eastern Plateau and Hills
57
VIII. Central Plateau and Hills
1. Bundelkhand 780 Dry sub humid Mixed red Banda, Jalaun. Jhansi,
to dry and and black Lalitpur, Ham1rpur(U.R.)
2. Bundelkhand (M.P.) 700 Dry sub humid Mixed red Chhatarpur. Dalia,
to semi and and black Tikamgarh (M.P.)
4. Kymore Plateau 1 1 00 Dry sub humid Red & Yellow Jabalpur, Panna. Rewa.
and Satpura Hills Med1um black Satna, Seon1, S1dhi
5. Vindhya Plateau 1 1 30 Dry sub humid Medium black Bhopal, Damoh, Raisen,
Sagar, Sehore, Vidisha
(M P )
11. Transtttonal Plams 490 Semi arid Desert soil Pali Sirohi (Rajasthan)
to arid Grey brown
58
s. Sub Zone Ramfal Climate Soils D1stncts
No (mm)
59
IX. Western Plateau and Hills
60
X. Suthern Plateau and Hills Region
61
XI. East Coast Plains and Hil ls Region
2. Coastal Midland 3127 Dry sub humid Red loamy, Alleppy, Cannanore,
& per humid Coastal Ernakulam Kasargood,
alluvium Kozhikode, Malappuram
laterite Quilion, Trichur,
Trivandrum (Kerala)
63
XJfl.=l 11QijarafPfairnfaRdHill Regions IX
'
S Sub Zone • n Ra,nfal ::. C mate r. · ') Soils "· Districts · � ": �� ?
•l·r:J
'1
.
No. (mrn)
5. North West Ariel 340 ... Arid to Grey brown Kachchh (Gujarat)
' i('.. ..... '"lt .,·r '! <1
1
semi arid I 1' G deltaic1 :: t �!'., ' ,
(h':. ··•)11 t , •• ,,, r•· a.t', 1 alluvium
7
r 1$buth saurasl\tra 844 Dry sub Coastal Junagadh
I I •
\' • I
humid aJIUVIUill
Medium black
XIV. Western Dry Regions
(1) (2)
1 . Andaman 1 Laksjadweep
.
2. Nicobnr
A P P E N D I X-8
66
No. A l Abutilon indicum Linn.
Fom. - Molvoceoe
C.N. - Country mallow; Beng. Jhompi; Guj. Khopot;
Hin. - Konghi; Kon - Srimudrigido; Mol. Jhonkoped;
Mar - Chokrobhendo; Oriyo - Nokochono;
Tom - Thuttli; Tel - Botlobendo, Tuttilibendo;
Assam - Jhopo; Goo - Petori.
SIT T
HA Shrub
HT 5m
GR Quick growing
R Through Seeds.
67
No. A3 Acacia catechu, Willd
Fam - Mimoseae
C.N. - The cutch tree. Sonkhairi, Sans - Khadira,
H i n - Khair; Beng - Kuth; Tam - Karangalli,
Tel - Khadiramu.
S/T T
HA Shrub
HT 3m
GR Quick growtng
R By seeds.
E/D Evergreen.
Flo.S. - May - August
70
Bihar - Bobule; Kon - Korijouli, Mol - Korivelon,
Mar - Vedibobul; Oriyo - Boubro;
Sons - Borburoh, Vovori; Tom - Koruvelomorom;
Tel - Nollotummo.
SIT T
HA Tree
HT Bm
GR Quick growmg
R By seeds
E/D Evergreen
Flo.S. Aug - Jan.
CSA - 8293.74 m1
cs Spreading.
7�
HT 1 0m
GR Quick growmg
R By seeds
E/0 Semi - deciduous.
Flo.S. - May - June, Oct - Nov.
cs Flat crown
72
SIT T
HA Tree
HT Bm
GR Quick growing.
R By seeds.
E/D Evergreen
73
SIT T
HA Tree.
HT 1 0m
GR Slow growing during early stages.
R Grafti ng.
E/D Evergreen
Flo.S. - Round the year tn coastal d i stricts.
Sept. - Dec. tn other areas.
CSA - 309.02 1 m2
cs Spreadi n g .
LA 1 08.02 cm2
Sl 25.78
74
HA Tree
HT 20m
GR Qu ick gro win g
R By seeds
E/D Deciduous
Flo.S. Mar - Aug.
cs Spreading
76
C/D - Deciduous
Flo.S. - Sept - Nov.
cs Spreading
77
No. A'27 Albizio omoro Boiv
Fom - Mimoseoe
C.N. - Mar - Tugli Loloi; Sons - Krishna sirisho;
Tom - Turinjil; Tel - Sigoro.
SIT T
HA Tree
HT 1 0m
GR Quick growmg
R By seeds, Root suckers
E/D Deciduous
Flo.S. April - June
cs Spreading
78
Bhondi; Tom - Vokoi, Vogei Tel - Dirisono, Sirisho;
Trade - Kokko
S/T T
HA Tree
HT 20m
GR Quick growing
R By seeds
E/D Deciduous
Flo.S. - April - May
CAS - 62,509.32 m1
cs Round I spreading.
LA 2 7 2 . 5 1 cm1
Sl 1 9.72
79
Tom - Koruvogei; Tel - Chindugo.
SIT T
HA Tree
HT 1 8m
GR Quick grow1ng
R By seeds
EIO Evergreen
Flo S - April - .:J une.
cs Oblong
80
HT 8m
GR Quick growing
R By seeds
E/D Deciduous
Flo.S. - April - June.
cs Round
E/D Deciducous
Flo.S. - August - October
81
saittan kajat; Mal - Elilampala, Yaksippala, Palo,
Daiva ppala; Mar - Satvin; Sans - Saptapomah,
Saptachadah; Tam - Elilappalai, Polai
SIT T
HA Tree
HT 1 5m
Gr Quick growmg
R By seeds
EID Evergreen
Flo.S. - Dec - Mar.
CSA - 2 4 1 ,680.5 m2
cs Round
LA 52 . 3 1 cm1
82
LA 5 3 . 86 cm1
Sl 26. 1 9
83
R By seeds, Root suckers
E/0 Evergreen
Flo.S. May - July
CSA - 6 7 5 4 2 . 8 2 m2
cs Round I oblong
LA 1 40.23 cm2
Sl 1 8. 7 2
84
GR Slow growing
R By seeds
E/D Evergreen
Flo.S. - July.
CSA - 1 0826.95 m7
cs Ob ong Round
LA 1 56 6 . 4 em�
Sl 1 8. 1 4
85
GR Quick growing
R By seeds.
E/D Deciduous
Flo.S. Mar - April
CSA - 2 1 1 3 .20 m1
cs Spreading I Round
LA 1 04 . 3 2 cm1
Sl 1 8. 9 5
CS Spreading.
LA 8 3 . 8 9 cm2
Sl 29.2
86
Oriyo - lngudiholo, Sons - Angovruksho;
Tom - Nonjundon; Tel - Goro; Raj - Hingorni
SIT T
HA Tree
HT 9m
GR Quick growing
R By seeds.
EID Evergreen
Flo.S. - April - June.
cs Spreading
87
HT 1 5m
GR Quick growmg
R Cutting.
E/D Deciduous.
GR Quick grow1ng
R By seeds
E/D Deciduous
Sl 25.68.
90
C.N. - Budhist bauhinia, Mountain Ebony,
Beng - Raktakanchan; Guj - kovindara;
Hin - Kachnar; Kan - Arrsinatige;
Mal - Mandaram, Kon n u ," Malayakatti;
Mar - Kanchan, Sans - Kovidarah;
Ta m - Shemmandarai; Tel - Devakanchanamu.
SIT T
HA Tree
HT Sm
GR Quick growing
R By seeds
EID Deciduous
91
Flo.S. - Nov. - Jan.
cs Oblong
92
No. B 1 4 Bridelio squa mosa Lomk.
Fom - Euphorbiaceae
C.N. - Hin - Khajo; Beng - Geio, Kantokoi;
Mal - Mukkoyini; Mar · Asanai;
Sans - Mahavira; Tom · Mullovengai;
Tel - Bontha-yepi.
SIT T
HA Tree
HT 1 0m
GR Quick growing
R By seeds, Root suckers.
E/D Deciduous
93
C.N. - Almondette tree. Beng - chironji;
Guj and Mar - Charoli; Hin - Achor;
Kan - Murka li; Mai-Mungapera;
Oriya - Charu; Sans - Priyalom; Tom - Merola;
Tel - Mortichettu or Saara .
S/T T
HA Tree
HT 1 3m
GR Quick growmg
R By seeds, root suckers.
E/0 Evergreen
F l o . S. Jan - Mar.
95
C.N. - Alexandrian laurel,
Beng and Hin - Sultonochompo;
Guj - Udi; Kon - Honne; Mol - Punnoi;
Mar - Surongi; Oriyo - Poonong,
Sons - Punnogoh; Tom - Punnai, Punnagam;
Tel - Ponnochettu.
SIT T
HA Tree
HT 1 8m
GR Slow growmg
R By seeds.
E D Evergreen
97
C.N. - Golden showers, Indian laburnum; Beng and
Hin, Jammu - Amaltas; Guj, Mar - Garmalo,
Bahwo; Kan - Arogena; Mal - Svarnaviram;
Oriya - Sunari;Punjob - Alash; Son - Saraphala;
Tam - Arakkuvadam;
Te1 - Reelochettu, VKoolaponna
S/T T
HA Tree
HT 1 2m
GR Quick growing
R By seeds, suckers
E/D Deciduou�
98
SIT T
HA Tree
HT 1 0- 1 2 m
GR Quick growing
R By seeds
E/0 Evergreen
CSA -
1 3, 2 7 3 . 7 m1
cs Round
LA 1 1 8 . 4 7 cm1
Sl 1 9 . 84
99
.1
HT 1 0- 1 2m
GR Fast growing
R By seeds.
E/0 Evergreen
Flo.S. · Aug - May.
CSA -
3927.36 m2
cs Oblong
lA 1 38.32 cm7
Sl 21 2
1 00
E/D Deciduous
Flo.S. - March - July
CSA - 3 1 26.98 m'
cs Oblong
LA 1 3 5.07 cm2
Sl 1 8. 2 1
1 01
No. C 1 6 Citrus limon (linn) Burm
Fom - Rutoceoe
C.N. - lime of Indio. (limbu.); Beng - Bora nebu, Gore
nebu; Hin - Bora nimbu. Pohori nimbu;
Sons - Malo nimbu; Tom - Periyo; Yel umichoi;
Tel - Bijopurom.
SIT T
HA Shrub
HT 3m
GR Slow growing
R By cutting, Grafting
EID Evergreen
102
No. C l 8 Clerodendrum infortunotum Linn {auct), Wight.
Fom - Verbenoceoe
C.N. - Hin and Beng - Shant, Son - Bhontoko;
Tom -Perugilai ; Tel - Gurrapukattiyaku;
/lial - Peruku.
S/T T
HA Shrub
HT 3-4m
GR Quick growing
R By seeds, cutting
E/D Evergreen
Flo.S. - Oct - Jan
l Q3
No. C20 Cordia dichotoma Forst
Fam - Cordiaceae
C.N. - Seb estan fruit tree. Beng - Bahubara;
Gu1- Bargunda; Hin - Chota - losora;
Kan - Chikka challe; Mal - Cheruviri;
Tam - Naruvili; Tel - Chinn - anakkeru.
