Mindfulness-Based

Interventions for Anxiety

a n d D e p res s i o n
Stefan G. Hofmann, PhD*, Angelina F. Gómez, BA

KEYWORDS
 Mindfulness  Mindfulness-based interventions  Anxiety  Depression
 Cognitive behavior therapy

KEY POINTS
 Research on mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) for anxiety and depression has
increased rapidly in the past decade. The most common include mindfulness-based
stress reduction and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy.
 MBIs have shown efficacy in reducing anxiety and depression symptom severity in a
broad range of treatment-seeking individuals.
 MBIs consistently outperform non–evidence-based treatments and active control condi-
tions, such as health education, relaxation training, and supportive psychotherapy.
 MBIs also perform comparably with cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). The treatment prin-
ciples of MBIs for anxiety and depression are compatible with those of standard CBT.

INTRODUCTION

Buddhist traditions first explored the concept of mindfulness in broad philosophic

terms unfamiliar to most modern readers. Nevertheless, mindfulness has spread
rapidly in Western psychology research and practice, in large part because of the suc-
cess of standardized mindfulness-based interventions.1 These interventions, namely
mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR)2 and mindfulness-based cognitive ther-
apy (MBCT),3 incorporate the essence of Eastern mindfulness practices into Western
cognitive-behavioral practice. The body of literature on mindfulness-based interven-
tions (MBIs) has grown rapidly in recent years.4,5 Despite the popularity of these inter-
ventions, the evidence base is still not fully established, in part because this literature
contains many cross-sectional studies, waitlist-controlled trials, and other methodo-
logical shortcomings that limit the strength of conclusions that can be drawn from
these studies.1 Considering these weaknesses, clinical researchers have increasingly

Disclosure: The authors have nothing to disclose.

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, 648 Beacon Street, 6th
Floor, Boston, MA 02215, USA
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: [email protected]

Psychiatr Clin N Am 40 (2017) 739–749

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2017.08.008 psych.theclinics.com
0193-953X/17/ª 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
740 Hofmann & Gómez

studied MBIs with more rigorous methodology, allowing select meaningful conclu-
sions to be drawn from the present body of work.
Recent reviews of well-designed randomized controlled trials comparing mindful-
ness treatments (primarily MBSR and MBCT) with active control conditions indicate
that MBIs are effective in treating a broad range of outcomes among diverse popula-
tions.6–11 These outcomes include clinical disorders and symptoms such as anxi-
ety,8,12,13 risk of relapse for depression,14,15 current depressive symptoms,9
stress,16–18 medical and well-being outcomes such as chronic pain,19 quality of
life,14,20 and psychological or emotional distress.21,22 In addition, MBIs have been
shown to work via changes in specific aspects of mental disorder, such as cognitive
biases, affective dysregulation, and interpersonal effectiveness.17,23,24
In addition to the mindfulness-based treatment protocols, mindfulness principles
have been integrated into other notable therapeutic interventions such as dialectical
behavioral therapy (DBT)25 and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT).26 In addi-
tion, mindfulness has increasingly been explored within the context of cognitive
behavior therapy (CBT) for emotional disorders.27 The use of mindfulness in these
treatment protocols is markedly different from MBSR and MBCT, in that mindfulness
is merely a component of these interventions, whereas it is the core skill taught in
mindfulness-based treatments. In addition, these treatments include other, nonmind-
fulness therapeutic ingredients, thus making it difficult to attribute therapeutic effects
to mindfulness skills specifically.1,28 Despite these distinctions, MBIs are compatible
with the dominant cognitive behavior psychotherapy practiced today. CBT is an um-
brella term that refers to a conceptual model of treatment more than any single proto-
col.29,30 Mindfulness and acceptance strategies are consistent with general CBT
principles because they target core processes, such as increased emotional aware-
ness and regulation, cognitive flexibility, and goals-based behaviors.31,32 This topic
is outside the boundaries of this article but it is likely to become part of the future of
psychotherapy. As discussed throughout this article, mindfulness targets one such
core process that has shown efficacy in reducing anxiety and depression symptom
severity, as the core treatment ingredient as well as when integrated into other treat-
ments. The primary aim of this article is to explore the ways in which cognitive and
behavioral treatments for depression and anxiety have been advanced by the applica-
tion of mindfulness practices.

