2012 - Review PDF
2012 - Review PDF
com
Microencapsulation can represent an excellent example of involves the incorporation of natural ingredients, poly-
microtechnologies applied to food science and biotechnology. phenols, volatile additives, enzymes, bacteria (i.e. lactic
Microencapsulation can be successfully applied to entrap acid bacteria acting as starters or probiotics) in small
natural compounds, like essential oils or vegetal extracts capsules, giving them the chance to be stable, protected
containing polyphenols with well known antimicrobial and preserved against nutritional and health loss and to
properties to be used in food packaging. Microencapsulation eventually act as antimicrobial agents. The matrices in
preserves lactic acid bacteria, both starters and probiotics, in contact with food are generally natural components, but
food and during the passage through the gastrointestinal tract, mainly they must be Generally Recognised As Safe
and may contribute to the development of new functional (GRAS) for human health.
foods.
Addresses Microencapsulation of bioactive components is per-
1
Istituto di Scienze dell’Alimentazione, ISA-CNR, Via Roma 64, 83100, formed through use of different materials, for example
Avellino, Italy
2
water and oil. A usual water-oil-water emulsion is formed
Istituto di Biochimica delle Proteine, IBP-CNR, Via P. Castellino, 121, with small water droplets, dispersed in large oil droplets,
80134, Napoli, Italy
themselves dispersed in an outer aqueous phase. The
Corresponding author: Nazzaro, Filomena ([email protected]) functional component can be encapsulated within the
inner phase, the oil phase or the outer water phase after
drying; thus, a single delivery system can contain multiple
Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2012, 23:182–186 functional components.
This review comes from a themed issue on
Food biotechnology Micro-emulsions, with droplets sizes less than 500 nm
Edited by Gabriella Gazzani and Michael Grusak diameter, are produced by micro-fluidization or micelle
formation techniques. ME can be successfully applied to
Available online 22nd October 2011
entrap natural compounds, like essential oils (EOs) or
0958-1669/$ – see front matter vegetal extracts containing polyphenols with well known
# 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. antimicrobial properties. This aspect represents an
DOI 10.1016/j.copbio.2011.10.001
important starting point for industries, which can try
out new natural and safe materials or systems of packa-
ging capable to prolong the shelf life of foods, such as
highly perishable fresh foods (vegetables, fruits, meat,
Microencapsulation: principles and use with etc.), without lessening their characteristics in terms of
natural ingredients quality and hygiene. ME can be considered as a real
Microencapsulation (ME) is the envelopment of small resource for food packaging also to mask unpleasant
solid particles, liquid droplets or gases in a coating flavors and odors, or to supply barriers between the
(1–1000 mm). In general, one can differentiate between sensitive bioactive materials and the environment
mononuclear capsules, which have one core enveloped by (represented by food or oxygen). Many of the EOs have
a shell, and aggregates, which have many cores embedded antimicrobial properties against several foodborne patho-
in a matrix, usually polymers (Figure 1). The develop- gens and can be potentially used in different food
ment of a successful encapsulation system for a target matrices, including meat products [3,4]. However, limits
application is based on the need of a good knowledge to their use are linked to the aroma that can be unpleasant
about the stability of the chosen component, biomole- for consumers, or having poor water solubility and
cules or cells, to be encapsulated (core), the properties of volatility.