S/T T
HA Tree
HT 1 0m
GR Quick growmg after 1 st yr.
R By seeds, stem cutting
E/0 Evergreen
Flo.S. March - April
1 04
HT 1 0m
GR Quick growmg
R By seeds
E/0 Deciduous
GR Quick growtng
R By seeds, stem, root cuttings.
E/0 Semideciduous
Flo.S. - August - Sept
CSA - 2 1 ,723.2 m1
cs Round
LA 1 8 7 . 9 cm7
Sl 1 0. 1 2
105
R By seeds, Root and Stem cuttings.
E/0 Evergreen
Flo S. - March - April - June
CSA - 5,848.5 m2
CSA - Round
LA 1 90.84 cm7
Sl 1 8. 7 2
\06
HT 1 2m
GR Quick growing
R By seeds, stem, rhizome cutting, layering
E/D Deciduous
1 07
HA Tree
HT 1 0m
GR Slow growing
R By seeds, root suckers.
EID Deciduous
Flo.S. - Feb - April
CSA -
324,355.2m1
cs Oblong
LA 1 6 7 . 7 8 cm1
Sl 1 7 .89
1 08
GR Quick growmg
R By seeds
E/D Evergreen
Flo.S. - Throughout the year
CSA - 60.47 m"
cs Spreading
LA 6 2 . 7 em'
Sl 2 1 .5
1 09
GR Quick grow1ng
R By seeds
E/D Deciduous
Flo S - Mar - May
CSA - 28,609 . 1 m2
cs Spreading
LA 84.07 em�.,
Sl 1 2 .84
HA Tree
HT 1 0m
GR Slow growing
R By seeds
111
E/D Evergreen
Flo.S. Nov. - Dec.
cs Round
112
CSA - 87,326. 1 2 m7
cs Spreading
LA 2 9 . 2 7 cm7
Sl 1 8.62
GR Ou1ck grow1ng
R By cuttings, seeds
E D Evergreen
Flo.S. April - May
CSA - 2 2 3 , 4 5 . 4 m'
cs Spreading
113
LA 40. 1 cm2
Sl 1 9.81
N o . F6 Ficus hispida ( L . ) F.
Fam - Moraceae
C.N. - Kala - umbar, Beng - Kakdumur;
Assam - Khoskadumar; Hin - Konea du mber;
Punjab - Rumbal; Sans - Kakadumbura;
Tam and Mal - Peyatti; Tel - Vettiyati.
SIT T
HA Tree
HT 1 0m
GR Quick growmg
R By seeds, cuttings
E/D Evergreen
Flo.S. - April - July
1 14
CSA - 46942.02 m2
cs Spreading
LA 45.23 cm2
Sl 1 7. 2 1
1 15
E/0 Evergreen.
Flo.S. - Throughout the year.
CSA - 52,809 . 6 1 m2
cs Round
LA 8 4 . 50 cm2
Sl 1 7.38
116
E/D Evergreen
Flo.S. - Nov - Feb
CSA - 2 1 0.748 m2
cs Oblong
LA 8 2 . 1 cm2
Sl 2 2 . 03
117
LA 57 . 5 1 cm2
Sl 1 9. 2 1
118
No. G6 Gr�vi ll�g robustg A. cunn
Fam - Proteaceaf .
C.N. - Silvery or silky oak, Tam - Savukkamaram
SIT T
HA Tree
HT 20m
GR Quick growing
R By seeds
E/D Evergreen
Flo.S. - Feb - April
cs Obk>ng
119
HA Shrub.
HT 7m
GR Quick growing
R By seeds
E/D Evergreen
Flo.S. - Apr - June
cs Round
1 20
E/D Evergreen
Flo.S. - Od - Jon
CSA - 824 .06 m1
cs Round
LA 4 7 . 2 cm1
Sl 1 9.07
' 22
CSA -
29443.5 m'1
cs Oblong
LA 67.30 cm1
Sl 3 1 .03
cs Oblong to spreading
'
LA 54.2 em
Sl 1 7 .3
N o . 13 lxoro coccinea L
Fom - Rubiaceoe
C.N. Beng and Hin - Rangan. Mar - Pendgul;
1 23
So ns - Bo nd huk o; Tom - Vedj
i ; Tel - Ko ron om ,
Toc hi; Mo l - Tec hi
SIT T
HA Tree
HT 6m
GR Quick growmg
R B y cutting
EID Evergreen
Flo .S. Throughout the year
CSA - 1 83 . 2 6 m2
cs Oblong
LA 6 9 . 70 cm2
Sl
1 24
GR Quick growing
R By cutting
E/D Evergreen
Flo.S. - March - April
cs Oblong
1 25
No. K l Kigelia africana Lamk
Fam - Bignoniaceae
C.N . - Sausage tree
S/T T
HA Smal l tree
HT 1 0m
GR Quick growing
R By seeds
EID Evergreen
Flo.S. - Mar - June
CSA -
58432 . 2 1 m2
cs Round I Oblong
1 26
C . N. - Queen crape Myrtle. Beng and Hin - Punjab
Jorool; Kon - Holedosovolo; Mol - Monimoruthu;
Mar -Toman; Oriyo - Potoli; Tom - Kodoli;
Tel - Vorogoogu.
SIT T
HA Tree
HT 1 0m
GR Quick growing
R By seeds
E/0 Evergreen
Flo.S. April - June
CSA - 72569.31 m2
1 27
No. L4 Lawsoni a ine rm is Lin n
Fa m - Lythraceae
C.N. - Hen na; Ben g - Me hed i; Gu j - Me
di; H i n , Ma r
and Pun jab - Me hnd i; Ken - Mo
yilo nch i,go ran ta;
Ma l - Ma ilan chi ; Or iya - Ben jat,
Sans - Mendika; Tam - Marithondi;
Tel - Gorinta; Kashmir -Mohuz.
SIT T
HA Shrub
HT 5m
GR Quick growing
R By seed and cutting
128
No. M2 Modhuco longifolio (Koen)
Fom - Sopotoceoe
C.N. - The Butter tree; Beng Hin and Mar - Mohwo,
Guj - Mohudo; Kon - Hippe; Mol - llupu,
Poonom; Oriyo - Mohulo; Tom - lllupei;
Tel - lppo.
SIT T
HA Tree
HT 15m
GR Quick growmg
R By seeds
E/0 Deciduous
1 29
LA 5 8 . 3 cm1
Sl 1 9 .0
1 30
E/D Evergreen
Flo.S. - South India - Jan - Mar;
North India - Feb. - Apr.
CSA -
69,004.67 m2
cs Round I Oblong
LA 85.27 cm1
Sl 30.77
131
GR Quick growmg
R By seeds, stem, root, cutting, root sucker.
E!D Evergreen
Flo S. March - May
CSA - 38964 . 1 6 m1
cs Oblong
LA 8 3 . 7 9 cm7
Sl {23 5 3 2 3 . 5 3
1 32
CSA 2 2 4 39 . 1 7m2
CS Oblong I Round
LA 1 39.2 cm7
Sl 1 8. 1 1
1 33
CSA - 4063. 1 m2
cs Oblong I Round
LA 8 9 . 3 2 cm2
Sl 20.4
1 34
GR Quick grow1ng
R By seeds, cut11ng, grafting, budding
E/0 Evergreen
Flo.S. Feb. - June.
CSA - 1 04 7.62 m1
cs Oblong
LA 285.3 cm1
Sl 1 7.4
1 35
HT Sm
GR Quick grow1ng
R By cutting
EID Evergreen
Flo.S. - Throughout the year
CSA -
5747.63 m1
cs Oblong I Round
LA 3 2 . 62 cm2
Sl 1 5. 7
1 36
Ta rn - Nanvengai; Tel - Tellamoduga;
M P - Tinsa; Bthar - Ruta; Trade - Sandon.
S/T T
HA Tree
HT 1 2m
GR Quick growmg
R By seeds. Root cutting
E/D Deciduous
Flo.S. - Feb. - March
1 37
R By seeds.
E/0 - Evergreen.
Flo. S - Jon. - Feb.
CSA - 546. 1 m?
cs Round.
LA 4 1 1 . 32 cm7
Sl 1 2 .4
HA Tree
HT 1 0m
GR Slow growing
R By seeds.
1 38
EID - Evergreen.
Flo S. May - June, Sept. - Oct.
CS Round.
1 39
Mol - Koruk kopuli ; Mar - Viloyo ti chmot ·
To m - Kodukk oopuli; Tel - Seemo chinto.
S/T T
HA Tree
HT 8 m
GR Ourck growing
R By seeds, Branch cutti ng.
E!D Evergreen.
F l o S. Jon - Feb.
CSA - 2 5 6 4 . 75 m2
cs Oblong.
LA 1 82 . 6 cm7
140
No. P9 Polyolthio longifolio (Son n . ) Th
Fom · Anonoceoe.
C N. . Hin & Beng · Devdoru; Guj · Asupolo;
Mar · Ashok; Kon · Putrojrvi; Mol · Ashokom;
Tom · Asogom; Tel · Asokomu.
SIT s
HA Tree
HT 1 5 or 5 m
GR Quick growing
R Through seeds (fresh).
E/0 · Evergreen.
Flo.S. · April · June.
HA Tree
HT 15 m
GR Quick growrng
R By seeds, stem, root cutting, root sucker.
E/0 · Deciduous.
cs Oblong.
141
N.W.H.P. - Bagnu chelum, tilaunja.
SIT S
HA Tree
HT 20 m
GR Qu ick gro wrn g
R By see ds, ste m, roof cut tin g, roo t suc ker.
E/0 -
De cid uo us .
cs Ob lon g.
1 42
No. P 1 4 Populus nigra Linn
Fam - Salicaceae.
C N. - Lombardy - poplar; N W.H . P. - Frost.
SIT s
HA Tree
HT 20 m
GR Quick grow1ng
R By seeds, stem, root cutting, root sucker.
E/D - Deciduous.
cs Conical.
143
Tom - Perumboy, Jombu; Tel - Jommichettu.
S/T T
HA Tree
HT 12 m
GR Qu•ck growing
R By seeds, root suckers.
E D - Evergreen.
Flo.S. Dec. - April.
CSA - 1 3 .430 6 m'
cs Spreading.
LA 5 4 . 2 3 cm2
Sl 1 8. 1
1 44
No. P 1 9 Prosopis tomorugo FiPhil.
Fom - Mimos eoe.
SIT T
HA Tree
HT 13 m
GR Quick growrng
R By seeds, root suckers.
EID - Evergreen.
Flo.S. - Dec. - April.
cs Spreading.
1 45
HA Tree
HT 15 m
GR Quick growmg
R By seeds, cuttings.
E/D -
Semi deciduous.
Flo.S. - Mar. - April.
CSA - 1 79,320.8 m2
cs Rround/Oblong
LA 1 89 . 4 cm2
Sl 22 .04
cs Rround/Oblong
LA 1 89 . 4 cm2
Sl 2 2 . 04
146
No. Q3 Quercus rubra
Fam -
Fagaceae.
C.N. - Oak.
SIT T
HA Tree
HT 15 m
GR Quick growtng
E1D Deciduous.
cs Round.
Fam - Salicaceae.
C N. - European willow; White wtllow. Kashmtr - Butvir,
Vivir; H . P. Punjab - Bisbhushan, Modnu,
Malchang.
SIT T
1 47
HA Tree
HT 20 m
GR Quick growmg
R By stem cuttmg, root cuttin g .