OVERVIEW OF MINDFULNESS TREATMENTS

The overarching theoretic premise of MBIs is that, by practicing mindfulness (eg,

through sitting meditation, yoga, or other mindfulness exercises), individuals become
less reactive to unpleasant internal phenomena but more reflective, which in turn leads
to positive psychological outcomes.3,33 This article briefly reviews the most recent
literature in mindfulness-based treatments for anxiety and depression, starting with
current perspectives in the definition and measurement of mindfulness.

What is Mindfulness?
Mindfulness refers to a process that leads to a mental state characterized by nonjudg-
mental awareness of the present moment experience, including the person’s sensa-
tions, thoughts, bodily states, consciousness, and the environment, while
encouraging openness, curiosity, and acceptance.34–36 Bishop and colleagues34
(2004) distinguished 2 components of mindfulness, 1 that involves self-regulation of
attention and 1 that involves an orientation toward the present moment characterized
by curiosity, openness, and acceptance.
 Mindfulness-based CBT 741

Mindfulness stands in stark contrast with much of people’s common daily experi-
ence, because the default mode of attention for many individuals is nonattention.
Mind wandering is ubiquitous,37 as is the state of mindlessly going through daily ac-
tivities, often known as running on autopilot.”38 When people do manage to focus
on internal experiences in the present moment, this attention is often filled with self-
critical, ruminative, or otherwise worrisome thoughts and emotions that people then
attempt to suppress.39 The experience of attending to the present moment can be
so aversive that some people prefer almost anything else; a review of 11 laboratory
studies with healthy adults found that most people choose to do mundane tasks, or
even receive mild electric shocks, rather than be left alone with their own thoughts.40
Despite their predominance in daily life, mindless states have been shown to be
maladaptive. In a large study using ecological momentary assessment data,37 approx-
imately 47% of subjects’ waking hours were spent in a state of mind wandering;
furthermore, the investigators showed that mind wandering predicts subsequent un-
happiness. In contrast, the capacity to keep the mind focused on the present moment
is associated with higher psychological well-being.41 Taken together, these findings
suggest that mindfulness is a difficult state to achieve but is ultimately beneficial.
This skill has been likened to the cognitive science theory of a desirable difficulty,
which is essentially a task that requires expenditure of cognitive resources but results
in higher cognitive flexibility, insight, and self-regulation abilities.4
Mindfulness is thus both a skill and a practice; the practice of mindfulness begets
the skill of staying mindful. The stronger the ability to adopt a mindful state throughout
the perpetual ups and downs of life, the less suffering will be experienced. This basic
premise remains the foundation of mindful practices, as it has for centuries42; howev-
er, when clinical scientists attempt to parse apart the mechanisms of this seemingly
simple process, the evidence rapidly becomes messy and ill-defined. Whichever
mechanisms truly underlie mindfulness (key mechanisms are reviewed later), mindful-
ness practices seem to show therapeutic effects on emotional well-being, and thus
continue to capture the interest of myriad clients, practitioners, and researchers.

Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction

The first and perhaps the most well-known mindfulness-based intervention to gain
empirical support in the treatment of psychological symptoms is MBSR, developed
by Jon Kabat-Zinn2 in the early 1980s. MBSR is an 8-week treatment program that
is designed to reduce stress via enhanced mindfulness skills developed through reg-
ular meditation practices. The program consists of weekly 2-hour to 2.5-hour group-
based meditation classes with a trained teacher, daily audio-guided home practice
(approximately 45 min/d), and a day-long mindfulness retreat occurring during the
sixth week. Much of the course content is focused on learning how to mindfully attend
to body sensations, using various mind-body meditative practices such as sitting
meditation, body scans, gentle stretching, and yoga. In addition, the group classes
foster discussion of how to apply these mindful practices in daily life, with the ultimate
effect of being able to handle stressors in a more adaptive way. The MBSR program
was initially developed to treat medical patients with chronic pain2 but has since been
applied to many other populations of medical and psychiatric patients, as well as com-
munity members.43 Across these various groups, MBSR has consistently been found
to be tolerable, with high rates of compliance, program completion, and patient
satisfaction.6,44,45
Studies comparing MBSR with active control conditions have shown that MBIs
are superior in reducing anxiety symptoms. Hoge and colleagues46 found that
MBSR outperformed an active stress-management education program in a group
742 Hofmann & Gómez

of individuals with generalized anxiety disorder. More specifically, individuals in the