the materials used for encapsulation (encapsulant matrix)
and the suitability of the delivery system (microcapsule) Encapsulation makes it possible to increase the effec-
for its ultimate application [1]. The most available tech- tiveness of EOs and to decrease their sensory impact on
nologies for microencapsulation use a liquid (complex foods. Microencapsulation of EOs is generally achieved in
coacervation, interfacial and in situ polymerization or two steps. Firstly, an emulsion of the volatile compound is
solvent evaporation from emulsions) or a gas as suspend- made in an aqueous dispersion of a wall material which
ing medium (spray-drying or spray-cooling, fluidized-bed also functions as the emulsifier. Then, the microencap-
coating or co-extrusion) [2]. ME has an evident impact on sulated emulsion must be dried under controlled con-
the food industry. In food science and biotechnology, it ditions so as to diminish the loss of the encapsulated
Figure 1 Figure 2
Rosemary extract
entrappedin PVA
Polyphenols
Negative
control
re
co
Ou
te Pure
rm
at Rosemary
rix extract
affected by the physico-chemical properties of the cap- Spray drying involves atomization of a suspension of
sules: type and concentration of the coating material, probiotics and carrier material into a drying gas, giving
particle size, initial cell numbers and bacterial strains rise to a rapid evaporation of water. Spray-drying pre-
are some of the parameters to be considered [23]. conditions the cells so that they can be better stress-
adapted to subsequent environmentally adverse con-
The main purpose of probiotic encapsulation is to protect ditions, such as high temperatures, acidic environment,
cells against an unfavourable environment, and to allow or presence of bile salts. However, despite these advan-
their release in a viable and metabolically active state in tages, the high temperatures needed to facilitate water
the intestine [24]. Microparticles should be water-inso- evaporation also lower the viability of the probiotics and
luble to maintain their structural integrity in the food reduce their activity in the final product.
matrix and in the upper part of the GI tract; above all,
particle properties should allow progressive liberation of Spray chilling involves the dispersion of the core material
the cells during the intestinal phase [24,25]. For ME of into a warm coating material and the subsequent spraying
microorganisms, the most used polymers (all natural, through a heated nozzle into a controlled environment,
inexpensive, biocompatible and GRAS) are chitosan where the encapsulant solidifies to form the microcapsule
(obtained from arthropods), alginate (a polymer particles [27]. The process is performed in equipment
extracted from seaweed), carrageenan, whey proteins, similar to that used in spray drying except that the process
pectin, poly-l-lysine, and starch. Different types of starch air is not heated.
and modified starches have been tested as entrapping
agents of probiotics [26]; unfortunately, in some cases, Sometimes, microcapsules have a certain number of
the low pH and the presence of proteases, two of the particles located at their surface. This type of microen-
conditions commonly experienced by probiotic organ- capsulation is known as matrix encapsulation, and often
isms during their passage through the stomach, diminish provides more protection during spray drying and storage
their adhesion to starch [27]. Resistant starch is not of probiotics, as well as during their passage through the
degraded by the pancreatic amylase and arrives at the stomach [27].
intestine in an indigestible form. This provides a good
release of bacterial cells in the large intestine and offers The size of the microcapsules is an important parameter
them prebiotic functionality [28]. The materials are that affects the sensory properties of foods. The size of
used alone (monolayer) or in combination: in this last alginate beads ranges from 20 mm to 4 mm. However, a
case, coating the microcapsules with an additional film bead size of 150 mm can be obtained with the new
can avoid their exposure to oxygen during storage and can extrusion technologies, thereby allowing the achieve-
enhance their stability at low pH. For example, one of the ment of more uniformly shaped microcapsules than those
most common double (or triple) layer strategy is reached through the emulsion technique. Spray drying
represented by an inner layer of alginate, containing produces capsule sizes ranging between 5 and 80 mm.
the entrapped microorganisms, then covered by a mono- Bead size also affects the adhesion property of probiotics,
layer of chitosan that might be eventually contained in a and is optimal with granules of starch that are 50 mm in
further outer layer of alginate, chitosan or other polymer diameter [27,28,29,36–37].
[29–31]. Chitosan-coated alginate beads give better pro-
tection in simulated gastric conditions than other outer Co-encapsulation of microorganisms and other important
coating films [27,32]. components like prebiotics protects probiotics in food
systems and in the gastrointestinal tract much better,
Different techniques are used in microencapsulation of owing to synbiosis [38–40]. To date, dairy-based products
probiotics: coacervation, emulsion, extrusion, spray-dry- have emerged as the main carriers for the delivery of
ing, and gel-particle technologies (including spray-chil- probiotics to humans [18]. However, increasing demand
ling). Coacervation is a fluid–fluid phase separation of an by consumers has opened a trend in using nondairy-based
aqueous polymeric solution, where a change in pH products as potential carriers of probiotics. Most of the
enables the formation of the shell by the polymer com- foods containing probiotic microorganisms are found in
plex. Microcapsules are then dried by spray-drying or the refrigerated section of supermarkets; this being owing
freeze-drying [33,34]. When using the emulsion tech- to the fact that the bacteria are sensitive and can be
nique [35], the encapsulating material is added to the destroyed by heat.