E/D Deciduous.
F l o S. - Mar. - May.
cs Oblong/Round.
1 46
Flo.S. - Mar. - May.
cs Round/Oblong.
GR Quick growrng
R By cutting.
E/D Deciduous.
cs Round.
149
SIT T
HA Tree
HT 20 m
GR Quick growing
R By seeds cuHing.
E/D Evergreen.
Flo .S. - Mar. - J u n e
CSA - 99306 . 2 m7
cs Spreadmg, Round.
LA 2 8 2 . 6 cm2
Sl 1 5 .64
1 50
HT 12 m
GR Quick growing
R By seeds.
E/0 Deciduous.
Flo.S. - June - Aug.
CSA - 24980.3 m1
cs Round.
LA 74.2 cm2
Sl 1 4.2
151
HA Tree
HT 10 m
GR Quick growmg
R By seeds.
E/D Evergreen.
F l o . S. - Sept. - Dec.
CSA -
4694.87 m·
cs Oblong.
LA 1 30 em"
Sl 20.45
1 52
C N Tom - Seemoiogofhi.
ST T
HA Shrub
HT 4 m
GR Quick growmg
R By seeds.
EID Evergreen.
Flo.S. - Sept. - Dec.
cs Oblong.
1 53
GR Quick growing
R By seeds, cutting
E/D Evergreen.
Flo.S. - Nov. - Jon.
CSA - 73,250. 1 7 m1
cs Oblong ' Round
LA 89.3 cm2
Sl 2 4 . 84
154
HT 15 m
GR Quick growing
R By seeds.
E/D Deciduous.
Flo.S. - Mar. - May.
cs Oblong/Round.
1 55
LA 6 7 . 3 7 cm1
Sl 1 2 . 87
1 56
No. T l Tobernaemontono divaricate linn.
Fam - Apocyn oceoe.
C.N. - Beng, Mar, Hin & Sons - Togor, Chondoni;
Tom - Nondiyavottom; Tel - Gondhitogoropu.
SIT T
HA Shrub
HT 3m
GR Quick growing
R By cutting.
E/D Evergreen.
Flo.S. - Throughout the yea�
CSA - 1 28 . 6 7 m1
1 57
LA 1 28.60 cm2
Sl 1 8.4
1 58
CS Oblong/Round
LA 790.37 m7
Sl 23.48
159
CSA - 7 1 9,992.2 m2
cs Oblong/Round
LA 60 06 cm2
Sl 24.57
1 60
Flo S. - Oct . - Nov.
CSA -
94367.4 m'
cs Conical
LA 6 2 . 0 1 cm7
Sl 20.9
161
HA Tree
HT 10 m
GR Quick growmg
R By seeds, cuHings.
E/D Evergreen.
Flo S. - Throughout the year.
CSA .
34,635.32 m1
cs Round
LA 1 84 . 3 9 cm2
Sl 29.81
1 62
HA Tree
HT 15 m
GR Quick growtng
R By cutting.
E/0 Evergreen.
cs Conical
1 63
LA 65.7 cm2
Sl 27.30
1 64
No. Z2 Zizyphus oenoplia Mill
Fam - Rhomnoceoe.
C.N. - Jackal jujube; Beng - Siakul; Hin - Mokai;
Kon - Borige; Mal - Kottaval l i ;
Oriyo - Kantokolli; Tam - Ambulam;
Tel - Banko paragi.
SIT T
HA Straggler shrub.
HT S m
GR Quick growing
R By seeds.
E/D Evergreen.
� 65
Kantobohul; Tam - Kottei ; Tel - Gotte.
S/T T
HA Straggler shrub.
HT 4 m
GR Quick growing
R By seeds.
E/D Evergreen.
Flo.S. April - June.
cs Round
1 66
APPENDIX-C
Green Belt :
For listing plant species for cultivation in on oreo of concern, please follow the
following steps.
1 . Place the o reo (os per District) of your concern in subzone and zone, after
referring to Appendix A.
sheets.
Cz 1 . 1 A . 3,4,7,9- 1 1 , 1 3, 1 6, 1 7 , 1 9 , 2 2 - 2 6 , 2 8 - 3 5, 4 1 , 4 4 ;
B - 6- 1 2 , 1 6; C - 1 4 , 2 1 ,22; 0 - 1 ; E - 4-6; F
- 1 -4 ; 7-9; G - 6-8; H - 4 ; I - 1 , 2 ; J - 2 ; L
- 3,4; M - 1 , 8; N - 1 , 2 ; 0 - 1 ; P - 4-6, 1 0
- 1 4 ; Q - 1 - 3 · S - 1 - �,8, 1 5 , T - 1 -3 , 6 , 7,9,
1 2, 1 3 ; u - 1 ; z - 1
1 67
Cz 1 . 2 - A - 3,4,7,9- 1 1 , 1 3 , 1 6 , 1 7 , 1 9,22-26,28-35,39, 4 1 ,
4 4 ; B - 4,6- 1 7 ; C - 2 - 5 , 1 4 , 1 8 ,2 1 , 2 2 ; D - 1 , 4 ;
I - 1 - 3,5; J - 2; L - 3 , 4 ; M - 1 , 3,8, 1 2 , 1 4;
N - 1 , 2 , 0 - 1 ; P - 4 - 6 , 1 0 - 1 4 , 1 6 ,2 1 ; Q - 1 - 3,
S - 1 - 5, 7 - 1 0, 1 4 , 1 5 ; T - 1 - 3 , 6 , 7 , 9 , 1 2 , 1 3 ; U - 1 ;
z - 1
H - 3,4; I - 1 - 3,5; J - 2; L - 1 , 4 ; M - 1 ,
3,8, 1 2 - 1 4 ; N - 1 , 2 , 0 - 1 ; P - 4 - 1 6; Q - 1 -
3; S - 2 - 5 , 7 - 1 0, 1 4 , 1 5 ; T - 1 - 3,6,7,9, 1 2 , 1 3 ; U
- 1 ; z - 1 , 3,4
Cz 1 . 4 A - 1 - 4 , 7 , 1 0 , 1 1 , 1 3 , 1 6 , 1 7 , 1 9 , 2 2 - 2 6 , 2 8 - 3 2 ,34 -
3-4,6-8; H - 3 ,4 ; 1 - l - 5 ; J - 2 ; K - 1 ; L -
1 - 4; M - 1 , 3,5,8, 1 2 - 1 4 ; N - 1 , 2 ; 0 - 1 ; P -
4 - 1 6 ,· Q - 1 - 3 I- S - 1 - 5 I 7 - 1 0 I 1 4 I 1 5 · T - I 1-
3,6,7,9, 1 2 - 1 4; u - 1 ; z - 1
1 68
C z I I . Eastern Himamlayan Region
Cz 1 1 . 1 A - 1 ,3,4, 7 , 1 0, 1 1 , 1 3 , 1 4 , 1 6 , 1 7 , 1 9,22-26,28-36,
39-4 1 ; 8 - 1 ,4 , 6 - 1 7; c - 2 - 5 , 7 - 1 1 , 1 3 - 1 6, 1 8,
8; G - 6-8; H - 3, 4 ; I - 1 -3 , 5; J - 2 ; L -
1 - 3; M - 1 , 3,8,9, 1 2 - 1 4 ; N - 1 -2 ; 0 - 1 ; P -
4 - 6 , 1 0 - 1 4 ; Q - 1 -3; R - 1 ; S - 1 - 5, 1 - 1 0, 1 5;
T - 1 -3, 5 - 7 , 9 , 1 1 , 1 3 , 1 4 ; U - 1; Z - 1
8 - 1 -4,6- 1 7 ; C - 2 - 9 , 1 1 , 1 3 - 1 6, 1 8 - 2 2 , D - 1-
6 I 8I· E - 1 -6 · F - 1 - 8 · G - 3 I 4 I 6 - 8 · H -
I I I
3,4,·
I - 2 , 3 5; J - 1 ,2 ; L - 1 - 4 ; M - 1 -3 , 5 , 8,
9, 1 2 - 1 4; N - 1 ,2; 0 - 1 ; P - 4 - 6 , 1 0 - 1 4 , 1 6,
2 1 ; Q - 1 -2; S - 2 - 5 , 7 - 1 0 , 1 5,20; T - 1 - 3, 5-
7 1 1 , 1 3 I 1 4 ; u - 1 ; z. - 1
1
Cz 1 1 .3 - A - 1 ,3 , 4 , 7 , 8, 1 0, 1 1 , 1 3 , 1 4 , 1 6 - 2 6 , 2 8 , 2 9 , 3 2 - 3 6 ,
3 9 - 4 4 ; 8 - 1 -4 , 6 - 1 7; c - 2 - 9, 1 1 , 1 3 - 1 6, 1 8- 2 2 ;
8,9, 1 2 - 1 4 , N - 1 , 2 ; 0 - 1 ; P - 4 - 1 0, 1 2 - 1 6,2 1 ;
Q - l -3 R - I S 2 - 5 , 7 - 1 0 , 1 5,20; T - 1 -3,
5-7, 1 1 , 1 3, 1 4; u - 1 ; z - 1
169
Cz 1 1 .4 A - 1 , 3-5,7,8, 1 0, 1 1 , 1 3, 1 4 , 1 6- 2 6 , 2 8 - 4 4 ; 8 - 1 -
E · 1 -6; F - 1 - 8; G - 3-4,6-8; H - 2 - 4 ; I -
1 - 3,5; J - 1 ,2 , K - 1 ; L - 1 - 4 ; M - 1 -3 ,5,8,9,
1 2 - 1 4 ; N - 1 ,2 ; 0 - 1 ; P - 2,4- 1 6,20,2 1 ; Q -
1 - 3; R - 1 ; S - l - 5, 7 - 1 0 , 1 5,2 0; T - 1 -3,5-
7,9 , 1 3, 1 4 ; u - 1 ; z - 1
Cz 1 1 . 5 A - 1 , 3,5,7,8, 1 0 - 1 4 , 1 6-26,28,29, 3 1 - 4 4 ; B - 1 -
E - 1 -6; F - 1 -8 ; G - 3,4,6-8; H - 2 - 4 ; I -
1 2 - 1 4 ; N - 1 ,2 ; 0 - 1 ; P - 2,4- 1 6,20,2 1 : Q -
1 - 3; R - 1 ; S - 1 -5 , 7 - 1 0, 1 5,20; T - 1 -9 , 1 2,
14; u - l; z - 1
1 70
Cz I l l . lower Gangetic Plains
(West Bengal)
4 4 ; B - 1 - 1 0, 1 2 - 1 6; C - 1 -9, 1 1 - 1 3 , 1 5-20, D -
3,4; I - 2-5; J - 1 ,2 ; K - 1 ; l - 1 -4 ; M - 2 ,
3,5,6,8,9, 1 1 - 1 4 ; N - 1 ,2 ; 0 - 1 ; P - 1 ,2 , 4 -
1 6,20,2 1 ; Q - 1 - 3 ; R - 1 ; S - 1 - 1 3 , 1 5 -20; T
4 4 ; B - 1 - 1 0, 1 2- 1 6 ; C - 1 -9, 1 1 - 1 3 , 1 5-20, D -
1 , 3,4; I - 2 - 5 ; J - 1 , 2, K - 1 ; l - 1 - 4 ; M -
2,315,6,8,9, 1 1 - 1 4 ; N - 1 , 2; 0 - 1 ; P - 1 , 2 , 4 -
1 6,20,2 1 ; Q - 1 - 3; R - 1 ; S - 1 - 1 3 , 1 5-20; T
- 1 -3,5-7,9- 1 4 ; z - 1 , 3 , 4 .