MBSR group showed significantly more reduction in anxiety symptom severity than
the control group, as measured by self-report measures of anxiety as well as anxiety
in response to a laboratory social stress challenge task. The MBSR group showed a
pretreatment-posttreatment effect size (Cohen d) of 1.06, which is comparable with
the effect sizes seen in CBT for anxiety. These results are supported by select meta-
analyses that have shown the superiority of MBSR in reducing anxiety and stress
relative to heterogeneous control conditions.8,47,48 Pretreatment-posttreatment
treatment effect sizes for these meta-analyses are all in the moderate to large range
(Hedges g from 0.24–1.54).
MBSR seems to be a safe and effective treatment to reduce emotional dysregu-
lation. In addition, researchers have adapted the many basic principles of the
program into modified protocols to treat specific populations and outcomes. These
principles include MBCT for depression,15 mindfulness-based relapse prevention
for drug addiction,49 mindfulness-based relationship enhancement to improve
relationship functioning,50 and a mindfulness-based program to foster healthy
eating.51

Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy

The most widely researched adaptation of MBSR is MBCT, originally developed by
Teasdale and colleagues15 to prevent relapse of major depression. As its name im-
plies, MBCT combines elements of both mindfulness training and cognitive therapy
to reduce the recurrence of depression. Mindfulness principles are applied to aid in-
dividuals in recognizing deterioration of mood without immediately judging or reacting
to this change. This enhanced internal awareness is then combined with principles of
cognitive therapy that teach individuals to disengage from maladaptive patterns of re-
petitive negative thinking that contribute to depressive symptoms.52 Other than this
additional cognitive therapy component, MBCT closely follows the structure of
MBSR, including the 8-week group-based format, and the length and type of home-
work assignments.
Since its initial development, several well-designed randomized controlled trials
examining the efficacy of MBCT relative to control conditions have shown that the pro-
gram is effective in reducing rates of relapse among individuals with major depres-
sion.4 Furthermore, studies of individual moderators of treatment outcomes have
found that MBCT may be most effective in preventing relapse among individuals
with the greatest risk of relapse. These high-risk individuals include those with 4 or
more previous major depressive episodes (Cohen h 5 0.88),53 and those who experi-
enced maltreatment during childhood.53,54 In addition to preventing rates of relapse,
MBCT has also shown efficacy in reducing current acute depression symptoms (Hed-
ges g 5 0.73).9
In one of these trials, Eisendrath and colleagues55 tested the efficacy of a modi-
fied MBCT program for individuals with current treatment-resistant depression.
MBCT reduced depressive symptoms posttreatment compared with a well-
matched active control program (health enhancement program). Despite these
promising findings, the MBCT and control groups did not differ significantly on rates
of depression remission, suggesting that the effects of MBCT were not strong
enough to achieve full disorder remission. These findings also show the importance
of a well-matched control condition. Until recent years, most trials compared MBIs
with waitlist controls, which introduce a multitude of confounding factors that limit
the strength of conclusions that can be drawn from these trials. Given that MBCT
was no better than a general health education program in achieving depression
 Mindfulness-based CBT 743

remission in this high-quality trial, the results of waitlist-controlled trials should be

interpreted with great caution.

Other Mindfulness-based Treatments

MBSR and MBCT are intensive treatment programs requiring a sizable commitment in
terms of both patient and therapist time and training. In addition to these standardized
treatments, mindfulness practices have been applied therapeutically in several other
ways.

Retreats and residential programs

One popular treatment delivery method is mindfulness meditation retreats, which typi-
cally range from 1 to 3 days but can extend for as long as 3 months.4 These retreats
vary greatly in terms of their format and target population, and there is scant research
on their short-term and long-term effects. Nevertheless, these retreats are a fairly
cost-effective way of delivering intensive and well-controlled doses of a mindfulness
intervention, and recent trials have shown promising effects on anxiety, stress, and
other measures of psychosocial well-being and health.56,57