bacterial cells; then, the mixture is suspended in an oil
bath containing Tween 80 (acting as emulsifier). The Research is ongoing to develop new envelopes, especially
emulsion is then broken by adding CaCl2 and microcap- formed by double or triple layers of alginate-chitosan, that
sules are collected by centrifugation. For extrusion, pro- allow a better resistance of bacteria to heat (e.g. to
biotics are added to a hydrocolloid solution, then the pasteurization). Ding and Shah [25] demonstrated, in
solution is dripped through a syringe needle or nozzle fact, that the heat tolerance of microencapsulated pro-
[27], which influences the size of microcapsules. biotic bacteria incubated at 65 8C for up to 1 h survived at
ated into many types of food products. 2. Schrooyen PMM, van der Meer R, De Kruif CG:
Microencapsulation: its application in nutrition. In Symposium
on ‘Nutritional effects of new processing technologies’
Different foods containing encapsulated probiotic cells Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, vol 60. Cambridge University
Press; 2001:475-479.
are present on the market. Belgium group Barry Callebaut
produces chocolate containing encapsulated probiotic 3. De Martino L, De Feo V, Nazzaro F: Chemical composition and in
vitro antimicrobial and mutagenic activities of seven
cells that do not negatively affect the taste, texture or Lamiaceae essential oils. Molecules 2009, 14:4213-4230.
mouth feel of the final functional product, and which, at
4. De Martino L, De Feo V, Fratianni F, Nazzaro F: Chemistry,
doses of 13. 5 g per day, might be sufficient to positively antioxidant, antibacterial and antifungal activities of volatile
affect the gut microbiome. In some cases, inulin or other oils and their components. Nat Prod Commun 2009,
4:1741-1750.
prebiotics have been added to probiotics in the manu-
facturing of the bar called ‘Attune’ (www.attunefoods.- 5. Kim Y, Morr C, Schenz T: Microencapsulation properties of gum
arabic and several food proteins: liquid orange oil emulsion
com), into yogurt-covered raisins, nutrient bars, chocolate particles. J Agric Food Chem 1996, 44:1308-1313.
bars, or tablets (www.balchem.com). The ice cream 6. Pandit VA, Shelef LA: Sensitivity of Listeria monocytogenes to
industry is viewing the probiotic market with much in- rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.). Food Microbiol 1994,
terest. Unilever, Hansen, and company Dos Pinos, have 11:57-63.
developed a probiotic ice cream having multiple health 7. Gaysinsky S, Davidson PM, McClements DJ, Weiss J:
Formulation and characterization of phytophenol-carrying
benefits (www.chr-hansen.com). Many products contain- antimicrobial microemulsions. Food Biophys 2008, 3:54-65.
ing encapsulated probiotic cells are available in a tablet/ This is an example of how microencapsulation can be used to develop an
antimicrobial formulation.
capsule form or in a powder form [22], ensuring the
probiotic cells to be preserved against the acidic juices 8. Perez-Conesa D, McLandsborough L, Weiss J: Inhibition and
Inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes and Escherichia coli
of the stomach and able to reach the intestine, and with a O157:H7 colony biofilms by micellar-encapsulated eugenol
shelf life over 24 months if stored at refrigerated tempera- and carvacrol. J Food Prot 2006, 69:2947-2954.
ture (www.cerbios.ch). 9. Chacon PA, Buffo RA, Holley RA: Inhibitory effects of
microencapsulated allyl isothiocyanate (AIT) against
Escherichia coli O157:H7 in refrigerated, nitrogen packed,
Today, new foods such as cereal-based products, soy- finely chopped beef. Int J Food Microbiol 2006, 107:231-237.
based products, fruits, vegetables and meat products are
10. Desai KGH, Park HJ: Recent development in
considered as potential carriers of probiotics. However, microencapsulation of foods ingredients. Drying Technol 2005,
growth in non-dairy products such as sausage and fruit 23:1361-1394.
juices is diminished by the presence of inhibitory sub- 11. Gibbs S, Alli KI, Mulligan CN: Encapsulation in the food industry:
stances such as nisin, organic acids and curing salts. a review. Int J Food Sci Nutr 1999, 50:213-224.