44; B - 1 - 1 0, 1 2 - 1 7 ; C - 1 - 9 , 1 1 -20, D -
1 -5 , 7 ; E - 1 - 6; F - 1 - 8; G - 1 -4 , 6 - 8 ; H -
1 , 3,4; I - 2-5; J - 1 , 2; K - 1 ; l - 1 - 4; M -
2,3,5,6,8,9, 1 1 - 1 4 ; N - 1 ,2; 0 - 1 ; P - 1 ,2 , 4 -
1 6 ,20,2 1 ; Q - 1 - 3; R - l ; S - 1 - 1 3 , 1 5-20; T
- 1 - 1 4 ; u - 1 ; z - 1 , 3,4
1 71
Cz 1 1 1 . 4 - A - 1 , 3-5,7,8, 1 0 - 1 4, 1 8-20,24-33,36-4 1 ; B - 1 -
1 0 , 1 2 - 1 6 ; C - 1 - 8 , 1 1 - 1 3 , 1 5-20; D - 1 - 5 , 7 ; E -
9, 1 1 - 1 4; N - 1 ,2; 0 - 1 ; P - 1 , 2 , 4 - 1 6,20,2 1 ;
Q - 1 - 3 ; R - 1 ; S - 1 - 1 3 , 1 5-20: T - 1 - 7 , 9 - 1 4;
z - 4.
1 72
Cz IV. Middle Gangetic p l a i n s .
Cz IV.l A - 1 , 3 , 4 , 7 , 1 0 - 1 5 , 1 8,20,22,24-26,28-33,36-
4 2 , 4 4 ; B - 1 -4 , 6 - 1 0, 1 2 - 1 6; C - 2 - 1 3 , 1 5 , 1 6 , 1 8 -
3,4,6-9; H - 1 -4 ; I - 2,3,5; J - 1 K - 1;
L - 1 -4 ; M - 2,3,5,6,8,9, 1 1 - 1 4 , N - 1 ,2 ; 0 -
1; P - 1 ,2 , 7 - 9 , 1 2 - 1 6,20,2 1 R -1; S - 1-
1 5 ,20; T - 1 -4,6,7,9- 1 2 , 1 4 Z - 1 ,3 , 4 .
33,36-44; 8 - 1 -4 , 6 - 1 0 , 1 2 - 1 7 ; c - 2 - 1 3 , 1 5-20;
- 1 -4 ; 1 - 2 - 5 ; J - 1 ; K - 1 ; L - 1 -4 ; M -
2,3,5,6,8,9, 1 1 - 1 4 ; N - 1 , 2 , 0 - 1 ; P - 1 , 2 , 5 -
4 ,6 , 7 , 9 - 1 2 , 1 4 ; z - 1 , 3,4 .
1 73
, ,
(Uttar Pradesh)
Cz V.l A - 1 - 5 , 7 , 1 0- 1 5, 1 8,20-22,24-33,36-4 1 , 4 4 ; B -
1 -4 , 6- 1 0, 1 2 - 1 5, 1 7 ; C - 2 - 1 6 , 1 8 - 2 0 ; D - 1-
4 , 6 - 7 ; E - 2 - 5 ; F - 1 - 3 , 5 - 7 9; G - 3 , 4 , 6 - 9 ; H
- 2 - 4 ; 1 - 1 -5 ; J - 1 , 2 ; K - l ; L - 1 - 4 ; M -
2,3,5,8- 1 4 ; N - 1 , 2 ; 0 - 1 ; P - 1 - 3, 5 , 7 -9,
1 2 - 1 6, 1 9 - 2 1 ; R - 1 ; S - 1 - 1 7 , 20; T - 1 -3,6,
Cz V.2 - A - 1 -5 , 7 1 0 - 1 5, 1 8,20-22,24-33,36-44; 8 - 1 -4 ,
6 - 1 0, 1 2 - 1 5 . 1 7 ; C - 2 - 1 2 , 1 5 , 1 6 , 1 8-20· D - 1-
5,7,8; E - 2 - 5 ; F - 1 - 3,5,7,9; G - 3 , 4 , 6 - 9 ; H
- 1 - 4 ; I - 1 - 5 , J - 1 , 2; K - 1 ; L - 1 - 4 ; M -
2,3,5,8- 1 4 , N - 1 ,2 ; 0 - 1 ; P - 1 - 3 , 5 , 7 - 9 , 1 2 -
1 6, 1 9 - 2 1 ; R - 1 ; S - 1 - 1 7 20, T - 1 - 3 , 6 , 7 ,9-
1 2, 1 4; z - 1 ,3,4.
B - 1 , 3,4,6- 1 0 , 1 2 - 1 5 , 1 7 ; C - 2 - 1 2 , 1 5 , 1 6 , 1 8-20;
3,4,6-9; H - l - 4; I - l -5 ; J - 1 , 2 ; L - 1 -4 ;
3,5,7,9, 1 2 - 1 6 , 1 9- 2 1 ; R · 1 ; S - 1 - 1 5,20; T
1 - 4,6,9- 1 2 , 1 4 ; z - 1 , 3,4.
1 74
Cz VI. Trans Gangetic Plains
4 4 ; B - 1 - 4,6- 1 0, 1 2 - 1 5 , 1 7 ; C - 2 - 1 3 , 1 5 , 1 6 , 1 8,
20; D - 1 -8 ; E - 1 - 5; F - 1 - 3, 5-7,9; G - 3-
4,6-9; H - 1 - 4 ; I - 1 , 3,4; J - 2 , K - 1 ; L -
1 -4 , M - 2,5,8- 1 4; N - 1 , 2; 0 - 1 ; P - 1-
1 6, 1 8-2 1 ; R - 1 ; S - 1 - 1 3 , 1 5 ,20; T - 1-
3,6,7,9, 1 1 , 1 4; u - 1 ; z - 1 ,3, 4.
4 4 ; B - 1 - 4 , 6- 1 0, 1 2 - 1 5, 1 7 ; C -2 - 1 3 , 1 5 , 1 6, 1 8,
4 , 6 - 9; H - 1 - 4; I - 1 - 3,5; J - 2 ; K - 1 ; L -
1 -4 ; M - 2,3,5, 8 - 1 4 ; N - 1 ,2; 0 - 1 ; P - 1-
3,7,9 , 1 2 , 1 5- 1 7, 1 9 ; R - 1 ; S - 1 - 1 3 , 1 5 ,20; T
- 1 -3 ,6,7,9 - 1 2 , 1 4; u - 1 ; z - 1 - 4 .
44; B - 1 , 3,4,6 - 1 0, 1 3 - 1 4, 1 7; C 2-
7,9; G - 3,4,6-9; H - 1 - 4; I - 1 - 5; J - 2; K -
1 ; L - 1 - 4 ; M - 2,5,8- 1 4 , N - 1 ,2 , 0 - 1 ; P -
T - 1 -4, 6,9- 1 1 , 1 4 ; U - 1 ; Z - 1 - 4 .
1 75
Cz VII. Ea ste rn Pla te au a
n d Hi lls .
- 1 ,3, 4,6 - 1 0, 1 2 - 1 6; c
- 2 · 1 1 , 1 3 , 1 5 , 1 6, 1 8-2 0;
D · 2- 8; E - 2- 5; F
- 1 · 7 , 9 ; G - 3, 4, 6,
8, 9; H -
1 ·3, 5; I - 1 · 5; J 2; K
·
· 1 ; L - 1 ·4; M ·2-
5,9 . 1 4 ; N - 1 , 2; 0 · 1 ; P -
1 -3 ,5, 7-9 ; 1 2 , 1 3 ,
1 5 , 1 6, 1 9· 2 1 ; R - 1 ; S
· 5 - 1 8,2 0; T - 1 - 7,9
. 1 2;
1 4 ; z - 1 . 4.
Cz Vll.2 -
20; D - 2- 8; E - 1 · 5; F - 1 - 7,9
; G · 3, 4, 6, 8,
9; H - 1 ·3, 5; I - 1 ·5
; J · 2; K - 1 ; L -
1 -4 ;
M - 2,3 ,5,9 . 1 4 ; N . 1 , 2 ;
0 - 1; P . 1 · 3,5 ,7,
9; 1 2, 1 3 , 1 5, 1 6,2 0,2 1
; R - 1 ; S - 5 - 1 8,2 0;
T -
1 - 7,9 , 1 1 , 1 4; z . 1 -4
.
Cz Vl1.3 - A - 1 ,3 5 , 7 , 1 0- 1 5, 1 8-
20 ,22 ,25 ,27 , 29 -32 ,
36 -
44 ; B · 1 -4 ,6 - 1 0, 1 2 - 1 6 ; C
· 2- 1 1 , 1 3 , 1 5 , 1 6,
--
- 1 76
Cz Vll.4 - A - 1 1 3-5,71 1 0- 1.5 1 1 8-20,22125127, 2 9 - 3 2 , 36-
44; 8 - 1 - 416- 1 01 1 2 - 1 6; c - 2 - 1 1 1 1 31 1 51 1 61
3 1 4 1 61819; H - 1 -315; I - 1 - 5; J - 2; K - 1;
L - 1 -4 ; M - 2,315191 1 1 - 1 4 ; N - 1 1 2 ; 0 - 1; P
1 61 1 8-20; T - 1 - 7 � 9 - 1 2 1 1 4 ; Z - 1 -4 .
L - 1 -4 ; M - 2,3,5,9, 1 0 - 1 4 ; N - 1 , 2 ; 0 - 1; P
1 5 , 1 8-20; T · - 1 - 7,9- 1 2 , 1 4 ; Z - 1 - 4 .
1 77
Cz VIII. Centra' Plateau a n d H i l l s .
B - 1 - 4,6 - 1 0, 1 3 - 1 7 ; C - 2 - 9, 1 1 , 1 3, 1 5, 1 6, 1 8 -
2 0 · D - 2-8 ; E - 2-5 ; F -
1 - 7,9 ; G -3, 5,9 ; H
- 1 -3 , 5; I - 1 - 5; J - 2 ; K
- 1 ; L - 1 -4; M -
2 , 3 , 5 9 - 1 4; N - 1 , 2, 0
- 1 ; P - 1 -3,5 ,7- 9, 1 4 -
3,6 ,9, 1 0, 1 2 , 1 4 ; z - 1 - 4.
1 -3,5 ; I - 1 - 5; J - 2; K - 1 ; L -
1 - 4; M -
2,3 ,5,9 - 1 4f N - 1 , 2 ; 0 -
1 ; P - 1 -3 , 5 , 7-9 , 1 4 -
Cz V l l 1 . 3 - A - 1 , 3,4 ,8, 1 0, 1 1 , 1 3 , 1 4 , 1 8 , 2
0,22,25,27,29-
1 5, 1 6, 1 8 -20 D -2- 8; E - 1 , 3 - 5 ; F
- 1 ,7,9; G -
3 - 6 8,9 ; H - 1 - 3,5 ; I - 1
-5; J - 2; K - 1 ; L
- 1 - 4 ; M - 2,3 ,5,9 - 1 1 N - 1 , 2, 0 - 1 ; P -
1-
3 ,5 ,7, 9, 1 4 - 1 6, 1 9- 2 1 ; R -
1 S - 5 - 1 5,2 0; T - 1 -
4 , 6 , 7 , 9, 1 1 , 1 4 ; z - 1 , 3 , 4 .