Brief mindfulness interventions

Some investigators have adapted the MBSR treatment protocol into abbreviated pro-
grams of 2 to 3 weeks.58,59 These programs have not been examined as thoroughly as
the standard 8-week interventions; however, preliminary evidence indicates that these
modest interventions can have beneficial effects on a variety of symptoms, including
compassion58 and working memory capacity.59 It is as yet unclear whether these
abbreviated mindfulness interventions can effectively reduce clinical levels of anxiety
or depression, although the potential for beneficial effects in a fraction of the time war-
rants further study.
Another emerging adaptation of standard MBIs is even shorter, 3-day or 4-day,
laboratory-based mindfulness training.60 These brief and highly controlled interven-
tions typically involve 20-minute to 30-minute group sessions conducted by a trained
meditation instructor, and minimal to no required practice outside of the laboratory.61
Although these mindfulness interventions are too truncated to provide any long-term
effects, studies indicate that they can have immediate effects on psychological and
neuroendocrine responses to social stress,60 as well as perceived pain severity in
response to noxious heat stimulation.61 These significant effects after only a few
days of mindfulness training are exciting, and future research should explore whether
such brief interventions can have similar effects on symptoms of anxiety or depres-
sion. Regardless, these shorter mindfulness interventions offer 1 clear benefit already,
in that they afford greater research flexibility to conduct both efficacy-focused and
mechanisms-focused trials.4

Internet and smartphone mindfulness-based interventions

Another new development in the mindfulness literature is the recent surge of Internet-
based and app-based MBIs. These interventions vary a great deal in treatment length,
ranging from 8-week programs that closely mimic the MBSR protocol62 to 2-week or
3-week self-guided interventions with little formal structure.58,63 Although these
technology-delivered interventions are still in their infancy, a recent meta-analysis of
15 randomized controlled trials found that, relative to control or waitlist conditions,
technology-delivered MBIs had a significant beneficial impact on depression, anxiety,
stress, well-being, and mindfulness (Hedges g ranging from 0.22 for anxiety to 0.51 for
stress).64 Although studies have not yet examined the efficacy of online MBIs
744 Hofmann & Gómez

compared with in-person approaches, these preliminary findings are promising and
warrant further research.

Summary: Efficacy of Mindfulness-based Interventions for Anxiety and Depression

Randomized controlled trials comparing MBSR with active control conditions indicate
that MBSR is moderately to largely effective at reducing anxiety and depression symp-
tom severity among individuals with a broad range of medical and psychiatric condi-
tions. The most comprehensive review to date6 examined the effects of 209 trials of
MBIs among 12,145 patients with a variety of disorders. The results indicated that
MBIs are more effective in reducing psychological and medical symptom severity
than waitlist, psychoeducation, supportive psychotherapy, relaxation training, and im-
agery or suppression techniques. Posttreatment effect sizes were largest for psycho-
logical outcomes, relative to physical or medical outcomes, with the strongest effects
found for anxiety, followed by depression. These beneficial effects remained fairly sta-
ble after follow-up periods (ranging from 3 weeks to 3 years, with a median of
28 weeks), although the comparative effect sizes for MBI versus control treatment
conditions diminished at follow-up.6 Collectively, these results indicate that MBIs
are more effective than non–evidence-based treatments in reducing anxiety and
depression symptom severity among a broad range of treatment-seeking individuals.
However, as noted by Dimidjian and Segal,65 there have been several methodological
gaps that restrict both the reach and relevance of the conclusions that can be drawn
from the current literature.