A good review about the application of encapsulation in food science.
Appropriate selection of cultures to be microencapsulated
12. Stevens C, Meriggi A, Booten K: Chemical modification of inulin,
can improve their viability without affecting the sensory a valuable renewable resource, and its industrial applications.
property of the final products [41–44,45], opening new Biomacromolecules 2001, 2:1-16.
13. Saénz C, Tapia S, Chávez J, Paz R: Microencapsulation by from UHT- and conventionally treated milk during storage.
spray drying of bioactive compounds from cactus pear LWT - Food Sci Technol 2006, 39:177-183.
(Opuntia ficus-indica). Food Chem 2009, 114:616-622.
30. Chávarri M, Marañón I, Ares R, Ibáñez FC, Marzo R, Villarán M:
14. Xu XJ, Huang SM, Zhang LH: Biodegradability, antibacterial Microencapsulation of a probiotic and prebiotic in alginate-
properties, and ultraviolet protection of polyvinyl alcohol- chitosan capsules improves survival in simulated gastro-
natural polyphenol blends. Polym Compos 2009, 30:1611-1617. intestinal conditions. Int J Food Microbiol 2010, 142:185-189.
The first article related to use of PVA as entrapping agent for polyphenols.
31. Li XY, Chen XG, Sun ZW, Park HJ, Cha DS: Preparation of
15. Ottombrino A, Fratianni F, Nazzaro F: Antibacterial properties of alginate/chitosan/carboxymethyl chitosan complex
polyvinyl alcohol-rosemary polyphenol blends. International microcapsules and application in Lactobacillus casei ATCC
Conference BIOMICROWORLD; Torremolinos, Spain: 2011. 393. Carbohydr Polym 2011, 83:1479-1485.
16. Mohammadi R, Mortazavian AM, Khosrokhavar R, Gomes da 32. Zhou Y, Martins E, Groboillot A, Champagne CP, Neufeld RJ:
Cruz A: Probiotic ice cream: viability of probiotic bacteria and Spectrophotometric quantification of lactic bacteria in
sensory properties. Ann Microbiol 2011. published online 6 alginate and control of cell release with chitosan coating.
January 2011. J Appl Microbiol 1998, 84:342-348.
17. Favaro-Trindade CS, Grosso CRF: Microencapsulation of L. 33. Champagne CP, Gaudy C, Poncelet D, Neufeld RJ: Lactococcus
acidophilus (La-05) and B. lactis (Bb-12) and evaluation of lactis release from calcium alginate beads. Appl Environ
their survival at the pH values of the stomach and in bile. Microbiol 1992, 58:1429-1434.
J Microencapsul 2002, 19:485-494.
34. Oliveira AC, Moretti TS, Boschini C, Baliero JCC, Freitas O,
18. Champagne CP, Lacroix C, Sodini-Gallot I: Immobilized Favaro-Trindade CS: Microencapsulation of B. lactis (BI 01) and
cell technologies for the dairy industry. Crit Rev Biot 1994, L. acidophilus (LAC 4) by complex coacervation followed by
14:109-134. spouted-bed drying. J Microencapsul 2007, 24:673-681.
One of the most important reviews about use of microencapsulation in the
dairy industry. 35. Gouin S: Microencapsulation: industrial appraisal of existing
technologies and trends. Trends Food Sci Technol 2004,
19. Chandramouli V, Kailasapathy K, Peiris P, Jones M: An improved 15:330-347.
method of microencapsulation and its evaluation to protect
Lactobacillus spp. in simulated gastric conditions. J Microbiol 36. Sheu TY, Marshall RT: Microentrapment of lactobacilli in
Methods 2004, 56:27-35. calcium alginate gels. J Food Sci 1993, 58:557-561.
20. De Giulio B, Orlando P, Barba G, Coppola R, De Rosa M, Sada A, 37. Muthukumarasamy P, Holley RA: Survival of Escherichia
De Prisco PP, Nazzaro F: Use of alginate and cryo-protective coli O157: H7 in dry fermented sausages containing
sugars to improve the viability of lactic acid bacteria after micro-encapsulated probiotic lactic acid bacteria.
freezing and freeze-drying. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2005, Food Microbiol 2007, 24:82-88.