1 78
Cz V l l l .4 - A - 1 ,3,4,8, 1 0, 1 1 , 1 3 , 1 4 , 1 8,20,22,25,27,29-
32,36-44; B - 1 -4 , 6 - 1 0, 1 2 , 1 4 - 1 7 ; C - 2- 1 1 , 1 3,
- 3-6,8,9; H - 1 - 3,5; I - 1 - 5; J - 2 ; K - 1;
L - 1 - 4; M - 2,3,5,9- 1 4; N - 1 ,2 ; 0 - 1; P -
1 -3,5,7,9, 1 4 , 1 6, 1 9- 2 1 ; R - 1 ; S - 5 - 1 3,20; T
- 1 - 4,6,7,9, 1 1 , 1 4 ; z - 1 ,3 , 4 .
Cz VIII. 5 - A - 1 , 3 , 4 , 8 , 1 0, 1 1 , 1 3, 1 4, 1 8,20,22,25,27,29-
G - 3-6,8,9; H - 1 - 3,5; I - 1 - 5; J - 2; K -
1 ; L - 1 - 4 ; M - 2-5,9- 1 4 ; N - 1 ,2; 0 - 1 ; P -
1 - 3,6,9, 1 0, 1 2 , 1 4 ; z - 1 , 3,4.
Cz V l l l .6 - A - 1 , 3,4,8, 1 0, 1 1 , 1 3, 1 4 , 1 8,20,22,25,27,29-
32,36-44; B - 1 ,3,4,6- 1 0, 1 2 - 1 7 ; C - 2-
1 1 , 1 3, 1 5 , 1 6 , 1 8 -20; 0 -2-8; E - 1 - 5; F - 1 - 7 , 9 ;
1 ; L - 1 -4 ; M - 2, 3,5,9 - 1 4 ; N - 1 ,2 0 - 1;
P - 1 - 3,7,9, 1 4- 1 6 , 1 9 -2 1 ; R - 1 ; S - 5,6,8-
1 3,20; T - 1 - 3,6,9, 1 0, 1 2 , 1 4 ; Z - 1 ,3 , 4 .
Cz Vl l 1 . 7 - A - 1 ,3,4,8, 1 0, 1 1 , 1 3, 1 4 , 1 8,20,22,25,27,29,32,
36-44; B - 1 ,3 , 4 , 6- 1 0, 1 2 - 1 7 ; C - 2- 1 1 , 1 3 , 1 5 ,
1 79
1 6I 1 8- 2 0I· D - 2 - 8 · E - 1
I - 5 I· F - 1 - 7 I 9 · G -
I 3-6 I
8; H - 1 -5 ; I - 1 - 5; J
- 2; K - 1 ; L - 1 ,4 ;
M - 2,3 ,5, 9 - 1 4 ; N -
1 , 2 ; 0 - 1 ; P - 1 -3 , 5
,7-
9, 1 4 - 1 6, 1 9,2 0; R - 1 ;
S - 5,6 , 8 - 1 3,2 0; T
- 1
- 3,6 ,9, 1 0, 1 2, 1 4; z
- 1 ,3 , 4 .
Cz VIII.S -
A - 1 - 4,7 ,8 , 1 0, 1 1 , 1
3- 1 5, 1 8, 20 ,22 ,25 ,29 ,32 ,3 6-
4 4 ; B - 1 , 3,4 ,6 - 1 0,
1 2 - 1 7; C - 2 - 1 1 , 1 3, 1 5, 1 6,
1 8 -2 0; D -2 -8 ; E - 1 -
5; F - 1 -7 ,9 ; G -
3- 6, 8;
H - 1 - 3,5 ;
9, 1 4 - 1 6, 1 9- 2 1 ; R -
1 ; S - 5,6 ,8 - 1 3 , 1 8,2
0; T -
1 -4, 6,7 ,9, 1 2, 1 4; z -
1 -4 .
Cz Vll1.9 - A - 1 - 5,8 , 1 0 , 1 1 , 1
3 - 1 5, 20 ,22 ,25 ,29 ,3 0, 32 , 36 -
44; B - 1 ,3, 6- 1 0, 1 2 - 1 4 , 1 6 , 1
7; C - 1-11,
1 3, 1 5, 1 6, 1 8-2 0; D -
2 - 7; E - 1 - 5; F -
1 - 7,9 ;
G - 3-6 ,8; H - 1
- 3,5 ; I - l -5; J - 2 ;
K - l;
L - 1 -4 ; M - 2, 5, 9-
1 4; N - 1 ,2; 0 -
l; P -
1 -3 ,5, 7,9 , 1 5 , 1 6, 1 9-2 1 ; R - 1; S - 5,6 ,8-
1 3, 1 8,2 0; T - 1 -4 ,6
,7, 9, 1 0- 1 2, 1 4 ; Z - 2,3 ,4.
Cz Vl l l . l 0 - A - 1 -5 ,8 , 1 0, 1 1 , 1 3- 1 5
, 20 ,2 2, 25 ,2 9, 30 ,3 2, 36 -
4 4 ; 8 - 2, 3, 6 - 1 0, 1
2 - 1 4, 1 6, 1 7; c - 2 - 1 0, 1 3 , 1
5,
1 6 , 1 8- 2 0I· D - 2 - 7 · E
- 1 - 5 I· F - 1 - 7 9 · G
I
I I - 3-
180
6,8; H - 1 -3 . � : I - 1 -5; J - 2 : K - 1 ; L - 1 -
4; M - 2,5. 9- 1 4 ; N - 1 , 2; 0 - 1 ; P - 1-
T - 1 -4,6,7,9 - 1 2, 1 4 ; Z - 1 ,3,4.
36 -38,40-44; B - 1 ,3,6- 1 0. 1 2 - 1 4, 1 6, 1 7; C -
2 ,4 , 6 - 1 0 I 1 5 I 1 8-20·I D - 2 - 7I· E - 1 -5 I· F - 1-
1; P - 1 ,2,5,7,9, 1 4- 1 6, 1 9-2 1 ; R - 1 ; S -
Cz Vl l l . 1 2 - A - 1 -5,8, 1 0 , 1 1 , 1 3- 1 5 , 1 8,20,22,25,27,29,30,
2; K - 1 ; L - 1 -4 ; M - 2,3,5,9- 1 2 , 1 4 ; N -
1 , 2; 0 - 1 ; P - 1 - 3, 5,7,9, 1 4 - 1 6, 1 9-20; R -
1 ; S - 5 - 1 3,20; T - 1 -4 , 6,9, 1 1 , 1 4 ; Z - 1 -4 .
Cz V l l l . 1 3 - A 1 -5,7, 1 0, 1 1 , 1 3 - 1 5, 1 8,20,22,25,29,30,
32,36-44; B - 1 -3,6- 1 0, 1 3 , 1 4 , 1 6, 1 7 ; C
- 1 ; L - 1 -4 ; M - 2,9, 1 1 , 1 2 , 1 4 ; N - 1 ,2 ; 0 -
181
1 ; P - 1 -3 , 7 , 9 , 1 4 , 1 5 , 1 9 - 2 1 ; R - 1 ; S - 5 , 6 , 8 -
1 3,20; T - 1 -4 , 6 , 9 , 1 1 , 1 4 ; Z - 1 -4 .
Cz V l l l . 1 4 - A - 1 -5 , 7 , 1 0 , 1 1 , 1 3 - 1 5,20,22,25,29,30,32,36-
8, 1 3, 1 8 ,20; D - 2 , 3 , 5 , 7 ; E - 1 -5 ; F - 1 - 7 ; G
- 3 - 6 , 8 ; H - 1 -3 , 5 ; I - 3,5; J . 2; K - 1 ; L
- 1 -4 ; M - 2,5,8 , 1 0- 1 2 , 1 4 ; N - 1 ,2; 0 - 1 ; P
- 1 -3,7,9, 1 4 - 1 6 , 1 9 -2 1 ; R - 1 ; S - 5,6,8-
1 3 ,20; T 1 -4 , 6 , 9, 1 1 , 1 4; Z - 1 -4 .
182
Cz IX Western Plateau an d H ills .
36-44, 8 . 1 - 4,6- 1 0, 1 2- 1 7 ; c . 1 - 1 3 , 1 5 , 1 6, 1 8 -
H - 1 -3,5; I - 1 - 5; J - 2 ; K - 1 ; L - 1 -4;
M - 2-6,9 - 1 4; N - 1 , 2; 0 - 1 ; P - 1 -3,5,7-9,
1 4 - 1 6, 1 9 -2 1 ; R - 1 ; S - 5 - 1 5 , 1 8,20; T - 1-
4,6,7,9, 1 1 , 1 2, 1 4 ; z - 1 - 4.
1 2 - 1 7; C - 1 - 1 3 , 1 5, 1 6, 1 8-20; D - 2-8; E - 1-
- 2 ; K - 1 ; L - 1 - 4; M - 2-5,9- 1 4 ; N - 1 ,2; 0
- 1 ; P - 1 - 3,5,7,9, 1 4 - 1 6, 1 9 -2 1 ; R - 1 ; S - 5 -
20; T - 1 -4,6,7,9- 1 2 , 1 4; Z - 1 - 4 .
8 - 1 -4,6- 1 0 , 1 2 - 1 7 ; C - 1 - 1 3 , 1 5 , 1 6 , 1 8 -20; D -
I - 1 -5; J - 2; K - 1 ; L - 1 - 4; M - 2- 6,9 - 1 4 ;
- 1 ; S - 5 - 1 7 , 20; T - 1 -4,6,7,9 , 1 1 , 1 2 , 1 4 ; Z
- 1 -4.
1 83
Cz IX. 4 - A - 1 - 3 , 7 , 1 0 - 1 5 , 1 8-22,25,27,29-32,36-44, B -
2-4,6- 1 0, 1 2 - 1 7 ; C - 1 - 1 3 , 1 5 , 1 6, 1 8-20; D - 2-
8 , E - 1 - 5 ; F - 1 - 7,9; G - 3-9; H - 2 5 ; I - -
1 - 5; J - 2 ; K - 1 ; L - 1 -4 ; M - 2,5, 9 - 1 4 ; N -
1 , 2; 0 - 1 ; P - 1 - 3,5,7,9, 1 4 , 1 6, 1 9 - 2 1 ; R - 1 ;
1 -4 .
184
Cz X. Southern Plateau a n d Hills Region.
Cz X. 1 - A - 1 -3,6-8, 1 0 - 1 5, 1 9 - 2 2 , 2 5 , 2 7 -33,36-44, B -
1 - 4,6- 1 0 , 1 2 - 1 7 ; C - 1 - 1 1 , 1 3, 1 5-20; D - 2 - 8;
1 ,3 - 5 ; J - 2 ; K - 1 ; L - 1 -4 ; M - 2-5,9- 1 4 ; N
- 1 , 2 ; 0 - 1 ; P - 1 -3,5,7-9, 1 4 - 1 6 , 1 9- 2 1 ; R -
1 ; S - 5,6,9-20; T - 1 - 7 ,9, 1 1 , 1 2, 1 4; Z - 1 -4 .