MINDFULNESS IN THE CONTEXT OF COGNITIVE BEHAVIOR THERAPY

Mindfulness-based treatments and traditional (beckian) CBT share many similar

characteristics.45 Both aim to reduce psychopathologic suffering, and approach
this goal with a combination of cognitive and behavioral therapeutic exercises.
Both involve a desensitization of conditioned fear responses, although MBIs
approach this effect through sustained attention, whereas traditional CBT directly fo-
cuses on severing the conditioned response through exposure-based processes.66
Another key similarity between traditional CBT and MBIs is the directive for patients
to view their internal phenomena (thoughts, feelings, sensations) as temporary and
without inherent worth or meaning. Again, MBIs approach this process through sim-
ple observation, whereas traditional CBT involves directly challenging metacogni-
tions about such phenomena.67 In addition, both treatments involve relaxation and
improvements in self-modulatory efforts,45 although it is unclear whether these ef-
fects are attributable to a specific treatment component or simply engaging in a ther-
apeutic process.
There are also key differences between mindfulness interventions and traditional
CBT. Perhaps the most evident difference is the focus on accepting versus chang-
ing maladaptive cognitions. Although traditional CBT includes elements of both
these directives, the overall aim of traditional CBT is to challenge automatic
thoughts by holding them up to disconfirming evidence, and then to change
them into different thoughts.68 This cognitive restructuring process is antithetical
to mindfulness principles, which encourage a complete lack of engagement with
cognitive and emotional processes. Another key distinction is the degree to which
each treatment is goal oriented. CBT typically begins with the client identifying the
primary treatment goals (eg, improve mood, reduce maladaptive behaviors), and
continues helping the client to strive toward these goals. Although clients seek
mindfulness-based treatments for similar reasons, the therapeutic process involves
 Mindfulness-based CBT 745

little attention to such goals, instead cultivating a seemingly paradoxic attitude of

nonstriving.45
Despite these differences, the result of both approaches is ultimately similar: by
changing the patient’s perspective on unpleasant thoughts, feelings, or sensations,
the individual comes to realize that these internal phenomena are not as dangerous
or powerful as previously thought, and the cycle of maladaptive cognitions, emo-
tions, and behaviors gradually weakens. These similarities may be responsible for
the compatibility of mindfulness and cognitive-behavioral treatments.

Mindfulness as a Component of Cognitive-Behavioral Treatments

Before the widespread interest in mindfulness-specific treatments, mindfulness was
included as a component of broader evidence-based interventions, such as DBT,
ACT, cognitive behavioral stress management, and integrative body-mind training.4
Although these treatments focus on disparate clinical populations and symptoms, ef-
ficacy evidence for each suggests that mindfulness training is a key beneficial compo-
nent of these interventions.69 This article briefly reviews the 2 most common therapies
(DBT and ACT) and the role that mindfulness plays in each.

Dialectical behavior therapy

DBT was developed by Marsha Linehan25 for the treatment of individuals with
borderline personality disorder. This multifaceted intervention is founded on the
concept of a unified dialectic; essentially, the view that life is composed of opposing
forces that must be simultaneously accepted to achieve beneficial change. Mindful-
ness is taught as a skill to help clients recognize and synthesize the key dialectic;
namely the contrast between acceptance and change. Mindfulness skills taught in
DBT are similar to those in MBSR, particularly the nonjudgmental observation of in-
ternal phenomena; however, the format in which these skills are taught differs
considerably. Unlike MBSR, which prescribes a specific dose of meditative practice,
mindfulness training is one of many skills taught throughout a year-long weekly skills
group (other skills include interpersonal effectiveness, emotion regulation, and
distress tolerance). In addition, clients learn mindfulness through numerous exer-
cises, rather than predominantly through meditation as in MBSR. These exercises
include imagery practices (eg, imagining that the mind is a conveyor belt), breath-
focused exercises (eg, breath counting, coordinating breaths with footsteps), and
various other exercises that encourage clients to practice mindfulness throughout
daily tasks such as showering or doing the dishes.25,45 Clients may choose which
mindfulness exercises they wish to practice and when, which allows all individuals
to benefit from mindfulness training regardless of their severity or willingness to
meditate.45

Acceptance and commitment therapy

ACT was developed by Hayes and Wilson26 as a contemporary approach to general
adult outpatient psychotherapy based in classic behavior-analytical principles. ACT
does not include meditation practices and rarely uses the term mindfulness in its treat-
ment protocol, but the therapeutic strategies of ACT are practically identical to mind-
fulness skills as described in this article. For example, a core principle of ACT is the
observing self, in which clients cultivate the ability to simply observe internal phenom-
ena, without attaching to, evaluating, or attempting to change them. Clients attempt to
see themselves as separate from their distressing thoughts, feelings, and sensations,
and are encouraged to accept such phenomena as they are, while changing maladap-
tive behaviors to improve their lives.26,45
746 Hofmann & Gómez