21:739-746.
38. Dinakar P, Mistry VV: Growth and viability of Bifidobacterium
21. Nazzaro F, Fratianni F, Coppola R, Sada A, Orlando P: bifidum in cheddar cheese. J Dairy Sci 1994, 77:2854-2864.
Fermentative ability of alginate-prebiotic encapsulated
Lactobacillus acidophilus and survival under simulated 39. Reid AA, Vuillemard JC, Britten M, Arcand Y, Farnworth E,
gastrointestinal conditions. J Funct Foods 2009, 1:319-323. Champagne CP: Microentrapment of probiotic bacteria in a
Ca2+-induced whey protein gel and effects on their viability in a
22. Burgain J, Gaiani C, Linder M, Scher J: Encapsulation of
dynamic gastro-intestinal model. J Microencapsul 2005,
probiotic living cells: from laboratory scale to industrial
22:603-619.
applications. J Food Eng 2011, 104:467-483.
23. Chen MJ, Chen KN: Encapsulation of probiotics in alginate 40. Lee KY, Heo TR: Survival of Bifidobacterium longum
systems. Drug Deliv Technol 2005:6–9, online: immobilized in calcium alginate beads in simulated gastric
wwww.controlledrelease.org. juices and bile salt solution. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000,
66:869-873.
24. Picot A, Lacroix C: Encapsulation of Bifidobacteria in whey
protein-based microcapsules and survival in stimulated 41. Nazzaro F, Fratianni F, Sada A, Orlando P: Synbiotic potential of
gastrointestinal conditions and in yoghurt. Int Dairy J 2004, carrot juice supplemented with Lactobacillus spp. and inulin
14:505-515. or fructooligosaccharides. J Sci Food Agric 2008, 88:2271-2276.
25. Ding WK, Shah NP: Acid, bile, and heat tolerance of free and 42. Mattila-Sandholm T, Myllärinen P, Crittenden R, Mogensen G,
microencapsulated probiotic bacteria. J Food Sci 2007, Fonden R, Saarela M: Technological challenges for future
72:M446-M450. probiotic foods. Int Dairy J 2002, 12:173-182.
A good example of development of encapsulating matrix to protect
43. Krasaekoopt W, Bhandari B, Deeth H: Evaluation of
probiotics also against heat.
encapsulation techniques of probiotics for yoghurt. Int Dairy J
26. Crittenden R, Laitila A, Forssell P, Matto J, Saarela M, Mattila- 2003, 13:3-13.
Sandholm T, Myllärinen P: Adhesion of bifidobacteria to
granular starch and its implications in probiotic technologies. 44. Yeo SK, Ewe JA, Sau-Chan Tham C, Liong MT: Carriers of
Appl Environ Microbiol 2001, 67:3469-3475. probiotic microorganisms. Probiotics Microbiol Monogr 2011,
21:191-220.
27. Rokka S, Rantamäki P: Protecting probiotic bacteria by
microencapsulation: challenges for industrial applications. 45. Muthukumarasamy P, Holley RA: Microbiological and sensory
Eur Food Res Technol 2010, 231:1-12. quality of dry fermented sausages containing alginate-
microencapsulated Lactobacillus reuteri. Int J Food Microbiol
28. Mortazavian A, Razavi SH, Ehsani MR, Sohrabvandi S: Principles 2006, 111:164-169.
and methods of microencapsulation of probiotic A really interesting application of microencapsulation in the manufactur-
microorganisms. Iran J Biotechnol 2010, 5:2007-2020. ing of sausages.
The authors wrote an excellent review on the topic of probiotic micro-
encapsulation. 46. Fratianni F, Coppola R, Sada A, Mendiola J, Ibanez E, Nazzaro F: A
novel functional probiotic product containing phenolics and
29. Krasaekoopt W, Bhandari B, Deeth HC: Survival of probiotics anthocyanins. Int J Probiotics Prebiotics 2010, 5:85-90.
encapsulated in chitosan-coated alginate beads in yoghurt A good example of a new functional formulation.