K - 1 ; L - 1 - 4 ; M - 2-5,9 - 1 4 ; N - 1 , 2 ; 0 - 1 ;
P - 1 - 3 , 5 , 7 - 9, 1 4 - 1 6 , 1 9 -2 1 ; R - 1 ; S - 5,6,9-
2 0 ; T - 1 - 7,9 , 1 1 , 1 2 , 1 4; Z - 1 -4 .
Cz X. 3 - A - 1 - 3,6,8, 1 0 - 1 5 , 1 8 - 2 2 , 2 5 - 3 2 , 3 6 - 4 4 , B - 1 -
4 , 6 - 1 0, 1 2 - 1 7 ; C - 1 - 1 1 , 1 3 , 1 5 , 1 6 , 1 8-20; D - 2 -
8; E - 1 - 5; F - 1 - 7,9; G - 3-6,8,9; H - 1-
3,5; I - 3-5; J - 2; K - 1 ; L - l - 4; M - 2-
5 , 9- 1 4 ; N 1 ,2 · 0 - 1 ; P - 1 -3 , 5 , 7 - 9 , 1 4 -
1 6, 1 9 -2 1 ; R - l, S - 5, 6,9-20; T - 1-
6,9, 1 1 , 1 2 , 1 4 ; z - 1 -4 .
Cz X. 4 - A - 1 - 3 , 6- 1 5 , 1 8 - 2 2 , 2 5 , 2 7 - 3 3 , 3 6 - 4 4 , B - l - --i ,6 - 1 0 ,
1 2 - 1 7 ; C - l - 1 1 , 1 3, 1 5 , 1 6, 1 8-20; D - 2-8; E -
135
l -5; F - l - 7,9; G - 3-6,8,9; H - 2,3,5; I -
1 ,3-5; J - 2; K - 1 ; L - l - 4; M - 2 - 5 , 9 - 1 4; N
- 1 , 2 ; 0 - 1 ; IP - 1 -3,5,7-9, 1 4 - 1 6, 1 9- 2 1 ; R -
1 ; S - 5, 6,9-20; T - 1 -6,9, 1 1 , 1 4 ; Z - 1 - 4 .
Cz X. 5 - A - 1 -3 , 6 - 1 5 , 1 8-22,25,2 7,28,30-32,36-40, B -
1 -4,6- 1 0, 1 2 - 1 6; C - 1 - 1 1 , 1 3 , 1 5, 1 6, 1 8-20; D -
2-8; E - 1 - 5 ; F - 1 - 7 , 9 ; G - 3-6,8,9; H -
5,9- 1 4; N - 1 , 2; 0 - 1 ; P - 1 -3,5,7,9, 1 4 -
1 6, 1 9 - 2 1 ; R - 1; S - 5-20; T - 1 - 6 , 9 , 1 1 , 1 4 ; Z
- 1 -4 .
Cz X. 6 - A - 1 -3,6-8, 1 0- 1 5 , 1 9-22,25,27-33,36-44, B -
1 - 4,6- 1 0, 1 2 - 1 7 ; C - 1 - 1 1 , 1 3 , 1 5 , 1 6 , 1 8-20; D -
3,5; I - 1 - 5; J - 2; K - 1 ; L - 1 -4 ; M - 2-
5,9- 1 4 ; N - 1 , 2 ,. 0 - 1 ; P - 1 -3,5,7,9, 1 4 -
1 6 , 1 9 - 2 1 ; R - 1 ; S - 5-20; T - 1 - 7 , 9, 1 1 , 1 4 ; Z
- 1 -4 .
186
Cz XI. East Coast Plains a n d Hills Region.
8 - 1 - 1 0, 1 2 - 1 6 ; C - 1 - 20; 0 - 1 - 8; E - 1 -5; F
2; K - 1 ; L - 1 -4 ; M - 2-6,9- 1 4 ; N - 1 ; 0 -
1; P - 1 -3,5,7-9, 1 4, 1 6, 1 9-2 1 ; R - 1; S -
5,6,8-20; T - 1 -3 , 5 - 1 2, 1 4 ; Z - 1 -4 .
Cz X I . 2 - A - 1 , 3,6-8, 1 0- 1 5, 1 8-22,25-32,36-44, 8 - 1-
2; K - 1 ; L - 1 -4 ; M - 2-6,9- 1 4 ; N - 1 ; 0 -
1; P - 1 - 3,5,7-9, 1 4 , 1 6 , 1 9- 2 1 ; R - 1; S -
5,6,8-20; T - 1 - 3,5- 1 2, 1 4 ; Z - 1 - 4 .
Cz X I . 3 - A - 1 - 3,6-8, 1 0- 1 5 , 1 8-22,25-32,36-44, 8 - 1-
2; K - 1 ; L - 1 - 4 ; M - 2-6,9 - 1 4 ; N - 1 , 2: 0 -
1 ; P - 1 - 3,7-9 , 1 4 - 1 6 , 1 9 -2 1 ; R - 1 ; S - 5,6,8-
20; T - 1 - 3, 5- 1 2 , 1 4 ; Z - 1 -4 .
Cz X I . 4 - A - 1 -3,6- 1 5, 1 8 - 2 2 ,25,27-32, 3 6 -4 4 , 8 - 1 - 1 0,
1 2 - 1 7; C - 1 -20; 0 - 1 - 8; E - 1 , 3-5; F - 1-
1 87
K - 1 ; l - 1 - 4 ; M - 2 - 6 ,9 - 1 4 ; N - 1 , 2 ; 0 - 1 ;
P - 1 - 3 , 7 - 9, 1 4 - 1 6, 1 9 -2 1 ; R - 1 ; S - 5,6,8-20;
T - 1 -3,5- 1 2 , 1 4; Z - 1 -4 .
Cz X I . 5 - A - 1 - 3 ,6 - 1 5, 1 8 - 2 2 , 2 5 , 2 7 , 3 2 , 3 6 - 4 4 , 8 - 1 - 1 0, 1 2,
1 4 - 1 7 ; C - 1 -20; D - 1 - 8; E - 1 -5 ; F - 1 -7 , 9 ;
G - 1 -6,8,9; H . 1 - 3 , 5 ; I - 1 ,3- 5; J - 2 ; K -
1 ; l - 1 - 4 ; M - 2-6,9- 1 4 ; N - 1 ,2 ; 0 - 1 ; P -
3,5-9, 1 1 , 1 4 ; z - 1 - 4 .
1 2 - 1 4 , 1 6 , 1 7 ; C - 1 - 20; D - 1 - 8; E - l -5; F -
2 ; K - 1 ; l - 1 -4 ; M - 2 - 6 , 9 - 1 4 ; N - 1 ,2 ; 0 -
1 ; P - 1 - 3 , 7 - 9 , 1 4 - 1 6 , 1 9 -2 1 ; R - 1 ; S - 5-20;
T - 1 -3 ,5 - 1 2 , 1 4 ; Z - 1 -4 .
1 88
Cz XII. West Coast Plains an d Ghat Region.
Cz X I I . 1 - A - 1 , 3 , 4 , 6 - 8 , 1 0 - 1 5 , 1 8-22,25,27-33,36-44, B -
1 - 1 0, 1 2- 1 7 ; C - 1 -20; D - 1 -8; E - 1 -5 ; F -
2; K - 1 ; L - 1 - 4; M - 2-6,9- 1 4 ; N - 1 ,2 ; 0 -
1 ; P - 1 - 3,5, 7 - 9 , 1 4 -2 1 ; R - 1 ; S - 5-15,17-
20; T - 1 -4, 1 1 , 1 2 , 1 4; Z - 1 - 4 .
Cz X I I . 2 - A - 1 ,3,4,6- 1 5, 1 8-22,25,27-33,36-44, B - 1-
2; K - 1 ; L - 1 - 4 ; M - 2-6,9- 1 4 ; N - 1 ; 0 -
1; P - 1 -3,5,7-9, 1 4 - 2 1 ; R - 1 ; S - 5,6,8-
1 3, 1 5-20; T - 1 - 1 1 , 1 4 ; Z - 1 - 4 .
Cz XII. 3 - A - 1 ,3,4,6-8,1 0- 1 5, 1 8 - 2 2 , 2 5 , 2 7 - 3 3 , 3 6 - 4 4 , B -
1 - 1 0, 1 2 - 1 7; C - 1 - 20; D - 1 - 8; E - 1 -5 ; F -
K - 1 ; L - 1 -4 ; M - 2-6,9 - 1 4 ; N - 1 ,2 ; 0 - 1 ;
P - 1 -3,5, 7 - 9, 1 4 -2 1 ; R - 1 ; S - 5,8-20; T -
1 - 1 1 , 1 4; z - 1 -4 .
1 0, 1 2 - 1 7; C - 1 - 20; D - 1 -8 ; E - 1 - 5 ; F - 1 -
1 89
- l ; L - l -4 ; M - 2-6,9- 1 4; N - 1 , 2 ; 0 - 1 ; P
- 1 -3 , 5 , 7 - 9, 1 4 - 2 1 ; R - 1 ; S - 5-20; T - 1 -9 ,
1 1 , 1 2 , 1 4 ; z - 1 -4 .
190
'\ 88
'I
Cz XIII. Gujarat Plains and Hill Region.
Cz X l l l . l - A - 1 -6 , 1 0, 1 1 , 1 3 - 1 5, 1 8,20,22,25,27,29-32,36-
4�, B - 1 -4 , 6 - 1 0, 1 2 - 1 4 , 1 7; C - 2-20 ; D - 2 -8 ;
1 ,3-5; J - 2 ; K - 1 ; L - l - 4; M - 2,3,5,6,9-
1 4 ; N - 1 ; 0 - 1 , P - 1 - 3,5,7-9, 1 4 - 2 1 ; R - 1 ;
4 4 , B - 1 -4 , 6 - 1 0, 1 2 - 1 4 , 1 7; C - 2 - 1 8; D - 2 - 8 ;
1 , 3- 5 ; J - 2 ; K - 1 ; L - 1 -4; M - 2,3,5,6,9-
1 4; N - 1 ; 0 - 1; p . 1 - 3 , 5 I 7 - 9 I 1 4-2 1 ; R - 1 ;
S - 5 , 6 . 8- 1 4 , 1 6 , 1 7,20; T - 1 -4 , 6- 1 2 , 1 4; Z -
1 -4.
C z X l l l .3 - A - 1 - 6, 1 0, 1 1 , 1 3 - 1 5 , 1 8,20,22,25,27,29-32,36-
2,3,5; I - 3 - 5 ; J - 2 ; K - 1 ; L - 1 -4 ; M -
2,3,5,6,9 - 1 4 ; N - 1 ; 0 - 1 ; P - 1 -3,5,7-9, 1 4-
2 1 ; R - 1 ; S - 5,6. 8 - 1 4 , 1 6 , 1 7,20 ; T - 1 -4 , 6 -
1 2, 1 4 ; Z - 1 -4 .
191
Cz X l l 1 .4 - A - 1 - 6 , 1 0, 1 1 , 1 3 - 1 5,20, 2 2 , 2 5 , 2 7 , 2 9 - 3 2 , 3 6 - 4 4 ,
B - 1 , 6- 1 0, 1 2 - 1 4 , 1 7 ; C - 2 - 2 0 ; D - 2 - 8 ; E -
5 ; J - 2; K - 1 ; L - 1 - 4 ; M - 2,3,5,6,9 - 1 4 ; N
- 1 I2I· 0 - 1 I· P - 1 -3 I 5 I 7 -9 I 1 4 -2 1 I· R - 1 I· S -
1 -4.