SUMMARY

Mindfulness-based and acceptance-based interventions, including DBT, ACT, MBSR,

and MBCT, are examples of the so-called third wave of CBTs.70 After a contentious
debate about the meaning, validity, and relevance of the term third wave,4,29 2 prom-
inent representatives from both camps (Steven Hayes and Stefan Hofmann, who is
also the first author of this article), recently joined forces based on the evidence and
their shared beliefs and values. The result is a call to redirect clinical practice away
from treating medical syndromes and toward focusing on processes and core compe-
tencies. MBIs target one such process. A more detailed discussion of this can be
found elsewhere.31,32

REFERENCES

1. Gu J, Strauss C, Bond R, et al. How do mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and

mindfulness-based stress reduction improve mental health and wellbeing? A sys-
tematic review and meta-analysis of mediation studies. Clin Psychol Rev 2015;37:
1–12.
2. Kabat-Zinn J. An outpatient program in behavioral medicine for chronic pain pa-
tients based on the practice of mindfulness meditation: theoretical considerations
and preliminary results. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1982;4(1):33–47.
3. Segal ZV, Williams JMG, Teasdale JD. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for
depression: a new approach to preventing relapse. New York: Guilford Press;
2002.
4. Creswell JD. Mindfulness interventions. Annu Rev Psychol 2017;68:491–516.
5. Hofmann SG, Asmundson GJG. Acceptance and mindfulness-based therapy:
new wave or old hat? Clin Psychol Rev 2008;28(1):1–16.
6. Khoury B, Lecomte T, Fortin G, et al. Mindfulness-based therapy: a comprehen-
sive meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 2013;33(6):763–71.
7. Eberth J, Sedlmeier P. The effects of mindfulness meditation: a meta-analysis.
Mindfulness 2012;3(3):174–89.
8. Hofmann SG, Sawyer AT, Witt AA, et al. The effect of mindfulness-based therapy
on anxiety and depression: a meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol 2010;
78(2):169–83.
9. Strauss C, Cavanagh K, Oliver A, et al. Mindfulness-based interventions for peo-
ple diagnosed with a current episode of an anxiety or depressive disorder: a
meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. PLoS One 2014;9(4):e96110.
10. Piet J, Hougaard E. The effect of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for pre-
vention of relapse in recurrent major depressive disorder: a systematic review
and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 2011;31(6):1032–40.
11. Goyal M, Singh S, Sibinga EMS, et al. Meditation programs for psychological
stress and well-being: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern
Med 2014;174(3):357–68.
12. Green SM, Bieling PJ. Expanding the scope of mindfulness-based cognitive ther-
apy: evidence for effectiveness in a heterogeneous psychiatric sample. Cogn Be-
hav Pract. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2011.02.006.
13. Hinton DE, Pich V, Hofmann SG, et al. Acceptance and mindfulness techniques
as applied to refugee and ethnic minority populations with PTSD: examples from
“culturally adapted CBT”. Cogn Behav Pract 2013;20(1):33–46.
14. Kuyken W, Byford S, Taylor RS, et al. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy to pre-
vent relapse in recurrent depression. J Consult Clin Psychol 2008;76(6):966–78.
 Mindfulness-based CBT 747