Cz X I I I . S - A - 1 - 6 , 1 0 , 1 1 , 1 3 - 1 5, 1 8,20, 2 2 , 2 5 , 2 7 , 2 9 - 3 2 ,36-
1 ,3 - 5 ; J - 2 ; K - 1 ; L - 1 - 4 ; M - 2,3,5,6,9-
1 4; N - 1 ; 0 - 1 ; P - 1 -3,5,7-9, 1 4 - 2 1 ; R - 1;
S - 5,6,9 - 1 3, 1 5 - 1 7 , 20; T - 1 -4 , 6 , 8 - 1 2 , 1 4 ; Z
- 1 -4 .
Cz X l l l . 6 - A - 1 -6 , 1 0, 1 1 , 1 3 - 1 5 , 1 8,20, 2 2 , 2 5 , 2 7 - 3 2 , 3 6 - 4 4 ,
B - 1 -3 , 6 - 1 0, 1 2 - 1 4 , 1 7 ; C - 2 - 2 0 ; D - 2 - 8; E -
1 , 3-5; J - 2; K - 1 ; L - 1 - 4 ; M - 2,3,5,6,9-
1 4 ; N - 1 ,2 ; 0 - 1 ; P - 1 - 3 , 5 , 7 - 9 , 1 4 -2 1 ; R -
1; S - 5,6,9- 1 3, 1 5-20; T - 1 - 4 , 6 - 1 2 , 1 4 ; Z -
1 -4.
Cz X 1 1 1 . 7 - A - 1 , 3 - 7 , 1 0, 1 1 , 1 3 - 1 5 , 1 8,20 , 2 2 , 2 5 , 2 7 - 3 2 , 3 6 -
44, B - 1 , 2 , 6 - 1 0, 1 2 - 1 4 , 1 6, 1 7 ; C - 2 - 2 0 ; D -
192
2-8; E - l - 5; F - l - 7,9; G - 3-9; H - 1 - 3; I
- 3-5; J - 2; K - 1 ; l - l - 4 ; � - 2,3,5,6,9-
1 4 ; N - 1 ,2 ; 0 - 1 ; P - l - 3,5,7-9, 1 4 - 2 1 ; R -
1 ; S - 5,6,9- 1 3, 1 5 - 1 7,20; T - l -4 , 6 - 1 2, 1 4; Z
- 1 -4 .
Cz XIV. - A
4 1 ,44; 8 - 1 - 3,6- 1 0, 1 2 - 1 4 , 1 7 ; c - 2- 5, 1 3, 1 8;
1; P - 2 , 7 , 9, 1 5 -2 1 ; R - 1 ; S - 6,8, 1 0 -
1 2 , 1 5,20; T - 1 - 4,6,9, 1 4; Z - 1 - 4 .
• n"
Cz XV. The island Region.
Cz XV. - A - 1 -3 , 5 - 7 , 9- 1 3, 1 8-20,22,24,25,27,30-32,37-
-14; N -
- 2 ; K - 1 ; L - 1 ,4 ; M - 1 -3,5 ,6,8
1; R - 1, S -
1 , 2; 0 - 1 ; P - 1 - 3,5- 9 , 1 2 , 1 5-2
- 1 -4 .
1 ,5,6 ,8, 1 5 - 1 8,2 0; T - 1 - 1 4 Z
REFRENCES
Agarwal, M. and D.N Rao {1 983) Effect of ozone and sulphur dioxide pollutants on seed
characters of rice plants. Sc1 and Cult. 49 (c) : 1 77-1 78.
Agrawal M. and N Khanam (1 989). Man and H1s Ecosystem. L.J. Brasser & W.C. Mulder
(Eds). Proceedings of the 8th World Clean Air Congress 1 989, The Hague. The
Netherlands. 1 1 -15 September 1 989
Agrawal M. and S.B Agrawal {1 989) Phytomonitoring of air pollution around a thermal
power plant. Atmosp Env�ron. 23 763-769.
Alagh, Y K (Summary by Wadia F.K ) (1 990) Agro- climatic regional planning Overview
of a new approach. Jour. lnd School of Polit1cal Economy. 2 (1) 81-1 1 1 .
·
Ambasht, R.S. (1 970}. Conservatton of soil through plant cover of certain slopes tn India
Proc IX Tech. Meet1ng I UCN. pp. 44-48.
Baneqee, A K �nd S.B. Chaphekar {1 978). Effects of S02 on germination and early
growth of seedlings Geobios. 7 8-1 1 .
Bedi,S J M.O Patel. and S J Shah (1 982). Ecomorpholog1cal and phytochemical studies
to determ1ne the pollutant and 1ts source. caus1ng damage to vegetat1on. A case study of
damage to banana plantat1an Ind. J Ecol 2 · 335-338.
Bell, D.C. and S.J. Bed1 (1981). Effect of 1ndustnal atr pollution on the b1omass and y"eld
of Lycopersicon lycopers1cum L Karsten (Tomaro} V•llnter Crop. Proc. Silver Jub Symp.
of VIISTE, Bhopal.
Bennett, J H and A.C. Hill (1 973) Absorption of gaseous atr pollutants by a standardized ,
Bennett. J.H. and A C Hill (1 975) Interaction of atr pollutants w1th canopies of vegetation.
In : J B. Mudd and T T Kozlowski (eds) Response of Plants to A1r Pollution Academic
press New York, 273-306
Bhatravmurthy, P. V. and P.V. Kumar (1 983). A1r pollution and epidermal traits of
Calotropis gigantea (L) R. lnd.J.Ar Pollut Contr.l . (1 &2) 23-26
Bhatia. Roop Rekha {1 978) Effect of Fly-ash on Plant growth. M.Phil. Thes1s J N.U New
Delhi.
Boralkar, D.B. and S.B. Chaphekar (1 978). Sulphur dioxide effects on Jawar - Sorghum
vulgare Var. CSH-1. Proc. Symp. Env1ron. Bioi. Muzaffairnagar, 361 -366.
Boralkar, D. B. and S.B. Chaphekar {1 980). Effects of atmospheric pollution due to a glass
industry on plants in Kera, Maharashtra.
Boralkar. D.B. and S.B. Chaphekar (1 983). Foliar injury to Trigonella foenum graecum
due to sulphur dioxide exposure lnd J. Air. Pollut.Contr.4 :
Boralkar, D. B. and 0 B. Shinde {1 983) Effects of sulphur dioxide and ozone stngly and
in combination. on germinatton and chlorophylls of Abelmoschus esculantus Var. pusa
savant j Environ. Btol. 4 : 99-1 02.
Bradshaw, A D. and M.J Chadwtck {1 980) The Restoration of Land. Blackwell Scientific.
pp. 317.
Brennan, E.; I.A. Leone, and R.H. Daines (1 965). Chlorine as Phytotoxic air pollutant. Int.
J. Air Water Pollut 9 : 791 -797.
Chaphekar, S.B. and D. B. Boralkar (1979). Effects of gaseous ammonia on plant growth
and protection. Ind. J. Air Pollut Contr 2 : 1 9-23.
Chaphekar, S.B. D B. Boralkar. and R.P. Shetye (1 980). Effects of Industrial Pollutants
on Plants. Final Report of UGC sponsored proJect.
Chaphekar. S.B (1 989} Revegetation of Zn-Pb Mine Tailings. Frnal Report to Sponsors
Chowdhury, A.; H.P. Das and S S Singh (1 993) Agro- climatic Classrficatron of India
Mausam, 44 ( 1 ) 53- 60
Das, T.M. and P. Pattanayak (1978). Dust filtering property of green plants and the effect
of a1r borne part1cles on growth and yield. pp. 224-234 In: Proceedings of the lnternat.
Symp. Envrronmental Agents and the1r b1ol. effects. Hyderabad.
Das T.M.; A. Bhaum1k A. Ghosh. and A Charkraborty {1981). Trees as dust filters.
Scrence Today 1 9 . 1 9-21
Davis. D. D. (1 975). Vanable tree response due to environmental factors climate. I n : W.H.
Sm1th and L.S. Doch1nger (Eds.), A1r Pollution and Metropolitan Woody Vegetation.
U S D A. Forest Service PI EFR - PA-1 Upper Darby. Pennsylvania, 1 4- 1 6.
Dubey, P S K Pawar S K Shnngi and L. Trivedi (1 982} Effects of fly ash deposrtion on
photosynthetic pigment and dry weight production of Wheat and Gram. Agro. Ecosystem
8 . 1 37-140
Dubey. P S . L. Tnvedi. and S K. Shnng1 (1 982) - Pollution studies of Betul forest area
due to Satpura Thermal Power Stat1on aenal d scharge F1nal report. DOE project
no 1 9/27/78. Env. 53.
Environmental Health Science Centre (1 975). The role of plants in environmental
purification Oregon State Umversity, Corvallis, Oregon. 53.
Evans, D.W. and J P G esy Jr) 1 979) Trace metal concentrations n stream swamp
system. In : Ecology and Coal Resource Development (ed) Mohan K. Walt Vol 2.
782-790.
Flemm1ng, G. (1 967). When can forest belts reduce the emissions concentration? Luft
and Kaeltechmk. 6. 255-258.
Fulekar, M.H. and J.M Dave ( 1 990). Environmental Impact Assessment of Fly-Ash from
Coal-Fired Power Plants. Encology Vol. 4. No. 8, pp. 25-34.
Ghouse, A.K M. and F A Khan ( 1 983) Growth responses of Mehlotus alba L. to air
pollutants emerging out of coal burning Geob1os 1 o : 227-228.
Gupta V.K. and R.K. Kapoor (1 992). Attenuat1on of a!r pollut1on by green belt -
Optimisation of density of tree plantation. Conference on Precipitation Scavenging
and Atmosphere Surface Exchange. Washington D C , U S.A
Hanson, G.P. and L. Thorne (1 970). A partial pollution solution - plant trees. Lasca Leaves
20 . 35·36.
Hill, A.C. (1971). Vegetation A sink for atmospheric pollutants. J. Air pollution control
Assoc. 21 . 341 -346.
Hill, A.C. and E.M. Chamberlain, Jr. (1 974). The removal of water solub e gases from the
atmosphere by vegetation Atmospher c surface. Exchange of Particulate and Gaseous
polh..:tants symp. Richland, Wash1ngton Sept. 4-6, 1 974, 1 2 pp.
IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) Safety Guide. Safety Series No. 50-SG-S3
(1 980), Atmospheric Disperston 1n Nuclear Power Plant S1t1ng
IAEA - TEA DOC - 379 (1 986) Atmospheric Dispersion Models for Application in Relation
to Radionuclide Releases.
Jha, A K and J.S. Singh (1 944). Rehabrlltation of mine spoils With partrcular reference to
multipurpose trees in agroforestry systems for sustainable land use Ed. PunJab Singh,
P.S. Pathak, and M M Roy Oxford and IBH publishers. 237-250.
Juwarkar, A.S , V.P. Thergaonkar; A.S Malhotra, and An1mesh Kumar (1 989).
Reclamation of m1ned land and mine spo11 using sewage sludge and soil. Natl Sem
Protectron of Environ. and Ecol by Mining Ind., Panjim Vol I : 396-408.
Keller T. and H. Schwager {1 977). Air pollutron and ascorbic acrd. Eur. J. Forest Pathol.
7 (6) : 338-350.
Keller T (1 978). How effectrve are forests in improvrng air quality? Eight World Forestry
Conference Jakarta, lndonesra. 1 978, pp 9.
Kellogg, W.W., R.D.Cadle, E.R. Allen; AL. Lazarus. and E.A Martell (1 972) The Sulphur
Cycle. Science 1 75 : 587-596.
Krishnan A. (1 988) Delineatron of so11 climatic zones of lndra and rts practical application
1n agriculture fertilizer News. 33 (4) : 1 1 -19
Kumar S and C.B. Prakash (1 978 Su phur droxide : The major gaseous pollutant Ind.
J Arr. Pollut. Control. 1 : 1 02-1 09.
Kumar S and S.N Upadhyay · 1 983.'. Atmospherrc emissions from thermal power plants
rn lndra In . Proceedings of sympos11Um of Arr Pollutron Control. lndra 1 1 9- 1 3 1 .
Lrnzon S N (1 978). Effects of airborne sulfur pollutants on plants. In : J.O Nrragu (Ed.).
Sulfur rn the Environment : Part II Ecologrcal Impacts. Wiley, New York, 1 09-162.
Mudd, J B. (1 973). Biochemical effects of some atr pollutants on plants. In J.A Naegele
(Ed.) Air Pollutants damage to vegetation. Adv. Chern Series. No 122, Amer Chem. Soc .
Washrngton 0 C pp 31 -47.
Murthy. lv1.S.R.; 0. Bhagyalakshmr, S i-l Raza, and A. Ahmad (1991). A new Method for
Evaluating Sulfur Droxide Tolerance of Certain Trees I ntern. J. Environmental Studies.
Vol 39, pp 85-94.
Pandey. G.P. and D.N. Rao (1 980) HF induced e#ects and therr amelioration by Ca(OH)2
solution in Gladrolus plants. Be,tr Brol. Pflanzen 55 : 1 1 9-128.
Pandey, S.N and D.N. Rao (1 979) Eco-phys1ological 1nvestrg-:1tion of sulphur d1oxide
pollution effects on Soybean. Proc. Symp Environ. Bioi. 1 73-1 82
Pandey. V.; J Mrsra· S . N S•ngh: N Stngh: M. Yunus and J Ahmad (1 994). Growth
response of Hehanthus annus L Grown on fly-ash Amended soil J Env ron Bioi. 1 5 (2)
1 1 7-125.
Pawar. K . : L. Trivedi . and P.S. Dubey (1 982). ComparatiVe effects of cement. coal. dust
and fly - ash on Abelmoschus exculantus. Inter. J. Env. studres 1 9 : 221 - 223. ·
Pawar. K. and P S. Dubey { 1 982). Gro�tlth response of wheat culttvar N-14 to fly ash
Incorporated black cotton so11. All lndra sem1nar on Atr pollutton. 1 9-21 . Apnl Indore
Pawar. K. and P.S Dubey (1 983). Effects of atmosphe11c pollutants on the morphology
and pigment content of Mangrfera rndrca L. Proc. VI World Congr. Air Quality. Paris, pp
501 -507
Pawar K. L. Trivedi and P S Dubey {1 983). fly ash deposition and productivity
measurements in beans Ind. J A1r Poilut contr 5 : 1 8-20.
Prasad. B.J and D N Rae (1 979) Influence of Nitrogen dtoxide (N02) on photosynthetic
apparatus and net pnmary producttvrty of wheat plant. Acta Bot lndtca. 7 : 1 6-21 .
Prasad. B.J.(1 980).Phytotoxicity of petro eum refinery air pollutants. Ph.D. Thesis B.H.U..
Varanasi.
Prasad, B.J. and D. N. Rae (1981 ) . Growth responses of Phaseolus aureus plants to
petro-coke pollutton. J. Expt Bot. 32 : 1 343-1350
Prasad, B.J. and D.N Rae (1 982). Relattve sensitivity of a legumtnous and a cereal crop
Rae. D.N. and F. Leblanc (1 966). Effects of sulphur dioxide on the lichen algae, wtth
special reference to chlorophyll Bryologtst. 69 : 60-75.
Rae. D.N. (1971). A study of a1r pollution problem due to coal unloading in Varanas India.
pp : 273-276. In Proceedtng of Second International A1r Congress (Eds. M.M.
Englend and G.T. Beny). AcademiC Press, New York.
Rae D. N. (1 972). Mangifera 1ndtca, a bloindtcator of pollution 1n the trop1cs. Proc 22nd
Int. Geog. Cong. Montreal. p. 272.
Rae. D.N and 0 Pal (1 978) Effect of hydrogen fluonde on growth and yteld of corn (Zea
mays) In Glimpses of Ecology, Ed. J S. Stngh and B. Gopal. lnternattonal Scient1f1c
Publicat1ons. Jaipur, lndta 461 -470.
Rae. D.N (1979). Plants as a pollution monrtonng devtce. Ferttltser News 24 : 25-28
Rao. D.N . R.S Snvastav; R S. Rat. P. Jatn, B.J. Prasad; S K Stngh; M. Agarwal, V.
Stngh, and P K. Nandi ( 1 983). To Study the Relative Suscepttblhty of Saplings of Some
Common FrUit and Avenue Trees to Sulphur d10k1de Pollution. F1nal Tech. Report of UGC
sponsored research project Nc. F-23-1 1 5/79 (SA II) 29
Response and ProductiVIty Pattern of Plants w•th Respect to Fly-ash and S02• F1na1 Tech.
Report of MAB proJect DOE I 1 4 1256 I 85-MABIRE.
Raynor G. S.: J.V. Hayes. and E C Ogden (1 974}. Particulate dtsperston into and within a
forest Boundary - Layer Met 7 429-456.
Raza, S.H., M.S.R. Murtny, and A. Ahmed 1 988) Fol ar sulfate content in certain trop1cal
trees under low levels of S02. Air Pollutton and Forest Decline (J. B. Bucher & I. Bucher
.__ -
Wallin. eds.) Proc. 1 4th lnt Meetrng for specialists in Air Pollution Effects on Forest
Ecosystems. IUFRO P2 05 Interlaken Swrtzerland. Oct. 2-8. 1 988. Brrmensdozf. 1 989,
pp. 1 05-1 09.
Raza. S.H.; G. Shylaja (1 992). Studres of tolerance of certarn succulent plants to ambrent
air sulfurdioxide levels in urban envrronments of a city rn India. A New Approach. I ntern. J.
Envrronmental Studres. Vol. 42 : 301-318.
Roberts, B.A. {1 974). Fohar sorption of atmospheric sulphur dioxide by woody plants ..
Eviron. Pollut. 7 : 1 33-140.
Shetye. R.P. and S B. Chaphekar (1 980). On measurement of dustfall with plants. pp.
205-213 in Proc. Sem Management of Environment BARC Bombay. (Ed ) Patel B.
Singh, S.N and D.N. Rao ( 1 978). Possibilities of using chlorophyll and potassium contents
tn plants to detect cement dust pollutron. J. IPHE, India, 1 : 1 0-13.
Srngh. N and 0 N Rao (1 979). Studres of the effect of sulphus dioxide on alfafa plants
especially under condttrons of natural precrprtatron I. Changes pertaining to growth
pattern phytomass accumulatron and producuvtty tn plants lndran J. Arr Pollut. Contr. 2 :
55-69.
Singh, N. and D.N. Rao ( 1 980). Growth responses of wheat plant to cement dust polluted
environment. Proc. Indian Natl. Sci. Acad. 3 : 325-320.
Smith, W.H. (1981) Air Pollution and Forests Interactions between Air Contaminants and
Forest Ecosystems. Spnnger-Verlag New York
Smith, W.H. and L.S. Dochinger ( 1 976). Capabihtes of metropolitan trees to reduce
atmospherrc contaminats. In : H. Gerhold, F. Santamor and S. Lrttle (Eds.) Proc.
Better Trees for Metropolition Landscapes. U S.D.A.. Forest Service, Gen. Tech. Report
No. NE-22, Upper Darby. Pensylvanra, pp. 49-59.
Tandon. G L. {1 989). Planning for susta1ned mineral development by 2001 A.D. Proc.
Sem Protection of Env1ronment and Ecology by M1mng Industry PanJim Vol 1 . 1 5-45.
Taylor, 0 C ; C A. Thompson. D.T T1ngey and R.A Reinert (1975) Ox1des of nrtrogen.
In : J G. Mudd and T T Kozlowski (Eds ) Responses of Plants to Air Polluton Academic
.
Treshow, M. (1 970). Environment and Plant Response Me Graw Hill. New York.
Varshney, C K. Use of sulphur content in Ne'lum indicum for monitoring sulphur dioxide
pollution in Delt'l1
U.S EPA (1 978) Guideline on a1r quality models OAOPS guideline series no. 1 .2-080,
EPA-450/2-78-027
Warren, J.L. (1 973\ Green space for a1r pollution control. N.C State University Sch. for
Resour. Tech. Rep 50. Rale1gh N.C
Wash - 1 400 (1 975). Reactor safety study : An assesment of acctdent nsks in U.S.
commercial nuclear power plants. Appendix - VI, U S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commtss1on Report NUREG - 75/014, Nat1onal Techn1cal lnformat1on Serv1ce
Yunus M and K.J. Ahmad (1 979). LJse of epidermal tra1ts of plants tn pollution monitoring
Proc of Nat Sem on Env1ron Pollut. and Its Control. A Status Review. National
Productivtty Council. Bombay.
Yunus, M and K J Ahmed (1 980). Effect of air pollution on leaf epidermis of Psidium
guava L. Indian J Air. Pollut Contr 3 : 62-67
Yusuf. M. and L.N. Vyas 1 982). Efect of cement dust pollution on some se ected plant
species growtng around uda1pur cement works Bajaj Nagar. Udaipur. Presented at the All
India Seminar on Air pollut1on Apr; 1 982. ndore.
Zeevart, A.J. (1 976 Some effects of fumigating plants for short periods with N02.
Envtron. Pollut. 1 1 : 97- 108.
I n addttion to the Reference Ltst, the following were offerred extensively as sources of
informatton.
Effects of Air Pollutants on Plants Ed. T.A. Mansf1eld. Society for Expenmental Series 1
Cambridge Univ. Press. 1 976.
Flora of Eastern Karnataka. Vol. I. II by N P Singh. Mittal Publ Delhi, 1988 pp 794.
Flora of Coibatore. M. Chandrabose and N.C Natr, Publ. Bishan Stngh Mahaendral Pal
Stngh Oehradun. 1 988 pp 398.
Flora of the Prestdency of Bombay by Theordore Cooke Vol I . I I . I l l . pp. 1 -649. Publ. by
BSI. Calcutta 1901 , 1 902, 1 903.
Glossary of Indian Medictnal Plants . R N Chopra. S.L. Nayar: I 0 Chopra. CSIR New
Delht 1 956 pp. 329.
Indian Medicinal Plants. Vol. I , II by K.R. Kirt.kar, B.D. Basu, Published by Sudhindra Nath
Basu, 1 9 1 8 pp. 1 4 1 9.
Name changes tn Flowering Plants of ndia and adjacent regions. SSR Bennet; Triseas
Publishers, Dehradu, 1 987 pp 772.
Presepectives in Botanical Museums with Reference to lnd1a V.S. Agarwal; Today and
Tommorrows Publ. New De '11 1 983.
Trees for Drylands Ed. By Drake Hock ng Publ. by Mohan Primalani Oxford IBH New
Delhi.
ENVIS Centre, CPCB (www.cpcbenvis.nic.in)