15. Teasdale JD, Segal ZV, Williams JMG, et al. Prevention of relapse/recurrence in
major depression by mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. J Consult Clin Psy-
chol 2000;68(4):615–23.
16. Chiesa A, Serretti A. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for stress management
in healthy people: a review and meta-analysis. J Altern Complement Med 2009;
15(5):593–600.
17. Bullis JR, Boe HJ, Asnaani A, et al. The benefits of being mindful: trait mindful-
ness predicts less stress reactivity to suppression. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry
2014;45(1):57–66.
18. Grossman P, Niemann L, Schmidt S, et al. Mindfulness-based stress reduction
and health benefits. J Psychosom Res 2004;57(1):35–43.
19. Grossman P, Tiefenthaler-Gilmer U, Raysz A, et al. Mindfulness training as an
intervention for fibromyalgia: evidence of postintervention and 3-year follow-up
benefits in well-being. Psychother Psychosom 2007;76(4):226–33.
20. Godfrin KA, van Heeringen C. The effects of mindfulness-based cognitive ther-
apy on recurrence of depressive episodes, mental health and quality of life: a ran-
domized controlled study. Behav Res Ther 2010;48(8):738–46.
21. Ledesma D, Kumano H. Mindfulness-based stress reduction and cancer: a meta-
analysis. Psychooncology 2009;18(6):571–9.
22. Xu W, Jia K, Liu X, et al. The effects of mindfulness training on emotional health in
Chinese long-term male prison inmates. Mindfulness 2016;7(5):1044–51.
23. Brown KW, Ryan RM, Creswell JD. Mindfulness: theoretical foundations and evi-
dence for its salutary effects. Psychol Inq 2007;18(4):211–37.
24. Curtiss J, Klemanski DH, Andrews L, et al. The conditional process model of
mindfulness and emotion regulation: an empirical test. J Affect Disord 2017;
212:93–100.
25. Linehan M. Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder.
New York: Guilford Press; 1993. Diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders.
26. Hayes SC, Wilson KG. Acceptance and commitment therapy: altering the verbal
support for experiential avoidance. Behav Anal 1994;17(2):289–303.
27. Boswell JF, Anderson LM, Barlow DH. An idiographic analysis of change pro-
cesses in the unified transdiagnostic treatment of depression. J Consult Clin Psy-
chol 2014;82(6):1060–71.
28. Chiesa A, Malinowski P. Mindfulness-based approaches: are they all the same?
J Clin Psychol 2011;67(4):404–24.
29. Hofmann SG, Sawyer AT, Fang A. The empirical status of the “new wave” of
cognitive behavioral therapy. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2010;33(3):701–10.
30. Hofmann SG, Asmundson GJG, Beck AT. The science of cognitive therapy. Be-
hav Ther 2013;44(2):199–212.
31. Hayes SC, Hofmann SG. The third wave of CBT and the rise of process-based
care. World Psychiatry, in press.
32. Hofmann SG, Hayes SC. Process-based CBT: core competencies of behavioral
and cognitive therapies. Oakland (CA): New Harbinger; 2017.
33. Kabat-Zinn J, Massion AO, Kristeller J, et al. Effectiveness of a meditation-based
stress reduction program in the treatment of anxiety disorders. Am J Psychiatry
1992;149(7):936–43.
34. Bishop SR. Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition. Clin Psychol Sci Pract
2004;11(3):230–41.
35. Kabat-Zinn J. Mindfulness-based interventions in context: past, present, and
future. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 2003;10(2):144–56.
748 Hofmann & Gómez

36. Allen NB, Chambers R, Knight W, Melbourne Academic Mindfulness Interest

Group. Mindfulness-based psychotherapies: a review of conceptual foundations,
empirical evidence and practical considerations. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2006;
40(4):285–94.
37. Killingsworth MA, Gilbert DT. A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science
2010;330(6006):932.
38. Bargh JA, Chartrand TL. The unbearable automaticity of being. Am Psychol 1999;
54(7):462–79.
39. Kang Y, Gruber J, Gray JR. Mindfulness and de-automatization. Emot Rev 2013;
5(2):192–201.
40. Wilson TD, Reinhard DA, Westgate EC, et al. Just think: the challenges of the dis-
engaged mind. Science 2014;345(6192):75–7.
41. Brown KW, Ryan RM. The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in
psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol 2003;84(4):822–48.
42. Bodhi B. What does mindfulness really mean? A canonical perspective. Contem-
porary Buddhism 2011;12(1):19–39.
43. Ludwig DS, Kabat-Zinn J. Mindfulness in medicine. JAMA 2008;300(11):1350–2.
44. Kabat-Zinn J, Chapman-Waldrop A. Compliance with an outpatient stress reduc-
tion program: rates and predictors of program completion. J Behav Med 1988;
11(4):333–52.
45. Baer RA. Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: a conceptual and empir-
ical review. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 2003;10(2):125–43.
46. Hoge EA, Bui E, Marques L, et al. Randomized controlled trial of mindfulness
meditation for generalized anxiety disorder: effects on anxiety and stress reac-
tivity. J Clin Psychiatry 2013;74(8):786–92.
47. Bohlmeijer E, Prenger R, Taal E, et al. The effects of mindfulness-based stress
reduction therapy on mental health of adults with a chronic medical disease: a
meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res 2010;68(6):539–44.
48. Fjorback LO, Arendt M, Ornbol E, et al. Mindfulness-based stress reduction and
mindfulness-based cognitive therapy: a systematic review of randomized
controlled trials. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2011;124(2):102–19.
49. Bowen S, Witkiewitz K, Clifasefi SL, et al. Relative efficacy of mindfulness-based
relapse prevention, standard relapse prevention, and treatment as usual for sub-
stance use disorders: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2014;71(5):
547–56.
50. Carson JW, Carson KM, Gil KM, et al. Mindfulness-based relationship enhance-
ment. Behav Ther 2004;35(3):471–94.
51. Mason AE, Epel ES, Kristeller J, et al. Effects of a mindfulness-based intervention
on mindful eating, sweets consumption, and fasting glucose levels in obese
adults: data from the SHINE randomized controlled trial. J Behav Med 2016;
39(2):201–13.
52. Shahar B, Britton WB, Sbarra DA, et al. Mechanisms of change in mindfulness-
based cognitive therapy for depression: preliminary evidence from a randomized
controlled trial. Int J Cogn Ther 2010;3(4):402–18.
53. Ma SH, Teasdale JD. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: repli-
cation and exploration of differential relapse prevention effects. J Consult Clin
Psychol 2004;72(1):31–40.
54. Williams JMG, Crane C, Barnhofer T, et al. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy
for preventing relapse in recurrent depression: a randomized dismantling trial.
J Consult Clin Psychol 2014;82(2):275–86.
 Mindfulness-based CBT 749

55. Eisendrath SJ, Gillung E, Delucchi KL, et al. A randomized controlled trial of
mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for treatment-resistant depression. Psy-
chother Psychosom 2016;85(2):99–110.
56. Cohen JN, Jensen D, Stange JP, et al. The immediate and long-term effects of an
intensive meditation retreat. Mindfulness 2017;14(1):449.
57. Rosenberg EL, Zanesco AP, King BG, et al. Intensive meditation training influ-
ences emotional responses to suffering. Emotion 2015;15(6):775–90.
58. Lim D, Condon P, DeSteno D. Mindfulness and compassion: an examination of
mechanism and scalability. PLoS One 2015;10(2):e0118221.
59. Mrazek MD, Franklin MS, Phillips DT, et al. Mindfulness training improves working
memory capacity and GRE performance while reducing mind wandering. Psy-
chol Sci 2013;24(5):776–81.
60. Creswell JD, Pacilio LE, Lindsay EK, et al. Brief mindfulness meditation training
alters psychological and neuroendocrine responses to social evaluative stress.
Psychoneuroendocrinology 2014;44:1–12.
61. Zeidan F, Martucci KT, Kraft RA, et al. Brain mechanisms supporting the modula-
tion of pain by mindfulness meditation. J Neurosci 2011;31(14):5540–8.
62. Boettcher J, Astrom V, Pahlsson D, et al. Internet-based mindfulness treatment for
anxiety disorders: a randomized controlled trial. Behav Ther 2014;45(2):241–53.
63. Cavanagh K, Strauss C, Cicconi F, et al. A randomised controlled trial of a brief
online mindfulness-based intervention. Behav Res Ther 2013;51(9):573–8.
64. Spijkerman MPJ, Pots WTM, Bohlmeijer ET. Effectiveness of online mindfulness-
based interventions in improving mental health: a review and meta-analysis of
randomised controlled trials. Clin Psychol Rev 2016;45:102–14.
65. Dimidjian S, Segal ZV. Prospects for a clinical science of mindfulness-based
intervention. Am Psychol 2015;70(7):593–620.
66. Hofmann SG. Cognitive processes during fear acquisition and extinction in ani-
mals and humans: implications for exposure therapy of anxiety disorders. Clin
Psychol Rev 2008;28(2):199–210.
67. Longmore RJ, Worrell M. Do we need to challenge thoughts in cognitive behavior
therapy? Clin Psychol Rev 2007;27(2):173–87.
68. Ellis A. Rational-emotive therapy and cognitive behavior therapy: similarities and
differences. Cognit Ther Res 1980;4(4):325–40.
69. Hayes SC, Villatte M, Levin M, et al. Open, aware, and active: contextual ap-
proaches as an emerging trend in the behavioral and cognitive therapies.
Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2011;7:141–68.
70. Hayes SC, Follette VM, Linehan MM, editors. Mindfulness and acceptance: ex-
panding the cognitive-behavioral tradition. New York: Guilford Press; 2004.